Groups and Galois Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Groups and Galois Theory Groups and Galois Theory Course Notes Alberto Elduque Departamento de Matem´aticas Universidad de Zaragoza 50009 Zaragoza, Spain c 2009-2019 Alberto Elduque Contents Syllabus v What is this course about? vii 1 Groups 1 x 1. Definitions and examples . 1 x 2. Cyclic groups. Generators . 3 x 3. Homomorphisms . 5 x 4. Symmetric group . 9 x 5. Group actions . 13 x 6. Conjugation. Translation . 17 6.1. Action by conjugation . 17 6.2. Action by translation . 19 x 7. Sylow's Theorems . 20 x 8. Direct products . 22 x 9. Finitely generated abelian groups . 24 x 10. Solvable groups . 27 x 11. Simple groups . 30 Exercises . 32 2 Galois Theory 37 x 1. Algebraic extensions . 37 x 2. Splitting fields. Algebraic closure . 42 x 3. Separable extensions . 47 x 4. Galois group . 49 x 5. The Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory . 55 x 6. Finite fields . 58 x 7. Primitive elements . 59 x 8. Ruler and compass constructions . 60 x 9. Galois groups of polynomials . 62 x 10. Solvability by radicals . 69 Exercises . 75 Previous exams 79 iii Syllabus This is a required course for Math Majors at the University of Zaragoza (Science School). It consists of 6 credits. It is a sequel of (and relies heavily on) the course Algebraic Structures. Lecturer: Alberto Elduque Office: Math. Building. Second floor. Algebra Section. Office no. 2. e-mail: [email protected] http://www.unizar.es/matematicas/algebra/elduque Office hours: Tuesday and Friday, from 17:00 to 20:00. Course description: The goal of the course is to understand the basic properties of the groups, which form the basic algebraic structure to under- stand and measure the symmetry, and then to proceed to study the symme- try of the algebraic equations (Galois Theory). The peak of the course will be the proof of the impossibility to solve by radicals the algebraic equations of degree ≥ 5. Exam, exercises: There will be a final exam, which will consist of some questions of a theoretical nature and some exercises. Students will be re- quired to solve and explain to their classmates some of the exercises in the notes. This will constitute a ten percent of the final mark. References: There are many good references on Abstract Algebra, which include chapters devoted to Groups and to Galois Theory. Here are just a few of them: - D.S. Dummit and R.M. Foote: Abstract Algebra (2nd edition). John Wiley and Sons, 1999. - J.J. Rotman: A First Course in Abstract Algebra (2nd edition), Pren- tice Hall, 2000. - R.B. Ash: Abstract Algebra. The Basic Graduate Year http://www.math.uiuc.edu/ r-ash/Algebra.html v vi SYLLABUS Some more specific textbooks are the following: - I. Stewart: Galois Theory. 4th ed., CRC Press, 2015. - J.P. Tignol: Galois' Theory of Algebraic Equations, World Scientific, 2001. - J.S. Milne: Group Theory and Fields and Galois Theory, http://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/index.html What is this course about? Symmetries of an equilateral triangle Fix an equilateral triangle and consider the set 2 G = fisometries of R fixing the triangleg G consists of three reflections relative to the lines that pass through a vertex and the middle point of the opposite side (see Figure 1) together with the rotations of 0, 120 and 240 degrees. Thus G consists of 6 elements: jGj = 6. Each isometry fixing the triangle permutes the vertices. The three reflec- tions correspond to the transposition of two vertices. The rotations of 120 and 240 degrees correspond to the two cyclic permutations of the vertices. σ1 . .... ....... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... .. .... ... ... .... ...... ...... ... ... ... ... ... .... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... ..... ... ... .. .. ... ... ........... ... ... .. .. ... ... ...... ...... ... ... ... ... ....... ....... ... ... ... ... ...... ...... ... ... ... ... ...... ...... ... ..... ..... ....... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ....... ....... σ3 σ2 Figure 1: Symmetries of an equilateral triangle. For us, the important property of this set G is that its elements can be composed (they are bijective maps!), and the composition of any two of its elements again belongs to G. Thus, for example, σ1σ2 is the clockwise rotation of 120 degrees. These sets, endowed with a binary operation satisfying the usual prop- erties of the composition of bijective maps, are called groups. vii viii WHAT IS THIS COURSE ABOUT? Solutions of equations by radicals We are quite used to find the solutions of the degree 2 equations: ax2 + bx + c = 0; which are given by the familiar formula: p −b ± b2 − 4ac x = : 2a In the course Algebraic Structures we learned how to solve the equations of degree 3 and 4, which involve the use of square and cubic roots. The clue to deal with equations of degree ≥ 5 is to study the symme- tries of the equation. These form a group, called the Galois group of the equation. Many properties of the equation, like its solvability by radicals, are determined by the structure of its Galois group. The theory devoted to the study of the algebraic equations and their Galois groups is called Galois Theory. This course is devoted to study the basic properties of groups and of the Galois Theory of algebraic equations. Chapter 1 Groups The purpose of this chapter is the study of those sets which, like the set of isometries preserving an equilateral triangle, are endowed with a binary operation satisfying the usual properties. x 1. Definitions and examples 1.1 Definition. A group is a set G endowed with a binary operation (usually called multiplication) G × G −! G (x; y) 7! xy; which is associative ((xy)z = x(yz) for any x; y; z 2 G), there is a neutral element (which will usually be denoted by e: ex = x = xe for any x 2 G), and such that for any element x 2 G there exists an element, denoted by x−1 and called the inverse of x, such that xx−1 = x−1x = e. Moreover, if the multiplication is commutative (xy = yx for any x; y 2 G), then the group is said to be commutative or abelian. 1.2 Examples. (i) Any ring R is an abelian group with the operation given by its addition. In particular we get the abelian groups (Z; +) or (Z=nZ; +). (ii) If R is a unital ring, the set of its units R× = fr 2 R : 9s 2 R such that rs = sr = 1g is a group. The operation is given by the product of the ring. (iii) Classical groups: For any natural number n 2 N we have the fol- lowing groups of matrices (the operation is the usual product): 1 2 CHAPTER 1. GROUPS • GL(n; R) = fA 2 Matn(R) : det A 6= 0g (general linear group), • SL(n; R) = fA 2 Matn(R) : det A = 1g (special linear group), 0 • O(n; R) = fA 2 Matn(R): AA = Ing (orthogonal group), • SO(n; R) = O(n; R) \ SL(n; R) (special orthogonal group). (iv) Let Ω be an arbitrary set, then the set S(Ω) = ff :Ω ! Ω: f is a bijective mapg is a group under the composition of maps. It is called the group of permutations of Ω. The groups contained in S(Ω) are called groups of transformations of Ω. The famous Erlangen Program (Felix Klein, 1872) proposed that Geome- try is the study of invariants under the action of a group. Thus the euclidean geometry becomes the study of invariants under the isometry group (angles, distances, ..., are invarians), the affine (or projective) geometry becomes the study of invariants under the affine (or projective) group (for instance, the barycenter is an invariant), the topology becomes the study of invariants under the action of the group of homeomorphisms (compactness, connect- edness, fundamental groups, ..., are invariants), ... 1.3 Remark. Thanks to the associativity of the product, there is no need to put parentheses in products x1x2 ··· xn (n > 2). Also, we may define recursively the powers of an element of a group G as follows: x0 = e, n+1 n −n n −1 x = x x, x = (x ) , for any n 2 N. The associativity of the product n m n+m immediately gives the property x x = x for any x 2 G and n; m 2 Z. The associativity also implies the uniqueness of the inverse: If xy = e = zx, then z = ze = z(xy) = (zx)y = ey = y: As (xy)(y−1x−1) = e, it follows that (xy)−1 = y−1x−1 . 1.4 Definition. Let G be a group and let H be a nonempty subset of G. H is said to be a subgroup of G if for any x; y 2 H, both xy and x−1 belong to H. (It will be denoted by H ≤ G.) 1.5 `Silly' properties. Let H be a nonempty subset of the group G. • H ≤ G =) e 2 H. • H ≤ G () 8x; y 2 H; xy−1 2 H. • H is a subgroup of G if and only if H is closed under the multiplication in G, and it is a group with this multiplication. x 2. CYCLIC GROUPS. GENERATORS 3 1.6 Examples. • SO(n; R) ≤ SL(n; R) ≤ GL(n; R), O(n; R) ≤ GL(n; R). × • Let H be the ring of Hamilton quaternions, then H = fa+bi+cj+dk : a2 + b2 + c2 + d2 6= 0g. Consider the subset Q = {±1; ±i; ±j; ±kg. × Then Q is a subgroup of H consisting of 8 elements. It is called the quaternion group. × Another subgroup of H is given by the three-dimensional sphere: S3 = fa + bi + cj + dk : a2 + b2 + c2 + d2 = 1g: • Any group G contains two trivial subgroups: feg and G. Any other subgroup is said to be a proper subgroup of G. By abuse of notation, the trivial subgroup feg is usually denoted simply by 1 (or 0 if additive notation is being used).
Recommended publications
  • APPLICATIONS of GALOIS THEORY 1. Finite Fields Let F Be a Finite Field
    CHAPTER IX APPLICATIONS OF GALOIS THEORY 1. Finite Fields Let F be a finite field. It is necessarily of nonzero characteristic p and its prime field is the field with p r elements Fp.SinceFis a vector space over Fp,itmusthaveq=p elements where r =[F :Fp]. More generally, if E ⊇ F are both finite, then E has qd elements where d =[E:F]. As we mentioned earlier, the multiplicative group F ∗ of F is cyclic (because it is a finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of a field), and clearly its order is q − 1. Hence each non-zero element of F is a root of the polynomial Xq−1 − 1. Since 0 is the only root of the polynomial X, it follows that the q elements of F are roots of the polynomial Xq − X = X(Xq−1 − 1). Hence, that polynomial is separable and F consists of the set of its roots. (You can also see that it must be separable by finding its derivative which is −1.) We q may now conclude that the finite field F is the splitting field over Fp of the separable polynomial X − X where q = |F |. In particular, it is unique up to isomorphism. We have proved the first part of the following result. Proposition. Let p be a prime. For each q = pr, there is a unique (up to isomorphism) finite field F with |F | = q. Proof. We have already proved the uniqueness. Suppose q = pr, and consider the polynomial Xq − X ∈ Fp[X]. As mentioned above Df(X)=−1sof(X) cannot have any repeated roots in any extension, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Galois Group of a Rational Polynomial
    Determining the Galois group of a rational polynomial Alexander Hulpke Department of Mathematics Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO, 80523 [email protected] http://www.math.colostate.edu/˜hulpke JAH 1 The Task Let f Q[x] be an irreducible polynomial of degree n. 2 Then G = Gal(f) = Gal(L; Q) with L the splitting field of f over Q. Problem: Given f, determine G. WLOG: f monic, integer coefficients. JAH 2 Field Automorphisms If we want to represent automorphims explicitly, we have to represent the splitting field L For example as splitting field of a polynomial g Q[x]. 2 The factors of g over L correspond to the elements of G. Note: If deg(f) = n then deg(g) n!. ≤ In practice this degree is too big. JAH 3 Permutation type of the Galois Group Gal(f) permutes the roots α1; : : : ; αn of f: faithfully (L = Spl(f) = Q(α ; α ; : : : ; α ). • 1 2 n transitively ( (x α ) is a factor of f). • Y − i i I 2 This action gives an embedding G S . The field Q(α ) corresponds ≤ n 1 to the subgroup StabG(1). Arrangement of roots corresponds to conjugacy in Sn. We want to determine the Sn-class of G. JAH 4 Assumption We can calculate “everything” about Sn. n is small (n 20) • ≤ Can use table of transitive groups (classified up to degree 30) • We can approximate the roots of f (numerically and p-adically) JAH 5 Reduction at a prime Let p be a prime that does not divide the discriminant of f (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • ON R-EXTENSIONS of ALGEBRAIC NUMBER FIELDS Let P Be a Prime
    ON r-EXTENSIONS OF ALGEBRAIC NUMBER FIELDS KENKICHI IWASAWA1 Let p be a prime number. We call a Galois extension L of a field K a T-extension when its Galois group is topologically isomorphic with the additive group of £-adic integers. The purpose of the present paper is to study arithmetic properties of such a T-extension L over a finite algebraic number field K. We consider, namely, the maximal unramified abelian ^-extension M over L and study the structure of the Galois group G(M/L) of the extension M/L. Using the result thus obtained for the group G(M/L)> we then define two invariants l(L/K) and m(L/K)} and show that these invariants can be also de­ termined from a simple formula which gives the exponents of the ^-powers in the class numbers of the intermediate fields of K and L. Thus, giving a relation between the structure of the Galois group of M/L and the class numbers of the subfields of L, our result may be regarded, in a sense, as an analogue, for L, of the well-known theorem in classical class field theory which states that the class number of a finite algebraic number field is equal to the degree of the maximal unramified abelian extension over that field. An outline of the paper is as follows: in §1—§5, we study the struc­ ture of what we call T-finite modules and find, in particular, invari­ ants of such modules which are similar to the invariants of finite abelian groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Techniques for the Computation of Galois Groups
    Techniques for the Computation of Galois Groups Alexander Hulpke School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, The University of St. Andrews, The North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS, United Kingdom [email protected] Abstract. This note surveys recent developments in the problem of computing Galois groups. Galois theory stands at the cradle of modern algebra and interacts with many areas of mathematics. The problem of determining Galois groups therefore is of interest not only from the point of view of number theory (for example see the article [39] in this volume), but leads to many questions in other areas of mathematics. An example is its application in computer algebra when simplifying radical expressions [32]. Not surprisingly, this task has been considered in works from number theory, group theory and algebraic geometry. In this note I shall give an overview of methods currently used. While the techniques used for the identification of Galois groups were known already in the last century [26], the involved calculations made it almost imprac- tical to do computations beyond trivial examples. Thus the problem was only taken up again in the last 25 years with the advent of computers. In this note we will restrict ourselves to the case of the base field Q. Most methods generalize to other fields like Q(t), Qp, IFp(t) or number fields. The results presented here are the work of many mathematicians. I tried to give credit by references wherever possible. 1 Introduction We are given an irreducible polynomial f Q[x] of degree n and asked to determine the Galois group of its splitting field2 L = Spl(f).
    [Show full text]
  • Galois Groups of Cubics and Quartics (Not in Characteristic 2)
    GALOIS GROUPS OF CUBICS AND QUARTICS (NOT IN CHARACTERISTIC 2) KEITH CONRAD We will describe a procedure for figuring out the Galois groups of separable irreducible polynomials in degrees 3 and 4 over fields not of characteristic 2. This does not include explicit formulas for the roots, i.e., we are not going to derive the classical cubic and quartic formulas. 1. Review Let K be a field and f(X) be a separable polynomial in K[X]. The Galois group of f(X) over K permutes the roots of f(X) in a splitting field, and labeling the roots as r1; : : : ; rn provides an embedding of the Galois group into Sn. We recall without proof two theorems about this embedding. Theorem 1.1. Let f(X) 2 K[X] be a separable polynomial of degree n. (a) If f(X) is irreducible in K[X] then its Galois group over K has order divisible by n. (b) The polynomial f(X) is irreducible in K[X] if and only if its Galois group over K is a transitive subgroup of Sn. Definition 1.2. If f(X) 2 K[X] factors in a splitting field as f(X) = c(X − r1) ··· (X − rn); the discriminant of f(X) is defined to be Y 2 disc f = (rj − ri) : i<j In degree 3 and 4, explicit formulas for discriminants of some monic polynomials are (1.1) disc(X3 + aX + b) = −4a3 − 27b2; disc(X4 + aX + b) = −27a4 + 256b3; disc(X4 + aX2 + b) = 16b(a2 − 4b)2: Theorem 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclotomic Extensions
    CYCLOTOMIC EXTENSIONS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction For a positive integer n, an nth root of unity in a field is a solution to zn = 1, or equivalently is a root of T n − 1. There are at most n different nth roots of unity in a field since T n − 1 has at most n roots in a field. A root of unity is an nth root of unity for some n. The only roots of unity in R are ±1, while in C there are n different nth roots of unity for each n, namely e2πik=n for 0 ≤ k ≤ n − 1 and they form a group of order n. In characteristic p there is no pth root of unity besides 1: if xp = 1 in characteristic p then 0 = xp − 1 = (x − 1)p, so x = 1. That is strange, but it is a key feature of characteristic p, e.g., it makes the pth power map x 7! xp on fields of characteristic p injective. For a field K, an extension of the form K(ζ), where ζ is a root of unity, is called a cyclotomic extension of K. The term cyclotomic means \circle-dividing," which comes from the fact that the nth roots of unity in C divide a circle into n arcs of equal length, as in Figure 1 when n = 7. The important algebraic fact we will explore is that cyclotomic extensions of every field have an abelian Galois group; we will look especially at cyclotomic extensions of Q and finite fields. There are not many general methods known for constructing abelian extensions (that is, Galois extensions with abelian Galois group); cyclotomic extensions are essentially the only construction that works over all fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Section V.4. the Galois Group of a Polynomial (Supplement)
    V.4. The Galois Group of a Polynomial (Supplement) 1 Section V.4. The Galois Group of a Polynomial (Supplement) Note. In this supplement to the Section V.4 notes, we present the results from Corollary V.4.3 to Proposition V.4.11 and some examples which use these results. These results are rather specialized in that they will allow us to classify the Ga- lois group of a 2nd degree polynomial (Corollary V.4.3), a 3rd degree polynomial (Corollary V.4.7), and a 4th degree polynomial (Proposition V.4.11). In the event that we are low on time, we will only cover the main notes and skip this supple- ment. However, most of the exercises from this section require this supplemental material. Note. The results in this supplement deal primarily with polynomials all of whose roots are distinct in some splitting field (and so the irreducible factors of these polynomials are separable [by Definition V.3.10, only irreducible polynomials are separable]). By Theorem V.3.11, the splitting field F of such a polynomial f K[x] ∈ is Galois over K. In Exercise V.4.1 it is shown that if the Galois group of such polynomials in K[x] can be calculated, then it is possible to calculate the Galois group of an arbitrary polynomial in K[x]. Note. As shown in Theorem V.4.2, the Galois group G of f K[x] is iso- ∈ morphic to a subgroup of some symmetric group Sn (where G = AutKF for F = K(u1, u2,...,un) where the roots of f are u1, u2,...,un).
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Mathematics a Brief History of Mathematics
    A Brief History of Mathematics A Brief History of Mathematics What is mathematics? What do mathematicians do? A Brief History of Mathematics What is mathematics? What do mathematicians do? http://www.sfu.ca/~rpyke/presentations.html A Brief History of Mathematics • Egypt; 3000B.C. – Positional number system, base 10 – Addition, multiplication, division. Fractions. – Complicated formalism; limited algebra. – Only perfect squares (no irrational numbers). – Area of circle; (8D/9)² Æ ∏=3.1605. Volume of pyramid. A Brief History of Mathematics • Babylon; 1700‐300B.C. – Positional number system (base 60; sexagesimal) – Addition, multiplication, division. Fractions. – Solved systems of equations with many unknowns – No negative numbers. No geometry. – Squares, cubes, square roots, cube roots – Solve quadratic equations (but no quadratic formula) – Uses: Building, planning, selling, astronomy (later) A Brief History of Mathematics • Greece; 600B.C. – 600A.D. Papyrus created! – Pythagoras; mathematics as abstract concepts, properties of numbers, irrationality of √2, Pythagorean Theorem a²+b²=c², geometric areas – Zeno paradoxes; infinite sum of numbers is finite! – Constructions with ruler and compass; ‘Squaring the circle’, ‘Doubling the cube’, ‘Trisecting the angle’ – Plato; plane and solid geometry A Brief History of Mathematics • Greece; 600B.C. – 600A.D. Aristotle; mathematics and the physical world (astronomy, geography, mechanics), mathematical formalism (definitions, axioms, proofs via construction) – Euclid; Elements –13 books. Geometry,
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Fields and Function Fields
    Copyrighted Material 1 Finite Fields and Function Fields In the first part of this chapter, we describe the basic results on finite fields, which are our ground fields in the later chapters on applications. The second part is devoted to the study of function fields. Section 1.1 presents some fundamental results on finite fields, such as the existence and uniqueness of finite fields and the fact that the multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic. The algebraic closure of a finite field and its Galois group are discussed in Section 1.2. In Section 1.3, we study conjugates of an element and roots of irreducible polynomials and determine the number of monic irreducible polynomials of given degree over a finite field. In Section 1.4, we consider traces and norms relative to finite extensions of finite fields. A function field governs the abstract algebraic aspects of an algebraic curve. Before proceeding to the geometric aspects of algebraic curves in the next chapters, we present the basic facts on function fields. In partic- ular, we concentrate on algebraic function fields of one variable and their extensions including constant field extensions. This material is covered in Sections 1.5, 1.6, and 1.7. One of the features in this chapter is that we treat finite fields using the Galois action. This is essential because the Galois action plays a key role in the study of algebraic curves over finite fields. For comprehensive treatments of finite fields, we refer to the books by Lidl and Niederreiter [71, 72]. 1.1 Structure of Finite Fields For a prime number p, the residue class ring Z/pZ of the ring Z of integers forms a field.
    [Show full text]
  • EARLY HISTORY of GALOIS' THEORY of EQUATIONS. the First Part of This Paper Will Treat of Galois' Relations to Lagrange, the Seco
    332 HISTORY OF GALOIS' THEORY. [April, EARLY HISTORY OF GALOIS' THEORY OF EQUATIONS. BY PROFESSOR JAMES PIERPONT. ( Read before the American Mathematical Society at the Meeting of Feb­ ruary 26, 1897.) THE first part of this paper will treat of Galois' relations to Lagrange, the second part will sketch the manner in which Galois' theory of equations became public. The last subject being intimately connected with Galois' life will af­ ford me an opportunity to give some details of his tragic destiny which in more than one respect reminds one of the almost equally unhappy lot of Abel.* Indeed, both Galois and Abel from their earliest youth were strongly attracted toward algebraical theories ; both believed for a time that they had solved the celebrated equation of fifth degree which for more than two centuries had baffled the efforts of the first mathematicians of the age ; both, discovering their mistake, succeeded independently and unknown to each other in showing that a solution by radicals was impossible ; both, hoping to gain the recognition of the Paris Academy of Sciences, presented epoch making memoirs, one of which * Sources for Galois' Life are : 1° Revue Encyclopédique, Paris (1832), vol. 55. a Travaux Mathématiques d Evariste Galois, p. 566-576. It contains Galois' letter to Chevalier, with a short introduction by one of the editors. P Ibid. Nécrologie, Evariste Galois, p. 744-754, by Chevalier. This touching and sympathetic sketch every one should read,. 2° Magasin Pittoresque. Paris (1848), vol. 16. Evariste Galois, p. 227-28. Supposed to be written by an old school comrade, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Galois Theory at Work: Concrete Examples
    GALOIS THEORY AT WORK: CONCRETE EXAMPLES KEITH CONRAD 1. Examples p p Example 1.1. The field extension Q( 2; 3)=Q is Galois of degree 4, so its Galoisp group phas order 4. The elementsp of the Galoisp groupp are determinedp by their values on 2 and 3. The Q-conjugates of 2 and 3 are ± 2 and ± 3, so we get at most four possible automorphisms in the Galois group. Seep Table1.p Since the Galois group has order 4, these 4 possible assignments of values to σ( 2) and σ( 3) all really exist. p p σ(p 2) σ(p 3) p2 p3 p2 −p 3 −p2 p3 − 2 − 3 Table 1. p p Each nonidentity automorphismp p in Table1 has order 2. Since Gal( Qp( 2p; 3)=Q) con- tains 3 elements of order 2, Q( 2; 3) has 3 subfields Ki suchp that [Q( 2p; 3) : Ki] = 2, orp equivalently [Ki : Q] = 4=2 = 2. Two such fields are Q( 2) and Q( 3). A third is Q( 6) and that completes the list. Here is a diagram of all the subfields. p p Q( 2; 3) p p p Q( 2) Q( 3) Q( 6) Q p Inp Table1, the subgroup fixing Q( 2) is the first and secondp row, the subgroup fixing Q( 3) isp the firstp and thirdp p row, and the subgroup fixing Q( 6) is the first and fourth row (since (− 2)(− 3) = p2 3).p p p The effect of Gal(pQ( 2;p 3)=Q) on 2 + 3 is given in Table2.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Galois Fields
    A HISTORY OF GALOIS FIELDS * Frédéric B RECHENMACHER Université d’Artois Laboratoire de mathématiques de Lens (EA 2462) & École polytechnique Département humanités et sciences sociales 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France. ABSTRACT — This paper stresses a specific line of development of the notion of finite field, from Éva- riste Galois’s 1830 “Note sur la théorie des nombres,” and Camille Jordan’s 1870 Traité des substitutions et des équations algébriques, to Leonard Dickson’s 1901 Linear groups with an exposition of the Galois theory. This line of development highlights the key role played by some specific algebraic procedures. These in- trinsically interlaced the indexations provided by Galois’s number-theoretic imaginaries with decom- positions of the analytic representations of linear substitutions. Moreover, these procedures shed light on a key aspect of Galois’s works that had received little attention until now. The methodology of the present paper is based on investigations of intertextual references for identifying some specific collective dimensions of mathematics. We shall take as a starting point a coherent network of texts that were published mostly in France and in the U.S.A. from 1893 to 1907 (the “Galois fields network,” for short). The main shared references in this corpus were some texts published in France over the course of the 19th century, especially by Galois, Hermite, Mathieu, Serret, and Jordan. The issue of the collective dimensions underlying this network is thus especially intriguing. Indeed, the historiography of algebra has often put to the fore some specific approaches developed in Germany, with little attention to works published in France.
    [Show full text]