Laboratory Information Systems Project Management: a Guidebook for International Implementations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

NOTE: This edition of the Guidebook was published in November 2018. The May 2019 Guidebook is the most recent version. ® ® Laboratory Information Systems Project TM TM Management: A Guidebook for International Implementations November 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This publication has been a multi-year, multi-country collaborative effort. APHL would like to thank participants at LIS trainings in South Africa and Uganda for their feedback. Multiple teams developed and reviewed this Guidebook over several months: Core Development Team: The St. John Group/Srinath Remala, Reshma Kakkar, Michelle Meigs, Patina Zarcone and Bob Bostrom. Core Review Team: Michelle Meigs, Jan Flowers, Garrett Peterson, Paul Jankaus- kas, Kim Lewis, Solon Kidane and Kenneth Landgraf. Second Review Team: Ava Onalaja, Sherrie Staley, Samantha Dittrich, Ralph Tim- peri, Rufus Nyaga, Fredrick Mwasekaga, Aika Mongi and Thomas Nyongesa. Final Review Team: Lucy Maryogo-Robinson, Eric Blank, Patina Zarcone and Rachelle Jones. A special thanks to APHL In-Country Informatics Staff for sharing their experiences, the APHL Com- munications Team for additions to the LIMS data provided in this publication, and Halima Jenkins for her diligence with design and layout. FUNDING This publication was 100% funded with federal funds and supported by Cooperative Agreement #NU60OE000103 from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 8 LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEMS (LIS) OVERVIEW ........................................... 10 THE BASICS ................................................................................................................. 11 LIS VS. LIMS ......................................................................................................................................11 WHY LABORATORIES NEED A DEDICATED LIS ........................................................... 14 TYPES OF LIS ...................................................................................................................................14 DETERMINING NEED ..........................................................................................................................16 LIS CONCERNS, PROCESSES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ..........................................................................16 LIS BENEFITS AND CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ...................................................................17 CORE FUNCTIONS OF AN LIS ....................................................................................... 18 PRE-ANALYTICAL ..............................................................................................................................18 ANALYTICAL ......................................................................................................................................18 POST ANALYTICAL .............................................................................................................................20 UNDERSTANDING AND MANAGING DATA ........................................................................................................ 22 COLLECTING AND USING DATA ...........................................................................................................22 THREE MAIN TYPES OF DATA USE .......................................................................................................23 EXAMPLES OF VALUABLE DATA USE ...................................................................................................23 STORING DATA (OLTP & OLAP) ...........................................................................................................24 APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE .............................................................................................................24 USE OF DATA BY ROLE ............................................................................................... 25 STARTING A NATIONAL LIS PROGRAM ...................................................................... 26 VISION, MISSION AND DEFINING SUCCESS ................................................................ 27 DISCUSSION POINTS FOR DEFINING SUCCESS ...................................................................................28 BUY-IN ......................................................................................................................... 29 PROGRAM/PROJECT CHARTER ...........................................................................................................29 BUSINESS CASE ................................................................................................................................30 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/ TEAM STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION ..................................................................... 31 PROJECT SPONSOR ..........................................................................................................................34 LIS TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP .......................................................................................................34 THE LIS TWG PARTICIPANTS ..............................................................................................................34 LIS PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM ...................................................................................................35 LIS TASK FORCE/SUBCOMMITTEE ......................................................................................................35 IMPLEMENTING PARTNER .................................................................................................................36 STRATEGIC PLANNING ............................................................................................... 37 PURPOSE .........................................................................................................................................37 SUMMARY AND EXAMPLES OF LIS STRATEGIC PLAN ...........................................................................39 IMPLEMENTATION OF LIS AS A NATIONAL PROGRAM ............................................... 40 IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH ............................................................................................................40 APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................................................................44 EXPANSION .......................................................................................................................................47 MONITORING AND EVALUATION.................................................................................. 48 INDICATOR MONITORING EXAMPLE AT FOUR LABORATORIES PRE- AND POST-LIS IMPLEMENTATION ...............................................................................................49 ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................................................50 SAMPLE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY RESULTS 6 MONTHS AND 12 MONTHS POST IMPLEMENTATION (%) ..................................................................50 USE OF DATA TO SUPPORT PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE ................................................................................ 51 NATIONAL LAB PROGRAM CENTRAL DATABASE ..................................................................................52 CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNED ..............................................................................................53 SUSTAINABILITY: ENHANCEMENTS AND EXPANSION ................................................ 54 FINANCIAL .........................................................................................................................................54 LIS COST ESTIMATES .........................................................................................................................55 DEVELOPMENT OF AN IT HUMAN RESOURCE PLAN FOR LIS DEPLOYMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT AND BUILDING CAPACITY ...............................................57 DEVELOPMENT OF A HARDWARE MAINTENANCE PLAN: REPLACE OUTDATED AND/OR MALFUNCTIONING HARDWARE, TROUBLESHOOTING ............................................58 CREATING VALUE ..............................................................................................................................59 LIS AS A PROJECT IN A LABORATORY ...................................................................... 60 ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................................................ 61 SITE ASSESSMENTS ..........................................................................................................................61 WORKFLOW ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................................62 SCOPE ......................................................................................................................... 63 LIS FUNCTIONAL AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 65 STANDARDIZATION ..................................................................................................... 68 INTERFACING WITH LABORATORY INSTRUMENTS ...................................................
Recommended publications
  • Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm

    Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm

    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/25094 SHARE Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm DETAILS 380 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-47517-4 | DOI 10.17226/25094 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Jeffrey R. Botkin, Michelle Mancher, Emily R. Busta, and Autumn S. Downey, Editors; Committee on the Return of Individual-Specific Research Results Generated in Research Laboratories; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Health and FIND RELATED TITLES Medicine Division; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm Jeffrey R. Botkin, Michelle Mancher, Emily R. Busta, and Autumn S. Downey, Editors Committee on the Return of Individual-Specific Research Results Generated
  • Information Management Technology

    Information Management Technology

    Information Management Technology 12 May 2006 | News Image not found or type unknown Information Management Technology Laboratory informatics has a much broader application area-scientific research from drug discovery to production. Information science or "informatics" is the science of information. It is often studied as a branch of computer science and information technology and is related to database, ontology and software engineering. Informatics is primarily concerned with: Creating and structuring data Management, storage and retrieval of data Distribution and transfer of information Informatics is about the transformation of information by computation or communication; by machines or people. It is the intersection of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, computing science and related fields. Informatics focuses on understanding business or scientific research challenges and applying information technology as the solution-tackling the problem first rather than technology first. It combines software applications, search technology, database storage and tools for digitally-enabled collaboration. Laboratory informatics Laboratory informatics is the specialized application of information technology to maximize laboratory operations, particularly in analytical, production and research and development. Laboratory informatics encompasses data acquisition, data processing, data analysis and long-term archiving, electronic laboratory notebooks, laboratory information management, laboratory automation, scientific data management, document
  • Türk Akreditasyon Kurumu

    Türk Akreditasyon Kurumu

    TÜRK AKREDİTASYON KURUMU REFERANS DOKÜMAN LİSTESİ Yürürlük Tarihi: Reference Document List Validity 09.01.2017 İlgili Bölüm: Kalite Yönetim Sistemi (Genel) Related Department Doküman Yayın Numarası Tarihi Tanımı Description Document Number Date of Issue Uygunluk Değerlendirmesi — Uygunluk Değerlendirmesi Yapan TS EN ISO/IEC 2006 Kuruluşları Akredite Eden Akreditasyon Kuruluşları İçin Genel 17011 Şartlar General Requirements for Bodies Providing Assessment and ISO 17011 2004 Accreditation of Conformity Assessment Bodies EA Multilateral Agreement Criteria for signing Policy and EA 1/06 A-AB 2015 procedure for development EA Procedure and Criteria For the Evaluation of Conformity EA 1/22 2016 Assessment Schemes by EA Accreditation Body Members EA 2/02 2016 EA Policy and Procedures for the Multilateral Agreement EA 2/13 2012 EA Cross Frontier Policy for Cooperation between EA Members EA 2/17 2016 EA Document on Accreditation for Notification Purposes EA conditions for the use of accreditation symbols, text EA 3/01 2012 reference to accreditation and MLA signatory status Use of Proficiency Testing as a Tool for Accreditation in EA 3/04 2001 Testing IAF ML 2 2016 General Principles for Use of the IAF MLA Mark IAF/ILAC A5 2013 IAF/ILAC Multi-Lateral Mutual Recognition Arrangements (Arrangements): Application of ISO/IEC 17011:2004 Cross Frontier Accreditation - Principles for Avoiding ILAC-G21 2012 Duplication ILAC-G3 2012 Guidelines for Training Courses for Assessors Used by Accreditation Bodies ILAC-G11 2006 ILAC Guidelines on Qualifications
  • Laboratory Informatics Guide 2014

    Laboratory Informatics Guide 2014

    LABORATORY INFORMATICS GUIDE 2014 www.scientific-computing.com/lig2014 FROM THE PUBLISHERS OF subsidiaries. BREAKTHROUGH MOMENT #46 QUERYING YOUR DATA AND INSTANTLY VISUALIZING THE ANSWER © 2011 PerkinElmer, Inc. 400280_06. All trademarks or registered are the property of and/or its Scientifi c breakthroughs don’t happen every day. But with the TIBCO Spotfi re® platform, they just might happen more often. TIBCO Spotfi re® software visualizes your data in stunning, impactful analyses—giving you immediate insights and even answering questions you haven’t posed yet. With such a powerful tool, you can take complete control of your data: • Combine data from multiple sources—chemical structures, text, numbers, images, chemical properties, biological assays, and more. • Identify new relationships, isolate signifi cant outliers, and easily spot trends and patterns. TIBCO Spotfi re® software connects to data sources with just a few clicks—and runs visualizations instantly. It’s that easy. Download your free trial and get started on your next breakthrough today. www.perkinelmer.com/spotfi re-scientifi ccomputingworld Created By: WHM Creative Production: Sarah Pruett / 206.313.1252 Stock: TBD Job: CID3639 PerkinElmer TIBCO Spotfi re Breakthrough Print Ad Inks: CMYK - Match to PMS swatches for PMS299C, PMS 369C, Date: 12/02/13 PMS 423C, PMS 286C, PMS 144C Finish Size: 213mm x 282mm contents | LABORATORY INFORMATICS GUIDE 2014 WELCOME There is a paradox at the heart of this year’s Laboratory Informatics Guide. On the one hand, we have an article showing how technology developed for the consumer market can help drive down costs and improve efficiencies in the work of the analytical laboratory.
  • Preparation for the Accreditation According to ISO 15189: a Quality Folder Realization

    Preparation for the Accreditation According to ISO 15189: a Quality Folder Realization

    MOJ Bioorganic & Organic Chemistry Research Article Open Access Preparation for the accreditation according to ISO 15189: A quality folder realization Abstract Volume 2 Issue 2 - 2018 The quality manual is a quality guideline which is imposed to all medical laboratories Marouane Nasser,1 Tijane M’hamed,1 Narjis which are ISO 15189 certified. In order to meet the standard requirements, we have Badrane,2 Soulaymani Rachida Bencheikh,2 El elaborated a quality manual. This approach will enable the mastery of all LAB- 2 CAPM (laboratory of toxicology and Pharmacology of the Center of Poison Control Bouazzi Omaima and Pharmacovigilance of Morocco) specific activities and as well optimize their 1Laboratory of biochemistry and immunology of Faculty of realization. This article describes the methodology, the means used and the advantages Sciences, University Mohammed-V, Morocco 2 of elaborating a quality manual in the context of an ISO 15189 accreditation procedure. Laboratory of toxicology and pharmacology of the Center of In order to ensure this, we have developed several points in this article, starting with Poison Control and Pharmacovigilance of Morocco, Morocco the presentation of the ISO 15189 standard, its requirements and topics, in the second Correspondence: Nasser Marouane, Laboratory of chapter we described the standards used in the accreditation of ISO 15189. The quality biochemistry and immunology of Faculty of Sciences, University manual: imposed by ISO 15189 “describe the content of a quality manual according to Mohammed-V, Morocco, Email [email protected] the ISO15189 standard. In results and discussion we presented the quality manual that we realized within the LAB-CAPM.
  • Handbook for Good Clinical Laboratory Practices in Pakistan, Created by the Pakistan Academy of Sciences (PAS) in Cooperation with the U.S

    Handbook for Good Clinical Laboratory Practices in Pakistan, Created by the Pakistan Academy of Sciences (PAS) in Cooperation with the U.S

    In cooperation with The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine THE PAKISTAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES This activity was supported by the Pakistan Academy of Sciences, the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and the U.S. State Department. The Pakistan Academy of Sciences is solely responsible for this publication and the contents are the responsibility of the individual chapter authors. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-578-46481-7 Additional copies of this report are available from the Pakistan Academy of Sciences. Copyright 2019 by the Pakistan Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Suggested Citation: Pakistan Academy of Sciences. 2019. Good Clinical Laboratory Practices in Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan. Printed by Shiuman Design & Print, Blue Area, Islamabad-Pakistan Price: $15; PKR 1500 Good Clinical Laboratory Practices in Pakistan Preface & Acknowledgements The Handbook for Good Clinical Laboratory Practices in Pakistan, created by the Pakistan Academy of Sciences (PAS) in cooperation with the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), is intended to serve as an informational guide for clinical laboratories in order to improve the health and wellbeing of people and animals in Pakistan. Promotion of laboratory best practices and communication between and among laboratories is the best way to enhance disease surveillance and to help establish the relationships that keep experts engaged with the international community of responsible practitioners working
  • Informatics Self-Assessment Tool for Public Health Laboratories 2013 Suggested Citation

    Informatics Self-Assessment Tool for Public Health Laboratories 2013 Suggested Citation

    Informatics Self-Assessment Tool for Public Health Laboratories 2013 Suggested Citation Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Laboratory Efficiencies Initiative: Informatics Self-Assessment Tool for Public Health Laboratories. Silver Spring, MD; APHL; 2013. http://www.aphl.org/aphlprograms/lss/Laboratory-Efficiencies-Initiative/Pages/Informatics.aspx This publication was supported by Cooperative Agreement # U60HM000803 from CDC and/or Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC and/or Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. Funding for the program was funded 100% from federal funds. Table of Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 1 CA 5: Prescheduled Testing ....................................................................... 29 Description ...................................................................................... 29 Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 Guidance Statement ........................................................................ 29 The Laboratory Efficiencies Initiative (LEI) ........................................... 2 Capability Area 5 ............................................................................. 30 Tool Development Process ...............................................................
  • Indian Standardizations Landscape “Priority Sectors – Automotive, Electrical Equipment Including Consumer Electronics, Smart City, ICT

    Indian Standardizations Landscape “Priority Sectors – Automotive, Electrical Equipment Including Consumer Electronics, Smart City, ICT

    Indian Standardizations Landscape “Priority Sectors – Automotive, Electrical Equipment including Consumer Electronics, Smart City, ICT 0 | P a g e Contents 1. Context …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 2. Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………….5 3. Indian Standardization Bodies ……………………………………………………………………………8 3.1. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) .............................................................................. 8 3.2. Telecommunication Standards Development Society for India (TSDSI) .................... 21 3.3. Telecommunication Engineering Centre (TEC) ......................................................... 26 4. New Approach / Initiatives (Project Priority Sectors) ………………………………………..33 4.1 New Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Bill 2016 ...................................................... 33 4.2 BIS Rules, 2017 ....................................................................................................... 35 4.3 BIS Conformity Assessment Regulations, 2017 ........................................................ 36 4.4 National Intellectual Property Rights Policy ............................................................ 36 4.5 Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and their availability on Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms ........................................................................ 37 4.6 A National Telecom M2M Roadmap, IoT policy & Telecom Regulator (TRAI) recommendation ..................................................................................................
  • 2017 Informatics Resource Guide

    2017 Informatics Resource Guide

    The Lab Manager INFORMATICS RESOURCE GUIDE Things to Think About Before Buying a Lab Informatics System BY RYAN ACKERMAN Considering the Cloud BY JOHN JOYCE, PhD LIMS: Flexible Data Management BY MIKE MAY, PhD 20 To LIMS or Not to LIMS? 17 BY ANGELO DEPALMA, PhD Product Focus: Electronic Laboratory Notebooks BY ANGELO DEPALMA, PhD Informatics Resource Guide 2017 Things to Think About Before Buying a Lab Informatics System Modern informatics systems come in a variety of different types and configurations to suit any researcher’s needs By Ryan Ackerman A LABORATORY INFORMATICS INTEGRATION TIP When integrating a new informatics solution into your lab, one thing you’ll want to make sure of is that the variety of instruments in your lab will be compatible with the new software. Make a list of your lab’s equipment and do your research to make sure it will work with the new informatics platform before you start. How does the scale (size, people, and processes) How will increases in scope or scale determine affect the ideal informatics set-up? which informatics system should be used? Modern informatics systems come in a variety of different types and Increases in scope or scale can bring up many fears for most configurations to suit any researcher’s needs. If you are part of a small laboratories. Failing to meet compliance, having a system which is research lab that works out of a single location with only a few tests, no longer fit for the purpose, or having an informatics system which using a hardware-based solution may be best.
  • ISO 9001, Quality Management Systems — Requirements

    ISO 9001, Quality Management Systems — Requirements

    Task Name [1] ISO 9001, Quality management systems — Requirements [2] ISO 9004, Quality management systems — Guidelines for performance improvements [3] ISO 10002, Quality management — Customer satisfaction — Guidelines for complaints handling in organ. [4] ISO 10005, Quality management systems — Guidelines for quality plans [5] ISO 10006, Quality management systems — Guidelines for quality management in projects [6] ISO 10007, Quality management systems — Guidelines for configuration management [7] ISO 10012, Measurement management sys — Requirements for measu. processes and measuring equipment [8] ISO/TR 10013, Guidelines for quality management system documentation [9] ISO/TR 10014, Guidelines for managing the economics of quality [10] ISO 10015, Quality management — Guidelines for training [11] ISO/TR 10017, Guidance on statistical techniques for ISO 9001:2000 [12] ISO 19011, Guidelines for quality and/or environmental management systems auditing [13] ISO/IEC Guide 62, General requirements for bodies operating assessment and certification/registration TSE ISO Guide 73 Risc Management SA 8000 Social Accountability Standard ISO 8402:1994, Quality management and quality assurance-Vocabulary. ISO 10011-1:1990, Guidelines for auditing quality system-Part 1: Auditing. ISO/IEC Guide 2:1996, Standardization and related activities-General vocabulary. ISO/IEC Guide 7:1994, Guidelines for drafting of standards suitable for use for conformity assessment. ISO/IEC Guide 23:1982, Methods of indicating conformity with standards for third-party certification systems. ISO/IEC Guide 25:1990, General requirements for the competence of calibration and testing laboratories. ISO/IEC Guide 27:1983, Guidelines for corrective action to be taken by a certification body in the event of misuse of its mark of conformity.
  • Approaches to Quality Management and Accreditation in a Genetic Testing Laboratory

    Approaches to Quality Management and Accreditation in a Genetic Testing Laboratory

    European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, S1–S19 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/10 www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Approaches to quality management and accreditation in a genetic testing laboratory Sarah Berwouts1,3, Michael A Morris2,3 and Elisabeth Dequeker*,1,3 Medical laboratories, and specifically genetic testing laboratories, provide vital medical services to different clients: clinicians requesting a test, patients from whom the sample was collected, public health and medical-legal instances, referral laboratories and authoritative bodies. All expect results that are accurate and obtained in an efficient and effective manner, within a suitable time frame and at acceptable cost. There are different ways of achieving the end results, but compliance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189, the international standard for the accreditation of medical laboratories, is becoming progressively accepted as the optimal approach to assuring quality in medical testing. We present recommendations and strategies designed to aid genetic testing laboratories with the implementation of a quality management system, including key aspects such as document control, external quality assessment, internal quality control, internal audit, management review, validation, as well as managing the human side of change. The focus is on pragmatic approaches to attain the levels of quality management and quality assurance required for accreditation according to ISO 15189, within the context of genetic testing. Attention is also given to implementing efficient and effective quality improvement. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, S1–S19; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2010.104 Keywords: accreditation; quality system; quality management; genetic testing; ISO 15189; recommendations INTRODUCTION system (QMS).
  • Laboratory Informatics and the Laboratory Information System

    Laboratory Informatics and the Laboratory Information System

    1 Laboratory Informatics and the Laboratory Information System DANIEL F. COWAN The primary objective of clinical laboratorians is to provide the highest possible quality of service to patients and those who care for patients. High-quality ser- vice encompasses accurate and precise analysis, timely, clear, and concise report- ing, and delivery of the service to a location in a format most valuable to the user of the service. Quality has also come to include elements of efficiency, effective- ness, analysis of diagnostic utility, and decision support.1,2 Delivery of the ser- vice has come to mean that integration into a comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR) is to be expected.3,4 Although it is widely accepted that about 70% of the information used in the management of patients comes from the clinical and anatomical pathology laboratories,5 in one large medical center in which information flow is tracked, about 94% of requests to the EMR are for laboratory results.4 In addition, a critical quality feature is the transformation of laboratory data into information.2,5,6–8 Drives for improved quality, integration, and efficiency have resulted in the incorporation of information technology and the personnel, policy, and proce- dural changes needed to exploit the technology into the clinical service labora- tory.9–11 This applies equally well to anatomic and clinical pathology. It seems clear enough that the managers of laboratory operations must understand infor- mation, the purpose of information, and the proper management of information in order to survive and prosper in an environment that demands an orientation to service and a full appreciation for the inter-relationship between processes and events.