The Mechanism of the Origin and Development of Lightning from Initiating Event to Initial Breakdown Pulses (V.2)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Physics of Streamer Discharge Phenomena
The physics of streamer discharge phenomena Sander Nijdam1, Jannis Teunissen2;3 and Ute Ebert1;2 1 Eindhoven University of Technology, Dept. Applied Physics P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands 2 Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 KU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma-astrophysics, Leuven, Belgium E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In this review we describe a transient type of gas discharge which is commonly called a streamer discharge, as well as a few related phenomena in pulsed discharges. Streamers are propagating ionization fronts with self-organized field enhancement at their tips that can appear in gases at (or close to) atmospheric pressure. They are the precursors of other discharges like sparks and lightning, but they also occur in for example corona reactors or plasma jets which are used for a variety of plasma chemical purposes. When enough space is available, streamers can also form at much lower pressures, like in the case of sprite discharges high up in the atmosphere. We explain the structure and basic underlying physics of streamer discharges, and how they scale with gas density. We discuss the chemistry and applications of streamers, and describe their two main stages in detail: inception and propagation. We also look at some other topics, like interaction with flow and heat, related pulsed discharges, and electron runaway and high energy radiation. Finally, we discuss streamer simulations and diagnostics in quite some detail. This review is written with two purposes in mind: First, we describe recent results on the physics of streamer discharges, with a focus on the work performed in our groups. -
Relativistic Runaway Electrons Above Thunderstorms
Relativistic Runaway Electrons above Thunderstorms Nikolai G. Lehtinen Physics Department STAR Laboratory Stanford University Advisers: Umran S. Inan, EE Department, Timothy F. Bell, EE Department, Roger W. Romani, Physics Department Plan 1. Introduction 2. Monte Carlo model of runaway electron avalanche 3. Fluid model of runaway electrons above thunderstorms 4. Effects of runaway electrons in the conjugate hemisphere Lightning-mesosphere interaction phenomena ~ 2000 cm-3 Electron density Β 100 km THERMOSPHERE Elves 80 km Sprites MESOSPHERE γ-rays 60 km Runaway ~100 MV 40 km E ~ 103 V/m electrons STRATOSPHERE at 40 km Blue Jet 20 km Cameras + + + + + TROPOSPHERE +CG 0 km - --- - γ-ray flash Red Sprites (BATSE observation) 40 Elves 30 20 Sprites 10 Rate (counts/0.1ms) 0 015205 10 1996.204.07.17.38.792 Time (ms) Red Sprites Red Sprites: - altitude range ~50-90 km - lateral extent ~5-10 km - occur ~1-5 ms after +CG discharge - last up to several 10 ms Aircraft view Ground View 90-95 km horizon Space Shuttle View sprite sprite thunderstorm Examples of Terrestrial Gamma Ray Flashes (BATSE Data) Terrestrial Gamma Rays: - time duration ~1 ms - energies 20 keV—2 MeV - hard spectrum (bremsstrahlung) Rate (counts/0.1ms) Rate (counts/0.1ms) Rate (counts/0.1ms) Time (ms) Time (ms) Time (ms) Time (ms) C. T. R. Wilson, 1925 While the electric force due to the thundercloud falls off rapidly, ... the electric force required to cause sparking ... falls off still more rapidly. Thus, ... there will be a height above which the electric force due to the cloud exceeds the sparking limit .. -
Runaway Electrons During Subnanosecond Breakdowns in High- Pressure Gases
Page 1 of 25 High Voltage This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication in an issue of the journal. To cite the paper please use the doi provided on the Digital Library page. Runaway electrons during subnanosecond breakdowns in high- pressure gases Victor F. Tarasenko *, Mikhail I. Lomaev, Dmitry V. Beloplotov, Dmitry A. Sorokin Institute of High Current Electronics Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Science, 2/3 Akademicheskii Ave., Tomsk 634055. Russia *[email protected] Abstract: The parameters of runaway electrons produced in nanosecond high-voltage discharges in different gases (air, nitrogen, sulfur hexafluoride, krypton, argon, methane, neon, hydrogen, helium) at atmospheric and higher pressure were studied. An optical analysis was also performed to investigate the ionization dynamics in diffuse discharges in nitrogen and nitrogen-containing mixtures. At breakdown of a point-to-plane gap by nanosecond (≈2 ns) high-voltage (≈200 kV) pulses of negative voltage polarity and gas pressure above 0.1 MPa, a supershort avalanche electron beam (SAEB) was detected by a collector behind the flat anode. For pressure > 0.1 MPa of nitrogen and other gases it is shown that the maximum pressure for SAEB registration decreases with increasing the voltage pulse rise time. Therefore, to detect a SAEB at atmospheric and higher gas pressure, one should use voltage pulses with an amplitude of hundred kilovolts and rise time of ~1 ns and shorter. The experimental research in the dynamics of optical radiation from the discharge plasma shows that the breakdown in which runaway electrons are produced develops as an ionization wave. -
Glow Corona Discharges and Their Effect on Lightning Attachment: Revisited
2012 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Vienna, Austria Glow Corona Discharges and Their Effect on Lightning Attachment: revisited Marley Becerra School of Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology –KTH– Stockholm, Sweden Power Technology Department, ABB Corporate Research Västerås, Sweden [email protected] Abstract— Previous studies in the literature have suggested that has been recently suggested that air terminals can shield glow corona discharges could be potentially used to control the themselves due to the generated glow corona [10]. frequency of lightning flashes to grounded objects. Such studies use simplified one-dimensional corona drift models or basic Based on these studies, different non-conventional lightning empirical equations derived from high voltage experiments to protection systems based on the generation or suppression of assess the effect of glow corona on the initiation of both streamers glow corona have been released into the market. Thus, it is and upward connecting leaders under the influence of a claimed that multi-point corona configurations (better known descending lightning leader. In order to revisit the theoretical as a dissipation array system) can prevent lighting strikes to basis of these studies, a two-dimensional glow corona drift model objects “protected” with such a system. In addition, lightning has been implemented together with a self-consistent upward rods specially designed to avoid glow corona generation are leader inception and propagation model –SLIM–. A 60 m tall claimed to be more efficient than conventional sharp or blunt lightning rod is used as a study case. It is found that the shielding lightning rods. However, there is an ongoing debate in the effect of the glow corona space charge has been strongly lightning protection community about the validity of these overestimated in the literature. -
Runaway Breakdown and Electrical Discharges in Thunderstorms
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115, A00E60, doi:10.1029/2009JA014818, 2010 Runaway breakdown and electrical discharges in thunderstorms Gennady Milikh1 and Robert Roussel‐Dupré2 Received 22 August 2009; revised 2 August 2010; accepted 22 September 2010; published 24 December 2010. [1] This review considers the precise role played by runaway breakdown (RB) in the initiation and development of lightning discharges. RB remains a fundamental research topic under intense investigation. The question of how lightning is initiated and subsequently evolves in the thunderstorm environment rests in part on a fundamental understanding of RB and cosmic rays and the potential coupling to thermal runaway (as a seed to RB) and conventional breakdown (as a source of thermal runaways). In this paper, we describe the basic mechanism of RB and the conditions required to initiate an observable avalanche. Feedback processes that fundamentally enhance RB are discussed, as are both conventional breakdown and thermal runaway. Observations that provide clear evidence for the presence of energetic particles in thunderstorms/ lightning include g‐ray and X‐ray flux intensifications over thunderstorms, g‐ray and X‐ray bursts in conjunction with stepped leaders, terrestrial g‐ray flashes, and neutron production by lightning. Intense radio impulses termed narrow bipolar pulses (or NBPs) provide indirect evidence for RB particularly when measured in association with cosmic ray showers. Our present understanding of these phenomena and their enduring enigmatic character -
Cosmic Ray Breakdown Mechanism in the Atmophere
IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 6, Issue 3 Ver. II (May-Jun. 2014), PP 62-64 www.iosrjournals.org Cosmic Ray Breakdown Mechanism in the Atmophere Akande, P. I[1], Azi Amaechi O.[2], A. O. Chikwendu[3], Nwoba Isreal A.[4] [1][2]Department of Industrial Physics, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki [3]Department of Industrial Physics, Renaissance University, Ugbawka [4]Evangel University, Akaeze, PMB 126, Ebonyi State Abstract: Cosmic rays are high energy particles originating from outer space. These cosmic rays produce secondary cosmic rays as they enter the atmosphere and generate runaway electrons. The generation of runaway electrons in the relativistic region of the atmosphere is the focus of this work. To achieve our aim, basic consideration is given to the cold electron having mean velocity which is less than electron thermal speed. The effects of force on these electrons are obtained. From the result, it shows that cosmic ray breakdown occurs in the atmosphere within the relativistic region and the electrons are accelerated by the electric field. Hence there is an exponential increase of the fast electrons. This exponential increase in fast electron in the atmosphere could be the basic reason for the spontanouse characteristic behavour of most atmospheric processes. I. Introduction Most cosmic rays are thought to originate outside the solar system, with many coming from within our Milky Way Galaxy, and a few arriving from other galaxies, (James, 1998). This cosmic ray produce secondary particle which can be sufficiently energetic to contribute themselves to further ionization of the neutral gases. -
JGRA20111A.Pdf (435.8Kb)
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 116, A09301, doi:10.1029/2011JA016494, 2011 Low‐energy electron production by relativistic runaway electron avalanches in air Joseph R. Dwyer1 and Leonid P. Babich2 Received 24 January 2011; revised 31 May 2011; accepted 8 June 2011; published 7 September 2011. [1] This paper investigates the production of low‐energy (few eV) electrons by relativistic runaway electron avalanches. This work is motivated by a growing body of literature that claims that runaway electron avalanches produce an anomalous growth of low‐energy electrons and hence an anomalously large electrical conductivity, a factor of 50 larger than expected from standard calculations. Such large enhancements would have a substantial impact on properties of runaway electron avalanches and their observable effects. Indeed, these purportedly large conductivities have been used to argue that runaway electron avalanches result in a novel form of electrical breakdown called “runaway breakdown.” In this paper, we present simple analytical calculations, detailed Monte Carlo simulations, and a review of the experimental literature to show that no such anomalous growth of low‐energy electron populations exists. Consequently, estimates of the conductivity generated by a runaway electron avalanche have been greatly exaggerated in many previous papers, drawing into question several of the claims about runaway breakdown. Citation: Dwyer, J. R., and L. P. Babich (2011), Low‐energy electron production by relativistic runaway electron avalanches in air, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A09301, doi:10.1029/2011JA016494. 1. Introduction field [Dwyer, 2003]. Because electric fields exceeding the RREA threshold field have been observed inside thunder- [2] In 1925, C. T. -
On the Transition from Positive Glow Corona to Streamers in Air
ON THE TRANSITION FROM POSITIVE GLOW CORONA TO STREAMERS IN AIR LIPENG LIU¹* AND MARLEY BECERRA¹ ¹ Royal Institute of Technology –KTH–, School of Electrical Engineering, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden *Corresponding author's e-mail: [email protected] arrangements. It was shown that the streamer- ABSTRACT like ionizing waves from a 2 cm inner sphere occurred if the voltage was raised at a rate larger The transition phase from glow to streamer than 1 kV/s in the presence of stable glow corona is of significant importance for the corona [4]. However, it is difficult to extrapolate evaluation of leader discharges initiated from this result to the actual case of glow to streamer ultra-high voltage power transmission lines transition from power transmission lines since under thunderstorms. In order to study the the gap between the inner and outer spheres in condition required for streamer inception from a the simulation was only 2 cm. glow-corona generating wire, the continuity equations for electrons, positive ions and In the present paper, a similar analysis as in negative ions coupled with Poisson’s equation Morrow’s [4] is performed to obtain are solved. The calculations are performed for a characteristics of corona discharge with larger air wire-cylinder coaxial configuration in one gaps. For this, the continuity equations for dimension. The analysis is performed by electrons, positive ions and negative ions considering the generation of glow corona under coupled with Poisson’s equation are solved. The a DC electric field, followed by the transition to analysis is performed by considering the a streamer-like ionization wave under a fast- generation of glow corona under DC electric changing electric field ramp. -
Tesla's High Voltage and High Frequency Generators with Oscillatory Circuits with Each Other the Capacitance Are Great on Primary Side and Small on Secondary
SERBIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Vol. 13, No. 3, October 2016, 301-333 UDC: 621.317.32+621.373 DOI: 10.2298/SJEE1603301C Tesla’s High Voltage and High Frequency Generators with Oscillatory Circuits* Jovan M. Cvetić1 Abstract: The principles that represent the basics of the work of the high voltage and high frequency generator with oscillating circuits will be discussed. Until 1891, Tesla made and used mechanical generators with a large number of extruded poles for the frequencies up to about 20 kHz. The first electric generators based on a new principle of a weakly coupled oscillatory circuits he used for the wireless signal transmission, for the study of the discharges in vacuum tubes, the wireless energy transmission, for the production of the cathode rays, that is x-rays and other experiments. Aiming to transfer the signals and the energy to any point of the surface of the Earth, in the late of 19th century, he had discovered and later patented a new type of high frequency generator called a magnifying transmitter. He used it to examine the propagation of electromagnetic waves over the surface of the Earth in experiments in Colorado Springs in the period 1899-1900. Tesla observed the formation of standing electromagnetic waves on the surface of the Earth by measuring radiated electric field from distant lightning thunderstorm. He got the idea to generate the similar radiation to produce the standing waves. On the one hand, signal transmission, i.e. communication at great distances would be possible and on the other hand, with more powerful and with at least three magnifying transmitters the wireless transmission of energy without conductors at any point of the Earth surface could also be achieved. -
Propagation Characteristics of Surface Discharge Under Impulse Application Voltage
Chapter 5 Propagation Characteristics of Surface Discharge under Impulse Application Voltage 5.1 Introduction Flashover on insulator surface in air at atmospheric pressure occurs as a sequence of several processes that leads to the formation of a plasma channel which bridges the electrode gap. The main stages of the flashover are the occurrence of initial seeding electrons, the development of electron avalanches, the inception and the propagation of streamers, the streamer-to-leader transition, the propagation of leader, and the formation of a breakdown[1, 2]. The streamer-to-leader transition is a very critical stage of such a breakdown since the leader can propagate a long distance with a low increment of application voltage. The streamer-to-leader transition and the propagation process of a leader are still the object of intensive experimental and theoretical studies [3, 4, 5, 6]. In this chapter, the propagation characteristics of surface discharge including propagation speed, length, and the residual charge distribution are investigated under the application of impulse voltage with the 2-layer structure pipe, where the surface discharge propagates on the pipe without any accumulated charge. 5.2 Propagation Length of Surface Discharge The propagation length of impulse surface discharge on the 2-layer structure pipe is measured with changing the applied voltage. The distance between electrodes, d, is set to 100 mm, and 300 mm, and the experiments under each impulse voltage are repeated four times. Figures 5.1 and 5.2 show the relationships between the propagation length, which are measured from the photographs, and the peak values of the application voltage for d = 100 mm and 300 mm, respectively. -
Elongation and Branching of Stem Channels Produced by Positive Streamers in Long Air Gaps Xiangen Zhao1*, Marley Becerra2*, Yongchao Yang1 & Junjia He1
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Elongation and branching of stem channels produced by positive streamers in long air gaps Xiangen Zhao1*, Marley Becerra2*, Yongchao Yang1 & Junjia He1 The elongation and branching of long positive spark discharges in the laboratory and in lightning have been attributed to the formation of thermalized channels inside a difuse, glow-like streamer section at the leader head. It is experimentally shown here that the structured morphology of streamers produce low-density stem channels that elongate and branch well before a new leader channel section is formed. These non-thermalized stems are also shown to develop ahead of a developing leader channel. These fndings are based on high-speed photography and Schlieren imaging used to visualize both the morphology of streamer flaments and stem channels. Numerical analysis is also performed to estimate the axial temperature and density of the stem channels. A stem-driven mechanism for the propagation and branching of positive long air gap discharges is proposed and discussed based on the presence of not-yet thermalized, low density channels formed by streamer ensembles at the leader head. Te knowledge of the physical mechanisms of long positive sparks is necessary to solve a variety of engineering problems and to understand natural lightning fashes 1–3. Streamers and leaders are the two main mechanisms involved in the development of electrical discharges in long air gaps. Streamers are non-thermal plasmas com- posed by a large number of flaments, developing from a sharp electrode or at the tip of a thermalized leader channel. Mobile electrons in streamers converge in the positive leader and diverge in the negative leader 2,3. -
A Study of X-Ray Emission from Laboratory Sparks in Air at Atmospheric Pressure J
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, D23207, doi:10.1029/2008JD010315, 2008 Click Here for Full Article A study of X-ray emission from laboratory sparks in air at atmospheric pressure J. R. Dwyer,1 Z. Saleh,1 H. K. Rassoul,1 D. Concha,1 M. Rahman,2 V. Cooray,2 J. Jerauld,3,4 M. A. Uman,3 and V. A. Rakov3 Received 23 April 2008; revised 17 July 2008; accepted 25 September 2008; published 9 December 2008. [1] We present a detailed investigation of X-ray emission from long laboratory sparks in air at atmospheric pressure. We studied 231 sparks of both polarities using a 1-MV Marx generator with gap lengths ranging from 10 to 140 cm. The X rays generated by the discharges were measured using five NaI/PMT detectors plus one plastic scintillator/PMT detector, all enclosed in 0.32-cm-thick aluminum boxes. X-ray emission was observed to accompany about 70% of negative polarity sparks and about 10% of positive polarity sparks. For the negative sparks, X-ray emission was observed to occur at two distinct times during the discharge: (1) near the peak voltage, specifically, about 1 ms before the voltage across the gap collapsed, and (2) near the time of the peak current through the gap, during the gap voltage collapse. Using collimators we determined that the former emission emanated from the gap, while the latter appeared to originate from above the gap in the space over the high-voltage components. During individual sparks, the total energy of the X rays that was deposited in a single detector sometimes exceeded 50 MeV, and the maximum energy of individual photons in some cases exceeded 300 keV.