Eco-Innovation in Slovakia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eco-Innovation in Slovakia Eco-innovation in Slovakia EIO Country Profile 2018-2019 Eco-Innovation Observatory The Eco-Innovation Observatory functions as a platform for the structured collection and analysis of an extensive range of eco-innovation and circular economy information, gathered from across the European Union and key economic regions around the globe, providing a much-needed integrated information source on eco-innovation for companies and innovation service providers, as well as providing a solid decision-making basis for policy development. The Observatory approaches eco-innovation as a persuasive phenomenon present in all economic sectors and therefore relevant for all types of innovation, defining eco-innovation as: “Eco-innovation is any innovation that reduces the use of natural resources and decreases the release of harmful substances across the whole life-cycle”. To find out more, visit www.eco-innovation.eu and ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap Any views or opinions expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Commission. 1 Eco-Innovation Observatory Country Profile 2018-2019: Slovakia Author: Boglárka Ivanegová (SUSTO – Sustainability Tools) Coordinator of the work package: Technopolis Group Belgium 1 Acknowledgments This document was prepared with the support from: • Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic • Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic • Slovak Business Agency • Slovak Centre for Research and Technical Information • Institute for Circular Economy A note to Readers Any views or opinions expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Union. A number of companies are presented as illustrative examples of eco-innovation in this report. The EIO does not endorse these companies and is not an exhaustive source of information on innovation at the company level. This brief is available for download from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap/country_profiles_en 1 Table of contents Summary .............................................................................................................. 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3 1 | Eco-innovation performance ............................................................... 4 2 | Selected circular economy and eco-innovation areas and new trends .. 8 3 | Barriers and drivers to circular economy and eco-innovation in Slovakia 11 4 | Policy landscape in Slovakia .............................................................. 14 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 19 ANNEX: Policy strategies and instruments ........................................................... 24 List of abbreviations: EC European Commission Eco-IS Eco-Innovation Scoreboard EEA European Environment Agency MŽP SR Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic MŠVVaŠ SR Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sports of the Slovak Republic MPVR SR Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Slovakia MZVaEU SR Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development NKÚ SR Highest Controlling Office of the Slovak Republic SAŽP Slovak Environment Agency 1 Summary The Slovak Republic, with an overall score of 62, ranks 23rd amongst the then 28 EU Member States on the 2019 Eco-Innovation Scoreboard (Eco-IS). Slovakia’s position declined when compared to the last reporting period (when it was on the 20th place), and the country now performs under the EU average in all the five components of the Eco-IS. Similarly to the last two reporting periods, the weakest components of the Eco-IS are eco- innovation inputs and eco-innovation outputs, reflecting the persistently low share of both public and private support for research and development activities, as well as the fragmented eco-innovation institutional framework. The share of eco-innovation related patents and publications remain low, and so is media coverage of eco-innovation and circular economy topics. This is followed by low socio-economic outcomes, highlighting the low share in the export of products from eco-innovative industries and low added value of environmental protection and resource management activities. On the bright side, with regards to resource efficiency outcomes, the water productivity of Slovakia continues to grow and is now three times the EU average. Slovakia performs best in the component of eco-innovation activities, thanks to a high number of ISO 14001 certifications. Nevertheless, the number of certifications decreased when compared with previous years. Multiple barriers impair Slovakia’s eco-innovation performance, including the continuously weak research and development system or the overall quality of the Slovak business environment. Companies lack reliable information, support, and motivation to adopt eco- innovations. Educational objectives do not align with the need to transition to a climate- neutral society. The potential of digitization for sustainable development should receive more attention. However, multiple new platforms for information and best practice sharing are emerging. The evolving start-up ecosystem and projects of regional collaboration are driving the eco- innovation agenda forward. The circular economy policy landscape is getting more robust, and the transition to resource-efficient, low-carbon, and circular economy is now considered imperative for both the country’s 2030 Strategy of Environmental policy until 2030 (2019), as well as within the program statement of the new government. The overall improvement of Slovakia’s lagging eco-innovation performance will depend on the effective implementation of these ambitions. 2 Introduction Waste management, air quality as well as habitat and species protection pose the main environmental challenges in Slovakia. Despite the introduction of multiple important measures in the area of waste management over the last couple of years, Slovakia is at risk of not meeting its 2020 municipal waste recycling target of 50%, with reaching only a 38,1% recycling rate in 2018. At the same time, the landfilling rate of municipal waste remains one of the highest in the EU at 53,8% in 2018 (MŽP SR& SAŽP, 2019). In 2019, the industry remained the most significant economic activity in Slovakia, accounting for 24,5% of gross value added, which was the fourth-highest amongst EU member states (Eurostat, 2020a). In 2018, the industry was also the largest waste producer out of all economic activities, followed by transport and storage (MŽP SR& SAŽP, 2019). The circularity rate of Slovakia, explained as the share of material resources coming from recycled products and recovered materials, was 5,1% both in 2010 and 2017, which is half of the EU(27) average of 11,2 % (Eurostat, 2020b & 2020c). As the 2018 Report on the State of the Environment informs (MŽP SR & SAŽP, 2019), multiple challenges persist for various constituents of the environment, for example, with regards to the quality of surface and groundwater bodies. In 2018, only 39% of all the municipalities had the public sewage system built, serving only 68,4% of the population. The health condition of forests is considered worse than the European average. In 2018, 72,1% of all the forests were commercial forests, used primarily for timber production (MPRV SR, 2019). Forests with the unnatural composition are much more vulnerable to climate influences as well as biotic factors, such as bark beetles and woodworms. Furthermore, 38,5% of agricultural lands are potentially threatened by water erosion, and 29% are influenced by soil compaction. Particulate matter pollution has been one of the most significant problems, causing severe public health concerns. In 2016, approximately 4 800 premature deaths could be attributable to PM2.5 exposure (EEA, 2019). Slovakia also belongs to the EU countries with the highest PM10 daily values. The primary sources are solid fuel burning within households for heating. In fact, according to the Ministry of Environment, approximately 120 000 households use boilers that are more than 30 years old (MŽP SR, 2019a). Another major air polluter is the transport sector, which calls for significant improvements in transport system efficiency, including multi-modality, and improved deployment of low- and zero-emission vehicles (EC, 2020a). The share of renewable energy on gross energy final consumption was 11,9% in 2018, while in 2016 it was 12% (Eurostat, 2020d). It is questionable if the national goal to achieve 14% share of renewable energy will be reached. The research, development, and innovation, including eco-innovation, environment remains suboptimal, with competencies being distributed among multiple government bodies without comprehensive coordination. Both public and private investment into this sector are one of the lowest within the EU. 3 1 | Eco-innovation performance The analysis in this section is based on the EU 28 Eco-innovation Index (EcoI Index) for the year 2019. The Eco-I Index demonstrates the eco-innovation performance of a country compared with the EU average and with the EU top performers. EcoI Index is a composite index that is based on 16 indicators which are aggregated into five components: eco-innovation inputs, eco-innovation activities and eco-innovation outputs as well as resource-efficiency outcomes
Recommended publications
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-Term January 2017
    Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-term January 2017 STUDY Public Opinion Monitoring Series Directorate-General for Communication Published by EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Jacques Nancy, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit PE 599.242 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit REVIEW EE2014 Edition Spéciale Mi-Législature Special Edition on Mid-term Legislature LES ÉLECTIONS EUROPÉENNES ET NATIONALES EN CHIFFRES EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTIONS RESULTS TABLES Mise à jour – 20 janvier 2017 Update – 20th January 2017 8éme Législature 8th Parliamentary Term DANS CETTE EDITION Page IN THIS EDITION Page EDITORIAL11 EDITORIAL I.COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN 6 I. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 6 A.REPARTITION DES SIEGES 7 A.DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS 7 B.COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT 8 B.COMPOSITION OF THE PARLIAMENT 8 -9-9AU 01/07/2014 ON THE 01/07/2014 -10-10AU 20/01/2017 ON THE 20/01/2017 C.SESSIONS CONSTITUTIVES ET PARLEMENT 11 C.CONSTITUTIVE SESSIONS AND OUTGOING EP 11 SORTANT DEPUIS 1979 SINCE 1979 D.REPARTITION FEMMES - HOMMES 29 D.PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN 29 AU 20/01/2017 ON 20/01/2017 -30-30PAR GROUPE POLITIQUE AU 20/01/2017 IN THE POLITICAL GROUPS ON 20/01/2017 ET DEPUIS 1979 AND SINCE 1979 E.PARLEMENTAIRES RÉÉLUS 33 E.RE-ELECTED MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT 33 II.NOMBRE DE PARTIS NATIONAUX AU PARLEMENT 35 II.NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN 35 EUROPEEN AU 20/01/2017 PARLIAMENT ON 20/01/2017 III.TAUX DE PARTICIPATION 37 III. TURNOUT 37 -38-38TAUX DE PARTICIPATION
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER of Political Organizations and Parties
    VOLUME 30 ISSUE 3 VOX POP Spring 2012 NEWSLETTER of Political Organizations and Parties An Official section of the American Political Science Association Produced by the Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics, The University of Akron FROM HEADQUARTERS Political Organizations and Parties 2012 Annual APSA Meeting Program Business Meeting 35-1 Political Parties in the U.S. Congress Friday, August 31, 12:15-1:15pm Friday, August 31 4:15 – 6:00 p.m. 35-2 Lobbying, the Revolving Door, and Congress Thursday, Aug 30 8:00 – 9:45 a.m. 35-3 Interest Group Politics in Cities Friday, Aug 31 8:00 – 9:45 a.m. 35-4 How’s and Why’s of Party Manifestos VOX POP is now available online at the Ray C. Bliss Saturday, Sept 1 2:00 – 3:45 p.m. Institute of Applied Politics website only. Copies will not be 35-5 Personalistic Leadership, Party Politics and the Quality of printed any longer. The VOX POP website can be found Democracy at: https://www.uakron.edu/bliss/about-us/vox-pop.dot Thursday, Aug 30 10:15 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. 35-6 Interest Groups and Party Position Change Thursday, Aug 30 2:00 – 3:45 p.m. 35-7 Parties, Interest Groups and Policy-Making in the Era of Obama and the Tea Party Political Organizations and Parties Executive Saturday, Sept 1 10:15 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Council Meeting 35-8 Parties and Interest Groups in the States Thursday, August 30, 12:15-1:15pm Thursday, Aug 30 4:15 – 6:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain • Carsten Jacob Humlebæk and Antonia María Ruiz Jiménez New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain
    New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain in Nationalism on Perspectives New • Carsten Humlebæk Jacob and Antonia María Jiménez Ruiz New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain Edited by Carsten Jacob Humlebæk and Antonia María Ruiz Jiménez Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Genealogy www.mdpi.com/journal/genealogy New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain Editors Carsten Humlebæk Antonia Mar´ıaRuiz Jim´enez MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editors Carsten Humlebæk Antonia Mar´ıa Ruiz Jimenez´ Copenhagen Business School Universidad Pablo de Olavide Denmark Spain Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genealogy/special issues/perspective). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03943-082-6 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03943-083-3 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND.
    [Show full text]
  • Natália Kováčová, Andrea Jankurová Direction of Slovak Party System After the Parliamentary Elections in 2016
    Natália Kováčová, Andrea Jankurová Direction of Slovak Party System After the Parliamentary Elections in 2016 Security Dimensions. International & National Studies nr 2 (22), 152-164 2017 SECURITY DIMENSIONS INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL STUDIES NO. 22; 2017 (152–164) DOI 10.24356/SD/22/7 DIRECTION OF SLOVAK PARTY SYSTEM AFTER THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN 2016 Natália Kováčová, Ph.D. Danubius University, Slovakia Andrea Jankurová, Ph.D. Danubius University, Slovakia ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is in the context of the main specifics of the Slovak parliamentary elections in 2016 to highlight the party development in Slovakia and to predict its future direction. Parliamentary elections due to electoral instability and fluctuations determined the configuration of the parliamentary political scene. The proportion of new, non- system parties was increased and output was to create surprising ruling coalition which has dissolved the existing ideological and ethnic line. The ambition of the paper is tho highlight the political situation that followed the elections and significantly modified the distribution of political forces existed previously. ARTICLE INFO Article history Received: 07.04.2017 Accepted 26.06.2017 Key words voters, elections, coalition models, political parties, government Introduction In March 2016, the seventh parliamentary elections took place since the es- tablishment of the independent Slovak Republic, which result is visible in Direction of Slovak Party System After the Parliamentary Elections in 2016 the radical reconfiguration of the party system, enfeeblement of standard moderate parties and election of anti-system forces to parliament. Parliamentary elections have brought success to 8 political parties, which managed to pass the 5% threshold at the Election Day (SMER- SD, SaS, OľaNO-NOVA, SNS, ĽSNS, Sme rodina, Most-Híd, Sieť) (see Table No.1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Populism and Its Implications for Development Ngos
    OXFAM RESEARCH BACKGROUNDER THE RISE OF POPULISM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT NGOS NICK GALASSO GIANANDREA NELLI FEROCI KIMBERLY PFEIFER MARTIN WALSH CONTENTS Oxfam’s Research Backgrounders ............................................................ 3 Author Information and Acknowledgments ................................................ 3 Citations of this paper ................................................................................ 4 Executive summary ................................................................................... 5 Introduction .............................................................................................. 11 Data on political trends ............................................................................ 12 Explanations for what is driving these trends .......................................... 37 The discourses of right-wing populism .................................................... 46 Implications for development NGOs ........................................................ 50 Research Backgrounders Series Listing .................................................. 56 2 Footer (odd pages) OXFAM’S RESEARCH BACKGROUNDERS Series editor: Kimberly Pfeifer Oxfam’s Research Backgrounders are designed to inform and foster discussion about topics critical to poverty reduction. The series explores a range of issues on which Oxfam works—all within the broader context of international development and humanitarian relief. The series was designed to share Oxfam’s rich research with a wide
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019
    Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019 Codebook: SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET – GOVERNMENT COMPOSITION 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set provides detailed information on party composition, reshuffles, duration, reason for termination and on the type of government for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member countries. The data begins in 1959 for the 23 countries formerly included in the CPDS I, respectively, in 1966 for Malta, in 1976 for Cyprus, in 1990 for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Latvia and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia. In order to obtain information on both the change of ideological composition and the following gap between the new an old cabinet, the supplement contains alternative data for the year 1959. The government variables in the main Comparative Political Data Set are based upon the data presented in this supplement. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. Please quote this data set as: Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann. 2021. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. These (former) assistants have made major contributions to the dataset, without which CPDS would not exist. In chronological and descending order: Angela Odermatt, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, Sarah Engler, David Weisstanner, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlène Gerber, Philipp Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegal.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism Supplementary
    The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism Supplementary Online Appendix Yann Algan Sergei Guriev Sciences Po and CEPR EBRD, Sciences Po and CEPR Elias Papaioannou Evgenia Passari London Business School and CEPR Université Paris-Dauphine Abstract This supplementary online appendix consists of three parts. First, we provide summary statistics, additional sensitivity checks and further evidence. Second, we provide details and sources on the data covering regional output and unemployment, trust, beliefs, attitudes and voting statistics. Third, we provide the classification of non-mainstream political parties’ political orientation (far-right, radical-left, populist, Eurosceptic and separatist) for all countries. 1 1. Summary Statistics, Additional Sensitivity Checks, and Further Evidence 1.1 Summary Statistics Appendix Table 1 reports the summary statistics at the individual level for all variables that we use from the ESS distinguishing between the pre-crisis period (2000-08) and the post-crisis period (2009-14). Panel A looks at all questions on general trust, trust in national and supranational institutions, party identification, ideological position on the left-right scale and beliefs on the European unification issue whereas in panel B we focus on attitudes to immigration. 1.2 Additional Sensitivity Checks Appendix Table 2 looks at the relationship between employment rates and voting for anti- establishment parties. Panel A reports panel OLS estimates with region fixed effects. Panel B reports difference-in-differences estimates. In contrast to Table 4, the specifications now include a dummy that takes on the value of one for core countries (Austria, France, Norway, Sweden) and zero for the periphery countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Ireland, Slovakia).
    [Show full text]
  • National Strategy for Sustainable Development for the Slovak
    NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 2001 The National Strategy for Sustainable Development for the Slovak Republic has been prepared in the framework of the Project “Capacity Building for Sustainable Development”.. Project was implemented by the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe - REC Slovakia, financed by the United Nations Development Program and guaranted by the Minsitry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic. 2 CONTENT 1. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, ITS PRINCIPLES, CRITERIA AND INDICATORS..9 2. ENFORCEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE WORLD – A CHALLENGE FOR SLOVAKIA.......................................................................................................13 2.1 ENFORCEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE UNITED NATIONS ..........................................................................................................................................13 2.1.1 The UN Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janiero, 1992)..............13 2.1.2 The UN Commission on Sustainable Development...........................................................13 2.1.3 World Summit on Sustainable Development (Johannesburg, 2002).................................13 2.1.4 UN programmes and UN agencies ...................................................................................14 2.2 ENFORCEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ........................14 2.3 ENFORCEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Slovak Republic Cyber Readiness at a Glance
    SLOVAK REPUBLIC CYBER READINESS AT A GLANCE Melissa Hathaway, Francesca Spidalieri and Anushka Kaushik April 2019 AC INST M IT O U T B T O E P F O G S E R I P D O U LICY ST Copyright © 2019, Cyber Readiness Index 2.0, All rights reserved. Published by Potomac Institute for Policy Studies Potomac Institute for Policy Studies 901 N. Stuart St, Suite 1200 Arlington, VA 22203 www.potomacinstitute.org Telephone: 703.525.0770; Fax: 703.525.0299 Email: [email protected] Follow us on Twitter: @CyberReadyIndex Cover Art by Alex Taliesen. Acknowledgements The Potomac Institute for Policy Studies and the authors would like to thank Alex Taliesen for cover art and Sherry Loveless for editorial and design work. SLOVAK REPUBLIC CYBER READINESS AT A GLANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 2 1 . NATIONAL STRATEGY . .9 . 2 . INCIDENT RESPONSE . 16 . 3 . E-CRIME AND LAW ENFORCEMENT . 21. 4 . INFORMATION SHARING . 24 . 5 . INVESTMENT IN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT . 26 6 . DIPLOMACY AND TRADE . 30 . 7 . DEFENSE AND CRISIS RESPONSE . 33 CRI 2 .0 BOTTOM LINE . .36 . ENDNOTES . 37. ABOUT THE AUTHORS . 47 . SLOVAK REPUBLIC CYBER READINESS AT A GLANCE Country Population 5,440 million Population Growth 0 .17% GDP at market prices (current $US) $95,769 billion (ranked 64th in 2017) GDP Growth 3 .4% Year Internet Introduced 1992 National Cyber Security Strategy 2008, 2015 Internet Domain(s) .cs and .sk Internet users per 100 users 81 .6 Fixed broadband subscriptions per 100 users 25 .8 Mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 users 130 .7 Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Development and Connectivity Standing International Telecommunications World Economic Forum’s Union (ITU) 46 Networked Readiness Index (NRI) 47 ICT Development Index (IDI) Sources: World Bank (2017), ITU (2017), and NRI (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Major Political Parties Coverage for Data Collection 2021 Country Major
    Major political parties Coverage for data collection 2021 Country Major political parties EU Member States Christian Democratic and Flemish (Chrétiens-démocrates et flamands/Christen-Democratisch Belgium en Vlaams/Christlich-Demokratisch und Flämisch) Socialist Party (Parti Socialiste/Socialistische Partij/Sozialistische Partei) Forward (Vooruit) Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open Vlaamse Liberalen en Democraten) Reformist Movement (Mouvement Réformateur) New Flemish Alliance (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie) Ecolo Flemish Interest (Vlaams Belang) Workers' Party of Belgium (Partij van de Arbeid van België) Green Party (Groen) Bulgaria Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (Grazhdani za evropeysko razvitie na Balgariya) Bulgarian Socialist Party (Bulgarska sotsialisticheska partiya) Movement for Rights and Freedoms (Dvizhenie za prava i svobodi) There is such people (Ima takav narod) Yes Bulgaria ! (Da Bulgaria!) Czech Republic Mayors and Independents STAN (Starostové a nezávislí) Czech Social Democratic Party (Ceská strana sociálne demokratická) ANO 2011 Okamura, SPD) Denmark Liberal Party (Venstre) Social Democrats (Socialdemokraterne/Socialdemokratiet) Danish People's Party (Dansk Folkeparti) Unity List-Red Green Alliance (Enhedslisten) Danish Social Liberal Party (Radikale Venstre) Socialist People's Party (Socialistisk Folkeparti) Conservative People's Party (Det Konservative Folkeparti) Germany Christian-Democratic Union of Germany (Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands) Christian Social Union in Bavaria (Christlich-Soziale
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia by Peter Učeň Capital: Bratislava Population: 5.42 Million GNI/Capita, PPP: $29,670
    Slovakia By Peter Učeň Capital: Bratislava Population: 5.42 million GNI/capita, PPP: $29,670 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 2.75 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Governance Electoral Process 1.50 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 Independent Media 2.75 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 Local Democratic 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Governance Judicial Framework 2.75 3.00 2.75 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 and Independence Corruption 3.25 3.75 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Democracy Score 2.46 2.68 2.54 2.50 2.57 2.61 2.64 2.61 2.61 2.61 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]