DOCSLIB.ORG

Implications of Robotic Space Mining

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Implications of Robotic Space Mining Implications of Robotic Space Mining An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by Steven Chen, Class of 2011 __________________________ Jared Ingalls, Class of 2011 __________________________ Date: February 8, 2010 Approved: _____________________________________ Professor David Brown, IQP Advisor Abstract This project centered on the use of robots to conduct mining in space, specifically on the lunar surface. It examined proposed work, including the construction of a lunar base. The project investigated legal, financial and ethical concerns raised by considering such endeavors. It aims to forecast the future of space mining by gathering and analyzing information from interviews and a survey. The project concludes that the public would support robotic space mining if it were a viable source of revenue. Chen, Ingalls 2010 Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents...................................................................................................................... ii 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 What is a robot? .................................................................................................................2 1.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Robots vs. Humans .......................................................6 1.3 So Which Should We Send?............................................................................................. 12 2. Regolith and Space Excavation ........................................................................................... 14 2.1 About Helium-3 ............................................................................................................... 14 2.2 The Need for Regolith ..................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Possibilities of Near-Earth Locations for Mining ............................................................. 16 2.3.1 The Moon ................................................................................................................. 17 2.3.2 Mars ......................................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Problems with These Locations ....................................................................................... 20 2.4.1 Territorial Dispute over the Moon ............................................................................. 21 2.4.2 Difficulties with Mining Mars ................................................................................... 22 3. Past and Current Work ....................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Past Work ........................................................................................................................ 23 3.2 Current Work and Research ............................................................................................. 24 3.2.1 Down-Well Tactile Exploration ................................................................................. 24 3.2.2 Fundamentals of Digital Mechatronics ...................................................................... 25 3.2.3 NASA‘s Regolith Excavation Challenge ................................................................... 26 3.2.4 Artificial Intelligence ................................................................................................ 28 3.3 Impact ............................................................................................................................. 29 4. Financial Aspect .................................................................................................................. 31 4.1 Rocket Costs ................................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Price of Processing Regolith ............................................................................................ 31 4.3 Costs of Researching Helium-3 for Fusion ....................................................................... 32 4.4 Benefits of Helium-3 ....................................................................................................... 33 4.5 Costs of Research and Development of Robots for Space Mining .................................... 33 4.6 Current Financial Status of NASA ................................................................................... 33 5. Mining .................................................................................................................................. 35 5.1 Surface Mining on the Moon ........................................................................................... 35 5.1.1 Open Pit Mining ....................................................................................................... 35 5.1.2 Strip Mining ............................................................................................................. 36 5.1.3 Dry Dredging ............................................................................................................ 36 5.2 Underground Mining on the Moon................................................................................... 36 5.3 Complications ................................................................................................................. 37 ii Chen, Ingalls 2010 5.3.1 Heavy Equipment and Energy ................................................................................... 37 5.3.2 Large Amount of Personnel....................................................................................... 38 5.3.3 Environmental Concerns ........................................................................................... 38 5.4 Mining on Mars ............................................................................................................... 39 5.4.1 Mining Mars Atmosphere ......................................................................................... 40 6. Robot Ethics (Roboethics) ................................................................................................... 41 6.1 Concerns ......................................................................................................................... 41 6.2 Roboethics Pertaining to Robotic Space Mining .............................................................. 43 7. Goals .................................................................................................................................... 44 8. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 45 8.1 Survey Question Selection ............................................................................................... 46 8.2 Interview Question Selection ........................................................................................... 49 9. Survey Analysis ................................................................................................................... 51 9.1 Hypotheses ...................................................................................................................... 51 9.1.1 Survey Demographics ............................................................................................... 51 9.1.2 General Survey Responses ........................................................................................ 52 9.2 Individual Survey Questions ............................................................................................ 53 9.2.1 Question 5 ................................................................................................................ 54 9.2.2 Question 6 ................................................................................................................ 54 9.2.3 Question 7 ................................................................................................................ 55 9.2.4 Question 8 ................................................................................................................ 55 9.2.5 Question 9 ................................................................................................................ 56 9.2.6 Question 10 .............................................................................................................. 56 9.2.7 Question 11............................................................................................................... 57 9.2.8 Question 12 .............................................................................................................. 57 9.2.9 Question 13 .............................................................................................................. 57 9.2.10 Question 14............................................................................................................. 58 9.2.11 Question 15 ............................................................................................................. 58 9.2.12 Question 16............................................................................................................. 59 9.2.13 Question 17............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study
    Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study 2 April 2012 Prepared for the: Keck Institute for Space Studies California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California 1 2 Authors and Study Participants NAME Organization E-Mail Signature John Brophy Co-Leader / NASA JPL / Caltech [email protected] Fred Culick Co-Leader / Caltech [email protected] Co -Leader / The Planetary Louis Friedman [email protected] Society Carlton Allen NASA JSC [email protected] David Baughman Naval Postgraduate School [email protected] NASA ARC/Carnegie Mellon Julie Bellerose [email protected] University Bruce Betts The Planetary Society [email protected] Mike Brown Caltech [email protected] Michael Busch UCLA [email protected] John Casani NASA JPL [email protected] Marcello Coradini ESA [email protected] John Dankanich NASA GRC [email protected] Paul Dimotakis Caltech [email protected] Harvard -Smithsonian Center for Martin Elvis [email protected] Astrophysics Ian Garrick-Bethel UCSC [email protected] Bob Gershman NASA JPL [email protected] Florida Institute for Human and Tom Jones [email protected] Machine Cognition Damon Landau NASA JPL [email protected] Chris Lewicki Arkyd Astronautics [email protected] John Lewis University of Arizona [email protected] Pedro Llanos USC [email protected] Mark Lupisella NASA GSFC [email protected] Dan Mazanek NASA LaRC [email protected] Prakhar Mehrotra Caltech [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Ice in the Martian Regolith
    16. ICE IN THE MARTIAN REGOLITH S. W. SQUYRES Cornell University S. M. CLIFFORD Lunar and Planetary Institute R. O. KUZMIN V.I. Vernadsky Institute J. R. ZIMBELMAN Smithsonian Institution and F. M. COSTARD Laboratoire de Geographie Physique Geologic evidence indicates that the Martian surface has been substantially modified by the action of liquid water, and that much of that water still resides beneath the surface as ground ice. The pore volume of the Martian regolith is substantial, and a large amount of this volume can be expected to be at tem- peratures cold enough for ice to be present. Calculations of the thermodynamic stability of ground ice on Mars suggest that it can exist very close to the surface at high latitudes, but can persist only at substantial depths near the equator. Impact craters with distinctive lobale ejecta deposits are common on Mars. These rampart craters apparently owe their morphology to fluidhation of sub- surface materials, perhaps by the melting of ground ice, during impact events. If this interpretation is correct, then the size frequency distribution of rampart 523 524 S. W. SQUYRES ET AL. craters is broadly consistent with the depth distribution of ice inferred from stability calculations. A variety of observed Martian landforms can be attrib- uted to creep of the Martian regolith abetted by deformation of ground ice. Global mapping of creep features also supports the idea that ice is present in near-surface materials at latitudes higher than ± 30°, and suggests that ice is largely absent from such materials at lower latitudes. Other morphologic fea- tures on Mars that may result from the present or former existence of ground ice include chaotic terrain, thermokarst and patterned ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Residence Times of Regolith on the Lunar Maria
    52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 1652.pdf 1 1 SURFACE RESIDENCE TIMES OF REGOLITH ON THE LUNAR MARIA. P. O’Brien and S. Byrne ,​ 1 ​ ​ L​ unar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 ([email protected]) Introduction: The surfaces of airless bodies like Our model simulates mare-like surfaces evolving the Moon undergo microscopic chemical changes as a over time from flat surfaces to cratered landscapes. result of energetic processes operating in the space Impacts are randomly sampled from the present-day environment, collectively known as space weathering lunar impact flux [5] and the global population of [1,2]. Despite returned lunar soil samples, the rate of secondary craters produced by these impacts is space weathering on the Moon is not well understood. generated following empirical observations of The amount of chemical weathering incurred in the secondary production on airless bodies [6,7]. At each lunar regolith depends critically on the rate at which timestep, we compute the downslope flux of regolith regolith is excavated, transported, and buried by by solving the 2D diffusion equation [8]. The rate of macroscopic impact processes. These physical diffusion is calibrated by matching the average processes control how long regolith spends on the roughness of the model landscapes to the observed surface where it is exposed to the space environment. roughness of the lunar maria, as measured by the We have developed a Monte Carlo model that median bidirectional slope at 4 m baselines [9]. Figure simulates the evolution of lunar maria landscapes 1 shows how model surfaces subject to these physical under topographic relief-creation from impact cratering processes become rougher and more heavily-cratered and relief-reduction from micrometeorite gardening over time.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Spacecraft Nears Encounter with Dwarf Planet Ceres 4 March 2015
    NASA spacecraft nears encounter with dwarf planet Ceres 4 March 2015 of 590 miles (950 kilometers), makes a full rotation every nine hours, and NASA is hoping for a wealth of data once the spacecraft's orbit begins. "Dawn is about to make history," said Robert Mase, project manager for the Dawn mission at NASA JPL in Pasadena, California. "Our team is ready and eager to find out what Ceres has in store for us." Experts will be looking for signs of geologic activity, via changes in these bright spots, or other features on Ceres' surface over time. The latest images came from Dawn when it was 25,000 miles (40,000 kilometers) away on February 25. This image was taken by NASA's Dawn spacecraft of dwarf planet Ceres on February 19, 2015 from a The celestial body was first spotted by Sicilian distance of nearly 29,000 miles astronomer Father Giuseppe Piazzi in 1801. "Ceres was initially classified as a planet and later called an asteroid. In recognition of its planet-like A NASA spacecraft called Dawn is about to qualities, Ceres was designated a dwarf planet in become the first mission to orbit a dwarf planet 2006, along with Pluto and Eris," NASA said. when it slips into orbit Friday around Ceres, the most massive body in the asteroid belt. Ceres is named after the Roman goddess of agriculture and harvests. The mission aims to shed light on the origins of the solar system 4.5 billion years ago, from its "rough The spacecraft on its way to circle it was launched and tumble environment of the main asteroid belt in September 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil, Regolith, and Weathered Rock Theoretical Concepts and Evolution
    Geoderma 368 (2020) 114261 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geoderma journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geoderma Soil, regolith, and weathered rock: Theoretical concepts and evolution in T old-growth temperate forests, Central Europe ⁎ Pavel Šamonila,b, , Jonathan Phillipsa,c, Pavel Daněka,d, Vojtěch Beneše, Lukasz Pawlika,f a Department of Forest Ecology, The Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic b Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic c Earth Surface Systems Program, Department of Geography, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA d Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 267/2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic e G IMPULS Praha Ltd., Czech Republic f University of Silesia, Faculty of Earth Sciences, ul. Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handling Editor: Alberto Agnelli Evolution of weathering profiles (WP) is critical for landscape evolution, soil formation, biogeochemical cycles, Keywords: and critical zone hydrology and ecology. Weathering profiles often include soil or solum (O, A, E, and Bhor- Soil evolution izons), non-soil regolith (including soil C horizons, saprolite), and weathered rock. Development of these is a Saprolite function of weathering at the bedrock weathering front to produce weathered rock; weathering at the boundary Weathering front between regolith and weathered rock to produce saprolite, and pedogenesis to convert non-soil regolith to soil. Hillslope processes Relative thicknesses of soil (Ts), non-soil regolith (Tr) and weathered rock (Tw) can provide insight into the Geophysical research relative rates of these processes at some sites with negligible surface removals or deposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonization of Venus
    Conference on Human Space Exploration, Space Technology & Applications International Forum, Albuquerque, NM, Feb. 2-6 2003. Colonization of Venus Geoffrey A. Landis NASA Glenn Research Center mailstop 302-1 21000 Brook Park Road Cleveland, OH 44135 21 6-433-2238 geofrq.landis@grc. nasa.gov ABSTRACT Although the surface of Venus is an extremely hostile environment, at about 50 kilometers above the surface the atmosphere of Venus is the most earthlike environment (other than Earth itself) in the solar system. It is proposed here that in the near term, human exploration of Venus could take place from aerostat vehicles in the atmosphere, and that in the long term, permanent settlements could be made in the form of cities designed to float at about fifty kilometer altitude in the atmosphere of Venus. INTRODUCTION Since Gerard K. O'Neill [1974, 19761 first did a detailed analysis of the concept of a self-sufficient space colony, the concept of a human colony that is not located on the surface of a planet has been a major topic of discussion in the space community. There are many possible economic justifications for such a space colony, including use as living quarters for a factory producing industrial products (such as solar power satellites) in space, and as a staging point for asteroid mining [Lewis 19971. However, while the concept has focussed on the idea of colonies in free space, there are several disadvantages in colonizing empty space. Space is short on most of the raw materials needed to sustain human life, and most particularly in the elements oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Glassy Magnets from Simulated Composition of Moon/Mars Regolith for Exploration Applications
    Developing Glassy Magnets from simulated Composition of Moon/Mars Regolith for Exploration Applications C. S. Ray1, N. Ramachandran2 and J. Rogers1 1Exploration Science and Technology Division 2BAE SYSTEMS Analytical Solutions Inc. Science and Technology Directorate NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL 35812 ABSTRACT The feasibility of preparing glasses and developing glass-ceramic materials that display magnetic characteristics using the simulated compositions of Lunar and Martian regoliths have been demonstrated. The reported results are preliminary at this time, and are part of a larger on- going research activity at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) with an overall goal aimed at (i) developing glass, ceramic and glass-ceramic type materials from the Lunar and Martian soil compositions in their respective simulated atmospheric conditions, (ii) exploring the potential application areas of these materials through extensive materials characterization, and (iii) further improving the related materials properties through a variation of the processing methods. This research activity is an important component of NASA’s current space exploration program, which encourages feasibility studies for materials development using in situ resources on planetary bodies to meet the technological and scientific needs of future human habitats on these extra terrestrial outposts. This paper presents an overview of this on-going work at NASA (MSFC) and reports on a few selected results obtained to date. INTRODUCTION The long-term space exploration goals of NASA include developing human habitats and conducting scientific investigations on planetary bodies, especially on Moon and Mars. In-situ resource processing and utilization on planetary bodies, therefore, is recognized as an important and integral part of NASA’s space exploration program [1], since it can minimize (or eliminate) the level of up-mass (transporting materials from earth to the planetary bodies) and, hence, can substantially reduce the overall work-load and costs of exploration missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Material on Ceres: Insights from Visible and Infrared Space Observations
    life Article Organic Material on Ceres: Insights from Visible and Infrared Space Observations Andrea Raponi 1,* , Maria Cristina De Sanctis 1, Filippo Giacomo Carrozzo 1 , Mauro Ciarniello 1 , Batiste Rousseau 1 , Marco Ferrari 1 , Eleonora Ammannito 2, Simone De Angelis 1, Vassilissa Vinogradoff 3, Julie C. Castillo-Rogez 4, Federico Tosi 1, Alessandro Frigeri 1 , Michelangelo Formisano 1 , Francesca Zambon 1, Carol A. Raymond 4 and Christopher T. Russell 5 1 Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica–Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, 00133 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (M.C.D.S.); fi[email protected] (F.G.C.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (B.R.); [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (S.D.A.); [email protected] (F.T.); [email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (F.Z.) 2 Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, 00133 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 3 Physique des Interactions Ioniques et Moléculaires, PIIM, Université d’Aix-Marseille, 13013 Marseille, France; [email protected] 4 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA; [email protected] (J.C.C.-R.); [email protected] (C.A.R.) 5 Earth Planetary and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The NASA/Dawn mission has acquired unprecedented measurements of the surface of the dwarf planet Ceres, the composition of which is a mixture of ultra-carbonaceous material, phyllosilicates, carbonates, organics, Fe-oxides, and volatiles as determined by remote sensing instruments including the VIR imaging spectrometer.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Dwarf Planet Ceres and Meteorite Analogs H
    80th Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society 2017 (LPI Contrib. No. 1987) 6003.pdf GEOLOGY OF DWARF PLANET CERES AND METEORITE ANALOGS H. Y. McSween1, C. A. Raymond2, T. H. Prettyman3, M. C. De Sanctis4, J. C. Castillo-Rogez2, C. T. Russell5, and the Dawn Science Team, 1Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1410, [email protected]. 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109, 3Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 85719, 4Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Rome, Italy, 5Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Introduction: Although no known meteorites are thought to derive from Ceres, CI/CM carbonaceous chondrites are potential analogs for its composition and alteration [1]. These meteorites have primitive chemical compositions, despite having suffered aqueous alteration; this paradox can be explained by closed-system alteration in small parent bodies where low permeability limited fluid transport. In contrast, Ceres, the largest asteroidal body, has experi- enced extensive alteration accompanied by differentiation of silicates and volatiles [2]. The ancient surface of Ceres has a crater density similar to Vesta, but basins >400 km are absent or relaxed. The Dawn spacecraft’s GRaND instrument revealed near-surface ice concentrations in the regolith at high latitudes [3], exposed on the surface locally in a few craters [4]. The VIR instrument indicates a dark surface interpreted as a lag deposit from ice sublimation and composed of ammoniated clays, serpentine, MgCa-carbonates, and a darkening component [5]. Elemental analysis of Fe and H abundances in the non-icy regolith are lower and higher, respective- ly, than for CI/CM chondrites [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Planetary Mission Concept Study: Assessing Dwarf Planet Ceres’ Past and Present Habitability Potential
    NASA PLANETARY MISSION CONCEPT STUDY: ASSESSING DWARF PLANET CERES’ PAST AND PRESENT HABITABILITY POTENTIAL. J. C. Castillo-Rogez1, M. T. Bland2, D. L. Buczkowski3, A. R. Hen- drix4, K. E. Miller5, T. H. Prettyman4, L.C. Quick6, J. E. C. Scully1, Y. Sekine7, M. M. Sori8,9, T. Titus2, D. A. Wil- liams10, H. Yano11, M. Zolensky12, C. A. Raymond1, J. Brophy1, W. Frazier1, G. Lantoine1, B. G. Lee1, M. S. Kelley13, 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. 2United States Geological Sur- vey, Flagstaff, AZ. 3John Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD. 4Planetary Science Institute. 5Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX. 6NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD. 7Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan. 8Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Ari- zona, Tucson, AZ. 9Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. 10School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ. 11Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Kana- gawa, Japan. 12Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX. 13NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC. Email: [email protected]. Introduction: The Dawn mission revolutionized ical evolution. While the latter goal does not directly re- our understanding of Ceres during the same decade that late to ROW, it addresses the place of Ceres in the early has also witnessed the rise of ocean worlds as a research solar system and its potential connection to other large and exploration focus. We will report progress on the dwarf planets. Planetary Mission Concept Study (PMCS) on the future Future exploration of Ceres would reveal the de- exploration of Ceres under the New Frontiers or Flag- gree to which liquid water and other environmental fac- ship program that was selected for NASA funding in tors may have combined to make this dwarf planet a October 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Made in Space, We Propose an Entirely New Concept
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “Those who control the spice control the universe.” – Frank Herbert, Dune Many interesting ideas have been conceived for building space-based infrastructure in cislunar space. From O’Neill’s space colonies, to solar power satellite farms, and even prospecting retrieved near earth asteroids. In all the scenarios, one thing remained fixed - the need for space resources at the outpost. To satisfy this need, O’Neill suggested an electromagnetic railgun to deliver resources from the lunar surface, while NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission called for a solar electric tug to deliver asteroid materials from interplanetary space. At Made In Space, we propose an entirely new concept. One which is scalable, cost effective, and ensures that the abundant material wealth of the inner solar system becomes readily available to humankind in a nearly automated fashion. We propose the RAMA architecture, which turns asteroids into self-contained spacecraft capable of moving themselves back to cislunar space. The RAMA architecture is just as capable of transporting conventional sized asteroids on the 10m length scale as transporting asteroids 100m or larger, making it the most versatile asteroid retrieval architecture in terms of retrieved-mass capability. ii This report describes the results of the Phase I study funded by the NASA NIAC program for Made In Space to establish the concept feasibility of using space manufacturing to convert asteroids into autonomous, mechanical spacecraft. Project RAMA, Reconstituting Asteroids into Mechanical Automata, is designed to leverage the future advances of additive manufacturing (AM), in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) and in-situ manufacturing (ISM) to realize enormous efficiencies in repeated asteroid redirect missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Regolith Simulant Jsc Mars-1
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXIX 1690.pdf MARTIAN REGOLITH SIMULANT JSC MARS-1. Carlton C. Allen1, Richard V. Morris2, Karen M. Jager3, D. C. Golden1, David J. Lindstrom2, Marilyn M. Lindstrom2 and John P. Lockwood4, 1Lockheed Martin, Houston, TX 77258 [email protected] 2NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 3Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711, 4Geohazards Consultants International, Volcano, HI 96785. JSC Mars-1 is a Martian regolith simulant Electron microprobe analysis indicates that specifically developed to support scientific research, plagioclase in the simulant is anorthite (An73Ab21Or6). engineering studies and education. The simulant is The olivine composition is Fa65Fo35. Pyroxenes lie in the <1 mm fraction of weathered volcanic ash from the augite field (En51Wo32Fs17). The Ti-magnetite Pu’u Nene, a cinder cone on the Island of Hawaii. contains 15-22 wt% TiO2. Weathered ash from Pu’u Nene has been repeatedly Iron Mössbauer spectroscopy demonstrates the cited as a close spectral analog to the bright regions of presence of magnetite and olivine in the simulant, as Mars [1-4]. We chose Pu’u Nene ash based on its well as traces of hematite and pyroxene and/or glass. spectral similarity to Martian material, extensive The majority of iron (64%) is present as nanophase previous characterization and availability in quantity. ferric oxide (np-Ox) particles. Characterization: JSC Mars-1 was characterized The mineralogy in the bright regions of Mars is by a variety of techniques, and the results compared to largely unknown, but is constrained by spectral data our current knowledge of the regolith of Mars.
    [Show full text]