DOCSLIB.ORG

ANAGNOSTOU PRINT.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANAGNOSTOU PRINT.Indd SINCE THE TURN OF THE MILLENNIUM, the European Court of OF HUMAN RIGHTS HUMAN OF COURT EUROPEAN THE Human Rights has been the transnational setting for a European-wide ‘rights revolution’. One of the most remarkable characteristics of the European Convention of Human Rights and its highly acclaimed judicial tribunal in Strasbourg is the extensive obligations of the contracting states to give observable effect to its judgments. This book explores the domestic execution of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments and dissects the variable patterns of implementation within and across states. It also relates how marginalised individuals, civil society and minority actors strategically take recourse in the Strasbourg Court to challenge state laws, policies and practices. These bottom-up dynamics influencing the domestic implementation of human rights have been little explored in the scholarly literature until now. By adopting an inter-disciplinary perspective, this volume seeks to go beyond the existing, mainly legal and descriptive studies and contributes to the flourishing scholarship on human rights, courts and legal processes, by Edited and their consequences for national politics. Dia Anagnostou is Assistant Professor of Comparative Politics, in THE EUROPEAN COURT Panteion University of Social Sciences, and Senior Research Fellow at the Hellenic Foundation of European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) in Dia Anagnostou Athens. She is a co-editor of Rights in Pursuit of Social Change: Legal OF HUMAN RIGHTS Mobilisation in the Multi-Level European System (2013). Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy Edited by Dia Anagnostou Cover image: All Distances by Holly Van Hart, Oil painting on canvas, 38" x 18", www.hollyvanhart.com. Cover design: riverdesign.co.uk ISBN 978-0-7486-7057-4 www.euppublishing.com The European Court of Human Rights Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy Edited by Dia Anagnostou AANAGNOSTOUNAGNOSTOU PPRINT.inddRINT.indd iiiiii 226/03/20136/03/2013 111:531:53 © in this edition, Edinburgh University Press, 2013 © in the individual contributions is retained by the authors Edinburgh University Press Ltd 22 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LF www.euppublishing.com Typeset in 10/12pt Goudy Old Style by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire, and printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon CR0 4YY A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 0 7486 7057 4 (hardback) ISBN 978 0 7486 7058 1 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 0 7486 7059 8 (epub) ISBN 978 0 7486 7060 4 (Amazon ebook) The right of the contributors to be identifi ed as authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. AANAGNOSTOUNAGNOSTOU PPRINT.inddRINT.indd iivv 226/03/20136/03/2013 111:531:53 Contents The contributors vii Acknowledgements ix Introduction: Untangling the domestic implementation of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments 1 Dia Anagnostou PART I: INSTITUTIONAL DYNAMICS OF DOMESTIC IMPLEMENTATION 1. The interrelationship between domestic judicial mechanisms and the Strasbourg Court rulings in Germany 27 Sebastian Müller and Christoph Gusy 2. Between political inertia and timid judicial activism: the attempts to overcome the Italian ‘implementation failure’ 49 Serena Sileoni 3. The reluctant embrace: the impact of the European Court of Human Rights in post-communist Romania 71 Dragos, Bogdan and Alina Mungiu-Pippidi PART II: LEGAL MOBILISATION AND THE POLITICAL CONTEXT OF IMPLEMENTATION 4. European human rights case law and the rights of homosexuals, foreigners and immigrants in Austria 97 Kerstin Buchinger, Barbara Liegl and Astrid Steinkellner 5. Political opposition and judicial resistance to Strasbourg case law regarding minorities in Bulgaria 122 Yonko Grozev 6. Under what conditions do national authorities implement the European Court of Human Rights’ rulings? Religious and ethnic minorities in Greece 143 Dia Anagnostou and Evangelia Psychogiopoulou 7. A complicated affair: Turkey’s Kurds and the European Court of Human Rights 166 Dilek Kurban and Haldun Gülalp AANAGNOSTOUNAGNOSTOU PPRINT.inddRINT.indd v 226/03/20136/03/2013 111:531:53 vi The European Court of Human Rights 8. The European Court of Human Rights and minorities in the United Kingdom: catalyst for change or hollow rhetoric? 188 Kimberley Brayson and Gabriel Swain 9. Politics, courts and society in the national implementation and practice of European Court of Human Rights case law 211 Dia Anagnostou List of European Court of Human Rights judgments and European Commission on Human Rights cases 232 Index 238 AANAGNOSTOUNAGNOSTOU PPRINT.inddRINT.indd vvii 226/03/20136/03/2013 111:531:53 The contributors Dia Anagnostou (PhD Comparative Politics) is an assistant professor in the Department of Public Administration, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences and a senior research fellow at the Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) in Athens. Dragos, Bogdan is a practising lawyer who has worked in the Romanian delegation at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Kimberley Brayson is a postgraduate research student at Queen Mary, University of London. She is working on a doctoral thesis on human rights and Muslim women in Europe. Kerstin Buchinger (PhD Legal Studies) is a law clerk at the Austrian Constitutional Court. Before that, she was a legal researcher at the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights in Vienna with a research focus on asylum law and anti-discrimination issues. Yonko Grozev is a legal expert on human rights and programme director of the Centre for Liberal Strategies in Sofi a. Haldun Gülalp is Professor of Political Science and director of the Center for Global Studies at Yıldız Technical University in Istanbul. Christoph Gusy is Professor of Public Law, Constitutional Law and Constitutional History at Bielefeld University. Dilek Kurban (MA, JD Columbia Law School) is a researcher and pro- gramme offi cer at the Democratization Program of the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV) in Istanbul. Barbara Liegl (MA Political Science) is Resident Twinning Adviser for the project ‘Establishing a Comprehensive System of Anti-discrimination Protection’ in Zagreb, Croatia, on behalf of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights (Vienna). Sebastian Müller (PhD Human Rights Law) is a member of the Faculty of Law at Bielefeld University. Alina Mungiu-Pippidi is Professor of Democracy Studies at the Hertie School of Governance in Berlin. AANAGNOSTOUNAGNOSTOU PPRINT.inddRINT.indd vviiii 226/03/20136/03/2013 111:531:53 viii The European Court of Human Rights Evangelia Psychogiopoulou (PhD European Law) is a research fellow at the Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) in Athens. Serena Sileoni (PhD Public Comparative Law) is a lecturer in public law at the Faculty of Political Science and a research fellow in constitutional law at the Faculty of Economics, University of Florence. Astrid Steinkellner (MA Legal Studies) is a legal researcher at the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights in Vienna on the topics of human rights in development cooperation and business and European human rights protection. Gabriel Swain has worked as a researcher and consultant for the Council of State Governments, an American think tank. AANAGNOSTOUNAGNOSTOU PPRINT.inddRINT.indd vviiiiii 226/03/20136/03/2013 111:531:53 Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the generous fi nancial support provided by the European Commission’s 6th Framework Programme, which funded the research for this volume as part of the JURISTRAS project (‘The Strasbourg Court, Democracy and Human Rights: Patterns of Litigation, State Implementation and Domestic Reform’, contract no. FP6-028398, 2006–9). Further information on the project’s fi ndings can be found at http://www.juristras.eliamep.gr. I would like to especially thank Angela Liberatore, the European Commission’s project offi cer, whose enthusiastic support for the subject of this research was from the start and throughout the project extremely encouraging and motivating. This book was originally conceived at a project meeting in Strasbourg in June 2009 where its basic structure was also defi ned. As so commonly happens with collective volumes, it has taken much longer to complete it than was originally planned, partly due to some unpredictable setbacks along the way. Since then, the rapidly increasing case law of the European Court of Human Rights and changes in the state of execution of the judgments under study necessitated substantial and constant updating of the country-based chapters. I would like fi rst of all to thank the contributors to this volume, who have sustained an unmitigated interest in and commitment to this book project during its lengthy process of preparation. They were extremely responsive throughout our collaboration, being willing to revise their chap- ters a number of times without losing their patience or temper. I would also like to thank John Watson, commissioning editor at Edinburgh University Press, who believed in the value of this book project from the beginning, and his excellent support team, among them Rebecca Mackenzie, project manager, and Eddie Clark, managing desk editor. Special thanks go to the artist Holly van Hart from the San Francisco Bay area, who once again has kindly given her permission to use one of her paintings, All Distances, for the book cover. Even though we have never met in person, her paintings formed the bridge that brought us into contact, reifying their underlying concept about how we are all connected across nations, dis- tances, time and cultures. The bulk of the editorial and writing work on my part was completed during a Marie Curie fellowship at the Law Department of the European University Institute in Florence in 2010–12. It provided a highly stimulating and conducive environment for thinking about human rights in Strasbourg AANAGNOSTOUNAGNOSTOU PPRINT.inddRINT.indd iixx 226/03/20136/03/2013 111:531:53 x The European Court of Human Rights and Europe, as well as an ideal place for research and writing, for which I can only be grateful.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working Paper No
    Working Paper No. 641 Researching legal mobilisation and lawfare Jeff Handmaker February 2019 ISSN 0921-0210 The International Institute of Social Studies is Europe’s longest-established centre of higher education and research in development studies. On 1 July 2009, it became a University Institute of the Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR). Post-graduate teaching programmes range from six- week diploma courses to the PhD programme. Research at ISS is fundamental in the sense of laying a scientific basis for the formulation of appropriate development policies. The academic work of ISS is disseminated in the form of books, journal articles, teaching texts, monographs and working papers. The Working Paper series provides a forum for work in progress which seeks to elicit comments and generate discussion. The series includes academic research by staff, PhD participants and visiting fellows, and award-winning research papers by graduate students. Working Papers are available in electronic format at www.iss.nl/en/library Please address comments and/or queries for information to: Institute of Social Studies P.O. Box 29776 2502 LT The Hague The Netherlands or E-mail: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents ABSTRACT 4 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 LEGAL MOBILISATION AS AN AREA OF RESEARCH 6 2.1 Social movements and law-based advocacy 6 2.2 Justifying and managing legal mobilisation 7 3 A LEGAL MOBILISATION LENS 9 3.1 Legal mobilisation vs. lawfare 10 3.2 Legal mobilisation as a legitimate political claim 11 3.3 Legal mobilisation as an analytical tool 12 3.3.1 Civic actors have the capacity to challenge the state 13 3.3.2 Civic actors are translators 13 3.3.3 The relevance of structural bias 14 4 EMPIRICAL POSSIBILITIES FOR APPLYING A LEGAL MOBILISATION ANALYTICAL LENS 16 REFERENCES 17 3 Abstract Law-based, civic-led advocacy has long been an important means for addressing rule of law deficits and problems of development and governance more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Justice Series
    ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ETHIOPIA: Towards an Inventory of Issues Editors Pietro S. Toggia (Prof.) Thomas F. Geraghty (Prof.) Kokebe W. Jemaneh Center for Human Rights Addis Ababa University May 2014 Access to Justice Series Contents Acknowledgement About the Editors Notes on Contributors Acronyms Introduction Part I: Rethinking The Ethiopian Justice System 1. Reconsidering Access to Justice in Ethiopia: Towards A Human Rights-Based Approach Kokebe Wolde Jemaneh 2. Access to Constitutional Justice in Ethiopia Adem Kassie Abebe 3. Petitioning the Executive in Ethiopia: Trends, Implications and Propriety of Institutionalizing Petitioning Kinfe Michael Yilima & Tadesse Melaku Part II: Engaging Customary Dispute Resolution Mechanisms to Enhance Access to Justice 4. Improving Access to Justice through Harmonization of Formal and Customary Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Assefa Fiseha 5. The Role of Traditional and Informal Justice Systems in Promoting Access to Justice in Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Study of South Africa, Uganda and Ethiopia Wondimagegne Gebre Fantaye Part III: National Human Rights Institutions and Access to Justice 6. National Human Rights Institutions and Access to Justice: The Role and Practice of Ethiopian Human Rights Commission in Advancing Access to Justice Mohammed Abdo Part IV: The Role of Legal Literacy in Enhancing Access to Justice 7. Effective Access to Justice through Legal Literacy in Ethiopia. Pietro Toggia Part V: Access to Justice for the Disadvantaged and Vulnerable 8. Disability and Access to Criminal Justice System in Ethiopia. Muradu Abdo 9. Beyond Legal Aid: CLPC‘s Experience in Providing Comprehensive Services to Realize Access to Justice for Children. Fasika Hailu Afterword Index Select Bibliography Acknowledgment The Center for Human Rights is deeply grateful to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs who enabled the publication of this book by providing financial assistance including publication costs and honoraria for contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting the Neoliberal Order Through Legal Mobilisation: the Case of Chilean Unions
    Journal of Latin American Studies (2020), 1–25 doi:10.1017/S0022216X20000590 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Contesting the Neoliberal Order through Legal Mobilisation: The Case of Chilean Unions Francisca Gutiérrez Crocco* Adjunct Researcher at the Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social (Centre for the Study of Conflict and Social Cohesion, COES), Santiago, Chile, and Assistant Professor at the Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Alberto Hurtado (UAH), Santiago, Chile. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 22 November 2016; revised 31 August 2019; accepted 18 September 2019) Abstract Scholars interested in labour in Latin America have traditionally paid little attention to trade unions’ legal mobilisation. However, the increasing number of legal complaints filed by workers with labour ministries and/or the courts in countries like Argentina, Brazil and Chile calls for a more serious debate on the role that trade unions play in this process. This article focuses on the Chilean case. Drawing on various sources, it shows that Chilean unions have turned legal complaints into a weapon to gain more rights and curb employers’ power. This process has involved the strongest and most combative unions, and is due to two historical conditions: (1) the obstacles placed in the way of suc- cessful resort to more disruptive tactics; (2) the increase in institutional opportunities to report infringements of the law. Overall, the article challenges the current image of the Chilean unions by foregrounding their agency and their achievements over the last decade. Keywords: trade unions; labour movement; legal mobilisation; labour courts; Dirección del Trabajo (Chilean Labour Office); Chile Introduction Over the past three decades, most Latin American countries have moved towards a market economy, which has negatively impacted workers’ rights and the power of labour movements.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is an Accepted Manuscript of an Article Published by Taylor
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology on 8 July 2014, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14442213.2014.916341?journalCode=rtap 20 Legal Mobilisation and Justice: Insights from the Constitutional Court Case on International Standard Schools in Indonesia Andrew Rosser and Jayne Curnow University of Adelaide Abstract Analysis of the role of courts in shaping access to justice in Indonesia has emphasised the role of judges and the incentives created for them by courts’ institutional design. Alternatively, it has focused on individual justice-seekers and their capacities to choose between alternative pathways through the legal repertoire. In this paper, we suggest that ‘support structures for legal mobilisation’ (SSLMs) have also played an important role in shaping access to justice by influencing both the potential for legal mobilisation and the type of justice sought. In making this argument, we focus on a recent Constitutional Court case on ‘international standard schools’. In this case, a group of parents were able to mobilize for legal action only because NGOs provided the required technical expertise and financial resources while the central involvement of an anti-corruption NGO in the SSLM shifted the focus from parents concerns about discrimination to corruption. Keywords: Access to Justice, Indonesia, legal mobilisation, international standard schools Acknowledgements We wish to thanks the Australian Research Council for funding the research on which this paper is based through grant number FT110100078 and Laurens Bakker, Jaap Timmer and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Law, Power & Inequality
    HC LAW Honours Summer Course Law, Power & Inequality: Global Perspectives June 19 – 28 at Leiden Law School, the Netherlands 5 ECTS - 3 US Credits The course will be graded on a pass or fail basis Short description In this international and interdisciplinary summer course, we will pay attention to the question what the law has accomplished in different countries across the world. Those in support of the law and legal reasoning have promised many things —the spread of human rights and the rule of law, the elimination of discrimination and the protection of the vulnerable, the lure of economic development and the fostering of global trade, endowments of human dignity and restraints on economic rapacity. Yet, its critics observe law as an instrument for repression, hegemonic control and infringements on privacy and intrusive surveillance - in the context of a never-ending and ubiquitous ‘war against terror’ - as a weapon against free speech or political opposition, as a tool of economic exploitation and domination, and as a retreat from politics. As we aim to explore during this summer honours course, the reality will be somewhere in between. Law and legal norms, whether they’re state or non-state issued norms, can result in both positive and negative things. And these results can differ for different groups within society, but also between different societies and different countries. We will engage law's promises and law's pathos in domestic and transnational contexts, through sessions addressing the roles of law in the war on terror, in land tenure, in emancipation and protection of the world's most vulnerable populations, and in law's relationships with religions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Activism: Creating Legal and Social Change for Children in Immigration Detention
    THE POWER OF ACTIVISM: CREATING LEGAL AND SOCIAL CHANGE FOR CHILDREN IN IMMIGRATION DETENTION SANDY SANDHYA JACKSON A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SYDNEY LAW SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY 2020 ABSTRACT In February 2019, the Australian government announced that there were no longer any children in offshore immigration detention. The influence of the Australian refugee advocacy movement on this outcome is important to understand because of its relevance to the global refugee crisis in which children continue to be detained across the world. My thesis examines how the Australian refugee advocacy movement has tried to create legal and social change for children in immigration detention using strategic litigation and grassroots advocacy. Cases are analysed to critically evaluate the success of lawyers in the courtroom to challenge an intransigent government determined to pursue its harsh policies. The mass mobilisation of activists and their efforts to shift public and political opinion are also examined. Drawing on the wider socio‐legal literature and notably the work of McCann, the integrated legal mobilisation framework is proposed. It consists of capabilities and practical grassroots strategies, and provides an in‐depth and evidenced way of understanding the influence of the Australian refugee advocacy movement in helping to achieve the release of children from immigration detention. Data from 41 interviews from refugee advocacy groups, activists, lawyers, doctors, journalists, bureaucrats, policy advisors, and politicians are used to evaluate how the capabilities and strategies have been used by the refugee advocacy movement to help create legal and social change for children in immigration detention.
    [Show full text]
  • 31. Contesting Migration Governance Through Legal Mobilization Leila Kawar
    http://dx.doi.org/10.7302/1095 31. Contesting migration governance through legal mobilization Leila Kawar INTRODUCTION How does the field of law matter in the governance and politics of migration? Over the past four decades, as immigration has emerged as one of the most pressing and polarizing areas of policymaking in both developed and developing economies, a large and growing sub-field of social science research has addressed human movement across borders and the political reac- tions such movements create. Yet on the Question of who wields influence over immigration matters, the focus of attention tends to be directed to legislative politics and the exercise of executive discretion rather than to activity in court (but see discussion of liberal constraint thesis, Natter in this volume, Chapter 9). When the juridical world does make an appearance in studies of immigration politics, it is discussed primarily in terms of judicial rulings that override policies enacted by the other branches. For example, studies of immigration politics acknowledge that massive immigration control sweeps, such as the US Government’s “Operation Wetback” in the early 1950s, “would be illegal today, given court decisions that have enhanced the rights of immigrants” (Andreas 2004: 34). Similarly, the constitution of a European immigration policy domain beginning in the mid-1980s has been described as an effort by national immigration officials “to regain the discretion taken away by courts” (Guiraudon 2003: 264). As these two illustrations show, studies of immigration politics generally pay attention to legal interventions only in passing and only to the extent that judicial review places limits on the more important political action that takes place in other venues of policymaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Complexity: Law, Social Movements and Political Violence Colm Campbell
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Journal of International Law 2007 Deadly Complexity: Law, Social Movements and Political Violence Colm Campbell Ita Connolly Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Campbell, Colm and Connolly, Ita, "Deadly Complexity: Law, Social Movements and Political Violence" (2007). Minnesota Journal of International Law. 14. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Journal of International Law collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cite as: 16 MINN. J. INT'L L. 265 War on Terror Symposium A Deadly Complexity: Law, Social Movements and Political Violence Colm Campbell & Ita Connolly* The increasing quagmire of the "war on terror" casts doubt on the legal devises that were employed to rationalise it. This is especially the case in Iraq, and is true both in relation to the international use of force and anti-terrorist legal discourse. With regards to the latter, some argue for a recalibration of state response within the parameters of existing discourse (suggesting for instance, that some kind of better 'balance' needs to be struck between the interests of protecting society and upholding human rights). This article suggests that the problem lies deeper-that the simplistic structure of dominant anti- terrorist legal discourse obscures the complexity of law's role in the interactions of the state and its violent challengers; and that dominant 'anti-terrorist' legal discourse may contribute to the increasingly obvious problem of counter production in the state of exception.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Legal Empowerment to Curb Corruption and Advance Accountability
    U4 Issue 2020:4 Using legal empowerment to curb corruption and advance accountability By Stephen Golub Series editor: Monica Kirya Disclaimer All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies. Partner agencies Australian Government – Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade – DFAT German Corporation for International Cooperation – GIZ German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development – BMZ Global Affairs Canada Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark / Danish International Development Assistance – Danida Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency – Sida Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation – SDC The Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation – Norad UK Aid – Department for International Development About U4 U4 is a team of anti-corruption advisers working to share research and evidence to help international development actors get sustainable results. The work involves dialogue, publications, online training, workshops, helpdesk, and innovation. U4 is a permanent centre at the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) in Norway. CMI is a non- profit, multi-disciplinary research institute with social scientists specialising in development studies. www.U4.no [email protected] Cover photo UN Women (CC by-nc-nd) https://www.flickr.com/photos/unwomen/31338225398/ Keywords accountability - basic services - citizen engagement - civil society - governance - health sector - human rights - legal empowerment - legal instruments - public sector - sustainable development goals Publication type U4 Issue Creative commons This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Legal empowerment refers to the use of laws and rights to increase relatively powerless populations’ control over their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilising the Law: Environmental Ngos in Court
    Mobilising the law: Environmental NGOs in court LISA VANHALA the use of strategic litigation is an important way for Dr Lisa Vanhala was a British Academy Postdoctoral engaged civil society actors to influence public policy and Fellow 2010-2012 at the University of Oxford and at participate in governance processes. They see the role of NGOs as two-fold: first, protecting the (legal) interests of University College London. She is now Lecturer in the ‘voiceless elements in nature’, and second, advocating Politics at the Department of Political Science and for changes to a system that they see as inherently biased School of Public Policy, University College London. towards the interests of business and developers to ensure Her research on legal mobilisation in the UK was that access to environmental justice is affordable, fair and published in Law & Society Review in September effective. By its critics, legal mobilisation efforts empower ‘non-democratic’ NGOs and ‘unaccountable’ judges vis-à- 2012. With Professor Chris Hilson, she organised a vis majoritarian institutions, such as legislatures, thus British Academy workshop and roundtable on undermining democracy. This article, while focusing on ‘Climate Change Litigation and Policy’ in April 2012. the empirics and theory of legal mobilisation by the The symposium resulting from the workshop was environmental movement, sheds some light on this debate. One part of my British Academy Postdoctoral published in Law & Policy in July 2013. Fellowship examined how the environmental movement in the United Kingdom has mobilised the law over the last twenty years.2 Two questions motivate the research Originally published in 1972, Christopher Stone’s presented here: to what extent have environmental NGOs environmental treatise Should Trees Have Standing? served mobilised the law in the UK, and have they been as a rallying cry for the then budding environ-mental ‘successful’ in doing so? movement in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Lisa C Vanhala Department Of
    Dr Lisa C Vanhala Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy, University College London 29/30 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9QU, Tel: 07914 044003 [email protected] TEACHING AND RESEARCH EXPERIENCE University College London (UCL), Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy Director of Research (2018-present) Reader (now Associate Professor) in Political Science (2017-present) Senior Lecturer in Political Science (2014-2017) Lecturer in Political Science (2012-2014) University of California, Berkeley, Center for the Study of Law and Society/Boalt Law School Visiting Scholar (2015) Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Paris Invited Professor (2011 and 2014) University of Oxford, Centre for Socio-legal Studies (CSLS) Associate Fellow (2011-2016) British Academy Post-doctoral Fellowship (2010-2011) London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), Centre for the Study of Human Rights Economic and Social Research Council Post-doctoral Fellow (2009) EDUCATION University of Oxford, Nuffield College and Department of Politics (2006-2008) DPhil in Political Science, Clarendon Fund Scholar (full-funding) Supervisor: Dr Katrin Auel Thesis title: Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization in Canada and the United Kingdom University of Oxford, Hertford College (2003-2005) Distinction in the MPhil in Politics: European Politics and Society (the first student in the history of the programme to achieve a distinction) Supervisor: Professor R. Daniel Kelemen Thesis title: European Litigation Strategies, Equality Activists and EU Anti-Discrimination Law McGill University, Montreal, Canada (1999-2003) First Class Honours B.A. in Political Science, Minor in French. L’Institut d’Études Politiques (Sciences Po), Paris, France (2001-2002) Diplôme du Programme International PUBLICATIONS Book Making Disability Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization in Canada and the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Mobilisation As a Societal Response to Violence Lessons from Michoacán Salvador Maldonado, Iran Guerrero and Pilar Domingo October 2019
    Briefing note Legal mobilisation as a societal response to violence Lessons from Michoacán Salvador Maldonado, Iran Guerrero and Pilar Domingo October 2019 • This ODI Briefing Paper explores how local organisations and associations have used legal mobilisation strategies to counter extreme violence in the state of Michoacán in Mexico, with a particular focus on three vulnerable groups: families of victims of forced disappearances; victims Key messages of sexual and gender-based violence; and sex workers. • All three groups have used various means of legal mobilisation to seek justice, protect their interests and reduce their vulnerability. While these efforts have secured some notable achievements, they have also faced substantial challenges and limitations. • International efforts to support legal mobilisation by vulnerable groups in contexts of extreme violence should invest in greater cross-fertilisation of evidence on societal responses to violence in both crime- and conflict-related settings. Context-specific histories of violence need to be fully understood in order to identify where and how efforts to support survivors of different forms of violence can be best directed. • Including gendered experiences of violence sheds light on often invisible forms of violence that are shrouded in silence or go unreported. Power asymmetries shape vulnerabilities to different forms of violence, intersecting in complex ways across class, ethnicity and ideology. • It is important to be realistic about what can be achieved through legal mobilisation, and what is politically possible given prevailing power asymmetries and interests. Introduction advocacy, awareness-raising, social and political mobilisation, and the use of public space to Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG 16) is a advance their objectives.
    [Show full text]