Galaxy Types

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Galaxy Types Galaxy Types The galaxies which Hubble studied were often spiral in form, like M31, but not all galaxies are spirals. Our nearest neighbours, the Magellanic Clouds, have little organised structure and are prototype irregular galaxies. The other main variety, or `morphological type', of large galaxy are the ellipticals, which are regular in shape and free of substructure (e.g. M87 in Virgo). The appearance of elliptical galaxies depends just on the population of stars they contain; as they emit most light at longer wavelengths they must contain mostly red stars. Spirals contain gas and dust between the stars and the spiral patterns are delineated by both dark dust lanes and bright regions where new stars are forming from the gas. As a population of young stars will contain bright blue ones, spirals are also bluer in colour than ellipticals. Hubble (again!) came up with the system which serves as the starting point for all more complex classifications; the famous `tuning fork' diagram. The handle comprises the elliptical galaxies, running from circular (as projected on the sky) E0s to more and more flattened E1s to E7s. Here the numeral (0 to 7) represents the elongation of the galaxy's image via the quantity 10(1 b=a), where b=a is the ratio of the short (minor) to long (major) axis lengths, e.g. an axis ratio of 0.7:1− corresponds to E3. The prongs contain spiral galaxies. While elliptical galaxies are ellipsoidal in their 3-D shape, spiral galaxies are basically flat discs. They can look very elongated if seen edge-on, but they often also have a central spheroidal component known as the `bulge'. The characteristic spiral pattern, produced by the bright spiral arms, can be more or less tightly wound. Sa galaxies have the most tightly wound arms, while the pattern in Sb, Sc and Sd galaxies becomes progressively more open (that is, the `pitch angle' of the spiral becomes larger). In step with this, spirals show a decrease in the importance of their spheroidal components, i.e. Sa s have large bulges while Sc s have small bulges and bulges are almost non-existent in Sd galaxies. At the end of the sequence, Hubble placed the Irregulars, which are again ‘flat’ but with chaotic patterns of bright regions. Intermediate are the Sm s, with fragmentary arm-like structures, and Irregulars are nowadays often referred to as Im galaxies (the `m' in each case standing for Magellanic). The reason for there being two prongs to the fork is that spirals can also be separated into two sequences depending on whether the spiral arms start from the central bulge or from the ends of a further component, a central `bar' { the types SBa, SBb, etc. Roughly half of all spirals are barred. Hubble later added another category, the S0 (or lenticular) galaxies, where the prongs join the handle. They possess large bulges and disc components with no sign of any spiral pattern, and can be viewed as intermediate between the ellipticals and spirals. Elliptical and S0 galaxies are often referred to jointly as `early type' galaxies, and Sa s as early type spirals, while Sc s etc. are late type spirals, because Hubble conjectured that they might form an evolutionary sequence. More elaborate classification schemes for spirals exist, e.g. filling in intermediate types such as Sab or Sbc, and the intermediate family of weakly barred systems, SABa and so on. (In this system the original unbarred galaxies are SAa etc.). de Vaucouleurs introduced a numerical sequence to represent the main morphological types. These run from T = 5 up to 1 for ellipticals through to S0s, 0 for S0/a galaxies, 1 for Sa galaxies and so on up to 5 for− Sc and−9 for Sm, i.e. one numerical class for each Hubble sub-class. Class 10 is used for irregulars. van den Bergh's classsification system attempts to indicate the intrinsic luminosity of a galaxy. He found that the luminosity of a spiral galaxy correlated roughly with the structure of its arms. More luminous spirals had better developed, well defined continuous arms, while low luminosity ones had weak, patchy arms. The former are sometimes called `grand design' spirals, the latter ‘flocculent' spirals. A luminous Sc galaxy with very clearly defined arms would then be an ScI and a less bright one with indistinct arms an ScIII, the Roman numerals denoting the `luminosity class'. Luminosities and Sizes If we know the distance to a galaxy and measure its apparent brightness, then we can use the inverse square law to deduce its intrinsic luminosity (power output). When discussing galaxies (at least at optical wavelengths) astronomers seldom work in conventional `physics' units such as Watts, usually preferring Solar luminosities, L , or working in magnitudes (see Note). 11 10 Our Galaxy contains 10 stars and has a luminosity around 2 10 L . Given the Sun's (blue) absolute magnitude of 5.48,∼ this implies a total absolute magnitude×for the Galaxy of M 20:3. B ' − 1 Our giant neighbour M31 has MB 20:8 (i.e. it is about 1.5 times as luminous). It was originally thought that the luminosity range of'galaxies− was quite small, with the Magellanic Clouds representing the faint tail of the distribution. (They have MB 18 and 16:5.) However, this is due to what is called a `selection'effect’,− not−the true state of affairs. Very luminous galaxies may really be rare, but we will be biassed against including low intrinsic luminosity systems in our samples, since they will need to be very nearby in order to look bright to us. On the other hand, very luminous galaxies will be seen easily throughout some large volume of space. Exactly this problem is encountered with stars. The apparently bright stars like Vega and Rigel are mostly (quite distant) stars intrinsically much brighter than the Sun. However, in a representative volume of space most stars are much less luminous than the Sun. The companions to the Andromeda spiral, M32 and NGC 205 are prototypes of the class of dwarf elliptical (dE) galaxies. They are 100 times less luminous than M31 itself and look like small versions of a normal (giant) elliptical galaxy∼, ellipsoidal in shape and with little or no internal structure (though some, denoted dE,N for `nucleated', contain bright central star clusters. Dwarf irregular (dI) galaxies also exist, with similar luminosities, e.g. NGC 6882, one of the galaxies in which Hubble first found Cepheids. None of these dwarf types is included properly in the tuning fork classification. Evidence for a very wide range of galaxy luminosities came in the late 1930s with Shapley's discov- ery of two `dwarf spheroidal' galaxies; companions of our Galaxy known as the Fornax and Sculptor Dwarfs. Dwarf spheroidals (dSph) are the extension to yet lower luminosities of the dEs, with Sculptor only 1/100 of the brightness of previously known systems. Thorough surveys of the sky, such as the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS) in the 1950s and the UK Schmidt Telescope (UKST) sky surveys undertaken from the 1970s, revealed even fainter examples. The lowest luminosity currently known companions to our Galaxy are the Draco and Ursa Minor dwarfs, while M31's companion And IX, discovered in 2004, is marginally fainter and thus the least luminous galaxy known. Each is −5 5 about 10 of the luminosity of M31 (i.e. a few 10 L ). At MB 8, these are similar to the magnitudes of very bright single stars. The brigh×test giant ellipticals'in− galaxy clusters, called cD galaxies, can range up to about MB 24, i.e. 25 times brighter than our Galaxy. Determining L is straightforward' once− we know the distance to a galaxy, but sizes are more problematic { galaxies do not have obvious `edges', they fade away gradually. To describe the physical size of a galaxy, we need to consider how the stars (or other constituents) are distributed as a function of distance from the galaxy's centre. For stars, this is reflected in the radial distribution of the intensity, the light emitted per unit area, or surface brightness (SB). The different galaxy types each have characteristic intensity profiles, I(R), but a general measure of the size of a galaxy is its `half- light' or ‘effective' radius. This is the radius of the circle (projected on the sky) which encloses half the total light of a galaxy. A large spiral galaxy will have an effective radius, Re, up to 10 kpc. Large E galaxies are of similar dimensions, while cD galaxies, which are surrounded by large extended envelopes, have R up to 100 kpc. Dwarf galaxies are much smaller, dSph ranging down to 200 pc. e ∼ ∼ Surface Brightness High L galaxies also have high SB (in their central regions). Dwarf galaxies are typically of low SB { they look rather diffuse and and can be hard to see against the faint sky foreground glow from our atmosphere. (This was the main reason for their relatively recent discovery). Physically the low SB is due to a low surface density of stars; whether this corresponds to a low volume density depends on how `thick' the galaxy is along the line of sight. −2 2 SB is not usually quoted in Wm , but in L /pc or magnitudes per square arc second (µ). To 26 16 translate between these, 1 L = 3:86 10 W and 1 parsec = 3:086 10 m so × × 2 −7 −2 1 L =pc = 4:05 10 Wm : (1) × For the Sun MB = 5:48, and as 1 pc subtends 0.1 radians (20626 arc sec) at the standard distance of 2 10 pc used to calculate absolute magnitudes, 1 L /pc corresponds to µB = MB + 5 log(20626) = 27:05 B magnitudes per sq arc sec (Bµ): (2) 2 Characterizing the overall SB by the mean inside the effective radius (i.e.
Recommended publications
  • Lecture 6: Galaxy Dynamics (Basic) Elliptical Galaxy Dynamics
    Lecture 6: Galaxy Dynamics (Basic) • Basic dynamics of galaxies – Ellipticals, kinematically hot random orbit systems – Spirals, kinematically cool rotating system • Key relations: – The fundamental plane of ellipticals/bulges – The Faber-Jackson relation for ellipticals/bulges – The Tully-Fisher for spirals disks • Using FJ and TF to calculate distances – The extragalactic distance ladder – Examples 1 Elliptical galaxy dynamics • Ellipticals are triaxial spheroids • No rotation, no flattened plane • Typically we can measure a velocity dispersion, σ – I.e., the integrated motions of the stars • Dynamics analogous to a gravitational bound cloud of gas (I.e., an isothermal sphere). • I.e., dp GM(r)ρ(r) HYDROSTATIC − = EQUILIBRIUM dr r2 Check Wikipedia “Hydrostatic PRESSURE FORCE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE Equilibrium” to see PER UNIT VOLUME PER UNIT VOLUME deriiation. € 2 1 Elliptical galaxy dynamics • For an isothermal sphere gas pressure is given by: 2 Reminder from p = ρ(r)σ Thermodynamics: P=nRT/V=ρT, 1 E=(3/2)kT=(1/2)mv^2 ρ(r) ∝ r2 σ 2 GM(r) 2 ⇒ 3 ∝ 4 2σ r r r M(r) = G M(r) ∝σ 2r € 3 € Elliptical galaxy dynamics • As E/S0s are centrally concentrated if σ is measured over sufficient area M(r)=>M, I.e., Total Mass ∝σ 2r • σ is measured from either: – Radial velocity distributions from individual stellar spectra – From line widths€ in integrated galaxy spectra [See Galactic Astronomy, Binney & Merrifield for details on how these are measured in practice] 4 2 Elliptical galaxy dynamices • We have three measureable quantities: – L = luminosity (or magnitude) – Re = effective or half-light radius – σ = velocity dispersion • From these we can derive Σο the central surface brightness (nb: one of these four is redundant as its calculable from the others.) • How are these related observationally and theoretically ? x y • I.e., what does: L ∝ Σ o σ ν look like ? Σο Log logL THE FUNDAMENTAL PLANE € Logσ 5 Fundamental Plane Theory 2 (I.e., stars behaving as if isothermal sphere) IF σν ∝ M Re 2 Surf.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolated Elliptical Galaxies in the Local Universe
    A&A 588, A79 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527844 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics Isolated elliptical galaxies in the local Universe I. Lacerna1,2,3, H. M. Hernández-Toledo4 , V. Avila-Reese4, J. Abonza-Sane4, and A. del Olmo5 1 Instituto de Astrofísica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. V. Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile e-mail: [email protected] 2 Centro de Astro-Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. V. Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile 3 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 4 Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 70-264, 04510 México D. F., Mexico 5 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía IAA – CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008 Granada, Spain Received 26 November 2015 / Accepted 6 January 2016 ABSTRACT Context. We have studied a sample of 89 very isolated, elliptical galaxies at z < 0.08 and compared their properties with elliptical galaxies located in a high-density environment such as the Coma supercluster. Aims. Our aim is to probe the role of environment on the morphological transformation and quenching of elliptical galaxies as a function of mass. In addition, we elucidate the nature of a particular set of blue and star-forming isolated ellipticals identified here. Methods. We studied physical properties of ellipticals, such as color, specific star formation rate, galaxy size, and stellar age, as a function of stellar mass and environment based on SDSS data. We analyzed the blue and star-forming isolated ellipticals in more detail, through photometric characterization using GALFIT, and infer their star formation history using STARLIGHT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saga of M81: Global View of a Massive Stellar Halo in Formation
    Draft version October 27, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The Saga of M81: Global View of a Massive Stellar Halo in Formation Adam Smercina ,1, 2 Eric F. Bell ,1 Paul A. Price,3 Colin T. Slater ,2 Richard D'Souza,1, 4 Jeremy Bailin ,5 Roelof S. de Jong ,6 In Sung Jang ,6 Antonela Monachesi ,7, 8 and David Nidever 9, 10 1Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 2Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195-1580, USA 3Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 4Vatican Observatory, Specola Vaticana, V-00120, Vatican City State 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0324, USA 6Leibniz-Institut f¨urAstrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany 7Instituto de Investigaci´onMultidisciplinar en Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa,Universidad de La Serena, Ra´ulBitr´an1305, La Serena, Chile 8Departamento de F´ısica y Astronom´ıa,Universidad de La Serena, Av. Juan Cisternas 1200 N, La Serena, Chile 9Department of Physics, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173840, Bozeman, MT 59717-3840 10National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85719 (Received 31 October, 2019; Revised 31 August, 2020; Accepted 23 October, 2020) Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal ABSTRACT Recent work has shown that Milky Way-mass galaxies display an incredible range of stellar halo properties, yet the origin of this diversity is unclear. The nearby galaxy M81 | currently interacting with M82 and NGC 3077 | sheds unique light on this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • NEUTRAL HYDROGEN CLOUDS in the M81/M82 GROUP KM Chynoweth
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Astronomy Department Faculty Publication Series Astronomy 2008 NEUTRAL HYDROGEN CLOUDS IN THE M81/M82 GROUP KM Chynoweth GI Langston Min Yun University of Massachusetts - Amherst FJ Lockman KHR Rubin See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/astro_faculty_pubs Part of the Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons Recommended Citation Chynoweth, KM; Langston, GI; Yun, Min; Lockman, FJ; Rubin, KHR; and Scoles, SA, "NEUTRAL HYDROGEN CLOUDS IN THE M81/M82 GROUP" (2008). The Astrophysical Journal. 1129. 10.1088/0004-6256/135/6/1983 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Astronomy at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Astronomy Department Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors KM Chynoweth, GI Langston, Min Yun, FJ Lockman, KHR Rubin, and SA Scoles This article is available at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/astro_faculty_pubs/1129 Neutral Hydrogen Clouds in the M81/M82 Group Katie M. Chynoweth1 Vanderbilt University, Physics and Astronomy Department, 1807 Station B, Nashville, TN 37235 Glen I. Langston National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green Bank, WV 24944 Min S. Yun University of Massachusetts, 710 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01002 Felix J. Lockman, K.H.R. Rubin2 and Sarah A. Scoles3 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green Bank, WV 24944 ABSTRACT We have observed a 3◦ ×3◦ area centered on the M81/M82 group of galaxies using the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope (GBT) in a search for analogs to the High Velocity Clouds (HVCs) of neutral hydrogen found around our galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Magazine Special Issue
    γ ι ζ γ δ α κ β κ ε γ β ρ ε ζ υ α φ ψ ω χ α π χ φ γ ω ο ι δ κ α ξ υ λ τ μ β α σ θ ε β σ δ γ ψ λ ω σ η ν θ Aι must-have for all stargazers η δ μ NEW EDITION! ζ λ β ε η κ NGC 6664 NGC 6539 ε τ μ NGC 6712 α υ δ ζ M26 ν NGC 6649 ψ Struve 2325 ζ ξ ATLAS χ α NGC 6604 ξ ο ν ν SCUTUM M16 of the γ SERP β NGC 6605 γ V450 ξ η υ η NGC 6645 M17 φ θ M18 ζ ρ ρ1 π Barnard 92 ο χ σ M25 M24 STARS M23 ν β κ All-in-one introduction ALL NEW MAPS WITH: to the night sky 42,000 more stars (87,000 plotted down to magnitude 8.5) AND 150+ more deep-sky objects (more than 1,200 total) The Eagle Nebula (M16) combines a dark nebula and a star cluster. In 100+ this intense region of star formation, “pillars” form at the boundaries spectacular between hot and cold gas. You’ll find this object on Map 14, a celestial portion of which lies above. photos PLUS: How to observe star clusters, nebulae, and galaxies AS2-CV0610.indd 1 6/10/10 4:17 PM NEW EDITION! AtlAs Tour the night sky of the The staff of Astronomy magazine decided to This atlas presents produce its first star atlas in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • DUST and ATOMIC GAS in DWARF IRREGULAR GALAXIES of the M81 GROUP: the SINGS and THINGS VIEW Fabian Walter,1 John M
    The Astrophysical Journal, 661:102Y114, 2007 May 20 # 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. DUST AND ATOMIC GAS IN DWARF IRREGULAR GALAXIES OF THE M81 GROUP: THE SINGS AND THINGS VIEW Fabian Walter,1 John M. Cannon,1, 2 He´le`ne Roussel,1 George J. Bendo,3 Daniela Calzetti,4 Daniel A. Dale,5 Bruce T. Draine,6 George Helou,7 Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr.,8,9 John Moustakas,9,10 George H. Rieke,9 Lee Armus,7 Charles W. Engelbracht,9 Karl Gordon,9 David J. Hollenbach,11 Janice Lee,9 Aigen Li,12 Martin J. Meyer,4 Eric J. Murphy,13 Michael W. Regan,4 John-David T. Smith,9 Elias Brinks,14 W. J. G. de Blok,15 Frank Bigiel,1 and Michele D. Thornley16 Received 2006 September 26; accepted 2007 February 12 ABSTRACT We present observations of the dust and atomic gas phase in seven dwarf irregular galaxies of the M81 group from the Spitzer SINGS and VLA THINGS surveys. The Spitzer observations provide a first glimpse of the nature of the Y À1 nonatomic ISM in these metal-poor (Z 0:1 Z ), quiescent (SFR 0:001 0:1 M yr ) dwarf galaxies. Most detected dust emission is restricted to H i column densities >1 ; 1021 cmÀ2, and almost all regions of high H i column density (>2:5 ; 1021 cmÀ2) have associated dust emission. Spitzer spectroscopy of two regions in the brightest galaxies (IC 2574 and Holmberg II) show distinctly different spectral shapes and aromatic features, although the galaxies have comparable gas-phase metallicities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2) Adolgov-PACTS.Pdf
    Primordial black holes, dark matter, and other cosmological puzzles A. D. Dolgov Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia ITEP, Moscow, Russia Particle, Astroparticle, and Cosmology Tallinn Symposium Tallinn, Estonia, June 18-22 2018 A. D. Dolgov PBH, DM, and other cosmological puzzles 19 June 2018 1 / 39 Recent astronomical data, which keep on appearing almost every day, show that the contemporary, z ∼ 0, and early, z ∼ 10, universe is much more abundantly populated by all kind of black holes, than it was expected even a few years ago. They may make a considerable or even 100% contribution to the cosmological dark matter. Among these BH: massive, M ∼ (7 − 8)M , 6 9 supermassive, M ∼ (10 − 10 )M , 3 5 intermediate mass M ∼ (10 − 10 )M , and a lot between and out of the intervals. Most natural is to assume that these black holes are primordial, PBH. Existence of such primordial black holes was essentially predicted a quarter of century ago (A.D. and J.Silk, 1993). A. D. Dolgov PBH, DM, and other cosmological puzzles 19 June 2018 2 / 39 However, this interpretation encounters natural resistance from the astronomical establishment. Sometimes the authors of new discoveries admitted that the observed phenomenon can be the explained by massive BHs, which drove the effect, but immediately retreated, saying that there was no known way to create sufficiently large density of such BHs. A. D. Dolgov PBH, DM, and other cosmological puzzles 19 June 2018 3 / 39 Astrophysical BH versus PBH Astrophysical BHs are results of stellar collapce after a star exhausted its nuclear fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Strong Gravitational Lenses
    12 Strong Gravitational Lenses Phil Marshall, MaruˇsaBradaˇc,George Chartas, Gregory Dobler, Ard´ısEl´ıasd´ottir,´ Emilio Falco, Chris Fassnacht, James Jee, Charles Keeton, Masamune Oguri, Anthony Tyson LSST will contain more strong gravitational lensing events than any other survey preceding it, and will monitor them all at a cadence of a few days to a few weeks. Concurrent space-based optical or perhaps ground-based surveys may provide higher resolution imaging: the biggest advances in strong lensing science made with LSST will be in those areas that benefit most from the large volume and the high accuracy, multi-filter time series. In this chapter we propose an array of science projects that fit this bill. We first provide a brief introduction to the basic physics of gravitational lensing, focusing on the formation of multiple images: the strong lensing regime. Further description of lensing phenomena will be provided as they arise throughout the chapter. We then make some predictions for the properties of samples of lenses of various kinds we can expect to discover with LSST: their numbers and distributions in redshift, image separation, and so on. This is important, since the principal step forward provided by LSST will be one of lens sample size, and the extent to which new lensing science projects will be enabled depends very much on the samples generated. From § 12.3 onwards we introduce the proposed LSST science projects. This is by no means an exhaustive list, but should serve as a good starting point for investigators looking to exploit the strong lensing phenomenon with LSST.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction 2. the Accordant Group Members
    THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 474:74È83, 1997 January 1 ( 1997. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. DISCORDANT ARGUMENTS ON COMPACT GROUPS HALTON ARP Max-Planck-Institut fu r Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 1, 85740 Garching, Germany Received 1995 December 8; accepted 1996 July 17 ABSTRACT Much print has been dedicated to explaining discordant redshifts in compact groups as unrelated background galaxies. But no one has analyzed the accordant galaxies. It is shown here that when there is a brightest galaxy in the group, the remainder with di†erences of less than 1000 km s~1 are systemati- cally redshifted. This is the same result as obtained in all other well-deÐned groups and demonstrates again an increasing intrinsic redshift with fainter luminosity. DeÐning discordant redshifts as 1000 km s~1 or greater than the brightest galaxy, it is shown that 76 out of 345, or 22% are discordant, reaching excesses of up to 23,000 km s~1. This large percentage cannot be explained by background contamination because the number of discordances would be expected to increase rapidly with larger excesses, exactly opposite to what is observed in compact groups. HicksonÏs logarithmic intensity image of the NGC 1199 group conÐrms earlier direct evidence from Arp that a peculiar, compact object of 13,300 km s~1 redshift is silhouetted in front of the 2705 km s~1 central galaxy. Subject headings: galaxies: clusters: general È galaxies: distances and redshifts 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE ACCORDANT GROUP MEMBERS Accordant members are here deÐned as galaxies with When redshifts began to be measured in the nearest, *cz \ 1000 km s~1 di†erence from the redshift of the densest groups of galaxies, it quickly became evident that brightest galaxy in the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018
    Page 1 Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018 Page 2 Table of Contents Chairman’s Chatter …...…………………….……….………..….…… 3 Andrew Gray …………………………………………...………………. 5 The Hyades Star Cluster …...………………………….…….……….. 6 At the Eye Piece …………………………………………….….…….... 9 The Cover Image - Antennae Nebula …….……………………….. 11 Galaxy - Part 2 ….………………………………..………………….... 13 Self-Taught Astronomer …………………………………..………… 21 The Month Ahead …..…………………...….…….……………..…… 24 Minutes of the Previous Meeting …………………………….……. 25 Public Viewing Roster …………………………….……….…..……. 26 Pre-loved Telescope Equipment …………………………...……… 28 ASSA Symposium 2018 ………………………...……….…......…… 29 Member Submissions Disclaimer: The views expressed in ‘nDaba are solely those of the writer and are not necessarily the views of the Durban Centre, nor the Editor. All images and content is the work of the respective copyright owner Page 3 Chairman’s Chatter By Mike Hadlow Dear Members, The third month of the year is upon us and already the viewing conditions have been more favourable over the last few nights. Let’s hope it continues and we have clear skies and good viewing for the next five or six months. Our February meeting was well attended, with our main speaker being Dr Matt Hilton from the Astrophysics and Cosmology Research Unit at UKZN who gave us an excellent presentation on gravity waves. We really have to be thankful to Dr Hilton from ACRU UKZN for giving us his time to give us presentations and hope that we can maintain our relationship with ACRU and that we can draw other speakers from his colleagues and other research students! Thanks must also go to Debbie Abel and Piet Strauss for their monthly presentations on NASA and the sky for the following month, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Afterschool Universe Session 9 Slide Notes: Galaxies
    This presentation supports the “Background” material in Session 9 of the Afterschool Universe program. This session is about galaxies. The picture shows the Whirlpool galaxy, a large, iconic, spiral galaxy. 1 Let us summarize the main concepts in this Session. We will discuss these in the rest of this presentation. 2 A galaxy is a huge collection of stars, gas and dust. A typical galaxy has about 100 billion stars (that’s 100,000,000,000 stars!), and light takes about 100,000 years to cross a galaxy (in other words, they are typically 100,000 light years ago). But some galaxies are much bigger and some are much smaller. 3 If you look at the sky from a DARK location, you can see a band of light stretching across the sky which is known as the Milky Way. This is our view of our Galaxy - more precisely, this is our view of the disk of our galaxy as seen from the INSIDE. 4 This picture shows another view of our galaxy taken in the infra-red part of the spectrum. The advantage of the infra-red is that it can penetrate the dust that pervades our galaxy’s disk and let us view the central parts of our galaxy. This picture also shows the full sky. The flat disk and central bulge of our galaxy can be seen in this picture. 5 We live in the suburbs of our galaxy. The Sun and its planetary system are about 25,000 light years from the center of the galaxy. This is about half way out to the edge of the disk.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Sp Target Information
    WINTER SP TARGET INFORMATION MESSIER 15 BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Globular Cluster CONSTELLATION: Pegasus BEST VIEW: Late October DISCOVERY: Jean-Dominique Maraldi, 1746 DISTANCE: 33,600 ly DIAMETER: 175 ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +6.2 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 18’ DISTANCE DETERMINATION Globular clusters contain many RR Lyrae stars, which are a type of standard candle. These stars vary in brightness, and the period of variation relates to the star’s luminosity. Comparison of luminosity to apparent magnitude yields the distance. AGE DETERMINATION Astronomers plot the colors and magnitudes of cluster stars on an H-R diagram to get an overall picture of the evolutionary states of the cluster stars. This, in turn, allows astronomers to constrain the age of the cluster. NOTABLE FEATURES/FACTS • M15 contains several hundred thousand stars. • The cluster is estimated to be approximately 13 billion years old, making it one of the oldest structures in our Galaxy. • The total energy output of M15’s stars is 360,000 times the energy of the Sun. • M15 is the most dense globular cluster. Half of its mass is contained within 10 ly of its center. This is probably due to core collapse: stars have settled near the center due to their gravitational influence on one another. • Some astronomers suspect there may be an intermediate-mass black hole at the center of M15. Recent studies, however, have found no evidence of one. • M15 contains Pease 1, the first planetary nebula ever detected in a globular cluster. To date, only a handful of planetaries have been discovered in globulars. • In 2016, astronomers using the Fermi Large Area Telescope reported significant gamma ray emission from M15.
    [Show full text]