The Melville Bay area, North-West - the first phase of petroleum exploration

Richard C. Whittaker and Niels Erik Hamann

The first detailed interpretation of the structure and geo­ (Fig. I). This vast frontier exploration area. which extends logical development of the Melville Bay area based on for about 800 km from north-west to south-east and has a reflection seismic data was completed in June 1994 as part maximum width of about 240 km, is approximately of the KANUMAS project (Larsen & Pulvertaft. 1990). equivalent in size to the Central and Viking Grabens of the This marks the first step in the exploration for petroleum North Sea put together. Most of the continental shelf in offshore North-West Greenland and has resulted in re­ Melville Bay is in moderate to deep water, generally newed optimism for the oil potential of the region. between 200 m and 500 m. Physical conditions in the area are harsh. The area is covered by sea-ice from October to July and scattered large icebergs are present all year round. Background The first indication that a majorsedimentary basin exist­ The Melville Bay (Melville Bugt) area lies in the north­ ed in the area came from the interpretation or a regional f east corner of Bafin Bay (Baffin Bugt). covering the con­ airborne magnetic survey covering (Hood e/ tinental shelf between Svartenhuk Halv� and Carey 0er al., 1967). In 1970 the Bedford Institute of Oceanography

Fig. I. Location map of the Melville Bay area showing the KA UMAS seismic survey. Water depth, (in me­ GREENLAND tres) are also shown. along with the position of the Marraat-1 well and the Scott Trough oil seep.

I Baffin 1 Bay 1 \ \ • Scou Trough seep oil I I

<>OOPdnll site \

' 100km ' '

0 GGU, Copt'1tlw1,:t·11, /995 29

Bathn Bay KMOQ Melville Bay MGPVIIIG Bay MeMlle Bay SW Baain Ridge Graben Faull NE

SW Bal11n Bay

\ \ \ \ \ \ 25km

Fig. 2. Representative �tructural cross-scc1io11s or the Melville Bay area. and Dalhousic University (Halifax, Nova Scotia) began a were processed by the Danish National Survey and Caclas­ comprehensive geophysical study of Baffin Bay which tre (KMS) and were supplemented by additional marine provided further evidence for the presence of a major basin gravity data and airborne gravity data (supplied by John or graben in this area. A map based largely on gravity data Brozena of the U. S. Naval Research Laboratory, 1991- acquired during this study showed the ext em of the grnben 1992). and with satellite altimetry da1a, 10 produce a com­ and revealed the thickness of the scdimemary fill to reach posite Bouguer anomaly map. The composite gravity map 10 km (Ross & Henderson, 1973). reveals trends and features 1101 discernablefrom the widely It was 1101 until 1992 that the first systematic seismic spaced seismic lines. rcncction survey was carried ou1 in Melville Bay. The All KANUMAS data. both seismic lines and gravity seismic reconnaissance survey formed part of the KAN U­ data. arc the property of the partners in the project and are MAS project, which is a regional seismic project covering confidential. two major unexplored shelf areas: Melville Bay and the North-East Greenland shelf'. The KANUMAS project is funded by a group of oil companies consisting of BP, Basin evaluation Exxon. Japan a1ional Oil Company, unaoil, Shell. Sta­ Interpretation of the seismic data was ca1Tied out in close toil and Texaco, with Nunaoil A/S (the national oil compa­ cooperation with Nunaoil on behalf of the KANUMAS ny of Greenland) as operator. group of companies. for whom GGU acted as geological and geophysical consultants on the project. The interpreta­ tion work was performed primarily on Landmark interac­ Data acquisition and processing tive work stations at GGU and unaoil. A full interpreta­ In the period 20 August to 17 September I 992 Nunaoi I tion report covering the structure. basin development and acquired 4071 km of seismic rellection data along 23 lines petroleum potential of the area was submiued 10 the (Fig. I). using the Danish Navy high ice-class fisheries KANUMAS partners in June 1994. and a copy of this inspection ship The1is, which has been adapted to carry report was deposited with the Mineral Resource. Adminis­ seismic equipment. Despite the harsh conditions few prob­ u·ation for Greenland (MRA). lems were encountered, and !here was very liule ·down­ An impression of the main geological features of the time·. mainly because sea conditions were predominantly Melville Bay area can be gained from two representative calm in the area. The data were processed by Halliburton cross-sections drawn from seismic lines (Fig. 2). The seis­ Geophysical Services Inc., England under the supervision mic sections confirm the existence of deep sedimentary of Nunaoil. basins in t.he area and indicate the presence of potentially Gravity profiles acquired together with the seismic lines large structural traps for hydrocarbons. A series of struc- 30

D Basin outline D Ultramafic intrusion D Thick volcanics at seabed CJ Thick volcanics at depth D Structural high

76"

( Baffin Bay \

' 72 Q) C: 0 "I

:, .:!! E .2"' C: