DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 Prepared by Financial Advisory Services Local Government Services Division Municipal Affairs 1 2009 Financial Indicator Graphs The financial indicator graphs have been revised this year to reflect the significant changes in the presentation of the annual audited financial statements and the financial information return. Some indicators from previous years have been dropped or revised because the data set is no longer valid. Some new indicators have been added with data that is only available for 2009. The indicators are intended to serve as a tool that may assist council and administration with operational decisions. The comparative measures may be useful in assessing past performance and for budget planning. Comparison groups are shown on the last two slides and are arranged by population and by equalized assessment per capita. Other points to note are: 1. The range for most of the graphs is 2004 to 2009. 2. Equalized assessment is shown for the period 2005 to 2010. 3. Caution should be used when interpreting results as each municipality has unique characteristics affecting how it compares to the group. In addition, circumstances may have changed since the December 31, 2009 reporting date. 2 Financial Indicator Graphs include: °Equalized Tax Rates œMunicipal/Residential/Non-Residential °Equalized Assessment Per Capita (urban only) °Equalized Assessment Per Km of Roads (rural only) °Non-residential Equalized Assessment as % of Total °Tax Collection Rate °Debt & Debt Service as % of the Limits °Long Term Debt Per Capita °Major Revenue Sources As % of Total Revenue (2009 only) : °Municipal Property Tax °Sales & User Charges °Provincial & Federal Grants °Broad Function Expenses Per Capita (2009 only) °General Government °Protective Services °Transportation °Environmental Protection °Recreation °Total °Per Capita Expenses by Major Type: °Salaries, Wages & Benefits °Contracted & General Services °Materials, Goods, Supplies & Utilities °Bank Charges & Interest °Amortization (2009 only) °Net Book Value As % of Total Capital Property Cost (2009 only) °Accumulated Surplus Categories, As %, End of Year (2009 only) °Ratio of Current Assets to Current Liabilities 3 Municipal Equalized Tax Rate 02274-F03-0195 LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 12 10 9.1 8.7 8 6.3 6.5 6 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.7 4.3 4 4.2 4.2 4.1 3.7 3.8 2.9 2.8 2 0 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum Note : Municipal Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on total equalized assessment and net municipal property tax. 4 Residential Equalized Tax Rate LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 16 14 12 11.5 10 8.8 8.6 8 8.0 8.2 7.7 7.1 6.5 7.4 6 6.7 6.4 5.4 5.0 4 4.5 4.5 3.4 2 0 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum Note : Residential Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on gross residential property taxes and residential equalized assessment. 5 Non-Residential Equalized Tax Rate LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 17 15 15.0 14.3 13 11.5 11.4 11 11.1 10.7 10.1 9.5 9 7 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.0 5.6 5.5 5.5 5 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum Note : Non-Residential Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on gross non-residential property taxes and non-residential equalized assessment. 6 Equalized Assessment Per Capita (in thousands) LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 1,400 1,220 1,200 1,000 800 576 599 600 521 483 408 372 450 400 340 410 328 275 236 200 211 226 116 0 2005 Group 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum Note : Equalized Assessment Per Capita approximates a municipality's ability to generate property tax revenue in comparison to similar municipalities. 7 Non-Residential Equalized Assessment As % of Total LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 94 92 92 84 81 81 81 80 74 76 76 73 73 73 74 71 70 64 54 44 34 24 21 14 15 2005 Group 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 8 Tax Collection Rate LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 101 100 99.4 99.5 99.2 99.1 99.0 98.9 98.9 99 99.0 99.0 98.3 98.5 98.5 98.2 98.3 98 97 96 95.4 95.2 95 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum Note : This indicator reflects the percentage of taxes and grants in place of taxes which are collected by the municipality in the year in which they are levied. 9 Percent of Debt Limit Used LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 80 75 60 40 37 20 9 8 7 8 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -20 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum Note : This graph shows, in percentage terms, the municipality's debt as a percentage of the regulated limit. This is compared to the median for the group of similar municipalities. 10 Percent of Debt Service Limit Used LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 70 60 50 57 40 30 20 26 10 10 10 6 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 -20 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum Note: This graph shows, in percentage terms, the municipality's current debt servicing requirement relative to the regulated limit. This is compared to the median for the group of similar municipalities. 11 Long Term Debt Per Capita LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 4,400 4,583 3,400 2,400 1,400 1,280 400 371 236 302 256 123 135 0 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 -600 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 12 Net Municipal Property Taxes Per Capita LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 9,000 8,642 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,506 2,291 2,537 2,098 2,000 2,261 1,690 2,144 1,548 1,973 1,395 1,737 1,545 1,000 1,415 971 575 0 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 13 Sales and User Charges Per Capita LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 800 674 600 400 456 200 178 177 175 154 135 106 151 165 101 120 144 97 32 42 0 -200 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 14 Provincial and Federal Grants Per Capita LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 3,800 3,300 3,481 2,800 2,300 1,800 1,300 800 804 746 797 637 365 371 605 597 300 487 446 306 197 349 56 244 -200 -700 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 15 Major Revenue Sources As % of Total Revenue, 2009 LACOMBE COUNTY Group Median Group Maximum 90 80 78 70 68 64 60 50 41 40 30 19 20 18 14 10 5 4 0 Net Municipal Property Tax Sales and User Charges Grants 16 Broad Function Expenses Per Capita, 2009 LACOMBE COUNTY Group Median Group Maximum 9000 8,119 8000 7000 6,101 6000 5000 4000 3,410 3,268 3000 2,406 1,929 2000 1,571 1,674 1000 560 333 338 354 155 179 184 232 101 142 0 General Government Protective Services Transportation Environment Recreation and Culture Total Expense 17 Per Capita Expenses - Salaries, Wages and Benefits LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 1,600 1,523 1,400 1,200 1,147 1,000 764 800 706 740 615 677 612 534 614 600 508 518 457 478 400 384 200 222 0 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 18 Per Capita Expenses - Contracted and General Services LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 2,500 2,000 1,826 1,761 1,500 1,124 1,000 905 942 942 762 689 690 500 667 649 535 474 238 315 152 0 -500 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 19 Per Capita Expenses - Materials, Goods, Supplies and Utilities LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 1,400 1,200 1,121 1,000 800 600 675 432 400 319 332 323 305 359 265 318 341 200 281 264 245 91 44 0 -200 -400 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 20 Per Capita Expenses - Bank Charges and Interest LACOMBE COUNTY Median (Equalized Assessment 3,123 - 13,512 million - Rural) 100 80 81 74 60 40 20 18 15 16 9 8 9 8 0 0 5 0 2 2 2 0 -20 2004 Group 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Group Maximum Maximum Minimum Minimum 21 Per Capita Expenses - Amortization, 2009 6000 5,176 5000 4000 3000 2000 1,890 1000 839 0 LACOMBE COUNTY Group Median Group Maximum 22 Net Book Value As % of Total Capital Property Cost, 2009 80 70 68 60 53 50 50 40 30 20 10 0 LACOMBE COUNTY Group Median Group Maximum 23 Accumulated Surplus Categories As % of Total - End of Year, 2009 LACOMBE COUNTY Group Median Group Maximum 100 98 89 87 80 60 44 40 29 20 9 10 2 1 0 Unrestricted Restricted Equity in TCA 24 Ratio of Current Assets To Current Liabilities LACOMBE_COUNTY Current Assets ($) Current Liabilities ($) $3,483,513 $4,985,036 $2,293,769 $5,080,387 $7,426,770 $3,249,210 11.4 5.0 5.5 4.1 4.3 2.8 $39,776,037 $27,284,762 $11,438,038 $21,019,975 $32,044,649 $8,955,961 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Note: The current ratio calculation measures ability to meet short-term obligations with existing liquid assets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Collective Agreement Wage Tables – Municipalities, January 2020
    Collective Agreement Wage Tables Municipalities January 2020 Employer Wage Increases – Page 2 Firefighter, Police & Transit Wage Increases – Page 8 For further information, contact: Collective Bargaining Information Services 702, 10808 – 99 Avenue Edmonton AB T5K 0G5 Telephone: 780-427-8301 Fax: 780-427-6327 E-mail: [email protected] Municipality Wage Increases Employer Union Ees Expiry Date Term Settled On 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beaver County Operating Engineers Local 955 35 2020-08-19 12 2019-10-01 5.00 2.00 2.00 Varies 2.50 2.50 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 Brazeau County Operating Engineers Local 955 40 2021-12-31 24 2019-10-16 1.50 3.80 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.75 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 Calgary Public Library CUPE Local 1169 650 2020-12-31 36 2019-06-23 2.50 3.00 3.00 1.80 2.40 3.50 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camrose County Operating Engineers Local 955 40 2020-12-31 36 2018-01-18 3.50 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.00 1.00 1.50 City of Airdrie IAFF Local 4778 71 2020-12-31 36 2019-07-05 5.00 3.00 5.00 2.50 1.50 2.60 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 City of Brooks CUPE Local 1032 60 2022-12-31 48 2019-01-29 3.00 4.15 4.07 3.00 1.34 1.36 1.35 1.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 City of Calgary ATU Local 583 3,240 2018-01-05 48 2014-10-02 2.75 3.00 3.00 1.80 3.20 3.50 4.00 City of Calgary Calgary Police Association 2,176 2018-01-05 12 2016-12-14 2.50 3.00 3.90 2.25 2.75 3.00 2.50 City of Calgary Calgary Police Senior Officers' Association 37 2018-01-05 12 2016-12-16 2.50 5.00 3.90 2.25 2.75 3.00 2.50 City of Calgary Carpenters Local
    [Show full text]
  • Salinity Mapping for Resource Management Within the County of Newell, Alberta
    Salinity Mapping for Resource Management within the County of Newell, Alberta Prepared by J. Kwiatkowski C.R. King Conservation and Development Branch Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development 1998 Abstract This report presents a methodology to map salinity at a municipal scale and applies this procedure to the County of Newell, a municipality in southern Alberta. The methodology was developed for the County of Vulcan (Kwiatkowski et al. 1994) and is being applied to other Alberta municipalities which have identified soil salinity as a concern. Soil salinity is a major land degradation issue in the County of Newell. The information on salinity location, extent, type and control measures presented in this report will help municipal planners to target salinity control and resource management programs. The methodology has five steps: 1. The location and extent of saline areas are mapped based on existing information including aerial photographs, maps, satellite imagery, and information from local personnel and field inspections. 2. Saline areas are classified on the basis of the mechanism causing salinity. The mechanism is important because it determines which control measures are appropriate. Eight salinity types are recognized within Alberta. 3. Cost-effective, practical control measures are identified for each salinity type. 4. A digital data base is created in ArcInfo format with geographically referenced information on salinity location, type and extent. This data base can be easily managed and transformed into ArcView format. It can be used to create maps and calculate statistics. Additional text and graphic information can be added to the data base as the data become available.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Wheatland County
    infinite landscapes infinite possibilities LIVING IN WHEATLAND Overview of County quality of life assets, taxes, utilities, support programs and services WHEATLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY profile WHEATLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY profile from Reeve welcome AMBER LINK As a long time resident and elected representative of Wheatland County, I welcome you to our story. Our story is one of the discoveries of our infinite landscapes and infinite possibilities. This region has provided for millennia to our indigenous people everything that they needed to flourish and build a foundation of culture and life. To the peoples who came here over the last few centuries to the present, that belief in possibility has provided additional fabric to the culture and prosperity of Wheatland County. Agriculture is a foundational sector of our economy and has now diversified into oil & gas, green energy, manufacturing, tourism and more. Emerging industries through time have found a way to thrive here. It is the people and the land that seems to make this happen. Through respect of both, it is the secret to our infinite possibilities. This Community Overview provides a snapshot of our path and the data to show where we are today. We hope through our story, you see possibilities and understand the opportunities in your future as a business or resident of this place. Our Community & Development Services brand of the WC and its promise of infinite landscapes and infinite possibilities is our mantra. Many innovations and hard work within this community have designed our municipality and the quality of life we treasure within it. We welcome you to share in this experience and opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of the County of Newell, Alberta Report No
    ' Agriculture Canada Research Direction générale Branch de la recherche Soil survey of the County of Newell, Alberta Report No. 41 Alberta Soil Survey Soil survey of the County of Newell, Alberta by A. A. KJEARSGAARD, T. W . PETERS and W . W . PETTAPIECE Agriculture Canada, Edmonton, Alberta Soil mapping by J. A. CARSON, G. M. GREENLEE, A. A. KJEARSGAARD, S . S. KOCAOGLU, T. W . PETERS, W . W. PETTAPIECE, and R . L. McNEIL Alberta Soil Survey Report No. 41 Alberta Institute of Pedology Report No. S-82-41 Land Resource Research Institute Contribution No. LRRI 83-48 Research Branch Agriculture Canada 1983 Copies of this publication are available from Agriculture Canada - Soil Survey Terrace Plaza, Calgary Trail South Edmonton, Alberta T6H 5C3 or from Faculty of Extension University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E1 Produced by Research Program Service ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1983 Cat. No . A57-351/41-1983E ISBN : 0-662-12795-1 SUMMARY The County of Newell, in south-central Alberta, encompasses an area of more than 600 000 ha . It lies within the Alberta Plains physiographic region . Surface landform features are mainly those of an undulating till plain interrupted by areas of smoother topography indicative of water-laid deposits . Underlying soft rock formations of Upper Cretaceous age occur at relatively shallow depths, particularly on the eastern side of the county . Spectacular views of hoodoo formations on exposed soft rock materials can be seen along Red Deer River, especially in Dinosaur Provincial Park . A continental type of climate prevails, with semiarid conditions, which results in native vegetative cover characteristic of the shortgrass prairie ecological region .
    [Show full text]
  • Least Conflict Lands Municipal Decision Support Tool for Siting Renewable Energy Development
    Least Conflict Lands Municipal Decision Support Tool for Siting Renewable Energy Development Tracy Lee, Kelly Learned and Ken Sanderson PHOTO: SARAH SCHUMACHER PHOTO: Innovative research. Engaged communities. Healthy landscapes. Municipal Decision Support Tool for Siting Renewable Energy Development Prepared by Tracy Lee, Kelly Learned and Ken Sanderson October 2018 Miistakis Institute Rm U271, Mount Royal University 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW Calgary, Alberta T3E 6K6 Phone: (403) 440-8444 Email: [email protected] Web: www.rockies.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements . .1 Executive Summary .........................................2 Introduction................................................8 Project Expectations and Constraints .........................9 The Process ...............................................10 Wind and Solar Opportunity Areas...........................14 Ecological Theme ..........................................18 Agriculture Theme .........................................24 Culture and Scenic Resources Theme.........................30 Composite Map and Least Conflict Lands . .36 References ................................................40 Appendix 1: Feature, Justification and Regulations .............41 Appendix 2: Stakeholder Survey .............................45 Appendix 3: Features Source Layers..........................50 Acknowledgements The Miistakis Institute is grateful for funding support from Rural Municipalities of Alberta, the INTACT Foundation, Energy Efficiency Alberta’s Community Energy Capacity
    [Show full text]
  • IDP with Wheatland County
    Vulcan County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan Bylaw No. 2015-009 & Bylaw No. 2015-15 May 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following individuals and organizations are thanked for their assistance in the development of this document: Residents and Stakeholders who provided comments Intermunicipal Development Plan Review Committee Members Vulcan County Councillors Wheatland County Councillors Glen Gatemen Donald Vanderveld Murray McLean Glenn Koester Administration Staff from Vulcan County and Wheatland County Vulcan County Wheatland County Leo Ludwig – CAO Alan Parkin – CAO Anne Erickson – Planning Projects Jim Laslo – GM Agriculture, Community and Jeff Gibeau - Development Officer Protective Services Gerry Melenka – Community Planner ORRSC PROJECT TEAM Cameron Klassen – Project Manager Ryan Dyck – Planner Diane Horvath – Planner Gavin Scott – Planner Barb Johnson – Executive Secretary Intellectual Property – All Rights Reserved © Copyright This document is protected by Copyright and Trade Secret Law and may not be reproduced or modified in any manner, or for any purpose, except by written permission of the Oldman River Regional Services Commission. This document has been prepared for the sole use of the Municipality addressed and the Oldman River Regional Services Commission. This disclaimer is attached to and forms part of the document. Rural Multi-jurisdictional Intermunicipal Development Plan Project In 2012, Vulcan County and seven other rural municipalities initiated a process to create a series of 11 rural-to-rural intermunicipal development plans. The impetus of the project is to improve consultation between rural municipalities in Southern Alberta, who in many cases share expansive borders. Although the border areas are primarily used for agricultural purposes, in many cases significant ecological, mineral and hydrogeological resources exist, as well as important infrastructure including transportation and utilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Order, Altering the Boundaries of the County of Newell
    F I frm ALBERTA GAZETTE, DECEMBER 15, 1954 THE MINES ANI) MINERALS ACT I'ETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS LEASE REINSTATED O.C. 1535-54 (Correction) The firm name Arcoil Petrolems Limited appearing on page 1834 of The Alberta Gazette of November 30, 1954, should have read Acroil Petroleums Limited. -. DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS MINISTERIAL ORDER LANDS WITHDRAWN FROM THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF FORTY MILE, NO. 2 Whme%s, for administrative reasons it is deemed advisable and sspedient to transfer certain lands from the Municipal District of. Forty Mile, No. 2 to Improvement District No. 11, ~ Now therefore, the undersigned, by virtue of the authority vested in me by section 22 of The Municipal District Act, being chapter 70 of the Statutes of Alberta, 1954, doey@ereby order that: Sections 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 in township 8 and sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in township 9, all in range 5, west of the fourth meridian; and sections 25, 26, 27, 33, 34, 35, 36 and the east half and south-west quarter of section 28 in township 8 and sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10 11 , and 12 in township 9 all in range 6, west of the fourth meridian, shall on and from the 1st day of Jan:uary, 1955, be excluded €Tom the &<unicipal District of Forty Mile, No. 2 and included in Improvement District No. 11. That this order shall become effective on the 1st day of January, 1955, except for the purpose of Certificates of Assessment as required by sections 283 and 296 of The School Act, 1952 and section 73 of The ' Municipal Hospitals Act for which purpose this order shall be deemed to .
    [Show full text]
  • Bylaw No 1766
    KNEEHILL COUNTY REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ADOPTED AGENDA Tuesday, April 24, 2018 8:30 a.m. Kneehill County Council Chambers 1600- 2ND Street NE Three Hills, Alberta 1.0 Agenda 1.1 Additions to the Agenda 1.2 Adoption of the Agenda 2.0 Approval of Minutes 2.1 Regular Council Meeting Minutes of April 10, 2018 3.0 Delegations 3.1 BDO Canada LLP, Alan Litster and Ryan Wachter @ 8:40 a.m. 3.2 Dennis Berdahl Family- Century Farm Award @ 10:00 a.m. 4.0 Public Hearings No Public Hearings Scheduled 5.0 Municipal Services 5.1 Transportation 5.1.1 Wimborne Environmental Reclamation 5.1.2 Torrington Arena Capital Project 5.2 Water/Wastewater/Environment 5.2.1 Churchill Water System Rehabilitation 5.3 Planning No Report 5.4 Agricultural Service Board & Parks 5.4.1 Weed, Pest & Soil Conservation Inspector 5.4.2 Kneehill County Tourism and Recreation Masterplan Overview 5.5 Protective Services 5.5.1 Emergency Management Overview 6.0 Corporate Services 6.1 2018 Reserve Allocation 6.2 2018 Operating and Capital Budget Changes 7.0 Business Arising from Previous Minutes 7.1 Reconsideration of Motion 118/18- Village of Acme Waste Water Lagoon 8.0 New Business 8.1 Alberta Firefighter Curling Association Championship Sponsorship 8.2 Acme/Linden Soccer Association Request 8.3 Bylaw # 1766- Councillor Code of Conduct 8.4 Bylaw #1765- Chief Administrative Officer 8.5 Kneehill 4-H District Request 8.6 Stettler Regional Board of Trade Invitation 8.7 Cancellation of Policy #15-12, Regional Resource Urban Sustainability Grant 8.8 Implementation of Urban Recreation/Expense
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page.Xps
    Appendix 8 Performance Measures 2011 Budget Each year the Province of Alberta collects standard financial information from each municipality. From this information they develop financial indicator graphs for groups of similar municipalities. These charts give rate payers and Council and idea of how Mountain View County compares with its peers. These graphs are discussed as part of the budget process and have been included in the budget package. In addition, Council has asked that there be a greater emphasis on County performance measures. Included in the 2011 budget are funds to conduct a rate payer survey. One of the objectives of the survey is to obtain feedback regarding the County’s performance. The other aspect of performance measurement is to develop performance reporting. There has always been performance evaluation and measurement but not a formalized process. In 2011 it’s planned to develop a formalized performance reporting process. As part of this process performance measures for each major County function will be developed. A sample of the proposed format is included in the budget package for the Property Assessment area. The format includes objectives of the area, the resources or inputs used in the area, what’s produced or output, measures of the cost per unit of output or efficiency, measures of the quality of the output or effectiveness and a section on rate payer feedback concerning the function. ASSESSMENT – PERFORMANCE MEASURES Objectives: • To accurately value the properties within Mountain View County to ensure property values are consistent with Provincial regulations. • To ensure that comparable properties have a comparable value.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparable Municipalities/ Financial Information
    RECREATION MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS Recreation Master Plan Topline Report Comparable Municipalities/ Financial Information September 2019 P a g e | 1 RECREATION MASTER PLAN COMPARABLE MUNICIPALITIES AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION Examining Municipal Financial Comparisons Financial data were analyzed from 63 rural • M.D. of Taber has similar statistics to those of municipalities in Alberta such as overall M.D.s with smaller operating budgets; operational budgets, recreation expenditures, although, again, the Municipal General Tax and municipal general tax rates. Observations Rate is lower. from these data include: • Some of the comparisons that the Town of • Compared to all M.D.s, the M.D of Taber Taber has suggested as appropriate statistics are lower (e.g. average recreation comparables have either higher Recreation expenditure to budget and population and Expense to Operating Budget ratios or municipal general tax rate). Operating Budgets (e.g. Athabasca County, County of Newell, etc.). • Compared to other M.D.s with similar populations, M.D. of Taber statistics are • Some rural municipalities with higher consistent; although, the Municipal General Recreation Expense to Operating Revenue Tax rate is lower. provide substantial contributions to operations • of urban municipality's recreation facilities (see next page). P a g e | 1 RECREATION MASTER PLAN COMPARABLE MUNICIPALITIES AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION Considering Specific Cases - Recreation Contributions to Urban Municipalities The following municipal district status communities, which have higher than average County of Barrhead ->Town of Barrhead Recreation Expense to Operating Revenue • $30,000 for summer recreation revenues are typically providing substantial programming contributions to operations of urban • $282,000 on debenture for Barrhead municipality's recreation facilities (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Boards, Committees & Commissions
    County of Newell Boards, Committees & Commissions 10/3/2016 Boards, Committees, & Commissions Index Introduction Procedural Guidelines Boards, Commissions, Committees • COUNCIL (10 Councillors) 5 • MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION (10 Councillors) 6 • FOOTHILLS LITTLE BOW MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION (10 Councillors) 7 • AGRICULTURE PEST ACT/WEED CONTROL ACT APPEAL COMMITTEE 8 (4 Members-at-Large) • AIRPORT COMMISSION (1 Councillor + 2 Members-At-Large) 9 • ART & VISUAL DISPLAY COMMITTEE (1 Councillor) 10 • ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD (TRAINING REQUIRED) 11 • BOW RIVER BASIN COUNCIL (1 Councillor) 12 • CANADIAN BADLANDS (Reeve + 2 Councillors) 13 • CITY OF BROOKS RECREATION, PARKS, & CULTURE COMMITTEE 14 (Councillor from Div. 5, Councillor from Div. 10, + Member-at-Large from Div. 5 or 10) • COUNCILLOR COMPENSATION REVIEW COMMITTEE (3 Councillors) 15 • COUNTY OF NEWELL LIBRARY BOARD (1 Councillor) 16 • COUNTY OF NEWELL WATER PROJECT (CNWP) (3 Councillors) 17 • CRIME STOPPERS BOARD/RURAL CRIME WATCH/SAFE COMMUNITIES 18 COMMITTEE (1 Councillor) • EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 19 (Reeve + 2 Councillors + Director + 2 Deputy Directors) • FIRE AREA COMMITTEE – BASSANO & RURAL AREA 20 (Division 6 Councillor +1 other Councillor) • FIRE AREA COMMITTEE – ROSEMARY & RURAL AREA 21 (Division 7 Councillor +1 Member-at-Large) • GRASSLANDS REGIONAL F.C.S.S. (1 Councillor + 1 Member-at-Large) 22 • GRIEVANCE/SALARY NEGOTIATION/CAO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 23 COMMITTEE (Reeve or designate, Deputy Reeve or designate, or another Councillor & CAO) • INTER-MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • The Building of Wheatland County
    infinite landscapes infinite possibilities THE BUILDING OF WHEATLAND a brief history County with overview of our hamlets and localities WHEATLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY profile WHEATLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY profile from Reeve welcome AMBER LINK As a long time resident and elected representative of Wheatland County, I welcome you to our story. Our story is one of the discoveries of our infinite landscapes and infinite possibilities. This region has provided for millennia to our indigenous people everything that they needed to flourish and build a foundation of culture and life. To the peoples who came here over the last few centuries to the present, that belief in possibility has provided additional fabric to the culture and prosperity of Wheatland County. Agriculture is a foundational sector of our economy and has now diversified into oil & gas, green energy, manufacturing, tourism and more. Emerging industries through time have found a way to thrive here. It is the people and the land that seems to make this happen. Through respect of both, it is the secret to our infinite possibilities. This Community Overview provides a snapshot of our path and the data to show where we are today. We hope through our story, you see possibilities and understand the opportunities in your future as a business or resident of this place. Our Community & Development Services brand of the WC and its promise of infinite landscapes and infinite possibilities is our mantra. Many innovations and hard work within this community have designed our municipality and the quality of life we treasure within it. We welcome you to share in this experience and opportunity.
    [Show full text]