Mndot Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Bicycle Route Planning Guide

July 2017 Acknowlegements The Bicycle Route Planning Guide was developed with the support from the following people and organizations:

Project Advisory Committee MnDOT Central Office Staff Andrew Korsberg, MN DNR Liz Walton, Landscape Architect - MnDOT Pedestrian Bryan Anderson, MnDOT District 1 and Bicycle Section Jon Mason, MnDOT District 3 Tim Mitchell, Planning Director - MnDOT Office of Transit Gina Mitteco, MnDOT Metro District Amber Dallman, State Bicycle and Pedestrian , MnDOT Metro District Mackenzie Turner Bargen Coordinator Steve Elmer, Metropolitan Council Cindy Bellefeuille, Tribal Liaison – MnDOT Government Bob Bollenbeck, East Central Regional Development Affairs Commission/RDO 7E Andy Hubley, Arrowhead Regional Development Commission Consultant Team James Gittemeier, Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Toole Design Group Interstate Council Stantec Krysten Foster, Lake County HDR Brian Fanelli, Explore Minnesota Tourism Andy Trcka, MnDOT Office of Enterprise Development Cover Photo by Demaio Mary Derks, Bicycle advocate/tour operator Dorian Grilley, Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota Table of Contents

Introduction...... pg 4

Step 1: Getting Started...... pg 7

Step 2: Early Coordination & Communication...... pg 8

Step 3: Public Engagement...... pg 10

Step 4: Produce a Draft Route within the Corridor...... pg 13

Step 5: Revise and Finalize Route...... pg 15

Step 6: Designate and Map the Route...... pg 17

Step 7: Manage the Route...... pg 20

Appendices Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Introduction

Introduction The Bicycle Route Planning Guide (Guide) serves as a blueprint to develop and designate long distance bicycle routes in Minnesota, including United States Bicycle Routes (USBR) and the Minnesota Bicycle Route Network (MBRN). The Guide details seven steps for designating a route from route planning inception to management. An overview of the route designation steps is displayed below. »

STEP 1 | GETTING STARTED STEP 4 | PRODUCE A DRAFT ROUTE • Determine Route Leader • Evaluate Route Options Using Criteria • Develop Scope & Timeline • Identify a Draft Route

• Determine Staff Resources » »

STEP 5 | REVISE & FINALIZE ROUTE STEP 2 | COORDINATION & • Seek Feedback & Support COMMUNICATION • Present Draft Route • Identify Partners • Revise the Draft Route • Designate a Project Advisory Committee • Produce a Final Route • Introduce the Project to Road and Trail • Prepare Resolution of Support Maps Authorities » • Early Coordination

» STEP 6 | DESIGNATE & MAP THE ROUTE

STEP 3 | PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT • Seek Route Approvals • Produce Turn-by-Turn Directions • Establish Engagement Goals • Produce Route Maps • Determine Target Audiences • Apply for Route Designation • Determine Engagement Type & Frequency • Produce Maps for Ride Planning & Navigation • Establish Outreach & Engagement Methods » • Establish a Public Outreach & Participation Plan

• Determine Need and Method to Document STEP 7 | MANAGE THE ROUTE Results • Partner Communcations • Use Engagement Comments to Refine the Route • Route Realignments & Amendments • Share Results • Amending Route Designations • Refine Contact Lists

» • Route Signs

Audience The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) developed this guide primarily for staff, although additional audiences may find the Guide useful. For example, local route planning partners and organizations involved in developing or supporting long distance or inter-city bicycle routes may apply the Guide to their work or use the Guide to understand procedures.

4 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Introduction

United States Bicycle Route System and provides an overview of the existing and future USBRs; Figure 1 displays the National Corridor Plan; see (USBRS) Appendix A for a larger corridor map. The U.S. Bicycle Route System (USBRS) is a national bicycle route network designed to connect people to In Minnesota, AASHTO officially designated USBR 45, places, featuring long distance routes which connect the Mississippi River Trail, after MnDOT submitted an states to states as well as states to Canada and Mexico. application in 2013. USBR 45 follows the Mississippi In the early 1980s the American Association of State River from its headwaters to the Iowa border. In Highway and Traffic Officials (AASHTO) designated Fall, 2016, AASHTO approved MnDOT’s application the first USBR and continues to designate routes. The to designate USBR 41. USBR 41, also known as the USBRS is a network of broad route corridors across North Star Route, runs from St. Paul north to the the country. State Departments of Transportation are Canadian border. MnDOT will pursue its next USBR responsible for selecting and planning specific routes based on Minnesota Statewide Bicycle System Plan within the corridors and applying to AASHTO for route recommendations (See the System Plan route network designation. The National Corridor Plan is a map that map in Appendix A). identifies where to develop and designate future USBRs

The goal of The United States Bicycle Route System is to connect America through a America’s bicycle travel experts network of numbered interstate NATIONAL CORRIDOR PLAN bicycle routes. May 2017

Seattle 10 14

95 87 Spokane 14 85 10 Portland Missoula 20 20 10 Salem 20 8 41 Helena Sault Ste Marie Bismarck Fargo Duluth 1 Eugene 76 45 Burlington 30 65 8 10 10 Portland Billings 9 Boise 30 20 Albany 7 Manchester Minneapolis 25 Rochester 85 40 Pierre 55 35 Boston Syracuse Providence Idaho Falls 20 87 Sioux Falls 30 37 15 Hartford 30 95 Casper Scranton 51 Milwaukee Lansing New Haven Detroit Cleveland New York 76 36 36 40 50 40 1 Reno Salt Lake City Davenport Chicago Toledo Canton Santa Rosa Cheyenne 65 Philadelphia Omaha Des Moines 21 Pittsburgh Fort Collins Lincoln 40 Wilmington 79 Provo 50 Columbus 50 Sacramento 50 Dayton Baltimore San Francisco Springfield Denver Indianapolis Washington D.C. San Jose 51 50 Cincinnati 15 45 66 11 Colorado Springs Kansas City 35 Topeka 76 Richmond Fresno 70 70 25 Lexington 85 Louisville Virginia Beach 95 50 St. Louis 87 76 76 55 1 Bakersfield 75 Wichita 21 Las Vegas 76 23 Raleigh 70 80 Springfield Nashville 66 Santa Fe Knoxville Tulsa Fayetteville Los Angeles Riverside 65 51 Charlotte 66 Memphis 80 121 95 Oklahoma City 66 79 Albuquerque Little Rock Chattanooga Columbia 5 80 21 San Diego Phoenix 45 84 Atlanta Augusta 1 90 Lubbock 75 84 35 DESIGNATED U.S. Tucson 25 15 Savannah BICYCLE ROUTE 84 Fort Worth Dallas Shreveport Jackson Montgomery Deadhorse El Paso 51 Established U.S. Bicycle 45 Jacksonville 90 55 Mobile Route designated by 90 Tallahassee Austin 90 Gulfport AASHTO. Fairbanks Baton Rouge Pensacola Daytona Beach Houston New Orleans 8 51 Orlando 97 95 San Antonio Melbourne Tampa 108 UNDEVELOPED 87 1 West Palm Anchorage 208 Beach CORRIDOR Skagway Honolulu Sarasota Haines Corpus Christi 15 Homer Juneau These corridors are not Miami Hilo routes, but 50-mile wide McAllen areas where a route may Key West be developed.

ADVENTURECYCLING.ORG/USBRS

Figure 1: USBR National Corridor Plan map.

5 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Introduction

Minnesota Bicycle Route Network (MBRN) MnDOT adopted its Statewide Bicycle System Plan (Plan) in 2016. The Plan describes the future Minnesota Bicycle Route network (MBRN), including priority corridors the public identified for development. The MBRN represents envisioned connections that link destinations throughout the state by bicycle. The MBRN does not describe the actual facilities that will form these connections. Rather, this Plan presents the MBRN as a set of corridors throughout the state that link destinations. The Plan calls for MnDOT to lead work related to state bicycle route planning and legislative authorization. At the time of writing this guide, MnDOT is developing bicycle plans for each district. Those plans will result in specific routes (based on the corridors), investments and priorities, and clear guidance regarding future plan updates. Minnesota Bicycle Routes (MBRs) will not exclusively use State Highways; therefore, MnDOT will need to coordinate closely with other road and trail authorities.

Figure 2: Minnesota Bicycle Route Network map. The Plan identifies four “high priority” corridors for official designation: • Twin Cities to the Grand Portage State Park, via Hinckley and Duluth – USBR 41 • Itasca State Park to Iowa, via the Mississippi River Trail – USBR 45 • Twin Cities to Mankato loop, via the Minnesota River Valley and Northfield • Moorhead to St. Cloud, via Detroit Lakes, Fergus Falls and Alexandria

MnDOT will typically develop routes commonly identified within the USBRS and MBRN simultaneously. Figure 2 and Appendix A display a map of the MBRN.

6 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 1

» STEP 1 | Getting Started The first step to develop and designate a U.S. Bicycle Route and/or a State Bicycle Route is to determine who will principally lead the route work, develop a project scope and timeline, and determine staff resources.

Determine Route Leader 2. Evaluate route options; 3. Select a draft and final route; and Once a route is selected for development, MnDOT 4. Designate the route. will typically lead the project work. If other agencies and/or organizations wish to develop a route before See Figure 3 for the USBR 41 timeline and milestones. MnDOT is ready or develop a route not on the high priority list, MnDOT will consider working with groups NOTE: Planning and designating USBR 41 occurred under who can clearly show organization and initiative to lead an accelerated schedule. The process would typically take necessary project work. Such groups will need to closely approximately one year to complete. coordinate their effort with MnDOT and other key partners. Determine Staff Resources Develop the Project Scope and While developing the project scope and timeline, determine the staff hours needed to complete the work Timeline within the proposed timeframe. This will help determine if In developing a project scope and timeline with targeted there is enough staff capacity internally, or if a consultant milestones, identify the proposed route length, route with bicycle route planning experience or outside termini, major route supporters and potential planning resources (volunteers or another agency) are necessary. If participants, and describe logical steps to follow. The hiring a consultant, determine if a request-for-proposal is scope should include these four major tasks: required, and factor in time for the proposal solicitation, review time, and contract authorization. Follow the 1. Community engagement (includes soliciting project standard steps required by MnDOT Consultant Services. support);

Prepare Public Prepare online Outreach and survey and online Participation Plan mapping tool

Communication and In-person Public Prepare materials and Produce ﬁnal social media Outreach activities or Public USBR 41 route Designate outreach begins Session One Outreach Session Two map USBR 41

April May June July August September

Develop Drat Prepare materials Synthesie and In-person Public Prepare application USBR 41 and activities or analye results o Outreach to designate USBR 41 Route Map Public Outreach Public Outreach Session Two Session One Session One Launch online Develop tactics or survey and online Public Outreach Session One mapping tool

Figure 3: Timeline and target milestones to plan and designate USBR 41.

7 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 2

» STEP 2 | Early Coordination & Communication This step sets early coordination and communication with key partners in motion.

Identify Partners important long-term partners. As a courtesy, contact road and trail authorities where the route may be Planning USBRs and MBRs involves strong ties amongst located as early as possible and prior to informing many; the word partner is used throughout this guide the general public of project specifics. Introductory to refer to different agencies, organizations, and communication may help indicate initial support for others involved in route planning and implementation. the route and potential issues to consider. The initial Partnerships will be necessary at all project stages and contact may be brief. For example, an introductory it is important to identify potential partners and begin email or phone call, followed with a one-page project forging relationships at the earliest opportunities. Key info sheet, may suffice; See Appendix B for a sample partners may include MnDOT districts, counties, cities, introductory letter and project information sheet. regional development commissions, the Minnesota Provide a summary of how public engagement will Department of Natural Resources, local bicycle clubs, occur, invite participation in the project, and direct the Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota, Adventure Cycling authorities to project resources, including a project Association staff, and others. Key steps to identifying webpage. For project efficiency, any communications partners include: should include: • Review the potential route corridor alignment to • A request for local bicycle and trail plans (and data create an initial list of list of road and trail authorities if appropriate), looking for route segments that are and municipal partners; planned or exist • Use the partner list to identify potential project • Route suggestions, based on local knowledge advisory committee members (see PAC below) • Expectations/requirements (i.e. resolution of support required to designate route, etc.) Designate a Project Advisory • Inquire if interested in participating in the PAC (if Committee (PAC) appropriate) The purpose of a Project Advisory Committee (PAC) is to inform staff and guide decisions while developing and designating the route. Include MnDOT district staff and key partners such as local engineers and planners, regional development organization staff, DNR planners, a State Non-Motorized Transportation Advisory Committee representative, and Explore Minnesota Tourism staff. Look for PAC members during early outreach. Convene and communicate with the PAC regularly throughout the project.

Introduce the Project to Road and Trail Authorities Because it’s likely any long-distance bicycle route will be on roads and trails under the jurisdiction of a variety of road and trail authorities, the authorities are Figure 4: Draft route map of USBR 41.

8 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 2

Early Coordination Early coordination tasks include: • Develop a contact database of primary contacts (road/trail authorities, municipalities, adjacent states, etc.) and secondary contacts (elected official, advocates, etc.); this database will be updated throughout the project. • Produce initial media communications; this may include a “one-pager”/project info sheet, a project webpage, and social media posts; Figure 5 displays a screen capture of the MnDOT USBR 41 website. • Introduce the project using social media, meetings, and workshops.

Figure 5: MnDOT USBR 41 website.

9 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 3

» STEP 3 | Public Engagement Public engagement forms the foundation to successfully plan and designate a USBR or an MBR. Engagement includes communicating with the general public, road and trail authorities, and other partners. This step focuses on preparing a Public Outreach and Participation Plan (POPP) and describes engagement goals and desired outcomes, the target audience, and the process for communicating with that audience. Engaging the public and key partners occurs at various levels in Steps 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7.

Establish Engagement Goals Engagement goals will vary, but generally will focus on: • Engaging key partners; • Gaining and documenting support from road and trail authorities; • Ensuring route decisions are beneficial to local communities and bicyclists; and • Determining a name for the route (if applicable).

Determine Target Audiences Partners can generally be divided into three categories: Figure 6. MnDOT Central Office and District 1 staff with partners at Tofte workshop. 1. Decision-makers; 2. Project partners; and 3. Community members. » EXAMPLE PARTNER TYPES The partners in each category will vary from route to • Adventure Cycling Association staff route, but at a minimum, should include all groups that • Road and trail authorities have ownership or authority of any roadway or trail that • Regional planning authorities (RPCs, MPOs) may become part of the final route. Use the list of partners • Municipalities and counties from the USBR 41 project in Appendix B as an example. • Relevant state agencies (DNR, Tourism) • Relevant Tribal governments Determine Engagement Type & • Elected officials Frequency for Each Step/Partner • Bicycle advocacy and promotion groups After establishing target audiences, select specific • Bicycle clubs engagement efforts for each potential project partner. • Trail associations Consider the number of times to engage; some • Railroads partners may only need to be engaged once, while • Businesses other partners may be engaged multiple times over the course of the project. Recommended engagement phases include, but are not limited to: Engage road and trail authorities early in the process • When corridor evaluation begins; to allow sufficient time to address any concerns they may have. The public and other partners are best • Following draft route development; initially engaged after identifying a draft route, which • Following final draft route selection; and allows people to respond with specific route-related • Designation and any associated opening/ribbon- comments to something tangible. cutting events.

10 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 3

Establish Outreach and Engagement Methods Apply a variety of engagement methods: COMBINING PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT • Direct outreach: Includes mail, email, and » telephone contact; best used to reach specific There may be opportunities to combine public partners such as road and trail authorities. engagement with other organizations. For • Online outreach: Includes project website, example, as MnDOT began communicating social media, surveys, mapping tools; best used with potential partners to inform them of to provide general project information and the upcoming USBR 41 planning, it learned solicit input across large geographic areas and from the Minnesota Department of Natural populations. Resources (MnDNR) that the MnDNR was developing a state trail master plan in a similar • In-person forums: Includes open houses, geographic area to the proposed USBR 41 workshops, focus groups, and interviews. Open route. After discussing route options between houses and workshops are best used agencies, MnDOT and MnDNR held joint open in more densely populated areas where people do houses to inform its partners of each other’s not have to travel far to attend projects. The joint open houses were arranged the event or in a specific community where the with the intent to expand each agency’s route alignment is complex and/or it is difficult to partner-base, reach a broader audience than identify one route alignment; if meeting separately, eliminate the need for focus groups and interviews are best used some partners to attend two meetings. to solicit information from specific groups or individuals.

Select a variety of outreach and engagement methods to ensure broad input on the project. Where practical, participate jointly in other planned meetings or events that may offer efficiencies and more diverse/ focused engagement (see Figure 7 and Combining Public Engagement sidebar).

Clearly identify the intended engagement method for each future recommended engagement phase. For example, engagement to review and comment on the draft route may have been at an open house and online, but reviewing and commenting on the final route may be only online. Figure 7: MnDOT and MnDNR co-hosted a meeting to jointly discuss agency projects.

11 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 3

Establish a Public Outreach and Share Results Participation Plan (POPP) Produce a summary of engagement efforts to share Organize engagement goals, target audiences, and and highlight input received. The summary should use engagement methods into a plan. The plan should be graphics and charts to summarize input clearly and succinct, but should include sufficient detail for a reader succinctly. Consider using maps, charts, and other to understand public engagement goals and the steps infographics to summarize engagement comments, and necessary to achieve those goals. Before each major to highlight how input shaped the plan and affected engagement phase, prepare a detailed work plan for recommendations. Share the results first with the outreach communications, engagement tactics, and PAC and, as a courtesy, with trail authorities who other logistics. may benefit from reviewing pertinent engagement comments; then share information broadly on the Determine Need and Method to project webpage to those on the project contact database and via social media (see Figure 8 for an Document Results example public engagement results infographic). Document information received during engagement to evaluate comments, make decisions, and justify project Refine Contact Lists decisions and recommendations. Record participant Add or remove people from the project contact interactions including comments from the various database throughout the project. Ask participants outreach and engagement methods and identify early in engagement events if they wish to be added to what documentation to retain in long-term project files. the project email list and receive specific project communications. A more general method is to invite Use Engagement Comments people to receive information at key points and be to Refine the Route informed of other bicycle projects by signing up for govdelivery (MnDOT’s agency-to-citizen email Use comments from public engagement to refine the communication). Update the project contact list after route. In particular, review and consider input from each engagement event. local road and trail authorities as their support for the final route alignment is required. Consider comments from the public and other partners, particularly comments regarding local road or trail conditions and suitability for bicycling—local bicyclists and partners generally have a good understanding of area bicycling conditions.

Figure 8. On-line engagement results infographic.

12 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 4

CANADA P o p la r C rk R 61 STEP 4 | Produce a Draftd Route within the Corridor TH 1 Superior National Forest» N 6 M TH MN r t T This step identifies methods to produce a draft route within the project corridor. This involves considering both road lin Grand Portage nf Gu T o 4th St and trail options, leading to a recommended draftS route alignment.w See Figure 9 for a sample segment of the draft n

t W o s d E

i r t R e r T e e e o

v p R p St S w 8th A U USBR 411 route. d 6 t n

h H

t T 1 s e MN d 6

7 i Grand Marais 5 r t o R H e t h r T h 3 S D s N t d R r

A c M d N R

i e d

n r g v

S n CSAH 7 th St A e i d 5 e c a s R 9 y h u v S a g o 8 B

W e 4th St e r H posted speeds. In some cases there may be only 4th St t

r a h

E r

i d

A M

e Evaluate Route Options Using d 10 R v R

e r s

a 2nd St n e

W e one road option and it may have higher than desired v v i 1st St te

R S S

l l

B Defined Criteria a r Grand Portage F tate Trail o traffic volumes or speeds. Gitchi-Gami S a d Grand Marais w

a y Apply route criteria to help determine the ?ÝA@best route • Local interest and connections: Route follows 1 61 6 d H H option. To begin, evaluate and/or map all relevantR T T k or connects to popular points of interest (scenic, N N e M M re C e locally planned and existing bicycle facilitiesil and M Lake Superiorhistoric, cultural, and recreational value) or makes

routes; this may narrow down route optionsd within the il

R strong local route connections (routes are part Lake Superior ra Lutsen

o T n

i e N 9 s t 5

a a corridor. Many of the criteria below are loosely defined of an existing or planned local or regionalt bicycle th C S A i ve m t W as conditions and what is considered acceptable may a S network). Also consider the popularityG of existing h - t i y h 0 t Observation Rd 1 S w 0 3,000 6,000 tc Tofte e h k i v t P Ca 9 Feet sino R A e d T vary significantly across the state. G S n p n i r routes. For instance, the alignment receives W l a r i o y n t k i g t l e g S va t S r n l i S W h Schroeder t e l t C S R r th 5 o considerable support during public engagement or is A h d 8 N W u t 4 S 1 r ?¦A@ W 1 t 2 th Mineral Center Rd R W Appalachian St d t A d ÝA@ ? R v Tettegouche State Park Primary route evaluation criteria include: rk S popular based on existing use. P Pa e h i rgy th W t 10 e Ene 4 d a H m P 1 u on )q W t t 6 ch t e i Av S • Roadway/trail suitability: Trail orH on-road bicycle • Services and amenities: Daily services, including ns e r s T 1 on T U N 6 R yrol St io - d r ti M H W 10th St t e l t S u d facilities exist (paved shoulders or bike lanes) or the water, food, Tand overnight accommodations S w p lv 0 1,000 2,000 Little Marais e B N th t N u M s 1 Feet M 5 S S m 6 1 h a t G Dr d H W 3 urk A roadway has low or very low traffic volumes and Illgenare City available at appropriate intervals along the 1 N W a B r N i T 2 20th Ave W r W 7 fi C N t 1 e l h l l M A t 9 d r e v is D e S t A v B Lake Superior t h v Da W s Dr Silver Bay 8 1 A e d uter Lyman St W v C lv O t e S B Duluth t A Wellington St S W H ks S 5 d n d d lv a r n B H B Beaver Bay Hermantownl H i 3 la r n o t t e D o rn a H H r l s r a S u b y P i B i a W r e en d l T ne i o t o c n vd s n i rg n Bl E R e r S C i vd e d Vernon St e D u t s p m R t u l r Q r a S e %&g( Law Dr t d S D n H r S t o W e i s Marks Dr t S r u il e )q m n t O a a o t r s a T G r P t e Silver Bay - te S e i t v !"`$ t h a th t A ta P t 7 S c S S it W th d S i th e 4 n G al St 7 3 m Castle Danger Miner Oneota Park v W a 7 a W t A Albion St r th P wy G W Skyline Pk umbia St S G A i - Cardigan St Col v p i h d t e e S h t n dina St W c Me Ist St a L t t d i 6 a N W o i r n R W e G Medina St n ta e e e G rs ighland St W 4 O so v H R u ÝA@ 4 e ? N n o t n i A e s d t f C S 4 v h in n l h Clay St t A M o o Vinland St t 4 !"`$ sc G S d A 7 h i t h t n 7 Tacony St t h a v W 8 4 r Two Harbors G e N A e W v W Lexington St W e v

1 e 6 y W A

w v Larsmont k l

y P a t A w e dy S r n o r i C l D

H l t L y o

a a l x d Kinfe River Duluth k Greene St il d S e l n La l v r a

k R l St. Louis Bay t e A o e R t O d C 7 d n n s

C )i Bayview Forest Park Palmers ra e Roosevelt St G e

W Nicollet St C d 1 lv Main St Main St 0 3,000 6,000 Beaver Bay 6 B !"`$ Feet H Polk St Polk St T n )i i o

)i W m N 8 )q d Raleigh St a il M g Raleigh St G n Redruth St e i- ra o h v c T )i C S t e e

i 5 A at Lake Superior v W

G t 9 e S A t

v h h L

t e A d A s u

d v n 7

r r e e

a 3 0 3,000 6,000 r 5 S W )i Spirit Mountian 6 t

Feet t G S ?ÅA@ Regional Park S r S n a e Duluth m g S le 7 d o n 5 v C u th l M l A M B

i t d i ve nn r ra W es 406th St s a W isc ot e ll T on a r !"`$ o Carlton i te sin ?}A@ 7 W ta F 5 S 404th St e Kimballs Bay v A

6 403rd St y a

A Sunnyside St N

402nd St w I g

T Pokegama

t n

Mahtowa 402nd St i

e C S

v Bay r m O

6 A e l m h i N e

w c a S 0 3,000 6,000 t e 401st St H r i e Feet l v

T O F d ?æA@ E 400th St 400th St

o e t o C N

G a t S

a N l I L Aztec Tr i

S I e

Barnum a v r c r

r A e T W

e M l

g n i d P n k E e a r u z ?¼A@ !"`$ d

R l d r Chippewa Tr e

1 e v 4 a 397th St v 5 o M l Figure 9. Segment of draft USBR 41 Route. T th

o S N

W B t P A

N G d g e t k r l Buffalo S d ÀA@ B u k ? e n g l a a a Moose Lake a H e Sioux Tr l l a l d E N r r

i North Branch e G E d o w l N C

e v N 8 r a a r Ash St W v th e t A g B e e d

A h l v A

v e d v w o Pine La v 394th St i A g

n e B A Sturgeon Lake Bald Eagle Lake n o

e a d r Tr a R y g l ou l l C

o v Park Ave s t a w

a r d L t Bi !"`$ E Ce r Timber Wolf Tr rc dar S h o 13 t

w S e d t e

A e

P n v

v g e

a A A z

e v t

F i

k t H 392nd St Birch S a E A

F n

g n t

g i l

d n Stillwater St L s

a F t

F e 1 Stillwater St e k v

e l v

i C H o R

Willow River A d 6 B n 9 N e

c a H d

t i

T i f

i N 3 A s 91 M s st St

r c

v e

e a t N e h S

35t e 1 r

P v N Cedar St

o N

R A

e White Bear Lake F Garden e

La v d

e e

Elm St n 12th St A

v v

d 2

a v

e L

w A 11th St v A d

L l h v Rutledge A Hugo t

o i N h

h e

e B v

t 9

t r n 132nd St N l

v r ?÷A@

a e i y 4 in St

o Ma h r d

A A B t v

1 1

n a

e l öA@

o ?

s T

m 6

i a A h

e t v t Maple S w

l B

e t e ´A@ Finlayson v 10th St

? a p

A n s y

L g 4 v l

p G e

t e i

D e s

m e 0 1,000 2,000

e e A o l t v ak S r O e Oak St u r F e

a e

a r v 13 E 0 th S d 130th St N t N r v A

n u

r Feet

D w 9th St v

A l

A a C Lino Lakes o o

d A

e e

E r d A

a l T

t 385th St N i

n t H F F

v r S e a

a h h v i h St o t h

8t 9 t W a

A 2 e

e k 1 e

B c s c

i 4

e w v

h a

a d n n r

Groningen v

e e e h St i

7t e A

7th St n h a O

r Flay Rd N v r

G A v

a a

o Pine St h o

t A B

A r 6th St J t N l S m h 1

t 9 M 26 2 M 1 6 G k th a P

a o S e n t N

r o i t N

o o v t

l u

o I e n s

A 5th St l E e B a N

C n s e d v t i Friesland d R h )s e C d A r

o 4th St a 125th St N F v e

a n v N n lf A io A Go

e u W A N )s n r 3rd St 3rd St v o

a e A v r e S e e u h 2nd St v R

t e k 382nd St a E d N A 2nd St v a L N e A n

o H 1st St k r 1st St c l r

Webber St a e l il a p F Elm St C a Tr p

U Hinckley e e Ash St ?ÓA@ v Eugene St Av 12 A e 0th St N

h k

t a

4 L Mahtomedi Fish Lake

e e v v White Bear Lake L 1

A a

6 117th St N k Park St d ln e n o

2 c A H H n i v u M A L e

Whitaker St g o S Grant S o r g

a C R ?¼A@ n 0 1,000 2,000 d ?`A@ White Bear Lake T Feet r O B ld e 0 2,000 4,000 a W Feet Pine City r h S A i t t v e Bald Eagle Lake E Goose Lake e d

v e S l Blvd B v N re e ho 3 l A 4 S h S Shor South ag e Blvd d

t E d

ld n

6 a R N a

B l

o t t r r Dellwood lo St o

h a Rock Creek Buff t h P ?äA@ g A Lakeridge Dr Rishworth La i v w

n e e

0 Floral Dr s k

3 t c U.S. Bicycle Route (USBR) 41 A

N M

H T I

Rush City S S O

C N S White Bear O S E O B l ou d Lake th S !"`$ e hore a W B N C South Shore Blvd lvd r h d A

l i N S

i t v v e I I l ve a e

A r Harris nia B lva T M sy Ash St W t t nn CSAH 12 e e P S t s E d

d o a R e t USBR 41 On-Road t R r t o n

S S s n h a o 1 2

c e ?öA@ r a

A y m D F E f USBR 41 Off-Road m f a

e t o N

n w

S H t u e s S e t )s t d Birchwood Village

e i h Mississippi River Trail Bikeway (USBR 45) l l R S

N North Branch a i p c a te E North St

p e N t e S Cedar Ave G a i

v e W v

i E Mount Airy St s y r l d

s fa

i t

T a r Roadways s L R t d

a S

3 s i N t

S N

e 9 R n

i M

0 B o N n n

r 2

s h

a g h i e

N Railroad

J t

n o i a y e m

5 a u a J

h c v f n i r f

r k w A

e k e

o e B s W

k t v i v P c o e H

S State and Regional Parks

B N A n A Lost Lake E 13th St n

e County Rd E M y

e e y

S v e

a r

t A i i s

%&c( u

y P t a ¸A@ P i l ?

it l n Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA)

Stacy r s N

r Gem Lake e e )l N e n v B ni Grove St C u U N White Bear Lake Federal and State Forests

S K i tt l Wyoming Saint Paul s i N o C n Orchard La National Wildlife Refuge a J P e S r a in lA@ n ? t c e t T r Heiner's Lake a k S l s t k P t Open Water a o S

e n h Mahtomedi rk 8t e P S E l r t t r t S e S Municipal Boundary C Forest Lake h !"b$ h 2t e 0t àA@ 1 t 1 t ? S d E B E h

St 4t o l State Boundary h ik P E E County Rd D %&h( 1t h E Co o 1 e t t unty E w 9 S Rd D E th t w a 8 S öA@ h e ? y E 5t %&d( d v N E r t !"b$ A dia Ave E R S Ly oy Rd a th B J o e 4 t ©A@ 6 r b Hugo S ? r H E o th e a i 0 r N d May 2016 1 t a S w )p l N E N l l t P W a

N W e th a y Beam Ave E d 7 a l S M l R E c S t B t USBR 41 Info on MNDOT Website: www.mndot.gov/bike/usbr41 in o t t n u h Silver Lake S e t g a i Alternative Format: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bike/ada.html e s g o S d n 3 n v k %&c( t t l a a Maplewood S B c Disclaimer: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/information/disclaimer.html

h N 2 c a N S g x i g M E n t lo t t W N el W P a t K d S e b S S R h i E r Oakdale t a t b e Casey Lake n e s 5 l rn N r h E e a 3 17th Ave E e 2 l White Bear Lake S y W CSAH a t t 1 t S S S e 9 th t S t 4 H

0 t 1 E North Saint Paul e ?ÇA@ r

1 North St. Paul a

g Rd 12th Ave E r

r a 0 500 1,000 t rd e S pa iv 0 2,000 4,000 Maplewood Feet nd e R M 2 Sh pi Feet !"b$ E sip y a sis w il is e ra M at T St. Paul G te µ ta ?öA@ 0 5 10 15 20 S Miles Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 4

route (40-60 miles or more frequently). Non-daily Identify a Draft Route services, such as bicycle shops and libraries, can be considered using longer intervals. A draft route alignment will likely emerge after applying the primary criteria to the map showing existing and • Directness: Route is reasonably direct and easy to follow with limited turns (both on bicycle and on planned bicycle facilities and routes within the corridor. maps). Often the first criterion – roadway/trail suitability – will narrow options significantly enough for a draft route to • Continuous: Route facilities should be continuous, emerge. Where multiple route options exist or multiple especially trails. Long lengths of trails are preferred route options are very closely rated using the primary in contrast to routes where bicyclists must criteria, apply secondary criteria. frequently transition from on-road to off-road and back again. Secondary criteria include: • Multi-modal: Routes connect to transit and transportation hubs, preferably on a daily basis • Bicycle friendliness: Connects to a designated (every 50 miles). Multi-modal connections are bicycle-friendly community. especially helpful for bicyclists travelling in a linear • Terrain: Avoids very hilly areas, unless other criteria “A to B” direction vs. those travelling a loop. Multi- supersede terrain. modal connections are sometimes not an option. • Traffic control: Bridges, underpasses, or traffic controls are present to assist crossing busy Some criteria must be on a case-by case basis. For roadways. instance, “reasonably direct” and “continuous” may differ • Surface condition:Trail and roadway surfaces in when a route is in a rural vs. urban area. See Appendix C good condition and receive routine maintenance. for detailed criteria information used in USBR 41. May include short stretches of high quality and maintained unpaved roads. • Emergencies: Consider routes that can be used for evacuation routes during emergencies.

As necessary, use online mapping tools and field reviews to fine tune the draft route. Photo by French

Figure 10. Bicycle trail photo used for public engagement materials.

14 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 5

» STEP 5 | Revise and Finalize Route After presenting the draft route(s) to road and trail authorities and the public, evaluate and incorporate comments to create a final route.

Seek Feedback and Support ROAD AND TRAIL AUTHORITY » PARTICIPATION The goal of this step is to create a final route that partners will support and road and trail authorities For USBR 41 public engagement, invitations will formally support for designation by passing a appeared to increase road and trail authority resolution. participation—particularly at open houses where a county engineer, city planner, etc. could hear and participate in open discussions Present Draft Route with a diverse audience. After identifying and mapping a draft route, present it to the public for broad input: • Solicit comments using public outreach and Revise the Draft Route engagement methods from the POPP; • Evaluate public engagement comments, reapply • Using the contact database, personally invite road and route criteria, and consider and apply valid trail authorities with jurisdiction over segments of the comments to the draft route. draft route to attend an open house or provide online • Particularly address route suggestions and comments (see Road and Trail Authority Participation objections from road and trail authorities. sidebar). Be sure to inform each authority that a letter or resolution of support will be required. The invitation • If appropriate, consult with experts or conduct ensures the authorities were informed appropriately. field work to verify or further evaluate localized information brought to the project staff’s attention. These actions are important tools to gain support from For instance, high truck volumes to serve mining local governments, especially if the route uses local operations or large farms may be reported on roads and trails. otherwise low volume roadways. As appropriate or possible, adjust the route around these facilities. In some cases, MnDOT or local road agencies or public works departments may be able to address concerns and improve facilities for bicycling along the route segment in question (i.e. widen shoulders pavement, add bike lanes or trails/shared-use paths). However, often these improvements take years to plan, program, and construct. • Include facilities in the final route that are programmed and will be constructed by the designation announcement. As a service to bicyclists, it is better to err on the side of revising maps the following year rather than creating navigation confusion. Address exceptions on a case- by-case basis, for example: Figure 11. Participants providing route »»If a spring designation, consider including comments at workshop in Tofte. work that will be constructed within

15 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 5

approximately one month after designation; or »»If a fall designation, work will be completed before the next active bicycling year begins.

If there are route deficiencies that can’t be overcome or known imminent route improvements, create a list of these issues and changes to consider for inclusion in the MnDOT State and District Bicycle Plans. A list may be helpful if funding or project opportunities arise; the project manager or road and trail authorities can consult the list for potential improvements, which may lead to some cost efficiencies or faster improvements.

Produce a Final Route After making changes based on feedback, present a recommended final route to the public. It is especially important for partners and the general public to see how routes have been adjusted based on comments. Appropriately contact people and agencies on the contact list informing them of the recommended final route and designation status. As before, communicate Figure 12. Resolution of support map. with partners based on their role in the project. Road and trail authorities, PAC members, elected officials, and agencies may merit a different message or communication method than those who just want to keep abreast of project progress. Sample communications are provided in Appendix B.

Prepare Resolution of Support Maps for Road and Trail Authorities Prepare a map for each road and trail authority where the route is located, showing the final route on their specific facilities. This map may bring to light ownership discrepancies. If so, revise and resubmit to authorities as an attachment for each authority’s resolution of support. See Figure 12 for a sample resolution of support map and Appendix D for an example resolution of support.

16 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 6

» STEP 6 | Designate and Map the Route The route may be formally designated after selecting the final route alignment and once all road and trail authorities with jurisdiction over route facilities have submitted letters or resolutions of support.

Seek Route Approvals the recommended action is to consider relocating the route and seeking approval from any new authorities. Route designation requires formal approval from all Ideally, this will have come to light before this step. road and trail authorities that own the road or trail where the route is located. Comments from road Produce Turn-by-Turn Directions and trail authorities should have been solicited and reviewed while planning the route (Steps 4 and 5). At After finalizing the route and collecting approvals from that time, authorities should have been informed of all required road and trail authorities, create turn-by- the approval requirements associated with designating turn directions. Turn-by-turn directions should start the road or trail as a USBR or authorizing it as an MBR. at the northern-most or eastern-most point of the Approval can come in the preferred form, a resolution route. If applicable, identify where the route enters of support, a memorandum of understanding (MOU), or and exists the state. Be sure to use the most common an interagency agreement, or in isolated cases, a letter name or number for roads and/or use names/numbers of support. See Appendix D for a sample resolution of that match any signs along the route. Consult with local support. MnDOT‘s project representative or project experts; if uncertain, err by including multiple names/ staff may need to attend city council or county board numbers rather than too few. AASHTO turn-by-turn meetings to present the route to officials for approval. directions must be submitted in a specific format. See Figure 13 for the general AASHTO format. If any resolutions of support from road and trail authorities are pending, follow up with the authorities Turn-by-turn directions to accompany navigation in a timely manner; seek assistance from the PAC, maps and ride planning and are typically presented as necessary. in a variation of the AASHTO format. See the USBR 41 website for the turn-by-turn format used on navigation Before submitting documents to designate a route, ensure maps (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bike/usbr41/ all managing authorities have submitted approval. If an index.html). Turn-by-turn directions from the USBR 41 authority chooses not to provide formal route approval, AASHTO application are in Appendix E.

Turn location Starting Point of Route or Miles traveled on General Direction Cumulative miles and road name/ Realignment this facility of Travel designation

Terminus: Total Mileage:

Figure 13. AASHTO turn-by-turn directions format example.

17 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 6

)q Cook County Produce Route Maps Grand ?ÝA@ Portage ?æA@ ?¦A@ The AASHTO designation application requires a route Grand Marais map. Produce a map in an electronic format that is easily ?rA@ Lutsen ?æA@ Lake County ?¦A@ Tofte printable. The route map used for designation need not Schroeder ?ÈA@ Little Marais MINNESOTA Illgen City provide the same level of detail as a user map, but it Silver Bay Beaver Bay Lake Superior should provide a view of the overall route. Turn-by-turn ?àA@ St. Louis County )q Castle Danger directions supplement the map. The map used for USBR Two Harbors designation is shown in Figure 14 and Appendix E. )i Palmers ?ÅA@ )i ?æA@ Duluth Aitkin County ?}A@ Carlton

Mahtowa Apply for Route Designation Carlton County Barnum ?ÀA@ Moose Lake Complete the AASHTO Application for US Bicycle Sturgeon Lake ?¼A@ Rutledge !"`$ Routes Finlayson

Friesland Pine County MnDOT must electronically submit an application to Hinckley ?ÓA@ ?¼A@ WISCONSIN

AASHTO’s Special Committee on Route Numbering Pine City ?äA@ approximately 5-6 weeks before its annual fall or spring Rush City US Bike Route 41 Harris meeting. The application schedule and instructions ?öA@ Downtown St. Paul to US/Canada Border North Branch Isanti County Chisago County USBR 41 Route are available from the Adventure Cycling Association. Stacy )l Wyoming Minnesota Highways

Anoka Forest Lake Though the work to develop the route may be lengthy, County State Boundary %&d( County Boundaries Hugo?öA@ the application is brief. The application includes: Ramsey Open Water County WBL ´ 0 10 20 40 Miles September 1, 2016 • A brief route description ; St. Paul Washington County Afton State Park • Turn-by-turn directions; Figure 14: USBR 41 route designation map. • The application route map; and • MnDOT’s Commissioner of Transportation signature. Approve and Authorize the Minnesota State Bicycle Route MnDOT need not submit resolutions of support or The items developed for U.S. Bicycle Route designation other approvals from road and trail authorities or should be sufficient for state bicycle route approval: support from neighboring states (if applicable) to a brief route description, turn-by-turn directions, the AASHTO, but must retain the approvals in its files. See route map, approval from road and trail authorities, a complete AASHTO route application for USBR 41 in and approval from neighboring states (if applicable). Appendix E. There is no application for state routes; MnDOT reviews the route and local route support, and has the authority to approve all final routes. To authorize the route in state statute, MnDOT (or a legislator) proposes the state route on the legislative agenda; if passed, the route is authorized. The state authorization need not occur simultaneously with a USBR designation.

18 , , e r e t a s e t e Minnesota Department’ of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 6 k u h v o a i a t o t n t s r L o e c e R y o e t , s h e a h b s e g r n h t t r e t T e g n a ( n r i n d i e t n . g o o l o e 5 r P n S e M i c n a g 4 ( a k w h l e h , , a M y t a , t h 9 l s l R r h n h l t k a t t n

other pertinent information (such as2 route deficiencies u r r i a a B r f . u 5 r e a l m r u o N o Produce Maps for Ride Planning and n t r m 3 e e P o - o s U S f n e m s l v f D u . 7 or alerts). Ideally, thel maps should be available online e f w a e h k s t f t e 2 a ’ r e o h R i g t a o , 6 d v a F s t i a l i Navigation - n s t 1 t t r p e p S r 0 h o d s as ar scalable map and as a printable product. Also 4 a i p f o 0 g t i n e ) n i 7 t w o p 8 s r c @ w o g - t s 1 R H t w i s e n i e a e t / 1 o e , l 0 t B Create maps for users of the newly designated route. publish u the route with a file that bicyclists can load into s e h 1 h j r 1 d r g s t t a . s 2 h r 4 o i 4 t k o t , e r r a r U S h n s l P , h ( M b 1 l R a e g t a e Once the route is final and designated a national a GPS unit for navigation.l Reformat the AASHTO turn- 1 s s d v p u B t ’ u e e a n t 7 u f n i o a d q h / S r e l M a y R i u r t ; a t l t r e e e r i U o h t 4 r t : a u n o k or state route, coordinate within MnDOT to make by-turn directions,t as necessary, for navigational use. t p i . a 7 a o G A R a e , ) s f w p b l 7 t i i / s w P e D n e m 3 e s i l a e s a n c t t - A i u i r s c n h u s

electronic files available for department use (shapefiles, i i n s 1 7 t c . v g : i T y o t r s e n d 4 5 , o n t e c a r . r s i a e h n i 6 l d b h e S d i - o m g R B S e i . i

Map users will primarily be bicyclists,m but road and trail v g f M e a MPK, etc.) and include the route on the state bicycle s 0 r e i r i t B e h t s k u d o 0 e t o h r e m R a S u e f t o n s p 8 a t ’ i y a c e r h t - o t t U a t u a r e i a p planners, municipalities,o and tourism groups may also s h P r 1 t s map. Also prepare standalone navigation maps with l t , t . v S p s r e t l C o i : e i e o t S r t l s o o g l a i ; T i s s e u c i o a ) d r d n a n s , k e q e i . i t y m n use maps. See Figurer 15 for an example USBR 41 map i e e sufficient detail for users to discern which road or trail o m - a r n e s n s i t a e D O i r p t l p 5 L s r e n n s v i i t n u l 1 a o o o o U n M S t 3 p M C a c N a R i R e F M w T to follow, location of amenities along the route, and panel. A

)i MINNESOTA On-Road (>4' Shoulder) Abbreviations: )m CANADA Av = Avenue mi = Mile )q Map On-Road (<4' Shoulder) BL = Bike Lane N = North Map Map Map Map Map Map 10 Map Blvd = Boulevard Pl = Place 5 6 9 11 Map !"b$ Map 7 8 12 13 Trail/Shared Use Path C = Continue R = Right

)y S

M G D

o i r

l u

o v

4 s a Co = County Rd = Road l

n G !"`$ e u r USBR 45 (MRT) L d

Map t

r h

a B H a CR = County Road Ret = Return

k M n

3 in e a

a d c y

P k r E = East RR = Railroad P in le a Highways

Map y i

e o C s r Hwy = Highway S = South it t 2 a N y o )q g r e Other Roads I = Interstate St = Street Map th B F r )t Lake Superior Jct = Junctions Tr = Trail 1 o an re c s h t Railroad L = Left Trhead = Trailhead S L )i t a Map . k P e WISCONSIN La = Lane V = Veer au )l l ´ 1 !"b$ 0 15 30 Miles Map and Inset Panels W = West State Boundary Services: White North Grand Grand Portage Airport Restroom Mileage Chart St. Paul Hinckley Duluth Silver Bay Bear Lake Branch Marais State Park Municipal Boundary St. Paul - 14 46 82 153 217 272 315 ©¡ Bike Shop/Repair Wayside White Bear Lake 14 - 32 68 139 203 258 301 Open Water North Branch 46 32 - 36 107 171 226 269 Historic Site I2 Train Station Hinckley 82 68 36 - 71 135 190 233 Duluth 153 139 107 71 - 64 119 162 National, State Forests !o Lighthouse Silver Bay 217 203 171 135 64 - 55 98 Grand Marais 272 258 226 190 119 55 - 43 Grand Portage State Park 315 301 269 233 162 98 43 - National, State, Regional Parks

NB Rice St N CR 49 Start NW on Sibley St path at jct. with Sam Morgan Tr !"b$ St. Paul 1 R %&d( Snail Lake B

C L i a

%&h( r (0.1) * R on E Kellogg Blvd (0.2) * L on Broadway St ke D Inset Regional Park c r CR h t 23

S (<0.1) * R on Bruce Vento Tr (5.6) * R on Gateway Tr S Rice Creek

%&c( t 1 h (3.1) * R on Margaret St N (0.6) * L on 19th Av E (<0.1) N Edgerton St s Chain of Lakes

A ?ÇA@ C

I2 R * R on Lake Blvd N (0.6) * L on Tr on Lydia Av E (0.8) Park Reserve

Phalen-Keller 3 * R on McKnight Rd N (2.6) * L on S Shore Blvd (0.3) ©¡ Regional Park 4

* R on Old White Bear Av (0.3) * VR on Mark Sather Tr Bruce Vento Tr 3 G 2 Bald Eagle - Otter Lakes

(2.1) * R on CR 96/Lake Av (0.4) * L on Northwest Av a R t ?©A@ C Regional Park e )s (0.6) * L on Buffalo St (0.2) * R on Hugo Rd (1.4) * L on N White Bear Ave CR 65 w Inset Inset %&c( a Inset 120th St N (0.5) * L on 122nd St N (0.7) * R on Tr on y Inset 3 T 5 Europa Tr N (0.3) * Cross to Tr (0.2) * R on Tr on r 2 4 132nd St N (0.1) * L on Tr on Fenway Blvd N (0.9) McKnight Rd N * R on 140th St N (0.2) * L on Hardwood Creek Tr (10.1) Maplewood Hard r ?lA@ ©¡ wood Creek T SB 4

R C on Hardwood Creek Tr * R on 140th St N (0.2) * L C ?øA@

0 5 Hugo Forest Lake on Tr on Fenway Blvd N (0.9) * R on Tr on 132nd St %&h( ?¸A@ t

t 1

h S R S h

N (0.1) * L on Tr on Europa Ct N (0.2) * Cross to Tr !"b$ t C t

Lake Elmo 0

N ÷A@ 7 (0.3) * L on Ethan Av N (0.7) * R on Everton Av N (0.5) Regional Park ? 1

´ Reserve * R on Hugo Rd (1.4) * L on Buffalo St (0.2) * R on Map R

?ÇA@ 1

Northwest Av (0.6) * R on CR 96/Lake Av (0.4) * L on 0 1 2 Miles 2 Mark Sather Tr (2.1) * C on Old White Bear Av (0.3) 1 Keystone Ave N CR 57 * L on S Shore Blvd (0.3) * R on McKnight Rd N (2.6) * L on Tr on Lydia Av E (0.8) * R on Lake Blvd N (0.6) * L on 19th Av E (<0.1) * R on Margaret St N (0.6) 1,000' * R on Gateway Tr (3.1) * L on Bruce Vento Tr (5.6) * L 800' on Broadway St (<0.1) * R on E Kellogg Blvd (0.2) * L on Sibley St path (0.1) * Arrive at jct. with Sam Morgan Tr 0 5 mi 10 mi 15 mi 20 mi 25 mi

Figure 15. Example panels from the USBR 41 navigation map.

19 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 7

» STEP 7 | Manage the Route Communicate routinely with partners for information related to changes, improvements, opportunities, and concerns along the route.

Partner Communications Minor Route Realignments Through routine partner communication, MnDOT Each bicycle route is different and involves various will learn of the need or opportunity for minor route types of partners. MnDOT will communicate with USBR realignments. This may include shifting the route over and MBR partners while coordinating updates to the a street or two in an urban area when new bicycle Statewide Bicycle System Plan and District Bicycle Plans; facilities are added or including a new section of trail Plan updates are scheduled to occur every five years. In when a trail is extended. Evaluate changes using the between the scheduled updates, partners may contact route criteria. MnDOT staff anytime about issues related to routes on an as-needed basis. If a local road or trail authority initiates changes, the authority is best served through preliminary Route Realignments and communication with MnDOT to at least conceptually Amendments discuss route changes. Assuming realignment approval from MnDOT and pertinent partners, the authority For various reasons, routes may need to change after should plan to: official designation. Among others, reasons may include a change in conditions on a roadway or trail or opening • Submit a letter or email to MnDOT detailing the (or closing) a roadway or trail. Realignments may be requested change; temporary, minor, or significant. • Identify ownership for all road and trail segment changes; Temporary Route Realignments • Submit support documentation for the realignment It may be necessary to temporarily realign a route when (resolutions of support from all owners); construction or other activities temporarily restrict • Submit an adequately detailed map showing on- and access to the route. In these cases, a route designation off-road segments; amendment is not necessary. Communicate with each • Submit amended turn-by-turn directions; and road and trail authority to understand if activities may • If navigation signs exist, identify locations and still allow safe bicycle access. If not, work with the methods to re-sign route. authorities to identify an alternate route. The road or trail authority should post route detour signs along MnDOT will typically update maps, as necessary. the route and detour details online where route maps and general information are available. Temporary If MnDOT initiates changes and the change only route realignments, even if lasting a year or longer, involves MnDOT facilities, route changes are approved do not require edits to printed route materials. Public internally. Unless determined contentious or time- engagement is also not required for temporary route sensitive, MnDOT will inform partners in its routine amendments. Evaluate detours and temporary routes communications. using the route criteria.

20 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide | Step 7

Significant Route Realignments Route Signs No matter who initiates, if route conditions may It is recommended, but not required, that USBRs and significantly change, or a new facility such as a state MBRs be signed. Route trail opens, consider a significant realignment or a spur/ signs supplement maps alternative route for a previously designated route. All and offer easier navigation of these occurrences require a more involved process, for route users, inform similar to the original route designation steps. This motorists that bicyclists process includes: may be on roads, and can 1. Evaluate the potential change using route criteria; also serve as a tourism or document justification for/against the route promotional tool. Planning realignment. for and installing route 2. If a decision is made to move ahead with the route signs can be complex realignment, identify who will lead each step; and time-consuming, 3. Produce a draft revised route (see Step 4). particularly if involving multiple road and trail Figure 17. USBR sign. 4. Conduct an appropriate level of public engagement (FHWA interim approval) to solicit input from agencies, partners, and the authorities’ jurisdiction, public (see Step 3). even if MnDOT or another agency agrees to fund a sign project. To ensure project 5. Revise and finalize the realigned route (see Step 5). efficiencies, discuss intentions regarding signs early 6. Amend the designated route (see Step 6 and below). in any project coordination and communication. See Figure 17 and Appendix F for more information about Amending Route Designations route signs. To revise USBRs, MnDOT must amend its route application with AASHTO. See Step 6 for the required Route Promotion submission materials. MnDOT need not submit an Following designation, promote the route. Statewide amendment for every route change; it can approve organizations such as Explore Minnesota Tourism, changes and submit an amended application to or local departments of tourism and chambers of AASHTO at a logical and suitable time. For MBRs, the commerce are logical partners to promote routes. A state statute authorizing the route should be general name and logo created for USBR 41/North Star Route enough that a legislative amendment is not required. is available to incorporate into marketing materials (Figure 18). See Figure 16 and Appendix G for more information about route promotion.

Figure 16. A promotional page from the Mississippi River Trail Bikeway Marketing Toolbox. Figure 18. USBR 41/ North Star Route Logo.

21 Appendix A: National and Minnesota Corridor Maps

USBR National Corridor Plan

Detailed inset map showing U.S. Bicycle Routes in Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Minnesota State Bicycle Route Network map.

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide Appendix B: Sample Outreach and Communication Materials This appendix provides sample outreach materials used during the USBR 41 designation process

Sample Introductory Letter Dear City Engineers, Public Works, Planners, and staff:

The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is developing a new bicycle route in Minnesota: U.S. Bicycle Route 41 (USBR 41). The route will connect Saint Paul to Grand Portage State Park (at the Canadian border). This email is to inform you of the project and MnDOT’s desire to work with you and other partners over the summer to combine existing roads and trails to create a continuous bicycle route that’s “ride-ready”. USBR 41 is a designation. It is intended to complement local bicycle facility planning and to build upon communities’ efforts and help move local bicycle plans forward. It is also intended to introduce bicyclists to local culture, history, scenery, and adventure. Please see the attachment “About USBR 41” for additional information.

MnDOT identified USBR 41 as a high priority corridor in its Statewide Bicycle System Plan (pg. 33). The proposed route was developed based on comments from a cross-section of people statewide from 2013 - 2015. We’ve developed a draft USBR 41 route that is available for public comment. The draft route passes through your municipality or jurisdiction and may include using one or more of your existing roads and/or trails. I’ve attached the draft route for your review in a: 1) general pdf map and 2) detailed digital route file that you can download in Google Earth (see MnDOT’s USBR45/Mississippi River Trail website for instructions on downloading and viewing with Google Earth).

I invite you to attend one of four upcoming public open houses and to extend the invitation to your colleagues and partners you believe may be interested in learning about the bicycle route (see attached open house flyer). At the open house, people will have the opportunity to:

• Help identify which roads and trails to connect to create the new route; • Suggest a name for the new route; and • Identify route map preferences.

For anyone not attending an open house, an online survey and route-comment tool are available at www.mndot.gov/bike/usbr41 for comments until June 23rd.

Public open houses will be held: • Tuesday, June 7, 4-6 p.m.at Hinckley Community Room, 106 First St. SE, Hinckley • Thursday, June 9, 4-6 p.m.at the White Bear Lake Police and Fire Building, 4700 Miller Ave, White Bear Lake • Tuesday, June 14, 3:30-5:30 p.m. at Duluth Central Library, Gold Room, 520 West Superior St., Duluth • Thursday, June 16, 4-6 p.m. at Bluefin Bay On Lake Superior, Tofte Room, 7192 West Highway 61, Tofte After the public comment period closes, I will follow up with you on next steps, including confirming the route location on your facilities, answering any questions, and obtaining a resolution of support. If all USBR 41 planning and map work is completed this summer, MnDOT intends to designate the route in October, 2016.

MnDOT seeks willing partners as success depends on partnerships–from developing to promoting the route. I very much look forward to working with you.

Sincerely,

Attachments: • About USBR 41 – route information • Draft route maps: pdf map and kmz (opens in Google Earth) • Open house flyer

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide Sample Project Information Sheet

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide Sample Final Route Communications For road and trail authorities:

Dear road and trail authorities near U. S. Bicycle Route 41:

MnDOT and its many partners have made much progress in planning and implementing USBR 41. This email is to keep you abreast of project progress. Here’s a summary:

• Public Engagement. Completed second route of public engagement in August. Engagement was both online and in person at open houses (Grand Marais, Duluth, Pine City, White Bear Lake). People received a project update and provided input by: ▪ Reviewing/commenting on the final route alignment. Based on input during public engagement and with road and trail authorities when soliciting route support, MnDOT made additional route revisions. Approximately 47% of USBR 41 is on trails, including a short segment of the Gateway State Trail and the complete Willard Munger and Gitchi Gami State Trails. It also includes the regional Bruce Vento, Hardwood Creek and Sunrise Prairie Trails, as well as various local trail segments. ▪ Voting on preferred route name. The name will be announced shortly. ▪ Identifying preferred bicycle route connections between Minnesota and a future Wisconsin segment (top two locations selected = Stillwater Lift Bridge and Duluth’s Bong Bridge).

• Route designation. In mid-September MnDOT submitted an application to AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) for the full USBR 41 route, which is from St. Paul to Grand Portage State Park (315 miles). Adventure Cycling, with AASHTO, will nationally announce the USBR 41 designation on/about December 6th through a news release. MnDOT will issue a local news release at the same time (including announcing the route name). • Website. MnDOT created a USBR 41 website to assist in route communication during planning/public engagement. MnDOT is revising the website to include information such as general route info and maps. If all goes as planned, the website will be ready for viewing the same time the designation announcement is made on December 6th. • Promotion: ribbon-cutting and USBR 41 bicycle tour. MnDOT plans to celebrate USBR 41 with a ribbon-cutting event the morning of May 20th in St. Paul at the junction with USBR 45, the Mississippi River Trail. The event will be coordinated with day-one of a planned five-day USBR 41 bicycle tour (May 20-25; St. Paul to Grand Portage). Details are still evolving; MnDOT will post information on the USBR 41 website. • Bicycle Route Planning Guide. MnDOT is developing a bicycle route planning guide. The guide will outline steps for MnDOT staff and others to consistently and effectively develop future state and U.S. bicycle routes.

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

An easy way to stay abreast of USBR 41 in the future, as well as other bicycling projects, is to subscribe to email updates. You can subscribe from the pop-up box that appears when you open the link on the MnDOT main web page: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/.

Please let me know if any USBR 41 questions. Thanks for your interest and help in developing the route.

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide For the general public:

You are receiving this email because you attended a U. S. Bicycle Route 41 (USBR 41) open house in June or August and noted that you were interested in receiving project updates.

USBR 41 is a bicycle route that connects St. Paul to Grand Portage State Park, using existing roads and trails.

PROJECT UPDATE

MnDOT and its many partners have made much progress in planning and implementing USBR 41. Here’s a summary:

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

• Bicycle Route Planning Guide. MnDOT is developing a bicycle route planning guide. The guide will outline steps for MnDOT staff and others to consistently and effectively develop future state and U.S. bicycle routes.

An easy way to stay abreast of USBR 41 in the future, as well as other bicycling projects, is to subscribe to updates (email or text). You can subscribe by selecting email updates in the “connect with us” box on MnDOT’s main web page: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/.

Please let me know if any USBR 41 questions. Thanks for your interest in the project.

Sample Target Audiences It is important to gather input from a wide variety of partners. The target audiences for the USBR 41 project are listed below, and have been divided into three categories: 1) decision-makers; 2) project partners; and 3) community members.

Decision-Makers • Road and trail authorities • Counties along potential route (engineer, public works director, planner, parks and recreation director, and/or pedestrian and bicycle coordinator) • Cities along potential route (engineer, etc.) • Townships along potential route (engineer, etc.) • Tribal governments along potential route • MnDOT District planners along route • Elected officials • City Councils • County Commissioners

Project Partners • Regional Development Commission planners • State trails coordinator • National and state parks • National and state forests • MnDOT Tribal Liaison • MnDOT State Nonmotorized Transportation Advisory Committee (SNTC) • Public Health and Active Living Groups • U.S. Fish and Wildlife • U.S. Forest Service • Bicycle advocacy and promotion: • Adventure Cycling/U.S. Bicycle Route System • Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota • Minnesota Trails/Jan Laser • Parks and Trails Council of Minnesota • Bicycle Clubs • Explore Minnesota Tourism/Pedal Minnesota • Chambers of Commerce and Visitors Bureaus • Environmental organizations • Historical Societies • Railroads • Nearby state or country (Canada) planners/pedestrian and bicycle coordinator

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

• Adjacent landowners/residents/area citizens • Resorts/businesses • Scenic Byways • Trail associations • Tour operators

Community Members • Businesses along or near the route • Bicyclists • Other target demographics (e.g. children, women, low-income populations, etc.) • Homeowners

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide Appendix C: USBR 41 Route Criteria This appendix lists criteria used to select the USBR 41 route.

Primary Criteria* 1) Roadway/Trail Suitability Facilities exist that meet recommended design guidelines or Rural Bicycle Level of Service/Stress thresholds: a) Facilities meet accepted state or local design and operations guidelines. i) Identify recommended and minimum facility dimensions for shoulder width, bike lane width, etc. ii) Not all segments may meet guidelines, but represent best-choice overall (identify circumstances: i.e. low volume or low speed roads or high volume roads for short distances). iii) Trails meet recommended design guidelines. b) Traffic (volume, speed, visibility). Considers appropriate combinations of low daily motorized traffic volume, low truck traffic, lane widths, presence and width of paved shoulders, lane striping, adequate sight distance/reaction time, and traffic speed (provide local examples for reference). c) Crossings. Consider crossing frequency and complexity, including both route directions. 2) Local interest/Connections a) Follows/connects to points of interest/high tourism potential (scenic, historic, cultural, and recreational value). b) Local connections. Facility is part of a local or state network, connects to a bicycle network, part of a local or state bicycle plan, or enhances network. c) Popularity. Alignment receives much support during public outreach or is currently considered popular based on existing use (Strava heat map, public comments, etc.). 3) Local services and amenities at appropriate intervals. Daily needs: food, water, overnight accommodations (no more than 40-60 miles apart, where possible). Non-daily needs: bike shops/parts, library, showers, etc. 4) Directness. Route is reasonably direct/intelligible (easy to follow with limited turns—both on bicycle and on maps). 5) Continuous (especially off-road facilities; identify desired minimum length). 6) Multi-modal. Connects to transit and transportation hubs. * Will most greatly determine bicyclists’ skill level/desired audience SECONDARY CRITERIA 1) Bicycle friendliness. Connects to a designated bicycle-friendly community a) In urban areas, suitable for utility cycling (commuting, access to shopping, schools and universities, recreation centers, etc.). b) Connects adjacent neighborhoods (equitably distributed/increase mode share) c) Connects to adjacent cities/communities 2) Terrain. Considers terrain difficulty (avoids extremely hilly and limited visibility winding roads, when feasible and balanced with access to services, points of interest, traffic, directness, etc.) 3) Traffic control. a) Includes traffic control devices where practical (signal, signs) b) Includes efforts to adjust devices to give greater priority to bicyclists. 4) Surface. May include short stretches of high quality and maintained unpaved roads if needed to connect highly desirable paved road sections 5) Emergencies. Consider routes that can be used for evacuation routes during emergencies.

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide REFERENCES 1. Adventure Cycling Association: https://www.adventurecycling.org/routes-and-maps/us-bicycle-route- system/implementation-resources/ 2. Met council: http://www.metrocouncil.org/Transportation/Publications-And-Resources/RBS-AppendixB.aspx 3. MnDOT Statewide Bicycle System Plan: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bike/system-plan/index.html 4. Mississippi River Trail public outreach 5. FHWA. Transportation’s Role in Advancing Ladders of Opportunity: https://www.transportation.gov/fastlane/50th- spotlight-transportation-and-opportunity a. …good transportation doesn't just connect residents to opportunities outside their community, but attracts opportunities into their community and helps revitalize the community. b. We have learned … that when a community invests in transportation, the private sector invests in the community.

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide Appendix D: Resolution of Support Template

A RESOLUTION OF (TOWNSHIP, CITY OR COUNTY) STATING ITS SUPPORT TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT U.S. BICYCLE ROUTE 41.

WHEREAS, bicycle tourism is a growing industry in North America, presently contributing approximately $47 billion dollars a year nationally to the economies of communities that provide facilities for said tourism; and

WHEREAS, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) has designated a corridor connecting Saint Paul, to Grand Portage State Park, via Duluth, to be developed as United States Bike Route 41; and

WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has convened several public open houses and offered online public comment opportunities throughout the corridor to gather information and review route alternatives; and

WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation in cooperation with road and trail authorities have proposed a specific route to be designated as United States Bike Route 41, a map of which is herein incorporated into this resolution by reference; and

WHEREAS, the proposed United States Bike Route 41 traverses through (TOWNSHIP, CITY OR COUNTY) and is expected to provide a benefit to local residents and businesses; and

WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation will continue to maintain statewide mapping and information regarding United States Bike Route 41, convene meetings and facilitate resolving issues and future alignment revisions within the State,

WHEREAS, the (TOWNSHIP, CITY OR COUNTY) has duly considered said proposed route and determined it to be a suitable route through the (TOWNSHIP,CITY OR COUNTY) and desire that the route be formally designated so that it can be appropriately mapped and signed, thereby promoting bicycle tourism locally and throughout Minnesota along the corridor.

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the (TOWNSHIP, CITY OR COUNTY) hereby expresses its approval and support for the development of United States Bike Route 41 and requests that the appropriate government officials take action to officially designate the route accordingly as soon as possible.

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide Appendix E: Designation/Authorization Documents

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

APPLICATION FOR DESIGNATION OF A

U.S. BICYCLE ROUTE

Member State Submitting Application: Minnesota USBR No. 41 Date: September 16, 2016

This is an application for (please check):

Establishment of a new U.S. Bicycle Route or segment

Realignment of an existing U.S. Bicycle Route

Deletion of a U.S. Bicycle Route or segment

Route Connects St. Paul (at jct. of existing USBR 45 - Mississippi River and Grand Portage State Park Trail Bikeway) at the US/Canada international border (e.g., State Border, International Border, Existing US Bicycle Route, etc.)

The following state or states are involved: Minnesota

Map and Route Log

Attachment A: Map (PDF the map in color and attach to this form)

Attachment B: Route Log

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide Use the following form (or similarly formatted spreadsheet file labeled “Attachment B” and submitted with your application) for turn-by-turn details of the U.S. Bicycle Route you are proposing for designation.

Starting Point of Route or Miles Turn location and road name/ General Direction of Realignment traveled on designation Travel this facility

Sibley Street Path & Samuel Morgan 0.1 Go northwest on Sibley Street path Northwest Regional Trail in Downtown St. Paul/USBR 45 jct

Sibley Street & E Kellogg Blvd 0.2 Turn right on E Kellogg Blvd Northeast

E Kellogg Blvd & Broadway St < 0.1 Turn left onto Broadway St bike lane Northwest

Broadway St & Bruce Vento Regional 5.6 Turn right on Bruce Vento Regional Northeast Trail along E Prince St Trail along north side of E Prince St

Bruce Vento Regional Trail & Gateway 3.1 Turn right on Gateway State Trail East State Trail

Gateway State Trail & Margaret St N 0.6 Take left-side path just before Margaret North St. N; cross under Margaret St. N bridge; then turn right to loop onto Margaret St N bike lane

Margaret St N & 19th Ave E < 0.1 Turn left on 19th Ave E West

19th Ave E & Lake Blvd N 0.6 Turn right on Lake Blvd N North

Lake Blvd N & Lydia Ave E 0.8 Turn left on trail along west side of West Lydia Ave E

Lydia Ave E & McKnight Rd N 2.6 Turn right onto McKnight Rd N North

McKnight Rd N & South Shore Blvd 0.3 Turn left on South Shore Blvd West

South Shore Blvd & Old White Bear Ave 0.3 Turn right on Old White Bear Ave Northwest

Old White Bear Ave & Cottage Park Rd 2.1 Veer right at TH 61/96 & Lake Ave to Northwest continue on Mark Sather Trail

Mark Sather Trail & Lake Ave/Hwy 96 0.4 Turn right on Lake Ave/Hwy 96 Northeast

Lake Ave/Hwy 96 & Northwest Ave 0.6 Turn left on Northwest Ave Northwest

Northwest Ave & Buffalo St 0.2 Turn left on Buffalo St West

Buffalo St & Hugo Rd 1.4 Turn right on Hugo Rd North

Hugo Rd & 120th St N 0.2 Turn left on 120th St N West

120th St N & Everton Ave N 0.3 Turn right on Everton Ave N Northwest

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Everton Ave N & 122nd St N 0.1 Turn left on 122nd St N West

122nd St N & Ethan Ave N 0.6 Veer right on Ethan Ave N North

Ethan Ave N & Europa Trail N 0.3 Turn right onto trail on north side of Northeast Europa Trail N

Europa Trail N & Europa Ct. N 0.2 Cross Europa Ct. N to continue on trail North along east side of Europa Ct. N

Europa Ct. N & 132nd St N 0.1 Turn right on trail along south side of East 132nd St N

132nd St N & Fenway Blvd N 0.9 Turn left on trail along west side of Northeast Fenway Blvd N

Fenway Blvd N & 140th St N 0.2 Turn right on 140th St N East

140th St N & Hardwood Creek Trail 10.1 Turn left on Hardwood Creek Trail at Northeast intersection of 140th St N & Forest Blvd/TH 61

Hardwood Creek Trail & Sunrise Prairie 15.0 Continue; Hardwood Creek Trail North Trail becomes Sunrise Prairie Trail

Sunrise Prairie Trail & Hwy 95/Main St < 0.1 Turn right onto concrete side path on East TH 95 and cross Forest Blvd/CR 30

Hwy 95/Main St & Forest Blvd/Co Rd 30 0.2 Turn left onto concrete side path on North east side of Forest Blvd/CR 30 and continue two blocks to Sunrise Prairie Trail at Cedar St.

Forest Blvd/Co Rd 30 & Cedar St 2.0 Continue across Cedar St onto Sunrise North Prairie Trail

410th St & Forest Blvd 9.2 Veer left off trail onto 410th St and turn North immediately right onto Forest Blvd

Forest Blvd & S Bremer Ave 1.4 Continue on S Bremer Ave North

S Bremer Ave & Forest Blvd/Co Rd 7.3 Continue on Forest Blvd/ Co Rd 30/ Co North 30/Co Rd 61 Rd 61

Forest Blvd/Co Rd 30/ Co Rd 61 & 6th 2.4 Continue; Forest Blvd becomes 6th St North St S/Co Rd 61 S/ Co Rd 61

6th St S/Co Rd 61 & Main St N/ Co Rd 2.1 Continue; 6th St becomes Main St N/ North 61 Co Rd 61

Main St N/ Co Rd 61 & Co Rd 61 8.2 Continue on Co Rd 61 North

Co Rd 61 & TH 23 & I-35 Bridge 0.1 Turn left to cross I-35 bridge West

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

TH 23 & I-35 Bridge & Co Rd 61 3.1 Turn right on Co Rd 61 Northeast

Co Rd 61 & 2nd St NW < 0.1 Turn left on 2nd St NW/Co Rd 18 West

2nd St NW/ Co Rd 18 & Willard Munger 32.2 Turn right onto Willard Munger State North State Trail Trail

Willard Munger State Trail & Moose 0.1 Continue as Willard Munger Trail Northeast Lake city trail becomes Moose Lake city trail

Moose Lake city trail & Industrial Rd 0.1 Turn right on Industrial Rd Northeast

Industrial Rd & Folz Blvd/Hwy 27 < 0.1 Turn right on Folz Blvd/Hwy 27 East

Folz Blvd/Hwy 27 & Industrial Rd 0.2 Turn left on Industrial Rd Northeast

Industrial Rd & 7th St < 0.1 Turn right on 7th St Southeast

7th St & Arrowhead La/ Co Rd 61 0.1 Turn left on Arrowhead La/ Co Rd 61 Northeast

Arrowhead La & 8th St < 0.1 Turn left on 8th St Northwest

8th St & Willard Munger State Trail 37.3 Turn right onto Willard Munger State Northeast Trail

Willard Munger State Trail & S 75th Ave < 0.1 Turn left on S 75th Ave W Northwest W

S 75th Ave W & Grand Ave 0.8 Turn right on Grand Ave Northeast

Grand Ave & Raleigh St 0.6 Turn right on Raleigh St East

Raleigh St & Central Ave 0.4 Turn left on Central Ave North

Central Ave & Bristol St 0.2 Turn right on Bristol St East

Bristol St & Colalillo Dr 0.6 Veer left on Bristol St, which becomes Northeast Colalillo Dr

Colalillo Dr & W 1st St 0.5 Continue on W 1st St Northeast

W 1st St & W Superior St 0.3 Continue as W 1st St becomes W Northeast Superior St

W Superior St & S 38th Ave W < 0.1 Continue right as W Superior St Southeast becomes S 38th Ave W

S 38th Ave W & W Michigan St 0.3 Turn left on W Michigan St Northeast

W Michigan St & W Superior St 0.2 Continue as W Michigan St becomes Northeast W Superior St

W Superior St & Carlton St 4.8 Continue onto Lake Walk Trail along Northeast southeast side of W Superior St

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Lake Walk Trail & E Water St 0.2 Exit trail to continue on E Water St Northeast

E Water St & S 23rd Ave E 4.3 Turn left onto Lake Walk Trail North

Hwy 61/Congdon Blvd & Brighton 0.8 Veer right onto Brighton Beach Rd Northeast Beach Rd

Brighton Beach Rd & Congdon Blvd 4.1 Turn right onto Congdon Blvd Northeast

Congdon Blvd & N Shore Dr 7.7 Continue as Congdon Blvd becomes N Northeast Shore Dr

N Shore Dr & Scenic Dr 7.3 Continue as N Shore Drive becomes Northeast Scenic Dr

Scenic Dr & Hwy 61 0.5 Turn right on Hwy 61 Northeast

Hwy 61 & 7th Ave/ Hwy 61 1.1 Continue on 7th Ave/ Hwy 61 East

7th Ave/ Hwy 61 & Hwy 61 4.2 Continue on Hwy 61 Northeast

Hwy 61 & Town Rd 614/ Cliff Point 0.2 Turn right on Cliff Point Road and Northeast Road/Silver Cliff Rd/Old Hwy 61 immediately to Town Rd 614/Silver Cliff Rd/Old Hwy 61

Town Rd 614/Silver Cliff Rd/Old Hwy 61 0.6 Continue onto Gitchi-Gami State Trail Northeast & Gitchi-Gami State Trail

Gitchi-Gami State Trail & Hwy 61 7.7 Turn right onto Hwy 61 Northeast

Hwy 61 & Co Rd 1 < 0.1 Turn right on Co Rd 1 Southwest

Co Rd 1 & Gitchi-Gami State Trail 10.2 Turn left onto Gitchi-Gami State Trail Northeast

Gitchi-Gami State Trail & Pine Bay Loop 0.4 Continue onto bike lane on Pine Bay Northeast Loop

Pine Bay Loop & Gitchi-Gami State Trail 1.1 Continue onto Gitchi-Gami State Trail Northeast

Gitchi-Gami State Trail & Algoma Way 0.2 Continue onto bike lane on Algoma Northeast Way

Algoma Way & Gitchi-Gami State Trail 1.1 Continue onto Gitchi-Gami State Trail Northeast

Gitchi-Gami State Trail & Co Rd 4/Lax 0.2 As trail ends turn left onto Hwy 61 Northeast Lake Rd & Hwy 61

Hwy 61 & West Rd 0.6 Turn left on West Rd Northeast

West Rd & Gitchi-Gami State Trail 2.3 Turn left onto Gitchi-Gami State Trail Northeast

Gitchi-Gami State Trail & Outer Dr/Co 0.8 Turn Right onto Outer Dr/Co Rd 5 Northeast Rd 5

Outer Dr/Co Rd 5 & Hwy 61 24.9 Turn left on Hwy 61 Northeast

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Hwy 61 & Gitchi-Gami State Trail 2.8 Turn left approximately 450’ past Northeast (approximately 1,170’ past intersection parking lot on northwest side of Hwy 61 with Buckman Ln and Co Rd 32) to enter Gitchi-Gami State Trail

Gitchi-Gami State Trail & Co Rd 0.6 Cross Hwy 61 to continue on Co Rd Northeast 24/Tofte Park Rd 24/Tofte Park Rd

Co Rd 24/Tofte Park Rd & Hwy 61 0.6 Turn right on Hwy 61 Northeast

Hwy 61 & Gitchi-Gami State Trail (just 4.7 Veer right onto Gitchi-Gami State Trail Northeast past mile post 83)

Gitchi-Gami State Trail & Rollins Creek 1.0 Continue onto Rollins Creek Rd Northeast Rd

Rollins Creek Rd & Gitchi-Gami State 1.6 Turn left onto Gitchi-Gami State Trail North Trail at Co Rd 34

Gitchi-Gami State Trail & Co Rd 5 < 0.1 Turn right on Co Rd 5 Southeast

Co Rd 5 & Hwy 61 17.4 Turn left on Hwy 61 Northeast

Hwy 61 & Fall River Rd/Co Rd 13 1.8 Veer right onto Gitchi-Gami State Trail Northeast

End of Gitchi-Gami State Trail 250’east 0.2 Exit trail to continue on bike lane on W East of Hwy 61/N Shore Scenic Dr & W Wisconsin St Wisconsin St intersection

W Wisconsin St & N Broadway 0.1 Turn left onto N Broadway bike lane North

N Broadway & Hwy 61 33.8 Turn right on Hwy 61 Northeast

Hwy 61 & Casino Rd < 0.1 Turn right on Casino Rd East

Casino Rd & Casino Dr & Bay Estates 0.4 Continue onto city trail on east side of Northeast Dr Casino Dr

Casino Dr & Marina Rd 0.2 Continue on city trail on north side of Northeast Marina Rd

Marina Rd & entrance to mobile home 0.2 Veer left to continue on city trail Northeast park

City trail & Mile Creek Rd 0.5 Veer right and cross Mile Creek Rd to Northeast continue on city trail

Mile Creek Rd & Store Rd 0.7 Turn left onto Store Rd Northwest

Store Rd & Hwy 61 5.0 Turn right on Hwy 61 Northeast

Finish at Grand Portage State Park Visitor Center is on north side of Hwy Visitor Center before US/Canada 61 Border

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide Terminus: Total Mileage:

314.7

By signing below, the applicant attests to the following statements:

The state affirms that this application complies with the current Purpose and Policy in Establishment and Extending United States Bicycle Routes.

The State agrees and pledges its good faith that it will not erect, remove, or significantly alter any U.S. Bicycle Route, including markers and/or maps, without the authorization, consent, or approval of the Standing Committee on Highways of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, notwithstanding the fact that the changes proposed are entirely within this State.

The state affirms concurrence from all regional and local agencies that have ownership or operational authority over any part of the proposed routing of the U.S. Bicycle Route within this state.

Member State Signature of State DOT Chief Executive Date Officer or other authorized official

(A letter from your Member State Chief Executive Officer with a signature is sufficient for the completion of this application, if the agency chooses not to include the signature on this form.)

Member State contact person:

Name: Mark Gieseke

Title: Director, Office of Transportation System Management

Agency: Minnesota Department of Transportation

Address: 395 John Ireland Blvd; MS 440

City / State / ZIP: St. Paul, MN 55155

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Telephone: 651-366-3770

FAX: 651-234-7960

E-Mail: [email protected]

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

USBR 41 designation application map

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Appendix G: Route Signs Creating final route maps and installing signs along a route should not occur until the route has been designated at the national level or approved at the state level. Until the route alignment is final, planning for or installing signs prior to designation may result in significant and costly sign plan changes. Physically signing a designated route is not required. Signing routes must proceed with the support and approval of the jurisdiction that owns the designated roadway or trail segment; jurisdictional authorities ultimately control whether or not signs can be installed on their facilities. Benefits to signing designated routes include providing easier navigation for bicyclists, alerting motorists they may encounter bicyclists on the route, and signs may assist in overall route promotion. If routes are proposed to be signed, consider and discuss frequency, installation method, and maintenance with partners. For best success, address the potential for signs during the early communication and coordination and public engagement steps (see Steps 2 and 3). Depending who fabricates and installs signs, work may require agreements and permits, which require additional coordination and time.

As with motorized transportation and recreation routes, signs are desirable for navigation ease and a priority on route segments where there are many turns and it is easy for bicyclists to lose their way. Signs are most effective when fully installed along a route. If not able to fully install signs, seek to install in long stretches or distinct, logical segments, rather than sporadically. Developing sign installation plans often calls for collaboration amongst jurisdictions. For example, signing the route through an entire county likely includes coordination with the cities within the county.

If intending to install signs, develop a comprehensive document to guide the work and schedule. MnDOT installed signs along USBR 45, the Mississippi River Trail. MnDOT has sample sign plans, agreements, and pertinent documents on file.

Guidance The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) outlines sign requirements and guidance for how to sign USBRs and bicycle routes in general. The NCHRP 20-07 Task 350: U.S. Bicycle Route Signing Final Report provides additional guidance for signing USBRs. State bicycle routes should be signed in the same manner as USBRs for consistency across the state, although state route marker signs are different than USBRS signs.

State Bicycle Route sign and US Bicycle Route Sign

Minnesota Department of Transportation Bicycle Route Planning Guide

Appendix G: Route Promotion Once a route is officially designated, at a minimum it should be broadly mapped and presented on statewide materials (state bicycle map, state plans, etc.). In addition, make route documents and information available to those interested in including the route in regional, county, and local materials and to bicycle tour operators. Broad promotion will help communicate a route’s existence to the public. Promoting a designated bike route may provide benefits to regional and local economies. For more information and resources to promote routes, see the Mississippi River Trail Marketing Toolbox, Adventure Cycling Association’s promotion checklist, and MnDOT’s report, Assessing the Economic Impact and Health Effects of Bicycling in Minnesota.

MnDOT hosts websites for its bicycle routes. On the websites, people can find general route information, maps, some local attractions and tourist information, and an opportunity for the public and road and trail authorities to submit comments to MnDOT with information that affects the route or to request information.

Mississippi River Trail Bikeway Marketing Toolbox Contents • MRT Bikeway Vision & Setting • Why Market • The MRT Product • The Target Audience • Marketing Strategies • Marketing Partners • Supporting Information – samples, templates, and checklists • Press release • Ride itinerary • Ride ideas • Ride event planning guide • Social media plan • Bicycling and tourism websites, contacts and organizations