DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern California Wetlands Recovery Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern California Wetlands Recovery Project Southern California Wetlands Recovery Project Celebrating Fifteen Years 15 1 CONTENTS Dear Friends: We are thrilled to be celebrating the accomplishments of the Southern California Wetlands Recovery Project (WRP) since its inception in 1997. To those agencies and scientists who WRP Member Agencies 2 established the WRP, helped develop and manage the projects funded by the WRP, provided matching funds or support, or simply enjoyed a restored watershed or wetland, we say Thank You! Introduction 3 The Board of Governors, which acts as the overarching policy making body for the WRP, and Who We Are 4 the Coastal Conservancy, which provides staff support for the WRP, are proud of the astounding Tidal Wetlands 6 achievements over the years. This report outlines major accomplishments the WRP has achieved Urban Streams and Wetlands 10 throughout the Southern California Bight and highlights some exemplary restoration projects. Community-Based Projects 12 The WRP is a novel, collaborative, and broad-based partnership of 18 state and federal agency Partners. We have been successful in working in concert with scientists, local governments, Rivers and Streams 14 WRP Member Agencies environmental organizations, business leaders, and educators over the years. Our collaborators Fish Passage 16 outside the defined 18-agency partnership have included land trusts, cities and counties, fellow Federal Partners Restoration Planning Projects 18 state agencies, federal resource agencies, environmental and community organizations, private foundations, local universities, elected leaders and the general public. Working together, we Acquisition Projects 20 National Marine Fisheries Service have implemented projects that benefit the people and wildlife of Southern California. Natural Resources Conservation Service WRP Science Initiatives 22 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WRP Organizational Chart 26 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency WRP Projects Map 28 Our Partners 30 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service John Laird Samuel Schuchat Secretary Executive Officer Cover photos Natural Resources Agency Coastal Conservancy Main image: Tijauna Estuary State Partners Inset photos, left to right: Ocean Discovery Institute; Carpinteria Creek, South Coast Habitat Restoration; California Natural Resources Agency Plover photo credit Hartmut Walter California Coastal Conservancy California Department of Fish and Wildlife U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service California Department of Parks and Recreation Wildlife Conservation Board California Coastal Commission State Lands Commission California Environmental Protection Agency State Water Resources Control Board Central Coast Regional Water Quality Contol Board Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Contol Board Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Contol Board San Diego Regional Water Quality Contol Board www.scwrp.org 1 Elegant Tern Colony Saltworks San Diego Bay 3 Who We Are FIFTEEN YEARS MORE THAN 200 PROJECTS The WRP has completed 206 wetlands projects over the past 15 years and has 85 active projects underway. These projects consist he Southern California Wetlands Recovery Project (WRP) is a unique partnership, chaired Since 2000, there has been of a variety of acquisition, restoration and habitat enhancement T by the California Resources Agency and supported by the State Coastal Conservancy. unprecedented state investment in projects that range in size from a few acres to large scale projects Through the WRP, public agencies, scientists, and local communities work cooperatively to natural resources and the WRP has that encompass hundreds of acres. Projects on the WRP Work Plan, benefited from these investments. approved annually by the Board of Governors, are larger projects acquire and restore wetlands in coastal Southern California. Two significant projects, the ranging from $50,000 to multimillion dollar projects. Projects of The WRP’s geographic scope is from Point Conception in Santa Barbara County to the restoration of Bolsa Chica Wetlands the Community Wetlands Restoration Grants Program (CWRGP) are small scale projects with grants up to $30,000 that are international border with Mexico. Using a non-regulatory approach and an ecosystem- ($144 million) and the acquisition designed to be completed in one or two years. based perspective, the WRP works together to identify wetland acquisition and restoration of the Ballona Wetlands ($140 priorities, prepare plans for these priority sites, pool funds to undertake these projects, million) received $284 million WRP Work Plan of the total project funds. The implement priority plans, and oversee post-project maintenance and monitoring. The WRP Work Plan is the list of priority wetland acquisition, Port of Los Angeles provided restoration and enhancement projects. The Work Plan is reviewed The goal of the WRP is to accelerate the pace, extent, and effectiveness of coastal wetland $40 million and the Port of Long by the various branches of the WRP including the County Task restoration through a regional prioritization plan for the acquisition, restoration and Beach provided $50 million to the Forces and the Wetland Managers Group, and is adopted by the enhancement of Southern California’s coastal wetlands and watersheds. The long-term Bolsa Chica restoration project in Board of Governors. Projects on the Work Plan must be consistent with the priorities and strategies in the WRP Regional Strategy for vision of the WRP is to re-establish a mosaic of functioning wetland and riparian systems exchange for mitigation credit. Wetland Recovery. WRP partner agencies use the WRP Work Plan that supports a diversity of species, while also providing refuges for humans within the urban Of the remaining projects, the to identify potential projects for available grant funds. In addition, landscape. majority of the funding came from the WRP works to help identify other sources of project funding for Work Plan projects. The WRP is comprised of 18 partner state and federal agencies. Representatives from State agencies. This funding has each of the partner agencies form the WRP Board of Governors. The Wetlands Managers primarily come from statewide Community Wetlands Restoration Grant Program bond measures, including Group, made up of staff from each of the partner agencies and representatives of other key The CWRGP provides funding for community-based restoration Proposition 12, Proposition 13, stakeholder organizations, along with the Science Advisory Panel, conduct the oversight projects in coastal wetlands and watersheds in the region. Proposition 40, Proposition 50 and WETLAND PROJECTS The purpose of the program is to further the goals of the WRP and implementation of WRP projects and research. A County Task Force in each of the five Proposition 84. Regional Strategy; build local capacity to plan and implement Southern California coastal counties provides local input to WRP priorities and projects. ACRES 13,130 wetland restoration projects; promote community involvement in wetland restoration activities; and foster education about wetland The WRP was created in 1997 as a regional voice for the valuable coastal wetland resources Total acres restored: 4,884 ecosystems. Grants of up to $30,000 are awarded. The program Total acres acquired: 8,246 of Southern California and began its first projects in 1999, 15 years ago. Prior to the creation is administered by Earth Island Institute in coordination with the of the WRP, there was little regional coordination or communication among public agencies, Coastal Conservancy. Nonprofit organizations, tribes and local agencies are eligible to apply. CWRGP grants are awarded on an nonprofit organizations and community members who had a vested interest in Southern FUNDING $631,324,722 annual basis. California’s wetlands. Many people held little hope for the wetlands that remained in the Total restoration funds: $301,984,228 Over the past 15 years more than $631 million has been invested rapidly developing region of Southern California. Total acquisition funds: $300,384,477 in 206 wetlands projects. The State of California has contributed In this publication we celebrate the many projects and accomplishments of the WRP over the Total planning funds: $ 28,956,017 more than half of that funding. This includes $2.5 million for 112 CWRGP projects. past 15 years of on the ground projects, research and education. Hartmut Walter 2002 May Community 1999 2006 Wetlands Restoration First 23 projects Grant Program 2002 Passage of selected for the 2009 established Proposition 84 WRP Work Plan Passage of 2008 - 2010 2010 2 011 2004 2005 2012 2013 2002 Proposition 40 Tijuana Estuary Restoration of Upper Newport South San 2000 Colorado Lagoon Mission Creek September Bolsa Chica Arroyo Burro 2006 Tidal Restoration Huntington Beach Bay Ecosystem Diego Bay Wetlands 1997 Passage of 2003 Restoration Restoration Phase Fish Passage Project December Task Forces Estuary Restoration Los Cerritos Program Phase II Brookhurst and Magnolia Restoration completed Restoration Project Proposition 50 Groundbreaking I completed $8.7 completed $4.2 Wetlands Recovery 1999 established in the Ballona Project completed Wetlands Authority/ Feasibility Study Marsh completed $53 million completed $5.6 $144 million million million Project Working April First meeting of the five counties Acquisition Joint Powers Authority completed million Agreement signed 1998 WRP Public Advisory $140 million formed Science Advisory Group Panel formed 1999 – 2014 MORE THAN 200 WETLAND PROJECTS 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix I Appendix I Appendix I Appendix I Appendix I Appendix I
    APPENDIX I APPENDIX I APPENDIX I APPENDIX I APPENDIX I APPENDIX I Harbors, Beaches and Parks Facilities Inventory Assessment Findings Report Prepared for: Orange County Board of Supervisors and the Resources and Development Management Department Harbors, Beaches and Parks Prepared by: Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) 169 North Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91104 August 2007 APPENDIX I Table of Contents CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION and SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ...................... 3 Purpose............................................................................................................... 3 Criteria................................................................................................................ 3 Methodology...................................................................................................... 5 Overall Assessment Findings.......................................................................... 7 CHAPTER II – REGIONAL RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ASSESSMENTS..18 Non‐Coastal Regional Parks............................................................................18 Nature Preserves...............................................................................................50 Coastal Regional Parks.....................................................................................54 Historic Regional Parks....................................................................................71 Proposed Regional Recreational Facilities ....................................................77 Local Parks ........................................................................................................83
    [Show full text]
  • Your April 2017 Neighborhoods First New...Ter
    12/12/2017 Your April 2017 Neighborhoods First Newsletter - Mike Bonin - Council District 11 ABOUT MIKE COUNCIL STAFF NEWS ISSUES NEIGHBORHOODS MEDIA TAKE ACTION HOME » NEWS Your April 2017 Neighborhoods First Newsletter Sign Up For Updates Posted by David Graham-Caso 721.80sc on April 28, 2017 · Flag · Add your reaction April 2017 Welcome to the April issue of Mike Bonin's "Neighborhoods First Newsletter!” IN THIS ISSUE: Construction begins on Mar Vista’s Great Street, Mike fights for funding for a life-saving program to end traffic fatalities, and an effort launches Contact Our Ofce to protect people from dangerous oil and gas wells in our neighborhoods... but first, please read this month's Neighborhoods First Profile about a Pacific Palisades neighbor who is helping kids see a bright future ahead of them. Connect with Facebook You can find out more about Mike, meet your CD11 staff and see the latest Connect with Twitter videos and updates from the Westside on our website at www.11thdistrict.com. And remember to like Mike's Facebook page to see the latest news about your neighborhood. Councilmember Mike… 5,188 likes Liked You and 17 other friends like this Vision to Learn: Pacific Palisades’ Austin Beutner Is Helping Kids See Success Pacific Palisades neighbor Austin Beutner has served Los Angeles in a variety of capacities - as First Deputy Mayor, interim head of the Los Angeles Department Water and Power, and publisher and CEO of the Los Angeles Times. In 2012, however, Beutner founded Vision To Learn - an organization that serves Los Angeles in a different, more focused way.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Newport Bay Ecosystem Restoration Project
    Upper Newport Bay Ecosystem Restoration Project Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 1. Why is the project necessary? Upper Newport Bay is one of the last remaining coastal wetlands in southern California, and continues to play a significant role in providing critical habitat for a variety of migratory waterfowl, shorebirds and endangered species of birds and plants. Bay sedimentation has significantly increased in the last several decades due to rapid urbanization of the watershed. As a result, open water areas are disappearing in the bay, tidal circulation has diminished and shoaling is occurring within the Federal and local navigation channels and slips. Upstream efforts to control sediment inputs to the Upper Newport Bay Ecological Reserve and within-Bay dredging projects have not been completely effective. A primary objective of this project is to effect management of sediments deposited within the bay, with the objective of reducing the frequency of dredging projects while also enhancing habitat values within the upper bay and slowing the detrimental impacts of sediment accumulation on the fish and wildlife habitats. 2. What are the benefits of the project? The Upper Newport Bay restoration project will allow for a reduced frequency of maintenance dredging; improve or restore estuarine habitats; sustain a mix of open water, mudflat and marsh habitat; increase tidal circulation for water quality; reduce predator access to sensitive habitats; improve public use and recreational access; and improve educational opportunities. 3. What do
    [Show full text]
  • Ebird Top 100 Birding Hot Sots
    eBird Top 100 Birding Locations in Orange County 01 Huntington Central Park 02 San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary 03 Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve 04 Seal Beach NWR (restricted access) 05 Huntington Central Park – East 06 Bolsa Chica – walkbridge/inner bay 07 Huntington Central Park – West 08 William R. Mason Regional Park 09 Upper Newport Bay 10 Laguna Niguel Regional Park 11 Harriett M. Wieder Regional Park 12 Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve 13 Mile Square Regional Park 14 Irvine Regional Park 15 Peters Canyon Regional Park 16 Newport Back Bay 17 Talbert Nature Preserve 18 Upper Newport Bay – Back Bay Dr. 19 Yorba Regional Park 20 Crystal Cove State Park 21 Doheny State Beach 22 Bolsa Chica - Interpretive Center/Bolsa Bay 23 Upper Newport Bay – Back Bay Dr. parking lot 24 Bolsa Chica – Brightwater area 25 Carbon Canyon Regional Park 26 Santiago Oaks Regional Park 27 Upper Santa Ana River – Lincoln Ave. to Glassel St. 28 Huntington Central Park – Shipley Nature Center 29 Upper Santa Ana River – Lakeview Ave. to Imperial Hwy. 30 Craig Regional Park 31 Irvine Lake 32 Bolsa Chica – full tidal area 33 Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve – Muth Interpretive Center area 1 eBird Top 100 Birding Locations in Orange County 34 Upper Santa Ana River – Tustin Ave. to Lakeview Ave. 35 Fairview Park 36 Dana Point Harbor 37 San Joaquin Wildlife Area – Fledgling Loop Trail 38 Crystal Cove State Park – beach area 39 Ralph B. Clark Regional Park 40 Anaheim Coves Park (aka Burris Basin) 41 Villa Park Flood Control Basin 42 Aliso and Wood Canyons Wilderness Park 43 Upper Newport Bay – boardwalk 44 San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary – Tree Hill Trail 45 Starr Ranch 46 San Juan Creek mouth 47 Upper Newport Bay – Big Canyon 48 Santa Ana River mouth 49 Bolsa Chica State Beach 50 Crystal Cover State Park – El Moro 51 Riley Wilderness Park 52 Riverdale Park (ORA County) 53 Environmental Nature Center 54 Upper Santa Ana River – Taft Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Context Work Plan
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Industrial Development, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources September 2011; rev. February 2018 The activity which is the subject of this historic context statement has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service; 1849 C Street, N.W.; Washington, D.C. 20240 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Industrial Development, 1850-1980 TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES TWO RECENT RECORDS of the CLAPPER RAIL from the BALLONA WETLANDS, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Daniel S
    NOTES TWO RECENT RECORDS OF THE CLAPPER RAIL FROM THE BALLONA WETLANDS, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DANIEL S. COOPER, Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc., 5850 W. 3rd St., #167, Los Angeles, California 90036; [email protected] I report on two recent records of the Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris) from the Ballona Wetlands at Playa del Rey in Los Angeles County, including the first well- documented report in in the county over 40 years, from a site where a population persisted into the 1950s. On 25 August 2008, two biological consultants (A. Gutierrez and R. Woodfield, with Merkel and Associates, San Diego) sampling fish in a tidal chan- nel at the Ballona Wetlands just south of Ballona Creek spotted a bird they suspected was a Clapper Rail. On 21 January 2010 Gutierrez wrote to me, “on August 25, 2008 a Light-footed Clapper Rail was observed foraging along the eastern waterline of a channel in the pickleweed of the Ballona Wetlands. The observation occurred at 11:30 A.M. on a clear day, with no wind, a temperature of 70 °F, and during a low tide of 3.2 ft mean lower low water. Although it was a low tide, the water level was fairly high due to the tide being subject to muting and lag from the presence of tide gates at the Ballona Wetland. The Clapper Rail walked the edge of the high waterline from south to north and then back to the south, weaving through the pickleweed. After approximately 5 minutes, the Clapper Rail flew to the west shore of the channel and proceeded out of sight into the dense pickleweed.” Fortunately, (using a cell phone) Woodfield took a photograph (Figure 1) showing an unmistakable image of a Clapper Rail.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Encinitas Sea Level Rise Workshop
    City of Encinitas Sea Level Rise Workshop Climate Action Plan May 8, 2018 Crystal Najera, CAP Program Administrator 1 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW How does the City’s Climate Action Plan address Sea Level Rise? 2 Global Climate Change 3 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE 4 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Industrial activities have raised global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from 280 parts per million to 400 parts per million in the last 150 years. 5 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Temperatures will More droughts and continue to rise heat waves The frost-free season (growing season) will Sea level will rise lengthen 1-4 feet by 2100 Change in precipitation Hurricanes will become patterns stronger and more intense 6 Local Climate Change 7 ENCINITAS CLIMATE ACTION PLAN • Mitigation • Adaptation 8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (2012) 9 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE 85 Average Temperature 80 80 78 Average Temperature 75 74 (Avg) Degrees Fahrenheit Degrees 80 70 1950 2005 2050 2099 50 74 Extreme Heat Events 37 40 93F + 30 20 Days per yearper Days 10 4 12 10 Source: Cal-Adapt 0 1960-2005 2090-2099 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE Extreme Heat Days (93.3 F or more) 37 12 4 11 Source: Cal-Adapt LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE 20 18 Annual Rainfall 16 14 14.5 12 10.9 (Avg) 11.1 11.6 10 10.8 Inches 8 6 4 2 0 1950-2005 2050 2099 Fire Risk 12 Source: Cal-Adapt 6 5.5 Sea Level Rise High Emissions Scenario 5 4 3 Feet 2.0 2 Low Emissions Scenario 1.0 1 1.4 0.2 0.4 0 2000 2030 2050 2100 Source: Encinitas Climate Action Plan, 2018; San Diego Coastal Resilience Assessment, 2012 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE Sea Level Rise 167 cm (SD high)
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Iii: Baseline Status and Cumulative Effects for the San Francisco Bay Listed Species
    ATTACHMENT III: BASELINE STATUS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY LISTED SPECIES 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: ALAMEDAWHIPSNAKE ............................................................................................ 6 1.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ...................................................................................... 6 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE........................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Factors affecting species within the action area ............................................... 6 1.2.1.1 Urban development .................................................................................... 7 1.2.1.2 Fire suppression ......................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.3 Predation .................................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.4 Grazing practices ..................................................................................... 10 1.2.1.5 Non-native species ................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Baseline Status ................................................................................................ 11 1.3 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 13 2: BAY CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY ....................................................................... 14 2.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Biological Resources
    3.4 Biological Resources 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4.1 Introduction This section evaluates the potential for implementation of the Proposed Project to have impacts on biological resources, including sensitive plants, animals, and habitats. The Notice of Preparation (NOP) (Appendix A) identified the potential for impacts associated to candidate, sensitive, or special status species (as defined in Section 3.4.6 below), sensitive natural communities, jurisdictional waters of the United States, wildlife corridors or other significant migratory pathway, and a potential to conflict with local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources. Data used to prepare this section were taken from the Orange County General Plan, the City of Lake Forest General Plan, Lake Forest Municipal Code, field observations, and other sources, referenced within this section, for background information. Full bibliographic references are noted in Section 3.4.12 (References). No comments with respect to biological resources were received during the NOP comment period. The Proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and zone change for development of Sites 1 to 6 and creation of public facilities overlay on Site 7. 3.4.2 Environmental Setting Regional Characteristics The City of Lake Forest, with a population of approximately 77,700 as of January 2004, is an area of 16.6 square miles located in the heart of South Orange County and Saddleback Valley, between the coastal floodplain and the Santa Ana Mountains (see Figure 2-1, Regional Location). The western portion of the City is near sea level, while the northeastern portion reaches elevations of up to 1,500 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • P.L. 94-171 COUNTY BLOCK MAP (2010 CENSUS): San Diego County, CA 117.270098W
    33.107128N 33.105876N 117.34042W P.L. 94-171 COUNTY BLOCK MAP (2010 CENSUS): San Diego County, CA 117.270098W 2040* Avena Ct W C t 2002* 2023 C Seascape Dr Towhee Ln Avena Ct E i 2059* S 3008* n 2004* a n r r T 2056* Butt H Cattail Pl d e a e r n Ponto Dr 3006* cu e e p d R F Ca a 3001* m r a 2022* s t d on l R R i ras W t p Cir 3004* r LEGEND a 4004* 4006* l 3005* urina Ct g i u t o Breakwater Rd al Macadamia Dr o rc e a e S S w h R d n R Strand St n te e n 3001* r Q R Sandbar Way i t r t D t a a u T o u e D t B a u Ave e 2055* k P s l i c h P s e 2050 r c B c a l e a u C t t a d l a t r p l l y Sandcastle Dr e R C us e 3008 P C 3012* P S h r B r l SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LABEL STYLE m D y C 2025* Coral o m s t i 3009* Waters End Dr u n Lobelia Ct v P r t l s e Conosa 2024 a r e s r ll e ly t i F C n id St Mallee 178.11 W Reef Ave D A o e 4013* s E Way Sweetwater St s Ct l r l 3011 h r 3005* 2012* e B t 3000* a D Federal American Indian s r C e t r r t A l Pso del Norte g T r viara t u i t a Catamaran Dr d P C e e e r u Crane Ct C e L'ANSE RES 1880 S l l M f i Pkwy Reservation o S o 2010 s f a d Tradewinds Dr h i d in R r t O o Brookside C R k i o 2060 4001* V Sage Ct Dr Snapdragon P Blac r r r 2049* r l fb c t 2009 2001 d h R e r C e Raintree l l li Wimbrel Ct i t u id n o Co e a S r L M W m 2017* Dr s T n S o D a e r c l 2054 r gu o r Off-Reservation Trust Land, e Ivy St a 4001* t P g rit e e D r Pl n e L n A r h t m T1880 s m Pl Goldfinch D t Hawaiian Home Land u Way b r r u r e h r N Boxthorn Way Ter o 4012* D v 2008 T A 2051* s
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Coast SNPL 2012 Breeding Survey with WA OR CA
    2012 Summer Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2005-2011 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. Total Adults 2012 Adult Breakdown REGION SITE OWNER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 male fem. sex? Grays Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 00000 00 00 0 Conner Creek State Parks 00000 00 00 0 Damon Point/Oyhut S. Parks, D. Nat R. F & W 500000 00 00 0 County Total 500000 00 00 0 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 23 25 22 12 16 18 22 11 65 0 Graveyard Shoalwater Indian Tribe 10 0 0 2 11 0 Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 9 42282926201215 10 4 1 South Long Beach Private 00000 County Total 32 67 50 42 42 38 34 28 17 10 1 Washington Total 37 67 50 42 42 38 34 28 17 10 1 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 0 0 0 0 1 00 1 Necanicum Spit OPRD 0000 0 01 00 1 County Total 000000 02 00 2 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Bayocean Spit ACOE 00000 00 00 0 Netarts Spit OPRD 000000 00 00 0 Sand Lake Spit (S) USFS 000000 00 00 0 Nestucca Spit OPRD 0000 0 0 00 0 County Total 000000 00 00 0 Lane Baker Beach/Sutton Creek USFS 0200 1 00 00 0 Sutton Cr./Siuslaw River N Jetty USFS 0 0 0 0 00 0 Siuslaw River S Jetty to Siltcoos USFS 4 40 0 Siltcoos Spits N & S USFS 11 18 16 11 17 18 18 22 11 10 1 County Total 11 20 16 11 17 19 18 26 15 10 1 Douglas Siltcoos-Tahkenitch (Dunes Overlook) USFS 9 2 19 7 6 19 39 42 22 20 0 Tahkenitch Spit N & S USFS 515035132716 11 0 Umpqua River S Jetty to Tenmile Spit USFS 0 11 10 12 57 0 County Total 14 3 24 7 20 24 62 81 43 38 0 Coos Tenmile Spits USFS 13 15 27 24 24 36 13 16 88 0 Coos Bay N Spit BLM, ACOE 27 27 26 30 41 38 39 52 35 17 0 Whiskey Run to Coquille River OPRD 0000 00 00 0 Bandon State Park to New River OPRD, Private, BLM 22 12 15 8 14 40 16 14 95 0 County Total 62 54 68 62 79 114 68 82 52 30 0 Curry New River to Floras Lake BLM, Private, County 13 14 17 25 24 1 20 15 96 0 Blacklock Point to Sixes River (C.
    [Show full text]