ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL

MINUTES

25 MAY 2016

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item Subject Page No.

Table of Contents ...... 2

1.0 Meeting Opened ...... 5 2.0 Leave of Absence ...... 5 3.0 Condolences/Get Well Wishes ...... 5 3.1 Condolences/Get Well Wishes ...... 5 4.0 Declaration of any Material personal interests/conflicts of interest by councillors and senior council officers ...... 6 5.0 Mayoral Minute ...... 6 6.0 Confirmation of Minutes ...... 7 6.1 Confirmation of Ordinary Meeting Minutes of 13 April 2016 ...... 7 6.2 Confirmation of Post Election Meeting of 4 May 2016 ...... 7 6.3 Confirmation of Ordinary Meeting Minutes of 11 May 2016 ...... 8 7.0 Business Arising from Minutes ...... 8 8.0 Committee Reports ...... 8 9.0 Deputations/Presentations ...... 8 10.0 Executive Office Reports ...... 9 10.1 Chief Executive Officer's Report ...... 9 10.2 Organisational Structure - May 2016 ...... 22 10.3 Acceptable Request Guidelines ...... 26 10.4 Council Business - Decision Making Framework ...... 35 10.5 Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas ...... 40 10.6 Appointment of Delegates to Organisations and Committees ...... 46 10.7 Suspension of Placement of Temporary Signs Policy ...... 53 10.8 Telstra Corporation Ltd - Renewal of Lease of Part of Lot 2 on SP 270096 & Application of Section 236 Local Government Regulation 2012 Exception...... 56 10.9 Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy ...... 62 10.10 Proposed Lease over Park of Lot 3 on RP25621 to Optus Mobile Pty Ltd - Application of Section 236 (1) (c) (vi) Local Government Regulation 2012 Exception ...... 75 10.11 Urban Utilities Report ...... 81 10.12 Council of Mayors (CoMSEQ) Committee Report ...... 85 10.13 Landcare Inc - Lease of Merryfields Environmental Park & Outdoor Education Centre - Request for Council Assistance and Change of Name ...... 91

Page 2 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

11.0 Organisational Development and Planning Reports ...... 101 11.1 Request for Permissible Change to Amend the Conditions of a Development Permit for Reconfiguration of a Lot for Boundary Realignment (10 lots into 10 lots), on land described as Lot 2 RP222104, Lots 1 & 2 RP161069, Lot 1 RP135140, Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 RP7817, Lots 1 & 3 RP199340 located at 62 Gatton-Laidley Road, Forest Hill ...... 101 11.2 Requirement to Seek Extension for the Finalisation of the Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) ...... 106 11.3 Queensland Audit Office (QAO) Report Flood Resilience of River Catchments ...... 112 11.4 Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning Monthly Update ...... 117 12.0 Corporate and Community Services Reports ...... 124 12.1 Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Budget – 30 April 2016 ...... 124 12.2 April Budget Review and Updated Long Term Financial Plan ...... 146 12.3 Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Charges - 2016/2017 ...... 155 12.4 Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee ...... 240 12.5 Lockyer Valley Sports & Aquatic Centre – Closure for Gatton Show ...... 255 12.6 Kensington Grove Community Kindy – Proposed Name Change ...... 257 12.7 Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Update - April 2016 ...... 260 12.8 Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre Refurbishment Project ...... 275 13.0 Infrastructure Works and Services Reports ...... 282 13.1 Road Safety Concerns - Correspondence received from Minister Bailey MP ...... 282 13.2 Laidley Flood Mitigation - Improvements to Main Drain Channel and Associated Levee Banks ...... 289 13.3 Second Range Crossing - correspondence received from Minister Bailey MP ...... 292 13.4 Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Package 3 ...... 306 13.5 River Catchment Flood Study Overview ...... 329 13.6 Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services Monthly Report ...... 339 14.0 Items for information...... 345 15.0 Confidential Items ...... 345 15.6 Lights on the Hill Event ...... 346 15.1 Application for Lease Renewal over Lot 103 on CA31327 - Airforce Road, Helidon Spa ...... 347 15.2 Legal Update ...... 348 15.3 Sale of Land for arrears of Rates Preliminary to Notice of Intention to Sell ...... 349 15.4 Planning and Environment Court Appeal No. 3793 of 2015 ...... 350 15.5 Cooper Street Drainage ...... 350 16.0 Meeting Closed ...... 351

Page 3 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

ATTENDANCE:

Councillors Present  Cr Tanya Milligan (Mayor) (Chairperson)  Cr Jason Cook  Cr Jim McDonald  Cr Kathy McLean  Cr Janice Holstein  Cr Chris Wilson  Cr Michael Hagan

Officers Present  Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer  Dan McPherson, Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning  David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services  Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services  Jason Cubit, Manager Marketing, Communication & Engagement  Stephen Hart, Manager Executive & Business Services  Susan Boland, Council Business Support Officer  Trevor Boheim, Manager Planning & Environment (part of meeting)  Caitlan Natalier, Legal Services Coordinator/Solicitor (part of meeting)  Richard Collins, Coordinator Environmental Planning (part of meeting)  Corrin Bischoff, Major Projects Officer (part of meeting)

Media Present  Garry Worrall, Gatton Star (part of meeting)  Francis Witsenhuysen, Gatton Star (part of meeting)

Page 4 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

1.0 MEETING OPENED

The meeting commenced at 10.00 am

The Mayor, Cr Milligan as Chairperson opened the meeting and welcomed all present. Pastor Doug Beahan, Gatton Baptist Church led the meeting in prayer, following a minute’s silence for those persons recently deceased.

2.0 LEAVE OF ABSENCE

No Leave Of Absence.

3.0 CONDOLENCES/GET WELL WISHES

3.1 Condolences/Get Well Wishes

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Susan Boland, Council Business Support Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

RESOLUTION THAT letters of condolences be forwarded to the families of the recently deceased persons from within or associated with the .

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0018

CARRIED 7/0

Page 5 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

4.0 DECLARATION OF ANY MATERIAL PERSONAL INTERESTS/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BY COUNCILLORS AND SENIOR COUNCIL OFFICERS

4.1 Declaration of Material Personal Interest on any Item of Business Pursuant to Section 172 of the Local Government Act 2009, a councillor who has a material personal interest in an issue to be considered at a meeting of the local government, or any of its committees must – (a) Inform the meeting of the councillor’s material personal interest in the matter; and (b) Leave the meeting room (including any area set aside for the public), and stay out of the meeting room while the matter is being discussed and voted on.

4.2 Declaration of Conflict of Interest on any Item of Business Pursuant to Section 173 of the Local Government Act 2009, a councillor who has a real or perceived conflict of interest in a matter to be considered at a meeting of the local government, or any of its committees must inform the meeting about the councillor’s personal interest in the matter and if the councillor participates in the meeting in relation to the matter, how the councillor intends to deal with the real or perceived conflict of interest.

Cr McDonald declared a perceived conflict of interest relating to Item 12.8 “Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre Refurbishment Project” (as defined in section 173 of the Local Government Act 2009) based on his place of residence neighbouring the building.

Cr McLean declared a perceived conflict of interest in item 10.7 “Suspension of Placement of Temporary Signs Policy” (as defined in section 173 of the Local Government Act 2009), due to her family business interests being associated with printing and advertising.

5.0 MAYORAL MINUTE

The Mayor noted there would be no Mayoral Minute taken for this meeting. The Mayor invited discussion from Councillors on the purpose of the Mayoral Minute. Following input from Councillors, the Mayor indicated that generally the Mayoral Minute would consist of only those matters for which she considered the Council needed a timely update.

Page 6 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

6.0 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

6.1 Confirmation of Ordinary Meeting Minutes of 13 April 2016

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

RESOLUTION THAT the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of the Lockyer Valley Regional Council held on Wednesday 13 April 2016 be taken as read and confirmed.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr McLean Resolution Number: 16-20/0019

CARRIED 7/0

6.2 Confirmation of Post Election Meeting of 4 May 2016

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

RESOLUTION THAT the Minutes of the Post Election Meeting of the Lockyer Valley Regional Council held on Wednesday 4 May 2016 be taken as read and confirmed.

Moved By: Cr Wilson Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0020

CARRIED 7/0

Page 7 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

6.3 Confirmation of Ordinary Meeting Minutes of 11 May 2016

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

RESOLUTION THAT the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of the Lockyer Valley Regional Council held on Wednesday 11 May 2016 be taken as read and confirmed.

Moved By: Cr Hagan Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0021

CARRIED 7/0

7.0 BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES

No Business Arising from Minutes

8.0 COMMITTEE REPORTS

No Receival of Committee Reports as Minutes

9.0 DEPUTATIONS/PRESENTATIONS

No Deputations/Presentations

Page 8 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.0 EXECUTIVE OFFICE REPORTS

The Mayor, Cr TM Milligan left the meeting at 10:12am The Mayor, Cr TM Milligan returned to the meeting at 10:13am

10.1 Chief Executive Officer's Report

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

This report is to update Council on the key issues currently being actioned and on the significant items of information presently at hand.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT the Chief Executive Officer’s Report be received and adopted.

RESOLUTION THAT the Chief Executive Officer’s Report be received and adopted.

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0022

CARRIED 7/0

As this was the Chief Executive Officer’s final report before retirement the Mayor and Councillors expressed their appreciation to Mr Flint for his service to local government and the community of the Lockyer Valley Region.

It was noted that he provided outstanding service to local government over a career spanning 40 years. His knowledge and support for the community during the flood events of 2011 and 2013 was greatly appreciated. Councillors wish Ian, his wife Megan and their family all the very best in his retirement.

Report

1. Introduction

This report is to update Council on the key issues currently being actioned and on the significant items of information presently at hand.

2. Background

Page 9 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The previous reports provide the background information in the case of matters ongoing and only progress is being reported during the current reporting period on those matters.

3. Report

Local Government Elections – Lockyer Valley Regional Council

With the LVRC elections concluded, Councillors are reminded of their obligations within the disclosure period due to expire imminently. Councillors support is available to assist in meeting those obligations by the due date.

The LGAQ website contains a number of reports such as sitting Mayors and Councillors returned and new candidates elected as Mayors and Councillors. Further information was provided at the recent LGAQ briefing as part of the Councillor Induction process.

As indicated at the Post-Election Meeting a further report is anticipated from the Electoral Commission of Queensland with statistical data and electoral analysis. It is also envisaged that opportunity will be afforded to Council to provide feedback on review of the electoral process.

LGAQ Policy Executive District Representatives Elections

Council has nominated Mayor Paul Pisasale from Ipswich City Council for the LGAQ Policy Executive 2016-2020 for District No.2 (South East) – Western District. The nomination has been submitted by the due date of 24 May 2016. Members elected take up their positions on 30 June 2016.

ALGA National General Assembly

The 2016 National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government is being held at the National Convention Centre in Canberra from 19 to 22 June.

The Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition have been invited to attend. The theme for the 2016 NGA is Partners in an Innovative and Prosperous Australia. The program will be focused on debating and discussing the role that Local Government can and does play in boosting productivity and showcasing innovation and best- practice.

The ALGA Board has also called for motions for the 2016 NGA under the theme of “Partners in an Innovative and Prosperous Australia”. This theme reflects the renewed focus across all levels of government on the roles and responsibilities of the public sector and the challenge of meeting our communities’ needs. LVRC has submitted five motions listed below. A copy of the full submission is available for Council’s information.

Motion 1 That the ALGA call on the Commonwealth Government to increase funding for the appropriate Agency to properly resource the integration into our local communities of migrant workers, refugees and members of other minority groups.

Motion 2

Page 10 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

That the ALGA lobby the Commonwealth to further investigate options to conduct elections electronically at Commonwealth, State and local Government levels.

Motion 3 That the ALGA lobby the Australian Government to streamline additional targeted funding directly to local governments.

Motion 4

That the ALGA to seek increased local government and regional representation on International Trade Missions to give our industries a voice to directly seek opportunities for economic growth.

Motion 5 That the ALGA lobby the Australian government to provide specific funding for flood and other natural disaster mitigation projects to protect communities impacted by natural disasters.

Federal Budget

The ALGA has provided comment as follows:- “The 2016-17 Federal budget handed down this week was in line with broad expectations and saw some substantial changes to taxation to address revenue shortfalls but little in the way of new spending initiatives, with the Government reserving its options in advance of the Federal election expected to be set for 2 July over the next few days. There was no explicit statement on ending the freeze of indexation for Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs), but the budget out-years did indicate an expectation that indexation would return from 2017-18. Although this indication is a step in the right direction, it does not guarantee an end to the freeze. ALGA will continue to reiterate the sector's call for a public commitment to restore the FAGs indexation from all political parties as we approach the election. The budget included assurances to maintain spending on infrastructure with major funding commitments in public transport identified and other commitments of great interest to our sector, including:  the decision to increase Roads to Recovery funding by $50 million per year to $400 million per year from 2019-20, which also implicitly confirms the continuation of the program beyond 2018-19  the continuation of the Black Spot Programme with the Government committing $60 million per year from 2019-20  a commitment of $60 million per year from 2019-20 to continue the Bridges Renewal Program. These extra funds will certainly be welcomed in helping to address the challenge of maintaining more than 640,000 kilometres of roads, and help to address access, productivity and road safety issues - particularly in regional areas. However, we need action and commitment sooner rather than later to help local communities build economic resilience by investing in infrastructure, investing in job creation and providing continued support for essential community services. ALGA's election plan, Local Government’s Plan for an Innovative and Prosperous Australia, includes strategies which, if implemented, could add an estimated $7.46 billion to national GDP and create an estimated 19,300 local jobs over three years. ALGA is calling for all major parties and candidates in the upcoming election to support local government and community priorities by backing this plan in the lead up to the election”.

Page 11 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The LGAQ has also provided a detailed analysis of the Federal Budget on its website.

Federal Election

The Prime Minister has announced that a federal election will occur on 2 July 2016, and the government commenced the caretaker period from 9.00am Monday 9 May 2016 when the House of Representatives was dissolved until such time as the election result is clear or, if there is a change of government, until the new government is appointed.

During the caretaker period, the routine business of government continues and ordinary matters of administration still need to be addressed. However, the Government is expected to avoid:  making major policy decisions that are likely to commit an incoming Government;  making significant appointments; and  entering major contracts or undertakings.

Election advocacy plans have been circulated by ALGA, LGAQ and Council of Mayors(SEQ) for Council’s consideration.

National Stronger Regions Fund – GWIZ

As resolved by Council at the 11 May 2016 Ordinary Meeting, the Federal Government has been notified of the incoming Council’s indicative support to provide partnership funding for the Gatton West Industrial Zone project as submitted under Round 3 of the National Stronger Regions Fund. As the Federal Government is under caretaker arrangements, it is expected that assessment of the grant applications will be undertaken at the administrative level, however any announcement regarding successful applications will only be made after the election has been concluded.

State Government

On 6 May 2016, Tim Nicholls MP was elected the Queensland Opposition Leader and on 9 May he announced the new Queensland Shadow Ministry. The key members of the new Shadow Ministry for local government are:

 Tim Nicholls MP - Leader of the Opposition  Deb Frecklington MP – Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Infrastructure, State Development, Trade and Investment  Andrew Powell MP, Shadow Minister for Transport and Main Roads and Shadow Minister for Local Government

Key members of the state government for councils are:  Hon Annastacia Palaszczuk MP - Premier  Hon Jacklyn (Jackie) Trad MP - Deputy Premier, Minister for Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning  Hon Mark Bailey MP - Minister for Main Roads  Ms Jennifer Howard MP- Assistant Minister for Local Government

Councillor Complaints Process Revamp

Page 12 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Correspondence has been received from Dr David Solomon AM advising that The Deputy Premier, The Hon Jackie Trad MP, has appointed an independent panel to review the policy and framework for complaints about the conduct of local government Councillors. The panel is to provide a report to the Government with recommendations on any changes in policy, legislation, procedures and operations to achieve an effective and efficient framework for the administration of complaints about local government Councillor’s conduct.

The panel is chaired by Dr David Solomon AM, a former Integrity Commissioner. The other members are Mr Noel Playford, nominated by the Local Government Association and Mr Gary Kellar, nominated by the Local Government Managers Australia, Queensland.

The panel intends to circulate an issues paper that will be made available to the public and all interested parties to which Council will also be invited to respond. In preparing that paper, the panel invites Council’s and/or individual Councillors to provide any comments or information about the operation of the present system for dealing with complaints about the conduct of local government Councillors and any matters concerning changes in policy, legislation, procedures and operations that the panel should consider in preparing the issues paper.

Responses are to be addressed to the Councillor Complaints Review Panel to be received by 3 June 2016.

A copy of the Deputy Premier’s media statement released on 21 April 2016 and a copy of the Terms of Reference for the Review Panel are available for Council’s information.

Queensland Grants Commission

The Queensland Government has newly appointed the Commission with the following membership:

Pam Parker (Chairperson) – Former Mayor of Council Stephen Johnston (Deputy Chairperson) – Deputy Director-General, Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Ann Bunnell – (Member) - former Councillor and Deputy Mayor of Townsville City Council Donna Stewart – (Member) - former Mayor of Balonne Shire Council Brendan McNamara – (Member) - former Mayor of Flinders Shire Council Janelle Menzies – (Member) Chief Executive Officer of Yarrabah Aboriginal Shire Council Michael Meehan (Executive Officer) – Department of Infrastructure Local Government and Planning

The Commission’s primary responsibility is the equitable distribution of the Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grant (FAG), which totalled approximately $450.7 million in 2015–16, for all of Queensland, bearing in mind that it is a fixed pool of funding for allocations between Queensland’s 77 local government bodies. As with previous Commissions, they will be periodically visiting councils over the three-year term of the Commission.

The Commission urges Council’s to be aware of the issue of population undercounts and of the importance of every member of the community completing the Census on 9 August for a number of purposes including the FAG calculation (and other funding) for each council. The Commission also draws Councils attention to the annual Consolidated Data Collection,

Page 13 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

distributed by the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning, generally in August. This collection is vital in the annual calculation of the FAG distribution, particularly the section dealing with road data is to be completed as accurately as possible.

Finance and Administration Committee, Queensland Parliament

The Committee be will be holding regional hearings regarding the Inquiry into the practices of the labour hire industry in Queensland from 6-9 June 2016 including at the Lockyer Valley Cultural Centre, Gatton on Monday 6 June 2016. Council is reminded of the submission which was submitted on 6 April 2016 in relation to this matter.

Regional Development Update

Lakeview Accommodation – Room Motel The project is currently on time and within budget, with Council to complete bulk works as per scheduled milestone date with formal handover of the site to the builder due by the end of May. Completion of remaining works storm water, road construction and footpaths are due for completion at the end of July. Construction of building works will be due to commence by June 30 with the motel still on schedule for opening November/ December.

TAFE SouthWest – Lockyer Valley TAFE Services

Regional Development continues to work with directors from TAFE Southwest to establish a greater TAFE presence in the Lockyer Valley. Discussions have been positive and officers continue to work towards a TAFE presence in the Lockyer Valley.

Business and Training Awards 2016

Currently seeking sponsorship for the Awards with some early success in confirming sponsorships. Work has commenced on preparing the Nomination documentation, and the project plan and timelines for delivery of the full Awards process.

Neilsen’s Place / Incubator Update

 A retro and vintage pop up in Neilsen’s Place has been organised to operate during the Chrome & Clutter Festival on the 25 & 26 June and space is almost booked out, with only one stall remaining. Regular traders in Neilsen’s Place will also open for the weekend festival to take advantage of the expected visitors.  An Artisan pop-up is also planned for the Spring Festival in September, facilitator has appointed to assist to co-ordinate the additional visiting retailers in Neilsen’s Place for Spring Festival.  Following the success of April’s Meet Up morning tea in the Digital Work Space – it is planned to continue regular networking Meet Up’s with guest speakers and business mentors to support local business and promote the use of the Digital Work Space. In May the guest speaker is Mel Kettle, from Melkettle Consulting, who will share practical low cost marketing tips (online and offline) with the group. Mel Kettle is a communication and social media strategist, speaker, blogger, educator and board member. She has over 20 year’s professional experience, a Master of Business in Marketing and a Master of Public Health.

Page 14 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 Council Hosted a visit from representatives from Boonah Chamber of Commerce to look at the Incubator and discuss the project learnings. Interest from Boonah was sparked due to the praises being given by Graham Neilsen on the concept and use in the Lockyer Valley.

Queensland Week – Shop Local to win tickets to State of Origin 2016

Following the success of Shop Local during Queensland Week last year, the concept is being repeated again this year. Queensland week runs from 4 to 12 June with prize of 4 tickets to Queensland’s only State of Origin game as the winning prize for a lucky shopper and a participating business. Information and entry forms will be distributed to local businesses in the week leading up to 4 June 2016, and a print and radio campaign to encourage shopping local in the Lockyer Valley.

COMSEQ SEQ Investment Attraction Website:

COMSEQ have develop a South East Queensland Region Investment Attraction website which is due to go live in the next week. Regional Development has completed the training and are uploading our region’s content which will include projects seeking investment and success stories. Each Council will be responsible for ensuring that their projects are kept up to date and COMSEQ will also use the information to produce and print the SEQ Investment Prospectus on an annual basis.

Marketing Communication and Engagement Update

Media

 The Corporate Communications section of MCE has been heavily engaged with local media outlets promoting both Council activities and the wider Lockyer Valley.  Recent media activity has included coverage of:  Heavy Horse event  Weekly promotion of region with Mayor on River 949  Progression of motel development on WIN, Seven Toowoomba and Gatton Star  Swearing in of new Council on WIN, Seven Toowoomba and Gatton Star  Coverage of latest water meeting on Seven Toowoomba and WIN  Stories covering Mayor’s profile on WIN and Seven Toowoomba  Coverage of recent food famil with Lockyer Valley Food Ambassador Alastair McLeod on WIN and Seven Toowoomba  Coverage of Council organised skate events on WIN and Seven Toowoomba  Media releases were also written and picked up on:  Digital Champion, Laidley Business Incubator tenant Shop My Town has been announced as an Advance Queensland Community Digital Champion.  Storytime, On Wednesday 25 May, children Australia-wide will enjoy a delightful rendition of the children’s book “I Got This Hat” as part of National Simultaneous Storytime.  Harmony Day, This year’s Lockyer Multicultural Festival is set to once again showcase the many different cultural backgrounds that call the region home.  Meet up morning tea, Communication and social media strategist, Mel Kettle will be on hand to discuss all things “business” at a Meet-up Morning Tea, to be held later this month.  QLD Week, Lockyer Valley residents are encouraged to shop local for their chance to score tickets to Queensland’s only State of Origin game.

Page 15 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 Mayoral Speech comp, Mikayla Shea and Molly Pitkin took out this year’s top prize in front of guests at the Lockyer Valley Cultural Centre on Sunday afternoon.  A number of additional stories have been pitched and will be taken up by local media outlets.

Tourism, Marketing and Events

 Great South East promotion  The region was thrilled to have Lockyer Valley Food Ambassador Alastair McLeod and Laidley Local Tony Tierney in the region recently filming for a special Great South East segment promoting the Lockyer Valley and a producers dinner being held at Tony’s Ocean View Estate Winery at Mt Mee. The pair visited Bauer’s Organic Farm and a number of other farms in the region for the filming. The segment is expected to go on air prior to the producer’s dinner on June 25.

Food Bloggers Media Famil

 On Sunday May 15 Council partnered with Brisbane Marketing to bring a number of well- known food bloggers and instagrammers into the region to give them the Lockyer Valley experience. The group visited Schulte’s Meat Tavern before sitting down to a Ploughman’s Lunch on the farm at Bauer’s Organic Farm followed by a visit to Thornton Lavender Farm and dinner an accommodation at Branell Homestead in Laidley. Alastair McLeod played host for the day and cooked dinner at Branell’s. The visit will enable Brisbane Marketing to use imagery and footage taken by the MCE Team in the lead-up to the Regional Flavours event at South Bank on July 16 and 17. Plans are being finalised for the Lockyer Valley’s involvement at the event.

EKKA Rural Discovery Day

 Last Thursday May 19 Council participated in the Brisbane EKKA’s Rural Discovery Day. Rural Discovery Day sees primary students celebrate and experience first-hand the best that Queensland's primary industries has to offer. With a robotic dairy, cotton classrooms and everyone's favourite barnyard babies, RQS Rural Discovery Day is the perfect pre- Ekka excitement students look forward to every year. In a unique hands-on learning experience, students taste fresh fruit and produce, milk cows and pot seeds all while discovering how their foods gets from paddock to plate through the help of real life farmers. Council officers were on hand teaching the hundreds of school students in attendance from across Brisbane all about where their fresh produce is grown, the beautiful Lockyer Valley.

Citizenship Ceremony

 A Citizenship Ceremony was held last Thursday May 19 and officiated at by Mayor Tanya Milligan which saw 5 people take the pledge to become Australian Citizens.

Community Engagement

 Council’s Community Engagement Team has been closely engaging with backpackers from across the region by running a series of free monthly backpackers BBQ’s in Centenary Park in Gatton. Council has engaged with hundreds of backpackers during the

Page 16 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

course of these events with a number of key themes being identified for Council’s possible advocacy on their behalf, and on behalf of local farming families, one of which being the so-called “Backpacker tax”. The tax has certainly become an issue in the Federal election campaign and the Mayor is set to write to the Federal Member on behalf of the region’s backpackers and farming families regarding the impact the tax could have on the vegetable growing industry across the region.

Advocacy Update

Intention to postpone expiry of the Moreton, Logan Basin and Gold Coast water resource plans

The Issue: The Lockyer Valley Growers were concerned about the impact of changes to water allocations under the Central Lockyer Valley Water Supply Scheme.

Background: The Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines had plans to convert 315 surface water and groundwater entitlements to tradeable volumetric water allocations. The department planned to introduce volumetric water allocations to parts of the Lockyer Valley, and growers claimed the changes to proposed volumes would mean they will lose between 30 and 50 per cent of the water they would normally access. Growers Group representative Anthony Staatz stated the “impact would be massive”. The loss the growers were facing with the proposed increase in costs was considered substantial and concerns of growers leaving the industry to go to less costly production of Lucerne and Hay fodder where important as well.

Many of the farmers were not aware of the change and when Council become aware of the change the late Mayor Jones started to make this topic become public and by using media informed many in the community that this change was occurring. If this had not been made public community consultations and community awareness may not have been achieved.

Speaking with those affected by the change the late Mayor’s concerns were raised with the Minister for Natural Resources and Mines Hon Dr. Anthony Lynham and Agricultural Minister Leanne Donaldson. A socio-economic impact study was prepared and submitted to the minister for his consideration as well as a request for further detailed studies could be made to measure the impact of the proposed changes. Over 150 submissions were made from the Lockyer Valley to the Department of Natural Resources and Mines regarding these changes.

Our role in the initial stage was to make the public aware of the issue and help advocate. Since the final submissions closed back in January the Lockyer Water Users Group (LWUF) has formed and taken the lead on community engagement and advocacy for any future changes.

Current Status: The Minister for Natural Resources and Mines intends to postpone the expiry of the Water Resource (Moreton) Plan 2007 to the 14th of December to 2016. In order to do this the Minister must make public notice and open this up for submission. This letter is the notification of that public notice and we would have received this as we were involved.

Key Considerations: We can reasonably infer that the amendments to the Central Lockyer Water Supply Scheme will not be in place before September 2017 (the original expiry date)

Page 17 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

and will now be sometime later. Amendments are still able to go ahead and be implemented at any time. This means that it is not clear as they have not ruled out implementation but have delayed. This might be the case that metering has been implemented across the state and the government must not back down to ‘save face’ or they might be taking a step back due to the community objection which has forced them to take some time to implement.

Conclusion and/or Recommendations: It has been noted and those involved (Growers group, Water Users group etc.) have been notified of this and there is no further action required by Council at this stage. The Lockyer Water Users group are taking the lead with this and Council are in contact with them.

Forward Calendar

The calendar for the period June to December 2016 is presented as attached for Council’s information. It is noted that the ALGA National General Assembly in June and the LGAQ Civic Leaders Summit in July clash with Council Meeting dates. The 25 July has been set aside for Special Meeting to adopt the 2016/17 Budget.

CEO Farewell

With the newly Council duly inducted and the business of Council transitioned, I retire as CEO at the end of my contract on 27 May 2016. I am encouraged by the new regime of Mayor and Councillors and wish them well in the service and betterment of the Lockyer Valley Region over the term ahead. I thank Council, the Executive Leadership Team and our staff across the organisation for the many achievements together in a relatively short period of time. I look forward to the new Council and the new CEO guiding the Lockyer Valley further towards a secure and sustainable future in its own right.

Attachments 1View Forward Calendar June to December 2016

Page 18 Chief Executive Officer's Report Attachment 1 Forward Calendar June to December 2016

Attachment 1 10.1 Page 19

Chief Executive Officer's Report Attachment 1 Forward Calendar June to December 2016

Attachment 1 10.1 Page 20

Chief Executive Officer's Report Attachment 1 Forward Calendar June to December 2016

Attachment 1 10.1 Page 21

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.2 Organisational Structure - May 2016

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Corrin Bischoff, Major Projects Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

The purpose of this report is to seek the endorsement from the incoming Council of the current Lockyer Valley Regional Council’s organisational structure. This structure has been established by the Chief Executive Officer to effectively undertake the operational requirements of the organisation.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council adopts the high level Organisational Structure, May 2016.

RESOLUTION THAT Council adopts the high level Organisational Structure, May 2016.

Moved By: Cr McLean Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0023

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

There is a legislative requirement for Queensland local governments to adopt by resolution an organisational structure required to meet the responsibilities of Council. In addition, seeking this resolution provides the basis on which resources should be allocated to the Chief Executive Officer to achieve these responsibilities.

2. Background

In accordance with section 196 of the Local Government Act 2009: (1) A local government must, by resolution, adopt an organisational structure that is appropriate to the performance of the local government’s responsibilities. (2) The local government may employ local government employees for the performance of the local government responsibilities. (3) The chief executive officer appoints local government employees (other than senior executive employees).

In 2011, a significant restructure of the Lockyer Valley Regional Council organisation was undertaken to meet the current and future needs of the Council. This restructure anticipated the need to refine the structure over the next three to five-year period. A further restructure was initiated in the second half of 2015 and implemented from January 2016 with further

Page 22 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

modification in May 2016. The May 2016 Organisational Structure reflects the finalisation of the 2011 strategy in addition to specific efficiency and productivity measures required for the long term financial sustainability of Council.

3. Report

A focus on an organisational restructure was developed over the second half of 2015 and into the first half of 2016 to ensure that a structure was developed and implemented which adequately reflected the needs of the organisation in meeting its service demands within budget constraints.

This latest restructure has seen the reduction of the Executive Managers from five (5) members to three (3). This change has required a realignment of the responsibilities of each Executive Manager and the Chief Executive Officer. This reduction in the number of Executive Managers has been accompanied by a revision of the management arrangements applying to functional units within each Group. This has resulted in a decrease in the number of full-time equivalent staff.

A full review of service levels in each business unit is being undertaken to determine not only the range, level, cost and sustainability of each service area but also the most appropriate level of management required to achieve the agreed service levels.

The adoption of the new organisational structure will be supported by the long term financial strategy and provides the platform for short and medium term budget considerations.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Adoption of the organisational structure by Council complies with the requirements of s196 of the Local Government Act 2009. Any future policy and legal implications will be addressed as matters arise before Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Budget and resource implications will continue to be addressed through existing allocations. The reduction in staff numbers and specifically the reduction in the number of Executive Managers has resulted in significant savings for Council.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report. The Chief Executive Officer will manage requirements in line with existing delegations.

7. Communication and Engagement

The adopted formal organisational structure of Council will be published on the Council website and intranet.

8. Conclusion

The new organisational structure at the high level presents opportunities for continued improvement in the organisation’s performance and effectiveness in providing services to the

Page 23 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

community. Formal adoption by Council of the high level structure as proposed provides the platform for immediate and longer term budgetary considerations.

9. Action/s

The adopted organisational structure is to provide the basis for 2016/17 budget deliberations and forward financial planning over the Council term.

Attachments 1View Org Chart Overview 1 Page

Page 24 Organisational Structure - May 2016 Attachment 1 Org Chart Overview

Attachment 1 10.2 Page 25

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.3 Acceptable Request Guidelines

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Corrin Bischoff, Major Projects Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s approval of the updated Councillor Acceptable Requests Guidelines.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council approves the Councillor Acceptable Request Guidelines, May 2016.

RESOLUTION THAT Council approves the Councillor Acceptable Request Guidelines, May 2016.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Cook Resolution Number: 16-20/0024

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

The development and approval of Acceptable Request Guidelines is a statutory requirement for Queensland Local Government. An updated version of this document has been drafted for adoption by the new Council.

2. Background

In accordance with s170A(6) of the Local Government Act 2009, Council is required to adopt by resolution acceptable requests guidelines. The acceptable requests guidelines are adopted by resolution of the local government, about— (a) the way in which a councillor may ask a local government employee for advice to help the councillor carry out his or her responsibilities under this Act; and (b) reasonable limits on requests that a councillor may make.

After organisational restructure or at the commencement of a new term of Council, these guidelines are reviewed to ensure the officers listed remain relevant and the process required to be followed is acceptable to Councillors and the Chief Executive Officer.

Page 26 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

3. Report

The Acceptable Request Guidelines document is developed to provide clear guidelines when a Councillor asks an employee for advice, to assist them carry out their responsibilities and when Councillors request to be provided with information, that the Council has access to, relating to Council business.

The Acceptable Request Guidelines document lists the title of the officers from which Councillors are able to seek advice and access information. The Guidelines also outline the process via which these requests should be made.

Communication between Councillors and employees must;  Be conducted in accordance with s4(2) of the Local Government Act 2009;  Comply with the law and Council policies, procedures and guidelines;  Be conducted in good faith; and  Be conducted in a respectful, reasonable and professional manner.

An allegation of a breach of this guideline by a Councillor (including the Mayor) will be dealt with in accordance with sections 176 – 182 of the Local Government Act 2009.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Council’s policy framework has been adhered to in the development and review of the document outlined in this report. The guideline complies with the requirements of relevant legislation. Any future policy and legal implications will be addressed as matters arise before Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Budget and resource implications will continue to be addresses through existing allocations. The content of this guideline does not alter current budgetary requirements.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report. The Chief Executive Officer will manage requirements in line with existing delegations.

7. Communication and Engagement

The following officers were engaged in the review and drafting of the Guidelines addressed in this report:  Chief Executive Officer  Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services  Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services  Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning Services.

8. Conclusion

The Acceptable Request Guidelines outlined in this report has been developed and reviewed in line with relevant legislation and Council practice.

Page 27 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

9. Action/s

The approved guidelines will be updated in Council’s procedure register and published as appropriate on the intranet and internet.

Attachments 1View Acceptable Request Guidelines

Page 28 Acceptable Request Guidelines Attachment 1 Acceptable Request Guidelines

Attachment 1 10.3 Page 29

Acceptable Request Guidelines Attachment 1 Acceptable Request Guidelines

Attachment 1 10.3 Page 30

Acceptable Request Guidelines Attachment 1 Acceptable Request Guidelines

Attachment 1 10.3 Page 31

Acceptable Request Guidelines Attachment 1 Acceptable Request Guidelines

Attachment 1 10.3 Page 32

Acceptable Request Guidelines Attachment 1 Acceptable Request Guidelines

Attachment 1 10.3 Page 33

Acceptable Request Guidelines Attachment 1 Acceptable Request Guidelines

Attachment 1 10.3 Page 34

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.4 Council Business - Decision Making Framework

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Stephen Hart, Manager Executive Business Services Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

At the commencement of this Council term it is timely to review the current decision making framework and meeting structure to ensure it is the most effective for conducting Council business.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolves to adopt the following Council Meeting structure for its decision making framework to be effective from June 2016:  Workshops – 1st Tuesday of the month  Ordinary Meeting – 2nd Wednesday of the month  Tours/Inspections – 3rd Tuesday of the month  Ordinary Meeting – 4th Wednesday of the month  Special Meetings (as per LGA Provisions) - as required.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to adopt the following Council Meeting structure for its decision making framework to be effective from June 2016:  Workshops – 1st Tuesday of the month  Ordinary Meeting – 2nd Wednesday of the month  Tours/Inspections – 3rd Tuesday of the month  Ordinary Meeting – 4th Wednesday of the month  Special Meetings (as per LGA Provisions) - as required. And further; THAT Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to investigate options to enable regional community engagement in the process of Council business.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0025

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

Council meetings are the linchpin of local government democracy. These are where key decisions are made. Councils set their policies, adopt their corporate plans, approve and adopt budgets and make local laws in meetings. The business of Council is to be conducted through Page 35 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

meetings as a legislative requirement. Council meetings are the principal decision making forum. They are the prime example of accountable and transparent decision making by local government.

2. Background

In January 2015, Council adopted the Decision Making Framework to include 2 Ordinary Meetings per month to enhance decision making and debate on key strategic issues. This was in addition to the use of a workshop to discuss matters and seek feedback to assist with reporting for decision making.

Workshops Workshops have been held on the 1st Tuesday of the month and occur between the Councillors, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Managers with officers attending to address matters as required. The workshops are discussions forums only, for information sharing and direction guidance. As workshops are not formal meetings, they are not open to the public. These workshops are scheduled to be day sessions. In addition, strategic presentations are made to Council at these workshops and not at the Ordinary meetings.

Tours/Inspections Tours/Inspections have been held on the 4th Tuesday of the month and are attended by Councillors and where applicable the CEO, relevant Executive Managers and Officers depending on the nature of the issues to be considered. Generally these issues relate to matters that have a physical aspect such as planning, land, infrastructure or works. Tours/Inspections cover items where a physical inspection will assist with context and an understanding of relevant issues prior to decision making.

Ordinary Meetings The Ordinary Meeting of Council is a formalised meeting process considering the reports and recommendations from officers or other committees (eg Audit & Risk Management Committee, Local Disaster Management Group). These reports are provided for formal consideration and decision. The Ordinary Meeting is for consideration of Council business at the discretion of the CEO in consultation with the Mayor. There is limited opportunity for other business to be raised in the Ordinary meetings as there are other forums for matters to be raised directly with the CEO or Council. The Ordinary Meetings of Council are open to the public, with the provision for closed sessions as required.

Special Meetings Any matters that require urgent discussion and decision of Council would be dealt with through the provisions of the Local Government Act for special meetings. The CEO and Mayor would determine the need and timing of any special meeting. Business is confined to that purpose/s for which the Special Meeting is called.

3. Report

Open and transparent meeting procedures underpin representative democracy and ensure public confidence in Council’s decision making processes. As such, every effort should be taken to ensure that all meetings, workshops and information sharing procedures follow best practice standards.

Page 36 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The encouragement of open and transparent local government is viewed as a desirable objective in improving the integrity of local government, and this is underpinned by the local government principles contained within Section 4 of the Local Government Act 2009.

Councillors also should be conscious of the need to handle council information in a way that promotes and maintains the public’s trust and confidence in the integrity of the local government. Mishandling of information that should be treated confidentially could harm or compromise the interests of Council or someone else; for example, by enabling an individual or organisation to gain a financial advantage.

All matters presented to Council via an agenda will clearly indicate if any matter is confidential, and that all information relevant to the matter is to be treated as confidential to Council. The reasons for classifying the information as confidential will be outlined in the material provided with the agenda.

Councillors may participate in four (4) types of formal meetings:  Post-election Meeting  Ordinary local government or Council Meeting – to conduct core business  Committee Meetings – standing committees are established by some local governments to oversee specific functions  Special local government Meeting – may be called to address an urgent item of business.

Meeting and Decision Making Structures

Across Queensland and Australia there are a variety of meeting and decision making structures in use. A review of a number of the most common structures was conducted to determine the most effective format for Lockyer Valley Regional Council decision making.

There are a number of benefits to the use of a workshop in the decision making process. Such a workshop enables a briefing session and allows councillors the opportunity to more effectively discuss and debate complex issues without the constraints of a formal meeting. A workshop provides an opportunity for officers to inform Councillors of strategic matters and to canvass direction on specific issues. Workshops also provide councillors with the opportunity to seek clarification on key issues. A workshop or briefing session is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer.

Presentation and discussion of confidential matters in a workshop or briefing session are governed by the Councillor Confidentiality Procedure as with all confidential matters discussed at any meeting type. A workshop is not a decision making forum and councillors should refrain from participating in the formation of decisions at these sessions.

Lockyer Valley Regional Council currently conducts two Ordinary Meetings per month along with a workshop and tour/inspection . The combination provides a formal structure for decision making and processes followed in line with meeting protocols. There is a high level of transparency with 2 meetings open to the public each month. If matters are confidential the meeting may go into a closed session to discuss the matter and then return to open forum to make any associated decision. The workshop provides an additional benefit of frank discussion of issues and the development of alternate options.

Page 37 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

There are costs associated with meeting and workshop preparation and reporting. The model of two meetings and a workshop each month (and the associated agendas and minutes preparation) does have time and resourcing implications.

Alternate models used in a number of local governments (often larger Councils) involve variations of a standing committee approach. This model is not recommended for Lockyer Valley but is included for completeness. Under this model a range of committees are established with a Councillor Chair. Each of these Committees may include a subset or all Councillors. Councillors may be on a number of such Committees. Under this model, these Committees meet on a regular basis and in compliance with legislative requirements. Each Committee would require agenda papers and minutes and then would make recommendations to the Ordinary Meeting for decision making. In the absence of an additional workshop, each of the Committee Meetings may need closed sessions to deal with confidential items. This may not provide a satisfactory perception of open and transparent government.

Council has adopted a Portfolio rather than standing committee approach and a separate report on Portfolios will be provide for Councils consideration.

Based on the above analysis and on the review of other structures in place in other Councils of a similar size to Lockyer Valley, it is recommended that the current structure remain to provide a stronger focus on strategic matters being dealt with through the formal meeting structure and to ensure compliance with the confidentiality of the information being discussed. This will provide a more effective forum to address the advocacy platform that has been developed and ensure that the direction of Council’s strategic initiatives remains a focus for the whole of Council.

It is also considered that the first Ordinary Meeting of the month (2nd Wednesday) be intended for the consideration of Portfolios Reports, considered along with Executive Managers Reports and other monthly reports to Council. The meeting would have a more strategic focus. Advocacy matters and approaches could also be considered. Deputations and visitations also could be entertained. The second Ordinary Meeting of the month (4th Wednesday) is intended for more core business decision making.

A special meeting is a meeting at which the only business that may be conducted is stated in the notice of meeting. Normally, the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer will agree that a special meeting is required, and the Chief Executive Officer will organise the agenda and notification for councillors.

It is proposed that Council resolves to adopt the following Council Meeting structure for its decision making framework (to be effective from June 2016).

o Workshops – 1st Tuesday of the month o Ordinary Meeting – 2nd Wednesday of the month o Tours/Inspections – 3rd Tuesday of the month o Ordinary Meeting – 4th Wednesday of the month o Special Meetings (as per LGA Provisions) - as required.

This will enable a cycle of decision making with the workshopping of options, preparation of reports, inspection on a tour if required, consideration of the matter at a meeting for a decision followed by the implementation of the decision and reporting back to Council.

Page 38 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

4. Policy and Legal Implications

It is essential that Council remain consistent with the local laws and the code of meeting practice. The proposed process will continue to comply with the requirements of the legislation.

5. Financial and Resource Implications . Costs associated with governance of Council decision making are budgeted each year as core business. It is considered that the recommended process of decision making will lead to well informed, legislatively compliant decisions that will lead to better decisions and the effective utilisation of resources across council

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No additional delegations are required as this can be managed through existing delegations and standing orders. The Chief Executive Officer has current delegations and the existing policies provide advice and guidance to address any necessary changes.

7. Communication and Engagement

There are statutory obligations upon Council in respect of advertising Council’s ordinary and special meetings. Any changes to the meetings structure will be communicated through the normal channels.

8. Conclusion

The recommended process of decision making will lead to well informed, legislatively compliant decisions. It is considered that this is the most appropriate and effective format for Lockyer Valley Regional Council and its implementation will lead to better decisions and the effective utilisation of resources across council.

9. Action/s

Council adopt the following Council Meeting structure for its decision making framework (to be effective from June 2016.

o Workshops – 1st Tuesday of the month o Ordinary Meeting – 2nd Wednesday of the month o Tours/Inspections – 3rd Tuesday of the month o Ordinary Meeting – 4th Wednesday of the month o Special Meetings (as per LGA Provisions) - as required.

Page 39 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.5 Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

This report is to confirm the Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas for the Council term 2012-2016. The adoption of a portfolio model will allow Council the opportunity to focus energy toward key strategic areas and form alliances with the Executive Leadership Team to deliver outcomes.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT the Council resolve to adopt the Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas as shown:

Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas Councillor Lead Portfolio Focus Areas Executive Leadership Team Member Lead Mayor Councillor Milligan Civic Leadership/Regional  Communication, CEO Development Promotion and Advocacy  Intergovernmental and Media Relations  Economic Development  Agribusiness  Tourism and Events  Community Engagement  Disaster Management

Councillor Wilson Finance + Technology  Business Systems and Executive Manager Processes Corporate and Community  Corporate Plans and Services Performance  Finance David Lewis  Information, Communication and Technology (ICT) Councillor Holstein Infrastructure  Roads and Drainage Executive Manager  Parks & Gardens Infrastructure Works and  Transport & Active Services Transport  Asset Management Myles Fairbairn Councillor McLean Planning  Planning and Building Executive Manager Services Organisational Development  Planning Scheme and Planning Services  Townships and Villages cultural heritage and Dan McPherson streetscape  Regional Planning Councillor McDonald Environment  Environmental Executive Manager Management Organisational Development  Weed/Pest and Planning Services

Page 40 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Management  Waterways Dan McPherson  Natural Resource & Management Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services

Myles Fairbairn Deputy Mayor Councillor Recreation/Amenity &  Sport and Recreation Executive Manager Cook Facilities  Community Facilities Corporate and Community  Health and Waste Services Management  Animal Management David Lewis & Executive Manager Organisational Development and Planning Services

Dan McPherson Councillor Hagan Community Development  Arts and Culture Executive Manager  Youth and Corporate and Community Disability/Multicultural Services  Public Safety  Customer Service David Lewis  Community Services & Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services

Myles Fairbairn

RESOLUTION THAT the Council resolve to adopt the Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas as shown:

Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas Councillor Lead Portfolio Focus Areas Executive Leadership Team Member Lead Mayor Councillor Milligan Civic Leadership/Regional  Communication, CEO Development Promotion and Advocacy  Intergovernmental and Media Relations  Economic Development  Agribusiness  Tourism and Events  Community Engagement  Disaster Management

Councillor Wilson Finance + Technology  Business Systems and Executive Manager Processes Corporate and Community  Corporate Plans and Services Performance

Page 41 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 Finance David Lewis  Information, Communication and Technology (ICT) Councillor Holstein Infrastructure  Roads and Drainage Executive Manager  Parks & Gardens Infrastructure Works and  Transport & Active Services Transport  Asset Management Myles Fairbairn Councillor McLean Planning  Planning and Building Executive Manager Services Organisational Development  Planning Scheme and Planning Services  Townships and Villages cultural heritage and Dan McPherson streetscape  Regional Planning Councillor McDonald Environment  Environmental Executive Manager Management Organisational Development  Weed/Pest and Planning Services Management  Waterways Dan McPherson  Natural Resource & Management Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services

Myles Fairbairn Deputy Mayor Councillor Recreation/Amenity &  Sport and Recreation Executive Manager Cook Facilities  Community Facilities Corporate and Community  Health and Waste Services Management  Animal Management David Lewis & Executive Manager Organisational Development and Planning Services

Dan McPherson Councillor Hagan Community Development  Arts and Culture Executive Manager  Youth and Corporate and Community Disability/Multicultural Services  Public Safety  Customer Service David Lewis  Community Services & Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services

Myles Fairbairn

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0026

CARRIED 7/0

Page 42 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Report

1. Introduction

Given the changes to local government legislation over the recent years, and the greater sophistication associated with Council activities, there is a need to consider an approach to managing the business of the Council that shares the workload and responsibility with Councillors and Executive Staff in dealing with the future strategic directions.

2. Background

Council had previously adopted a portfolio structure for the 2008-2012 and 2012-2016 terms of Council to manage the workloads for councillors associated with change to a regional council. There is now an opportunity to refocus and readopt a more strategic approach to managing the business of Council.

3. Report

It is proposed that the functional areas of Council are aligned with the Community and Corporate Plans. From these plans, the strategies and actions are divided into distinct focus areas and the Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas are drawn from these and designed to achieve the long term success of the region. In aligning the portfolios in this manner, it will allow individual councillors to work towards the delivery of the outcomes with the allocated Executive Leadership Team member. These areas are outlined in the table below:

Councillor Portfolio Responsibility Areas Councillor Lead Portfolio Focus Areas Executive Leadership Team Member Lead Mayor Councillor Milligan Civic Leadership/Regional  Communication, CEO Development Promotion and Advocacy Ian Flint  Intergovernmental and Media Relations  Economic Development  Agribusiness  Tourism and Events  Community Engagement Councillor Wilson Finance + Technology  Business Systems and Executive Manager Processes Corporate and Community  Corporate Plans and Services Performance  Finance David Lewis  Information, Communication and Technology (ICT) Councillor Holstein Infrastructure  Roads and Drainage Executive Manager  Parks & Gardens Infrastructure Works and  Transport Services  Asset Management Myles Fairbairn Councillor McLean Planning  Planning and Building Executive Manager Services Organisational Development  Planning Scheme and Planning Services

Page 43 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 Townships and Villages cultural heritage and Dan McPherson streetscape  Regional Planning Councillor McDonald Environment  Environmental Executive Manager Management Organisational Development  Weed/Pest and Planning Services Management  Waterways Dan McPherson  Natural Resource & Management Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services

Myles Fairbairn Deputy Mayor Councillor Recreation/Amenity &  Sport and Recreation Executive Manager Cook Facilities (including Corporate and Community sportsgrounds and Services bikeways/pathways)  Community Facilities David Lewis  Health and Waste & Management Executive Manager  Animal Management Organisational Development and Planning Services

Dan McPherson Councillor Hagan Community Development  Arts and Culture Executive Manager  Youth and Corporate and Community Disability/Multicultural Services  Public Safety  Customer Service David Lewis  Community Services & Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services

Myles Fairbairn

Assigning Councillors to Portfolios ensures:  The workload associated with being an elected member is shared across all Councillors;  The Councillor's individual skill, knowledge and background is utilised by linking them to an area of interest;  Ratepayers can identify which Councillor to approach according to the strategic issue at hand;  Councillors act as sounding boards for strategic issues and suggestions from senior officers, members of the public, and other Councillors relating to their portfolio; and  Councillors are seen to be reporting back to the community.

The portfolio basis should allow the clear integration of existing external representations to be matched directly to a Councillor and Executive Manager and provide continuity for the term of Council. eg the Lockyer Nature portfolio holder may be the representative on the Council of Mayors Environment committee.

Page 44 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The portfolios should also align with the Recovery & Resilience Taskforces as and when required per the Lockyer Valley Local Disaster Management Plan in accordance with the Disaster Management Act 2003.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

There are no policy or legal issues as the responsibilities are clearly provided for in the Local Government Act 2009 and Regulation. The portfolio model has no legislative authority but assists councillors in the division of workloads.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

There are no additional finance implications in adopting a portfolio model and council stationery will accommodate the portfolio details to ensure ongoing continuity.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No delegations or authority will be passed to the Councillor Portfolio holder in the first instance.

7. Communication and Engagement

The portfolio model will form the basis of an approach to managing communication and will provide an opportunity to reinforce messaging to the community in concert with the media releases on behalf of Council.

8. Conclusion

The portfolio approach has been discussed in a workshop with Council and has been developed by the CEO and Mayor in setting up a model that will provide a focus for Councillor and key support for achieving outcomes.

9. Action/s

1. Portfolios are adopted for immediate effect with terms of reference, working group arrangements and resourcing needs established by the Councillor Lead and Executive Leadership Team Member lead for each portfolio. 2. Portfolio Update reports are prepared on a monthly basis and included in the monthly business cycle of Council Meetings.

Page 45 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.6 Appointment of Delegates to Organisations and Committees

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

At the beginning of each new term of Council, it is necessary to review the commitments that Council has to various organisations and committees, both internal and external and agree on the delegates to attend and represent Council at these various forums. This year, additional time has been taken to identify where relevant that the representation is still required and whether all forums are indeed still required.

The recommendations contained below are to address the appointments required at this time and to align where possible the portfolio arrangements recently adopted by Council. These recommendations are to take effect immediately to allow for upcoming meetings.

Officer’s Recommendation:

THAT Council approve the following representations to organisations and committees:

Lockyer Valley Tourism & Development Association 2 Representatives – Cr Holstein & Cr McLean

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Brigade Group (Laidley) 2 Representative – Cr McDonald & Cr Hagan

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Brigade Group (Gatton) 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Area Finance Committee Representative – Cr Hagan & Cr McDonald (proxy)

Spring Bluff Railway Station Trust 2 Representatives – Cr McLean & Cr Holstein

Gatton Historical Society Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Laidley Spring Festival Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Lockyer Better Business Committee 1 Representative – Cr Wilson

Laidley Pioneer Village Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Lockyer Valley Crime Stoppers Committee

Page 46 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

2 Representatives – Cr Milligan & Cr Holstein

Lake Apex Community Advisory Committee 2 Representatives – Cr McDonald & Cr Holstein

Forest Hill Progress Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Laidley Better Business Committee 1 Representative – Cr Wilson

Cahill Park Cluster Group Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Laidley Recreation Reserve Committee 1 Representative – Cr Cook

Das Neumann Haus Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Junction View Pest Management Group 1 Representative – Cr McDonald

Lockyer Valley Rabbit Group Representative – Cr Milligan (Chair), Cr Holstein (proxy)

Lockyer Valley Traffic Safety Working Group 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

Regional Road & Transport Group 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

UQ Gatton Community Advisory Group 1 Representative – Cr Cook

Lockyer Valley Growers Association 1 Representative – Cr Milligan

Lockyer Water Users Forum 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Ipswich & Regional Development Australia 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

SEQ Water/Healthy Waterways Catchment 1 Representative – Cr McDonald

SEQ Regional Plan 1 Representative – Cr Milligan

Page 47 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

RESOLUTION

THAT Council approve the following representations to organisations and committees:

Lockyer Valley Tourism & Development Association 2 Representatives – Cr Holstein & Cr McLean

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Brigade Group (Laidley) 2 Representative – Cr McDonald & Cr Hagan

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Brigade Group (Gatton) 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Area Finance Committee Representative – Cr Hagan & Cr McDonald (proxy)

Spring Bluff Railway Station Trust 2 Representatives – Cr McLean & Cr Holstein

Gatton Historical Society Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Laidley Spring Festival Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Lockyer Better Business Committee 1 Representative – Cr Wilson

Laidley Pioneer Village Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Lockyer Valley Crime Stoppers Committee 2 Representatives – Cr Milligan & Cr Holstein

Lake Apex Community Advisory Committee 2 Representatives – Cr McDonald & Cr Holstein

Forest Hill Progress Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Laidley Better Business Committee 1 Representative – Cr Wilson

Cahill Park Cluster Group Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Laidley Recreation Reserve Committee 1 Representative – Cr Cook

Page 48 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Das Neumann Haus Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Junction View Pest Management Group 1 Representative – Cr McDonald

Lockyer Valley Rabbit Group Representative – Cr Milligan (Chair), Cr Holstein (proxy)

Lockyer Valley Traffic Safety Working Group 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

Regional Road & Transport Group 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

UQ Gatton Community Advisory Group 1 Representative – Cr Cook

Lockyer Valley Growers Association 1 Representative – Cr Milligan

Lockyer Water Users Forum 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Ipswich & West Moreton Regional Development Australia 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

SEQ Water/Healthy Waterways Catchment 1 Representative – Cr McDonald

SEQ Regional Plan 1 Representative – Cr Milligan

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0027

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

Council hosts and participates in a range of committees to various organisations, however these are normally categorised as either regional groups/associations, or Council Advisory Committees. The latter have not yet been determined in full, and there is a need to appoint Councillors to ongoing committees where the business has been continuing

Page 49 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

2. Background

Council previously made appointments at the Statutory Meeting in 2012 to such organisations and reviewed these throughout the term in consideration of Councillor workloads.

The adoption of the portfolio arrangements has also required consideration to align where possible the portfolio with each committee or organisational delegate as required.

3. Report

A number of organisations and committees have identified a need for representations from Council and these are listed below.

The committees require representations to be confirmed at this time. The proposed delegates outlined below have been matched to the portfolio arrangements and historical representations where identified and are subject to review by Council throughout the Council term.

Lockyer Valley Tourism & Development Association 2 Representatives – Cr Holstein & Cr McLean

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Brigade Group (Laidley) 2 Representative – Cr McDonald & Cr Hagan

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Brigade Group (Gatton) 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Lockyer Valley Rural Fire Area Finance Committee Representative – Cr Hagan & Cr McDonald (proxy)

Spring Bluff Railway Station Trust 2 Representatives – Cr McLean & Cr Holstein

Gatton Historical Society Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Laidley Spring Festival Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Lockyer Better Business Committee 1 Representative – Cr Wilson

Laidley Pioneer Village Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Lockyer Valley Crime Stoppers Committee 2 Representatives – Cr Milligan & Cr Holstein

Lake Apex Community Advisory Committee 2 Representatives – Cr McDonald & Cr Holstein

Page 50 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Forest Hill Progress Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Laidley Better Business Committee 1 Representative – Cr Wilson

Cahill Park Cluster Group Committee 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Laidley Recreation Reserve Committee 1 Representative – Cr Cook

Das Neumann Haus Committee 1 Representative – Cr McLean

Junction View Pest Management Group 1 Representative – Cr McDonald

Lockyer Valley Rabbit Group Representative – Cr Milligan (Chair), Cr Holstein (proxy)

Lockyer Valley Traffic Safety Working Group 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

Regional Road & Transport Group 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

UQ Gatton Community Advisory Group 1 Representative – Cr Cook

Lockyer Valley Growers Association 1 Representative – Cr Milligan

Lockyer Water Users Forum 1 Representative – Cr Hagan

Ipswich & West Moreton Regional Development Australia 1 Representative – Cr Holstein

SEQ Water/Healthy Waterways Catchment 1 Representative – Cr McDonald

SEQ Regional Plan 1 Representative – Cr Milligan

4. Policy and Legal Implications

The Local Government Act 2009 and regulation provide the basis for advisory committees to council and for council representation to external and statutory bodies as required for the ongoing business of Council.

Page 51 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

5. Financial and Resource Implications

There are minimal financial implications for this report and where necessary administrative support is provided by Council to these committees. It would be accepted practice that an officer of council is often involved in some of the committees and can sometimes support the councillors in the committees endeavours.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required. Each member of a committee will be required to report back to Council and carries no express delegation or authority to make commitments on behalf of Council, unless expressly authorised to do so.

7. Communication and Engagement

All organisations and committees will be advised in writing of Council’s nominated delegates for the current term of Council, including where relevant proxies.

8. Conclusion

Council is to nominate representatives to organisations and committees and the recommendations have been made for those where an immediate need has been identified and where a meeting is pending and representation is required. Further recommendations may be required over the coming months as the needs of all organisations and committees are identified.

9. Action/s

1. Council are to advise the organisations and committees outlined in this report of Council’s nominated delegates to each organisation or committee.

2. Delegates are to provide a report to Council meetings on outcomes or activities relevant to Lockyer Valley Regional Council as discussed at the organisation or committee meetings attended.

Page 52 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Cr McLean advised of a perceived conflict of interest in item 10.7 “Suspension of Placement of Temporary Signs Policy” (as defined in section 173 of the Local Government Act 2009), due to her family business interests being associated with printing and advertising. Cr McLean took no part in the discussion or decision and left the meeting at 10:50am.

10.7 Suspension of Placement of Temporary Signs Policy

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Stephen Hart, Manager Executive Business Services Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

The purpose of this report is to suspend the application of the Placement of Temporary Signs Policy (SG24) which regulates the use of temporary corflute signs in the Lockyer Valley Regional Council area. This policy was adopted on 16 December 2015 as a temporary measure to regulate these types of signs until a more robust outcome could be achieved through the local law process.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council suspends the operation of the Placement of Temporary Signs Policy.

RESOLUTION THAT Council suspends the operation of the Placement of Temporary Signs Policy.

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0028

CARRIED 6/0

Report

1. Introduction

In 2015, Council sought the optimal means of regulating the placement of temporary signs in the local government area. This regulation was sought to address safety and amenity issues that can arise with the proliferation of temporary signs relating to events in the Region.

The regulation of such signage can be achieved through amendment to Council’s Subordinate Local Law No 1.4 (Installation of Advertising Devices) 2011. Unless amendments are insubstantial, amendment to such local laws follows a specified process.

2. Background This matter was considered by the previous Council in December 2015 where Council expressed an interest in regulating the placement of temporary signage. A question raised at that time was whether or not the management of such signs was best carried out through the planning scheme, by policy/guideline or through the local law process.

Page 53 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

At the meeting of 11 November 2015 Council determined that this matter was best regulated through the local law process. Council defined a number of parameters that they were seeking to achieve with respect to the placement of temporary signs. These included that the local law was to:

 Apply to both public and privately held land  Limit the size of temporary signs  Limit the number of temporary signs  Address the timeframes for the display of signs around particular events  Require an application to be made to permit signs  Require a bond payment, and  Provide for penalties for the breach of the prescribed activity.

3. Report

Council adopted the Placement of Temporary Signs Policy (SG24) which regulates the use of temporary corflute signs in the Lockyer Valley Regional Council area on 16 December 2015.

The intent of the policy was to address safety and amenity issues that can arise with the placement of temporary signs. It was introduced as a measure to assist with this regulation until the process of local law amendment could be undertaken.

A number of operational difficulties were experienced with the application of the policy during the recent local government election. Accordingly, the incoming Council has requested that this policy be suspended until further information is able to be provided regarding the most effective approach to regulate these types of signs.

This matter will be addressed as part of the review of local laws where all options associated with the management of this matter can be investigated.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Council’s policy framework has been adhered to in the suspension of this policy. The process complies with the requirements of relevant legislation. Any future policy and legal implications will be addressed as matters arise before Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Budget and resource implications will continue to be addressed through existing allocations. The suspension of this policy will see the cessation of officers processing applications for the installation of signage. The content of this report does not alter current budgetary requirements.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report. The Chief Executive Officer will manage requirements in line with existing delegations.

Page 54 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

7. Communication and Engagement

The suspension of this policy will be communicated via the removal of the policy from the policy register and Council’s website.

8. Conclusion

It is recommended that the Placement of Temporary Signs Policy (SG24) which regulates the use of temporary corflute signs in the Lockyer Valley Regional Council area on 16 December 2015 be suspended. Council will address this matter as part of the review of local laws process to establish the most effective means of regulating this activity.

9. Action/s 1. The Placement of Temporary Signage Policy is removed from the policy register, website and intranet.

Page 55 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Cr McLean returned to the meeting, the time being 10:58am

10.8 Telstra Corporation Ltd - Renewal of Lease of Part of Lot 2 on SP 270096 & Application of Section 236 Local Government Regulation 2012 Exception

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Caitlan Natalier, Solicitor/Legal Services Coordinator Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

The Lessee has requested a new lease of their telecommunications tower site on part of Lot 2 on SP 270096 located at Bowtells Road, Grantham when their existing lease expires in April 2017. The purpose of the new lease will be to enable Telstra to continue and maintain their existing telecommunications network. The purpose of this Report is to consider this request and if accepted, apply the exception from tendering under Section 236(1)(c)(iii) of the Local Government Regulation 2012.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT with respect to the request from Telstra Corporation Ltd for a new lease over their existing telecommunications facility on part of Lot 2 on SP 270096, Council resolves to:- a) apply the exception contained in Section 236(1)(c)(iii) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 to the Lease; and b) authorise the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate a new lease with Telstra Corporation Ltd, on substantially the same terms and conditions.

RESOLUTION THAT with respect to the request from Telstra Corporation Ltd for a new lease over their existing telecommunications facility on part of Lot 2 on SP 270096, Council resolves to:- a) apply the exception contained in Section 236(1)(c)(iii) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 to the Lease; and b) authorise the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate a new lease with Telstra Corporation Ltd, on substantially the same terms and conditions.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Cook Resolution Number: 16-20/0029

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

Page 56 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The purpose of this Report is to discharge Council’s statutory obligations to enable the lease arrangements with Telstra Corporation Limited to continue.

2. Background

Council were contacted by Telstra Corporation on 18 April 2016 with a request to continue their lease arrangement beyond the current lease expiry date of 30 April 2017 to ensure their telecommunications network is maintained.

As the lease does not contain further options, a new lease will need to be entered into. As Telstra is effectively seeking to renew their lease arrangement, Council can apply the exception from tendering in Section 236(1)(c)(iii) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 to enable a new lease to be entered into.

3. Report

The proposed lease renewal is over part of freehold land situated at Bowtells Road, Grantham described as Lot 2 on SP 270096 consisting of approximately 54m². The land is zoned as Rural Agricultural, Rural General. The attached Aerial Map and Survey Plan 118810 show the lease area.

The current lease commenced on 1 May 2007 and will expire on 30 April 2017. The lease does not contain any further options. The permitted use is for Communications Operations including Cellular Mobile Telephone Base Station, antennae and associated services. Telstra have requested a new lease to commence on 1 May 2017 in order to enable their telecommunications operations to continue uninterrupted. The new lease will be negotiated on substantially the same terms and conditions subject to the following:-

a) The term of the Lease shall be 10 years with 2 x 5 year options; b) The rent shall be $12,000.00 during the first year of the term and increased by 3% compounding annually thereafter for the balance of the term; and c) The Lessee shall be responsible for all costs incurred in preparation of the Lease including but not limited to survey and registration fees.

The proposed term and conditions are consistent with similar leases relating to telecommunications in the region.

In order to enable a new lease to be entered into, the Recommendation in this Report is to apply the exception contained in Section 236(1)(c)(iii) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the disposal of land or an interest in land if the disposal is for the purpose of renewing the lease of land to the existing tenant of the land.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Council must resolve to apply the statutory exception from tendering before a new lease can be entered into.

As has occurred in the past, Telstra will prepare the new lease for review by Council’s Legal Services Team.

Page 57 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

5. Financial and Resource Implications

The Lessee will be responsible for all costs involved in the preparation, execution and registration of the Lease, including but not limited to any required survey and registration fees.

Council will receive a commercial return for the lease and no costs to Council have been identified.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

If the Recommendation made in this Report is accepted, the Chief Executive Officer will have delegated authority to negotiate satisfactory lease terms.

7. Communication and Engagement

The Chief Executive Officer, through Council’s Legal Services Unit shall be responsible for engaging with Telstra Corporation Limited and the Department of Natural Resources and Mines to finalise the Lease.

8. Conclusion

The Recommendation made in this Report will discharge Council’s statutory obligations and enable formal lease arrangements to be entered so that Telstra’s telecommunications network in the area may continue uninterrupted. 9. Action/s

1. Advise Telstra Corporation Limited of Council’s resolution. 2. Commence lease negotiations. 3. Finalise lease. 4. Attend to registration with the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

Attachments 1View Aerial Map 1 Page 2View Map 1 Page

Page 58 Telstra Corporation Ltd - Renewal of Lease of Part of Lot 2 Attachment 1 on SP 270096 & Application of Section 236 Local Aerial Map Government Regulation 2012 Exception

Attachment 1 10.8 Page 59

Telstra Corporation Ltd - Renewal of Lease of Part of Lot 2 Attachment 2 on SP 270096 & Application of Section 236 Local Map Government Regulation 2012 Exception

Attachment 2 10.8 Page 60

Telstra Corporation Ltd - Renewal of Lease of Part of Lot 2 Attachment 2 on SP 270096 & Application of Section 236 Local Map Government Regulation 2012 Exception

Attachment 2 10.8 Page 61

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.9 Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Stephen Hart, Manager Executive Business Services Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

This Report updates Council on progress on the Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy developed in conjunction with Urbis. Ray White Commercial was appointed as principal agent and has previously presented to Council on their marketing proposal. This report provides an update on process, details of properties to be disposed of in the first tranche, the marketing program and timelines for disposal.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolves to receive and note the contents of the report and to continue with the next phase of the Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to receive and note the contents of the report and to continue with the next phase of the Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy. Further; THAT Council be briefed prior to any advertising or marketing options being undertaken on the next phase of the Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy.

Moved By: Cr Wilson Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0030

CARRIED 7/0

1. Introduction

The purpose of this Report is to provide further information to Council on the disposal of Council owned land. Council officers have worked with Ray White the Principal Agent to identify land available for disposal in accordance with legislative requirements.

2. Background

The audit of Lockyer Valley Regional Council land holdings reviewed all Council land holdings and considered the potential future use of this land by Council as well as the land’s potential use by community or commercial interests.

The intended outcomes of the Land Audit were :  A more efficient land portfolio  Reduced holding and maintenance costs  Positive returns where land disposal is effected

Page 62 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 Net community benefit; and  More productive use of land.

Urbis was engaged to provide a land divestment strategy for Council consideration. On July 16 2015, Council resolved to:  endorse the Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy;  delegate the authority to the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to identify land suitable for disposal; and  procure a principal agent to market the properties. Ray White Commercial were subsequently appointed as Principal Agents and presented to Council on 27 January 2016 to outline their approach.

3. Report

Council officers have worked with Urbis to develop the Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy and this has previously been presented to Council by Urbis.

The report was based upon the database of property developed by Council and which included in excess of 500 properties. Urbis have applied their expertise to those properties to identify those that are more saleable and those that have more complex marketing requirements.

Many parcels of land held by Council are “problematic”. There is a reason Council holds the land. For example there may be issues with contamination or flooding as well as complications relating to historical trusteeships, vegetation management requirements, access, legislative requirements, flood mitigation works etc. Over time the Council portfolio has swollen as these problematic lands have been acquired.

The preferred approach confirmed by Council and consistent with the legislation is to procure a principal agent to direct the sale by auction of properties identified as suitable for disposal. The advantages of utilising a principal agent include that they:

 have established databases and can market widely;  can utilise local agents as required;  can provide expert advice on sales and marketing;  are paid by commission which provides an incentive to sell; and  commission can be varied depending on the category of property (eg the hard to sell remnant parcels).

In conjunction with the then Mayor, the Chief Executive Officer, the Strategy Advisor to Mayor and Council Officers, the Principal Agents identified a first tranche of properties for Sale. Care was taken to avoid flooding any particular market with too many properties for sale. The selection of properties and a rational strategy to identify groups of property for sale over time will mitigate that risk.

The following land has been identified for sale by auction (refer attachment 1):-

1. Lot 1 Seventeen Mile Road, Helidon described as Lot 1 on RP 104369; 2. 8 Tryhorn Street, Grantham described as Lot 4 on SP 247670; 3. 2 Singh Street, Grantham described as Lot 23 on SP 247670;

Page 63 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

4. 67 Forest Hill-Fernvale Road, Glenore Grove described as Lot 161 on CP CC438; 5. 69 Forest Hill-Fernvale Road, Glenore Grove described as Lot 160 on CP CC438; 6. 26 Bertrand Avenue, Kensington Grove described as Lot 49 on RP 200070; and 7. Lot 997 Wilkinson Place, Grantham described as Lot 997 on SP 251288.

A further property at 168 Woodlands Road, Gatton described as Lot 205 on CP CC3116 is considered by the agent to be more suitable for sale by tender.

The Principal Agents were tasked with disposing of the properties this financial year. However, the process of disposal was delayed by the election and the associated caretaker period. T

Key dates in the process are as follows:-

 Marketing Campaign 16 May 2016 to 15 June 2016  Tender Closes (Woodlands Road) 15 June 2016 at 4pm  Public Auction (7 properties) 16 June 2016 at 6pm

Marketing is being conducted as per the following program:-

Print Media Advertising

Gatton Star Week 1 18 May 2016 Double Page Week 2 25 May 2016 Double Page Week 3 1 June 2016 Double Page Week 4 8 June 2016 Double Page Week 5 15 June 2016 Double Page

Queensland Country Life Week 1 19 May 2016 Half Page Week 2 26 May 2016 Half Page

Courier Mail Prime Site (168 Woodlands Road, Gatton) Week 1 20 May 2016 Eighth Page Week 2 27 May 2016 Eighth Page

Digital Marketing www.realestate.com.au (standard listing)

For properties 1 to 7, Ray White Gatton and Ray White Rural (Qld) will be responsible for actively running the marketing campaign, fielding enquiries and undertaking inspections, preparation of marketing material, execution of the auction and negotiations through to sale.

For property 8, Ray White Commercial (Qld) will be responsible for actively running the marketing campaign, fielding enquires and undertaking inspections, preparation of marketing material, execution of the tender and negotiations through to sale.

Page 64 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

4. Policy and Legal Implications

The Local Government Act 2009 provides an overarching requirement that when disposing of Council assets we adopt sound contracting principles (S104). These include :

 Value for money;  Open and effective competition; and  Ethical behaviour.

Section 227 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 also provides that in order to dispose of valuable non-current assets (such as land) Councils must go to tender or auction.

It is considered that, having appropriately engaged an agent and putting land to an open and well marketed auction meets the overarching sound contracting requirements spelt out in the Act.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

It has been recognised that Council needs a leaner asset portfolio. This would enable ongoing operations that support community benefit while reducing where possible unnecessary land holdings that require ongoing maintenance.

The disposal of this land in accordance with legislative requirements will, in some cases, require expenditure on land valuations, reconfiguration applications, survey costs and/or auctioneering costs and advertising.

The Budget for 2015/16 identifies $1.4 M to be proceeds generated by the sale of land. This is considered achievable under the proposed Land Disposal Strategy.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

The Chief Executive Officer has sufficient delegation and authorisation to do all things necessary to dispose of land in accordance with legislative requirements and to implement the Council Resolutions.

7. Communication and Engagement

The land disposal will require engagement with the market. The principal agent, along with our Communications team, has worked on marketing for these properties to enable sufficient awareness in the market.

8. Conclusion

This report advises of progress to date on the Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy and describes the key elements of the sale of tranche 1. Implementation of the Strategy will rationalise Council land holdings and enable the Draft Budget target to be met. Further work will be undertaken to investigate and categorise properties for the next stage of the project.

Page 65 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

9. Action/s

1. CEO to work with Agent to market Tranche 1. 2. Conduct Auction and Tender process.

Attachments 1View Divestment Strategy 8 Pages

Page 66 Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy Attachment 1 Divestment Strategy

Attachment 1 10.9 Page 67

Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy Attachment 1 Divestment Strategy

Attachment 1 10.9 Page 68

Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy Attachment 1 Divestment Strategy

Attachment 1 10.9 Page 69

Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy Attachment 1 Divestment Strategy

Attachment 1 10.9 Page 70

Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy Attachment 1 Divestment Strategy

Attachment 1 10.9 Page 71

Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy Attachment 1 Divestment Strategy

Attachment 1 10.9 Page 72

Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy Attachment 1 Divestment Strategy

Attachment 1 10.9 Page 73

Land Portfolio Divestment Strategy Attachment 1 Divestment Strategy

Attachment 1 10.9 Page 74

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.10 Proposed Lease over Park of Lot 3 on RP25621 to Optus Mobile Pty Ltd - Application of Section 236 (1) (c) (vi) Local Government Regulation 2012 Exception

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Caitlan Natalier, Solicitor/Legal Services Coordinator Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

The purpose of this Report is to consider a request by Optus Mobile Pty Ltd (“Optus”) for a lease of part of Lot 3 on RP 25621 situated at 102 Edward Street, Laidley to establish a telecommunications facility.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT with respect to the request by Optus Mobile Pty Ltd for a lease of part of Lot 3 on RP 25621 to establish a telecommunications facility, Council resolves to:- a) apply the exception in Section 236(1)(c)(vi) of the Local Government Regulation 2012; and b) delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate a lease over part of Lot 3 on RP 25621 with Optus Mobile Pty Ltd on terms satisfactory to Council.

RESOLUTION THAT with respect to the request by Optus Mobile Pty Ltd for a lease of part of Lot 3 on RP 25621 to establish a telecommunications facility, Council resolves to:- a) apply the exception in Section 236(1)(c)(vi) of the Local Government Regulation 2012; and b) delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate a lease over part of Lot 3 on RP 25621 with Optus Mobile Pty Ltd on terms satisfactory to Council.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr McLean Resolution Number: 16-20/0031

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

The purpose of this Report is to consider a request by Optus for a lease of part of Lot 3 on RP 25621 to establish a telecommunications facility.

Page 75 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

2. Background

A report has previously been considered at Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 13 April 2016 for a proposed lease over part of the Laidley Recreation Grounds Reserve, at which time Council resolved that a telecommunications use would be inconsistent with the purpose of the reserve and it would not support such a use at this location. However, Council recognized a need for such infrastructure in Laidley and authorised the Chief Executive Officer to work with Optus to identify a more suitable location.

Council Officers met with a representative of Optus on 22 April 2016 to discuss alternative sites in Laidley. It was decided that 102 Edward Street, Laidley described as Lot 3 on RP 25621 would be the most suitable block as it was about the same elevation as the original site. An Aerial Map is attached to this Report showing the proposed lease area.

3. Report

Lot 3 on RP 25621 is a freehold lot situated at 102 Edward Street, Laidley. The land is vacant land and is zoned as Rural Landscape, Urban Residential. It is in a high flood risk area and stormwater from the Storr Street drain is channelled through the adjoining properties to the west. Optus is aware of this and have advised that it is not of concern to them.

The Optus telecommunications tower will be approximately 35m high. Optus are requesting a lease of approximately 100m² as shown on the attached Location Map. A plan of the proposed telecommunications tower is also attached.

Optus have requested an initial lease term of 10 years with an option of a further 10 years. An first year rental of $8,000.00 subject to annual fixed price increases of 3% has been offered by Optus. While this appears to be a commercial rental, and the fixed price increase is in line with other telecommunications leases in Council’s local government area, Council is required by law to obtain a market valuation to confirm the rental to be charged.

As the establishment of a telecommunications facility in Laidley will improve services to the local community, the Recommendation in this Report will enable Council to discharge its statutory obligations and commence lease negotiations with Optus.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

If the Recommendation made in this Report is accepted, Council has no legal obligation to call tenders for disposal of the land before a lease can be offered to Optus.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Council will incur costs of approximately $500.00 to $1,000.00 to obtain a market valuation to determine an appropriate lease rental. However, this cost is minimal in comparison to the community benefit and commercial return Council will receive from a lease with Optus.

Lease negotiations and preparation can be performed through Council’s Legal Services team and Optus will be responsible for all survey and registration costs. Optus will also be responsible for insuring their infrastructure.

Page 76 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

6. Delegations/Authorisations

It is recommended that the Chief Executive Officer be granted authority to negotiate satisfactory lease terms with Optus and do all things necessary to finalise the lease over the land.

7. Communication and Engagement

The Planning and Environment and Infrastructure Works and Services teams have been given the opportunity to review and comment on this Report. It is noted that the Manager Planning and Environment was involved in the meeting with Optus on 22 April 2016 and had no concerns with a telecommunications facility being constructed on Lot 3 on RP25621.

The Chief Executive Officer, through Council’s Legal Services Unit, shall be responsible for engaging with Optus to finalise lease negotiations over the land.

8. Conclusion

The Recommendation in this Report will enable Council to meet its statutory obligations and work with Optus to establish a new telecommunications facility in Laidley to improve telecommunication services for ratepayers.

9. Action/s

1. Advise Optus of Council’s resolution; 2. Obtain a Valuation of the proposed leased area; 3. Negotiate satisfactory commercial lease terms; 4. Arrange a survey of the lease area; 5. Execution of the lease by all parties; and 6. Registration of the lease and survey plan with the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

Attachments 1View Aerial Map 1 Page 2View Location Map 1 Page 3View 1 Page

Page 77 Proposed Lease over Park of Lot 3 on RP25621 to Optus Attachment 1 Mobile Pty Ltd - Application of Section 236 (1) (c) (vi) Local Aerial Map Government Regulation 2012 Exception

Attachment 1 10.10 Page 78

Proposed Lease over Park of Lot 3 on RP25621 to Optus Attachment 2 Mobile Pty Ltd - Application of Section 236 (1) (c) (vi) Local Location Map Government Regulation 2012 Exception

Attachment 2 10.10 Page 79

Proposed Lease over Park of Lot 3 on RP25621 to Optus Attachment 3 Mobile Pty Ltd - Application of Section 236 (1) (c) (vi) Local Government Regulation 2012 Exception

Attachment 3 10.10 Page 80

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.11 Queensland Urban Utilities Report

Date: 13 May 2016 Author: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

Council has received an update from the Queensland Urban Utilities (QUU) Board which provided highlights from their April Board Meeting, including the Board’s Quarterly Report to 31 March 2016 and the Board’s Corporate Plan 2016-21.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT the Queensland Urban Utilities (QUU) Report be received and noted.

RESOLUTION THAT the Queensland Urban Utilities (QUU) Report be received and noted.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0032

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

Lockyer Valley Regional Council maintains an ongoing working relationship with QUU on both operational and strategic aspects of water and sewerage provision. This report is an update on matters of significance with respect to QUU for Council’s information.

2. Background

Queensland Urban Utilities is:  A statutory body, created on 1 July 2010 as a result of Queensland Government changes to the way water is managed in South East Queensland.  Owned by the Brisbane and Ipswich City Councils, and Lockyer Valley, Scenic Rim and Somerset Regional Councils and governed by an independent Board.  Tasked to deliver drinking water, recycled water and sewerage services to the cities and townships within the boundaries of these five local government areas.  Responsible for delivering water to customers, collecting, transporting and treating sewage, as well as charging and billing for water and waste water services for customers in the Brisbane, Ipswich, Lockyer Valley, Scenic Rim and Somerset local authority areas.

Page 81 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

3. Report

The Queensland Urban Utilities (QUU) Board held its ordinary meeting on 18 April 2016. At the meeting, the Board considered the following matters:

Operational Excellence

2016/17 Capital Program

Following review by the Strategic Asset Management Committee, the Board considered and approved QUU’s 2016/17 capital budget.

QUU’s 2016/17 Capital Program, which is set at $236.26 million, will ensure that customers continue to receive reliable water and sewerage services, and that economic and population growth is catered for.

The program, which is part of a $1.5 billion five-year capital program, will cover investment across all service regions.

Utility of the Future

This month, the Board held a strategic discussion on QUU becoming a Utility of the Future.

By way of background, QUU has embarked on a journey to become a Utility of the Future, which will transform the way they view themselves, manage their assets and operations, and interact with their customers, the community, and the world.

Recognising that the successful development and implementation of this vision requires the commitment of all stakeholders, QUU have adopted a collaborative approach, which will involve broad engagement across all stakeholder groups - beginning with their employees. QUU expect to engage with their shareholders between July and September this year.

QUU will also look to use the Special General Meeting to further engage with Councils and Chief Executive Officers on how QUU can become a Utility of the Future.

Utility Charges

In readiness for QUU to be in a position to announce prices before 30 June, this month the Board considered utility and sundry charges for 2016/17.

The Board is committed to maintaining downward pressure on pricing through a range of efficiency and productivity initiatives across the business to offset rising operational costs and the need for continued significant investment in new and existing infrastructure.

Tariff Reform

QUU was established through the merger of five Council water and sewerage businesses in 2010 and, as a result, the tariffs and charging regimes vary between these local government areas.

Page 82 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Following consideration by the Finance and Pricing Committee, the Board provided direction and input into QUU’s tariff reform program.

Environmental Risks

As part of ongoing due diligence, the Board received a briefing from management on environmental risks and the strategies and programs in place to mitigate these risks.

Since QUU was formed, significant effort and capital investment has been made to improve the performance of the sewerage network and sewage treatment plants (STPs) across all service regions. This investment has improved compliance at the STPs by 75% since 2012.

National Performance Report 2014/15

The Board noted the National Performance Report 2014/15 for water utilities, which was released by the Bureau of Meteorology in mid-March. QUU maintained or improved its performance in key indicators. Highlights from this report include:

 A 37% reduction in water quality complaints since 2012/13 through the adoption of innovative technology, new governance arrangements, and enhanced asset management and monitoring regimes.

 A 14% reduction in the average duration of unplanned water interruptions since 2012/13 as a result of a new schedule and dispatch process and the adoption of new technologies.

 A 17% reduction in real water losses since 2012/13 through the implementation of the Unaccounted for Water Program and TaKaDu, an analytics system that predicts leaks and pressure issues.

Population trends

Management presented to the Board on the latest population trends for the regions that QUU services.

Population growth for the total QUU region has been on a general decline since 2010. The current growth rate is generally aligned to the Queensland Government’s low series projection and this is expected to continue for the next five years before transitioning to the medium series projection in the subsequent five years. Current growth is approximately 25,000 per annum, or approximately 1.7%.

Shareholders and Communities

Quarterly Report

The Board considered and approved the Quarterly Report for the period of 1 January to 31 March 2016. A copy of this report highlighting “our financial management and infrastructure delivery, our performance against our customer service standards and our progress against achievements of our 2015-2 Corporate Plan” is available for Council’s information.

Page 83 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Corporate Plan 2016-21

The Board considered and supported the Queensland Urban Utilities 2016-21 Corporate Plan.

This plan, which has been developed in accordance with the Central SEQ Distributor-Retailer Participation Agreement, sets out the future direction, goals and priorities as defined by the Board, and is informed by shareholder insights. It articulates QUU’s strong focus on customers, the community, shareholders and service excellence.

Similar to last year, QUU’s strategic direction was developed using a methodology endorsed by the Australian Institute of Company Directors.

This year, slight changes have been made to the Customer and Shareholder strategic pillars. QUU have broadened the Customer strategic pillar to include customers and communities, as the customers we service make up the communities we serve. This has enabled QUU to refine the Shareholder strategic pillar to include strategic stakeholders, as shareholders and strategic stakeholders represent the future partners who will support QUU in achieving their strategic direction.

A copy of this plan is to be provided to all shareholder Chief Executive Officers for feedback during April and May. It is expected the draft Corporate Plan will be circulated to shareholders for approval during May, June and July in accordance with the requirements of the Participation Agreement.

The copy of the plan has been provided as stated and following, a preliminary review of this draft document, feedback has been provided to QUU that Council is supportive of its approval. It is to be noted that the financials are not included in the draft and will have to be reviewed prior to the final Corporate Plan being approved.

Shareholder Portal

The Board noted that the Shareholder Portal will be released later this month under a pilot program, with the full release to all shareholders scheduled for May and June. This portal will provide Council another means to communicate with QUU and receive information on QUU’s performance and plans.

People

Leadership Programs

A paper was presented to the Board on the various leadership programs that are in place across the business. These leadership programs, which are being progressively deployed at organisational, group, team and individual levels, are moving QUU closer to realising their cultural aspirations of being a humanistic and encouraging workplace.

Page 84 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

10.12 Council of Mayors South East Queensland (CoMSEQ) Committee Report

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Stephen Hart, Manager Executive Business Services Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

The Committee structure and taskforce activities for Council of Mayors South East Queensland (COMSEQ) are reported. Recommendations are made for Lockyer Valley Regional Council representation on the Committees.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolves the following COMSEQ Council Committee representation:

 Infrastructure and Planning Committee Cr Holstein (Member) Cr McLean (Alternate Member)

 Waterways and Environment Committee Cr McDonald (Member) Cr Hagan (Alternate Member)

 Economic Development Committee Cr Wilson (Member) Cr McLean (Alternate Member)

 COMSEQ Resilient Rivers Taskforce Cr Milligan (Member) Cr McDonald (Proxy)

 COMSEQ Rural Communities Special Interest Group Cr Milligan (Member) Cr Hagan (Proxy)

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves the following COMSEQ Council Committee representation:

 Infrastructure and Planning Committee Cr Holstein (Member) Cr McLean (Alternate Member)

 Waterways and Environment Committee Cr McDonald (Member) Cr Hagan (Alternate Member)

 Economic Development Committee Cr Wilson (Member) Cr McLean (Alternate Member)

 COMSEQ Resilient Rivers Taskforce Cr Milligan (Member) Cr McDonald (Proxy)

Page 85 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 COMSEQ Rural Communities Special Interest Group Cr Milligan (Member) Cr Hagan (Proxy)

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0033

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

Lockyer Valley Regional Council is an active member of Council of Mayors South East Queensland (COMSEQ) and this report is intended to provide the new Council with a brief overview of the functions and role of Council of Mayors as well as the committee and taskforce structure under which COMSEQ operates. The report also recommends Council representation on the COMSEQ Committees.

2. Background

Given the recent Council election and since the previous report provided, there have been a number of key actions and activities undertaken by COMSEQ which will be of interest to the Lockyer Valley. This report intends to give Council an overview on the role and function of Council of Mayors and its committee and taskforce structure.

3. Report

COMSEQ was established in September 2005 as an independent political advocacy organisation to represent the interests of one of the nation’s fastest growing regions – South East Queensland.

They are Australia’s largest regional local government advocacy organisation, representing the one in seven Australians who call SEQ home.

The membership of the COMSEQ consists of the 11 Mayors representing the Councils of SEQ: Brisbane, Ipswich, Logan, Redland, and Gold Coast City Councils and Lockyer Valley, Scenic Rim, Somerset, Toowoomba, Moreton Bay and Sunshine Coast Regional Councils.

With five out of the six largest Councils in Australia in SEQ, the region is no longer just a series of disparate geographic areas but a region that, in practical terms, functions as a single metropolitan area.

MISSION

Their mission is: To consistently deliver better regional funding, policy and collaborative outcomes for the mayors, councils and communities of South East Queensland. Their role is to :

Page 86 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 Advocate for a better resourced SEQ region with world standard infrastructure to support economic development.

 Influence other levels of government to ensure that their policy and legislative positions support SEQ regional growth.

 Collaborate in effective and innovative cooperative programs across the SEQ region.

Committees

At the Post-Election Meeting, Council resolved that Cr Milligan be appointed as Director of COMSEQ and Cr Cook be confirmed as the Alternate Director.

Council is also required to nominate a Councillor Member, and a Councillor Alternate Member, to each of the three COMSEQ Standing Committees:

 Economic Development Committee  Infrastructure and Planning Committee  Waterways and Environment Committee.

The Standing Committees:

 are made up entirely of elected members (up to 11 – one per member Council)  are chaired and deputy chaired by a Mayor  have the authority to co-opt Council officers or external parties as necessary to undertake their work  meet four times per annum.

At the Council Workshop on 24 May 2016 Council discussed the use of Portfolio Responsibility Areas that could operate within the governance framework of the Lockyer Valley Regional Council. This is to be determined at the Council Meeting on 24 May 2016.

Where proposed portfolios align with COMSEQ Committees there would be benefit in the Portfolio Councillor being nominated for the membership of the corresponding COMSEQ Committee.

The COMSEQ Infrastructure and Planning Committee would be a good fit for a Infrastructure and/or Planning Portfolio. Similarly the COMSEQ Water and Environment would be a likely fit for an Environment Portfolio.

The COMSEQ Economic Development Committee does not have a directly parallel LVRC Portfolio and would cut across a number of portfolio areas including Regional Development, Community Development and Planning.

Additional COMSEQ Groups and Projects

COMSEQ also has a Rural Communities Special Interest Group that is made up of both elected members and officers. Councils wishing to participate in this group are encouraged to nominate appropriate Councillors or staff. Previously Cr Milligan has been actively involved in this Group

Page 87 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

COMSEQ is also an active participant in the Resilient Rivers Initiative that is a partnership between the Queensland Government, COMSEQ, water utilities, catchment organisations and the community seeking to better manage our waterway catchments. Representation is also sought from Councillors for this Resilient Rivers Taskforce. Previously Cr McDonald has actively involved in this Initiative.

A further significant Project underway under the auspices of COMSEQ is the SEQ CityDeal Project. This project is looking at a long term funding commitment over 10 + years that links funding with a set of agreed economic and social/environmental outcomes. It is about prioritising infrastructure and agreed funding mechanisms to ensure delivery. This will be a staged process over 12- 18months and involves the :

 Lead Officers Group – CEO level  Economic Working Group – Officer level  Finance & Funding Working Group – Officer level  Governance Working Group – Officer level

This Project may have significant implications for the Region and will involve a considerable body of work from Officers. It is considered that Mayoral oversight will be required.

It is considered by working within these Committees and Groups representatives will be able to effectively promote the regions interests and influence outcomes for the benefit of the local government area and broader region.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

COMSEQ is established as the Council of Mayors(SEQ) Pty Ltd and has a Board comprised of Director representatives of each Member Local Government.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Lockyer Valley Regional Council has committed to COMSEQ and has been an active participant in COMSEQ’s activities. It is recognised that LVRC is a smaller regional player. However our Region is a fundamental part of the region and can influence the “no borders” approach of this significant entity. Funding of the COMSEQ from Member Councils is based on relative populations. LVRC contribution to funding COMSEQ is budgeted at $28 000 pa.

Internal LVRC staff costs associated with this activity are not insignificant in terms of staff time. However these costs are considered core business.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No additional delegations are required as this can be managed through existing delegations and standing orders.

7. Communication and Engagement

There are no communications arising from this report other than to advise COMSEQ of the resolved nominations.

Page 88 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

8. Conclusion

The COMSEQ Committee structure and taskforce activities for Council of Mayors South East Queensland are noted along with the substantial body of work to be undertaken. Council representation on Committees and other COMSEQ Groups will be utilised effectively to promote the regions interests and influence outcomes for the benefit of the local government area and broader region.

9. Action/s

Council advise COMSEQ of resolved nominations.

Attachments 1View Calendar 1 Page

Page 89 Council of Mayors South East Queensland (CoMSEQ) Attachment 1 Committee Report Calendar

Attachment 1 10.12 Page 90

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Cr Holstein advised of a perceived conflict of interest in item 10.13 “Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc – Lease of Merryfields Environmental Park & Outdoor Education Centre – Request for Council Assistance and Change of Name” (as defined in section 173 of the Local Government Act 2009), due to her associated family business interests. Cr Holstein took no part in the discussion or decision and left the meeting at 11:23am.

10.13 Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc - Lease of Merryfields Environmental Park & Outdoor Education Centre - Request for Council Assistance and Change of Name

Date: 20 May 2016 Author: Caitlan Natalier, Solicitor/Legal Services Coordinator Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

The purpose of this Report is to consider requests made by Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc., who lease the land on which the Merryfields Environment Park is established, for Council to provide financial assistance to construct and insure new buildings on the land and change their name.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT with respect to the requests for financial assistance and a change of name by Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc. in relation to the Merryfields Environmental Park and Outdoor Education Centre established on Lot 151 on CC2725 at Meadows Road, , Council resolves to authorise the Chief Executive Officer to write to the Lessee:- a) Noting the funding, in-kind support, electricity and water usage costs provided to Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc. since the lease of the land commenced in 2012 and Council’s resolution of 23 March 2016 ; b) Advising that Council is unable to provide further financial assistance in relation to the construction of the new building on the land; c) Endorsing the arrangement made on 28 February 2013 for Council to be responsible for all property and contents insurance for all buildings on the Land, including the new building currently under construction, subject to an agreed value for contents being negotiated; d) approving the change of name from “Merryfields Environmental Park and Outdoor Education Centre” to “Merryfields Environmental Education Centre” to bring the facility in line with similar facilities in Queensland subject to the Lessee being responsible for updating the signed in the name of the Merryfields Environmental Education Centre and all costs incurred; and e) confirming that any proposed future improvement or development of the Land must first be approved by Council in accordance with the lease terms and the Land Management Plan.

Page 91 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

RESOLUTION THAT with respect to the requests for financial assistance and a change of name by Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc. in relation to the Merryfields Environmental Park and Outdoor Education Centre established on Lot 151 on CC2725 at Meadows Road, Withcott, Council resolves to note:- a) the funding, in-kind support, electricity and water usage costs provided to Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc. since the lease of the land commenced in 2012 and Council’s resolution of 23 March 2016 ; b) the arrangement made on 28 February 2013 for Council to be responsible for all property and contents insurance for all buildings on the Land, including the new building currently under construction, subject to an agreed value for contents being negotiated; c) that any proposed future improvement or development of the Land must first be approved by Council in accordance with the lease terms and the Land Management Plan. Further; THAT Council resolves to authorise the Chief Executive Officer and the Portfolio Councillor to hold further discussions with the Lessee in respect of:- d) Any further financial assistance in relation to the construction of the new building on the land; and e) Any change of name from “Merryfields Environmental Park and Outdoor Education Centre” to “Merryfields Environmental Education Centre”. And further; THAT a report be provided back to Council prior to a decision being made in relation to this request.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr McLean Resolution Number: 16-20/0034

CARRIED 6/0

1. Introduction

The purpose of this Report is to consider requests for financial assistance and a change of name made by Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc. (Lessee) in respect of the Merryfields Environmental Park and Outdoor Education Centre (Facility).

2. Background

In December 2010 the Lessee first approached Council with a proposal to undertake a small scale improvement project on the recreation reserve situated at Meadows Road, Withcott described as Lot 151 on CC2725 (Land). This project focused mainly on removing lantana and undertaking native revegetation however through 2011 further requests of Council were made to assist with construction of gravel pathways and a dry creek. All requests made were approved.

Page 92 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

In late 2011, the Lessee contacted Council’s Infrastructure Works and Services team requesting financial assistance to develop an Outdoor Education Centre and double garage on the Land. The request involved fee waivers in relation to building, sewerage and hydraulic designs and plumbing matters. Council also committed to assist in insuring the proposed buildings, and covering power and water usage costs. The name of the Land was also changed to “Merryfields Environmental Park”.

In September 2012 Council entered into a Trustee Lease with the Lessee over part of the Land. The lease is for a term of 20 years with a peppercorn rental approved on the basis that the Lessee will be providing community and education benefits in addition to maintaining land which had long been overgrown.

A Land Management Plan was also prepared by Council in consultation with the Lessee, and approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, as required.

Since the lease commenced the Lessee has regularly requested financial and in-kind assistance from Council and the value of contributions provided to date is included in the Financial and Resource Implications section of this Report.

3. Report

This Report has been prepared to enable Council to consider the following requests for assistance received from the Lessee:

1. by email to the Mayor on 4 May 2016:

(a) A change of name to “Merryfields Environmental Education Centre” and replacement of the park sign to show this new name;

(b) A $20,000.00 budget allocation to provide wall sheeting, electrical works, toilets, plumbing and insulation to complete the main section of a new community / classroom building on the land; and

2. by telephone to Council’s Property Officer on 10 May 2016:

(c) that Council insure the new classroom building and toilets currently under construction in addition to all other buildings currently on site.

Change of Name

The Lessee has requested a change of name from “Merryfields Environmental Park and Outdoor Education Centre” to the “Merryfields Environmental Education Centre”. The Lessee has advised that the name change is required to come into line with similar centres throughout Queensland and is important for future development and use.

If this name change is approved, the Lessee has also requested that Council update the current sign on the Land with the new name.

The request for a change of name does not appear to be unreasonable although no evidence supporting the request has been provided. The Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and

Page 93 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Services has indicated that the anticipated cost to change the sign would be between $500 - $1,000 although this should be the Lessee’s responsibility if Council consents to the name change.

Financial assistance for construction of new Community / Classroom Building

This request was made by the Lessee directly to the Mayor just over one month after an earlier request from the Lessee to Council’s Plumbing and Building team for $20,000 for a toilet block facility which was considered at Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 23 March 2016.

On 23 March 2016 Council was advised of the significant financial and in-kind assistance already provided to the Lessee since 2010, details of which are included in the Financial and Resource Implications section of this Report. Council ultimately resolved to note this support and not provide the additional financial assistance requested. Council also resolved to authorise the Chief Executive Officer to write to the Lessee and offer assistance for the future with preparing a business plan, inclusive of succession planning, and with making application for alternative grants funding.

In the days following the Council Meeting the Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning, Manager Plumbing & Building and the Sports, Recreation & Community Grants Officer met with the Lessee and advised him of Council’s resolution. It is noted that some months prior to the March Council Meeting, the Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services also met with the Lessee to discuss a business and succession plan and explain what should be included.

Whilst the new request is for a community / classroom building, with internal toilets, it is effectively for the same financial commitment and purpose. No additional or supporting information has been provided to justify a change to the position taken by Council.

Insurance

Under the lease, which the Lessee accepted and signed, the Lessee is responsible for all insurances. This obligation is a standard lessee obligation and was explained to the Lessee before lease negotiations commenced. However, following a meeting between the Lessee and the former Executive Manager Governance and Performance and the Executive Manager Corporate and Community Services on 28 February 2013, a letter was issued to the Lessee confirming that Council would provide public risk liability insurance for the Land and property and contents insurance for all buildings on the Land in recognition of a pre-lease resolution of Council to this effect. The value of the contents was estimated at $10,000.

The Lessee maintains public risk liability insurance in respect of ongoing activities of the group through the umbrella coverage of the State Landcare group.

The Lessee has advised that it is now in the process of constructing the new classroom / community building and has requested that Council insure this building in line with this arrangement.

A review of Council’s assets insurance schedule has revealed that the existing buildings are not specifically listed. This could be the case for various reasons including that the buildings are the Lessee’s assets, or it may be a result of the assets schedules never being fully completed under Council’s previous assets insurer. With Council’s new insurance scheme,

Page 94 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Council is currently working to ensure all assets are specifically included on the insurance schedule (with appropriate values indicated).

In light of the Lessee’s request, the possibility that the Lessee will construct further improvements on the Land in future and this arrangement having been made which binds Council to a long-term insurance obligation, it is appropriate for the new Council to consider and endorse the arrangement made with the Lessee. If Council confirms that it will be responsible for all insurances for the duration of the lease term, including any buildings constructed in the future, the insurance schedules will be appropriately completed.

It should be noted that the lessee will retain ownership, management and control of the assets.

The Recommendation made in this Report recognises the support given to the Lessee since 2010 and the arrangement made with the Lessee in February 2013 in relation to insurance liability. However, except for the insurance costs, it does not commit Council to any further financial responsibility in relation to the construction of the new building or updated signage. This is an appropriate outcome to manage the ongoing relationship with the Lessee who is providing a community benefit albeit balanced against the Lessee’s expectations.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Council’s records and mapping will need to be updated to reflect the facility’s new name.

If Council accepts the Recommendation made in this Report and continues to be responsible for all insurance costs (and electricity costs as also agreed in writing on 15 May 2013), further consideration will be given to formally amending the Trustee Lease terms to reflect this. This will occur by way of Form 13 Amendment which will be signed by Council and the Lessee and approved by, and registered with, the Department of Natural Resources and Mines. It will take effect as a formal, enforceable part of the Lease.

As the Land is trust land, the Lessee is bound not only by the trustee lease conditions but also by the Mandatory Standard Terms imposed by the State, including that the Lessee can only improve the land in accordance with all approvals and the Land Management Plan prepared by Council. The Land Management Plan was prepared in consultation with the Lessee, and only provides for the following buildings to be constructed on the Land:

 a Teaching building – 15m x 7.6m x 2.4m with a 3m awning  a Workshop and Storage building – 9m x 6m x 2.4m with a 3 m awning

Ideally, the Lessee should be reporting to Council, and Council inspecting any proposed development sites, so that the Land Management Plan can be updated before any further improvement commences. Council’s Property Officer will now review the Land Management Plan and make any amendments necessary to reflect the improvements on site.

The Lessee has already been granted significant concessions, both legally and financially. There is a risk that this could be perceived as a precedent for similar commitments to be sought by other land users, notwithstanding the efforts of Council’s Legal Services team to provide consistency in lease obligations and rental expectations.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Page 95 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

When Council considered the Lessee’s last request for financial assistance to construct a toilet block in March 2016 (which was refused), Council noted the significant funding and in-kind support that has already been provided to the Lessee since 2010:

Community Grants $ 9,000.00 Environmental Grants $10,620.00 Capital Works $ 9,025.19 Water line installation $ 3,900.00 2010 In-kind Assistance $ 8,669.24 2011 In-kind Assistance $22,128.86 2012 In-kind Assistance $21,791.66 2013 In-kind Assistance $23,273.01 2014 In-kind Assistance $ 4,541.08 TOTAL $112,949.04

The in-kind assistance covered mowing, maintenance and plant supply costs.

In addition, Council waived fees related to the design and application of building, plumbing and sewerage works to the value of $2,976.00.

Council also pays all electricity and insurances costs, except public liability insurance in respect of the Lessee’s activities, in relation to the Lessee’s use of the land. A review of previous Council resolutions also indicates that Council has agreed to assist the Lessee with covering all water usage costs. Over the full term of the lease, it is anticipated that this will be significant.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

The Chief Executive Officer shall be authorised to do all things necessary to give effect to Council’s resolution.

7. Communication and Engagement

The Chief Executive Officer, through Council’s Legal Services team, shall be responsible for advising the Lessee in writing of Council’s resolution and ensuring that all insurance liability is appropriately reflected in Council’s insurance policies and schedules.

It is proposed that compliance with the Land Management Plan will be more strictly managed through annual reporting and inspections where necessary. It is also appropriate for communication with the Lessee to occur through one Council contact point to be determined by the Chief Executive Officer in order to more effectively manage the Lessee’s requests and expectations and avoid duplication of work.

8. Conclusion

The Recommendation in this Report will provide a determination of the Lessee’s requests whilst recognising the support previously offered and the financial commitments given by Council to date.

9. Action/s

Page 96 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

1. The Chief Executive Officer provide written notification to the Lessee of Council’s resolution.

Attachments 1View Map 1 Page 2View Letter 1 Page 3View Letter - Name Change 1 Page

Page 97 Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc - Lease of Merryfields Attachment 1 Environmental Park & Outdoor Education Centre - Request Map for Council Assistance and Change of Name

Attachment 1 10.13 Page 98

Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc - Lease of Merryfields Attachment 2 Environmental Park & Outdoor Education Centre - Request Letter for Council Assistance and Change of Name

Attachment 2 10.13 Page 99

Lockyer Valley Landcare Inc - Lease of Merryfields Attachment 3 Environmental Park & Outdoor Education Centre - Request Letter - Name Change for Council Assistance and Change of Name

Attachment 3 10.13 Page 100

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Cr Holstein returned to the meeting, the time being 11:43am.

11.0 ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING REPORTS

11.1 Request for Permissible Change to Amend the Conditions of a Development Permit for Reconfiguration of a Lot for Boundary Realignment (10 lots into 10 lots), on land described as Lot 2 RP222104, Lots 1 & 2 RP161069, Lot 1 RP135140, Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 RP7817, Lots 1 & 3 RP199340 located at 62 Gatton-Laidley Road, Forest Hill

Date: 16 May 2016 Author: Tanya O'Brien, Planning Officer Responsible Officer: Dan McPherson, Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning

Summary:

The request has been assessed in accordance with the requirements of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and is recommended for approval subject to the conditions stated in the Officer’s Recommendation.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT the request for a Permissible Change to a Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot for Boundary Realignment (10 lots into 10 lots) on land described as Lot 2 RP222104, Lots 1 & 2 RP161069, Lot 1 RP135140, Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 RP7817, Lots 1 & 3 RP199340 at 62 Gatton-Laidley Rd be agreed to by the amendment of Condition 5 and 6 to read:

5. A ‘Certificate of Supply’ must be submitted to Council, verifying that a supply of electricity is available to proposed Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 , 9 and 10 or that the applicant has entered into a suitable agreement with the relevant authority for the supply of electricity to the new lots.

6. A ‘Certificate of Supply’ must be submitted to Council, verifying that telecommunications is available to proposed Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 or that the applicant has entered into a suitable agreement with the relevant authority for the provision of telecommunications to the new lots.

RESOLUTION THAT the request for a Permissible Change to a Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot for Boundary Realignment (10 lots into 10 lots) on land described as Lot 2 RP222104, Lots 1 & 2 RP161069, Lot 1 RP135140, Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 RP7817, Lots 1 & 3 RP199340 at 62 Gatton-Laidley Rd be agreed to by the amendment of Condition 5 and 6 to read:

Page 101 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

5. A ‘Certificate of Supply’ must be submitted to Council, verifying that a supply of electricity is available to proposed Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 , 9 and 10 or that the applicant has entered into a suitable agreement with the relevant authority for the supply of electricity to the new lots.

6. A ‘Certificate of Supply’ must be submitted to Council, verifying that telecommunications is available to proposed Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 or that the applicant has entered into a suitable agreement with the relevant authority for the provision of telecommunications to the new lots.

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0035

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

The request for a permissible change to amend conditions 5 and 6 of Reconfiguration of a Lot approval ROL2015/0026 was lodged with Council on 29 March 2016 by OWR Surveyors Pty Ltd.

2. Background

An application for ten (10) lot boundary realignment was approved by Council on at its Ordinary Meeting on 16 December 2015. As the application was approved at a Council meeting the request for a permissible change must be put before Council for determination.

The approval included conditions 5 and 6 that are applied where new lots are likely to be used for residential occupation and require evidence that an electricity supply and telecommunications connections are available to the land.

3.0 Assessment

3.1 Approved Development

The development approval of 16 December 2016 allows the ten existing lots to be reconfigured as indicated below.

Page 102 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

3.2 Assessment – Request for a Permissible Change

The request seeks to amend conditions 5 and 6 which require:

5: A ‘Certificate of Supply’ must be submitted to Council, verifying that a supply of electricity is available to all proposed allotments or that the applicant has entered into a suitable agreement with the relevant authority for the supply of electricity to the new lots.

6. A ‘Certificate of Supply’ must be submitted to Council, verifying that telecommunications is available to all proposed allotments or that the applicant has entered into a suitable agreement with the relevant authority for the provision of telecommunications to the new.

Page 103 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

In support of the request to amend conditions 5 and 6 to remove the requirement for an electricity supply and telecommunications connections to proposed Lots 5 and 6, the applicant has indicated:

The approved boundary realignment has created ten (10) useable lots, some of which are not intended for future residential uses, however the majority will be retained for farming/cropping purposes. Energex representatives have advised that the lots fronting Gatton-Laidley Road (proposed Lots 7 – 10) can be serviced by existing infrastructure, however the lots fronting Railway Street will require new/augmented infrastructure at a cost of approximately $50,000.

Considering the current and future use of the lots fronting Railway Street, the applicant is seeking to change the condition with reference to proposed Lots 5 and 6. These lots are occupied by a pivot irrigator and will continue to be used for cropping purposes. Given the investment in farming infrastructure that the owner has made and the low lying characteristics of this highly productive arable land, it is very unlikely that the lots will be used for purposes other than cropping in the foreseeable future. This irrigator is supplied with electricity from proposed lots 8 and 9 (i.e. the main farm) and the requirement to service new lots with electricity from Railway Street is unreasonable from both a use and cost perspective. As such, the applicant requests that a permissible change is made to condition 5 and it is amended as follows:

A ‘Certificate of Supply’ must be submitted to Council, verifying that a supply of electricity is available to proposed Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 , 9 and 10 or that the applicant has entered into a suitable agreement with the relevant authority for the supply of electricity to the new lots.

Consistent with the reasons outlined above, proposed Lot 5 and 6 do not require servicing with telecommunications infrastructure. As such, the applicant requests that a permissible change is made to condition 6 and it is amended as follows:

A ‘Certificate of Supply’ must be submitted to Council, verifying that telecommunications is available to proposed Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 or that the applicant has entered into a suitable agreement with the relevant authority for the provision of telecommunications to the new lots.

Conditions 5 and 6 are attached to any reconfiguring a lot approval that results in the creation of a new lot that is likely to be used for the construction of a residence. The applicant has indicated that proposed Lots 5 and 6 will be utilised for agricultural purposes and not residential purposes. It is agreed that the conditions should be amended to reflect proposed Lots 5 and 6 not requiring telecommunication and electricity supply certificates on this basis.

Should circumstances change and proposed lots 5 and 6 are sold in the future the responsibility for providing electricity and telecommunications connections to any dwellings or other buildings on the land will be borne by the future owners.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Council’s decision on the request to amend the conditions requiring evidence of an electricity supply and telecommunications services to new lots that are likely to be used for residential purposes will clarify Council’s policy on this matter.

Page 104 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

5. Financial and Resource Implications

There are no financial and resource implications that arise from the recommendation provided in this report.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

There are no implications for either delegations or authorisations arising from the recommendation provided in this report.

7. Communication and Engagement

The decision of Council will be formally communicated to the applicant in accordance with the requirements of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.

8. Conclusion

The approved boundary realignment will allow more useable lots for agriculture purposes. The removal of proposed Lots 5 and 6 from the list of lots for which electricity and telecommunications supply certificates are required to be provided prior to plan sealing will not affect the ability for the proposed lots to be used for agricultural purposes.

9. Action/s

That the request be approved subject to the conditions provided in the Officer’s Recommendation.

Page 105 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

11.2 Requirement to Seek Extension for the Finalisation of the Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP)

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Trevor Boheim, Manager Planning and Environment Responsible Officer: Dan McPherson, Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning

Summary:

Changes to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) that came into effect in 2015, make it a requirement to prepare and finalise a SPA compliant Adopted Infrastructure Charges Plan (LGIP) by 1 July 2016. If Councils have not met this timeframe, they will be unable to charge infrastructure charges beyond 1 July 2016, unless they pass a resolution to seek an extension up to June 30, 2018. In order to qualify for the State extension, Council must write to the Minister with a copy of the resolution and provide a project plan demonstrating an ability to comply with the ultimate, June 2018 extension deadline to prepare a new LGIP. In order to meet the State imposed deadline, Council must now write to the Minister by 27 May, 2016 with the resolution and project plan.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolve under Section 982 and Section 997 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 to apply to the Minister for an extension to the adoption deadline of the Local Government Infrastructure Plan in alignment with the adoption of the proposed draft Planning Scheme or no later than 30 June 2018;Further; THAT Council resolve to approve the application and project plan, to accompany the extension request be submitted to the Minister.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolve under Section 982 and Section 997 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 to apply to the Minister for an extension to the adoption deadline of the Local Government Infrastructure Plan in alignment with the adoption of the proposed draft Planning Scheme or no later than 30 June 2018; Further; THAT Council resolve to approve the application and project plan, to accompany the extension request be submitted to the Minister.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Cook Resolution Number: 16-20/0036

CARRIED 7/0

Page 106 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Report

1. Introduction

In order for Council to continue to levy infrastructure charges for development, Council needs to pass a resolution to seek an extension to prepare an LGIP and to write to the Minister on the matter by 27 May 2016, to allow for sufficient time for the matter to be considered for the 30 June 2016 deadline. The letter and resolution must be accompanied by a detailed project plan including project benchmarks, budget, and resource allocation to satisfy the State Government that Council will be able to have an operational LGIP in place by June 2018.

Should Council determine that it will not pass the recommended resolution and write to the Minister to seek the extension with a relevant project plan it will no longer be able to levy infrastructure charges on development from 1 July 2016.

2. Background

In addition to the recommended resolution the Minister is seeking a detailed LGIP Project Plan. The project plan identifies the main steps to prepare and adopt an LGIP, the time frames relevant to each step and the adoption date. A summary of the main steps in the process and anticipated timeframes for each step is outlined in the table below. The LGIP will ultimately form part of any proposed new draft Planning Scheme for the Locker Valley Regional Council. After consultation at an officer level with Brisbane City Council it has been determined that Brisbane City Logan, Redlands, Gold Coast, Toowoomba, Moreton Bay, Ipswich, Scenic Rim and Somerset Councils will be seeking a similar extension.

3. Report-LGIP Project Plan  The project plan identifies the main steps to prepare and adopt the LGIP, timeframes associated with each step, and the adoption date. The summary of the main steps in the process as outlined below meet the requirements of the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning’s “Advice to local governments applying for an extension of the timeframe to prepare a local government infrastructure plan of January 2016 (the Advice).  The Advice requires that the local government should set out the following information in a project plan. A detailed project plan to meet the requirements of the advice is enclosed at as Attachment 1.

Key Milestones Project Timeframe Local government resolution to commence drafting an LGIP May 2016 Drafting of LGIP May 2016 – Apr 2017 Review of draft LGIP and completion of LGIP checklist by the appointed Apr – June 2017 independent reviewer Submission of draft LGIP for state review and approval by the Minister to Jul – Sep 2017 proceed to public consultation Public consultation and responding to submissions Oct – Nov 2017*

Page 107 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Update LGIP to include any amendments and have it reviewed by the Dec 2017 – Jan 2018 appointed independent reviewer Submission of draft LGIP for state review and approval of the Minister to Feb – Mar 2018 adopt in planning scheme Local government resolution to adopt the LGIP Apr 2018 Adoption of LGIP in the planning scheme Apr 2018 *LGIP public consultation is dependent on the timing of the planning scheme public consultation stage.

Council resources involved in LGIP Delivery

Section of LGIP Council Department Contributing Resources Planning Scheme and Land Planning and Land Use Planning Use Planning Development Water Supply Infrastructure Not Applicable Not Applicable Network Wastewater Infrastructure Not Applicable Not Applicable Network Transport & Stormwater Infrastructure Works Infrastructure Works and Services Infrastructure Network and Services Recreational Parkland and Infrastructure Works Community Infrastructure Infrastructure Works and Services and Services Network Asset Management Plan Infrastructure Works Preparation and Infrastructure Works and Services and Services Maintenance Long term Financial Plan Corporate and Preparation and Finance Community Services Maintenance Local government Finances Corporate and Long Term Financial Finance Community Facilities Sustainability

Expertise necessary to prepare an LGIP

Council has a combination of Land Use Planning staff and Infrastructure officers who can prepare the LGIP in accordance with the statutory guidelines. Resources are anticipated to be required to deliver the draft LGIP, such as specialist engineering and infrastructure consultants may be utilised.

Project budget arrangements

An allocation has been made in the budget to fund the anticipated costs associated with the LGIP.

Management structure to ensure project coordination and delivery

The Manager Planning is the Project Manager for the delivery of the LGIP. The progress of the LGIP project is required to be reported regularly to the Executive Leadership Team. The Executive Leadership Team is cognisant of the requirements of LGIP and ensures appropriate resources are dedicated to the project, particularly in the identification of desired standards of services, schedule of works and alignment with Asset Management Plans and the Long Term Financial Forecast to ensure a whole of Council view.

Page 108 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Project progress reporting schedule to Council and Executive

The Executive Leadership Team is briefed regularly on the progress of the project. The draft LGIP is required to be considered by the Executive Leadership Team prior to its presentation to Council for endorsement. Council are briefed on the progress of LGIP project periodically at Council workshops and meetings. The reporting schedule for the balance of the project is outlined in the below table.

Meeting Schedule Date Planning Workshop Nov 2016 Executive Team Meeting July 2016 Council Meeting - Endorsement of Draft LGIP for June 2017 reviewer check Council Meeting - Endorsement of Draft LGIP for July 2017 Minister's review Council Meeting - Endorsement to commence Public Oct 2017* Notification Council Meeting - Endorsement to amend LGIP in response to submissions and second reviewer check and seek Minister's Feb 2018 review Council Meeting - Endorsement to adopt LGIP and set Apr 2018 commencement date *LGIP public consultation is dependent on the planning scheme public consultation stage. The LGIP is based on the planning assumption of the new Planning Scheme. Accordingly, the LGIP will not commence public consultation until such time that approval has similarly been received to consult on the draft planning scheme.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

It is necessary to adopt the attached Infrastructure Charges Resolution to ensure that Council’s ability to levy and collect infrastructure charges after 1 July 2016 is not compromised.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Failure to have an Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution request sent to the Minister by May 27, 2016 could prevent Council levying collecting charges after 1 July 2016. The approximate revenue for the financial year to June 2015 was approximately one million dollars.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

There are no implications for delegations or authorisations arising from this report. 7. Communication and Engagement

Council is not required to undergo any consultation to prepare the resolution to seek an extension to prepare an LGIP but would ultimately be required to undertake community consultation on the LGIP when drafted for adoption.

Page 109 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

8. Conclusion

Changes to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, make it essential for Council to seek an extension to prepare an LGIP in order to continue to collect infrastructure charges. This must be accompanied by a written request to the Minister and a project plan indicating Council has resourced and planned for the preparation of the LGIP to meet the June 30, 2018 deadline.

9. Action/s

That Council resolves to write to the Minister in accordance with the Officer’s Recommendation

Attachments 1View 1 Page

Page 110 Requirement to Seek Extension for the Finalisation of the Attachment 1 Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP)

Attachment 1 11.2 Page 111

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

11.3 Queensland Audit Office (QAO) Report Flood Resilience of River Catchments

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Richard Collins, Coordinator Environmental Planning Responsible Officer: Dan McPherson, Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning

Summary:

The QAO report ‘Flood resilience of river catchments’ recognises and supports many of the issues confronting Lockyer Valley Regional Council in achieving sound flood management and building resilience in its catchments. The report identifies the issues of policy fragmentation, lack of coordination, poor resourcing and no overarching vision and regulatory body as fundamental to the failure to effectively manage river catchments. Much of the responsibility for these failings is directed to State departments. This report strongly supports the QAO report and suggests that a letter should be directed to the Queensland Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture and the Environment urging the wholehearted and timely adoption by the State departments of the QAO report’s four recommendations.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT the Queensland Audit Office report ‘Flood resilience of river catchments’ is noted and that a letter is forwarded to the Parliamentary Agriculture and Environment Committee requesting, as a matter of priority, that all of the Report’s recommendations are adopted, in particular, those requiring actions by the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning and the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

RESOLUTION THAT the Queensland Audit Office report ‘Flood resilience of river catchments’ is noted and that a letter is forwarded to the Parliamentary Agriculture and Environment Committee requesting, as a matter of priority, that all of the Report’s recommendations are adopted, in particular, those requiring actions by the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning and the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr McLean Resolution Number: 16-20/0037

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

The Queensland Audit Office tabled its report ‘Flood resilience of river catchments’ in the Queensland Parliament in April 2016 in which it examined the effectiveness of flood resilience

Page 112 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

activities in the Bremer, Lockyer, Mid and Upper Brisbane catchments. The report is broadly supportive of the activities being undertaken by Lockyer Valley Regional Council and recognises the difficulties for local governments in achieving the best possible outcomes within a fragmented and uncoordinated administrative background. The report makes four recommendations with the aim to address these issues and build a resilient regional response to flooding and catchment management in south east Queensland.

2. Background

The Queensland Audit Office (QAO) is the principal external auditor of all Queensland public sector entities. It provides Parliament with assurance about the performance and accountability of the public sector.

The report on the ‘Flood resilience of river catchments’ (the Report) is one of a number of reports to be tabled in the financial year 2015-2016.

The report focussed on the effectiveness of flood resilience activities since 2011 in the Bremer, Lockyer, Mid and Upper Brisbane River catchments and included the following local governments:  Ipswich City Council  Lockyer Valley Regional Council  Scenic Rim Regional Council  Somerset Regional Council The report recommends that, in the absence of stand-alone catchment management authorities, the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning:

1. fulfil its obligation under the State Disaster Management Plan to drive the enhancement of flood resilience in the four catchments:  coordinating flood resilience activities and funding at a state and catchment level  developing strategies and plans, in consultation with the four councils and relevant entities, to effectively identify, assess, prioritise and manage catchment scale flood risks using an integrated catchment management approach  assessing the capacity and capabilities of the four councils and supporting them as necessary in building flood resilience in the catchments and in their local areas. 2. as a matter of priority, establish what funding is reasonably required and complete all elements of the Brisbane River Catchment Flood Studies.

We recommend that the four councils:

3. develop floodplain management plans in accordance with Recommendation 2.12 of the Final Report of the Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry.

We recommend that the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and the four councils:

4. work together to effectively and economically regulate levee banks.

The report was tabled in Parliament on 19 April 2016. It is expected to go to the Agriculture and Environment Committee for a preliminary private briefing during the next sitting of parliament.

Page 113 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

3. Report

The Report notes that flood events are the most destructive and expensive natural disasters in Australia with average losses of $377 million per year. The most recent floods in south east Queensland occurred in 2011 and 2013 and while flood events are an unavoidable, natural phenomena mitigation measures can minimise flood impacts.

The Report recognises that the four councils better understand flood risks today than they did in 2011 and are better prepared, however, the current allocation of roles and responsibilities between State and local governments does not facilitate a strategic approach that manages risk and prioritises and integrates efforts and resources at the catchment scale.

The Report advocates the adoption of integrated catchment management which recognises and balances the relationships in factors impacting on the complex ecosystems within a catchment and that it is often not possible to adjust one factor without affecting another. In Victoria and New South Wales Catchment Management Authorities (CMAs) have been created as statutory bodies to manage biodiversity and native vegetation, waterway health, flood response and recovery. CMAs also conduct flood mapping and studies within their respective catchments which ensures consistency. In contrast, individual councils in Queensland are predominately responsible for managing flood risk and mitigation in their local government areas. Many local government areas can be within a single catchment which, given the variability between council’s resourcing and capabilities, has the potential for inconsistencies in approach and complexities in coordination and administration. Furthermore, disaster management – in this case flooding – is seen as an entirely separate matter rather than a function of broader catchment management.

The Report highlights the differences between local governments and their capability to understand flood risk either ‘in-house’ or through the procurement of professional expertise and yet the State government regularly devolves responsibilities on a range of matters to local governments without consideration of their capacity to effectively manage, respond or enforce. Indeed, this point is illustrated by the expectation of the State government for councils to regulate levee banks as assessment managers under the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009. The Report includes the following quote from once council:

‘…the evaluation and monitoring of the existing levee network would be a mammoth and controversial undertaking and its delivery would be far beyond the financial capacity of councils.’

The Report also considers the complexities in coordination between local governments and many State departments as well as non-government actors including natural resource management organisations and water authorities noting that activities to manage flood risk and build resilience within catchments is fragmented and lacks leadership and clearly defined outcomes. Compounding this critical observation is the, all too frequent, requirement for local governments and natural resource management organisations to compete for grants. This runs the risk of funding going to the ‘best’ application rather than highest priority or most strategic activity within a catchment. It also ensures that for every ‘winner’ there is a ‘loser’ as well introducing uncertainty into the budgeting and project planning of organisations. Awareness of these and many other examples included in the Report is forefront in the work and response of local governments and Lockyer Valley Regional Council has, out of necessity, taken responsibility for managing flood risk and building resilience; it has lobbied the State government for assistance in fulfilling the requirements to regulate the many levee banks

Page 114 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

within the catchment. It coordinates the local Disaster Management Group bringing together government departments, emergency response actors, specialist experts and local communities. Most significantly, it has followed the initiative of the former Mayor Steve Jones and been instrumental in the development of the Resilient Rivers Initiative (RRI) through the Council of Mayors SEQ and the drafting of the Lockyer Catchment Action Plan. While the Report recognises the RRI it also notes that its four goals do not specifically include floodplain management and that the catchment action plans are not floodplain management plans. However determined, and despite its resource shortcomings, Council cannot manage flood risk and build resilience alone. In its recommendations, the Report is quite plain in the need for leadership, coordination and resourcing. In the absence of a CMA or similar statutory body it turns its attention to the State, with particular focus on the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning to drive and coordinate flood resilience, assess the capacity and capabilities of councils and to develop strategies and plans to manage catchment scale flood risks. The Report also recommends that the four councils develop floodplain management plans in accordance with the Final Report of the Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry and that the Department of Natural Resources and Mines works with the four councils to effectively and economically regulate levee banks. Recognising that the Report is far reaching in its considerations it identifies many of the difficulties and frustrations encountered by Council, seeks the same outcomes that Council is striving to achieve and makes recommendations that are in the interest of the community of the Lockyer and more broadly across Queensland. As consequence, this report recommends that the Report is noted and that a letter is forwarded to the Agriculture and Environment Committee requesting, as a matter of priority, that all of the Report’s recommendations are adopted in particular those requiring actions by the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning and the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Initially, there are no policy or legal implications associated with the QAO report or the officer’s recommendations, however, if the recommendations are adopted by the relevant government departments there is the potential for Council to reconsider its policy position and legislative requirements. In this instance a further report will be presented to Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

As with the consideration of Policy and Legal Implications above there are no financial or resource issues directly associated with the QAO report or the officer’s recommendation. In the event that the government departments respond positively to the QAO report any changes are likely to be in the favour of Council.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

There are no Delegations or Authorisations required in regard to this matter.

7. Communication and Engagement

The Lockyer Catchment Action Plan (mentioned above) is now being finalised. As part of that process the engagement with the community - which took the form of one-on-one conversations during the document’s drafting - will be continued to gain acceptance within the community of the Plan’s intent and actions. This process, therefore, may be the best vehicle for talking to the community about the QAO report. Page 115 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

8. Conclusion

The QAO report has the potential to provide significant benefits to Council and the community of the Lockyer whereas the costs and implications are minimal or non-existent. In conclusion the Report and its recommendations and the officer’s recommendations should be supported.

9. Action/s

Draft and forward a letter to the Agriculture and Environment Committee of the Queensland Parliament before or during its consideration of the report ‘Flood resilience of river catchments’ supporting its intent and urging the relevant State departments to adopt the recommendations in full.

Attachments https://www.qao.qld.gov.au/report-16:-2015-16

Page 116 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

11.4 Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning Monthly Update

Date: 20 May 2016 Author: Dan McPherson, Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning Responsible Officer: Dan McPherson, Acting Chief Executive Officer

Summary:

This report is to update Council on key issues currently being actioned within the Organisational Development and Planning group.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council receive and note the Executive Manager Organisational Development and Planning Monthly Update.

RESOLUTION THAT Council receive and note the Executive Manager Organisational Development and Planning Monthly Update.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Holstein Resolution Number: 16-20/0038

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

This report provides an update on key matters arising and being addressed since the last report.

2. Background

The previous reports provide the background information to date and only progress is being reported during April 2016.

3. Report

Learning & Development

Courses Held Since Last Report  Drug and Alcohol Training  Corporate & WHS Induction

Page 117 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 Intermediate Excel Training

Upcoming Training

 Corporate Induction  Drug & Alcohol Awareness (for new staff)  Fire Warden Training  Code of Conduct (Catch Up)  Workplace Bullying and Harassment (All Staff)  Provide First Aid  Provide Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)

Currently Scheduling

 Difficult Conversations Training for Field Staff  Basic Supervisor Training  Workplace Bullying, Harassment and Discrimination  Asbestos Awareness  Adult Language, Literacy and Numeracy program  Microsoft Office Suite (looking at online options)  Professional Development under CSQ funding

Work Health & Safety

Injuries/ Incidents

 There have been three (3) injuries reported during this period.

Plant Vehicle incidents

 There have been three (3) plant vehicle incidents reported during this period.

Near Miss Incidents

 There has been one (1) near miss incident reported during this period.

Workers Compensation Claims / Injury Management LTI

 There is two (2) Approved open workers compensation claim  There is two (2) Applications for compensation pending

Sports, Recreation and Community  Assessed Community Grant Application, 21 Applications received a report will got to Council in late May  Overseen spreading of fertiliser at Laidley Rec Grounds  Completed ‘Get Playing Plus’ grant application  ANZAC Day assistance funds paid  Three (3) Sporting Ambassador payments made totalling $1500  Community Grants Program closed

Page 118 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 21 Applications requesting $63,133 worth of funding assistance  Met with Department Sport and Recreation regarding ‘Get Playing Plus’ grant. Council will apply for funding to upgrade and install new lighting to the Laidley Recreation Reserve as current lighting is close to end of life.  Laidley Rec Grounds (all fields) have started to receive fertiliser to help with maintaining high standard of service.  $5000 worth of donations was made to the Ropehill Sports Complex to assist in purchasing of new field maintenance equipment sought through external funding opportunities.

Staging Post Café

Sales revenue remains very strong at the Staging Post with double digit revenue growth recorded for April.

There has been some staff attrition in the senior ranks of the café. However, these roles have now been recruited with these new staff due to commence in the coming weeks. The recruitment of these key roles will ensure that the Café and Functions operations remain strong.

Development Assessment

Development applications received between 1 April 2016 and 18 May 2016: o MCU for Dwelling in a Bushfire Area at 31 Dobel Drive, Upper Lockyer o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 1 Crosby Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 3 Crosby Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 25 Francis Road, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 27 Francis Road, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 29 Francis Road, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 30 Francis Road, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 5 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 56 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 60 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 62 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 68 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 70 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 4 Rampton Street, Laidley North o MCU for Apartment at 12 Hanlon Court, Laidley Heights o MCU for Dual Occupancy at Woodlands Road, Gatton o MCU for Cemetery (extension) at 815 Gatton-Clifton Road, Ma Ma Creek o MCU for Accommodation Units at 1 Dwyer Street, Gatton o Reconfiguring a Lot for 1 into 2 lots at Blanchview Road, Withcott o Reconfiguring a Lot for 1 into 2 lots at 2 Australia II Drive, Kensington Grove o Reconfiguring a Lot for 1 into 2 lots at 2 Faith Avenue, o Boundary Realignment at 46 Lake Clarendon Way, Lake Clarendon o Operational Works for Advertising Device at 114 Spencer Street, Gatton o Operational Works for Civil Works at 5 Faith Avenue, Plainland o Operational Works for Civil Works at Ranger Road, Adare

Requests received between 1 April 2016 and 18 May 2016: o Extend Approval for Subdivision at 18 Laidley-Plainland Road, Plainland

Page 119 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Development applications approved between 1 April 2016 and 18 May 2016: o MCU for Dual Occupancy Dwelling at 5 Golf Links Drive, Gatton o MCU for Dual Occupancy Dwelling at 43 Highview Avenue, Gatton o MCU for Dual Occupancy Dwelling at 37 Allan Cunningham Drive, Gatton o MCU for Shop at Gehrke Road & Endeavour Way, Plainland o MCU for Roadside Stall at 1 Weier Road, Plainland o MCU for Catering Shop at 10 Railway Street, Gatton o MCU for Bulk Retail at Warrego Highway & Fairway Drive, o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 3 Crosby Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 30 Francis Road, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 68 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 70 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 4 Rampton Street, Laidley North o MCU for Dwelling in a Flood Hazard Area at 56 Hardy Drive, Laidley North o Reconfiguring a Lot for 1 into 3 lots at 29 Meadows Road, Withcott o Operational Works for a Billboard at 8726 Warrego Highway, Withcott o Operational Works for Civil Works for Motel at Lake Apex Drive, Gatton o Operational Works for Vegetation Clearing at Old Toowoomba Road, Glen Cairn

Requests approved between 1 April 2016 and 18 May 2016: o Change Approval for Indoor Entertainment at 75 Cochrane Street, Gatton

Strategic Planning

The Manager Planning and Environment attended a meeting of Senior Council planning officers convened by the Council of Mayors (SEQ) to discuss the development of the SEQ Regional Plan on 4 April 2016.

The Manager Planning and Environment and the Coordinator Strategic Land Use Planning attended a meeting of Senior Council planning officers convened by the Council of Mayors (SEQ) on 3 May 2016 to discuss the development of the SEQ Regional Plan.

Environmental Planning

Council’s annual Connect to Your Creek Week bus tour “Creeks, Cameras and Cakes” was held on 9 April 2016. There were 19 attendees and feedback from numerous attendees was very positive. This year’s event focussed on the links between waterways and food production and included stops at: o Holmwood Produce for a talk about native bush tucker, a tour of their farm and morning tea made using bush food ingredients; o Mulgowie Farming Company to look at how they have incorporated flood mitigation measures into their farmland and at the restoration work done along Laidley Creek with SEQ Catchments (Paul Daly from SEQ Catchments joined the tour to give a talk on the work they have been doing); and o Cattle producers Gordon and Donella Van Der Est at Forest Hill to look at the creek restoration work that they completed 10 years ago which has returned the creek to a more natural state, slowed down erosive processes which threatened their property and improved their pasture.

Page 120 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

University of Queensland Project – Six students in the Bachelor of Environmental Management course are undertaking a group project throughout semesters 1 and 2: Infrastructure and Community Protection through Stabilisation or Re-siting of Road Reserves, Services and Utilities. This project is one of the actions in the Draft Lockyer Catchment Action Plan. The team is focussing on the Tenthill Creek catchment, and will consider aspects such as human safety, property access, socio-economic implications of reduced access, environmental risks, opportunities for creek stabilisation, standard crossing designs etc. Council is the client for their project, and the inception meeting was held 15 April 2016.

University of Queensland Intern – Three students from the Bachelor of Environmental Management course at UQ were interviewed for a 14-week student placement in Semester 2, commencing in July. Sam Mahaffey has been offered the placement, and his project will focus on development of community awareness in relation to the rights and responsibilities of landholders adjacent to creeks. This project is one of the actions in the Draft Lockyer Catchment Action Plan.

Reach Project (with SEQ Catchments) – Due to favourable weather, tree planting works have recommenced at two properties at Carpendale on Lockyer Creek. Planting and bank stabilisation will continue over the coming weeks at a further five properties.

Balaam Hill offset – 4,900 plants have been planted at the regeneration site. The regeneration and revegetation are both progressing very well however the most recent planting has suffered with the recent lack of rain. The contractor has agreed to redirect funds towards increased watering. Preparation for slashing fire breaks will commence shortly.

Geomorphological studies – Consultants Water Technology have provided preliminary results for Murphy’s Creek, including recommendations for on ground works. This creek is relatively stable, being bedrock confided, however some works could be undertaken in floodplain pockets to reduce sediment transfer in future rain events. Awaiting results for the Tenthill catchment. Findings will be incorporated into the Draft Lockyer Catchment Action Plan.

The Inaugural Meeting of the Derrymore-Iredale Community Pest Management Group was held on 16 April 2016 and a meeting of the Forest Hill-Glen Cairn Community Pest Management Group was held on 20 April 2016. The participation of members of the newly formed group at Derrymore-Iredale at the meeting provides an indication that this group will be a particularly effective local pest management group moving forward.

The Wild Dog, Fox and Pig Baiting Program was undertaken on 6, 7 and 8 April 2016 with baits distributed from the Gatton Saleyards (on 6 April 2016), Springbrook Park Withcott (on 7 April 2016) and the Junction View Hall (on 8 April 2016). The number of baits being issued appears to have stabilised after the initial increases that occurred when Council became more active in this area during 2015.

The Coordinator Environmental Planning attended a breakfast with the Mayor, Ian Rickus MP, Jon Krause MP, Somerset Regional Council Mayor Graeme Lehmann and Cr David Pahlke (Ipswich City Council) to discuss the Queensland Audit Office Report 16: 2015-16 ‘Flood resilience of river catchments’. A report to council on this document has been provided at this Council meeting.

Page 121 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The Council of Mayors (SEQ) Board Meeting included the meeting of the Resilient Rivers Taskforce. While no minutes have yet been received it is understood that the Taskforce agreed that COMSEQ will establish a company to manage funds provided by third parties for the implementation of the Lockyer Catchment Action Plan.

The Coordinator Environmental Planning and the Senior Environmental Planner met with Tim Shields from Ipswich City Council to discuss in detail the experience of LVRC in the development of the documentation for the management of flying-fox roosts. This included a visit to the three roosts in the Lockyer Valley within the Urban Flying-fox Management Area.

The Coordinator Environmental Planning and the Senior Environmental Planner visited the Reach-Stewardship projects along the Lockyer Creek with Ross Bigwood (SEQ Catchments). These projects are now effectively complete and the acquittal process is underway. The projects have been very successful, look impressive and will contribute towards the outcomes of the Lockyer Catchment Action Plan. Consideration is being given to including the project sites within the Landholder Assistance Programme.

The Coordinator Environmental Planning attended the regional Koala Conservation Planning workshop at Nerang. Given the recent media interest in the research by the University of Queensland regarding the rapid decline of koalas in the Koala Coast and the indication by the State Environment Minister Steven Miles to establish an expert panel there is a possibility that the South East Queensland Koala Conservation State Planning Regulatory Provisions may be extended further west to include the Lockyer Valley in the future.

A letter was drafted for the CEO in response to a request from Biosecurity Queensland to comment on a number of specific biosecurity programmes. The letter requested that the management of rabbits in the Lockyer Valley should be included as a programme.

Council’s Pest Management Officer and Spraying Officer attended training on the human destruction of pest animals at Canungra.

The Coordinator Environmental Planning attended the Department of Transport and Main Roads’ ‘Declared Species’ workshop at Toowoomba. The purpose of the workshop was to establish a common approach to the management of weed species on Main Roads across the region and to agree upon funding for the next financial year. The additional responsibility for managing work presently carried out by RoadTek on Murphys Creek road and the Gatton-Helidon Road was also discussed.

Notice was provided that Moreton Water Resource Plan which was due to expire on 1 September 2017 has been extended. The Department of Natural Resources and Mines had indicated that the replacement plan would include the conversion to entitlements to volumetric allocations and while Minister’s Performance Assessment Report Water Resource (Moreton) Plan 2007 makes it clear that while intended proposals will still go ahead, these are now very unlikely to occur before September 2017. The Environmental Planning team provided considerable input into the political and community response to the plan.

Page 122 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Agreement was reached on the compressing of the June round wild dog bait delivery. For this round, baits will be distributed on two days (Thursday 9 June 2016 9:00am Gatton Saleyard and 3:00pm Withcott, Friday 10 June 2016 1:00pm Mulgowie and 3:00pm Junction View). This change is in response to insufficient staff availability for the preparation of baits.

The Coordinator Environmental Planning attended a meeting at the Council of Mayors (SEQ) office to discuss the structuring of the investment programme for the Mid Brisbane River Catchment Action Plan.

Agreement was reached on the method of recording, reporting and invoicing for the contract for the management of weeds on State Controlled Roads with IWS. The process will ensure that a Works Order will be generated prior to commencement of works, will satisfy the recording for invoicing requirements and reporting for the DTMR pest officers while generating data that will enable informed budget preparation for the 2017-2018 FY.

Page 123 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

12.0 CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORTS

12.1 Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Budget – 30 April 2016

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Tony Brett, Manager Finance and Customer Service Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services

Summary:

In accordance with Section 204 of the Local Government Regulation 2012, a financial report summarising the progress of Council’s actual performance against budgeted performance is to be presented to Council. This report provides a summary of Council’s financial performance against budget for the financial year to 30 April 2016.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolves to receive and note the Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance versus Budget to 30 April 2016.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to receive and note the Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance versus Budget to 30 April 2016.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0039

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

In accordance with Section 204 of the Local Government Regulation 2012, a financial report summarising the progress of Council’s actual performance against budgeted performance is to be provided to Council.

2. Background

Monthly reporting of Council’s financial performance is a legislative requirement and reinforces sound financial management practices throughout the organisation.

3. Report

The following report provides a summary of Council’s financial performance against budget to 30 April 2016.

Page 124 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Operating Revenue - Target $47.18 million Actual $47.64 million or 100.97%

At 30 April 2016, overall operating revenue is on target for the budgeted amount.

Operating grants and subsidies received equal $7.19 million or 102.11% of the year to date budgeted revenue amount. The majority of these grants relate to the Commonwealth’s Federal Assistance Grants which has been paid in advance. Council has also received the final $2.54 million in NDRRA payments relating to the acquittal of the 2013 flood event.

Interest revenue remains under budget due to lower cash balances and interest rates not rising as anticipated. The budget for this line item will be amended as part of the April Budget Review.

Operating Expenditure - Target $43.34 million Actual $46.69 million or 107.73%

At 30 April 2016, overall operating expenditure for the year is over the budgeted target. A significant factor in this overrun is due to the fact that depreciation has been applied for the year to date based on revised asset values following the completion of 2014/15 audit.

Overall employee costs are over target for the month and overall goods and services costs are on target for the month. The variance in employee costs relates to the timing of the back pay, under recovery of accounting on-costs and the split of works between operating and capital. A budget transfer from Capital will be prepared for the April Budget Review to cover the additional wage costs.

Depreciation costs are forecast to exceed the end of year budget amount by around $1.48 million and this will also be included in the next budget review.

Capital Grant Revenue - Target $3.87 million Actual $2.90 million or 74.94%

Overall capital grants and subsidies revenue is under the target for the year to date with the timing of capital grants and subsidies remains largely dependent upon the completion of the annual capital works program and the grant application approval process.

Capital Expenditure – Target $19.77 million Actual $8.53 million or 43.15%

To 30 April 2016, Council has expended $8.53 million on its capital works program with a further $1.20 million in committed costs for works currently underway. The capital works budget includes the approved carry forward works from the 2014/15 financial year. At present the capital budget is significantly underspent and a revision of the works will be included in the budget review.

The main expenditures for the year to date are $6.33 million within Infrastructure Services and $1.58 million within Corporate and Community Services.

Statement of Financial Position

The Statement of Financial Position provides information on the breakdown of Council’s assets and liabilities at a point in time. At 30 April, Council had $30.30 million in current

Page 125 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

assets compared to $8.41 million in current liabilities with a ratio of 3.60:1. This means that for every dollar of current liability, there is $3.60 in current assets to cover it.

Statement of Cash Flows

The Statement of Cash Flows provides information on the amount of cash coming in and going out. As at 30 April, there has been a net cash inflow of $4.54 million with $10.14 million generated from operating activities, a net $4.54 million spent on capital works and $1.06 million repaying Council’s borrowings.

Council’s cash balance for the 2015/2016 financial year has now peaked with the collection of the rates instalment in March. Council’s cash balance will now decline until the first levy of 2017 rates is collected towards the end of August 2016.

The Statement of Cash Flows is important as it shows the real movement in Council’s cash balances, as opposed to the accounting movements shown in the Statement of Income and Expenditure. In order to maintain adequate working capital, it is estimated that Council needs around $11.00 million cash at any one time, at 30 April, the cash balance was $25.66 million.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Policy and legal implications will be addressed in future on matters that arise before Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

With the 2013 flood recovery works completed, Council is returning to a “business as usual” situation and will have a much greater degree of control over its financial results. The significant ups and downs in Council’s cashflows due to the timing of NDRRA expenditure and grant payments will no longer be experienced. The final payments of the 2013 recovery grants have now been received.

Monitoring of budgets and actuals remains important if Council is to achieve the financial results adopted as part of the 2015-2016 budget, and any variations or anomalies will need to be investigated and action taken as appropriate. A formal budget review has been completed and amendments made as needed. The results of this review will now form the basis for the 2016/2017 Budget.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report. The Executive Manager Corporate and Community Service will manage the requirements in line with existing delegations.

7. Communication and Engagement

The matters arising from this report that require further communication will be addressed through existing communication channels.

Page 126 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

8. Conclusion

At 30 April, Council’s overall revenues are on target with overall expenditure over target mainly as a result of increased depreciation on Council’s non-current assets.

9. Action/s

Nil.

Attachments 1View Monthly Financial Report 201604 18 Pages

Page 127 Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 128

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 129

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 130

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 131

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 132

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 133

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 134

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 135

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 136

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 137

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 138

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 139

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 140

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 141

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 142

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 143

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 144

Summary of Council Actual Financial Performance vs. Attachment 1 Budget – 30 April 2016 Monthly Financial Report 201604

Attachment 1 12.1 Page 145

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

12.2 April Budget Review and Updated Long Term Financial Plan

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Tony Brett, Manager Finance and Customer Service Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services

Summary:

This report provides an updated budget resulting from changes to key assumptions since the 2015/2016 Budget was adopted. The changes include adjustments to operating income and expenditure and capital works. Attached to the report is the updated Long Term Financial Plan incorporating the recommended budget changes for Council’s adoption.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolves to adopt the amended 2015-16 Budget and Long Term Financial Plan as set out in the attachment.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to adopt the amended 2015-16 Budget and Long Term Financial Plan as set out in the attachment.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Cook Resolution Number: 16-20/0040

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

In adopting its annual budget, a number of assumptions are used by Council which needs to be updated periodically based on changes in actual results. This budget review has included a review of major changes in assumptions which have occurred since the 2015/2016 Budget was adopted to take into account actual revenues and expenditures for the year to 30 April 2016 and forward projections to 30 June 2016. Where Council amends its budget, the Long Term Financial Plan must also be updated.

2. Background

In order to maintain sound financial management practices, a periodic review of financial performance is required. Council’s Management Team has carried out a review of major changes to income and expenditure for the ten months to 30 April 2016. As a result of this review, it is recommended that Council amend its 2015/16 Budget and associated Long Term Financial Plan to better reflect the 30 June 2016 forecasted position.

Page 146 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

3. Report

At 30 April 2016 a review of financial performance against budget was conducted. As the end of the year is approaching, this review focussed on all variations where impacts are currently known and the need to identify any changes needed to the opening balances for the development of the 2016/17 budget. The future years of the Long Term Financial Plan have also been updated to reflect the amended forecasts.

Table 1 outlines the major operational income and expense items which now require amendment:

TABLE 1 – OPERATING BUDGET AMENDMENTS

Item Income/ Description Amount Comment Expenditure Increase/ (Decrease) 1 Income General Rates ($0.04M) Reduction in revenue due to a greater take up of discount. 2 Income Grant Funding $0.29M Additional grant revenue for 2014 flood funding, trainees, library, roads and pest management. Partially offset by reductions in child care grants (reduced occupancy rates), multicultural programs and immunisation grants. 3 Income Other Income ($0.93M) Reduction in contributions for emergency services precinct (now expected 2017), and developer contributions partially offset by increases in QUU investment return and insurance recoveries. 4 Income Interest ($0.23M) Reduction in interest from investments (lower interest rates) offset by interest on overdue rates. 5 Income Sales ($0.65M) Reductions in recoverable works Revenue (expected works on the Second Range Crossing did not eventuate) offset by increased sponsorship revenue for events. Total Income ($1.56M) Net Decrease in Revenues. 6 Expenditure Employee $3.11M Increase in budget due to Costs adjustments to accounting on- costs, transfers from capital to operating, establishment changes and enterprise bargaining agreement increase. Partially offset by vacant positions and reduced training costs. 7 Expenditure Materials & ($1.13M) Reduced spending on contractors Services and consultants across Council and savings made through new agreements with suppliers. 8 Expenditure Depreciation $1.48M Increased depreciation on non-

Page 147 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

current assets due to annual revaluation and new assets. Total Expenditure $3.46M Net increase in Expenditure. Net Total $5.02M Overall net increase in Expenditure.

The changes to the operational budget will increase the projected deficit to $5.00 million. Where the changes are ongoing, they will be further considered in the 2016/17 Budget process and have been adjusted in the forward projections of the Long Term Financial Plan.

Table 2 shows the changes to the capital income and expense items which now require amendment:

TABLE 2 – CAPITAL BUDGET AMENDMENTS

Item Income/ Description Amount Comment Expenditure Increase/ (Decrease) 1 Income Developer $0.24M Developer contributions for open Contributions spaces and roads and drainage. Total Income $0.24M Net increase in Revenues. 3 Expenditure Regional ($0.44M) GWIZ Project on hold. Development 4 Expenditure Information ($0.10M) Savings in projects. Technology 5 Expenditure Parks & Open $0.10M Laidley Cemetery Shed and Lake Spaces Apex Car Park. 6 Expenditure Waste $0.20M Cell 4 Construction at landfill. Management 7 Expenditure Fleet $0.14M Upgrades to fuel trailers. 8 Expenditure Various minor $0.15M Minor adjustments to projects in adjustments Staging Post, Pest Management, Corporate Communications, Disaster Management, and Facilities. 9 Expenditure Capital ($3.08M) Reductions for various projects to Program be deferred to future years and Delivery savings in completed projects. Total Expenditure ($3.02M) Net decrease in Expenditure.

The total capital works expenditure budget for 2015/16 is now $16.74 million with capital revenues of $4.99 million.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Policy and legal implications will be addressed in future on matters that arise before Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

The updated Relevant Measures of Financial Sustainability are as follows:

Page 148 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The key changes to the long term plan are:

Operating Service Ratio – The long term average increases from -2.4% to 2.6% and operating deficits now projected to 2018.

Net Financial Asset/Liability Ratio – The long term average increases from 54.7% to 29.4% and the ratio exceeds the recommended level to 2017. For 2016 the ratio has exceeded 70% which will impact on Council’s borrowing capacity.

Asset Sustainability Ratio – The long term average reduces from 114.7% to 92.2%. The level of renewal works remains at or near the recommended ratio but is subject to change depending on the capital works approved each year.

The amended long term financial plan shows a significant improvement in Council’s financial position with reduced operating deficits and an improved capacity to borrow. In the final years of the plan, the operating surplus exceeds the recommended level of 10% which will allow for adjustments to income and expenditures in the first half of the timeframe.

The parameters in the 2017 and forward years are under review as part of the 2017 budget process and may vary significantly depending on Council’s directions prior to adopting the budget for the new financial year. Savings measures introduced in the current and previous budgets have been effective in controlling costs and reducing the level of deficit but without changes to service levels or ongoing increases in revenues the situation will deteriorate.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report. The Executive Manager Corporate and Community Service will manage the requirements in line with existing delegations.

7. Communication and Engagement

The matters arising from this report that require further communication will be addressed through existing communication channels.

8. Conclusion

The April budget review has identified the major changes that need to be made to the budget and long term plan. These changes have taken into account the actual incomes and expenditures to date and the expected end of year result. The updated 2015/16 figures will form the starting point for the 2016/17 budget process.

Page 149 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

9. Action/s

1. Update the Long Term Financial Plan and publish it on Council’s website. 2. Update the budgets in the One Council financial system.

Attachments 1View April Budget Review 4 Pages

Page 150 April Budget Review and Updated Long Term Financial Attachment 1 Plan April Budget Review

Attachment 1 12.2 Page 151

April Budget Review and Updated Long Term Financial Plan Attachment 1 April Budget Review

Attachment 1 12.2 Page 152

April Budget Review and Updated Long Term Financial Attachment 1 Plan April Budget Review

Attachment 1 12.2 Page 153

April Budget Review and Updated Long Term Financial Plan Attachment 1 April Budget Review

Attachment 1 12.2 Page 154

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

12.3 Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Charges - 2016/2017

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Tony Brett, Manager Finance and Customer Service Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services

Summary:

The purpose of this report is to seek the adoption of Council’s register of fees and charges (attached) effective from 1 July 2016.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council adopt the Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Charges for 2016/2017 with an effective date of 1 July 2016.

RESOLUTION THAT Council adopt the Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Charges for 2016/2017 with an effective date of 1 July 2016.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Cook Resolution Number: 16-20/0041

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

The purpose of this report is to seek the adoption of Council’s register of fees and charges (attached) effective from 1 July 2016.

2. Background

Council is required as part of its annual budget process, to review its fees and charges each year to ensure that:  cost recovery fees and charges continue to reflect the cost of providing the services performed; and  commercial fees and charges are appropriate given the commercial nature of the services provided.

Page 155 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

3. Report

Finance staff co-ordinate the preparation of Council’s annual budget process which includes its annual fees and charges. Council unit managers are responsible for setting both the level and expected revenue from fees and charges.

Cost recovery fees are set at or as close as possible to full cost, with commercial fees set at rates that reflect market and other associated conditions. In general terms, the cost of services should be borne through fees and charges by those customers who benefit from them.

This position also reflects the recovery constraints of Section 97 of the Local Government Act 2009 in that a cost recovery fee, other than an application fee, must not be more than the cost to Council of taking the action for which the fee is charged.

Key items within the fees for 2016/2017 include:

 Public Halls & Function Rooms – Based on feedback from regular users, and previous Council decisions, all hall hire fees have been changed back to a flat hourly fee charged up to a maximum of twelve hours per day. The fees have remained unchanged from the last review conducted in March 2016.

 Animal Control – Fees for desexed dogs have remained unchanged in order to encourage animals to be registered in a timely manner. Other fees have increased in accordance with the adopted parameter to maintain their relativity to the costs incurred.

 Swimming pools – no change to 2016 fees.

 Waste Charges – no change to domestic waste fixed fees for residents with other charges increasing by minor amounts. A full review of waste fees will be undertaken on the completion of the full cost pricing project.

 Building and Plumbing - The proposed fees and charges have been streamlined and simplified to reflect current processes and the services offered. Some adjustments have been made to the fees being charged to keep them in line with costs or to maintain competitiveness in the market.

In the 2016/2017 financial year, fees and charges are expected to produce approximately $3.50 million in operating revenue. This is slightly less than the amount budgeted for the 2015/2016 financial year and reflects the expectations of the Managers responsible for setting the fees and estimating associated revenues.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Section 97 of the Local Government Act 2009 (the Act) provides for a local government to fix a cost recovery fee and Section 98 of the Act provides for a Register of Cost Recovery Fees.

Section 262 (3) (c) of the Act also empowers a local government to charge for a service or facility, other than a service or facility for which a cost-recovery fee may be fixed.

Page 156 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Various other pieces of State non-local government legislation fix fees for a local government or provide a specific head of power for a local government to set fees or charges in relation to a function imposed on the local government.

Sections 172 and 193 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 (the regulation) establish the requirements for Council’s Revenue Statement and Revenue Policy in relation to information on fees and charges.

Council’s Revenue Statement is also required to outline the criteria used to decide the amount of the cost-recovery fee – Section 172(1)(c) of the Regulation and if Council conducts a business activity on a commercial basis, the criteria used to decide the amount of the charges for the activity’s goods and services – Section 172(1)(d) of the Regulation.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

The price increase parameter for fees and charges has been set in line with Council’s long term financial plan, while recognising the Council Cost Index developed by the Local Government Association of Queensland.

The parameter used is an indicative 3%; however, fees and charges in some instances have been set so as to achieve Council’s requirement to have business units generate sufficient income during the year to cover their respective operating costs plus a return on capital. Other adjustments to fee amounts may be the result of changing costs or service levels or where fees have been combined or abolished.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

There are no new or additional delegation or authorisation issues associated with this report.

7. Communication and Engagement

The proposed fees and charges contained in the attachments have been reviewed by relevant Executive Managers and Unit Managers. Where appropriate they have been benchmarked against other Local Governments and in some cases have been subject to consultation with external stakeholders.

Once adopted by Council, the revised fees and charges will be incorporated into the communication strategy for the 2016/2017 Budget.

8. Conclusion

The adoption of fees and charges forms an integral part of Council’s annual budget process and ensures cost recovery fees and charges reflect the true cost of providing the associated service. Adoption of the register of fees and charges also ensures compliance with Council’s legislative obligations.

9. Action/s

1. Adoption of the attached fees and charges and inclusion in the Register. 2. Communication of the revised fees and charges to all relevant stakeholders, both internal and external, together with the date of effect.

Page 157 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

3. Publication of the Register on Council’s website 4. Inclusion in the Budget Communication strategy.

Attachments 1View Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges 81 Pages

Page 158 Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 159

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 160

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 161

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 162

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 163

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 164

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 165

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 166

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 167

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 168

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 169

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 170

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 171

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 172

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 173

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 174

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 175

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 176

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 177

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 178

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 179

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 180

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 181

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 182

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 183

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 184

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 185

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 186

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 187

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 188

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 189

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 190

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 191

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 192

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 193

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 194

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 195

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 196

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 197

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 198

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 199

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 200

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 201

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 202

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 203

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 204

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 205

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 206

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 207

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 208

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 209

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 210

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 211

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 212

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 213

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 214

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 215

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 216

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 217

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 218

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 219

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 220

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 221

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 222

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 223

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 224

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 225

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 226

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 227

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 228

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 229

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 230

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 231

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 232

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 233

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 234

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 235

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 236

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 237

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 238

Register of Cost Recovery and Commercial Fees and Attachment 1 Charges - 2016/2017 Adoption of 2016/17 Fees & Charges

Attachment 1 12.3 Page 239

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

12.4 Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee

Date: 04 May 2016 Author: Madonna Brennan, Business Improvement Officer Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services

Summary:

Section 105 of the Local Government Act 2009 requires that a local government establish an effective and efficient internal audit function and audit committee. The committee is required to monitor Council’s internal audit function and to provide Council with assurance that its internal control environment is effective.

Council adopted in January 2012 to establish its Audit and Risk Committee and included risk management into the Committee to reflect a best practice governance approach.

In line with the recent election appointments and terms of appointment of independent members, Council is required to appoint its elected members for the current term and review and appoint the terms of the Independent Members.

The next meeting of the Audit and Risk Management Committee has been scheduled for Wednesday 15 June 2016.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolves to adopt the Audit and Risk Management Committee Membership in accordance with the Committee Charter, being the Mayor (ex-officio non-voting), Deputy Mayor, the Councillor who holds responsibility for the Portfolio which includes Corporate and Community Services and a proxy member, being Cr ; Further THAT Council resolves to extend the tenure of the current Independent Chair, Graham Webb for another two year term; And further THAT Expressions of Interest be called seeking nominations from eligible persons for the positions of Independent Community Member and Independent Professional Member.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to adopt the Audit and Risk Management Committee Membership in accordance with the Committee Charter, being the Mayor (ex-officio non-voting), Deputy Mayor - Councillor Cook, Councillor Wilson who holds responsibility for the Portfolio which includes Corporate and Community Services and a proxy member, being Cr McDonald; Further; THAT Council resolves to extend the tenure of the current Independent Chair, Graham Webb for another two year term; And further ; THAT Expressions of Interest be called seeking nominations from eligible persons for

Page 240 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

the positions of Independent Community Member and Independent Professional Member.

Moved By: Cr Cook Seconded By: Cr McLean Resolution Number: 16-20/0042

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

To ensure legislative compliance and that a best practice governance approach is taken, Council adopted to establish an Audit and Risk Committee (the Committee) and set a Committee Charter at its meeting on 20 January 2012.

2. Background

The current Charter for the Committee (which at present is under review) sets the membership of the Committee comprising of the Mayor (ex officio & non-voting), the Deputy Mayor, the Councillor holding the Portfolio responsibility for Corporate and Community Services and a Proxy being a Councillor nominated by Council to attend in the absence of an appointed Councillor member.

The Committee membership also includes three (3) independent external members being an Independent Community Member, an Independent Professional Member and an Independent Chairperson.

3. Report

Three key events are currently impacting the function and form of the Committee with these being:  The election of a new Council and therefore elected members are required to be determined;  The first term for the Independent Chair is due for completion in June; and  The second term for the Independent Professional Member and Independent Community Member are due for completion in August 2016.

As previously highlighted the Committee Charter outlines the membership as being the Mayor (ex-officio and non-voting), Deputy Mayor, the Councillor appointed the Portfolio of Corporate and Community Services and a Proxy, being a Councillor nominated by Council to attend in the absence of an appointed Councillor member. However, as the Charter is under review amendments can be made to the membership of the Committee, noting though that the Act states that there can be no more than two elected voting members on the Audit and Risk Management Committee.

The incumbent Chair, Graham Webb has written (see attached letter) to Council requesting to extend his tenure for another term. The Charter outlines that an extension of another two year

Page 241 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

term can be appointed without the requirement to call nominations. Graham has extensive knowledge and significant background in local government, the continuation of his appointment would provide the Committee with a solid foundation in a transition period of newly appointed elected members and the possible appointment of new independent members.

The current terms of the Independent Community Member and Independent Professional Member will conclude in August 2016. Both members have been in these positions now for two terms and in accordance with the Charter, Council is required to seek nominations by expression of interest; both incumbent members are eligible to re-nominate for their positions.

As outlined in the Committee Charter the eligibility and selection requirements for each independent member follows.

Independent Community Member:

This member may not be a current or previous Councillor or staff member of the Council or its predecessor local government entities. They must be generally of good character and free of any current or past criminal convictions. They must reside in the area of the Council. They need not hold any particular professional qualifications but should be sufficiently experienced in business or organizational management so as to be able to participate fully in the business and functions of the Committee. They must be able and willing to subscribe to any Code of Conduct of the Committee that may be established from time to time.

Independent Professional Member:

This member may not be a current or previous Councillor or staff member of the Council or its predecessor local government entities. They must be generally of good character and free of any current or past criminal convictions. They need not reside in the area of the Council. They must hold duly recognised professional qualifications in Accounting, Finance, Business or Risk Management and should be sufficiently experienced in business or organisational management so as to be able to participate fully in the business and functions of the Committee. They must be able and willing to subscribe to any Code of Conduct of the Committee that may be established from time to time.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Section 105 of the Local Government Act 2009 requires Council to establish an Audit Committee and Section 210 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 sets the required framework of the Audit Committee. The Committee Charter has been developed in accordance with the legislative framework and as such outlines the role, responsibilities, composition and operating guidelines of the committee.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Budget implications will continue to be addressed through existing allocations.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

The Committee remains an advisory committee to Council and has no delegated authority to make decisions, but can make recommendations to the Council. The Committee will report to

Page 242 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

the Council after each meeting and the Chair will initiate any review of the performance of the Committee. A code of conduct has been implemented for the independent members of the Committee.

7. Communication and Engagement

On adoption of the recommendation, expressions of interest will be called for the positions of Independent Community Member and Independent Professional Member on the Council website and in the local newspapers.

8. Conclusion

That Council appoints its elected members to the Audit and Risk Management Committee, extends the appointment of the incumbent Independent Chair and calls for expression of interest for the positions of Independent Professional and Community Members for the Committee.

9. Action/s

1. Include the appointed elected members in the Audit and Risk Management Committee meeting invitations and contacts distribution lists; 2. Write to the incumbent Chair to advise of extension of tenure; 3. Call expressions of interest for the positions of Independent Professional and Community Members though identified communication channels.

Attachments 1View Committee Charter 9 Pages 2View Chair Reappointment Letter 2 Pages

Page 243 Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 244

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 245

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 246

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 247

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 248

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 249

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 250

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 251

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 1 Committee Charter

Attachment 1 12.4 Page 252

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 2 Chair Reappointment Letter

Attachment 2 12.4 Page 253

Audit and Risk Management Advisory Committee Attachment 2 Chair Reappointment Letter

Attachment 2 12.4 Page 254

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

12.5 Lockyer Valley Sports & Aquatic Centre – Closure for Gatton Show

Date: 16 May 2016 Author: Mike Lisle, Manager Community Facilities and Services Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services

Summary:

The management of the Lockyer Valley Sports and Aquatic Centre has requested Council approval for the closure of the Centre during the Gatton Show.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council approve the closure of the Lockyer Valley Sports and Aquatic Centre from Monday 11 July 2016 until Sunday 17 July 2016 (inclusive) to facilitate the running of the 2016 Gatton Show and scheduled pool maintenance works.

RESOLUTION THAT Council approve the closure of the Lockyer Valley Sports and Aquatic Centre from Monday 11 July 2016 until Sunday 17 July 2016 (inclusive) to facilitate the running of the 2016 Gatton Show and scheduled pool maintenance works.

Moved By: Cr Hagan Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0043

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

The Lockyer Valley Sports and Aquatic Centre (the Centre) was officially opened on 7 February 2015 and is in its second year of operation. The Centre provides a 10 lane 50m pool, learn to swim pool, refurbished gym and associated infrastructure. The complex is managed under a management contract with DB & PA Reinhardt trading as Gatton Swim Centre.

2. Background

In 2015, Council resolved to approve the closure of the Centre during the set up and operation of the Gatton Show. The closure provided for the Gatton Show administration and operations to occur unencumbered and also allowed the Centre to undertake scheduled pool maintenance works.

Page 255 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

3. Report

The management of the Centre has formally requested Council approval for the closure of the Centre during the Gatton Show from Monday 11 July 2016 until Sunday 17 July 2016 (inclusive) to allow for the 100th annual Gatton show administration and operations to occur unencumbered and to also allow the Centre to undertake scheduled pool maintenance works.

The closure will allow the Gatton Show Society (the Society) freedom to set up and undertake the general operation of the show including locating exhibitions and stalls within the sports centre and pavilion area. The Society will also require the use of the whole of the existing carpark located outside the Centre for stalls and the existing indoor facilities for various exhibitions.

Due to the colder winter temperatures the use and operating hours of the pool are normally scaled back at this time of the year as patronage is reduced. If this initiative is approved by Council, it is anticipated that the 100th Gatton Show will run smoothly and thus continue to provide a great event and showcase for the Lockyer Valley community.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Policy and legal implications will be addressed in future on matters that arise before Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

There are no financial or resource implications associated with the officer recommendation of this report.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report. The Executive Manager Corporate and Community Services will manage the requirements in line with existing delegations.

7. Communication and Engagement

The matters arising from this report that require further communication will be addressed through existing communication channels.

8. Conclusion

The closure of the Centre during the Gatton Show from Monday 11 July 2016 to Sunday 17 July 2016 (inclusive) will allow the Gatton Show administration and operations to occur unencumbered and also allow the Centre to undertake scheduled pool maintenance works.

9. Action/s

Advise the management of the Lockyer Valley Sports and Aquatic Centre and the Gatton Show Society of the outcome of Councils deliberations.

Page 256 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

12.6 Kensington Grove Community Kindy – Proposed Name Change

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Mike Lisle, Manager Community Facilities and Services Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services

Summary:

In November 2015 Council resolved to request the Chief Executive Officer to investigate and report on the options for the renaming of the Kensington Grove Community Kindy. This report proposes a name change to the Kensington Grove Community Child Care.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolves to approve the renaming of the Kensington Grove Community Kindy to the Kensington Grove Community Child Care; Further; THAT Council notify the Department of Education and Training of the name change to amend the Service Approval for the Centre under Section 65 of the Education and Care Services Act 2013; And further; THAT Council advertise the name change to Kensington Grove Community Child Care and actively market the Kensington Grove Community Child Care through existing communication channels.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to approve the renaming of the Kensington Grove Community Kindy to the Kensington Grove Community Child Care; Further; THAT Council notify the Department of Education and Training of the name change to amend the Service Approval for the Centre under Section 65 of the Education and Care Services Act 2013; And further; THAT Council advertise the name change to Kensington Grove Community Child Care and actively market the Kensington Grove Community Child Care through existing communication channels.

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0044

CARRIED 7/0

Page 257 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Report

1. Introduction

The Kensington Grove Community Kindy (the Centre) is licensed by the Department of Education and Training under the Education and Care Services Act 2013 and was officially opened by the former Laidley Shire Council in July 2010.

This report recommends a change in the Centre’s service name from Kensington Grove Kindy to Kensington Grove Community Child Care.

2. Background

A number of inquiries have been received from the Kensington Grove local community seeking a change of name of the Centre to better reflect to the general public the nature of the business conducted at the Centre.

In November 2015 Council resolved to request the Chief Executive Officer to investigate and report on the options for the renaming of Kensington Grove Community Kindy.

During the previous twelve months, attendance figures have declined at the Centre. The childcare industry is very competitive and many factors including socioeconomic and demographic changes affect childcare numbers from time to time.

It is anticipated that the recommended name change may attract a greater range of new cliental as the existing name indicates that only children in preschool years are accommodated at the Centre.

3. Report

The Centre is located at 24 Bertrand Avenue; Kensington Grove and provides child care for up to 21 children per day from birth to five year old. The Centre is open from 7am to 6pm, Monday to Friday (except Public Holidays), 50 weeks per year.

The centre is located in a very quiet rural residential area, with the very real possibility that its existence is not widely known outside of its immediate local area. With most of the Centre’s current business currently coming from word of mouth and with family numbers now very low, the Centre can no longer rely on referrals to sustain its business.

In an attempt to address the Centre’s low attendance rates and accommodate community needs, it is considered that a change of name from Kensington Grove Community Kindy to Kensington Grove Community Child Care will better reflect the service provided and will bring the Centres purpose into line with community expectations and needs.

If the change in name is approved, it is proposed to provide new Centre information signage in key traffic areas away from the Centre’s location. An open day for prospective parents to come and inspect the facility and activities provided for children will also be undertaken. This initiative will provide local families with a chance to have a look at the centre and its facilities and to discuss their needs with Educators.

Page 258 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

It is also intended to increase media coverage of the centre by providing newspaper articles and additional Facebook and website promotions. Where programs are enhanced at the Centre, the community will also be advised through Council’s corporate communication avenues.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

An application for notification amendment of service approval (SA03) will be completed to identify the change of name and submitted to the Department of Education and Training to amend the Service Approval for the Centre under Section 65 of the Education and Care Services Act 2013.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

There are no financial or resource implications associated with the officer recommendation of this report.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report. The Executive Manager Corporate and Community Services will manage the requirements in line with existing delegations.

7. Communication and Engagement

The matters arising from this report that require further communication will be addressed through existing communication channels.

8. Conclusion

It is considered that a service name that clearly reflects the services offered at the Centre will encourage better occupancy levels at the Centre for children of all targeted age groups.

9. Actions

1. Submit a notification of the amendment to the service name to the Department of Education and Training to amend the Service Approval for the Centre under Section 65 of the Education and Care Services Act 2013. 2. Advertise the proposed new name of Kensington Grove Community Child Care through existing communication channels. 3. Proactively advertise the Centre and its services through all available communication channels.

Page 259 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

12.7 Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Update - April 2016

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services

Summary:

This report provides Council with a brief summary of key operational activities undertaken by Corporate and Community Services during April 2016.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT the Executive Manager Corporate and Community Services Monthly Update be received and noted.

RESOLUTION THAT the Executive Manager Corporate and Community Services Monthly Update be received and noted.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Holstein Resolution Number: 16-20/0045

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

This report provides Council with a brief summary of key operational activities undertaken by Corporate and Community Services during April 2016.

2. Background

Council should be aware of group activities to guide future decision making.

3. Report

A brief summary of the key outcomes for Corporate and Community Services during April 2016 by functional grouping follows.

Page 260 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

FINANCE AND CUSTOMER SERVICES

Finance

At the end of April 91.95% of the rates levy had been collected. This is slightly more than the same time last year. Arrangements for the Sale of Land for Unpaid Rates were finalised with the auction of the final remaining property held on 8 April 2016. The sale of the property recouped the outstanding rates and associated costs. Preparations are now being made to review the next batch of properties which meet the legislative requirements for sale with a report to be prepared for Council in May 2016.

The 2017 budget process is now well underway with the Executive Team in the process of reviewing bids made by the Management Team. The next stage is for the Executive Team to provide recommendations to the Council for consideration. It is expected that a draft budget will be ready for review by the Council towards the end of May 2016. A series of workshops will also be held with the Council during May and June.

Customer Services

This section of the report breaks down April 2016 activity within the Customer Services Branch by service type.

Service Requests

Details of April 2016 customer service requests and recent trends in relation to same are detailed in the two attachments to this report.

Councillor requests

During April there were 23 new Councillor requests, with 54 Councillor requests remaining open at 30 April 2016.

Telephones

2,844 telephone calls attempted to connect with Council’s telephone exchange in April 2016. During the month, Council’s service level decreased to 78.9% against a service level target of 80%.

However, Council’s, “call back” function increased, with 146 calls logged; 31 live chats were also performed during the month.

QGAP

There were 781 QGAP transactions processed by Council during April 2016.

Page 261 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES

Facilities

 The Old Gatton Squash Courts was cleared of excess furniture and an initial clean was undertaken. Anuha was offered and took delivery of the majority of the undamaged furniture.  A new basketball scoreboard was installed at the Lockyer Valley Sports and Aquatic Centre. A new LED clock was also installed.  The new double barbeque was installed at Lake Dyer.  The new Gazebo at the Gatton Cemetery was completed on 24 March 2016. The approximate total cost (including seating) was $35,000.00 as estimated.

Libraries

During April 2016, 172 new members joined our service with 10,333 items being issued.

Childcare

Average occupancy rates for the month of April were Gatton 75.5% and Kensington Grove 48%.

HEALTH, WASTE & REGULATORY SERVICES

 Council’s Senior local Laws Compliance Office Darryl Simpson was successful in his recent nomination to the Dog Breeder Registration Compliance Strategy Working Group. The activities of this group fall under Animal Biosecurity and Welfare, Biosecurity Queensland and Darryl’s nominations reflects well on his experience and qualifications and Council’s animal management practices.  The extension of time to the clear Gatton landfill vegetation under an operational works permit has been APPROVED by Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning. The relevant period for the approval is now 15 August 2016.  The Minister for Agriculture & Fisheries has provided a response to LGAQ for Resolution 32 (Animal Management - Removal of Requirement to Register Non -Working Dogs on Rural Properties) as raised by Lockyer Valley Regional Council. This advice will be discussed at a future Council workshop as part of Local Law deliberations on Animal Management.  Concrete crushing was completed at the Gatton Landfill on 15 April with approximately 4,600 tonnes of material being produced ranging from 75mm down to 30 mm.  A new draft ERA framework for Waste is being considered by the Department of Environment, Heritage & Protection. These proposed changes are likely to have an impact on how Council operates its waste management facilities as well as possible devolution of waste responsibilities from the State Government for Local Governments to enforce.  A constant number of overgrown property complaints continue to be received with 7 received in the middle two weeks of April.  Council officers received a request from a Councillor to remove a dead animal from private property. This request was acted upon despite it not being a core responsibility of Council. A new fee in 2016/2017 will be introduced to limit further requests in this space.

Page 262 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

INFORMATION SERVICES

 Approval has been given to implement Technology One’s People Performance Management module; this will provide great efficiency and reporting gains on the performance of our people and teams. The aim is to have the module in place by August 2016 for the commencement of 2016/17 performance appraisals.  The CCTV installation for Forest Hill is waiting on Energex to complete work required to relocate the power meter to the pole.  Skype For Business administration training and user train the trainer training has been completed. The new contact centre call management software has been designed with the approval of the Customer Services Team. Installation commenced on 29 April.  A Grant application has been lodged to implement new functionality and cameras for both the Gatton and Laidley CCTV systems.  Enghouse software which is the new Customer Contact Centre phone management software has been installed. Testing is due to commence this week with a current tentative go live in early May.

Attachments 1View Statistics - Whole of Council - 201604 4 Pages 2View Statistics - CCS - 201604 7 Pages

Page 263 Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Update Attachment 1 - April 2016 Statistics - Whole of Council - 201604

Attachment 1 12.7 Page 264

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Attachment 1 Update - April 2016 Statistics - Whole of Council - 201604

Attachment 1 12.7 Page 265

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Update Attachment 1 - April 2016 Statistics - Whole of Council - 201604

Attachment 1 12.7 Page 266

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Attachment 1 Update - April 2016 Statistics - Whole of Council - 201604

Attachment 1 12.7 Page 267

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Update Attachment 2 - April 2016 Statistics - CCS - 201604

Attachment 2 12.7 Page 268

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Attachment 2 Update - April 2016 Statistics - CCS - 201604

Attachment 2 12.7 Page 269

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Update Attachment 2 - April 2016 Statistics - CCS - 201604

Attachment 2 12.7 Page 270

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Attachment 2 Update - April 2016 Statistics - CCS - 201604

Attachment 2 12.7 Page 271

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Update Attachment 2 - April 2016 Statistics - CCS - 201604

Attachment 2 12.7 Page 272

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Attachment 2 Update - April 2016 Statistics - CCS - 201604

Attachment 2 12.7 Page 273

Executive Manager Corporate and Services Monthly Update Attachment 2 - April 2016 Statistics - CCS - 201604

Attachment 2 12.7 Page 274

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Cr McDonald declared a potential perceived conflict of interest in Item 12.8 “Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre Refurbishment Project” (as defined in section 173 of the Local Government Act 2009) based on his place of residence neighbouring the building. Cr McDonald took no part in the discussion or decision and left the meeting at 12:13pm.

12.8 Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre Refurbishment Project

Date: 20 May 2016 Author: Mike Lisle, Manager Community Facilities and Services Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services

Summary:

The purpose of this report is to seek Council approval for the Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre building refurbishment and demolition works project.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council considers the inclusion of $850,000 in the budget for the 2016/17 financial year to allow for the calling of suitable tenders and project commencement of the Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre located in Spicer Street, Laidley.

RESOLUTION THAT Council consider the inclusion of $850,000 in the budget for the 2016/17 financial year to allow for the calling of suitable tenders and project commencement of the Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre located in Spicer Street, Laidley. further; THAT Council approve that, during the construction phase of the Laidley Library project, consideration be given to locating Council’s mobile library adjacent to Das Neumann Haus for that period and mobile library services continue to be provided through an alternate service delivery model; And further: THAT office accommodation in Nielsen Place be temporarily utilised for customer service.

Moved By: Cr McLean Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0046

CARRIED 6/0

Report

1. Introduction

The Laidley branch of Lockyer Valley Libraries is vital to the community. Catering for a wide variety of clientele and services including:

Page 275 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 borrowing of library resources  events and activities offered to children including Rhyme Time, Story Time, and School Holiday programs  adults book groups, knitting groups, author talks, and computer classes  Technology services including WiFi, free internet, scanning, printing and photocopying  Social services including a space to meet. The library and customer service area is currently located in a section of the existing Council Administration building and is operating around existing infrastructure (rooms). It is considered that the building is in need of refurbishment to improve functionality and accessibility and to cater for a wide variety of community needs. Fulton Trotter Architects have provided a concept design for a refurbished Library and Customer Contact Centre building at Laidley. The concept design incorporates the Old Town Hall and the demolition of the adjacent administration building. A design concept and cost estimate has been established following workshops with Councillors and staff including numerous communication responses on operation requirements from key stakeholders. The project aims to create a modern Library and Customer Contact Centre facility for the Laidley and district community that incorporates multi-function areas, a meeting room and a new community park in Spicer Street, Laidley.

2. Background

Fulton Trotter architects were engaged to provide alternatives and options for the redevelopment of the Library and Customer Contact Centre located in Spicer Street, Laidley.

In February 2015 Council resolved to consider the redevelopment of the Library in the 2015/16 financial year. A provision was allocated in the 2015/16 budget to have building alterations designed with the necessary works to be completed in the 2015/16 calendar year. However design and planning works were subsequently placed on hold, due to budget commitments on other priority projects.

3. Report

Fulton Trotter Architects were commissioned to provide design documentation to deliver a tender package and costings for a Library and Customer Contact Centre in the old Town Hall at 9 Spicer Street, Laidley. This design process has incorporated workshop discussions between officers from facilities, customer services, libraries, information services and Fulton Trotter to determine a suitable operational floor plan that is fit for purpose from both a libraries and customer services perspective.

Fulton Trotter Architects have previously advised that the complex of buildings adjacent to the old town hall (i.e. old administration offices) is not considered suitable for use as a commercial premise, or specifically as a public library facility. The agglomerations of buildings have been significantly “worked over” with significant additions, infills and temporary works to accommodate various uses over time.

While the structural fabric of these buildings is past their useful life, of greater concern is the fact that the condition of building services including air conditioning, plumbing, lighting and

Page 276 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

electrics are likely to make long term maintenance and upkeep increasingly costly and unviable.

A major re-purpose of these buildings would require consideration of applicable building codes, particularly with regard to issues such as fire safety and energy efficiency.

Following consultation with officers from facilities, customer services, libraries, information services, Fulton Trotter Architects has developed an initial concept design demonstrating varying levels of intervention into the existing fabric of the Old Town Hall to achieve an acceptable service standard for a small neighbourhood Library and Customer Contact Centre. The initial concept design is shown in Attachments 1 and 2.

The proposal is to demolish the majority of the buildings on site, with the exception of the old hall, which will then be completely refurbished into a modern functional building for both of these public services.

The argument for removal of redundant buildings from the site can be justified in that it removes a significant cost liability in operating and maintaining old stock, it frees up the site as open green space and creates the possibility and momentum for new uses for the site.

With the removal of the adjacent administration buildings, it also becomes possible to enhance the available light, ventilation and amenity of the remaining space by opening up and re- establishing old window openings and for the addition of a verandah fronting the open space with connections to neighbouring green spaces. It is also planned to have an enhanced green space connection to McNulty Park by seeking the acquisition of a small portion of land occupied by the Queensland Police Service in Spicer Street. This will allow access via the Laidley mall.

The following project cost estimates have been provided by Fulton Trotter Architects based on the concept design scope of works.

Demolition $80,000 - $120,000 External works to Old Hall $220,000 - $260,000 Refurbishment and fit out $435,000 - $475,000 Total base build $735,000 - $855,000

External Paths, Landscaping & Play Equipment $107,000 - $147,000

Upon completion of the Fulton Trotter Architects tender documentation a quantity surveyor will assess the construction works and provide a more detailed cost estimate breakdown.

Facilities has budgeted for $850,000 in the 2016/17 capital works budget to complete the Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre project.

Fulton Trotter Architects are liaising with engineer consultants on the analysis of the existing building structure and services to determine the full extent of works within the building refurbishment.

Council received a funding grant of $264,000 under the Local Government Grants and Subsidies Program (LGGSP) in October 2015 with a condition that all works were to be completed within 12 months of the funding execution.

Page 277 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The current completion date of the project is 16 December 2016 for the grant funding that was approved in October 2015. A grant funding extension of time (maximum 12 months) will be pursued to allow this project to be completed within the 2016/ 2017 financial year.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Public footpath access from McNulty Park to the open green space area is currently being assessed by Queensland Government Agencies and Council is awaiting a response from the Queensland Police Service Region on the request to purchase additional land at the rear of the Laidley Police Station property.

Council will need to seek an extension of time for the funding grant provided by the Local Government Grants and Subsidies Program for up to 12 months. The current completion date for the Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre is 16 December 2016.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

This project will be partially funded from external funding grants under the Local Government Grants and Subsidies Program (LGGSP). Nominated deadlines from this grant will need to be extended by application.

6. Delegations/Authorizations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report. The Executive Manager Corporate and Community Services will manage the requirements in line with existing delegations.

7. Communication and Engagement

The Lockyer Valley Community will be notified through public workshops and media channels of the proposed design and associated works. Fulton Trotter Architects will complete the required tender documentation before progressing to market.

8. Conclusion

With over 44,000 visits to the existing Laidley Library, the refurbishment of the Library and Customer Contact Centre will provide a significant boost to the Laidley and the district community.

This project will provide the facilities expected of a modern community Library and Customer Contact Centre where resources and services can be accessed in a safe and comfortable environment. Other community benefits for the refurbishment and upgrade of this building include the extra services and larger events that will be offered to both Library and Customer Contact visitors, the increased floor space for additional library books (kept in storage) and reduced maintenance costs associated with ageing buildings.

It is considered that the Local Government grant funding of $264,000 is a strong incentive to proceed with this project and provide the community with upgraded facilities and improved services.

Page 278 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

9. Action/s

1. Council approval of the project design and estimated costs for inclusion in the 2016/17 Budget. 2. Community workshops on the proposed design and associated works. 3. Advertisement of the project through existing communication channels. 4. Project commencement.

Attachments 1View Floor Plan 1 Page 2View Site Plan 1 Page

Page 279 Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre Refurbishment Attachment 1 Project Floor Plan

Attachment 1 12.8 Page 280

Laidley Library and Customer Contact Centre Attachment 2 Refurbishment Project Site Plan

Attachment 2 12.8 Page 281

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Cr McDonald returned to the meeting, the time being 12:21pm.

13.0 INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS AND SERVICES REPORTS

13.1 Warrego Highway Road Safety Concerns - Correspondence received from Minister Bailey MP

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services Responsible Officer: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services

Summary:

Lockyer Valley Regional Council has raised a number of concerns with Mark Bailey MP about road safety on the Warrego Highway in the Region. The Minister’s response is attached to his report.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council receive and note the Warrego Highway Road Safety Concerns Report.

RESOLUTION THAT Council receive and note the Warrego Highway Road Safety Concerns Report.

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0047

CARRIED 7/0

RESOLUTION THAT following a recent accident in Withcott involving a pedestrian, Council forward correspondence to the Hon. Darren Chester MP, Federal Minister for Infrastructure & Transport and The Hon. Mark Bailey MP, State Minister for Main Roads, Road Safety & Ports & Minister for Energy, Biofuels, & Water Supply and Scott Buckholz MP, Federal Member for Wright & Ian Rickuss MP, State Member for Lockyer in regard to road safety on the Warrego Highway at Withcott, in particular to address safety for pedestrians via treatments that may include traffic lights, a pedestrian overpass and/or a speed camera.

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0048

CARRIED 7/0

Page 282 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Report

1. Introduction

In March 2016, the Chief Executive Officer of Lockyer Valley Regional Council wrote to the Queensland Government's Minister for Main Roads, Mark Bailey MP regarding the numerous road safety concerns along the Warrego Highway between Hatton Vale and Withcott.

2. Background

Council wrote to Minister Bailey requesting that the Department undertake road safety audits at a number of locations along the Warrego Highway in our region. This letter (see Attachment 1) was formulated out of a previous Council Report and Resolution Number. 4526.

3. Report

It is common each year for there to be fatal crashes on the Warrego Highway between Woolshed Creek and Redwood Park in the Lockyer Valley Region. Council's letter of 07 March 2016 articulated a number of road safety concerns along the Warrego Highway, the majority of which are at intersections.

Whilst Council has no management jurisdiction with regard to the Warrego Highway, but because it does provide an important transport link for the Region and its economy, its safety and efficiency of operation does have an impact on Council's road network, most particularly at the interface points. Also of note is that at times it is necessary for traffic to be diverted away from the Warrego Highway onto the local road network thereby leading to asset and road safety impacts on Council roads. Therefore, Council's advocacy in this area is of merit.

The response from Minister Bailey is self-evident, but it refers to a short-term study that is developing low cost road safety works and a long-term motorway-standard vision for the Warrego Highway (see Attachment 2).

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Policy and legal implications will be addressed in future on matters that arise before Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Budget implications will continue to be addressed through existing allocations.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report.

7. Communication and Engagement

The matters arising from this report that require further communication will be addressed through existing communication channels.

Page 283 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

8. Conclusion

The Department of Transport and Main Roads is proposing to undertake some road safety improvements in the short-term, the details of which will be sought by Council staff at the appropriate time.

9. Action/s

Council will continue to monitor short-term and long-term proposals as they affect this Warrego Highway, as well as the resultant impacts on Council’s local roads.

Attachments 1View Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council 2 Resolution 4526. Pages 2View Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council's 2 letter dated 7 March 2016 Pages

Page 284 Warrego Highway Road Safety Concerns - Attachment 1 Correspondence received from Minister Bailey MP Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council Resolution 4526.

Attachment 1 13.1 Page 285

Warrego Highway Road Safety Concerns - Correspondence Attachment 1 received from Minister Bailey MP Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council Resolution 4526.

Attachment 1 13.1 Page 286

Warrego Highway Road Safety Concerns - Attachment 2 Correspondence received from Minister Bailey MP Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council's letter dated 7 March 2016

Attachment 2 13.1 Page 287

Warrego Highway Road Safety Concerns - Correspondence Attachment 2 received from Minister Bailey MP Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council's letter dated 7 March 2016

Attachment 2 13.1 Page 288

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

13.2 Laidley Flood Mitigation - Improvements to Main Drain Channel and Associated Levee Banks

Date: 17 May 2016 Author: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services Responsible Officer: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services

Summary:

Lockyer Valley Regional Council’s funding application to the State Government’s Department of Local Government, through the Community Resilience Fund, to undertake flood mitigation works at Laidley was successful. Given the quantum of funding involved, the formal signing of the funding sub- agreement has been delayed to the term of the new Council. This Report seeks to obtain Council’s approval for the project to proceed.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council endorse the Chief Executive Officer to sign the funding sub-agreement for the Laidley flood mitigation works - drainage channel works and associated levee to be jointly funded by Council and the State.

RESOLUTION THAT Council endorse the Chief Executive Officer to sign the funding sub-agreement for the Laidley flood mitigation works - drainage channel works and associated levee to be jointly funded by Council and the State.

Moved By: Cr McLean Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0049

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

Lockyer Valley Regional Council is seeking to provide essential flood mitigation infrastructure for the town of Laidley as part of an ongoing improvement programme.

The Laidley Town Flood Protection Scheme report was finalised in December 2014, with projects such as Laidley Flood Mitigations Works – Drainage Channel Works and Associated Levee required in order to embed long term community and economic resilience in Laidley. In recent years Council has been actively undertaking staged construction works in partnership with the State and Federal governments to better protect the township of Laidley. This current project forms the next stage of the mitigation works for the town, and Council committed to the project when it endorsed the submission for grant funding at the Council Ordinary meeting on 19th August 2015.

Page 289 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

The formal signing of the funding sub-agreement has been delayed to the term of the new Council with an ability to discuss the merits of the project, ensure governance transparency and Council's commitment to the funding arrangements.

The purpose of this report is to obtain Council's view on whether or not the funding sub- agreement should be signed by the Chief Executive Officer on Council's behalf.

2. Background

Early on, it is important to recognise the risks associated with this project and the need manage potential negative impacts. This this end, a significant portion of the planning and design phases would be devoted to flood modelling in order to attain a good understanding of this risk.

The broader flood mitigation construction programme is being delivered in a staged and measured manner in order to optimize value-for-money at each construction point. The approach being taken is also seen as fiscally responsible with due consideration being given to the funding ability of both the State and Council.

3. Report

This current project involves channel works and associated levee bank works that will improve the flow of flood water northwards away from Laidley. Channel augmentation is required below the Patrick Street bridge to the Queensland Rail bridge adjacent to Alexander Street. Downstream of the Alexander Street rail bridge further channel augmentation is required as well as small levee banks being identified in the report as the Laidley north levee.

The Laidley Flood Mitigation project is based on recommendations from the SKM Jacobs report titled Laidley Town Flood Protection Scheme - Phase 1, which was completed in 2014, following the January 2013 flooding of the town. The report determined there are three different types of rainfall events impacting on the town, being regional flooding, sub-regional flooding, and local flooding. The rainfall events can result in isolation of the Laidley township, and high velocity flow paths through the centre of town. For economic reasons, the overall Laidley Town Flood Protection Scheme seeks to manage flood risks associated with large regional and sub-regional events through structural flood mitigation. Phase 1 of this protection scheme involves flood mitigation works to reduce the impact of future regional flood events on the township of Laidley.

Along with improvements to the main range channel heading north away from the Patrick Street bridge, construction of this current project would also include associated levee bank works to assist in the protection of residential and commercial areas within Laidley. Importantly, the project continues to build upon flood mitigation studies undertaken in recent years by Council and the Narda Lagoon Levee and Storr Street / Leonard Street drainage works constructed in 2013-14.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Policy and legal implications, where relevant, will be addressed before Council as they arise.

Page 290 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

5. Financial and Resource Implications

The current project aligns with the 2015-16 Community Resilience Fund (CRF) objectives to help local governments to deliver key natural disaster infrastructure that incorporates consideration of the potential impact of the project on communities downstream, e.g., levees and detention basins to protect lives, property and essential infrastructure, and the needs of the catchment.

The offer of part funding of this project was secured through the State Government's 2015-16 Community Resilience Fund to a maximum subsidy amount of $625,600 (with $938,400 to be funded by Council) for a total project value of $1,564,000.

If this funding opportunity is foregone on this occasion, it is not certain if another would arise in the future.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

The recommendation in the Report would allow the Chief Executive Officer to sign the funding sub-agreement, and hence work on the project could commence.

7. Communication and Engagement

It is expected that once some project-specific flood study work and ‘optioneering’ has been completed that community engagement, the extent of which is yet to be determined, would be undertaken.

8. Conclusion

Failure to take any mitigation measures, i.e., 'do nothing', would result in a continued high risk to public safety, infrastructure, and the Laidley economy. Whilst it will not ‘flood proof’ Laidley, this current project is intended to improve the level of flood protection to the township through drainage channel and small levee works that would increase channel capacity on the western side of the town.

9. Action/s

 Chief Executive Officer to sign the funding sub-agreement  Commence commissioning of the various consultants necessary to undertake early activities such as topographic surveys, flood modelling, etc.

Page 291 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

13.3 Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence received from Minister Bailey MP

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services Responsible Officer: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services

Summary:

During the construction procurement phase, Council officers raised a number of concerns expected to arise as a result of the construction of the Toowoomba Second Range Crossing project. Council staff have continued to raise these matters with the State and the constructor as the project has developed, with varying degrees of success.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council receive and note the Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Report.

RESOLUTION THAT Council receive and note the Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Report.

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr Cook Resolution Number: 16-20/0050

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

In March 2016, the Chief Executive Officer of Lockyer Valley Regional Council wrote to the Queensland Government's Minister for Main Roads, Mark Bailey MP regarding the numerous local road network concerns arising from the Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Project.

2. Background

Council wrote to Minister Bailey requesting that he give due consideration to several long- standing concerns that Council has previously presented to the State, largely without success. This letter (see Attachment 1) was formulated out of a previous Council Report and Resolution No. 4524.

3. Report

Construction has now commenced on the Toowoomba Second Range Crossing, specifically the clearing and grubbing of vegetation. The correspondence forwarded to Minister Bailey captured concerns regarding:  road safety and road asset condition impacts on Council's road network

Page 292 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 accessibility impacts due to road network changes such as the expected closure of the median gap at the Twidales Road / Postmans Ridge Road / Warrego Highway intersection  omission of any connectivity to the new Toowoomba Second Range Crossing in the Lockyer Valley Region other than from the Warrego Highway system interchange at Helidon Spa.  impacts on disaster management activities due to changes in road network connectivity  Council's governance role in the project.

The response from Minister Bailey does address each of the points raised by Council, but it does not adequately several of the issues and they generally remain a problem (see Attachment 2).

In turn, the current status of the matters raised is as follows:

1. Road safety and road asset condition impacts on Council's road network Nexus Delivery and Council officers are discussing the proposed Road Maintenance Management Plan for the project. It is worthy of mention that Wallens Road (South) recently became impassable to cars due to damage arising from the TSRC project. This led to a specific complaint being sent from Council staff to the Independent Reviewer and copies to Nexus Infrastructure (the Special Purpose Vehicle) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads. Nexus Delivery has responded and has been undertaking emergency reparatory works on Wallens Road in recent times, which is a positive. Nonetheless, significant concerns remain around the asset condition and externalities that will likely arise from the movement of construction traffic (large and small) around Council's road network.

2. Accessibility impacts due to road network changes such as the expected closure of the median gap at the Twidales Road / Postmans Ridge Road / Warrego Highway intersection The intention to close the median gap would mean that it will not be possible for traffic to turn right onto the Warrego Highway from Twidales Road or Postmans Ridge Road, which could reasonably be expected to lead to more unsafe U-turn manoeuvres being undertaken along the Warrego Highway. It is known that the Department of Transport and Main Roads has been developing a long-term vision for the Warrego Highway in this area, so it would be advantageous if non-abortive aspects of this vision (subject to their detail) could be built as part of the TSRC project.

3. Omission of any connectivity to the new Toowoomba Second Range Crossing in the Lockyer Valley Region other than from the Warrego Highway system interchange at Helidon Spa. The deletion of road connectivity from earlier incarnations of TSRC has obviously been disappointing. Council has been historically supportive of the TSRC project and its desired outcomes relating to improved freight journey times and diverting 'through traffic' away from the Toowoomba CBD, but defining key wins specific to the broader Lockyer Valley Region, and improbably the local community in the west of our Region are difficult to determine.

4. Impacts on disaster management activities due to changes in road network connectivity In addition to the severing of Postmans Ridge Road, construction of large cuttings and embankments as part of the TSRC will affect known and established fire trails and

Page 293 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

emergency access/egress routes. Council has made many representations on this matter and continues to do so, to the extent that there is a greater level of confidence in is matter being improved from the circumstances presented during the bid phase.

5. Council's governance role in the project. The correspondence from the Minister clearly articulates the role that it considers appropriate for Council, but this does not fetter our ability to raise concerns about the project and its delivery.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

Policy and legal implications will be addressed in future on matters that arise before Council.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Budget implications will continue to be addressed through existing allocations.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

No further delegations are required to manage the issues raised in this report.

7. Communication and Engagement

The matters arising from this report that require further communication will be addressed through existing communication channels.

8. Conclusion

Disappointingly, the State has been insufficiently responsive on a number of serious matters raised by Council. It is clear that further and ongoing advocacy will be necessary to ensure that project impacts are overcome.

9. Action/s

LVRC staff continue to liaise with the Department of Transport and Main Roads, Nexus Infrastructure, and Nexus Delivery in order to address issued raised.

Attachments 1View Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council 6 Resolution 4524 Pages 2View Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council 5 letter dated 8 March 2016 Pages

Page 294 Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 1 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council Resolution 4524

Attachment 1 13.3 Page 295

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 1 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council Resolution 4524

Attachment 1 13.3 Page 296

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 1 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council Resolution 4524

Attachment 1 13.3 Page 297

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 1 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council Resolution 4524

Attachment 1 13.3 Page 298

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 1 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council Resolution 4524

Attachment 1 13.3 Page 299

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 1 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 1: Correspondence to Minister Bailey MP formulated from Council Resolution 4524

Attachment 1 13.3 Page 300

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 2 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council letter dated 8 March 2016

Attachment 2 13.3 Page 301

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 2 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council letter dated 8 March 2016

Attachment 2 13.3 Page 302

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 2 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council letter dated 8 March 2016

Attachment 2 13.3 Page 303

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 2 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council letter dated 8 March 2016

Attachment 2 13.3 Page 304

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing - correspondence Attachment 2 received from Minster Bailey MP Attachment 2: Correspondence from Minister Bailey MP responding to Council letter dated 8 March 2016

Attachment 2 13.3 Page 305

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

13.4 Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Package 3

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Seren McKenzie, Coordinator Infrastructure Planning & Design Responsible Officer: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services

Summary:

The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s endorsement of package 3 of design drawings of local roads (contractually referred to as Returned Works) affected by the State’s Toowoomba Second Range Crossing project (TSRC).

Council officers have reviewed the 30% designs for Package 3 and are yet to provide feedback to the designer. Subsequent reviews of the design packages will determine the extent to which the designers accept Council feedback.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council resolves to not endorse the 30% design drawings for Design Lot ERDLR03 East – Local Road – Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road, noting that not endorsing this design package does not equate to a rejection of these works as future Council-maintained assets, a matter which would be the subject of a future Agreement with the State. Furthermore, Council will be given a further opportunity to comment on this design package as it progresses.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to not endorse the 30% design drawings for Design Lot ERDLR03 East – Local Road – Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road, noting that not endorsing this design package does not equate to a rejection of these works as future Council-maintained assets, a matter which would be the subject of a future Agreement with the State. Furthermore, Council will be given a further opportunity to comment on this design package as it progresses.

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0051

CARRIED 7/0

Page 306 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

RESOLUTION THAT Council forward correspondence to the Hon. Darren Chester MP, Federal Minister for Infrastructure & Transport and The Hon. Mark Bailey MP, State Minister for Main Roads, Road Safety & Ports & Minister for Energy, Biofuels, & Water Supply expressing Council’s disappointment in the current level of service provided in regard to the Toowoomba Second Range Crossing and seeking to ensure the protection and future use of the Bicentennial National Trail.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Holstein Resolution Number: 16-20/0052

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

A number of Council-controlled local roads will be affected by the construction of the TSRC project. Nexus Delivery (through Nexus Infrastructure) is the entity responsible for designing and constructing the TSRC on behalf of the State. It is understood that the Project Deed between the State and Nexus requires that Nexus gain Council endorsement of the proposed changes to the affected local roads.

2. Background

Council officers continue to meet with the Nexus design team to discuss the effects of the TSRC within the Lockyer Valley Region. Nexus has been supplied with information to assist in the design of the Council roads, including preferred alignments, standards, and current and projected road use.

Nexus has now released the third design package which consists of the realigned section of Gittins Road, and a new T- intersection for Gittins Road and Six Mile Creek Road on the southern side of the TSRC.

Council has previously received 2 design packages being for construction works on Morleys Road, Wallens Road and a property access off Paynters Road, and the realigned Postmans Ridge Road.

3. Report

Page 307 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Due to the TSRC alignment cutting through Gittins Road and cutting off the road reserve for Six Mile Creek Road, realignment of both sections of road and the construction of an intersection are required.

Figure 1: Existing layout of Gittins Road and track along Six Mile Creek Road reserve

The 30% design drawings for the new section of Gittins Road are not in accordance with the Performance Specifications outlined for the TSRC, and there are a number of additional notable items identified by Council officers which require further consideration by the designers.

Page 308 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Figure 2: Proposed alignment of Gittins Road and Six Mile Creek Road

The new section of Gittins Road has been designed with a typical cross section of two 3.5 metre wide lanes with 1 metre wide shoulders on each side, which is in accordance with the Performance Specifications. This section of road was also listed in the Performance Specifications as requiring minimum standard of a sealed rural road with a design speed of 80 km/h. Neither of these requirements have been met in this design, with the design report stating that “providing a bitumen sealed section may result in higher speeds on an otherwise unsealed section of road was considered a safety issue and it is proposed to continue the unsealed pavement throughout the rebuilt section of Gittins Road”.

It should be noted there is a small section of sealed road at the T-intersection and through the tunnel under the TSRC. It is not uncommon for LVRC to have short sections of sealed roads within an unsealed road. In this case, it would be appropriate to continue the seal as required under the Specification, and place appropriate warning signs for the changing road conditions, such as warning motorists the road narrows and to drive to conditions. As a minimum, Council should request sealing of Gittins Road to the extent of the guard rails proposed in the design, which are required due to the steep batters. It is preferable to not install barriers or guard rail on unsealed roads due to the maintenance difficulties that ensue.

The Performance Specification requires the realignment of the Bicentennial National Trail. This may either under the Six Mile Creek bridge, or through the Gittins Road underpass, however neither of the design reports for these structures appear to address the requirement, and as such this should be raised with Nexus to ensure this requirement is met, and to determine any impact on returned works. The underpass has a wider verge on the eastern side, which may allow passage of pedestrians. The purpose in the design reports of the wider section is for an inspection platform.

Page 309 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Figure 3: Proposed Gittins Road underpass

The realignment of Six Mile Creek Road with the requirement in the Performance Specification to an unsealed rural road standard with suitable width for a semi-trailer to pass a car has been met; however there are several notable items.

The design includes a steep section of road on Six Mile Creek Road leading to the intersection with Gittins Road, which is greater than the recommended 8% grade for unsealed roads. ARRB Unsealed Road Manual states “unsealed roads with steeper grades (>8%) are more subject to longitudinal scours than roads of flatter grades……Where steep grades cannot be avoided in the design, construct surface drains across the road, such as water bars or rolling grades to facilitate the flow of water off the road surface”.

The steep section of road is approximately 170m in length, and is sealed for the first 50m due to the intersection. Council may request an extension of the sealing of this section, which is not a requirement of the Performance Specification, or may request the installation of ‘whoa boys’ on the road as a means to control the stormwater and prevent scouring of the road.

This same section of Six Mile Creek Road is cut through a large hill, and as such the batter is benched in sections. In the design report, Six Mile Creek Road is still within the alignment of the TSRC, and Council will only maintain the road itself, and the guardrail. The maintenance of the benching and any barriers identified in the design remain the responsibility of Transport and Main Roads, this is shown in red in the figure below.

Page 310 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Figure 4: Cross-section of proposed Six Mile Creek Road

On the northern side of Six Mile Creek Road, there is guardrail from CH 50 to CH 125 (which would be Council maintained), this then changes to a barrier from CH 125 to CH 300 (TMR maintained barrier), and then back to guardrail from CH 300 to approximately CH 390 (Council maintained). At CH 390 there is a maintenance access track to the TSRC, and Six Mile Creek Road then joins back into the existing track and continues south.

As per previous design reports from Nexus, no geotechnical reports or stormwater reports (cross sectional or long sectional) were completed prior to the design, as such the design is subject to some minor changes.

It is understood by Council Officers that to amend a requirement of the Performance Specification a formal letter must be submitted and all three parties being Transport and Main Roads, Lockyer Valley Regional Council and Nexus must agree to the proposed changes. Council is not in receipt of such a request at this time.

For the purpose of supplying comments back to the designer, the notable items to be raised should include: a) Design is not in accordance with the Performance Specifications, and Council has not formally been requested to consider an amendment of the Specification. Request for Gittins Road to be sealed as per the Specification and adequate warning signage to be installed. b) Incomplete signage shown on the plans. c) A request for Council officers to see other design elements included for further comment prior to the 90% design being issued, including further drainage design work and the geotechnical reviews. d) Request for review of the use of guardrails and barriers on unsealed roads.

Page 311 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

e) Request for a suitable treatment of the steep section of Six Mile Creek Road. f) Further detail on the alignment of the Bicentennial National Trail including use of Council roads, and location it crosses under the TSRC.

4. Policy and Legal Implications

The State proposes that the realigned section of Gittins Road and Six Mile Creek Road would remain a Council maintained asset.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

Ongoing additional maintenance costs would be included in future budgets.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

Nil.

7. Communication and Engagement

Council officers from various business units have regularly met with teams from Nexus to discuss communications, design, and construction.

8. Conclusion

Although the preliminary design package shows designs which are only 30% complete, there are a number of notable items which should be raised with the designer and Council should request further input throughout the design.

9. Action/s

1. Notify Department of Transport and Main Roads and Nexus of Council’s non endorsement of Design Lot ERDLR03 East – Local Road – Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road 2. Continue to meet with Nexus to progress the designs of affected roads.

Attachments 1View Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek 16 Road/Gittins Road Pages

Page 312 Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design Attachment 1 - Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 313

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Attachment 1 Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 314

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design Attachment 1 - Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 315

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Attachment 1 Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 316

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design Attachment 1 - Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 317

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Attachment 1 Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 318

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design Attachment 1 - Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 319

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Attachment 1 Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 320

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design Attachment 1 - Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 321

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Attachment 1 Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 322

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design Attachment 1 - Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 323

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Attachment 1 Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 324

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design Attachment 1 - Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 325

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Attachment 1 Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 326

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design Attachment 1 - Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 327

Toowoomba Second Range Crossing Local Roads Design - Attachment 1 Package 3 Attachment 1: Design Lot ERDLR03 East - Local Road - Six Mile Creek Road/Gittins Road

Attachment 1 13.4 Page 328

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

13.5 Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Overview

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Quentin Underwood, Senior Engineer Water & Projects Responsible Officer: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services

Summary:

The purpose of this report is to brief Council on the management of the Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study (BRCFS), its current status, and Lockyer Valley Regional Council’s future role in this study.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council notes the details of the framework set up to by the State Government to manage the Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study, the Floodplain Management Study, and the Floodplain Management Plans, and Lockyer Valley Regional Council’s continued role in these flood studies.

RESOLUTION THAT Council notes the details of the framework set up to by the State Government to manage the Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study, the Floodplain Management Study, and the Floodplain Management Plans, and Lockyer Valley Regional Council’s continued role in these flood studies.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Holstein Resolution Number: 16-20/0053

CARRIED 7/0

Report

1. Introduction

The State Government and several SEQ councils are working together in the execution of a range of flood related studies into the Brisbane River catchment. This work derived from the findings of the Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry final report released in 2012. The various studies, to be done over several years, consist of four phases:  Phase one: Wivenhoe and Somerset Dams Optimisation Study (WSDOS)  Phase two: Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study (BRCFS)  Phase three: Brisbane River Catchment Floodplain Management Study (BRCFMS)  Phase four: Brisbane River Catchment Floodplain Management Plans (BRCFMP)

This report details that operation of the BRCFS and Floodplain Management Study (BRCFMS) to date and the expectation by officers of Council’s continued role in this work moving forward.

Page 329 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

2. Background

The BRCFS (phase 2 above) is the $5 million study of the Brisbane River and its tributaries set up by the previous State Government in 2012 in response to the recommendations in the Final Report of the QFCOI. It is funded 60:40 State Government: Councils (Brisbane, Ipswich and Somerset). Lockyer Valley Regional Council (LVRC), under the Joint Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), has provided data, learnings from its 2011- 2014 studies, and ‘in kind’ staff support. The explanatory notes in Attachment 1 provide additional details.

The BRCFS followed from the Wivenhoe and Somerset Dams Optimisation Study (WSDOS) framework set up after the 2011 flood by the previous Government. LVRC was invited to join WSDOS in March 2012.

3. Report

The purpose of the BRCFS is to examine and set up new 2-D calibrated modelling for the Brisbane River incorporating particular technical strategies to capture the complex interaction of rain and flood operations that is presented by Lockyer Creek and the Bremer River (neither of which are captured by a water storage facility). It is also tasked with undertaking a Floodplain Management Study and Plan (phases 3 and 4 above). Due to the limitations of the modelling software and the focus on BCC, ICC and SRC by the Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry recommendations, the hydraulic model stops at Glenore Grove in the east of our Region.

The directing body of the BRCFS has evolved from a committee of selected State Directors- General and SEQ Water to the current Implementation Committee (IC) which has expanded the committee to include the CEOs of BCC, ICC, SRC and LVRC. Figure 1 represents the current governance arrangements.

Page 330 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Figure 1: BRCFS governance arrangements

Key Committee Responsibilities The Implementation Committee is chaired by the Director-General of DNRM during the Catchment Flood Study phase. It is anticipated that the Director-General of DILGP will chair the Implementation Committee in the next two phases for the Floodplain Management Study and Plans.

The day-to-day matters of Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry recommendation are overseen by the Steering Committee. This may include, but is not limited to:  approval and management of study budget decisions  approval and endorsement of Catchment Flood Study components  extensions of time to studies  issues in relation to scoping, implementation of catchment-wide FMS/FMP and possible implementation framework of FMPs  communication and engagement matters.

The Implementation Committee will act in a high-level governance role to oversee the implementation of QFCOI recommendation. It will provide a forum to oversee progress and to resolve any matters that cannot be determined by the Steering Committee, or requires higher level approval, relating to the above matters and more broadly:  holistic flood risk management

Page 331 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 major infrastructure in the floodplain  land use planning regimes in the floodplain  investment strategies for funding for works and measures  governance around catchment-wide flood mitigation  high level communication and engagement strategies.

The Implementation Committee operates on a consensus and confidential basis. Implementation Committee members may be supported by non-voting observers at the meetings. The Steering Committee may request additional meetings of the Implementation Committee. The preparation of any papers for discussion and decision will be the responsibility of the Steering Committee.

Project Operations

Council officers attend the Implementation Committee, the Steering Committee and the Technical Working Groups as time allows. LVRC’s Planning and Community engagement officers have attended the relevant Technical Working Groups. The Implementation Committee nominally meets every 6 months, the Steering Committee more frequently (project control points generally dictate) and the Technical working Groups generally 4-6 weekly.

It is expected that beyond the flood and hazard mapping that this project produces, it will also be setting new planning and flooding standards/criteria for the catchment and wider area. LVRC’s officers brief from the CEO is to assist with local knowledge, data and learnings as well as to intervene/advise on matters that may impact on LVRCs interests.

Current Status

Figure 2 shows the current status of the studies – the flood modelling hydraulic study in currently in its end phase, the risk management study and planning is underway. The explanatory notes in Attachment 1 provide additional details if required.

Page 332 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Figure 2 – Current status of the various flood studies

Driven by an outcome of the last Implementation Committee meeting in December 2015 and the need for significant new funding to complete the BRCFS Risk Management Plan an Implementation Committee meeting was planned for the end of April to meet budget timeframes. This meeting is in the process of being rearranged.

No final agenda has been circulated as yet, but based on a current understanding that some are seeking to bring the matter of the form of catchment management authority to a head before approving an extension to the budget it is likely that an item will be tabled for discussion.

Figures 3 and 4 show the relationship of the proposed BRCFS flood mapping extent in relationship to LVRC’s 2012 modelling extent. Due to the setup and extent of the of the BRCFS modelling moving upstream from Lyons Bridge, the BRCFS mapping becomes less reliable. LVRC and SRC have recently reached agreement with BRCFS with a practical interface between the SKM (Jacobs) and BRCFS overlays. Upstream of this line stakeholders will need to refer to Council.

Page 333 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Figure 3 –2016 BRFS Flood Extent 1%AEP (1in 100 years AEP) around lower limit of LVRC boundary. Black line is extent of SKM (Jacobs) 2012 Lockyer Creek Modelling. The green line is indicative extent of BRCFS mapping.

Page 334 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Figure 4 – Proposed template of BRCFS Flood Extent Mapping around the Lockyer and Somerset boundary. Due to technical limitations of the Monte Carlo method (means of establishing the rainfall input in the hydraulic model in a complex catchment), in the hatched area, queries will need to be referred to Council (and the SKM 2012 Lockyer Creek Modelling).

4. Policy and Legal Implications

It is expected that beyond the flood and hazard mapping that the BRCFS produces, it will also be setting new planning and flooding standards/criteria for the catchment and wider area.

The staff brief from the LVRC CEO is to assist with our local knowledge, data and learnings as well as to intervene/advise on matters that may impact on LVRC’s interests.

5. Financial and Resource Implications

No financial contribution has been made by LVRC, other than the ‘in kind’ element. Under the Joint Memorandum of understanding (MOU), LVRC has provided data, learnings from its 2011- 2014 studies and ‘in kind’ support. This status is not likely to change.

6. Delegations/Authorisations

The Chief Executive Officer is authorised to continue the management of the BRCFS as required maintaining Council interests.

7. Communication and Engagement

Page 335 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Officers continue to work with the BRCFS engagement group and maintain Council interests.

8. Conclusion

The State has set up a framework to oversee the execution of the outcomes of the Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry in relation to flooding and the impacts of flooding from the Brisbane River and its tributaries. Council officers have been attending the various controlling committees and groups since 2012.

Many matters of detail from the study will not affect the Council area except at the boundaries and in overall flood control and planning matters.

It is in best the interests of Council (and future economic development in the Region) that it continues with the role setup within this framework.

9. Action/s

No actions required.

Attachments 1View Attachment 1: Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study - Explanatory Notes 2 Pages

Page 336 Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Overview Attachment 1 Attachment 1: Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study - Explanatory Notes

Attachment 1 13.5 Page 337

Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study Overview Attachment 1 Attachment 1: Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study - Explanatory Notes

Attachment 1 13.5 Page 338

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

13.6 Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services Monthly Report

Date: 17 May 2016 Author: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services Responsible Officer: Myles Fairbairn, Executive Manager Infrastructure Works & Services

Summary:

This report is to update Council on the emerging matters arising since Council last met in regards to the Infrastructure Works and Services Group.

Officer’s Recommendation: THAT Council receive and note the Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services Monthly Update.

RESOLUTION THAT Council receive and note the Executive Manager Infrastructure Works and Services Monthly Update.

Report

1. Introduction

This report is to provide an update to Council on activities and issues for the Infrastructure Works and Services Group since Council’s meeting of 23 March 2016.

2. Background

The previous Infrastructure Works and Services report to Council as described above. Activities undertaken and issues arising are described in the body of this report.

3. Report

PARKS AND OPEN SPACES WORKS

 Parks and Open Spaces staff have been doing the site works for funerals at Laidley and Gatton cemeteries.  Crews are mowing parks and grassed medians in Laidley and Gatton  Garden maintenance being undertaken at Narda Lagoon  Street tree pruning ongoing in Gatton, targeting areas that affect the mowers  Grantham garden maintenance work including mulching, pruning, playground soft fall backfilling is ongoing  Furley Park, Forest Hill – pad preparation for exercise equipment  Shelter installation at Littleton Park consisting of new 4x4m shelter with table and chairs  ‘Welcome to Withcott’ sign installation and landscaping completed

Page 339 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

 Playground inspections is ongoing  Event set up assistance for the Lockyer Community fun day, pack up ANZAC Day display at the Lockyer Valley Cultural Centre  Line marking and mowing at Laidley Recreation Reserve  Rubbish bin run continuing across the Region  Plaque levelling work at Gatton Cemetery being done

ROADS AND DRAINAGE WORKS

 LVRC capital works projects: .Jones Road Withcott footpath construction completed. .Tenthill Creek Road and Ingoldsby Road upgrade - traffic has been diverted to the slip lanes so the northern side can be worked on. .Future Motel Site, Gatton: Stormwater works being undertaken across Western Drive and across Lake Apex Drive, at the Lakeview Accommodation precinct site. .Black Spot project at Tenthill Creek Road / Ingoldsby Road intersection is ingoing .Black Spot project at Old College Road / Allan Street, Gatton is ingoing .Commenced stabilisation work on a further 900m section of Mount Berryman Road, with 300m more done thus far. .Mountain Road and Summerholm Road sealing of gravel road – Have sealed the second section chainage 2030 to 2900. Laying the gravel on the last section of Mountain Road.  Road maintenance works .Grader maintenance crews (Grahame Eveans, North) – Started work behind Murphys Creek, finished Fifteen Mile Road, Unnamed Road off Fifteen Mile and White Mountain and started Kunkels Road. .CRMs gang (Nicki-John Harch) – Requests last week at Glenore Grove, Neimeyer and Thallon Roads, repairs to failed areas. .Request last week at Thallon Road cut off and trim failed areas to be sealed with the jetpatcher. Clean up gravel and sand from a driveway at Firetail Court. Tuesday clean out a drain at Kiln Court Grantham and clean out drain at Tew Court, Gatton. .Concrete crew - removing broken kerb and trip hazards in Hunt Street Forest Hill, and replacing with new kerb. Concreting a 4m square slab in Littleton Park, Gatton. Pram walks at Old Collage Road, Gatton. .Car parks and kerb repairs on Old College Road, Gatton. .Kerb repairs on Buaraba Street and Jubilee Street, Gatton.

INVESTIGATION, PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT

 Inland Rail (Gowrie to Calvert section) corridor study .The Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) is currently investigating the Inland Rail Corridor .The Australian Government’s focus on this Melbourne to Brisbane route is for the passage of freight. However, it is understood that the State’s desire for a Toowoomba to Brisbane passenger rail capability (as identified in the recently published State Infrastructure Plan) is not being precluded from eventuating. .In the Lockyer Valley Region that means a ‘concept level’ investigation of the merits of the established Gowrie to Grandchester corridor.

Page 340 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

.The Australian Government’s Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, Darren Chester, recently announced some of the names of the technical consultants working on this concept phase. .As a comparator, the Australian Infrastructure Plan (published by Infrastructure Australia) lists Cross River Rail and the Ipswich Motorway (Darra – Rocklea) projects as “high priority initiatives” whilst listing Inland Rail as a “priority initiative”, largely reflected in the different time horizons. .The Inland Rail team has been visiting some properties along the existing Gowrie-Grandchester corridor and testing the merits some options outside of this alignment. .A corridor study report is due to be presented to the Australian Government in July 2016.

 Toowoomba Second Range Crossing .Nexus meetings continuing. Some issues identified on inspection of Council roads with use by Nexus. Revised Maintenance Management Plan has been provided by Nexus, Council to review. .Nexus have commenced maintenance works on Wallens Road due to poor condition, and have minimised use of Morleys Road due to safety concerns. Gittins and Six Mile Creek Road design package report going to May Council meeting. .Maintenance of Council controlled roads impacted by TSRC continues to be of concern. LVRC to review second draft of Maintenance Management Plan received from Nexus. .Design packages continue to be received and commented on, advice from Nexus is Morleys Road needs to be constructed within next few months, however no further designs received since 30% designs. .Ongoing meeting with various teams from Nexus. .Monitoring impact on local roads and community. .Nexus have commenced condition survey of roads.

 Black Spot projects for 2016-17 (next financial year) .Topographic survey work has been split into two packages for external work, and some survey to be done by Council’s survey team. Request for quote has been issued. .Geotechnical requirements to be sent out as a package. Request for quote has been issued. .One design to be completed externally, being the Main Greenswamp Road / Lake Clarendon Road intersection – this will be sent out once survey and geotechnical data is received. .Next round of submissions from Council are expected to be submitted in June 2016.

 Bridges and structures .Middletons Bridge timber strengthening, : Tenders received, with preferred being an option to rebuild elements of the bridge for similar cost, and reuse timber elsewhere. Advised TMR that LVRC would award the tender based on construction completion in September 2016. Designed to 42.5t load limit (currently 12t).

Page 341 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

.Level 3 investigation of three bridges (Mahons Bridge, Steinkes Bridge and Sheep Station Bridge), to look at the as-constructed pile-headstock connection detail and the longitudinal shear key connection between adjacent deck units, is due to report at the end of June 2016.

 Design of Capital Works .Old College Road / Allan Street intersection – work has commenced on site. TMR rep contacted to request EOT, email sent requesting to 17 June, as per advice. Awaiting response. .Tenthill Creek Road / Ingoldsby Road intersection upgrade – work has commenced on site. TMR rep contacted to request EOT, email sent requesting to 17 June, as per advice. Awaiting response. .Park area adjacent to Das Neumann Haus - Stage 1 complete. Insight DAS is unavailable to complete detailed design due to current workload. .Lake Apex BBQ and Dry Creek Bed Foreshore (Stage 1) – design has been completed construction pending. .TIDS projects (50% TMR funding, 50% LVRC funding): - Murphys Creek Cycleway - Construction complete. - Murphys Creek State School Parking - Construction complete. - Summerholm Road and Mountain Road upgrade - Realignment on Mountain Road complete. Intersection surveyed, concept designs and estimates complete. Construction moving to Summerholm Road until decision on intersection is made. .Buaraba Street Gatton outfall: - Outfall works - monitoring levels monthly. Also monitoring internal drain for further movement. - Considering alternative design for outfall which doesn’t involve removing gabions and is easier to construct. Original design sourced, which is in line with alternative proposed design. .Gatton Revitalisation Project - Footpath colour trial - finalising pricing and details with contractor - Wayfinding sign - Installation due next week. - CBD street lighting - Tenders received, to be awarded soon. .Mountain Drive easement, Laidley - Letter posted to resident regarding requirement of easement. - Concept design to be completed and sent to resident. - Construction deferred .Anzac Avenue mitigation works, Grantham - Letter posted to resident regarding reparation proposal - No response to Deed of Agreement letter in ECM as of 26/3/15. - Design approved. - Engagement with property owner undertaken, property owner satisfied, with a suggestion of some minor drainage improvements on northern side of property. - Design complete. - Construction deferred

Page 342 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

ASSET MANAGEMENT UNIT

 Stormwater system capacity and condition assessment, Gatton – This work has started, expect completion by the end of May.  Transport infrastructure asset management plan currently being updated to better match the long-term financial plan and importantly the condition of the assets. (Draft report on asset valuations has been received and is currently under review)  OneCouncil mobility solution for defect collection is being refined and field tested. Toshiba tablets have arrived and are being field tested.  Level 2 bridge assessments currently being undertaken on a number of concrete bridges

PLANT AND FLEET UNIT

 Internal plant hire recoveries are $1,407,992 (23%) behind YTD actual budget. While still behind budget, income has improved through the journaling of plant hire against the various work groups.  Fleet maintenance budget YTD expenses are $2,751,895, whilst actual YTD expenses are $2,303,741 (16%, $448,154) under budget.  Depot maintenance Budget YTD is $161,463. Actual YTD maintenance figures are $245,716 (52% $84,253) over budget, largely due to significant costs in cleaning up depot for the WH&S audit and upgrading of the undercover staff parking area. There are also several urgent pavement failures being repaired at the depot at present. Budget amendment to be considered at next review.  Ongoing plant maintenance and servicing activities through May 2016.  Continuation of review of potential plant and equipment replacement for 2016-17

FUNDING APPLICATIONS

 Black Spot road safety funding submissions from July 2015: 11 out of 13 submissions were successful. Australian Government awarded $3.71 million in funding to LVRC, which was around 11% of the total amount awarded to Qld Councils. The listing of successful applications follows. .Thallon Road, between Funk Road and Niemeyer Road, KENSINGTON GROVE - Shoulder widening and signage improvements at bends/curve and intersection. Review speed limit and associated signage - $954,000 .Australia II Drive, between Thallon Road and Bond Court, KENSINGTON GROVE - Replace missing guardrails and hazard markers - $615,500 .Old Laidley Forest Hill Road, between Harvey Road and Forest Hill Fernvale Road, LAIDLEY NORTH - Road widening and shoulder installation. Installation of signage and drainage works - $552,000 .Gehrke Road, 1.5km section near Carol Anne Court, REGENCY DOWNS - Shoulder widening. Installation of CAMS and new signs

Page 343 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

- $470,000 .Lake Clarendon Way / Main Greenswamp Road, LAKE CLARENDON - Layout of the intersection to be upgraded. Upgrade existing line marking, signs and implementation of further varied warning signs - $414,000 .North Street / William Street, GATTON - Improvement of the layout of the intersection by channelising turning movements - $178,500 .Tenthill Creek Road / Winwill Connection Road, LOWER TENTHILL - Improvements to shoulders, street lighting and advance warning signs, line marking, guideposts - $149,500 .East Street / Crescent Street, GATTON - Closure of one of the approaches, creating a standard T-intersection controlled by a stop sign - $140,200 .Railway Street near Winston Street, LAIDLEY - Delineation, signage and intersection improvements - $91,000 .William Street / Orton Street, LAIDLEY - Traffic island, signage and marking improvements - $77,500 .Markai Road / Nangara Road, LOCKYER WATERS - Shoulder widening. Delineation improvements. Signage and lighting - $71,000  2016-17 Cycle Network Local Government Grants Program – awaiting funding decision for Gatton CBD to University of Queensland (Gatton Campus) cycleway project  Forest Hill Stage 1A - Meeting held with State requesting extension for this project. Now awaiting decision from the State.  Community Resilience Fund (State Government, DILGP) successful for Laidley Flood mitigation Works. Request for quote has been sent for survey of the drain.  Heavy Vehicle Safety and Productivity Programme (Australian Government) - Submission for Carpendale/Flagstone Creek Road intersection, floodway upgrade, and signage improvements was submitted 10th February 2016. Now awaiting decision from the Feds

Page 344 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

14.0 ITEMS FOR INFORMATION

No Information Items.

15.0 CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS

ADDITIONAL ITEM FOR BUSINESS THAT the following item not included in the agenda, be brought forward for discussion and subsequent consideration, as it is considered an urgent matter which needs to be responded to at this meeting of Council:  Cooper Street Drainage (Closed Session)  Lights on the Hill (Closed Session)

Moved By: Cr Holstein Seconded By: Cr McDonald Resolution Number: 16-20/0054

CARRIED 7/0

The meeting adjourned for lunch at 1.00 pm and resumed at 1.48 pm.

Cr Milligan advised of a perceived conflict of interest in item 15.6 “Lights on the Hill Event” (as defined in section 173 of the Local Government Act 2009), due to a family member being associated with the Lockyer Valley Race Club Inc. Cr Milligan took no further part in the discussion and left the meeting at 1.50pm.

Cr Cook assumed the Chair.

CLOSED SESSION THAT Council move into Closed Session at 1.49 am to the exclusion of the press and public, in accordance with Section 275 (1) (f) & (h) of the Local Government Regulation, 2012.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0055

CARRIED 7/0

Page 345 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

OPEN SESSION THAT Council move into Open Session, the time being 4.05 pm.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0056

CARRIED 6/0

Item Number: 15.6 Councillor: Cr Jason Cook SUBJECT: LIGHTS ON THE HILL EVENT RESOLUTION THAT Council delegate to the Deputy Mayor and the Acting Chief Executive Officer authority to work with Lights on the Hill (LOTH) and the Lockyer Valley Racing Club to find a suitable and cost effective solution to the issues identified, with the aim of holding the LOTH event in October 2016 at the Lockyer Valley Race Club; Subject to: 1. LOTH being responsible for all insurance and risk liability; 2. That LOTH provide in-kind or cash support to local community organisations in addition to any donation or fee paid to the Lockyer Valley Race Club; and 3. That Council’s combined financial and in-kind contribution for the event is capped at $15,000.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0057

CARRIED 6/0

Page 346 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Cr Milligan returned to the meeting, the time being 2.43pm and assumed the position of Chair.

15.1 Application for Lease Renewal over Lot 103 on CA31327 - Airforce Road, Helidon Spa

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Caitlan Natalier, Solicitor/Legal Services Coordinator Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer That the above item be considered in Closed Session to the exclusion of the press and public in accordance with Section 275 (1) (h) of the Local Government Regulation, 2012, as the matter involves other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage.

Summary:

The Department of Natural Resources and Mines has received an Application from the Lessee of Term Lease 0/231694 for lease renewal. The Department is currently investigating this application and whether a freehold tenure would be more appropriate. The purpose of this Report is for Council to consider this request and advise of any views and requirements which should be considered in assessing the application.

RESOLUTION THAT with respect to the correspondence received from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines dated 21 April 2016 requesting Council’s views in respect of the proposed renewal of Term Lease 0/231694 over Lot 103 on CA31327, Council resolves to:- 1. offer no objection to the renewal of Term Lease 0/231694; and 2. advise the Department of Natural Resources and Mines that it has no objection to a freehold tenure being issued for the land provided that the land is not required by Queensland Rail, as no significant values or other overriding community interests have been identified which would require the protection and management of the State or Council.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0058

CARRIED 7/0

Page 347 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

15.2 Legal Update

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Caitlan Natalier, Solicitor/Legal Services Coordinator Responsible Officer: Ian Flint, Chief Executive Officer That the above item be considered in Closed Session to the exclusion of the press and public in accordance with Section 275 (1) (h) of the Local Government Regulation, 2012, as the matter involves other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage.

Summary:

The purpose of this Report is to provide an update to Council on the status of current legal matters.

RESOLUTION THAT Council receive and note the contents of the legal update report.

Moved By: Cr Hagan Seconded By: Cr Cook Resolution Number: 16-20/0059

CARRIED 7/0

Page 348 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

15.3 Sale of Land for arrears of Rates Preliminary to Notice of Intention to Sell

Date: 18 May 2016 Author: Tony Brett, Manager Finance and Customer Service Responsible Officer: David Lewis, Executive Manager Corporate & Community Services That the above item be considered in Closed Session to the exclusion of the press and public in accordance with Section 275 (1) (h) of the Local Government Regulation, 2012, as the matter involves other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage.

Summary:

The following report is presented to commence the process required under the Local Government Act 2009 and Local Government Regulation 2012 by which overdue rates and charges may be recovered by the sale of subject properties.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to advise the owners of certain properties in writing that it is Council’s intention to resolve to sell the properties if a genuine attempt to clear their outstanding rates and charges is not made within thirty days of the date of Council’s letter; And further; THAT Council receive a further report on the properties remaining unpaid after the thirty day period and consider a further resolution to proceed with the sale at that time.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Wilson Resolution Number: 16-20/0060

CARRIED 7/0

Page 349 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

15.4 Planning and Environment Court Appeal No. 3793 of 2015

Date: 19 May 2016 Author: Trevor Boheim, Manager Planning and Environment Responsible Officer: Dan McPherson, Executive Manager Organisational Development & Planning That the above item be considered in Closed Session to the exclusion of the press and public in accordance with Section 275 (1) (f) of the Local Government Regulation, 2012, as the matter involves starting or defending legal proceedings involving it.

Summary:

This report provides relevant information for Council in respect of correspondence from solicitors acting for the appellants (JKAD Developments Pty Ltd) providing an offer to settle Planning and Environment Court Appeal No. 3793 of 2015.

RESOLUTION THAT Council resolves to agree in part to the proposal put forward to settle Planning and Environment Court Appeal No. 3793 of 2015 by:

1. Amending Condition 1 to read as follows: The approved plan for this development permit is Subdivision Proposal Plan, Reference Number H0355-P5, dated 16 January 2015, subject to the following amendments: a. The number of new residential lots is reduced to 18 lots; b. The minimum area of all 18 new residential lots is 2,945m2; c. Easements D, E and F are realigned so that they align roughly west-north-west to east-south-east as a straight line extension of the drainage line between Lots 14 and 15 SP856583.

2. Include a new Condition 1A to read as follows: The stormwater detention basin in proposed Lot 88 is to have a storage capacity of at least 850m3 and is to be capable of attenuating design events from a 2 year ARI to a 100 year ARI.

3. Retaining Conditions 31, 36, 41, 49 and 52 as they are in the Development Permit.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Hagan Resolution Number: 16-20/0061

CARRIED 7/0

Item Number: 15.5

Page 350 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 25 MAY 2016

Councillor: Cr Tanya Milligan SUBJECT: COOPER STREET DRAINAGE RESOLUTION THAT Council receive and note the verbal update in regard to the issues raised with drainage in Cooper Street, Laidley. further; THAT Council invite the affected resident to present to Council on Wednesday, 8 June, 2016; And further; THAT a full report on the drainage issues in Cooper Street, Laidley be included in the Agenda of the 22 June 2016.

Moved By: Cr McDonald Seconded By: Cr Cook Resolution Number: 16-20/0062

CARRIED 7/0

The Chief Executive Officer advised that Jason Cubit, Manager Marketing, Communication and Engagement had accepted the position as the Chief Executive Officer of the Ipswich Jets. The CEO passed on his congratulations to Jason and thanked him for almost 10 years of meritorious service to Council and the Lockyer Valley community.

16.0 MEETING CLOSED

There being no further business, the Mayor closed the meeting, the time being 4.11 pm.

Page 351