Symmetry breaking and skyrmionic transport in twisted bilayer graphene

Shubhayu Chatterjee,1 Nick Bultinck,1 and Michael P. Zaletel1 1Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA Motivated by recent low-temperature magnetoresistance measurements in twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron-nitride substrate, we perform a systematic study of pos- sible symmetry breaking orders in this device at a filling of two electrons per moir´eunit cell. We find that the surprising non-monotonic dependence of the resistance on an out-of-plane magnetic field is difficult to reconcile with particle-hole charge carriers from the low-energy bands in symmetry broken phases. We invoke the non-zero Chern numbers of the twisted bilayer graphene flat bands to argue that skyrmion textures provide an alternative for the dominant charge carriers. Via an effec- tive field-theory for the spin degrees of freedom, we show that the effect of spin Zeeman splitting on the skyrmion excitations provides a possible explanation for the non-monotonic magnetoresistance. We suggest several experimental tests, including the functional dependence of the activation gap on the magnetic field, for our proposed correlated insulating states at different integer fillings. We also discuss possible exotic phases and quantum phase transitions that can arise via skyrmion-pairing on doping such an insulator.

I. INTRODUCTION cones in the tBLG flat bands are gapped by the C2v sym- metry breaking AB-sublattice splitting induced by the A series of recent experimental breakthroughs has un- hBN substrate. Although we focus on the case where the covered surprising and fascinating correlated electron bandgap at charge neutrality has a trivial single-particle phenomena in two-dimensional van der Waals moir´e origin, most of our results can also be applied to mean- materials. Transport experiments on twisted bilayer field band structures where the gap at the CNP results graphene [1–3], ABC trilayer graphene on hexagonal from spontaneous symmetry breaking induced by elec- boron-nitride (hBN) [4,5], and twisted double bilayer tron interactions. In tBLG, C2vT symmetry (with T graphene [6–8] show evidence of insulating states around being time-reversal) needs to be spontaneously broken charge neutrality at electron fillings for which no single- in order to generate a mean-field gap at charge neutral- particle band-gap is expected. To make the story even ity. Self-consistent Hartree-Fock studies have found that more interesting, superconducting domes flanking some this indeed happens for certain interaction strengths and of these insulating states were observed [2,3,6,8,9]. In twist angles [3, 26, 31]. It was found that the C2vT sym- Refs. [10–12], spatially resolved properties of the insu- metry breaking self-consistent Hartree-Fock solutions are lating states were studied using scanning tunneling mi- very susceptible to C3v breaking strain [31], an observa- croscopy (STM) experiments. Recently, transport exper- tion which agrees with the STM and transport experi- iments were also performed at larger temperatures, and ments [32]. revealed an interesting broad temperature range with a Our main focus is tBLG with a single-particle gap at large and linearly increasing resistivity [13, 14]. charge neutrality at electron filling ν = 2, i.e. at a dop- The origin of the insulating and superconducting states ing of two electrons per moir´eunit cell with respect to can be traced back to the presence of bands with vanish- charge neutrality. Based on a phenomenological mean- ing bandwidth in the mini- or moir´eBrillouin zone. In field analysis, we argue that the magnetoresistance mea- twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG), such flat mini-bands surements of Ref. [29] impose very non-trivial constraints were predicted to occur at special ‘magic’ twist angles on the state that is realized at ν = 2. We analyse the dif- between the top and bottom graphene layer [15]; an ex- ferent possible symmetry breaking orders and find that act flat band criterion was later obtained in Ref. [16] for (almost) all of them are hard to reconcile with the trans- a chiral approximation of the tBLG continuum model port measurements of Ref. [29], given that we assume [15, 17, 18]. In ABC trilayer graphene on hBN and the charge carriers to be conventional particle-hole ex- twisted double bilayer graphene, similar flat mini-bands citations. However, because of the non-trivial topology

arXiv:1908.00986v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 28 Apr 2020 around charge neutrality can be obtained by applying a of the flat bands, skyrmions textures in a spin-polarized suitable displacement field [4, 19, 20]. Interestingly, the flat band carry electric charge [33]. We study the po- flat bands often also have non-trivial topological proper- tential role of skyrmions as the dominant charge carriers ties. For instance in tBLG, the flat bands have non-trivial and find that they provide a natural explanation of the fragile topology protected by the space group symme- experimental data of Refs. [29, 30]. We therefore posit tries [21–24]. In devices which have isolated flat bands, that skyrmions contribute to transport in tBLG, and we one generally finds broad parameter regimes where these provide experimentally falsifiable predictions for the acti- bands have non-zero Chern number [19, 20, 25–28]. vation gap as a function of out-of-plane magnetic field for In this work, we focus on flat bands which have a gap insulators at ν = 2, 3 to test our assertion. Towards the at the charge neutrality point (CNP). This is motivated end of the manuscript, we speculate on skyrmion-pairing by the experiments of Refs. [29, 30], where the Dirac and possible connections to superconductivity. 2

II. MAGIC-ANGLE TWISTED BILAYER the electrons to spontaneously polarize into one valley GRAPHENE ALIGNED WITH HBN [27, 28]; complete spin polarization in addition to valley polarization can lead to an insulator with quantized σxy. We consider tBLG at the first magic angle θ ≈ 1.05◦ In this work we focus on the experimental findings for the [15], encapsulated on both sides by a hBN substrate. If same devices at filling ν = 2. At this filling, no anoma- hBN is sufficiently aligned with graphene, it induces a lous Hall effect was observed, but a clear resistance peak non-negligible sublattice splitting ∆ σz, which results in is nevertheless present [29, 30]. Although an activation gap is yet to be observed at ν = 2 in transport measure- a C2T breaking mass term at the Dirac points [34–37]. Further, because of the mismatch in lattice constant be- ments, this resistance peak hints at the possibility of a tween graphene and hBN, a second moir´epattern arises true insulating state at zero temperature. Here we as- [38]. As the rotation angle between graphene and hBN sume that such an insulating state is indeed realized at decreases, both the induced Dirac mass term and the lower temperatures. strength of the second moir´epattern increase. There is a Before going into the interaction effects that stabilize regime where the hBN induced moir´epattern can be ne- the putative insulator at ν = 2, we first discuss one last glected, while there is nonetheless a sizable Dirac mass. single-particle effect. In Ref. [29], it was observed that Here, we consider the situation where the top graphene applying a displacement field along one direction destroys layer and hBN substrate are in this regime, while the the resistance peak at ν = 2, while this peak is almost bottom graphene layer is sufficiently unaligned with hBN insensitive to a displacement field applied in the other and is therefore not affected by the substrate. We will direction. To understand this behavior, we studied the often use a hBN induced sublattice splitting of 15 meV, effect of a non-zero potential energy difference between which is expected to be a good estimate based on the top and bottom graphene layers on the flat bands. In findings of Ref. [39]. We refer to AppendixA for a de- Fig.1 (c), we show the density of states (DOS) of the tailed discussion of the moir´eHamiltonian used in this flat bands with a sublattice splitting ∆t = 15 meV, and a work. potential energy difference ∆U = Ut−Ub of 0, 50 and −50 In Refs. [27, 28], it was found that a non-zero sublat- meV. We see that for ∆U = 50 meV, there is only a small tice splitting on one side of magic-angle tBLG gaps out all change in the conduction band DOS as compared to the Dirac cones of the moir´eHamiltonian. Because the two case when ∆U = −50 meV. Fig.1 clearly shows that for Dirac cones in a single-valley moir´eHamiltonian, shown negative ∆U, the conduction band DOS decreases more, in Fig.1(a), originate from the two different graphene and spreads over a larger energy window as function of layers, this is a consequence of the inter-layer coupling. |∆U|. At the very least, this dependence of the DOS on Ignoring spin, the single-valley moir´eHamiltonian with displacement field, and in particular on the sign of ∆U, sublattice splitting on one layer has two isolated flat is consistent with the scenario that the resistance peak bands, as shown in Fig.1(b). The Chern numbers of at ν = 2 is attributed to a correlated insulator, because these bands were calculated in Refs. [27, 28], and found a lower DOS and a larger bandwidth reduce the effect of to be C = ±1. Note that once we know the Chern num- electron interactions. ber C of one band, all the other Chern numbers are fixed. This is because the total Chern number in one valley al- ways adds up to zero (as long as the sublattice splitting is III. POSSIBLE SYMMETRY BREAKING not strong enough to mix the flat bands with the disper- ORDERS AT ν = 2 sive bands), and because the two valleys are interchanged by time-reversal symmetry, which changes the sign of the To address the nature of the correlated insulator ob- Chern number. With positive sublattice splitting ∆ on served at ν = 2, we follow the phenomenological ap- one of the graphene layers, the band above charge neu- proach of Ref. [28] and identify the symmetry break- trality in valley +, i.e. the valley at the K points of the ing orders that are compatible with the experimental mono-layer graphene Brillouin zone, has C = −1. observations (for simplicity, we neglect spatial symme- In Refs. [29, 30], spontaneous time-reversal symmetry try breaking on the moir´escale). We note that recently breaking at ν = 3 was observed in a magic-angle tBLG a similar phenomenological approach was used to dis- device where one of the graphene layers is nearly aligned tinguish different pairing order parameters in tBLG and with hBN. In particular, Ref. [29] reported a rotational twisted double bilayer graphene [40, 41]. The dominant mismatch between the top graphene layer and the hBN terms in the Hamiltonian are U(2)+×U(2)− symmetric, substrate of ≈ 0.83◦. In both experiments, the sponta- where the ± subscript refers to the valley quantum num- neous time-reversal breaking is accompanied by a non- ber. The U(2)+×U(2)− symmetry consists of overall zero anomalous Hall effect. On top of this, ref. [30] ob- charge conservation, valley-charge conservation, and in- served insulating behavior at ν = 3, and a corresponding dependent SU(2) spin rotations in each valley. We write 2 z z quantized Hall conductance σxy = ±e /h. Because of its corresponding Lie algebra as 1, τ , s and τ s, where the non-zero Chern numbers of the flat bands with hBN τ i and si are the Pauli matrices acting respectively on alignment, these experimental observations at ν = 3 can the valley and spin indices. The total Hamiltonian also be naturally explained if the Coulomb interactions cause contains terms that break the SU(2)+×SU(2)− subgroup 3

= 0, U = 0 (meV) = 15, U = 0 (meV) 30 t 30 t K 20 20 − mK− = −mK+ 10 10 −1 0 1 0 0 Γ 1 0 −1 10 10 µ energy (meV) K+ mK+ 20 20

30 30 −|mK| |mK| K + M K M K + M K M (a) (b) (a) (b)

FIG. 2: (a) Mini-Brillouin zone with the Dirac cones at the K 3.0 U = 50 meV + and K points coming from the IVC insulator order parameter U = 0 meV − 2.5 x x y y ) M (k)τ + M (k)τ . Both Dirac cones have the same chirality.

1 U = 50 meV M The mass terms at K+ and K−, which have opposite signs, come A 2.0 1 from the flat band dispersion: mK± = ±(ε+,K+ − ε+,K− )/2. (b) V z e 1.5 Effect of a fictitious term µτ on the IVC insulator mean-field m (

Hamiltonian. Tuning µ from minus infinity to plus infinity

S 1.0

O induces two Chern number changing transitions, where the Chern D 0.5 number of the valence (conduction) band changes from 1 (−1) to 0, and from 0 to −1 (1) (for positive ∆t). In the figure, above the 0.0 µ axis we schematically show the valence and conduction bands 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 with their respective Chern number. Energy (meV) (c)

FIG. 1: (a) Band spectrum around charge neutrality of the (ε+,k − ε−,k) z 0 x x 0 y y 0 single-valley tBLG moir´eHamiltonian at the first magic angle hk = τ ⊗ s + M (k)τ ⊗ s + M (k)τ ⊗ s θ ≈ 1.05◦. At the K points in the mini-Brillouin zones, Dirac 2 cones protected by C T are present. (b) With a sublattice µ g (k)B µ g B 2v − B v ⊥ τ z ⊗ s0 − B s ⊥ τ 0 ⊗ sz , (1) splitting ∆t of 15 meV on the top graphene layer, induced by 2 2 alignment with the hBN substrate, the Dirac cones acquire a mass. The resulting isolated valence and conduction bands carry where ετ,k is the band energy in valley τ. Note that non-zero Chern number |C| = 1. (c) The effect on the flat band we have dropped an unimportant term proportional to density-of-states (DOS) of a potential energy difference ∆U the identity. The first term on the second line in Eq. between top and bottom graphene layers as a result of non-zero (1) is the valley Zeeman term, with µB the Bohr mag- displacement field, for ∆t = 15 meV. AM is the area of the moir´e unit cell. The valence (conduction) band DOS is strongly affected neton, which describes the coupling between an out-of- by positive (negative) ∆U. plane magnetic field B⊥ and the orbital magnetic mo- ment of the electrons [42–44]. The last term is the con- ventional spin-Zeeman term. Time reversal acts on the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) as τ xK, where K means com- down to the physical SU(2) spin rotation group, but they plex conjugation. Let us first analyze this mean field operate at much lower energy scales. We will ignore these Hamiltonian for B⊥ = 0. Because the flat bands above terms for now, and discuss them in more detail in the next charge neutrality have Chern number C = ±1, we know section. We can organize the fifteen order parameters that M(k) = M x(k) + iM y(k) has at least two nodes i j τ s into three different multiplets under U(2)+×U(2)− in the mini-Brillouin zone with the same phase winding [28]: (1) τ z, (2) (τ x/y, τ x/ys) and (3): (s, τ zs). [27, 45] (see also [46]). Assuming the minimal scenario The order parameter τ z corresponds to a spin singlet, with only two nodes is realized, C3v and time-reversal valley-polarized insulator where all electrons occupy the symmetry dictate that these nodes are located either at same valley. This possibility can readily be excluded, the K+ and K− points of the mini-Brillouin zone, or since in this case the system would be an anomalous both at the Γ point. Since the IVC mass M set by the 2 Coulomb scale (≈ 20 meV) is expected to be much larger Hall insulator with σxy = ±2e /h. However, no sign of non-zero Hall conductivity at zero magnetic field was than the non-interacting bandwidth (≈ 3 meV), the min- observed at ν = 2 [29]. imum band gap corresponds to the nodes of M(k) in the MBZ. Therefore, when the nodes are at the K points, The second possibility is that the ground state corre- the band gap of the mean field Hamiltonian is given by sponds to an intervalley coherent (IVC) state, with or- |ε − ε | = |ε − ε |, where we have used x/y x/y +,K+ −,K+ +,K+ +,K− der parameter multiplet (τ , τ s). Let us pick the ε = ε as follows from time-reversal symmetry. x y −,k +,−k τ , τ order parameters, and write the mean field Hamil- We will refer to this possibility as the IVC insulator. If tonian for the four bands above charge neutrality (includ- the nodes are both at Γ, then the mean field Hamiltonian P † ing spin) as HMF = k ck,τ,s[hk]τ,s;τ 0,s0 ck,τ 0,s0 , where k is a semi-metal, which we will refer to as the IVC semi- lies in the mini-Brillouin zone (MBZ). For the IVC state, metal. Let us first elaborate on the topological proper- restricting to an out-of-plane magnetic field (Bk = 0), ties of the gapped bands of the IVC insulator. Because 4

↓ ↓ ↑, ↓ ↑ ∆ ∆SZ ∆VZ ↑ SZ ∆VZ ↑, ↓ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↑ (a) (b) (c)

FIG. 4: Band spectrum around Γ of the IVC semi-metal mean-field Hamiltonian, corresponding to Eq. (1) with both nodes of M(k) located at Γ. (a) Band spectrum at B⊥ = 0. (b) With non-zero B⊥, the band spectrum develops a Fermi surface if FIG. 3: Schematic charge gap ∆c as a function of B⊥ for the the spin-Zeeman splitting ∆SZ = |gsµB B⊥| is greater than the IVC-I state, neglecting the small spin Zeeman effect. ∆c would valley-Zeeman splitting ∆VZ = |gv(0)µB B⊥|.(c) The opposite increase for uniform non-zero MIVC (k). This is not allowed by case compared to (b). Now the valley-Zeeman splitting is larger the opposite Chern numbers of the two valleys and hence ∆c than the spin-Zeeman splitting, resulting in a gapped band decreases at one node of MIVC (k). spectrum. the nodes of ∆(k) have the same winding, the result- as a function of out-of-plane magnetic field, with a resis- ing Dirac cones in the mean field Hamiltonian have the tance peak around 6 T. same chirality. The mass terms m τ z and m τ z at K+ K− For the IVC semi-metal, the valley-Zeeman term will the K and K points coming from the flat-band dis- + − generate a mass term at Γ. The spin-Zeeman term persion have opposite sign, as can easily be seen from lifts the spin degeneracy, which makes the valence and m = (ε − ε )/2 = (ε − ε )/2 and K+ +,K+ −,K+ +,K+ +,K− conduction bands overlap around Γ. The net effect m = (ε − ε )/2 = (ε − ε )/2. So we K− +,K− −,K− +,K− +,K+ of the out-of-plane magnetic field depends on the sign conclude that the bands of the IVC insulator mean field of g − g (0), where g (0) is the orbital g-factor at Hamiltonian have zero Chern number. This can also be s v v Γ. As we show in Fig.4, if the spin-Zeeman splitting seen by adding a fictitious term µτ z to the Hamiltonian ∆ (B ) = |g µ B | is bigger than the valley-Zeeman in Eq. (1). Tuning µ from minus infinity to plus infinity SZ ⊥ s B ⊥ splitting ∆ (B ) = |g (0)µ B |, a Fermi surface ap- induces two Chern number changing transitions, where VZ ⊥ v B ⊥ pears around Γ. If ∆ (B ) > ∆ (B ), then the at each transition the Chern number changes by one at VZ ⊥ SZ ⊥ IVC semi-metal develops an energy gap at Γ. We find a Dirac cone located at one of the nodes of M(k). This that g (0) depends sensitively on twist angle, lattice re- is shown schematically in Fig.2 (b). v laxation and sublattice splitting. However, generically Now we investigate the consequences of turning on a g (0) > g , such that an out-of-plane magnetic field cre- non-zero out-of-plane magnetic field. We first consider v s ates a non-zero energy gap. The IVC semi-metal is thus the IVC insulator. For non-zero B , the valley-Zeeman ⊥ consistent with the magnetoresistance measurements of term starts to compete with the mass terms m τ z and K+ Ref. [29]. However, we expect such a phase to be energet- m τ z. Since m = −m , the valley Zeeman effect K− K+ K− ically unfavorable for two reasons. First, the Fermi sur- must decrease the gap at either K or K (and increase + − face is not entirely gapped out at B = 0, which means the gap at the other point, see Fig.3), regardless of the ⊥ that the fermions gain less correlation energy compared sign of the perpendicular magnetic field. At the twist to other order parameters that lead to a fully gapped angle used in Ref. [29], and with ∆ = 15 meV, the mag- t spectrum. Second, a double vortex in M(k) costs twice nitude of g (k) is approximately 15 at the mini-Brillouin v the energy of two single vortices from a symmetry allowed zone K points [28]. Because of this, we can safely ignore term of the form R |∇ M(k)|2 in the effective action, as the spin-Zeeman term. From the mean-field Hamiltonian k k the latter endows a vortex with an energy cost propor- Eq. (1), we see that the band gap of the IVC insulator tional to the square of its winding number. Therefore, is given by below we will focus on the possibility of an insulating state at ν = 2.

∆IVC−I (B⊥) = 2|mK | − µB|gv(K)B⊥| (2) Let us also briefly comment on the possibility that C3v and/or time-reversal are spontaneously broken. In Irrespective of the sign of B⊥, the band gap ∆IVC−I that case, the nodes of M(k) appear at generic positions closes when µB|g(K)B⊥|/2 = |mK |, where |mK | = in the mini-Brillouin zone, and will be gapped out by z |mK+ | = |mK− |. Given that |mK | ≈ 1.5 meV, we the mass terms (ε+,k − ε−,k)τ /2 at the locations of the find that the bandgap of the IVC insulator closes when nodes. For non-zero B⊥, both the valley-Zeeman and the B⊥ ≈ 3 − 4 T. However, this behavior, schematically spin-Zeeman terms will compete with these mass terms, depicted in Fig.3, is difficult to reconcile with the ex- similar to the case when the nodes are at the K-points, perimental findings of Ref. [29] as the magnetoresistance as long as time-reversal is preserved and hence the gap measurements show an increase in resistivity at ν = 2 decreases for either direction of B⊥. However, if M(k) 5

spontaneously breaks time-reversal and C3v, it is possible IV. SU(2)+×SU(2)− SYMMETRY BREAKING for both mass terms to have the same sign at the location EFFECTS of the nodes. In this case, the band gap will decrease for one direction of B⊥, but increase for the other direction. In the previous section we have argued that if the re- So this scenario could in principle explain the magne- sistance peak observed in Ref. [29] at ν = 2 can be toresistance measurements of Ref. [29], but it requires attributed to an insulating state, then this insulator has strong breaking of valley-U(1), C3v and time-reversal. It a symmetry breaking order parameter in the multiplet can readily be identified in experiments by doing magne- (s, τ zs), and skyrmions as lowest-energy charge carriers. toresistance measurements for both directions of B⊥ and Before discussing the skyrmion excitations in more de- observing opposite behavior of Rxx(B⊥). tail, we first study the SU(2)+×SU(2)− symmetry break- The third and final possibility is that the insulator has ing terms in the Hamiltonian, which distinguish between an order parameter in the multiplet (s, τ zs), in which case the s and τs order parameters. We want to know what the electrons fill one spin-polarized band in each valley. order parameter gives the lowest energy, i.e. whether z Let us assume the order parameter is s , and write down the SU(2)+×SU(2)− breaking terms favor spin align- a corresponding mean-field Hamiltonian: ment or anti-alignment between the different valleys. If the spins are aligned in the two valleys (order parame- ter s), the insulator is a time-reversal symmetry break- (ε − ε ) ing ferromagnet with a non-zero local spin moment. If h = +,k −,k τ z ⊗ s0 + M τ 0 ⊗ sz k 2 S the spins in the valleys are anti-aligned (order parame- µ g (k)B µ g B ter τ zs), the insulator is time-reversal symmetric which − B v ⊥ τ z ⊗ s0 − B s ⊥ τ 0 ⊗ sz (3) 2 2 implies there is no local spin moment. Because the elec- tron spin in this state is locked to the valley quantum z τ z τ In this case, the valley-Zeeman term competes with the number (s = 2 or s = − 2 ), we will refer to it as the z ‘spin-valley locked state’. In a non-zero external mag- order parameter mass term MS s , and the mean-field band gap is given by netic field, the spins in the spin-valley locked insulator will cant in the direction of the magnetic field, similar to ∆ ≈ 2|M | − µ |g B | , (4) the canted anti-ferromagnet (CAF) [49–51]. The canted VI S B v,max ⊥ spin-valley locked state which appears in this manuscript where g is the maximal value of g (k) in the mini- is similar to the CAF occuring in the ν = 0 graphene v,max v Landau levels [52–55]. Brillouin zone. Note that we have assumed that MS is much larger than the bandwidth of the flat bands, al- A first microscopic SU(2)+×SU(2)− breaking term though our conclusions below will also be valid without comes from the Coulomb interaction, which takes the form this assumption (as long as MS is bigger than the band- width). We have also ignored the spin-Zeeman term be- 1 X X H = V 0 (q): ρ (q)ρ 0 (−q): , (5) cause the maximal orbital g-factor is much larger than C 2A ll l l q l,l0 the spin g-factor. The bandgap ∆VI again decreases with an out-of-plane magnetic field. So at first sight, also this where l = t, b is a layer index and A is the area of the insulator seems incompatible [28] with the experimental mono-layer graphene unit cell. From now on we will al- findings of Ref. [29]. However, in contrast to the IVC in- ways implicitly assume normal ordering. For the inter- sulator, now the bands of the mean-field Hamiltonian in action potential we use a dual-gate screened Coulomb Eq. (3) have Chern number C = ±1. It is well-known in potential, which in momentum space takes the form the context of quantum Hall ferromagnetism [33, 47, 48] that skyrmion textures in a spin-polarized Landau level e2 Vtt(q) = Vbb(q) = tanh(D|q|) (6) carry electric charge [33]. This is also true for Chern 2r0|q| insulators, which means that there is another candidate e2  2e−2D|q|  for the lowest-energy charged excitations. If skyrmions V (q) = V (q) = e−d|q| − (7) tb bt −2D|q| are indeed the lowest-energy charge carriers, then the re- 2r0|q| 1 + e sistivity increase with out-of-plane magnetic field in the where D is the distance from the tBLG to the metallic transport measurements of Ref. [29] would result from gates, which we take to be three moir´elattice constants. the spin-Zeeman term, which increases the energy of a Eq. (7) holds when the inter-layer distance d, of the order skyrmion. In the next sections, we examine this possi- of one graphene lattice constant, is much smaller than the bility in more detail. We note that skyrmions in general gate distance D. Based on the findings of Ref. [56], we flat moir´ebands with non-zero Chern number were also take the hBN dielectric constant to be r = 6.6. The discussed in Ref. [19]. While Ref. [19] focuses on the layer resolved density operator ρl(q) is given by possibility of skyrmionic superconductivity for bosonic skyrmions in C = 2 Chern bands, in our work we mainly 1 0 focus on fermionic skyrmions in C = 1 bands and their X X † ρl(q) = √ ψk+q,l,σ,sψk,l,σ,s , (8) implication on the gap. N k σ,s 6 where N is the number of graphene unit cells and σ and K valleys (see AppendixA for additional details). Using s are respectively sublattice and spin indices. We use a standard Fierz identity we can write HIV as the sum of primed momentum sums to denote sums that run over an inter-valley density-density interaction and an inter- the mono-layer graphene Brillouin zone. A few remarks valley Heisenberg or Hund’s coupling [19]. We focus only are in order before we proceed with our analysis. We on the SU(2)+×SU(2)− breaking term, i.e. the inter- have used the expression V (q) = R d2r V (r)eiq·r for the valley Heisenberg term. From Eq. (12) we see that it is interaction potential in Fourier space. This approxima- of the form tion is valid for a|q|  1, with a the graphene lattice constant. However, the inter-valley scattering terms we 1 X X are interested in involve large momentum transfers be- H = − V C (q + k0 − k, k, k0) (14) C,J NA τ tween electrons, and are therefore not in the regime where q,k,k0 τ a|q|  1 holds. Although V (q) does not accurately de-  i   i  X † s † s scribe lattice-scale interactions, we nevertheless still ex- × c 0 ck0,−τ c ck,τ , k +q,−τ 2 k−q,τ 2 pect it to give a reliable estimate for the energy scale i of the inter-valley scattering, and to provide the correct where si are the Pauli matrices acting on spin indices. physical picture of the SU(2) ×SU(2) symmetry break- + − To see whether the Hamiltonian in Eq. (14) prefers ing effects. ferro- or anti-ferromagnetically aligned spins in different We now project the density operators in the flat bands valleys, we define the four Slater determinants |τ, si = above charge neutrality, which gives −1/2 Q † (NM !) k ck,τ,s|0i, where NM is the number of moir´e unit cells. The relevant matrix element determining the 1 X X τ,τ 0 † inter-valley spin splitting in first order perturbation the- ρ˜l,g(q) = √ λl,g (q, k)ck+q,τ ck,τ 0 . (9) N τ,τ 0 k ory is given in terms of these Slater determinants as In this expression, both q and k lie in the mini-Brillouin zone, and g is a moir´ereciprocal lattice vector. The h+, ↑; −, ↑ |HC,J |+, ↑; −, ↑i T operators ck,τ = (ck,τ,↑, ck,τ,↓) annihilate an electron 1 X X = − V C (k0 − k, k, k0) (15) with momentum k in the mini-band of valley τ. Note 4NA τ that since we are only considering one band per valley, k,k0 τ we can use the valley index τ to label the mini-bands. We have calculated this matrix element numerically, and The form factors are defined using the moir´eHamiltonian found that to a very good approximation it can be written Bloch states |uτ (k)i as as a function of the inter-layer distance d as

τ,τ 0 λ (q, k) = huτ (k + q)|SgPl|uτ 0 (k)i , (10) l,g 1 h+, ↑; −, ↑ |HC,J |+, ↑; −, ↑i where Pl projects onto layer l and Sg is a matrix with NM entrees [Sg]g ,g = δg ,g+g , where g, gi and gj are moir´e − 4π d i j i j ≈ −(0.20 − 0.16 e 3 a ) meV , (16) reciprocal lattice vectors. Using the projected density operators, we write the Coulomb Hamiltonian as the sum So the inter-valley Heisenberg coupling arising from of an intra-valley and an inter-valley parts Coulomb interaction is ferromagnetic, and its magnitude increases as a function of the inter-layer distance. This is a consequence of the phase structure of the flat band H˜ = H + H , (11) C V IV wave functions, which leads to the minus sign in front of the exponential factor. where HV is U(2)+×U(2)− symmetric. Here we are only interested in the inter-valley part, which takes the form Next to the Coulomb interaction, there is a second source of SU(2)+×SU(2)− symmetry breaking, which comes from lattice-scale phonons near the K points of 1 X X C 0 † † H = V (q, k, k )c c c c 0 , the graphene Brillouin zone. As discussed in detail in IV 2NA τ k+q,−τ k,τ k0−q,τ k ,−τ q,k,k0 τ AppendixB, the phonon-induced inter-valley coupling (12) projected into the flat bands is where the flat-band projected interaction potential, de- gph X X H = − V PH (q, k, k0) (17) fined to include the form factors, is given by PH N τ q,k,k0 τ C 0 X 0 † † Vτ (q, k, k ) = Vll (q + g + 2X) × (13) 0 ×ck+q,−τ ck,τ ck0−q,τ ck ,−τ , l,l0,g τ,−τ −τ,τ 0 where the phonon interaction strength is approximately λl,g (q, k)λl0,−g(−q, k ) gph ≈ 630 meV. The phonon mediated interaction poten- τ In the above expression, we use X to denote the position tial is expressed in terms of the form factors fl,g(q, k) = x of the center of the mini-Brillouin zone at the monolayer hu−τ (k + q)|σ SgPl|uτ (k)i as 7

A. Skyrmion energy with SU(2)+×SU(2)− PH 0 X τ −τ 0 symmetry Vτ (q, k, k ) = fl,g(q, k)fl,−g(−q, k ) . (18) l,g For temperatures larger than the inter-valley Heisen- As before, we can use a Fierz identity to isolate the berg coupling (T & 1K), the spins from opposite valleys SU(2)+×SU(2)− symmetry breaking part of the Hamil- are decoupled via thermal fluctuations, while they remain tonian in Eq. (17). We find ferromagnetically correlated within each valley due to the large Coulomb scale (as exemplified by the spin stiff- 2gph X X ness ρs calculated below). Therefore, let us first ignore H = V PH (q + k0 − k, k, k0) (19) P H,J N τ the inter-valley Heisenberg coupling and assume that the q,k,k0 τ Hamiltonian is SU(2)+×SU(2)− symmetric. In that case,  i   i  X † s † s the lowest-energy skyrmions are skyrmions with topolog- × c c 0 c c , k0+q,−τ 2 k ,−τ k−q,τ 2 k,τ ical charge ±1 in a single valley. Because the flat bands i have Chern number ±1, these skyrmions have electric The relevant matrix element for the phonon induced charge ±1 according to Eq. (22). The energy of such a inter-valley coupling Hamiltonian is skyrmion is given by Esk = 4πρs [65], where ρs is the spin stiffness. In Refs. [33, 66], a mean-field expression for the spin stiffness of a spin polarized Landau level was h+, ↑; −, ↑ |HP H,J |+, ↑; −, ↑i derived. In AppendixC, this expression is generalized gph X X = V PH (k0 − k, k, k0) (20) to the case of electrons interacting via a density-density 2N τ P ˜ k,k0 τ term of the form k V (k)ρ(k)ρ(−k), projected onto a flat band with Berry curvature F(k). Using the same Evaluating this matrix element numerically, we find approach as Ref. [66], we find the following approximate expression for the spin stiffness: 1 h+, ↑; −, ↑ |HP H,J |+, ↑; −, ↑i ≈ 0.075 meV (21) NM ! ! 1 1 X 1 X We see that the phonon induced inter-valley Heisenberg ρ = F(k0)2 V˜ (k)f 2(k)|k|2 , s 8A N N coupling is anti-ferromagnetic. Note that it is a signifi- k0 k cant fraction of the Coulomb inter-valley Heisenberg cou- (23) pling in Eq. (16) for d ≈ a, so it cannot be neglected. where A is the area of the unit cell, N is the number of In fact, if one would not take a finite layer separation unit cells and f(k) = |λ(k, k0)| for some representative into account in the Coulomb potential, the phonon con- k0. The only approximation used to derive Eq. (23) is tribution would dominate. We conclude that although that the magnitude of the form factor |λ(k, q)| is indepen- the system at ν = 2 will most likely be ferromagnetic dent of q. If the Berry curvature is completely uniform (FM) and spontaneously break time-reversal symmetry, throughout the Brillouin zone, Eq. (23) reduces to the we can not rule out the spin-valley locked state (SVL) previously derived expression for Landau levels [33, 66]. where the electron spins are anti-aligned in different val- From Eq. (23), we see that a non-homogeneous Berry leys (hτ zsi= 6 0). The ferromagnetic state with order pa- curvature leads to a higher spin stiffness, and therefore a rameter s was also recently found to describe the ν = 2 higher skyrmion energy. insulator observed in twisted double bilayer-graphene [6– If we apply Eq. (23) to tBLG, we find 8, 20]. The possibility of magnetic order in magic-angle tBLG was also previously discussed in Refs. [26, 57–64]. ! 1 1 X 0 2 ρs ≈ F(k ) × 8AM NM k0∈mBZ V. CHARGED SKYRMION EXCITATIONS ! 1 X X V (k + g)f 2(k)|k|2 , (24) N g As mentioned previously, a skyrmion texture described k∈mBZ g by a unit vector field n(r) in a spin polarized Chern band carries electric charge, as follows from the following gen- where AM is the area of the moir´eunit cell, N is the eral relation between the excess charge density ρ(r) and number of mono-layer graphene unit cells, NM the num- Pontryagin density [33]: ber of moir´eunit cells, g again denotes the moir´ere- ciprocal lattice vectors, V (k) is the screened Coulomb potential defined in Eqs. (6) and (7) (with d = 0), and C P ++ ρ(r) = − n(r) · (∂ n(r) × ∂ n(r)) , (22) fg(k) = | l λl,g (k, K+/2)| (recall that K+ is the mini- 4π x y BZ K-point). The reason for defining fg(k) with respect where C is the Chern number. In order to identify to the momentum point K+/2 instead of the Γ point is P ++ skyrmions as the dominant charge carriers, we have to that we found | l λl,g (k, q)| to be largely independent study their energetics, which is what we turn to next. of q, except near Γ. 8

The energy cost of a well-separated skyrmion pair 2.5 E2,sk = 8πρs is to be compared with the energy cost of a particle-hole excitation in the spin polarized flat band. 2.0 Using the same approximation as for the calculation of 1.5 ρs, this energy cost in a mean-field decoupled Hamilto- nian is readily found to be r 1.0

0.5 2 X 2 Eph = V (k + g)fg (k) , (25) N 0.0 k,g 0 10 20 30 40 50 t (meV) which agrees with the expression for the energy of a well- separated particle-hole pair in the spin polarized lowest FIG. 5: Ratio r = E2,sk/Eph of the energy of a well-separated Landau level [67], and sets the scale for the mean-field skyrmion pair over the energy of a particle-hole excitation in a SU(2)+×SU(2)− symmetric model as a function of the sublattice gap MS. splitting on the top graphene layer. In Fig.5 we plot the ratio r = E2,sk/Eph of the energy of a skyrmion pair over the energy of a well-separated particle-hole pair for a dual-gate screened Coulomb po- tential, as a function of the sublattice splitting ∆t on in response to the formation of a single skyrmion. We ex- the top layer. The shape of this curve is completely de- pect this to be a good approximation in the regime where termined by the distribution of the Berry curvature over the inter-valley exchange, parameterized byρ ¯s, is weaker the mini-Brillouin zone. From Fig.5 we see that r ini- than the spin stiffness ρs in each individual valley; this tially decreases very quickly, until it reaches a minimum is the case for tBLG on HBN as shown by our numerical at ∆t ≈ 5 meV. This decrease follows from the fact that estimates (¯ρs/ρs ≈ 0.1). the Berry curvature is initially peaked at the K points First, we consider the ferromagnet. A single skyrmion because of the Dirac cones in the ∆t = 0 band spectrum, in one valley contains spins which are not aligned with but starts to smoothen out when ∆t increases. The ratio the spins in the other valley, and also with the external r reaches a minimum for ∆t ≈ 5 meV. After this min- magnetic field B⊥ which aligns all spins with itself in the imum, the Berry curvature starts to accumulate again, ground state. The core-size (and energy) of a skyrmion is this time at the Γ point. Now the spin stiffness increases determined by the competition between the Coulomb re- only slowly with ∆t. This is because a large value of pulsion and exchange energy loss due to decoupling with ∆t is required in order to close the gap between the flat spins from the opposite valley (determined byρ ¯s), and band and the higher dispersive band at Γ, at which point with B⊥. For smallρ ¯s and B⊥, the skyrmion would be the Berry curvature would also become singular. How- large as it would try to minimize Coulomb repulsion. On ever, for realistic values of ∆t, we see that the skyrmion- increasing B⊥, the Zeeman energy dominates and the pair energy is around 40 to 45 percent of the particle- skyrmion size saturates to a small value of the order of hole energy. For example, with ∆t = 15 meV, we find a moir´elattice spacing aM . In this limit, the skyrmion en- skyrmion-pair energy of ≈ 21 meV, and a particle-hole ergy also saturates to a maximum value; and a skyrmion- energy of ≈ 48 meV. antiskyrmion pair resembles a particle-hole pair. The energy of a skyrmion in a single valley will increase To illustrate this schematically, we make an (over- when the inter-valley Heisenberg coupling is taken into simplified) estimate the energy Esk of a two-dimensional account because this term wants to lock the spin mo- skyrmion of linear size R, which is given by the sum of ments in both valleys together and therefore penalizes a its elastic energy Eel, Coulomb energy EC (for simplic- skyrmion texture made from the spins in only one valley ity we temporarily ignore screening) and Zeeman-energy but not the other. In the next section, we study the ef- EZ that receives contribution from both the inter-valley fect of non-zero inter-valley Heisenberg coupling in more coupling and the external magnetic field B⊥: detail.

2  2 e  ρ¯s  R Esk ≈ 4πρs + + gsµBB⊥ + =⇒ 4πR 2 aM 1/3  2 2 1/3 a2 `2 ! B. Effective field theory description e aM M B˜ Ropt ≈ ≡ (26) 4π(gsµBB⊥ +ρ ¯s/2) a0 In this section, we compute the energy of a charge e skyrmion in a single valley with non-zero inter-valley 4π Heisenberg coupling. We take into account the change of where a0 = m e2 is the effective Bohr radius, `B˜ = p e the ground state due to the external magnetic field, but ~/e[B⊥ +ρ ¯s/(2gsµB)] is the effective magnetic length neglect the back-reaction of spins in the opposite valley and aM is the moir´elengthscale. At the optimal length- 9

(a) (b)

FIG. 6: (a) Band-splitting and skyrmion gap in the ferromagnet as a function of B⊥.(b) Green (brown) line schematically depicts the charge gap ∆c as a function of B⊥ for the ferromagnet (spin-valley locked state). ∆c increases till B⊥ = BFM (BSVL) when the energies of the skyrmion-pair and particle-hole pair cross, and then drops. scale, the energy of the skyrmion is given by As shown in AppendixD1, we find that the field the- ory yields the following energy for the skyrmion ansatz !1/3 e2 a a W (z) = R/z after optimizing its size R (α is an O(1) E (B ) − E (B = 0) ≈ 0 M sk ⊥ sk ⊥ 4πa `2 numerical constant). M B˜ (    ν B , for g µ B  ρ¯ ∆ EC ∝ ⊥ s B ⊥ s (27) Esk = 4πρs + αEC ln 1 + (30) 1/3 EC ∆ B⊥ forρ ¯s  gsµBB⊥ where ν = 1/2 (1/3) for strongly gate-screened (un- Therefore, E first increases linearly, and subsequently sk screened) Coulomb interaction (see Eq. (6)), and ∆ = sublinearly in B for small B ; this feature remains valid ⊥ ⊥ g µ B +ρ ¯ /2 is the effective Zeeman energy-scale in a even in presence of screening and can contribute to an s B ⊥ s given valley. We conclude that irrespective of the pre- increasing charge gap on turning on B . ⊥ cise details of screening, E increases sub-linearly with Next, we turn to a continuum field theory for a more sk B for small external fields. Though this effective the- accurate estimate of the skyrmion energy. The effective ⊥ ory cannot capture large B when lattice-scale effects Lagrangian density for the ferromagnet can be described ⊥ become important, the skyrmion energy is expected to by the following two-component O(3) non-linear σ model: saturate as a skyrmion pair gets squeezed to a particle- X    hole pair. L = nS A[nτ ] · ∂tnτ (r) + gsµBB · nτ (r) We can estimate the energy and size of a skyrmion for τ=± screened Coulomb coupling with a screening length of the ρ  nS2ρ¯ order of a . Taking E ≈ ρ ≈ 1 meV, we find that the − s (∇n (r))2 − s [n (r) − n (r)]2 M c s 2 τ 2 + − correction to the elastic energy of the skyrmion is ≈ 1 1 Z meV for B⊥ = 0 andρ ¯s = 0.12 meV. This implies that − dr0 V (r − r0)ρ(r)ρ(r0) (28) the skyrmion-antiskyrmion pair still costs lower energy 2 than the particle-hole pair. The net magnetic moment where A[nτ ] corresponds to the vector potential of a unit carried by the skyrmion is approximately 2.7 gsµB, so we monopole with ∇n × A[nτ ] = nτ , and nτ (r) lies on the are in the regime where the skyrmion size is quite small. P 2-sphere (nτ · nτ = 1). ρ(r) = τ ρτ (r) with ρτ (r) = Hence, the exact numerical estimates from our contin- Cτ uum model are not likely to be very accurate; however, − 4π nτ · (∂xnτ × ∂ynτ ) is the topological charge density they are robust to small microscopic deformations of the of the skyrmion (Cτ = ∓1 for valleys labeled√ τ = ±), 2 Hamiltonian and provide a reasonable sense of the rele- ρ¯s is the inter-valley spin-stiffness, n = 2/( 3aM ) is the density of electrons and S = 1/2 is the electron spin vant energy scales. For the spin-valley locked state, we replace n → −n (~ = 1). In the ground state, n+(r) = n−(r) for the − − in Eq. (28). While the Zeeman gap ∆ =ρ ¯ /2 is identical ferromagnet so the term withρ ¯s does not contribute. s To calculate the energy of a skyrmion configuration, it to the ferromagnet for B⊥ = 0, turning on B⊥ causes is convenient to use complex coordinates z = x + iy, and spins from opposite valleys to cant towards itself, chang- write the single skyrmion texture in terms of a complex ing the ground state (however, spins within one valley re- analytic function W (z) as follows [65]. main ferromagnetically aligned). Interestingly, the effec- tive Zeeman gap for a single valley (∆) remains constant 2W (z) 1 − |W (z)|2 until the field reaches the critical value B =ρ ¯ /(g µ ), n − in = , n = (29) ⊥ s s B x y 1 + |W (z)|2 z 1 + |W (z)|2 at which point a transition to the ferromagnetic state oc- 10

FIG. 7: The band-gap evolution at ν = 3 as a function of B⊥, for ∆VZ < ∆SZ and ∆VZ > ∆SZ . We have assumed that gv < 0, gs > 0 and |gv| > |gs|, following Refs. [27, 28]. curs (see AppendixD1). Once the system is ferromag- D. Charge gap at ν = 3 netic, the skyrmion energy increases linearly as discussed above. To summarize, we find the following behavior for Next, we turn our attention to the ν = 3 state and ∆: discuss predictions for the charge gap in presence of B⊥, assuming it is insulating in a high-quality sample. The ( ρ¯s ρ¯s ,B⊥ < anomalous Hall effect and evidence of edge transport [29] ∆ = g µ B˜ = 2 gsµB (31) s B ρ¯s ρ¯s can be explained by a single spin and valley polarized gsµBB⊥ − ,B⊥ ≥ 2 gsµB hole-band. Equivalently, three of the four conduction bands are filled; for concreteness let us assume these are Accordingly, the skyrmion size also remains fixed till (τ z, sz) = (+, ↑), (−, ↑) and (+, ↓). If the lowest energy B⊥ =ρ ¯s/(gsµB) and then gradually decreases as B⊥ charged excitations are skyrmions, then the energy of a is tuned up further. single isolated skyrmion is be given by Eq. (30). In par- ticular, the elastic energy 4πρs of the skyrmion should remain unchanged as the spin-stiffness ρs is insensitive to the valley or spin quantum number of the conduction band. The effective magnetic field seen by the skyrmion C. Charge gap in a magnetic field at ν = 2 B˜ is given by the sum of the external field B⊥ and the internal field which is proportional toρ ¯s and the internal Having established that a skyrmion is the lowest energy Zeeman field from the ordered moments of the remain- charge e excitation for small external fields, we now turn ing filled bands. In our mean-field picture, the (+, ↑) and (+, ↓) states form a spin-singlet at each k. There- to the longitudinal resistivity ρxx as a function of B⊥. We assume that the insulator at ν = 2 has an activated fore, skyrmions cannot be excited in the τ = + valley. A skyrmion excitation is possible in the τ = − valley, start- ρxx which is governed by the gap ∆c to the charged exci- tation that costs the lowest energy. Because of the valley- ing with electrons in the (−, ↓) band. Such a skyrmion and spin-Zeeman terms in Eq. (1), the bandgap decreases will see no background ordered moment, and therefore have a lower energy E given by Eq. (30) with B˜ = B . with increasing B⊥, and hence the gap to exciting an elec- sk ⊥ tron to an empty band decreases. On the other hand, The charge gap ∆c is just 2Esk. the single charge e skyrmion gap for the ferromagnet in- At higher external fields, we expect the charge gap to ν creases as B⊥ (1/3 ≤ ν ≤ 1/2 depending on the nature be set by the particle-hole gap, as the skyrmion energy of screening) for small fields B⊥. Therefore, the overall increases with B⊥. Note that although the degeneracy charge gap ∆c = min{2Esk(B⊥), 2|MS|−µB|gv,maxB⊥|} between the four conduction bands is spontaneously bro- will initially increase as a function of B⊥, and then start ken at B⊥ = 0, turning on an infinitesimal B⊥ automat- dropping when the valley-Zeeman term dominates, as ically chooses an arrangement of the bands via the valley schematically depicted in Fig.6. Assuming that the be- and spin Zeeman terms in the Hamiltonian. The behav- havior of the resistivity is determined entirely by the acti- ior of the particle-hole gap as a function of B⊥ depends vation gap ∆c, charge e skyrmions can explain the pecu- on the sequence in which these bands are ordered with liar behavior of ρxx(B⊥)[29]. For the spin-valley locked energy, which in turn depends on the interaction induced state, the gap remains constant till B⊥ ≈ ρ¯s/(gsµB), valley-Zeeman and spin-Zeeman gaps at zero B⊥. If the and then increases; therefore it appears unlikely that the valley-Zeeman gap is larger than the spin-Zeeman gap, ground state is the spin-valley locked state based on the the top two bands are spin-split and they move apart transport data. This agrees with the results of Section under an applied B⊥ via the single-particle Zeeman shift IV, where we found the net inter-valley Heisenberg cou- with a constant g-factor gs = 2. In contrast, if the spin- pling to be ferromagnetic. Zeeman gap dominates and the top two bands are valley- 11 split, then the particle-hole gap increases with B⊥, but with a g-factor gv(k0) where k0 corresponds to the point where the gap is minimal at B⊥ = 0. The situation is depicted schematically in Fig. (7), where we neglect the dispersion of the flat bands (which is justified for a spa- tially uniform order parameter, as the gap magnitude is set by the larger Coulomb scale). To summarize, at ν = 3 the skyrmion energy is ex- pected set the charge gap at B⊥ = 0, leading to a FIG. 8: Schematic depiction of the skyrmion-pair potential from a non-linear onset with B⊥. At intermediate fields the skyrmion-antiskyrmion energy will exceed the particle- single valley. The skyrmions can form a bound state if the minima at 2L is deeper than minima at L → ∞. hole energy. In this regime gap will continue to increase opt with B⊥, but linearly. Further, the coefficient of linear increase can tell whether the valley Zeeman gap is larger tances [69, 70] (or a screened Coulomb repulsion, which than the spin-Zeeman gap at B = 0, or vice-versa. At ⊥ decays exponentially at distances larger than the screen- even larger values of B , the valence bands which we ⊥ ing length). Therefore the skyrmions prefer to be paired have neglected till now may come close the Fermi level, at the lowest energy scales (akin to vortices in a U(1) su- resulting in a decrease of the charge gap. perfluid below the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless tran- sition temperature TBKT ). We now consider an opposite phase skyrmion pair con- VI. SKYRMION PAIRING figuration in the ferromagnet, with a distance 2L between their centers. In this section, we show that charge e fermionic R R skyrmions have a generic tendency to attract and bind W (z) = − (32) into charge 2e bosonic pairs, leading to the exotic possi- z − L z + L bility of quantum phases (like superconductivity) that The energy of the skyrmion-pair Epair can be computed can arise from skyrmion pairing at finite density at using the effective field theory in Eq. (28); the details are T = 0. Although we use a semiclassical description for relegated to AppendixD2. the energetics to maintain an analytical handle and pin- el Z C point the physical mechanism of pairing, the small size Epair = Epair + Epair + Epair of the skyrmions for parameters relevant to tBLG (see 8πg µ BR˜ 2 2L e2 sectionVB) motivates us to consider these skyrmions = 8πρ + √s B ln + s 2 R 4π(2L) (or skyrmion-pairs) as charged quantum quasiparticles. 3aM Therefore, we can envision transitions to quantum liq- (33) uid (superconductor) or quantum solid (Wigner crystal) ρ¯s where B˜ = B⊥ + is the effective Zeeman field at phases of 2e skyrmion-pairs at small but finite density of 2gsµB charge carriers, in the same spirit as band structures or ν = 2. Therefore, we confirm that the skyrmion-pair phase transitions of charge-neutral quantum skyrmions attracts at distances L larger than R but smaller than have been considered in two-dimensional chiral magnets ξs, as depicted schematically in Fig.8. [68]. At finite density the charge 2e bosonic skyrmion-pairs We first consider two skyrmions from the same Chern can either condense to form a superconductor, or form band (same valley). If they have opposite phases in the into a Wigner crystal phase to minimize Coulomb re- plane normal to the spin-ordering axis (x-y plane in our pulsion [70]. Such superconductivity may be aided by scenario), they will always attract at large distance scales gate-screening of Coulomb interaction, or suppressed by (an opposite phase-winding skyrmion can be obtained the Magnus force felt by a skyrmion-pair from the same by n = (nx, ny, nz) → (−nx, −ny, nz) and has the same Chern band [71]. The exact phase diagram requires an topological and electric charge). The physical reason is involved study we will not attempt here; instead we focus simple: for a pair of well-separated skyrmions of oppo- on the symmetry properties of superconductor obtained site phases (the distance between their centers 2L is much by such a condensate. larger than the typical skyrmion size R, but smaller than To derive the quantum numbers of the skyrmions and the spin-correlation length ξs), the components of the skyrmion-pairs, we follow the approach in Ref. 70. we iφ spin pointing normal to the effective field B˜ are quenched note that if we write nx + iny ∼ e sin θ, the classical at distance L  ξs. This lowers the effective Zeeman en- phase space variables (φ, nz) can be promoted to canoni- ˆ ergy, which is present in tBLG due to intervalley coupling cally conjugate quantum operators (φ, 2ˆsz). The infinite even at B⊥ = 0. Indeed, we show below that the effec- degeneracy with respect of rotation of phase φ for a single tive Zeeman energy gain is logarithmic and this results classical skyrmion texture translates to a fixed quantum −1 R in a L attractive force between these skyrmions that number for the total spin Sz = (n/2) dr[nz(r) − 1] (re- always prevails the L−2 Coulomb replusion at large dis- call that n is the electron density, and we have subtracted 12 out the background spin from the ground state). The size required to establish its stability. of the quantum skyrmion R takes the closest possible value to the classical minimum to ensure a half-integer For the spin-valley locked state, a skyrmion- antiskyrmion pair from opposite valleys (both with same spin Sz. The same should be true for a skyrmion-pair, the quantum 2e boson corresponding to classical texture charge) can avoid losing any exchange energy at zero B⊥ by keeping spins locally anti-aligned (n+(r) = −n−(r) ≡ npair(r) carries a quantized integer spin given by n(r)), and simultaneously quench the Coulomb energy n Z cost by having a very large radius R which is fixed by Sz = dr [npair(r) · zˆ − 1] (34) 2 small anisotropies beyond the SU(2)+× SU(2)− symmet- ric limit. Such a charge 2e pair therefore only costs an The 2e bosonic pair carries non-zero net spin; there- elastic energy of Epair ≈ 8πρs. In analogy with the previ- fore its condensation breaks time-reversal, and ferromag- ous discussion, the quantum number Qa of the skyrmion- netism persists into the superconductor. This is easiest antiskyrmion pair under a generator T a ∈ {s, τ zs} of the to see in the small-size limit when the skyrmion pair re- symmetry group SU(2)+× SU(2)− are given by: sembles a hole pair, it carries spin S = 1, and its con- densation leads to triplet superconductivity. However, the symmetry properties of the superconductor do not Z change away from this limit, where our proposed mech- a n z a Q = dr (nsk(r) − n0) · Tr[(τ s)T ] (35) anism is operative. Hence, the quantum phase transi- 2 tion (QPT) from the ferromagnet to the superconductor only breaks U(1) charge conservation, and is described by the Abelian Higgs model (charged 2e scalar coupled where n (r) is the skyrmionic texture in n(r) and to a U(1) electromagnetic gauge field). Further, since the sk n0 = (0, 0, 1) is the ground state configuration. From 2e boson carries charge ±2 under U(1)v (depending on Eq. (35), we note that the superconductor formed by the valley/Chern sector), it transforms non-trivially un- skyrmion pairing from opposite valleys in the spin-valley der moir´elattice translations and its condensation will locked state preserves global spin-rotation symmetries, lead to broken translation symmetry with a three-fold i.e, Qa = 0 ∀ T a ∈ {s}. Further, it also preserves time- enlarged unit cell. A similar scenario holds for the spin- reversal and translation (being neutral under U(1) ). valley locked state as well, making appropriate modifica- v ˜ This necessarily implies that in case of a direct tran- tions to B using Eq. (31). sition, the critical point that describes the QPT from Next, we consider skyrmion pairing from opposite the spin-valley locked state (breaks spin-rotation sym- Chern sectors (or equivalently, from opposite valleys). In metry, preserves U(1) charge conservation) to the super- case of the ferromagnet, a charge 2e pair requires pair- conductor (which breaks U(1) charge conservation but ing a skyrmion from one valley with an antiskyrmion preserves spin-rotation) is a deconfined quantum critical from the opposite valleys (since they have opposite Chern point. The critical theory for this transition has been numbers). This does not lead to any effective Zeeman discussed using a five-component ’super-spin’ order pa- energy gain, and is therefore not favorable. However, rameter in Ref. [72] that transforms as a vector under an skyrmion pairing of opposite charges from opposite val- emergent SO(5) symmetry. The defects of the spin-Hall leys is favored by both Coulomb and effective Zeeman like order parameter, which are skyrmion pairs, carry terms (as it locally preserves the inter-valley ferromag- charge 2e. Therefore proliferation of these defects leads netic configuration when the skyrmions sit on top of each to suppression of anti-ferromagnetic order and simul- other with n+(r) = n−(r)). Such a skyrmion pair again taneous appearance of superconductivity. Approaching carries a large spin. The resulting inter-valley coherent from the opposite side, the defects of the superconduc- state breaks valley U(1) and spin-rotation, and the QPT tor, which are vortices, carry quantized spin. This can be is described by a complex scalar field theory. Note that seen via the critical theory with the Wess-Zumino-Witten this state is distinct from the conventional time-reversal term in Ref. [72]; the latter endows a superconducting preserving IVC phase discussed in the context of tBLG vortex with a spin-half. Hence, proliferation of vortices [28]. Regardless, a uniform condensate of such skyrmion destroys superconductivity and simultaneously results in pairs is also precluded by the opposite Chern number long-range magnetic order. of the bands. To understand this, one can again resort the small size (or large field) limit, when the skyrmion- Lastly, we note that if this mechanism is operative in antiskyrmion pair reduces to a particle-hole or exciton tBLG, the critical temperature of the superconducting pair carrying a net spin S = 1. Since the argument of transition would be set by the Heisenberg coupling J be- Ref. 27 relies solely on topological considerations and is tween the spins from opposite valleys (which provides independent of the spin of charge carriers, we expect such the binding energy). From Eq. (16), we therefore expect a uniform condensate to be energetically unfavorable. A Tc ∼ J ∼ 1K. An in-depth investigation of supercon- lattice of skyrmion-antiskyrmion pairs (analogous to the ductivity via skyrmion-pairing, including a quantitative exciton-vortex lattice discussed in Ref. 27) offers an at- estimate of Tc and a phase diagram as a function of dop- tractive alternative, but more detailed investigations are ing, will be the subject of a forthcoming study [73]. 13

VII. DISCUSSION net; it will stay constant till a critical field Bc that in- duces a phase transition to FM. Hence, a careful study We have argued that the ν = 2 resistance peak ob- of the activation gap as a function of the magnetic field served in magic-angle tBLG aligned with hBN observed can distinguish these scenarios. The said phase transi- in Ref. [29, 30] arises from electrons filling a spin polar- tion to a FM and associated critical signatures may also ized band in each valley. The spins in different valleys be observed via thermodynamic probes. are most likely aligned ferromagnetically, but we can- Outlook: Recent theoretical and experimental works not completely exclude the possibility that there is anti- have shown that flat bands with non-zero Chern number ferromagnetic alignment between the valleys. The pre- are quite common in moir´ematerials [19, 80]. For ex- cise nature of the inter-valley spin correlation depends ample, Refs. [3, 26, 31] found either from experiments on lattice-scale effects which determine the inter-valley or a self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculation that in cer- Heisenberg coupling and are not accurately captured by tain regimes electron interactions in magic-angle tBLG our approach. However, irrespective of the spin align- unaligned with hBN lead to a spontaneous breaking of ment or anti-alignment between the valleys, we expect the C2vT symmetry protecting the Dirac cones, giving skyrmion excitations to be lower in energy than particle- rise to mean-field bands with Chern number equal to ei- hole excitations. Because of the the non-zero Chern ther ±2 [3, 26] or ±1 [3, 31]. In twisted double bilayer number of the flat bands, these skyrmions carry charge graphene the C2 symmetry is broken explicitly on the ±e, making them the most relevant charge carriers. Be- single-particle level, and the flat bands have Chern num- cause skyrmions have a large effective g-factor, the spin- ber 2 [20]. In Ref. [5], a Chern insulator at ν = 1 was Zeeman term efficiently raises their energy, which we pro- observed in ABC trilayer-graphene on hBN, which can pose to be the origin of the increase in resistivity with be understood from a Hartree-Fock study which predicts out-of-plane magnetic field observed in Ref. [29] at ν = 2. mean-field bands with Chern number ±2 at intermediate We note that our diagnosis of a ferromagnetic insulator interaction strengths. at ν = 2 based on magnetotransport data is consistent There is also mounting evidence that the insulating with recent predictions of ferromagnetic insulating states states at integer ν result from spontaneous symmetry at integer fillings of nearly flat bands based on exact di- breaking which lifts the spin and valley degeneracies, sim- agonalization and DMRG studies of models appropriate ilar to what happens in quantum Hall ferromagnetism to tBLG on hBN [74]. [33, 47, 48]. The general picture that seems to emerge Experimental probes: A natural question arises regard- at present is that this spin and valley degeneracy lift- ing experimental probes that distinguish between the dif- ing occurs in a valley-U(1) preserving manner, i.e. with- ferent magnetic orders at ν = 2, since neutron-scattering out developing inter-valley coherence. For example, the experiments may be difficult due to the two-dimensional anomalous Hall effect at ν = 3 in tBLG aligned with nature of the sample. The ferromagnet breaks time- hBN observed in Refs. [29, 30] and the Chern insulator reversal symmetry, and therefore can be probed using at ν = 1 in trilayer graphene [5] can both naturally be at- muon spin resonance. However, non-linear optical re- tributed to a spontaneous valley polarization [5, 27, 28]. sponses that are enhanced by orbital ferromagnetism in The insulators at ν = 1 and ν = 2 observed in twisted flat bands as suggested in Ref. [75] will remain sup- double bilayer graphene in Ref. [6–8] were proposed to pressed as there is no net valley-polarization at this fill- respectively be a valley-polarized and valley-singlet fer- ing. The spin-valley locked state breaks spin-rotation but romagnet [20]. A priori, skyrmions could play a role in preserves time-reversal (since opposite valleys carry op- charge transport for any of these devices. However, this posite spin), and is comparatively harder to detect. We is less likely for bands with higher Chern numbers be- note that the collective magnons (which simultaneously cause the spin stiffness increases quadratically with C involve both valleys) have different dispersions in the two [19, 47]. We note that, interestingly, the ν = −2 insula- cases (quadratic for FM, linear for spin-valley locked); tor observed in ABC stacked trilayer graphene on hBN further ferromagnetic magnons gap out under a magnetic [5] also shows an increased resistance peak under an ap- field while antiferromagnetic magnons do not. Therefore, plied out-of-plane magnetic field. ABC stacked trilayer studying the magnetic contribution to specific heat or graphene has a large orbital g-factor [81], which means thermal conductivity; or performing spin-injection exper- that the valley-Zeeman effect dominates the spin-Zeeman iments (which can directly probe the magnon dispersion) effect. Because of this, one expects that a slightly modi- at the sample-edge [76, 77] can distinguish these states. fied version of our discussion in the main text applies to Since a skyrmion has a large number of flipped spins, this device as well. one can sense a trapped skyrmion in an impurity poten- An important general open question concerns the con- tial via spin-polarized STM, or local magnetometers like nection between the insulators observed at integer fillings a scanning nano-squid [78] or a Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV) in moir´ematerials and the superconducting domes which center [79]. Finally, if the state is indeed an AFM, then result from doping these insulators. No superconducting applying a strong B⊥ will cant the spins and change the domes were observed in Refs. [29, 30], but this could be ground state. As discussed, the charge e skyrmion gap because the temperatures in these experiments were too ∆c(B⊥) will behave very differently from the ferromag- high, or because of device quality. Further experimental 14 studies are needed to either rule out superconductivity the moir´epuzzle. in magic-angle tBLG aligned with hBN, or to establish its existence and measure its response to different elec- tric and magnetic fields. If superconductivity is observed, theory will have to come up with a pairing mechanism Acknowledgements for the charge carriers which are doped into the insulator. In this work, we looked into the possibility of skyrmion pairing, but other mechanisms are possible of course. For It is a pleasure to thank Zhen Bi, Rafael Fernan- example, Ref. [20] proposed a more conventional pairing dez, David Goldhaber-Gordon, Jiang Kang, Eslam Kha- mechanism driven by ferromagnetic spin fluctuations to laf, Biao Lian, Hoi Chun Po, Louk Rademaker, Cecile explain the superconducting domes in twisted double bi- Repellin, Todadri Senthil, Oskar Vafek, Ashvin Vish- layer graphene. wanath, Fengcheng Wu, Andrea Young and Ya-Hui Finally, the precise connection between the insulators Zhang for stimulating discussions. SC is particularly observed in magic-angle tBLG aligned with hBN, and thankful to Eslam Khalaf for clarifying the computation those observed in the C2v symmetric devices [1,3] where of skyrmion quantum numbers, and related collabora- the substrate does not significantly modify the single- tions. SC acknowledges support from the ERC synergy particle physics, is not clear. Theoretically, one would grant UQUAM via Ehud Altman. MZ and NB were sup- like to understand what happens if one continuously ported by the DOE, office of Basic Energy Sciences under turns off the hBN-induced sublattice splitting. It is likely contract no. DE-AC02-05-CH11231. This work was fi- that some insulators will undergo phase transitions, per- nalized in part at the Aspen Center for Physics, which is haps accompanied by changes in Chern number. Under- supported by National Science Foundation grant PHY- standing this connection is an important missing piece in 1607611.

[1] Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Ahmet Demir, Shiang Fang, [6] Xiaomeng Liu, Zeyu Hao, Eslam Khalaf, Jong Yeon Spencer L. Tomarken, Jason Y. Luo, Javier D. Sanchez- Lee, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Ashvin Vish- Yamagishi, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, wanath, and Philip Kim, “Spin-polarized Correlated In- Efthimios Kaxiras, Ray C. Ashoori, and Pablo Jarillo- sulator and Superconductor in Twisted Double Bilayer Herrero, “Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling Graphene,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1903.08130 (2019), in magic-angle graphene superlattices,” Nature 556, 80 arXiv:1903.08130 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. EP – (2018). [7] Yuan Cao, Daniel Rodan-Legrain, Oriol Rubies- [2] Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, Hryhoriy Polshyn, Bigord`a, Jeong Min Park, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Yuxuan Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, David Taniguchi, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Electric Field Graf, Andrea F. Young, and Cory R. Dean, “Tuning Tunable Correlated States and Magnetic Phase Tran- superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene,” Science sitions in Twisted Bilayer-Bilayer Graphene,” arXiv 363, 1059–1064 (2019). e-prints , arXiv:1903.08596 (2019), arXiv:1903.08596 [3] Xiaobo Lu, Petr Stepanov, Wei Yang, Ming Xie, Mo- [cond-mat.str-el]. hammed Ali Aamir, Ipsita Das, Carles Urgell, Kenji [8] Cheng Shen, Na Li, Shuopei Wang, Yanchong Zhao, Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Guangyu Zhang, Adrian Jian Tang, Jieying Liu, Jinpeng Tian, Yanbang Chu, Bachtold, Allan H. MacDonald, and Dmitri K. Efe- Kenji Watanabe, and Takashi Taniguchi, “Observation tov, “Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated of superconductivity with Tc onset at 12K in electri- states in magic-angle bilayer graphene,” Nature (Lon- cally tunable twisted double bilayer graphene,” arXiv don) 574, 653–657 (2019), arXiv:1903.06513 [cond- e-prints , arXiv:1903.06952 (2019), arXiv:1903.06952 mat.str-el]. [cond-mat.supr-con]. [4] Guorui Chen, Lili Jiang, Shuang Wu, Bosai Lyu, [9] Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Shiang Fang, Kenji Watan- Hongyuan Li, Bheema Lingam Chittari, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxiras, and Pablo abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Zhiwen Shi, Jeil Jung, Yuanbo Jarillo-Herrero, “Unconventional superconductivity in Zhang, and Feng Wang, “Evidence of a gate-tunable magic-angle graphene superlattices,” Nature 556, 43 mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moir´esuperlattice,” EP – (2018). Nature Physics 15, 237–241 (2019). [10] Alexander Kerelsky, Leo J McGilly, Dante M Kennes, [5] Guorui Chen, Aaron L. Sharpe, Eli J. Fox, Ya-Hui Lede Xian, Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, Zhang, Shaoxin Wang, Lili Jiang, Bosai Lyu, Hongyuan K Watanabe, T Taniguchi, James Hone, Cory Dean, Li, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Zhiwen Shi, et al., “Maximized electron interactions at the magic T. Senthil, David Goldhaber-Gordon, Yuanbo Zhang, angle in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 572, 95–100 and Feng Wang, “Tunable correlated Chern insulator (2019). and ferromagnetism in a moir´esuperlattice,” Nature [11] Youngjoon Choi, Jeannette Kemmer, Yang Peng, Alex (London) 579, 56–61 (2020), arXiv:1905.06535 [cond- Thomson, Harpreet Arora, Robert Polski, Yiran Zhang, mat.mes-hall]. Hechen Ren, Jason Alicea, Gil Refael, Felix von Op- pen, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Ste- 15

van Nadj-Perge, “Electronic correlations in twisted bi- arXiv:1810.03103 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. layer graphene near the magic angle,” Nature Physics [26] Ming Xie and A. H. MacDonald, “Nature of the corre- 15, 1174–1180 (2019), arXiv:1901.02997 [cond-mat.mes- lated insulator states in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. hall]. Rev. Lett. 124, 097601 (2020). [12] Yuhang Jiang, Xinyuan Lai, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi [27] Nick Bultinck, Shubhayu Chatterjee, and Michael P. Taniguchi, Kristjan Haule, Jinhai Mao, and Eva Y. Zaletel, “Anomalous Hall ferromagnetism in twisted Andrei, “Charge order and broken rotational symme- bilayer graphene,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1901.08110 try in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature (2019), arXiv:1901.08110 [cond-mat.str-el]. (London) 573, 91–95 (2019), arXiv:1904.10153 [cond- [28] Ya-Hui Zhang, Dan Mao, and T. Senthil, “Twisted bi- mat.mes-hall]. layer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: [13] Yuan Cao, Debanjan Chowdhury, Daniel Rodan- Anomalous Hall effect and a lattice model,” Physical Legrain, Oriol Rubies-Bigorda, Kenji Watanabe, Review Research 1, 033126 (2019), arXiv:1901.08209 Takashi Taniguchi, T. Senthil, and Pablo Jarillo- [cond-mat.str-el]. Herrero, “Strange Metal in Magic-Angle Graphene with [29] Aaron L. Sharpe, Eli J. Fox, Arthur W. Barnard, near Planckian Dissipation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, Joe Finney, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, 076801 (2020), arXiv:1901.03710 [cond-mat.str-el]. M. A. Kastner, and David Goldhaber-Gordon, “Emer- [14] Hryhoriy Polshyn, Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, gent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in Yuxuan Zhang, K Watanabe, T Taniguchi, Cory R twisted bilayer graphene,” Science 365, 605–608 (2019), Dean, and Andrea F Young, “Large linear-in- arXiv:1901.03520 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene,” [30] M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, Nature Physics 15, 1011–1016 (2019). J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and [15] Rafi Bistritzer and Allan H. MacDonald, “Moir´ebands A. F. Young, “Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall ef- in twisted double-layer graphene,” Proceedings of the fect in a moir´eheterostructure,” Science 367, 900–903 National Academy of Sciences 108, 12233–12237 (2011). (2020), arXiv:1907.00261 [cond-mat.str-el]. [16] Grigory Tarnopolsky, Alex Jura Kruchkov, and Ashvin [31] Shang Liu, Eslam Khalaf, Jong Yeon Lee, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer Vishwanath, “Nematic topological semimetal and in- graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019). sulator in magic angle bilayer graphene at charge [17] J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and neutrality,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1905.07409 (2019), A. H. Castro Neto, “Continuum model of the twisted arXiv:1905.07409 [cond-mat.str-el]. graphene bilayer,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 155449 (2012). [32] Ya-Hui Zhang, Hoi Chun Po, and T. Senthil, “Landau [18] J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. level degeneracy in twisted bilayer graphene: Role of Castro Neto, “Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 125104 (2019). structure,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256802 (2007). [33] S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. A. Kivelson, and E. H. [19] Ya-Hui Zhang, Dan Mao, Yuan Cao, Pablo Jarillo- Rezayi, “Skyrmions and the crossover from the integer Herrero, and T. Senthil, “Nearly flat chern bands in to fractional quantum hall effect at small zeeman ener- moir´esuperlattices,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 075127 (2019). gies,” Phys. Rev. B 47, 16419–16426 (1993). [20] Jong Yeon Lee, Eslam Khalaf, Shang Liu, Xiaomeng [34] Jeil Jung, Ashley M. DaSilva, Allan H. MacDonald, and Liu, Zeyu Hao, Philip Kim, and Ashvin Vishwanath, Shaffique Adam, “Origin of band gaps in graphene on “Theory of correlated insulating behaviour and spin- hexagonal boron nitride,” Nature Communications 6, triplet superconductivity in twisted double bilayer 6308 EP – (2015). graphene,” Nature Communications 10, 5333 (2019), [35] Pablo San-Jose, A. Guti´errez-Rubio, Mauricio Sturla, arXiv:1903.08685 [cond-mat.str-el]. and Francisco Guinea, “Spontaneous strains and gap in [21] Hoi Chun Po, Liujun Zou, Ashvin Vishwanath, and graphene on boron nitride,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 075428 T. Senthil, “Origin of mott insulating behavior and (2014). superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. [36] B. Hunt, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, A. F. Young, Rev. X 8, 031089 (2018). M. Yankowitz, B. J. LeRoy, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, [22] Liujun Zou, Hoi Chun Po, Ashvin Vishwanath, and P. Moon, M. Koshino, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and R. C. T. Senthil, “Band structure of twisted bilayer graphene: Ashoori, “Massive Dirac Fermions and Hofstadter But- Emergent symmetries, commensurate approximants, terfly in a van der Waals Heterostructure,” Science 340, and wannier obstructions,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 085435 1427–1430 (2013), arXiv:1303.6942 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. (2018). [37] F. Amet, J. R. Williams, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, [23] Zhida Song, Zhijun Wang, Wujun Shi, Gang Li, Chen and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, “Insulating Behavior at Fang, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “All Magic Angles the Neutrality Point in Single-Layer Graphene,” Phys. in Twisted Bilayer Graphene are Topological,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 216601 (2013), arXiv:1209.6364 [cond- Rev. Lett. 123, 036401 (2019), arXiv:1807.10676 [cond- mat.mes-hall]. mat.mes-hall]. [38] Jeil Jung, Arnaud Raoux, Zhenhua Qiao, and A. H. [24] Kasra Hejazi, Chunxiao Liu, Hassan Shapourian, Xiao MacDonald, “Ab initio theory of moir´e superlattice Chen, and Leon Balents, “Multiple topological transi- bands in layered two-dimensional materials,” Phys. Rev. tions in twisted bilayer graphene near the first magic B 89, 205414 (2014). angle,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 035111 (2019). [39] Hakseong Kim, Nicolas Leconte, Bheema L. Chittari, [25] Jianpeng Liu, Junwei Liu, and Xi Dai, “Pseudo Lan- Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Allan H. Mac- dau level representation of twisted bilayer graphene: Donald, Jeil Jung, and Suyong Jung, “Accurate Gap Band topology and implications on the correlated in- Determination in Monolayer and Bilayer Graphene/h- sulating phase,” Physical Review B 99, 155415 (2019), BN Moir´eSuperlattices,” Nano Letters 18, 7732–7741 16

(2018), arXiv:1808.06633 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. rect measurement of discrete valley and orbital quantum [40] Fengcheng Wu and Sankar Das Sarma, “Identification numbers in bilayer graphene,” Nature Communications of superconducting pairing symmetry in twisted bi- 8, 948 (2017). layer graphene using in-plane magnetic field and strain,” [57] Luis A. Gonzalez-Arraga, J. L. Lado, Francisco Guinea, Phys. Rev. B 99, 220507 (2019), arXiv:1904.07875 and Pablo San-Jose, “Electrically controllable mag- [cond-mat.supr-con]. netism in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. [41] Mathias S. Scheurer, Rhine Samajdar, and Subir 119, 107201 (2017). Sachdev, “Pairing in twisted double-bilayer graphene [58] Alex Thomson, Shubhayu Chatterjee, Subir Sachdev, and related moire superlattice systems,” arXiv e-prints and Mathias S. Scheurer, “Triangular antiferromag- , arXiv:1906.03258 (2019), arXiv:1906.03258 [cond- netism on the honeycomb lattice of twisted bilayer mat.supr-con]. graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 075109 (2018). [42] T. Thonhauser, Davide Ceresoli, David Vanderbilt, and [59] Jian Kang and Oskar Vafek, “Strong coupling phases of R. Resta, “Orbital magnetization in periodic insula- partially filled twisted bilayer graphene narrow bands,” tors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137205 (2005). Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 246401 (2019). [43] Di Xiao, Ming-Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase [60] Kangjun Seo, Valeri N. Kotov, and Bruno Uchoa, “Fer- effects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, romagnetic Mott State in Twisted Graphene Bilayers 1959–2007 (2010). at the Magic Angle,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1812.02550 [44] Di Xiao, Wang Yao, and Qian Niu, “Valley-contrasting (2018), arXiv:1812.02550 [cond-mat.str-el]. physics in graphene: Magnetic moment and topological [61] Xiao-Chuan Wu, Anna Keselman, Chao-Ming Jian, transport,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236809 (2007). Kelly Ann Pawlak, and Cenke Xu, “Ferromag- [45] Shuichi Murakami and Naoto Nagaosa, “Berry phase in netism and spin-valley liquid states in moir´e corre- magnetic superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 057002 lated insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 024421 (2019), (2003). arXiv:1905.00033 [cond-mat.str-el]. [46] Sasa Dukan and Zlatko Tesanovic, “Superconductiv- [62] T. M. R. Wolf, J. L. Lado, G. Blatter, and O. Zilber- ity in a high magnetic field: Excitation spectrum and berg, “Electrically Tunable Flat Bands and Magnetism tunneling properties,” Phys. Rev. B 49, 13017–13023 in Twisted Bilayer Graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, (1994). 096802 (2019), arXiv:1905.07651 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. [47] S. M. Girvin and A. H. MacDonald, “Multicomponent [63] Constantin Schrade and Liang Fu, “Spin-valley density quantum hall systems: The sum of their parts and wave in moir´ematerials,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 035413 more,” in Perspectives in Quantum Hall Effects (John (2019), arXiv:1905.07401 [cond-mat.str-el]. Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2007) Chap. 5, pp. 161–224. [64] Yahya Alavirad and Jay D. Sau, “Ferromagnetism and [48] J. P. Eisenstein and A. H. MacDonald, “Bose–einstein its stability from the one-magnon spectrum in twisted condensation of excitons in bilayer electron systems,” bilayer graphene,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1907.13633 Nature 432, 691–694 (2004). (2019), arXiv:1907.13633 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. [49] Subir Sachdev and T. Senthil, “Zero temperature phase [65] Alexander M. Polyakov and A. A. Belavin, “Metastable transitions in quantum heisenberg ferromagnets,” An- States of Two-Dimensional Isotropic Ferromagnets,” nals of Physics 251, 76 – 122 (1996). JETP Lett. 22, 245–248 (1975), [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. [50] S. Das Sarma, Subir Sachdev, and Lian Zheng, Fiz.22,503(1975)]. “Double-layer quantum hall antiferromagnetism at fill- [66] K. Moon, H. Mori, Kun Yang, S. M. Girvin, A. H. ing fraction 2/m where m is an odd integer,” Phys. Rev. MacDonald, L. Zheng, D. Yoshioka, and Shou-Cheng Lett. 79, 917–920 (1997). Zhang, “Spontaneous interlayer coherence in double- [51] S. Das Sarma, Subir Sachdev, and Lian Zheng, “Canted layer quantum hall systems: Charged vortices and antiferromagnetic and spin-singlet quantum hall states kosterlitz-thouless phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. B 51, in double-layer systems,” Phys. Rev. B 58, 4672–4693 5138–5170 (1995). (1998). [67] S. M. Girvin, “The Quantum Hall Effect: Novel Excita- [52] Maxim Kharitonov, “Canted antiferromagnetic phase of tions and Broken Symmetries,” in Topological Aspects of the ν=0 quantum hall state in bilayer graphene,” Phys. Low Dimensional Systems, Vol. 69, edited by A. Comtet, Rev. Lett. 109, 046803 (2012). T. Jolicoeur, S. Ouvry, and F. David (Springer, Berlin, [53] Maxim Kharitonov, “Edge excitations of the canted an- Heidelberg, 1999) p. 53, arXiv:cond-mat/9907002 [cond- tiferromagnetic phase of the ν = 0 quantum hall state mat.mes-hall]. in graphene: A simplified analysis,” Phys. Rev. B 86, [68] Rina Takashima, Hiroaki Ishizuka, and Leon Balents, 075450 (2012). “Quantum skyrmions in two-dimensional chiral mag- [54] S Pezzini, C Cobaleda, B A Piot, V Bellani, and E Diez, nets,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 134415 (2016). “Canted antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic phase tran- [69] D. Lillieh¨o¨ok, K. Lejnell, A. Karlhede, and S. L. sition in bilayer graphene,” Journal of Physics: Confer- Sondhi, “Quantum hall skyrmions with higher topolog- ence Series 647, 012044 (2015). ical charge,” Phys. Rev. B 56, 6805–6809 (1997). [55] A. F. Young, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, B. Hunt, S. H. [70] Yu. V. Nazarov and A. V. Khaetskii, “Quantum phase Choi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. C. Ashoori, and transition in the skyrmion lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, P. Jarillo-Herrero, “Tunable symmetry breaking and he- 576–579 (1998). lical edge transport in a graphene quantum spin hall [71] Michael Stone, “Magnus force on skyrmions in ferro- state,” Nature 505, 528 EP – (2013). magnets and quantum hall systems,” Phys. Rev. B 53, [56] B. M. Hunt, J. I. A. Li, A. A. Zibrov, L. Wang, 16573–16578 (1996). T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, [72] Tarun Grover and T. Senthil, “Topological spin hall M. Zaletel, R. C. Ashoori, and A. F. Young, “Di- states, charged skyrmions, and superconductivity in two 17

dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 156804 (2008). imally localized wannier orbitals and the extended hub- [73] Eslam Khalaf, Shubhayu Chatterjee, Nick Bultinck, bard model for twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. X Michael P. Zaletel, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Charged 8, 031087 (2018). Skyrmions and Topological Origin of Superconduc- [88] Stephen Carr, Shiang Fang, Ziyan Zhu, and Efthimios tivity in Magic Angle Graphene,” arXiv e-prints Kaxiras, “Exact continuum model for low-energy elec- , arXiv:2004.00638 (2020), arXiv:2004.00638 [cond- tronic states of twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. mat.str-el]. Research 1, 013001 (2019). [74] C´ecileRepellin, Zhihuan Dong, Ya-Hui Zhang, and [89] Fengcheng Wu, A. H. MacDonald, and Ivar Mar- T. Senthil, “Ferromagnetism in narrow bands of moir\’e tin, “Theory of phonon-mediated superconductivity in superlattices,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1907.11723 (2019), twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 257001 arXiv:1907.11723 [cond-mat.str-el]. (2018). [75] Jianpeng Liu and Xi Dai, “Anomalous Hall effect, [90] Biao Lian, Zhijun Wang, and B. Andrei Bernevig, magneto-optical properties, and nonlinear optical prop- “Twisted bilayer graphene: A phonon-driven supercon- erties of twisted graphene systems,” arXiv e-prints ductor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257002 (2019). , arXiv:1907.08932 (2019), arXiv:1907.08932 [cond- [91] Fengcheng Wu, Euyheon Hwang, and Sankar mat.mes-hall]. Das Sarma, “Phonon-induced giant linear-in-t resistiv- [76] Shubhayu Chatterjee and Subir Sachdev, “Probing ex- ity in magic angle twisted bilayer graphene: Ordinary citations in insulators via injection of spin currents,” strangeness and exotic superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Rev. B 92, 165113 (2015). B 99, 165112 (2019). [77] H. Zhou, H. Polshyn, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, [92] Young Woo Choi and Hyoung Joon Choi, “Strong and A. F. Young, “Solids of quantum Hall skyrmions electron-phonon coupling, electron-hole asymmetry, in graphene,” Nature Physics 16, 154–158 (2019), and nonadiabaticity in magic-angle twisted bilayer arXiv:1904.11485 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 241412 (2018). [78] Aviram Uri, Alexander Y. Meltzer, Yonathan Anahory, [93] Feng Wang, Weitao Liu, Yang Wu, Matthew Y. Sfeir, Lior Embon, Ella O. Lachman, Dorri Halbertal, Naren Limin Huang, James Hone, Stephen O’Brien, Louis E. HR, Yuri Myasoedov, Martin E. Huber, Andrea F. Brus, Tony F. Heinz, and Y. Ron Shen, “Multiphonon Young, and Eli Zeldov, “Electrically Tunable Multi- raman scattering from individual single-walled carbon terminal SQUID-on-Tip,” Nano Letters 16, 6910–6915 nanotubes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 047402 (2007). (2016), arXiv:1606.05088 [cond-mat.supr-con]. [94] A. S´ed´eki,L. G. Caron, and C. Bourbonnais, “Electron- [79] Y Dovzhenko, F Casola, S Schlotter, TX Zhou, phonon coupling and peierls transition in metallic car- F B¨uttner, RL Walsworth, GSD Beach, and A Yacoby, bon nanotubes,” Phys. Rev. B 62, 6975–6978 (2000). “Magnetostatic twists in room-temperature skyrmions [95] S. Piscanec, M. Lazzeri, Francesco Mauri, A. C. Fer- explored by nitrogen-vacancy center spin texture recon- rari, and J. Robertson, “Kohn anomalies and electron- struction,” Nature communications 9, 2712 (2018). phonon interactions in graphite,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, [80] Jianpeng Liu, Zhen Ma, Jinhua Gao, and Xi Dai, 185503 (2004). “Quantum valley hall effect, orbital magnetism, and [96] Mikito Koshino and Young-Woo Son, “Moir´ephonons anomalous hall effect in twisted multilayer graphene sys- in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 075416 tems,” Phys. Rev. X 9, 031021 (2019). (2019), arXiv:1905.09660 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. [81] Ya-Hui Zhang and T. Senthil, “Bridging hubbard [97] D. M. Basko and I. L. Aleiner, “Interplay of coulomb model physics and quantum hall physics in trilayer and electron-phonon interactions in graphene,” Phys. graphene/h − BN moir´esuperlattice,” Phys. Rev. B 99, Rev. B 77, 041409 (2008). 205150 (2019). [98] NguyenAi Viet, Hiroshi Ajiki, and Tsuneya Ando, [82] M. M. van Wijk, A. Schuring, M. I. Katsnelson, and “Lattice instability in metallic carbon nanotubes,” Jour- A. Fasolino, “Relaxation of moir´epatterns for slightly nal of the Physical Society of Japan 63, 3036–3047 misaligned identical lattices: graphene on graphite,” (1994). 2D Materials 2, 034010 (2015), arXiv:1503.02540 [cond- [99] Hidekatsu Suzuura and Tsuneya Ando, “Phonons and mat.mes-hall]. electron-phonon scattering in carbon nanotubes,” Phys. [83] Kazuyuki Uchida, Shinnosuke Furuya, Jun-Ichi Iwata, Rev. B 65, 235412 (2002). and Atsushi Oshiyama, “Atomic corrugation and elec- [100] Kohta Ishikawa and Tsuneya Ando, “Optical phonon in- tron localization due to moir´epatterns in twisted bilayer teracting with electrons in carbon nanotubes,” Journal graphenes,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 155451 (2014). of the Physical Society of Japan 75, 084713 (2006). [84] Xianqing Lin, Dan Liu, and David Tom´anek,“Shear [101] Ken-ichi Sasaki and Riichiro Saito, “Pseudospin instability in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B and Deformation-Induced Gauge Field in Graphene,” 98, 195432 (2018). Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 176, 253– [85] Procolo Lucignano, Dario Alf`e, Vittorio Cataudella, 278 (2008). Domenico Ninno, and Giovanni Cantele, “Crucial role [102] G. D. Mahan, “Electron–optical phonon interaction in of atomic corrugation on the flat bands and energy carbon nanotubes,” Phys. Rev. B 68, 125409 (2003). gaps of twisted bilayer graphene at the magic angle [103] A. Gr¨uneis,R. Saito, T. Kimura, L. G. Cancado, M. A. θ ∼ 1.08◦,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 195419 (2019). Pimenta, A. Jorio, A. G. Souza Filho, G. Dressel- [86] Nguyen N. T. Nam and Mikito Koshino, “Lattice re- haus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, “Determination of two- laxation and energy band modulation in twisted bilayer dimensional phonon dispersion relation of graphite by graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 075311 (2017). raman spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B 65, 155405 (2002). [87] Mikito Koshino, Noah F. Q. Yuan, Takashi Koretsune, [104] Jia-An Yan, W. Y. Ruan, and M. Y. Chou, “Phonon Masayuki Ochi, Kazuhiko Kuroki, and Liang Fu, “Max- dispersions and vibrational properties of monolayer, bi- 18

τ = − G1

M Γ X K− τ = − Γ τ = + K+

G2 a) b)

FIG. 9: (a) The mono-layer graphene Brillouin zone with the two basis vectors G1 and G2 of the reciprocal lattice. We have indicated the high-symmetry K points, where the Dirac cones are located, by the valley label τ = ±. (b) The mono-layer Brillouin zones of the top and bottom graphene layer with relative twist angle θ. The vector X points from the common Γ point of the mono-layer Brillouin zones to the center of the mini-Brillouin zone at the τ = + valley. In presence of C6T symmetry, there are Dirac points at the K+ and K− points of the mini Brillouin zone (which is depicted by the small hexagon).

layer, and trilayer graphene: Density-functional pertur- binding and density functional calculations,” New Jour- bation theory,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 125401 (2008). nal of Physics 11, 115002 (2009). [105] R M Ribeiro, Vitor M Pereira, N M R Peres, P R Brid- [106] S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, “Frac- don, and A H Castro Neto, “Strained graphene: tight- tional chern insulators and the W∞ algebra,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 241308 (2012).

Supplementary material

Appendix A: moir´eHamiltonian

The spinless moir´eHamiltonian in valley +, i.e. around the K+-points of the graphene Brillouin zone, is given by

  X tt bb X  tb bt  H(k) = h (R(θ/2)(k + X + g1))δg1,g2 + h (R(−θ/2)(k + X + g1))δg1,g2 + Tg˜ δg1,g2+g˜ + Tg˜ δg1+g˜,g2 

g1,g2 g˜ (A1) Here, g1 and g2 lie on the moir´ereciprocal lattice, R(±θ/2) is a rotation matrix over angle ±θ/2 with θ corresponding ◦ tt z bb z to the first magic angle θ ≈ 1.05 [15]. h (k) = −t0h(k) + ∆tσ (h (k) = −t0h(k) + ∆bσ ) is the mono-layer z graphene Hamiltonian of the top (bottom) layer with hopping strength t0 = 2.61 eV and a sublattice splitting ∆tσ z (∆bσ ). X is the position of the center of the mini-Brillouin zone at the mono-layer K+-points as shown in Fig.9(b). The inter-layer coupling is given by the matrices [15]

  w0 w1 T0 = (A2) w1 w0   w0 w1ω Tg = ∗ (A3) 1 w1ω w0  ∗ w0 w1ω Tg = , (A4) 2 w1ω w0

i2π/3 where ω = e , g1 = (R(θ/2) − R(−θ/2))G1 and g2 = (R(θ/2) − R(−θ/2))G2, with G1 and G2 the graphene reciprocal lattice vectors shown in Fig.9. The AB inter-layer hopping strength is w1 = 195 meV. To phenomenolog- ically incorporate corrugation of the bilayer system [82–85] we use an AA-AB inter-layer hopping ratio w0/w1 = 0.85 [86–88]. The moir´eHamiltonian in valley − can be obtained by acting with time-reversal on the moir´eHamiltonian in valley +. 19

Appendix B: Phonon Hamiltonian and electron-phonon coupling

In this appendix, we review electron-phonon coupling in graphene, and phonon-mediated electron interactions in tBLG. The potential relevance of phonons for the superconducting domes and transport in magic-angle tBLG graphene was studied previously in Refs. [14, 89–92]. Our approach to incorporate the effects of phonons is most closely related to that of Ref. [89], where mono-layer graphene phonons near both the Γ and K points were taken into account (these are the modes that couple most efficiently to the electrons [93–95]). In Refs. [90, 91, 96], only long-wavelength acoustic phonons were considered. Here, we ignore these acoustic modes, as they do not give rise to inter-valley scattering for the electrons. The analysis below is solely based on the symmetry properties of graphene, and parallels the approach of Ref. [97].

1. Phonon Hamiltonian

i We define the Fourier transformed displacement operatorsu ˆq,σ for the carbon atoms and the canonical conjugate i operatorsp ˆq,σ as

1 0 i X iq·RA i uˆq,A = √ e uˆA(RA) (B1) N q 1 0 i X iq·(RA+δ1) i uˆq,B = √ e uˆB(RA + δ1) (B2) N q 1 0 i X −iq·RA i pˆq,A = √ e pˆA(RA) (B3) N q 1 0 i X −iq·(RA+δ1) i pˆq,B = √ e pˆB(RA + δ1) , (B4) N q where i = x, y, σ denotes sublattice, N is the number of unit cells, RA denotes the positions of the A sublattice sites, δ1 is one of the three vectors δl (l = 1, 2, 3) pointing from the A sublattice sites to the neighboring B sublattice sites. Recall that we define primed sums to run over the graphene Brillouin zone. We only consider in-plane displacements, as the out-of-plane displacements couple only weakly to the electrons. Using the combined four-dimensional index ν = (i, σ), the phonon Hamiltonian can be written as

  0 1 X 1 X † X † H = pˆ pˆ + 2 uˆ D(q) 0 uˆ 0 (B5) ph 2 M q,ν q,ν q,ν νν q,ν  q ν ν,ν0   0 1 X 1 X j j∗ † X j∗ j † = pˆ e e 0 pˆ 0 + 2 uˆ e λ e 0 uˆ 0 (B6) 2 M ν q,ν q,ν ν q,ν q,ν q,j q,ν q,ν  q ν,ν0,j ν,ν0,j   1 X0 1 X X = pˆ · pˆ† + 2 uˆ λ uˆ† , (B7) 2 M q,j q,j q,j q,j q,j q j j

p where M is the carbon atom mass. Using ωq,j = 2λq,j/M, we define the phonon annihilation and creation operators as

s i † λq,j bq,j = p pˆq,j + uˆq,j (B8) 2M~ωq,j ~ωq,j s † −i λq,j † bq,j = p pˆq,j + uˆq,j (B9) 2M~ωq,j ~ωq,j

In terms of the creation and annihilation operators, the phonon Hamiltonian becomes 20

X0 X  1 H = ω b† b + (B10) ph ~ q,j q,j q,j 2 q j

Using the eigenvectors of the phonon Hamiltonian we can write the displacement operator in second quantization as

s X0 uˆ (r) = ~ (b + b† )ej e−iq·r , (B11) ν 2NMω qj −qj qν q,j q,j

For future convenience, we also introduce the notation

j bq,j ≡ heq|bqi (B12) X j∗ = eq,ν bq,ν (B13) ν s ! X i λq,j = ej∗ pˆ† + uˆ (B14) q,ν p q,ν ω q,ν ν 2M~ωq,j ~ q,j

2. Electron-phonon coupling in graphene

In a tight-binding approximation, the only coupling between electrons and lattice vibrations occurs via the associated spatial modulation of the tight binding parameters. In the case of graphene we write the tight-binding Hamiltonian coupled to small lattice vibrations as [98–102]

3 3 X X ∂t0 X X H = −t ψ† ψ − (|δ + u (R ) − u (R + δ )| − a ) ψ† ψ + h.c. 0 RA RA+δl l A A B A l CC RA RA+δl ∂aCC RA l=1 RA l=1 3 3 X X 1 ∂t0 X X ≈ −t ψ† ψ − δ · (u (R ) − u (R + δ ))ψ† ψ + h.c. (B15) 0 RA RA+δl l A A B A l RA RA+δl aCC ∂aCC RA l=1 RA l=1 where t0 is the graphene hopping strength, aCC = |δl| the distance between two carbon atoms. Going to momentum space, the electron-phonon coupling Hamiltonian becomes

3 1 ∂t 0 0 X X −iq·δl
−ik·δl † He−ph = − δl · uA(q) − uB(q)e e ψk+q,Aψk,B + h.c. (B16) aCC ∂aCC k,q l=1 3 s 1 ∂t 0   0 X X X ~ j j −iq·δl −ik·δl † † = − δl · eq,A − eq,Be e ψk+q,Aψk,B(bqj + b−qj) aCC ∂aCC 2NMωq,j k,q j l=1

By defining the vectors

3     X ik·δl i(k+q)·δl j j j |Vq,ki = δle , −δle , |eqi = eq,A, eq,B (B17) l=1 we can write the electron-phonon coupling Hamiltonian as

0 X X −1/2 j † † He−ph = −g˜ ωq,j hVq,k|eqi ψk+q,Aψk,B(bqj + b−qj) + h.c. (B18) j q,k 21

q whereg ˜ = 1 ~ ∂t0 . Let us now examine how the symmetries of graphene are realized in this Hamiltonian. aCC 2NM ∂aCC We first consider the three-fold rotation symmetry group C3v and define the rotation matrix R3

√  cos(2π/3) sin(2π/3)  −1/2 3/2 R = = √ . (B19) 3 − sin(2π/3) cos(2π/3) − 3/2 −1/2

C3v symmetry of the phonon Hamiltonian implies that

  † R3 D(R3q) = R D(q)R, with R = , (B20) R3

j from which it follows that ω = ω and R|ej i = eiαq |e i. The C symmetry of the electron-phonon Hamil- q,j R3q,j q R3q 3v tonian implies that

ω−1/2 hV |ej ihej |R|b i = ω−1/2hV |ej ihej |b i , (B21) R3q,j R3q,R3k R3q R3q q q,j q,k q q q

Because ωR3q,j = ωq,j, we can see that this is true by doing following steps

hV |ej ihej |R|b i = hV |RR†|ej ihej |R|b i (B22) R3q,R3k R3q R3q q R3q,R3k R3q R3q q = e−iαk hV |R|ej ihej |b ieiαk (B23) R3q,R3k R3q q q j j = hVq,k|eqiheq|bqi (B24)

The C2v symmetry can be derived in a similar way, with the main difference that C2v interchanges the A and B sublattices. So C2v symmetry implies that

 −1 ω−1/2hV |ej ihej |R˜|b i = ω−1/2hV |ej i∗hej |b i , with R˜ = (B25) −q,j −q,−k −q −q q −q,j −q,k+q −q q q −1

Equality (B25) follows from the definition of |Vk,qi, the C2v rotation symmetry of the phonon Hamiltonian which ˜ j iβq j j j ∗ implies that R|eqi = e |e−qi, and |eqi = |e−qi , which follows from hermiticity of the displacement operator. Time reversal symmetry of the electron-phonon Hamiltonian in Eq. (B18) is more straightforward to see, as this simply ∗ j ∗ j follows from the properties |V−q,−ki = |Vq,ki and |e−qi = |eqi. We now focus on the coupling between lattice-scale phonons and low-energy electrons at the Dirac cones.√ So in the 4π
above electron-phonon Hamiltonian we fix both k and q to either K or −K, where K = 3a , 0 and a = 3aCC is the graphene lattice constant. Specifically, the terms we are interested in are

X −1/2 j † † He−ph ≈ −g˜ ωK,j hVK|eKiψ−K,AψK,B(bKj + b−Kj) (B26) j X −1/2 j ∗ † † −g˜ ωK,j hVK|eKi ψK,Aψ−K,B(b−Kj + bKj) + h.c. , j where |VKi = |VK,Ki. Let us now choose a basis in which the δl take the form

√ ! √ ! 3 1 3 1 δ = a (0, 1) , δ = a , − = R δ , δ = a − , − = R δ (B27) 1 CC 2 CC 2 2 3 1 3 CC 2 2 3 2

iK·δ1 iK·δ2 2πi/3 iK·δ3 2 −1 from which we see that e = 1, e = e ≡ ω and e = ω = ω . The phonon Hamiltonian at the K+ point satisfies

1  1  R†D(K)R = D(R K) = D(K − G ) = D(K) , (B28) 3 2 e−iG2·δ1 1 eiG2·δ1 1 22

 √  where we have used that R K = K−G , with G = √4π 3 , 1 a reciprocal lattice vector. The last equality follows 3 2 2 3a 2 2 iG·δ1 iG2·δ1 from bq+G,A,xi = bq,A,xi and bq+G,B,xi = e bq,B,xi for any reciprocal lattice vector G. Using that e = ω, −1 j we see that the matrix R− = R3 ⊕ ω R3 commutes with D(K). This means that the eigenvectors eK are also −1 eigenvectors of R−, which has two non-degenerate eigenvalues 1 and ω , and one two-fold degenerate eigenvalue ω. A B The vector |VKi can be written as |VKi = |VK i + |VK i, where

3 3 A X iK·δl
B X i2K·δl
|VK i = δle , 0 , |VK i = 0, −δle (B29) l=1 l=1

A −1 A B B These vectors have the property R−|VK i = ω |VK i and R−|VK i = |VK i. This means that only two of the four j j inner products hVK|eKi are non-zero. The eigenvectors |eKi which can couple to the electrons are those which have −1 j eigenvalue 1 and ω under R−. We can thus express |VKi in terms of the eigenvectors |eKi as follows:

1 1 1 2 iθK 1 iθK 2 √ |VKi = √ (e |eKi + e |eKi) , (B30) 6aCC 2 This allows us to write the electron-phonon Hamiltonian as

2 iθj −iθj √ X e K † † e K † † He−ph = −g˜ 3aCC √ ψ ψK,B(bK,j + b ) + √ ψ ψ−K,B(b−K,j + b ) + h.c. (B31) ω −K,A −Kj ω K,A Kj j=1 Kj Kj

iθj iθj −iθj iθj From C2v symmetry we know that e K = e −K = e K , which implies that e K is real and can be absorbed in bK,j † and b−K,j. So the final form for the electron-phonon coupling between lattice-scale phonons and low-energy electrons at the K points is simply

2 X 1  † † † †  He−ph = −g √ ψ ψK,B(bK,j + b ) + ψ ψ−K,B(b−K,j + b ) + h.c. , (B32) ω −K,A −Kj K,A Kj j=1 K,j q where g = 3~ ∂t0 . Because the graphene phonon bands have little dispersion around the K-points [99, 103, 104], 2NM ∂aCC we will now simply ignore any momentum dependence and simply assume that (B32) holds for electrons close to the K-points. We will also take ωK,1 = ωK,2 = ω0.

3. Phonon mediated electron interactions

The Hamiltonian describing the combined electron-phonon system, projected into the flat bands, takes the form

H = He + Hph + He−ph , (B33)

P † with He = k,τ,s εk,τ ck,τ,sck,τ,s. For the phonon Hamiltonian we take just two copies of the graphene phonon Hamiltonian:

X X  1 H = ω b† b + , (B34) ph ~ q+g,l,j q+g,l,j q+g,l,j 2 q,g l,j where q is defined to lie in the mini-Brillouin zone. We don’t consider out-of-plane phonon modes as these couple only to the inter-layer tunneling, which is much smaller than the intra-layer hopping. Correspondingly, the electron-phonon Hamiltonian is just two copies of Eq. (B32). If we project this into the flat bands, we get 23

g X X x †  †  He−ph = −√ hu−τ (k + q)|σ PlSg|uτ (k)ick+q,−τ,sck,τ,s bq+g+2τX,l,j + b−q−g−2τX,l,j (B35) ω0 τ,l,j,g k,q,s g X X τ †  †  ≡ −√ fl,g(q, k)ck+q,−τ,sck,τ,s bq+g+2τX,l,j + b−q−g−2τX,l,j , (B36) ω0 l,j,g k,q,τ,s

Using a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation we obtain following phonon-mediated electron interaction Hamiltonian

2 τ −τ 0 2g X X X fl,g(k, q)fl,−g(k , −q) † † 0 0 HPH = ~ω0 2 2 ck+q,−τ,sck,τ,sck0−q,τ,s0 ck ,−τ,s ω0 (εk+q,−τ − εk,τ ) − ( ω0) k,k0,q τ,s,s0 l ~   2 2g ~ X X X X τ −τ 0 † † 0 0 ≈ − 2  fl,g(k, q)fl,−g(k , −q) ck+q,−τ,sck,τ,sck0−q,τ,s0 ck ,−τ,s , ( ω0) ~ k,k0,q s,s0 τ l,g where we have again ignored the phonon dispersion, and also the flat band dispersion. The interaction strength gph used in the main text is

2 2  2 3~ β t0 gph = 2 , (B37) 2M (~ω0) aCC where β = ∂ ln t0√/∂ ln aCC . The numerical value gph ≈ 630 meV can be obtained by using ~ω0 = 0.16 eV, t0 = 2.61 eV, aCC = 0.25/ 3 nm and β = 3 [89, 105].

Appendix C: Spin stiffness in a spin polarized flat Chern band

In this section we derive an expression for the spin stiffness associated with a spin polarized flat Chern band. The spin stiffness ρs appears in a long-wavelength description as the coefficient of the gradient term in the effective action describing spin fluctuations:

ρ Z s dr (∇n)2 (C1) 2

To derive ρs within mean-field theory, we generalize the calculation of Ref. [66] for a spin-polarized lowest Landau level to a Chern insulator. We assume that in the ground state the spins are polarized in the z-direction. We create a non-homogeneous spin texture by acting with eiOˆ on the uniformly polarized ground state wave function. The operator eiOˆ is defined as

iOˆ i P Ω(r)·S(r) i P Ω(q)·S(−q) e = e r = e q , (C2) where S(r) is the spin operator at site r. We will assume that the resulting spin texture consists only of small fluctuations around the z-direction, such that Ω(r) ≈ zˆ × n(r), and is slowly varying in space. If we project eiOˆ in ˆ i P Ω(q)·S (−q) a Chern band with band label µ, the resulting operator eiOµ = e q µ is defined using the projected spin operator

1 X s 1 X s S (−q) = √ hu (k − q)|u (k)ic† c ≡ √ λ (−q, k)c† c , (C3) µ µ µ k−q,µ 2 k,µ µ k−q,µ 2 k,µ N k N k

† where the operator ck,µ creates an electron with crystal momentum k in band µ, N is the number of unit cells, x y z s = (s , s , s ) are the Pauli spin operators, and |uµ(k)i are the periodic Bloch states. From now on, we will drop the band index µ. This should not cause any confusion, as we are always considering the same single band. We are interested in the energy increase associated with the spin texture in the small |q| limit, which we get from 24

δE = heiOˆ He−iOˆ i − hHi (C4) 1 = ih[O,Hˆ ]i − h[O,ˆ [O,Hˆ ]]i + ··· (C5) 2 P ˜ For the Hamiltonian we use a general density-density interaction k V (k): ρ(k)ρ(−k) : , projected into the flat Chern band. So the commutator we need to calculate is

X X [O,Hˆ ] = Ωi(q)V˜ (k)[Si(−q), ρ(k)ρ(−k)] (C6) k,q i

We can easily evaluate this by applying the identity

[Si(−q), ρ(k)ρ(−k)] = [Si(−q), ρ(k)]ρ(−k) + ρ(k)[Si(−q), ρ(−k)] (C7)

1 P 0 † Using the explicit expression ρ(k) = √ λ(k, k )c c 0 for the projected density operator, and Eq. (C3), we N k0 k0+k k find

i i 1 X 0 0 0 0 † s [S (−q), ρ(k)] = (λ(k, k )λ(−q, k + k ) − λ(k, k − q)λ(−q, k )) c c 0 (C8) N k0+k−q 2 k k0 i 1 X † s ≡ Λ 0 c c 0 (C9) N k ,k,−q k0+k−q 2 k k0 and thus

 i i  1 X i X † σ † σ [O,Hˆ ] = Ω (q)V˜ (k) Λ 0 c c 0 ρ(−k) + Λ 0 ρ(k)c c 0 (C10) N k ,k,−q k0+k−q 2 k k ,−k,−q k0−k−q 2 k i,k,q k0

The expectation value of this commutator with respect to the homogeneously z-polarized Slater determinant vanishes because Ωz = 0. The double commutator determining the energy change in second order becomes

1 X X [O,ˆ [O,Hˆ ]] = Ωi(q )Ωj(q )V˜ (k) × N 1 2 i,j k,q1,q2  i i  X j † s j † s Λk0,k,−q [S (−q2), c 0 ck0 ρ(−k)] + Λk0,−k,−q [S (−q2), ρ(k)c 0 ck0 ] (C11) 1 k +k−q1 2 1 k −k−q1 2 k0 Evaluating the expectation value of this double commutator is tedious, but straightforward. We find

1 X h[O,ˆ [O,Hˆ ]]i = Ωi(q)Ωi(−q)V˜ (k) N 2 i,k,q X 0 0 0 0 × Λk0,k,−q (λ(q, k + k − q)λ(−k, k + k) − λ(q, k − q)λ(−k, k + k − q)) (C12) k0 To simplify the product of form factors λ, we work up to second order in q, because by assumption Ω(q) is a fast decaying function. The interaction V (k) is in general not decaying fast enough to justify working up to second order in k. However, the expectation value of the double commutator contains factors of the form λ(k, k0) = hu(k + k0)|u(k0)i, which are expected to decay very fast in |k|. So this decay does allow us to work up to second order in k, but we need to explicitly keep the function f(k, k0) = |λ(k, k0)|. We expect the decay of the form factors not to vary too much over the Brillouin zone, so we will use the function f(k) = |λ(k, k0)| for a fixed representative k0 in the Brillouin zone to enforce the fast decay in |k| (for example, Ref. [19] chose k0 = 0). The Taylor expanded expressions for the 25 form factors contain a term proportional to the Berry connection, which provides the connection between a Landau level and a Chern band, as noted in Ref. [106]. After a few straightforward manipulations, we find for the energy difference

1 X X δE = Ωi(q)Ωi(−q)V˜ (k)(q ∧ k)2 F(k0)2f 2(k) (C13) 8N 2 i,k,q k0 ! ! 1 1 X 1 X X = F(k0)2 V˜ (k)f 2(k)|k|2 (iqjΩi(q))(−iqjΩi(−q)) (C14) 16 N N k0 k i,j,q ! ! 1 1 X 1 X X = F(k0)2 V˜ (k)f 2(k)|k|2 (∇Ωi(r)) · (∇Ωi(r)) (C15) 16 N N k0 k i,r ρ Z → s d2r (∇n)2 , (C16) 2 where in the second line we have used (q ∧ k)2 = |q|2|k|2 sin2 α, where α is the angle between q and k. Because V˜ (k) and to a good approximation also f(k) are isotropic, we can replace sin2 α by its average value 1/2. So we arrive at the following Hartree-Fock expression for the spin stiffness

! ! 1 1 X 1 X ρ = F(k0)2 V˜ (k)f 2(k)|k|2 , (C17) s 8A N N k0 k where A is the area of the unit cell. In the continuum limit, the factor A−1 is interpreted as the charge density [47].

Appendix D: Skyrmion energetics

1. Single skyrmions

In this section, we present an explicit evaluation of the energy of a skyrmion in a single-valley, using the two- component non-linear σ model discussed in Eq. (28), which we recall below for completeness. We assume that while a skyrmion forms in a single valley, the spins in the other valley remain in their equilibrium configuration. We first look at the ferromagnet.     2 Z X ρs nS ρ¯s 1 L = nS A[n ] · ∂ n (r) + g µ B · n (r) − (∇n (r))2 − [(n (r) − n (r)]2 − dr0 V (r − r0)ρ(r)ρ(r0) τ t τ s B τ 2 τ 2 + − 2 τ=± (D1) We henceforth set S = 1/2 for the electron spin. We consider a single isolated skyrmion in valley + (say), completely characterized by a complex function W (z) (see Eq. (29)) As shown by Belavin and Polyakov, any analytic complex el function W (z) with a single pole minimizes the elastic energy E to be 4πρs [65], and the size of a charged skyrmion in a Chern band is therefore determined by the competition between the effective Zeeman and Coulomb energies [33]. A skyrmion of linear size R can be described by W (z) = R/z, or more explicitly by  2xR 2yR r2 − R2  n (r) = , , , and n (r) = (0, 0, 1) (D2) + r2 + R2 r2 + R2 r2 + R2 − We want to optimize the size R as a function of the ratio of effective Zeeman energy ∆ (which is a combination of the external magnetic field B = B⊥zˆ and the internal exchange field from the other valleyρ ¯s n−(r) =ρ ¯s zˆ) to the Coulomb energy, i.e,g ˜ which we define below.

∆ g µ B˜ ρ¯ g˜ ≡ = s B , where B˜ = B + s (D3) e2 ⊥ EC 2gsµB 4πaM If we naively use the effective Hamiltonian from Eq. (D1) to compute the energy, the Zeeman term will diverge as a very large number of spins are flipped in our ansatz in Eq. (D2). There is a natural cutoff set by the correlation 26 length of spin fluctuations, as the Goldstone mode in a single valley gets gapped in presence of the effective magnetic field B˜. In particular, we can use the equation of motion derived from Eq. (D1) to get the dispersion of a neutral spin-wave. ∂n 2ρ  ∂ψ 2ρ  + = s ∇2n + g µ B˜zˆ × n =⇒ i + = s ∇2 − g µ B˜ ψ where ψ = n + in ∂t n + s B + ∂t n s B + + +,x +,y 2ρ 2ρ =⇒ ω = s k2 + g µ B˜ ≡ s (k2 + ξ−2) (D4) k n s B n s √  1/2 1/2 This implies that the spin-correlations fall off exponentially beyond a length-scale set by ξs ≡ 3ρs ≈ EC
, aM gsµB B˜ ∆ √ 2 where n = 2 is the density of electrons per band, and we have used that the spin-stiffness ρs is set by the Coulomb 3aM e2 energy scale EC = . Note that we treat  as a phenomenological dielectric constant that also takes into account 4πaM the renormalization of the bare Coulomb energy due to projection to the relevant flat bands. Therefore, we can write down the total excitation energy of the skyrmion as the sum of the elastic contribution Eel, the effective Zeeman contribution EZ and the Coulomb contribution.

g µ B˜ Z κξs 1 Z d2q E = 4πρ + √s B d2r [1 − n (r)] + V (q)ρ ρ (D5) sk s 2 z 2 q −q 3aM 0 2 (2π) The first term, which is the elastic contribution, is independent of the size of the skyrmion [65]. The effective Zeeman energy, with a cutoff κξs for the domain of integration is given by (the additional scale factor of κ is added for later analytical convenience)

g µ B˜ Z κξs 2πg µ BR˜ 2 R2 + (κξ )2  E = √s B d2r [1 − n (r)] = √s B ln s (D6) Z 2 z 2 2 3aM 0 3aM R 1 We first discuss the case of unscreened Coulomb interaction V (r) = 4πr , as would be expected for a dilute gas R 2 iq·r 1 of skyrmions in the absence of gate-screening. Therefore, we take V (q) = d r V (r)e = 2q and compute the Coulomb energy 1 R2 Z ρ(r) = −  n · (∂ n × ∂ n) = − =⇒ ρ = d2r ρ(r)eiq·r = −qR K (qR) 8π µν µ ν π(r2 + R2)2 q 1 Z 2 2 Z ∞ 2 1 d q e 2 3πe =⇒ 2 V (q)ρqρ−q = dt [tK1(t)] = 8 (D7) 2 (2π) 8πR 0 2 R 2 Now, we parametrize the size of the skyrmion by R = κaM (roughly speaking, κ counts the number of flipped spins), and minimize the skyrmion energy Esk in Eq. (D5) as a function by κ.

2π  E  3π2E  28  ∆   E −1/3 √ 2 C C √ C Esk(κ) = 4πρs + ∆κ ln 1 + + 6 =⇒ κoptimal = ln 1 + (D8) 3 ∆ 2 κ 3 3π EC ∆ Hence, we finally find that the energy of optimal size skyrmion is given by

 5 5 1/3    1/3    1/3 3 π ∆ EC ∆ EC Esk = 4πρs + EC √ ln 1 + ≈ 4πρs + 1.75 EC ln 1 + (D9) 213 3 EC ∆ EC ∆

We immediately see that our analytical estimate of Esk in Eq. (27) receives a logarithmic correction. For small 1/3 Zeeman fields B⊥ and intervalley couplingρ ¯s, the energy of the skyrmion grows as Esk(∆) ≈ [∆ ln(EC /∆)] . At larger fields (when the Zeeman energy becomes roughly of the order of the Coulomb energy) the size of the skyrmion will saturate, but an accurate estimate of the required magnetic field depends on lattice scale physics, and cannot be obtained from the low-energy field theory. Next, we turn to the effects of screening of the Coulomb interaction, which is relevant due to the metallic gates used on twisted bilayer graphene (see Eq. (6)). Since the long-range (small q) nature of the Coulomb interaction is responsible for the 1/R scaling of the Coulomb energy with skyrmion size, we expect this scaling and thereby the optimal size and energy of the skyrmion to be significantly affected by screening. We assume that the gate-screened Coulomb interaction takes the following form discussed in Eq. (6). In the limit of small linear size of the skyrmion compared to the screening length D, i.e, R  D, screening effects are irrelevant and our previous result for the skyrmion energy holds (Eq. (30)). However, the more relevant limit (where our continuum theory is likely to work 27 better) is the large skyrmion size limit with R  D, as the screening length is typically of the order of a few moir´e lattice spacings aM . In this limit, the interaction term reduced to a short-range (contact-like) term. More precisely, the Fourier transformed charge density ρq is significant only for q . 1/R; in this regime qD  qR and therefore e2D Vscreened(q) ≈ 2 . Using Eq. (D5) and parametrizing R = κaM , we repeat the previous computations and find that our results for optimal size and energy are altered as follows for D ≈ aM (α is an O(1) numerical constant).    −1/2    1/2 ∆ EC ∆ EC κoptimal ∝ ln 1 + , and Esk = 4πρs + αEC ln 1 + (D10) EC ∆ EC ∆

1/2 We note that the energy of the skyrmion grows as Esk(∆) ≈ [∆ ln(EC /∆)] as a function of the magnetic field in ν this case. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that Esk(∆) ≈ [∆ ln(EC /∆)] for some ν ∈ (1/3, 1/2) will accurately capture intermediate screening. Irrespective of the exact value of the exponent ν, the estimate for the saturation √ lengthscale for the skyrmion remains identical, i.e, `B˜ ≈ a0aM . Finally, we discuss how the energetics of the skyrmion in a magnetic field are significantly different for a spin-valley locked state. In this case, the low energy Lagrangian density is given by:     2 Z X ρs nS ρ¯s 1 L = nS A[n ] · ∂ n (r) + g µ B · n (r) − (∇n (r))2 − [(n (r) + n (r)]2 − dr0 V (r − r0)ρ(r)ρ(r0) τ t τ s B τ 2 τ 2 + − 2 τ=± (D11)

In presence of a magnetic field B⊥, the ground state is a canted antiferromagnet, with spins in each valley canting towards B⊥. The optimal canting angle θ0(B⊥) can be obtained by minimizing the local energy for a spatially uniform ground state with n+ = (cos θ, 0, sin θ), n− = (cos θ, 0, − sin θ). g µ ρ¯ ρ¯ E(θ) = − s B B · (n + n ) + s (n + n )2 = −g µ B sin θ + s sin2 θ; 2 + − 8 + − s B ⊥ 2 ( gsµB B⊥ ρ¯s ∂E ρ¯ ,B⊥ ≤ g µ = 0 =⇒ sin θ0 = s s B (D12) ∂θ 1, otherwise θ=θ0

We now find the effective magnetic field Beff acting on the (ferromagnetic) spins of a single valley (say +), which will determine the magnon gap ∆. We expect Beff,+ to be parallel to the ferromagnetic order parameter n+ at equilibrium; we show that this is explicitly true below (takinge ˆk ande ˆ⊥ to be the axes parallel and normal to n+(θ0)).     ρ¯s ρ¯s ρ¯s ρ¯s Beff,+ = B⊥zˆ − n−(θ0) = B⊥ sin θ0 + cos(2θ0) eˆk + B⊥ cos θ0 − sin(2θ0) eˆ⊥ = eˆk 2gsµB 2gsµB 2gsµB 2gsµB (D13) Therefore, the Zeeman gap for each valley is given by

( ρ¯s ρ¯s ,B⊥ < ∆ = g µ |B | = 2 gsµB (D14) s B eff ρ¯s ρ¯s gsµBB⊥ − ,B⊥ ≥ 2 gsµB Therefore, we find that the unlike the ferromagnet, the Zeeman gap ∆ initially remains fixed as the spins in each valley reorient in the ground state to give a canted antiferromagnet, and only starts to increase beyond a critical field of Bc =ρ ¯s/(gsµB). This implies that the skyrmion size and the charge gap (due to charge e skyrmions) also remains fixed till Bc. On further increasing B⊥ beyond Bc, we get analogous behavior to the ferromagnet, as the skyrmion ν begins to shrink in size and increase in energy as (B⊥ − Bc) with logarithmic corrections.

2. Skyrmion pairs

In this section, we compute energy of skyrmion pairs, and discuss the situations where skyrmion pairing is favored at the lowest energy scales. First, let us consider the ferromagnet with hszi= 6 0, and discuss pairing between skyrmionic charges in the same valley. This will be the case when the inter-valley coupling J 0 is much smaller than the intra- valley coupling J, as such a scenario will prefer the spins within the same valley to be aligned at the small cost of misalignment of spins in opposite valleys. For a charge 2e pair, we need the skymions to carry the same Pontryagin index but opposite phases. Therefore, consider the skyrmion pair ansatz given by: R R W (z) = − (D15) z − L z + L 28

The elastic energy for W (z) with 2 poles is 8πρs, while the effective Zeeman energy is given by: g µ B˜ Z ∞ ρ¯ EZ = √s B d2r [1 − n (r)], where, as before B˜ = B + s (D16) pair 2 z ⊥ 3aM 0 gsµB

We now expect the logarithmic divergence to be cut off by L instead of ξs, which we verify by an explicit calculation below. g µ B˜ Z ∞ Z 2π 2(2LR)2 EZ = √s B dr r dθ pair 2 4 2 2 4 2 3aM 0 0 r − 2L r cos(2θ) + D + (2LR) 16πg µ BR˜ 2L2 Z ∞ 2π = s√ B dr r 2 p 4 4 2 2 2 6 2 3aM 0 (r − L + 4D R ) + 16L R 8πg µ BR˜ 2 2L R ≈ √s B ln for  1 (D17) 2 3aM R L The Coulomb energy of interaction between the skyrmions (labeled ± according to their centers at ±L xˆ) can be written down as: Z d2q EC = e2 V (q)ρ ρ where ρ = ρ e±iq·Dxˆ pair (2π)2 +,q −,−q ±,q q 2 Z ∞ e 2 2 = dq (qR) [K1(qR)] J0(2qL) (D18) 4π 0 The integral in Eq. (D18) is cut off at q ≈ 1/L in the limit of small R/L (skyrmion sizes are small compared to their separation), while for small separation 2L compared to the skyrmion size R it is cutoff by q ≈ 1/R. Recall that 2L is the separation between the skyrmions, so in the limit of small R/L we can write down the net energy of the skyrmion pair as follows (neglecting the self-Coulomb energy). 8πg µ BR˜ 2 2L e2 E = Eelastic + EZ + EC = 8πρ + √s B ln + (D19) pair pair pair pair s 2 3aM R 4π(2L) It is evident from Eq. (D19) that there is a minima in the energy at a finite separation 2L, and therefore a bound state 2 of two skyrmions will be formed. Minimizing E (L) in Eq. (33) as a function of L, we find that 2L ≈ aM
`2 /a pair R B˜ 0 as the optimal separation between the skyrmions of size R. Since the inter-valley couplingρ ¯s is the smallest scale in the problem, the corresponding magnetic length `B˜ will be very large and therefore our assumption of L  R is self-consistent. We carefully note that the mean-separation 2L between the two skyrmions needs to be less than ξs, as at very large distances greater than ξs only the repulsive Coulomb interaction, which disfavors pairing, operates [70]. 1/2 EC
Recall that ξs = ∆ aM , so such a regime always exists as long as the effective Zeeman energy is not too large. Further, as discussed in the main text (see also Ref. [70]), such a skyrmion pair carries spin, so the superconductor obtained by skyrmion-pairing also breaks spin-rotation (and time-reversal) symmetry. Skyrmionic charges pairing from opposite valleys need to have opposite Pontryagin indices so that they have the same physical charge (because of their opposite Chern numbers). There are two ways to do so: n → −n (which will cost a huge amount of energy in a large system as spins far away are antialigned) and n = (nx, ny, nz) → (−nx, ny, nz) or (nx, −ny, nz), which will be relatively more favorable from energetic considerations. In either case, the skyrmion pair configuration does not lead to a gain in the effective Zeeman energy (unlike the previous scenario) as there is no quenching of the perpendicular components of the spin at distances larger than the skyrmion separation. Neither can it gain energy from alignment of spins in opposite valleys by having the two skyrmions sit on top of each other (D . R), as the requirement of opposite Pontryagin index forces the effective Zeeman energy to add up (it is approximately 2 2πρ¯s(R/aM ) ln(ξs/R) in the continuum limit), and further, the Coulomb energy of placing two charges on top of each other also becomes large. Therefore, we conclude that there is no binding glue for skyrmions from opposite valleys in the ferromagnet. On the contrary, both Coulomb and Zeeman energy favors a charge-neutral skyrmion-pairing from opposite valleys, resulting in a time-reversal symmetry breaking intervalley coherent phase as discussed in the main text. Next, we turn to the spin-valley locked state. Once again, we start by discussing pairing between skyrmions in the same valley at zero external magnetic field (B⊥ = 0). Skyrmions with opposite phases still lead to an effective Zeeman energy (as B˜ ∝ ρ¯s 6= 0) which is logarithmic in their separation for D  R. The energy of the skyrmion pair is given by 8πρ¯ R2 2L e2 E = Eelastic + EZ + EC = 8πρ + √ s ln + (D20) pair pair pair pair s 2 3aM R 4π0(2L) 29 which is identical to Eq. (33) for the ferromagnet at zero external magnetic field (B⊥ = 0). To summarize, the physics of pairing is analogous to the corresponding ferromagnetic case, and the skyrmion pair will also carry a large spin. Finally, we discuss the pairing between skyrmions in opposite valleys for the spin-valley locked state. In this case, skyrmion from one valley and an anti-skyrmion from the opposite valley can prevent any loss of inter-valley exchange energy by simply sitting on top of each other and locally satisfying n+(r) = −n−(r). Such a configuration has twice the charge of a single-valley skyrmion, so its Coulomb energy goes as 1/R where R is its size, and can be almost negligible for a large enough skyrmion-sizes. In the limiting case of R → ∞, the energy of this skyrmion pair is simply 8πρs. Such a skyrmion-antisykrmion pair thus avoids both the effective Zeeman energy cost by keeping spins from opposite valleys locally anti-aligned, and Coulomb energy cost by distributing the charge over a large lengthscale; it is the minimum energy skyrmion pair.