DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes (EN) (PDF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes (EN) (PDF EURONEST PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLÉE PARLEMENTAIRE EURONEST PARLAMENTARISCHE VERSAMMLUNG EURONEST ПАРЛАМЕНТСКАЯ AССАМБЛЕЯ ЕВРОНЕСТ Committee on Political Affairs, Human Rights and Democracy NEST_PV(2014)0211 MINUTES of the meeting of 11 February 2014, 09.00-12.30 Brussels The meeting opened on Tuesday 11 February 2014 at 09.15, with Co-Chairs Mr Gunnar HÖKMARK (European Parliament) and Mr Victor DOLIDZE (Parliament of Georgia) in the chair. Co-Chair Mr Gunnar HÖKMARK welcomed all the participants and noted that at this meeting, Members would have to hold a first discussion on the draft report of the Committee in view of the preparation of amendments, at a later stage. 1. Adoption of draft agenda The draft agenda was adopted without change. 2. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of the Euronest PA Committee on Political Affairs, Human Rights and Democracy of 27 May 2013 in Brussels Co-Chair Mr HÖKMARK informed that proposals for modification to the draft minutes of the meeting of 27 May 2013 should be sent to the secretariat of the Euronest PA by 12 February 2014, at 10:00. Should no proposal be submitted, the minutes would be deemed adopted without modification. 3. Presentation by Mr Gunnar WIEGAND, Director, European External Action Service (EEAS), Directorate for Russia, Eastern Partnership, Central Asia, Regional cooperation & OSCE, on the prospect of the Eastern Partnership, until the 2015 Summit, in Riga Mr Gunnar WIEGAND gave an overview of the outcome of the Eastern Partnership following PV\1050578EN.doc AP101.502v01-00 EN EN the Summit of November 2013 in Vilnius and the prospects until the next Summit to be held in 2015 in Riga. He first stressed a much higher degree of mutual political engagement between the EU and every partner country as well as collectively since the Eastern Partnership was launched at the Prague Summit in 2009. He then explained that the Eastern Partnership was not a policy projected by Brussels only and imposed on partner countries but rather a common policy with joint ownership. Although the Vilnius Summit was dominated by the "U-turn" of Ukrainian President Yanukovich, it led to the initialling of the Association Agreements with Moldova and Georgia as well as the signature of the visa facilitation agreement with Azerbaijan. Furthermore, at this Summit, Belarusian officials announced a change of position towards an agreement with the EU on visa facilitation and readmission. Mr WIEGAND took the view that the last events in Ukraine had demonstrated the impact of the Eastern Partnership. He stressed the high level engagement of the EU, shown by the frequent visits of EU High Representative Ashton and Commissioner Füle to Kyiv, aiming at de- escalating the situation, coming to a proper political process, and rendering a concrete package of economic and financial aid, provided there would be a new and inclusive government with a clear economic reform programme. Mr WIEGAND then drew five lessons of from the last events, which are of importance to further progress towards the Riga Summit in 2015. First, the EU cannot offer the same perspectives to every partner country, given the multi-speed and multi-demand reality on the ground. For this reason, more differentiation in bilateral relations would be needed. The deepest relations would materialise in political association and economic integration which is what Georgia and Moldova were going to achieve. In this regard, Mr WIEGAND underlined that the EU hoped and believed that Ukraine would continue to strive for that integration process too. While there is a slower process with regard to the relations with Azerbaijan, he pointed out that the EU regretted but at the same time respected the decision made by Armenia to take a different course and not to sign an Association Agreement. As a consequence, there is a need to reflect on what is possible in the spirit of the Eastern Partnership with a partner country which should soon be member of the Custom Union and of the future Eurasian Union. This would also be an important reference point as regards the future of the EU-Belarus relations. Moreover, despite the recognition of differences among partner countries, the EU should ensure that European values remain at the heart of each bilateral relationship. The second lesson is the necessity of maintaining a high level of political engagement with every partner country. This engagement should not be the privilege of executive powers, but should have a legislative dimension. Following the entry into force of Association Agreements, Parliamentary Association Committees will be set up as part of new institutional architectures. MEPs should play a key role in assisting their colleagues involved in the process of implementing the EU acquis into national legislations. The third lesson is that the Eastern Partnership should reach out to broader civil society. In particular, civil society actors directly affected by EU policies such as business communities should be further involved in their preparation and their implementation. The EU should also engage more with civil society in areas such as education, research, innovation and in terms of people-to-people contacts at various levels. Fourth, it is needed to improve the public impact of the Eastern Partnership. As the EU cannot do the campaigning alone, Mr WIEGAND called on Members of Parliaments to put more pressure on their national governments in order to increase efforts for this purpose. Fifth, the dialogue with the Russian Federation on the Eastern Partnership should be intensified. Mr WIEGAND reminded that during the EU- Russia Summit in January 2014, the Eastern Partnership was at the centre of the debate and he AP101.502v01-00 2/13 PV\1050578EN.doc EN also informed about upcoming formal consultations on the impact of Association Agreements including DCFTAs on Russian economy as agreed at that Summit. He added that the EU would make every effort to dispel misconceptions and to make sure people understand that there is no negative impact of DCFTAs on Russian economy but rather new opportunities for Russian business operators. However, he also pointed out that these talks should not be understood as renegotiations or trilateral consultations but as bilateral consultations about an existing agreement which the EU had negotiated with Ukraine. He concluded by stressing that the EU did not believe in zero-sum thinking on the European continent and that the EU foreign policy was geared towards the creation of new trade and investment opportunities. Sovereignty and freedom of choice must be guaranteed for every partner country and the EU rejects external pressures on any of its partners. While thanking Mr WIEGAND for his presentation, Co-Chair Mr DOLIDZE stressed the commitment of the Members to fulfil their legislative role within the Eastern Partnership. Co-Chair Mr HÖKMARK emphasised that the EU did not aim at imposing the future of any neighbouring countries and this conduct had also applied to the Euronest PA. He gave the example of the recent referendum on migration policy held in Switzerland independently of EU interference. This illustrated a significant and fundamental difference with what Russia had tried to do towards its neighbours, by exerting pressures. Moreover, Russian pressure gave a very awkward signal that democratic development in its neighbourhood was perceived as a negative factor by Russia. Besides, Co-Chair Mr HÖKMARK pointed out that it was not in the Russian interest to hinder such democratic development. He also asked whether trade sanctions taken by Russia were consistent with its membership in the World Trade Organisation and what the EU could do about this issue in the WTO framework. Mr David DARCHIASHVILI (Georgia) interpreted Russian last political steps as a will to have some kind of say in the Eastern Partnership and somehow become part of the decision- making process. He wondered what could be the added value of bilateral consultations of the EU with Russia, if this perception corresponds to reality. Mr WIEGAND pointed out that criticisms from Russia went out very late in the negotiating process of Association Agreements. The EU had never received Russian official papers raising objections or depicting a negative impact on partner countries, resulting from those Agreements. The EU remained ready to respond to any objections and wrong assumptions. Mr WIEGAND underlined that in reaction to the recently signed EU-Canada trade agreement which is far more-reaching than the NAFTA agreement between Canada, the US and Mexico, the US did not suddenly close their borders with Canada and did not ask the EU for urgent consultations. This new agreement was seen as an instrument bringing more opportunities for the Northern American and European markets. It could have only been negatively perceived when adopting a static view on economy. The purpose of future consultations with Russia should therefore consist of dispelling misperceptions. Mr Asim MOLLAZADE (Azerbaijan) expressed fears of new threats and pressures emerging after the Olympic Games in Sochi. He illustrated current diverging views between the EU and Russia by drawing a comparison with different sports practised by two players. He reminded that for several years, Russia had threatened the independence of states coming from the former Soviet Union. He asked whether the EU was ready to more comprehensively help the partner countries which are about to sign Association Agreements, and to contribute to terminate the foreign occupation of Azerbaijani territories, in line with EU resolutions. He also asked about political, economic and security guarantees that those countries could expect PV\1050578EN.doc 3/13 AP101.502v01-00 EN the EU to offer. Mr Artak ZAKARYAN (Armenia) thanked the EP Co-Chair for the constructive atmosphere of the meeting. He put forward that deepening relations with the EU remained a vector of the Armenian foreign policy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building Bridges Thoughts About the Other Russia
    Andrei Sakharov Research Center Vytautas Magnus University Building Bridges Thoughts about the other Russia Second Leonidas Donskis Memorial Conference With Vyacheslav Bakhmin, Yevgeni Gindilis, Mikhail Shishkin and Andrew Wood Conference report Organizers Introduction Robert van Voren For more than forty years I have been involved in Soviet – and Russian – affairs and gradually I started to understand the subject of my interest a bit more. But part of that is that I understand there is no way you can understand Russia. You need to stop thinking logically because there is no logic. You need to learn to feel it, you love it and you hate it, and that combination is shared by many if not most Russians themselves. The difference however is that, for a Russian, it is acceptable to make fun of his country, to an extent that many other nationals would not about their homeland. Self-mockery is exceptionally well developed in Russia. But as a foreigner you are always an outsider, and you have to watch your tongue because any critical remark can have a serious backlash. Best is to laugh along when Russians make fun of themselves. So gradually, when I was hiring staff for my foundation, I would carefully listen to their views. If they would start telling me extensively how much they loved Russia, its culture, its people, the hospitality, without anything else, they would not be hired. The moment they would start telling me that they had this morbid conflicting feeling inside of loving and hating the country, a combination of two extremes, I knew I had a good candidate in front of me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extraordinary Recent History of Holocaust Studies in Lithuania
    PROOF ONLY The Extraordinary Recent History of Holocaust Studies in Lithuania by Dovid Katz (Vilnius) Proof of a paper whose final version of record appeared in Dapim: Studies on the Holocaust, vol. 31:3 (Dec. 2017), pp. 285-295. The final version of record is available only from the publishers, Taylor and Francis: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23256249.2017.1395530 The Extraordinary Recent History of Holocaust Studies in Lithuania Dovid Katz Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The paper argues that the recent history of Holocaust Studies in Holocaust in Lithuania; Lithuania is characterized by major provision (for research, Prague Declaration (2008); teaching and publishing) coming from state-sponsored agencies, Green House (Vilnius); particularly a state commission on both Nazi and Soviet crimes. Double Genocide Problematically, the commission is itself simultaneously active in revising the narrative per se of the Holocaust, principally according to the ‘Double Genocide’ theories of the 2008 Prague Declaration that insists on ‘equalization’ of Nazi and Soviet crimes. Lithuanian agencies have played a disproportionate role in that declaration, in attempts at legislating some of its components in the European Parliament and other EU bodies, and ‘export’ of the revisionist model to the West. Much international support for solid independent Lithuanian Holocaust researchers and NGOs was cut off as the state commission set out determinedly to dominate the field, which is perceived to have increasing political implications in East-West politics. But this history must not obscure an impressive list of local accomplishments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Central and Eastern European Online Library
    You have downloaded a document from The Central and Eastern European Online Library The joined archive of hundreds of Central-, East- and South-East-European publishers, research institutes, and various content providers Source: Revista Română de Studii Baltice şi Nordice Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies Location: Romania Author(s): Lina Kutkauskaitė Title: How is Leonidas Donskis remembered in Lithuania? How is Leonidas Donskis remembered in Lithuania? Issue: 1/2019 Citation Lina Kutkauskaitė. "How is Leonidas Donskis remembered in Lithuania?". Revista Română style: de Studii Baltice şi Nordice 1:101-107. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=803674 CEEOL copyright 2020 Revista Română de Studii Baltice şi Nordice / The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies, ISSN 2067-1725, Vol. 11, Issue 1 (2019): pp. 101-107. ow is Leonidas Donskis remembered in Lithuania? H Lina Kutkauskaitė-Žilaitė Deputy Head of Mission, Embassy of Lithuania, Bucharest, [email protected] CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0) This paper has been presented at the 10th International Conference on Baltic and Nordic Studies in Romania entitled Dissent versus Conformism in the Nordic, Baltic and Black Sea Areas, “Ovidius” University of Constanţa, 6-8 June 2019. First of all, I would like to thank The Romanian Association for Baltic and Nordic Studies, and prof. Miloiu personally for organising this conference. We, as the Lithuanian Embassy in Romania, highly value the Association’s contribution to promoting the relations between the academic communities of our respective countries and deepening the knowledge of the Romanian public about the Baltic Sea region.
    [Show full text]
  • Indices of the Comparative Civilizations Review, No. 1-83
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 84 Number 84 Spring 2021 Article 14 2021 Indices of the Comparative Civilizations Review, No. 1-83 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation (2021) "Indices of the Comparative Civilizations Review, No. 1-83," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 84 : No. 84 , Article 14. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol84/iss84/14 This End Matter is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. et al.: Indices of the <i>Comparative Civilizations Review</i>, No. 1-83 Comparative Civilizations Review 139 Indices of the Comparative Civilizations Review, No. 1-83 A full history of the origins of the Comparative Civilizations Review may be found in Michael Palencia-Roth’s (2006) "Bibliographical History and Indices of the Comparative Civilizations Review, 1-50." (Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 54: Pages 79 to 127.) The current indices to CCR will exist as an article in the hardcopy publication, as an article in the online version of CCR, and online as a separate searchable document accessed from the CCR website. The popularity of CCR papers will wax and wane with time, but as of September 14, 2020, these were the ten most-popular, based on the average number of full-text downloads per day since the paper was posted.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Nationalism in Post-Soviet Lithuania
    After Independence: Making and Protecting the Nation in Postcolonial and Postcommunist States Lowell W. Barrington, Editor http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=126246 The University of Michigan Press 7. Nationalism in Post-Soviet Lithuania New Approaches for the Nation of “Innocent Sufferers” TERRY D. CLARK Most scholars argue that, in contrast to many of the states of the for- mer Soviet Union, Lithuania has had few dif‹culties with its national minorities.1 Much of this owes to Lithuanians constituting over 80 percent of the population, while the two largest national minorities comprise approximately 8 percent (Russians) and 7 percent (Poles) respectively. Given these demographics, the new Lithuanian state, unlike its Baltic neighbors, exercised the so-called zero option—granting citizenship to all individuals on its state territory at the time of restoration of independence irrespective of their national identity. This was a major factor in the rela- tively tranquil relations between national communities in the country.2 The argument for comparatively tranquil relations between national communities, however, is not the same as making the case that nationalism as a phenomenon does not exist in the political system. This chapter argues that nationalism has existed in one form or another since the late Soviet era. While it has not led to con›ict of the sort seen in the other Baltic republics or parts of the former Soviet Union, it has nonetheless con- tributed to social dif‹culties and unrest, particularly in the period leading up to and immediately following the restoration of independence. But, since the immediate postindependence period, nationalism has also been both weakened and transformed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuanian Political Science Yearbook
    LITHUANIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE YEARBOOK 2008 Published by INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE VILNIUS UNIVERSITY Vokiečių str.10 LT-01130 Vilnius LITHUANIA Tel. (370-5) 251 4130 Fax (370-5) 251 4134 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.tspmi.vu.lt LITHUANIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Vokiečių str.10 LT-01130 Vilnius LITHUANIA Tel. (370-5) 251 4133 Fax (370-5) 251 4134 http://www.lpasoc.vu.lt LITHUANIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE YEARBOOK 2008 VILNIUS 2009 TheLithuanian Political Science Yearbook aims to provide a wide picture of the main fields of Political Science in Lithuania – Political Theory, Institutional Design, Electoral Process, Public Policy and Public Administration, International Relations and related disciplines. However, it is by no means limited to publications on Lithuania or by Lithuanian authors. Contributions are welcome both from Lithuania and abroad. Editorial Commitee Jonas Čičinskas (Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University) Leonidas Donskis (Institute of Political Science and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University) Algimantas Jankauskas (Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University) Alvydas Jokubaitis (Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University) Algis Krupavičius (Kaunas University of Technology) Antanas Kulakauskas (Department of Political Science, Mykolas Romeris University) Vaidutis Laurėnas (Klaipėda University) Raimundas Lopata (Institute of International Relations and Political Science,
    [Show full text]
  • Ow Is Leonidas Donskis Remembered in Lithuania? Lina Kutkauskaitė-Žilaitė
    Revista Română de Studii Baltice şi Nordice / The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies, ISSN 2067-1725, Vol. 11, Issue 1 (2019): pp. 101-107. ow is Leonidas Donskis remembered in Lithuania? H Lina Kutkauskaitė-Žilaitė Deputy Head of Mission, Embassy of Lithuania, Bucharest, [email protected] CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0) This paper has been presented at the 10th International Conference on Baltic and Nordic Studies in Romania entitled Dissent versus Conformism in the Nordic, Baltic and Black Sea Areas, “Ovidius” University of Constanţa, 6-8 June 2019. First of all, I would like to thank The Romanian Association for Baltic and Nordic Studies, and prof. Miloiu personally for organising this conference. We, as the Lithuanian Embassy in Romania, highly value the Association’s contribution to promoting the relations between the academic communities of our respective countries and deepening the knowledge of the Romanian public about the Baltic Sea region. We have been cooperating with the Association for many years now and our Embassy is always 102 | Revista Română de Studii Baltice şi Nordice / The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies 11 (1) delighted to contribute to and participate in the Association’s events. This year it is even more special, because this time we are celebrating the legacy of the late Leonidas Donskis, Lithuanian political theorist, historian of ideas, social analyst, political commentator, and professor, who also happened to be a close friend of the Romanian Association for Baltic and Nordic Studies, and one of the masterminds behind the idea for this conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography to Early March 2007
    Dovid Katz Bibliography for 2008-2009 Seven Kingdoms of the Litvaks , International Cultural Program Center in cooperation with the Vilnius Yiddish Institute, Vilnius 2009, 61 pp. http://www.dovidkatz.net/dovid/Lithuania/7_KingdomsLitvaks.pdf (LJC) “The Sounds of Silence of Jewish Lithuania” [preface] in Isaac Zibuts et al (eds), Sounds of Silence. Traces of Jewish Life in Lithuania , R. Paknio leidykla: Vilnius 2009, pp. 14-17 [also: consultant to the project]. Parallel Lithuanian edition ( Tylos gausmas žyd ų gyvenimo p ÷dsakai Lietuvoje ) with preface (pp. 14-17) translated by Tomas Venclova. http://www.dovidkatz.net/dovid/Lithuania/2009_SOUNDS_OF_SILENCE.pdf http://www.dovidkatz.net/dovid/Lithuania/2009_SOUNDS_OF_SILENCE_translation.pdf (LJC) Windows to a Lost Jewish Past: Vilna Book Stamps. Versus Aureus: Vilnius 2008, 100 pp. (LJC) (CH) [Editor and publisher], Menke Katz, Land of Manna , Fairy Glen Press: Capelulo 2009, ii + 96 pp. 1 — Dovid Katz, PUBLICATIONS 2008-2009 (compiled 31 December 2009) Draft maps from work in progress on Litvish: An Atlas of Northeastern Yiddish at: http://www.dovidkatz.net/WebAtlas/AtlasSamples.htm (YDP) Questionnaire for Litvish: An Atlas of Northeastern Yiddish at: http://www.dovidkatz.net/WebAtlas/atl_quest.htm (YDP) “Don’t let the Holocaust be written out of History” in the Washington Jewish Week , 30 December 2009. http://washingtonjewishweek.com/print.asp?ArticleID=12036&SectionID=31&SubSectionI D=49 (HoloStu) Dovid Katz & Clemens Heni, “The Prague Declaration is Europe’s new antisemitic poison” in Algemeiner Journal , 4 December 2009, p 10. Revised version on WPK, 26 November 2009. http://clemensheni.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/the-%E2%80%9Cprague- declaration%E2%80%9D-is-europe%E2%80%99s-new-antisemitic-poison/ and http://www.holocaustinthebaltics.com/2009Dec4KatzAndHeniOnPragueDecl.pdf (HoloStu) “Tories must reject ‘Double Genocide’ proponents.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Studies Press 28 Montfern Avenue, Brighton, MA 02135, United States of America | Tel: +1 (617) 782-6290 |
    Academic Studies Press 28 Montfern Avenue, Brighton, MA 02135, United States of America | Tel: +1 (617) 782-6290 | www.academicstudiespress.com — CALL FOR PAPERS — JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ANTISEMITISM (JCA) EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Clemens Heni (Director, The Berlin Intl. Center for the Study of Antisemitism (BICSA)) EDITORS Lesley Klaff (Sheffield-Hallam University, UK) Neil Kressel (William Paterson University, US) Michael Kreutz (The Berlin Intl. Center for the Study of Antisemitism (BICSA)) REVIEWS EDITOR Ron Jontof-Hutter (The Berlin Intl. Center for the Study of Antisemitism (BICSA)) SPECIAL ISSUE: "POSTCOLONIALISM AND ANTISEMITISM" OF THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ANTISEMITISM (JCA), ISSUE 2 (SPRING 2018) Deadline for submissions: September 15th 2017 Postcolonialism has been the dernier crie of the humanities and social sciences for many years now. This special issue of JCA wants to analyze mainly two aspects of postcolonial ideology: 1) Postcolonialism and the Shoah: What is the connection between postcolonial thinking and antisemitism in regard of the Shoah? Why, since when and how has it become mainstream to connect the history of racism and colonialism to the history of the Holocaust? Are postcolonial scholars as well as scholars in comparative genocide studies eager – and if so, why - to include the Holocaust in their framework? Does this reject the uniqueness of the Shoah and the unprecedented character of Auschwitz? Is there a tendency, even among scholars in antisemitism, to link racism, colonialism and the Shoah? What are the possible consequences for Holocaust Studies and an institution like Yad Vashem, taken these tendencies in scholarship to frame the Holocaust as “genocide among others”? 2) What is the connection between postcolonial ideology and anti-Zionism? The superstar of postcolonialism is Edward Said.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Semitism, Radicalisation and Violent Extremism List of Speakers
    Anti-Semitism, Radicalisation and Violent Extremism Conference List of Speakers Faina KUKLIANSKY was born in Vilnius, in the Lithuanian Jewish family, survivors of the Holocaust. She has graduated from Vilnius University, Faculty of Law, as well as from Criminology Research Institute in Moscow. She has published more than 20 scientific articles and publications. Since 2013, Faina Kukliansky acts as a chairperson of the Jewish Community of Lithuania. She is also a member of Vilnius International and National Commercial Arbitration, and of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists. She is a partner at a law firm, mostly practicing in the field of restoration of ownership rights. In 2013, Faina Kukliansky was awarded by the Lithuanian President with Order of Merit to Lithuania. Natalija BITIUKOVA is a deputy director at the Human Rights Monitoring Institute. After graduating from law studies in Lithuania, Natalija Bitiukova deepened her knowledge of international human rights law and European Union law at the Central European University. The thematic areas of her interest and activities include anti-discrimination law, the protection of women from domestic violence, the new technology and the law. Natalija Bitiukova has worked for Public Interest Law Institute (PILnet) and the Open Society Justice Initiative in Budapest. Jūratė GUZEVIČIŪTĖ works as a legal director at the Human Rights Monitoring Institute where she is responsible for strategic litigation, legal research, law initiatives, alternative reporting. The main fields of her interests include discrimination cases, hate speech and hate crime, radicalization, refugee law, human trafficking. Jurate Guzevičiūtė has graduated from Vilnius University, Faculty of Law, as well as from Leiden University where she studies Public International Law (LL.M.).
    [Show full text]
  • Another Word for Uncertainty: Anti-Semitism in Modern Lithuania
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by edoc Publication server Another Word for Uncertainty: Anti-Semitism in Modern Lithuania Leonidas Donskis Summary Lithuania can take pride in its historical legacy of ethnical, religious and cultural diver- sity during the time of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Polish-Lithuanian Union. Modern Lithuania departed from this tradition, turning into an increasingly homogenous political actor in the age of nationalism. However, the new Lithuanian state offered Jews extensive cultural autonomy from 1918 to 1926. The Second World War and the Holo- caust caused the complete destruction of the Litvak community and culture. Anti- Semitism in Soviet Lithuania never differed significantly from official policies, adopted by the Kremlin. Some characteristically Lithuanian traits of anti-Semitism emerged within conservative and chauvinistic émigré circles. Yet the country was to revive the full scale of prejudice and hatred after 1990. This article explores the trajectories of anti- Semitic imagination and the dynamics of anti-Semitic politics in modern Lithuania. Zusammenfassung Litauen verfügt über ein historisches Erbe ethnischer, religiöser und kultureller Vielfalt zur Zeit des Großherzogtums Litauens sowie der polnisch-litauischen Union. Das moder- ne Litauen wich von dieser Tradition ab und wandelte sich im Zeitalter des Nationalismus zu einem homogeneren Akteur. Der neue Staat gestand den Juden jedoch zwischen 1918 bis 1926 kulturelle Autonomie zu. Der Zweite Weltkrieg und der Holocaust bedeuteten die Zerstörung der angestammten jüdischen Gemeinschaft und Kultur. Der Antisemitis- mus Sowjetlitauens unterschied sich nicht wesentlich von der offiziellen Politik des Kremls. Charakteristische litauische Merkmale entwickelten sich indes in konservativ- chauvinistischen Emigrantenkreisen.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Leonidas Donskis, Department of Political Science, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania; Member of European Parliament (MEP), ALDE (2009–2014)
    “Antisemitism is a not a breakaway territory in the mainland of modernity; nor is its illogical aberration. Whether we like it or not, but the unpleasant truth is that antisemitism is a significant and inescapable part of modernity. By no means were demonization of the Jews and the charge of maleficium for their supposed collective participation in occult evil just a marginal trait in Christian Europe. Incredible as it sounds, it was its substantial and essential feature which did not contradict the greatest cultural and intellectual accomplishments of medieval and Renaissance Europe. The same may be said about modern antisemitism which was practiced in the most civilized European societies and sophisticated scholarly circles. Antisemitism did not deny the modern project with its promises of equality, pursuit of happiness, just society, and better life. Likewise, modernity did not deny antisemitism until the Catastrophe of Humanity which we know as the Holocaust. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why Clemens Heni, in his profound and painstaking study, aptly describes antisemitism as a specific, strange, awkward, and paradoxical phenomenon, which departs from our modern sensibilities and fails us as human beings, which leaves us devastated, disenchanted, yet which stays… It is still there whatever we say and whatever we do. It changes its forms over time, it walks in disguise as an honest and liberal criticism of Israel, it masquerades as a perfectly legitimate and consistent fight for human rights, it lends itself to philosophy and cultural studies, it misleads politicians, and it misguides scholars, yet it does not disappear. Why is it so? Clemens Heni’s timely and important book will help us throw more light on antisemitism – this specific phenomenon, as the author would have it.” Prof.
    [Show full text]