17 X Chromosome Rearrangements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

17 X Chromosome Rearrangements Chapter 17 / X Chromosome Rearrangements 247 17 X Chromosome Rearrangements Pauline H. Yen, PhD CONTENTS BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION DELETIONS/DUPLICATIONS CAUSED BY NAHR BETWEEN DIRECT LCRS INVERSIONS CAUSED BY NAHR BETWEEN INVERTED LCRS DELETIONS/DUPLICATIONS CAUSED BY NHEJ THE SHOX GENE DELETIONS CONTIGUOUS GENE SYNDROMES SUMMARY REFERENCES BACKGROUND X chromosome rearrangements usually convey clinical manifestations in the hemizygous males and are, thus, readily ascertained. They are found in all parts of the X chromosome and are associated with more than 20 disorders. Some of the rearrangements are the results of homologous recombination between low-copy repeats (LCRs) on the X chromosome or between large homologous regions on the X and Y chromosome, whereas others are caused by nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). For most large deletions associated with contiguous gene syndromes, the deletion breakpoints remain uncharacterized. The deletions, as well as inversions and duplications on the X chromosome, occur mainly in male germ cells, indicating intrachromatid or sister chromatid exchange as the underlying mechanism. INTRODUCTION Among all human chromosomes, the X chromosome seems to have more than its share of genomic disorders identified so far (1). There are two main reasons for the apparent prevalence of genomic disorders on the X chromosome. The hemizygous status of the X chromosome in males allows phenotypic manifestation of rare recessive genomic disorders that would have escaped detection if they were present on an autosome. In addition, high homology shared between the X and the Y chromosome makes the X chromosome specifically prone to X/Y translocation, resulting in the deletion of the terminal sequences (2). To date, more than 20 genomic disorders have been identified on the X chromosome. Deletions associated with the genomic disorders can be easily detected in the males by polymerase chain reaction or Southern From: Genomic Disorders: The Genomic Basis of Disease Edited by: J. R. Lupski and P. Stankiewicz © Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 247 248 Part IV / Genomic Rearrangements and Disease Traits blotting, whereas the carrier status of a female is usually determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis (3–6). In this chapter, X-linked genomic disorders are grouped according to the underlying mechanisms such as nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between direct LCRs, NAHR between inverted LCRs, and NHEJ. For most of the Short Stature Homeobox (SHOX) deletions and contiguous gene syndromes, the breakpoints have not been characterized and, thus, the mechanisms remain unclear. DELETIONS/DUPLICATIONS CAUSED BY NAHR BETWEEN DIRECT LCRS Most cases of X-linked ichthyosis (XLI), color blindness, and incontinential pigmenti (IP) are caused by recurrent deletions resulting from NAHR between direct LCRs (7–9). In XLI the LCRs flank the steroid sulfatase (STS) gene, in color blindness the color pigment genes reside within the LCRs, and in IP the LCRs are one within and one outside the nuclear factor (NF)-κB essential modulator (NEMO) gene. When NAHR occurs between two direct repeats on the same chromatid, it generates only deletion (Fig. 1A). If the recombination involves two X chromosome homologs or sister chromatids, it generates both duplication and deletion (Fig. 1A). Reciprocal duplications have been identified at the color pigment gene cluster and the NEMO locus (8,10). Although duplications at the STS locus have also been reported, whether they involve the same LCRs as the recurrent deletion remains to be determined (11). Studies on de novo NEMO deletions in IP patients show that most cases occur in the paternal germ cells, indicating unequal crossover between sister chromatids or intrachromatid recombination as the underlying mechanism (9). X-Linked Ichthyosis and the STS Gene at Xp22.3 XLI (MIM 308100) affects approx 1 in 5000 males worldwide (12). It is caused by a deficiency of the microsomal enzyme steroid sulfatase (STS) that hydrolyzes a variety of 3β- hydroxysteroid sulfates. The STS gene at Xp22.3 consists of 10 exons and spans approx 135 kb of genomic DNA (13). There is a truncated STS pseudogene at Yq11 that contains sequences homologous to five of the exons. XLI is one of the first genomic disorders found to have recurrent deletions flanked by LCR elements (7). Up to 90% of XLI patients have the entire STS gene deleted (14). The deletions are heterogeneous in size and the breakpoints spread over several megabases. A majority of the deletions have common breakpoints within two direct LCRs, S232A and S232B, that are 1.6 Mb apart (Fig. 1B). The common recurrent 1.6-Mb deletion is present in approx 87% of STS deletion patients in the Unites States and Japan, and 30% of the patient population in Mexico (15–18). One-third of the Mexican patients appear to have a smaller recurrent deletion with the distal breakpoint at S232A and the proximal breakpoint somewhere between S232B and another LCR G1.3 (DXF22S1) (18). The 1.6-Mb segment between S232A and S232B contains four genes, HDHD1A(GS1), PNPLA4(GS2), VCX-8r/VCX-A, and LOC392425 in addition to STS (19–21). Interestingly, patients with the 1.6-Mb deletion have the same phenotype as those with mutations within the STS gene, indicating that removal of the addi- tional genes around STS has no apparent phenotypic consequences. There are six copies of S232 repeats within the human genome, four at Xp22.3 flanking STS and two at Yq11. The X-linked S232 repeats are highly polymorphic in length. They span more than 2 Mb and are oriented in different directions (Fig. 1B). The 1.6-Mb deletion breakpoints Chapter 17 / X Chromosome Rearrangements 249 Fig. 1. Nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between direct low-copy repeats. Horizontal arrows depict genes in the 5' to 3' direction and arrowheads depict repeats. (A) Models of NAHR. Recombination between repeats on different chromatids produces both deletion and duplication, whereas recombination between repeats on the same chromatid produces only deletion. (B) The steroid sulfatase (STS) gene and its flanking S232 repeats. The solid arrows within the arrowheads represent the Variable Charge X genes within the S232 repeats. Vertical arrows connect the repeats that are involved in the NAHR to generate the STS deletion. (C) Tandem array of the color pigment genes. Only one green color pigment (GCP) gene in addition to the red color pigment gene is shown. Recombination between the intergenic regions (rearrangement 1) changes the copy number of the GCP gene in the recombinant chromosomes. Recombination between the genes (rearrangement 2) results in hybrid genes in addition to changed gene copy number. (D) Complex structure of the NEMO/LAGE region. Gray unlabeled arrowheads depict the int3h repeats that are present in introns 3 and the 3' flanking regions of NEMO (depicted as open arrow) as well as the truncated ΔNEMO pseudogene. Open arrowheads depict the large inverted repeats that contain the 3' portion of NEMO and the LAGE2 (solid arrow) genes. The recom- bination products involving the various pairs of repeats are shown. The drawings are not to scale. fall within S232A and S232B, which are in the same direction and share more than 11 kb of 95% identity. The structure of the S232 repeats is quite complex. Each S232 repeat contains 5 kb of unique sequence in addition to two elements, RU1 and RU2, that are composed of variable number of tandem repeats (22). The repeating unit of RU2 is of highly asymmetric sequence and in itself contains a variable number of a GGGA repeat. The size of RU2 varies from 0.6 kb to more than 23 kb among different individuals, accounting entirely for the observed polymorphism at the S232 loci. RU1 consists of a 30-bp repeat unit and is a part of a testis-specific gene, Variable Charge X (VCX) or Variable Charge Y (VCY), that is complete 250 Part IV / Genomic Rearrangements and Disease Traits embedded in the S232 repeat (21). The VCX/Y family encodes basic proteins that appear to play a role in the regulation of ribosome assembly during spermatogenesis (23). The RU2 VNTR sequences as well as the open chromatin structure associated with active transcription of the VCX genes may facilitate homologous recombination between S232A and S232B, though the exact locations of the deletion breakpoints within the S232 repeats have not been determined (22,24). Color Blindness and the Red and Green Pigment Genes at Xq28 Color blindness affects approx 5% of the male population worldwide, and a vast majority of the cases are caused by defects in the color pigment genes on the X chromosome (8). Of the genes encoding the three color pigments in humans, the blue pigment gene is located on chromosome 7, and the red pigment (Opsin 1 Long-wave-sensitive, OPN1LW) and green pigment (Opsin 1 Middle-wave-sensitive, OPN1MW) genes are embedded in head-to-tail tandem-arrayed repeating units at Xq28. Such tandem arrangement predisposes the red and green pigment genes to NAHR and genomic rearrangement. The pigment genes consist of six exons spanning 14 kb. They are derived from a duplication event 30 million years ago and share 98% similarity throughout the entire gene. The repeating unit in the tandem array includes a single pigment gene at the 5' end and 25 kb of intergenic sequences. The red pigment gene is located at the 5' end of the array, followed by one or more copies of the green pigment gene (Fig. 1C). Unequal crossover within the 25-kb intergenic regions would generate X chromo- somes with increased or decreased copies of the green pigment gene (Fig. 1C1). This accounts for the variable copy number of the green pigment gene in the human population. Of the X chromosomes in the normal population with trichromatic vision, the percentages carrying one, two, three, four, and more copies of the green pigment gene are 25, 50, 20, and 5%, respectively.
Recommended publications
  • An Overview of Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome
    An Overview of Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome Abstract Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome is a disorder that strikes the sufferer with debilitating motor and cognitive problems, hyperuricemia, and the urge to do harm to yourself with acts of self-injurious behavior. Research has lead to the discovery of a genetic sequence that results in a defective enzyme, but researchers are still unsure how this leads to the neurological and behavioral problems that are the hallmark of the disorder. Treatments as simple as wearing oven mitts and as complicated as electrical wiring in the brain have been used to help LNS patients, but no cure for the syndrome seems in sight. Lars Sorensen Prof. Stanley Vitello : IDD : 293:522 : Fall 2008 Rutgers University - Graduate School of Education Introduction In the world of developmental and physical disorders none is stranger than Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome. It brings with it a variety of physical ailments but the defining feature of the condition is behavioral. The sufferer seems to be overtaken with an involuntary uncontrollable compulsion to destroy themselves and those around them. In the autumn of 1962, a young mother brought her four year old son to the pediatric emergency room at Johns Hopkins medical center. The boy had previously been diagnosed with cerebral palsy and could not walk or sit up. He was experiencing pain when he urinated. His mother told the resident who was examining the boy that he had “sand in his diaper” (Preston, 2007). The young boy was admitted to the hospital. The resident and an intern began examining the “sand” from the boy's diaper.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hunter Syndrome) Complicated by Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
    Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 1093–1099 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0268–3369/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/bmt Case report Unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation in infancy for mucopolysaccharidosis type IIB (Hunter syndrome) complicated by autoimmune hemolytic anemia CA Mullen1,2, JN Thompson3, LA Richard and KW Chan1 Departments of 1Pediatrics and 2Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 3Laboratory of Medical Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA Summary: a median of 21 years in type IIB.8 Allogeneic BMT has been used to treat Hunter disease, but remains controversial This report describes unrelated umbilical cord blood since it often fails to reverse CNS impairment9–11 and car- transplantation for a 10-month-old infant boy with ries with it substantial early mortality and morbidity. Here, mucopolysaccharidosis IIB (Hunter syndrome), an X- we report treatment of an infant with mucopolysacch- linked metabolic storage disorder due to deficiency of arisosis type IIB with transplantation of unrelated umbilical iduronate sulfatase. Two years after transplant ෂ55% cord blood cells and its complication by autoimmune hemo- normal plasma enzyme activity has been restored and lytic anemia. abnormal urinary excretion of glycosaminoglycans has nearly completely resolved. The boy has exhibited nor- mal growth and development after transplant. Nine Case report months after transplant he developed severe auto- immune hemolytic anemia and required 14 months of The patient is the only child of a couple with a maternal corticosteroid treatment to prevent clinically significant family history of Hunter syndrome. The mother’s brother anemia. Bone marrow transplantation for Hunter syn- was diagnosed with Hunter syndrome in 1979 at age 3 years drome and post-transplant hemolytic anemia are when he exhibited the physical stigmata of the disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Counsyl Foresight™ Carrier Screen
    The Counsyl Foresight™ Carrier Screen 180 Kimball Way | South San Francisco, CA 94080 www.counsyl.com | [email protected] | (888) COUNSYL The Counsyl Foresight Carrier Screen - Disease Reference Book 11-beta-hydroxylase-deficient Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia .................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 21-hydroxylase-deficient Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia ...........................................................................................................................................................................................10 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin Synthase Deficiency ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................12 ABCC8-related Hyperinsulinism........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Alpha Thalassemia.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mini-Review on “Molecular Diagnosis of 65 Families With
    Mashima R, Okuyama T. J Rare Dis Res Treat. (2016) 2(1): 43-46 Journal of www.rarediseasesjournal.com Rare Diseases Research & Treatment Mini-Review Open Access Mini-review on “Molecular diagnosis of 65 families with mucopoly- saccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome) characterized by 16 novel mutations in the IDS gene: Genetic, pathological, and structural stud- ies on iduronate-2-sulfatase.” Ryuichi Mashima1* and Torayuki Okuyama1,2 1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan 2Center for Lysosomal Storage Disorders, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan ABSTRACT Article Info Article Notes Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome; OMIM #309900) Received: November 29, 2016 is an X-linked congenital disorder characterized by an accumulation of Accepted: December 28, 2016 glycosaminoglycans in the body. Accumulating evidence has suggested that the prevalence of the severe type of MPS II is almost 70%. In addition, novel *Correspondence: mutations that are relevant to MPS II pathogenesis are being increasingly Ryuichi Mashima, Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10- discovered, so the databases of genetic data regarding pathogenic mutations 1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan, E-mail: have been growing. We have recently reported a collection of 16 novel [email protected] pathogenic mutations of the iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS) gene in 65 families with MPS II in a Japanese population1. We also proposed that a homology- © 2016 Ryuichi Mashima.
    [Show full text]
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: One Hundred Years of Research, Diagnosis, and Treatment
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: One Hundred Years of Research, Diagnosis, and Treatment Francesca D’Avanzo 1,2 , Laura Rigon 2,3 , Alessandra Zanetti 1,2 and Rosella Tomanin 1,2,* 1 Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Lysosomal Disorders, Department of Women’s and Children ‘s Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy; [email protected] (F.D.); [email protected] (A.Z.) 2 Fondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica “Città della Speranza”, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127 Padova, Italy; [email protected] 3 Molecular Developmental Biology, Life & Medical Science Institute (LIMES), University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 January 2020; Accepted: 11 February 2020; Published: 13 February 2020 Abstract: Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome) was first described by Dr. Charles Hunter in 1917. Since then, about one hundred years have passed and Hunter syndrome, although at first neglected for a few decades and afterwards mistaken for a long time for the similar disorder Hurler syndrome, has been clearly distinguished as a specific disease since 1978, when the distinct genetic causes of the two disorders were finally identified. MPS II is a rare genetic disorder, recently described as presenting an incidence rate ranging from 0.38 to 1.09 per 100,000 live male births, and it is the only X-linked-inherited mucopolysaccharidosis. The complex disease is due to a deficit of the lysosomal hydrolase iduronate 2-sulphatase, which is a crucial enzyme in the stepwise degradation of heparan and dermatan sulphate.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Reference Book
    The Counsyl Foresight™ Carrier Screen 180 Kimball Way | South San Francisco, CA 94080 www.counsyl.com | [email protected] | (888) COUNSYL The Counsyl Foresight Carrier Screen - Disease Reference Book 11-beta-hydroxylase-deficient Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia .................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 21-hydroxylase-deficient Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia ...........................................................................................................................................................................................10 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin Synthase Deficiency ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................12 ABCC8-related Hyperinsulinism........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Alpha Thalassemia.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly
    277 Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly KellenD.Winden,MD,PhD1 Christopher J. Yuskaitis, MD, PhD1 Annapurna Poduri, MD, MPH2 1 Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Address for correspondence Annapurna Poduri, Epilepsy Genetics Massachusetts Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Department of Neurology, Fegan 9, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Electrophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (e-mail: [email protected]). Semin Neurol 2015;35:277–287. Abstract Megalencephaly is a developmental disorder characterized by brain overgrowth secondary to increased size and/or numbers of neurons and glia. These disorders can be divided into metabolic and developmental categories based on their molecular etiologies. Metabolic megalencephalies are mostly caused by genetic defects in cellular metabolism, whereas developmental megalencephalies have recently been shown to be caused by alterations in signaling pathways that regulate neuronal replication, growth, and migration. These disorders often lead to epilepsy, developmental disabilities, and Keywords behavioral problems; specific disorders have associations with overgrowth or abnor- ► megalencephaly malities in other tissues. The molecular underpinnings of many of these disorders are ► hemimegalencephaly now understood, providing insight into how dysregulation of critical pathways leads to ►
    [Show full text]
  • Alport Syndrome of the European Dialysis Population Suffers from AS [26], and Simi- Lar Figures Have Been Found in Other Series
    DOCTOR OF MEDICAL SCIENCE Patients with AS constitute 2.3% (11/476) of the renal transplant population at the Mayo Clinic [24], and 1.3% of 1,000 consecutive kidney transplant patients from Sweden [25]. Approximately 0.56% Alport syndrome of the European dialysis population suffers from AS [26], and simi- lar figures have been found in other series. AS accounts for 18% of Molecular genetic aspects the patients undergoing dialysis or having received a kidney graft in 2003 in French Polynesia [27]. A common founder mutation was in Jens Michael Hertz this area. In Denmark, the percentage of patients with AS among all patients starting treatment for ESRD ranges from 0 to 1.21% (mean: 0.42%) in a twelve year period from 1990 to 2001 (Danish National This review has been accepted as a thesis together with nine previously pub- Registry. Report on Dialysis and Transplantation in Denmark 2001). lished papers by the University of Aarhus, February 5, 2009, and defended on This is probably an underestimate due to the difficulties of establish- May 15, 2009. ing the diagnosis. Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark. 1.3 CLINICAL FEATURES OF X-LINKED AS Correspondence: Klinisk Genetisk Afdeling, Århus Sygehus, Århus Univer- 1.3.1 Renal features sitetshospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Århus C, Denmark. AS in its classic form is a hereditary nephropathy associated with E-mail: [email protected] sensorineural hearing loss and ocular manifestations. The charac- Official opponents: Lisbeth Tranebjærg, Allan Meldgaard Lund, and Torben teristic renal features in AS are persistent microscopic hematuria ap- F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ophthalmology
    Ophthalmology Information for health professionals MEDICAL GENETIC TESTING FOR OPHTHALMOLOGY Recent technologies, in particularly Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), allows fast, accurate and valuable diagnostic tests. For Ophthalmology, CGC Genetics has an extensive list of medical genetic tests with clinical integration of results by our Medical Geneticists. 1. EXOME SEQUENCING: Exome Sequencing is a very efficient strategy to study most exons of a patient’s genome, unraveling mutations associated with specific disorders or phenotypes. With this diagnostic strategy, patients can be studied with a significantly reduced turnaround time and cost. CGC Genetics has available 2 options for Exome Sequencing: • Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), which analyzes the entire exome (about 20 000 genes); • Disease Exome by CGC Genetics, which analyzes about 6 000 clinically-relevant genes. Any of these can be performed in the index case or in a Trio. 2. NGS PANELS For NGS panels, several genes associated with the same phenotype are simultaneously sequenced. These panels provide increased diagnostic capability with a significantly reduced turnaround time and cost. CGC Genetics has several NGS panels for Ophthalmology that are constantly updated (www.cgcgenetics.com). Any gene studied in exome or NGS panel can also be individually sequenced and analyzed for deletion/duplication events. 3. EXPERTISE IN MEDICAL GENETICS CGC Genetics has Medical Geneticists specialized in genetic counseling for ophthalmological diseases who may advice in choosing the most appropriate
    [Show full text]
  • Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II in Illinois: an Update
    International Journal of Neonatal Screening Article Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II in Illinois: An Update Barbara K. Burton 1,2,*, Rachel Hickey 1 and Lauren Hitchins 1 1 Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; [email protected] (R.H.); [email protected] (L.H.) 2 Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 August 2020; Accepted: 1 September 2020; Published: 3 September 2020 Abstract: Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome) is a rare, progressive multisystemic lysosomal storage disorder with significant morbidity and premature mortality. Infants with MPS II develop signs and symptoms of the disorder in the early years of life, yet diagnostic delays are very common. Enzyme replacement therapy is an effective treatment option. It has been shown to prolong survival and improve or stabilize many somatic manifestations of the disorder. Our initial experience with newborn screening in 162,000 infants was previously reported. Here, we update that experience with the findings in 339,269 infants. Measurement of iduronate-2-sulfatase (I2S) activity was performed on dried blood spot samples submitted for other newborn screening disorders. A positive screen was defined as I2S activity less than or equal to 10% of the daily median. In this series, 28 infants had a positive screening test result, and four other infants had a borderline result. Three positive diagnoses of MPS II were established, and 25 were diagnosed as having I2S pseudodeficiency. The natural history and the clinical features of MPS II make it an ideal target for newborn screening.
    [Show full text]
  • Orphanet Report Series Rare Diseases Collection
    Marche des Maladies Rares – Alliance Maladies Rares Orphanet Report Series Rare Diseases collection DecemberOctober 2013 2009 List of rare diseases and synonyms Listed in alphabetical order www.orpha.net 20102206 Rare diseases listed in alphabetical order ORPHA ORPHA ORPHA Disease name Disease name Disease name Number Number Number 289157 1-alpha-hydroxylase deficiency 309127 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase 228384 5q14.3 microdeletion syndrome deficiency 293948 1p21.3 microdeletion syndrome 314655 5q31.3 microdeletion syndrome 939 3-hydroxyisobutyric aciduria 1606 1p36 deletion syndrome 228415 5q35 microduplication syndrome 2616 3M syndrome 250989 1q21.1 microdeletion syndrome 96125 6p subtelomeric deletion syndrome 2616 3-M syndrome 250994 1q21.1 microduplication syndrome 251046 6p22 microdeletion syndrome 293843 3MC syndrome 250999 1q41q42 microdeletion syndrome 96125 6p25 microdeletion syndrome 6 3-methylcrotonylglycinuria 250999 1q41-q42 microdeletion syndrome 99135 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 67046 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 1 deficiency 238769 1q44 microdeletion syndrome 111 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 2 13 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase 976 2,8 dihydroxyadenine urolithiasis deficiency 67047 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 3 869 2A syndrome 75857 6q terminal deletion 67048 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 4 79154 2-aminoadipic 2-oxoadipic aciduria 171829 6q16 deletion syndrome 66634 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 5 19 2-hydroxyglutaric acidemia 251056 6q25 microdeletion syndrome 352328 3-methylglutaconic
    [Show full text]
  • X-Linked Diseases: Susceptible Females
    REVIEW ARTICLE X-linked diseases: susceptible females Barbara R. Migeon, MD 1 The role of X-inactivation is often ignored as a prime cause of sex data include reasons why women are often protected from the differences in disease. Yet, the way males and females express their deleterious variants carried on their X chromosome, and the factors X-linked genes has a major role in the dissimilar phenotypes that that render women susceptible in some instances. underlie many rare and common disorders, such as intellectual deficiency, epilepsy, congenital abnormalities, and diseases of the Genetics in Medicine (2020) 22:1156–1174; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436- heart, blood, skin, muscle, and bones. Summarized here are many 020-0779-4 examples of the different presentations in males and females. Other INTRODUCTION SEX DIFFERENCES ARE DUE TO X-INACTIVATION Sex differences in human disease are usually attributed to The sex differences in the effect of X-linked pathologic variants sex specific life experiences, and sex hormones that is due to our method of X chromosome dosage compensation, influence the function of susceptible genes throughout the called X-inactivation;9 humans and most placental mammals – genome.1 5 Such factors do account for some dissimilarities. compensate for the sex difference in number of X chromosomes However, a major cause of sex-determined expression of (that is, XX females versus XY males) by transcribing only one disease has to do with differences in how males and females of the two female X chromosomes. X-inactivation silences all X transcribe their gene-rich human X chromosomes, which is chromosomes but one; therefore, both males and females have a often underappreciated as a cause of sex differences in single active X.10,11 disease.6 Males are the usual ones affected by X-linked For 46 XY males, that X is the only one they have; it always pathogenic variants.6 Females are biologically superior; a comes from their mother, as fathers contribute their Y female usually has no disease, or much less severe disease chromosome.
    [Show full text]