CLCV: POLITICAL ACTION CONTENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION he League of Conservation Voters is the non-partisan political action arm of Best & Wo r s t ...... 1 TC a l i f o rnia’s environmental movement. Celebrating its 25th anniversary, CLCV’s mission is to 1997: Year in Review ...... 1 p rotect the environmental quality of the state by working to elect environmentally responsible can- Voting Index ...... 2 didates to state and federal office, then holding them accountable to the environmental agenda. The Agenda: Bill Descriptions . . . .3 - 5 CLCV conducts rigorous re s e a rch on candidates and concentrates on the races where our re s o u rc e s can make a diff e rence. We back our endorsements with expertise, assisting candidates with the Notes on the Score c a r d...... 5 media, fundraising, and grassroots organizing strategies they need to win. We work to educate Assembly Floor Vo t e s ...... 6 - 9 voters, then help get out the vote on election day. Senate Floor Vo t e s...... 10 - 11 CLCV is also a legislative watchdog. Each year, we track scores of environmental bills and votes F i v e - Year Av e r a g e s ...... 1 2 in Sacramento and work to make sure legislators hear from environmental voters. At session’s end 1998 Legislative we publish the C a l i f o rnia Environmental Score c a rd to help voters distinguish between the rh e t o r i c R o s t e r...... Inside Back Cover and the reality of a lawmaker’s re c o r d . This edition of the Scorecard records the most important environmental votes of the 1997 session. Now in its 24th year, the Scorecard—distributed to 25,000 CLCV members, other © 1997 California League of e n v i ronmental organizations and the news media—is the authoritative source on the state’s Conservation Vo t e r s e n v i ronmental politics.

965 Mission St., Suite 625 BOARD OF DIRECTORS San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 896-5550 Executive Committee Dian Grueneich, Pre s i d e n t 10780 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 210 Paul Growald, Chairm a n Los Angeles, CA 90025 Kimo Campbell, Vice President, Northern CA (310) 441-4162 Ruth Hunter, Vice President, Southern CA Ann Notthoff, Endorsements Committee Chair Email: [email protected] or V. John White, Program Committee Chair Web: http://www.ecovote.org Larry Wan, Tre a s u re r Jane Wingfield, Secre t a r y Winston Hickox, Immediate Past Pre s i d e n t P e rmission granted to quote from Thomas Adams D r. Alan Harper or re p roduce portions of this Melinda Bittan Jennifer Hern a n d e z publication if properly cre d i t e d Ann Bore n Doug Linney Frank Cardenas S h a ron Morris Fran Diamond Rico Mastro d o n a t o Printed on recycled paper using Mike Eaton Dylan Norden soy-based inks C l i ff Gladstein Gary Patton Designed by Mark Deitch & Roger Gorke Tom Soto Associates, Inc., Burbank Charles Grace w w w . w e b s i t e d e s i g n s . c o m ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CLCV thanks the following organizations and individuals for their contributions to the 1997 C a l i f o rnia Environmental Scorecard: Audubon Society, Californians Against Waste, California Public I n t e rest Research Group, Joe Caves, Clean Water Action, Mark Deitch & Associates, Inc., E n v i ronmental Working Group, Aaron Mitchell, Mountain Lion Foundation, Planning & Conservation League, Price Consulting, Sierra Club California and V. John White & Associates.

1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 1997: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BACK ON TRACK he 1997 legislative session was the most promising for the environment and public health in Best & Wo r s t Ta number of years. A record number of pro- e n v i r onmental bills and a substantial rise in NEW KIDS ON THE BLOCK: Carrying sub- en v i r onmental scores among legislators marks an important turn from the anti-environ m e n t a l stantive legislation and providing leader- ship in key environmental committees, le g i s l a t u r e of the earlier part of the decade. freshmen 100%-ers Assemblymembers Fred New legislators joined seasoned environmental champions in carrying and voting for a wide Ke e l e y , Ted Lempert, Don Perata, Kevin en v i r onmental agenda. There were virtually no anti-environmental bills, a big change from the Shelley and Howard Wayne distinguish past five years. This new agenda reflects both public outcry to several years of assault on themselves as environmental leaders for Ca l i f o r nia’s environmental safeguards, as well as the fall ’96 elections, which brought to the future. Sacramento a large freshmen class—many of them fresh from elections defined by environ - GREENEST GOP’ers: Assemblyman mental issues, and prodded by strong public support for the environ m e n t . Jim Cunneen, retains the title again this year with a score of 83. Runners-up are One of the biggest gains was in the area of coastal protection. The “Coastal Flotilla,” a far- Assemblymen Brooks Firestone and Steve reaching package of 36 coastal protection bills ranging from improving coastal water quality Kuykendall, both scoring 80. Kuykendall’s standards to protecting public access at beaches, earned 1997 the subtitle: the “Year of the score proves he’s listening to voters after Co a s t . ” his tight race last fall. Ho w e v e r , big business, led by oil companies and other polluters, quickly figured out the dra- MARCHING TO A DIFFERENT DRUMMER: matic agenda change and launched a public relations campaign to defeat ten key environ - In a year when almost everyo n e ’ s score mental bills. The campaign, perhaps never really meant to reach the public, worked better as goes up, the average of the Senate a message to the legislature, which in turn abandoned stronger bills. This pres s u r e, combined Republican caucus stays virtually the same. Even worse, scores for a handful actually with veto threats by Governor Wilson, also led many bill authors—committed to passing their take a dive: Assemblyman Bill Leonard bills—to accept weakening amendments. (-24), and Senators David Kelley (-18), Dick The result: many good environmental bills were killed in committee, and others were watered Monteith (-10), and Richard Mountjoy (-8). down. Legislators thus had less difficulty casting pro- e n v i r onment votes. WH A T PLANET DO THEY LIVE ON? Despite For example, most of the Coastal Flotilla bills were narrowed and weakened in committees and strong public support for the environment only 22 were passed by the legislature. Governor Wilson, despite an initial “commitment” to and record jumps across the board, a group of legislators—many of them repeats from coastal issues, then vetoed 7 of them, including some of the most important water quality and last year—manage rock bottom scores: anti-pollution measures. Assemblymen Dick Ackerman (4), Howard Kaloogian (9), Bill Leonard (9), ...many good environmental bills were killed in committee, Tom McClintock (9), Rico Oller (9), and others were watered down. Legislators thus had Charles Poochigian (9) and (5), less difficulty casting pro - e n v i ronment votes. and Senators Raymond Haynes (5), Rob Hurtt (10), Pete Knight (5), The number one environmental priority this year was AB 278 (Escutia), the Children ’ s John Lewis (5) and Richard Mountjoy (10). En v i r onmental Health Protection Act, a measure to better protect kids from the harmful health BETTER LATE THAN NEVER: Annually one of ef fects of pollution by setting health standards at levels that protect children, and increa s i n g the lowest scores, this year Senator Richard monitoring near schools and daycare centers. It garne r ed bi-partisan support in the Assembly Mountjoy surprised environmentalists with and passed the Senate despite stiff opposition from the oil companies. However, it stalled on his concern for clean drinking water. His the last night of the session, when in a final Assembly concurrence vote a group of MTBE bill, SB 521, was one of the strongest in a generally weak set. We hope he’ll be Assemblymembers (Dennis Cardoza, Jim Cunneen, Steve Kuykendall, Mike Machado, and Peter back next year. Frusetta) bowed to industry pres s u r e and withheld their votes, even though they had voted in June for a stronger version of . BUDGET HEROES: Senator Mike Thompson and Assemblymembers Denise Ducheny, Th r ee high profile environmental issues that were addressed by the legislature are not includ- Fred Keeley, Don Perata and Martha Escutia ed in the 1997 Scorecard: renewal of the Smog Check program, MTBE contamination in drink- fight behind the scenes on funding for ing water sources, and revisions to the California Endangered Species Act. In each case, environmental programs during the budget although the bills received broad legislative support, they were amended in committee so that war with the Governor. Pushed through is a by the time they reached the floor they either lacked strong enough solutions, or they did not new Natural Resources Infrastructure Fund achieve consensus among environmental organizations. and increases for coastal protection. The environmental community applauds the legislature for listening to their consitutencies and GOOD SCIENCE: On the heels of the Wilson Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n ’ s call for scientists to voting for a wide array of measures that have put California back on the track of cleaning up destroy evidence on health problems our air and water, and of protecting our environment. However, a number of strong bills are caused by pollution, Senator Byron Sher on hold and serious issues remain to be tackled. The legislature needs to build on this year’s and Assemblymember Howard Wayne hold work and come back next year with a more substantive agenda that challenges polluters and public hearings and craft measures to pr otects our natural res o u r ces for future generations. California’s voters demand it and our envi- restore scientific integrity in state agencies. ronment deserves no less. 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 1 1997 VOTING INDEX ASSEMBLY Average of all Assembly members: 67 In 1996: 44 Average Republican Assembly score: 29 In 1996: 10 Average Democratic Assembly score: 97 In 1996: 86 P e rcentage of Assembly Republicans scoring 20 or lower: 49 In 1996: 93 P e rcentage of Assembly Democrats scoring 80 or higher: 98 In 1996: 82 Republican Assembly members with scores of 50 or higher: Cunneen (83), Kuykendall (80), Firestone (80), Frusetta (62), Pacheco (55), Richter (53) , Goldsmith (50) Democratic Assembly members with scores of 50 or lower: none P e rfect 100s: Alquist, Aro n e r, Baca, Bowen, Bustamante, Caldera, Cardenas, Davis, Ducheny, Escutia, Figueroa, Gallegos, Havice, Hertzberg, Honda, Keeley, Knox, Kuehl, Lempert, Martinez, Mazzoni, Migden, Murray, Napolitano, Ortiz, Perata, Scott, Shelley, Strom-Martin, Sweeney, Thomson, Torlakson, Villaraigosa, Vincent, Washington, Wayne, Wildman, Wr i g h t

SENATE Average of all Senators: 67 In 1996: 55 Average Republican Senate floor score: 22 In 1996: 25 Average Democratic Senate floor score: 97 In 1996: 78 P e rcentage of Senate Republicans scoring 20 or lower: 56 In 1996: 39 P e rcentage of Senate Democrats scoring 80 or higher: 96 In 1996: 45 Republican Senators with scores of 50 or higher: McPherson Democratic Senators with scores of 50 or lower: none P e rfect 100s: Alpert, Ayala, Burton, Hughes, Johnston, Karnette, Lee, O’Connell, Polanco, Rosenthal, Schiff, Sher, Solis, Thompson, Vasconcellos, Wa t s o n

THE GOVERNOR P ro - e n v i ronmental bills signed: 9 P ro - e n v i ronmental bills vetoed: 9 S c o re in 1997: 50 S c o re in 1996: 10

MOST IMPROVED1 WORST DECLINES Kuykendall +67 Leonard -24 Machado +65 Kelley -18 Bustamante +60 Monteith -10 Johnston +50 Mountjoy -8 C a l d e ron +50 Richter +49 G reene +49 Frusetta +48 Baca +46

1 To be eligible for the Most Improved list, legislators must achieve a minimum score of 40. 2 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD THE AGENDA: THE BILLS THAT MAKE UP THE SCORES

6. BEACH SAFETY ✔ ✔ P R O - E N V I R O N M E N TAL BILL C a l i f o rnia beaches were closed for over 1300 days in 1995 due to ✗ A N T I - E N V I R O N M E N TAL BILL contamination and 11 beaches were permanently closed. AB 411 (Wa y n e ) i n c reases pollution monitoring at public beaches and P R O - E N V I R O N M E N TAL ACTION BY GOVERNOR W I L S O N re q u i res uniform health standards for monitoring programs. It also re q u i res health officials to close beaches when pollution levels are A N T I - E N V I R O N M E N TAL ACTION BY GOVERNOR W I L S O N d a n g e rous and sets up a hotline for beach closure information. Signed into law. AIR QUALITY 7. COASTAL ACCESS ✔ 1. AIR POLLUTION MONITORING ✔ AB 1188 (Lempert) started the session as a bill to protect the public’s One of the most serious public health problems facing the state is fine access to the California coastline by making it harder to give away air particulates — inhalable soot from air pollutants. AB 968 (Knox) state-owned accessways to developers. It was defeated in the Senate, sets up a comprehensive monitoring system for PM 2.5, the gre a t e s t then amended and enacted as an unrelated budget bill. health risk of all air particulates. Original Bill Died on the Senate Floor. Signed into law 8. COASTAL MONITORING ✔ 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RELEASE ✔ Earlier this year the Resources Agency issued a report concluding that AB 1190 (To r l a k s o n ) would have let local governments be more the state lacks a coordinated and comprehensive coastal water quality involved in investigations of hazardous chemical accidents by allow- monitoring program. AB 1429 (Shelley) will develop this program. ing county health officers to examine witnesses. Signed into law. Vetoed 9. COASTAL ACCESS FUNDING ✔ 3. FUNDING FOR CLEANER ALTERNATIVES TO DIESEL ✔ SB 72 (McPherson) i m p roves public access to the coast by re q u i r i n g Diesel emissions are a more serious public health threat than gasoline that revenues from coastal development fees, which currently go into emissions. AB 1368 (Vi l l a r a i g o s a ) would have created funding and the state’s general fund, be deposited into a special account dedicated financial incentives to help operators of heavy-duty trucks upgrade to constructing trails, stairways and other forms of beach access. their engines to cleaner technologies. Signed into law. Held in the Senate Transportation Committee. ✔ ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE/ 4. AIR POLLUTION MONITORING COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW Also addressing the health threats of air pollution, SB 1306 (Sher) would have set up an extensive re s e a rch program—funded by polluter 10. INTERNET ACCESS TO PUBLIC HEARING fees—on particulate matter caused by combustion processes, such as INFORMATION ✔ diesel engines, as well construction and agricultural operations. Public interest groups are often caught by surprise by last-minute Vetoed documents or hearing time switches. AB 1169 (Shelley) would have re q u i red the state’s environmental agencies to post such inform a t i o n on the Internet. COASTAL PROTECTION Held in the Senate Governmental Operations Committee. 5. COASTAL WETLANDS ✔ AB 241 (Lempert) funded a program to develop a community-based wetlands conservation strategy in the south, and a mitigation banking pilot program in the San Francisco Bay. Vetoed.

1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 3 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE/COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW, CONTINUED ✔ 11. INTERNET ACCESS TO CAMPAIGN 16. RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN APPLIANCES CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURES ✔ AB 847 (Wa y n e ) sets up accountability pro c e d u res to enforce laws SB 49 (Karn e t t e ) allows “digital sunlight to shine on the political that re q u i re hazardous waste to be removed from appliances and other p rocess.” The bill makes it easier for the public to follow the money scrap metal before they go into landfills. in political campaigns by requiring campaign contribution reports Signed into law. for statewide candidates and ballot initiatives to be available on the Internet. TOXICS Signed into law. 17. CHILDREN’S ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ✔ ✔ 12. ENVIRONMENTAL EQUITY IN LOCAL PLANNING AB 278 (Escutia) would bring public health standards for pollution to A significant step in stopping low-income and minority communities levels that protect children and increase air pollution monitoring f rom becoming the dumping grounds for pollution, SB 451 (Wa t s o n ) a round schools and daycare centers. The number one enviro n m e n t a l would have re q u i red local general plans to examine the distribution priority this year, it was narrowly defeated in its Assembly concurre n c e and locations of polluting facilities in relation to schools and vote with the help of a handful of legislators who changed their votes. n e i g h b o rh o o d s . The bill will come up for a reconsideration vote in early January, 1998. Vetoed. Defeated on a Assembly Concurrence vote; reconsideration granted. 13. ENVIRONMENTAL EQUITY THROUGH CEQA ✔ Also an effort to stop disproportionate pollution impacts on 18. NOTICE ON HAZARDOUS WASTE VARIANCES ✔ low-income and minority communities, SB 1113 (Solis) would have AB 1157 (Wa y n e ) would have re q u i red the state to notify the changed California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines public 30 days before it issues a variance from hazardous waste to prevent too many polluting facilities from locating in these regulations to a business. Under current law, the public is notified only communities. after the variance has been granted. Vetoed. Vetoed. ✔ ENERGY 19. CalEPA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Late last year the Wilson Administration drafted a proposal calling for 14. SOLAR ENERGY FINANCING ✔ state scientists to destroy certain evidence about health pro b l e m s AB 1387 (Murray) would create financing to provide loans for quali- caused by toxic chemicals. Public outrage led to public hearings, fied homeowners to purchase solar systems. called by Senator Byron Sher. The outcome was SB 1320 (Sher), which re s t o res scientific integrity at CalEPA by requiring scientific peer Held in the Senate Appropriations Committee. review of any new rule pro p o s a l s . Signed into law. SOLID WASTE / RECYCLING

15. BUILDING RECYCLING LAWS ✔ TRANSPORTATION AB 705 (Stro m -M a r t i n ) started out as a bi-partisan supported bill to 20. LOCAL FUNDING FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ✔ apply recycling laws to state agencies. It was pared down to a mea- s u re coordinating waste management programs between state and Local governments are increasingly responsible for transportation local agencies, and encouraging the state to buy recycled building funding. AB 595 (Bro w n ) sets an important precedent by p ro d u c t s . opening up the potential to fund important Bay Area regional transportation projects—especially alternatives to single-driver Vetoed. v e h i c l e s — t h rough voter- a p p roved revenues from gasoline taxes. Signed into law.

4 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD WATER QUALITY

21. INLAND OIL SPILL PREVENTION ✔ Notes on the Score c a rd The benefits of the landmark Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act This edition of the California Environmental often end at the ocean’s shore, yet spills from the state’s countless Sc o r e c a r d evaluates floor votes by the 1997 session pipelines and storage facilities into rivers or streams can be even more of the Legislature on 25 key environmental bills. damaging than sea spills. AB 667 (Lempert) would have applied oil spill laws to inland waters. Bills listed are not all the environmental bills of the session, but those judged most important by a Held in the Senate Rules Committee. consensus of the environmental community. (See acknowledgements for a list of participating 22. TOXIC “HOT SPOTS” PROGRAM ✔ organizations.) Votes counted for scoring may not AB 1479 (Sweeney) aimed to extend and re s t r u c t u re the “toxics hot be the final rollcall: the Scorecard panel decided spots” program, which is set to expire this year. Funded by polluters, which votes were most indicative for each bill. the program determines the sources of pollution in bays and estuaries ✔ and those responsible for clean-up. It has stalled, largely because the Pro-environment votes are designated by ; ✗ advisory board is dominated by oil and polluter interests, which have anti-environmental votes by . Members who did caused the pollution in the first place. These same interests were not vote are marked NV, and those not eligible for a successful in pressuring Governor Wilson to veto the bill. vote as NE. Final scores are the percentage of pro-environment votes cast, not counting absences. Vetoed. This edition of the Scorecard does not grade legislators for votes cast in committee. 23. COASTAL WATER QUALITY ✔ After nearly a decade of Coastal Commission bashing by the Wi l s o n Administration during the annual budget process, AB 1581 (Keeley) p rovides critical funding for the Commission and its work, ranging f rom grants for coastal communities to finish local development plans, to coastal water quality monitoring programs and computer upgrades. Signed into law.

24. NONPOINT POLLUTION IN COASTAL WATERS ✔ The number one threat to coastal water quality is polluted runoff , caused by ground contaminants picked up from rain, farm drainage or o v e rflowing lawn sprinklers which travel through urban systems and get flushed into the ocean. SB 499 (Alpert) would have given a push to state coastal regulators to implement programs to control “nonpoint” p o l l u t i o n . Vetoed.

25. CLOSING LOOPHOLES IN WATER POLLUTION LAWS ✔ Under the guise of allowing polluters to corral contamination when cleanup is not technologically possible, the state water board’s “containment zone” policy has become a giant loophole for many polluters to avoid cleanup. Strongly opposed by business interests, S B 661 (O’Connell) closed this loophole by limiting the ability of the state Water Board to designate containment zones. Defeated in the Assembly Appropriations Committee; Reconsideration granted.

1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 5 AS S E M B L Y FLOOR VOTES

AIR COAST JUSTICE/DISCLOSURE ENERGY WASTE SCORECARD BILL NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PR O - E N V I R O N M E N T AL VOTES 57 41 43 46 64 53 43 47 74 50 73 42 39 44 60 47 AN T I - E N V I R O N M E N T AL VOTES 18 37 26 29 12 26 30 30 4 27 3 35 37 33 18 32 AC K E R M A N R- 7 2 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✗✗✗✗ AG U I A R R- 6 1 ✔✗✗✗✔✗✗✔✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✗ AL B Y R- 0 5 ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✔ ✗ ✔ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ AL Q U I S T D- 2 2 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ AR O N E R D- 1 4 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ AS H B U R N R- 3 2 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ BA C A D- 6 2 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ BA L D W I N R- 7 7 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ BAT T I N R- 8 0 ✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✗ BA U G H R- 6 7 ✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ BO R D O N A R O R- 3 3 ✔✗✗✗✔✔✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✗ BO W E N D- 5 3 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ BO W L E R R- 1 0 ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ BR E W E R R- 7 0 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ BR O W N D- 0 7 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ BU S TA M A N T E D- 3 1 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ CA L D E R A D- 4 6 NE NE ✔ NE NE ✔ ✔ ✔ NE ✔ NE NV NE NV ✔ NE CA M P B E L L R- 7 1 ✔✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✗ CA R D E N A S D- 3 9 ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ CA R D O Z A D- 2 6 ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✗✔✔✔ CU N N E E N R- 2 4 ✔✗✗✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✗✗✔✔✔ DAV I S D- 7 6 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ DU C H E N Y D- 7 9 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ES C U T I A D- 5 0 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ FI G U E R O A D- 2 0 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ FI R E S T O N E R- 3 5 ✔ ✗ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ FL O Y D D- 5 5 ✔ ✔ ✗ NV ✔ NV ✔ ✔ NV ✔ NV ✔ NV ✗ ✔ ✗ FR U S E T T A R- 2 8 NV ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ GA L L E G O S D- 5 7 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ GO L D S M I T H R- 7 5 ✔ ✗ NV ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ NV ✔ ✔ GR A N L U N D R- 6 5 ✔✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗ NV ✗ HAV I C E D- 5 6 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ HE RT Z B E R G D- 4 0 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ HO N D A D- 2 3 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ HO U S E R- 2 5 ✔✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✔ KA L O O G I A N R- 7 4 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ KE E L E Y D- 2 7 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ KN O X D- 4 2 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ KU E H L D- 4 1 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ KU Y K E N D A L L R- 5 4 ✔ ✗ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ NV NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔

✔– PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE ✗ – ANTI-ENVIRONMENT VOTE NV – ABSENT OR NOT VOTING

6 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD AS S E M B L Y FLOOR VOTES

TOXICS TRANSPORTATION WATER 19 9 7 19 9 6 19 9 5 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 FL O O R FL O O R FL O O R CO N T I N U E D ☞ 37 53 57 44 42 46 59 51 26 23 11 34 35 31 13 25 SC O R E SC O R E SC O R E ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 4 4 33 AC K E R M A N R- 7 2 NV ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 35 9 7 AG U I A R R- 6 1 ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 14 0 12 AL B Y R- 0 5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ AL Q U I S T D- 2 2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ AR O N E R D- 1 4 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 14 ~ ~ AS H B U R N R- 3 2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 54 41 BA C A D- 6 2 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 13 8 19 BA L D W I N R- 7 7 NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV NV 19 13 27 BAT T I N R- 8 0 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 17 0 ~ BA U G H R- 6 7 NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ 35 8 12 BO R D O N A R O R- 3 3 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 94 BO W E N D- 5 3 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✔ ✗ 18 8 17 BO W L E R R- 1 0 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 26 4 24 BR E W E R R- 7 0 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 95 10 0 BR O W N D- 0 7 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 40 46 BU S TA M A N T E D- 3 1 NE ✔ ✔ NE NV NE NE NE 10 0 80 94 CA L D E R A D- 4 6 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ 26 ~ ~ CA M P B E L L R- 7 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ CA R D E N A S D- 3 9 NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ 91 ~ ~ CA R D O Z A D- 2 6 NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 83 71 67 CU N N E E N R- 2 4 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 91 76 DAV I S D- 7 6 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 90 79 DU C H E N Y D- 7 9 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 90 10 0 ES C U T I A D- 5 0 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 92 FI G U E R O A D- 2 0 NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ 80 44 56 FI R E S T O N E R- 3 5 NV ✔ NV ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ 76 ~ ~ FL O Y D D- 5 5 NV ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ 62 14 29 FR U S E T T A R- 2 8 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 95 78 GA L L E G O S D- 5 7 ✗ NV ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✔ 50 13 28 GO L D S M I T H R- 7 5 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 26 4 12 GR A N L U N D R- 6 5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ HAV I C E D- 5 6 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ HE RT Z B E R G D- 4 0 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ HO N D A D- 2 3 ✗ ✔ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 30 4 22 HO U S E R- 2 5 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ 9 4 18 KA L O O G I A N R- 7 4 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ KE E L E Y D- 2 7 ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 10 0 KN O X D- 4 2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 94 KU E H L D- 4 1 NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 80 13 33 KU Y K E N D A L L R- 5 4 NE – NOT ELIGIBLE ~ – NOT CALCULATED (TOO FEW VOTES) OR NOT APPLICABLE + – SCORES ARE FROM THE SENATE * – MISSED MUCH OF THE SESSION DUE TO ILLNESS

1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 7 AS S E M B L Y FLOOR VOTES

AIR COAST JUSTICE/DISCLOSURE ENERGY WASTE SCORECARD BILL NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PR O - E N V I R O N M E N T AL VOTES 57 41 43 46 64 53 43 47 74 50 73 42 39 44 60 47 AN T I - E N V I R O N M E N T AL VOTES 18 37 26 29 12 26 30 30 4 27 3 35 37 33 18 32 LE A C H R- 1 5 ✔ ✗ NV ✔✔✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ LE M P E R T D- 2 1 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ LE O N A R D R- 6 3 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ MA C H A D O D- 1 7 ✔✗✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ MA R G E T T R- 5 9 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ NV ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ MA RT I N E Z D- 4 9 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ MA Z Z O N I D- 0 6 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ MC C L I N T O C K R- 3 8 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✔✗✗✗✗✗ MI G D E N D- 1 3 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ MI L L E R R- 6 0 ✔✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✗✗✗✗ MO R R I S S E Y R- 6 9 ✔ NV ✗✗✔✗✗✗✔✔✔✗✗✗✔✗ MO R R O W R- 7 3 ✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✗ MU R R A Y D- 4 7 ✔ ✔ NV ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ NA P O L I TA N O D- 5 8 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ OL B E R G R- 3 4 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ OL L E R R- 0 4 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ ORT I Z D- 0 9 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ PAC H E C O R- 6 4 ✔ ✗ NV ✔✔✔✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✔ PAPA N D- 1 9 ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ PE R A TA D- 1 6 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ PO O C H I G I A N R- 2 9 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ PR E N T E R R- 3 0 ✗✗✗✗✔✔✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ PR I N G L E R- 6 8 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ RI C H T E R R- 0 3 NV ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ RU N N E R R- 3 6 ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗✗✗✗✔✗✔✗✗✗✔✗ SC O T T D- 4 4 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ SH E L L E Y D- 1 2 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ ST R O M - M A RT I N D- 0 1 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ SW E E N E Y D- 1 8 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ TAK A S U G I R- 3 7 NV ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✔✔✗✗✗✗✗ THOMPSON, B. R- 6 6 ✗ ✗ NV ✗✔✔✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗ TH O M S O N D- 0 8 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ TO R L A K S O N D- 1 1 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ VI L L A R A I G O S A D- 4 5 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ VI N C E N T D- 5 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ WAS H I N G T O N D- 5 2 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ WAYN E D- 7 8 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ WI L D M A N D- 4 3 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ WO O D S R- 0 2 NV ✗ NV ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ NV ✔ ✗ WR I G H T , R. D- 4 8 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔

✔– PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE ✗ – ANTI-ENVIRONMENT VOTE NV – ABSENT OR NOT VOTING

8 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD AS S E M B L Y FLOOR VOTES

TOXICS TRANSPORTATION WATER 19 9 7 19 9 6 19 9 5 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 FL O O R FL O O R FL O O R 37 53 57 44 42 46 59 51 26 23 11 34 35 31 13 25 SC O R E SC O R E SC O R E ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ 39 ~ ~ LE A C H R- 1 5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ LE M P E R T D- 2 1 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 9 33 + 10 + LE O N A R D R- 6 3 NV ✔ ✔ NV NV ✔ ✔ ✔ 95 30 31 MA C H A D O D- 1 7 ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 27 8 10 MA R G E T T R- 5 9 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 95 83 MA RT I N E Z D- 4 9 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 10 0 MA Z Z O N I D- 0 6 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 9 ~ ~ MC C L I N T O C K R- 3 8 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 ~ MI G D E N D- 1 3 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 17 5 13 MI L L E R R- 6 0 NV ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 41 9 18 MO R R I S S E Y R- 6 9 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 17 0 19 MO R R O W R- 7 3 NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV 10 0 86 94 MU R R A Y D- 4 7 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 94 NA P O L I TA N O D- 5 8 NV ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ NV NV ✗ 16 4 12 OL B E R G R- 3 4 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ 9 ~ ~ OL L E R R- 0 4 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ ORT I Z D- 0 9 NV ✔ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✔ 55 ~ ~ PAC H E C O R- 6 4 ✔ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 91 ~ ~ PAPA N D- 1 9 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ PE R A TA D- 1 6 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 9 4 13 PO O C H I G I A N R- 2 9 NV NV ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ 32 ~ ~ PR E N T E R R- 3 0 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ 5 5 7 PR I N G L E R- 6 8 ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ NV ✔ NV 53 4 13 RI C H T E R R- 0 3 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 17 ~ ~ RU N N E R R- 3 6 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ SC O T T D- 4 4 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ SH E L L E Y D- 1 2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ ST R O M - M A RT I N D- 0 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 10 0 SW E E N E Y D- 1 8 ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 26 14 19 TAK A S U G I R- 3 7 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ 13 4 6 THOMPSON, B. R- 6 6 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ TH O M S O N D- 0 8 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ TO R L A K S O N D- 1 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 10 0 VI L L A R A I G O S A D- 4 5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ VI N C E N T D- 5 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ WAS H I N G T O N D- 5 2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ WAYN E D- 7 8 ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ WI L D M A N D- 4 3 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 29 4 19 WO O D S R- 0 2 NV NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ WR I G H T , R. D- 4 8 NE – NOT ELIGIBLE ~ – NOT CALCULATED (TOO FEW VOTES) OR NOT APPLICABLE + – SCORES ARE FROM THE SENATE * – MISSED MUCH OF THE SESSION DUE TO ILLNESS

1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 9 SE N A TE FLOOR VOTES

AIR COAST JUSTICE/DISCLOSURE WASTE SCORECARD BILL NO. 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 15 16 PR O - E N V I R O N M E N T AL VOTES 23 22 24 28 28 15 24 38 31 23 21 23 21 AN T I - E N V I R O N M E N T AL VOTES 11 17 13 11 7 19 11 0 7 14 16 10 15 AL P E R T D- 3 9 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ AYAL A D- 3 2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ NV NV ✔ NV ✔ ✔ BR U LT E R- 3 1 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ NV ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ BU RT O N D- 0 3 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ NV CA L D E R O N D- 3 0 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ CO S T A D- 1 6 NV ✔✔✔✔✗✔✔✔✔✗✔✔ CR AV E N R- 3 8 NV ✗ NV ✔ ✔ NV NV NV NV NV NV NV NV DI L L S D- 2 8 NV NV NV NV NV ✔ NV ✔ ✔ NV ✔ NV NV GR E E N E D- 0 6 NV ✔✔✔✔✗✔✔✗✔✔✔✔ HAY D E N D- 2 3 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ HAY N E S R- 3 6 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ HU G H E S D- 2 5 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ HU RT T R- 3 4 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✔✗✗✗✗ JO H A N N E S S E N R- 0 4 ✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✔✔✗✗✗✗ JO H N S O N R- 3 5 NV ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ NV ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ JO H N S T O N D- 0 5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV NV ✔ KA R N E T T E D- 2 7 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ KE L L E Y R- 3 7 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✔✗✗✗✗ KN I G H T R- 1 7 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ KO P P I- 0 8 ✔✔✔✔✔✗✔✔✔✔✔✔✗ LE E D- 0 9 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ LE S L I E R- 0 1 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ NV ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ LE W I S R- 3 3 ✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ LO C K Y E R D- 1 0 ✔✔✔✔✔✗✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ MA D D Y R- 1 4 ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ NV ✔ ✔ NV ✗ NV ✗ MC P H E R S O N R- 1 5 ✔✗✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✗✗✔ NV MO N T E I T H R- 1 2 ✔✗✗✗✗✗✗✔✔✗✗✗✗ MO U N T J O Y R- 2 9 ✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✔✗✗✗✗✗ O’ C O N N E L L D- 1 8 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ PE A C E D- 4 0 ✔✗✔✔✔✗✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ PO L A N C O D- 2 2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ RA I N E Y R- 0 7 ✗✗✗✔✔✗✗✔✔✗✗ NV ✗ RO S E N T H A L D- 2 0 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ SC H I F F D- 2 1 NV ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ SH E R D- 1 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ SO L I S D- 2 4 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ THOMPSON, M. D- 0 2 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ VAS C O N C E L L O S D- 1 3 ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ WATS O N D- 2 6 ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔ WR I G H T , C. R- 1 9 ✗✗✔✗✗✗✗✔✗✗✗✔✗

✔– PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE ✗ – ANTI-ENVIRONMENT VOTE NV – ABSENT OR NOT VOTING

10 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD SE N A TE FLOOR VOTES

TOXICS TRANSPORTATION WATER 19 9 7 19 9 6 19 9 5 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 FL O O R FL O O R FL O O R 22 22 24 22 21 27 24 21 16 13 10 11 12 11 8 16 SC O R E SC O R E SC O R E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 78 + 88 + AL P E R T D- 3 9 ✔ NV ✔ ✔ NV ✔ NV NV 10 0 63 55 AYAL A D- 3 2 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ 17 8+ 7+ BR U LT E R- 3 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 + 10 0 + BU RT O N D- 0 3 ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ 94 44 43 CA L D E R O N D- 3 0 ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ 70 45 44 CO S T A D- 1 6 NV ✔ ✔ NV NV ✔ ✔ NV ~* ~* 36 CR AV E N R- 3 8 NV ✔ NV NV NV NV NV ✔ ~* 10 0 10 0 DI L L S D- 2 8 ✔ NV NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 89 50 71 GR E E N E D- 0 6 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 95 10 0 95 HAY D E N D- 2 3 ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 5 0 6 HAY N E S R- 3 6 ✔ NV NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 75 89 HU G H E S D- 2 5 ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 10 11 6 HU RT T R- 3 4 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ NV NV ✗ 16 20 20 JO H A N N E S S E N R- 0 4 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ ✗ 21 10 20 JO H N S O N R- 3 5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 50 58 JO H N S T O N D- 0 5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ KA R N E T T E D- 2 7 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 24 42 15 KE L L E Y R- 3 7 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 5 4+ 13 + KN I G H T R- 1 7 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 90 83 60 KO P P I- 0 8 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 + 10 0 + LE E D- 0 9 ✗ ✗ ✗ NV NV ✗ ✔ ✗ 22 27 11 LE S L I E R- 0 1 ✗ NV NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 5 10 5 LE W I S R- 3 3 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 95 73 76 LO C K Y E R D- 1 0 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✔ ✗ 35 36 15 MA D D Y R- 1 4 ✗ NV NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 78 50 + 54 + MC P H E R S O N R- 1 5 ✗ ✗ ✗ NV ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 15 25 11 MO N T E I T H R- 1 2 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 10 18 5 MO U N T J O Y R- 2 9 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 95 O’ C O N N E L L D- 1 8 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ 85 78 56 PE A C E D- 4 0 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 64 79 PO L A N C O D- 2 2 ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ 45 13 + 24 + RA I N E Y R- 0 7 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 10 0 RO S E N T H A L D- 2 0 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 ~ ~ SC H I F F D- 2 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ 10 0 10 0 10 0 + SH E R D- 1 1 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 10 0 10 0 10 0 SO L I S D- 2 4 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV 10 0 70 55 THOMPSON, M. D- 0 2 ✔ ✔ ✔ NV NV ✔ NV ✔ 10 0 10 0 + 10 0 + VAS C O N C E L L O S D- 1 3 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ 10 0 10 0 94 WATS O N D- 2 6 ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 14 17 15 WR I G H T , C. R- 1 9 NE – NOT ELIGIBLE ~ – NOT CALCULATED (TOO FEW VOTES) OR NOT APPLICABLE + – SCORES ARE FROM THE ASSEMBLY * – MISSED MUCH OF THE SESSION DUE TO ILLNESS 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 11 1 2 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 1997 LEGISLATIVE ROSTER Following is a list of members of the 1997 California Legislature. To write your legislators, use this address: The Honorable (legislator’s name), C a l i f o rnia Assembly (or Senate), State Capitol, Sacramento, CA 95814. Phone numbers are in the (916) area code.

ASSEMBLY District, Member, Party Capitol Phone District, Member, Party Capitol Phone District, Member, Party Capitol Phone 1 . Vi rginia Stro m -Martin (D) 4 4 5-8 3 6 0 2 8 . Peter Frusetta (R) 4 4 5-7 3 8 0 5 5 . Richard Floyd (D) 4 4 5-3 1 3 4 2 . Tom Woods, Jr. (R) 4 4 5-7 2 6 6 2 9 . Charles Poochigian (R) 4 4 5-2 9 3 1 5 6 . Sally Havice (D) 4 4 5-6 0 4 7 3 . B e rnie Richter (R) 4 4 5-7 2 9 8 3 0 . Robert Prenter (R) 4 4 5-7 5 5 8 5 7 . Martin Gallegos (D) 4 4 5-7 6 1 0 4 . Thomas Oller (R) 4 4 5-8 3 4 3 3 1 . Cruz Bustamante (D) 4 4 5-8 5 1 4 5 8 . Grace Napolitano (D) 4 4 5-0 9 6 5 5 . Barbara Alby (R) 4 4 5-4 4 4 5 3 2 . Roy Ashburn (R) 4 4 5-8 4 9 8 5 9 . Bob Margett (R) 4 4 5-7 2 3 4 6 . Kerry Mazzoni (D) 4 4 5-7 7 8 3 3 3 . Tom Bordonaro, Jr. (R) 4 4 5-7 7 9 5 6 0 . Gary Miller (R) 4 4 5-7 5 5 0 7 . Valerie K. Brown (D) 4 4 5-8 4 9 2 3 4 . Keith Olberg (R) 4 4 5-8 1 0 2 6 1 . F red Aguiar (R) 4 4 5-1 6 7 0 8 . Helen Thomson (D) 4 4 5-8 3 6 8 3 5 . B rooks Firestone (R) 4 4 5-8 2 9 2 6 2 . Joe Baca (D) 4 4 5-7 4 5 4 9 . Deborah Ortiz (D) 4 4 5-1 6 1 1 3 6 . G e o rge Runner (R) 4 4 5-7 4 9 8 6 3 . Bill Leonard (R) 4 4 5-8 4 9 0 1 0 . Larry Bowler (R) 4 4 5-7 4 0 2 3 7 . Nao Takasugi (R) 4 4 5-7 8 2 7 6 4 . Rod Pacheco (R) 4 4 5-0 8 5 4 1 1 . Tom Torlakson (D) 4 4 5-7 8 9 0 3 8 . Tom McClintock (R) 4 4 5-8 3 6 6 6 5 . B rett Granlund (R) 4 4 5-7 5 5 2 1 2 . Kevin Shelley (D) 4 4 5-8 2 5 3 3 9 . Tony Cardenas (D) 4 4 5-1 6 1 6 6 6 . Bruce Thompson (R) 4 4 5-1 6 7 6 1 3 . C a role Migden (D) 4 4 5-8 0 7 7 4 0 . Bob Hertzberg (D) 4 4 5-7 6 4 4 6 7 . Scott Baugh (R) 4 4 5-6 2 3 3 1 4 . Dion Aroner (D) 4 4 5-7 5 5 4 4 1 . Sheila James Kuehl (D) 4 4 5-4 9 5 6 6 8 . Curt Pringle (R) 4 4 5-8 3 7 7 1 5 . Lynne Leach (R) 4 4 5-6 1 6 1 4 2 . Wally Knox (D) 4 4 5-7 4 4 0 6 9 . Jim Morrissey (R) 4 4 5-7 3 3 3 1 6 . Don Perata (D) 4 4 5-7 4 4 2 4 3 . Scott Wildman (D) 4 4 5-8 3 6 4 7 0 . Marilyn C. Brewer (R) 4 4 5-7 2 2 2 1 7 . Mike Machado (D) 4 4 5-7 9 3 1 4 4 . Jack Scott (D) 4 4 5-8 2 1 1 7 1 . Bill Campbell (R) 4 4 5-2 7 7 8 1 8 . Michael Sweeney (D) 4 4 5-8 1 6 0 4 5 . Antonio Villaraigosa (D) 4 4 5-0 7 0 3 7 2 . Richard Ackerman (R) 4 4 5-7 4 4 8 1 9 . Lou Papan (D) 4 4 5-8 0 2 0 4 6 . Louis Caldera (D) 4 4 5-4 8 4 3 7 3 . Bill Morrow (R) 4 4 5-7 6 7 6 2 0 . Liz Figueroa (D) 4 4 5-7 8 7 4 4 7 . Kevin Murray (D) 4 4 5-8 8 0 0 7 4 . Howard Kaloogian (R) 4 4 5-2 3 9 0 2 1 . Ted Lempert (D) 4 4 5-7 6 3 2 4 8 . Roderick Wright (D) 4 4 5-2 3 6 3 7 5 . Jan Goldsmith (R) 4 4 5-2 4 8 4 2 2 . Elaine White Alquist (D) 4 4 5-4 2 5 3 4 9 . Diane Martinez (D) 4 4 5-7 8 5 2 7 6 . Susan A. Davis (D) 4 4 5-7 2 1 0 2 3 . Mike Honda (D) 4 4 5-8 2 4 3 5 0 . Martha Escutia (D) 4 4 5-8 1 8 8 7 7 . Steve Baldwin (R) 4 4 5-3 2 6 6 2 4 . Jim Cunneen (R) 4 4 5-8 3 0 5 5 1 . Edward Vincent (D) 4 4 5-7 5 3 3 7 8 . Howard Wayne (D) 4 4 5-2 1 1 2 2 5 . G e o rge House (R) 4 4 5-7 9 0 6 5 2 . Carl Washington, Jr. (D) 4 4 5-7 4 8 6 7 9 . Denise Moreno Ducheny (D) 4 4 5-7 5 5 6 2 6 . Dennis Cardoza (D) 4 4 5-8 5 7 0 5 3 . Debra Bowen (D) 4 4 5-8 5 2 8 8 0 . Jim Battin (R) 4 4 5-5 4 1 6 2 7 . F red Keeley (D) 4 4 5-8 5 7 0 5 4 . Steven Kuykendall (R) 4 4 5-9 2 3 4

SENATE District, Member, Party Capitol Phone District, Member, Party Capitol Phone District, Member, Party Capitol Phone 1 . Tim Leslie (R) 4 4 5-5 7 8 8 1 5 . Bruce McPherson (R) 4 4 5-5 8 4 3 2 9 . Richard Mountjoy (R) 4 4 5-2 8 4 8 2 . Mike Thompson (D) 4 4 5-3 3 7 5 1 6 . Jim Costa (D) 4 4 5-4 6 4 1 3 0 . Charles Calderon (R) 3 2 7-8 3 1 5 3 . John Burton (D) 4 4 5-1 4 1 2 1 7 . William Knight (R) 4 4 5-6 6 3 7 3 1 . Jim Brulte (R) 4 4 5-3 6 8 8 4 . Maurice Johannessen (R) 4 4 5-3 3 5 3 1 8 . Jack O’Connell (D) 4 4 5-5 4 0 5 3 2 . Ruben S. Ayala (R) 4 4 5-6 8 6 8 5 . Patrick Johnston (R) 4 4 5-2 4 0 7 1 9 . Cathie Wright (R) 4 4 5-8 8 7 3 3 3 . John Lewis (R) 4 4 5-4 2 6 4 6 . L e roy Greene (D) 4 4 5-7 8 0 7 2 0 . Herschel Rosenthal (D) 4 4 5-7 9 2 8 3 4 . Rob Hurtt (R) 4 4 5-5 8 3 1 7 . Richard Rainey (R) 4 4 5-6 0 8 3 2 1 . Adam Schiff (D) 4 4 5-5 9 7 6 3 5 . Ross Johnson (R) 4 4 5-4 9 6 1 8 . Quentin L. Kopp (I) 4 4 5-0 5 0 3 2 2 . Richard Polanco (D) 4 4 5-3 4 5 6 3 6 . Raymond Haynes (R) 4 4 5-9 7 8 1 9 . Barbara Lee (D) 4 4 5-6 5 7 7 2 3 . Tom Hayden (D) 4 4 5-1 3 5 3 3 7 . David Kelley (R) 4 4 5-5 5 8 1 1 0 . (D) 4 4 5-6 6 7 1 2 4 . Hilda Solis (D) 4 4 5-1 4 1 8 3 8 . William Craven (R) 4 4 5-3 7 3 1 1 1 . B y ron Sher (D) 4 4 5-6 7 4 7 2 5 . Te resa Hughes (D) 4 4 5-2 1 0 4 3 9 . D e i r d re Alpert (D) 4 4 5-3 9 5 2 1 2 . Dick Monteith (R) 4 4 5-1 3 9 2 2 6 . (D) 4 4 5-5 2 1 5 4 0 . Steve Peace (D) 4 4 5-6 7 6 7 1 3 . John Vasconcellos (D) 4 4 5-9 7 4 0 2 7 . Betty Karnette (D) 4 4 5-6 4 4 7 1 4 . Kenneth Maddy (R) 4 4 5-9 6 0 0 2 8 . Ralph Dills (D) 4 4 5-5 9 5 3 1997 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD CLCV ADVISORY COUNCIL Ruben Aro n i n , Earth Communications Off i c e Barry Nelson, Save San Francisco Bay Association Mike Belliveau, Communities for a Better Environment Mel Nutter, LA League of Conservation Voters David Chatfield, C a l i f o rnians for Pesticide Reform Buck Parker, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund Michael Bennet Cline, Train Riders Assn. Of CA John Perez, United Food & Commercial Wo r k e r s Antonio De La Rosa, LA Center for Law and Justice Dave Phillips, Earth Island Institute Gail Rudderman Feuer, Natural Resources Defense Council, LA Gary Phillips, Multicultural Collaborative John Gamboa, G reenlining Institute Betsy Reifsnider, Friends of the River Mark Gold, Heal the Bay Will Rogers, Trust for Public Land Antonio Gonzalez, Southwest Voter Registration & Education Project David Roe, E n v i ronmental Defense Fund Andy Goodman, E n v i ronmental Media Association Lynn Sadler, Mountain Lion Foundation Juana Gutierrez, M a d res del Este de Los Angeles—Santa Isabel Bruce Saito, LA Conservation Corps Randy Hayes, R a i n f o rest Action Network Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund Bonnie Holmes-Gen, Sierra Club California Jim Sayer, G reenbelt Alliance Brian Huse, National Parks & Conservation Association Rahman Shabazz, Community Coalition for Change, Inc. Jane Kelly, Union of Concerned Scientists Ted Smith, Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition Micci Martinez, Clean Water Action Frances Spivy-We b b e r, Mono Lake Committee John McCaull, Audubon Society Bob Sulnick, American Oceans Campaign Carlos Melendrez, EDGE Connie Stewart, North Coast Environmental Center Angela Johnson Meszaros, E n v i ronmental Justice Resource Network Erik Vink, American Farmland Tr u s t Monica Moore, Pesticide Action Network Bill Wa l k e r, E n v i ronmental Working Gro u p Marilyn Morton, The Ethnic Coalition Jay Thomas Watson, Wi l d e rness Society Mark Murray, C a l i f o rnians Against Waste Jane Williams, Desert Citizens Against Pollution

Organization listed for identification purposes only

1997 Californ i a BULK RATE E n v i ronmental Score c a rd U.S. POSTAGE Ca l i fo r nia League of Conservation Vot e r s PAID 965 Mission St., Suite 625 PERMIT #987 San Fran c i s c o , CA 94103 VAN NUYS, CA

Address Service Requested