George Municipality Submission on Energy Efficiency

• ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN THE CITIES OF THE SOUTHERN CAPE KAROO BY : GEORGE MUNICIPALITY PRESENTED BY : KEVIN GRűNEWALDT : CARLO VAN WYK : LANDILE SHEMBE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE : ENERGY 5 SEPTEMBER 2012 CITY ENERGY SUPPORT UNIT

• AGENDA • 1. RENEWABLE ENERGY – THE GEORGE WAY – CARLO VAN WYK • 2. ESKOM – ENERGY EFFICIENCY / DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT • 3. CITY ENERGY SUPPORT UNIT’S ROLE – ANDREW JANISCH • 4. IMPLIMENTATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY – CARLO VAN WYK • 5. COMPARISON OF GRAPHS FOR THE 5 MUNICIPALITIES • 6. 2009/2010 – 2011/2012 : LESSONS LEARNED • 7 2012/2013 – 2015/2016 : MORE ENERGY EFFICIENCY • 8. CONCLUSION HOST CITY GEORGE

1. RENEWABLE ENERGY – THE GEORGE WAY – CARLO VAN WYK

• 1.1 GEORGE MUNICIPALITY STATEMENT • - TO BE SELF SUFFICIENT REGARDING ENERGY BY 2030 • - ENERGY AGREEMENTS IN PLACE WITH HESSEQUA BIOMASS : GEORGE : 8 MW : CEF SOLAR ENERGY: ESKOM TEST 7DEMONSTRATION : 500 KW : GEIPP BIOGAS ENERGY : GWAING : 500 KW : GEIPP SOLAR ENERGY : GWAING : 5 MW : GEIPP

• - ENERGY AGREEMENTS IN PLACE WITH ESKOM / REBID SOLAR ENERGY : VARIOUS : 10 MW

• 1.2. ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES AT ALL THE GEORGE HOST CITY GEORGE

SHAREHOLDING IN RED 1

RED’S ARE DEAD WE ARE NOW CALLED A CITY HOST CITY GEORGE

2. ESKOM – ENERGY EFFICIENCY / DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT

WAS PRESENTED BY ESKOM – LODINE REDELINGHUIS HOST CITY GEORGEA

Western Cape Draft Integrated Recovery Plan

SOUTHERN CAPE / KAROO AREA

ILME MALHERBE : CUSTOMER EXECUTIVE 15 MAY 2006 HOST CITY GEORGE

3. CITY ENERGY SUPPORT UNIT’S ROLE – ANDREW JANISCH

WAS PRESENTED BY SEA HOST CITY GEORGE

4. IMPLIMENTATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY – CARLO VAN WYK THE CITY WAY HOST CITY GEORGE

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENERGY EFFICIENCY

RENEWABLE ENERGY IN :

1. GEORGE MUNICIPALITY : KEVIN GRUNEWALDT 2. MOSSELBAAI MUNICIPALITY : DICK NAIDOO 3. HESSEQUA MUNICIPALITY : ETIENNE STEYN 4. BITOU MUNICIPALITY : LAWRENCE MSIBI 5. KANNALAND MUNICIPALITY : JULIUS HERFURTH

• 4.1. BUSINESS PLANS • Mossel Bay Municipality - Mr Dick Naidoo • George Municipality - Mr Kevin Grunewaldt • Bitou Municipality - Mr Lawrence Msibi Hessequa Municipality - Mr Etienne Steyn • Kannaland Municipality - Carlo van Wyk • • 4.2. FUTURE BUSINESS PLANS

• Beafort west Municipality - Mr Roelof van staden • Oudtshoorn Municipality - Mr Corrie Greef • Stellenbosch Municipality - Mr Joe Hames Drakenstein Municipality - Mr Micheal Rhode • West Coast District Municipality - Mr Nic Faasen • 4.2. Planning Meeting held on 9 June 2009 Maphuti Legodi: Acting Director, Energy Efficiency, DOE • 4.3 2010/2011;2011/2012 Allocations

2010/2011

• 4.3.1 MOSSEL BAY MUNICIPALITY R 6 M R 8 M 2011/2012 • 4.3.2 GEORGE MUNICIPALITY R 6 M R 8 M

• 4.3.3 HESSEQUA MUNICIPALITY R 6 M R 8 M

• 4.3.4 BITOU MUNICIPALITY R 6 M R 8 M

• 4.3.5 KANNALAND MUNICIPALITY R 6 M R 8 M • 4.4. DORA Requirements / Energy Efficiency

• • The mission of the DOE's Energy Efficiency Directorate is to develop measures to promote energy saving, reduce the negative impact of energy use on the environment, reduce energy costs to the economy, contribute towards sustainable development, and to achieve a national energy policy. • DOE's vision is to optimise energy sector development through efficient utilisation, production and consumption of energy resources.

• 4.4.1 THE ESKOM GRID • 4.4.2 LOAD PROFILE : PROTEUS MONTHLY WEEKLY • 4.4.3 MOSSEL BAY MUNICIPALITY • 4.4.4 GEORGE MUNICIPALITY • 4.4.5 BITOU MUNICIPALITY • 4.4.6 HESSEQUA MUNICIPALITY • 4.4.6 KANNALAND MUNICIPALITY 4.5 ESKOM GRID 5.2 A:PROTEUS 400/132 kV : LOAD PROFILE :MONTHLY

500

400

300

200

100

0 1 17 33 49 65 81 97 113 129 145 161 177 193 209 225 241 257 273 289 305 321 337 353 369 385 401 417 433 449 465 481 497 513 529 545 561 5.2 B :PROTEUS : 400 /132 kV LOAD PROFILE : WEEKLY

400

360

320

280

240

200

160

120

0 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 141 146 151 156 161 166 5.3 Mossel Bay Municipality:

MOSSEL BAY MUNICIPALITY Municipal Electricity Consumption Breakdown (DEC 2009)

*Only fill‐in coloured cells Losses Streetlights 6% 5% MWh % Residential (mid‐hi income) 118,270 37.3% Residential (mid‐ Residential (low income) 26,974 8.5% hi income) 38% Commercial 23,694 7.5% Agric 418 0.1% Industrial 113,703 35.8% Streetlights 15,564 4.9% Industrial 36% Losses 18,829 5.9% Total 317,452 100%

ESKOM PURCHASES 317,452 Agric Residential (low 0% Commercial income) 7% 8% 5.3 Mossel Bay Municipality:

TECHNOLOGY NUMBER OF COST ESTIMATE SAVINGS ( KVA) SAVINGS ( kWh) MONTHLY MONTHLY

Retrofit Street lighting 500 R 1 000 000 500 kVA 244,081 Retrofit Street lighting 7000 R 9 000 000 3 000 kVA 1 464,486 Retrofits 25 R 5 000 000 2 660 kVA 1 298,777 Pump efficiency 0 R 0 000 000 0 000 kVA 0 /Telemanagement/Solar Geysers TOTAL 2009/2010 R 15 000 000 6 160 kVA 3,007,075

Retrofit Street lighting 250 R 500 000 250 kVA 122,040 Retrofit Street lighting 800 R 2 000 000 1 000 kVA 976,322 Retrofits 15 R 3 000 000 1 500 kVA 1,220,400 Pump efficiency 5 R 500 000 500 kVA 244,081 /Telemanagement/Solar Geysers TOTAL 2010/2011 R 6 000 000 3 250 kVA 2 562,843

Retrofit Street lighting 600 R 1 500 000 750 kVA 366,120 Retrofit Street lighting 650 R 1 500 000 750 kVA 366,120 Retrofits 15 R 3 000 000 1 500 kVA 1,220,400 Pump efficiency 20 R 2 000 000 2 000 kVA 1,464,484 /Telemanagement/Solar Geysers TOTAL 2011/2012 R 8 000 000 5 000 kVA 3,417,124 Mossel Bay Energy

31,000,000

29,000,000

27,000,000

25,000,000

23,000,000 kWh

21,000,000

19,000,000

17,000,000

15,000,000 AMJ J ASOND J FM 2010 Target 22,113,706 22,604,210 22,522,656 23,538,109 23,583,453 22,012,048 21,972,143 21,674,879 26,086,992 24,142,970 20,873,942 23,493,599 2010 Budget 24,570,784 25,115,789 25,025,173 26,153,455 26,203,837 24,457,831 24,413,492 24,083,199 28,985,547 26,825,523 23,193,269 26,103,998 2009 Actual 23,522,716 24,170,994 23,709,962 25,061,598 24,660,791 22,570,653 23,591,889 23,316,986 28,023,895 24,476,952 22,189,281 24,951,586 Mossel Bay Demand

70,000

60,000

50,000

40,000 kVA 30,000

20,000

10,000

2010 Target 47,355 48,885 49,099 50,271 47,181 43,137 44,521 44,268 52,185 49,480 43,715 47,364 2010 Budget 52,616 54,317 54,554 55,857 52,423 47,930 49,468 49,187 57,983 54,978 48,572 52,626 2009 Actual 50,111 51,730 51,957 53,197 49,927 45,648 46,772 45,699 60,291 55,106 44,294 50,120 NMD 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 Requested NMD 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 5.3 George Municipality: 5.3 George Municipality:

TECHNOLOGY NUMBER OF COST ESTIMATE SAVINGS ( KVA) SAVINGS ( kWh) MONTHLY MONTHLY

Retrofit Street lighting 500 R 1 000 000 500 kVA 244,081 Retrofit Street lighting 400 R 1 000 000 500 kVA 244,081 Retrofits 10 R 2 000 000 1 000 kVA 976,322 Pump efficiency /Telemanagement/Solar Geysers TOTAL 2009/2010 R 4 000 000 2 000 kVA 1,464,484

44,000,000

42,000,000

40,000,000

38,000,000 kWh

36,000,000

34,000,000

32,000,000

30,000,000 AMJ J ASOND J FM 2010 Target 33,188,139 36,713,681 35,461,759 37,166,168 37,979,483 34,830,086 36,116,646 35,060,721 34,909,653 35,320,197 33,089,256 35,999,834 2009 Actual 35,535,838 39,302,442 37,964,919 39,785,869 39,694,792 37,290,054 38,543,731 36,702,048 36,524,132 36,248,564 35,713,378 38,539,785 2010 Budget 36,875,711 40,792,979 39,401,955 41,295,743 42,199,426 38,700,095 40,129,607 38,956,357 38,788,503 39,244,663 36,765,840 39,999,816 George Demand (kVA)

90,000

85,000

80,000

75,000 kVA

70,000

65,000

60,000 AMJ J ASOND J FM 2010 Target 72,082 79,530 72,745 74,142 74,171 73,662 68,159 67,201 67,983 70,240 65,590 71,215 2009 Actual 77,011 84,968 77,719 79,212 79,243 78,699 78,467 76,634 73,909 78,870 77,864 76,085 2010 Budget 80,091 88,367 80,828 82,380 82,413 81,847 75,732 74,668 75,537 78,045 72,878 79,128 NMD 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 5.5 Bitou Municipality:

BITOU MUNICIPALITY Municipal Electricity Consumption Breakdown (DEC 2008)

*Only fill‐in coloured cells Losses 9% Streetlights Residential (mid‐ MWh % 7% hi income) Residential (mid‐hi income) 35,417 29.8% 30% Residential (low income) 10,226 8.6% Commercial 10,424 8.8% Agric 3,365 2.8% Industrial 39,865 33.5% Streetlights 8,737 7.4% Losses 10,802 9.1% Industrial Residential (low Total 118,836 100% 33% income) 9% ESKOM PURCHASES 108,034 Commercial Agric 9% 3% 5.5 Bitou Municipality:

TECHNOLOGY NUMBER OF COST ESTIMATE SAVINGS ( KVA) SAVINGS ( kWh) MONTHLY MONTHLY

12,000,000

11,000,000

10,000,000

9,000,000 kWh 8,000,000

7,000,000

6,000,000

5,000,000 AMJ J ASOND J FM 2010 Target 7,969,0 8,008,5 8,667,5 9,768,0 9,068,0 8,705,7 8,405,7 8,078,5 9,801,3 8,967,6 7,624,3 8,000,0 2010 Budget 8,854,5 8,898,3 9,630,6 10,853, 10,075, 9,673,0 9,339,7 8,976,1 10,890, 9,964,0 8,471,4 8,888,8 2009 Actual 8,353,3 8,394,6 9,085,4 10,239, 9,505,2 9,125,4 8,811,0 8,468,0 10,274, 9,400,0 7,991,9 8,385,7 Bitou Demand

40,000

35,000

30,000

25,000

kVA 20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

- 2010 Target 20,885 22,575 20,200 22,062 18,518 18,977 18,686 18,047 23,643 24,477 16,390 23,505 2010 Budget 23,206 25,084 22,444 24,514 20,575 21,086 20,763 20,052 26,270 27,197 18,211 26,116 2009 Actual 22,313 24,119 21,581 23,571 19,784 20,275 19,964 19,281 25,260 26,151 17,511 25,112 NMD 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 26,200 Requested NMD 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 33,700 5.5 Hessequa Municipality: 5.5 Hessequa Municipality:

TECHNOLOGY NUMBER OF COST ESTIMATE SAVINGS ( KVA) SAVINGS ( kWh) MONTHLY MONTHLY

Retrofit Street lighting 500 R 1 000 000 500 kVA 244,081 Retrofit Street lighting 400 R 1 000 000 500 kVA 244,081 Public Building Retrofits 10 R 2 000 000 1 000 kVA 976,322 Pump efficiency /Telemanagement/Solar Geysers TOTAL 2009/2010 R 4 000 000 2 000 kVA 1,464,484

Retrofit Street lighting 250 R 500 000 250 kVA 122,040 Retrofit Street lighting 800 R 2 000 000 1 000 kVA 976,322 Public Building Retrofits 15 R 3 000 000 1 500 kVA 1,220,400 Pump efficiency 5 R 500 000 500 kVA 244,081 /Telemanagement/Solar Geysers TOTAL 2010/2011 R 6 000 000 3 250 kVA 2 562,843

Retrofit Street lighting 600 R 1 500 000 750 kVA 366,120 Retrofit Street lighting 650 R 1 500 000 750 kVA 366,120 Public Building Retrofits 15 R 3 000 000 1 500 kVA 1,220,400 Pump efficiency 20 R 2 000 0002 000 kVA 1,464,484 /Telemanagement/Solar Geysers TOTAL 2011/2012 R 8 000 000 4 000 kVA 3,417,124

5.6 Kannaland Municipality:

KANNALND MUNICIPALITY Municipal Electricity Consumption Breakdown (DEC 2008)

*Only fill‐in coloured cells Losses Streetlights 8% Residential (mid‐ 4% hi income) MWh % 26% Residential (mid‐hi income) 12,683 26.1% Residential (low income) 3,200 6.6% Commercial 5,985 12.3% Agric 2,092 4.3% Industrial 18,698 38.4% Streetlights 2,150 4.4% Residential (low income) Industrial Losses 3,850 7.9% 7% 39% Total 48,658 100%

Commercial ESKOM PURCHASES 48,658 12% Agric 4% 5.6 Kannaland Municipality:

TECHNOLOGY NUMBER OF COST ESTIMATE SAVINGS ( KVA) SAVINGS ( kWh) MONTHLY MONTHLY

High mast lighting 1 1.18 kVA 300 Flood light lighting 32R 2 500 000 18.82 kVA 4800 Retrofit Street lighting 839 27.02 kVA 2043 Retrofit Public Building 3 R 1 500 000 211.76 kVA 81000 TOTAL 2009/2010 R 4 000 000 316.78 kVA 107 687

Retrofit Public Buildings 5 R 3 500 000 301 kVA 153839 Pump/Telemanagement 15 R 500 000 150 kVA 73224 efficiency Solar Geysers 70 R 1 800 000 1 240 kVA 420 000 Power factor correction 1 R 200 000 200 kVA 67741 TOTAL 2010/2011 R 6 000 000 1 891 kVA 714804

Retrofit Public Buildings 8 R 4 000 000 562.6kVA 215744 Pump/Telemanagement 25 R 2 000 000 600 kVA 292896 efficiency Solar Geysers 40 R 1 000 000 700 kVA 237096 Public lighting (Homes) 5000 R 1 000 000 336 kVA 129000 TOTAL 2011/2012 R 8 000 000 2 198 kVA 874736

6. 2009/2010 -2011/2012

GEORGE MUNICIPALITY HAVE PROVEN BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT THAT ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMBINED WITH LOAD MANAGEMENT AND FUTURE RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION IS THE BEST WAY TO SOLVE THE POWER SHORTAGES IN SOUTH AFRICA.

THE TOTAL MAXIMUM DEMAND HAVE DECREASED FROM :

85 MW IN 2009 – 78 MW IN 2012

THE TOTAL ENERGY USAGE HAVE DECREASED FROM :

84 000 MWh in 2009 – 78 000 MWh in 2012 7. 2013/2014 -2015/2016

GEORGE MUNICIPALITY HAVE PROVED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND NATIONAL TREASURY THAT THE FUNDS HAVE BEEN SPENT ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY TECHNOLOGIES WITH PROVEN SAVINGS THAT WAS VERIFIED BY AN INDEPENDENT M&V SPECIALIST.

THIS IS BY FAR THE CHEAPEST WAY TO DEFER THE BUILDING OF NEW POWER STATIONS.

SEE ATTACHED BUSINESS PLANS FOR :

2013/2014 : R 6 M 2014/2015 : R 6 M 2015/2016 : R 6 M 8. Summation and Closure

THE END

THANK YOU