DOCSLIB.ORG

Dept. of Public Administration University of Alaska Anchorage Comprehensive Core Exam – August 22, 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dept. of Public Administration University of Alaska Anchorage Comprehensive Core Exam – August 22, 2008 Some wise sage said that in order to make an omelet you have to break some eggs. The main question facing those making the decision about the Knik Arm Crossing is whether the omelet is worth the eggs that are broken. Prepare a Knik Arm Bridge briefing paper for local public policymakers that answers the following (note: questions are weighted equally): 1. Costs/ benefits: What are the costs and benefits of the Bridge from the perspective of the Municipality of Anchorage and from the Matsu Borough? 2. Short and long term issues: In light of the increased cost of fuel and reduction of federal spending what are the three major short and long term issues that local policy makers might choose to examine regarding the continuation of support for the Bridge. Why is each of these issues important? 3. Funding strategy: Why might the decision to build the bridge be supported by a private investment firm but not by the Anchorage Municipality and the State? Why might the Mat‐Su Borough differ in its support from the Anchorage Municipality and the State? 4. Political Impact What eggs are Municipal/Borough officials (Mayor, Assembly members) most worried about? (Be specific)? KTUU.com | Alaska's news and information source | Begich pulls suppor... http://www.ktuu.com/global/story.asp?s=6364821&ClientType=Printable <<Back Begich pulls support of bridge by Mike Ross Thursday, April 12, 2007 ANCHORAGE, Alaska -- Mayor Mark Begich is pulling his support for the proposed Knik Arm Bridge because of a last-minute change in the plan. Begich is upset because a transportation planning committee is going against the wishes of the Anchorage Assembly and made a decision today he said will dump too much traffic downtown. Begich was the only "no" vote when the Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions group voted this afternoon to include the Knik Arm Bridge in its long-range plan. The Assembly voted recently to support the bridge, but only if it's tied in to the Seward Highway-to-Glenn Highway project by the year 2017. But AMATS went against that recommendation today - it said the tie-in should only be built, quote "if needed" Begich said that means the bridge traffic will probably get dumped into the A and C Street corridor downtown. "It makes sense to put it on Gamble-Ingra, they'll tell you 'well, that's in the plan, because we have it in there as needed.' That's the most wishy-washy language I've ever seen," Begich said. Gordon Keith, ATMAS chairman, said the group still doesn't know how busy the bridge will be. "We don't know what the traffic count is gonna come across, the number of tolls is gonna come across the bridge, if the projected tolls don't materialize, there's no need to have the connection to Ingra-Gamble," Bridge opponents were livid about the AMATS decision. "The only person at this table who was protecting the interests of the citizens of Anchorage was Mark Begich, every single other person at this table was protecting the profits of venture capitalists who want to build a bridge across the water," said Suzanne Dipietro, Government Hill Community Council. Assemblyman and ATMAS member Dan Sullivan didn't see it that way. "I don't think we did anything other than probably what was prudent today, in making sure that nobody had to commit funds to a portion of the project that may not be necessary," Sullivan said. There are still lingering doubts about whether the bridge is even economically feasible. Rep. Les Gara sent AMATS a letter expressing his concerns about the bridge's cost. "This is very odd, because this is one of the biggest state projects on the horizon, and people are pushing for us to approve it before we find out what it will cost," said Gara, D-Anchorage. Marianne Pease with the Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority said the plan has been thought out. "I can assure you that the consortiums that have sent forward their proposals are the sharpest financial minds in the industry," Pease said. 1 of 2 KTUU.com | Alaska's news and information source | Begich pulls suppor... http://www.ktuu.com/global/story.asp?s=6364821&ClientType=Printable Despite the mayor's concerns, AMATS has given a green light to the Knik Arm Bridge. Two private investor groups have made proposals to build the bridge. The Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority still needs final approval from the Federal Highway Administration before construction can begin. E-mail Mike Ross at [email protected] All content © Copyright 2000 - 2008 WorldNow and KTUU. All Rights Reserved. For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 2 of 2 adn.com | Knik Arm bridge focus of program http://www.adn.com/knik/v-printer/story/150357.html Knik Arm bridge focus of program ALASKA DIGEST (06/16/07 04:28:00) ANCHORAGE -- A civil engineer with Environmental Defense, a Washington D.C.-based nonprofit organization, will be in Anchorage next week to discuss the proposed Knik Arm bridge and the public-private partnership being considered as a way to finance and build it. Michael Replogle's appearance is sponsored by three community councils, the Alaska Center for the Environment, the Alaska Public Interest Research Group, the Alaska Conservation Alliance, Alaska Transportation Priorities Project and Friends of Mat-Su. Replogle will speak from 7 to 9 p.m. Tuesday in Room 101 of Rasmuson Hall at the University of Alaska Anchorage. In written comments submitted earlier to the state-city transportation planning committee that oversees road projects, Replogle was critical of the bridge proposal. He said it would have "profound adverse impacts" on the environment, land use and the rest of the transportation system in the Anchorage area. The Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority, an organization created by former Gov. Frank Murkowski and the Alaska Legislature to promote the crossing, has invited proposals from two international consortiums that have expressed interest in the project. It still must complete an environmental review process and get a go-ahead from the Federal Highway Administration before beginning to apply for permits. -- Anchorage Daily News Copyright © Thu May 01 2008 14:30:44 GMT-0800 (Alaskan Daylight Time)1900 The Anchorage Daily News (www.adn.com) 1 of 1 December 7, 2007 The Honorable George Wuerch, Chairman Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority 550 West 7th Avenue, Suite 1850 Anchorage, AK 99501 Dear Mayor Wuerch: In 2003, the legislature passed SB 213 forming the Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority (KABATA). The legislature gave KABATA the challenging task of connecting the Municipality of Anchorage with a bridge across the Knik Arm to the Mat-Su Borough. KABATA has legislative authority via AS 19.75.111 to develop the project using a Public-Private Partnership (P3) approach. The P3 approach provides an opportunity for KABATA to build and operate the project with private financing backed by user fees. It is reported that KABATA’s project is making progress, and is nearing the point where the Federal Highway Administration will issue its Final Environmental Impact Statement and then its Record of Decision. As the project moves forward, I anticipate close coordination and outreach between KABATA and my administration, including the Alaska Department of Law and Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. Our joint cooperation and mutual project review will ensure the project moves forward in a timely manner if the project is deemed economical, and I look forward to working with you in the year ahead. Sincerely, Sarah Palin Governor Governor Sarah Palin 17 Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority adn.com | Knik bridge project marks a milestone http://www.adn.com/knik/v-printer/story/288600.html Knik bridge project marks a milestone PERMIT: Agency OKs final environmental impact statement. By KYLE HOPKINS [email protected] (01/20/08 03:44:36) The long-hoped for, much-ridiculed Knik Arm bridge project is quietly moving forward, as supporters recently cleared a permitting hurdle and hired three law firms to lobby for them in Washington, D.C. Though it took several months longer than expected, the Federal Highway Administration signed a final environmental impact statement for the project in December. So what? So without it, construction on the bridge couldn't begin, said Highway Administration spokesman Doug Hecox. "It's a very big milestone. ... it brings the actual date of construction a little bit closer," he said. The document fills four folders the size of jumbo phone books and selects a specific route the bridge would take from a mostly undeveloped area around Point MacKenzie across the Arm into Anchorage through Government Hill. The Highway Administration still must take one more step in formally approving the plan, which could take 30 days or longer as the administration considers things like what the project would mean for certain historic property in Government Hill, Hecox said. "We're at the fine-tuning part of the project." Among the next tasks for bridge backers: getting investors to propose how they would design, build, operate, finance and maintain the bridge. WORLDWIDE INVESTORS Alaskans have talked about building a bridge across Cook Inlet, from Anchorage to the Mat-Su Borough, for decades. In 2003, then-Gov. Frank Murkowski and the Legislature created the Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority to make it happen. For more than two years, the Toll Authority has estimated the bridge would cost about $600 million.
Recommended publications

  • Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear

    ï . •,";,£ CASL M T. ^oÛNTAE À SUL'S, REVITA 1ENT, HASSLE- NT_ MAIN STR " \CCOUNTA ;, INNOVAT MLUE, CASL : REVITA JOVATh IE, CASL )UNTAE CO M M XIMEN1 VlTA • Ml ^re aW c^Pti ( °rds *cc Po 0 ^rof°>lish lu*t* >nk Lan <^l^ gua a ul Vic r ntz °ko Ono." - Somehow, W( c< Words are enorm i Jheer pleasure of CJ ftj* * - ! love laag^ liant about Words." gM °rder- Franl< Luntz * bril- 'Frank Luntz understands the power of words to move public Opinion and communicate big ideas. Any Democrat who writes off his analysis and decades of experience just because he works for the other side is making a big mistake. His les sons don't have a party label. The only question is, where s our Frank Luntz^^^^^^^™ îy are some people so much better than others at talking their way into a job or nit of trouble? What makes some advertising jingles cut through the clutter of our crowded memories? What's behind winning campaign slogans and career-ending political blunders? Why do some speeches resonate and endure while others are forgotten moments after they are given? The answers lie in the way words are used to influence and motivate, the way they connect thought and emotion. And no person knows more about the intersection of words and deeds than language architect and public-opinion guru Dr. Frank Luntz. In Words That Work, Dr. Luntz not only raises the curtain on the craft of effective language, but also offers priceless insight on how to find and use the right words to get what you want out of life.
  • Capital Project Summary Department of Transportation and Public Facilities FY2007 Governor Amended Reference No: 41919 4/28/06 2:59:44 PM Page: 1

    Capital Project Summary Department of Transportation and Public Facilities FY2007 Governor Amended Reference No: 41919 4/28/06 2:59:44 PM Page: 1

    Gravina Island Bridge FY2007 Request: $91,000,000 Reference No: 41919 AP/AL: Allocation Project Type: Construction Category: Transportation Location: Ketchikan Contact: John MacKinnon House District: Ketchikan Contact Phone: (907)465-6973 Estimated Project Dates: 07/01/2006 - 06/03/2011 Appropriation: Congressional Earmarks Brief Summary and Statement of Need: Improve surface access between Ketchikan and Gravina Island, including the Ketchikan International Airport. This project contributes to the Department's Mission by reducing injuries, fatalities and property damage, by improving the mobility of people and goods and by increasing private investment. Funding: FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Total Fed Rcpts $91,000,000 $91,000,000 Total: $91,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $91,000,000 State Match Required One-Time Project Phased - new Phased - underway On-Going 9% = Minimum State Match % Required Amendment Mental Health Bill Operating & Maintenance Costs: Amount Staff Project Development: 0 0 Ongoing Operating: 0 0 One-Time Startup: 0 Totals: 0 0 Additional Information / Prior Funding History: FY2005 - $215,000,000; FY2002 - $20,000,000; FY1999 - $20,200,000. Project Description/Justification: The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to start the final step toward constructing access from Revillagigedo (Revilla) Island to Gravina Island in Southeast Alaska. It is intended to provide a roadway link from Ketchikan to Gravina Island across the Ralph M. Bartholomew Veterans' Memorial Bridges over two channels of Tongass Narrows. Pennock Island in the Narrows is also now accessible. The proposed Gravina Island Highway begins as the Airport Access Road at the Ketchikan International Airport parking lot on Gravina Island and extends south around the end of the present day runway and up the hill to an intersection with Gravina Island Highway and Lewis Reef Road.
  • A WHITE PAPER EXPLAINING the Need for The

    A WHITE PAPER EXPLAINING the Need for The

    A WHITE PAPER EXPLAINING The Need for the 2011 Alaska Legislature to Examine the Financial Plans of the Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority By Jamie Kenworthy, [email protected] Bob French, [email protected] February 2011 SUMMARY The Knik Arm Bridge cannot be built unless: (1) the State guarantees repayment of the debt necessary to finance the bridge, (2) that guarantee would need to make up the annual shortfall between toll revenues and expenses, including debt repayment, and (3) the State agrees to spend on the bridge a substantial portion of all federal money available for transportation statewide. The legislature must exercise some oversight on the project because Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority (KABATA) intends to issue an RFP for the $700 million to $1 billion dollar first phase of this project. If KABATA proceeds as planned, the State will be exposed to considerable financial liability and transportation projects statewide will be jeopardized. Using federal and state numbers, the deficits for the first 10 years of Bridge operations will significantly exceed the approximately $25 million per year that Anchorage or Mat Su have averaged over the last decade on total state and federal spending on transportation. I. Background The Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority, a quasi-independent state agency with a Governor-appointed Board of Directors, has a sole purpose to construct and operate the proposed Knik Arm Bridge. The original federal funds with their small state match, total $114 million. Half of those funds or approximately $61 million remains unspent. Since the federal money was de-earmarked, the State of Alaska can decide how it spends the remaining funds, if those funds do not go to KABATA.
  • RESOURCES NATURAL Divisto~OF Geologicala CEOPHYSKAL SURVEYS RESOURCES

    RESOURCES NATURAL Divisto~OF Geologicala CEOPHYSKAL SURVEYS RESOURCES

    Published by STATEOF ALASKA Abska Department of DEPARTMENTOF NATURAL RESOURCES NATURAL Divisto~OF GEOLOGICALa CEOPHYSKAL SURVEYS RESOURCES 1996 /rice: $5.00 - -- .-. -- -- - -A-- - - - - - - - Information Circular 11 PUBLICATIONSCATALOG OF THE DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL& GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Fourth Edition Published by STATEOF ALASKA DEPARTMENTOF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISIONOF GEOLOGICAL& GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS DEDICATION All of us who have had the pleasure of working with Roberta (Bobbi) Mann are indeed fortunate. Without exception, we have found her to be industrious, dedicated, efficient, and of unflagging good humor. Fully half of the publications listed in this brochure couldn't have been produced without her. STATE OF ALASKA For over 20 years, Bobbi has routinely typed (and corrected) Tony Knowles, Governor all the sesquipedalian buzzwords in the geologist's lexicon, from allochthonous to zeugogeosyncline (with stops at DEPARTMENT OF hypabyssal and poikiloblastic)-without having even the NATURAL RESOURCES remotest idea of their meaning. John T. Shively, Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & Such zeal. Bobbi has spent most of her adult life typing error- GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS free documents about an arcane subject she knows virtually Milton A. Wiltse, Acting Director and nothing about. If, at the end of her career, someone would ask State Geologist her what she spent the last few decades typing, I'm positive Bobbi would shyly smile and say, "I'm not really sure. Some- Publication of DCCS reports is required by thing about rocks." Alaska Statute 41, "to determine the poten- tial ofAlaskan land for production of metals, minerals, fuels, and geothermal resources; Now THAT'S dedication. the location and supplies of groundwater and construction materials; the potential geologic hazardsto buildings, roads, bridges, and other installations and structures; and .
  • The Folly of Wisdom Preacher: Rev

    The Folly of Wisdom Preacher: Rev

    The Folly of Wisdom Preacher: Rev. Jill Olds Date: February 23, 2014 20:29 Let us pray. Holy One, guide our hearts towards compassion, and guide our minds towards understanding. And may the words of my mouth and the meditations of all of our hearts and minds together be acceptable in Your sight, O Lord our Rock and our Redeemer, through Jesus Christ we pray, Amen. In September of 2008, on a tiny strip of land in Alaska known as Gravina Island, workers put down their shovels, and parked their steamrollers for the last time. The road was completed. And this was not just any road. The road now known as Gravina Island Highway was nearly thirty years in the making—research began in the 1980s, the intention being to connect the nearby town of Ketchikan with the airport located on the island, about a mile and a half away, thus eliminating the need for a ferry service that carried some 350,000 people every year. The completed road—3.2 miles long—started at the airport and was destined to be connected to the Gravina Island Bridge. Except, herein lies the rub. If you go visit the road today, you’ll start at the airport and, 3.2 miles later, you’ll wind up in a dead-end cul-de-sac. The bridge, which was to cost a whopping $398 million, was never approved of by Congress, and so the project has been indefinitely shelved. But here’s the real kicker—the powers-that-be in Alaska knew before the road was begun that the bridge would never be constructed.
  • Cook Inlet Beluga Whales: 3,000 Square Miles of Critical Habitat Proposed

    Cook Inlet Beluga Whales: 3,000 Square Miles of Critical Habitat Proposed

    http://ecoworldly.com/2009/12/02/cook-inlet-beluga-whales-3000-square-miles-of-critical-habitat-proposed/ Cook Inlet Beluga Whales: 3,000 Square Miles of Critical Habitat Proposed Written by Rhishja Larson Published on December 2nd, 2009 The National Marine Fisheries Service has proposed to designate over 3,000 square miles of critical habitat for endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales. Good news for critically endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales: The Center for Biological Diversity announced today that over 3,000 square miles of critical habitat has been proposed by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). » See also: Yemen No Longer Major Destination for Illegal Rhino Horn » Get EcoWorldly by RSS or sign up by email. Unfortunately, the Cook Inlet beluga whale population has plummeted in recent years. An October 2009 population survey found only 321 whales. Even in the 1980’s, there were reportedly as few as 1,300 of this imperiled species. Cook Inlet beluga whale numbers were slashed by overhunting, and now the species is failing to recover, most likely as a result of increasing industrial activities in Alaska. Cook Inlet is the most populated and fastest-growing watershed in Alaska, and is subject to significant proposed offshore oil and gas development in beluga habitat. Additionally, the proposed Knik Arm Bridge, a billion-dollar boondoggle, will directly affect some of the whale’s most important habitat. Port expansion and a proposed giant coal mine and coal export dock would also destroy key beluga habitat. Senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity Brendan Cummings noted via today’s release that although the proposal is a welcome step in the right direction for the Cook Inlet belugas, industrial development needs to be curtailed.
  • Transportation Infrastructure Needs in Alaska

    Transportation Infrastructure Needs in Alaska

    S. HRG. 108–349 TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS IN ALASKA FIELD HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON OVERSIGHT OF THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMS IN THE STATE OF ALASKA APRIL 14, 2003—PALMER, ALASKA Printed for the use of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 92–373 PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma, Chairman JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia JAMES M. JEFFORDS, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri MAX BAUCUS, Montana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio HARRY REID, Nevada MICHAEL D. CRAPO, Idaho BOB GRAHAM, Florida LINCOLN CHAFEE, Rhode Island JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut JOHN CORNYN, Texaa BARBARA BOXER, California LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska RON WYDEN, Oregon CRAIG THOMAS, Wyoming THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York ANDREW WHEELER, Majority Staff Director KEN CONNOLLY, Minority Staff Director (II) CONTENTS Page APRIL 14, 2003—PALMER, ALASKA OPENING STATEMENTS Murkowski, Hon. Lisa, U.S. Senator from the State of Alaska ........................... 1 WITNESSES Anderson, Hon. Tim, Mayor, Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska ................... 20 Angasan, Trefon, Co-Chair, Board of Directors, Alaska Federation of Natives . 10 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 38 Barton, Michael, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities .................................................................................................... 6 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 35 Boyles, Hon.
  • $315 Million Bridge to Nowhere Rep. Don Young (R-AK) Is Trying to Sell

    $315 Million Bridge to Nowhere Rep. Don Young (R-AK) Is Trying to Sell

    $315 Million Bridge to Nowhere February 9, 2005 Rep. Don Young (R-AK) is trying to sell America’s taxpayers a $315 million “bridge to nowhere” in rural Alaska. As Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, he is in a very good position to get his way. But Rep. Young should be stopped from using his political clout to force federal taxpayers to pay for a bridge that is ridiculous in its scope, unjustified on its merits, and far too expensive for taxpayers to swallow at a time of record federal deficits. If Rep. Young succeeds, tiny Ketchikan, Alaska, a town with less than 8,000 residents (about 13,000 if the entire county is included) will receive hundreds of millions of federal dollars to build a bridge to Gravina Island (population: 50). This bridge will be nearly as long as the Golden Gate Bridge and taller than the Brooklyn Bridge. The Gravina Bridge would replace a 7-minute ferry ride from Ketchikan to Ketchikan Airport on Gravina Island. Project proponents tell the public that the bridge is a transportation necessity, though the ferry system adequately handles passenger traffic between the islands, including traffic to and from the airport.1 Some herald the project as the savior of Ketchikan because it will open up land on Pennock Island to residential development, despite the fact that Gravina’s population has been shrinking. 1 Alaska Airlines, the only commercial passenger airline that flies to Ketchikan, runs seven daily flight routes in the summer and six in the winter. Two ferries, which run every 15 minutes in the summer and every 30 minutes in the winter, provide transportation to and from the airport.
  • A Political and Economic Analysis of Public Subsidization for Stadium Construction Projects

    A Political and Economic Analysis of Public Subsidization for Stadium Construction Projects

    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2021 Dropping the Ball: A Political and Economic Analysis of Public Subsidization for Stadium Construction Projects Max Fisher Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the American Politics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Political Theory Commons, and the Public Economics Commons Recommended Citation Fisher, Max, "Dropping the Ball: A Political and Economic Analysis of Public Subsidization for Stadium Construction Projects" (2021). CMC Senior Theses. 2756. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2756 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Claremont McKenna College Dropping the Ball: A Political and Economic Analysis of Public Subsidization for Stadium Construction Projects submitted to Professor Shanna Rose and Professor John Pitney by Max Fisher For Senior Thesis Spring 2021 May 3, 2021 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction: p. 3 2. Literature Review: p. 6 3. Theoretical Framework: p. 21 4. Case Study #1 – Las Vegas Raiders: p. 27 5. Case Study #2 – New York Yankees: p. 38 6. Lessons Learned/Discussion: p. 49 7. Conclusion: p. 55 3 Introduction Professional sports are a critical and universally loved part of America’s ethos. Millions of fans from across the country flock every year to sports stadiums, hoping to see their favorite player in action or just to enjoy the ambiance of the ballgame. Every Sunday during fall and winter, 60,000 fans attend prodigious NFL complexes, whereas 20,000 or so fans frequent an MLB stadium for 162-game schedule.
  • Why the Congressional Line Item Vote Can Succeed Where the Presidential Line Item Veto Failed

    Why the Congressional Line Item Vote Can Succeed Where the Presidential Line Item Veto Failed

    Volume 112 Issue 3 Article 9 April 2010 Eliminating Earmarks: Why the Congressional Line Item Vote Can Succeed Where the Presidential Line Item Veto Failed Jason Iuliano Harvard Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Law and Politics Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Jason Iuliano, Eliminating Earmarks: Why the Congressional Line Item Vote Can Succeed Where the Presidential Line Item Veto Failed, 112 W. Va. L. Rev. (2010). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol112/iss3/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Iuliano: Eliminating Earmarks: Why the Congressional Line Item Vote Can Su ELIMINATING EARMARKS: WHY THE CONGRESSIONAL LINE ITEM VOTE CAN SUCCEED WHERE THE PRESIDENTIAL LINE ITEM VETO FAILED Jason Juliano* IN TR O D U CTION ................................................................................................. 948 I. THE CASE AGAINST EARMARKS .......................................................... 952 A. The CongressionalAddiction to Earmarks ............................ 952 B. The Need for CongressionalTransparency ............................ 957 II. LINE ITEM VETO: PAST AND PRESENT ................................................. 958 A. Line Item Veto Act of
  • Lobbying, Rent-Seeking, and the Constitution

    Lobbying, Rent-Seeking, and the Constitution

    HASEN 64 STAN. L. REV. 191 (DO NOT DELETE) 1/14/2012 6:59 PM LOBBYING, RENT-SEEKING, AND THE CONSTITUTION Richard L. Hasen* Politicians across the political spectrum, from Barack Obama to Sarah Pa- lin and Rand Paul, routinely castigate lobbyists for engaging in supposedly cor- rupt activities or having unequal access to elected officials. Since attaining office President Obama has imposed unprecedented new lobbying regulations, and he is not alone: both Congress and state and local legislative bodies have done so in recent years. At the same time, federal courts, relying upon the Supreme Court’s new campaign finance decision in Citizens United v. FEC, have begun striking down lobbying regulations, including important regulations that limit campaign finance activities of lobbyists and impose a waiting period before legislators or legislative staffers may work as lobbyists. Two courts have held such laws could not be sustained on anticorruption grounds, and they are unlikely to be sustained on political equality grounds either. This Article advances an alternative rationale which could support some, though not all, of the recent wave of new lobbying regulations: the state’s interest in promoting national economic welfare. Lobbyists threaten national economic welfare in two ways. First, lobbyists facilitate rent-seeking activities. Rent- seeking occurs when individuals or groups devote resources to capturing gov- ernment transfers, rather than putting them to a productive use, and lobbyists are often the key actors securing such benefits. Second, lobbyists tend to lobby for legislation that is itself an inefficient use of government resources. Part I of this Article provides an overview of the current state of lobbying regulation and lobbying jurisprudence.
  • Gravina Access Tongass Narrows Biop AKR-2018-9806

    Gravina Access Tongass Narrows Biop AKR-2018-9806

    Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion for Construction of the Tongass Narrows Project (Gravina Access) Public Consultation Tracking System (PCTS) Number: AKR-2018-9806 Action Agencies: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF) on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) Affected Species and Determinations: Is Action Likely Is Action Likely Is Action to Adversely To Destroy or Likely To ESA-Listed Species Status Affect Species or Adversely Jeopardize Critical Modify Critical the Species? Habitat? Habitat? Humpback whale (Megaptera Threatened Yes No N/A novaeangliae) Mexico DPS Consultation Conducted By: National Marine Fisheries Service Issued By: ____________________________________ James W. Balsiger, Ph.D. Administrator, Alaska Region Date: February 6, 2019 Ketchikan Tongass Narrows Project PCTS AKR-2018-9806 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 4 Terms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 6 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background .....................................................................................................................