PAINTED-SNIPES Region 1 Migrants 0 Residents 1 Endemics 0/0 Family Rostratulidae Vagrants 0 Restricted 0

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PAINTED-SNIPES Region 1 Migrants 0 Residents 1 Endemics 0/0 Family Rostratulidae Vagrants 0 Restricted 0 World 3 Genera 1 PAINTED-SNIPES Region 1 Migrants 0 Residents 1 Endemics 0/0 Family Rostratulidae Vagrants 0 Restricted 0 Unexpectedly encountering a painted-snipe is always 1.5 a special birding moment. Not only are these among A vu - HU vu - HU vu - HU the most strikingly patterned waders, as their name 1.0 implies, but painted-snipes can also be exceptionally 0.5 difficult to see. They are secretive, skulking, and partly crepuscular, spending much of the day motionlessly kHz hunched among thick aquatic vegetation where their S 1s 2s 3s 4s complex markings provide them excellent disruptive 1.5 camouflage. In addition, their occurrence is erratic B VU'ku VU'ku VU'ku VU'ku... and unpredictable, and they may appear virtually 1.0 overnight after a big storm, only to disappear into thin air again, sometimes for years. 0.5 The Greater Painted-snipe is widespread across kHz much of sub-Saharan Africa, Madagascar and Asia. S 1s 2s 3s 4s Consequently the species is not of conservation con- cern at the global scale. In South Africa it is classified Greater Painted-snipe song. Using her oesophageal crop as as regionally Near Threatened due to perceived popu- a resonance chamber, the produces a long series of mellow, low-pitched hoots used as advertisement calls. Typical sequences lation reductions, particularly in the small, isolated W start with 5-6 lower vu-HU notes (A) like the sound produced by Cape population, plus ongoing degradation of wet- blowing over the mouth of an empty bottle. The emphasis is on lands. [Afrikaans: Goudsnip]. the second syllable. This introductory sequence is immediately followed by up to 50 higher, sharper, hollow VU'ku notes with the emphasis on the first syllable (B). General Characteristics Painted-snipes have comparatively broad, short and give them a characteristic hunched carriage. They blunt-tipped flight feathers; consequently their wings run with the head held low. Their legs are relatively are notably shorter and less pointed than most waders' long, with a stout tarsus and long, slender, flexible, and their flight is correspondingly weaker. They are unwebbed toes. The long middle toe is 95% as long often first seen when flushed close underfoot, flying as the tarsus; relative to the middle toe, the outer is heavily (with their long feet dangling like a crake's) approximately 83%, the inner 73% and the longish for a short distance before flopping unceremoniously hind-toe 31% as long. There are transverse scutes on back into the vegetation. Nevertheless, they are highly both the front and rear surfaces of the tarsus. mobile, and are quick to discover newly inundated Tactile probing is used to find food in mud or dirty pans or floodplains after big storms, even in isolated, water, but painted-snipes also locate prey visually, otherwise arid areas. and they have good eyesight. Their eyes are very Like jacanas, they have only 10 primaries, lacking large and bulging, and are set far forward on the face the tiny 11th of most wader genera. They have about for binocular vision (in contrast to the true snipes, in 15 secondaries and, unusually, 7 pairs of broad, short which the eyes are set far back in the skull). Thin black tail feathers. Painted-snipes have short necks, which 'eyelashes' surround the bare skin orbital ring. During the br. season, folds of subcutaneous fat develop in the neck of the , which allow for more movement of her bizarrely elongated and convoluted Genus tracheae. The long tracheal loop extends below the Rostratula sternum, lying atop the pectoral muscles. A calling GREATER inflates her trachea to act as a resonance chamber to PAINTED-SNIPE produce a deeper, more powerful sound; her song is audible for well over a kilometre. There is no seasonal variation, but the sexes differ greatly, the larger being more boldly marked (as in other polyandrous species). Given the unpredictable ephemeral nature of their habitat, moult is not well synchronised and is highly variable. Juveniles are very similar to ad. ; after the post-juv. moult immature birds can be aged, with difficulty, by retained juv. Genus AFRICAN SNIPE coverts. This is considerably easier in young in Gallinago (to compare) which the retained -like juv. coverts contrast with the new, plainer, greenish -type coverts. 100 ROSTRATULIDAE 4_PSnipe and Jacanas_x4.indd 100 2016/11/06 8:47 PM ADULT AND ADULT ADULT JUVENILE remiges have PRIMARY MEDIAN COVERT MEDIAN COVERT MEDIAN COVERT black on base of outer webs wing looks uniformly dark grey, scribbled very like adult striking orange brown from a base normally but... spots, clearly distance hidden visible in flight grey more 'oily' green extensive and sheen each spot or gorgeous: thus visible bar framed narrow, paired, shiny in black parallel golden 'eyes' bars only 1 pair of spots feathers short, broad, round; dark gold slightly paler wing shaped markings pearl- background duller gold more like a white towards feather itself rallid's (or small feather tip, esp. on no pale tip creamy tip a bit smaller owl's) in flight inner secondaries than adult's 'Painted' feathers. Adult are easily sexed by their almost unmarked coppery green wing coverts, but adult and juveniles are only separable with difficulty at close range. Best is to look at the median coverts. Origin of Names the painted-snipes are in an entirely different Both the English Painted-snipe and the Afrikaans family (Rostratulidae) than the true snipes (family Goudsnip ('gold snipe') refer to the exquisite plumage Scolopacidae, genus Gallinago). Although there is a of this species. For details on the etymology of the superficial resemblance between painted- and true word snipe, see p. 174. The generic Rostratula is the snipes, the former is actually sister to the jacanas diminutive form (-ula) of the Latin rostrata ('beaked'), (family Jacanidae) instead. Several unusual traits are so 'small-beaked'; this is presumably because the bill is shared by painted-snipes and jacanas, including a shorter than those of the Gallinago snipes. The specific serially polyandrous breeding system, in which are epithet benghalensis refers to the type locality of the larger than and take a dominant role in territory species, Bengal (Bangladesh-India). establishment and mate-attraction, but usually Interestingly, when Linnaeus first named the spe- forsake the once the eggs are laid, in search of a cies in 1758, he allocated it to the rail genus Rallus, new mate. Furthermore, both families only have 10 in reflection of the similarities in build, behaviour, primaries (instead of the usual 11) and have similar habitat and voice between these unrelated families. banded downy chicks. Both also have skeletal features The recently split Australian Painted-snipe R. australis, recalling those of rallids rather than other waders. was originally placed in Rhynchaea (meaning 'big- The Rostratulidae is one of the most species-poor nose'). Finally, the South American Painted-snipe is wader families. Until recently, all birds in sub-Saharan the sole member of the genus Nycticryphes, the Greek Africa, Madagascar, India, Asia, Indonesia and Aus- nuktos (night) and kruphe (secret). tralia were considered to be a single very widespread species, R. benghalensis. However, based on differences Classification and Relationships in mitochondrial DNA, biometrics, plumage (minor) It may come as a surprise that the painted-snipes and possibly voice, birds from Australia are now, are related to other snipes only in name. Indeed, tentatively, split as a separate species, Australian Painted-snipe R. australis. The only other member of the family is the South American Painted-snipe Pedionomidae (Plains-wanderer) which inhabits the swamps and wet grasslands of Thinocoridae (seedsnipes) S Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina. It is Jacanidae (jacanas) deemed to be sufficiently different to occupy a whole Rostratulidae (painted-snipes) other genus, Nycticryphes. In addition to lacking sexual Rostratula ('Old World' P-snipes) dimorphism, this species differs in being smaller and Nycticryphes (S American P-snipe) darker; having a more pronounced curve to the bill- Scolopacidae tip; in its narrow, brown, graduated tail feathers; and Numeniinae (whimbrels, curlews) Limosinae (godwits) in having webbing at the bases of its toes. Calidrinae (turnstones, sandpipers) Although only 3 species remain extant, the fossil Tringinae (shanks, phalaropes) record proves that painted-snipes probed the pre- Scolopacinae (true snipes) historic marshes as long ago as the early Miocene (23- 16 Ma). At least 2 species are now extinct: the small Classification of painted-snipes. The Rostratulidae R. pulia from Czech Republic (early Miocene), and our family is very closely allied to the jacanas, but only own R. minator from Langebaanweg, South Africa distantly related to the true snipes (p. 172). (early Pliocene, 5.3-3.6 Ma). PAINTED-SNIPES 101 4_PSnipe and Jacanas_x4.indd 101 2016/11/06 8:47 PM Biology bill looks short, A variety of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates are red back deep and broad enclosed in eaten, including insects (bugs, beetles, grasshoppers, black crickets), centipedes, freshwater snails, earthworms, crustaceans and probably many other groups. Small bold parallel bands fish, tadpoles or froglets are probably also taken on dark stripe occasion. Grass seeds are important, including rice in through eye areas where the species inhabits paddies. Polyandry appears to be the principal breeding golden wing system in painted-snipes, as in jacanas and button- spots soon begin quails: the larger typically pairs with 2-4 per year, to appear departing as soon as she has laid the clutch. She may lay a new clutch within 12 days of completing the exceedingly cute, like previous one. The builds the nest, incubates the all wader hatchlings, with awkwardly big eggs and raises the chicks, remaining with them for legs and feet 1-2 months after fledging.
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The
    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor How They Arise, Modify and Vanish
    Fascinating Life Sciences Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor Bird Species How They Arise, Modify and Vanish Fascinating Life Sciences This interdisciplinary series brings together the most essential and captivating topics in the life sciences. They range from the plant sciences to zoology, from the microbiome to macrobiome, and from basic biology to biotechnology. The series not only highlights fascinating research; it also discusses major challenges associated with the life sciences and related disciplines and outlines future research directions. Individual volumes provide in-depth information, are richly illustrated with photographs, illustrations, and maps, and feature suggestions for further reading or glossaries where appropriate. Interested researchers in all areas of the life sciences, as well as biology enthusiasts, will find the series’ interdisciplinary focus and highly readable volumes especially appealing. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15408 Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor Bird Species How They Arise, Modify and Vanish Editor Dieter Thomas Tietze Natural History Museum Basel Basel, Switzerland ISSN 2509-6745 ISSN 2509-6753 (electronic) Fascinating Life Sciences ISBN 978-3-319-91688-0 ISBN 978-3-319-91689-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91689-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018948152 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Ringing Totals Compiledby Robin M
    I II Friedman,H. 1938. Furtherrecords from St. LawrenceIsland, Alaska. (Gambell)as a non-breedingbird (Gabrielson et Condor 40: 88. a/.1959), one male was recordedby Murie (1936) on 7 Gabrielson,I.N. & Lincoln,F.C. 1959. Thebirds of Alaska.Stackpole May 1933, and five birdswere reportedon 17 June Co. and Wildl.Mgmt. Inst., Washington. 1961 (Sealy et a1.1971). We saw one female on 1 June Hanson,H.C. 1953. Vegetationtypes in northwesternAlaska and near a pool west of Troutman Lake. comparisonswith communities on otherarctic regions. Ecology 34: 111-140. AC KNOWLE DG E M E NTS Hayman, P., Marchant,J. & Prater, T. 1986. Shorebirds:an identificationguide to the wadersof the world.Croom Helm, London. I would liketo thank MajorJohn Kellyfrom the U.S.A. Airforcefor his help in collectingimportant literature and Hesse,R.W.,Allee, W.C. & Schmidt,K.P. 1951. Ecologicalanimal geography.2nd edition. Wiley, New York. providingassistance in the field. Kessel, B. & Gibson, D.D. 1978. Status and distributionof Alaska REFERENCES Birds.Studies in AvianBiology No. 1. CooperOrnithological Society. Murie, O.J. 1936. The birdsof St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. In O.W. Anon 1953. Localclimatological data with comparativedata, Gambell, Geistand F.G. Rainey(eds.), Archeologicalexcavations at Kukulik. Alaska. U.S. Weather Bur. Univ.Alaska Misc. Publ. 2: 359-376. GovernmentPrinting Office, Washington. Armstrong,R.H. 1986. A new, expandedguide to the Birds of Alaska. AlaskaNorthwest Publishing Company, Anchorage. Nelson,E.W. 1883.Birdsof the BeringSea and the ArcticOcean. Govt. Print.Off., Washington. Badey,A.M. 1925.A reporton the birdsof northwesternAlaska and regionsadjacent to BeringStrait. Condor 27: 20-238.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Brazil: Atlantic Rainforest and Savanna, Oct-Nov 2016
    Tropical Birding Trip Report Southeast Brazil: Atlantic Rainforest and Savanna, Oct-Nov 2016 SOUTHEAST BRAZIL: Atlantic Rainforest and Savanna October 20th – November 8th, 2016 TOUR LEADER: Nick Athanas Report and photos by Nick Athanas Helmeted Woodpecker - one of our most memorable sightings of the tour It had been a couple of years since I last guided this tour, and I had forgotten how much fun it could be. We covered a lot of ground and visited a great series of parks, lodges, and reserves, racking up a respectable group list of 459 bird species seen as well as some nice mammals. There was a lot of rain in the area, but we had to consider ourselves fortunate that the rainiest days seemed to coincide with our long travel days, so it really didn’t cost us too much in the way of birds. My personal trip favorite sighting was our amazing and prolonged encounter with a rare Helmeted Woodpecker! Others of note included extreme close-ups of Spot-winged Wood-Quail, a surprise Sungrebe, multiple White-necked Hawks, Long-trained Nightjar, 31 species of antbirds, scope views of Variegated Antpitta, a point-blank Spotted Bamboowren, tons of colorful hummers and tanagers, TWO Maned Wolves at the same time, and Giant Anteater. This report is a bit light on text and a bit heavy of photos, mainly due to my insane schedule lately where I have hardly had any time at home, but all photos are from the tour. www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] Tropical Birding Trip Report Southeast Brazil: Atlantic Rainforest and Savanna, Oct-Nov 2016 The trip started in the city of Curitiba.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival Rates of Russian Woodcocks
    Proceedings of an International Symposium of the Wetlands International Woodcock and Snipe Specialist Group Survival rates of Russian Woodcocks Isabelle Bauthian, Museum national d’histoire naturelle, Centre de recherches sur la biologie des populations d’oiseaux, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] Ivan Iljinsky, State University of St Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Sergei Fokin, State Informational-Analytical Center of Game Animals and Environment Group. Woodcock, Teterinsky Lane, 18, build. 8, 109004 Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Romain Julliard, Museum national d’histoire naturelle, Centre de recherches sur la biologie des populations d’oiseaux, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] François Gossmann, Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage, 53 rue Russeil, 44 000 Nantes, France. E-mail: [email protected] Yves Ferrand, Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage, BP 20 - 78612 Le-Perray-en-Yvelines Cedex, France. E-mail: [email protected] We analysed 324 recoveries from 2,817 Russian Woodcocks ringed as adult or yearling in two areas in Russia (Moscow and St Petersburg). We suspected that birds belonging to these two areas may experience different hunting pressure or climatic conditions, and thus exhibit different demographic parameters. To test this hypothesis, we analysed spatial and temporal distribution of recoveries, and performed a ringing-recovery analysis to estimate possible survival differences between these two areas. We used methods developed by Brownie et al. in 1985. We found differences in temporal variations of the age ratio between the two ringing areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilson's Snipe
    Wilson’s Snipe (Gallinago delicate) Torrey Wenger Monroe Co., MI. 4/10/2007 © Allen Chartier (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) Wilson’s Snipe is a victim of the lumpers and dwelling sandpiper was reported in 23% of Michigan’s townships; in MBBA II, they were splitters. In 1945, Wilson’s Snipe was reported in only 14.5%, a drop of nearly 40%. combined with other snipe species worldwide as The most significant decrease occurred in the the Common Snipe, Gallinago gallinago (AOU SLP: Wilson’s Snipe were found in almost 60% 1945). In 2002, based on behavioral and fewer townships and were not found in 14 structural differences, it was split off again counties where they were previously (Banks et al. 2002). While this frustrates casual documented. birders and competitive listers alike, the bird itself certainly does not care. This on-again, Some of this decline may be caused by observer off-again status is not the origin of the infamous bias. First, snipe are most detectable during “snipe hunt”, where children are sent into the their early mating season, as males make bushes searching for a non-existent bird. “winnowing” flights above their territories – if observers delayed the start of their fieldwork, All snipe feed by using their long bills to probe they missed this species. Second, the snipe is a for small insects and larvae in mud and moist habitat specialist, preferring wetlands with low soils. A snipe can open just the tip of its bill, herbaceous vegetation, sparse shrubs, and enabling it to capture and swallow small prey scattered trees (Mueller 1999) – if observers items without removing its bill from the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Marakele National Park
    BIRDS OF MARAKELE NATIONAL PARK English (Roberts 6) Old SA No. Rob No. English (Roberts 7) Global Names Names 1 1 Common Ostrich Ostrich 2 6 Great Crested Grebe Great Crested Grebe 3 8 Little Grebe Dabchick 4 50 Pinkbacked Pelican Pinkbacked Pelican 5 55 Whitebreasted Cormorant Whitebreasted Cormorant 6 58 Reed Cormorant Reed Cormorant 7 60 African Darter Darter 8 62 Grey Heron Grey Heron 9 63 Blackheaded Heron Blackheaded Heron 10 64 Goliath Heron Goliath Heron 11 65 Purple Heron Purple Heron 12 66 Great Egret Great White Egret 13 67 Little Egret Little Egret 14 68 Yellowbilled Egret Yellowbilled Egret 15 69 Black Heron Black Egret 16 71 Cattle Egret Cattle Egret 17 72 Squacco Heron Squacco Heron 18 74 Greenbacked Heron Greenbacked Heron 19 76 Blackcrowned Night-Heron Blackcrowned Night Heron 20 77 Whitebacked Night-Heron Whitebacked Night Heron 21 78 Little Bittern Little Bittern 22 79 Dwarf Bittern Dwarf Bittern 23 81 Hamerkop Hamerkop 24 83 White Stork White Stork 25 84 Black Stork Black Stork 26 85 Abdim's Stork Abdim's Stork 27 89 Marabou Stork Marabou Stork 28 90 Yellowbilled Stork Yellowbilled Stork 29 91 African Sacred Ibis Sacred Ibis 30 93 Glossy Ibis Glossy Ibis 31 94 Hadeda Ibis Hadeda Ibis 32 95 African Spoonbill African Spoonbill 33 96 Greater Flamingo Greater Flamingo 34 97 Lesser Flamingo Lesser Flamingo 35 99 Whitefaced Duck Whitefaced Duck 36 100 Fulvous Duck Fulvous Duck 37 101 Whitebacked Duck Whitebacked Duck 38 102 Egyptian Goose Egyptian Goose 39 103 South African Shelduck South African Shelduck 40 104 Yellowbilled
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Australia: October-November 2016
    Tropical Birding Trip Report Eastern Australia: October-November 2016 A Tropical Birding SET DEPARTURE tour EASTERN AUSTRALIA: From Top to Bottom 23rd October – 11th November 2016 The bird of the trip, the very impressive POWERFUL OWL Tour Leader: Laurie Ross All photos in this report were taken by Laurie Ross/Tropical Birding. 1 www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] Page Tropical Birding Trip Report Eastern Australia: October-November 2016 INTRODUCTION The Eastern Australia Set Departure Tour introduces a huge amount of new birds and families to the majority of the group. We started the tour in Cairns in Far North Queensland, where we found ourselves surrounded by multiple habitats from the tidal mudflats of the Cairns Esplanade, the Great Barrier Reef and its sandy cays, lush lowland and highland rainforests of the Atherton Tablelands, and we even made it to the edge of the Outback near Mount Carbine; the next leg of the tour took us south to Southeast Queensland where we spent time in temperate rainforests and wet sclerophyll forests within Lamington National Park. The third, and my favorite leg, of the tour took us down to New South Wales, where we birded a huge variety of new habitats from coastal heathland to rocky shorelines and temperate rainforests in Royal National Park, to the mallee and brigalow of Inland New South Wales. The fourth and final leg of the tour saw us on the beautiful island state of Tasmania, where we found all 13 “Tassie” endemics. We had a huge list of highlights, from finding a roosting Lesser Sooty Owl in Malanda; to finding two roosting Powerful Owls near Brisbane; to having an Albert’s Lyrebird walk out in front of us at O Reilly’s; to seeing the rare and endangered Regent Honeyeaters in the Capertee Valley, and finding the endangered Swift Parrot on Bruny Island, in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Painted-Snipe Rostratula Benghalensis, and Himalayan Region, from Himachal Pradesh to Bhutan
    CORRESPONDENCE 153 There are some isolated records of the species from the Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis, and Himalayan region, from Himachal Pradesh to Bhutan. In Himachal Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola in the Pradesh, Whistler (1926) recorded one bird on 05 May 1922 at Andaman Islands c. 1158m in Kangra. den Besten (2004) recorded seven birds on passage migration at Pong Wetland in the foothills of Kangra. There On 07 March 2018 GK spotted and photographed a Greater have been some recent photographic records of the species from Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis in a marsh at Sippighat Nepal. A bird was photographed at Suklaphanta Wildlife Reserve (11.60ºN, 92.68ºE) [172]. Though widespread on the Indian on 20 April 2010 (Nepal Wildlife 2010) and another, at Chitwan Subcontinent (Ali & Ripley 1983; Grimmett et al. 2011; National Park on 24 September 2014 (Bird Education Society– Rasmussen & Anderton 2012), this was the first time it was Nepal 2014). A juvenile, moulting into first winter plumage, was being reported from the Andaman Islands. It was recorded photographed on 22 September 2015 at Chitwan National Park, subsequently, from there, on 10 March 2018 (Vel 2018). (Giri 2015). The species has also been photographed on 03 November 2013 at Darjeeling, West Bengal (Ghosh 2013). The only record from Bhutan was on 05 May 1992 (Clements 1992; Spierenburg 2005). All these records indicate that the species, probably, undertakes both, spring, and autumn passage migration in small numbers through parts of western and central Himalayas. The present records from Uttarakhand support this hypothesis, though further observation is desirable to conclude its status in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • British Birds VOLUME 69 NUMBER IO OCTOBER I976
    British Birds VOLUME 69 NUMBER IO OCTOBER I976 Distinguishing Great Snipe from Snipe D. I. M. Wallace Records of the Great Snipe Gallinago media are among the hardest to prove. The Rarities Committee has harped upon this theme and observers unfamiliar with the species and lacking The Handbook in their libraries are not given more than a few pointers to the possi­ bilities of its identification. This paper is therefore concerned with restating and clarifying the differences between it and the Snipe G. gallinago. GROUND CHARACTERS The Great Snipe is the largest of the three species in western Europe, but it does not exceed the Snipe in all standard measurements. It is 5% to 10% longer- and broader-winged and about 10% longer- legged, but 10% shorter-billed and marginally shorter-tailed. It is bulkier, primarily because of its stouter bill, larger head, greater girth and broader wings. The second last difference gives it more of a ball shape on the ground. In the ideal circumstances of Snipe being present for comparison, these differences are obvious. Subtle but constant plumage differences are not restricted to the usually invisible tail markings and merit full discussion. General plumage pattern The Great Snipe is more barred than the Snipe, both above, where the individual feather patterns are very intricate, and below, where the markings are strong and numerous, extending in all plumages [Brit. Birds, 6g: 377-383, October 1976] 377 378 Great Snipe and Snipe over a wider area. This increased complexity reduces the clarity of the back stripes and the prominence of the white belly, which is virtually invisible in immatures.
    [Show full text]