Understanding Youth Offending – Profiling Young Offenders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

CONSTANTEION Criminology-Psychology and Forensic Sciences Centre Member of The British Society of Criminology The American Society of Criminology The International Corrections and Prisons Association www.constanteion.org.cy Dr. Constantinos Ch. Constantinides Youth offending or juvenile delinquency is the social deviant and the criminal behaviour of children or young people. This may include violent and severe delinquent acts, for example sexual abuse, arson, burglary, theft, severe personal injury, murder, possession, trafficking and use of drugs, but usually includes minor or moderate forms of infringement criminal law provisions, such as breach of the Driving Code, illegal night away from home without the approval of parents, theft, consumption of liquor by person under 18 years old. Young offender is a person who has been convicted or cautioned for a criminal offense. Criminal justice systems often deal with young offenders differently from adult offenders, but different countries apply the term young offender to different age groups, depending from the age of the criminal responsibility. The age for criminal responsibility in Cyprus is the 14 years old, as the most European countries which apply it at the age of 12 to 14 with exception of United Kingdom at the age of 10 years old. The phenomenon of juvenile delinquency as presented in the records of the Cyprus Statistical Service over the last 30 years is real and serious. There is an upsurge in the years 1996 and 1999 numbered over 500 minors involved in serious crimes and minor offenses, followed by a lower voltage for juvenile crime from 2001 to 2003 with less than 100 reported cases. The complaints coming years 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 ranged between 230 and 300. However according to the Analysis and Statistic Office of Cyprus Police, in 2010 there was a sharp increase of juveniles involved in the commission of offences, serious and minor reaching the unbelievable number of 630individuals. Fortunately in 2011 there was a noticeable decrease; the total juveniles offenders involved in delinquencies were 347 and in 2012 were 346. On the other hand a statistical summary of the convictions, give us another prospective in the field. Minors convicted from 1980 to 2003 were 100 or less per year. But in 2004 and 2005, was observed a sharp increase of minor’s conviction in Cypriot courts, at the range of 180-250%. This concerns mostly the possible change of attitude of the state towards minor offenders through sanctions. According to the Analysis and Statistic Office of Cyprus Police, the serious offences that involved juveniles involving Cyprus, are being categorized into: Riot and unlawful assembly The defilement of girls between 13 and 16 years of age The grievous harm The theft of over £500 (€700) Offences involving robbery and extortion Burglary, housebreaking and similar offences The receiving and unlawful possession of property (Over £500 (700)) Arson or attempt to commit arson The malicious damage of over £500 (€700) The forgery, attempt of burglary The explosive substances Firearms crimes Crimes concerning narcotic medicines and psychotropic substances The violence in athletic stadiums Cybercrime The category of crimes which involve other serious and severe crimes. The minor offences where juveniles are being involved, are categorised into: Offences against public order Offences against the administration of lawful authority Offences injurious to the public in general The offences against persons Offences relating to property Offences concerning malicious injuries to property Offences of attempts and conspiracies to commit crimes Offences against various other laws. The minor delinquency is in most cases episodic, occasional or incidental, and is a main feature of teenage 'explosions' and subsides in intensity and frequency at the end of the age and entering adulthood. However recent years have seen an increasing trend internationally on juvenile crime and especially violent crime as well as increasing multi- recidivist juvenile offenders. Incorrect criminal and social reactions to juvenile crime may consolidate the new criminal behaviour and increase the severity of this in the future. 50% of children with antisocial behaviour would be developed into antisocial adults 50-75% of adolescent offenders will become adult criminals. According to the classification of mental disorders in the Diagnostic criteria of American Psychiatric Association, 2005 (DSM-IV) and the Classification of Mental Disorders and Behavioural Disorders World Health Organization WHO, 1997 (IDC-10), there are behavioural disorders of children which can possibly been leading to expression of pre- delinquent or delinquent behaviours. The conduct disorder of children The oppositional defiant disorder of children The disruptive behaviour disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) Children who can’t pay attention / attention – deficit / hyperactive disorder (ADHD) Social phobia Depression and suicidal behaviour Mood and anxiety disorder Post-traumatic stress disorder Antisocial behaviour and drug use. problematic family environment with physical or emotional absence of parents low standard of living being foreigner in a country degraded urban environment indifference or excessive strictness parents and teachers learning difficulties, poor school performance, dropout of school aggressive behaviour of other peers, creation and activation of juvenile gangs negative use of internet social networks, video games and electronic gambling. For sure the figures included in a juvenile environment are catalysts in the psychological development and the build of their character. The parenting models are having the biggest and most important role in this procedure of minors and young adults, and so is that why parents should be very careful how they act, they talk and what they say in front of their children, at list until their adultness. Teachers can also be models and is that why they also should be ten times more careful due to the out of family relationship with minors, give their best self to them and recognize their effort to respond in their responsibilities in such a small ages and with teenage troubling them. Boy, 16 years old, with fairly good family and economic situation, but intense conflicts within the family, with poor performance in school but exceptional "performances" in the world of night and main occupations of "leisure time“ improvised racing, going to football stadium and pilfering. This is the profile of a juvenile offender of another class, the class of “Elite”. Spawn of a businessman father and a mother with high expectations of an eternal prim exterior appearance and social status, retaining their legal advisers at the forefront in order to have the public image of pure in reality. This class does not belong to the marginalized children on the ice, the common man child. those which are being done against : others, violence against persons affected as intimidation and serious injury or death things or other’s property, vandalism, insulting graffiti, not damage, property damage, or school, etc themselves; suicidal acts such as use and substances abuse, not taking security measures. Intimidation Threats Bullying peers and bullying physical bickering Abuse and killing Use of weapons Robbing elderly or peers Sexual coercion for nude photography, internet exposure or act Racist violence Hooliganism. Arson Vandalism and graffiti Burglary foreign house, building or car Theft of items without attack victim Fraud and false pretences to secure goods or favour and forgery Use and trafficking of drugs Consume alcohol Drive a vehicle without driving license Not fastening their seat belts when driving Not wearing protective helmet when they drive a motorcycle Leave the house without permission or informing the parents and not return home for a long time. Using the silent treatment or refusing to answer questions Anger, aggression and the verbal abuse Ironic and the sarcastic behaviour against police “power” Shame and embarrassment Nervousness and impatience Sweating and nervous tics Tears Intense chatter and myth mania Coldness and neutrality Indifference and laxity Active participation with questions about their rights if they have read them before. Bullying and cyber bullying Physical and verbal abuse from peers Domestic violence Sexual abuse Sports violence Racist violence Neglect due to the economic crisis. It should be noted that a victim of crime can be potentially anyone who is underage. However there is a greater degree of victimization in the following Cases: Young minor Reduced physique, dysplasia, body defect, mentally retarded Foreigners from other countries The sex of the individual matters, for example boys casualties, particularly violent acts and girls are victims of bullying Lack of supportive family and social context, which lead to unprotected, unaccompanied children Low self esteem Psychological dependence on the abuser. frequent silencing of the event, hence the large percentage of silent crime with a minor as victim appearance of post-traumatic stress disorder, which usually remains undiagnosed and untreated school failure tendencies such as burns and scratches suicide attempts using substances and alcohol abuse show unjustified violent behaviours penetration of peer groups rarely sought help from their parents due to the fear of reprimand may seek assistance from a person of trust,
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Youth Justice in Scotland: Policy, Practice and Legislation

    A Guide to Youth Justice in Scotland: Policy, Practice and Legislation

    www.cycj.org.uk A Guide to Youth Justice in Scotland: policy, practice and legislation Contents Section 1: Background, Policy and Legislation ………page 1 Section 2: Youth Justice in Scotland: the roles and responsibilities of key partners…………………………………………………page 31 Section 3: Theory and Methods …………………………...page 47 Section 4: Early and Effective Intervention & Diversion from Prosecution ………………………………………………...page 73 Section 5: Managing Risk of Serious Harm ………………page 89 Section 6: Reintegrations and Transitions ………………page 119 Section 7: Vulnerable Girls and Young Women ………..page 138 Section 8: Residential Care …………………………….page 168 Section 9: Speech, Language and Communication Needs in Youth Justice …………………………………………………page 199 Section 10: Mental Health …………………………………...page 232 www.cycj.org.uk A Guide to Youth Justice in Scotland: policy, practice and legislation Section 1: Background, Policy and Legislation Contents 1. Introduction …………………………………………………page 1 2. Key policies and approaches …………………………….page 2 3 Historical background: Youth Justice in Scotland ….page 6 4. Rights ………………………………………………………...page 10 5. Legislative Framework …………………………………….page 12 6. Young people in the Criminal Justice system …………page 26 1 www.cycj.org.uk 1. Introduction In Scotland, one of the principles underpinning the philosophy and practice with both children and young people who offend is a welfare approach. This stems from the work of the Kilbrandon Committee in 1964 and formed the basis of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968. Based on this principle, the primary role of youth justice in Scotland should be to improve life chances for children and young people, and to work with children, their families and communities to prevent offending and re-offending. The approach to children involved in offending should be guided by GIRFEC (Getting it Right for Every Child), recognising that these are children first and foremost.
  • Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice Arthur R

    Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice Arthur R

    Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 27 Article 7 Issue 2 Winter 1996 1996 Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice Arthur R. Blum Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Juvenile Law Commons Recommended Citation Arthur R. Blum, Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice, 27 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 349 (1996). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol27/iss2/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comments Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice When he wasn't stealing cars, he was throwing things at them or setting them on fire. "What could you do? . Tell his grandmother? She'd yell at him, and he'd be right back on the street. If the police picked him up, they'd just bring him back home because he was too young to lock up. He was untouchable, and he knew that."' I. INTRODUCTION The above passage articulates the exasperation felt by many who knew and feared eleven-year-old Robert Sandifer.2 In just a year and a half, he compiled a rap sheet that contained twenty-three felonies and five misdemeanors. 3 On August 28, 1994, apparently acting upon in- structions from older members of his gang, 4 he fired a semi-automatic weapon into a group of kids playing football and killed fourteen-year- old Shavon White, who happened to be in the area.5 Shortly after the shooting, according to the Chicago Police, fourteen-year-old Derrick Hardaway and his sixteen-year-old brother Cragg, both members of 1.
  • Youth Justice Statistics 2018/19 England and Wales

    Youth Justice Statistics 2018/19 England and Wales

    Youth Justice Statistics 2018/19 England and Wales Youth Justice Board / Ministry of Justice Statistics bulletin Published 30 January 2020 1 Youth Justice Statistics, England and Wales, April 2018 to March 2019 The Youth Justice System (YJS) in England and Wales works to prevent offending and reoffending by children. The YJS is different to the adult system and is structured to address the needs of children. This publication looks at the YJS in England and Wales for the year ending March 2019. It considers the number of children (those aged 10-17) in the system, the offences they committed, the outcomes they received, their demographics and the trends over time. Main points The number of children who received a caution or sentence has 21,700 children were fallen by 83% over the last ten years, with a 19% fall in the last cautioned or sentenced year. The number of first time entrants has fallen by 85% since the 11,900 first time entrants to year ending March 2009, with an 18% fall since the year ending the YJS March 2018. 4,500 knife and offensive There was a 1% decrease in these offences compared with the weapon offences were previous year after four year-on-year increases. Levels are 31% committed by children lower than those seen in the year ending March 2009. The average custodial sentence length given to children The average custodial increased by more than six months over the last ten years, sentence length has increased from 11.4 to 17.7 months. The number of children held in The number of children held in youth custody on remand custody on remand has increased by 12% in the last year and accounted for 28% of all increased children in youth custody.
  • A Study of 'Prolific' Offending by Young People in Wales 2009-2015

    A Study of 'Prolific' Offending by Young People in Wales 2009-2015

    A study of ‘prolific’ offending by young people in Wales 2009-2015 Diana Johns, Katherine S Williams and Kevin Haines. Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice (WCCSJ) January 2018 Cover photograph used under free MorgueFile licence. Original image URI: http://mrg.bz/PS3Js9 Acknowledgments This research is the result of collaborative work between the Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice and the Youth Justice Board (YJB) Cymru. In particular Dusty Kennedy and Lynzi Jarman (YJB Cymru) who, along with the authors, formed the steering group. We wish to acknowledge this team of people for their genuine commitment to understanding and improving the experience of young people in conflict with the law, and for the wonderful support they gave us in undertaking this research. Diana acknowledges with particular gratitude our YJB colleagues who offered invaluable assistance, support and friendship during her year in Wales. The people in the YOTs Diana visited across Wales are too numerous to mention individually. Needless to say, without their openness and willingness to help, this research would not have been possible. Thank you to all the YOT workers, managers, information officers, police officers and administrative staff who welcomed Diana into their workplaces, gave their time and energy, and shared their stories, experience and passion for the young people they work with. We are all incredibly grateful to the four young men who shared their personal experiences of ‘getting into lots of trouble’, and to the YOT workers they trusted enough to allow Diana to meet with them. The perspective of the ‘lads’ themselves on what helped them and made it hard to stay out of trouble was invaluable for the research and to help us understand some of the complexities associated with young people’s ‘prolific’ offending.
  • Justice for Juveniles

    Justice for Juveniles

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. )OS!, 7 JUSTICE FOR JUVENILES Charles E. Springer Vice-Chief Justice Supreme Court of Nevada ~ " :tment of Justice lvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention OJJDP Ie * JUSTICE FOR JUVENILES Charles E. Springer Vice-Chief Justice Supreme Court of Nevada U.S. Department of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention OJJDP II ,I;' - c :;;w '&-••1\'£:-.' ¥W, Charles E. Springer is Vice-Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada. Prior to being commissioned to the Supreme Court, he was Juvenile Court Master for the Second Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada from 1973 to 1980. He has also served the State of Nevada as Attorney General. He received the Outstanding Service Award from the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges in 1980 and has served on the Boards and Commissions of numerous civic and State organizations in an effort to improve the quality of justice for adults and juveniles . ........ * & & !MI',. u. S. ~partment of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention NmionallnslituJejiJr Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Juvenile Ju.rl;" Cfrorin8/w"''' NCJRS Box6000. Rochill<. MD 20lJjO Dear Colleague: "Justice for Juveniles" is a serious and deliberative look at the juvenile justice systeln, its philosophical and historical underpinnings, the strengths and weaknesses of today's system, and the implications for its future. Last year over 35,000 juveniles were arrested in this country for violent crimes, including murder, rape, and aggravated assault. The success of this office's e~forts to reduce juvenile crime and create a nlore secure society depends on the ready exchange of information and ideas among professionals in the field.
  • Appendix VIII the YOUNG OFFENDER

    Appendix VIII the YOUNG OFFENDER

    ABSTRACT The present thesis is a detailed examination of bullying behaviour in Young Offender Institutions and assaultive behaviour in adult prisons and Young Offender Institutions. An amalgam of methods of enquiry were used throughout, which comprised i) questionnaires, ii) structured interviews. Hi) focus groups, iv) standardised measures of personality, intelli^ ce and social background, v) analysis of official discipline report records, vi) analysis f f official assault incident report records and vii) analysis of computerised prisoner records. This mixture of methods, known as 'triangulation', was adopted in an attempt to achieve a more reliable and valid representation of bullying and assaultive behaviour occurring within penal establishments. Information was obtained from a variety of subject groups, including convicted young offenders, young offenders on remand, convicted adult prisoners, adult prisoners on remand, prison officers, prisons management and specialist staff working in the prisons. Data were analysed by means of parametric and non-parametric statistical techniques. Seven cross-sectional studies were designed and conducted, the results of which are reported herein. The first five studies examined only Young Offender Institutions. Concerning young offenders, the levels of bullying ivere comparatively high when compared with studies done on analogous populations. Among young offenders, the most common types of bullying were similar to those shown in previous studies, such as taxing, threats and name calling. More staff in Young Offender Institutions perceived bullying as a problem both nationally and in their own establishment than did young offenders. While staff and young offenders had discordant opinions as to the levels and types of bullying taking place within Young Offender Institutions, they had concordant views as to the characteristics of 'bullies' and 'victims'.
  • Report on Violence in Institutions for Juvenile Offenders

    Report on Violence in Institutions for Juvenile Offenders

    Strasbourg, 7 November 2014 PC-CP (2014) 13 rev 2 PC-CP\docs 2014\PC-CP(2014)13e rev2 EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) Council for Penological Co-operation (PC-CP) Report on Violence in Institutions for Juvenile Offenders Document prepared by: Prof Dr T. Liefaard Dr J. Reef M. Hazelzet, LL.M Leiden University, Leiden Law School UNICEF Chair in Children’s Rights The Netherlands ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This report has been prepared with the support of Ms. Ilina Taneva, Secretary to the PC-CP and Ms. Christine Coleur, Assistant to Ms. Taneva. The authors would like to express their gratitude to all respondents to the questionnaires and to the offices of the ombudspersons for children that responded to the request for materials. In addition, the authors would like to thank Prof Dr Frank Neubacher M.A. of the University of Cologne, Germany, for his feedback on an earlier draft of the report. This report is also contributing to the activities carried out within the framework of the CoE Strategy for the Rights of the Child. Content Chapter 1 Components of the study 1.1 Objectives and focus of study 1.2 Methodology 1.2.1 Literature study 1.2.2. Empirical Research 1.3 Structure of the report Chapter 2 Introduction to violence in institutions for juvenile offenders Chapter 3 Prevalence of violence in institutions for juvenile offenders 3.1 General observations 3.2 Violence by inmates (among juveniles,
  • Youth Custody in Scotland: Rates, Trends and Drivers

    Youth Custody in Scotland: Rates, Trends and Drivers

    YOUTH CUSTODY IN SCOTLAND: RATES, TRENDS AND DRIVERS SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION The upward trend in youth custody rates across the UK has led the Prison Reform Trust, with support from The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund, to identify the drivers to youth custody and to reduce the overall numbers of children and young people in prison or secure settings. The Trust’s concerns rest on the following facts: • Imprisoning children is harsh and ineffective; • Children can suffer mental health problems as a result of being deprived of their liberty and having limited contact with family and friends; • The incarceration of children is not cost-effective; • Custody exacerbates rather than reduces youth crime (Prison Reform Trust/ SmartJustice, 2008). Two studies have been undertaken in England and Wales to date as a result of this campaign (Gibbs and Hickson, 2009; Prison Reform Trust/SmartJustice, 2008). The Prison Reform Trust now wants to explore youth custody rates, trends and drivers in Scotland, with a view to reducing numbers of children and young people held in custody north of the Border. This review therefore gives some key statistics on youth custody rates and trends and explores the drivers to changes in those rates over time. The review identifies four key drivers: a) increasingly stringent requirements imposed on children and young people who offend; b) the increased use of remand; c) shorter prison sentences with little scope for rehabilitation; and d) the earlier criminalisation of children and young people. Reducing child imprisonment requires attention to all four of these factors which interact in different ways and at different times, depending on policy, practice and public concerns.
  • European Perspective on Youth Crime Prevention and Reintegration

    European Perspective on Youth Crime Prevention and Reintegration

    European Perspective on Youth Crime Prevention and Reintegration Prof. Dr. Ton Liefaard | Santiago de Chile, 28 November 2016 Discover theDwisocroldverattLheidene worldUnaitvLereidensity University Content and objectives of presentation Focus: How to respond to youth committing criminal offences? A European Perspective Outline: I. How is Europe organized? – Council of Europe & European Union - Standard-setting (law), agenda-setting (policy) and implementation II. Four themes - Prevention - Reintegration - Deprivation of liberty of children - Child-friendly justice III. Some reflections & lessons (to be) learned IV. Q&A Overarching perspective: international children’s rights. Discover the world at Leiden University European Union (EU) - 28 member states Discover the world at Leiden University Europe – Council of Europe Albania Estonia Lithuania San Marino Tirana Tallinn Vilnius San Marino Council of Europe 47 Member States Andorra Finland Luxembourg Serbia Andorra-la-Vella Helsinki Luxembourg Belgrade t f o r E a s t a u S i B e b e r i a n S e S a a e O k of Alask a ho Armenia France Malta Slovakia t sk Yerevan Paris Valletta Bratislava E a st S i ber i a a n S t S e ea f or J a u a p B e c t i a n r c S A ea o f a J a d a pa a n n Austria Georgia Republic of Moldova Slovenia n i Vienna Tbilisi Chişinău Ljubljana a h C O C c e a n Azerbaijan Germany Monaco Spain G Baku Berlin Monaco Madrid r e e n ( a o D n en i y y s Ma e l Jan l a d n.
  • Timely Justice: Turning 18 a Briefing on the Impact of Turning 18 in the Criminal Justice System

    Timely Justice: Turning 18 a Briefing on the Impact of Turning 18 in the Criminal Justice System

    Timely Justice: Turning 18 A briefing on the impact of turning 18 in the criminal justice system Introduction Quite simply, the impact of turning 18 is profound. If a child reaches this age before criminal proceedings Young adults who have committed offences are commenced, they will become an adult in the as children must have the opportunity to build eyes of the law. Significant inequities arise for those meaningful futures and be treated fairly. The United who commit offences as children but cross the age Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (the threshold in to adulthood before their cases are “UN Committee”), has made it clear that “child heard. justice systems should also extend protection to children who were below the age of 18 at the time of The data available indicates that each year the commission of the offence but who turn 18 during approximately 2%-3% of proven offences are the trial or sentencing process1.” committed by children who turn 18 prior to conviction. This corresponds to 2,500 offences for System delay is the main reason children turn the twelve months ended March 2017 and 1,400 18 between the commission of an offence offences for the twelve months ended March 20183. and prosecution, resulting in real injustice. Turning 18 prior to conviction has a significant The coronavirus crisis has exacerbated delays impact as the young people affected are prosecuted throughout the criminal justice system and the in adult courts and lose the opportunity to benefit impact on children approaching their 18h birthdays from the youth justice system.
  • A Rights-Based Analysis of Youth Justice in the United Kingdom

    A Rights-Based Analysis of Youth Justice in the United Kingdom

    A RIGHTS-BASED ANALYSIS OF YOUTH JUSTICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2 A RIGHTS-BASED ANALYSIS OF YOUTH JUSTICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Figures and tables Figure 1: Number of Children Referred to the Children’s Reporter in Scotland – 2006/07 to 2019/20 Figure 2: Children’s Hearing Panel – The Key Individuals Involved Figure 3: Key Demographic Data of Children in Scottish Secure Care - 2019 Figure 4: Number of First Time Entrants (FTEs) in Wales: 2009-2019 Figure 5: Rates of First Time Entrants (FTEs) in Wales: 2009 -2019 Figure 6: Swansea Number of First Time Entrants (FTEs) - Year Ending March 2009 to 2013 Figure 7: Non-Criminal Disposals (NCDs) as a Proportion of All Swansea Bureau Model Disposals. Administered 2009/10 to 2012/13 Figure 8: The Stages of the Trauma Recovery Model Figure 9: Permanent School Exclusions in Wales Figure 10: Fixed Term Exclusions (Over 5 Days) in Wales Figure 11: Number of First Time Entrants (FTEs) in England: 2009-2019 Table1: Children’s Reporter Decisions in Scotland – 2019/20 Table 2: Secure Care Provision in Scotland Table 3: Scottish School Exclusions (2006/07-2018/19) Table 4: Number of Arrests 2010-2018 by Welsh Police Service Area Table 5: Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility (MACR) Across Europe Table 6: Child Arrests by English Police Forces: 2010-2018 Table 7: Use of Force Incidents in English Secure Training Centres (STC) – Year Ending March 2019 Table 8: Number and Proportion of Arrests for Recorded Crime (Notifiable Offences) of Children by Self-Defined Ethnicity in English Police Force Areas Table 9: ‘Permanent’ and ‘Fixed Period’ School Exclusions in England – 2013/14 to 2018/19 Table 10: Juvenile Justice Centre (JJC) Demographic Data - 2018/19 CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES ..................................................................................................
  • 1 Measures of Deprivation of Liberty for Young Offenders: How to Enrich

    1 Measures of Deprivation of Liberty for Young Offenders: How to Enrich

    Measures of Deprivation of Liberty for young offenders: how to enrich International Standards 1 in Juvenile Justice and promote alternatives to detention in Europe? ile Justice n EuropeanAcademic Council Sectionfor Juve Measures of Deprivation of Liberty for young offenders: how to enrich International Standards 2 in Juvenile Justice and promote alternatives to detention in Europe? Measures of Deprivation of Liberty for young offenders: how to enrich International Standards in Juvenile Justice and promote alternatives to detention in Europe? Author Dr. Ursula Kilkelly Directors of Publication Dr. Francisco Legaz Cristina Goñi Cedric Foussard ile Justice n EuropeanAcademic Council Sectionfor Juve Measures of Deprivation of Liberty for young offenders: how to enrich International Standards 3 in Juvenile Justice and promote alternatives to detention in Europe? International Juvenile Justice Observatory European Juvenile Justice Observatory www.ijjo.org www.ejjo.org [email protected] [email protected] Rue Mercelis, 50 1050 Brussels Belgium Tel: 0032 2629890 - Fax: 0032 2629899 Many professionals have contributed to research, and made inputs and contributions at European and national level as experts on the ground concerning children and young people in situations of social exclusion. All of them have shared their knowledge and expertise generously with us. ile Justice n The work has been coordinated by the International Juvenile Justice Observatory and its European branch, the European Juvenile Justice Observatory. The IIJO as well as EJJO appreciate the efforts and professional devotion of Dr. Ursula Kilkelly as author of this paper. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views of the author only, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.