DOCSLIB.ORG

In the High Court of South Africa Limpopo Division, Polokwane

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the High Court of South Africa Limpopo Division, Polokwane Reportable: YES / NO Circulate to Judges: YES / NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES / NO Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES / NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE CASE NO: 2866/2016 In the matter between: MALULEKE TSHUNDZUKA KEVIN Applicant and st NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS 1 Respondent CONTROL PROSECUTOR MAGISTRATE'S COURT POLOKWANE 2nd Respondent MINISTER OF POLICE 3rd Respondent PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER POLICE (LIMPOPO PROVINCE) 4th Respondent NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE 5th Respondent WARRANT OFFICER POOTONA (INVESTIGATING OFFICER) 6th Respondent STATION / BRANCH COMMANDER (POLOKWANE SAPS) 7th Respondent 1 HONOURABLE JUDGE PRESIDENT MAKGOBA EPHRAIM MAMPURU 8th Respondent FREEDOM UNDER LAW 9th Respondent DATE OF HEARING : 08 DECEMBER 2017 DATE OF JUDGMENT : 30 JANUARY 2018 COUNSEL FOR APPLICANT : IN PERSON COUNSEL FOR THE 1ST TO 7TH RESPONDENTS : ADV. W.T MOKHARI SC with ADV. N THOKOANA COUNSEL FOR THE 8TH RESEPONDENT : ADV. G.J DIAMOND JUDGMENT ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL HENDRICKS J Introduction [1] This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) against the judgment / order of this Court in which the point of law raised by the first to eight respondents were upheld with costs. The point in limine raised by the applicant, was dismissed. 2 [2] It was contended by the applicant, an advocate by profession who appeared in person, that leave to appeal is premised on the fact that: (i) there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal in terms of Section 17 (1) (a) (i) of the Superior Court Act, 10 of 2013 (Superior Court Act); and (ii) that although the decision sought to be appealed does not dispose of all the issues in the case, the appeal would lead to a just and prompt resolution of the real issues between the parties as contemplated in section 17 (1) (c) of the Superior Court Act. [3] The facts and reasons for judgment are comprehensively dealt with in the judgment of this Court dated 23 May 2017 and same need not be rehashed in this judgment on leave to appeal. I need however to deal with the pertinent issues raised during argument and submitted in the heads of argument by the respective counsel. [4] The applicant contended that the point in limine raised by the first to eight respondents is not at all dispositive of the matter in that the real issues between the parties have not been resolved. It is a mere technical point of law implying only that the applicant should have sought consent in terms of section 47 (1) of the Superior Court Act, allegedly prior to the institution of these proceedings. 3 [5] Section 47 (1) of the Superior Court Act is clear and unambiguous. No civil proceedings may be instituted against any judge or Judge President except with the consent of the Head of that Court or, in the case of a Head of Court, the Chief Justice. This aspect was extensively dealt with in the judgment of this Court and same need not be repeated herein. [6] The applicant contended that the case law quoted and referred to in the judgment of this Court are distinguishable from the present case because in all the quoted cases the relief was claimed against the judge / judges, whereas in this case no relief is claimed against the Judge President but he is merely cited as an interested party. I am holding a different view. [7] In paragraphs [17] and [18] of the judgment, I dealt with the effect of the citation of the Judge President in these proceedings. That the relief sought will have a bearing on the person of the Judge President, who is cited in his personal capacity, is beyond question. This much was also conceded to by the applicant during address. The case law makes it undoubtedly cleat that once a Judge/Judge President is cited in his/her personal capacity, the provisions of section 47 (1) becomes applicable. [8] The order of this Court reads as follows: 4 “Consequently the following order is made: (i) The point of law raised by the 1st to 8th Respondents is upheld. (ii) The point in limine raised by the Applicant is dismissed. (iii) The Applicant is ordered to pay the costs of this application on a scale as between attorney- and-client. (iv) Such costs to include the costs consequent upon the employment of two counsel (junior and senior), where applicable.” The order does not have the effect of disposing of the review application. It is trite that an appeal lies against the order granted and not against the ratio decidendi. [9] In terms of section 17 (1) of the Superior Court Act, leave to appeal may only be granted where the judge(s) concerned are of the opinion that the appeal could (not might) have a reasonable prospect of success. The test to be applied in applications for leave to appeal, is now higher than what it used to be. I am of the view that there are no reasonable prospects that a court of appeal will arrive at a different decision than what this Court had arrived at. [10] The applicant furthermore submitted that in terms of section 17 (1) (c) of the Superior Court Act, the decision sought to be appealed does not dispose of all the issues in the case. Due to the fact that the merits of the review application were not disposed of, there is merit in the appeal; so it was submitted. 5 [11] This, in my respectful view, is not what was intended by the legislature. This section must be read in full to understand the purpose and intention thereof. Leave to appeal may be granted where the decision sought to be appealed does not dispose of all the issues in the case but the appeal would lead to a just and prompt resolution of the real issues between the parties. This is not applicable to the present case. [12] An appeal in this instance would not resolve the real issues between the parties. The merits of the review application cannot be dealt with on appeal when no pronouncement was made on it by the court of first instance. Therefore, although the decision sought to be appealed does not dispose of all the issues in the case, an appeal in this instance would not lead to a just and prompt resolution of the real issues between the parties. Section 17 (1) (c) is therefore applicable to this matter. [13] To reiterate, section 47 (1) of the Superior Court Act is clear and unambiguous. No civil proceedings by way of summons or notice of motion may be instituted against a judge. This simply means that any form of civil proceedings against a judge is prohibited unless or except where the consent of the Head of Court or Chief Justice, where applicable, is obtained. 6 [14] Counsel on behalf of the eight respondent submitted that to argue that civil proceedings can be instituted against a judge in instances where no relief is sought against the judge but he/she is only cited in so far as the judge may have an interest in the application, would lead to absurdity because the judge may be compelled to participate in the proceedings (whether to resist the relief or not) and the whole purpose of the section, viz, to guard the integrity of the institution of the court as an institution, will be defeated. I fully agree with this contention. [15] I am of the view that there are no reasonable prospects of success on appeal and leave to appeal should therefore be refused. Costs should also follow the result. This case, because of its import for the parties concerned, is meritorious of the employment of two counsel. Costs of two counsel should therefore be awarded, where applicable. Order: [16] Consequently the following order is made: (i) Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) is refused. (ii) The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal. 7 (iii) Such costs to include the costs consequent upon the employment of two counsel (junior and senior), where applicable. ___________________ R D HENDRICKS ACTING JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT, LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE 8 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUPERIOR COURTS ACT 10 of 2013 (Gazette No. 36743, Notice
    (28 February 2014 – to date) SUPERIOR COURTS ACT 10 OF 2013 (Gazette No. 36743, Notice No. 615 dated 12 August 2013. Commencement date: 23 August 2013 [Proc. No. R36, Gazette No. 36774]- with the exception of sections 29, 37 and 45 and Items No. 11 of Schedule 1 and No. 1.1 of Schedule 2) OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Directive: 3/2014 RENAMING OF COURTS IN TERMS OF SECTION 6 OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS ACT NO 10 OF 2013 Government Notice 148 in Government Gazette 37390 dated 28 February 2014. Commencement date: 28 February 2014. By virtue of the powers vested in me in terms of section 8 of the Superior Courts Act, 2013 (Act no 10 of 2013) (the Act) I, Mogoeng Mogoeng, the Chief Justice of the Republic of South Africa, hereby issue the following directive: The Act created a single High Court, with various divisions constituted in terms of section 6 of the Act. In this regard all court processes in the High Court shall be headed in accordance with the Act; and all court processes shall be as headed as follows: (a) "IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA" EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN (b) "IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA" EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BHISHO (c) "IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA" EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA (d) "IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA" EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH (e) "IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA" FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN (f) "IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA" GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Prepared by: Page 2 of 2 (g) "IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA" GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION,
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE of the CHIEF JUSTICE the Office of the Chief Justice Is an Equal Opportunity Employer
    ANNEXURE J OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE The Office of the Chief Justice is an equal opportunity employer. In the filling of vacant posts, the objectives of section 195(1)(i) of the Constitution of South Africa, 1996, the Employment Equity imperatives as defined by the Employment Equity Act, 1998 (Act55) of 1998) and the relevant Human Resources policies of the Department will be taken into consideration and preference will be given to Women and Persons with Disabilities. APPLICATIONS : National Office (Midrand)/ Constitutional Court: Braamfontein: Quoting the relevant reference number, direct your application to: The Director: Human Resources, Office of the Chief Justice, Private Bag X10, Marshalltown, 2107 or hand deliver applications to the Office of the Chief Justice, Human Resource Management, 188, 14th Road, Noordwyk, Midrand, 1685. Eastern Cape/ Port Elizabeth/ Grahamstown/ Bisho/ Umthatha/ East London: Quoting the relevant reference number, direct your application to: The Provincial Head, Office of the Chief Justice, Postal Address: Private Bag x 13012, Cambridge 5206, East London. Applications can also be hand delivered to 59 Western Avenue, Sanlam Park Building, 2nd Floor, Vincent 5242, East London Free State/ Supreme Court of Appeal: Bloemfontein: Quoting the relevant reference number, direct your application to: The Provincial Head, Office of the Chief Justice, Private Bag X20612, Bloemfontein, 9300 or hand deliver applications to the Free State High Court, Corner President Brand and Fontein Street, Bloemfontein, 9301 Gauteng (Provincial Centre) /Land Claims Court (Randburg)/ Johannesburg High Court/ Pretoria High Court/ Labour and Labour Appeals Court: Johannesburg: Quoting the relevant reference number, direct your application to: The Provincial Head, Office of the Chief Justice, Private Bag X7, Johannesburg, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Cape Division
    CHIEF PROSECUTORS AND SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTORS: ALL DIVISIONS NAME TEL. NO. CELL NO. FAX NO. PHYSICAL ADDRESS E-MAIL Eastern Cape Division Cnr Govan Mbeki / De Villiers Street Wilport Kakangu New Law Courts Acting Chief Prosecutor 041 5025302 084 874 7889 041 4847945 [email protected] North End Port Elizabeth PORT ELIZABETH 6000 Carl Fischer The Old Show Grounds, Chief Prosecutors 049 8923258 084 294 8949 049 8910150 [email protected] Oval Road, Queenstown Graaff-Reinet Nombeko Ngxande Acting Chief Prosecutor 040 6086828 084 250 2019 [email protected] East London Urcelle Appolis New Brighton Senior Public Prosecutor Port Elizabeth [email protected] 041 4541122 084 815 4687 Port Elizabeth Room 31 Uitenhage Magistrates Louise Van Wyk Court Senior Public Prosecutor 041 9924211 084 294 8945 041 9220929 164 Durban St, Uitenhage [email protected] Uitenhage Lower Central, Uitenhage, 6229 Grahamstown Magistrates Desmond Amsterdam Court Senior Public Prosecutor 046 6227303 084 703 9482 [email protected] 119a High St, Grahamstown Grahamstown, 6140 New Law Court Clive Killian 041 5025251 Magistrates Court Senior Public Prosecutor 074 768 0381 [email protected] 041 5025327 Govan Mbeki Ave, North Port Elizabeth End, Port Elizabeth, 6001 CHIEF PROSECUTORS AND SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTORS: ALL DIVISIONS NAME TEL. NO. CELL NO. FAX NO. PHYSICAL ADDRESS E-MAIL Port Elizabeth, New Law Dumisani Guza Court, Magistrate’s Court Senior Public Prosecutor 041 5025247 083 992 3367 Govan Mbeki Ave, [email protected] Port
    [Show full text]
  • Pollak: the South African Law of Jurisdiction 3E
    Pollak: The South African Law of Jurisdiction 3e Edition: 3rd Edition Publication date: 2019 Author/Editors: Van Loggerenberg, DE ISBN: 9781485128854 Format: Loose-leaf Number of Pages: Approx. 500 Pages Retail price: R1,025.00 (incl. VAT, excl. delivery.) Website Link: juta.co.za/pdf/25721/ About this Publication: ADD TO ENQUIRY TO ORDER Pollak on Jurisdiction has remained the most trusted, authoritative work on the subject since 1937, often being referred to with approval by South African courts and scholars. The third edition of this work was necessitated by the many changes to the law and the court structure in South Africa since the advent of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. On 23 August 2013 a new dispensation came into operation following the commencement of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 and the Constitution Seventeenth Amendment Act of 2012. Section 166(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, was substituted by s 2(a) of the Constitution Seventeenth Amendment Act of 2012, and a single High Court of South Africa was introduced. Now published in an updatable loose-leaf format, the original service of the third edition attempts to state the law as at 31 December 2018. Revision services updating the new loose-leaf edition will appear biannually. Key Benefits: The first comprehensive discussion of the jurisdiction of the South African superior courts since the advent of the Constitution. Discusses the following in respect of each of the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court of Appeal
    [Show full text]
  • 44750 25-06 Legal B
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10177 Regulasiekoerant June Vol. 672 25 2021 No. 44750 Junie LEGAL NOTICES B WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS SALES IN EXECUTION AND OTHER PUBLIC SALES GEREGTELIKE EN ANDER OPENBARE VERKOPE ISSN 1682-5845 N.B. The Government Printing Works will 44750 not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 584003 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 2 No. 44750 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 25 JUNE 2021 IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS THAT MIGHT OCCUR DUE TO THE SUBMISSION OF INCOMPLETE / INCORRECT / ILLEGIBLE COPY. NO FUTURE QUERIES WILL BE HANDLED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ABOVE. CONTENTS / INHOUD LEGAL NOTICES / WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS SALES IN EXECUTION AND OTHER PUBLIC SALES GEREGTELIKE EN ANDER OPENBARE VERKOPE Sales in execution • Geregtelike verkope ............................................................................................................ 13 Public auctions, sales and tenders Openbare veilings, verkope en tenders ............................................................................................................... 114 This gazette is also available free online at www.gpwonline.co.za STAATSKOERANT, 25 JUNIE 2021 No. 44750 3 HIGH ALERT: SCAM WARNING!!! TO ALL SUPPLIERS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS OF THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS It has come to the attention of the GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS that there are certain unscrupulous companies and individuals who are defrauding unsuspecting businesses disguised as representatives of the Government Printing Works (GPW). The scam involves the fraudsters using the letterhead of GPW to send out fake tender bids to companies and requests to supply equipment and goods. Although the contact person’s name on the letter may be of an existing official, the contact details on the letter are not the same as the Government Printing Works’.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC of SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA August Vol. 662 Pretoria, 28 2020 Augustus No. 43659 B LEGAL NOTICES WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS SALES IN EXECUTION AND OTHER PUBLIC SALES GEREGTELIKE EN ANDER OPENBARE VERKOPE ISSN 1682-5843 N.B. The Government Printing Works will 43659 not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 584003 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 2 No. 43659 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 28 AUGUST 2020 IMPORTANT NOTICE OF OFFICE RELOCATION Private Bag X85, PRETORIA, 0001 149 Bosman Street, PRETORIA Tel: 012 748 6197, Website: www.gpwonline.co.za URGENT NOTICE TO OUR VALUED CUSTOMERS: PUBLICATIONS OFFICE’S RELOCATION HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED. Please be advised that the GPW Publications office will no longer move to 88 Visagie Street as indicated in the previous notices. The move has been suspended due to the fact that the new building in 88 Visagie Street is not ready for occupation yet. We will later on issue another notice informing you of the new date of relocation. We are doing everything possible to ensure that our service to you is not disrupted. As things stand, we will continue providing you with our normal service from the current location at 196 Paul Kruger Street, Masada building. Customers who seek further information and or have any questions or concerns are free to contact us through telephone 012 748 6066 or email Ms Maureen Toka at [email protected] or cell phone at 082 859 4910.
    [Show full text]
  • 44067 15-01 Legal B
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA January Vol. 667 Pretoria, 15 2021 Januarie No. 44067 PART 1 OF 2 B LEGAL NOTICES WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS SALES IN EXECUTION AND OTHER PUBLIC SALES GEREGTELIKE EN ANDER OPENBARE VERKOPE ISSN 1682-5843 N.B. The Government Printing Works will 44067 not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 584003 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 2 No. 44067 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 15 JANUARY 2021 IMPORTANT NOTICE OF OFFICE RELOCATION Private Bag X85, PRETORIA, 0001 149 Bosman Street, PRETORIA Tel: 012 748 6197, Website: www.gpwonline.co.za URGENT NOTICE TO OUR VALUED CUSTOMERS: PUBLICATIONS OFFICE’S RELOCATION HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED. Please be advised that the GPW Publications office will no longer move to 88 Visagie Street as indicated in the previous notices. The move has been suspended due to the fact that the new building in 88 Visagie Street is not ready for occupation yet. We will later on issue another notice informing you of the new date of relocation. We are doing everything possible to ensure that our service to you is not disrupted. As things stand, we will continue providing you with our normal service from the current location at 196 Paul Kruger Street, Masada building. Customers who seek further information and or have any questions or concerns are free to contact us through telephone 012 748 6066 or email Ms Maureen Toka at [email protected] or cell phone at 082 859 4910.
    [Show full text]
  • Judiciary Annual Report 2019 – 2020
    JUDICIARY ANNUAL REPORT 2019/20 The South African Judiciary Annual Report | 2019/20 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations 4 PART A 5 Foreword by the Chief Justice 7 South African Judiciary 11 PART B 13 Regulatory Framework in the Judicial Environment 14 PART C 17 Governance Framework of the Judiciary 18 PART D 25 Court Performance 26 Key Performance Indicators of the Superior Courts 27 Performance of the Superior Courts for the period April 2019 - March 2020 28 Key Performance Indicators of the Magistrates’ Courts 33 Performance of the Magistrates’ Courts for the period April 2019 - March 2020 35 PART E 43 Extra-Judicial Activities 44 PART F 53 Judicial appointments, retirements and vacancies 54 Race and gender composition: Superior Courts 56 Race and gender composition: Magistrates Courts 57 In Memoriam 58 3 The South African Judiciary Annual Report | 2019/20 ABBREVIATIONS AU African Union CCJA Conference of Constitutional Jurisdictions of Africa CMF Chief Magistrates’ Forum CRT Court Recording Technology DoJ&CD Department of Justice and Constitutional Development ICT Information and Communication Technology JAC Judicial Accountability Committee JAIT Judicial and Administrative Information Technology Steering Committee JCFMC Judicial Case Flow Management Committee JCC Judicial Conduct Committee JCPS Justice, Crime Prevention and Security JOC Judicial Oversight Committee JP Judge President JSC Judicial Service Commission KPI Key Performance Indicator NA National Assembly NCOP National Council of Provinces NEEC National Efficiency Enhancement
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Notices Wetlike Kennisgewings
    Pr t ri 13 December 2019 Vol. 654 e 0 a, Desember No. 42901 LEGAL NOTICES WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS SALES IN EXECUTION AND OTHER PUBLIC SALES GEREGTELIKE EN ANDER QPENBARE VERKOPE 2 No. 42901 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 13 DECEMBER 2019 STAATSKOERANT, 13 DESEMBER 2019 No. 42901 3 CONTENTS / INHOUD LEGAL NOTICES / WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS SALES IN EXECUTION AND OTHER PUBLIC SALES GEREGTELIKE EN ANDER OPENBARE VERKOPE Sales in execution • Geregtelike verkope ....................................................................................................... 14 Limpopo ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Public auctions, sales and tenders Openbare veilings, verkope en tenders .......................................................................................................... 16 Western Cape / Wes-Kaap ............................................................................................................... 16 4 No. 42901 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 13 DECEMBER 2019 STAATSKOERANT, 13 DESEMBER 2019 No. 42901 5 6 No. 42901 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 13 DECEMBER 2019 STAATSKOERANT, 13 DESEMBER 2019 No. 42901 7 8 No. 42901 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 13 DECEMBER 2019 STAATSKOERANT, 13 DESEMBER 2019 No. 42901 9 10 No. 42901 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 13 DECEMBER 2019 STAATSKOERANT, 13 DESEMBER 2019 No. 42901 11 12 No. 42901 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 13 DECEMBER 2019 STAATSKOERANT, 13 DESEMBER 2019 No. 42901 13 14 No. 42901 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 13 DECEMBER 2019 SALES IN EXECUTION AND
    [Show full text]
  • Superior Courts Bill
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERIOR COURTS BILL (As amended by the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development (National Assembly)) (The English text is the offıcial text of the Bill) (MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT) [B 7B—2011] ISBN 978-1-4850-0050-1 No. of copies printed .................................... 1 800 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: []Words in bold type in square brackets indicate omissions from existing enactments. Words underlined with a solid line indicate insertions in existing enactments. BILL To rationalise, consolidate and amend the laws relating to the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court of Appeal and the High Court of South Africa; to make provision for the administration of the judicial functions of all courts; to make provision for administrative and budgetary matters relating to the Superior Courts; and to provide for matters incidental thereto. PREAMBLE NOTING THAT section 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, provides that the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law form part of the founding values of the Republic; AND section 165 of the Constitution provides that— (a) the judicial authority of the Republic is vested in the courts; (b) the courts are independent and subject only to the Constitution and the law, which they must apply impartially and without fear, favour or prejudice; (c) no person or organ of state may interfere with the functioning of the courts; (d) organs of state, through legislative and other measures, must assist and protect
    [Show full text]
  • The South African Judiciary
    THE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIARY 1 THE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIARY Constitutional Court Justices of South Africa 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE ...................................................09 THE JUDICIARY IN SOUTH AFRICA ...................................................13 1. THE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM ..........................................23 2. JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS ...............................................................31 3. JUDICIAL TRAINING .........................................................................35 4. NATIONAL EFFICIENCY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE ........................39 4 5 THE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIARY THE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIARY THE JUDICIARY IN SOUTH AFRICA 6 7 THE SOUTH AFRICAN JUDICIARY MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF JUSTICE Message from Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, Chief Justice of the Republic of South Africa and Vice-President of the CCJA 1. The Fourth Congress of the Conference of Constitutional Jurisdictions of Africa takes place in Cape Town from 23 to 26 April 2017. The South African Judiciary considers it a privilege and honour to host this Congress on South African soil. On behalf of the Judiciary of South Africa I welcome all our Colleagues in the Judiciary from throughout the length and breadth of our continent. A special word of welcome goes to all the speakers who accepted invitations to speak at this Congress. A number of them come from outside of our continent and we are grateful that they have taken their time to be with us. 2. It is appropriate that we tell you something about the South African Judiciary. We do that in the next few pages. The South African Judiciary enjoys a high degree of independence from the Legislative and Executive arms of government. Nevertheless, it has not reached the acceptable level of institutional independence. We continue to work hard towards the attainment of that objective.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 June 2021 ______Floor Court _____ 10:00
    OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE Private Bag X 9693; Polokwane; 0700. 36 Biccard Street; Polokwane; 0699 Tel no. (015) 230 4000; Fax no. 015 230 4200 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUDGE SEMENYA UNOPPOSED APPLICATIONS: 15 JUNE 2021 ______ FLOOR COURT _____ 10:00 No Names of Parties Case no Nature Outcomes 1. Dada’s World of 3798/2019 Default Hardware CC Judgment V Taliflash (PTY) LTD & 1 Other 2. First National Bank (A 1104/2020 Default Division of Firstrand Judgment Bank LTD) V Alphamega Development & Construction (PTY) LTD & 2 Others 3. Pieter Hendrik Strydom & 7435/2020 Default 2 Others Judgment V Johanna Jacomina Scheepers 4. The Standard Bank of 5430/2019 Summary South Africa Limited Judgment V Matome Patrick Pheeha 5. Potpale Investments (RF) 7831/2020 Summary (PTY) LTD Judgment V Netshisaulu Avhatakali Justice 6. HGM Steelboys 924/2019 Summary Judgment V Nengwes Transport (PTY) LTD & 1 Other 7. SG Guarantee Company 6166/2020 Rule 46 (RF) PTY LTD V Corne Janse Van Vuuren 8. The Standard Bank of 5289/2019 Rule 46 South Africa Limited V Julius Reynold Dry & 1 Other 9. Nedbank Limited 4206/2019 Rule 46 V Zandile Martin Nzimeni & 2 Others 10. SG Guarantee Company 1943/2019 Rule 46 (RF) (PTY) LTD V Tlouneo Business Enterprises CC & 1 Other 11. Nedbank Limited 2771/2019 Rule 46 V Sethosa John Leswika & 1 Others 12. Maswanganyi Rosy obo 2009/2018 Struck Out Mahlehlo Samantha Nyiko V The Member of the Executive for Health Limpopo Province 13. Lesufi Cheska obo Lesufi 6669/2018 Struck Out Kgetho V The Member of the Executive Council for Health Limpopo Province 14.
    [Show full text]