Siipcrfwnd Records Center SITE: t, axjHVN^w<\^ • r BREAK: \ .3. OTHER:
FINAL SITE INSPECTION REPORT SDMS DocID FOR 474336 RAYMARK INDUSTRIES STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT
CERCLIS No. CTD001186618 TDD No. 9202-02-AWS Work Assignment No. 09-lJZZ
Prepared by:
Roy F. Weston, Inc. 187 Ballardvale Street Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887
September 30, 1993
WESTON/ARCS Reviewed and Approved: U r-^.^m Task Manager r
)c-^^c C -hch^ Site Manager Date
'^ ki^%2/.J^ -a-^.'^7^?>^2c ^ q ^30-^3 QA^leview Date
Work Order No. 04100-009-074-0007-00
O TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
INTRODUCnON 1
SITE DESCRIPTION 1
OPERATIONAL AND REGULATORY HISTORY
AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS 8
WASTE/SOURCE SAMPLING 25
GROUNDWATER PATHWAY 42
SURFACE WATER PATHWAY . 51
SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY 68
AIR PATHWAY 84
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 86
REFERENCES
ATTACHMENT A - Raymark Industries, Inc. Stratford, Connecticut On-site Storage Tank Information Compiled from WESTON/TAT and Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (ELI) On-site Tank Information A-1
ATTACHMENT B - Raymark Industries, Inc. Stratford, Connecticut Source (Lagoon Sediment), Sediment and Soil Samples WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results, and Quantitation and Detection Limits (samples collected September and November 1992) B-1
WIL\(M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL U 09/30/93 r\
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title Page
1 Location Map 2
2 Site Sketch 3
3 Raymark Facility Site Sketch 6
4 Groundwater Well Locations 22
5 Previous Sample Locations 24
6 WESTON/ARCS Sediment Sample Locations 40
7 WESTON/ARCS Soil Sample Location 69
WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.FN1. Ul 09/30/93 I ,
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page
1 Summary of Raymark NPDES Permit Information 10
2 Source Evaluation for Raymark Industries 12
3 Hazardous Waste Quantity for Raymark Industries 14
4 Chronological Sunmiary of Regulatory History, Investigations and/or Events Related to Raymark Industries 17 5 Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Wells Installed on the Raymark Industries Property 23
6 CERCLA Properties Located Within One Mile of Raymark Industries . 26
7 Summary of Maximum Analytical Organic Results BCA Source (Soil) Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Collected 1987) 28
8 Summary of Maximum Analytical Inorganic Results BCA Source (Soil) Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Collected 1987) 29
9 Summary of WESTON/TAT Analytical Results Source (Soil) Samples Analysis for Raymark Industries (samples collected 1991) 31
10 Maximum Concentrations Detected at Raymark Industries Property For 1992 Soil Samples Collected by ELI Szunples Collected July and September 1992 . 34
11 Sample Summary of Raymark Industries Source (On-site Sediment) Sample Collected by WESTON/ARCS on August 4, 1992 38
12 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Source (Sediment) Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries 39
13 Estimated Drinking Water Populations Served by Groundwater Sources Within Four Miles of Raymark Industries 45
W1L\M100009\(J74\RAYMARK.FNL IV 09/30/93 LIST OF TABLES (Concluded)
Table No. Title Page
14 Constituents Exceeding EPA Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards (MCLs) during the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program (samples collected 1982 to 1988) 47
15 Constituents Exceeding Concentrations of 1,000 ug/1 during the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program Samples Collected 1982 to 1988 50
16 Maximum Concentration Detected at Raymark Industries Property During 1992 Groundwater Samples Collected by ELI (samples collected November 1992) 52
17 Sample Summary of Raymark Industries Sediment Samples Collected by WESTON/ARCS on November 18 and 19, 1992 (samples collected by WESTON/ARCS) 58
18 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Sediment Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries 60
19 Sample Summary: Raymark Industries Soil Samples Collected by WESTON/ARCS 70
20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries 74
21 Estimated Population Within Four Miles of Raymark Industries 85
WIL\W10OOO9\O74\RAYMARK.FNL V 09/30/93 Final Site Inspection Report CERCLIS No. CTD0011866I8 Raymark Industries TDD No. 9202-02-AWS Stratford, Connecticut Work Assignment No. 09-lJZZ Work Order No. 04100-009-074-0007-00
INTRODUCTION
The Roy F. Weston, Inc. Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy (WESTON/ARCS) team was requested by the Region I United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Waste Management Division to perform a Site Inspection of the Raymark Industries site in Stratford, Coimecticut. Tasks were conducted in accordance with the ARCS contract, the Site Inspection scope of work, and technical specifications provided by the EPA under Work Assignment No. 09-lJZZ, which was issued to WESTON/ARCS on March 26, 1991.
Background information used in the generation of this report was obtained through file searches conducted at the EPA and Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CT DEP), telephone interviews with town officials, conversations with persons knowledgeable of the Raymark Industries site and conversations with other Federal, State, and local agencies. Additional information was collected during the WESTON/ARCS on-site reconnaissance on September 9,1992 and envirormiental sampling events conducted on September 23 and 24, 1992 and November 18 and 19, 1992.
This package follows the guidelines developed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended, commonly referred to as Superfund. However, these documents do not necessarily fulfill the requirements of other EPA regulations such as those under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or other Federal, State, or local regulations. Site Inspections are intended to provide a preliminary screening of sites to facilitate EPA's assignment of site priorities. They are limited efforts and are not intended to supersede more detailed investigations.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The Raymark Industries, Inc. (Raymark) site, formerly named Raybestos-Manhattan Company, is located at 75 East Main Street in Stratford, Fairfield County, Connecticut at latitude 41° 12' 02.5"N, longitude 73° 07' 14.0''W [Longitude and Latitude locations are based on Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements] (Figure 1) [1, 2, 3, 4]. For the purpose of this report the Raymark site consists of two parcels: the inactive Raymark Industries facility parcel (which is the subject of this Site Inspection) and the Raybestos Memorial Baseball Field (Raybestos Field) parcel (Figure 2). Based on Stratford tax map information, both sites combined cover approximately 47.1 acres, of which 33.4 acres were used as part of the former plant operations and the adjacent 13.7 acres area known as Raybestos Field was used as a former waste disposal area by Ravmark (Figure 2) [1, 5, 6, 7].
WIL\O1100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 1 09/30/93 CO- / k^
BASE MAP IS A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING 7.5' U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE: MILFORD, CT 1960. PHOTOREVISED 1984; BRiDGEPORT. CT 1970, PHOTOREVISED 1984
1 ; 24,000
OUUMWMtf LOCI nCH H H H
LOCATION MAP
tUMIBB V -* KSOeBJODeUIiKII RAYMARK INDUSTRIES STRATFORD. CONNECTICUT FIGURE 1
WIL\W 100009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 09/30/93 ADAPTED FROM: WESTONAAT 1991 RAYUARK SITE SKETCH. STRATFORD DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERINC MAPS F-ll AND F-I Z ENIVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. FACIUTY SITE PLAN RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SHEETS SI -S4. SITE SKETCH
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES MANAGCRS DCSCNERS/CONSUITAN TS STRATFORD. CONNECTICUT FIGURE 2
WIL\0» 100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 09/30/93 Raymark and the Raybestos Field are located in an urban/industrial area of Stratford, Connecticut. Much of the land abutting the site (Raymark and Raybestos Field) is zoned residential. The Raymark facility is bordered by Amtrak's New York-New Haven-Hartford Railroad (Amtrak Railroad) tracks and • Raybestos Field to the northwest; Longbrook Avenue to the southwest; Bamum Avenue and Interstate 95 to the south and southeast; and East Main Street (Connecticut Highway 110) to the east and northeast (Figure 2) [2, 10]. The area located west and southwest of the site, opposite Longbrook Avenue, is zoned industrial and commercial. A few scattered industrial facilities, a shopping center, and a movie theater occupy this area. Northwest of the site, along the northwestern border of the Raybestos Field, are 19 abutting residential properties along Clinton Street and Patterson Avenue. Northeast of the Raybestos Field along the northern side of Frog Pond Lane is the Stratford Department of Public Works offices. Southeast of Raymark, on the eastern side of East Main Street, is a shopping center, a gasoline station, and seven residential properties along Sidney Street (Figure 2) [1, 2, 3, 4, 10].
The Raybestos Field (CERCLIS No. CTD980520357), one of Raymark's former asbestos sludge disposal areas is located northwest of Raymark (Figure 2) [10, 12, 13]. The Raybestos Field is separated from Raymark by Amtrak Railroad track lines (approximately 100 feet wide) [3, 4, 10]. The Raybestos Field was reportedly used for sludge disposal by Raymark between 1940 and 1977 [10,22]. The Raybestos Field consists of a fenced baseball diamond with bleachers, a paved parking lot, an open grassy field, and a wooded area to the northwest (Figure 2). At the time of the WESTON/ARCS reconnaissance, the approximately 13-acre Raybestos Field (excluding the fenced baseball diamond) was being capped with a impermeable cover as part of an EPA emergency interim remediation. A 6-foot high chain-link fence surrounds the entire Raybestos Field, restricting vehicle and pedestrian access to the property (Figure 2) [10].
Raymark was in operation from August 1919 until 1989, when the plant was shut down and permanently closed. Raymark was a manufacturer of friction materials containing asbestos and non-asbestos materials, metals, phenol-formaldehyde resins, and various adhesives. The primary products produced were gasket material, sheet packing, and friction materials including: clutch facing, transmission plates, and brake linings and other automotive asbestos products [1, 8, 9]. Currently Raymark maintains a staff of approximately 10 people at the site to secure and maintain Raymark files and records. Additionally, Building No. 43, on the western portion of the site is currently leased to Pirotti and Sons, a waste hauler which employs an estimated 25 people (Figure 2) [10].
During the on-site reconnaissance, the WESTON/ARCS field team observed scattered areas of debris and localized patches of stained soil along the northern edge of the Raymark facility [10]. Mr. Michael Hill (EPA-RCRA) and Mr. Arthur Wing, EPA On-Scene Coordinator (EPA-OSC) identified one of the stained soil areas, approximately 1.5 square feet, as the location where a previous soil sample had been found to contain 9,200 parts per million (ppm) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), specifically Aroclor-1242 [1, 10]. Pieces of what appeared to be asbestos brake parts were observed mixed in with the soil and scattered debris. The WESTON/ARCS team noted that most of the buildings containing windows facing the railroad tracks (north) had broken windows or had been boarded-up
WIL\O41000O9\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 4 09/30/93 indicating evidence of vandalism and/or access to the property along the northern border [1, 10].
At the time of the WESTON/ARCS on-site reconnaissance on September 9, 1992, the Raymark facihty consisted of numerous abandoned production buildings (totaling approximately 500,000 square feet), several paved areas bordered by unpaved grass/dirt covered areas, numerous partially filled storage tanks, and four unlined open air lagoons (Figures 2 and 3) [1, 10]. It should be noted that interim measures have been and are currently being conducted under an EPA CERCLA 106 Removal Order; these include the removal of waste materials and storage tanks from the property' and installation of interim caps at three of the on-site lagoons [76].
Raymark's former operational area, the eastern and central portions of the property, contains numerous former production buildings linked by enclosed and open walkways. A majority of the area between production buildings is paved. Based on visual observation, the structural integrity of several of the abandoned buildings, appeared to be questionable. Consequently, the production buildings were not entered by WESTON/ARCS personnel during field activities at the time of the reconnaissance; however, the interior of several of the buildings were able to be viewed through open windows and doorways. Mr. Hill stated that Raymark was in the process of conducting remediation in buildings which contained asbestos materials. Based on limited visual observation, it appeared that the contents of most of the buildings had been removed; however, some of the buildings appeared to still contain files and machinery. During the on-site reconnaissance, Mr. Hill entered the doorway of Building No. 44, which had formerly contained numerous bags of asbestos waste remaining from various on-site activities. Mr. Hill stated that he observed approximately 30 partially filled 1.5 cubic yard bags of friable asbestos remaining in the building [10].
Numerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) were observed, including four 100,000-gallon tanks reportedly containing an estimated combined volume of 250,000 gallons of asbestos slurry. WESTON/ARCS personnel also observed evidence (vents and fill caps) of several underground storage tanks (USTs). Numerous ASTs and USTs had been used for storage of raw materials, process wastewater, and fuels on the Raymark property [10]. See Attachment A for a complete Hst of ASTs and USTs at the Raymark facility, their location and contents as of March 1993, compiled by Environmental Laboratories, Inc (ELI), a Raymark contractor [1, 10, 11].
A waste soil pile was observed, on a paved area, north of Building No. 38. Reportedly, the soil was excavated around a leaking underground toluene storage tank in 1984. The soil pile is currently covered by a polyethylene tarp; however, WESTON/ARCS personnel observed several holes and rips in the tarp [1, 8, 10] (Figure 2).
During the September 1992 WESTON/ARCS on-site reconnaissance, four on-site unlined open air lagoons were observed along the southwestern portions of the property (Figures 2 and 3). The lagoons are each enclosed by locked 6-foot high chain-link security fences. All four of the lagoons contained some volume of standing water/liquid and stressed vegetation.
WIL\(>1100009\a74\RAYMARK.F^fL 5 09/30/93 WIU(MI0O0O9\0r74\RAYMARK.FNL 09/30/93 Lagoon No. 1 is located in the western portion of the property, southwest of Building No. 43. Lagoon No. 2 is located southeast of Lagoon No. 1. Both these lagoons contained a grayish color liquid sludge material. Lagoon No. 3 is located south of the Building No. 38, southeast of Building No. 43, and southwest of Lagoon No. 2. Lagoon No. 3 contained greenish-grey liquid. Lagoon No. 4 is located along the south-central portion of the site, south of Building No. 1. Lagoon No. 4 also contained a greenish-gray color standing liquid. Reportedly, the four lagoons were connected by a series of underground overflow pipes. Lagoon No. 1 reportedly discharged to Lagoon No. 2, which discharged to Lagoon No. 3 and which discharged to Lagoon No. 4. WESTON/ARCS personnel noted a concrete overflow pipe which possibly linked Lagoon Nos. 3 and 4. These lagoons have been inactive since 1984 and are no longer connected to one another. The pipes linking the lagoons have been plugged with cement and discoimected, according to Mr. Hill. However, Lagoon No. 4 serves as a stormwater collection point for the facility and drains ultimately to Ferry Creek [75]. Lagoon No. 4 was observed by WESTON/ARCS personnel to contain an outlet (discharge) pipe which was partially dammed, but was allowing some wastewater to flow out of the lagoon through the outlet pipe during the on-site reconnaissance. Mr. William McCaim (Stratford Conservation Commissioner) stated that this overflow pipe leads to Ferry Creek via an underground culvert below Interstate 95 [10] (Figure 2).
The banks of all four lagoons contained dried fine-grained sludge material and pieces of what appeared to be asbestos from brake and clutch parts. WESTON/ARCS personnel also noted that scattered pieces of asbestos brake parts and construction debris were abundant throughout the unpaved areas surtounding the lagoons [10]. In December 1993, Raymark installed interim caps at Lagoon Nos. 1, 2, and 3 under an EPA CERCLA 106 Removal Order [76].
WESTON/ARCS personnel noted several on-site monitoring wells during the on-site reconnaissance (see Groundwater Pathway). Mr. Hill pointed out the location of a groundwater recovery pump system, located in the northeastern corner of the property, installed in 1984 to remove toluene from contaminated groundwater beneath the site. The WESTON/ARCS field team noted a reading of 50 benzene equivalent units (ambient air background reading equal to 2.6 units) on an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) when the pump system housing was opened. Mr. Hill stated that the groundwater recovery system pumped continuously at a rate of 180,000 gallons per day (gpd) and discharged via the town sewer system to the Stratford Pollution Control Plant for treatment. However, this system has not been operational continuously since its installation [10].
Public access to the Raymark facility is restricted by a 6-foot chain-link fence surtounding the property. However, during the on-site reconnaissance of the Raymark property, WESTON/ARCS personnel observed several open tractor-trailer trucks driving across the southern portion of the property to and from Building No. 43, located on the western portion of the property. The trucks are part of Pirotti and Sons, waste hauling operation, which leases a portion of the Raymark property. The trucks use the paved area along the south portion of the site, and north and east of the lagoons, as a right-of-way to reach Building No. 43. The right-of-way area is, however, restricted by chain-link fence and locked gates along the entrance/exit of the property. In addition to the fence restricting access, warning signs have been posted along the fence warning of a potential asbestos hazard [10].
WIL\W100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 7 09/30/93 It should be noted that between the fall of 1992 and the spring of 1993, numerous storage tanks, drums and containers of hazardous substances were removed from the facility under EPA supervision. In addition, gravel and topsoil were placed on three of the four lagoons during this time period to mitigate any threat from exposure to contaminants present in the lagoons. Additionally, access to the site and buildings were limited by the installation of fences and securing the buildings. During the summer of 1993, all areas not paved by asphalt were covered with gravel and potholes were filled in and paved with asphalt to reduce exposure to contaminants. As of September 20, 1993, Raymark is in the process of rerouting the drainage around Lagoon No. 4, so that the water from the lagoon does not discharge into Ferry Creek [75].
OPERATIONAL AND REGULATORY HISTORY, AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
Raymark Industries, Inc. of Stratford Connecticut currently owns the 33.4-acre Raymark facility [14,15]. Raymark Industries, Inc. acquired the property through a corporate merger with Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. on June 28, 1982 [73]. The Raymark facility was operational for 70 years from August 1919 until September 1989, when it was shut down and permanently closed. The Raybestos Field was owned by Raymark (Raybestos) until October 1986, when the property was purchased by the current owner, Daley Development Corporation. Raymark was a manufacturer of friction material containing asbestos and non-asbestos materials, metals, phenol-formaldehyde resins, and various adhesives. Primary products produced were gasket material, sheet packing, and friction material including: clutch facings, transmission plates, and brake linings [1, 7, 8, 9]. The following paragraphs briefly outline production processes used to produce materials on-site during the Raymark operational history.
Gasket material and sheet packing were produced by blending asbestos, latex, "Hy-cor" rubber and solvents together in a mixer. Asbestos was received in large paper bags and transferred to smaller plastic bags on-site. The small plastic bags were dropped into a mixer containing rubber and a solvent mixture of toluene and naphtha. The mixing room air was exhausted through a long cone cyclone and an "American Air Filter" pulse type for dust control. The asbestos and rubber mixture were formed between two metal rollers into sheets. One roller (maintained at 245°F) evaporated the solvent, leaving an asbestos impregnated rubber sheet which was used for packing or gasket material. The solvent from the 13 sheeting machines was exhausted into a common header and collected by a carbon absorption system. A fiberglass filter located before the two carbon beds was used to remove asbestos containing dust from the exhaust stream. The carbon beds were steam cleaned and the exhaust from the carbon beds was condensed and decanted. Recovered solvent flowed to an on-site storage tank for reuse [9].
Automatic transmission plates were produced in the friction material department. In this process, asbestos was mixed with water in large beaters to form a slurry. Resins were added, as required, for the product being produced. The beaters were also used for recycling trimmings from the friction material department. Asbestos slurry from the beaters was stored in holding tanks adjacent to building No. 27. From the holding tanks, the slurry was pumped to cylinder type paper machines. The products produced by the paper wn,\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 8 09/30/93 machines were saturated in a roll coater with phenolic resin dissolved in ethanol and oven-cured [9].
Clutch facings were produced from a mixture of wet asbestos and resins. The mixture was fed to a die machine which formed clutch facings. The facings were cured in an indirect oil-fired oven. When resin was not added to the clutch facing, the facings were formed by a die machine, then soaked for up to 12 hours in a phenolic resin dissolved in "Hi-Solv" and oven-cured. After curing, the facings were ground to the proper thickness in the finishing department. Grinding equipment in the finishing department was hooded and ducted to wet rotoclones on the roof, which were later replaced by dry dust collection systems in 1984 [9].
In the manufacturing of brake linings, asbestos, liquid resin, aluminum oxide, clay, and "varsol" were mixed. The mixture was pulverized and roll extruded to form brake linings. Emissions from the pulverizer were controlled by baghouses, located throughout the facility. The brake linings were cured in a continuous chain conveyer oven. A thermal setting resin was applied to the back of the brake linings. The linings were clamped to the brake shoes and bonded to the shoe in a 285° to 300°F oven. When bonding was completed, the brake linings were ground to the proper size and shape. Dust from grinding operations involved with the manufacturing of brake linings were controlled by baghouses [9].
Disc brake pads were produced from a granular mixture of asbestos, resin, and filters. The mixture was fed from hoppers to presses which formed and cured the brake pads [9].
Scrap and trimmings from the manufacturing operations were ground in a pulverizer and recycled back into the processes. The room and equipment used to recycle scraps were controlled by baghouses [9].
According to the 1991 Raymark Report (Draft) prepared by Raymark, three general types of wastes were generated from the above processes: wastewater; waste asbestos and lead solids; waste acids, and caustics [9].
In general, production wastes were discharged into lagoons on the western portion of the site during Raymark's operational history and allowed to settle. Wastewater was allowed to flow to the other lagoons via overflow pipes linking the lagoons in sequence. The current lagoons were shut down in July 1984, when the facility installed new dry dust collectors to replace the wet collectors. After this time, the paper-making process began operating on a closed-loop basis. After July 1984, asbestos/lead dust was disposed off-site by commercial contractors. Limited information was available regarding the waste haulers and disposal locations. However, information provided by Raymark indicates that a majority of the asbestos/lead waste material after January 1990 was disposed of in approved disposal facilities; including the S & S Landfill, Inc., Clarksburg, West Virginia and GSX Services, Inc., Pinewood, South Carolina [1, 9, 77, 78].
A majority of the asbestos and lead waste solids were created from the wet paper-making operations, and various grinding operations where final products were cut to size. Historically, excess "white water" (asbestos lead/wastewater slurry) from the wet dust
WlL\CMI00009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 9 09/30/93 collectors was discharged to the on-site settling lagoons. Solids were allowed to settle in the lagoons by gravity, and the resulting clarified water was discharged to Ferry Creek [1,9,10].
Throughout its operational history, Raymark had acquired several National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permits to discharge wastewater at several locations throughout the property; however, all discharges eventually flowed to Lagoon No. 4 [8, 9, 16, 17]. Wastewaters from Raymark then discharged directly via a stormwater overflow culvert from Lagoon No. 4 to Ferry Creek, which flows into the Housatonic River south of Raymark (Figure 1). Table 1 summaries the NPDES discharge information prior to the facility shut down in 1989.
Table 1
Summary of Raymark Industries NPDES Permit Information
Discharge Description NPDES Permitted Flow
OOIA Acid treatment plant wastewater 130,000 gallons per day OOIB Wet dust collector and paper-making wastewater 750,000 gallons per day
OOIC Non-contact cooling water 1,175,00 gallons per day
OOID Solvent recovery plant wastewater 20,000 gallons per day
002 Non-contact cooling water Variable
001 Fmal discharge to Ferry Creek 2,075,000 gallons per day [9, 17J
During peak production in the 1970s, approximately 750,000 gpd of clarified wastewater (sediment free) was discharged via the lagoons to Ferry Creek in this manner, in accordance with NPDES Permit No. CT001881. Dewatered asbestos and lead solids, which accumulated in the lagoons, amounted to approximately 10,000 cubic yards per year during this peak production period. The quantity of solids generated during the early years of the facility operation could not be determined [8, 9, 16].
During at least the 1970s through the early 1980s, accumulated asbestos and lead solids were annually dredged fi-om the lagoons and disposed off-site in various locations throughout Stratford, including Raybestos Field located north of the operational facility. During the eariy operational history of the facility prior to 1970, these asbestos and lead solids were primarily disposed on-site as fill material to support further land development at the Raymark facility [8, 9, 13, 16]. Based on aerial photographic interpretafion by EPA soil samples collected at depth by Raymark contractors, and historical information from Raymark, most of the western half of the Raymark property contains some degree of asbestos and lead solids fill material [1, 7, 8, 9, 16, 18, 19].
Waste acids and caustics were primarily by-products of a pickling operation at the facility, which was used to clean metal parts (i.e., brake shoes, clutch plates), prior to subsequent
W1L\(M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 10 09/30/93 manufacturing operations. The base metal was carbon steel. Muriatic (hydrochloric), nitric, and sulfuric acids were used on-site [9].
Reportedly, beginning in the 1950s, spent pickle acid containing dissolved metals was transported to acid pits, located in the western part of the facility, where it was dumped and mixed with lime for neutralization (Figure 3). A spent caustic solution used to clean phenolic resins from reaction kettles was also reportedly dumped into the open pits to aid in neutralization. Acid neutralization in the pits continued until the early 1970s when an acid treatment plant (located south of Building No. 3C, Figure 2) was built to treat rinsewaters and spent acids. Iron hydroxide sludge from this treatment plant was disposed at an undisclosed off-site location, according to the Raymark 1991 Draft Report. No additional information was available concerning the disposed sludge. Disposal of spent caustic solutions into the acid pits reportedly continued until the late 1970s [9]. The known locations of the pits have been paved and no visible evidence of the acid pits remain [10]. The total quantity of spent waste acid disposed of at the Raymark property is unknown.
According to Raymark documents, numerous ASTs and USTs located throughout the facility, were used for storage of raw materials, process wastewater, and fuels [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Several leaks or spills have been documented from these tanks and may have contributed to other areas of contamination (i.e., soil and groundwater contamination) [1, 7, 8, 22].
Additionally, during Raymark's operational history, drummed hazardous wastes were stored at various locations on the facility. Although many of these drums were ultimately removed from the site by commercial contractors, leaking drums were observed on a number of occasions during EPA inspections conducted between 1980 and 1991, particularly in the area north of Lagoon No. 3 (Figure 3) [1, 7, 8, 9, 20, 21, 22].
In 1986, the former drummed storage areas, scattered throughout the property, were replaced with a centraHzed container storage area located in the northern secfion of the facility (Figure 3). The new area was covered by a canopy-type roof Approximately 1,400 square feet of this area was used for liquid waste container storage. Any spills from this area were directed to a sump and transferred to an 1,800 gallon storage tank. Approximately 2,500 square feet of the container storage area was used for the storage of solids waste (without free liquids). However, EPA observed during several inspecfions that drums containing Uquid hazardous wastes were also stored in this area [75]. This area was also used for storage of bags containing scrap paper and solid waste from facility dust collectors [9].
Table 2 presents identified structures or.areas on the Raymark site that were potential sources of contamination (at the time of on-site reconnaissance), the containment factors associated with each source, and the relative location of each source (Figure 3).
Table 3 summarizes the types of potentially hazardous substances which are disposed, used, or stored on the property at the time of the on-site reconnaissance.
WIL\(>4I00009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 1 1 09/30/93 Table 2
Source Evaluation for Raymark Industries'
Containment Potential Source Area Factors Spatial Location
Raybestos Field (contaminated soil) None (Interim cap*") North and northwest of Raymark Industries (13.7 acres).
4 Lagoons (contaminated soil) None (Interim cap*") Southwestern/northwestern corners of property.
Former Lagoons Areas (contaminated soil) None (Interim cap") Western and central portions of site. Former Trim Waste Area (contaminated soil) None (Covered with gravel'') North-central portion of Raymark property. Former Acid Pit Area (contaminated soil) None Partially paved Western portion of site, southwest of Building No. 4. 1.5 Gubic Yard Bags of Asbestos ;• Norie:;;t:;?;:;|si|:i|;t:;:i;H|i:iis Inside Building No. 44.
Waste Soil Pile (toluene contaminated soil) Stored on asphalt pad/ North of Building No. 38. polyethylene tarp cover
Former Toluerib Tank Spill Area (contaminated soil) None (Covered with gravel'') Northeast of Building No. 35. |
Stained Soil Areas (PCB/oil contaminated soil) None (Covered with gravel") Throughout Raymark facility.
4 - Asbestos Slurry Tanks (Nos. 1 to 4) Concrete pad (Removed") Adjacent tc» Building; Nd^ 27 (north and west). ? Waste Oil Tank (No. 68) Concrete pad Inside Building No. 29.
Former Drum Storage Areas (contaminated soil) None"'"'' Various locations throughout eastern portion of facility. | Current Drum/Trim Waste Storage Area (contaminated soil) Concrete pad Northeast corner of facility, west of Building No. 6.
2 - Phenol Tank (Nos. 20 and 21) ^ Concrete pad Inside Building No. 16. | Mcta Para Cresol Tank (No. 23F) Concrete pad Inside Building No. 16.
2 -: Cresylic Acid (NbS: 23R: and 24) Concrete pad ;; Inside Building No. 16.
Formaldehyde Tank (No. 25) Concrete pad Inside Building No. 16.
WIUM100009\074\RAYMARK .TBL 09/30/93 12 Table 2
Source Evaluation for Raymark Industries (Concluded)
Containment Potential Source Area Factors Spatial Location
Varsol 18 Tank (No. 27) Concrete pad Inside Building No. 16.
2 - Latex Tanks (Nos. 44 and 45) Concrete pad Inside Building No. 29.
2 - Linseed Oil Tanks (Nos; 19F and 19R>v^^^^^^^;^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | Concrete pad Inside Building N6y.]6;l:;m;iS;::'::::'^:# Chinawood Oil Tank (No. 22) Concrete pad Inside Building No. 16.
Abandoned No:-2^^FuerQil UST^-(N6i;i;54|ii^ •;;?lNJorie?ii!:|i^:|;:|||;| Inside wall along east side of Building No. 1. 2 - No. 6 Fuel Oil Tanks (Nos. 11 and 12) Concrete pad and retention wall Adjacent to Building No. 39A (east).
"Sources represented are based on available data and condictions of the facility at the time when the Raymark Site Inspection was initated. "Containment factors reported were completed between the Fall of 1992 and the Summer of 1993.
[1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 20]
- ^
WIL\(V410 Hazardous Waste Quantity for Raymark Industries Quantity Years of Years of Substance Volume/Area Storage Disposal Source Area Asbestos/Lead Contaminated Soil Approximately 32 acres 1919 to present 1919 to 1989 Raybestos Field (-14 acres), and western (estimated) portion of Raymark Facility (-18 acres). Raw Asbestos material Approximately 30 1.5 Onknowri (prior to N/A Storage area in Building No. 44. cubic yard bags 1989) to present Toluene contaminated Soil 400 cubic yards 1984 to present N/A Soil waste pile (north of Building No. 38). Toluene Contaminated Soil 100 cubic yards N/A Unknown Former toluene tank spill area. (estimated) (prior to 1984) Asbestos Slurry 250,000 gallons Unknown (prior to N/A Tank Nos. 1 to 4 (adjacent Building No. 39A). 1989) to present PCB Contaminated Soil 50 square feet • • Unknown-s' :; Unkhbwii; v;::-i:3:;: Various locations throughout site. (estimated) Waste Oil 10,000 gallons Unknown N/A Tank No. 68 (inside Building No. 29). Potentially Contaminated soil associated 3,900 square feet Unknown Unknown * Various location throughout eastern portion of with Current and Former Drum Storage (estimated) facility. Areas -:---^-" Phenol 24,000 gallons Unknown (prior to N/A Tank Nos. 20 and 21 (inside Building No. 16). (12,000 each) 1989) to present Meta-Cresol 6,000 gallons Unknown (prior to N/A Tank No. 23F (inside Building No. 16). Para-Cresol 1989) to present V Cresylic Acids 18,000 gallons Unknown (prior to N/A Tank Nos. 23R and 24 (inside Building 1989) to present No. 16). WIL\(m000O9\074\RAYMARK.TBL 09/30/93 14 Table 3 Hazardous Waste Quantity for Raymark Industries (Concluded) Quantity Years of Years of Substance Volume/Area Storage Disposal Source Area Formaldehyde':-^•': 12,000 gallons Unknown (prior to N/A Tank No. 25 (inside Building No. 16). 1989) to present Varsol 18 12,000 gallons Unknown (prior to N/A Tank No. 27 (inside Building No. 16). 1989) to present Linseed Oil 12,000 gallons Unknown (prior to N/A Tank Nos. 19F and 19R (inside Building 1989) to present No. 16). Chinawood Oil 12,000 gallons Unknown (prior to N/A Tank No. 22 (inside Building No. 16). 1989) to present No. 6 Fuel Oil 100,000 gallons Unknown (prior to i?l^i:i;^liiliii Tanks Nos. 11 and 12 (adjacent Building (50,000 each) 1989) to present No. 39A). No. 2 Fuel Oil 12,000 gallons Unknown Unknown Abandoned UST No. 54 (inside Building No. 1). [1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 20] N/A = Not applicable. WII,\(MI(XXX>9\()74\RAYMARK.TnL 09/30/93 15 Table 4 provides a chronologic summary of available regulatory history, on-site investigations and/or events related to Raymark. In 1981, 13 "TW-Series" groundwater observation wells were installed by Raymark, to measure the groundwater flow direction and characterize the groundwater quality at Raymark. According to the 1987 Buonicore-Cashman Associates, Inc. (BCA) Report, a Raymark contractor, these monitoring wells were constructed in accordance with CT DEP or EPA approved monitoring well specifications. These wells were destroyed during a snow removal operation prior to collection of any groundwater quality samples; however, water level measurements were obtained from these wells. Results of the water level measurements indicated the general groundwater flow direction at Raymark was to the southeast [8, 9, 11]. In the spring of 1982, five RCRA monitoring wells (A-1 through E-1) were installed around the four existing lagoons to determine the groundwater quality in the regulated (waste management) portions of the site (Figure 4). Quarterly groundwater monitoring began on these wells in July 1982 [8, 25]. In December 1983, 6,000 gallons of phenol leaked from a storage tank. Approximately 4,000 gallons were contained and removed from a sump and roughly 2,000 gallons flowed to Lagoon No. 4. The lagoon gates were closed to contain the phenol. At the time of containment, the lagoon held approximately 70,000 gallons of contaminated liquid. An unknown amount of this liquid was pumped to tanks for later disposal [75]. Five 'T Series" groundwater monitoring wells were installed (1983) in the eastern portion of the property to monitor groundwater quality in the vicinity of the USTs (Figure 4) [7, 8, 9, 22]. Based on the groundwater information from these wells, a toluene leak from the UST was detected. Elevated levels of toluene were detected in all the T-series wells with the exception of T-5 (Figure 4). As a result of the elevated toluene levels in the groundwater samples, Raymark was ordered by the CT DEP in 1984 to remove the toluene storage tank and a recovery pump system was installed to remove toluene from the contaminated groundwater near well T-3 [1, 8, 10]. The tank was removed along with roughly 400 cubic yards of contaminated soil. The 400 cubic yards of contaminated soils (concentrations of toluene as high as 12,000 ppm) were placed directly upon the asphalt pad north of Building No. 38, where it has remained to date [1, 8, 9, 10]. According to BCA, a groundwater recovery system was installed in the northeast section of the property in 1985. This recovery system operated at a rate of approximately 180,000 gpd, as measured by CT DEP, since February 1985 to remove the toluene in the groundwater and to contain the contamination plume [8, 22]. According to EPA/RCRA, this groundwater recovery well had ceased operating prior to a July 1990 on-site inspection [7]. To further assess the extent of the toluene contamination, 11 soil test borings were completed in 1984, in the area of the T-series wells [8, 9, 11, 25]. The 1988 BCA report, the T-series wells were sampled and analyzed for toluene on a monthly basis since 1985 [8]. WESTON/ARCS was unable to obtain the monthly analytical results from groundwater samples collected from the T-series wells or the locations of the 11 soils borings. WIL\M10O0O9\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 16 09/30/93 Table 4 Chronological Summary of Regulatory History, Investigations and/or Events Related to Raymark Industries Contractor/Agency Date Report and/or Activity EPA November 1980 Raymark falls subject to RCRA regulations. EPA January 1981 EPA assigned Discovery Date to Raymark facility, initiating CERCLA procedures. EPA June 1981 EPA assigned Discovery Date to Raybestos Field, initiating CERCLA procedures. :l'itaymark|ii:|:i;ii||||:| 1981 13 TW-Series" observation wells were installed to (unknown date) characterize the groundwater quaUty. Raymark 1982 (spring) 5 "RCRA" monitoring wells installed to characterize groundwater condition around the 4 unlined lagoons. Raymark June 1982 Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. transfers property to Raymark Industries, Inc through corporate riierger. Raymark July 1982 RCRA quarterly groundwater monitoring begins. CT DEP August 1983 CT DEP issued an Administrative Order HM-81, requiring Raymark Industries to come into compliance with waste-handling procedures and upgrade groundwater monitoring program. Raymark (Spill) December 1983 Approximate 6,000 gallon phenol leak occurred, approximately 2,000 gallons flowed into Lagoon No. 4. Raymark 1983 Five T-Series" monitoring wells were installed to monitor (unknown date) groundwater quality in the vicinity of potentially leaking underground storage tanks located in the eastern portion of the facility. Raymark (Spill) 1984 Discovery of toluene leak from an underground storage (unknown date) tank. The tank was removed along with roughly 400 cubic yards of contaminated soil. A groundwater recovery system was installed to remove the toluene in the groundwater and contain the plume. BCA January 1984 BCA submits Annual RCRA Groundwater Report, 1983 sampling year for the Raymark Industries, Stratford, Connecticut. CTDEP March 1984 CT DEP requires Raymark to prepare and implement a Groundwater Assessment Program, due to statistically significant increase in the concentration of hazardous waste in the reportedly downgradient (southeast) well samples verses reportedly upgradient (northwest) well samples. WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 17 09/30/93 Table 4 Chronological Summary of Regulatory History, Investigations and/or Events Related to Raymark Industries (Continued) Contractor/Agency Date Report and/or Activity Raymark July 1984 Lagoon Nos. 1, 2, and 3 became inactive and surface impoundment assessment was initiated. Two additional RCRA monitoring wells were mstalled around these lagoons. Cr DEP August 1984 CT DEP issued an Administrative Order HM-194, requiring Raymark to submit closure plan for the surface impoundments. (Lagoons were not capped until December 1992.) EPA September 1984 EPA files Compliance Order against Raymark pursuant to Section 3008(a) of RCRA. EPA October 1984 EPA files Amended Compliance Order against Raymark pursuant to Section 3008(a) of RCRA. Raymark (Spill) ^|||pmi3er-i984-s|||| Release of 75,000 gailbns of asliestos/phenol wastewater : occurred from an undisclosed holding tank. The release penetrated surface soils aiid also entered Lagoon No; 4 and ultimately discharged to Ferry Creek and the Housatonic River. BCA January 1985 BCA submits Annual RCRA Groundwater Report, 1984 sampUng year for the Raymark Industries, Stratford, Connecticut. Raymark (Spill) February 1985 An estimated 500 to 1,000 gallons of cotton liner, graphite and aluminum oxide released from aboveground storage tank onto ground surface.: Raymark (Spill) February 1985 Release of approximately 10 to 15 gallons of wastewater containing red oxide, cotton Hner, and asbestos to Lagoon No. 4. Raymark (Spill) February 1985 Release of approximately 100 to 200 gallons of wastewater, containing phenol at concentrations of approjdmately 20 to 30 ppm, discharged into Lagoon No. 4. Raymark (Spill) February 1985 Approximately 800 gallons of waste or process water containing asbestos and phenolic resin released to Lagoon No. 4. Raymark (Spill) March 1985 Approximately 1,000 gallons of wastewater containing phenol and asbestos released to Lagoon No. 4. Raymark (Spill) Aprai985;;/"\:;:i| An estimated 500 to 1,000 gallons of water containing phenolic resin and asbestos overflow a holding tank. WIL\(M10OOO9\0r74\RAYMARK.FNL 18 09/30/93 Table 4 Chronological Summary of Regulatory History, Investigations and/or Events Related to Raymark Industries (Continued) Contractor/Agency Date Report and/or Activity Raymark (Spill) May 1985 Approximately 100 to 200 gallons of water containing asbestos and phenoUc resin released to Lagoon No. 4. Raymark (Spill) September 1985 Approximately 5 gallons of hydraulic oil were released during on-site operations; material reportedly recovered using an absorbent material Raymark 1985 EPA Consent Agreement, Raymark agreed to prepare (unknown date) and submit to EPA and CT DEP a groundwater quality program and correct other violations and pay a penalty of $39,500. Raymark 1985 Brake Systems, Inc. acquires Raymark's dry brake (unknown date) manufacturing operations and leases space from Raymark. BCA January 1986 BCA suJDmits Annual RCRA Groundwater Report, 1985 sampling year for the Raymark Industries, Stratford, Connecticut. EPA/ Department February 1986 EPA/DOJ file complaiiit against Raymark in U.S. District of Justice (DOJ) Court for violations of the Clean Air Act. cr DEP April 1986 CI DEP issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) No. 252 following February 4 RCRA inspection. CTDEP August 1986 RCRA compliance inspection preformed by CT DEP reveals non-compliance with NOV No. 252. : Raymark October 1986 Raymark sold Raybestos Field to Daley Development Corporation. EPA October 1986 EPA Preliminary Assessment completed on Raymark facility. BCA January 1987 BCA submits Annual RCRA Groundwater Report, 1986 sampling year for the Raymark Industries, Stratford, Connecticut. Raymark (Spill) January 1987 Estimated 400 gallons of resin and alcohol released, reported material evaporated. EPA March 1987 EPA issues RCRA 3013 and 3008(a) Orders against Raymark. BCA Summer 1987 BCA, under the direction of Raymark, initiate a Prelimiiiary Assessment of the Raymark property. WIL\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 19 09/30/93 Table 4 Chronological Summary of Regulatory History, Investigations and/or Events Related to Raymark Industries (Continued) Contractor/Agency Date Report and/or Activity Raymark (Spill) December 1987 Spillage of 600 gallons of 1,1,1-trichloroethane at the facility from an aboveground tank. The spill was reportedly vacuumed clean. Raymark 1988 Raymark agrees to correct deficiencies under RCRA and (unknown date) pay penalty of $36,750. On the eve of settlement EPA inspects Raymark and finds same violations, Consent Agreement revised with penalty of $51,335. EPA/DOJ 1988 EPA/DOJ enter into a Consent Decree with Raymark (unknown date) that resolves Clean Air Act violations. Raymark pays penalty of $135,000. :iHlllilllllllllllllllll pjpiiaiy'"^i988;:|;-:^^^^^ BCA submits Annual RCRA Groundwater Report, 1987 sampling year for the Raymark Industries, Stratford, Connecticut. Raymark (Spill) March 1988 Spillage of 100 gallons of resin waste released and reportedly contained and removed. Raymark (Spill) ||i§'i988i;ii||||:||| 20 to 30 gallons of unknown waste were discharged from ; a disconnected hose to Ferry Creek. Raymark (Spill) April 1988 Discharge of an unknown volume of oil to Lagoon No. 4. Reportedly material was boomed and then removed. Ebasco;|;||||||i::|iii October 1988 Ebasco submits a comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring Evaluation (CME) Report, for Raymark Industries, Stratford, Connecticut. BCA January 1989 BCA submits Annual RCRA Groundwater Report, 1988 sampling year for Raymark Industries, Stratford, Connecticut. EPA February 1990 EPA issues CERCLA 106 Removal Order to Daley Development Corporation, current owner of Raybestos Field. WESTON/TAT Summer 1991 WESTON/TAT, under the direction of EPA, completes a Site Characterization of the Raybestos Field. EPA concludes that there is an actual or potential exposure threat to nearby human populations, and/or drinking water supplies and sensitive ecosystems. EPA Summer 1991 EPA initiated an emergency interim remediation at the Raybestos Field, including the construction of an impermeable cover. WTL\O410O009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 20 09/30/93 Table 4 Chronological Summary of Regulatory History, Investigations and/or Events Related to Raymark Industries (Concluded) Contractor/Agency Date Report and/or Activity EPA/DOJ July 1991 Civil Judicial Complaint filed in the U.S. District Court of Connecticut for violations of RCRA. .-Mll®ffliliiiii? October 1991 WESTON/TAT, under the direction of EPA, completes a Supplemental Site Investigation of the Raymark facility. EPA concludes that there is an actual or potential exposure threat to nearby human populations, and/or drinking water supplies and sensitive ecosystems. ELI July 1992 ELI collects and analyzes samples at Raymark from 15 newly completed soil borings; ELI also installs 10. additional groundwater wells and conducts groundwater sampling of on-site wells. "Mggggll^^ :||ipt^i|blfl^|||;-;;| ELI installs 3 deep bedrock groundwater wells and conducts soil sampling at Raymark. Additionally, ELl • collects and analyzes groundwater samples from on-site;; wells. EPA September 1992 EPA issues CERCLA 106 Removal Order for the Raymark Industries facility. WESTON/ARCS September/ WESTON/ARCS collects sediment and soil samples from November 1992 public and residential properties in the vicinity of Raymark Industries as part of the EPA Site Inspection. Raymark January 1993 Raymark submits a Phase II A Report, completed by ELI, mdicating the presence of Dioxin/Furans in soil samples collected at the Raymark property. ATSDR May 1993 Issues Public Health Advisory for Raymark Industries/Stratford Asbestos Sites. [1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 75] WIL\O41000O9\074\RAYMARK.FNL 21 09/30/93 ADAPTED FROM: WESTON/TAT 1991 RAYMAHK STTE SKETCH STRATFORD DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MAPS F-l l AND F-IS. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INC. FACIUTY SITE PLAN LEGEND RAYUARK INDUSTRIES. INC SHEETS SI - S4. NOT TO SCALE ^Tw-. MONITORING WELL LOCATION -»»- FENCE WITH GATE ] CULVERT • — PROPERTY' UNE GROUNDWATER WELL LOCATIONS WASTE SOIL PILE MANAGERS DESIGNERS/CONSULTANTS O) STORAGE TANK RAYMARK INDUSTRIES LOCATION yy OVERFLOW CULVERT ^ STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT STAINED SOIL FIGURE 4 WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 22 09/30/93 In the summer of 1987, a groundwater assessment program was conducted by BCA, for Raymark, to supplement the RCRA quarterly monitoring well program. BCA submitted a copy of the Draft - Preliminary Assessment Report for Raymark Industries to EPA on April 12, 1988 [8]. As part of the BCA study, 8 additional monitoring wells were installed and 12 soil borings were completed to better define the groundwater flow direction and plume migration on the western portion of the property (Figures 4 and 5) [8]. In the summer of 1992, ELI initiated a Phase IIA investigation of the site. ELI completed 15 soil borings and installed 10 additional wells (clusters) around the western portion of the property (Figures 4 and 5). Soil samples were collected and analyzed from the soil borings. Soil boring samples indicate that numerous organic and inorganic constituents are found significantly above detection limits throughout the Raymark facility [11, 28, 29]. In the fall of 1992, ELI conducted sampling and analysis of groundwater from three monitoring well clusters A, E, and F. Analytical results for these 13 wells sampled indicated numerous organic and inorganic constituents detected above the human health standards MCLs [11, 27]. Table 5 provides information for the groundwater wells installed at the Raymark property between 1981 and 1992. Table 5 Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Wells Installed on the Raymark Industries Property Total Approximate Well Series Well Identification Date of Number of WeU Depth Installation Wells (feet) TW 1 through 13 1981 13 Unknown W^^^^^^^ A-1, B-1, C, D, and E-1 IIHIiPiiiB 5 20 to 25 T T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5 1983 5 16 to 27 W^^^^^^ FandG |||i|||MI|s||i;; 2 18 to 20 A A-2, B-2, E2, H-1, H-2, J-1, 1987 8 20 to 60 J-2, and I Unknown |||||:piiii||||i|M^^ Unknown 2 Unknown ; L L-3 1991 1 Unknown Replacement |ii|pii|||||||B^^^^^^^^ 1992 2 Unknown Cluster Al-l, A-4, E2, E4-1, E-5, 6, 1992 10 20 to 97 Fl-1, F2, F3, and F4 I . —1 • • . *See Figure 4 for locations of existing wells. [26, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 43] WIL\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 23 09/30/93 ADAPTED FROM: LEGEND WESTON/TAT 1991 RAYMARK SITE SKETCH STRATFORD DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MAPS F-l l AND F-12. BCA 1887 SOIL BORING LOCATIONS SKETCH •»-« ELI SOIL BORING LOCATION ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INC. FACIUTY SITE PLAN RAYMARK INDUSTRIES. INC SHEETS SI - S4. OB-« BCA SOIL BORING LOCATION NOT TO SCALE A'-" " TAT SAMPLE LOACTiON -»+-»*- FENCE WITH GATE ) CULVERT , - ^ PROPERTY UNE PREVIOUS SAMPLE LOCATIONS WASTE SOIL PILE MANAGERS V y DESICNERS/C0NSULIANT5 STORAGE TANK RAYMARK INDUSTRIES e — LOCATION OVERFLOW CULVERT STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT STAINED SOIL FIGURE 5 WIL\041000(»\074\RAYMARK.FNL 24 09/30/93 Removal actions at Raymark facility were initiated by Raymark Industries, Inc. in September 1992 and are ongoing. Approximately 75 percent of the work is complete. Remaining activities include removing a 400 yard cubic pile of solvent-and lead-contaminated soil, permanent capping of Lagoon No. 4 and diversion of stormwater; assessing the potential for off-site migration of contaminants; and implementing measures to mitigate those releases [75, 76]. During the fall of 1992, WESTON/ARCS conducted on- and off-site sampling in the vicinity of the Raymark facility. WESTON/ARCS collected and analyzed soil samples from various residential properties abutting the Raymark facility and Raybestos Field. Sediment samples were collected and analyzed from locations along the surface water pathway (including Ferry Creek and the Housatonic River) [10]. In January 1993, EPA received from Raymark, a Phase 11 A Report completed by ELI, indicating the presence of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (dioxins) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (furans) in soil samples collected on the Raymark property [75]. On May 26, 1993, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) issued a Health Advisory for Raymark Industries/Stratford Asbestos Sites, Stratford, Fairfield County, Connecticut. The Public Health Advisory was issued to advise the EPA, the State of Connecticut, the Town of Stratford, and the public of an imminent public health hazard associated with past, present, and potential future exposures to waste from past operations and disposal practices of Raymark Industries [13]. No National Priority List sites are located within one mile of the Raymark property as of April 9, 1993 [30]. However, there are several Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) properties within a one-mile radius of the facility (excluding Raymark) (Table 6) [30]. There are also 197 RCRA notifiers located within the towns of Stratford and Milford, possibly within a one-mile radius of the site, listed in the U.S. EPA RCRA Generators in Region I Active and Inactive by Town report as of October 28, 1991 [31]. The dates listed indicate the printing date of the respective lists cited above. WASTE/SOURCE SAMPLING In 1987, a Preliminary Assessment program was initiated by BCA, under the direction of Raymark. As part of this investigation, 8 monitoring wells were installed and 12 soil borings were completed (Figures 4 and 5). The 1987 study indicated that several of the soil borings conducted at the site encountered fill or waste material between the ground surface and approximately 15 feet below the grade. In many cases, the fill material appeared to extend for only a few feet below grade; however, in some cases, fill extended to as much as 10 feet below the groundwater table. Generally, soils that contained fill material were comprised of various wastes including: asbestos waste, wood, bricks, and brake materials. In nearly all cases, "asbestos fill" was encountered as referenced from the drilling logs [8]. WIL\O410OOO9\0r74\RAYMA!UC.FNL 25 09/3(V93 Table 6 CERCLIS Properties Located Within One Mile of Raymark Industries Site Name Address CERCLIS No. Distance/Direction Boise Cascade Containers 1255 West Broad Street, SUatford CTD983870379 0.9 southwest Dresser Industries 250 East Main Street, Stratford CrD001840974 03 north Freeman Property Stratford Avenue, Stratford C1D98387G494 0.9 southwest Housatonic Boat Club Shore Road, Stratford CTD980520365 0.7 south Morgan Francis Co (Fleet East Broadway and Ferry CTD001165307 0.2 south Tool) Boulevard, Stratford 1 Raybestos Field Frog Pond Lane, Stratford CTD980520357 0.05 north Reynolds Aluminum 347 Longbrook Avenue, Stratford CTD000845172 0.3 northwest 1 Building Products Co. 1 Ross & Roberte 1299 West Broad Street, Stratford C1'D001180231 0.9 southwest 1 Spada's Rotary Shop Ferry Boulevard, Stratford Cm018830166 0.4 south Synthetic Prod, Co 1525 Stratford Avenue, Stratford CTD001179688 0.8 southwest Synthetic Products 375 Bamum Avenue Cutoff, CTD000844365 0.2 west Stratford 1 Milford Rivet & Machine 857 Bridgeport Avenue, Milford CTD001179720 0.9 east 1 U S Baird Corp. The 1700 Stratford Avenue, Stratford CrD001168384 0.9 southwest [30, 32] The lateral extent of fill material encountered during the 1987 soil borings >vas interpreted by BCA to be bound by B-3, B-7, B-8, B-9, B-10, and B-11 (Figure 5), which reportedly corresponds to areas noted as fill areas and past lagoons (Figure 3) [8]. According to the 1988 BCA (Draft) report, soil samples were collected for laboratory analyses based on field screening results of split spoon samples collected during soil borings (maximum depth 60 feet). Soil samples which appeared to have high contamination levels based on field screening results (above 5 ppm) were sent to a State-certified and EPA-approved laboratory for organic and inorganic analyses. Samples from various depths fi-om 12 boring locations were analyzed for 10 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), 39 semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), 14 inorganic constituents, total cyanide and fuel oil hydrocarbons using EPA-approved methods [9]. In addition, the soil samples collected were analyzed for fibrous materijJs, based on asbestos and non-asbestos analyses. WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 26 09/30/93 Laboratory analyses of the Raymark soil boring samples indicated several types of asbestos fibers were detected on-site [8]. Tables 7 and 8 summarize the maximum concentration for organic and inorganic constituents for the soil samples collected by BCA during 1987 at the Raymark property. BCA detected 13 organic constituents above their detection limit, ranging from 79.2 parts per billion (ppb) (ethylbenzene) to 84,700 ppb (total fuel oil hydrocarbons) (Table 7) [8]. BCA stated that aromatic volatile compounds were detected throughout the Raymark property. Toluene, and xylenes (meta-, para-, and ortho-) appeared to be the most prevalent, while benzene and ethylbenzene were detected in isolated samples. According to BCA, there is a close relationship between the occurrence of metals contamination and the occurrence of toluene and xylenes contamination. The lateral extent of toluene and xylenes contamination is similar to that outlined for metals and fill extent [8]. Significant toluene contamination was detected in the northeastern portion of the property, extending southward to soil boring location B-1 (Figure 5). BCA soil samples indicate toluene contamination occurrences above and at the water table (approximately 3 to 16 feet below surface grade). Based on the extensive area of toluene contamination along the eastern portion of the site, BCA concluded that it appeared that toluene contamination was caused by more than just a toluene tank leak [8]. BCA also reported the detection of halogenated VOCs, tetrachlorethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and trichloroethene, at "significant concentrations" in isolated areas and depths throughout the property. These compounds were generally detected in shallow soil samples, but were not detected throughout fill areas. Phenol concentrations are also somewhat random according to BCA with isolated occurrences of detectable concentrations in the fill material [8]. According to the 1988 BCA (Draft) report, an area of "significant fuel-oil contamination" was detected in the vicinity of B-10 and B-11 (Figure 4). The fuel oil was detected at and above the groundwater table. Samples collected from below the groundwater table indicated non-detectable concentration levels (below the detection limit equal to 20 ppb) [81. Table 8 summarizes analj'tical inorganic results for the Raymark samples collected by BCA in 1987. According to the 1988 BCA report, metal analyses of soil samples collected from the Raymark property indicated the presence of elevated metal constituents on-site. BCA further stated that the elevated levels of metals detected on-site could not have occurred naturally based on the site geology. Elevated inorganic elements and compounds detected on-site included: arsenic, lead, barium, copper, chromium, cadmium, cyanide, and zinc. BCA noted that elevated concentrations of metals were generally detected throughout the vertical section of fill material. However, samples collected below areas of fill material and analyzed for metal constituents generally indicated that concentration decreased rapidly with depth below the fill material [8]. WIL\O41O00O9\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 2 7 09/30/93 Table 7 Summary of Maximum Analytical Organic Results BCA Source (Soil) Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (collected 1987) Maximum Concentrations in Soil Borings Organic Constituents Maximum Concentration Sample Depth of Sample (ppb) Location (feet) 1 ChlorobenzMie 1,300 B-3 0.5 to 1.5 1 1,1,-Dichloroethane ^B^^^B^^KM- i|i||||i||;B^^^^^ 4 to 6 Tetrachloroethane 5,240 B-10 6 to 8 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane I^^XBlB^^U: i||i||i||li||i 8 to 10 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,041 B-10 8 to 10 1 Trichloroethene illillliH^^^^ (|||||B|P^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 8 to 10 1 Benzene 225 B-5 4 to 6 Ethyl B^izene ^^^^^^^M] ||||||W|||||i| 0to2 Toluene 8,360 B-3 2 to 4 1 1 m & p-Xylenes iHliiilRiiiiiiilii ^f^gmMmii lmKlK^9H9-'f \ o-Xylenes 9,460 B-11 13 to 15 1 Fuel Oil Hydrocarbons 84,700 Wg^miSgsi 13 to 15 1 Phenols 40,800 B-3 4 to 6 1 Note: Detection limit = 20 ppb. ppb = Parts per billion = microgram per kilogram (ug/kg). [8] WIL\OI100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 28 09/30/93 Table 8 Summary of Maximum Analytical Inorganic Results BCA Source (Soil) Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (collected 1987) Maximimi Concentrations in Soil Borings Inorganic Elements Maximimi Concentration Sample Depth of Sample (ppm) Location (feet) Arsenic 7.12 B-9 8 to 10 WMM^&iMMMM9MSmMM^ 371 B-9 15 to 16.5 1 Copper 164,542 B-7 4 to 6 illiiiii 445,726 B-6 25 to 26.5 1 Lead 56,415 B-9 0to2 1 Chromium (total) ^|||:;:||:|;::||||;i|:l||||liii^ iii^isiiiSi^-ii^^iiii 8 to 10 1 Chromiimi (hexavalent) ND ~ ~ Magnesium 260,072 lliilliiilllll 8 to 10 Zinc 41,458 B-3 8 to 10 Manganese 1,045 |||||iili||:|||||l 8 to 10 Sodium 5,020 B-9 6 to 8 1 Cadmium 38.5 B-12 8 to 10 Nickel 1,645 B-4 15 to 16.5 j Cyanide (total) 25.9 B-9 0 to 2 ND = Not Detected (Detection Limit =0.01 ppm). ppm = Parts per million = milligram per kilogram (mg/kg). [8] WIL\O410O0O9\074\RAYMARK.FNL 29 09/30/93 In 1991, the WESTON/Technical Assistance Team (TAT) and the EPA On-site Coordinator (OSC) conducted a supplemental site investigation of the Raymark property. The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate changes in site conditions based on clean-up activities conducted by the property owner (Raymark) and evaluate potential health threats subsequent to the preliminary assessment conducted on January 16,1989. WESTON/TAT conducted two sampling rounds on August 28, and September 13, 1991. WESTON/TAT collected 12 samples [including one quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) sample] from various potential source locations throughout the Raymark facility (Figure 5) and delivered the source samples to the EPA Envirormiental Services Division (ESD) laboratory in Lexington, Massachusetts for analyses. Selected samples were analyzed for VOCs, base/neutral and acid extractables (BNAs), PCBs, and metals in accordance with EPA guidelines. Table 9 summarizes the analytical results of the WESTON/TAT source samples collected from the Raymark facility in 1991. The WESTON/TAT results indicate significant levels of VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, metals, and asbestos on the Raymark property. WESTON/TAT detected 10 VOCs ranging from equal to the detection Umit to 100 times the detection limit for toluene (20 ppb). Six SVOCs were detected on-site ranging from less than the detection limit to 1.1 times the detection limit for phenol (5.8 ppm). Five on-site source (soil) samples were determined to contain various PCB compounds (Aroclor-1242, -1260, -1262, and -1268). PCB concentrations ranged from 1.5 ppm (Aroclor-1242/sample 003) up to 9,200 ppm (Aroclor-1242/sample 009). Four metals were detected at levels above their naturally occurring concentrations levels: lead, copper, zinc, and nickel. Concentrations of metals ranged from 130 ppm to 7,000 ppm, for lead at locations 002 and 007, respectively. Lead was detected at significant (greater than 1,500 ppm) levels in six of the on-site sample locations. Asbestos concentrations were determined to be between 0 and 75 percent for the on-site samples collected by WESTON/TAT from the Raymark property [1]. Chirrently, ELI is in the process of conducting further investigations of the Raymark property in response to an EPA RCRA 3013 Order. As part of the investigations of Raymark, ELI compiled analytical soil data from 15 soil borings completed in July 1992, and from 3 deep well clusters (A, E, and F) installed in September 1992. A total of 67 soil samples (including 2 aqueous QA/QC samples) were collected at various depths [13, 28, 29]. Table 10 summarizes the maximum concentrations detected and its sample location (for each constituent observed above the detection limit parameter). ELI results indicated that numerous organic and inorganic compounds were detected above the sample detection limits. Organic analyses indicated 22 VOCs, 25 SVOCs, 5 chlorinated herbicides, and 11 organophosphorus and dioxin compounds present. Additionally, 17 metals, sulfide, cyanide, and four asbestos constituents were also detected above detection limits at Raymark. Table 11 summarizes the location of the source (ILagoon No. 4 sediment) sample collected at the Raymark property by WESTON/ARCS on September 24, 1992 (Figure 5) [12]. This sample was submitted for Routine Analytical Service (RAS) full organic, total metals, and cyanide analyses through the EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). In addition, this source sample was also submitted for CLP Special Analytical Service (SAS) for PCB and WIL\a4100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 3 0 09/30TO Table 9 Summary of WESTON/TAT Analytical Results Source (Soil) Samples Analysis for Raymark Industries (samples collected 1991) Sample Location No. Analyses Detection (Lab Sample No.) Performed Compound/Element Concentration Limit Comments 001 VOCs Toluene 10 ' ppb 0.41 ppb 24xDL (00163) Ethylbenzene 0.45 ppb 0.41 ppb 1.1 X DL Xylenes (total) 5.4 ppb 0.82 ppb 6.6 X DL 002 liBfiillllllll Toluene 5.4 ppb 0.53 ppb 10.2 xDL (00164) i||i||||i||||i||f Xylenes (total) 3.4 ppb 1.06 ppb 3.2 X DL |;iii^|||t|||ii|| Lead 130 ppm NR > NOMC Asbestos (total percent) 0% NR - 003 VOCs Toluene 2.4 ppb 1.03 ppb 2.3 X DL (00165, 00172) BNAs 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 20 ppb 3.09 ppb' 6.5 X DL PCBs Xylenes (total) 2.2 ppb 2.06 ppb 1.1 X DL Metals Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 : ppm 6.06 ppm < DL Asbestos 2-4-Dimethylphenol 2 • ppm 6.06 ppm < DL Phenol 4 ppm 6.06 ppm < DL Aroclor-1242 1.5 ppm 1.00 ppm 1.5 X DL Lead 3,500 ppm NR > NOMC Copper 2,800 ppm NR > NOMC Zinc 700 ppm NR > NOMC Asbestos (total percent) 25 % NR - liiiiiiiiiiiB^^^^^ VOCs Toluene 20 ppb 0.20 ppb 100 xDL :|i||||^||i|i||||§ BNAs 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.2 ppb 0.20 ppb 2.0 xDL |iiiiiiiiiiiiii;iiisiiii^^^^^^^^^^^^ PCBs 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 039 * ppb 0.20 ppb 23.3 X DL iiiliiliiiilii^ii^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Metals 4-Methyl-2-Peotanone 14 . ppb 0.60 ppb 1.8 X DL i|i||iiii||i|;|i^^^^^ Asbestos Naphthalene 0.35 * ppb 0.20 ppb < DL liiiliiiiiiliiB^^^^^^ Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phtha]afe 1 : ppm 4.75 ppm NOMC •;-;•• •;-;>-:::-:-r';';SS-;-:';-:-;>;-;^^ Copper 3,000 ppm NR > NOMC Zinc 500 ppm NR > NOMC iiHiiiiiiiiiiiiip Asbestos (total percent) 30% NR - 005 Metals Lead 1,600 ppm NR > NOMC (00167) Asbestos Copper 600 ppm NR > NOMC Zinc 500 ppm NR > NOMC Nickel 500 ppm NR > NOMC Asbestos (total percent) 75 % NR -
WIL\04100009\Or74\RAYMARK.FNL 31 09/30/93 Table 9
Summary of WESTON/TAT Analytical Results Source (Soil) Samples Analysis for Raymark Industries (samples collected 1991) (Continued)
Sample Location No. Analyses Detection (Lab Sample No.) Performed Compound/Element Concentration Limit Comments
006 VOCs Toluene 3.8 ppb 0.8 ppb 4.8 X D L (00168, 00174) BNAs 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 22 ppb 2.40 ppb 9.2 xDL PCBs Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 : ppm 5.11 ppm < DL 2-4-Dimethyiphenol 4 « ppm 5.11 ppm < DL Phenol' 5.8 • ppm 5.11 ppm 1.1 xDL 2-Methylphenol 2 ppm 5.11 ppm < DL
007 VOCs Toluene 4.9 ppb 1.10 ppb 4.5 X DL (00169, 00175) BNAs Phenol 2 * ppm 25.2 ppm < DL PCBs Aroclor-1242 7.0 ppm 0.77 ppm 9.1 X DL Metals Aroclor-1260/1262'' 3.42 ppm 0.46 ppm 7.4 X DL Asbestos Aroclor-1268 11 ppm 0.46 ppm 23.9 X DL Lead 7,000 ppm NR > NOMC Copper 1,200 ppm NR > NOMC Zinc 1,000 ppm NR > NOMC Asbestos (total percent) 75% NR .. . 008 ^W&&§$:'W Aroclor-1260/1262'' 46 ppm 231 ppm ; 19.9 X DL: (00170, 00176) i'lMiii:::-.'.!:: Aroclor-1268 170 ppm 231: ppm : 73.6 X DL ;,:|eii:|||ir>:;| Lead 5,900 ppm . NR .•-: > NOMC ••if^etai:iir"''iii;; Copper 3,000 ppm NR ;. > NOMC ;|\|besit(M'^;:-^;-:•:•,;;: Zinc 1,000 ppm NR > NOMC Asbestos (total percent) 50% NR . ..
009 PCBs Aroclor-1242 9,200 ppm 250 ppm 36.8 X DL (00171)
010 VOCs Methylene Chloride 1 : ppb 1 ppb.;; IxDL (00177) BNAs 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2 ppb 1 ppb: :: 2xD L PCBs 1,1-Dichloroethane 17 ppb 1 ppb j:;^ 17 X DL 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 37 ppb 1 ppb;;;; 37xDL Carbon Disulfide 12 ppb 3 ppb;;; 4xD L ; v:
Oil VOCs Chloroethane 4 : ppb 1 ppb 4xD L (00178) BNAs Methylene Chloride 2 ppb 1 ppb 2xD L PCBs 1,1-Dichloroethylene 16 " ppb 1 ppb 16xDL 1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 ppb 1 ppb IxDL isomers 46 ppb 1 ppb 46xDL 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3 ppb 3 ppb IxDL Carbon Disulfide
WIL\M100009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 32 09/30/93 •••> (•• ^
Table 9
Summary of WESTON/TAT Analytical Results Source (Soil) Samples Analysis for Raymark Industries (samples collected 1991) (Concluded)
Sample Location No. Analyses Detection (Lab Sample No.) Performed Compoimd/Element Concentration Limit Comments
012 iij^M 'Quantitation is approximate. "Unable to distinguish compounds due to interference. DL = Detection Limit. PCBs = Polychlorinated biphenyls. ppb = Parts per billion = microgram per kilogram (ug/kg). ppm = Parts per million = milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) = microgram per gram (ug/gm). NOMC = Naturally occurring metal concentrations (Taken from "Hazardous Waste Land Treatment" USEPA OSWER, SW-874, April 1983). NR = Not Reported. VOCs = Volatile organic compounds. WIL\O4100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 33 09/30/93 Table 10 Maximum Concentrations Detected at Raymark Industries Property For 1992 Soil Samples Collected by ELI (Samples Collected July and September 1992) Sample Analyses Constituent Manmimi Detection Limit Location/ Concentration Depth (feet) VOA Acetone 3,893 ppb 100 ppb 2 (8 to 10) (EPA Method 8240) Benzene 80.4 ppb 5 ppb 28 (8 to 10) 2-Butanone 28,046 ppb 100 ppb E5 (8 to 9) Carbon Disulfide 209 ppb 100 ppb SB-17 (7 to 8) Chlorobenzene 141,379 ppb 5 ppb E5 (8 to 9) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 195 ppb ••5--;-^-- :• -ppl|- £2(8 to 9y;;;::: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 138.0 ppb 5 ppb E2 (8 to 9) 1,1-Dichloroethane 2,287 ppb ; ',5- ppbl;- E5(8to9) ;;• 1,2-D ichloroethane 35 ppb 5 ppb E5 (8 to 9) 1,1-Dichloroethene 148.6 ppb ppb 3 (15 to 17) ;; •••^••> trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 202 ppb 5 ppb 2 (8 to 10) Ethylbenzene 22,644 ppb W'-: ppb E5(8to9) ;;• 2-Hexanone 109.6 ppb 50 ppb 2 (8 to 10) 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1,399 ppb SOK •ppte- 51 (4 to 6) ;: Sytrene 367 ppb 5 ppb 66 (0 to 2) Tetrachloroethene:;|;;;::;:.;: &2^^^^?:i§M:^ippb:-- 5 ; • ppb 22 (45 to 47) Toluene 2,569,620 ppb 5 ppb E5 (4 to 6) ..._. 1,1,1-TricUoroethaiie : 116.7 ppb v; ppb;-^^ 17 (20 to 22) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 544 ppb 5 ppb 28 (48 to 50) Trichloroethene •;';;;||||;;-;:;;;;..V'^|^|;;;;;i 2,196 ppb ; ''f<. • •ppb:;:;;; 3 (41 to 43);;;; Vinyl Chloride 514 ppb 10 ppb 2 (8 to 10) Xylenes 113,908 ppb • y)' ppb; E5(8to9)^ WIL\O4100OO9\074\RAYMARK.FNI. 34 09/30/93 Table 10 Maximum Concentrations Detected at Raymark Industries Property for 1992 Soil Samples Collected by ELI (samples collected July and September 1992) (Continued) Sample Analyses Constituent Maximum Detection Limit . Location/ Concentration Depth (feet) *SVOA (BNA) Acenaphthene 12.6 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) (EPA Method 8270) Acenaphthylene 10.4 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (Q: to 8) Anthracene 36.5 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Benzo(a) anthracene 61.7 ppm 4.4 ppm 66(0 to 8) Benzo(b)fluoranthene 35.1 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Beiizo(k)flu6ranthene 47.6 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 10.8 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Benzo(a)pyrene 26.1 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 27.4 ppm 3.6 ppm 51 (0 to 10) Butyl benzyl phthalate 16.9 ppm 3.6 ppm 51 (Oitb 10) ;: Chrysene 54.0 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Dibenzofuran 11.1 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) ;: Di-n-butylphthalate 36.6 ppm 5.4 ppm 11 (6 to 11) 2,4-Dimethylphenol 19.3 ppm 1.2 ppm 27 (2 to 12) Fluoranthene 170.4 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Fluorene 32.4 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Indeno(l,23-cd)pyrene 9.4 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Isophorone 33.6 ppm 3.8 ; ppm 2 (92 to 102) 2-Methybaphthalene 6.2 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol) 3.2 ppm 1.2 ppm 27 (2 to 12);;;; 3-Methylphenol (m-cresol) 55.9 ppm 1.2 ppm 27 (2 to 12) 4-Nitrophenol 0.5 ppm 0.4 ppm 27 (34 to 38) Naphthalene 5.3 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) : M^iianthrene ••;;;;; ; • • 154.3 ppm 4.4 ppm 66 (0 to 8) Pyrene 139.6 ppm 4.4 ppm 66(0 to 8) WIL\04100009\074\RA YMA RK. FW. 35 09/30/93 Table 10 Ma3dmum Concentrations Detected at Raymark Industries Property for 1992 Soil Samples Collected by ELI (samples collected July and September 1992) (Continued) Sample Analyses Constituent Maximum Detection Limit Location/ Concentration Depth (feet) Chlorinated 2,4-DichlorophenyIacetic Acid 398 ppb NR 27 (2 to 12) Herbicides (EPA Method 8150) 2,4-D 670 ppb NR 11 (6 to 11) Dinoseb 100 ppb NR 27;(2 to 12) 2,4,5-T 1,020 ppb NR 2 (8 to 11) 2,4,5-rP (SUvex) 1,700 H;;;;ppi;;:;< 'NRM7^^--& 2 (38; to 48) Organophosphorus Triphenylphosphate 203 ppb NR 46 (0 to 8) Pesticides (EPA Method 8140) Diallate WKiSi ppb \. NR ••'-•;;:?•;• •••••SS:-•;;;•' • • 2 (0 to 8) Dimethoate 125 ppb NR E5 (38 to 44) Disulfoton 1,000 ppb ^^:^M--KW7^ 66(0 ;to 8) Famphur 180 ppb NR 66 (0 to 8) Methyl Parathion 680 ppb .•M":;i-?--;;,;;;'5i;;l?:^^:;^^ 18;;(0tol0) Parathion 125 ppb NR E5 (38 to 44) Phorate 340 ppb •"NR.-;-:;;|;:;-:;;|f::---'-. • 27 (2 to 12) Pronamide 780 ppb NR 3 (7 to 15) Sulfotep 125 ppb? NR-. E5 (38 to 44) Thiazin 118 ppb NR E5 (52 to 62) Sulfide Sulfide 250 ppm 37 ppm 66 (12 to 22) (EPA Method 9030) Cyanide Cyanide 83 ppm NR 2 (0 to 8) (EPA Method 9012) Metals Antimony 30,182 ppb 1,000;:- ppb-S 11 (6 to 11) (EPA Methods) Arsenic 130,208 ppb 200 ppb 46 (0 to 8) Barium 2,314,400 ppb 400 ppb . 3 (7 to 15) Beryllium 8,400 ppb 500 ppb A4 (0 to 4) WIL\(M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 36 09/30/93 Table 10 Maximum Concentrations Detected at Raymark Industries Property for 1992 SoU Samples CoUected by ELI (samples collected July and September 1992) (Concluded) Sample Analyses Constituent Maximum Detection Limit Location/ Concentration Depth (feet) Metals Cadmium 10364 ppb 500 ppb 11 (6 to 11) (EPA Methods) (Concluded) Chromiimi 316,949 ppb 1,000 ppb 18 (0 to 10) Cobalt 87,100 ppb 5,000 ppb A4(0to4) > Copper 67,966,101 ppb NR 18 (0 to 10) Lead 57,230,769 ppb 'MI ;••;•• ••;;l;v'"-; 28 (2 to 11.5) ; Mercury 1,017 ppb 100 ppb 18 (0 to 10) Nickel 774,576 ppb 4,000 ppli;;;;;: 18(0 to 10) Selenium 67,470 ppb NR F4 (0.5 to 2) Silver 6,780 ppb 1,000 ppb;:;;:;;" •; 18(0 to-10) Thallium 781 ppb 500 ppb 51 (10 to 18) Tin 229,730 ppb ' 4^000';--ppb:"; •; ••" 2(0 to 8) Vanadium 103,000 ppb NR A4 (0 to 4) Zinc D,175,675 ppb 'm-...7:M-^:0' 7'- 2 (6 to 8) Aroclor 1268 Aroclor 1268 190" ppm 0.1 ppm 18 (0 to 10) and 35 (0 to 10) Dioxin Dioxin 1 hF 7.2162 N/A--',-;-;'!:;:-. 18 (0 to 10) ; (EPA Method 8280) Asbestos Chrysotile 40-45% N/A 18 (0 to 10) EPA Method NR) Cellulose 30-35% N/A 3 (15 to 18.5) Matrix 99-100% N/A b Synthetic 1-2% N/A 62 (12 to 22) 'Approximate Value. "Concentration occurred in 13 samples. N/A = Not Applicable. ND = Not Detected. NR = Not Recorded. ppb = Parts per billion = microgram per kilogram (ug/kg). pnrri = Parts per million = milligram per kilogram (mg/kg). = Toxicity Equivalence Factor. [28, 29] WIL\04:00OO9\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 37 09/30/93 Table 11 Sample Summary of Raymark Industries Source (On-site Sediment) (samples collected by WESTON/ARCS on August 4, 1992 Sample Traffic Date/ Location No. Report No. Time Remarks Sample Source MATRIX: Soil/Sediment SD-11 ACJ31 09/24/92 Grab, Latitude 41° IV 58.4"N, longitude 73° 07' 06.2"W; MAAWll 1015 Depth = 12 Raymark Industries Lagoon No. 4 culvert inlet to SA3511 inches Ferry Creek. SA3411 ::sii9.ii;ii;i;iii ACJ39 09/24/92 Grab, Latitude-iFii'mS*^^^^^^ MAAW19 1715 Depth = 12 Ferry Creek upstream (north) of 1-95 tulvert inlet- SA3519 inches. holding basin north of Ferry Creek, Tanner Brook SA3417 Reference intersection; south of Railroad tracks. sample* Upstream Ferry Creek Sample (reference sample*) for quality assurance/quality control. ;;;;; *It should be noted that there are no upstream sampling locations for the lagoon sample (SD-11); and therefore the upstream Ferry Creek sample was used for comparison of background (reference) conditions. [12] dioxin analyses through CLP. WESTON/ARCS personnel also delivered a representative sample of the source sample material to the EPA/ESD laboratory located in Lexington, Massachusetts for asbestos analysis utilizing EPA-approved methods [10]. The SAS request for dioxin analysis included analysis for selected dioxins and furans. These results were to be reported in toxicity equivalence factors (TEFs) as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodib^o-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD). A TEF value is an assessment of the human health risk associated with exposure to a mixture of dioxins and furans. TEF values are calculated using assigned values for individual dioxin and furan compounds and equating the values to 2,3,7,8-TCDD [70]. Table 12 is a summary of compounds and elements detected through CLP analyses of WESTON/ARCS source (Lagoon No. 4 sediment) sample. For a sample location, a compound or element is listed if it is detected at three times or greater than the reference sample concentration (SD-19), the Ferry Creek upstream sample (Figure 6) (See the Surface Water pathway section this report) [10]. Compounds or elements which occur at a concentration three times or greater than the reference concentration are designated by their approximate relative concentration above the reference sample concentration. However, if the element or compound is not detected in the reference sample, the reference WIL\M10OO09\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 38 09/30/93 Table 12 Summaiy of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Source (Sediment) Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SD-11 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,600 ppb 15 ppb 106.7 x SQL 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 3,300 ppb 15 ppb 220.0 x SQL 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroe thane 1,900 ppb 15 ppb 127.6 X SOL Toluene 4,800 ppb 15 ppb 320.0 X SQL Ethylbenzene 9,700 ppb 15 ppb 646.7 X SQL Total Xylenes 42,000 ppb 15 ppb 2,800.0 X SQL Naphthalene 8,200 ppb 930 ppb 8.8 X REF 2-MethybaphthaIene 7,400 ppb 640 ppb 11.6 X REF N-nitrosodiphenylamine 3,800 ppb 490 ppb 7.8 X SQL Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 7,800 ppb 1,800 ppb 43 X REF Aroclor-1260 150,000 ppb 99 ppb 1,515.2 X SQL Aroclor-1262 39,000 ppb 580 ppb 67.2 X SQL Arsenic 12.5 ppb 2.6 ppb 4.8 X REF Bariimi 11,700 ppm 44.8 ppm 261.2 X REF Beryllium 0.47 ppm 0.14 ppm 3.4 X SQL Cobalt 33.4 ppm 3.7 ppm 9.0 X REF Copper 14,800 ppm 47.9 J ppm 309.0 X REF Lead 14,000 ppm 280 J ppm 50.0 X REF Magnesium 50,100 ppm 2,190 ppm 22.9 X REF Mercury 0.62 ppm 0.08 J ppm 7.8 X REF Nickel 357 ppm 90.6 J ppm 3.9 X REF V£madiiun 83.0 ppm 26.1 ppm 3.2 X REF Zinc 2,320 ppm 467 ppm 5.0 X SQL Dioxin 3.86 THF 0.0007 J TEF 5,514.3 X REF Asbestos (percent total) 75% 0% Non comparable *SVOC analyses conducted as medium level analyses. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. ppb = Parts per billion = microgram per kilogram (ug/kg). ppm = Parts per miUion = milligram per kilogram (mg/kg). REF = Reference Concentration at sample location SD-19. SDL = Sample Detection Limit. SQL = Sample Quantitation Limit. TEF = Toxicity Equivalence Factor. (Complete summary tables are included in Attachment B.) [33] WTL\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 39 09/30/93 laurel Beach .'Xedar Beach LEGEND • SD-XX Sediment Sample Location BASI lu r 15 A PORTION OF THE fOaOWlNC l. V OUADIUNCLES; lilL/ORD. CT. J960. PHOTORtVISZO l*8<: BRIDGEPORT. CT. 1970. PHOTOREMSEO I9M NOT TO SCALE Frash. 't i:2«.oao SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS RAYMARK INDUSTRIES DCSCNERS/CONSULTANTS STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT FIGURE 6 WIL\(M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 40 09/30/93 sample quantitation limit (SQL) (for organic analyses) or sample detection limit (SDL) (for inorganic analyses) is used as the reference value. Accordingly, these compounds or elements are listed by their approximate relative concentration only if they occur at a value equal to or greater than the reference sample's SQL or SDL. It should be noted that there are no upstream sampling locations for the lagoon sample (SD-11); and therefore the upstream Ferry Creek sample was used for comparison of background (reference) conditions. The complete analytical results of the WESTON/ARCS source sample, including quantitation and detection limits, are presented in Attachment B. Sample results qualified with a "J" on the analytical tables are considered approximate because of limitations identified during the CLP data validation process. In addition, organic sample results reported at concentrations below the SQLs and confirmed by mass spectrometry are also qualified by a "J" and considered approximate. Analyses of the one on-site source (Lagoon No. 4 sediment) sample location collected by WESTON/ARCS indicated 23 organic compounds and inorganic elements detected above the reference sample (SD-19) concentration values. Concentrations of these constituents ranged from 3.3 times the reference sample (vanadium) to 5,514.3 times the reference sample value (0.0007 TEF) for dioxin [10, 33]. Organic analyses of the Lagoon No. 4 sediment sample detected the presence of six VOCs, four SVOCs, and two PCBs above their reference sample concentrations (Table 12, Figure 6). It should be noted that organic laboratory analyses required medium level SVOC analyses and dilution factors of 50 or 500 for Aroclor-1260 (PCB) analyses due to laboratory instrumentation Umits [33]. The six VOCs referenced above (1,1,1-trichloroethane, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes) were detected above the reference value with concentrations ranging from 106.7 (1,1,1-trichloroethane) to 2,800 (total xylenes) times the SQL (Table 12) [33]. Organic analyses also indicated that four different SVOCs [naphthalene, 2-niethylnaphthalene, n-nitroso-di-phenylamine, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate] detected in the WESTON/ARCS sediment sample collected from Lagoon No. 4 ranged from 4.3 to 11.6 times the reference sample concentration [33]. No pesticide compounds were detected above the reference sample concentration value. However, through RAS and SAS analyses, two PCB compounds (Aroclor-1260 and -1262) were detected above the reference sample values [33]. RAS results indicated high concentrations of Aroclor-1260, 150,000 ppb (1,515.2 times the SQL), in the Lagoon No. 4 sediment sample. SAS PCB analyses for Aroclor-1262 indicated a concentration level of 39,000 ppb, 67.2 times the SQL. Note that the RAS Aroclor-1260 results may indicate slightly higher than actual concentrations due to interferences from Aroclor-1262 and Aroclor-1268. However, SAS PCB analyses could not confirm nor contradict the RAS Aroclor-1260 results since analytical results for all Aroclor compounds except Aroclor-1262 were rejected due to the sample's low percent solids which did not meet CLP guidelines requiring greater than 30 percent solids for anaiytes [33]. WIL\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FN1, 4 1 09/30/93 SAS dioxin analyses of sample location SD-11, the Lagoon No. 4 sample, indicated a TEF of 3.86 (J). This TEF is greater than 5,500 times the TEF of the sediment reference sample (SD-19) value. According to EPA Region I personnel and ATSDR representatives, neither the EPA nor ATSDR have health based action levels for dioxin. However, according to these sources, dioxin TEF values above 1.0 for soils and 0.5 for sediments are most likely considered to be a human health hazard [33, 34, 35, 75, 79, 80]. It should be noted that numerous unconfirmed and tentatively identified organic compounds (TICs) were detected in the gas chromatograph/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) analysis of the sediment samples. The TICs included aliphatic hydrocarbons, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), monoaromatic compounds, and unknown hydrocarbons commonly associated with fuel oil constituents [33]. Ten inorganic elements were detected in the Raymark source sample collected by WESTON/ARCS from Lagoon No. 4. Analytical results indicated that the source sample contained detectable concentrations of barium, beryllium, cobalt, copper, lead, magnesium, mercury, nickel, vanadium, and zinc. Concentrations ranged from 3.2 times the SDL (for vanadium) to 309.0 times the reference sample value (copper) (Table 12) [33]. According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), two of the inorganic elements (lead and copper) detected in the WESTON/ARCS soil samples from the Raymark lagoons were not within the typical, naturally occurring concentration ranges observed for soils and other surficial materials in the Eastern United States [36]. The lead level in the lagoon sediment was in excess of 46 times the typical, naturally occurring concentration range of 300 ppm; while the copper level in the lagoon sediment sample detected was in excess of 21 times the typical, naturally occurring concentration range of 700 ppm [33, 36]. Asbestos analyses conducted by ESD personnel utilizing polarized light microscopy (EPA approved method) indicated that the sediment sample collected from Lagoon No. 4 contained 75 percent asbestos [33]. Based on the facility's operational history and the historical disposal practices at the property, the VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, inorganic elements, and dioxins detected in the source samples are likely waste constituents associated with processes which occurred on-site at the Raymark property. GROUNDWATER PATHWAY Overburden in the vicinity of Stratford, consists predominantly of till deposits of varying thickness in the highlands, and glacial outwash deposits in the stream valleys [37, 38]. Swamp and marsh deposits have accumulated in many of the shallow basins in bedrock and glacial drift areas [38]. In 1968, the State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut mapped the surficial deposits for the area surrounding the Raymark property, as Stratford outwash sediments and artificial fill deposits. The Stratford outwash deposits consists mainly of sands with 25 to 50 percent gravel grading up-valley (northward). The artificial fill unit consists of deposits made by human activities [38]. Wn,\(MI00009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 42 09/30/93 Based on well hole borings, the surficial geology immediately beneath the Raymark property generally consists of artificial fill, stratified-outwash, silting till, peat and swamp deposits [8, 9]. Surficial materials range in thickness from approximately 20 to 30 feet in the central portion of the site to greater than 90 feet in the northwest comer of the facility [8,9]. According to the Raymark 1987 Draft Phase I Report and 1988 Draft Preliminary Assessment Report, fill material on the western portion of the property consists primarily of asbestos fill and construction material. Below the fill material on the western side of the property, outwash deposits consisting of varying amounts of sand, gravel silt and clay were observed by BCA personnel [8]. The outwash deposits predominantly consist of fine- to coarse-grained sand with fine- to medium-gravel with traces of clay. It was reported in the 1987 Draft Phase I Report that a layer of peat, varying in thickness up to 10 feet, was observed along the eastern portion of the site. Sand and gravel were noted below the peat layer [9], An estimated 26 feet of till material has been noted overlying bedrock in the northwest comer of the site. Based on well hole borings, there are no known continuous gravel or clay layers present beneath the property [8, 9]. The United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service has mapped the soil type surrounding the Raymark property as part of the udorthents, smoothed unit and "urban land" [39]. Urban land is defined as land that is at least 85 percent covered by urban construction; i.e., buildings, roads, etc. The udorthents, smoothed unit is a well- to excessively-drained soil. This unit is generally found in urban areas and composed of cut and borrow orfilled areas [39]. During environmental sampling, WESTON/ARCS generally encountered sands and gravels with traces of silts and organic materials in the soil samples collected. WESTON/ARCS also encountered fill materials including visible asbestos at several locations throughout the area [10]. According to the "Bedrock Geological Map of Connecticut," the Raymark property is located in the Connecticut Valley Synclinorium of Connecticut's Western Uplands [40]. According to the "Bedrock Geologic Map of the Milford Quadrangle in Fairfield and New Haven Counties" (prepared in 1965) the regional bedrock setting consists of a sequence of meta-sedimentary and meta-volcanic rocks of the Paleozoic Age. Bedrock beneath Raymark is mapped as Derby Hill Schist [41]. This schist is Lower to Middle Ordovician in age. The Derby Hill Schist is composed mainly of medium- to fine-grained, thinly laminated, greenish-grey to medium dark-grey chlorite, muscovite schist [41]. Depth to bedrock beneath the property ranges from approximately 30 to greater than 90 feet below grade [8, 9]. A high angle fault, the Mixville Fault, is located approximately one mile to the east of the Raymark property generally trending southwest to northeast [40]. Groundwater quality in the vicinity of the Raymark property is classified as class GB water (unsuitable for drinking without treatment) by CT DEP. Generally, Class GB waters are groundwater within a highly urbanized area and where public water supply service is available. GB Class groundwater is presumed not suitable for direct human consumption due to waste discharges, spills or leaks of chemicals or land use impacts [42, 43]. The average annual precipitation for the Stratford, Connecticut area is approximately 42 inches [44]. The regional hydrogeologic units consist of bedrock and surficial deposits; including till, stratified drift, and swamp deposits. Based on boring data from previous investigations of the Raymark property, saturated thickness of the stratified outwash deposits range from 20 to 40 feet [8,9]. The Derby Hill Schist acts as hydrologic unit, underlying the surficial materials beneath WlL\O110O009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 4 3 09/30/93 the site. Groundwater typically occurs in fractures within the upper 200 feet below the overburden-bedrock contact. Generally, bedrock wells placed in this portion of the Derby Hill Schist provide a medium well yield, approximately 5 to 6 gallons per minute (gpm) [8]. Well yields are typically higher when stratified drift overlies the bedrock, as opposed to less permeable till [8]. Regional groundwater flow is towards the Housatonic River [8, 9, 22, 26]. Groundwater level measurements taken by Ebasco (an EPA subcontractor) in conjunction with BCA in the fall of 1987 indicate that the localized groundwater flow at the site is from northwest to southeast across the site towards the Housatonic River. However, according to Ebasco, water table contouring including Well "G" information indicates a localized flow from Wells "D," "E," and "G" towards Well "A" (Figure 4). Ebasco further states that the water level readings from Well "G" appear to contradict all previous studies prior to Well "G" installation and that the location and construction of Well "G" could have been such that Well "G" water levels are influenced by surface water runoff or Lagoon No. 4 [26]. Mr. Hill has stated that the reason for the anomaly at Well "G" is because the well is screened in peat and the well measures the groundwater elevation of a perched water table [75]. The hydraulic gradient across the western end of the site ranges from 0.0017 to 0.005. The groundwater velocities were estimated to range from 0.096 to 0.85 feet per day (ft/day) [8, 9]. According to the Raymark 1987 Draft Phase I Report and the 1988 Draft Preliminary Assessment Report, hydraulic conductivity tests were conducted in several on-site overburden wells. Results of the 1987 and 1988 data indicate the hydraulic conductivity ranges from 1 to 190 feet per day and 1 to 85 feet per day, respectively [8, 9]. According to the 1988 Ebasco report, groundwater flow beneath Raymark may be subject to slight reversals in groundwater gradient resulting from tidal fluctuations due to the proximity (1,200 feet) of the property to the Housatonic River [26]. There are no known public water supply sources within a four-mile radius of the property [45, 46, 47, 48], Table 13 summarizes private and public well supply sources within four miles of the Raymark property [2, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51]. Due to the large area covered by the facility, the radial distance rings were adjusted to start at or near the outer limit of the Raymark property boundary by adjusting the center of the arc to a reference radii of 0.2 miles. Potable public water supplies are distributed to the cities and towns within four miles of the Raymark facility from surface water reservoirs located beyond the four-mile radii by the Bridgeport Hydraulic Company and the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority [47, 48]. According to officials at the Bridgeport Hydraulic Company and the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority, an estimated 1 to 2 percent of the population of the cities of Stratford and Milford, within the 4-mile radius of Raymark, may utilize private groundwater supply wells [47]. WESTON/ARCS was unable to determine the location of the nearest private groundwater WlL\(>tlOO0O9\074\RAYMARK.FNL 44 09/30/93 Table 13 Estimated Drinking Water Populations Served by Groundwater Sources Within Four Miles of Raymark Industries Radial Distance Estimated Population Estimated Population Total Estimated From Northeast Utilities Served by Served by Public Population Served by (miles) Private Wells* Wells Groundwater Sources* 0.0 < 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 < 0.50 'WtirWSKiM illii •;\f;'o 0.50 < 1.00 0 0 0 1.00 < 2.00 ':-;ii-|:!':::V'-|!pii^ 0 •-236 2.00 < 3.00 419 0 419 3.00 < 4.00 ^M%J^--r'9Ml§M:y 0 ••:95i • TOTAL 1,606 0 1,606 *Determined by using an equal distribution calculation of U.S. Census CENTRACTS data with adjustments based on Town of Stratford and Milford data. [45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52] well to the Raymark property. Private groundwater supplies within four miles of the property were estimated using equal distribution calculations of U.S. Census CENTRACTS data identifying population, households, and private water wells for "Block Groups" which lie within or partially within individual radial distance rings of the Raymark property [52]. The private well population within the one-mile radii (50 well users) has been adjusted to the 1.0 to 2.0 mile radii ring based on additional water supply information provided by the Bridgeport Hydraulic Company. Mr. Picone (Bridgeport Hydraulic Company) indicated that to the best of the water company's knowledge, there are no private drinking water wells located within a mile radius of the property [47]. The majority of the private well users in Stratford are believed to be located in the northeast comer of Stratford within the two- to three- and three- to four-mile radii of Raymark [2, 47, 49, 50]. Private groundwater supplies within four miles of the property serve an estimated 1,606 people [45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52]. According to Mr. Hill, "...the population served by groundwater supplies within four miles of the property are upgradient of the facility and not affected by Raymark's groundwater contamination" [75]. During the on-site reconnaissance, the WESTON/ARCS team noted several groundwater monitoring wells of different character at various locations throughout the Raymark property (Figure 4) [10]. According to Mr. Hill, 48 monitoring wells have been installed since 1981 (Table 5) [10]. Groundwater quality samples have been collected from various wells at different times since 1981. Some of these wells have been either destroyed, abandoned, or redrilled and replaced [8, 9, 10, 11,25, 26]. WIL\041000O9\O74\RAYMARK.FNl, 45 09/30/93 In 1981, 13 "TW-Series" groundwater observation wells were installed to measure the groundwater flow direction and the groundwater quality at Raymark. These wells were destroyed during a snow removal operation prior to collection of groundwater quality samples; however, water level measurements were obtained from these wells. Results of the water level measurements indicated the general flow direction at Raymark was to the southeast [8]. In 1982, five RCRA monitoring wells (A-1 through E-1) were installed around the four existing lagoons to determine the groundwater quality in the western portion of the site (Figure 4). Groundwater quality samples were collected and analyzed from on-site monitoring wells "A" through "E" on a quarterly basis between June 1982 and December 1988 [8, 9]. The first two quarters (June and October 1982) were analyzed for NPDES parameters. Subsequent samples beginning in the first quarter of 1983, were analyzed for RCRA parameters. Results of the 1982 through 1988 RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Program are extensive [25]. Table 14 summarizes the list of constituents exceeding the current (May 1993) EPA Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards MCLs during the RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Program at the Raymark facility [53]. It should be noted that the MCL is the maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water which is delivered to any user of a public water system. The monitoring wells located on-site at Raymark are not used for drinking water supplies and the nearest private groundwater drinking water well location could not be determined. However, comparison MCLs to on-site monitoring well concentration levels provide a benchmark for evaluating groundwater conditions [53]. In the fall of 1983, five "T Series" groundwater monitoring wells were installed in the eastern portion of the property to monitor groundwater quality in the vicinity of an underground toluene storage tank (Figure 4). Elevated levels of toluene were detected in all of the T-series wells with the exception of T-5 which is located east of Lagoon No.4. As a result of the elevated toluene levels in the groundwater samples, Raymark was ordered by the CT DEP to remove the toluene storage tank and a groundwater recovery pump system was installed to remove toluene from the contaminated groundwater near Well T-3. According to BCA, the groundwater recovery system started pumping continuously at a rate of 180,000 gpd beginning in February 1985 [8, 9]. However, according to an EPA RCRA document, this groundwater recovery well had ceased operating prior to July 1990 [75]. BCA reported that to further assess the extent of the toluene contamination, the T-series wells were sampled and analyzed for toluene on a monthly basis starting in 1985; however, WESTON/ARCS was unable to obtain the results of the monthly toluene sample results [8]. During 1983, the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program results indicated that arsenic concentrations exceeded the 1993 EPA MCL values each quarter for Well D, which is located in the northwestern comer of the facility, near Lagoon No. 1 (Figure 4). Barium concentrations also exceeded the EPA standard in Wells C and E each quarter. Fluoride exceeded the EPA standard in Wells B, C, and D, but only for a maximum of two quarters. Chromium exceeded the EPA standard in Wells D and E, but only for a maximum of two quarters. In 1983, several organic compounds also exceeded the May 1993 MCLs values. These included toluene at Wells D and E, i,l-dichloroethene at Wells C and E, and chlorobenzene and 1,1,1 trichloroethane at Well C (Figure 4) [25, 53]. \VIL\O4I0O009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 4 6 09/30/93 Table 14 Constituents Exceeding EPA Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards (MCLs) During the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program (samples collected 1982 to 1988) Groundwater Years Constituents EPA May 1993 MCL Value (mg/L) 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Arsenic 0.05 (D) X X X X X X Barium 2.0 (F) X X '"'^:X:m • ••'• X ::.::>:• '•:^|i X ••:-:' "•^• x Fluoride 4.0 (F) X X X ^::ix ••• .•x%- Chromium 0.1(F) -.r-^miB^wg^^ , ..•••• ' X Nitrate-N 10.0 (F) X X X Cadmium 0.005 (F) • • X'' : 'X' :.. Selenium 0.05 (F) X Mercury 0.002 (F) '.'•:• •.•^•x;- Lead 0.015 (F)* X Vinyl Chloride 0.002 (F) • A x 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.200(F) X 7:i^M X '•:(' X Toluene 1.000(F) X X X Chlorobenzene 0.100 (F) X 'X •••' X (Monochlorobenzene) • . . . . Trans-l,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.600 (F) X Trichloroethene 0.005 (F) X •;-X :-'• •'::--;X: :.: . X (Trichlorethylene) Methylene Chloride 0.005 (P) X X (Dichloromethane) Chloroform 0.100 (T) X 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.007 (F) X *Currently imder review. F = Final MCL (May 1993). T = Tentative. P = Proposed. D = Draft. ^^J, 53] WIL\(M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 47 09/30/93 During 1984, the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program results indicated that concentrations of arsenic and barium exceeded the May 1993 EPA MCL values in every well except Well A. The concentration of arsenic in Well D exceeded the 0.05 mg/L standard in every quarter of 1984, and the concentration of barium in Well E exceeded the 2.0 mg/L standard in every quarter of 1984. Furthermore, the concentration of arsenic and barium in Wells B and C also were exceeded during this period, but not in every quarter. Additionally, three organic compounds exceeded the current 1993 EPA MCTL values; toluene, at Well E, chlorobenzene at Well D and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, at Wells A, E, and F (Figure 4) [25, 53]. Between April and June 1984, BCA installed two additional RCRA monitoring wells (F and G) on the Raymark property. These wells were included in subsequent RCRA quarterly sampling rounds starting in July 1984 [8, 9, 25]. During 1985, the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program results indicated that concentrations of arsenic and barium exceeded the current EPA MCLs in five wells. Concentrations of barium in Well E exceeded the 2.0 mg/L standard in every quarter of 1985. Wells C and F were noted to contain fluoride in excess of the EPA standard. Nitrate-N and chromium also exceed EPA standards. For the first time since RCRA monitoring was initiated, cadmium exceeded the EPA standard (Well F). Seven organic compounds exceeded the 1993 MCL values during the 1985 groundwater year; toluene (Well D), chlorobenzene (Well D), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (Wells E and F), trans-1,2 dichlorobenzene (Wells D and F), trichloroethene (Wells A and F), methylene chloride (Wells D and G) and chloroform (aU wells) (Figure 4) [25, 53]. During 1986, the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program results indicated that concentrations of arsenic, barium, cadmium, nitrate-N, and selenium exceeded the current EPA MCL values. Arsenic exceeded the MCL standard in Well D during the first and fourth quarters, and in Well A during the fourth quarter. The MCL standard for barium was exceeded in Well E during the last three quarters of 1986 and in Well D during the second quarter. Cadmium exceeded the 1993 MCL standard in Well F during the first quarter of 1986. Nitrate-N was present in Well F during the first quarter and exceeded the 10 mg/L standard. Selenium exceeded the MCL standard for the first time at this site in Wells B and F during the third quarter. Fluoride, for the first time, did not exceed the EPA standards for a full sampling year. Only one organic compound exceeded the 1993 MCL standard, trichloroethene in Well F (Figure 4) [25, 53]. In September and October 1987, eight additional monitoring wells were installed as part of the Raymark Groundwater Assessment Program. These wells, identified as A-2, B-2, E-1, H-1, H-2,1, J-1, and J-2 were installed to better define the groundwater flow direction and plume migration on the western portion of the property. Starting in the fall of 1987, groundwater samples were collected from the eight new RCRA monitoring wells installed by BCA and the seven previously existing RCRA monitoring wells (Figure 4) [8, 11]. During 1987, the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program results indicated that concentrations of arsenic, barium, fluoride, nitrate-N and mercury exceeded the 1993 EPA WIL\O4100009\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 48 09/30/93 MCL Standards in at least one well on-site. Arsenic exceeded the standard in Wells A, D, and E during the third and fourth quarters: arsenic was only detected during the fourth quarter at Well A. Barium exceeded the MCL only in Well C during the second quarter. Nitrate-N exceeded the 10.0 mg/L standard during the first quarter at Well F. Mercury for the first time exceeded the EPA standard, 0.002 mg/L, in Wells C and E during the fourth quarter. Although mercury did not exceed the EPA standard in the other wells, it was detected in all of the on-site wells during the fourth quarter. In 1987, two organic compounds, trichloroethene and methylene chloride exceeded the 1993 MCL values in Wells F and B respectively (Figure 4) [25, 53]. During 1988, the Raymark Groundwater Monitoring Program results indicated that concentrations of arsenic, chromium, and lead exceeded the current (May 1993) EPA MCLs standards in at least one well on-site. Arsenic exceeded the EPA standard, in Well D during the second and fourth quarters. Lead concentration at Well B during the first, third, and fourth quarters, and at Wells C and G during the first quarter exceeded the 1993 MCL values. Four organic compounds exceeded the current MCL values in 1988; vinyl chloride (Wells A and C), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (Well F), trichloroethene (Wells A, D, and F) and dichloroethane (Well F) (Figure 4) [25, 53]. In 1988, BCA conducted a Preliminary Assessment of the Raymark facility which indicated that analyses of groundwater samples collected from the Raymark property revealed metal concentrations above health-based standards for cadmium, chromium, lead, cyanide, barium, and copper. Elevated concentrations of organic compounds had also been detected in the groundwater beneath the facility according to the report. Table 15 is a partial list of contaminants and their concentration detected in Raymark groundwater samples. Several of these constituents are above health-based standards and/or Federal regulatory guidelines (MCLs) [8]. According to ELI, two additional groundwater monitoring wells (UK-1 and UK-2) were installed to the east of Building No. 44 and west of Building No. 3B, between 1987 and 1991 (Figure 4). No additional information is available regarding the installation parameters, installer, or analytical sampling results for these wells [11]. In 1991, an additional well, L-3 (Figure 4), was installed to the southeast of wells UK-1 and UK-2 (between Building Nos. 44 and 3B) by ELI to further assess the extent of the on-site contamination [11]. In July and September 1992, ELI installed 10 additional wells (clusters) around the western portion of the property as part of the Raymark RCRA investigations of the property (Figure 4). These wells were constructed and installed in accordance with CT DEP or EPA approved monitoring well specifications [11]. ELI conducted groundwater sampling and analyses of 13 on-site groundwater monitoring wells in three well cluster (A, E, and F) from the western portion of the property. EPA obtained split groundwater samples with Raymark in November 1992 [75]. Analytical results for the 13 wells sampled indicated numerous WIL\O410OOO9\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 49 09/30/93 (' ~^\ Table 15 Partial List of Maximum Groundwater Sample Concentrations Reported during the 1988 Preliminary Assessment EPA May 1993 Constituent Maximimi MCL Value Remarks Concentration Toluene 114,000 ppb 1,000 (F) ppb 114 X MCL Chloroethane 2,100 ppb N/L (L) MCL not established Chloroform 12,600 ppb 100 (T) ppb 126 X MCL Chlorobenzene 1,590 ppb 100(F) ppb 15.9 X MCL 1,1-dichloroethane 6,200 ppb N/L (L) MCL not established 1,2-dichloroethane 1683 ppb 5(F) ppb 33.6 X MCL 1,1-dichloroethene 1,900 ppb 7(F) ppb 271.4 X MCL Trans-1,2-dichIoroethene 2,810 ppb 600(F) ppb 4.7 X MCL Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 1,300 ppb 5(P) ppb 260 X MCL Trichloroethene 7,298 ppb 5(F) ppb 1,459.6 X MCL 1,1,1-trichloroethane 20,000 ppb 200(F) ppb 100 X MCL Vinyl chloride 18.2 ppb 2(F) ppb 9.1 X MCL Ethyl benzene 1,420 ppb 700(F) ppb 2xMCL Phenol 200 ppb N/L MCL not established Arsenic 930 ppb 50(0 ppb 18.6 X MCL Barium 35,800 ppb 2,000 (F) ppb 17.9 X MCL Chromium 38,800 ppb 100(F) ppb 388 X MCL Cadmium 60 ppb 5(F) ppb 12 X MCL Copper 1,810 ppb 1,300 (F') ppb 1.3 X MCL Cyanide 160 ppb 200 (P) ppb Below MCL Lead 1,260 ppb 15 (F") ppb 84 X MCL Zinc 2,140 ppb N/L (L) MCL not established 'Currently under review. ''Action Level. P = Proposed MCL (May 1993). F = Final MCL (May 1993). L = Listed for regulation. N/L = Not listed. ppb = Parts per billion = micrograms per liter (ug/L). [8, 53] WTL\W100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 50 09/30/93 organic and inorganic constituents. Table 16 lists the maximum concentration detected for each constituent found above the SDL, during the November 1992 sampling round [11]. Numerous constituents were detected above the May 1993 EPA MCL values [27, 53]. Sampling results indicated the presence of VOCs ranging up to 796 times the MCL value (trichloroethene). Metal analyses found 10 metals above their sample detection limit ranging up to 51.2 times the MCL for cadmium. Additionally, one PCB compound (Aroclor-1268) was detected at 7,000 times the MCL. WESTON/ARCS did not collect any additional groundwater samples from the Raymark facility during the Site Inspection. SURFACE WATER PATHWAY The Raymark property is located approximately 1,200 feet east of the western bank of the Housatonic River in Stratford, Connecticut, within the Housatonic Main Stem regional drainage basin [2, 42]. Based on this observation, the most likely rnanner in which water from the site enters into the surface water pathway is via overland flow [10]. Overland flow on-site is generally to the south-southwest and flows into Lagoon No. 4 (Figure 3) [1, 9, 11, 16, 20]. Overland flow is directed into a series of catch basins, located throughout the property, which also flow into Lagoon No. 4 [1, 9, 10, 11, 16]. Water from Lagoon No. 4 is allowed to exit the site via a 2,000 foot long overflow culvert which discharges to Ferry Creek at the Interstate 95/Ferry Creek culvert; the most upstream probable point of entry (PPE) (Figures 1 and 2) [10]. It should be noted that as of September 20, 1993, Raymark is in the process of rerouting the drainage around Lagoon No. 4, so that the water from the lagoon does not discharge into Ferry Creek [75]. From the PPE, the 15-mile downstream pathway consists of the downstream segments of Ferry Creek (approximately 0.7 miles), the Housatonic River (1.6 miles), and along a 12.7 mile radius from the mouth of the Housatonic River into the Long Isliand Sound [2, 49]. The 15-mile surface water pathway ends near Sherwood Point, Westport, to the west and near South End Point, New Haven, to the east [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60]. The USGS does not maintain any stream gaging stations along the Raymark 15-mile surface water pathway [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. The estimated average discharge for the Housatonic River at the mouth of the river is approximately 3,400 cubic feet per second based on an average discharge to drainage area ratio [62]. The Housatonic River is tidally influenced south of the Derby Dam in Derby, Connecticut located approximately eleven miles upstream of the mouth of Ferry Creek [2,50, 62]. The Raymark property is not within the 500-year floodplain boundary [63]. There are no drinking water intakes along the 15-mile downstream pathway [47, 48]. The Housatonic River, along the 15-mile surface water pathway, is listed as Class SC/SB water [45]. Connecticut Class SC/SB waters, Coastal Marine Surface Waters, may not meet all Class SB water quality criteria for one or more designated uses, but may be suitable for use for marine fish, shellfish and wildlife habitats, aquaculture operations, recreational uses, and WTL\04100O09\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 5 1 09/30/93 Tab' 16 Maximum Concentration Detected at Raymark Industries Property During 1992 Groundwater Samples Collected by ELI (Samples Collected November 1992) Maximum Well Location EPA May 1993 Analyses/Method Constituent Concentration MCL Value Remarks VOA (EPA Method Benzene 76.5 ppb E2 5ppb(F) 15.3 X MCL 8240) Chlorobenzene 269 ppb A4-2 100 ppb (F) 2.7 X MCL Chloroform 41.7 ppb E-5 100 ppb (T) Below MCL 1,1-Dichloroethane 166 ppb E2 N/L ppb (L) MCL not established 1,1-Dichloroethene 2,090 ppb E4-1 7 ppb (F) 298.5 X MCL Ethylbenzene 176 ppb f:iii^|||;i|||;:i;ii 700 ppb (F) Below MCL Methylene Chloride 811 ppb E2 5ppb(P) 162.2 MCL Tetrachloroethene 19.2 ppb |l||||||||:i|||||: 5ppb(F) 3.8 x MCL Toluene 10,500 ppb E2 1,000 ppb (F) 10.5 x MCL 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 9,870 ppb lEPiiiiiiiiiiiii 200 ppb (F) 49.3 X MCL Trichloroethene 3,980 ppb A4-2 5 ppb (F) 7% x MCL vinyl Chloride-'--|''•;. ? 191 ppb A4-2 2i^pb(F) 95;5xMcL\;:':^^;''"''v-^^^^^ • Xylene 1,220 ppb E4-1 100 ppb (F) 12.2 x MCL SVOA (BNA) (EPA Benzyl Alcbhol 45 ppb E2 N/L MCL not established Method 8270) Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 27 ppb F3 N/L MCL not established 4,6-Dinitro-2-melhylphcnol 85 (E) ppb E2 N/L MCL not established 4,6-DinitrophenoI 1,400 ppb E2 N/L MCL not established 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol) : V 130(E) ppb : ; ;-'E4-l,;V-.;, N/L MCL not established 4-Melhylphenol (p-crcsol) 4,500 ppb E4-1 N/L MCL not established Naphthalene 10 ppb' ',:0l.,:^:i,::,-ii \E4 4 :.:•;:; ;;•„:•:;,:•.:•.: ^/^'SZ y •:-:.-::::M,^::.^-.J^: MCL riot established^:;^^^^^:^^ -;:;:; WIL\(M100009\074\RAYMARK.THL 09/30/93 52 TaP- 16 Maximum Concentration Detected at Raymark Industries Property During 1992 Groundwater Samples Collected by ELI (samples collected November 1992) (Continued) Maximum Well Location EPA May 1993 Analyses/Method Constituent Concentration MCL Value Remarks SVOA (BNA) 2-Nitrophenol 240 (E) ppb E2 N/L MCL not established (EPA Method 8270) (Concluded) 4-Nitrophenol 2,900 (E) ppb E2 N/L MCL not established N-Nitrosodiethylamine 10 ppb A4-2 N/L N-Nitrosomorpholine • I4ppii-;i;|i|iiii| lE^^|i:^iiiiiilf N/L MCL not established | Phenol 3,500 ppb E4-1 N/L MCL not established P-Phenylenediamine |;35:pp||;;|||||i|||| iipiiillliiill N/L MCL not established Chlorinated Herbicides 2,4-D 24 (1) ppb A4-2 70 (F) ppb Below MCL 1 (EPA Method 8150) Sulfides (EPA Method Sulfides 1.0 ppm Al-l N/L MCL not established 1 8030) Cyanide (EPA Test Cyanide 555 ppb E6 200 (F)(ppb) 2.8 x MCL Method 9014) Total Metal ' Arseni c •••••••:.;?*-KS';i-:.^ 520 ppb A2 SOppbC) 10.4 X MCL 1 (EPA Test Methods) Barium 720 ppb Al-l 2,000 ppb (F) Below MCL | :;--jp3;:f:;|f.;*;;;--:V-;:^:-:--^ Cadmium/';' 25 6 ppi>''-^^^^-^---':^'''•;•-••; • 5 ppb (F) 51.2 x MCL Chromium 40 ppb E4-1, Fl-1, F4 100 ppb (F) Below MCL | Cobalt 540 ppb r Ei^r^y N/L MCt hot established i ; i i Copper 460 ppb E2 1,300 ppb (F*) Below MCL | Lead 256 ppb •E2-.': 15 ppb (F-) 17 x MCL Nickel 3,250 ppb El-1 100 ppb (F) 32.5 x MCL 1 WIL\O4100009\074\RAYMARK.TUL 09/30/93 53 Tah' 16 Maximum Concentration Detected at Raymark Industries Property During 1992 Groundwater Samples Collected by ELI (samples collected November 1992) (Continued) Maximum Well Location EPA May 1993 Analyses/Method Constituent Concentration MCL Value Remarks Total Metal Selenium 256 ppb E2 50 ppb (F) 5.1 X MCL (EPA Test Methods) (Concluded) Vanadium 160 ppb Al-l N/L (L) MCL not established Zinc... ..:. 2,460 ppb El-1 5,000 ppb (F-SMCL) ; Below SMCL.:-.;:;::.,• Dissolved Metals (EPA Antimony 10 ppb A4-2, E2, E3, 6 ppb (F) 1.6 X MCL Test Methods) Fl-1 Arsenic 1;:l(S:;:^pb:i;:iiii|ili;i|:i?l| iii|iilllii::iii:iii;i: 50 ppb C) Below MCL Cadmium 256 ppb F3 5 ppb (F) 51.2 X MCL Chromium g26;ppb?;i||||||||;i|;; l;E4iiiiiiiiiliil:i:; 100 ppb (F) Below MCL Cobalt 450 ppb E-2 N/L MCL not established Copper 246 ppb F2 1,300 ppb (FO Below MCL Lead 31 ppb F2 15 ppb (F>) 2xMCL Nickel .3,250 ppb Ei-I 100 ppb (F)^^^^^:^^^^^^^*}: 32.5 X MCL •••• Selenium 34 ppb E-3, F4 50 ppb (F) Below MCL Zinc 2,460 ppb El-1 5,000 ppb (F-SMCL) Below SMCL Aroclor 1268 (EPA Aroclor 1268 3.5 ppb Fl-1 0.0005 7,000 x MCL Method NR) WII,\mi()0009\074\RAVMARK.TDL 09/30/93 54 Tab' '6 Maximum Concentration Detected at Raymark Industries Property During 1992 Groundwater Samples Collected by ELI (samples collected November 1992) (Concluded) 1 Maximum Well Location EPA May 1993 Analyses/Method Constituent Concentration MCL Value Remarks Asbestos (EPA Method Total Asbestos 6,040 million !i|i|i|||i|i|:i|:i:| 7MFL Non comparable units 1982) asbestos structures per liter 'Currently under review. "Action level. P Proposed MCL (May 1993). F Final MCL (May 1993). L Listed for regulation. MCL Maximum Contaminant Level. MFL Million fibers per liter. N/L Not listed. ppb parts per billion = micrograms per liter (ug/L). ppm parts per million = milligrams per liter (mg/l). SMCL Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level. T Tentative. [27, 53] WII.\(MI()(HKW\()74\KAVMAUK'.'rilI. 09/30/93 55 industrial uses [41]. SB and SB/SA waters are also found along the 15-mile surface water pathway to the east and west of the mouth of the Housatonic River. Connecticut Class SB waters may not meet all Class SA water quality criteria for one or more designated uses, but may be used for marine fish, shellfish and wildUfe habitats, shellfish harvesting for transfer to a depuration plant or transfer to approved areas for purification prior to human consumption, recreational uses, and industrial uses [42, 43]. The mouth of the Housatonic River is considered to be a recreational fishery as there may be the potential for human food chain organisms to be taken from the river. Coastal waterways are considered to support various recreational activities, as well as recreational and commercial fishing. According to Mr. McCann, Stratford Conservation Commissioner, the lower reach of Ferry Creek and the Housatonic River along the 15-mile pathway are used for recreational fishing and boating [10]. Additionally, according to Mr. Dave Simpson, a representative of the State of Connecticut Marine Fisheries Department, Blue Fish, Stripped Bass, Black Fish, and Winter Flounder are caught near the mouth of the Housatonic River. No information was available regarding the volume of fin fish caught in this area [71]. Shellfish are also collected from areas along the 15-mile surface water pathway. Dr. John Volks, of the State of Connecticut Aquiculture Department, stated that the Lower Housatonic River, near the mouth of Ferry Creek, contains extremely important commercial seed beds for oyster cultivation. These oyster beds are known as the Lower Housatonic River Natural Beds. Oysters are seeded annually along the Housatonic River near the mouth of Ferry Creek and allowed to grow naturally in these beds for approximately one to two years. The oysters are harvested annually and transplanted (relayed) to offshore areas in the Long Island Sound where they are allowed to grow to maturity before being harvested for commercial use. Approximately 30,000 to 130,000 bushels of oyster seeds are harvested and transplanted each year from the Lower Housatonic River Natural Beds [72]. Additionally, there are numerous other restricted and approved oyster and shellfish beds located along the 15-mile surface water pathway. The nearest approved, shellfish beds are located to the east of the mouth of the Housatonic River in the Long Island Sound between Milford Point and Charles Island, approximately 2.2 to 5.4 miles downstream of the probable point of entry (PPE) area [72]. The WESTON/ARCS field team also observed several people fin fishing along the Housatonic River near the mouth of Ferry Creek [10]. In addition, EPA representatives have observed people crabbing from the flood control gates located on Broad Street, approximately 0.5 miles downstream from the PPE area [75]. Based on the above information the Housatonic River is considered to be the nearest recreational and commercial fishery to the Raymark PPE. There are two Federally-listed endangered species, within a four-mile radius of the Raymark property, the Atlantic Coast Piping Plover and the Least Tern. Nesting areas for the Atlantic Coast piping plover and the Least Tern, Federally listed threatened species, are found within the four-mile radius of the site and along the 15-mile downstream surface WIL\a410OOO9\ff74\RAYMARK.FNL 56 09/30/93 water pathway. In addition, the Northern Diamondback Terrapin, a Federally- listed candidate Category 2 species, is known to occur along the 15-mile downstream surface water pathway [2, 10, 64, 65]. Furthermore, according to the CT DEP Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB), 36 Federal or State endangered, threatened or special concern species at 79 NDDB points, are documented within four miles of the site. A NDDB point comprises the current or former location of a Federal or State endangered, threatened or special concern species or critical habitat. There is one NDDB point within a 0.25- and 0.5-mile radius of the Raymark property; there are two NDDB points within a 0.5 and one-mile radius of the Raymark property; there are nine NDDB points within a one- to two-mile radius of the Raymark property; and 30 NDDB points, within a two- to three-mile radius of the property [65]. Additionally, within a three- to four-mile radius of the property, there are another 37 NDDB points documented [65]. It is likely that many of these species living within the four-mile radius may live along the 15-niile surface water pathway but the CT DEP was unable to determine that possibility. Sensitive environments along the 15-mile downstream pathway include inter-tidal wetlands, coastal wetlands, and several coastal State parks [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. There are approximately 19.6 miles of wetland frontage along the 15-mile surface water pathway [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. This includes the wetland frontage along the upstream, tidally influenced section of the Housatonic River, north of the mouth of Ferry Creek, upstream to the Derby Dam. Additionally, there are two large coastal tidal wetlands, Nells Island and Great Meadow wetland, located within sbc miles of the Raymark point of discharge into Ferry Creek. The Nells Island wetland, comprising roughly 600 acres, is located opposite the mouth of Ferry Creek, approximately 0.8 miles downstream of the PPE for Raymark (Figures 1 and 5) [2]. A second large coastal tidal wetland, Great Meadows wetland, is located 5.7 miles downstream of the PPE (Figure 1) [2, 49]. This estimated 277-acre wetland is the nesting area for two Federally-listed endangered bird species: the Least Tern and the Atlantic Coast Piping Plover [10, 64, 65]. Prior to the WESTON/ARCS 1992 sediment sampling of Ferry Creek and the Housatonic River, no known surface water or sediment samples had been collected from along the 15-mile surface water pathway. Table 17 summarizes the location of 16 sediment samples collected from Ferry Creek and the Housatonic River, south of the Raymark property by WESTON/ARCS on September 23 and 24, 1992 (Figure 5) [10]. Sediment samples were submitted for RAS full organic, total metals, and cyanide analyses, along with SAS PCB, and SAS dioxin analyses through the EPA CLP. Samples were also delivered to the EPA ESD laboratory in Lexington, Massachusetts for EPA-approved asbestos analyses [10]. Table 18 is a summary of compounds and elements detected through CLP analyses of WESTON/ARCS sediment samples. For each sample location, a compound or element is WIL\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 57 09/30/93 Table 17 Sample Summary of Raymark Industries Sediment Samples Collected by WESTON/ARCS on November 18 and 19, 1992 (samples collected by WESTON/ARCS) Sample Traffic Date/ Location No. Report No. Time Remarks Sample Source MATRK: Sediment SD-01 Aa21 09/23/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 10' 41.4"N, longitude 73° 07' 03.4'W; MAAWOl 0930 Depth = 15 downstream east bank Housatonic River, along SA3501 mches Nells Island. SA3401 SD-02 Aa22 09/23/92 Grab, Latitude-4l°i0'49.4lN, longitude73° 07' 27.8"W; MAAW02 1010 Depth = 15 downstream west bank Housatonic River/ SA3502 inches SA3402 SD-03 AJC23 09/23/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 10' 557"N, longitude 73° 07' 14.0" W; MAAW03 1050 Depth = 12 downstream east bank Housatonic River, Adjacent to SA3503 inches Nells Island. SA3403 ;ffiiiiiiiiii ACJ24 09/23/92 ^^•OiM$MB& latitude 41° i r 17.0"N, longitiide 73° 07' 21:2"W; MAAW04 1130 msptbmiT:. downstream Housatonic River, Mbtith: of SA3504 •'inchSsS;:;?-;.^'*?: •;Ferry Creek. SA3404 SD-05 AJC25 09/23/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 10' 41.4"N, longitude 73° 07' 3.4" W; MAAW05 1210 Depth = 15 Ferry Creek Downstream (south) of Flood Control SA3505 inches Gates and Broad Street. SA3405 SD-06 Aa26 09/23/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 11': i4.8M, longitude 73° 07' lO.O'^W; MAAW06 1310 Depth = 12 Housatonic River east of mouth of Ferry Creek, SA3506 mches along Nells Island. SA3406 SD-07 ACJ27 09/23/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 12' 54.0"N, longitude 73° 06 36.' 1 "W; MAAW07 1400 Depth = 12 upstream Housatonic River Sample (reference SA3507 mches, sample) for quality assurance/quaHty control. • SA3407 SD-08 ACJ28 09/23/92 Grab, LatiUide 41° 11'23.8 :^N, longitude 73° 07' 23.4"W; MAAW08 1815 Deptii = 18 Ferry Creek Downstream (north) of Flood Control SA3508 mches Gates and Broad Street^ MS/MSD for quality SA3408 1 control. . • • SD-08D Aa29 09/23/92 Grab, Duplicate of SD-08 for quality control. MAAW09 1815 Depth = 18 SA3509 inches SA3409 WIL\O*I00009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 58 09/30/93 Table 17 Sample Summary of Raymark Industries Sediment Samples CoUected by WESTON/ARCS on November 18 and 19, 1992 (coUected by WESTON/ARCS) (Concluded) Sample Traffic Date/ Location No. Report No. Time Remarks Sample Source SD-09 ACJ30 09/23/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 11' 40.0"N, longitude 73° 07' 22.6" W,; MAAWIO 1915 Depth = 12 Ferry Creek Downstream (south) of Ferry Boulevard SA3510 inches culvert outlet. SA3410 • RB-12 Aa3 2 09/24/92 Grab Equipment rinsate blank, HPLC grade water blank. MAAW12 0915 SA3512 TB-01 Aa33 09/24/92;;;; Grab Trip blank, HPLC grade water blank. 0600 --^M SD-16 ACJ36 09/24/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 11' 45.5"N, longitude 73° 07' 22.3" W; MAAW16 1515 Depth = 12 Ferry Creek Downstream (south) of 1-95 culvert SA3516 inches oudet; adjacent Francis Morgan site. SA3414 ||ii|||||||||: Aa3 7 •09/24/92ii Grab, Latitude 41° 11' 453IN , longitude 73° 07' 223"W; v MAAW17 ••;i6p0:--:--|;;| Depth = 36 Ferry Creek Downstream (south) of 1-95 culvert SA3517 inches outlet; adjacent Francis Morgan site. SA3415 SD-18 Aa38 09/24/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 11' 45.5"N, longitude 73° 07' 22.3"W; MAAW18 1625 Depth = 72 Ferry Creek Downstream (south) of 1-95 culvert SA3518 inches outlet; adjacent Francis Morgan site. SA3416 SD-19 Aa39 09/24/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 11' 49.9" N, longitiide 73° 07' 377"W; • MAAW19 1715 Depth = 12 Ferry Creek upstream (north) 6f 1-95 culvert inlet: SA3519 mches. holding basin north of Ferry Creiek, Taiiner Bi-bok SA3417 Reference intersection; south of Railroad tracks. Upstream sample Ferry Creek Sample (reference sample) for quality assufahce/quaJity control. SD-20 ACJ40 09/24/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 11' 46.0"N, longitude 73° 07' 36.4'W; MAAW20 1745 Depth = 12 Tanner Brook upstream (west) of 1-95 culvert inlet; SA3520 inches prior to (west) intersection of Ferry Creek and SA3418 Tanner Brook. HPLC = High-performance liquid chromatography. MS/MSD = Matrbc Spike/Matrbc Spike Duplicate. [10, 66] WIL\MI00009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 59 09/30/93 Table 18 Summaiy of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Sediment Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SD-or Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 79 J ppb 26 J ppb 3.0 X REF 4,4'-DDD 3.6 J ppb 0.42 J ppb 8.6 X REF Arsenic 17 J ppm 0.76 ppm 2.2 X SDL Mercury 0.09 ppm 0.06 ppm 15 X SDL SD-02'' Aluminum 9,410 ppm 2,780 ppm 3.4 X REF. Arsenic 2.2 ppm 0.76 ppm 2.9 X SQL Cobalt 8.1 ppm 2.6 ppm 3.1 X REJF Iron 17,100 ppm 5,330 ppm 3.2 X REF Magnesium 6,600 ppm 1,600 ppm 4.1 X RE F Manganese 182 ppm 58.8 ppm 3.1 X REF Potassium 2,380 ppm 552 ppm 4.3 X REF Sodium 4,270 ppm 1,400 ppm 3.1 X REF ; Vanadiiun 22.7 ppm 6.8 ppm 3.3 X REF SD-03' Pyrene 970 J ppb 220 J ppb 4.4 X REF Benzo(a)Anthracene 310 J ppb 92 J ppb 3.4 X REF Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 140 J ppb 26 J ppb 53 X REF Benzo(a)pyrene 350 J ppb 110 J ppb 3.2 X REF Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 220 J ppb 72 J ppb 3.1 X REF 4,4'-DDD 6.8 ppb 0.42 J ppb 16.2 X REF Aroclor-1254 53 J ppb 42 ppb 13 X SQL Arsenic 1.9 ppm 0.76 ppm 2.5 X SDL Calciiun 10,400 ppm 928 ppm 11.2 X SDL Chromium 68.0 J ppm 19.9 J ppm 3.4 X REF Copper 198 J ppm 42.2 J ppm 4.7 X REF Dioxin 0.00039 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.00039 X TEF SD-04' Carbon Disulfide 26 J ppb 13 ;;;ippb 2.0 X SQL N-nitrosodinphenylamine 640 J ppb 410; -ppb 1.6 X SQL Phenanthrene 960 J ppb no J ppb 87 X REF;; Pyrene 4,100 J ppb 220 J ppb 18.6 X REF Ben7X)(a)Anthracene 1,400 J ppb 92 J ppb 15.2xREF,#,.:.,;--:J Chrysene 1,900 J ppb 120 J ppb 15.8 X REF Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 3,300 J ppb 26 J ; ppb 126.9 X REF Benzo(b) fluoranthene 1,600 J ppb 100 J ppb 16.0 X REF Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1,500 J ppb 120 J ppb 12.5 X REF Benzo(a)pyrene 1,600 J ppb 110 J Ippb 14.5 X REF Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 1,200 J ppb 72J ;;ppb 167 X REF Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 480 J ppb 410 i ; ppb 1.2 X SQL Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 1,400 J ppb 81J :ppb 173 X REF WIL\Cm00009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 60 09/30/93 Table 18 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Sediment Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SD-04' Aroclor-1260^ 4,600" J" ppb" 42" ppb" 1093 X SQL" (Concluded) Aroclor-1248 3,900 J ppb 42 ppb 92.9 X SQL Aroclor-1262 3,700 J ppb 42 ppb 88.1 X SQL Aroclor-1268 6,700 J ppb 42 ppb 159.5 X SQL Aluminum 14,100 ppm 2,780 ppm 5.1 X REF Arsenic 10.6 ppm 0.76 ppm 13.9 X SDL Barium 453 ppm 7.4 ppm 61.2 X REF Beryllium 0.99 ppm 0.10 ppm 9.9 X SDL Cadmium 7.5 J ppm 0.25 ppm 30.0 X SDL Chromium 631 ppm 19.9 J ppm 317 X REF Cobalt 12.5 ppm 2.6 ppm 4.8 X REF Copper 1,610 J ppm 42.2 J ppm 38.2 X REF Iron 29,100 ppm 5,330 ppm 5.5 X REF Lead 718 J ppm 10.1 J ppm 71.1 X REF Magnesium 9,590 ppm 1,600 ppm 6.0 X REF Manganese 381 ppm 58.8 ppm 6.5 X REF Mercury 0.76 ppm 0.06 ppm 12.7 X SDL Nickel 78.2 J ppm 6.0 J ppm 13.0 X REF Potassium 3,450 ppm 552 ppm 6.3 X REF Silver 53 ppm 0.62 ppm 8.5 X SDL Sodium 9,000 ppm 1,400 ppm 6.4 X REF Thallium 0.% ppm 0.45 ppm 2.1 X SDL Vanadium 55.0 ppm 6.8 ppm 8.1 X REF Dioxin 0.0106 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0106 X TEF Asbestos (percent total) ~l % 0% Non comparable SD-05' Phenol 460 J ppb 410 •ippb 1.0 X SQL Phenanthrene 1300 J ppb 110 J ppb 11.8 X REF Fluoranthene 3,200 J ppb 220J ppb 14.5 X REF Pyrene 5,800 J ppb 220 J ppb 26.4 X REF Benzo(a)Anthracene 2,100 J ppb 92J ppb 22.8 X REF i; Chrysene 2,500 J ppb 120 J ppb 20.8 X REF Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 30,000 J ppb 26J ppb 1,153.8 X REF Di-n-octylphthalate 3,700 J ppb 410 ppb 9.0 X SQL Benzo(b)nuoranthene 2,600 J ppb 100 J ppb 26.0 X REF Benzo(k)fiuoranthene 2,100 J ppb 120 J ppb 17.5 X REF Benzo(a) pyrene 2,000 J ppb 110 J ppb 18.2 X REF Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 1,700 J ppb 72 J ppb 23.6 X REF Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 640 J ppb 410 ppb 1.6 X SQL Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 1,800 J ppb 81 J ppb 22.2 X REF 4,4'-DDE 83 J ppb 4.2 ppb 2.0 X SQL 4,4'-DDD 14 J ppb 0.42 J ppb 333 X REF WlL\O4I00009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 61 09/30/93 Table 18 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Sediment Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference 1 Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SD-05' Alpha-Chlordane 12 J ppb 2.2 ppb 5.4 X SQL (Concluded) gamma-Chlordane 23 J ppb 2.2 ppb 10.5 X REF Aroclor-1260 3,100 J ppb 42 ppb 74 X REF Aroclor-1262 690 J ppb 42 ppb 16 X REF Aroclor-1268 1,300 ppb 42 ppb 31 X REF Alimiinum" 12,000" ppm 2,780" ppb 4.3 X REF* Arsenic 7.2 ppm 0.76 ppm 9.5 X SDL Barium 813 ppm 7.4 ppm 109.9 X REF Beryllium 0.44 J ppm 0.10 ppm 4.4 X SDL Cadmium 78 ppm 0.25 ppm 31.2 X SDL Calcium 10,900 •' , ppm 928 ppm 117 X SDL Chromium 164 ppm 19.9 J ^pm 8.2 X REF Cobalt 10.8 J ppm 2.6 ppm 4.2 X REF Copper 721 ppm 42.2 J ppm 17.1 X REF Iron 25,700 ppm 5,330 ppm 4.8 X REF Lead 900 J ppm 10.1 J ppm 89.1 X REF Magnesium 8,990 ppm 1,600 ppm 5.6 X REF Manganese 291 ppm 58.8 ppm 4.9 X REF Mercury 0.29 ^ ppm 0.06 ppm 4.8 X SDL Nickel 123 ppm 6.0 J ppm 20.5 X REF Potassium 3,190 ppm 552 ppm 5.8 X REF Silver 1.5 J ppm 0.62 ppm 2.4 X SDL Sodium 10,300 ppm 1,400 ppm 7.4 X REF Vanadium 45.6 ppm 6.8 ppm 6.7 X REF Zinc 877 Jr ppm 52.2 ppm 16.8 X SDL Dioxin 0.0055 •' TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0055 X TEF Asbestos (percent total) 1-3 % 0% Non comparable SD-06' Aluminum 11,500 ppm : 2,780 ppm 4.1XREF Arsenic 2.8 ppm 0.76 ppm 37xSb L Barium 233 ppm ; 7.4 ; ppm 3.I-X:REF:.;..: .. Beryiliimi 0.20 J ppm 0.10 ijpm 2.0'x^^SliL;:';' Calcium 6,890 ppm 928 ppm 7.4 X SDL Cobalt 10.2 ppm 2.6 ppm 3.9 X REF Iron ??,,500 ppm 5,330 ppm 4.2 X RE F Magnesium 10,200 ppm 1,600 ppm 6.4 X REF Manganese 253 ppm 58.8 ppm 43 X REF Potassium 2,750 ppm 552 ppm 5.0 X REF Sodium 5,600 ppm 1,400 ppm 4.0 X REF Vanadium 26.6 ppm 6.8' ppm 3.9 X REF WTL\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FN1. 62 09/30/93 Table 18 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Sediment Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SD-08 Acetone 190 J ppb 83 ppb 23 X SQL bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 30,000 J" ppb 1,800 J ppb 167 X REF Cadmium 215 J ppm 4.4 J ppm 5.0 X REF Di-n-octylphthalate 2,900 J ppb 62 J ppb 46.8 X REF 4,4*-DDD 14 J ppb 9.9 ppb 1.4 X SQL alpha-Chlordane 14 J ppb 5.1 ppb 2.7 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 24 J ppb 5.1 ppb 4.7 X SQL Aroclor-1260 5,100 J ppb 99 ppb 51.5 X SQL Aroclor-1262 1,100 J ppb 580 ppb 1.9 X SQL Aroclor-1268 2,000 ppb 580 ppb 3.4 X SQL Barium 785 ppm 44.8 ppm 17.5 X REF Cadmium 22.5 J ppm 4.4 J ppm 5.0 X REF Cobalt 117 ppm 3.7 ppm 3.2 X REF Copper 914 J ppm 47.9 J ppm 19.1 X REF Lead 1,030 J ppm 280 J ppm 3.7 X REF Magnesium 9,980 ppm 2,190 ppm 4.6 X REF Manganese 382 ppm 112 ppm 3.4 X REF Mercury 0.44 ppm 0.08 J ppm 5.5 X REF Sodium 10,200 ppm 105 ppm 97.1 X SDL Zinc 1,720 J ppm 476 ppm 3.6 X REF Dioxin 0.0519 J TEF 0.0007 TEF, 74 X REF Asbestos (percent total) 3-5% 0% Non comparable SD-08D Acetone 170 J ppb 83 ppb 2.0 X SQL bis (2 ethyihexyl) phthalate 160,000 J" ppb 1,800 J ppb 89xRE F :• Di-n-octyiphthalate 4,200 J ppb 62 J ppb 677 X REF 4,4'-DDD 13 J ppb 9.9 ppb 1.3 X SQL alpha-Chlordane 14 J ppb 5.1 ppb 27 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 22 J ppb 5.1 ppb 43 X SQL Aroclor-1254 370 J ppb 99 ppb 37 X SQL Aroclor-1262 1,600 J ppb 580 ppb 2.8 X SQL; : Aroclor-1268 3,100 ppb 580 ppb 53xSQ L Barium 385 ppm 44.8 ppm 8.5 X REF Copper 402 J ppm 47.9 ppm 8.4 X REF Magnesium 6,910 ppm 2,190 ppm 3.2 X REF Sodium 3,960 ppm 105 ppm 377xSDL Dioxin 0.0322 J TEF 0.0007 TEF 46xREF Asbestos (percent total) 5 % 0%-: Non comparable WlL\O410O0O9\074\RAYMARK.FNL 63 09/30/93 Table 18 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Sediment Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference 1 Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SD-09 Carbon Disulfide 28 J ppb 15 ppb 1.9 X SQL Aroclor-1260 48,000 J ppb 99 ppb 484.8 X SQL AroclorTl248 2,100 J ppb 580 ppb 3.6 X SQL Aroclor-1262 7,500 J ppb 580 ppb 12.9 X SQL Aroclor-1268 17,000 ppb 580 ppb 293 X SQL Barium 1,460 ppm 44.8 ppm 32.6 X REF Copper 2,080 J ppm 47.9 ppm 43.4 X REF Lead 1,080 J ppm 280 J ppm 3.9 X REF Magnesium 7,490 ppm 2,190 ppm 3.4 X REF Mercury 0.87 ppm 0.08 J ppm 10.9 X REF Sodium 4,400 ppm 105 ppm 41.9 X SDL Dioxin 0.512 J TEF 0.0007 TEF 731 X REF Asbestos (percent total) 5% 0% Non comparable ||lil||||||;|||;|; Aroclor-1260 900 J ppb 99 Ijipb 9.1 X SQL Aroclor-17.62 970 J ppb 580 ppb 17 X SQL pililiiiiiiiiii;!;;;; Aroclor-1268 2,000 ppb 580;;;ppb 3.4 X SQL Barium 356 ppm 44.8 ppm 7.9 X REF Copper 615 J ppm 47.9 J ppm 12.8 X REF Magnesium 6,470 ppm 2,190 ppm 3.0 X REF- •....: Sodium 1020 J ppm 105 ppm 9.7xSDL;;- ••••••:•-• Dioxin 0.0103 J lEF 0.0007 TEF 147 X REF Asbestos (percent total) 1-3% 0% ;; Non comparable SD-17 Aroclor-1248 75 J ppb 62 ppb 1.2 X SQL Aroclor-1260 440 J ppb 99 ppb 4.4 X SQL Aroclor-1262 190 J ppb 62 ppb 3.1 X SQL Aroclor-1268 340 ppb 62 ppb 5.5 X SQL Aluminum 18,700 ppm 4,940 ppm 3.8 X REF Arsenic 9.5 ppm 2.6 ppm 37 X REF Beryllium 0.99 ppm 0.14 ppm 7.1 X SDL Cobalt 12.4 ppm 3.7 ppm 3.4 X REF Magnesium 8,650 ppm 2,190 ppm 3.9 X REF Potassium 3,240 ppm 987 ppm 3.3 X REF Silver 13 J ppm 0.86 ppm 1.5 X SDL Sodium 814 ppm 105 ppm 7.8 X SDL WIL\(>»100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 64 09/30/93 Table 18 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Sediment Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Concluded) Sample Reference 1 Location No. Compoimd/Element Concentration Concentration Comments .fKisliiiiiili Acetone 260 J ppb 83 ppb 3.1 X SQL V l,2-Dichloroethene(total) 16 J ppb 2 J ppb 8.0 X REF ; ; Carbon Disulfide 29 J ppb 15 ppb 1.9 X SQL Aroclor-1242 110 J ppb 76 ppb 1.4 X SQL ;; Aroclor-1254 200 J ppb 99 ppb 2.0 X SQL Aroclor-1262 400 J ppb 76 ppb 53 X SQL Aroclor-1268 770 ppb 580 ppb 13 X SQL Lead 1,500 J ppm 280 J ppm 5.4 X REF Magnesium 6,440 ppm 2,190 ppm 2.9 X REF Sodium 907 ppm 105 ppm 8.6 X SDL Dioxin 0.0021 J TEF 0.0007 TEF 3xREF SD-20 4-Methylphenol 150 J ppb 36 J ppb 4.2 X REF Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phtiialate 80,000 ' ppb 1,800 J ppb 44.4 X REF Di-n-octylphthalate 5,300 \ ppb 62 J ppb 85.5 X REF 4,4'DDD 24 J ppb 9.9 ppb 2.4 X SQL alpha-Chlordane 25 J ppb 5.1 ppb 4.9 X SQL Aroclor-1262 280 ^ ppb 37 ppb 7.6 X SQL Cadmium 15.4 J ppm 4.4 J ppm 3.5 X REF Dioxin 0.0036 J TEF 0.0007 TEF 5.14 X REF 'Sediment samples collected from the Housatonic River. "Result reported from diluted analysis. J Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified durmg the quality control review. ppb Parts per billion = microgram per kilogram (ug/kg). ppm Parts per million = milligram per kilogram (mg/kg). REF Reference Concentration. TEF Toxicity Equivalence Factor. (Complete summary tables are included in Attachment B.) [33] WIL\CM100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 65 09/3a'93 listed if it is detected at three times or greater than the reference sample concentration. Two reference samples were collected for comparison of analytical results. Sample SD-07, an upstream Housatonic River sample, will be used as the reference sample for comparison of Housatonic River samples and Ferry Creek samples (SD-01 through SD-06) currently influenced by tidal effects of the Housatonic River (downstream of the flood control gates located at Broad Street). Sample SD-19, an upstream Ferry Creek sample, will be used as the reference sample for comparison of Ferry Creek samples (SD-08 through SD-09 and SD-16 through SD-20), currently outside of the zone of influenced by tidal effects of the Housatonic River (upstream of the flood control gates located at Broad Street) [10, 66]. Compounds or elements which occur at a concentration three times or greater than the appropriate reference concentration are designated by their approximate relative concentration above the reference sample concentration. However, if the element or compound is not detected in the reference sample, the reference sample's SQL (for organic analyses) or SDL (for inorganic analyses) is used as the reference value. Accordingly, these compounds or elements are listed by their approximate relative concentration only if they occur at a value equal to or greater than the reference sample's SQL or SDL. It should be noted that according to Mr. Ron O'Mally (Stratford Department of Engineering) prior to the installation of the flood control gates at Broad Street in 1956, Ferry Creek was tidally influenced upstream beyond sample location SD-19 [74]. The complete analytical results of the WESTON/ARCS sampling activities, including quantitation and detection limits, are presented in Attachment B. Sample results qualified with a "J" on the analytical tables are considered approximate because of limitations identified during the CLP data validation. In addition, organic sample results reported at concentrations below quantitation limits and confirmed by mass spectrometry are also qualified by a "J" and considered approximate. Analyses of the 14 Raymark sediment sample locations indicate the presence of numerous organic and inorganic constituents above three times the reference sample values (SD-07 or SD-19) [33]. Analytical results of WESTON/ARCS sediment samples indicate that 4 VOCs, 16 SVOCs, 4 pesticide compounds, 5 PCB compounds, 21 inorganic metals, along with dioxin compounds were detected in the off-site sediment samples (Table 18) [33]. Organic analyses of the 14 sediment samples detected four VOCs: acetone, 1,2-dichloroethene (total), carbon disulfide, and 4-methylphenol (Table 18). VOC concentrations ranged from 1.1 times the SQL to 8 times the REF sample concentration (1,2-dichloroethene (total)). The only VOC to be detected upstream of the Raymark (Lagoon No. 4) discharge point into Ferry Creek was 4-methylphenol. The remaining three VOCs [acetone, 1,2-DichIoroethene (total), and carbon disulfide] were detected in the sample collected immediately downstream of the Raymark discharge point to Ferry Creek. Acetone and carbon disulfide were also detected in other Ferry Creek samples, but not in samples collected beyond the mouth of Ferry Creek in the Housatonic River [10, 33, 66]. The majority of the SVOCs detected in the sediment samples above three times the reference sample value were found in Ferry Creek samples, downstream of the flood control gate, near the mouth of the Housatonic River (SD-04 and SD-05) [10, 33, 66]. The WIL\(MI00009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 66 09/30/93 comparison of SVOCs occurring above three times the reference sample values may be biased due to the high number of SVOCs detected and the concentration at which they were detected in the Ferry Creek upstream reference sample (SD-19) [33]. There may be other sources of SVOCs, such as parking lot runoff or stream water ponding and backflow during high water events, affecting the upstream reference sample results. See Attachment B for complete sediment sampling results. Pesticide compounds (4,4'-DDE, 4,4'-DDD, alpha-chlordane, and gamma-chlordane) were detected above three times their reference concentrations in three locations (SD-03, SD-05, and SD-08/08D). Pesticide compounds ranged from 1.4 times the SQL up to 33.3 times the reference sample concentration for 4,4'-DDD, at location SD-05 [33]. Through RAS and SAS PCB analyses, five PCB compounds were detected above the reference sample values: Aroclor-1242, -1254, -1260, -1262 and -1268 (Table 18) [33]. PCB analyses results indicated PCB ranging from 1.2 (Aroclor-1260) up to 484.8 (Aroclor-1254) times the SQL. The highest detected sediment PCB (Aroclor-1254) concentration was found at sediment location SD-09; directly downstream of the PPE, at a concentration level of 48,000 ppb (Figure 5) [33]. Inorganic analysis of sediment samples indicated the presence of 21 inorganic elements ranging from 1.5 times the SDL (mercury and selenium) up to 139.5 times the SDL (arsenic) (Table 18) [33]. The majority of the metals detected in the sediment samples above the reference sample value were found in Ferry Creek samples, downstream of the flood control gate, near the mouth of the Housatonic River (SD-04 and SD-05) [10, 33, 66]. The comparison of metals occurring above the reference sample values may be biased due to the high number of metals detected and the concentration at which they were found in the Ferry Creek upstream reference sample (SD-19). There may be other sources of metals, such as parking lot runoff or stream water ponding and backflow during high water events, affecting the upstream reference sample results. (See Attachment B for complete sediment sampling results) [33]. Only a few metals were detected above the reference values in the Housatonic River samples (SD-01 through SD-03 and SD-06), According to USGS, two of the inorganic element concentrations (copper and lead) detected in the sediment samples from the Raymark surface water pathway are not within the typical, naturally occurring concentration ranges observed for soils and other surficial materials in the Eastern United States [36]. Copper was detected up to a concentration of 2,080 ppm, nearly three times the typical, naturally occurring concentration of 700 ppm for the Eastern United States. Lead was detected up to a concentration of 1,080 ppm, nearly 3.5 times the typical, naturally occurring concentration of 300 ppm for the Eastern United States. Three additional elements (cadmium, silver, and thallium) were detected in the WESTON/ARCS sediment samples; however, the USGS has not identified typical, naturally occurring concentrations for these elements in the Eastern United States [22]. It should be noted that one additional elements (barium) was detected at 1,460 ppm at location SD-09, just within the typical, naturally occurring concentration for barium (1,500 ppm) in the Eastern United States [33, 36]. WIL\(M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 6 7 09/30/93 SAS dioxin analyses of sediment samples collected indicated TEFs ranging from 0.0 to 0.519 (J). The maximum TEF value for the sediment samples is 741.4 times the reference TEF sample value (0.0(X)7) of the sediment reference sample (SD-19) (Table 18) [33]. According to EPA persoimel, dioxin TEF values above 1.0 for soils and 0.5 for sediments are likely to be considered a health hazard [34]. Asbestos analyses conducted by ESD persoimel unitizing polarized light microscopy (EPA-approved method) indicated that the sediment sample collected from Ferry Creek ranged in contents from 0 to 5 percent at locations SD-08 and SD-09. Asbestos was not detected in the sediment samples collected from the Housatonic River [10, 33]. Based on the facility's operational history, the historical disposal practices at the property, the spacial relationship between sample concentrations and the PPE and the fact that the compounds and elements detected in the sediment samples were also found at detectable concentrations in the source (soil) and groundwater samples, it appears likely that waste constituents associated with the Raymark property have been released to the surface water pathway. SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY The nearest residence is located approximately 60 feet east of the Raymark property, along East Main Street (Figure 2) [2, 3, 4, 10]. Several other residential units are located within 200 feet of areas of observed contamination (Raymark and Raybestos Field) along Paterson Avenue, Clinton Street, and Sidney Street (Figure 2) [2, 3, 4, 10]. There are no known schools or day-care faciUties within 200 feet of areas of observed contamination [10]. Raymark is currently inactive; however, a limited number of Raymark personnel (approximately 10) are regularly on the property. Additionally, a portion of the property is leased to Pirotti and Sons, who employ approximately 25 workers who are also regularly on the property [10]. There are an estimated 13,421 people living within one mile of the property [52]. Tliere are no on-site terrestrial sensitive environments [10]. An EPA-removal action conducted at the Raybestos Memorial Field during the summer of 1992 included the placement of a temporary soil cap and installation of a fence around the site perimeter [75]. In September and November 1992, WESTON/ARCS collected 25 surface soil samples in the vicinity of the Raymark and Raybestos Field property along suspected soil exposure pathways. Samples locations included 12 residential lots and 9 locations along the northern Raybestos Field property boundary, adjacent to other residential property lots (Figure 7) [10, 66]. Table 19 summarizes the location of soil samples collected from the vicinity of the Raymark property by WESTON/ARCS on September 24, 1992 and November 'l8 and 19, 1992 (Figure 6). Soil samples was submitted for RAS full organic, total metals, and cyanide, along with SAS dioxin analyses through the EPA CLP. Soil samples were also submitted WIL\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 6 8 09/30/93 c This page has been redacted because of Privacy Act concerns Contact Jane Anderson, <::^ Site Assessment Manager V\ Table 19 Sample Summary: Raymark Industries Soil Samples Collected by WESTON/ARCS Sample Traffic Date/ Location No. Report No. Time Remarks Sample Source MATRIX: Soil SS-15 Aa35 09/24/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 12' 083" N, longitude 73° 07' 57.4" W; MAAW15 1425 Depth = 12 private'residence along Sidney Street. SA3515 inches SA3413 ;isg||||||i| ACJ42 09/24/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 12' 17.4"N, longitude 73°;07' 11.1" W; MAAW22 1850 Depth = 10 Town of Stratford Department of Public Works SA3522 inches property, along Patterson Avenue. SA3419 SS-23 (TB-2) ABR26 11/18/92 Grab Trip blank, HPLC grade water blank. 0700 :|is^:;||i||||| 'ii/ii/s&l. Composite, Latitude 41° 12' I6:7|N , longitude 73° Cl7':i73''W; Deptii = 12 private residential pi-bperty along Patterson Avenue; inches south of residential lihit. | SS-24B ABR48 11/18/92 Grab, Latitude 41° 12' 15.0"N, longitude 73° 07' 163"W; MAAS68 1??5 Depth = 12 private residential property along Patterson Avenue; SA3420 inches southeast of residential unit. | SS-25 ABR28 11/18/92 Composite, Latitude 4i° 12';i4;l'^N, loiigit^^^^^ MAAS48 1313 Deptii = 12 private residential property along Patterson Aveune; SA3422 inches south of residentialunit. SS-26 ABR29 11/18/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 13.4" N, longitude 73° 07' 177 "W; MAAS49 1406 Depth = 12 private residential property along Patterson Avenue; SA3423 inches south of residential unit. SS-27 ABR30 11/18/92 Composite, Utitude 4l° 12' 12.7':N, longitude 73° 07'19.5'-W; MAAS50 1520 Deptii = 12 private residential property along Patterson Avenue; SA3424 inches south of residential uinit. SS-28 ABR31 11/18/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 14.2"N, longitude 73° 07' 16.5"W; MAAS51 1541 Depth = 12 private residential property along Patterson Avenue; SA3425 inches south of residential unit. SS-29 ABR32 11/19/92 Composite, Latitude 41° W IQ^^'N, longitiule 73° 07' 20.4"W; MAAS52 0804 Depth = 12 private residential property aloiig Patterson Avenue; SA3426 1 inches south of residential linit. SS-30 ABR35 11/18/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 10.7"N, longitude 73° 07' 20.7"W; MAAS55 1 0920 Depth = 12 private residential property along Clinton Street; SA3427 inches south of residential unit. WIL\O1100OO9\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 70 09/30/93 Table 19 Sample Summary: Raymark Industries Soil Samples Collected by WESTON/ARCS (Continued) Sample Traffic Date/ Location No. Report No. Time Remarks Sample Source SS-31 ABR34 11/19/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 11.1"N, longitude 73° 07' 18.2"W; MAAS54 1405 Depth = 12 adjacent private residential property along SA3428 mches Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south: of residential unit. | SS-32 ABR33 11/18/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 11.1"N, longitude 73° 07' 21.1" W; MAAS53 1619 Depth = 12 private residential property along Clinton Street; inches south of residential unit. | ••ll^lllllllli ABR36 11/19/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 097"N, longitude 73°:;07'22.1"W; MAAS56 1320 Depth = 12 adjacent private residential property albng SA3429 inches Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south of resideiitial unit.. .•-••;...•.• • SS-33D ABR50 11/19/92 Composite, Duplicate of SS-33 for quality control. MAAS70 1320 Depth = 12 SA3430 mches i||i|ii:||l||||| ABR37 ii/i^/92':| Composite, Latitude 41° 12f (39.8':N, longitude 73° 07' 18.2"W; MAAS57 'i302iiii ! Depdi = 12 adjacent private residential property along SA3431 inches Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south of residential unit. : SS-35 ABR38 11/19/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 07.2" N, longitude 73° 07' 24.8" W; MAAS58 1239 Depth = 12 adjacent private residential property along SA3432 inches Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south of residential unit. SS-36 ABR39 11/19/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12';07.i''N, longitude 73° 07' 26.5''W; MAAS59 1218 Depth = 12 adjacent private residential property along SA3433 inches Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south of residential unit. SS-37 . ABR40 11/18/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 10.2" N, longitude 73° 07' 23.2" W; MAAS60 1000 Depth = 12 private residential property along Clinton Street; SAS434 inches south of residential unit. SS-37D ABR41 11/18/92 Composite, DupUcate of SS-37 for quality control. MAAS61 1000 Depth = 12 SA3435 inches SS-38 ABR42 11/18/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 07.6 "N, longitude 73° 07' 23.9 "W; MAAS62 1108 Depth = 12 private residential property along Clinton Street; SA3436 inches south of residential unit. WIL\04100009\074\RA YMARK. FNL 71 09/30/93 Table 19 Sample Summary: Raymark Industries SoU Samples CoUected by WESTON/ARCS (Concluded) Sample Traffic Date/ Location No. Report No. Time Remarks Sample Source SS-39 ABR43 11/19/92 Composite, 1 utitude 41° 12' 08.5" N, longitude 73° 07' 25.8" W; MAAS63 1123 Depth = 12 adjacent private residential property along SA3437 mches Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south of residential imit. | SS-40 ABR44 11/19/92 Composite, Utitude 41° 12' 10.8"N, longitude 73° 07' 16.2"W; MAAS64 1100 Depth = 12 adjacent private residential property along SA3438 inches Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south of residential unit. | jlliilllllll 'IJBRiiiV^^^ ii/19/92::: 'Composite;:::! Latitude 41° 12' 073"N, longitude 73° 07';24.5"W;^ ' •'KAi6 5 •;..•.;. •1040 r;;...;! .:;;:|!)epth::i|l2| adjacent private residential property along :; ••Illl§lll. !mches|!:!:ii;i Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south of residentialunit.- :::::•::::?;.•• •::V SS-42 ABR46 11/19/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 07.6" N, longitude 73° 07' 22.2" W; MAAS66 1017 Deptii = 12 adjacent private residential property along SA3440 inches Clinton Street, on Raybestos Field property; south of 1 residential unit. SS-43 (RB-2) ABR47 11/18/92 Grab Equipment rinsate blank, HPLC grade water blank. MAAS67 1702 SS-45 ABR49 11/19/92 Composite, Latitude 41° 12' 14.0"N, longitude 73° 07' 35.5 "W; MAAS69 0917 Deptii = 12 off-site soil sample location from Long Brook Park SA3441 inches property (Town of Stratford property); north of Hurd Avenue, west of Long Brook along hill slope. Reference sample for Quality Assurance and Quality Control. SS-47 (RB-3) ABR51 11/19/92 Grab Equipment Rinsate Blank, HPLC grade water blank. MAAS71 1648 HPLC = High-performance Uquid chromatography. MS/MSD = Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate. [10, 66] WIL\O41000O9\ff74\RAYMARK.FNL 72 09/30/93 to the ESD laboratory in Lexington, Massachusetts for asbestos analyses utilizing EPA-approved methodologies. Two soil samples, SS-15 and SS-22, were also submitted for SAS PCB analyses through the EPA CLP [10, 66]. Table 20 is a summary of compounds and elements detected through CLP analyses of WESTON/ARCS soil samples. For each soil sample location, a compound or element is listed if it is detected at three times or greater than the reference sample concentration (SS-45) taken from Long Brook Park. Compounds or elements which occur at a concentration three times or greater than the reference concentration are designated by their approximate relative concentration above the reference sample concentration. However, if the element or compound is not detected in the reference sample, the reference sample's SQL (for organic analyses) or SDL (for inorganic analyses) is used as the reference value. Accordingly, these compounds or elements are listed by their approximate relative concentration only if they occur at a value equal to or greater than the reference sample's SQL or SDL. The complete analytical results of the WESTON/ARCS soil sampling activities, including quantitation and detection limits, are presented in Attachment B. Sample results qualified with a "J" on the analytical tables are considered approximate because of limitations identified during the CLP data validation. In addition, organic sample results reported at concentrations below quantitation limits and confirmed by mass spectrometry are also qualified by a "J" and considered approximate. Analyses of the 25 Raymark soil samples indicate the presence of numerous organic and inorganic constituents above three times the reference sample values (SS-45) [10, 33, 66]. Soil sample analyses indicate that 12 SVOCs, 11 pesticide compounds, 2 PCB compounds, 16 inorganic metals, along with dioxin compounds were detected in the soil samples collected by WESTON/ARCS (Table 20) [33]. Organic analyses of the soil samples detected no VOCs above the reference sample concentrations in any of the soil samples. However, 12 different SVOCs were detected above three times the reference sample value at six separate sample locations in the vicinity of the Raymark property (SS-22, SS-24B, SS-29, SS-33/33D, SS-34, and SS-41) (Figure 6). SVOCs ranged from 1.0 to 8.2 times (fluoranthene at location SS-29) above the SQL values [33]. See Attachment B for complete soil sampling results. Organic analyses also indicated that several pesticide compounds were detected above the reference sample concentration in all but two of the soil samples locations (SS-15 and SS-25) collected by WESTON/ARCS. Eleven separate pesticide compounds were found above their reference concentrations values (Table 20), Pesticide compounds ranged from 1.0 times the SQL [Endrin (SS-27)] to 525.0 times the reference sample concentration for 4,4'-DDT, at location SS-39 [33]. Through CLP RAS and SAS PCB analyses, two PCB compounds were detected above the reference sample values: Aroclor-1262 and -1268 at two sample locations, SS-15 and SS-22 (Table 20) [33]. Analytical results for PCB analyses indicated that location SS-15 contained WIL\CM100009\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 7 3 09/30/93 Table 20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SS-15 Aroclor-1262 260 J ppb 200 ppb 13 X SQL Aroclor-1268 840 ppb 200 ppb 4.2 X SQL Bariimi 103 ppm 18.1 ppm 5.7 X REF Beryllium 0.35 ppm 0.22 ppm 1.6 X SDL Calcium 4,650 ppm 296 ppm 157 X SDL Lead 137 J ppm 12.8 ppm 10.7 X REF SS-22 Phenanthrene 490 ppb 380 ppb 1.3 X SQL Fluoranthene 880 ppb 380 pp b •••- 2 3 X SQL Pyrene 1,100 ppb 380 ppb 2.9 }c SQL Chrysene 510 ppb 380 ppb 13 X SQL Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 480 ppb 380 ppb 1 3 X SQL Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 390 ppb 380 ppb 1.0 X SQL Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 420 ppb 380 ppb LI X SQL Heptachlor 1.6 J ppb 0.16 J ppb: 10.0 X RHi- Heptachlor Epoxide 16 ppb 1.9 ppb::|:::: 8.4 X SQL : 4,4'-DDE 10 J ppb 3.8 ppb;;t 2.6 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 45 J ppb 0.40 J ppb • • 112.5 X REF: alpha-Chlordane 28 ppb 1.9 ppb '• 147xSQL : Aroclor 1268 120 J ppb 37 ppb : 3.2 X SQL Beryllium 0.64 J ppm 022 ppm: 2.9 X SDL Lead 72.0 J ppm 12.8 ppm : 5.6 X REF Silver 0.65 J ppm 0.45 ppm 1.4 X SDL Dioxin 0.0023 J TEF 0.0 ItF 0.0023 x'l'bF SS-24 4,4'-DDE 10 J ppb 3.8 ppb 2.6 x SQL 4,4'-DDT 19 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 47.5 x REF Chromium 34.9 ppm 8.3 ppm 4.2 x REF Lead 105 ppm 12.8 ppm 8.2 x REF Mercury 0.12 J ppm 0.11 ppm 1.1 X SDL Selenium 0.28 J ppm 0.22 ppm 13 X SDL Dioxin 0.0053 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0053 xlE F SS-24B Phenol 860 J ppb 380 ppb l3xSQ L : ^^ 2,4-Dimethylphenol 850 J ppb 380 ppb 2.2;xSQL Phenanthrene 820 J ppb 380 ppb 2.2 X SQL Fluoranthene 1,000 J ppb 380 ppb: 2.6 X SQL Pyrene 2,100 J ppb 380 ppb 5.5 X SQL Benzo(a)anthracene 760 J ppb 380 ppb 2.0 X SQL Chrysene LOOO J ppb 380 ppb 2.6 X SQL Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 1,000 J ppb 380 ppb 2.6 X SQL Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 1,000 J ppb;::: 380 ppb 2.6 X SQL Barium 7,040 J ppbV 18.ltJ ppb 389.0 X REF Cadmium 37 ppm 0.45 ppm 8.2 X SDL 11 1 Chromium 432 ppm 8.3 ppm 52.0 X REF WIL\CM100009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL .74 09/30/93 Table 20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SS-24B Cobalt 48.8 J ppm 4.3 ppm:: 113 x: REF (Concluded) Copper 22,500 J ppm 18.7 J ppm 1,203:2 X REF Lead 150,000 J ppm 12.8 J ppm tl,718.8 X REF Magnesium 114,000 ppm 1,740 ppni : 65.5 X REF Manganese 372 ppm 86.5 ppni; 43 X REF Mercury 0.18 J ppm 0.11 ppni i:6xSDL Nickel 775 ppm 7.3 ppm 106.2:xREF Silver 8.6 ppm 0.45 ppm 19.1 X SDL Zinc 8,290 J ppm 26.6 ppm 3117 X SDL Cvanide 98.7 ppm 0.56 ppm 1763 X SDL Dioxin 1.135 J ppm 6.0 TEF Ll35xTEF :; Asbestos (percent total) 75 % TEF 0 % Non comparable SS-25 4,4'-DDE 4.9 J ppb 3.8 ppb 13 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 97 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 24.3 X REF Barium 78.6 ppm 18.1 J ppm 4.3 X REF Lead 102 ppm 12.8 J ppm 8.0 X REF Mercury 0.13 J ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.57 ppm 0.22 ppm 2.6 X SDL Dioxin 0.0036 J lEF 0.0 TEF 0.036 X TEF 4,4'-DDE 7.7 J ppb v^tS^S ppb 2.0 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 24 J ppb 0.4d J ppb 60.0 xREF alpha-Chlordane 7.0 J ppb :M^ ppb 37 X SQL Arsenic 21.5 J ppm 5.3 J ppm 4.1 xREF Barium 107 ppm 18.1 J ppm 5.9 x REF Copper 60.4 ppm 18.7 J ppm 3:2 X REF I<-ad 126 J ppm 12.8 J ppm 9:8xIlEF m MerciU7 0.23 J ppm 0.11 ppm 2.1 X SDL Selenium 0J4 ppm 0.22 ppm 2:5 X SDL Vanadiiun 55.6 ppm 18.0 ppm 3:1 X REF Dioxin 0.0030 J lEF 0.0 lEF 0.0030 xibF SS-27 4,4'-DDE 5.6 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.5 X SQL Endrin 3.8 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.0 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 7.9 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 19.8 X REF Lead 983 ppm 12.8 J ppm 7.7 X REF Mercury 0.13 J ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.51 ppm 0.22 ppm 23 X SDL Dioxin 0.0045 J IHF 0.0 TEF 0.0045 X TEF ^ WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 75 09/30/93 Table 20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments i^M^m^^^^i Heptachlor 0.56 J ppb 0.16 J ppb 3.5 x REF Dieldrin 95 J ppb 3.8 ppb 25.0 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 22 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 55.0 X REF Endrin Aldehyde 5.6 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.5 X SQL alpha-Chlordane 42 J ppb 1.9 ppb 22.1 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 29 J ppb 1.9 ppb 153 X SQL Barium 72.6 ppm 18.1 J ppm 4.0 X REF Cadmium 0.61 J ppm 0.45 ppm 1.4 X SDL Lead 97.7 ppm 12.8 J ppm 7.6 X REF Manganese 324 ppm 86.5 ppm 37 X REF Mercury 0.13 J ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.53 ppm 0.22 ppm 2.4 XID L Dioxin 0.00305 J TEF 0.0 THF 0.00305 X TEF SS-29 Phenanthrene 2,200 ppb 380 ppb 5.8 X SQL Fluoranthene 3,100 ppb 380 ppb 8.2 X SQL Pyrene 2,500 ppb 380 ppb 6.6 X SQL Benzo(a)antiiracene 1,700 ppb 380 ppb 4.5 X SQL Chrysene 1,200 ppb 380 ppb 3.2 X SQL Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2,200 ppb 380 ppb 5.8 X SQL Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 620 ppb 380 ppb 1.6 X SQL Ben7o(a)pyrene 1,200 ppb 380 ppb 3.2 X SQL Indeno(l,23-cd)pyrene 560 ppb 380 ppb 1.5 X SQL Heptachlor Epoxide 3.9 J ppb 1.9 ppb 2.1 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 4.1 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.1 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 11 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 27.5 X REF alpha-Chlordane 13 J ppb 1.9 ppb 6.8 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 7.8 ppb 1.9 ppb 4.1 X SQL Barium 463 ppm 18.1 J ppm 25.6 X REF Cadmium 23 ppm 0.45 ppm 5.1 X SDL Copper 128 ppm 18.7 J ppm 6.8 X REF Lead 441 ppm 12.8 J ppm 34.5 X REF Manganese 1,150 ppm 86.5 ppm 13.3 X REF Selenium 0.51 J ppm 0.22 ppm 23 X SDL Sodium 138 ppm 75.9 ppm 1.8 X SDL Zinc 1,200 ppm 26.6 ppm 45.1 X SDL Dioxin 0.00122 J TEF 0.0 lEF 0.00122 X TEF WIL\(M100009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 76 09/30/93 Table 20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compoimd/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SS-30 Heptachlor Epoxide 42 J ppb 1.9 ppb 22.1 X SQL Dieldrin 5.5 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.4 X SQL 4.4'-DDE 12 J ppb 3.8 ppb 3.2 X SQL Endrin 6.9 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.8 X SQL Endosulfan II 6.0 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.6 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 23 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 57.5 X REF alpha-Chlordane 31 J ppb 1.9 ppb 163 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 27 J ppb 1.9 ppb 14.2 X SQL Barium 54.6 ppm 18.1 J ppm 3.0 X REF Cadmium 0.52 J ppm 0.45 ppm 1.2 X SDL Uad 667 ppm 12.8 J ppm 5.2 X REF Mercury 0.13 J ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.45 J ppm 0.22 ppm 2.0 X SDL Dioxin 0.0087 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0087 X TEF •SS-31 Heptachlor 1.5 J ppb 0.16 J • ppb 9.4 X REF Heptachlor Epoxide 16 J ppb 1.9 ppb 8.4 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 23 J ppb 3.8 ppb 6.1 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 65 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 162.5 X REF alpha-Chlordane 120 J ppb 1.9 ppb 63.2 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 98 J ppb 1.9 ppb 51.6 X SQL Barium 638 ppm 18.1 J ppm 35.2 X REF Chromium 28.7 ppm 8.3 ppm 35 X REF Copper 507 ppm 18.7 J ppm 271 X REF Lead 2,600 ppm 12.8 J ppm 203.1 X REF Manganese 360 ppm 86.5 ppm 4.2 X REF Mercury 0.26 ppm 0.11 ppm 2.4 X SDL Nickel 40.8 ppm 7.3 ppm 5.6 X REF Selenium 0.62 ppm 0.22 ppm 2.8 X SDL Sodium 174 J ppm 75.9 ppm 23 X SDL Zinc 1,650 J ppm 26.6 ppm 62.0 X SDL Dioxin 0.15 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.15 X lEF WIL\W100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 77 09/30/93 Table 20 Sununary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments |||i|j||||i;|]|[||| Heptachlor Epoxide 43 J ppb 1.9 ppb 23 x SQL Dieldrin 8.7 J ppb 3.8 ppb 23 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 93 J ppb 3.8 ppb 2.4 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 15 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 37.5 X REl- Endrin Aldehyde 4.2 J ppb 3.8 ppb LI X SQL ::.;:;|;:::::|||||||:;;:s:|:|::|||: alpha-Chlordane 18 J ppb 1.9 ppb 9.5 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 11 J ppb 1.9 ppb 5.8 X SQL Barium 138 ppm 18.1 J ppm 7.6 X REF Cadmium 0.67 J ppm 0.45 ppm 1.5 X SDL Lead 104 ppm 12.8 J ppm 8.1 X REF Mercury 0.25 J ppm 0.11 ppm 23 X REF Selenium 0.67 ppm 0.22 ppm 3.0 X SDL SS-33 Butylbenzylphthalate 470 J ppb 380 ppb 1.2 X SQL 3,3'-Dichlorobenridine 470 J ppb 380 ppb 1.2 X SQL Ben2o(a)anthracene 470 J ppb 380 ppb 1.2 X SQL Chrysene 470 J ppb 380 ppb 1.2 X SQL Heptachlor Epoxide 2.8 J ppb 1.9 ppb 1.5 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 21 J ppb 3.8 ppb 5.5 X SQL Endrin 4.0 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.1 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 35 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 87.5 X REF Endrin Aldehyde 17 J ppb 3.8 ppb 4.5 X SQL Barium 80.4 ppm 18.1 J ppm 4.4 X REF Copper 110 ppm 187 J ppm 5.9 X REF Lead 179 J ppm 12.8 J ppm 14.0 X REF Manganese 320 ppm 86.5 ppm 37 X REF Mercury 0.21 ppm 0.11 ppm 1.9 X SDL Selenium 0.87 ppm 0.22 ppm 4.0 X REF Vanadium 63.7 ppm 18.0 ppm 3.5 X REF Dioxin 0.0081 J lEF 0.0 TEF 0.0081 X TEF :;:||i3i:||||||||||| Fluoranthene 420 J ppb 380 ppb 1.1 X SQL Pyrene 440 J ppb 380 ppb i 1.2 X SQL Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 450 ppb 380 ppb > l.ixSQL: Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 450 ppb 380 ppb L2xSQL 4,4'-DDE 18.0 ppb 3.8 ppb 47 x SQL alpha-Chlordane 2.9 ppb 1.9 ppb L5xSQL Barium 75.1 J ppm 18.1 J ppm 4.1 X REF Copper 111 J ppm 18.7 J ppm 5.9 X REF Lead 112 J ppm 12.8 J ppm 8.8 X REF Manganese 303 ppm 86.5 ppm 3.5 X REF Mercury 0.20 ppm 0.11 ppm 1.8 X SDL Vanadium 60.8 ppm 18.0 ppm 3.4 X REF \Smc;?m& Dioxin 0.0105 J TEF 0.0 IhF 0.0105 X I'tF Wn-\04100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 78 09/30/93 r Table 20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SS-34 Di-n-butylphtiialate 380 J ppb 380 ppb 1.0 X SQL Heptachlor Epoxide 77 J ppb 1.9 ppb 4.1 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 17 J ppb 3.8 ppb 4.5 X SQL Endrin 10 J ppb 3.8 ppb 2.6 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 43 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 107.5 X REF alpha-Chlordane 18 J ppb 1.9 ppb 9.5 X SQL gamma-Chlordane L5 J ppb 1.9 ppb 7.9 X SQL Barium 72.5 ppm 18.1 J ppm 4.0 X REF Cadmium 1.0 J ppm 0.45 ppm 2.2 X SDL Copper 92.9 ppm 187 J ppm 5.0 X REF Lead 265 J ppm 12.8 J ppm 207 X REF Manganese 305 ppm 86.5 ppm 3.5 X REF Mercury 0.65 ppm 0.11 ppm 5.9 X SDL Nickel 313 ppm 7.3 ppm 43 X REF Selenium 0.44 J ppm 0.22 ppm 2.0 X SDL Vanadium 73.5 ppm 18.0 ppm 4.1 X REF Dioxin 0.0064 J TEF 0.0 IHF 0.0064 X TEF ||Si|:|||||||:|||||;:;; 4,4'-DDE 5.5 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.4 X SQL Endosulfan Sulfate 57 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.5 X SQL Barium 173 ppm 18.1 J ppm 9.6 X REF Cadmium 0.89 J ppm 0.45 ppm 2.0 X SDL Calcium 19,000 ppm 2,500 ppm 7.6 X SDL y^^yyyy-yi^yyyyyy:-^ Chromium 28.5 ppm 8.3 ppm 3.4 X REF Copper 90.8 ppm 18.7 J ppm 4.9 X REF \yMMM§MM§^ Iron 57,700 ppm 11,700 ppm 4.5;xREF Lead 166 ppm 12.8 J ppm • 13;6:x REF : Manganese 393 ppm 86.5 ppm 4.5.:X:REF:- • Mercury 0.27 ppm 0.11 ppm 2.5x:SDL.-:, Nickel 28.7 ppm 73 ppm 3.9}c:REF: Selenium 0.41 J ppm 0.22 ppm 1.9x-SDL,-S-;: Dioxin 0.0085 J TEF 0.0 THF 0.008^ Xl'HF SS-36 Heptachlor 1.0 J ppb 0.16 J ppb 63 X REF 4,4'-DDE 20 J ppb 3.8 ppb 53 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 39 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 97.5 X REF alpha-Chlordane 33 J ppb 1.9 ppb 174 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 29 J ppb 1.9 ppb 153 X SQL Baruim 85.2 ppm 18.1 J ppm 4.7 X REF Cadmium LI ppm 0.45 ppm 2.4 X SDL Lead 160 ppm 12.8 J ppm 12.5 X REF Mercury 0.13 J ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.42 J ppm 0.22 ppm 1.9 X SDL Dioxin 0.0061 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0061 X TEF WIL\O41000O9\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 79 09/30/93 r Table 20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SS-37 4,4'-DDE 14 J ppb 3.8 ppb 37 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 22 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 55.0 X REF alpha-Chlordane 9.9 J ppb 1.9 ppb 5.2 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 8.9 J ppb 1.9 ppb 47 X SQL Barium %.5 ppm 18.1 J ppm 53 X REF Cadmium 0.55 J ppm 0.45 ppm 1.2 X SDL Lead 381 ppm 12.8 J ppm 29.8 X REF Mercury 0.13 J ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.35 J ppm 0.22 ppm 1.6 X SDL Dioxin 0.0056 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0056 X TEF SS-37D Heptachlor 0.84 J ppb 0.16 J ppb 53 X REF 4,4'-DDE 15 J ppb 3.8 ppb 3.9 X SQL Endrin 53 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.4 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 21 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 52.5 X REF alpha-Chlordane 10 J ppb 1.9 ppb 5.3 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 10 J ppb 1.9 ppb 53 X SQL Barium 75.9 ppm 18.1 J ppm 4.2 X REF Lead 248 ppm 12.8 J ppm 19.4 X REF Mercury 0.13 J ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.48 J ppm 0.22 ppm 2.2 X SDL Dioxin 0.0063 J IHF 0.0 TEF 0.0063 X TEF 1||M]|;|1|1||^ Heptachlor Epoidde 2.2 J ppb 1.9 ppb i;2 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 77 J ppb 3.8 ppb 2.0 X SQL alpha-Chlordane 83 J ppb 1.9 ppb 4.4 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 67 J ppb 1.9 ppb 3.5 X SQL Antimony 3.1 J ppm 3.1 ppm 1.0 X SDL Barium 55.4 :ppm 18.1 J ppm 3.1 X REF Cadmium 0.68 J ppm 0.45 ppm 1.5 X SDL Lead. 78.9 ppm 12.8 J ppm 6.2 X REF Mercury 0.12 J ppm 0.11 ppm LI X SDL Selenium 026 J ppm 0.22 ppm 1.2 X SDL Dioan 0.0034 J THF 0.0 TEF 0.0034 X TEF WIL\(M100009\074\RAYMARK.F^fL 80 09/30/93 Table 20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continued) Sample Reference Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments SS-39 Heptachlor Epoxide 5.2 J ppb 1.9 ppb 2.7 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 49 J ppb 3.8 ppb 12.9 X SQL 4,4'-DDD 18 J ppb 3.8 ppb 4.7 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 210 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 525.0 X REF alpha-Chlordane 21 J ppb 1.9 ppb 11.1 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 14 J ppb 1.9 ppb 7.4 X SQL Barium 125 ppm 18.1 J ppm 6.9 X REF Cadmium 0.84 J ppm 0.45 ppm 1.9 X SDL Lead 145 J ppm 12.8 J ppm 113 X REF Mercury 0.13 ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.34 J ppm 0.22 ppm 1.5 X SDL Sodium 154 ppm 75.9 ppm 2.0 X SDL Dionn 0.0035 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0035 X TEF ||s||)|||||^i||||^^^^^ 4,4'-DDE 14 J ppb 3.8 ppb 3.7 X SQL alpha-Chlordane 13 J ppb 1.9 ppb 6.8 X SQL gamma-Chlordane D J ppb 1.9 ppb 6.8 X SQL Barium 200 ppm 18.1 J ppm 11.0 X REF Cadmium 0.78 J ppm 0.45 ppm 17 X SDL Copper 59.5 ppm 18.7 J ppm 3.2 X REF Lead 284 ppm 12.8 J ppm 22.2 X REF Mercury 0.D ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 1.2 ppm 0.22 ppm 5.5 X SDL Sodium 133 ppm 75.9 ppm 1.8 X SDL Dioxin 0.0043 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0043 X TEF SS-41 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1,100 ppb 380 ppb 2.9 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 5.9 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.6 X SQL 4,4'-DDT 15 J ppb 0.40 J ppb 37.5 X REF Barium 166 ppm 18.1 J ppm 9.2 X REF Cadmium 0.72 J ppm 0.45 ppm 1.6 X SDL Lead 263 ppm 12.8 J ppm 20.5 X REF Mercury 0.13 ppm 0.11 ppm 1.2 X SDL Selenium 0.36 J ppm 0.22 ppm 1.6 X SDL Dioxin 0.0039 J TEF 0.0 IHF 0.0039 X TEF WIL\M 100O09\O74\RAYMARK.n^ 81 09/30/93 Table 20 Summary of WESTON/ARCS Analytical Results Soil Sample Analysis for Raymark Industries (Continded) Sample Reference 1 Location No. Compound/Element Concentration Concentration Comments •i$iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii; Heptachlor Epomde 2,7 J ppb 1.9 ppb 1.4 X SQL 4,4'-DDE 4.1 J ppb 3.8 ppb 1.1 X SQL alpha-Chlordane 87 J ppb 1.9 ppb 4.0 X SQL gamma-Chlordane 63 J ppb 1.9 ppb 33 X SQL Barium 717 ppm 18.1 J ppm 4.0 X REF Cadmium 0.58 J ppm 0.45 ppm 13 X SDL Lead 87.0 ppm 12.8 J ppm 6.8 X REF Mercury 0.20 ppm 0.11 ppm 1.8 X SDL Selenium 0.63 ppm 0.22 ppm 2.9 X SDL Dioxin 0.0054 J TEF 0.0 TEF 0.0054 X TEF *SVOC analyses conducted as medium level analyses. REF = Reference Concentration from Long Brook Park (SS-45). SDL = Sample Detection Limit. SQL = Sample Quantitation Limit. = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quaUty control review, ppm = Parts per million = milligram per kilogram (mg/kg). ppb = Parts per billion = microgram per kilogram (ug/kg). TEF = Toxicity Equivalence Factor. (Complete summary tables are included m Attachment B.) [33] WIL\(M 100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 82 09/30/93 two PCB compounds at 1.3 times (Aroclor-1262) and 4.2 times (Aroclor-1268) the SQL. Additionally, analyses of SS-22 indicated the detection of one PCB compound Aroclor-1268 at 3.2 times the S(3L value [33]. It should be noted that preliminary field screening for PCB during the September (1992) sampling round indicated that no Aroclor-1262 or -1268 were present in the soil samples; and therefore, no samples were collected for SAS PCB analyses during the WESTON/ARCS November 1992 sampling round [10, 67]. However, since the two soil samples (SS-15 and SS-22) analyzed for CLP SAS PCBs (Aroclor-1262 and -1268) indicated detectable levels of PCBs, further SAS PCB analyses may be warranted for the remaining soil sample locations. Further PCB sampling of the residential properties abutting Raybestos Field are currently in progress. Inorganic analysis of surface soil samples indicated the presence of 16 inorganic elements ranging in concentration from 1.0 fimes the SDL (antimony) up to 11,718.8 fimes the reference sample concentrations (lead at location SS-24B) (Table 19) [29, 31]. Lead was detected at concentration above three times the reference sample concentration in all of the soil samples collected by WESTON/ARCS. Inorganic analyses indicate that barium, mercury, and selenium were detected above three times the reference sample concentration value in a high percentage (above 80 percent) of the WESTON/ARCS soil sample collected in the vicinity of Raymark [33]. It should be noted that WESTON/ARCS personnel observed fill material containing asbestos brake and clutch parts between a depth of approximately 6 to 12 inches below surface grade when collecting samples SS-24 and SS-24B [10]. According to USGS, five of the inorganic element (lead, copper, barium, nickel, and zinc) concentrations detected in the surface soil samples from along the Raymark soil exposure pathways are not within the typical, namrally occurring concentration ranges observed for soils and other surficial materials in the Eastern United States [20]. Lead was detected up to a concentration of 150,000 ppm (SS-24B), 500 times the typical, naturally occurring concentration of 300 ppm for the Eastern United States. Chopper was detected at a concentration of 22,500 ppm (SS-24B), approximately 32 times the typical, naturally occurring concentration of 700 ppm for the Eastern United States. A third element, barium was detected up to a concentration of 7,040 ppm (SS-24B), nearly five times the typical, naturally occurring concentration of 1,500 ppm for the Eastern United States. Zinc was also detected at abnormally high concentration levels, ranging up to a concentration of 8,290 ppm (SS-24B), approximately three times the typical, naturally occurring concentration of 2,900 ppm for the Eastern United States. A final element, nickel was detected up to a concentration of 775 ppm (SS-24B), slightly above the established observed naturally occurring concentration of 700 ppm for the Eastern United States. Three additional elements, cadmium, silver, and thallium were detected in the WESTON/ARCS surface soil samples; however, the USGS has not observed or has not identified the typical, naturally occurring concentration levels for these elements in the Eastern United States [33, 36]. Asbestos analyses conducted by ESD personnel unitizing polarized light microscopy (EPA-approved method) indicated that only one soil sample (SS-24B) collected by WESTON/ARCS contci^ted detectable concentrations of asbestos (75 percent) [33]. WIL\(m00009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 8 3 09/30/93 SAS dioxin analyses of soil samples collected indicated TEF values ranging from 0.0 to 1.135 (J) (Table 20). This TEF value is approximately 930 times the lowest soil TEF value detected, 0.00122 (sample location SS-29). Dioxin TEF values could not be compared to the reference sample's (SS-45) TEF value since the reference sample TEF value equaled 0.0; therefore, the detected TEF values for soil samples were compared to lowest detected TEF value in the soil samples, equal to 0.00122 at location SS-29 [33]. According to EPA and ASTDR persoimel, although neither agency has a health based action level, dioxin TEF values above 1.0 for soils are considered likely to be a health hazard [34]. Dioxin analyses indicated that detectable dioxin TEF values were found on or adjacent to 18 residential properties; however, the dioxin health hazjird values (1.0 TEF for soils), as defined by EPA personnel, was only exceeded at one residential sample location (SS-24B) [33, 34, 79]. EPA requested that ATSDR review the soil sample results and provide consultation. ATSDR determined that except for lead, no other contaminants at levels of health concern were detected in the data reviewed. ATSDR concluded that the 150,000 ppm lead level at location SS-24B posed an immediate health threat, and potential health threats existed at locations SS-29 and SS-31. The soil sample result from SS-29 may have been a dilution of the actual lead concentration (from composting). The soil sample result from SS-31 may or may not have been an indication of what is present in the yard because it was not collected from the residential property [76]. It should be noted that WESTON/ARCS asbestos and dioxin results were not available at the time of the ATSDR review. ATSDR also noted that actual lead levels may be higher at all locations (with the exception of SS-24B) because the samples were collected as composites. ATSDR, along with the Connecticut Department of Health Services, recommended that additional surface soil (0 to 3 inches) sampling and screening for lead, PCB, and asbestos be conducted in all of the yards, as the sampling reviewed may not reflect acmal surface soil contaminant concentrations, Surficial soil sampling of these locafions has been conducted by EPA. Results will be reported under the auspices of EPA's Removal Program [76]. Based on the facility's operational history, the historical disposal practices at the property, and the fact that several of the compounds and elements detected in the surface soil samples were also found at detectable concentrations in. the Raymark facility source (sediment and soil) samples and groundwater samples, it appears likely that waste constituents associated with the Raymark property have been released to the soil exposure pathway. However, it appears unlikely that the numerous pesticide compounds detected in the soil samples are related to Raymark operations or disposal practices. These compounds may be a result of lawn and gardening activities occurring at individual residences. AIR PATHWAY The nearest individuals to the property are located along East Main Street, less than 200 feet from the Raymark property [10]. Table 21 summarizes the population within four miles of the Raymark property (Figure 2). There are an estimated 145,248 people residing within a four-inile radius of the Raymark property (this estimate does not include on-site workers) [52]. WIL\O4100OO9\074\RAYMARK.FNL 84 09/30/93 Table 21 Estimated Population Within Four Miles of Raymark Industries Radial Distance From Raymark Estimated Population 1 On-site 35" 1 0.00 < 0.25 1,882 1 0.25 < 0.50 2,427 1 0.50 < 1.00 9,075 1.00 < 2.00 38,127 2.00 < 3.00 45,832 1 3.00 < 4.00 47,905 TOTAL 145,283" • •:.':|p. "Indicated on-site workers. [52] There are two Federally-listed endangered species, the Atlantic Coast Piping Plover and the Least Tern, within four miles of the Raymark property [64]. Additionally, according to the CT DEP NDDB, there are 36 Federal or State endangered, threatened or special concern species, at 79 NDDB points documented within four miles of the site. A NDDB point comprises the current or former location of a Federal or State endangered, threatened or special concern species or critical habitat. There is one NDDB point within a 0.25- and 0.5-mile radius of the Raymark property; there are two NDDB points within a 0.5 and one-mile radius of the Raymark property; there are nine NDDB points within a one- to two-mile radius of the Raymark property; and 30 NDDB points, within a two- to three-mile radius of the property [65]. Additionally, within a three- to four-mile radius of the property, there are another 37 NDDB points documented [65]. Sensitive environments within four miles of the property consist of approximately 1,612 acres of off-site wetlands including fi-esh water, inter-fidal and coastal wetlands along with several coastal and inland State and local parks [54, 55, 68, 69]. Air quality sampling for asbestos has been conducted at the Raybestos Field as part of the Health and Safety Plan during the interim remedial activifies conducted on-site. Airborne samples were collected daily and analyzed utilizing EPA approved methodologies. According to the WESTON/TAT persoimel, the results of the airborne sample analyses for asbestos have not found any detectable concentrafion of airborne asbestos above EPA approved action levels [10]. No additional information is available regarding airborne asbestos sampling activities at Raybestos Field. WIL\(>»100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 85 09/30/93 To date no known air sampling has been conducted at the Raymark facility. However, air sampling activities are to be conducted as part of the current Raymark investigations being conducted by ELI [9]. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The Raymark Industries, Inc. (Raymark) site, formerly named Raybestos-Manhattan Company, is located at 75 East Main Street in Stratford, Fairfield County, Connecticut at latitude 41° 12' 02.5''N, longitude 73° 07' 14.0''W. For the purpose of this report the Raymark site consists of two parcels: the Raymark Industries facility parcel (which is the subject of this Site Inspection) and the Raybestos Memorial Baseball Field (Raybestos Field) parcel. Based on Stratford tax map information, both sites combined cover approximately 47.1 acres, of which 33.4 acres were used as part of the former plant operations and the adjacent 13.7 acres area known as Raybestos Field was used as a former waste disposal area by Raymark. Raymark and the Raybestos Field are located in an urban/industrial area of Stratford, Connecticut. Much of the land abutting the site (Raymark and Raybestos Field) is zoned residenfial. At the fime of the Roy F. Weston, Inc. Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy (WESTON/ARCS) reconnaissance, September 1992, Raybestos Field (excluding the fenced baseball diamond) was being capped .with an impermeable cover as part of a Region I U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emergency interim remediation. Raymark was in operation from August 1919 until 1989, when the plant was shut down and permanently closed. Raymark was a manufacturer of friction materials containing asbestos and non-asbestos materials, metals, phenol-formaldehyde resins, and various adhesives. The primary products produced were gasket material, sheet packing, and friction materials including: clutch facing, transmission plates, and brake linings and other automotive asbestos products. According to Raymark three general types of wastes were generated from the above processes: wastewater, waste asbestos and lead solids, and waste acids and caustics. During at least the 1970s through the early 1980s, accumulated asbestos and lead solids were annually dredged firom the lagoons and disposed off-site in various locations throughout Stratford, including Raybestos Field located north of the operational facility. During the early operational history of the facility prior to 1970, these asbestos and lead solids were primarily disposed on-site as fill material to support further land development at the Raymark facility. At the fime of the WESTON/ARCS on-site reconnaissance on September 9, 1992, the Raymark facility consisted of numerous abandoned production buildings (totaling approximately 500,000 square feet), several paved areas bordered by unpaved grass/dirt covered areas, numerous partially filled storage tanks (including four 100,000-gallon tanks reportedly containing an esfimated combined volume of 250,000 gallons of asbestos slurry), and four unlined open air lagoons. It should be noted that interim measures have been and are currently being conducted under an EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) 106 Removal Order; these include the \MLW10OOO9\O74\RAYMARK.FNL 86 09/30/93 removal of waste materials and storage tanks from the property and installation of interim caps at three of the on-site lagoons. Additionally, during the summer of 1993, all areas not paved by asphalt were covered with gravel and potholes were filled in and paved with asphalt to reduce exposure to contaminants. As of September 20, 1993, Raymark is in the process of rerouting the drainage around Lagoon No. 4, so that the water from the lagoon does not discharge into Ferry Creek. Raymark maintains a staff of approximately 10 people at the site to secure and maintain Raymark files and records. Additionally, Building No. 43, on the western portion of the site is currently leased to Pirotti and Sons, a waste hauler which employs an estimated 25 people. PubUc access to the Raymark facility is restricted by a 6-foot chain-link fence surrounding the property. Since 1981 numerous investigations of the Raymark facility have occurred. In 1991, the WESTON/Technical Assistance Team (TAT) and the EPA On-site Coordinator (OSC) conducted a supplemental site investigation of the Raymark property. The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate changes in site conditions based on clean-up activities conducted by the property owner (Raymark) and evaluate potential health threats subsequent to the preliminary assessment conducted on January 16, 1989. Selected samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), base/neutral and acid extractables (BNAs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and metals in accordance with EPA guidelines. WESTON/TAT results indicated significant levels of VOCs, semivolafile organic compounds (SVOCs), PCBs, metals, and asbestos on the Raymark property. WESTON/TAT detected 10 VOCs ranging from equal to the detection hmit to 100 fimes the detecfion limit for toluene [20 parts per billion (ppb)]. PCB concentrations ranged from 1.5 parts per million (ppm) (Aroclor-1242) up to 9,200 ppm (Aroclor-1242). Four metals were detected at levels above their naturally occurring concentrations levels ranging up to 7,000 ppm, for lead. Asbestos concentrations were determined to be between 0 and 75 percent for the on-site samples collected by WESTON/TAT from the Raymark property. Based on the WESTON/TAT data, EPA concluded that there is an actual or potential exposure threat to nearby human populations, and/or drinking water supplies and sensitive ecosystems. On May 26, 1993, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) issued a Health Advisory for Raymark Industries/Stratford Asbestos Sites, Stratford, Fairfield County, Connecticut. The PubHc Health Advisory was issued to advise the EPA, the State of Connecticut, the Town of Stratford, and the pubHc of an imminent public health hazard associated with past, present, and potential future exposures to waste from past operafions and disposal pracfices of Raymark. Analyses of the one on-site source (Lagoon No. 4 sediment) sample location collected by WESTON/ARCS indicated 23 organic compounds and inorganic elements detected above the reference sample (SD-19) concentration values. Concentrations of these constituents ranged from approximately 3.3 times the reference sample (vanadium) to greater than 5,500 times the reference sample value [0.0007 toxicity equivalence factor (TEF)] for dioxin. Organic analyses of the Lagoon No. 4 sediment sample detected the presence of sbc VOCs, four SVOCs, and two PCBs above their reference sample concentrations (Table 12, Figure 6). Sbc VOCs were detected above the reference value with concentrations ranging WIL\O4I00009\O74\RAYNWRK.FNL 8 7 09/30/93 from approximately 100 (1,1,1-trichloroethane) to 2,800 (total xylenes) fimes the sample quantitation limit (SQL). Organic analyses also indicated that four different SVOCs were detected from Lagoon No. 4 ranging from approximately 4 to 11 times the reference sample concentration. No pesticide compounds were detected above the reference sample concentration value. However, through Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) routine analytical services (RAS) and special analytical services (SAS) analyses, two PCB compounds (Aroclor-1260 and 1262) were detected above the reference sample values. RAS results indicated high concentrations of Aroclor-1260, 150,000 ppb (greater than 1,500 times the SQL), in the Lagoon No. 4 sediment sample. SAS PCB analyses for Aroclor-1262 indicated a concentration level of 39,000 ppb, approximately 67 times the SQL. SAS dioxin analyses of the Lagoon No. 4 sample, indicated a TEF of 3.86 (J). This TEF is greater than 5,500 fimes the TEF of the sediment reference sample (SD-19) value. According to EPA personnel and ATSDR representatives, neither the EPA nor ATSDR have health based action levels for dioxin. However, according to these sources, dioxin TEF values above 1.0 for soils and 0.5 for sediments are most likely considered to be a human health hazard. Ten inorganic elements were detected in the Raymark source sample collected from Lagoon No, 4. Analytical results indicated that eight metals were detected ranging from approximately 3 times the SDL (for vanadium) to greater than 300 times the reference sample value (copper). According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), two of the inorganic elements (lead and copper) detected in the WESTON/AR(I!S soil samples from the Raymark lagoons were not within the typical, naturally occurring concentration ranges observed for soils and other surficial materials in the Eastern United States. The lead level in the lagoon sediment was in excess of 46 times the typical, naturally occurring concentration range of 300 ppm; while the copper level in the lagoon sediment sample detected was in excess of 21 times the typical, naturally occurring concentration range of 700 ppm. Asbestos analyses conducted by Environmental Services Division (ESD) personnel ufilizing polarized light microscopy (EPA-approved method) indicated that the sediment sample collected from Lagoon No. 4 contained 75 percent asbestos. Based on the facility's operafional history and the historical disposal pracfices at the property, the VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, inorganic elements, and dioxins detected in the source samples are hkely waste constituents associated with processes which occurred on-site at the Raymark property. Regional groundwater flow is towards the Housatonic River. Groundwater level measurements taken by Ebasco (an EPA subcontractor) in conjuncfion with Buonicore-Cashman Associates, Inc. (BCA) in the fall of 1987 indicate that the localized groundwater flow at the site is from northwest to southeast across the site towards the Housatonic River. There are no known public water supply sources within a four-mile WIL\W100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 8 8 09/30/93 radius of the property. Potable public water supplies are distributed to the cities and towns within four miles of the Raymark facility from surface water reservoirs located beyond the four-mile radii by the Bridgeport Hydraulic Company and the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority. An estimated 1 to 2 percent of the population of the cities of Stratford and Milford, within the 4-mile radius of Raymark, may utilize private groundwater supply wells. WESTON/ARCS was unable to determine the location of the nearest private groundwater well to the Raymark property. Private groundwater supplies within four miles of the property were esfimated at 1,606 people. However, according to Mr. Michael Hill (EPA), "...the population served by groundwater supplies within four miles of the property are upgradient of the facility and not affected by Raymark's groundwater contamination." While WESTON/ARCS did not collect any groundwater samples from the Raymark facility during the Site Inspection, numerous groundwater sampling events have occurred. Prior sampling results indicated the presence of VOCs ranging up to approximately 290 times the maximum contaminant level (MCL) value (1,1-dichloroethene). Metal analyses found 10 metals above their sample detection limit ranging in excess of 32 times the MCL for nickel. Additionally, one PCB compound (Aroclor-1268) was detected at 7,000 times the MCL. The Raymark property is located approximately 1,200 feet east of the western bank of the Housatonic River in Stratford Connecticut, within the Housatonic Main Stem regional drainage basin. Based on this observation, the most likely manner in which water from the site enters into the surface water pathway is via overland flow. Overland flow on-site is generally into a series of catch basins, located throughout the property, which also flow into Lagoon No. 4. Water from Lagoon No. 4 is allowed to exit the site via a 2,000 foot long overflow culvert which discharges to Ferry Creek at the Interstate 95/Ferry Creek culvert; the most upstream probable point of entry (PPE). It should be noted that as of September 20, 1993, Raymark is in the process of rerouting the drainage around Lagoon No. 4, so that the water from the lagoon does not discharge into Ferry Creek. From the PPE, the 15-mile downstream pathway consists of the downstream segments of Ferry Creek (approximately 0.7 miles), the Housatonic River (1.6 miles), and along a 12.7 mile radius from the mouth of the Housatonic River into the Long Island Sound. The 15-mile surface water pathway ends near Sherwood Point, Westport, to the west and near South End Point, New Haven, to the east. There are no drinking water intakes along the 15-mile downstream pathway. The mouth of the Housatonic River is considered to be a recreational fishery as there may be the potential for human food chain organisms to be taken from the river. Coastal waterways are considered to support various recreational activities, as well as recreational and commercial fishing. According to Mr. WiUiam McCann, Stratford Conservation Commissioner, the lower reach of Ferry Creek and the Housatonic River along the 15-mile pathway are used for recreauonal fishing and boafing. Shellfish are also collected from areas along the 15-mile surface water pathway. Dr. John Volks, of the State of Connecticut Aquiculture Department, stated that the Lower Housatonic River, near the mouth of Ferry Creek, contains extremely important commercial seed beds for oyster cultivation (Lower Housatonic River Natural Beds). These oysters are harvested annually and transplanted (relayed) to offshore areas in the Long Island Sound where they are allowed to grow to maturity before being harvested for commercial use. Approximately 30,000 to Wn,\M100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 89 09/30/93 130,000 bushels of oyster seeds are harvested and transplanted each year from the Lower Housatonic River Natural Beds, The nearest approved shellfish beds are located to the east of the mouth of the Housatonic River in the Long Island Sound between Milford Point and Charles Island, approximately 2.2 to 5.4 miles downstream of the PPE area. The WESTON/ARCS field team also observed several people fin fishing along the Housatonic River near the mouth of Ferry Creek. In addition, EPA representatives have observed people crabbing from the flood control gates located on Broad Street, approximately 0.5 miles downstream from the PPE area. There are two Federally-hsted endangered species, within a four-mile radius of the Raymark property, the Atlantic Coast Piping Plover and the Least Tern. In addition, the Northern Diamondback Terrapin, a Federally-listed candidate Category 2 species, is known to occur along the 15-mile downstream surface water pathway. There are approximately 19.6 miles of wetland frontage along the 15-mile surface water pathway. This includes the wetland frontage along the upstream, tidally influenced section of the Housatonic River, north of the mouth of Ferry Creek, upstream to the Derby Dam. Additionally, there are two large coastal fidal wetlands, Nells Island (600 acres), and Great Meadow wetland (277 acres), located within six miles of the Raymark point of discharge into Ferry Creek. WESTON/ARCS collected 14 sediment samples and 2 quality control samples from Ferry Creek and the Housatonic River, south of the Raymark property on September 23 and September 24, 1992. Sediment samples were submitted for RAS full organic, total metals, and cyanide analyses, along with SAS PCB, and SAS dioxin analyses through the EPA CLP. In addition, samples were delivered to the EPA ESD laboratory in Lexington, Massachusetts for EPA-approved asbestos analyses. Sediment analyses indicated the presence of numerous organic and inorganic constituents above three times the reference sample values (SD-07 or SD-19). Analytical results of WESTON/ARCS sediment samples indicate that 4 VOCs, 16 SVOCs, 4 pesficide cortipounds, 5 PCB compounds, 21 inorganic metals, along with detectable concentrafions of dioxin. VOC concentrations ranged from approximately 1 times the SQL to 8 times the reference sample concentration. The only VOC to be detected upstream of the Raymark (Lagoon No. 4) discharge point into Ferry Creek was 4-methylphenol. A majority of the SVOCs detected in the sediment samples above three times the reference sample value were found in Ferry Creek samples, downstream of the flood control gate, near the mouth of the Housatonic River. The comparison of SVOCs occurring above three times the reference sample values may be biased due to the high number of SVOCs detected and the concentration at which they were detected in the Ferry Creek upstream reference sample (SD-19). There may be other sources of SVOCs, such as parking lot runoff or stream water ponding and backflow during high water events, affecting the upstream reference sample results. Four pesticide compounds were detected above three times their reference concentrations in three locations. Pesficide compounds ranged from approximately 1 times the SQL up to greater than 33 fimes the reference sample concentration for 4,4'-DDD, at location SD-05. Through RAS and SAS PCB analyses, five PCB compounds were detected above the WIL\O4100009\074\RAYMARK.FNL 90 09/30/93 reference sample values: Aroclor-1242, -1254, -1260, -1262, and -1268. PCB analyses results indicated PCBs ranging from approximately 1 (Aroclor-1260) to an excess of 480 (Aroclor 1254) times the SQL. The highest detected sediment PCB (Aroclor-1254) concentration was found at sediment location SD-09; directly downstream of the PPE, at a concentration level of 48,000 ppb. Inorganic analysis of sediment samples indicated the presence of 21 inorganic elements ranging from approximately 1.5 times the sample detection limit (SDL) (mercury and selenium) up to approximately 140 times the SDL. According to USGS, two of the inorganic element concentrations (copper and lead) detected in the sediment samples from the Raymark surface water pathway are not within the typical, naturally occurring concentration ranges observed for soils and other surficial materials in the Eastern United States. SAS dioxin analyses of sediment samples collected indicated TEFs ranging from 0.0 to 0.519 (J). The maximum TEF value for the sediment samples is greater than 740 times the reference TEF sample value (0.0007) of the sediment reference sample (SD-19). According to EPA persoimel, dioxin TEF values above 1.0 for soils and 0.5 for sediments are likely to be considered a health hazard. Asbestos analyses conducted by ESD personnel indicated that the sediment sample collected from Ferry Creek ranged in contents from 0 to 5 percent. Asbestos was not detected in the sediment samples collected from the Housatonic River. Based on the facility's operational history, the historical disposal practices at the property, compounds and elements detected, and the spacial relationship between the source (soil) and sediment samples, it appears likely that waste constituents associated with Raymark property may have been released to the surface water pathway. The nearest residence is located approximately 60 feet east of the Raymark property, along East Main Street. Several other residential units are located within 200 feet of areas of observed contamination (Raymark and Raybestos Field) along Paterson Avenue, Clinton Street, and Sidney Street, There are no known schools or day-care facilities within 200 feet of areas of observed contamination. Raymark is currently inactive; however, a Umited number of Raymark personnel and authorized personnel are regularly on the property. There are an estimated 13,400 people living within one mile of the property. There are no on-site terrestrial sensitive environments. In September and November 1992, WESTON/ARCS collected 25 surface soil samples in the vicinity of the Raymark and Raybestos Field property along suspected soil exposure pathways. Samples locations included 12 residential lots and 9 locations along the northern Raybestos Field property boundary, adjacent to other residential property lots. Soil samples was submitted for RAS full organic, total metals, and cyanide, along with SAS dioxin analyses through the EPA CLP. Soil samples were also submitted to the ESD laboratory in Lexington, Massachusetts for asbestos analyses utiHzing EPA-approved methodologies. Two soil samples, SS-15 and SS-22, were also submitted for SAS PCB analyses through the EPA CLP. WIL\(MI00O09\O74\RAYMARK.IT«, 91 09/30/93 Analyses of the soil samples indicate the presence of numerous organic and inorganic constituents above three times the reference sample values (SS-45). Soil sample analyses indicate that 12 SVOCs, 11 pesticide compounds, 2 PCB compounds, 16 inorganic metals, and dioxin and furan compounds were detected. Organic" analyses of the soil samples detected no VOCs above the reference sample concentrations in any of the soil samples. However, 12 different SVOCs were detected above three times the reference sample value at six separate sample locations in the vicinity of the Raymark property. SVOCs ranged from approximately 1 to 8 times (fluoranthene at location SS-29) above the SQL values. Organic analyses also indicated that several pesticide compounds were detected above the reference sample concentration in all but two of the soil samples locations (SS-15 and SS-25) collected by WESTON/ARCS. Eleven separate pesticide compounds were found above their reference concentrations values. Pesticide compounds ranged from approximately 1 times the SQL [Endrin (SS-27)] to greater than 500 times the reference sample concentration for 4,4'-DDT, at location SS-39. Through CLP RAS and SAS PCB analyses, two PCB compounds were detected above the reference sample values: Aroclor-1262 and -1268 at two sample locations, SS-15 and SS-22. Analytical results for PCB analyses indicated that location SS-15 contained two PCB compounds at 1,3 times (Aroclor-1262) and 4.2 times (Aroclor-1268) the SQL. Additionally, analyses of SS-22 indicated the detection of one PCB compound Aroclor-1268 at 3.2 times the SQL value. Inorganic analysis of surface soil samples indicated the presence of 16 inorganic elements ranging in concentration from approximately 1 times the SDL (antimony) up to greater than 11,000 times the reference sample concentrations (lead at location SS-24B). Lead was detected at concentration above three times the reference sample concentration in all of the soil samples collected by WESTON/ARCS. Inorganic analyses also indicate that barium, mercury, and selenium were detected above three times the reference sample concentration value in a high percentage (above 80 percent) of the WESTON/ARCS soil sample collected in the vicinity of Raymark. It should be noted that WESTON/ARCS personnel observed fill material containing asbestos brake and clutch parts between a depth of approximately 6 to 12 inches below surface grade when collecfing samples SS-24 and SS-24B. According to USGS, five of the inorganic element concentrations detected in the surface soil samples from along the Raymark soil exposure pathways are not within the typical, naturally occurring concentration ranges observed for soils and other surficial materials in the Eastern United States. Lead was detected up to a concentration of 150,000 ppm (SS-24B), 500 times the typical, naturally occurring concentration range for the Eastern United States. Asbestos analyses conducted by ESD personnel indicated that only one soil sample (SS-24B) contains detectable concentrations of asbestos (75 percent). SAS dioxin analyses of soil samples collected indicated TEF values ranging from 0.0 to 1.135 (J). This TEF value is approximately 930 times the lowest detectable soil TEF value, 0.00122 (sample location SS-29). Dioxin TEF values could not be compared to the reference samples (SS-45) TEF value since the reference sample TEF value equaled 0.0. WIL\O11000O9\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 92 09/30/93 Dioxin analyses indicated that detectable dioxin TEF values were found on or adjacent to 18 residential properties; however, the dioxin health hazard values (1.0 TEF for soils), as defined by EPA persoimel, was only exceeded at one residential sample location (SS-24B). EPA. requested that ATSDR review the soil sample results and provide consultation. ATSDR determined that except for lead, no other contaminants at levels of health concern were detected in the data reviewed. ATSDR concluded that the 150,000 ppm lead level at location SS-24B posed an immediate health threat, and potential health threats existed at locations SS-29 and SS-31. The soil sample result from SS-29 may have been a dilution of the actual lead concentration (from composting). The soil sample result from SS-31 may or may not have been an indication of what is present in the yard because it was not collected from the residential property. It should be noted that WESTON/ARCS asbestos and dioxin results were not available at the time of the ATSDR review. ATSDR also noted that actual lead levels may be higher at all locations (with the exception of SS-24B) because the samples were collected as composites. ATSDR, along with the Connecticut Department of Health Services, recommended that additional surface soil (0 to 3 inches) sampling and screening for lead, PCB, and asbestos be conducted in all of the yards, as the sampling reviewed may not reflect actual surface soil contaminant concentrations. Surficial soil sampling of these locations has been conducted by EPA. Results will be reported under the auspices of EPA's Removal Program. Based on the facility's operational history, the historical disposal practices at the property, and the fact that several of the compounds and elements detected in the surface soil samples were also found at detectable concentrations in the Raymark facility source (sediment and soil) samples and groundwater samples, it appears likely that waste constituents associated with the Raymark property may have been released to the soil exposure pathway. However, it appears unlikely that the numerous pesticide compounds detected in the soil samples are related to Raymark operations or disposal practices. These compounds may be a result of lawn and gardening activities occurring at individual residences. The nearest individuals to the property are located along East Main Street, less than 200 feet from the Raymark property. There are an estimated 145,248 people residing within a four-mile radius of the Raymark property. There are two Federally-listed endangered species, the Atlantic Coast Piping Plover, and the Least Tern within four miles of the Raymark property. Sensitive environments within four miles of the property consist of approximately 1,612 acres of off-site wetlands including fresh water, inter-tidal and coastal wetlands along with several coastal and inland State and local parks. Air quality sampling for asbestos has been conducted at the Raybestos Field as part of the Health and Safety Plan during the interim remedial activities conducted on-site. Airborne samples were collected daily and analyzed utilizing EPA approved methodologies. According to the WESTON/TAT personnel, the results of the airborne sample analyses for asbestos have not found any detectable concentration of airborne asbestos above EPA approved action levels. No additional information is available regarding airborne asbestos sampHng activities at Raybestos Field. WIL\O41000O9\074\RAYMARK.n^ 93 09/30/93 At the present time, environmental consultants for Raymark Industries are continuing environmental investigations and are conducting interim measures at the Raymark facility under an EPA CERCLA 106 Removal Order, These measures include removal of waste materials and storage tanks from the property and installation of interim caps at the on-site lagoons. EPA is overseeing these interim measures at Raymark facility and is conducting further investigations of suspected Raymark waste at related off-site disposal areas that are located throughout Stratford, Connecticut, WIL\(M100009\a74\RAYMARK.FNL 9 4 09/30/93 REFERENCES [I] WESTON/TAT, 1991. Supplemental Site Investigation for Raymark FaciUty Site - Stratford, Connecticut. October. [2] USGS. (United States Geological Survey). 1960. Milford Quadrangle, CT. 7.5' Series (Topographic). Photorevised 1984. [3] Town of Stratford, 1990, Town of Stratford - Department of Engineering Block Map F-ll, [4] Town of Stratford, 1990. Town of Stratford - Department of Engineering Block MapF-12. [5] NUS Corporation. 1986. Raybestos Manhatten Company Preliminary Assessments -Stratford, Coimecticut. TDD Nos F1-8606-20. August 31. [6] NUS Corporation, 1986, Raybestos Memorial Field Parking Area Preliminary Assessments - Stratford, Connecticut. TDD Nos Fl-8606-21. August 30. [7] EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region I). 1987. Proceedings Under Section 3008(h) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C, & 6928(h) - Determination of Release of Hazardous Waste into the Environment from a RCRA Facility. October. [8] BCA. (Buonicore-Cashman Associates, Inc.). 1988 Draft Preliminary Assessment Report EPA Approved Groundwater Assessment Program Supplemental Site Investigation for Raymark Facility Site - Stratford, Connecticut. April. [9] Raymark, (Raymark Industries, Inc.). 1991. DRAFT - Detailed Work Plan Under EPA Order 87-1057 Requiring Sampling, Analyses, and Reporting for Determination of the Presence or Release of Hazardous Waste at Raymark Industries - Stratford Coimecticut. March 15, [10] WESTON/ARCS. 1992. Field Logbook - Raymark Industries - Stratford, CT. TDD No. 9202-02-AWS, [II] ELI, (Environmental Laboratories, Inc.). 1992. Overall Site Plan; Facility Site Plan - RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC, Stratford, Connecticut. Sheet No SI. Project No. 91-545-10. Dated August 26; Revision Date March 26, 1993. [12] WESTON/TAT. 1991. Supplemental Site Investigation for Raybestos Memorial Field - Stratford, Connecticut, October. WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.REF' 09/30/93 REFERENCES (Continued) [13] ATSDR. (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1993. Public Health Advisory for Raymark Industries/Stratford Asbestos Sites Stratford, Fairfield County, Connecticut. May 26. [14] Town of Stratford. 1992. Town of Stratford - Tax Assessor Property Card: for Raymark Industries, Inc, [15] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1992, Phone Conversation Record with clerk (Stratford Tax Assessors Office), RE: Raymark Industries, Inc. - Background Info. Raymark Industries, Inc, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. September 19. [16] BCA, (Buonicore-Cashman Associates, Inc.). 1988. Closure Plan for Lagoons at Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford, Connecticut. July. [17] CT DEP. (Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection). Water Compliance Unit, 1984, Leachate & Wastewater Discharge Sources - An Inventory Hudson, Housatonic - Major Basins, June. [18] EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region I). 1987. Site Analysis, Raymark Industries Stratford Coimecticut - Volume 1. April. [19] EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region I). 1987. Site Analysis, Raymark Industries Stratford Connecticut - Volume 2. April. [20] ELI, (Environmental Laboratories, Inc.), 1992. Building Usage Plan; Facility Site Plan - RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC, Stratford, Connecficut. Sheet No S2. Project No. 91-545-10. Dated August 26. [21] BCA. (Buonicore-Cashman Associates, Inc.). 1988. Revised Container Storage Area Closure Plan - Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford, Connecticut. May. [22] CT DEP. (Connecticut Department of Environmental Protecfion). 1987. Letter to Raymark Industries - RE: General background Info. April. [23] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS), 1992, Phone Conversation Record with Mr. Mike Hill (EPA-RCRA), RE: Raymark Industries - Background Info. Raymark Industries, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS, November. [24] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993. Phone Conversation Record with Mr. Mike Hill (EPA-RCRA), RE: Raymark Industries - Background Info. Raymark Industries, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. May. WIL\04100009\074yiAYMARK.REF 09/30/93 REFERENCES (Continued) [25] BCA, (Buonicore-Cashman Associates, Inc.), 1989. Annual RCRA Groundwater Report, 1988 Sampling Year, for Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford, Connecticut. January 31, [26] EBASCO, 1988. Evaluation Report Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring Evaluation - Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford, Coimecticut. October. [27] ELI. (Environmental Laboratories, Inc.). 1993, Well Cluster AE,F (Analytical Groundwater) RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC, Stratford, Connecticut -RCRA Section 3013 Order Docket No. 87-1057 Phase IIA Sheet No A2, Project No. 91-545-10. Dated March 26. [28] ELI. (Environmental Laboratories, Inc.). 1993. Data Package for Soils Under Phase IIA - Semivolatile Organic Compounds - EPA Method 8270 - RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC, Stratford, Connecticut -RCRA Section 3013 Order Docket No. 87-1057 Phase IIA, Project No. 91-545-10. Dated June 11. [29] ELI. (Environmental Laboratories, Inc.). 1993. Well Ouster A,E,F (15 Borings/Well Cluster A,E,F Soil Analytical) RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC, Stratford, Connecticut - RCRA Section 3013 Order Docket No. 87-1057 Phase IIA. Sheet No A3 and A4. Project No. 91-545-10. Dated February 15. [30] EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1993. CERCLIS Database Report-List 8: Site/Event listing. Printout dated April 9. [31] EPA, (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1991. RCRA Database Report -US EPA RCRA Generators in Region I Active and Inactive by Town. Printout dated October 28. [32] Champion Map Corporation. 1987. Champion Map Book Fairfield, Connecticut, [33] WESTON/ARCS, 1993. Data Validation Package - Raymark Industries Stratford, CT. TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. Includes Case Nos. 1880L 19138, and SAS 7518A-02. [34] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993. Phone Conversation Record with Mr. Mike Hill (EPA-RCRA), RE: Raymark Industries - Dioxin results. Ravmark Industries, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. June 11. [35] Lucius, J.E., G.R. Olhoeft, P.L. Hill and S.K. Duke. (United States Geological Survey). 1989. "Properties and Hazards of 108 Selected Substances," USGS Open-File Report 89-491. August. WIL\04I00009\074\RAVMARKJIEF 09/30/93 REFERENCES (Continued) [36] Shacklette, H.T. and J.B. Boemgen. (United States Geological Survey). 1984. "Elements Concentrations in Soils and Other Surficial Materials of the Conterminous United States," USGS Paper 1270. [37] Stone J.R. et al. (U.S. Geological Survey). 1992. Surficial Materials Map of- Connecticut: Scale 1 : 125,000. [38] Flint, R.F. (U.S. Geological Survey). 1968. Surficial Geology of the Ansonia and Milford, Connecticut: USGS Geologic Quadrangle Report No, 23. [39] USDA -SCS. (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service). 1979. Soil Survey of Fairfield County Connecticut. July. [40] Rodgers, J. (Connecticut Geological and Natural History Survey). 1985. Bedrock Geological Map of Connecticut: Scale 1 : 25,000. [41] Fritts, C.E. (U.S. Geological Survey), 1965. Bedrock Geologic Map of the Milford Quadrangle, Fairfield and New Haven Counties Connecticut: USGS Map GQ-427. [42] Murphy, J.E, (CT DEP), 1987. Water Quality Classifications Map of Connecticut. Scale 1 : 25,000, [43] Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CT DEP). 1987. Summary of Connecticut's Water Quality Standards, [44] LaForge L. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993, Phone Conversation Record with Northeastern Climate Center, RE: Aimual precipitation for Stratford, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS, September 27. [45] Sternberg, H, W. (Connecticut Geological and Natural History Survey). 1986. Community Water Systems in Connecticut Map, Scale 1:125,000. [46] Blais, M.J. (CT DEP). 1992. Letter to John Kelly (WESTON/ARCS), RE: CT DOHS Community Water Supplies database printout. March 20. [47] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993. Phone Conversation Record with Mr. Picone (Bridgeport Hydraulic Company), RE: Groundwater data information. Raymark Industries, Inc., TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. June 25. [48] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1992. Phone Conversation Record with Mr. Ed Gorman (South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority), RE: Raymark Industries, Inc., TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. June 25. WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.REF 09/30/93 REFERENCES (Continued) [49] USGS (United States Geological Survey). 1970. Bridgeport Quadrangle, CT. 7.5' Series (Topographic), Photorevised 1984, [50] USGS. (United States Geological Survey). 1964. Ansonia Quadrangle, CT. 7.5' Series (Topographic). Photorevised 1984. [51] USGS. (United States Geological Survey). 1964. Long Hill Quadrangle, CT. 7.5' Series (Topographic). Photorevised 1984. [52] Frost Associates. 1992, Centracts Database Printout of Population and Private Well Use Populations Within Four Mile Radius of Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford, Connecticut. September 21. [53] EPA, (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1993. Office of Water-Drinking Water Regulations and Health Advisories. Printout dated May 1993. [54] U.S. DOI. (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Milford, CT, Wetland Inventory Map 7.5' Series (Topographic). April. [55] U.S. DOI. (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Bridgeport, CT. Wetland Inventory Map 7.5' Series (Topographic). April. [56] U.S. DOI. (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. New Haven, CT, Wetland Inventory Map 7,5' Series (Topographic). April. [57] U.S. DOI, (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Branford, CT. Wetland Inventory Map 7.5' Series (Topographic). April. [58] U,S, DOI. (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Woodmount, CT. Wetland Inventory Map 7.5' Series (Topographic). April. [59] U.S. DOI. (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Westport, CT. Wetland Inventory Map 7.5' Series (Topographic). April. [60] U.S. DOI. (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Sherwood Point, CT. Wetiand Inventory Map 7.5' Series (Topographic). April. [61] USGS. (United States Geological Survey). 1991. Water Resources Data Connecticut - Water Year 1990. Crr-90-1. WIL\O41000O9\074\RAYMARK.REF 09/30/93 REFERENCES (Continued) [62] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS), 1993. Phone Conversation Record with Mr. McCartney (USGS Water Resources Division), RE: Discharge measurements for the Housatonic River, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. June 28. [63] FIRM Map, (Flood Insurance Rate Map). 1990, Town of Stratford, Connecticut - Fairfield County, Panel 3 of 4 (090016 0003 B). April 2. [64] Beckett, G. (U.S. Fish and WildUfe Service). 1992. Letter to J. Kelly (WESTON/ARCS), RE: Federally listed or proposed threatened and endangered species in relation to sites in Maine, Rhode Island, and Connecticut. April 23. [65] Murry, N.M. (Connecticut - Namral Diversity Data Base). 1992. Letter to J. Kelly (WESTON/ARCS), RE: State hsted or proposed threatened, endangered and special concern species in relation to sites in Texaco - New Haven Terminal property. June 24. [66] WESTON/ARCS. 1992. Trip Report - Raymark Industries - Stratford, CT. TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. December 8. [67] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1992. Phone Conversation Record with Ms, Jane Anderson (EPA Region I), RE: Preliminary PCB Data Results, Raymark Industries, Inc. TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. November 12. [68] U.S. DOI. (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Ansonia, CT. Wetiand Inventory Map 7.5' Series (Topographic). April. [69] U.S. DOI. (United States Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Long HiU, CT. Wetland Inventory Map 7.5' Series (Topographic). April. [70] EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Interim Procedures for Evaluating Risks Associated with Exposures to Mbctures to Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and -Dibenzofurans (CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update. EPA Document No. EPA/625/3-89/016. March. [71] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993. Phone Conversation Record with Mr. Dave Simpson (State of Connecticut Marine Fisheries Department), RE: Fin Fishing along the Lower Housatonic River and vicinity, Raymark Industries, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. June 30. [72] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993. Phone Conversation Record with Dr, John Volks (State of Connecticut Aquaculture Department), RE: ShellFish along the Lower Housatonic River and vicinity, Raymark Industries, TDD No, 9202-02-AWS. July 1. W1L\04I00009\074\RAYMARK.REF 09/30/93 REFERENCES (Concluded) [73] Town of Stratford. 1988. Town of Stratford - Tax Assessment Summary Card "75 East Main Street". Raymark Industries, Inc. Block Map F-12. [74] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993, Phone Conversation Record with Mr. Ron O'Mallie (Stratford Department of Engineering), RE: Flood control gates on Ferry Creek, TDD No, 9202-02-AWS, July 13, [75] Hill, M. (EPA). 1993. Letter to J. Kelly (WESTON/ARCS), RE: Commments on Draft Site Inspection Report, Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford Coimecticut, TDD No. TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. September 24. [76] Anderson, J. (EPA). 1993. Letter to J. Kelly (WESTON/ARCS), RE: Commments on Draft Site Inspection Report, Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford Connecticut, TDD No. TDD No. 9202-02-AWS. September 8. [77] Logan Trucking Company (1990) Four "Asbestos Disposal & Documentation Forms - Raymark Industries, Inc", May. [78] Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990) Ten "Bill of Ladings" Consignee S&S Landfill Clarksville, SC. May. [79] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993, Phone Conversation Record with Ms. Tammy McCray (ATSDR), RE: Dioxin heath levels for soils and sediments, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS, September 29, [80] Kelly, J. (WESTON/ARCS). 1993. Phone Conversation Record with Ms. Margaret McDunna (EPA), RE: Dioxin heath levels for soils and sediments, TDD No. 9202-02-AWS, September 29. WIL\04J00009\074\RAYMARK.REF 09/30/93 ATTACHMENT A RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT ON-SITE STORAGE TANK INFORMATION COMPILED FROM WESTON/TAT AND ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. (ELI) ON-SITE TANK INFORMATION WIL\MI00009\074\RAYMARK.ATT A-1 09/30/93 On-site Storage Tank information Raymark Industries Tank No. Symbol Dept. No. Capacity (Gal.) Description 1 C,R 2 100,000 White Water Storage 2 C,R 47 100,000 Boiler Feed Water (City) 3 C,R 100,000 Reclaimed City Water 4 C,R 2 100,000 White Water Storage 5 E 100,000 Fire Water Storage 6 R (UST) 8 6,000 Monochlorobenzene (MCB) 7 R(UST) 8 6,000 Denatured Alcohol 8 R (UST) 8 2,000 Empty 9 R (UST) 8 2^00 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) 10 R (UST) 8 1,500 Empty 11 P 47 50,000 No. 6 Fuel Oil 12 P 47 50,000 No. 6 Fuel Oil 13 R 5 1,000 Acetone 14 R 14 6,000 Chloroethene 15 R 14 6,000 Trichloroethane (1,1,1) 16 R 6,000 Removed 17 R 4 4,500 Muriatic Acid 18 (front) E 9 6,000 451 Saturant 18 (rear) E 9 6,000 Ammonia Aqua 19 (front) E 9 6,000 Linseed Oil 19 (rear) P 9 6,000 Overflow from tank 19 F 20 E 9 12,000 USP Phenol 21 E 9 12,000 USP Phenol 22 E 9 L2,000 Chinawood Oil 23 (front) E 9 6,000 Meta Para Cresol 23 (rear) E 9 6,000 Cresylic Acid 24 E 9 12,000 Cresylic Acid 25 E 9 12,000 37% Formaldehyde 26 (front) E 9 6,000 477 Saturant Wn,MA\(M 100009\074\RA YMARK-TANK .K 09/30/93 Storage Tanks Raymark Industries (Continued) Tank No. Symbol Dept. No. Capacity (Gal.) Description 26 (rear) E 9 6,000 Empty 27 E 9 12,000 Varsol 18 28 R (UST) 22 1,000 Saturant 29 R (UST) 22 1,000 Saturant 30 R 22 500 Denatured Alcohol 31 R 22 500 Denatured Alcohol 32 R (UST) 22 1,000 Saturant 33 R (UST) 22 1,000 Saturant 34 R (UST) 22 1,000 Saturant 35 R (UST) 22 1,000 Saturant 36 R(UST) 22 5,000 Saturant 439/8420/295 37 R 9 12,000 Raw Cashew Nut Oil 38 R 9 12,000 Raw Cashew Nut Oil 39 R 9 12,000 Raw Cashew Nut Oil 40 R 9 6,000 Caustic 41 R 9 3,000 Meta Para Cresol (Used by Dept #9) 42 R 9 3,000 Empty (Used by Dept. #9) 43 R 9 5,500 Process CNSL (Used by Dept. #9) 44 P 3 12,000 Latex (Used in Dept. 6) 45 P 3 12,000 Latex (Used in Dept. 6) 46 R (UST) 6 12,000 VMP Naphtha 47 R (UST) 6 10,500 No. 2 Fuel Oil 48 R (UST) 6 and 9 12,000 Toluol 49 R (UST) 9 10,500 Aromatic Hydrocarbon Blend 50 R (UST) 9 10,500 Denatured Alcohol 51 R 4 4,000 Nitric Acid 52 R (UST) 6 10,000 Lower Reclaim (Toluol and Napt.) Wn,MA\M100009\074\RAYMARK-TANK.JK 09/30/93 Storage Tanks Raymark Industries (Concluded) 1 Tank No. Symbol Dept. No. Capacity (Gal.) Description 53 R (UST) 6 10,000 Upper Reclaim (Toluol and Napt.) | 54 A (UST) 22 and 3 12,000 No. 2 Fuel Oil 1 55 R (UST) 22 and 32 8,000 No. 2 Fuel Oil 56 R (UST) 550 Unleaded Gasoline 57 R (UST) 3,000 Unleaded Gasoline 1 58 R Unknown Acid 59 R Unknown Acid 60 R Unknown Acid 1 61 R Unknown Acid 62 R Unknown Acid 63 R 10,000 Solvent 1 64 R 5,000 Naptha 65 R 6,000 Solvent 66 R 1,500 Acetone 67 E 10,500 Empty 1 68 E 10,000 Waste OU : UST = Underground Storage Tank C = Cleaned R = Removed E = Empty A = Abandoned P = Contains Product [1,11] WILMA\M1000C9\074\RAYMARK-TANK.JK 09/30/93 o ATTACHMENT B RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT SOURCE (LAGOON SEDIMENT), SEDIMENT AND SOIL SAMPLES WESTON/ARCS ANALYTICAL RESULTS, AND QUANTITATION AND DETECTION LIMITS Collected September and November, 1992 W1L\W100009\074\RAYMARK.ATT B-1 09/30/93 r W(O««C0«U>«M Data Summaiy Key A - Acceptable data. J • The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity. R - Reject data due to quality control criteria. The data are iinusable (compound may or may not be present). Resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. U - The compound was analyzed for; but, was not detected. The associated numerical value is the sample quantitation limit UJ - The compound was analyzed for; but, was not detected. The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity. - - The compound was analyzed for; but, was not detected. The sample quantitation limit is the same as the CRQL presented. VOLATILE ANALYSIS Raymark Industries W1L\04100009\074\RAYMARK.ATT 09/30/93 Vol' « Sod Analyala ug/ke O SiTE; Raymark Facility Butldfng CASE: 18801 SOC: ACJ21 SAMPLE NUMSER: ACJ21 ACJ22 ACJ23 ACJ24 ACJ25 ACJ26 ACJ27 ACJ28 ACJ29 ACJ30 STATION LOCATIOM: SD-01 SO-02 SO-03 SO-04 $0-05 SO-06 SO-07 so-oa so-oeo SO-09 >SORATO(tr NUHBER: BS004547 BS004S48 BS004549 BS004S50 BS004551 BS004552 BS00ASS3 BS0O4S54 BS004555 BS0045S6 COMPOUND CXQL Chloromethan« 10 14 U 15 U 13 U 23 U 23 U 17 U 13 U 20 U 17 U 17 U Bromomethane 10 14 U 15 U 13 U 23 U 23 U 17 U 13 U 20 U 17 U 17 U vinyl ChlorJda 10 14 U 15 U 13 U 23 U 23 U 17 U 13 U 20 U 17 U 17 U Chloroethane 10 14 U 15 U 13 U 23 U 23. U 17 U 13 U 20 U 17 U 17 U Methylene Chtorfd« 10 18 U 18 U ' 15 U 28 U 62 U 44 U 29 U 33 U 29 U 39 U Acetone 10 23 U 34 U 29 UJ 78 U 94 U 27 UJ 33 UJ 190 J 170 J 68 U Carbon Disulfide 10 14 U • 15 U 6 J 26 J 23 U 17 U 13 U 8 J 10 J 28 J 1.1-0ichloro«thena 10 14 U 15 U 13 U 23 U 23 U 17 U 13 U 20 U 17 U 17 U 1.1-0ichIoroethane 10 14 U 15 U 13 U 23 U 23 U 17 U 13 U 3 J 2 J 17 U 1,2-Dichloroethene REVISED 4/20/93 ta Soft Anatyala Medium Level ug/ka SITE: RayMrk Facility Building CASE: 18801 SOG: ACJ21 SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ31 STATION LOCATION: SD-11 LABORATORr MJHSEIi: BS004557 COMPOUND CROL Chloronethane 1200 3800 UJ Brontomethane 1200 3800 UJ Vinyl Chloride 1200 3800 UJ Chloroethane 1200 3800 UJ Methylene Chloride 1200 8000 UJ Acetone 1200 3800 UJ Carbon OlMilflde 1200 3800 UJ 1.1-0ichloroethane 1200 3800 UJ 1,1-Dichloroethane 1200 3800 UJ 1,2-Dichloroetheoe SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ35 ACJ36 ACJ37 ACJ38 ACJ39 AU40 ACJ42 STATICtI LOCATIOti; SS-15 SO-16 SO-17 SO-18 SO-19 SO-20 SS-22 LAaORATORY NUMBER: BS0045S8 BS004559 BS004560 BS004561 BS004S&2 BS004563 BS004564 COMPOUND CRQL Chloromethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 0 11 U Bromomethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Vinyl Chloride 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Chloroethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U I'S U 17 U n u Methylene Chloride 10 38 U 43 U 130 J 52 U 110 J 28 U 38 U Acetone 10 12 UJ 40 UJ 31 UJ 260 J 83 UJ 55 U 28 U J Carbon Oiaulfida 10 12 U 3 J 17 U 29 J 15 U 17 U 11 U 1.1-Dichloroethene 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u 1,1-Oichloroethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u 1,2-Dichloroethene(total) 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 16 J 2 J 17 U 11 u Chloroform 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 UJ 15 UJ 17 U 11 u 1,2-Dichloroethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 UJ 15 UJ 17 U 11 u 2-8utanone 10 12 U 24 U 19 U 45 U 27 U 17 U 11 u 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Carbon Tetrachloride 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Vinyl Acetate 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u 8 romod i ch I oromethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u 1,2-DichIoropropane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u cis-1,3-0ichloropropene 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Trichloroethene 10 12 U 24 U 17 U ^ 8 J 15 U 17 U 11 u D i broRioch I oromethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Benzene 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u trans-1,3-Dichloropropene • 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Bromoform 10 12 U 24 U . 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 0 11 u 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u 2-Hexanone 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Tetrachloroethene 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 12 U ''24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Toluene 10 12 U 24 U 17 UJ 18 U 15 UJ 17 UJ 11 UJ Chlorobenzene 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Ethylbenzene 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Styrene 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U 11 u Total Xylenes 10 12 U 24 U 17 U 18 U 15 U 17 U n u BXX5SSBKB3BBXBBBBBBBBBBB3BS8BBS3333SSBSBI tBSXSS3X33S=3BBBBB38BZES=Ba iBxvaasHisasaiiBBXXBBBSXB&B a ;caBxBBBBaBaa« DILUTION FACTOR : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED : 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 DATE ANALYZED 09/30/92 09/30/92 09/30/92 09/29/92 09/30/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 X SOLIDS 84 42 53 55 67 60 87 REVISED 4/20/93 .dtile Soil Analysis ug/kg SITE: Raymark Industries CASE: 19138 SOC: ABR27 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR27 ABR2B A8R29 A8R30 ABRSI ABR32 ABR33 AeR34 ABR3S ABR36 STATIOU LOCATION: SS-24 SS-25 SS-26 SS-27 SS-28 SS-29 SS-32 SS-31 SS-30 SS-33 LABORATORY NUMBER: 524561 524571 524572 524574 524576 524578 524579 524580 524582 524583 COMPOUND CROL Chloromethane 10 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 13 UJ 11 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ U UJ Bromomethane 10 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 13 UJ 11 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 14 UJ Vinyl Chloride 10 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 13 UJ n UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 14 UJ Chloroethane 10 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 13 UJ 11 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 14 UJ Methylene Chloride 10 31 UJ 23 UJ 40 UJ 18 UJ 28 UJ 28 UJ 33 UJ 26 UJ 35 UJ 19 UJ Acetone 10 39 UJ 12 UJ 61 UJ 12 UJ 27 UJ 13 UJ 18 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 14 UJ Carbon Disulfide 10 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 13 UJ 11 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 14 UJ 1,1-Oichloroethene 10 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 13 UJ 11 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 14 UJ 1,1-Oichloroethane 10 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 13 UJ 11 UJ 12 UJ 13 UJ 14 UJ 1.2-0ichtoroethene Revised OA/22/93 .atile Soil Analysis ug/kg SITE: Raymaric Industries CASE: 19138 SOG: A8R27 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR37 ABR38 ABR39 A8R40 AeR41 ABR42 ABR43 ASR44 ABR45 ABR46 STATION LOCATION; SS-34 SS-35 SS-36 SS-37 SS-370 S$-38 SS-39 SS-40 SS-41 SS-42 LABORATORY NUMBER: 524584 524585 524586 524587 524588 • 524589 524590 524591 524592 524593 COMPOUND CRQL Chloromethane 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Bromomethane 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Vinyl Chloride 10 • 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Chloroethane .10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Methylene Chloride 10 16 UJ 12 UJ 16 UJ 13 UJ 14 UJ 26 UJ 22 UJ 14 UJ 21 UJ 19 UJ Acetone 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Carbon Disulfide 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 1,1-Oichloroethene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 1,1-Dichloroethane 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 1.2-Dichloroethef>e(total) 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Ch 1 or ofomi 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 1,2-0ichloroethane 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 2-Butanone 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 1,1,1-TrtchloroethBne 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 2 J 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Carbon Tetrachloride 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ vinyl Acetate 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 uJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Bromodiehlorortethane 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 1,2-0ichloropropene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ cis*1,3-Dichloropropene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ n UJ Trichloroethene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Dibromochloromethane 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Benzene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ tran»-1,3-Olchloropropene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ n UJ Bromoform 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 4-Methyl•2-Pentanone 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ • 11 UJ 2-Hcxanone 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Tetrachloroethef^ 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Toluene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Chlorobenzene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Ethylbenzene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Styrene 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ Total Xylenes 10 16 UJ 14 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 12 UJ 11 UJ xKBxaBBBBaBBBaaaaaaaaBBaBi • •«• 1.0 1.0 1.0 DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 DATE ANALYZED 11/29/92 11/29/92 11/29/92 11/29/92 n/30/92 11/27/92 11/29/92 11/30/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 X SOLIDS 61 71 81 84 81 84 80 81 83 88 Revised OA/22/93 It)I* Aquaowa Analyali Ufl/l SITE: Raymark Industries CASE: 19138 SOG: ABR26 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR26 ABR47 ABR51 STATION LOCATION: SS-23 SS-43 SS-47 LABORATORY NUMBER: 124540 524544 524551 COMPOUND CRQL Chloromethane 10 u 10 U 10 U Bromon«thanc 10 u 10 U 10 u Vinyl Chloride 10 u 10 U 10 u Chloroethane 10 10 u 10 U 10 u Methylene Chloride 10 6 J 10 u 10 u Acetone 10 10 u 10 u 10 u Carbon Disulfide 10 10 u 10 u 10 u 1,1-Dichloroethene 10 10 u 10 u 10 u 3 1,1-Dichloroethane 10 10 u 10 u 10 u 1,2-Dichloroetheoe REVISED 4/20/93 le toll Analyala uo/kB SITE: Raymark Industries CASE: 19138 S06: ABR48 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR48 ABR49 ABR50 STATION LOCATION: SS-24B SS-45 SS-330 LABORATORY NUMBER: 524596 524606 524603 COMPOUND CRQL Chloromethane 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Bromomethane 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Vinyl Chloride 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Chloroethene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Methylene Chloride 10 29 UJ 21 UJ' 40 UJ Acetone 10 16 UJ 62 UJ 16 UJ Carbon Disulfide 10 16 U 12 U 14 UJ 1,l-0ichtoroethef>e 10 16 U 12 U 14 U J 1,1-Oichloroethane 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 1,2-Dichloroethene(totat) 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Chloroform 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 1,2•0ichIoroethane 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 2-Butanone 10 16 U tz U 14 UJ 1.1,1-Trichloroethane 10 16 U 12 U 4 J Carbon Tetrachloride 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Bromodichloromethane 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 1,2-Dichloropropene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U ci$-1,3-Dichloropropef>e 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Trichloroethene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 0 i bronocMoromethane 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Benzene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U trans-1,3-0ichloropropene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Bromoform 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 4-Methyl-2-Penianone 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 2-Hexanor*e 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Tetrachloroethene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U 1,1,2,2-Tet rachIoroethane 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Toluene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Chlorobenzene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U .y Ethylbenzene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Styrene 10 16 U 12 U 14 U Total Xylenes 10 16 U 12 U 14 U aXSBSBBBBXBKBBBBBBBBBXBBaaaa BBaaaaBBaaaaaKaaaaaaaaaaaaBaaaa S3XS3XSBXS3S =z==tsxas=«rs«ss:sBsx===S K OlLUrtOH FACTOR • 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 DATE ANALYZED 11/27/92 11/27/92 12/01/92 X SOLIDS 63.0 86.0 74.0 REVISED 4/20/93 Vi. le Aqueous Analysis ug/U SITE: Rayvark Facility Building CASE: 18801 SOG: ACJ32 SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ32 ACJ33 STATION LOCATION: RB-12 T8-01 LABORATORY NUMBER: BS004545 BS004546 COMPOUND CRQL Chloromethane 10 10 u 10 u Bromomethane 10 10 u 10 u Vinyl Chloride 10 10 u 10 u Chloroethane 10 10 u 10 U Methylene Chloride 10 10 UJ 10 UJ Acetone 10 10 u 10 u Carbon Disulfide 10 10 u 10 u 1,1-Dichloroethene 10 10 u 10 u 1.1-Dichloroethane 10 10 u 10 u 1,2-0ichloroeth«ne(total) 10 10 u 10 u Chloroform 10 12 10 UJ 1.2-0ichloroethane 10 10 u 10 u 2-Butanone 10 10 u 10 u 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 10 10 u 10 u Cart>on Tetrachloride 10 10 u 10 u Vinyl Acetate 10 10 u 10 u Bromodichloromethane 10 10 u 10 U 1,2-0 i chIoropropane 10 10 u 10 u cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10 10 u 10 U Trichloroethene 10 10 u 10 u Dibromochloromethane 10 10 u 10 U 1.1,2-Trichloroethane 10 10 0 10 u Benzene 10 10 u 10 u trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10 10 u 10 u Bromoform 10 10 u 10 u 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 10 10 u 10 u 2-Hexanone 10 10 u 10 U Tetrachloroethene 10 10 u 10 u 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 10 u 10 u :) Toluene 10 10 u 10 u Chlorobenzene 10 10 u 10 u Ethylt>enzene 10 10 u 10 u Styrene 10 10 u 10 u Total Xylenes 10 10 u 10 u ESSf = r = = rS= = S3S£ = «XSSaEBSBKC«VKHKMVB*C«*B*«* mmmmmmimMmmmmmmmmmmmmm Bsccxxrxsa =xxsx«aaBBsxB:'== : = at S = X3 = XSSS3BS=r==5=3sss= t c==B=ss==s=3Bs£seaar===s33==== DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1,0 DATE SAMPLED 09/24/92 09/23/92 DATE ANALYZED 09/28/92 09/28/92 REVISED 4/20/93 n SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSIS Raymark Industries WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.ATT 09/30/93 Semivolatile Sot' 'nalysts U8/k« SITE: Raynk... Facility Building aSE/SAS: 18801 SDC NO.: ACJ21 SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ21 ACJ22 ACJ23 ACJ24 ACJ25 ACJ26 ACJ27 ACJZS ACJ29 Aaso** SAMPLE LOCATION: SO-01 SO-02 SO-03 SO-04 SO-05 SO-06 SO-07 S0-08 SO-OflO SO-09 LABORATORY NUMBER: BS004547 BS004548 BS004549 BS004550 BS0045S1 BS0045S2 BS0045S3 BS004554 BS0045S5 BS0045S6 COMPOUND CRQL Phenol 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 420 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 310 J 360 J 17000 UJ bis(2-Chlorocthyl)ether 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2-Chlorophenol 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 7S0 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 1,5-DichIorobenzene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 1,4-Dichloro6enzene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Benzyl Alcohol 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 1,2-D(chlorobenzene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2-Methylphenol 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 120 J 17000 UJ bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 330 470 UJ 510 UJ . 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 4-Methylphenol 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 57 J 140 J 570 UJ 240 J 660 UJ 660 UJ 17000 U. N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ HexachIoroethane 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Nitrobenzene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Isophorone 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2-Niirophenol 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2,4-0inethylphenol 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 91 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Carbazole 800 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 140 J 140 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 140 J 160 J 17000 UJ bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2,4-Oichloropherwl 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570- UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Naphthalene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 62 J 56 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 43 J 53 J 1100 J 4-Chloroanillne 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Mexachlorobutadlene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2-Methylnaphthalene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 52 J 49 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 45 J 560 UJ 17000 UJ HexachtorocycIopentadiene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2,4,6-Trichlorof)henoI 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2.4,5-Trichlorophenol 800 1200 UJ 1200 UJ 1000 UJ 1900 UJ 1800 UJ 1400 UJ 1000 UJ 1600 UJ 1300 UJ 43000 UJ 2 - ChIoronaphth»Iene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 2-NitroaniIine 800 1200 UJ 1200 UJ 1000 UJ 1900 UJ 1800 UJ 1400 UJ 1000 UJ 1600 UJ 1300 UJ 43000 UJ Dime thyIphthalate 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 68 J 570 U4 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Acenaphthylene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 34 J 180 J 170 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 180 J 93 J 17000 U 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 U 3-Mitroaniline 800 1200 UJ 1200 UJ 1000 UJ 1900 UJ 1800 UJ 1400 UJ 1000 UJ 1600 UJ 1300 UJ 43000 UJ Acenaphthene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 99 J 170 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 88 J 84 J 17000 UJ 2,4-Oinitrophenol 800 1200 UJ 1200 UJ 1000 UJ 1900 UJ 1800 UJ 1400 UJ 1000 UJ 1600 UJ 1300 UJ 17000 UJ 4-Nttrophenol 800 1200 UJ 1200 UJ 1000 UJ 1900 UJ 1800 UJ 1400 UJ 1000 UJ 1600 UJ 1300 UJ 17000 UJ Oit>enzofuran 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 48 J 77 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 66 J 61 J 17000 UJ 2,4-Oinitrotoluene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Oiethylphthalate 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ 4-Chlorophenyl-Phenylether 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Fluorene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 170 J 570 UJ 410 UJ 100 J 81 J 17000 UJ 4-NitroaniIine 800 1200 UJ 1200 UJ 1000 UJ 1900 UJ 1800 UJ 1400 UJ 1000 UJ 1600 UJ 1300 UJ 17000 UJ 4,6-0initro-2-Methylphenol • 800 1200 UJ 1200 UJ 1000 UJ 1900 UJ 1800 UJ 1400 UJ 1000 UJ 1600 UJ 1300 UJ 17000 UJ N-ni trosodiphenylamine 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 640 J 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ <.-8romophenyl-Phenylether 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ HexachIorobenzene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 570 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Pentachlorophenol 330 1200 UJ 1200 UJ 1000 UJ 1900 UJ 1800 UJ 1400 UJ 1000 UJ 1600 UJ 1300 UJ 43000 UJ Phenanthrene 330 180 J 510 UJ 160 J 960 J 1300 J 1400 UJ 110 J 1300 J 1300 J 4500 J SamlvolatUi» Sol ilys Is SITE: Raymark Facility Building ug/kB CASE/SAS: 1B801 SOC NO.: ACJ21 SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ21 ACJ22 ACJ23 ACJ24 ACJ25 ACJ26 ACJ27 ACJ28 ACJ29 Aaso** SAMPLE LOCATION: SO-01 SO-02 SO-03 SD-04 SO-05 50-06 SO-07 SO-08 SO-080 $0-09 LABORATORY NUMBER: BS004547 BS004S48 BS004549 8S004S50 BS004551 BS004552 8S004553 BS004SS4 BS004555 85004556 COMPOUND CRQL Anthracene 330 47 J 510 UJ 50 J 310 J 250 J 1400 UJ 410 UJ 220 J 200 J 17000 UJ Oi-n-butyIphthalate 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 1400 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Fluoranthene 330 360 J 510 UJ 380 J 270 J 3200 J 1400 UJ 220 J 2100 J 2300 J 6800 J Pyrene 330 470 J 510 UJ 970 J 4100 J 5800 J 1400 UJ 220 J 8300 J* 3000 J* 6000 J Butylbenzylphthalate 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 270 J 1400 UJ 410 UJ 290 J 640 J 17000 UJ 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 750 UJ 1400 UJ 410 UJ 660 UJ 560 UJ 17000 UJ Benzo(a)Anthraccne 330 210 J 510 UJ 310 J 1400 J 2100 J 1400 UJ 92 J 1500 J 1900 J 2200 J Chrysene 330 230 J 510 UJ 330 J 1900 J 2500 J 1400 UJ 120 J 2400 J 3300 J 3100 J Bts(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 330 79 J 510 UJ 140 J 3300 J 30000 J* 1400 UJ 26 J 30000 J* 160000 J* 2600 J Di-n-octylphthalate 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 770 UJ 3700 J 1400 UJ 410 UJ 2900 J 4200 J 17000 U. Benzo(b)FIuoranthene 330 250 J 510 UJ 220 J 1600 J 2600 J 1400 UJ 100 J 2500 J 2100 J 2700 J Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 330 150 J 510 UJ 260 J 1500 J 2100 J 1400 UJ 120 J 1500 J 1600 J 2400 J 8enzo(6)Pyrene 330 250 J 510 UJ 350 J 1600 J 2000 J 1400 UJ 110 J 1800 J 1600 J 2400 J Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 330 140 J 510 UJ 220 J 1200 J 1700 J 1400 UJ 72 J 2000 J 2000 J 1800 J Oibenz(a,h)Anthracene 330 470 UJ 510 UJ 430 UJ 480 J 640 J 1400 UJ 410 UJ 900 J 560 UJ 17000 UJ Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 330 150 J 510 UJ 220 J 1400 J 1800 J 1400 UJ 81 J 2400 J 1700 J 2200 J XXXXXXS=XXXXBBXSXX«BXBBXXBaaXB3=3BBX:BBBSBSBSSS S ssBBSBBBXsBXBBSsxaBBKBaxxBBxBBBBKBxBxsxxBBaBBBBXBsaaaBBaaaBaaaBXxaaxaaBBaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaasaaai DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1/30- 1.0 1.0 1/100* 1/60* 1"« DATE SAMPLED: 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 DATE ANALYZED: 10/09/92 10/09/92 10/09/92 10/13/92 10/13/92 10/09/92 10/09/92 10/09/92 10/14/92 10/14/92 X SOLID: 69 65 77 43 44 58 79 50 59 58 REVISED 4/20/93 RESULT REPORTED FROM DILUTED ANALYSIS. • RESULT REPORTED FROM MEDIUM LEVEL ANALYSIS. Semivolatile Soil SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ31RE** ACJ35 ACJ36 ACJ37 ACJ38 ACJ39 ACJ40 ACJ42 SAMPLE LOCATION: 50-11 SS-15 SD-16 SO-17 SD-18 SO-19 SO-20 SO-22 LABORATORY NUMBER: BS004557REX BS004558 8S004559 BS004560 BS004561 BS004562 BS004563 BS004564 COMPOUND CROL Phenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U bi s{2-Chloroethyl)ether 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 2-Chloropjhenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 1,4-0ichIorobenzene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Benzyl Alcohol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 2-Methylphenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 4-Methylphenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 36 J 150 J 380 U N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Hexachloroethane 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Nitrobenzene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Isophorone 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 2-Nitrophenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 2,4-Dimethylphenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Carbazole 800 4900 J 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 2800 460 J 32 J bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 2,4-Oichlorophenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 1,2.4-Trlchlorobcniene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Naphthalene 330 8200 J 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 930 390 J 380 U 4-Chloroaniline 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U HexachIorobutadiene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 2-Methyl naphtha!ene 330 7400 J 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 640 420 J 380 U HexachIorocycIopentadi ene 330 28000 UJ 390 UJ 780 UJ 560 UJ 600 UJ 490 UJ 550 U 380 UJ 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 800 71000 UJ 950 U 1900 U 1400 U 1500 U 1200 U 1300 U 380 U 2-Chioronaphthaiene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 2-Ni troaniIine 800 71000 UJ 950 U 1900 U 1400 U 1500 U 1200 U 1300 U 380 U Dimethylphthalate 330 28000 UJ 390 U 760 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Acenaphthylene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 41 J 390 J 180 J 61 J 2,6-Oinitrotoluene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 3-Ni troaniline 800 71000 UJ 950 U 1900 U 1400 U 1500 U, 1200 U 1300 U 910 U Acenaphthene 330 2300 J 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 2700 510 J 380 U 2,4-Dini trophenol 800 71000 UJ 950 U 1900 U 1400 U 1500 U 1200 U 1300 U 910 U 4-Ni trophenol 800 R 950 U 1900 U 1400 U 1500 U 1200 U 1300 U 910 U Dibenzofuran 330 2000 J 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 2500 340 J 380 U 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Oiethylphthalate 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U 4-Chlorophenyl-Phenylether 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 U 380 U Fluorene 350 4600 J 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 3800 790 28 J 4-Mitroaniline 800 71000 UJ 950 U 1900 U 1400 U 1500 U 1200 U 1300 U 910 U 4,6-Diniiro-2-Methylphenol 800 71000 UJ 950 U 1900 U 1400 U 1500 UJ 1200 UJ 1300 UJ 910 U Mni trosodiphenylamine 330 3800 J 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 230 J 380 U 4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 UJ 380 U HexachIorobenzene 330 23000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 U 550 UJ 380 U Pentachlorophenol 330 71000 UJ 950 U 1900 U 1400 U 1500 U 1200 U 1300 UJ 910 U Phenanthrene 330 21000 J 110 J 70 J 560 U 180 J 19000 * 4400 J* 490 SemivolatI le Sof alys Is ug/xg SITE: Raymark Facility Building CASE/SAS: 18801 SOG NO.: ACJ21 SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ31RE** ACJ3S ACJ36 ACJ37 ACJ38 ACJ39 ACJ40 ACJ42 SAMPLE LOCATION: SO-11 SS-15 SD-16 SO-17 SD-18 SO-19 SO-20 SD-22 LABORATORY NUMBER: BS004557REX B$004558 BS004559 BS004560 BS004561 BS004562 BS004563 BS004564 COMPOUND CRQL Anthracene 330 1900 J 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 4700 J 980 J 36 J Dl-n-butylphthalate 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 70 J 150 J 22 J Fluoranthene 330 12000 J 230 J 220 J 560 U 500 J 19000 • 6000 J* 880 Pyrene 330 16000 J 250 J 170 J 560 U 590 J 21000 • 6700 J* 1100 Butylbenzylphthalate 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 290 J 860 J 380 U 3,3'-Dichlorobenzldine 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 490 UJ 550 UJ 380 U Benzo(a)Anthracene 330 28000 UJ 90 J 69 J 560 U 220 J 6900 J- 3600 J 350 J Chrysene 330 8700 J 140 J 92 J 560 U 280 J 7700 J« 3200 J* 510 Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 330 7800 J 84 J 130 J 70 J 890 J 1800 J 80000 • 280 J Di-n-octylphthalate 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 600 U 62 J 5300 J* 380 U 8enzo(b)Fluoranthefte 330 4500 J 140 J 97 J 560 U 360 J 6400 J* 3400 J 480 Benzolk)Fluoranthene 330 4100 J 120 J 82 J 560 U 250 J 4300 J* 4200 J 390 Benzol a)Pyrene 330 4400 J 93 J 78 J 560 U 220 J 5700 J" 3600 J 350 J Indenol1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 330 3100 J 84 J 59 J 560 U 250 J 440O J* 3700 J 310 J Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 330 28000 UJ 390 U 780 U 560 U 100 J 1200 J* 1300 J 380 U Benzo(g,h,i}Perylene 330 3800 J 100 J 70 J 560 U 260 J 4500 J* 3600 J 420 XXBBKa = XXBBBBXBSXSBtfXBX5eXaxX33 = SSaaBaBattX = = = 3XXaxBBXX3XS3XBX = X = KttaXXX3X3XXXX.3XSeX3 = = aSBa:aS S = 3 = = = 3XaKBt3X3BX = BXXXXSXXBaxa33S3XBBKXCSXaXXCXXKI DILUTION FACTOR: 1«« 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1/30* 1/60* 1.0 DATE SAMPLED: 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 10/13/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 10/01/92 DATE ANALYZED: 10/19/92 10/09/92 10/12/92 10/09/92 10/13/92 10/13/92 10/14/92 10/09/92 X SOLID: 32 84 42 58 55 67 60 87 REVISED 4/20/93 * " RESULT REPORTED FROM DILUTED ANALYSIS. •* " RESULT REPORTED FROM MEDIUM LEVEL ANALYSIS. Semivolatile Soil /sis ug/kg SITE: Rsywark Industries CASE: 19138 SOG HO.: A8R27 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR27 ASR28 AaR29 ABR30 ABR31 ABR32 ABR33 ABR34 ABR35 ABR36 SAMPLE LOCATION: S$-24 SS-25 SS-26 SS-27 SS-28 SS-29 SS-32 SS-31 SS-30 SS-33 LABORATORY NUMBER: 524561 524571 524572 524574 524576 524578 524579 524580 524582 524583 COMPOUND CROL Phenol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U bU(2-Chloroethyl) ether 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2-Chlorophenol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 1,3 • D i ch I or obenzerte 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 1.4 - D i ch I orobefuene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 1,2-Olchlorobenzene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2-Methytphcnol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2,2'-Oxytols(1-Chloropropane) 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 UJ 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 4-Methylphenol 330 , 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U N-Nitroso-dl-n-propylamine 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 0 410 U 410 U 470 U Hexachloroethane 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Nitrobenzene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Isophorone 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2-Nitrophenol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2,4-Dimethylphenol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U bi$(2-Chloroethoxy)«ethsne 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2,4-Dlchlorophenol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Naphthalene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 4-Chloroanlllne 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 UJ 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Nexach t orobutad 1 «fie 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 4-chloro-3-Methylphenol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2-Methylnaphthalene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Hexachlorocyclopentadlcne 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2,4,5-Trichloroi3henol 800 950 U 950 U 950 U 990 U 1000 U 1000 U 890 U 990 U 1000 U 1100 U 2-ChIoronaphthslene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2-Nitroaniline 800 950 U 950 U 950 U 990 U 1000 U 1000 U 890 U 990 U 1000 U 1100 U Dimethylphthalate 330 390 U 390 U .390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Acenaphthylene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 45 J 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 3-Nitroaniline 800 950 U 950 U 950 U 990 U 1000 u 1000 UJ 890 UJ 990 UJ 1000 UJ 1100 UJ Acenaphthene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 230 J 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 2,4-Oinitrophenol 800 950 U 950 U 950 U 990 U 1000 U 1000 UJ 890 U 990 U 1000 U 1100 U 4-Hitrophenol 800 950 U 950 U 950 U 990 U 1000 U 1000 U 890 U 990 U 1000 U 1100 U Dibenzofuran 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 81 J 370 U 4,10 U 410 U 470 U 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Oiethylphthalate 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 4 -ChIorophenyI -PhenyI ether 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U fluorene 330 590 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 160 J 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 4-NitroaniIine 800 950 U 950 U 950 U 990 U 1000 U 1000 U 890 U 990 UJ 1000 0 1100 UJ 4,6-0initro-2-Methylphenol 800 950 U 950 U 950 U 990 U 1000 U 1000 U 890 U 990 U 1000 U 1100 U N-nitrosodiphenylamlned) 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U 4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Hexachlorobenzene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Pentachlorophenol 800 950 U 950 U 950 U 990 U 1000 U 1000 U 890 U 990 U 1000 U 1100 U Phenanthrene 330 45 J 56 J 120 J 72 J 58 J 2200 43 J 200 J 160 J 83 J < .:<.,! n/, /'>'' /m SemivolatI Is Soil ysl,> ug/kg SITE: RayMrk Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO.: ABR27 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR27 ABR28 ABR29 ABR30 ABR31 ABR32 ABR33 ABR34 ABR35 ABR36 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-24 SS-2S SS-26 SS-27 SS-28 SS-29 SS-32 SS-31 SS-30 SS-33 LABORATORY NUMSER: 524561 524571 524572 524574 524576 524578 524579 524580 524582 524583 COMPOUND CRQL AnthracefM 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 59 J 230 J 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Carbazol 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 230 J 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Di-n-butylphthalate 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Fluoranthene 330 86 J 110 J 180 J 140 J 110 J 3100 93 J 330 J 340 J 140 J Pyrene 330 80 J 92 J 180 J 120 J 99 J 2500 92 J 410 U 330 J 170 J Butylbeniytphthalate 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 J 3,3'-0lchlorobenzldlne 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 J 8enzo(a)anthracene 330 390 U 49 J 89 J 64 J 49 J 1700 370 U 160 J 160 J 470 J Chrysene 330 60 J 59 J 110 J 91 J 67 J 1200 53 J 220 J 180 J 470 . 8if(2-ethythexyl)p(ithatate 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 u 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Oi-n-octylphthalate 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 u 420 U 430 U 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Benzolb)fluoranthene 330 110 J« 110 JIK 230 JM 150 J# 130 JH 2200 370 U 370 J 340 J# 470 U Benzo(k)fluoranthene 330 110 JU 110 J« 230 J# 150 j n 130 J# 620 370 U 410 U 340 J» 470 U Benzo(a)pyrene 330 390 U 40 J 79 J 50 J 420 U 1200 370 U 410 U 130 J 470 U I ndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pvrene 330 390 u 390 U 390 U 410 u 420 U 560 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 u 420 U 160 J 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U BenzoCg.h,1)perylene 330 390 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 420 U 520 J 370 U 410 U 410 U 470 U BBBBE5Z—BBZBB DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED: 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/18/92 11/19/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 n/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 DATE ANALYZED: 12/09/92 12/09/92 12/09/92 12/09/92 12/09/92 11/30/92 11/28/92 12/01/92 11/29/92 12/01/92 X SOLID: 83 84 84 80 78 76 89 80 79 70 VALUE REPORTED REPRESENTS TOTAL(B*IC)FLUORANTHEWE Revised OA/22/93 Semlvolatll'a Soil Analysl SITE: Raymsrk Industries uu/kB CASE: 19138 SOG NO.: ABR48 SAMPLE NUMBER: A8R48 ABR49 ABR50 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-24S SS-45 LABORATORY NUM3ER: SS-33D 524596 524606 524608 COMPOUND CRQL Phenol 330 860 J 380 U bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 330 UO U 5200 U 380 U 2-Chlorophenol 330 440 U 5200 380 U 1.3-Oichlorobenzefw 330 u 440 U 5200 U 380 U 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 330 440 U 5200 380 U 1,2-Oichlorobenzene 330 u 440 U 5200 u 380 U 440 U 2-Hethylphenol 330 5200 380 U 2,2'-Oxybis<1-chloropropane) 330 u 440 U 5200 380 U 440 U 4-Methylphenol 330 u 5200 380 U 440 U N-Mitroso-dl-n-propylamine 330 u 5200 u 380 U 440 U Hexachloroethane 330 5200 380 U Nitrobenzefie 330 u 440 U 5200 U 380 U 440 U Isophorone 330 5200 u . 380 U 2-Nitrophenol 330 440 U 5200 380 U 440 U 2,4-Dimethylphenol 330 u 850 J 380 U 440 U bis(2-Chloroethoxy)iBeth8ne 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U 2,4-Oichlorophenol 330 5200 380 U 440 U 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 330 u 5200 380 U 440 U Naphthalene 330 u 5200 380 U 440 U 4-Chloroaniline 330 u 5200 380 U 440 U Hexachlorobutadltne 330 u 5200 U 380 U 440 U 4Chloro-3-Methylphenol 330 5200 380 U 440 U 2-M«thyln»phth»lene 330 u 5200 u 380 U 440 U HexacMorocyctopentadiena 330 5200 u 300 U 440 U 2.4,6-Trichlorophenol 530 5200 u 380 U 440 U 2,4.5-Trichlorophenol 800 13000 920 U 1100 U 2-Chloronaphthalene 330 u 5200 380 U 440 U 2-Nitroaniline 800 u 13000 U 920 U 1100 U Dimethylphthalate 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U Acenaphthylene 330 5200 380 U 440 U 2.6-Oinitrotoluene 330 u 5200 380 U 440 U 3-Nitroaniline 800 u 13000 920 UJ 1100 UJ Acenaphthene 330 u 5200 380 U 440 U 2.4-Dinitrophenol 800 u 13000 920 U 1100 U 4-Nitrophenol 800 u 13000 920 U 1100 U Dibenzofuran 330 u 5200 u 380 U 440 U 2,4-Oinitrotoluene 330 520 0 u 380 U 440 U Oiethylphthalate 330 5200 u 380 U 440 U 4Chlorophenyl-Phenylether 330 5200 u 380 U 440 U fluorene 330 5200 u 380 U 440 U 4-Hitroaniline 800 13000 u 920 U 1100 U <.,6-0initro-2-Methylphenol 800 13000 u 920 U 1100 U N-nitrosodiphenylamine 330 5200 u 380 U 440 U 4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether 330 5200 u 380 U 440 U Hexachlorobenzene 330 5200 u 380 U 440 U Pentachlorophenol 800 13000 u 920 U 1100 U Phenanthrene 330 820 J 380 U 210 J Semlvolatlti» Soil Analysis ug/kg SITE: Raytaar.. Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO.: jIIBR48 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR48 ABR49 ABR50 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-24B SS-45 SS-33D LABORATORY NUMBER: 524596 524606 524608 COMPOUND CROL Anthracene 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U Carbazole 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U Di-n-butylphthalate 330 - 5200 U 380 U 440 U Fluoranthene 330 1000 J 380 U 420 J Pyrene 330 2100 J 380 U 440 J Butylbenzylphthalate 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U 3,3'-Dichlorobenzldine 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U Benzola)anthracenc 330 760 J 380 U 200 J Chrysene 330 1000 J 380 U 210 J 8is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U Di-n-octylphthalate 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U 8enzolb)f luorantherte 330 1000 J« 380 U# 450 U Benzolk)fluoranthene 330 1000 J<( 380 U# 450 U Benzo(a)pvrene 330 5200 U 380 U 160 J 1 ncJeno (1,2,3 cd) py r ene 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U Dibenz{a,h)anthracene 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U Benzolg,h,i)pery lene 330 5200 U 380 U 440 U IBSeCBSBI•BBBBBBSCBKKB B • BBBBBBSBBBBM DILUTION FACTOR: 10.0 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED: 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 DATE EXTRACTED; 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 DATE ANALYZED; 12/01/92 11/29/92 11/29/92 X SOLID; 63.0 86.0 74.0 n • VALUE REPORTED REPRESENTS TOTAL 6EN20(B*IC)rLU0RANTMENE. Ssffllvolatlla Soil >lyals ug/kg SITE: Rayaark Industries CASE: 19138 SOC NO.: A8R27 SAMPtE NUMBER: ABR37 ABR38 ABR39 ABR40 ABR41 ABR42 ABR43 ABR44 ABR45 ABR46 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-34 SS-35 SS-36 SS-37 SS-37D SS-38 SS-39 SS-40 SS-41 SS-42 LABORATORY NUMBER: 524584 524585 524586 524587 524588 524589 524590 524591 524592 524593 COMPOUND CROL Phenol 330 540 U 46 0 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U bisl2-Chloroethyl) ether 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U 2-Chlorophenol 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U 1.3-Dlchlorobenzene 330 54 0 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 330 54 0 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U 1,2-Dlchlorobenzene 330 54 0 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U 2-Methylphenol 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U 2,2'-OxyblSt 1-Chloropropene) 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u 4-Methylphenol 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u N-Nitroso-dl-n-propylamine 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u Hexachloroethane 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u Nitrobenzene 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u Isophorone 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u 2-Nitrophenol 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u 2,4-Oimethylphenol 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u bis(2-Chloroethoxy)»«ethane 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 2.4-Dlehlorophenol 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 370 u 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 1,2,4-Trlchlorobemana 330 540 U 460 U 370 u 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U Naphthalene 330 540 U 460 U 370 u 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 4-ChloroaniUne 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 790 U u 400 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 370 U Hexachlorobutadiene 330 54 0 U 460 U 400 U 790 U 400 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 570 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 330 540 U 460 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 400 U 370 2-Mcthylnaphthalene 330 54 0 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 540 U 460 U 370 Hexachlorocyclopentadtene 330 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 540 U 460 U 370 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 330 980 U 950 U 980 U 940 U 990 U 400 U 790 U u 1300 U 1100 U 370 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 800 400 U 590 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 2-Chlorooaphthaleoe 330 54 0 U 460 U 370 u 980 U 950 U 980 U 940 U 990 U 980 U 1900 U 900 2-Nitroaniline 800 1300 U • 1100 U 400 U 790 U u 400 U 390 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 370 Dimethylphthalate 330 540 U 460 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 400 U 370 Acenaphthylene 330 540 U 460 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 400 U 370 1 2,6-D)nitrotoluene 330 540 U 460 U 980 UJ 950 UJ 980 UJ 940 UJ 990 UJ 980 UJ 1900 U 900 I 3-Njtroaniline 800 1300 UJ 1100 UJ 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 400 U 370 Acenaphthene 330 540 U 460 U 950 U 980 U 940 U 990 U 980 U 1900 U u 980 U 900 2,4-Oinitrophenol 800 1300 U 1100 U 980 U 950 U 980 U 940 U 990 U 980 U 1900 U u 900 4-Nltrophenol 800 1300 U 1100 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 370 Dibenzofuran 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 7V0 U u 370 2,4-Oinitrotoluene 330 540 U 460 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 400 U 370 Oiethylphthalate 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 370 4-Chlorophenyl-Phenylether 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u 370 fluorene 330 540 U 460 U 980 UJ 950 UJ 980 U 940 U 990 UJ 980 UJ 1900 U u 900 4-witroanIUne 800 1300 UJ 1100 UJ 980 U 950 U 980 U 940 U 990 U 980 U 1900 U u 900 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 600 1500 U 1100 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U u N-nitrosodiphenylerainelD 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 u 370 U 4-8romophenyl-Phenylether 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U Hexachlorobenzene 330 540 U 460 U 980 U 950 U 980 U 940 U 990 U 980 U 1900 U 900 Pentachlorofrfienol 800 1300 U 1100 U 89 J 79 J 92 J 170 J 87 J 91 J 96 J u 46 J Phenanthrene 330 160 J 71 J Revised OA/22/93 Semivolatile Soil lyalI s ug/kg SITE: RaysMrk Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO.: ABR27 SAMPLE NUMBER; ABR37 ABR38 ABR39 ABR40 ABR41 ABR42 ABR43 ABR44 ABR45 A8R46 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-34 SS-35 SS-36 SS-37 SS-37D SS-38 SS-39 SS-40 SS-41 SS-42 LABORATORY NUMBER: 524584 524585 524586 524587 524588 524589 524590 524591 524592 524593 COMPOUND CRQL Anthracene 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U Carbazol 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U Di-n-butylphthalate 330 380 J 460 u 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U Fluoranthene 330 260 J 130 J 140 J 130 J 180 J 290 J 140 J 150 J 160 J 77 J Pyrene 330 320 J 140 J 180 J 140 J 200 J 290 J 180 J 190 J 230 J 73 J Butylbenzylphthalate 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U 3,3'-Dlchlorobenz{din« 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U Banzo(a)anthracena 330 120 J 460 U 400 U 390 U 76 J 130 J 410 U 400 U 140 J 39 J Chrysene 330 160 J 460 U 400 U 390 U 120 J 140 J 410 U 400 U 790 U 52 J 8ls(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 1100 370 U Di-n-octylphthalate 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U Benzotb)fluoranthene 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 230 Jl» 280 J« 410 U 400 U 320 J# 97 Jj 8enzo(k)fluoranthene 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 230 J« 280 J» 410 U 400 U 320 J# 97 Ji 8enzo(a)pyrene 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 94 J 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U I ndenol 1,2,3-cd) pyref^ 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U Dibenzta,h)anthracene 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 390 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U Benzolg,h,i)pery lene 330 540 U 460 U 400 U 390 U 400 U 590 U 410 U 400 U 790 U 370 U XaaXXBXKXBBXXXB3XKaBBaa«XBXaBXXX==:=aXEBBBXS3==SXB X SSXSX33BSKEC 3 E33KXB3X=Xa=X= 3333EE33333X B=3===3===3X=3 =3======X=CS 3SS=£Sr==SBBBBS3BaB=XSBXCBBB=CBS3S=B=B3«SB3BK==EBX l DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED: 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 11/24/92 DATE ANALYZED: 12/01/92 12/01/92 12/01/92 12/01/92 11/28/92 11/29/92 12/01/v? 12/01/92 12/09/92 12/09/92 X SOLID: 61 71 81 84 01 84 UO 81 83 88 # • VALUE HI PORTED REPRESENTS TOTAL(0»X)FLUORANT||| ME :) Revised 04/22/93 Semivolatile Aqueous Analysis ug/l SITE: Raysk. Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO.: ABR26 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR47 ABR51 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-43 SS-47 LABORATORY NUMBER: 524544 524551 COMPOUND CROL Phenol 10 10 UJ 10 u bisl2-Chloroethyl) ether 10 10 UJ 10 u 2-Chlorophcnol 10 10 UJ 10 u 1,3-DichIorobenzene 10 10 UJ 10 u 1,4-0ichIorobenzene 10 10 UJ 10 u 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 10 UJ 10 u 2-Methylphenol 10 10 UJ 10 u 2,2'-Oxyblsll-chloropropane) 10 10 UJ 10 u 4-Methylphenol 10 10 UJ 10 U N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 10 10 UJ 10 u Hexachloroethane 10 10 UJ 10 u Nitroberuene 10 10 UJ 10 u Isophorone 10 10 UJ 10 u 2-Nitrophenol 10 10 UJ 10 u 2,4-Oimethylphenol 10 10 UJ 10 u bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 10 10 UJ 10 u 2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 10 UJ 10 u 1,2,4-TrIchIorobenzene 10 10 UJ 10 u Naphthalene 10 10 UJ 10 u 4-Cnloroanillne 10 10 UJ 10 u Hexach lorobutadierte 10 10 UJ 10 u 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 10 10 UJ 10 u 2-MethyI naphthalene 10 10 UJ 10 u HexBchIorocycIopentadiene 10 10 UJ 10 u 2.4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 10 UJ 10 U 2,4,5-TrichlorophenoI 25 25 UJ 25 U 2 -ChIoronaphtha Iene 10 10 UJ 10 u 2-Nitroaniline 25 25 UJ 25 U Dimethylphthalate 10 10 UJ 10 u Acenaphthylene 10 10 UJ 10 u 2.6-0initrotoluene 10 10 UJ 10 u 3-Nitroaniline 25 25 UJ 25 U Acenaphthene 10 10 UJ 10 u 1 2,4-0initrophenol 25 25 UJ 25 U 4-Nitrophenol 25 25 UJ 25 UJ Dibenzofuran 10 10 UJ 10 U 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 10 UJ 10 u Oiethylphthalate 10 10 UJ 10 u 4 -ChIorophenyI-Phonylether 10 10 UJ 10 u f luorene 10 10 UJ 10 u 4-Ni troaniline 25 25 UJ 25 U 4,6-Oinitro-2-Methylphenol 25 25 UJ 25 U N•nitrosodiphenyl amine( 1) 10 10 UJ 10 U 4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether 10 10 UJ 10 U Hexachlorobenzene 10 10 UJ 10 U Pentachlorophenol 25 25 UJ 25 U Phenanthrene 10 10 UJ 10 U Semivolatile Aqueous Analysli ua/l SITE: Rayaark Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO.: ABR26 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR47 ABRS1 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-43 SS-47 UBORATORY NUMBER: 524544 524551 roni COMPOUND LKUU Anthracene 10 10 UJ 10 U Carbazole 10 10 UJ 10 U D i-n-butylphthalate 10 1 J 10 U Fluoranthene 10 10 UJ 10 U Pyrene 10 10 UJ 10 U Butylbenzylphthalate 10 10 UJ 10 U 3,3'-Dichlorobenzldtne 10 10 UJ 10 U Benzola)anthracene 10 10 UJ 10 U Chrysene 10 10 UJ 10 U Bis(2-ethylhcxyl)phthalate 10 10 UJ 10 U Di-n-octylphthalate 10 10 UJ 10 U Benzolb)fluoranthene 10 10 UJ 10 u Benzolk)fIuoranthene 10 10 UJ 10 U Benzol a)pyrene 10 10 UJ 10 u 1ndenoi1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10 10 UJ 10 u Dibenzla,h)anthracene 10 10 UJ 10 u Benzolg,h,i>peryIene 10 10 UJ 10 u C CBBEXB RE = cxaIBBBB»a=a=SB»BBB«B3BeBBBBm i ESBBBBBB: =X«BBa«SKCKZ= DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 DATE SAH?LED: 11/18/92 11/19/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 12/01/92 11/25/92 DATE ANALYZED: 12/15/92 11/29/92 REVISED 4/20/93 Semivolatile Aqueous Analysis ug/U tITCl Rayma K:llity Building CASE/SAS: 1i.^ SOO NO.] ACJ32 SAMPU NUMBER t ACJ32 SAMPLE LOCATION: RB-12 LABORATORY NUHBER; BS004545 COMPOUND CRQL Ptienot 10 10 U bls(2'Chloroethyl)ather 10 10 U 2-Chlorophenol 10 10 U 1,3-Dlchtorobenzcns 10 10 U 1,4-Dlchlorobenzena 10 10 u Benzyl Alcohol 10 10 u 1.2-0Ichlorobenxene 10 10 u 2-Methylphenol 10 10 U bls(2-Chlorol8opropyl)ether 10 10 u 4-Methylphenol 10 10 u H-Nl troso-dl-n-propylaoilne 10 10 u Hexachloroethane 10 10 U Nitrobenzene 10 10 u Isophorone 10 10 u 2-Ml trophenol 10 10 U 2,4-0l»ethylphenol 10 10 u Carbazole 50 10 u blsl2-Chloroethoxy)«ethane 10 10 u 2,4-0 Ich lorophenol 10 10 u 1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzane 10 10 u Naphthalene 10 10 u 4-ChloroanUlr>e 10 10 u Hexach I orobut ad 1 erw 10 10 u 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 10 10 u 2-Mathylnsphthalene 10 10 u Hexachlorocyclopentadlene 10 10 u 2,4,6-TrIchlorophenol 10 10 u 2,4,3-Trlchlorophenol 50 25 U 2-Chloronsphthalene 10 10 u 2-NItroaniIIne 50 25 U Olaethylphthalate 10 10 u Acenaphthylene 10 10 u 2,6-DInitrotoluene 10 10 u 3-Nttroantllne 50 25 U Acerwphtheoo 10 10 u 2,4-Dlnitrophenol 50 25 U 4-Nltrophenol 50 25 U Dibenzofuran 10 10 u 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 10 U Oiethylphthalate 10 10 U 4-Chlorophenyl-Phenylether 10 10 U Fluorene 10 10 U 4-Nltroanlllne 50 25 U 4,6-0lnitro-2-Methylphenol 50 25 U N-nltrosodiphenyla«ine(l) 10 10 U 4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether 10 10 U Hexachlorobenzene 10 10 U Pentachlorophenol 50 25 U Phenanthrene 10 10 u itvolatlle Aqueous Analyst! ug/U IITCt RayMf clllty Building CASC/SAS: U SOC NO.: ACJ32 SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ32 SAMPLE LOCATION: RB-12 LABORATORY NLMBER: BS004545 COMPOUND CRQL Anthracene 10 10 U 01-n-butylphthalate 10 10 U Fluoranthene 10 10 U Pyrene 10 10 U Butylbenzylphthalate 10 10 U S,3'-0lchlorobenzldlna 20 10 u Beruo(a)Anthracene 10 10 u Chryaene 10 10 u Blsl2-Ethylhexyl)phth«late 10 10 u Ol-n-octylphthalata 10 10 u Banzotb)FIuoranthene 10 10 u Bcnzo(k)Fluoranthene 10 10 u Benzol a )Pyref>e 10 10 u Indenot1.2.3-cd)Pyrentt 10 10 u Olbenz(a,h)Anthracef>e 10 10 u Benzo W1L\04100009\074\RAYMARK.ATT 09/30/93 Pastlcld«/PCB Soil Analysia ug/kg SITE: Raywark Facility Building CASE/SAS: 18801 SOG NO,: ACJ21 SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ21 ACJ22 ACJ23 ACJ24 ACJ25 ACJ26 ACJ27 ACJ28 ACJ29 ACJ30 SAMPLE LOCATION: SO-01 SO-02 SD-03 SO-04 SO-05 SO-06 SO-07 SO-08 SO-080 SD-09 LABORATORY NUMBER: BS004547 BS004548 BS004549 BS004550 8S004551 BS004552 BS004553 6S004554 BS004555 BS004556 COKPOUNO CRQL alpha-BHC 1.7 2.5 U 2.6 U teta-BHC 2.2 U 40 U 39 U -9 2.2 U 34 U 14 U 29 UJ 1.7 2.5 U 2.6 U 40 U delta-BHC 2.2 U 39 U .9 2.2 U 34 U 14 U 29 UJ 2.5 U 2.6 U 40 U gamma-BHC SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ31 ACJ35 ACJ36 ACJ37 ACJ38 ACJ39 ACJ40 ACJ42 SAMPLE LOCATION: SD-11 SS-15 SO-16 SO-17 SD-18 SO-19 SD-20 SS-22 LABORATORY NUMBER: BS004557 BS004558 BS004559 BS004560 BS004562 BS004562 BS004563 BS004564 COMPOUND CRQL alpha-BHC 1.7 270 U 4,0 U 8.1 U 5.3 U 15 U 5.1 UJ 5.7 U 9.8 U beta-BHC 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 U 15 U 5.1 UJ 5.7 U 9.8 U delta-BHC 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 U 15 U 5.1 UJ 5.7 0 9.8 U ga«ma-BHC(Llndane) 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 U 15 U 5.1 UJ 5.7 U 9.8 U Heptachlor 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 U 15 U R 1.6 J Aldrin 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 U 15 U 5.1 UJ 5.7 U 9.8 U Heptachlor Epoxide 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 U 15 U 5.1 UJ 5.7 U 16 Endosulfan I 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 u 15 U 5.1 UJ 5.7 U 9.8 U Dieldrin 3.3 270 U 7.9 U 16 U 10 u 30 U 9.9 UJ 11 u 19 U 4.4'-00E 3.3 520 U 1.3 J 2.0 J 10 u 30 U 9.9 UJ 7.5 J 10 J Endrin 3.3 520 U 7.9 U 16 U 10 u 30 U 9.9 UJ 11 U 19 U Endosulfan II 3.3 520 U 7.9 U 16 U 10 u 50 U 9.9 UJ R 19 U 4,4'-ODD 3.3 520 U 7.9 U 16 U 10 u 30 U 9.9 UJ 24 J 19 U Endosulfan Sulfate 3.3 520 U 7.9 U 16 U 10 u 30 U 9.9 UJ 11 U 19 U 4,4'-DOT 3.3 520 U 7.9 U 16 U 10 u 30 U 9.9 UJ R 45 J Methoxychlor 17 2700 U 40 U 81 U 53 u 150 U 51 UJ 57 U R Endrin Ketone 3.3 520 U 7.9 U 16 U 10 u 30 U 9.9 UJ R 19 U Endrin Aldehyde 3.3 520 U 7.9 U 16 U 10 u 30 U 9.9 UJ 11 U 19 U alpha-Chlordane 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 u 15 U 5.1 UJ 25 J 28 gamma-Chlordane 1.7 270 U 4.0 U 8.1 U 5.3 u 15 U 5.1 UJ R 9.8 U Toxaphene 170 27000 U 400 U 810 U 530 U 1500 U 510 UJ 570 U 980 U Aroclor-10r6 33 5200 U 79 U 160 U 100 U 300 U 99 UJ 110 U 190 U Aroclor-1221 67 10000 U 160 U 320 U 210 u 610 U 200 UJ 220 U 390 U Aroclor-1232 33 5200 U 79 U 160 U 100 u 300 U 99 UJ 110 U 190 U Aroclor-1242 33 5200 U 79 U 160 U 100 u 300 U 99 UJ no u , 190 U Aroclor-1248 35 5200 U 79 U 160 U 100 u 300 u 99 UJ 110 u 190 U Aroclor-1254 33 5200 UJ 79 UJ 160 UJ 100 u 200 J R no u 190 U Aroclor-1260 35 150000 J* 2000 J 900 J 440 J 300 UJ 99 UJ 110 u 190 U iMmnrnmrntsMmmmmmtttawmmmmsx i BKBl • BSI!kVBBBBBS>lff«BB a r««B«W«3»B»3« K«aaaaa«ia«MBi DILUTION FACTOR: 50/500* 2 2 1 5 2 2 5 DATE SAMPLED: 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 09/30/92 09/30/92 09/30/92 09/30/92 09/30/92 09/30/92 09/30/92 09/30/92 DATE: ANALYZED: 10/19/92 10/17/92 10/17/92 10/16/92 10/17/92 10/27/92 10/27/92 10/19/92 X SOLID: 32 84 42 58 55 67 60 87 REVISED 4/20/93 • B RESULT REPORTED FROM DILUTED ANALYSIS. Pestlcide/r Soil Analysis j/kg SITE: Raynark Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO.: ABR27 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR27 ABR28 ABR29 ABR30 ABR31 ABR32 ABR33 ABR34 ABR35 ABR36 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-24 SS-25 SS-26 SS-27 SS-28 SS-29 SS-32 SS-31 SS-30 SS-33 LABORATORY NUMBER:: 524561 524571 524572 524574 524576 524578 524579 524580 524582 524583 COMPOUND CRQL , alpha-BHC 1.7 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ 1.9 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.4 UJ beta-BHC 1.7 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.2 UJ 1.3 J 1.9 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.4 UJ delta-BHC 1.7 0.51 J 0.33 J 0.38 J 2.1 UJ 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ R R R 2.4 UJ gamma-BHClLlndane) 1.7 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ 1.9 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.4 UJ Heptachlor 1.7 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 0.56 J 2.2 UJ 1.9 UJ 1.5 J R 2.4 UJ Aldrin 1.7 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ 1.9 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.4 UJ Heptachlor Epoxide 1.7 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 1.1 J 0.69 J R 3.9 J 4.3 J 16 J 42 J* 2.8 J Endosulfan I 1.7 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ 1.9 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.4 UJ .^ Dieldrin 3.3 3.9 UJ 3.9 UJ R R 95 J* R 6.7 J R 5.5 J R i 4,4'-ODE 3.3 10 J 4,9 J 7.7 J 5.6 J R 4.1 J 9.3 J 23 J 12 J 21 J Endrin 3.3 0.91 J 0.95 J 3.9 UJ 3.8 J R R R R 6.9 J 4.0 J Endosulfan II 3.3 3.9 UJ 3.9 UJ 3.9 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.2 UJ 4.3 UJ 3.7 UJ 4.1 UJ 6.0 J 2.6 J 4,4--DDO 3.3 2.1 J 3.9 UJ R R R R R R R R Endosulfan Sulfate 3.3 3.9 UJ 3.9 UJ 3.9 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.2 UJ 4.3 UJ 3.7 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.7 UJ 4.4'-0DT 3.3 19 J 9.7 J 24 J 7.9 J 22 J 11 J 15 J 65 J 23 J 35 J Methoxychlor 17 20 UJ 20 UJ 65 J 21 UJ R R R 21 UJ 21 UJ 24 UJ Endrin Ketone 3.3 3.9 UJ 3.9 UJ 3.9 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.2 UJ 4.3 UJ 3.7 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.7 UJ Endrin Aldehyde 3.3 2.1 J 3.0 J 7.0 J 4.1 UJ 5.6 J 4.3 UJ 4.2 J R 4.1 UJ 17 J alpha-Chlordane 1.7 2.0 UJ R R R 42 J* 13 J 18 J 120 J» 31 J R gamma-Chlordane 1.7 R 2.0 UJ R R 29 J 7.8 J 11 J 98 J" 27 J 2.4 UJ Toxaphene 170 200 UJ 200 UJ 200 UJ 210 UJ 220 UJ 220 UJ 190 UJ 210 UJ 210 UJ 240 UJ Aroclor 1016 33 39 UJ 39 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 42 UJ 45 UJ 37 UJ 41 UJ 41 UJ 47 UJ Aroclor 1221 67 79 UJ 78 UJ 79 UJ 83 UJ 85 UJ 87 UJ 75 UJ 83 UJ 84 UJ 95 UJ Aroclor 1232 33 39 UJ 39 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 42 UJ 43 UJ 37 UJ 41 UJ 41 UJ 47 UJ Aroclor 1242 33 39 UJ 39 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 42 UJ 43 UJ 37 UJ 41 UJ 41 UJ 47 UJ Aroclor 1248 33 59 UJ 39 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 42 UJ 43 UJ 37 UJ 41 UJ 41 UJ 47 UJ Aroclor 1254 33 39 UJ 39 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 42 UJ 43 UJ 37 UJ 41 UJ 41 UJ 47 UJ Aroclor 1260 33 39 UJ 39 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 42 UJ 43 UJ 37 UJ 41 UJ 41 UJ 47 UJ DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1/5- 1.0 1.0 1/10* 1/5* 1.0 DATE SAMPLED: 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/18/92 11/19/92 --, DATE EXTRACTED: 11/27/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 11/27/92 DATE ANALYZED: 12/10/92 12/11/92 12/11/92 12/11/92 12/11/92 12/11/92 12/11/92 12/11/92 12/11/92 12/11/92 .J X SOLID: 85 84 84 80 78 76 89 80 79 70 NOTE: • « RESULT REPORTED FROM DILUTED ANALYSIS. o The results for Dieldrin tmi Alpha-Chlordane in sairpl eABR31, Alpha and Gamma-Chlordane in sample ABR34, and Heptachlor Epoxide In sanple ABR35 are reported from the diluted analysis of these samples. The urxJiluted results exceeded calibration range. o Confirmation of the presence o f4,4'-000 and Endosulfan II in sanples ABR35-38 has not been demonstrated due to coelutloo problens on the RTX-1701 colutn. Results are reported from the OB-608 column and estimated (J). Revised 04/22/93 Pastlelde/' Soil Analyala O/kg SITE: Raymark Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO. ABR48 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR48 ABR49 ABR50 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-24B SS-45 SS-33D LABORATORY NUMBER: 524596 524606 524608 COMPOUND CRQL alpha-BHC 1.7 53 U 1.9 U 2.3 U beta-BHC 1.7 53 U 1.9 U 2.3 U delta-BHC 1.7 53 U 1.9 U 2.3 U gantna-BHClLindane) 1.7 53 U 1.9 U 2.3 U Heptachlor 1.7 53 U 0.16 J 2.3 U Aldrin 1.7 53 U 1.9 U 2.3 U Heptachlor Epoxide 1.7 R 1.9 U 1.2 J Endosulfan I 1.7 53 U 1.9 U 2.3 U Dieldrin 3.3 R 3.8 U 4.4 U 4,4'-DDE 3.3 100 U 3.8 U 18.0 Endrin 3.3 100 U 3.8 U 4.4 U Endosulfan It 3.3 100 U 3.8 U 4.4 U 4,4'-0D0 3.3 R 3.8 U 4.4 U Endosulfan Sulfate 3.3 100 U 3.8 U 4.4 U 4,4'-00T 3.3 100 U 0.40 J 4.4 U Methoxychlor 17.0 530 U 19 U 23 U Endrin Ketone 3.3 100 U 3.8 U 4.4 U Endrin Aldehyde 3.3 100 U 3.8 U 4.4 U alpna-Chtordane 1.7 53 U 1.9 U 2.9 gamma-Chlordane 1.7 53 U 1.9 U R Toxaphene 170.0 5300 U 190 U 230 U Aroclor 1016 33.0 1000 U 38 U 44 U Aroclor 1221 67.0 2100 U 77 U 89 U Aroclor 1252 33.0 1000 U 38 U 44 U Aroclor 1242 33.0 1000 U 38 U 44 U Aroclor 1248 33.0 1000 U 38 U 44 U Aroclor 1254 33.0 1000 U 38 U 44 U Aroclor 1260 33.0 1000 U 38 U R S3C=£33BZBXXBBS3Xa KBS*msss=zsau IK3SK3SSV3VS DILUTION FACTOR: 20.0 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED: 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 11/25/92 11/25/92 11/25/92 DATE ANALYZED: 12/15/92 12/08/92 12/08/92 X SOLID: 63.0 86.0 74.0 REVISED 4/20/93 P«attclda/Pi >ll Analysis ug/ka SITE: RayMrk Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO. ABR27 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR37 ABR38 ABR39 ABR40 ABR41 ABR42 ABR43 ABR44 ABR45 ABR46 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-34 SS-35 SS-36 SS-37 SS-37D SS-38 SS-39 SS-40 SS-41 SS-42 LABORATORY NUMBER: 524584 524585 524586 524587 524588 524589 524590 524591 524592 524593 COMPOUND CRQL alpha-BHC 1.7 2.8 UJ 2.4 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 0.041 J 1.9 UJ beta-BHC 1.7 2.8 UJ 2.4 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 0.34 J 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 1.9 UJ delta-BHC 1.7 R 2.4 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ R 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 1.9 UJ ga«na-BHC(Llndane) 1.7 2.8 UJ R R 2.0 UJ R R R R R 1.3 J Heptachlor 1.7 2.8 UJ 2.4 UJ 1.0 J 2.0 UJ 0.84 J 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 0.44 J Aldrin 1.7 2.8 UJ 0,17 J 2.1 UJ R 2.1 UJ 0.081 J 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 0.12 J 0.10 J Heptachlor Epoxide 1.7 7.7 J 1.0 J R 1.3 J 2.1 UJ 2.2 J 5.2 J R 1.1 J 2.7 J Endosulfan I 1.7 2.8 UJ 2.4 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.0 UJ 1.9 UJ Dieldrin 3.3 R 4.6 UJ R 2.3 J 2.4 J R R R 1.9 J R 4,4'-DDE 3.3 17 J 5.5 J 20 J 14 J 15 J 7.7 J 49 J 14 J 5.9 J 4.1 J Endrin 3.3 10 J R 4.0 UJ R 5.5 J 3.9 UJ 4.1 UJ R 3.9 UJ 3.7 UJ Endosulfan II 3.3 3.4 J 4.4 UJ 4.0 UJ 3.9 UJ 4.0 UJ 3.9 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.0 UJ 3.9 UJ 3.7 UJ 4,4'-DDD 3.3 « 4.6 UJ R R R R 18 J R R R Endosulfan Sulfate 3.3 5.4 UJ 5.7 J 4.0 UJ 3.9 UJ R 3.9 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.0 UJ 3.9 UJ 3.7 UJ 4,4'-DOT 3.3 43 J R 39 J 22 J 21 J R 210 J* R 15 J R Methoxychlor 17 R 24 UJ R R R R R R 20 UJ R Endrin Ketone 3.3 5.4 UJ 4.6 UJ 4.0 UJ 3.9 UJ 4.0 UJ 3.9 UJ 4.1 UJ 4.0 UJ 3.9 UJ 3.7 UJ Endrin Aldehyde 3.3 5.4 UJ R R 3.9 UJ 2.0 J 3.9 UJ 4.1 UJ R 3,9 UJ 3.7 UJ alpha-Chlordane 1.7 18 J 2.4 UJ 33 J 9.9 J 10 J 8.3 J 21 J 13 J 2.0 UJ 8.7 J ganrna-Ch lordana 1.7 15 J R 29 J 8.9 J 10 J 6.7 J 14 J 13 J R 6.3 J Toxaphene 170 280 UJ 240 UJ 210 UJ 200 UJ 210 UJ 200 UJ 210 UJ 210 UJ 200 UJ 190 UJ Aroclor 1016 33 54 UJ 46 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor 1221 67 no UJ 93 UJ 82 UJ 78 UJ 82 UJ 79 UJ 82 UJ 82 UJ 80 UJ 76 UJ Aroclor 1232 33 54 UJ 46 UJ 40 UJ . 39 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor 1242 33 54 UJ 46 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor 1248 33 54 UJ 46 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor 1254 53 54 UJ 46 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor 1260 35 54 UJ 46 UJ 40 UJ 59 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 41 UJ 40 UJ 39 UJ 37 UJ B«B3BBVXB«BBESI:S3 :BBBBKBBrX= •SSBXBCZaSBSCBKEB aBXBBBXCS • BZBXaBaXXBXSSBXBBXeCBXSXXXXB B SSSBBKaXSBXXK • •SBBBBVBBBSB I • Bxa DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1/5* 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 11/19/92 DATE EXTRACTED 11/27/92 11/28/92 n/28/92 11/27/92 11/28/92 11/28/92 11/28/92 11/28/92 11/28/92 11/28/92 DATE ANALYZED 12/11/92 12/08/92 12/08/92 12/10/92 12/08/92 12/08/92 12/08/92 12/08/92 12/08/92 12/08/92 X SOLID 61 71 81 84 81 84 80 81 83 88 • B RESULT REPORTED FROM DILUTED ANALYSIS. NOTE: o The result fo r4,4'-D0T in sample ABR43 is reported from the diluted analysis of this sample. The undiluted result exceeded calibration range. o Confirmation of the presence o f4,4'-00D and Endosulfan II in samples ABR35-38 has not been demonstrated due to coelutlon problems on the RTX-1701 coluwi. Results are reported from the 08-608 column and estimated (J>. Revised 04/22/93 Pastlclde/'^' Aqueous Analysis ig/l SITE: RaysMrk Industries CASE: 19138 SOG NO.: ABR26 SAMPLE NUMBER: ABR47 ABR51 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-43 SS-47 LABORATORY NUHBER: 524544 524551 COMPOUND CRQL alpha-BHC 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U beta-BMC 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U delta-BHC 0,05 0.05 U 0.05 U gantna-BHCILI ndane) 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U Heptachlor 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U Aldrin 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U Heptachlor Epoxide 0.05 0.0018 J 0.05 U Endosulfan I 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U " ^ Dieldrin 0.10 0.10 U 0.10 U 4,4'-D0E 0.10 0.10 U 0.10 U Endrin 0.10 0.10 U 0.10 U Endosulfan II 0.10 0.10 U 0.10 u 4,4--ODD 0.10 0.10 U 0.10 u Endosulfan Sulfate 0.10 0.10 u 0.10 u 4,4'-00T 0.10 0.10 u 0.10 u Methoxychlor 0.50 0.50 U 0.50 U Endrin Ketone 0.10 0.10 U 0.10 u Endrin Aldehyde 0.10 0.10 u 0.10 u alpha-Chlordane 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U g amns C h 1 or dane 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U Toxaphrne 5.0 5.0 U 5.0 U Aroclor 1016 1.0 1.0 U 1.0 U Aroclor 1221 2.0 2.0 U 2.0 U Aroclor 1232 1.0 1.0 U 1.0 u Aroclor 1242 1.0 1.0 U 1.0 u Aroclor 1248 1.0 1.0 u 1.0 U Aroclor 1254 1.0 1.0 u 1.0 u Aroclor 1260 1.0 1.0 u 1.0 u DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED: 11/18/92 11/19/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 11/24/92 11/24/92 DATE ANALYZED: 12/08/92 12/08/92 REVISED 4/20/93 Pesticide Aqueous Analysis JO/tL. SITE: Raymark Facility Building CASE/SAS: 18801 SOC NO.: ACJ21 SAMPLE NUMBER: ACJ32 iSAMPLE LOCATION: RB-12 LABORATORY NUMBER: BS004S45 COMPOUND CROL alpha-BHC 0,05 0.05 UJ beta-BHC 0.05 0.05 UJ delta-BHC 0.05 0.05 UJ gamma-BHCCLindane) 0.05 0.05 UJ Heptachlor 0,05 0.05 UJ Aldrin 0.05 0.05 UJ Heptachlor Epoxide 0.05 0.05 UJ Endosulfan I 0.05 0.05 UJ Dieldrin 0.10 0.10 UJ 4.4'-0DE 0.10 0.10 UJ Endrin 0,10 0.10 UJ Endosulfan II 0.10 0.10 UJ 4,4'-DDD 0.10 0.10 UJ Endosulfan Sulfate 0.10 0.10 UJ 4,4'-00T 0,10 0.10 UJ Methoxychlor 0.50 0.50 UJ Endrin Ketone 0.10 0.10 UJ Endrin Aldehyde 0.10 0.10 UJ alpha-Chlordane 0.05 0.05 UJ gamma-Chlordane 0.05 0.05 UJ Toxaphene 5.0 5.0 UJ Aroclor-1016 1.0 1.0 UJ Aroclor-1221 2.0 2.0 UJ Aroclor-1232 1.0 1.0 UJ Aroclor-1242 1.0 1.0 UJ Aroclor-1248 1.0 1.0 UJ Aroclor-1254 1.0 1.0 UJ Aroclor-1260 1.0 1.0 UJ XXXSK3£X£S33XX=3XXBBB«BXXBB3aES==XBB:SSS3XS; = = £ = S = = ! EXEttSSSSSBSBBXBCSSBS BrSB = r«Ear3ft8SS = SS = = SBX = S8XSXBBSBBCBX3l DILUTION FACTOR: 1 DATE SAMPLED: 09/24/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 09/29/92 DATE ANALYZED: 10/09/92 REVISED 4/20/93 n SAS PCB ANALYSIS Raymark Industries WIL\041000«9\074\RAYMARK.ATT 09/30/93 avised 06/29/93 PCB Soil Analysis ug/kg SITE: Raymark Industries CASE/SAS: 7518A SDG No.: SA3501 SAMPLE NUMBER: SA3501 SA3502 SA3503 SA3504 SA3505DL SA3506 SA3507 SA35080L SA35090L SAMPLE LOCATION: SD-01 SD-02 SD-03 SO-04 SD-05 SO-06 SO-07 SO-08 SO-080 LABORATORY NUMBER: 9209204 9209205 9209206 9209207 9209208OL 9209209 9209210 92092110L 9209212DL COMPOUND CRQL APOclor-1016 33 • 44 U 50 U 42 U 390 U 370 U 55 U 42 U 510 U 780 U Aroclor-1221 67 90 U 100 U 85 U 800 U 750 U 110 U 85 U 1000 U 1600 U Aroclor-1232 33 44 U 50 U 42 U 390 U 370 U 55 U 42 U 510 U 780 U Aroclor-1242 33 44 U 50 U 42 U 390 U 370 U 55 U 42 U 510 U 780 U Aroclor-1248 35 44 U 50 U 42 U 3900 370 U 55 U 42 U 510 U 780 U Aroclor-1254 55 44 U 50 U 42 U 390 U 370 U 55 U 42 U 510 U 780 U Aroclor-1260 33 44 U 50 U 42 U 390 U 570 U 55 U 42 U 510 U 780 U Aroclor-1262 35 36 J 50 U R 3700 J 690 J 55 U 42 U 1100 J 1600 J Aroclor-1268 53 44 U 50 U 25 J 6700 J 1300 55 U 42 U 2000 3100 • •: = = = ccBs = a«BBSSEBaBBSSSBBBSBBS=C=S«BBBSBSC: = = stii«OBs:ar3 3BBCBBe = a = = = = = : : = s :======icc=:=« : = s:=:ECCS = = a = = := = =3E:SC = = = =: = =:i:KBC= 3 = 3Ct=3BBB DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 10.0 DATE SAMPLED: 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 09/25/92 09/23/92 09/23/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 DATE ANALYZED: 10/08/92 10/08/92 10/08/92 10/10/92 10/08/92 10/08/92 10/08/92 10/08/92 10/09/92 X SOLIDS: 73 65 77 41 44 59 78 63 41 Iscd 06/29/93 PCB SoiI Analysis ug/kg SITE: Raymark Industries CASE/SAS: 7518A SDG No.: SA3501 SAMPLE NUMBER: SA3510 SA3511 SA35150L SA35160L SA5517 SA3518 SA35190L SA3520 SA3522 SAMPLE LOCATION: SD-09 SD-11 SS-15 SO-16 SD-17 SO-18 SD-19 SD-20 SS-22 LABORATORY NUMBER: 9209213 9209214 92092160L 9209217DL 9209218 9209219 92092200L 9209221 9209222 COMPOUND CRQL Aroclor-1016 33 ' 500 U R 200 U 410 U 62 U 76 U 580 UJ 55 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor-1221 67 1000 U R 400 U 830 U 130 U 150 U 1200 UJ 110 UJ 76 UJ Aroclor-1232 35 500 U R 200 U 410 U 62 U 76 U 500 UJ 55 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor-1242 33 500 U R 200 U 410 U 62 U 76 U 580 UJ 55 UJ 57 UJ Aroclor-1248 35 2100 J R 200 U 240 J 75 J 110 J 5(!0 UJ 55 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor-1254 33 500 U R 200 U 410 U 62 u 76 U 5U0 UJ 55 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor-1260 33 500 U R 200 U 410 U 62 U 76 U 5(10 UJ 55 UJ 37 UJ Aroclor-1262 33 7500 J 39000 J 260 J 970 J 190 J 400 J R 280 J R Aroclor-1268 33 17000 R 840 2000 340 770 5B0 UJ 55 UJ 120 J CK^^.^^^^*i.Aa>.^^^S«* — EB — SS« — — — — — ••• — — — — — —.^SB-a^— — DILUTION FACTOR: 10.0 20.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 DATE SAMPLED: 09/23/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 09/24/92 DATE EXTRACTED: 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 09/29/92 DATE ANALYZED: 10/09/92 10/09/92 10/09/92 10/10/92 10/10/92 10/10/92 10/10/92 10/10/92 10/10/92 X SOLIDS: 65 28 84 40 53 43 56 59 87 INORGANIC ANALYSIS Raymark Industries WIL\04100009\074\RAYMARK.ATT 09/30/93 SITE: K ,.Mrk Facility INORGA '>OIL ANALYSIS Page 1 o' CASE: 18801 SOG: NAAUOI mg/kg LABORATORY: Sklrvter and Sherman SAMPLE NUMBER: MAAUOI HAAW02 MAAU03 HAAU04 MAAU05 MAAU06 MAAU07 HAAU08 MAAW09 MAAUIO SAMPLE LOCATION: SO-01 SO-02 SD-03 SO-04 SO-05 SD-06 SO-07 SD-08 SO-08O SO-09 LABORATORY NUMBER: 09462-01S 09462-02S 09462-03S 09462-04S 09462-05S 09462-06S 09462-07S 09462-08S 09462-09S 09462-1OS INSTRUMENT CONTRACT DETECTION DETECTION INORGANIC ELEMENTS LIMITS LIMITS ("O/kO, ppm) (mg/kg, ppm) ALUMINUM P 4.28 3430 9410 4340 14100 12000 11500 2780 14800 9080 6310 40 ANTIMONY P 3.34 4.5 UJ 5.0 UJ 4.6 UJ 7.5 UJ 7.1 UJ 5.8 UJ 4,2 UJ 9.4 UJ 5.5 UJ 6.0 UJ 12 ARSENIC F 0.58 1.7 J 2.2 1.9 10.6 7.2 2.8 0.76 U 7.0 6.9 2.5 J 2 BARIUM P 0.58 8.3 19.8 15.8 453 813 23.3 7.4 785 385 1460 40 BERYLLIUM P 0.08 0.11 0.12 0.11 U 0.99 0.44 0.20 J 0.10 0.22 0.13 U 0.14 1 CADMIUM P 0.20 0.27 0.29 0.27 U 7.5 J 7.8 J 0.34 U 0.25 22.5 4.0 J 6.4 1 CALCIUM P 5.18 1650 2410 10400 4200 U 10900 6890 928 4300 2890 U 5130 1000 CHROMIUM P 0.90 25.5 15.2 68.0 J 631 J 164 J 17.9 J 19.9 253 97.1 J 217 2 COBALT P 0.54 3.1 8.1 4.2 12.5 10.8 10.2 2.6 11.7 8.5 8,8 10 COPPER P 0.70 84.2 J 9.3 J 198 J 1610 J 721 J 14.1 J 42.2 J 914 J 402 J 2080 J 5 IRON P 2.32 6300 17100 8220 29100 25700 22500 5330 29500 18500 16200 20 LEAD F 0.38 13.3 J 5.9 UJ 25.0 J 718 J 900 J 6.5 UJ 10.1 J 1030 J 576 J 1080 J 0.6 MAGNESIUM P -8.16 2440 6600 3110 9590 8990 10200 1600 9980 6910 7490 1000 MANGANESE P 0.94 78.1 182 95.7 381 291 253 58.8 382 257 290 3 MERCURY CV 0.05 0.09 0.07 U 0.10 0.76 0.29 0.08 U 0.06 U 0.44 0.21 0.87 0.1 NICKEL P 1.08 6.5 J 12.3 J 12.0 J 78.2 J 125 J 16.1 J 6.0 J 265 J 85.6 J 57.8 J 8 POTASSIUM P 48.36 803 2380 1130 3450 3190 2750 552 2860 1970 1300 1000 SELENIUM F 0.76 1.0 UJ 1.1 UJ 0.96 UJ 1.8 UJ 1.6 UJ 1.3 UJ 1.0 UJ 2.1 UJ 1.2 UJ 1.4 UJ 1 SILVER P 0.50 0.67 U 0.74 U 0.68 U 5.3 1.5 J 0.86 U 0.62 U 1.4 U 0.81 U 0.88 U 2 SODIUM P 9.28 3310 4270 3370 9000 10300 5600 1400 10200 3960 4400 1000 THALLIUM F 0.34 0.46 U 0.51 U 0.43 U 0.96 0.74 U 0.57 U 0.45 U 0.93 ;U 0.54 U 0.61 U 2 VANADIUM P 0.56 8.3 22.7 11.8 55.0 45.6 26.6 6.8 70.3 34.6 25.3 10 ZINC P 0.44 55.1 UJ 53.1 UJ 137 UJ 730 UJ 877 J 65.3 UJ 52.2 UJ 1720 J 486 UJ 436 UJ 4 CYANIDE AS 0.50 0.71 UJ 0.74 UJ 0.67 UJ 2.4 UJ 1.7 UJ 0.87 UJ 0.66 UJ 2.4 UJ 4.3 UJ 2.3 UJ 0.25 X SOLIDS 69.7 66.6 72.3 43.2 45.3 57.3 75.3 35.0 56.7 55.4 ANALYTICAL METHOD NOTE: J QUANTITATION IS APPROXIMATE DUE TO LIMITATIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW (DATA REVIEU). F FURNACE R - VALUE IS REJECTED. P ICP/FLAME AA U VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS RAISED. CV COLO VAPOR UJ- VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS ESTIMATED. AS SEMI-AUTOMATED SPECTROMETRY SITE: Raymark Facility INORGANIC L ANALYSIS Page 2 of CASE: 18801 SOG: MAAWOl mg/kg LABORATORY: Skinner and Sherman SAMPLE NUMBER: MAAWll MAAU15 MAAW16 MAAW17 MAAW18 MAAW19 MAAW20 MAAU22 SAMPLE LOCATION: SO-11 SD-15 SD-16 SO-17 SD-18 SD-19 SO-20 ' SO-22 LABORATORY NUMBER: 09462-IIS 09462-13S 09462-14S 09462-15S 09462-16S 09462-17S 09462-18S 09462-19S INSTRUMENT CONTRACT DETECTION DETECTION INORGANIC ELEMENTS LIMITS LIMITS (mg/kg, ppm) (mg/kg, ppm) ALUMINUM P 4.28 8660 J 11200 11300 18700 13200 4940 6630 13000 40 ANTIMONY P 3.34 R 4.2 UJ 7.2 UJ 5.6 UJ 7.9 UJ 5.8 UJ 6.0 UJ 5.9 UJ 12 ARSENIC F 0.58 12.5 J 3.8 3.9 5.6 2.6 3.4 5.4 2 BARIUM P 0.58 11700 J 103 356 55.4 J 92.5 44.8 100 33.3 40 BERYLLIUM P 0.08 0.47 J 0.35 0.17 0.99 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.64 1 CADMIUM P 0.20 1.3 UJ 0.25 U 0.42 0.33 U 0.47 4.4 15.4 0.23 1 CALCIUM P 5.18 3750 UJ 4650 3420 2320 U 2460 2560 2910 600 1000 CHROMIUM P 0.90 210 14.5 J 101 36.0 J 35.2 107 98.4 15.0 2 COBALT P 0.54 33.4 6.0 10.7 12.4 10.7 5.7 5.5 5.6 10 COPPER P 0.70 14800 45.9 J 615 J 36.8 J 101 J 47.9 J 105 J 38.7 J 5 IRON P 2.32 24500 13400 32800 -34100 38000 12800 14400 14900 20 LEAD F 0.3S 14000 137 J 724 J 156 J 1500 J 280 J 766 J 72.0 J 0.6 MAGNESIUM P 8,16 50100 3070 6470 8650 6440 2190 2710 2470 1000 MANGANESE P 0.94 312 207 266 278 216 112 147 220 3 MERCURY CV 0.05 0.62 0.10 J 0.16 J 0.08 U 0.11 U 0.08 J 0.18 0.09 J 0.1 NICKEL p 1.08 357 14.2 J 35.0 J 25.5 J 24.6 J 90.6 J 121 J 15.4 J 8 POTASSIUM p 48.36 659 703 2270 5240 2100 987 1040 493 1000 SELENIUM F 0.76 R 0.95 UJ 1.6 UJ 1.2 UJ 1.8 UJ 1.3 UJ 1.3 UJ 4.3 UJ 1 SILVER P 0.50 R 0.62 U 1.1 U 1.5 J 1.2 U 0.86 U 0.89 U 0.65 J 2 SOOIUM P 9.28 150 UJ 66.0 U 1020 J 814 907 105 U 182 62.7 U 1000 THALLIUM F 0.34 R 0.42 U 0.72 U 0.55 U 0.80 U 0.58 U 0.60 0.38 U ' 2 VANADIUM P 0.56 83.0 J 27.9 32.8 J 40.0 55.5 26.1 35.7 40.5 10 0.44 ZINC P 2320 J 127 UJ 146 UJ 92.9 UJ 100 UJ 476 UJ 964 53.4 UJ 4 O.50 CYANIDE AS R 0.58 U 1.0 U 0.82 U 1.1 u 14.9 2.1 0.55 U 0.25 X SOLIDS 28.3 80.1 46.8 57.5 40.2 57.5 55.8 86.6 ANALYTICAL METHOD NOTE: J QUANTITATION IS APPROXIMATE DUE TO LIMITATIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE DUALITY CONTROL REVIEU (DATA REVIEW). F FURNACE R VALUE IS REJECTED. P ICP/FLAME AA U VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS RAISED. CV COLD VAPOR UJ- VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AMD DETECTION LIMIT IS ESTIMATED. AS SEMI-AUTOMATED SPECTROMETRY SITE: Raymark Facility, Stratford, CT .INORGANIC J L ANALYSIS 1»agc 1 ol« CASE: 19138 SOG: MAAS47 mg/kg LABORATORY: Keystone Environmental SAMPLE NUMBER: MAAS47 MAAS48 1KAAS49 1MAAS50 MAAS51 1HAAS52 1KAAS53 1"(AAS54 MAAS55 MAAS56 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-24 SS-25 SS-26 SS-27 SS-28 SS-29 SS-32 SS-31 SS-30 SS-33 LABORATORY NUMBER: HAAS47 1 HAAS50 MAAS51 MAAS52 ttAAS53 1HAAS54 KAAS55 1KAAS56 HAAS48 KAAS49 i ' INSTRUMENT , CONTRACT • DETECTION 1DETECTION INORGANIC ELEMENTS LIMITS LIMITS (mg/kg,, ppm) (»g/kg, ppm) ALUMINUM P 2.6 10100 12500 11900 14500 17300 13800 17600 15100 17100 19500 40 ANTIMONY P 2.6 3.0 UJ 3.1 1UJ 3.1 1J J 3.1 UJ 3.3 UJ 3.5 1JJ 3.4 1JJ 5.4 J 3.3 1UJ 3.7 UJ 12 ARSENIC F 0.6 11.8 11.4 21.5 J 15.3 9.4 12.0 12.2 10.5 8.6 10.5 2 BARIUM P 0.2 38.1 78.6 107 44.0 72.6 463 138 638 54,6 80.4 40 BERYLLIUM P 0.2 0.23 U 0.24 u 0.85 U 0.24 U 0.68 U 0.61 U 0.64 U 0.62 U 0.63 u 0.85 u 1 CADMIUM P 0.4 0.46 U 0.48 U 0.47 u 0.48 U 0.61 J 2.3 0.67 J 8.3 0,52 J 0.56 u 1 CALCIUM P 0.8 710 U 947 u 920 u 751 U 1120 U 6230 u 1220 u 3990 U 1360 u 2610 u 1000 CHROMIUM P 0.4 34.9 15.5 17.4 15.7 16.7 23.1 21.9 28.7 21.3 21.1 2 COBALT P 0.4 5.7 6.1 6.4 6.4 6.2 7.6 6.6 9.6 J 6.8 7.0 10 COPPER P 0.4 36.2 26.6 60.4 31.1 30.6 128 40.5 507 31.7 110 5 IRON P 0.4 12900 15000 17300 16000 18100 21200 19300 26400 19200 20500 20 LEAD F 0.4 105 102 126 J 98.3 97.7 441 104 2600 66.7 179 J 0.6 MAGNESIUM P 4.4 3130 2850 2980 3010 3110 3170 3110 5050 3350 3140 1000 MANGANESE P 0,2 186 266 210 237 324 1150 276 560 229 320 3 0.1 0.12 J 0.13 J 0.23 J 0.13 J 0.13 J 0.26 0.25 J 0.26 0.13 J 0.21 0.1 NICKEL P 1.4 16.1 U 13,9 u 17.2 17.4 U . 18.7 21.2 15.8 u 40.8 15.1 u 21.4 8 POTASSIUM P 69.4 793 698 687 794 417 1010 690 1300 650 760 1000 SELENIUM F 0.2 0.28 J 0.57 0.54 0.51 0.53 0.51 J 0.67 0.62 0.45 J 0.87 1 SILVER P 0.4 0.46 U 0.48 u 0.47 u 0.48 U 0.51 u 0.54 u 0.52 u 0.54 UJ 0.51 u 0.56 u 2 SODIUM P 6.2 73.1 U 88.3 u 80.4 u 62.5 U 81.4 u 138 89.6 u 174 T 69.4 u 101 u 1000 THALLIUM F 0.4 0.46 U 0.48 u 0.47 u 0.48 U 0.51 u 0.54 u 0.52 u 0.54 U 0.51 UJ 0.56 u 2 VANADIUM P 0.2 24.3 28.9 55.6 33.9 33.0 37.2 42.0 50.3 39.2 63.7 10 ZINC P 0.6 271 U 61.2 u 123 u 71.2 U 96.6 u 1200 223 u 1650 :sr 96.7 u 95.1 u 4 CYANIDE • AS 0.5 0.57 UJ 0.60 UJ 0.59 UJ 0.61 UJ 0.64 UJ 0.67 u 0.65 UJ 0.67 U 0.63 UJ 0.70 u 0.5 X SOLIDS 87.2 83.9 84.7 82.6 78.6 74.2 77.3 74.1 79.2 71.0 ANALYTICAL METHOD NOTE: J - QUANTITATION IS APPROXIMATE; DUE TO LIMITATIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE QUALITY' CONTROL REVIEU (DATA REVIEU). F - FURNACE R - VALUE IS REJECTED. P - ICP/FLAME AA U - VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS RAISED. CV - COLO VAPOR UJ- VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS ESTIMATED. AS - SEMI-AUTOMATED SPECTROMETRY SITE: Raymark Facility. Stratford, CT INORGANIC SOIL ANALYSIS Page 2 ot CASE: 19138 SDC: MAAS47 mg/kg LABORATORY: Keystone Environmental SAMPLE NUMBER: MAAS57 MAAS58 MAAS59 MAAS60 MAAS61 MAAS62 MAAS63 KAAS64 MAAS65 MAAS66 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-34 SS-35 SS-36 SS-37 SS-37D SS-38 SS-39 SS-40 SS-41 SS-42 LABORATORY NUMBER: MAAS57 HAAS58 MAAS59 MAAS60 MAAS6V MAAS62 MAAS63 MAAS64 MAAS65 MAAS66 INSTRUMENT CONTRACT . DETECTION DETECTION INORGANIC ELEMENTS LIMITS LIMITS (mg/kg, ppm) (mg/kg, ppm) ALUMINUM P 2.6 9480 11100 15600 17700 17100 16700 17300 16700 16800 17500 40 ANTIMONY P 2.6 4.4 UJ 3.6 UJ 3.2 UJ 3.2 UJ 3.1 UJ 3.1 3.2 UJ 3.3 UJ 3.1 UJ 3.4 UJ 12 ARSENIC F 0.6 5.2 8.1 9.5 8.0 8.2 10.6 7.5 12.7 6.3 5.7 2 BARIUM P 0.2 72.5 173 85.2 96.5 75.9 55.4 125 200 166 71.7 40 BERYLLIUM P 0.2 0.34 U 0.58 U 0.63 U 1.0 u 0.68 U 0.65 0.72 U 0.75 U 0.77 U 0.62 U 1 CADMIUM P 0,4 1-0 J 0.89 J 1.1 0.55 J 0.48 U 0.68 0.84 J 0.78 J 0.72 J 0.58 J 1 CALCIUM P 0.8 2360 U 19000 1660 U 792 U 660 U 738 2170 U 2300 U 930 U 1010 U 1000 CHROMIUM P 0.4 18.6 28.5 16.6 18.2 17.9 17.7 21.2 22.9 23.2 19.8 2 COBALT P 0.4 6.7 8.7 J 6.3 6.0 5.6 6.4 7.2 7.6 8.5 6.5 10 COPPER P 0.4 92.9 90.8 41.8 31.0 28.2 25.7 49.1 59.5 55.8 49.8 5 IRON P 0.4 15800 52200 16300 17800 17600 18800 18600 17700 20600 20700 20 LEAD F 0.4 265 J 166 160 301 240 70.9 145 J 204 263 87.0 0.6 P MAGNESIUM 4.4 3920 3740 2690 2640 2 790 3270 3540 3210 4oao 3170 1000 P MANGANESE 0.2 305 395 216 201 209 222 211 21U 230 253 3 MERCURY CV 0.1 0.65 0.27 0,13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.20 0.1 NICKEL p 1.4 31.3 28.7 16.8 14.0 14.7 15.7 19.4 17.1 U 20.0 17.4 U 8 POTASSIUM p 69.4 1380 1090 807 587 559 765 701 653 861 551 1000 SELENIUM F 0.2 0.44 0.41 J 0.42 0.35 0.48 0.26 0.34 1.2 0.36 0.63 1 SILVER P 0.4 0.67 0.55 UJ 0.49 0.50 0.48 0.47 0.49 0.50 U 0.48 0.53 U 2 SOOIUM P 6.2 119 R 104 92.7 84.4 98.1 154 133 93.4 82.1 U 1000 THALLIUM F 0.4 0.67 0.55 U 0.49 0.50 0.48 0.47 0.49 0.50 0.48 0.53 UJ 2 VANADIUM P 0.2 73.5 49.1 41.7 37.3 36.4 38.7 48.9 38.7 46.6 42.8 10 ZINC P 0.6 105 151 U 175 126 101 87.7 240 294 204 105 U 4 CYANIDE AS 0.5 0.84 0.68 U 0.62 0.62 0.60 0.59 0.61 0.63 0.60 0.66 U 0.5 X SOLIDS 59.4 73.2 81.1 80.3 82.7 84.9 81.5 79.4 83.6 76.1 ANALYTICAL METHOD NOTE: J - QUANTITATION IS APPROXIMATE DUE TO LIMITATIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW (DATA REVIEW). F - FURNACE R - VALUE IS REJECTED. P - ICP/fLAME AA U - VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS RAISED. CV - COLD VAPOR UJ- VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS ESTIMATED. AS - SEMI-AUTOMATED SPECTROMETRY SITE: RaysMr.. Facility, Stratford, CT INORGA, , SOIL ANALYSIS Page 1 t CASE: 19138 SOC: MAAS67 mg/kg LABORATORY: Keystone Environmental SAMPLE NUMBER: MAAS68 MAAS69 MAAS70 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-24B SS-45 SS-33D LABORATORY NUMBER: MAAS68 MAAS69 MAAS70 INSTRUMENT CONTRACT DETECTION DETECTION INORGANIC ELEMENTS LIMITS LIMITS (mg/kg, ppm) (mg/kg, ppm) ALUMINUM P 2.6 2850 11600 19500 40 ANTIMONY P 2.6 R R R 12 J ARSENIC F 0.6 8.5 J 5.3 J 9.0 J 2 BARIUM P 0.2 7040 J 18.1 J 75.1 J 40 BERYLLIUM P 0.2 0.35 UJ 0.22 UJ 0.26 UJ 1 CADMIUM P 0.4 3.7 0.45 U 0.53 U 1 CALCIUM P- 0.8 2500 U 296 U 2270 U 1000 CHROMIUM P 0.4 432 8.3 19,2 2 COBALT P 0.4 48.8 T 4.5 6.8 10 COPPER P 0.4 22500 J 18.7 111 J 5 IRON P 0.4 30300 11700 19500 20 LEAD F 0.4 150000 J 12.8 112 J 0.6 MAGNESIUM P 4.4 114000 1740 2850 1000 MANGANESE P 0,2 372 86.5 305 3 MERCURY CV 0.1 0.18 J 0.11 U 0.20 0.1 NICKEL P 1.4 775 7.3 17.4 8 POTASSIUM P 69.4 129 J 466 734 1000 SELENIUM F 0.2 R R R 1 SILVER P 0.4 8.6 J 0.45 UJ 0.53 UJ 2 SOOIUM P 6.2 116 U 75.9 112 U 1000 THALLIUM F 0.2 0.35 UJ 0.22 0.26 U 2 VANADIUM P 0.2 4.7 J 18.0 60.8 10 ZINC P 0.6 8290 J 26.6 81.3 4 CYANIDE AS 0.5 98.7 0.56 0.66 0.5 X SOLIDS 57.8 89.1 76.1 ANALYTICAL METHOD NOTE: J - QUANTITATIO N IS APPROXIMATE DUE TO LIMITATIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE QUALITY CONTROL REVIEU (DATA REVIEU). F - FURNACE R - VALUE IS REJECTED. P - IdP/FLAME AA U - VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS RAISED. CV • COLO VAPOR UJ- VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS ESTIMATED. AS - SEMI-AUTOMATED SPECTROMETRY Revised OA/22/93 SITE: Raynai.. Facility INORGANIC V . ANALYSIS Page 1 of 1 CASE: 19138 SDC: MAAS67 ug/L LABORATORY: Keystone Environmental SAMPLE NUMBER: MAAS67 MAAS71 SAMPLE LOCATION: SS-43 SS-47 LABORATORY NUMBER: MAAS67 MAAS71 INSTRUMENT CONTRACT DETECTION DETECTION INORGANIC ELEMENTS LIMITS LIMITS (ug/L. ppb) (ug/L. ppb) ALUMINUM P 13.0 29.3 UJ 22.2 UJ 200 ANTIM(MT P 13.0 UJ UJ 60 ARSENIC F 3.0 10 BARIUM P 1.0 200 BERYLLIUM P 1.0 UJ UJ 5 CADMIUM P 2.0 5 CALCIUM P 4.0 6200 7760 5000 CHROMIUM P 2.0 UJ UJ 10 COBALT P 2.0 2.3 50 COPPER P 2.0 8.8 5.1 25 IRON P 2.0 17.1 17.5 100 LEAD F 2.0 3 MAGNESIUM P 22.0 59.0 34.6 5000 MANGANESE P 1.0 4.5 6.0 15 MERCURY CV 0.2 UJ 0.2 NICKEL P 7.0 40 POTASSIUM P 347 5000 SELENIUM F 1.0 5 SILVER P 2.0 UJ UJ 10 u SOOIUM ? 31.0 48,9 UJ 5000 THALLIUM f 1.0 UJ UJ 10 VANADIUM P 1.0 50 ZINC P 3.0 710 887 20 CYANIDE AS 10.0 UJ 10 ANALYTICAL METHOD NOTE: J - QUANTITATION IS APPROXIMATE DUE TO LIMITATIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE QUALITY CONTROL REVIEU (DATA REVIEU). F - FURNACE R - VALUE IS REJECTED. P - ICP/FLAME AA U - VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIHIT IS RAISED. CV - COLO VAPOR UJ- VALUE IS NON-DETECIED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS ESTIMAICD. AS - SEMI-AUTOMATED SPECTROHETRY -- VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AT THE IDL. R.-vised nA/2?/03 SITE: Ra t Facility INORGANI lER ANALYSIS Page 1 of CASE: 18801 SOG: MAAUOI ug/L LABORATORY: Sklrv^er and Sherman SAMPLE NUMBER: MAAW12 SAMPLE LOCATION: RB-12 LABORATORY NUMBER: 09462-12S INSTRUMENT CONTRACT DETECTION DETECTION INORGANIC ELEMENTS ' LIMITS LIMITS (ug/L. ppb) (ug/L. ppb) ALUMINUM P 21.4 28.7 J 200 ANTIMONY P 16.9 60 ARSENIC F 2.9 10 BARIUM P 2.9 200 BERYLLIUM P 0.4 5 CADMIUM P 1.0 5 CALCIUM P 25.9 3300 5000 CHROMIUM P 4.5 10 COBALT P 2.7 50 COPPER n 3.5 25 IRON P 11.6 40.8 100 LEAD F 1.9 5.9 3 MAGNESIUM P 40.8 82.6 5000 MANGANESE P 4.7 15 MERCURY CV 0.1 0.2 NICKEL P 5.4 40 POTASSIUM P 241.8 5000 SELENIUM F 3.6 5 SILVER P 2.5 10 SOOIUM P 46.4 223 5000 THALLIUM F 1.7 10 VANADIUM P 2.8 50 ZINC P 2.2 355 20 CYANIDE AS 10 32.1 10 ANALYTICAL METHOD NOTE: J - QUANTITATION IS APPROXIMATE DUE TO LIMITATIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW (DATA REVIEW). F - FURNACE R - VALUE IS REJECTED. P - ICP/fLAME AA U - VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS RAISED. CV - COLO VAPOR UJ- VALUE IS NON-DETECTED AND DETECTION LIMIT IS ESTIMATED. AS SEMI-AUTOMATED SPECTROMETRY /-•' \ SAS DIOXIN ANALYSIS Raymark Industries W1L\04100009\074\RAYMARK.ATT 09/30/93 r SITE: Rayinark - Stratiorii. CT Page 1 Revised: 7/22/93 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3401 anple No SA-3401' SA-3402^ SA-3403RE' Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCOD/TCOF Cone tf9/Kg DL/EMPC* ;ig/Kg DL/EHPC* 2,3,7,8-Ta)0 U 0.0057 u 0.0068 U 0.0038 1.2,3,7,8-PeCOO U 0.0102 u 0.0060 U 0.0266 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOO UJ 0.0098 UJ 0.0108 UJ 0.0175 I 1,2,3,6,7.8-HxCOD UJ 0.0086 UJ 0.0095 UJ 0.0171 1,2,3,7,8,9-Hxa)D UJ 0.0090 UJ 0.0100 UJ 0.0180 « 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOO UJ 0.0109 UJ 0.0120 UJ 0.0042 OCOO U 0.0088 u 0.0094 0.30 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF U 0.0040 u 0.0041 UJ 0.0041 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF U 0.0064 u 0.0039 UJ 0.0200 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF U 0.0059 u 0.0036 UJ 0.0208 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0055 u 0.0063 UJ 0.0081 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0048 u 0.0054 UJ 0.0071 2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0049 u 0.0056 UJ 0.0082 1 ^.3.7.8.9-HxCOF u 0.0064 u 0.0074 UJ 0.0102 PIP,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOF UJ 0.0065 UJ 0.0068 0.009 J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCOF u 0.0084 u 0.0087 UJ 0.0034 OCDF u 0.0073 u 0.0061 u 0.0203 TOTAL TCOD UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 TOTAL PeCDD 0.02 • 0.04 * 0.13 • TOTAL HxCDO UJ 0.01 UJ 0.01 UJ 0.02 TOTAL HDCOO UJ 0.01 UJ 0.01 UJ 0.01 TOTAL TCDF UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 TOTAL PeCOF UJ 0.01 UJ 0.0039 UJ 0.09 TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.01 UJ 0.01 UJ 0.01 TOTAL HpCOF UJ 0.01 UJ 0.01 0.01 J 0.03 * 1 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0 u 0.0 u 0.00039 J 1 DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 i SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/15/93 04/15/93 05/12/93 1 ""ALYSIS DATE 04/19/93 04/19/93 05/19/93 ji ,/MS I.D. HH03050 HH03051 HH03341 • 3 These values are EMPCs (Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration). 1 1 These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE: Rayroark - Str;'^ 3rd. CT Page 2 Revised: 7/22/93 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3401 h Sample Mo SA-3404^ SA-3405^ SA-3406^ Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCDD/TCOF Cone Mg/xg DL/EMPC* ;»g/Kg OL/EMPC Mg/Kg OL/EHPC* 2,3,7,8-TCOD U 0.0275 u 0.0169 U 0.0130 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOD U 0.0422 u 0.0272 U 0.0128 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOO u 0.0882 u 0.0750 U 0.0109 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOO u 0.0770 u 0.0655 U 0.0095 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOO u 0.0812 u 0.0690 U 0.0100 1,2.3,4,6,7,8-Hpa)0 0.1 J UJ 0.0199 UJ 0.0085 OCOD 7.6 J 5.5 J U 0.0071 2,3,7,8-TCDF U 0.0161 u 0.0161 U 0.0038 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF u 0.0255 u 0.0220 U 0.0060 2.3.4,7,8-Pea)F u 0.0233 u 0.0200 U 0.0055 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0305 u 0.0264 u 0.0053 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0265 u 0.0229 u 0.0046 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0273 u 0.0237 u 0.0048 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF u 0.0359 u 0.0311 u 0.0063 1.2,3,4,6,7,8-HcCOF 0.2 J UJ 0.0196 UJ 0.0052 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCOF u 0.0371 u 0.0253 u 0.0067 OCDF u 0.0255 u 0.0215 u 0.0043 TOTAL TCDD UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 TOTAL PeCOO 1.77 • 0.07 * 0.04 » TOTAL HxCOD UJ 0.09 UJ 0.07 UJ 0.01 TOTAL HDCOD 0.18 J 10.07 • UJ 0.01 TOTAL TCDF UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 - TOTAL PeCOF 0.13 J 0.03 » 0.01 • TOTAL HXCDF 0.13 • UJ 0.03 UJ 0.01 TOTAL HpCOF 0.15 J UJ 0.03 UJ 0.01 1 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0106 J 0.0055 J 0.0 u - DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/15/93 04/15/93 04/15/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/19/93 04/19/93 04/19/93 GC/HS I.D. HH03053 HH03054 HH03055 * « These values are EMPCs (Estimated maximLin Possible Concentration). 1 « These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE; Raymark - Strat rci, CT Page 3 Revised: 7/22/93 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3401 I Sample No SA-3407^ SA-340a' SA-3409^ 1 Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCDO/TCOF Cone M9/Kg OL/EMPC* eg/Kg DL/EHPC* eg/Kg 0L/EHPC» 2,3,7,8-TCDD U 0.0113 U 0.0596 UJ 0.0121 1.2,3,7,8-PeCOO U 0.0185 u 0.0456 UJ 0.0121 1,2,3,4,7.8-HxCOO U 0.0500 U 0.0996 UJ 0.0194 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD U 0.0444 U 0.0885 UJ 0.0169 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD U 0.0554 u 0.1104 UJ 0.0178 1 1.2,3,4,6.7.8-HDCOt) UJ 0.0433 2.6 J 1.3 J i *^°'^ U 0.1523 20.9 J 18.2 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF U 0.6214 U 0.0422 UJ 0.0047 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF U 0.0139 u 0.0293 UJ 0.0067 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF U 0.0161 u 0.0338 UJ 0.0061 1.2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF U 0.0253 u 0.0379 UJ 0.0088 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF U 0.0205 u 0.0306 UJ 0.0077 1 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCOF U 0.0255 u 0.0382 UJ 0.0079 1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF U 0.0338 u 0.0507 UJ 0.0104 ;,3,4,6,7,8-HDC0F UJ 0.0383 0.5 J 0.1 J 1 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCOF U 0.0612 u 0.0950 UJ 0.0121 OCDF U 0.1310 u 0.2253 UJ 0.0079 1 TOTAL TCOD UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 TOTAL PeCOO 0.19 • 0.60 • UJ 0.01 TOTAL HxCOO UJ 0.06 0.44 J UJ 0.02 TOTAL HpCOD UJ 0.04 5.03 J 2.15 J TOTXL TCOF UJ 0.15 0.15 J 0.52 • UJ 0.15 TOTAL PeCOF UJ 0.02 0.51 J 0,57 • 0.04 * TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.03 0.66 J 0.09 • TOTAL HpCOF UJ 0.06 1.21 J 0.10 J 0.18 • TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0 u 0.0519 J 0.0322 J DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/15/93 04/15/93 04/15/93 1 ANALYSIS DATE 04/19/93 04/19/93 04/19/93 /MS I.D. E009305 E009304 HH03056 * = These values are EMPCs (Estimated HaxiumLin Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. r' SITE: Raymark - Stracford. CT Page 4 Revised: 7/22/93 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3401 „ Sanple No SA-3410^ SA-3411RE' SA-3412' • Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCOD/TCOF Cone Mg/Kg DL/EHPC* M/xg DL/EHPC* MS/Kg DL/EHPC* 2,3,7,8-TCDO UJ 0.1364 U 0.0612 U 0.0119 1,2,3.7,8-PeCOD UJ 0.3929 u 0.1153 U 0.0125 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDO UJ 0.0103 U 0.5092 U 0.0102 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD UJ 0.0090 U 0.4619 U 0.0094 i ... _ 1,2,3,7.8,9-HxCOO UJ 0.0095 U 0.5206 U 0.0093 1.2,3,4,6,7.8-HDCOD 1.8 J 5.1 J 0.026 J OCOD 28.1 J 17.0 J 1.3 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF 0.4 J 4.3 J U 0.0046 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF UJ 0.2592 2.3 • U 0.0097 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF 0.5 J 5.9 J U 0.0087 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF 1.0 J 8.8 J U 0.0093 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0049 2.6 J U 0.0084 2,3.4,6,7,8-HxCOF 0.4 J 3.5 J U 0.0085 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF UJ 0.0067 U 0.2084 u 0.0109 1 1,2.3.4,6,7,8-HDCOF 3.5 J 22.7 J 0.1 J 1,2,3,4,7,a,9-HpC0F UJ 0.0063 U 0.2033 u 0.0098 OCOF 1.2 J u 0.4043 u 0.0066 TOTAL TCDD UJ 12,8 UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 TOTAL PeCOD 6.06 • 66.87 • 0.94 • 1 TOTAL HxCOD 0.38 • 0.69 5.17 • 0.04 * TOTAL HDCDD 4.37 J 8.12 J 0.04 J TOTAL TCOF 0.37 J 1.00 • 14.25 J 14.92 • UJ 0.15 TOTAL PeCOF 2.65 J 2.95 • 27.05 J 29.07 • 0.02 * TOTAL HxCOF 4.71 J 5.19 • 43.33 J 46.73 • 0.09 • 1 TOTAL HpCOF 5.90 J 5.94 • 24.72 0.14 J 1 TOXICITY EOUIVALEMCT 0.512 J 5.28 J 0.00256 J 1 DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/15/93 04/15/93 04/16/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/19/93 04/19/93 04/20/93 GC/HS I.D. HH03057 HH03341 HH03064 • • These values are EMPCs (Estimated Haximun Possible Concentration). 1 » These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE:. Ravmark - Stra< rd, CT Page 5 revised: 1/22./^Z SAS/SDG NO: 78Q2A-Q2 / SA3401 ' Sairple Mo SA-3413^ SA-3414^ SA-3415^ Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCDD/TCDF Cone (ig/xg DL/EMPC* (ig/xg OL/EMPC* Mg/Kg DL/EHPC* 2,3,7,8-TCDO u 0.0113 u 0.0380 U 0.0137 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDO 0.0117 0.0145 _j_-t r u u U 0.0200 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOO u 0.0229 u 0.0279 U 0.0128 1.2,3,6,7,8-HxCOO u 0.0209 u 0.0255 U 0.0117 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOO u 0.0209 u 0.0254 U 0.0116 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCnp UJ 0.0091 UJ 0.0216 UJ 0.0107 OCDO u 0.0081 6.3 J u 0.0194 . 1 2.3.7.8-TCOF u 0.0069 u 0.0667 u o.oni 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF u 0.0074 u 0.0146 u 0.0186 2.3.4,7,8-PeCOF u 0.0067 u 0.0131 u 0.0167 1,2,3,4.7,8-HxCOF u 0.0104 u 0.0149 u 0.0080 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0094 u 0.0135 u 0.0073 1 2.3,4,6,7.8-HxCDF u 0.0095 u 0.0137 u 0.0074 I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF u 0.0121 u 0.0174 u 0.0094 I* '..3.4.6.7.8-HpCOF UJ 0.0120 0.4 J UJ 0.0089 1 ,,2,3,4.7,8,9-HpCOF u 0.0147 u 0.0184 u 0.0109 OCOF u 0.0094 u 0.0351 u 0.0160 TOTAL TCOD UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 TOTAL PeCOO 0.03 * 0.19 * 0.07 * TOTAL HxCOO UJ 0.02 UJ 0.03 UJ 0.01 TOTAL HpCOD UJ 0.01 0.06 • UJ 0.01 TOTAL TCOF UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 TOTAL PeCOF UJ 0.01 0.04 UJ 0.02 TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.01 0.26 • UJ 0.01 1 TOTAL HpCOF UJ 0.01 0.39 J 0.54 • UJ 0.01 1 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0 u 0.0103 J 0.0 U 1 DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 ! DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 1 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/15/93 04/15/93 04/15/93 1 ANALYSIS DATE 04/20/93 04/20/93 04/20/93 /MS I.D. HH03065 HH03066 HH03067 * = These values are EMPCs (Estimated MaximLTi Possible Concentration). 1 a These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE: Raymark - Stra-* '^rd. CT Page 6 Revised: 7/22/93 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-'02 / SA3401 ' Sample Mo SA-3416' SA-3417^ SA-3418' Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCOD/TCOF Cone ;»g/KB DL/EMPC* /ig/xg DL/EMPC* M9/xg DL/EMPC* 2,3,7,8-TCDO U 0.0808 u 0.0076 UJ 0.0172 1,2,3,7,8-Pea)0 U 0.1330 u 0.0123 UJ 0.0295 1,2,3.4,7,8-HxCOD U 0.0767 u 0.0161 UJ 0.0245 1,2,3,6.7,8-HxCDD U 0.0736 u 0.0147 UJ 0.0224 1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOD U 0.0801 u 0.0147 UJ 0.0224 1,2,3,4,6.7,8-Hpcap UJ 0.0761 UJ 0.0115 UJ 0.0269 OCOO 2.1 J 0.7 J 3.6 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF U 0.0514 u 0.0078 UJ 0.0134 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF u 0.1077 u 0.0069 UJ 0.0171 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF u 0.1124 u 0.0062 UJ 0.0154 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0727 u 0.0091 UJ 0.0177 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF u 0.0681 u 0.0082 UJ 0.0161 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF u 0.0789 u 0.0083 UJ 0.0163 1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCOF u 0.1046 u 0.0106 UJ 0.0207 1.2.3.4,6.7.8-HpCOF UJ 0.0470 UJ 0.0083 UJ 0.0159 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCOF u 0.0693 u 0.0102 UJ 0.0196 OCOF u 0.2115 u 0.0089 UJ 0.0164 TOTAL TCOD UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 TOTAL PeCOD 0.56 * UJ 0.01 UJ 0.03 TOTAL HxCOO UJ 0.08 UJ 0.02 UJ 0.02 TOTAL HpCOD UJ 0.08 UJ 0.01 UJ 0.03 TOTAL TCOF 0.21 J 0.35 * UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 TOTAL PeCOF UJ 0.11 UJ 0.01 UJ 0.02 TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.10 UJ 0.01 UJ 0.02 TOTAL HpCOF UJ 0.07 UJ 0.01 UJ 0.02 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0021 J 0.0007 J 0.0036 J DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/15/93 04/15/93 04/15/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/20/93 04/20/93 04/20/93 GC/MS I.D. E009316 HH03063 HH03062 * = These values are EMPCs (Estimated MaximLin Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE: Raymark - Strat. rd, CT Page 1 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3419 'ample No. SA-3419^ SA-3420^ SA-3421RE^ Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCDO/TCOF Cone M/kg DL/EMPC* M9/Kg DL/EHPC* M9/Xg DL/EHPC* 2,3,7,8-TCOD UJ 0.0160 UJ 0.1662 UJ 0.0123 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD UJ 0.0271 UJ 0.0773 UJ 0.0194 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0497 UJ 0.1452 UJ 0.0278 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD UJ 0.0456 UJ 0.1330 UJ 0.0286 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOD UJ 0.0475 UJ 0.1386 UJ 0.0293 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOi UJ 0.0276 1.6 J 0.1 J OCOD 2.3 J 6.4 J 4.3 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF UJ 0.0125 0.6 J UJ 0.0161 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF UJ 0.0230 0.3875 * UJ 0.0187 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF UJ 0.0230 1.1 J UJ 0.0202 1,2,3,4,7,a-HxC0F UJ 0.0396 2.8 UJ 0.0094 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0351 0.4 J UJ 0.0083 2,3.4,6,7,8-HxCDF UJ 0.0587 1.0 J UJ 0.0096 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF UJ 0.0467 UJ 0.0944 UJ 0.0121 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HPCOF UJ 0.0356 6.3 UJ 0.0145 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCOF UJ 0.0446 UJ 0.0857 UJ 0.0197 OCOF UJ 0.0674 UJ 0.2344 UJ 0.0212 • • TOTAL TCOO UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 TOTAL PeCOO UJ 1.7 UJ 1.7 UJ 0.02 TOTAL HxCOO UJ 0.05 UJ 0.15 UJ 2.3 TOTAL HpCOO UJ 0.03 UJ 1.64 UJ 27.75 TOTAL TCOF UJ 0.20 1.25 J 3.87 • UJ 0.20 TOTAL PeCDF UJ 0.85 3.75 J 4.14 • UJ 0.02 TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.02 11.57 J UJ 0.20 • UJ TOTAL HpCOF UJ 0.04 6.48 6.62 • 0.02 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0023 J 1.135 J 0.0053 J DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/17/93 04/17/93 04/17/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/21/93 04/21/93 04/26/93 GC/MS I.O. HH03076 HH03077 HH03121 • = These values are EMPCs (Estimated Haxiitijn Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE: Ravmark - Strat' d. CT Page 2 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3419 Sample NO SA-3422' SA3423^ SA-3424^ Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCOD/TCOF Cone M/Kg DL/EMPC* tfg/Kg DL/EMPC* (tg/Xg DL/EMPC* 2,3,7,8-TCOO UJ 0.0239 UJ 0.0136 UJ 0.0125 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOD UJ 0.0181 UJ 1.1117 UJ 0.0366 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0778 UJ 0.0806 UJ 0.0507 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0713 UJ 0.0738 UJ 0.0465 1,2,3,7,S,9-HxC00 UJ 0.0743 UJ 0.0769 UJ 0.0484 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HDCOC UJ 0.0244 UJ 0.0281 0.1 J 1 OCOO 3.6 J 3.0015 * 3.5 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF UJ 0.0261 UJ 0.0174 UJ 0.0126 1,2,3,7,8-Pea)F UJ 0.0231 UJ . 0.9708 UJ 0.0370 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF UJ 0.0231 UJ 0.9708 UJ 0.0370 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0466 UJ 0.0553 UJ 0.0393 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0412 UJ 0.0489 UJ 0.0348 2,3,4.6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0455 UJ 0.0540 UJ 0.0384 1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF UJ 0.0549 UJ 0.0651 UJ 0.0463 1 • •>,3,4,6,7,8-HoCOF UJ 0.0302 UJ 0.0237 UJ 0.0276 1 ., OCOF UJ 0.0697 UJ 0.1550 UJ 0.1265 TOTAL TCOD UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 TOTAL PeCOD UJ 1.7 19.44 • UJ 1.7 TOTAL HxCOO UJ 0.08 UJ 0.08 UJ 0.05 TOTAL HoCOD UJ 0.05 UJ 0.11 UJ 0.16 TOTAL TCOF UJ 0.20 UJ 0.20 UJ 0.20 TOTAL PeCDF UJ 0.85 9.89 • UJ 0.85 TOTAL HxCDF UJ 0.05 UJ 0.07 UJ 0.05 • TOTAL HpCOF UJ 0.04 0.07 * 0.03 • TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0036 J 0.00300 J 0.0045 DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/17/93 04/17/93 04/17/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/21/93 04/21/93 04/21/93 -/MS I.D. HH03078 HH03080 HH03081 * = These values are EHPCs (Estimated HaximLni Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. .qiTE: Ravmark - Stral ';rd. CT Page 3 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3419 r SA-3425^ SA-3426^ SA-3427^ Sairple Mo Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCOD/TCOF Cone **g/Xg DL/EHPC* M/Xg DL/EHPC* (ig/Kg OL/EMPC* 2,3,7,8-TCOD UJ 0.0164 UJ 0.0785 UJ 0.0116 1.2,3,7,8-PeCOD UJ 0.1170 UJ 0.2252 UJ 0.0259 j 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0827 UJ 0.0953 UJ ^0.0586 1.2,3.6,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0786 UJ 0.0874 UJ 0.0537 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOD UJ 0.0807 UJ 0.0910 UJ 0.0559 1.2,3,4,6,7,8-HpaJ« UJ 0.0482 O.I.J UJ 0.0210 OCDO 3.0495 • 0.2218 * a.7 J 2,3,7,a-TCDF UJ 0.0202 UJ 0.0320 UJ 0.0149 1,2,3,7,8-Pea)F UJ 0.0691 UJ 0.2776 UJ 0.0239 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF UJ 0.0758 UJ 0.2776 UJ 0.0239 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxaJF UJ 0.0420 UJ 0.0738 UJ 0.0398 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0355 UJ 0.0654 UJ 0.0352 2,3,4,6,7.8-HxCOF UJ 0.0419 UJ 0.0722 UJ 0.0389 1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCOF UJ 0.0548 UJ 0.0870 UJ 0.0469 ,2.3,4,6,7,8-HDa)F UJ 0.0474 UJ 0.0517 UJ 0.0384 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HDCOF UJ 0.0618 UJ 0.0647 UJ 0.0481 OCOF UJ 0.1412 UJ 0.1623 UJ 0.1426 TOTAL TCOO UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 TOTAL PeCOO 14.36 * UJ 1.7 UJ 1.7 TOTAL HxCOD UJ 0.08 UJ 0.10 UJ 0.06 TOTAL HoCOD UJ 0.14 UJ 0.31 UJ 0.09 TOTAL TCOF UJ 0.20 UJ 0.20 UJ 0.20 TOTAL PeCOF 5.45 * 5.48 * UJ 0.85 TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.05 UJ 0.04 UJ 0.05 TOTAL HpCDF 0.06 • 0.04 * UJ 0.05 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.00305 J 0.00122 J 0.0087 J DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/17/93 04/17/93 04/17/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/22/93 04/21/93 04/21/93 GC/HS I.D. HH03094 HH03082 HH030a3 • = These values are EMPCs (Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration). 1 * These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE: Ravmark - Stra1 rd. CT Page 4 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3419 SaoDle NO SA-3428^ SA-3429^ SA-3430^ j Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL 1 TCOD/TCOF Cone MS/Xg DL/EMPC* Mg/Kg DL/EMPC* Mg/Kg DL/EMPC* 1 2,3,7,8-1030 UJ 0.0138 UJ 0.0804 UJ 0.0206 1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOD UJ 0.1110 UJ 0.3055 UJ 0.1738 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOO UJ 0.0368 UJ 0.1O8O UJ 0.0666 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0350 UJ 0.1027 UJ 0.0634 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOD UJ 0.0360 UJ 0.1054 UJ 0.0650 1,2.3.4.6.7.8-HDCD8 0.8 J UJ 0.1504 0.1 J 1 OCOO 7.8 J 8.1 J 9.5 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF UJ 0.0196 UJ 0.0928 UJ 0.0240 1,2.3,7,8-PeCOF UJ 0.0271 UJ 0.1076 UJ 0.0970 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF 0.2 J UJ 0.1180 UJ 0.1064 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0327 UJ 0.0910 UJ 0.0377 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0276 UJ 0.0771 UJ 0.0319 1 2,3;4,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0326 UJ 0.0909 UJ 0.0376 1 1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCOF 0.1 J UJ 0.1189 UJ 0.0492 2.3.4,6,7,8-HpCOF 1.8 UJ 0.1010 UJ 0.0402 .,2,3,4,7,8,9-HDCOF 0.2 J UJ 0.1317 UJ 0.0524 OCOF 1.7.J UJ 0.1235 UJ 0.0408 1 TOTAL TCOD UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 1 TOTAL PeCOD 21.80 • UJ 1.7 8.20 * TOTAL HxCDD UJ 0.44 UJ 0.11 UJ 0.04 TOTAL HpCOO UJ 1.63 UJ 0.30 UJ 0.42 TOTAL TCOF 0.94 J 1.09 * 0.08 .1 0.38 • UJ 0.20 TOTAL PeCOF 1.55 J 10.55 * UJ 0.85 3.42 * TOTAL HxCOF 1.16 J 1.18 • UJ 0.19 UJ 0.06 TOTAL HpCOF 2.90 0.05 0.04 • 1 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY . 0.15 J 0.0081 J 0.0105 J 1 DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/17/93 04/17/93 04/17/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/22/93 04/22/93 04/22/93 VMS I.D. HH03095 HH03091 HH03092 • = These values are EMPCs (Estimated Haximun Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. .qiTE: Ravmark - Stra" )rd. CT Page 5 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3419 1 Sanple No SA-3431' SA-3432^ SA-3433' Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL 1 TCOD/TCOF Cone (ig/Kg DL/EHPC* (ig/xg OL/EMPC* (xg/xg DL/EMPC* 2,3,7,8-TCOO UJ 0.0713 UJ 0.0705 UJ 0.0435 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOD UJ 0.1028 UJ 0.5666 UJ 0.0857 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.1702 UJ 0.2171 UJ 0.0958 1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.1628 UJ 0.2076 UJ 0.0917 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOD UJ 0.1735 UJ 0.2213 UJ 0.0977 1.2,3,4,6,7.8-HDCOP UJ 0.1564 UJ 0.2741 UJ 0.1486 OCDO 6.4 J 8.5 J 6.1 J • 2,3,7,8-TCOF UJ 0.0680 UJ 0.0626 UJ 0.0262 1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF UJ 0.0582 UJ 0.4135 UJ 0.09O4 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF UJ 0.0612 UJ 0.4355 UJ 0.0952 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.1060 UJ 0.1249 UJ 0.0982 1,2,3,6,7,a-HxC0F UJ 0.1034 UJ 0.1219 UJ 0.0958 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.1168 UJ 0.1377 UJ 0.1082 j 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF UJ 0.1592 UJ 0.1877 UJ 0.1475 \2.3,4,6,7,8-HoC0F UJ 0.3154 UJ 0.1896 UJ 0.1056 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HoCOF UJ 0.4610 UJ 0.2772 UJ 0.1543 OCOF UJ 0.8365 UJ 0.4964 UJ 0.3304 TOTAL TCOD UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 TOTAL PeCOD UJ 1.7 0.66 J 6.46 0.29 J 2.47 * TOTAL -HxCOO UJ 0.17 UJ 0.37 UJ 0.10 TOTAL HpCOO UJ 0.36 UJ 0.27 UJ 0.15 TOTAL TCOF 0.55 * 0.36 J 0.73 * UJ 0.20 TOTAL PeCDF UJ 0.85 0.08 J 2.56 • UJ 0.85 TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.16 0.32 J 0.90 * UJ 0.15 i TOTAL HpCDF UJ 0.46 0.36 UJ 0.15 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0064 J 0.0085 J 0.0061 J 1 DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/17/93 04/17/93 04/17/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/22/93 04/22/93 04/22/93 GC/HS I.O. E009351 E009347 E00934S * - These values are EHPCs (Estimated HaximLn Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. STTE: Ravmark - Strat :d. CT Page 6 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / 5A3419 Sample No SA-3434^ SA-3435' SA-3436^ 1 Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCOD/TCOF Cone ;ig/Kg OL/EMPC* (xg/xg DL/EHPC* tfg/xg DL/EHPC* 2,3,7,8-TCOD UJ 0.0361 UJ 0.0072 UJ 0.0355 1 1.2.3,7,8-Pea)D UJ 0:i068 UJ 0.0315 UJ 0.2147 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.1144 UJ 0.0447 UJ 0.0688 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.1094 UJ 0.0437 UJ 0.0658 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOD UJ 0.1167 UJ 0.0446 UJ 0.0702 1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HDCOO UJ 0.1082 0.2 J UJ 0.0938 1 OCOD 5.6 J 4.3 J 3.4 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF UJ 0.0343 UJ 0.0151 UJ 0.0317 1,2,3.7,8-PeCOF UJ 0.1074 UJ 0.0272 UJ 0.0810 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF UJ 0.1131 UJ 0.0283 UJ 0.0853 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0601 UJ 0.0522 UJ 0.0516 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0586 UJ 0.0455 UJ 0.0504 2,3,4,6,7.8-HxCOF UJ 0.0662 UJ 0.0517 UJ 0.0569 1,2,3.7,8,9-HxCOF UJ 0.0903 UJ 0.0629 UJ 0.0776 1 2.3.4,6,7,8-HpCOF UJ 0.1353 UJ 0.0112 UJ 0.0806 „3,4.7,8,9-HpCOF UJ 0.1978 UJ 0.0155 UJ 0.1178 OCOF UJ 0.4040 UJ 0.0624 UJ 0.3335 TOTAL TCOO UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 UJ 13.95 TOTAL PeCDD 0.05 J 5.02 * UJ 1.7 0.22 J 3.14 • TOTAL HxCDD UJ 0.12 UJ 0.22 UJ 0.07 TOTAL HpCOD UJ 0.24 UJ 0.70 UJ 0.09 TOTAL TCOF UJ 0.20 UJ 0.20 UJ 0.20 TOTAL PeCDF 1.98 * UJ 0.85 1.12 • TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.09 UJ 0.06 UJ 0.08 TOTAL HDCOF UJ 0.20 UJ 0.02 UJ 0.12 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0056 J 0.0063 J 0.0034 J DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/17/93 04/17/93 04/17/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/22/93 04/28/93 04/22/93 '•'•'MS I.O. E009342 HH03146 EQ09349 • - ihese values are EMPCs (Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE: Raymark - Strc .ord. CT Page 1 Revised 7/26/93 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3437 Sample No SA.-3437RE ' SA-3438 ' SA-3439' 1 1 Matrix SOIL SOI L SOIL 1 TCDD/TCDF Cone Mg/Kg DL/EMPC* Mg/K g DL/EMPC* pg/Kg DL/EMPC* 2,3,7,8-TCOO UJ 0.0045 UJ 0.0034 UJ 0.0031 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOD UJ 0.0084 UJ 0.0177 UJ 0.0030 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0057 UJ 0.0259 UJ 0.0057 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0057 UJ 0.0253 UJ 0,0055 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOD UJ 0.0057 UJ 0.0267 UJ 0.0058 1.2,3,4,6.7,8-Hp(5)D UJ 0.0041 0.010 J UJ 0.0054 1 OCOD 3.5 J 4.2 J ' 3.9 J • 2,3,7,8-TCDF UJ 0.0047 UJ 0.0035 UJ 0.0035 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF UJ 0.0064 UJ 0.0163 UJ 0.0270 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF UJ 0.0063 UJ 0.0168 UJ 0.0280 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0019 UJ 0.0055 UJ 0.0041 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0017 UJ 0.0048 UJ 0.0035 2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0019 UJ 0.0055 UJ 0.0041 1 1,2.3,7,8.9-HxCOF UJ 0.0023 UJ 0.0069 UJ 0.0051 1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCOF UJ 0.0005 UJ 0.0036 UJ 0.0038 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCOF UJ 0.0007 UJ 0.0050 UJ 0.0052 OCDF UJ 0.0124 UJ 0.0196 UJ 0.0138 TOTAL TCOO UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 TOTAL PeCOD UJ 0.45 UJ 0.45 UJ 0.45 TOTAL HxCDD UJ 0.01 UJ 0.03 UJ 0.01 TOTAL HpCOO UJ 0.02 UJ 0.04 0.03 J TOTAL TCOF UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 II TOTAL PeCOF UJ 0.01 UJ 0.02 0.01 * TOTAL HxCOF UJ O.002 UJ 0.007 0.01 • TOTAL HpCOF UJ 0.001 UJ ! 0.005 UJ 0.01 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0035 J L 0.0043 J 0.0039 J DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE* 04/20/93 04/20/93 04/20/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/27/93 04/23/93 04/23/93 [ GC/HS I.D. HH03130 HH03102 HH03103 • = These values are EHPCs (Estimated HaximLn Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE: Ravmark - Stra, ord. CT Page 2 Revised 7/26/93 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3437 fi I Sample No SA-3440 ' SA-3441 ' SA-3442' 1 Matrix SOI L SOI L SOIL 1 TCDD/TCDF Cone ^g/Kg DL/E.MPC* pg/Kg DL/EMPC* pg/Kg DL/EMPC* 1 2,3,7,8-TCOO UJ 0.0062 UJ 0.0057 UJ 0.0051 1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOD UJ 0.0080 UJ 0.0210 UJ 0.0206 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0488 UJ 0.0365 UJ 0.0184 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD UJ 0.0478 UJ 0.0357 0.031 J 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOD UJ 0.0504 UJ 0.0377 UJ 0.0190 1,2,3.4,6,7,8-Hp(3)0 UJ 0.0068 UJ 0.0065 0.7 J OCDO 5.4 J UJ 0.0155 2.5 J 2,3,7,8-TCOF UJ 0.0140 UJ 0.0051 0.7 J 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF UJ 0.0174 UJ 0.0140 0.5 J 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF UJ 0.0180 UJ 0.0145 1.5 J 1 1 1,2,3,4,7.8-HxCOF UJ 0.0108 UJ 0.0093 5.8 J 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0094 UJ 0.0082 0.8 J 1 2,3,4,6,7.8-HxCDF UJ 0.0108 UJ 0.0094 2.7 J ,2.3,7,8,9-HxCOF UJ 0.0135 UJ 0.0117 UJ 0.1702 ri,2,3.4,6,7.8-HpC0F UJ 0.0066 UJ 0.0045 15.5 J 1,2,3,4,7,8.9-HpCOF UJ 0.0090 UJ 0.0061 UJ 0.0107 OCOF UJ 0.0217 UJ 0.0104 1.2 J • 1 TOTAL TCOO UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 UJ 12.8 1 TOTAL PeCOD UJ 0.45 UJ 0.45 UJ 0.45 TOTAL HxCOD UJ 0.05 UJ 0.04 0.11 J 0.14 • TOTAL HpCOO 0.04 J UJ 0.01 1.04 J 1.06 * TOTAL TCOF UJ 0.15 UJ 0.15 2.19 J 2.42 • TOTAL PeCDF 0.01 * 0.11 * 7.41 J 7.66 * , TOTAL HxCOF UJ 0.01 UJ 0.01 25.78 J 26.24 * TOTAL HpCOF UJ 0.01 UJ 0.01 17.54 J 17.60 • TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0054 J 0.0 1.944 J DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 1 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/20/93 04/20/93 04/20/93 ANALYSIS DATE 04/23/93 04/23/93 04/23/93 jl^GC/HS I.D. HH03104 HH03105 HH03106 * = These values are EHPCs (Estimated Haximun Possible Concentration). 1 = These values are reported on a dry weight basis. SITE: Raymark - Strw-ford, CT Page 3 Revised 7/26/93 SAS/SDG NO: 7802A-02 / SA3437 Sample No SA-3443 ' SA-3444 ' SA-3445' Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL TCDD/TCDF Cone pg/K g DL/EMPC* pg/Kg DL/EMPC* pg/K g DL/EMPC* 2,3,7,8-TCDO UJ 0.0189 UJ 0.0268 UJ 0.0803 1.2.3,7.8-PeCDD UJ 0.0155 UJ 0.1398 UJ 0.0948 1.2,3,4,7,8-HxCOO UJ 0.0763 0.025 J UJ 0.2719 1.2,3,6,7,8-HxCOD UJ 0.0746 0.0511 • UJ 0.2541 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDO UJ 0.0788 0.050 J UJ 0.2667 1,2,3,4,6,7.8-HpCOD 0.02 J 2.0 J UJ 0.1069 OCOD UJ 0.0460 16.6 J 0.50 J . . . 2,3,7,8-TCOF UJ 0.0296 UJ 0.0781 UJ 0.0637 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF UJ 0.0306 UJ 0.0499 UJ 0.0689 2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF UJ 0.0317 0.6 J UJ 0.0700 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF 0.04 J 2.9 J UJ 0.0685 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOF UJ 0.0453 0.2 J UJ 0.0643 2.3.4,6.7.8-HxCOF UJ 0.0567 1.3 J UJ 0.0696 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF UJ 0.0709 UJ 0.0740 UJ 0.0858 1,2,3,4,6,7.8-HpCOF 0.07 J 12.4 J UJ 0.0878 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCOF 0.0731 * UJ 0.0227 UJ 0.1166 OCOF UJ 0.0718 3.6 J UJ 0.4320 TOTAL TCOO UJ 12.8 0.06 19.74 * UJ 12.8 TOTAL PeCOD 2.86 • 8.98 * UJ 0.45 TOTAL HxCOD UJ 0.08 0.46 J 0.94 * UJ 0.27 TOTAL HpCOD 0.07 J 3.95 J 0.09 J TOTAL TCDF UJ 0.15 0.45 J 0.97 * UJ 0.15 TOTAL PeCOF 1.07 * 1.07 J 1.17 * UJ 0.07 TOTAL HxCOF 0.04 J 14.26 J 14.86 * 0.33 J TOTAL HpCOF 0.07 J 0.15 • 15.15 J UJ 0.12 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY 0.0056 J 0.93 J 0.0005 J DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 DATE OF RECEIPT 04/14/93 04/14/93 04/14/93 SAMPLE EXTRACTION DATE 04/20/93 04/20/93 04/20/93 ANALYSIS DATE C4/23/93 04/23/93 04/23/93 / GC/HS I.D. HH03107 HH03108 E009365 * s These values are EHPCs (Estimated Haximun Possible Concentration). 1 » These values are reported on a dry weight basis. n ( ) ESD ASBESTOS ANALYSIS Raymark Industries W1L\04100009\074\RAYMARK.ATT ( / (P ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE 2VKALYSI8 Page_/jf^ PR: Art Wing, OSC/ ESD SF DATE: /X JuL^ /'^^3 ANALYST: HOWARD DAVIS SEPA 60 Westview St. exington, MA 02173 Analytical Method:PLM with Dispersion Staining ^^tc^a^^^J-'i^'C^'^O' All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent Laboratory ID No. O^VbOl-C^LSr O^ZS^t-^^SF 0^2.3os~9:2.Sr o^X3oA'-i:i 5 F D'?2.30^^Z sr Sample ID No. sv- o\ ¥ SI>-0'2- 5T> -D3 P- o^ ST> -Ol Address or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sftes Building Stratford, CT Stratford, CI Stratford, CT Stratford. CT Stratford, CT location RAyn^/^K 5^/^£f 5">^/^«t' 5/^/^^ :^A^/^ ^ Sample Appearance Pfit^' fteawAJ , v/t>Ji/a«»A;p-/^ DAKx fi/tmj>) /tiap VAKK BfiDU}*f;n\UP VAMP ^p)l^ Asbestos Present jfysotiieX> T'^AC G Chrysotile: Chrysotile: ((jhrysotJleT^ y. J_ rfhr'ysotUe:') l~3 > (Type and Percent) Amosite: Amosite: Amosite: Amosite: AmosTtil CrocidotIte: Crocidolite: Crocidolite: Crocidolite: Crocidolite: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other Fibrous Percent Total Asbestos Present in j^'Z zii /-5 ^ sample : • m £^X RemarlcB T/iAt.& U.S. ENVIRONHENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 60 UESTVIEU ST.. LEXINGTON, HA 02173 PROJECT NO. r • V ; ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS Page / f / OR: Art Wing, OSC, ESD SF DATE: /2 JuLi^f M^)3 ANALYST: HOWARD DAVIS SEPA 60 Westview St. oxington, MA 02173 Analytical Method :PLM with Dispers|ort Staining at All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent Laboratory ID No. o^X2)0lc~^2'5F o^x^on-^/i. sr O^^SO^'-^Z 5r^ 09130^-^Z Sf^ O^^3/0-'?X5F Sample ID No. 3X>-oc» S-D-o-? 5D-0 2r 5P-o^P S-D'O^ Address or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites BuiIding Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford. CT RA*i/M/»/l>C Location 3A^e SAyr7^ 5^>^6' 3A^{^ Sample Appearance P^. ^f-ovo^i /yfUD gec/oAj, joer $AA)D Pfifi. BeowOy A^uf) P^K. fi^lAjKi M*ti> Asbestos Present Chrysotile: Chrysotile: (^hrysotlTeT? 3 —5"^ ^hrysotUe?'^ ^ ^ (Type and Percent) Amosite: Amosite; Amosite: Amosite: Amoimn Crocldolite: Croc idolite: Crocidolite: CrocldolIte: Crocidolite: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other Fibrous (tTtluloseT^ grccIiuLos7r> _!?llulo8i ._ CeKutosa: Materials Present Mineral Wool: Mineral Wool: Mineral iJoo(t Mineral Uool: (Type and Percent) Other: Other: Other: Other; Non-Fibrous Materials 'Sf\t^, fHiCA, jJu/ftti^ S/\MD,/hJCA SA^S) , Huryiu^ S^/Hl>j /v^^ ^ ^ 5AhS>^ GAA\/£L. ^ ti^t- Present Percent Total Asbestos Present in 3-6-1 :^^ Sample • 0% 3"i Remarks U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECITIDH AGENCY 60 UESTVIEU ST.. LEXINGTON. HA 02173 PROJECT NO. V C^-' ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS Page 1^2^ DEL Art Wing, OSC, ESD SF DATE: /Z diiLyj J^'^3 ANALYST: HOWARD DAVIS SEPA 60 Westview St. exington, MA 02173 Analytical Method; PLM with Dispersion Staining c^^-t^^i^jVJ. C^Ja^S^ All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent ^ Laboratory ID Ho. O^Z^DI-^Z SF 09x.4D2.'-9Z sr 09Z4D3-^ZJS/^ O^'Z^-O^-^2^SF O^Z^O^^^ZSF Sample ID No. S^D /I s-D -) a S^-lS' ST>-\C sv-\ n Address or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Building Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Location ^A^AlA^iC Sy^>-H(^ 5^^>je ^AyyiE. S/i/*iif: Sample Appearance p»?/:. pKOitM ^CK. dfiOloOj $MJD<'/ ^ic. Pfyi. C>^iHOA),^A)0*J^PU vA*:./!>tii>ioO /yiuX) Asbestos Present ^hrysotile^) 73V ^O-f CHhrysotiteT^ T^ey\CE (fTirysotll^T]^ /— 3 Chrysotile: /{J^XJ^ (Type and Percent) Amosite: RriosTte: Amosite: Amosite: Amosite: ^ ,. Crocldolite: Crocldolite: Crocidolite: Crocidolite: Crocidolite: f-Ot-lAJp Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other Fibrous lellulos^ (!5?llutosel> Cellulose: Cellulose: Materials Present Mineral v/ool: Mineral Wool; Mineral Uool: Mineral Uool: (Iyf>e and Percent) Other: Other: Other: Other: Non-Fibrous Materials Percent Total Asbestos Present in 7^-7. Sample ^o2 l-3t ^2 Remarks yA^ce U.S. ENVIRONHENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 60 UESTVIEU ST.. LEXINGTON. NA 02173 PROJECT NO. 1 (. c i ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS Page ^73 ORj. Art Wing, OSC, ESD SF DATE: )'3 Jt/^y J^Jcy^ ANALYST: HOWARD DAVIS SEPA 60 Westview St. exington, MA 02173 Analytical Method:PLM with Dispersion Staining i All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent Laboratory ID No. O^Z^Oh- "fi- -^P OqZAon- 91 5F a^/Z^o^-^xs/= o^rz4-o^-^z. sr= Sample ID No. SV-t^ 535-/^ SV-XC^ 5 s -2,2. 2^. •••••X Address or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites BuiIding Stratford, CT Stratford. CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Location Apifr^A/^ SA^f^JS S/h^6^ 5>^^ Sample Appearance DJ^K Ht>\i^^ /••wp W57;5/f/OD'/ 5P/Z_ Asbestos Present r^Ace (^rysot i le7> T'.^/^^-^ Chrysotile: \fyjQ/j£^ Chrysotile: /{Jfi/JB ChrysotKt: A)DA)£ (Type and Percent) AJnosite: Amosite: Amosite: Amosite: /-^ . ,, A Amosite: Crocldolite: Crocldolite: Crocidolite: /wOiVA^i) Crocidolite: /^ Non-Fibrous Materials 5tMJ> ) hiUMU^ S^^Dj fJt4rHU^ ^MAJD, /JU/tlU9 5t^Q^A$£^,/^'^^'^> 5A^D, jetfj?v5, ^up*»f Present Percent Total Asbestos Present in Sample ^1 jrz .en M JSf/^ Remarks r^Ace Fy^/iC^ U.SJ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTTON~AGENCY 60 UESTVIEU ST.. LEXINGTON. NA 02173 PROJECT NO. Sefii. (* JOD/. /^^ Z c ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS Page 1^4 Rj. Art Wing, OSC, ESD SF DATE: y3 Jl\L^ /^^3 ANALYST: HOWARD DAVIS EPA 60 Westview St. xington, MA 02173 Analytical Method:PLM with Dispersion Staining All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent - * aboratory 10 No. •ample ID No. 55-2.^'fi' 5S-Z5" 55-Z6 SS'-^l \ddress or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sftes lui Iding Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT ocat ion f\A^,»^A^J<. S^^£ S^*^*B S/i^J^ Sample Appearance SA/O^^) 5^/C Asbestos Present ^S'-P' Chrysotile: Chrysotile: AJOAJ^ (^R^sotTTeT) T-^ACC (Type and Percent) Amosite: Amosite: AiNJSttWT—• Crocidolite: FoUA)S> Crocidot ite: CrocidotIte: other: other: Other: other Fibrous (2rtl_Uilos|v> -CeTTuToseiia i^eKluloseT> Materials Present Mfneral Wool: Mineral Wool: Mineral Wool: (Type and Percent) Other: Other: Other: Non-Fibrous Materials ^»>^AJI>,/Ji^^nw^ 5A/OI)^ ^OOT^, f^u/nu<^ ^A)t>^ PyJSXfT^, /JUMtM> S^A)S> H>^^^'>j Present Percent Total Asbestos Present Sample 15 7, 02 £!% .^Z Remarks TA^L^ U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 60 UESTVIEU ST.. LEXINGTON. NA 02173 PROJECT NO. ^ ^;: / ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS Page 7^5^ )R: Art Wing, OSC, ESD SF DATE; )3 Jit^.y y?^-;? ANALYST: HOWARD DAVIS ;EPA 60 Westview St. ixington, MA 02173 Analytical Method:PLM with Dispersion Staining All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent Ioborntory 10 No. ^ Sample ID No. s-z^ 5 5-2^ 55-30 5 5-3/ 35-32L Address or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites BuiIding Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT /f/Jj/XF/^/^K Location SA*^*-!^ ^'^^e 5j^-yt£ 3y^^»^£' Sample Appearance f/AJe, ^AAJD<-J 5^/ Asbestos Present Chrysotile: /\)pfjc (ghrysotile: > r/^ACS. Chrysotile: /\JdA}£^ Chrysotile: Chrysotile: (Type and Percent) Amosite: Amosite: Amosite: r-^/ijin Amosite: Amosite: FdLiA)T> Crocidolite: fhl^AJj) Crocidot ite: Crocidolite: fO'^*-'^ CrocidotIte: Crocidolite: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: other Fibrous ^Celluloseo Percent Total Asbestos Present Sample 0% 0?. 0^2 J^l 01 Remarks -f^Ate U.S. ENVIRONHENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY lVB:)TOfO/AAC^ SApf/'^s^ ;9>y «• "^"v'™ ^^•' '^EXINCTON. HA 02173 PROJECT NO. f SF/7. ASBESTOS BULK STAPLE ANALYSIS Page /f <^ • Rl Art Wing, OSC, ESD SF DATE; /3 dUUf /^''IJ ANALYST: HOWARD DAVIS :EPA 60 Westview St. ^^ -^ • • -^ ^cO^^J.O^^a xington, MA 02173 Analytical Method;PLM with Dispersion Staining All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent aboratory ID No. ^ ample ID No. ^5^33 55-33 pw/>^ 5 5-34 55-3 s ss -3 6 ddress or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stra'^ford Sites ^ui Iding Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT ocation /f/?y/^^/^ 5 /+A»/£ S /»^<£' '5A>i^S SAm£^ .'ample Appearance VAt^fi) lu^ce^e ^^>^C i^sbestos Present Shrysotiterj f^AdS (^rysotite:^ 7'/:ACS Ch r yso 111 e: AJDJJ£ irysotlle^ 77f/lCJ£ Chrysotile: AJO^^ (Type and Percent) Amosite: Amosite: Amosite: Cniijsrrrei Amosite: ..lA Crocldolite: Crocldolite: Crocidolite: f-OUAJO Crocldolite: crocidolite: f^'^^^ Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other Fibrous CjeTTuTosejN (CefTuloseL? Mon-Fibrous Materials 5tAJf>; ^4>oT>, m/ntif 5»/t»J>/ /^c^ri^, /Ju^iiu', S/fAJ^, ^(S^T^ ,//vm,R^<>CT) /{u/ytu^ Present Percent Total Asbestos Present In Sample ^?, 01 M ^ Z 01 Remnrka T/lt^C& FXAd G ry^/fce U.S. ENVIRONHENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 60 UESTVICU ST.. trXINGTON. KA 02173 PROJECT NO. I 3B/r. )R; Art Wing, OSC, ESD SF DATE; /3JUL^J /^^. f ANALYST: HOWARD DAVIS ;EPA 60 Westview St. jxington, MA 02173 Analytical Method;PLM with Dispersion Staining All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent aboratory ID No. ^ iample ID No. r>5-37 5''S-.3 7 V^^PL,. 55 -36 5'5-3f -B^S-^O (ddress or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites lui Iding Stratford, CI Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT Stratford, CT ^A'i/f^f^A^JC 5>?'^£" S/^'^£: SW^^-^ ^/^/^e iample Appearance P/A-'g", UPcf^ -S^^/L fltO€,L&05£ SVIL. p"//\l£', \-S>OSc SoiL. vsbestos Present Chrysotile: AJi>Aj£ Chrysotile: AJOA)^ Chrysotile: Chrysotile: A)dA)C Chrysotile: /^j^/J^ (Type and Percent) Amosite: Amosite: Amosite: Amosite: _ Amosite: " Crocidolite: Crocidolite: CrocldolIte: FbuAiD Crocidolite: f:^A)P Crocidolite: C-^^^lj) Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: ' )ther Fibrous CTrgnuloscL> tf?llUl63tr3 Percent Total Asbestos Present in ^2 'j ample 0% 01 01 01 Remarks U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 60 UESTVIEU ST., LEXINGTON. HA 02173 PROJECT NO. T T IOE5TZ)0/Ayec5 SAMPLES rP^/n 4 ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS Page I^S ORi Art Wing, OSC, ESD SF DATE: ]3 , ]uL 0 /U S ANALYST; HOWARD DAVIS iSEPA 60 Westview St. exington, MA 02173 Analytical Method;PLM with Dispersion Staining '^t-t-c-K3 All Quantities Are Estimated Volume Percent Laboratory ID No. 4l Sample ID No. 55-4) 55-^-0 55-45" Address or Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Stratford Sites Building Stratford, CI Stratford, CI Strotford, CI locatIon ^R^J/f7A^lC 5/^/^-7 £" S^^E Sample Appearance 5i?^ Asbestos present ^rysotile:'::?7^/^Ct:r Chrysoti le:^^;)^£^ Chrysotile AjdA)£ (Type and Percent) Amosite: Amosite: Amosi te: CrocldolIte: Crocidolite: f^UA)P Crocidolite: FOl4VT> Other: Other: Other: Other Fibrous. :euut _ CCsmUoseTj} Materials Present lineral wool: Mineral Wool: (Type and Percent) Other: Other: Non-Fibrous Materials SAAJV, 6rM vet) /Ju/m^ S\A)l> y /^u/y)ii> S^AJP, J2S€>7^ ) /JiiA^u > | 54A;Z> T-^jy, Htu^m ^ Present Percent Total Asbestos Present in Sample 0% ,0?. 0?. Remarks r/f/?^e U.S. ENVIRONHENTAL PROIECTION AGENCY 60 UESTVIEU ST., LEXINGTON. MA 02173 PROJECT NO. ''V^^^-\OIO/fif^C-^ SAMPLES Fpj)Ui