DOCSLIB.ORG

Invasive Plants in Southern Forests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Invasive Plants in Southern Forests Invasive Plants in Southern Forests United States Department of Agriculture A Field Guide for the Identification of Invasive PlantsSLIGHTLY inREVISED NOVEMBERSouthern 2015 Forests United States Forest Service Department Southern Research Station James H. Miller, Erwin B. Chambliss, and Nancy J. Loewenstein of Agriculture General Technical Report SRS–­­119 Authors: James H. Miller, Emeritus Research Ecologist, and Erwin B. Chambliss, Research Technician, Forest Available without charge from the Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Southern Research Station, Auburn University, AL 36849; and Southern Research Station Nancy J. Loewenstein, Research Fellow and Alabama Cooperative Extension System Specialist for Also available online at Forest Invasive Plants, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, AL 36849. www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/35292 and invasive.org, or as a free download for iPhones and iPads at the AppStore Front Cover Upper left—Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) infestation that developed from dormant seed in the soil seed bank after a forest thinning operation. Upper right—Kudzu (Pueraria montana) infestation within the urban-wildland interface. Lower left—Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and dormant kudzu invading and replacing a pine- hardwood stand. Lower right—Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) infestation under mature slash pine (Pinus elliottii). Funding support for all printings provided by the Southern Research Station, Insect, Disease, and Invasive Plants Research Work Unit, and Forest Health Protection, Southern Region, Asheville, NC. First Printed April 2010 Slightly Revised February 2012 Revised August 2013 Reprinted January 2015 Slightly Revised November 2015 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 www.srs.fs.usda.gov i A Field Guide for the Identification of Invasive Plants in Southern Forests James H. Miller, Erwin B. Chambliss, and Nancy J. Loewenstein ii Acknowledgments The clarity and accuracy of descriptions and nomenclature have been measurably Ron Lance, plant consultant, Asheville, NC improved by the sizable and appreciated reviews of the following experts. Reviewers Nancy Loewenstein, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, of this edition: Curtis Hansen, Auburn University, Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn, AL, Bugwood.org Auburn, AL; Ron Lance, plant consultant, Asheville, NC; Steven T. Manning, Invasive Steven T. Manning, Invasive Plant Control Inc., Nashville, TN, Bugwood.org Plant Control, Inc., Nashville, TN; Carey Minteer, formerly with the University of Georgia’s Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, Tifton, GA; and Fred Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org Nation, Weeks Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Fairhope, AL. David J. Moorhead, Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org Reviewers of prior edition: Kristine Johnson, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Fred Nation, Weeks Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Fairhope, AL, Gatlingburg, TN; Fred Nation, Weeks Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Bugwood.org Fairhope, AL; Johnny Randall, North Carolina Botanical Gardens, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State Weed Lab Archive, The Ohio State University, Bugwood.org Jack Ranney, formerly with the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. Richard Old, XID Services, Incorporated, Bugwood.org All Plant Images by James H. Miller and Posted on Bugwood.org Christopher Oswalt, U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Knoxville, TN with Crucial Contributions by: Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources - Forestry Ted Bodner, copyrighted by the University of Georgia Press for “Forest Plants of the Archive, Harrisburg, PA, Bugwood.org Southeast and Their Wildlife Uses” and used by permission, Champaign, IL Corrie Pieterson, University of Florida, School of Forest Resources and Patrick Breen, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR, Conservation, Gainesville, FL Bugwood.org John M. Randall, The Nature Conservancy, University of California, Davis, CA, Steven J. Baskauf, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN Bugwood.org Charles T. Bryson, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Southern Weed Science Barry Rice, sarracenia.com, Bugwood.org Research Unit, Stoneville, MS, Bugwood.org Amy Richard, University of Florida, Bugwood.org John Cardina, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, Bugwood.org Jan Samanek, State Phytosanitary Administration, Bugwood.org Gerald D. Carr, Carr Botanical Consultation, Bugwood.org Michael Shephard, U.S. Forest Service, Bugwood.org Erwin Chambliss, U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Auburn, AL John Schwegman, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Springfield, IL Steve Dewey, Utah State University Extension, Logan, UT, Bugwood.org Forest and Kim Starr, U.S. Geological Survey, Bugwood.org Thomas Ellis, Jr., Baldwin County Forestry Planning Committee, Bay Minette, AL Dan Tenaglia, Missouriplants.com, Bugwood.org Stephen F. Enloe, Department of Agronomy & Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL Robert Vidéki, Doronicum Kft., Bugwood.org Chris Evans, River to River Cooperative Weed Management Area, Marion, IL, Bugwood.org Warner Park Nature Center, Metropolitan Board of Parks and Recreation, Nashville, TN John Everest, Department of Agronomy & Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL Gil Wojciech, Polish Forest Research Institute, Bugwood.org Nancy Fraley, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Asheville, NC Great Smoky Mountains National Park Resource Management Archive, USDI National Park Service, Gatlinburg TN, Bugwood.org Plant Names from: Michael Jordan, Alabama Department of Environmental Management, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service’s Plants Database: http://plants. Montgomery, AL usda.gov with recent published modifications. All images are available free at Forestryimages.org Steven Katovich, U.S. Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Bugwood.org iii Contents Explanation of Codes and Conventions Used in Species Descriptions .. iv Five-Leaf Akebia, Chocolate Vine . 64 TREES Japanese Honeysuckle .................................... 66 Invasive Introduction ............................................... 1 Kudzu .................................................. 68 Invasive Trees Nonnative Ivies ........................................... 70 Brazilian Peppertree ....................................... 2 Nonnative Wisterias ....................................... 72 Callery Pear, Bradford Pear ................................. 4 Oriental Bittersweet ....................................... 74 Camphortree ............................................ 6 Vincas, Periwinkles ....................................... 76 Chinaberrytree ........................................... 8 SHRUBS Winter Creeper ........................................... 78 Invasive Chinese Parasoltree ....................................... 10 Invasive Grasses and Canes Glossy Buckthorn ......................................... 12 Bamboos ............................................... 80 Paper Mulberry ........................................... 14 Chinese Silvergrass ....................................... 82 Princesstree, Paulownia .................................... 16 Cogongrass ............................................. 84 Russian Olive ............................................ 18 Giant Reed .............................................. 86 Silktree, Mimosa .......................................... 20 Invasive Tallowtree, Popcorntree .................................... 22 Johnsongrass ............................................ 88 VINES Tree-of-Heaven ........................................... 24 Nepalese Browntop, Japanese Stiltgrass ....................... 90 Trifoliate Orange, Hardy Orange .............................. 26 Tall Fescue .............................................. 92 Weeping Lovegrass ....................................... 94 Tungoil Tree ............................................. 28 Invasive Shrubs Invasive Ferns Japanese Climbing Fern ................................... 96 GRASSES Autumn Olive ............................................ 30 Bush Honeysuckles ....................................... 32 Invasive Forbs Invasive Chinese/European/Border/California Privet ..................... 34 Alligatorweed ............................................ 98 Hen’s Eyes, Coral Ardisia ................................... 36 Big Blue Lilyturf, Creeping Liriope ............................100 Japanese/Glossy Privet .................................... 38 Chinese Lespedeza .......................................102 Japanese Barberry ........................................ 40 Coltsfoot ................................................104 Japanese Knotweed ....................................... 42 Crownvetch . .106 FERNS Japanese Meadowsweet ................................... 44 Garlic Mustard ...........................................108 Invasive Leatherleaf Mahonia ...................................... 46 Nodding Plumeless Thistle ..................................110 Nonnative Roses ......................................... 48 Spotted Knapweed ........................................112 Sacred Bamboo, Nandina .................................. 50 Other Nonnative Plants Invading Southern Forests and Their Shrubby Nonnative Lespedezas ............................. 52 Margins, Openings, Waterway
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of Schizostachyum (Poaceae–Bambusoideae) from the Andaman Islands, India
    BLUMEA 48: 187–192 Published on 7 April 2003 doi: 10.3767/000651903X686169 NEW SPECIES OF SCHIZOSTACHYUM (POACEAE–BAMBUSOIDEAE) FROM THE ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA MUKTESH KUMAR & M. REMESH Botany Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi 680-653, Trichur, Kerala, India SUMMARY Two new species of Schizostachyum Nees: S. andamanicum and S. kalpongianum, are described and illustrated. Key words: Schizostachyum, Andaman Islands, India. INTRODUCTION During the revisionary studies on Indian bamboos the authors could undertake a survey in the Andaman Islands. Five species of bamboos, namely Bambusa atra, Dinochloa an- damanica, Gigantochloa andamanica, Bambusa schizostachyoides, and Schizostachyum rogersii have so far been reported from the Andaman Islands (Munro, 1868; Gamble, 1896; Brandis, 1906; Parkinson, 1921). As a result of exploring different parts of the is lands two interesting bamboos were collected. Critical examination revealed that they belonged to the genus Schizostachyum Nees and hitherto undescribed. The genus Schizostachyum was described by Nees in 1829 based on Schizostachyum blumei. This genus is represented by about 45–50 species distributed in tropical and sub- tropical Asia from southern China throughout the Malaysian region, extending to the Pacific islands with the majority of species in Malaysia (Dransfield, 1983, 2000; Ohrnberger, 1999; Wong, 1995). The genus is characterised by sympodial rhizomes; erect or straggling thin-walled culms; many branches of the same length arising from the node; indeterminate inflores­ cence; absence of glumes in the spikelets; presence of lodicules; slender ovary with long, glabrous stiff style which is hollow around a central strand of tissue; anthers usu- ally with blunt apex. The bamboos collected from the Andaman Islands have straggling culms and are similar to Schizostachyum gracile (Munro) Holttum in certain characters but differ in several other characters.
    [Show full text]
  • PRE Evaluation Report for Euonymus Alatus
    PRE Evaluation Report -- Euonymus alatus Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE™ Evaluation Report Euonymus alatus -- Texas 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 16 -- Reject (high risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 71 / 100 Questions answered: 19 of 20 -- Valid (80% or more questions answered) Privacy: Public Status: Submitted Evaluation Date: September 21, 2017 This PDF was created on August 13, 2018 Page 1/18 PRE Evaluation Report -- Euonymus alatus Plant Evaluated Euonymus alatus Image by Chris Barton Page 2/18 PRE Evaluation Report -- Euonymus alatus Evaluation Overview A PRE™ screener conducted a literature review for this plant (Euonymus alatus) in an effort to understand the invasive history, reproductive strategies, and the impact, if any, on the region's native plants and animals. This research reflects the data available at the time this evaluation was conducted. Summary Euonymus alatus is naturalized across much of Eastern North America. It is a 1 to 4 meter tall shrub which an produce thickets in forest understory, displacing native vegetation. Seed production is prolific and dispersed by birds. General Information Status: Submitted Screener: Kim Taylor Evaluation Date: September 21, 2017 Plant Information Plant: Euonymus alatus If the plant is a cultivar, how does its behavior differs from its parent's? This evaluation is for the species, not a particular cultivar. Regional Information Region Name: Texas Page 3/18 PRE Evaluation Report -- Euonymus alatus Climate Matching Map To answer four of the PRE questions for a regional evaluation, a climate map with three climate data layers (Precipitation, UN EcoZones, and Plant Hardiness) is needed. These maps were built using a toolkit created in collaboration with GreenInfo Network, USDA, PlantRight, California-Invasive Plant Council, and The Information Center for the Environment at UC Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Wildlife Food Planting Manual for the Southeast • Contents
    Supplemental Wildlife Food Planting Manual for the Southeast • Contents Managing Plant Succession ................................ 4 Openings ............................................................. 6 Food Plot Size and Placement ............................ 6 Soil Quality and Fertilization .............................. 6 Preparing Food Plots .......................................... 7 Supplemental Forages ............................................................................................................................. 8 Planting Mixtures/Strip Plantings ......................................................................................................... 9 Legume Seed Inoculation ...................................................................................................................... 9 White-Tailed Deer ............................................................................................................................... 10 Eastern Wild Turkey ............................................................................................................................ 11 Northern Bobwhite .............................................................................................................................. 12 Mourning Dove ................................................................................................................................... 13 Waterfowl ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotanical Uses of Alien and Native Plant Species of Yeşilırmak Delta, Samsun, Turkey
    Ethnobotanical uses of alien and native plant species of Yeşilırmak Delta, Samsun, Turkey Ümmügülsüm MUMCU1*, Hasan KORKMAZ2 1Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey. 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139 Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: Plants produce chemicals, known as secondary metabolites, have a variety of ecophysiological functions e.g. defense against herbivory/pathogen attacks and competitor plants, attracting pollinators and symbionts, protection against abiotic stresses, etc. These metabolites also have potential medicinal effects on humans. The Yeşilırmak Delta, Samsun, Turkey, is the second largest delta plain of Turkey. Among the plants distributed in different habitats of the delta, medically important species and their usage were investigated based on the literature. It has been determined 160 species and infraspecific taxa belonging 61 families and 141 genera which can be used for medicinal purposes in the research area. Our aim is to provide a database in relation to medicinal plants distributed naturally in such a region that 65.4% of which is assigned as agricultural area. Keywords: Ethnomedicine, Toxic effect, Yeşilırmak Delta. Introduction identification (Briskin, 2000). Food and medicines are integral part of human life (Datir While primary metabolites (such as carbohydrates, and Bhore, 2017) and the plants we have consumed are lipids, proteins, heme, chlorophyll,
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of China 22: 604–605. 2006. 201. DICHANTHIUM Willemet, Ann
    Flora of China 22: 604–605. 2006. 201. DICHANTHIUM Willemet, Ann. Bot. (Usteri) 18: 11. 1796. 双花草属 shuang hua cao shu Chen Shouliang (陈守良); Sylvia M. Phillips Eremopogon Stapf; Lepeocercis Trinius. Perennial, rarely annual. Leaf blades often cauline, linear; ligule membranous. Inflorescence of single or subdigitate racemes, terminal or also axillary and sometimes supported by spathes; racemes usually with 1 or more basal homogamous spikelet pairs, spikelets often imbricate; rachis internodes and pedicels slender, solid, bearded, truncate or oblique at apex. Sessile spikelet dorsally compressed; callus short, obtuse; lower glume papery to cartilaginous, broadly convex to slightly concave, sometimes pitted, rounded on flanks, becoming 2-keeled upward, apex obtuse; upper glume boat-shaped, dorsally keeled, awnless; lower floret reduced to an empty hyaline lemma; upper lemma stipitiform, entire, awned from apex; awn geniculate, glabrous or puberulous. Stamens (2–) 3. Pedicelled spikelet similar to the sessile, male or barren, awnless. About 20 species: Africa through India to SE Asia and Australia; three species in China. Dichanthium is closely related to Bothriochloa, but can be distinguished by its pedicels and rachis internodes being solid and lacking a median, purple line. The species present in China are not clear-cut and are also variable within themselves due to polyploidy and apomixis. All three species provide good grazing and now occur widely in tropical regions as introductions or escapes. 1a. Peduncle pilose below inflorescence ........................................................................................................................... 1. D. aristatum 1b. Peduncle glabrous. 2a. Lower glume of sessile spikelet obovate, winged along keels; leaf sheaths compressed; ligule less than 1 mm, margin ciliate ........................................................................................................................................................ 2. D. caricosum 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy: First Steps to Be Taken
    The National Crop Wild Relative Strategy for Italy: First Steps To Be Taken PGR Secure The National Crop Wild Relative Strategy for Italy: First Steps To Be Taken * Panella L. 1, Landucci S. 12, Torricelli R. 1, Gigante D. 13, Donnini D. 1, Venanzoni R.13 and V. Negri1 1 Department of Agricultural, Nutritional and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy 2 Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlárská 2, Brno 61137 (present address) 3 Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, via Elce di Sotto 8, 06123 Perugia, Italy (present address) * Largely based on Landucci et al. (2014). A prioritized inventory of crop wild relatives and harvested plants of Italy. Crop Science. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.05.0355. Index 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 DEFINITION OF A CROP WILD RELATIVE ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 CROP WILD RELATIVE CONSERVATION AND INTERNATIONAL TREATIES .............................................. 4 1.3 ITALIAN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANT CONSERVATION STRATEGIES .............................................. 5 1.4 GENETIC RESOURCES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN BASIN AND OF ITALY .................................................. 6 1.5 ITALIAN PROTECTED AREAS AND SPECIES .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Adaptation of Forages in Lao PDR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD REGIONAL MEETING OF THE FSP Environmental adaptation of forages in Lao PDR Phonepaseuth Phengsavanh1 and Viengsavanh Phimphachanhvongsod2 In Lao PDR, livestock production is almost totally a smallholder farming practice and is a vital component of livelihood security. Animals generally graze on native forages (grasses, shrubs, legumes, and tree leaves) that are available in forests and grasslands. However, native grass is abundant only during the wet season. Dry season feed shortages are common, resulting in severe animal feeding problems for farmers throughout the country. There are currently few, if any, alternative feed sources. For many years, some Hmong farmers, who live on the fertile highland soils in Luang Phabang and Xieng Khouang, have fed grazing animals Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) as a supplement. Some farmers in Xieng Khouang have recently started to use Ruzi grass (Brachiaria ruziziensis) for the same purpose. However, in general, very few farmers in Lao PDR plant forages. This does not mean that there is no demand. The severity of feed resource limitations in some provinces (especially Luang Phabang and Xieng Khouang) is creating a huge interest in planted forages among farmers. To meet this demand, the Department of Livestock and Fisheries, in collaboration with the Forages for Smallholders Project, established forage nurseries at five different agro-ecological sites in four provinces to evaluate forage adaptation for subsequent on- farm testing at Namsuang (Vientiane municipality), Houakhoth and Houaphai (Luang Phabang), Ban Km 32 (Oudomxay), and Khinak (Champassak). Site descriptions The soil pH (1:5 water) at these sites varied from very acid to neutral (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Allelopathic Potential of Mustard Crop Residues on Weed Management
    J Bangladesh Agril Univ 16(3): 372–379, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v16i3.39398 ISSN 1810-3030 (Print) 2408-8684 (Online) Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University Journal home page: http://baures.bau.edu.bd/jbau, www.banglajol.info/index.php/JBAU Weed diversity of the family Poaceae in Bangladesh Agricultural University campus and their ethnobotanical uses Ashaduzzaman Sagar, Jannat-E-Tajkia and A.K.M. Golam Sarwar Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh ARTICLE INFO Abstract A taxonomic study on the weeds of the family Poaceae growing throughout the Bangladesh Agricultural Article history: University campus was carried out to determine species diversity of grasses in the campus. A total of 81 Received: 03 July 2018 species under 46 genera and 2 subfamilies of the family Poaceae were collected and identified; their uses Accepted: 19 November 2018 in various ailments were also recorded. Out of the three subfamilies, no weed from the subfamily Published: 31 December 2018 Bambusoideae was found. Among the genera, Digitaria, Eragrostis, Brachiaria, Panicum, Echinochloa and Sporobolus were most dominant in context to number of species with a total of 29 species. While 28 Keywords: genera were represented by single species each in BAU campus; of these 15 genera were in Bangladesh as Grass weeds; Phenology; well. Some of them are major and obnoxious weeds in different crop fields including staples rice and Taxonomy; BAU campus; wheat. The flowering period will be helpful for the management of respective weed population. Many of Ethnobotanical uses these weed species have high economical, ethnomedicinal and other uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Life of Western Australia
    INTRODUCTION The characteristic features of the vegetation of Australia I. General Physiography At present the animals and plants of Australia are isolated from the rest of the world, except by way of the Torres Straits to New Guinea and southeast Asia. Even here adverse climatic conditions restrict or make it impossible for migration. Over a long period this isolation has meant that even what was common to the floras of the southern Asiatic Archipelago and Australia has become restricted to small areas. This resulted in an ever increasing divergence. As a consequence, Australia is a true island continent, with its own peculiar flora and fauna. As in southern Africa, Australia is largely an extensive plateau, although at a lower elevation. As in Africa too, the plateau increases gradually in height towards the east, culminating in a high ridge from which the land then drops steeply to a narrow coastal plain crossed by short rivers. On the west coast the plateau is only 00-00 m in height but there is usually an abrupt descent to the narrow coastal region. The plateau drops towards the center, and the major rivers flow into this depression. Fed from the high eastern margin of the plateau, these rivers run through low rainfall areas to the sea. While the tropical northern region is characterized by a wet summer and dry win- ter, the actual amount of rain is determined by additional factors. On the mountainous east coast the rainfall is high, while it diminishes with surprising rapidity towards the interior. Thus in New South Wales, the yearly rainfall at the edge of the plateau and the adjacent coast often reaches over 100 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Wild Angiosperms of Bhagwan Mahavir (Molem
    Check List 9(2): 186–207, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Check List of Wild Angiosperms of Bhagwan Mahavir PECIES S OF Mandar Nilkanth Datar 1* and P. Lakshminarasimhan 2 ISTS L (Molem) National Park, Goa, India *1 CorrespondingAgharkar Research author Institute, E-mail: G. [email protected] G. Agarkar Road, Pune - 411 004. Maharashtra, India. 2 Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P. O. Botanic Garden, Howrah - 711 103. West Bengal, India. Abstract: Bhagwan Mahavir (Molem) National Park, the only National park in Goa, was evaluated for it’s diversity of Angiosperms. A total number of 721 wild species belonging to 119 families were documented from this protected area of which 126 are endemics. A checklist of these species is provided here. Introduction in the National Park are Laterite and Deccan trap Basalt Protected areas are most important in many ways for (Naik, 1995). Soil in most places of the National Park area conservation of biodiversity. Worldwide there are 102,102 is laterite of high and low level type formed by natural Protected Areas covering 18.8 million km2 metamorphosis and degradation of undulation rocks. network of 660 Protected Areas including 99 National Minerals like bauxite, iron and manganese are obtained Parks, 514 Wildlife Sanctuaries, 43 Conservation. India Reserves has a from these soils. The general climate of the area is tropical and 4 Community Reserves covering a total of 158,373 km2 with high percentage of humidity throughout the year.
    [Show full text]