DOCSLIB.ORG

Stool Testing Support Guide Genova Diagnostics Stool Support Guide Table of Contents Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stool Testing Support Guide Genova Diagnostics Stool Support Guide Table of Contents Introduction Stool Testing Support Guide Genova Diagnostics Stool Support Guide Table of Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................................................3 Biomarker Comparison Charts ................................................................................................4-5 GI Effects Results Overview ...........................................................................................................6 Functional Imbalance Scores ....................................................................................................7 Therapeutic Support Options ..................................................................................................7 GI Effects Commensal Microbiome Analysis .........................................................................8 Commensal Abundance ..........................................................................................................8 Total Commensal Abundance ............................................................................................8 Relative Commensal Abundance ......................................................................................8 Commensal Dysbiosis Patterns ...........................................................................................9 REFLEX Inflammation-Associated Dysbiosis (IAD) Score ..........................................................9 Methane Score .........................................................................................................................9 BLASTOCYSTIS Dysbiosis Zones Graphic ......................................................................................................9 SUBTYPING Commensal Balance ................................................................................................................10 Reference Variance Score ...................................................................................................10 1-9: Healthy-Pattern Continuum ..............................................................................................10 Digestion and Absorption ...........................................................................................................11 N-BUTYRATE Pancreatic Elastase 1 ...........................................................................................................11-12 DIG Products of Protein Breakdown (Putrefactive Short Chain Fatty Acids) ................13 Fecal Fats .................................................................................................................................14-15 Chymotrypsin ...............................................................................................................................15 Meat and Vegetable Fibers ......................................................................................................16 Inflammation and Immunology ................................................................................................17 COMMENSAL Calprotectin ..................................................................................................................................17 O&P Eosinophil Protein X ...................................................................................................................18 BACTERIA Fecal secretory IgA .....................................................................................................................19 ZONULIN Fecal Lactoferrin ..........................................................................................................................20 Gastrointestinal Microbiome .....................................................................................................21 FAMILY Metabolic Indicators ...............................................................................................................22 PEPTIDE Short chain fatty acids ..................................................................................................22-23 Beta-glucuronidase ..............................................................................................................24 RELATIVE pH ...............................................................................................................................................25 Secondary Bile Acids ............................................................................................................26 ABUNDANCE Commensal Bacteria ...............................................................................................................27 GASTROINTESTINAL PCR Commensal Bacteria ............................................................................................28-29 Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio ........................................................................................30 MICROBIOMEFECAL Dysbiosis ..................................................................................................................................30 Clinical Associations Charts ........................................................................................31-32 LACTOFERRIN Bacteriology and Mycology ................................................................................................33 Bacteriology and Mycology Culture...............................................................................33 Bacteriology and Mycology Sensitivities...............................................................34-35 Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) Prep for Yeast ..................................................................35 Pathogenic Bacteria Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (Add-on only) ........................36 Parasitology ................................................................................................................................37 Microscopic ova and parasites (O&P) .....................................................................37-38 PCR Parasitology - Protozoa ..............................................................................................39 EIA Parasitology .....................................................................................................................40 Macroscopic Exam for Worms ..........................................................................................40 Therapeutic Considerations for Parasitology .......................................................40-41 ReflexBlastocystis subtyping 1-9 .............................................................................41-44 Additional tests.................................................................................................................................45 Occult Blood .................................................................................................................................45 Zonulin Family Peptide (Add-on only) ................................................................................45 References ....................................................................................................................................46-52 2 INTRODUCTION Advances in research, combined with clinical insight, confirm the essential role of the gut in determining overall health and wellness. Genova’s stool profiles offer a comprehensive evaluation of GI function paired with the broadest clinical utility available. It is important that clinicians possess these tools since they provide the most accurate and comprehensive assessment of gastrointestinal health. Genova’s line of stool testing provides immediate actionable clinical information for gastrointestinal health management. Utilizing both advanced technologies and premier biomarkers, the GI Effects Stool Profiles and CDSA/CDSA 2.0 Profiles offer valuable insight into digestive function, intestinal inflammation, as well as the gastrointestinal microbiota. Our tests are designed to identify potential root causes of symptoms. They assist clinicians by providing targeted therapeutics that improve symptoms and overall gut health. In addition to providing a comprehensive set of GI functional biomarkers, our stool profiles incorporate the most sophisticated tools in evaluating the microbial community of the GI tract, known as the microbiota. Genova uses multiple methodologies to provide the most clinically accurate assessment of bacteria, yeast, and parasites currently available on the market. The GI Effects Profiles include quantitative assessment of commensal bacteria to determine healthy bacterial balance based on research and analysis of hundreds of thousands of patient results. This data-driven, evidence-based analysis establishes a firm foundation from which to base clinical decisions and treatment. Lastly, the GI Effects utilizes an innovative scoring system that synthesizes the biomarker findings and groups them into 5 key areas relating to GI function: maldigestion, inflammation, dysbiosis, metabolite imbalance, and infection. This allows for clearer visualization of patterns among biomarkers. Protocol design and management of abnormal GI function through dietary, lifestyle, nutraceutical, and other relevant interventions are thus enhanced. 3 Gut Pathogen Prole GI Effects® Biomarkers Comparison Table 2200* 2205* 2207* *Not Available in New York Digestion and Absorption Pancreatic Elastase-1 • Products of Protein Breakdown (Total) (Valerate+Isobutyrate+Isovalerate) • Fecal Fat (Total) • Triglycerides • Long Chain Fatty Acids • Cholesterol • Phospholipids • Inflammation and Immunology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Utility of the Digital Rectal Examination in the Emergency Department: a Review
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1196–1204, 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. Printed in the USA 0736-4679/$ - see front matter http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.06.015 Clinical Reviews UTILITY OF THE DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A REVIEW Chad Kessler, MD, MHPE*† and Stephen J. Bauer, MD† *Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center and †University of Illinois-Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois Reprint Address: Chad Kessler, MD, MHPE, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown Veterans Hospital, 820 S Damen Ave., M/C 111, Chicago, IL 60612 , Abstract—Background: The digital rectal examination abdominal pain and acute appendicitis. Stool obtained by (DRE) has been reflexively performed to evaluate common DRE doesn’t seem to increase the false-positive rate of chief complaints in the Emergency Department without FOBTs, and the DRE correlated moderately well with anal knowing its true utility in diagnosis. Objective: Medical lit- manometric measurements in determining anal sphincter erature databases were searched for the most relevant arti- tone. Published by Elsevier Inc. cles pertaining to: the utility of the DRE in evaluating abdominal pain and acute appendicitis, the false-positive , Keywords—digital rectal; utility; review; Emergency rate of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) from stool obtained Department; evidence-based medicine by DRE or spontaneous passage, and the correlation be- tween DRE and anal manometry in determining anal tone. Discussion: Sixteen articles met our inclusion criteria; there INTRODUCTION were two for abdominal pain, five for appendicitis, six for anal tone, and three for fecal occult blood.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.04.26 Fecal Analysis in the Diagnosis of Intestinal Dysbiosis and Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    MEDICAL POLICY – 2.04.26 Fecal Analysis in the Diagnosis of Intestinal Dysbiosis and Irritable Bowel Syndrome BCBSA Ref. Policy: 2.04.26 Effective Date: July 1, 2021 RELATED MEDICAL POLICIES: Last Revised: June 8, 2021 None Replaces: N/A Select a hyperlink below to be directed to that section. POLICY CRITERIA | DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS | CODING RELATED INFORMATION | EVIDENCE REVIEW | REFERENCES | HISTORY ∞ Clicking this icon returns you to the hyperlinks menu above. Introduction Intestinal dysbiosis is a condition that occurs when the microorganisms in the digestive tract are out of balance. This condition is believed to cause diseases of the digestive tract, including poor nutrient absorption, overgrowth of certain bacteria, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Symptoms of these digestive problems are similar and may include: abdominal pain, excess gas, bloating, and changes in bowel movements (constipation or diarrhea, or both). One method of diagnosing digestive disorders is by testing a fecal sample. Using fecal analysis to diagnose intestinal dysbiosis, IBS, malabsorption, or small intestinal overgrowth of bacteria is unproven (investigational). More studies are needed to see if this testing improves health outcomes. Note: The Introduction section is for your general knowledge and is not to be taken as policy coverage criteria. The rest of the policy uses specific words and concepts familiar to medical professionals. It is intended for providers. A provider can be a person, such as a doctor, nurse, psychologist, or dentist. A provider also can be a place where medical care is given, like a hospital, clinic, or lab. This policy informs them about when a service may be covered.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH-SENSITIVITY GUAIAC-BASED FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TEST (HSGFOBT) Anyone Can Get Colon Cancer
    GET SCREENED: DETECT ANDDETECT PREVENT AND PREVENT COLON CANCER COLON CANCER TEST TYPE: HIGH-SENSITIVITY GUAIAC-BASED FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TEST (HSGFOBT) Anyone can get colon cancer. It can affect people of all racial and ethnic groups. Routine screening can help your health care provider find cancers earlier, when they are easier to treat. Screening may also prevent cancer, by finding and removing polyps or abnormal growths from the colon. COLON CANCER SCREENING There are different test options for screening. Talk with your provider to choose FACT SHEET the test that’s right for you. WHO? Adults who are at average risk for colon WHERE? You do this test at home. cancer may have an HSgFOBT. Talk with your health WHY? HSgFOBT detects signs of colon and rectal care provider about your risk and what age to begin cancer. It can also detect some polyps, which are screening. If you are at an increased risk of colon growths that could become cancer later. cancer, you may need screening early or this test may not be right for you. Discuss your medical and family HOW? You may have a restricted diet starting a medical history with your provider before choosing a few days before the test. You will get a kit from your test. Tell them if you have any of these risk factors: provider with instructions about how to take a sample A history of colon cancer or precancerous polyps of stool from three bowel movements in a row that A parent, sibling or child with colon cancer or you collect into a clean container.
    [Show full text]
  • Unenhanced Areas Revealed by Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal Ultrasonography with Sonazoidtm Potentially Correspond to Colorectal Cancer
    4012 EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 12: 4012-4016, 2016 Unenhanced areas revealed by contrast-enhanced abdominal ultrasonography with SonazoidTM potentially correspond to colorectal cancer MINORU TOMIZAWA1, MIZUKI TOGASHI2, FUMINOBU SHINOZAKI3, RUMIKO HASEGAWA4, YOSHINORI SHIRAI4, MIDORI NORITAKE2, YUKIE MATSUOKA2, HIROAKI KAINUMA2, YASUJI IWASAKI2, KAZUNORI FUGO5, YASUFUMI MOTOYOSHI6, TAKAO SUGIYAMA7, SHIGENORI YAMAMOTO8, TAKASHI KISHIMOTO5 and NAOKI ISHIGE9 Departments of 1Gastroenterology; 2Clinical Laboratory; 3Radiology and 4Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido City, Chiba 284-0003; 5Department of Molecular Pathology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba City, Chiba 260-8670; Departments of 6Neurology; 7Rheumatology; 8Pediatrics and 9Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization, Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Yotsukaido City, Chiba 284-0003, Japan Received September 18, 2015; Accepted September 22, 2016 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3868 Abstract. The present study investigated the potential utility of Introduction contrast-enhanced abdominal ultrasonography (CEUS), using SonazoidTM, in colorectal cancer (CRC). Three patients were Colorectal cancer (CRC) is commonly observed in clinical subjected to CEUS with SonazoidTM. Surgical specimens were settings (1). To improve the prognosis in patients with CRC, immunostained for CD31. Numbers of blood vessels positive prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential. Screening for CRC for CD31 were analyzed in each of five fields at x400 magnifi- is performed using fecal occult blood testing, and is diagnosed cation and averaged to determine blood vessel density. Blood with colonoscopy (2). vessel density was compared between non-tumorous and Abdominal ultrasound (US) is useful for the safe and tumorous areas. Prior to the administration of SonazoidTM, easy diagnosis of patients (3-6). During US screening of the CRC was illustrated as irregular-shaped wall thickening.
    [Show full text]
  • Fatty Acid Diets: Regulation of Gut Microbiota Composition and Obesity and Its Related Metabolic Dysbiosis
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Fatty Acid Diets: Regulation of Gut Microbiota Composition and Obesity and Its Related Metabolic Dysbiosis David Johane Machate 1, Priscila Silva Figueiredo 2 , Gabriela Marcelino 2 , Rita de Cássia Avellaneda Guimarães 2,*, Priscila Aiko Hiane 2 , Danielle Bogo 2, Verônica Assalin Zorgetto Pinheiro 2, Lincoln Carlos Silva de Oliveira 3 and Arnildo Pott 1 1 Graduate Program in Biotechnology and Biodiversity in the Central-West Region of Brazil, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79079-900, Brazil; [email protected] (D.J.M.); [email protected] (A.P.) 2 Graduate Program in Health and Development in the Central-West Region of Brazil, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79079-900, Brazil; pri.fi[email protected] (P.S.F.); [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (P.A.H.); [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (V.A.Z.P.) 3 Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79079-900, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-67-3345-7416 Received: 9 March 2020; Accepted: 27 March 2020; Published: 8 June 2020 Abstract: Long-term high-fat dietary intake plays a crucial role in the composition of gut microbiota in animal models and human subjects, which affect directly short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production and host health. This review aims to highlight the interplay of fatty acid (FA) intake and gut microbiota composition and its interaction with hosts in health promotion and obesity prevention and its related metabolic dysbiosis.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Questions and Answers
    16. Questions and Answers 1. Which of the following is not associated with esophageal webs? A. Plummer-Vinson syndrome B. Epidermolysis bullosa C. Lupus D. Psoriasis E. Stevens-Johnson syndrome 2. An 11 year old boy complains that occasionally a bite of hotdog “gives mild pressing pain in his chest” and that “it takes a while before he can take another bite.” If it happens again, he discards the hotdog but sometimes he can finish it. The most helpful diagnostic information would come from A. Family history of Schatzki rings B. Eosinophil counts C. UGI D. Time-phased MRI E. Technetium 99 salivagram 3. 12 year old boy previously healthy with one-month history of difficulty swallowing both solid and liquids. He sometimes complains food is getting stuck in his retrosternal area after swallowing. His weight decreased approximately 5% from last year. He denies vomiting, choking, gagging, drooling, pain during swallowing or retrosternal pain. His physical examination is normal. What would be the appropriate next investigation to perform in this patient? A. Upper Endoscopy B. Upper GI contrast study C. Esophageal manometry D. Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) E. Direct laryngoscopy 4. A 12 year old male presents to the ER after a recent episode of emesis. The parents are concerned because undigested food 3 days old was in his vomit. He admits to a sensation of food and liquids “sticking” in his chest for the past 4 months, as he points to the upper middle chest. Parents relate a 10 lb (4.5 Kg) weight loss over the past 3 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Pancreatitis: What the Clinician Want to Know from Mri
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Magn Reson Manuscript Author Imaging Clin Manuscript Author N Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 August 01. Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018 August ; 26(3): 451–461. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2018.03.012. CHRONIC PANCREATITIS: WHAT THE CLINICIAN WANT TO KNOW FROM MRI TEMEL TIRKES, M.D. Department of Radiology and Clinical Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA Keywords Pancreas; Chronic Pancreatitis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography; Computerized Tomography INTRODUCTION Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a low prevalence disease.1–3 In 2006, there were approximately 50 cases of definite CP per 100,000 population in Olmsted County, MN 3, translating to a total of 150,000–200,000 cases in the US population. Clinical features of CP are highly variable and include minimal, or no symptoms of debilitating pain repeated episodes of acute pancreatitis, pancreatic exocrine and endocrine insufficiency and pancreatic cancer. CP profoundly affects the quality of life, which can be worse than other chronic conditions and cancers.4 Natural history studies for CP originated mainly from centers outside the U.S.5−910,11 conducted during the 1960–1990’s and consisted primarily of males with alcoholic CP. Only one large retrospective longitudinal cohort study has been conducted in the US for patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1976–1982.12 While these data provide general insights into disease evolution, it is difficult to predict the probability of outcomes or disease progression in individual patients.
    [Show full text]
  • American Cancer Society Flufobt Program Implementation Guide for Primary Care Practices
    Health Care Solutions From the American Cancer Society American Cancer Society FluFOBT Program Implementation Guide for Primary Care Practices EIGHTY BY 2018 Reaching 80% screened for colorectal cancer by 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Background Information and Education .................................................................................... 3 Why Have a FluFOBT Program? .................................................................................................. 4 Colorectal Cancer Screening Eligibility ...................................................................................... 5 Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations ....................................................................... 6 Patient Education ......................................................................................................................... 8 How to Set Up Your FluFOBT Program .................................................................................... 10 Staff Training for Your FluFOBT Program ................................................................................ 16 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix A: FluFOBT Components and Logic Model ............................................................ 20 Appendix B: Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • (NCCN Guidelines®) Colorectal Cancer Screening
    NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Colorectal Cancer Screening Version 2.2017 — November 14, 2017 NCCN.org Continue Version 2.2017, 11/14/17 © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2017, All rights reserved. The NCCN Guidelines® and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN® NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2017 Panel Members NCCN Guidelines Index Table of Contents Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussion * Dawn Provenzale, MD, MS/Chair ¤ Þ Michael J. Hall, MD, MS † ∆ Robert J. Mayer, MD † Þ Duke Cancer Institute Fox Chase Cancer Center Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center * Samir Gupta, MD/Vice-chair ¤ Amy L. Halverson, MD ¶ UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Reid M. Ness, MD, MPH ¤ Center of Northwestern University Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Dennis J. Ahnen, MD ¤ University of Colorado Cancer Center Stanley R. Hamilton, MD ≠ Scott E. Regenbogen, MD ¶ The University of Texas University of Michigan Travis Bray, PhD ¥ MD Anderson Cancer Center Comprehensive Cancer Center Hereditary Colon Cancer Foundation Heather Hampel, MS, CGC ∆ Niloy Jewel Samadder, MD ¤ Daniel C. Chung, MD ¤ ∆ The Ohio State University Comprehensive Huntsman Cancer Institute at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital University of Utah Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute Moshe Shike, MD ¤ Þ Gregory Cooper, MD ¤ Jason B. Klapman, MD ¤ Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/ Moffitt Cancer Center University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Thomas P. Slavin Jr, MD ∆ Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig David W. Larson, MD, MBA¶ City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Institute Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Cancer Center Dayna S.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Home Care: Parenteral Nutrition—Part Two
    NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #11 Series Editor: Carol Rees Parrish, M.S., R.D., CNSD Navigating Home Care: Parenteral Nutrition—Part Two by Gisela Barnadas Parenteral nutrition (PN) is often used for patients who are unable to absorb suffi- cient nutrition through the gastrointestinal tract. PN can be safely administered in the home setting with proper assessment and monitoring of the patient. An interdiscipli- nary team approach is used to identify and avoid potential complications, which may occur. This article provides the physician with specific guidelines for evaluating, ordering and monitoring PN therapy in the home patient. It also addresses financial and reimbursement considerations with emphasis on understanding the often con- fusing, Medicare guidelines. CASE 1 • What resources are available to help manage this JR is a 65-year-old female with vascular disease, patient in the home? hypertension, diabetes and history of a hysterectomy. • What resources are there available for the patient? She presents with severe abdominal pain, vomiting and • Will insurance pay for this? diarrhea. A small bowel series documents a bowel obstruction, most likely due to bowel ischemia. Find- Providing total parenteral nutrition in the home ings during surgical intervention included: twisted, (HPN) is by no means a new treatment option. The gangrenous small bowel with multiple adhesions first record of a patient receiving HPN was a 36-year- resulting in resection of her distal jejunum, ileum and old woman with extensive metastatic ovarian carci- right colon, leaving an intact duodenum, approximately noma in 1968.(1) While the exact number of people 100 cm of the jejunum and most of her left colon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Isolation of Novel Lachnospiraceae Strains and the Evaluation of Their Potential Roles in Colonization Resistance Against Clostridium Difficile
    The isolation of novel Lachnospiraceae strains and the evaluation of their potential roles in colonization resistance against Clostridium difficile Diane Yuan Wang Honors Thesis in Biology Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology College of Literature, Science, & the Arts University of Michigan, Ann Arbor April 1st, 2014 Sponsor: Vincent B. Young, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Internal Medicine Associate Professor of Microbiology and Immunology Medical School Co-Sponsor: Aaron A. King, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Ecology & Evolutionary Associate Professor of Mathematics College of Literature, Science, & the Arts Reader: Blaise R. Boles, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology College of Literature, Science, & the Arts 1 Table of Contents Abstract 3 Introduction 4 Clostridium difficile 4 Colonization Resistance 5 Lachnospiraceae 6 Objectives 7 Materials & Methods 9 Sample Collection 9 Bacterial Isolation and Selective Growth Conditions 9 Design of Lachnospiraceae 16S rRNA-encoding gene primers 9 DNA extraction and 16S ribosomal rRNA-encoding gene sequencing 10 Phylogenetic analyses 11 Direct inhibition 11 Bile salt hydrolase (BSH) detection 12 PCR assay for bile acid 7α-dehydroxylase detection 12 Tables & Figures Table 1 13 Table 2 15 Table 3 21 Table 4 25 Figure 1 16 Figure 2 19 Figure 3 20 Figure 4 24 Figure 5 26 Results 14 Isolation of novel Lachnospiraceae strains 14 Direct inhibition 17 Bile acid physiology 22 Discussion 27 Acknowledgments 33 References 34 2 Abstract Background: Antibiotic disruption of the gastrointestinal tract’s indigenous microbiota can lead to one of the most common nosocomial infections, Clostridium difficile, which has an annual cost exceeding $4.8 billion dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • An Osteopathic Approach to Reduction of Readmissions for Neonatal Jaundice
    Osteopathic Family Physician (2013) 5, 17–23 REVIEW ARTICLE An osteopathic approach to reduction of readmissions for neonatal jaundice Rachel Click, DO,a Julie Dahl-Smith, DO,a Lindsay Fowler, DO,a Jacqueline DuBose, MD,a Margi Deneau-Saxton, RN, CCCE, CIMI, CLC, CPD,b Jennifer Herbert, MDc From aGeorgia Health Sciences University, Medical College of Georgia, Department of Family Medicine, GA; bGeorgia Health System, OB Labor and Delivery, GA; and cUniversity Primary Care, Evans, GA. KEYWORDS: Jaundice is a potentially life-threatening condition that continues to affect at-risk newborns, accounting Breastfeeding; for continued hospital readmissions. As family physicians, we should be cognizant of neonates who may Jaundice; be at risk for jaundice, including those with pathologic jaundice as well as newborns of breastfeeding Prevention; mothers, and ensure sufficient intervention is taken to help prevent further elevations in bilirubin levels. Hyperbilirubinemia; Interventions are likely to include evaluation for sepsis, education regarding feeding frequencies for both Neonatal massage breast- and bottle-fed neonates, reviewing maternal and hematologic risk factors for neonatal jaundice, and considering inborn errors of metabolism. An additional measure family physicians may consider is that of neonatal massage for those with elevated bilirubin levels. Neonatal massage, though not widely used, has been proven to promote excess bilirubin excretion, thus decreasing length of hospital stay; all the while, providing an intervention that allows parents to take an active role. r 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction morbidity rate with bilirubin 4 20 mg/dL. “It has been estimated that the risk of kernicterus in infants with total Jaundice is a product of excess bilirubin (a product of serum bilirubin (TSB) greater than 30 mg/dL is about 1 in broken down red blood cells), which manifests as a 7 infants”.1 Less serious complications of hyperbilirubine- yellowing of the skin and eyes.
    [Show full text]