PDF Download Discourse on Metaphysics and the Monadology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PDF Download Discourse on Metaphysics and the Monadology DISCOURSE ON METAPHYSICS AND THE MONADOLOGY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK G W Leibniz | 9780486149806 | | | | | Discourse on Metaphysics and The Monadology 1st edition PDF Book But, hey, that is exactly the point of reading philosophy! Supposedly this way of conceiving of the world solves the body-mind problem that emerged out of Descartes' dualism. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. More information about this seller Contact this seller. If you're new to Leibniz I wouldn't jump right into this kind of source material though. Paperback or Softback. Published in , the Discourse on Metaphysics One of the 17th century's most important thinkers, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz exercised enormous influence on the philosophy of Herder, Feuerbach, and Hegel as well as on the writings of Schiller and Goethe. Seller Inventory BBS Since Leipzig refused to grant him a doctoral degree because of his youth, Leibniz transferred to the University at Altdorf, near Nuremberg, where he received his doctorate in , before his twenty-first birthday. Aug 22, Xander rated it liked it. Previews available in: English. It is one of the few texts presenting in a consistent form the earlier philosophy of Leibniz. While working on adding automatic multiplication and division to Pascal's calculator, he was the first to describe a pinwheel calculator in and invented the Leibniz wheel, used in the arithmometer, the first mass-produced mechanical calculator. Leibniz's contributions to this vast array of subjects were scattered in various learned journals, in tens of thousands of letters, and in unpublished manuscripts. Philosophy of mind. New Paperback or Softback Quantity Available: Share this book Facebook. He was one of the most brilliant men of his era, or any era, and he had a mind that ranged far and wide. Edited by AnandBot. Views Read Edit View history. Discourse on Metaphysics and The Monadology 1st edition Writer A true polymath, Leibniz wrote ex-tensively on legal, cultural, and political affairs; compiled an official history of the Braunschweig family; and made seminal contributions to mathematics, theology, and phi-losophy. Editorial team. Discourse on metaphysics Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. There is no complete gathering of the writings of Leibniz. Is Love a Gift? Read more Download for print-disabled. It was only in the 20th century that his Law of Continuity and Transcendental Law of Homogeneity found mathematical implementation by means of non-standard analysis. August 13, Created by WorkBot. This dualistic conception is important, since it circumvents all sorts of problems, like the problem of the existence of the world - a problem which Descartes never solved according to Him God's goodness is our guarantee. Supposedly this way of conceiving of the world solves the body-mind problem that emerged out of Descartes' dualism. The Discourse is closely connected to the epistolary discussion which he carried with Antoine Arnauld. Clinton rated it did not like it Feb 06, Davidson - - The Leibniz Review Martin's Press. While working on adding automatic multiplication and division to Pascal's calculator, he was the first to describe a pinwheel calculator in and invented the Leibniz wheel, used in the arithmometer, the first mass-produced mechanical calculator. Other editions. Subjects Metaphysics , Monadology , Metafysica , Monadenleer. Revision history. He was one of the most brilliant men of his era, or any era, and he had a mind that ranged far and wide. He endorsed the view that God chose the best of all possible worlds. Discourse on Metaphysics, and the Monadology. Lists with This Book. Great Books in Philosophy 1 - 10 of 28 books. Discourse on Metaphysics and the Monadology. I enjoyed the Discourse on Metaphysics a lot more than the Monadology. Paperback or Softback. August 13, History. View 1 comment. Discourse on Metaphysics and The Monadology 1st edition Reviews Hidden categories: Articles containing French-language text All stub articles. Through this rationalistic enterprise here we see the influence of Scholasticism Leibniz is able to discover God both as Creator and the foundation of the world. Book Description Condition: New. Dec 06, Bradley rated it liked it. Buy this book Better World Books. In his two great philosophical works, the Discourse on Metaphysics and the Monadology, Leibniz outlined his metaphysical system, including his conception of physical substance, the motion and resistance of bodies, and the role of the divine within the dynamic universe. A true polymath, Leibniz wrote ex-tensively on legal, cultural, and political affairs; compiled an official history of the Braunschweig family; and made seminal contributions to mathematics, theology, and phi-losophy. I believe Descartes is more insightful. Rating details. Seller Rating:. Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Writings. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Edited by Clean Up Bot. In short: Leibniz wouldn't adopt Newton's God as a master watchmaker, creating the device and once in a while readjusting some spring. Leibniz's diplomatic missions took him to Paris, London, Amsterdam, and finally, Hanover, where he made his home. Beautifully written. Because much of Leibniz's thinking in the realm of the sciences flowed from his philosophy, understanding how he approached the natural world and humanity's place in it is vital to understanding his contributions to modern science. Most scholars believe Leibniz developed calculus independently of Isaac Newton, and Leibniz's notation has been widely used ever since it was published. Created by WorkBot. Agustin Casalia rated it it was amazing Nov 15, Discourse on metaphysics: a translation from the French based on the diplomatic edition , Manchester University Press. We are fully determined by God through his laws and thus, ultimately, through His will yet our essence is contingency, letting us freely act in the way we want - thus allowing for personal responsibility. Added to PP index Total views 21 , of 2,, Recent downloads 6 months 1 , of 2,, How can I increase my downloads? Aung Sett Kyaw Min rated it liked it Jun 19, Learn about the virtual Library Leaders Forum happening this month. His project is basically to preserve the mechanistic philosophy of nature as formulated by Descartes and Galileo, and developed further by Newton and Leibniz himself but in such a way that Christian theology would serve as the foundation of this world. He wrote in several languages, but primarily in Latin, French, and German. Useful as a prereq to various texts. Published July 26th by Dover Publications first published October 31st This part alone is worth five stars although it only covers a small portion of this book. He was a powerfully influential philosopher as well, and is still considered, alongside Descartes and Spinoza, one of the great 17th-century rationalists. To simply state, he distances himself from Cartesian subjectivity and Spinoza's monism in order to produce a philosophical system that carries a lot of similarities with the atomists e. Get A Copy. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Yet Leibniz's last years were dogged by illness and increasing neglect by those who regarded him as heterodox in religion. History of Western Philosophy. There is only one substance - God - and the universe consists of an infinity of entities that are manifestations of this substance. Both are heavily deterministic, but whereas Spinoza adopts a Stoic ethic as a result of this, Leibniz draws a line between necessary facts and contingent facts - allowing him to adapt a rather fuzzy theory about human freedom. This is a man who deserves respect. New Book. David Werther - - Religious Studies 32 1 - Until recently whenever I thought of Leibniz, I thought of him as "that guy who Voltaire demolished in Candide," or "that guy who was embroiled in a priority dispute with Isaac Newton over the invention of calculus. Among these are extensive passages from Leibniz's Theodicy, many of which are cited in The Monadology. Discourse on Metaphysics and The Monadology 1st edition Read Online He died in Hanover on November 14, Other editions. Leibniz's diplomatic missions took him to Paris, London, Amsterdam, and finally, Hanover, where he made his home. Monads is better than his Metaphysics. Seller Inventory BBS This edition published in by Open Court Pub. No trivia or quizzes yet. Frankfurt - - University of Notre Dame Press. Original Title. Customers who bought this item also bought. It was only in the 20th century that his Law of Continuity and Transcendental Law of Homogeneity found mathematical implementation by means of non-standard analysis. His project is basically to preserve the mechanistic philosophy of nature as formulated by Descartes and Galileo, and developed further by Newton and Leibniz himself but in such a way that Christian theology would serve as the foundation of this world. Applied ethics. Aug 19, Hoodlum rated it liked it. Shortly thereafter, Leibniz entered the civil service, first with the Elector of Mainz and later with the ducal family of Braunschweig-Lueneburg. Discourse on metaphysics , Manchester University Press. Request removal from index. Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Writings. I enjoyed the Discourse on Metaphysics a lot more than the Monadology. Loading Related Books. Substance and Intelligibility in Leibniz's Metaphysics. Philosophy of biology. I also learned that the conservation of energy or the 3rd law of thermodynamics was known to ancient philosophers long before Boltzman. Olivia rated it really liked it Jan 20, https://files8.webydo.com/9583258/UploadedFiles/4FA44DAD-9392-A668-E126-4C354F826D08.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9582751/UploadedFiles/2C8C6609-7F06-037F-874A-1D4344BA4D4F.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583431/UploadedFiles/E59F2BA2-6737-42C3-6811-D98A52ABDC8A.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583434/UploadedFiles/60AFB787-FA95-8CE1-090A-72B91225C015.pdf.
Recommended publications
  • Realizing Monads
    anDrás kornai Realizing Monads ABSTrACT We reconstruct monads as cyclic finite state automata whose states are what Leibniz calls perceptions and whose transitions are automatically triggered by the next time tick he calls entelechy. This goes some way toward explaining key as- pects of the Monadology, in particular, the lack of inputs and outputs (§7) and the need for universal harmony (§59). 1. INTrODUCTION Monads are important both in category theory and in programming language de- sign, clearly demonstrating that Leibniz is greatly appreciated as the conceptual forerunner of much of abstract thought both in mathematics and in computer sci- ence. Yet we suspect that Leibniz, the engineer, designer of the Stepped reck- oner, would use the resources of the modern world to build a very different kind of monad. Throughout this paper, we confront Leibniz with our contemporary scientific understanding of the world. This is done to make sure that what we say is not “concretely empty” in the sense of Unger (2014). We are not interested in what we can say about Leibniz, but rather in what Leibniz can say about our cur- rent world model. readers expecting some glib demonstration of how our current scientific theories make Leibniz look like a fool will be sorely disappointed. Looking around, and finding a well-built Calculus ratiocinator in Turing ma- chines, pointer machines, and similar abstract models of computation, Leibniz would no doubt consider his Characteristica Universalis well realized in modern proof checkers such as Mizar, Coq, or Agda to the extent mathematical deduc- tion is concerned, but would be somewhat disappointed in their applicability to natural philosophy in general.
    [Show full text]
  • "Computers" Abacus—The First Calculator
    Component 4: Introduction to Information and Computer Science Unit 1: Basic Computing Concepts, Including History Lecture 4 BMI540/640 Week 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000015. The First "Computers" • The word "computer" was first recorded in 1613 • Referred to a person who performed calculations • Evidence of counting is traced to at least 35,000 BC Ishango Bone Tally Stick: Science Museum of Brussels Component 4/Unit 1-4 Health IT Workforce Curriculum 2 Version 2.0/Spring 2011 Abacus—The First Calculator • Invented by Babylonians in 2400 BC — many subsequent versions • Used for counting before there were written numbers • Still used today The Chinese Lee Abacus http://www.ee.ryerson.ca/~elf/abacus/ Component 4/Unit 1-4 Health IT Workforce Curriculum 3 Version 2.0/Spring 2011 1 Slide Rules John Napier William Oughtred • By the Middle Ages, number systems were developed • John Napier discovered/developed logarithms at the turn of the 17 th century • William Oughtred used logarithms to invent the slide rude in 1621 in England • Used for multiplication, division, logarithms, roots, trigonometric functions • Used until early 70s when electronic calculators became available Component 4/Unit 1-4 Health IT Workforce Curriculum 4 Version 2.0/Spring 2011 Mechanical Computers • Use mechanical parts to automate calculations • Limited operations • First one was the ancient Antikythera computer from 150 BC Used gears to calculate position of sun and moon Fragment of Antikythera mechanism Component 4/Unit 1-4 Health IT Workforce Curriculum 5 Version 2.0/Spring 2011 Leonardo da Vinci 1452-1519, Italy Leonardo da Vinci • Two notebooks discovered in 1967 showed drawings for a mechanical calculator • A replica was built soon after Leonardo da Vinci's notes and the replica The Controversial Replica of Leonardo da Vinci's Adding Machine .
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz and Monads
    Leibniz and Monads The Human Situaon Team Omega, Spring 2010 Dr. Cynthia Freeland Overview • Leibniz’s Life • The Rise of Modernism • Monadology 1‐30 • All about Monads Leibniz 1646‐1716 The Duchess of Orleans said of him: “It's so rare for intellectuals to be smartly dressed, and not to smell, and to understand jokes.” A contemporary descripon of Leibniz “Leibniz was a man of medium height with a stoop, broad‐shouldered but bandy‐legged, as capable of thinking for several days sing in the same chair as of travelling the roads of Europe summer and winter. He was an indefagable worker, a universal leer writer (he had more than 600 correspondents), a patriot and cosmopolitan, a great scienst, and one of the most powerful spirits of Western civilisaon.” Goried Wilhelm von Leibniz “A walking encyclopedia” – King George I Monadology, 1714 Leibniz the Polymath • Studies in university: Law, philosophy, Lan, Greek • Independent: algebra, mathemacs, physics, dynamics, opcs, tried to create a submarine • Secretary of Nuremberg Alchemical Society • Laws of moon, gravity, mechanics, dynamics, topology, geology, linguiscs • Polics, internaonal affairs, economics, coinage, watches, lamps • Traveled to Paris, London, Vienna, Italy, etc. • Invented Infinitesimal calculus, created a notaon for it d(xn) = nxn‐1dx Leibniz’s Calculang Machine Leibniz and the Prince • 1676‐1716, Librarian to the Duke of Hanover • Privy councilor to successive members of the House of Brunswick of Hanover, and friend/correspondent/teacher of successive prominent women in the family
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz's Ultimate Theory Soshichi Uchii Abstract
    Leibniz’s Ultimate Theory Soshichi Uchii Abstract This is a short summary of my new interpretation of Leibniz’s philosophy, including metaphysics and dynamics. Monadology is the core of his philosophy, but according to my interpretation, this document must be read together with his works on dynamics and geometry Analysis Situs, among others. Monadology describes the reality, the world of monads. But in addition, it also contains a theory of information in terms of the state transition of monads, together with a sketch of how that information is transformed into the phenomena via coding. I will argue that Leibniz’s program has a surprisingly wide range, from classical physics to the theories of relativity (special and general) , and extending even to quantum mechanics. 1. How should we read Monadology? Among Leibniz’s papers he completed in his last years, the one that should be regarded as containing the core of his system of knowledge is Monadology (1714). It is a theory of metaphysics, but I take it that Leibniz thought that it is the foundation of dynamics, and he envisaged that dynamics should be combined with his new geometry, called Analysis Situs. There are two firm grounds for the preceding assertion. The first is that Leibniz sketched the relationship between his metaphysics and dynamics, in the two papers New System and Specimen Dynamicum (both published in 1695; English tr. in Ariew and Garber 1989). If we wish to figure out a reasonable interpretation of Monadology, this ground must be taken very seriously. The second ground is the amazing accomplishments shown in The Metaphysical Foundations of Mathematics (written around the same time as Monadology; English tr.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz' De Arte Combinatoria
    Leibniz’ De arte combinatoria John N. Martin Department of Philosophy University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH 45221 [email protected] John N. Martin, 2003 Page 1 Leibniz’ De arte combinatoria I. INTRODUCTION Logicians, philosophers and to judge from the Internet even the general public are vaguely aware that Leibniz held views about logic that anticipate modern ideas of proof system and algorithm. Though there are many places in Leibniz’ works that might be cited as evidence for such claims, popular works cite virtually only two of Leibniz’ shorter papers, Characteristica universalis and De arte combinatoria. Curiously, though there are hundreds, maybe thousands, of references to these papers, nothing serious has been written in recent decades about the papers themselves that could be called a professional exegesis or discussion of their logical content. The purpose of this short paper is to remedy that lack by offering a “reconstruction” of the system Leibniz sketches in De arte combinatoria, which of the two essays is the one more focused on the notions of proof and algorithm. A point of caution about method should be made at the outset. Any modern “reconstruction” of views in the history of logic is by its nature a compromise. It is an attempt to preserve as much of the original content, including its terminology and formulas, as is possible while simultaneously meeting the standards of modern metatheory. For example, if it is possible to do justice to the original by observing standard formats, then they should be Page 2 followed. For example, if it is fair to the text, it is desirable to define the syntax inductively, state definitions set theoretically, develop notions of proof within an axiom or natural deduction system, and define semantic ideas in a recursive manner parallel to syntax.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabriel Tarde
    Gabriel Tarde Monadology and Sociology Monadology and Sociology re.press Edited & translated by Theo Lorenc Open Access Statement – Please Read This book is Open Access. This work is not simply an electronic book; it is the open access version of a work that exists in a number of forms, the traditional printed form being one of them. Copyright Notice This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without express permission of the author and the publisher of this vol- ume. Furthermore, for any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. For more information see the details of the creative commons licence at this website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ This means that you can: • read and store this document free of charge • distribute it for personal use free of charge • print sections of the work for personal use • read or perform parts of the work in a context where no financial transactions take place However, you cannot: • gain financially from the work in anyway • sell the work or seek monies in relation to the distribution of the work • use the work in any commercial activity of any kind • profit a third party indirectly via use or distribution
    [Show full text]
  • A Leibnizian Approach to Mathematical Relationships: a New Look at Synthetic Judgments in Mathematics
    A Thesis entitled A Leibnizian Approach to Mathematical Relationships: A New Look at Synthetic Judgments in Mathematics by David T. Purser Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy ____________________________________ Dr. Madeline M. Muntersbjorn, Committee Chair ____________________________________ Dr. John Sarnecki, Committee Member ____________________________________ Dr. Benjamin S. Pryor, Committee Member ____________________________________ Dr. Patricia Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2009 An Abstract of A Leibnizian Approach to Mathematical Relationships: A New Look at Synthetic Judgments in Mathematics by David T. Purser Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy The University of Toledo May 2010 I examine the methods of Georg Cantor and Kurt Gödel in order to understand how new symbolic innovations aided in mathematical discoveries during the early 20th Century by looking at the distinction between the lingua characterstica and the calculus ratiocinator in the work of Leibniz. I explore the dynamics of innovative symbolic systems and how arbitrary systems of signification reveal real relationships in possible worlds. Examining the historical articulation of the analytic/synthetic distinction, I argue that mathematics is synthetic in nature. I formulate a moderate version of mathematical realism called modal relationalism. iii Contents Abstract iii Contents iv Preface vi 1 Leibniz and Symbolic Language 1 1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………. 1 1.2 Universal Characteristic……………………………………….. 4 1.2.1 Simple Concepts……………………………………….. 5 1.2.2 Arbitrary Signs………………………………………… 8 1.3 Logical Calculus………………………………………………. 11 1.4 Leibniz’s Legacy……………………………………………… 16 1.5 Leibniz’s Continued Relevance……………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • History of Computing Prehistory – the World Before 1946
    Social and Professional Issues in IT Prehistory - the world before 1946 History of Computing Prehistory – the world before 1946 The word “Computing” Originally, the word computing was synonymous with counting and calculating, and a computer was a person who computes. Since the advent of the electronic computer, it has come to also mean the operation and usage of these machines, the electrical processes carried out within the computer hardware itself, and the theoretical concepts governing them. Prehistory: Computing related events 750 BC - 1799 A.D. 750 B.C. The abacus was first used by the Babylonians as an aid to simple arithmetic at sometime around this date. 1492 Leonardo da Vinci produced drawings of a device consisting of interlocking cog wheels which could be interpreted as a mechanical calculator capable of addition and subtraction. A working model inspired by this plan was built in 1968 but it remains controversial whether Leonardo really had a calculator in mind 1588 Logarithms are discovered by Joost Buerghi 1614 Scotsman John Napier invents an ingenious system of moveable rods (referred to as Napier's Rods or Napier's bones). These were based on logarithms and allowed the operator to multiply, divide and calculate square and cube roots by moving the rods around and placing them in specially constructed boards. 1622 William Oughtred developed slide rules based on John Napier's logarithms 1623 Wilhelm Schickard of Tübingen, Württemberg (now in Germany), built the first discrete automatic calculator, and thus essentially started the computer era. His device was called the "Calculating Clock". This mechanical machine was capable of adding and subtracting up to 6 digit numbers, and warned of an overflow by ringing a bell.
    [Show full text]
  • Levels of Discourse in Leibniz's Metaphysics the Ontological Status of Bodies
    Levels of Discourse in Leibniz's Metaphysics The Ontological Status of Bodies: A Study of the Levels of Discourse in Leibniz's Metaphysics By SCOTT STAPLEFORD, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University C> Copyright by Scott Stapleford, August 1998 MASTER OF ARTS (1998) McMaster University (Philosophy) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Ontological Status of Bodies: A Study of the Levels of Discourse in Leibniz's Metaphysics AUTHOR: Scott Stapleford, B.A. (Brock University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Wilfrid Waluchow NUMBER OF PAGES: iv, 169 ii Table of Contents Introduction 1 The Problem 2 Collateral Issues 3 Procedure Part I 4 Some Working Deftnitions 5 Phenomenalism 5.1 Linguistic Phenomenalism 5.2 Berkeleian Phenomenalism 6 Leibniz and Phenomenalism 6.1 Macintosh's Interpretation 6.2 Jolley's Interpretation 6.3 Wilson's Interpretation 111 Part II 7 Recapitulation and Procedure 8 Athenian and Darwinian Approaches 8.1 Woolhouse's Interpretation 8.2 Adams' Interpretation 8.3 Hartz's Interpretation 8.4 Loeb's Interpretation 8.5 Rutherford's Interpretation 9 Psychology and Ontology 9.1 Mind and Matter in Descartes and Locke 9.2 Leibniz's Analysis of Mind and Matter 9.2.1 The Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction 9.2.2 Physical Considerations 9.2.3 Metaphysical Considerations 9.2.3.1 Substance as Unity 9.2.3.2 Substance as Activity 9.2.3.3 Substance as Subject 9.2.4 Psychological Considerations 10 Levels of Discourse 11 Leibniz's Epistemological Realism 11.1 Requirements of the System 11.2 The Contrary Proposition 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Perception and Representation in Leibniz
    PERCEPTION AND REPRESENTATION IN LEIBNIZ by Stephen Montague Puryear B.S., Mechanical Engineering, North Carolina State University, 1994 M.A., Philosophy, Texas A&M University, 2000 M.A., Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 2004 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Department of Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2006 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY This dissertation was presented by Stephen Montague Puryear It was defended on December 5, 2005 and approved by Nicholas Rescher University Professor of Philosophy Robert B. Brandom Distinguished Service Professor of Philosophy Stephen Engstrom Associate Professor of Philosophy J. E. McGuire Professor of History and Philosophy of Science Dissertation Director: Nicholas Rescher University Professor of Philosophy ii Copyright °c by Stephen Montague Puryear 2006 iii PERCEPTION AND REPRESENTATION IN LEIBNIZ Stephen Montague Puryear, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 2006 Though Leibniz’s views about perception and representation go to the heart of his philosophy, they have received surprisingly little attention over the years and in many ways continue to be poorly understood. I aim to redress these shortcomings. The body of the work begins with an exploration of Leibniz’s proposed analysis of representation (Chapter 2). Here I argue that on this analysis representation consists in a kind of structural correspondence— roughly an isomorphism—between representation and thing represented. Special attention is given to the application of this analysis to the challenging cases of linguistic and mental representation. The next two chapters concern what I take to be the central issue of the work: the nature of distinct perception.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaise Pascal's Mechanical Calculator
    machines Article Blaise Pascal’s Mechanical Calculator: Geometric Modelling and Virtual Reconstruction José Ignacio Rojas-Sola 1,* , Gloria del Río-Cidoncha 2 , Arturo Fernández-de la Puente Sarriá 3 and Verónica Galiano-Delgado 4 1 Department of Engineering Graphics, Design and Projects, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain 2 Department of Engineering Graphics, University of Seville, 41092 Seville, Spain; [email protected] 3 Department of Design Engineering, University of Seville, 41011 Seville, Spain; [email protected] 4 University of Seville, 41092 Seville, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-9-5321-2452 Abstract: This article shows the three-dimensional (3D) modelling and virtual reconstruction of the first mechanical calculating machine used for accounting purposes designed by Blaise Pascal in 1642. To obtain the 3D CAD (computer-aided design) model and the geometric documentation of said invention, CATIA V5 R20 software has been used. The starting materials for this research, mainly the plans of this arithmetic machine, are collected in the volumes Oeuvres de Blaise Pascal published in 1779. Sketches of said machine are found therein that lack scale, are not dimensioned and certain details are absent; that is, they were not drawn with precision in terms of their measurements and proportions, but they do provide qualitative information on the shape and mechanism of the machine. Thanks to the three-dimensional modelling carried out; it has been possible to explain in detail both its operation and the final assembly of the invention, made from the assemblies of its different Citation: Rojas-Sola, J.I.; del subsets. In this way, the reader of the manuscript is brought closer to the perfect understanding of Río-Cidoncha, G.; Fernández-de la the workings of a machine that constituted a major milestone in the technological development of Puente Sarriá, A.; Galiano-Delgado, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    ◆ INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS ◆ Eli Whitney THE COTTON GIN The first patent of major importance to be issued by the U.S. government after it was formed was Eli Whitney’s patent for the cotton gin (“gin” is short for “engine”), which was issued on March 14, 1794. The patent description is in longhand, for reasons I cannot explain. Upon graduating Yale as an engineer in 1792, Whitney, like many college graduates of today, found himself in debt and in need of a job. He left his home in Massachusetts and took a job as a teacher in South Carolina. That job fell through, and Katherine Greene, the war widow of General Nathanial Greene, invited Whitney to stay at her Georgia cotton plantation in early 1793. He noticed that long‐staple cotton, which was readily separated from its seed, could only be grown along the coast. The inland‐ grown variety of cotton had sticky green seeds that were difficult to cull from the fluffy white cotton bolls,COPYRIGHTED and thus was less profitable to MATERIALgrow and harvest. It took 10 hours of hand labor to sift out a single point of cotton lint from its seeds. Whitney, after observing the manual process being used for separating the sticky seeds from the cotton bolls, built his first machine, which did not work. The bulk cotton was pushed against a wire mesh screen, which held back the seeds while wooden Intellectual Property Law for Engineers, Scientists, and Entrepreneurs, Second Edition. Howard B. Rockman. © 2020 by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
    [Show full text]