Council Agenda

PUBLIC AGENDA This Agenda is provided for the assistance and information of members of the public.

AGENDA

NOTICE is hereby given that an Ordinary meeting of the Kingborough Council will be held at the Civic Centre, 15 Channel Highway, Kingston on Monday, 26 March 2018 at 5.30pm

Back (L – R): Cr Paul Chatterton, Cr Mike Percey, Cr Sue Bastone, Cr Dean Winter, Cr Richard Atkinson Front (L – R): Cr Dr Graham Bury, Cr Flora Fox, Mayor Cr Steve Wass, Deputy Mayor Cr Paula Wriedt, Cr David Grace

QUALIFIED PERSONS

In accordance with Section 65 of the Local Government Act 1993, I confirm that the reports contained in Council Meeting Agenda No. 6 to be held on Monday, 26 March 2018 contain advice, information and recommendations given by a person who has the qualifications or experience necessary to give such advice, information or recommendations.

Gary Arnold GENERAL MANAGER

20 March 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Open Session Page No.

Apologies 2

Confirmation of Minutes of Council Meeting No. 5 Held on 13 March 2018 2

Workshops Held Since Council Meeting on 13 March 2018 2

Declarations of Interest 2

Transfer of Agenda Items 2

Guidelines for Public Question Time 3

Questions on Notice from the Public 3

North Roslyn Avenue Traffic Safety 3

Questions Without Notice from the Public 4

Questions on Notice from Councillors 4

Questions Without Notice from Councillors 5

Motions of Which Notice has been Given 5

Petitions Received 5

Petitions Still Being Actioned 5

Officers Reports to Planning Authority 6

Delegated Authority for the Period 28 February 2018 to 13 March 2018 6

DA-2017-512 - Development Application for New Car Parking, Demolition of Garage, and New Front Fencing at 71 Beach Road, Kingston Beach for Mrs K Rettig 10

DA-2018-2 - Development Application for Ancillary Dwelling at 7A Gillies Street, Snug for Mr M C Hardie and Mrs T L Hardie 25

Officers Reports to Council 39

Snug to Margate Shared Path Budget Requirements 39

Council Borrowings 44

Nominations for Kingborough Access Advisory Committee 47

Bruny Island Advisory Committee 49

2018 Anzac Day Services 68 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Open Session Page No.

Information Reports 70

Mayor’s Communications 71

Financial Report for the Period 1 July 2017 to 28 February 2018 75

Minutes Kingborough Road Safety Committee 97

Confirmation of Items to be Dealt With in Closed Session 105 AGENDA of an Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held at the Kingborough Civic Centre, 15 Channel Highway, Kingston on Monday, 26 March 2018 at 5.30pm.

From To Time Occupied Open Council 5.30pm Planning Authority Open Council Closed Council Open Council TOTAL TIME OCCUPIED

AUDIO RECORDING

The Chairperson is to direct commencement of the recording.

Declare meeting open (time), welcome all in attendance and read:

“All persons in attendance are advised that it is Council policy to record Council Meetings.

The audio recording of this meeting will be made available to the public on Council’s website.

In accordance with Council Policy, I now ask staff to confirm that the audio recording has commenced.”

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRADITIONAL OWNERS

I acknowledge and pay respect to the Tasmanian Aboriginal Community as the traditional and original owners and continuing custodians of the land on which we now meet, and acknowledge elders past and present.

ATTENDEES

Councillors:

Mayor Councillor S Wass Deputy Mayor Councillor P Wriedt Councillor R Atkinson Councillor S Bastone Councillor Dr G Bury Councillor P Chatterton Councillor F Fox Councillor D Grace Councillor M Percey Councillor D Winter

Staff:

TITLE NAME

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 1 26 March 2018 APOLOGIES

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF COUNCIL MEETING NO. 5 HELD ON 13 MARCH 2018

MOVED SECONDED

That the Minutes of Council Meeting No. 5 held on 13 March 2018 be confirmed.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

WORKSHOPS HELD SINCE COUNCIL MEETING ON 13 MARCH 2018

DATE PURPOSE 19 March Metro and Bus Services

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

In accordance with Regulation 8 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 and Council’s adopted Code of Conduct, the Mayor requests Councillors to indicate whether they have, or are likely to have, a pecuniary interest (any pecuniary benefits or pecuniary detriment) or conflict of interest in any item on the Agenda.

TRANSFER OF AGENDA ITEMS

Are there any items, which the meeting believes, should be transferred from this agenda to the closed agenda or from the closed agenda to the open agenda, in accordance with the procedures allowed under Section 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 2 26 March 2018 GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC QUESTION TIME

At each meeting of Council or a Council Committee there will be an opportunity for questions to be asked by any member of the public. A question may either be in writing, or may be verbally asked at the meeting. You are reminded that the forum is designed to accommodate questions only. Neither the questions nor answers will be debated.

A period of 15 minutes, if required, will be set aside and the Chairperson will endeavour to deal with as many questions as possible at each meeting. If a response to a question cannot be provided at the meeting a written response will be provided as soon as practicable. If time constraints do not permit all questions to be put, the Council will reply to any question that is put in writing.

A Question must not relate to any matter that is listed on the agenda for the meeting.

Questions in Writing – A member of the public may give written notice to the General Manager 7 days before a meeting of a question to be put to the meeting. The question will appear in the agenda of the meeting, and a written response will be recorded in the minutes. There is no standard form for such questions, but they should be clearly headed Question(s) on Notice.

Questions asked at the Meeting – At the commencement of Question Time the Chairperson will ask members of the public present, if there are any questions, and if so what are those questions? This procedure is to permit the Chairperson to determine an appropriate time limit for Question Time and perhaps limit the opportunity for multiple questions, and to determine whether each question is appropriate. There is to be no discussion, preamble or embellishment of any question at this time.

The Chairperson will then determine which of those questions will be accepted and will provide the reason for any refusal; will determine the order of the questions, and may set a time limit for Question Time. The Chairperson may require a question to be put on notice and in writing.

A member of the public present may only ask one question at a time. The Chairperson may give preference to questions from other members of the public before permitting second or further questions from a member of the public. The Chairperson may rule that a multi-part question is in fact two or more questions, and deal with them accordingly.

The Chairperson may rule a question inappropriate, and thus inadmissible if in his or her opinion it has already been asked, is unclear, irrelevant, offensive or relates to any matter which would normally be considered in Closed Session.

Lengthy preambles or introductions are discouraged, and the Chairperson may require that a member of the public immediately put the question.

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE FROM THE PUBLIC

North Roslyn Avenue Traffic Safety

At the Council meeting on 13 March 2018, Ms Tricia Ramsay asked the following question without notice to the General Manager, with a response that the question would be taken on notice:

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 3 26 March 2018 1. Council was planning to duplicate last year’s winter traffic counting on North Roslyn Avenue is counterproductive. In August last year we requested that vehicle counting occur this summer to reflect the additional seasonal traffic associated with tourism, recreation and construction as well as heightened social activities. It was a rational legitimate ratepayer request. Why was it not acted upon.

2. Why hasn’t the work been done that Council promised would be completed in mid- February this year?

3. Why hasn’t anything tangible been done to alleviate the excessive traffic speeds in last winter’s traffic counting? Then, it was described by your officer as very concerning with almost consistently hourly maximums between 80 and 90kms/h. And other instances where vehicle speeds exceed 100km/h, the highest being 107.

4. The planned area traffic survey will be compromised if it omits data from Jindabyne Road and Kingston Heights. In the absence of a Kingston traffic plan, will Council ensure that data from these two relevant areas be included in the forthcoming traffic survey?

Officer’s Response:

1. Traffic counts are not generally accurate during summer time as this takes in the majority of the Christmas school holiday period. Council committed to the undertaking of a larger local area traffic survey to try to understand the origin and destination of the large majority of traffic which travels along the northern section of Roslyn Avenue. The survey needs to reflect typical daily traffic movements, not seasonal peaks.

2. Works to replace missing guideposts and install signage is being programmed.

3. Work is being programmed for improved speed limit delineation.

4. The North Roslyn Avenue area traffic survey is proposed to capture Auburn Road, the Kunama Drive area, Jindabyne Road and the Kingston Heights area.

Renai Clark – Roads & Stormwater Engineer

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE FROM THE PUBLIC

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE FROM COUNCILLORS

At the time the Agenda was compiled there were no questions on notice from Councillors.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 4 26 March 2018 QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE FROM COUNCILLORS

MOTIONS OF WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN

At the time the Agenda was compiled there were no Notices of Motion received.

PETITIONS RECEIVED

At the time the Agenda was compiled, no petitions had been received.

PETITIONS STILL BEING ACTIONED

There are no petitions still being actioned.

OPEN SESSION OF COUNCIL ADJOURNS

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 5 26 March 2018 PLANNING AUTHORITY IN SESSION

Planning Authority Meeting commenced at

OFFICERS REPORTS TO PLANNING AUTHORITY

FILE NO 17.170 DATE 14 MARCH 2018 OFFICER TASHA TYLER-MOORE – MANAGER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DELEGATED AUTHORITY FOR THE PERIOD 28 FEBRUARY 2018 TO 13 MARCH 2018

The following are matters that have received delegated approval from the Manager – Development Services for the period 28 February 2018 to 13 March 2018.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT/USE

DA-2018-65 Pitt & Sherry Extension to existing animal 170 Channel Highway hospital KINGSTON

DA-2018-71 JSA Consulting Engineers Grandstand addition to existing Twin Ovals, 10 Kingston View function centre Drive KINGSTON

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY DEVELOPMENT/USE

DA-2017-337 G Hills & Partners Architects Retaining wall 1 Moonya Drive KINGSTON BEACH

DA-2017-390 Wilson Homes Two units 5 Advocate Drive KINGSTON

DA-2017-495 Mr S D De Wit Shed Middleton Fire Station 19 Beach Road MIDDLETON

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 6 26 March 2018 DA-2017-553 Mr J F Sutherland Placement of fill (for horse 542 Leslie Road training/riding) LESLIE VALE

DA-2017-575 JSA Consulting Engineers Storage shed 469 Sandfly Road SANDFLY

DA-2017-576 Architects Designhaus Deck extension to classroom 15 School Road ALONNAH

DA-2017-583 Xsquared Architects Pty Ltd Partial change of use to pathology Shop 8/20 Channel Highway collection centre and signage KINGSTON

DA-2017-584 Mr B L Smith and Mrs K A Smith Ancillary dwelling 2156 Huon Road LOWER LONGLEY

DA-2017-586 Mr C Verdouw Retrospective approval for carport 200 Van Morey Road and deck and new shed MARGATE

DA-2017-588 Precision Design and Drafting Two units (one existing) 4 Derwent Avenue BLACKMANS BAY

DA-2017-612 P & J Sheds Shed, carport and demolition of 26A Nubeena Crescent outbuilding TAROONA

DA-2017-614 Tassie Homes Pty Ltd Dwelling 8 Panoramic Drive KINGSTON

DA-2018-11 Mr J A Rosevear Barbeque facility Kingborough Bowls Club 1615 Channel Highway, MARGATE

DA-2018-17 Mr J A Atkinson Dwelling Garth Seafood 367 Brightwater Road HOWDEN

DA-2018-19 Pegasus Sprouts Installation of 3 X 40ft containers as 210 McKenzies Road growing rooms for microgreens LESLIE VALE

DA-2018-40 P & J Sheds Awning addition to existing building Kingborough Council Depot 182 Channel Highway KINGSTON ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 7 26 March 2018 DA-2018-46 Maveric Builders Dwelling 49 Apolline Drive KINGSTON

DA-2018-72 Smeekes Drafting Pty Ltd Internal alterations and new deck 28 Gourlay Street BLACKMANS BAY

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FOR LOT SUBDIVISION / BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT / STRATA / STAGED DEVELOPMENT SCHEME / ADHESION ORDER / SEALED PLAN AMENDMENT

STG-2018-1 Mr R A Wilkins Staged development scheme 7-9 Maranoa Road KINGSTON

STR-2018-2 Mr R A Wilkins Stage 1 – Units 18-25 7-9 Maranoa Road KINGSTON

ADHORD-2018-3 Lark & Creese Adhere CT 134331 folio 1 and 243 Lighthouse Road CT 79377 folio 10 SOUTH BRUNY

SPA-2017-9 L Johnson Amend sealed plan 117498 folio 1 176 Church Road BARNES BAY

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT

DA-2016-536 Mr S Combes Amendment - Extending first floor 42 Esplanade level by an additional 17.64sqm MARGATE

DA-2017-207 Ms E J Percival Amendment – Relocate dwelling by 4052 Bruny Island Main Road 1mtr to the north of the site ALONNAH

DAS-2015-31 Mrs A L Reece Amendment – delete condition 5 8 Wyburton Place requiring a contribution towards MARGATE upgrade of Wyburton Road and amend condition 9 to remove requirement for sealed concrete or asphalt driveway sealing

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FOR NO PERMIT REQUIRED

DA-2018-6 Mr M J Page Dwelling 16 Panorama Dive Kingston

DA-2018-77 Blyth & Watchorn Builders Pty Ltd Alterations to kitchen and workshop 259 Roslyn Avenue enlargement BLACKMANS BAY ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 8 26 March 2018 DA-2018-88 Mr T Coyte Dwelling 42 Malachi Drive KINGSTON

DA-2018-89 Pinnacle Drafting and Design Dwelling 92 Apolline Drive KINGSTON

DA-2018-93 Smeekes Drafting Pty Ltd Dwelling 90 Apolline Drive KINGSTON

DA-2018-102 Mr P Brown Dwelling and shed 38 Eldridge Drive KINGSTON

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED

DA-2017-495 Mr S D De Wit Shed – Representations received 1 Middleton Fire Station 19 Beach Road MIDDLETON

RECOMMENDATION

MOVED SECONDED

That the report be noted.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 9 26 March 2018 FILE NO DA-2017-512 DATE 14 MARCH 2018 OFFICER SAMUEL MCCROSSEN - SENIOR PLANNING OFFICER ENDORSED BY TASHA TYLER-MOORE – MANAGER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DA-2017-512 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR NEW CAR PARKING, DEMOLITION OF GARAGE, AND NEW FRONT FENCING AT 71 BEACH ROAD, KINGSTON BEACH FOR MRS K RETTIG

Application Number: DA-2017-512 Applicant: Mrs K Rettig Owner: Mrs K M Rettig and Mr J W Rettig Zoning: General Residential Discretions: Frontage Fence, Historic Heritage, Works in Waterway and Coastal Protection, and Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas Existing Land Use: Single Dwelling No. of Representations: Nil Planning Issues: Frontage Fence in Heritage Precinct Recommendation: Approval subject to conditions

1 THE PROPOSAL IN DETAIL

1.1 The Proposal

The existing garage is sited on the front boundary of the site and is not of sufficient size to contain a modern car. It is estimated that the garage was constructed in the early to mid-20th century with a likely construction date around the 1930s to early 1940s. This building is an increasingly rare example of an early garage building in the area. The building walls are clad in brown coloured vertical board. The building is in poor condition.

The applicant proposes to replace the building with a new car parking area catering for a single car. The parking area would be surfaced using compacted crushed rock.

The applicant proposes to replace the existing 1.5m high front fence with a new 1.8m high fence along the entire property frontage. The new fence would be constructed of timber palings and would have no transparency. The applicant has advised that the purpose of the fence is to provide privacy and security for residents by preventing people using the footpath from looking into the property. The applicant has advised that they seek to replicate the height and design of the front fence on the adjacent property at 73 Beach Road. During the assessment of the application, the applicant was advised that a replacement fence of 1.5m in ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 10 26 March 2018 height replicating the existing fence would not require planning approval; however the applicant has chosen to pursue approval of the 1.8m high fence. The applicant has also been unwilling to consider a compromised design to include some transparency in the fence.

1.2 The Site

The property has an area of 592m2 with frontage and vehicle access to Beach Road. The rear of the site is bounded by Browns River. The property contains an existing dwelling. The land slopes downwards from street level for the first 5m from the frontage boundary and then is generally flat.

The existing fence is solid timber paling and painted brown with a maximum height of 1.5m. It is likely to have been constructed in the 1970s or 1980s.

The surrounding area is similarly zoned General Residential mainly containing single dwellings. The opposite side of the road features a small cliff face directly abutting the road pavement. The property is located within the Kingston Beach Heritage Precinct.

The adjoining property to the north at 73 Beach Road has a solid timber paling fence of 1.8m in height constructed in the late 1990s. The adjoining property to the south at 69 Beach Road has a solid timber paling fence of 1.7m in height. The broader Kingston Beach Heritage Precinct has a mix of fences of varying height and design. A general trait of Beach Street is that front fencing has a height of between 1m and 1.5m with transparency provided by picket and wire constructions.

2 PLANNING ASSESSMENT

2.1 Statutory Implications

The land is zoned General Residential under the Kingborough Interim Planning Scheme 2015 (the Scheme). The proposed use is classed as Residential (single dwelling). The proposal is discretionary because it does not meet the Acceptable Solutions under the Scheme relating to frontage fences, waterway and coastal protection, historic heritage, and coastal erosion.

The relevant parts of the Scheme are:

 Part 10 – General Residential Zone;

 Code E5.0 – Road and Railway Assets Code;

 Code E6.0 – Parking and Access Code;

 Code E7.0 – Stormwater Management Code;

 Code E11.0 – Waterway and Coastal Protection Code;

 Code E13.0 – Historic Heritage Code;

 Code E15.0 – Inundation Prone Areas Code; and

 Code E16.0 – Coastal Erosion Hazard Code.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 11 26 March 2018 Discretionary assessment is required against the following Scheme standards:

(a) General Residential Zone Clause 10.4.7 – Frontage fences; and

(b) Waterway and Costal Protection Code - Clause E11.7.1 P1 – Works within a waterway and coastal protection area;

(d) Historic Heritage Code Clause E13.8.2 P2 - Design and siting of Works in Heritage Precinct;

(e) Historic Heritage Code Clause E13.8.2 P4 – Front Fencing in Heritage Precinct; and

(f) Coastal Erosion Hazard Code Clause 16.7.1 A1 – Buildings and Works in Medium and High Risk Coastal Erosion Areas.

Council's assessment of this proposal should also consider the outcomes of any relevant State Policies and the objectives of Schedule 1 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.

2.2 Public Consultation

The application was advertised in accordance with the requirements of s.57 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 (from 17/2/2018 to 2/3/2018). No representations were received during the public exhibition period.

2.3 Strategic Planning

Relevant General Residential Zone Purpose Statements:

10.1.1.1 To provide for residential use or development that accommodates a range of dwelling types at suburban densities, where full infrastructure services are available or can be provided.

10.1.1.5 To encourage residential development that respects the neighbourhood character, natural landscape and provides a high standard of residential amenity.

Local Area Objectives and Desired Future Character Statements:

The Scheme details separate Local Area Objectives and Desired Future Character Statements for the main towns in the municipal area. The following Local Area Objectives and Desired Future Character Statements are relevant to the assessment of this application:

10.1.2 Local Area Objectives

Local Area Objectives Implementation Strategy KINGSTON BEACH (a) The built environment of Kingston (a) Residential development is to Beach should retain the area’s respect the existing scale and existing heritage values. architectural style of existing buildings.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 12 26 March 2018 10.1.3 Desired Future Character Statements

Desired Future Character Statements Implementation Strategy KINGSTON BEACH (a) Kingston Beach should retain its (a) New development within Kingston existing seaside village character. Beach should complement the existing architectural style (essentially Colonial Federation with single or two storey weatherboard clad homes and substantial street setbacks). (b) Kingston beach should remain (b) Commercial use or development primarily a residential area with within residential areas should be existing streetscape appearance limited to low impact uses. and character retained.

As discussed below, the proposal satisfies the relevant Acceptable Solutions and Performance Criteria of the Scheme, and by extension, is consistent with the above Zone Purpose Statements, Local Area Objectives and Desired Future Character Statements for Kingston Beach.

2.4 Zone

Clause 10.4.7 – Frontage fences for all dwellings

A fence (including a free-standing wall) within 4.5 m of a frontage must have a height above natural ground level of not more than:

(a) 1.2 m if the fence is solid; or

(b) 1.8 m, if any part of the fence that is within 4.5 m of a primary frontage has openings above a height of 1.2 m which provide a uniform transparency of not less than 30% (excluding any posts or uprights).

The proposed frontage fence would be 1.8m in height and feature no transparency between 1.2m and 1.8m in height. The fence therefore requires assessment against the Performance Criteria below:

The proposed front fence is assessed against Clause 10.4.7 P1 as follows:

P1 - A fence (including a free-standing wall) within 4.5 m of a frontage must:

(a) provide for the security and privacy of residents, while allowing for mutual passive surveillance between the road and the dwelling; and

(b) be compatible with the height and transparency of fences in the street, taking into account the:

(i) topography of the site; and

(ii) traffic volumes on the adjoining road.

While the extended height of the proposed fence would increase the level of privacy to the residents of the dwelling, it would prevent mutual passive surveillance between the road and the dwelling. Clause 10.4.7 intends to prevent fence designs that do not allow the street to be viewed from a property, and conversely, a property to be viewed from a street. Sight lines between a property and street discourage anti-social behaviour. ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 13 26 March 2018 It is accepted that the increase in fence height from 1.5m to 1.8m would not significantly change the capacity of the residents of the dwelling from viewing the street. The land and finished floor level of the dwelling is located below street level, so the street cannot be reasonably seen from the subject site with the current 1.5m high front fence. However, the proposed fence would further obstruct public view into the property. At present, a person of average height standing on the footpath can look into the property. It is understood that the developer seeks a higher level of privacy; however the Performance Criteria provides that a solid fence cannot be constructed at the expense of mutual passive surveillance. To put this in perspective, the Acceptable Solution allows a 1.8m high front fence with 30% transparency in the area between 1.2m and 1.8m high. In normal circumstances, the transparency provides some level of privacy while allowing a line of site between the street and the property. The Performance Criteria provides an avenue for alternative design where it can be demonstrated that mutual passive surveillance would exist. In this case, the applicant has failed to demonstrate how the property could be surveyed from the street.

The proposed fence is also incompatible with the height and transparency of fences elsewhere in the street (either side of Beach Road). Although there is a wide range of varying styles, there are limited examples of solid 1.8m high fences. Although the immediately adjacent properties at 69 and 73 Beach Road are similar in design to the proposed fence, the design is the exception to the height and transparency of other frontage fencing further along the street. There are relatively few examples of solid 1.8m high fences. The applicant has failed to demonstrate how the proposed fence design is compatible with the height and transparency of fences in the broader street, which are in direct contrast with the proposed design.

It is considered that the topography of the site and traffic volumes on the adjoining road do provide special circumstances that warrant the area of the fence between 1.2m and 1.8m in height being constructed without some form of transparency. Although traffic volumes on Beach Road are high, the road is a low speed environment, where the property does not suffer from a high level of vehicle noise or light intrusion.

It is considered that the proposal fails to satisfy the Performance Criteria in that the fence would prevent mutual passive surveillance between the road and the dwelling and is not compatible with the height and transparency of fences in the street. The introduction of another 1.8m high solid front fence would be a significant departure from the fence design in Beach Road and would cause further reduction in potential for mutual passive surveillance between the road and dwellings fronting it.

2.5 Code Matters

Code E5.0 – Road and Railway Assets Code

Council’s Development Engineer has advised that proposal complies with the Acceptable Solutions of the Road and Railway Assets Code.

Code E6.0 – Parking and Access Code

Council’s Development Engineer has advised that proposal complies with the Acceptable Solutions of the Parking and Access Code.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 14 26 March 2018 Code E7.0 – Stormwater Management Code

Council’s Development Engineer has advised that proposal complies with the Acceptable Solutions of the Stormwater Management Code, and is satisfied that stormwater from the proposed development can be adequately disposed by gravity to public stormwater infrastructure.

Code E11.0 – Waterway and Coastal Protection Code

The site is located within a Waterway and Coastal Protection Area.

A1 - Building and works within a Waterway and Coastal Protection Area must be within a building area on a plan of subdivision approved under this planning scheme.

The works would not be within a building area on a plan of subdivision approved under this planning scheme. Accordingly, the proposal requires assessment against the Performance Criteria of Clause E11.7.1 P1.

(a) avoid or mitigate impact on natural values – the works are within a highly modified area and do not require the removal of any native vegetation. Therefore there will be no impacts on natural values;

(b) mitigate and manage adverse erosion, sedimentation and runoff impacts on natural values – adverse erosion, sedimentation and runoff impacts on natural values will be limited to the construction phase. This is most appropriately addressed through implementation of a soil and water management plan;

(d) maintain natural streambank and streambed condition, (where it exists) – not applicable;

(e) maintain in-stream natural habitat, such as fallen logs, bank overhangs, rocks and trailing vegetation – not applicable;

(f) avoid significantly impeding natural flow and drainage – not applicable;

(g) maintain fish passage (where applicable) – not applicable;

(h) avoid landfilling of wetlands – not applicable;

(i) works are undertaken generally in accordance with 'Wetlands and Waterways Works Manual' (DPIWE, 2003) and “Tasmanian Coastal Works Manual” (DPIPWE, Page and Thorp, 2010), and the unnecessary use of machinery within watercourses or wetlands is avoided – this can be achieved via inclusion of a condition on the permit.

Council’s Environmental Planner has advised that the proposal satisfies the above Performance Criteria as existing stormwater disposal methods would remain the same.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 15 26 March 2018 Code E13.0 – Historic Heritage Code

The land is located in the Kingston Beach Heritage Precinct. Council’s Heritage Officer has made the following assessment against the Historic Heritage Code of the Scheme:

Heritage Code Clause E13.8.1 Demolition

The development proposes the demolition of a garage and a minor steel garden shed. There is no acceptable solution therefore consideration against the Performance Criteria is necessary which states:

Demolition must not result in the loss of any of the following:

(a) buildings or works that contribute to the historic cultural heritage significance of the precinct;

(b) fabric or landscape elements, including plants, trees, fences, paths, outbuildings and other items, that contribute to the historic cultural heritage significance of the precinct;

unless all of the following apply;

(i) there are, environmental, social, economic or safety reasons of greater value to the community than the historic cultural heritage values of the place;

(ii) there are no prudent or feasible alternatives;

(iii) opportunity is created for a replacement building that will be more complementary to the heritage values of the precinct.

There are safety considerations for the property owner and the general community (keeping in mind the garage directly fronts the street and public footpath) that outride the retention of the garage building. The garage is in such poor condition that retention is not possible without removal of the original fabric. The removal of the garage would enable the existing access into the site to accommodate off street parking. It is therefore argued that this is a prudent and feasible alternative to the retention of the garage building. It is considered that there are no important structural or façade elements that can be reused as part of the proposal. Although the building would be replaced with a new parking space and access, the area would provide future opportunity for a replacement building.

There are no heritage issues with the proposed demolition of the small steel garden shed, which has no heritage value.

Heritage Code Clause E13.8.2 A1 Buildings and Works other than Demolition

No Acceptable Solution so assessed under Performance Criteria P1.

Design and siting of buildings and works must not result in detriment to the historic cultural heritage significance of the precinct, as listed in Table E13.2.

Regarding assessment of the proposed parking area, the Statements of Historic Cultural Heritage Significance under Table E13.2 refer entirely to residential development in the form of dwellings. There are no cues or references to works such as hard landscaping. Notwithstanding this, the new proposed hard stand

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 16 26 March 2018 off-street parking area consists entirely of the hard surfacing of an existing ground level area that does not include any retaining structures or building forms.

On this basis, it is considered that the hard surfacing of an existing ground level area in the absence of any built form or retaining works would have little impact on the heritage values of the site which are primarily related to the weatherboard cottage on site that likely dates from the c1930’s. The proposed parking area is therefore considered to satisfactorily meet the Performance Criteria.

The proposed front fence is consistent with most of the Statements of Historic Heritage Significance for the precinct; however the design is in clear conflict with Statements 13 and 14 as discussed below:

13. Front fences are typically low (less than 1 metre) and simple picket designs with timber posts.

Response: As outlined under clause E13.8.2.P4, the proposed 1.8m solid paling timber fence is in contrast to this Statement of Historic Cultural Heritage Significance. It should be noted that the proposed fence would replace an existing 1.5m high fence that is likewise a solid paling fence. However the existing fence does not contribute positively to either the site, the streetscape, or the surrounding area. Its existence does not justify replacing it with an even higher fence. In summary, the proposal is not in accordance with this character statement.

14. The precinct exhibits a strong beachside landscape with strong residential amenity and character.

Response: The proposal would have an increased negative impact on residential character. The existing cottage would be predominantly obscured by the fence. The high solid fence is a poor example of front fence design that would not achieve good quality urban design and limits opportunities for passive surveillance. While there are other high solid fences along Beach Road, approving more or existing fences to be extended would have an increased negative impact on streetscape, amenity, heritage values and the overall character of the area. It is therefore summarised that the proposal is not in accordance with this character statement.

On this basis, it is considered that the proposed front fence fails to satisfy Clause E13.8.2 P1 of the Scheme.

Heritage Code Clause E13.8.2 A2 Buildings and Works other than Demolition

No Acceptable Solution so assessed under Performance Criteria P2.

P2 – Design and siting of buildings and works must comply with any relevant design criteria/conservation policy listed in Table E13.2, except if a heritage place of architectural style different from that characterising the precinct.

See comments made in in relation to assessment under P1 above.

Heritage Code Clause E13.8.2 A4 Buildings and Works other than Demolition

New front fences and gates must accord with the original design, based on photographic, archaeological or other historical evidence.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 17 26 March 2018 No evidence has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed fence accords with the original design. The application must therefore be assessed against Performance Criteria P4.

New front fences and gates must be sympathetic in design, (including height, form, scale and materials), and setback to the style, period and characteristics of the precinct.

The current solid timber paling fence is in poor condition and is likely to be of late 20th century construction, mostly likely 1970s-1980s, prior to there being specific planning or heritage controls for front fences in Kingston Beach.

Site inspections of Beach Road in Kingston Beach reveal that this road does not have a clear pattern of typical front fences – it is an eclectic mix of low and high fences that are constructed on anything from timber, picket, wire mesh, brick, rendered block etc. These front fences are of varying heights, colours and finishes. Therefore it cannot be concluded there is a typical style or height of front fence in Beach Road. However front fences in side streets such as Windsor Street, Balmoral Road, Recreation Street and Osborne Esplanade are much more cohesive – inspection of these streets reveals front fences typically less than 1m, timber (often picket) and unobtrusive in design, colour and finish.

The proposed new front fence at 71 Beach Road in the form of a 1.8m high solid paling fence has no historical precedent and is not supported by the Scheme, which overall notes that front fences for Kingston Beach as an area are typically low, under 1m in height.

Inspection of historical photographs of Kingston Beach on the Linc website as well as the publication ‘Browns River to Kingston’ (Gardam) shows the majority of front fences in Kingston Beach to be simple picket constructions of various heights but likely to be around 3-4 feet high. Other than a post and rail type fence that was evident in Beach Road (on the western side of the road) c1910, there is no evidence available to support a high solid paling fence as one that was likely at the site or indeed one that was common in the surrounding area.

Additionally, there appears to be little argument for a 1.8m high solid timber fence along the front boundary. Living areas inside the dwelling face north toward Browns River which runs directly along the rear boundary. The primary areas of private open space and deck are likewise located to the side or rear of the dwelling, rather than between the dwelling and street. It is therefore argued that there is little justification for the height or solid design of the fence on privacy or screening grounds.

On this basis, it is considered that the 1.8m high paling fence as proposed does not meet the P4 Performance Criteria.

Code E16.0 – Coastal Erosion Hazard Code

The land is located within a Medium and High Risk Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Clause E16.7.1 of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Code applies.

Clause 16.7.1 A1 – Buildings and Works in Coastal Erosion Hazard Area

There is no Acceptable Solution. Therefore the proposal must be assessed against the Performance Criteria as follows:

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 18 26 March 2018 Buildings and works must satisfy all of the following:

(a) not increase the level of risk to the life of the users of the site or of hazard for adjoining or nearby properties or public infrastructure;

(b) erosion risk arising from wave run-up, including impact and material suitability, may be mitigated to an acceptable level through structural or design methods used to avoid damage to, or loss of, buildings or works;

(c) erosion risk is mitigated to an acceptable level through measures to modify the hazard where these measures are designed and certified by an engineer with suitable experience in coastal, civil and/or hydraulic engineering;

(d) need for future remediation works is minimised;

(e) health and safety of people is not placed at risk;

(f) important natural features are adequately protected;

(g) public foreshore access is not obstructed where the managing public authority requires it to continue to exist;

(h) access to the site will not be lost or substantially compromised by expected future erosion whether on the proposed site or off-site;

(i) provision of a developer contribution for required mitigation works consistent with any adopted Council Policy, prior to commencement of works;

(j) not be located on an actively mobile landform.

Council’s Environmental Planner has assessed the proposal against the above Performance Criteria and is satisfied that the proposal is compliant for the following reasons:

 Risk to users of the site, adjoining or nearby land is considered acceptable;

 As the property fronts a tidal river, the risk to the proposed fence and parking area would be acceptable;

 Given the location of the proposed works, the need for future remediation works is low;

 Access to the site would not be compromised; and

 The site is not located on an actively mobile landform.

3 REFERRALS AND REPRESENTATIONS

3.1 Internal Referrals

Health

There are no environmental health issues relevant to the proposed development.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 19 26 March 2018 Engineering

There are no significant engineering issues. Council's Development Engineer has assessed the application and is satisfied that the proposal meets the relevant Acceptable Solutions of the Parking and Access and Stormwater Management codes.

Environmental Planning

There are no significant environmental planning issues. As discussed Council's Environmental Planner has assessed the application and is satisfied that the proposal meets the relevant Acceptable Solutions of the Inundation Prone Areas and Coastal Erosion Hazard codes.

Heritage Officer

As mentioned, Council’s Heritage Officer has made an assessment of the proposal and has advised that the proposed front fence fails to satisfy the requirements of the Historic Heritage Code. Accordingly, the Heritage Officer has recommended that the application be refused.

3.2 External Referrals

No external referrals were required.

3.3 Representations

None received.

4 STATE POLICIES AND ACT OBJECTIVES

The proposal is consistent with the outcomes of the State Policies, including those of the State Coastal Policy.

As the proposed does not satisfy the performance criteria of the Scheme relating to front fencing, it is considered that the proposal is not consistent with the objectives of Schedule 1 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.

5 CONCLUSION

The application seeks approval for demolition of an existing garage, construction of a new car parking area and construction of a new front fence at 71 Beach Street, Kingston Beach. The proposed garage demolition and car parking area satisfies the relevant Acceptable Solutions and Performance Criteria of the Scheme; however the applicant has failed to demonstrate same in relation to the proposed front fence. The fencing does not satisfy the Performance Criteria for frontage fences as prescribed in the General Residential Zone or Historic Heritage Code. Accordingly, it is recommended that the proposed front fence is omitted from any approval granted.

The application is therefore recommended for approval subject to conditions.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 20 26 March 2018 6 RECOMMENDATION

MOVED SECONDED

That the Planning Authority resolves that the report of the Manager Development Services be received and that the development application for new car parking, demolition of garage at 71 Beach Road, Kingston Beach for Mrs K Rettig be approved subject to the following conditions:

1. Except as otherwise required by this Permit, use and development of the land must be substantially in accordance with Development Application No. DA-2017- 512 and Council Plan Reference No. P3 submitted on 11 December 2017. This Permit relates to the use of land or buildings irrespective of the applicant or subsequent occupants, and whoever acts on it must comply with all conditions in this Permit. Any amendment, variation or extension of this Permit requires further planning consent of Council.

2. The proposed front fence is not approved.

3. Prior to any works commencing, a photographic extant record is to be provided to Council to provide a record of the early 20th century garage building prior to any demolition work being undertaken.

This extant record must comprise photographic prints of high resolution that clearly illustrate the form, detail and materials of the building to be demolished and these prints referenced to a plan or photograph that clearly shows the location/orientation for each image. One print copy and one digital version are to be provided to Council.

ADVICE

A. In accordance with section 53(5) of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 this permit lapses after a period of two years from the date on which it is granted if the use or development in respect of which it is granted is not substantially commenced within that period.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

Attachments:

1. Location Plan (1) 2. Proposal Plans (2)

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 21 26 March 2018

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 22 26 March 2018 ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 23 26 March 2018

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 24 26 March 2018 FILE NO DA-2018-2 DATE 14 MARCH 2018 OFFICER SAMUEL MCCROSSEN - SENIOR PLANNING OFFICER ENDORSED BY TASHA TYLER-MOORE – MANAGER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DA-2018-2 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR ANCILLARY DWELLING AT 7A GILLIES STREET, SNUG FOR MR M C HARDIE AND MRS T L HARDIE

Application Number: DA-2018-2 Applicant: Mr M C Hardie and Mrs T L Hardie Owner: Mr M C Hardie and Mrs T L Hardie Zoning: Low Density Residential Discretions: Site Coverage, Window Orientation, Inundation Existing Land Use: Dwelling No. of Representations: One (1) Planning Issues: Site Coverage, Window Orientation, Inundation, Compliance with Scheme definition for Ancillary Dwelling Recommendation: Conditional Approval

1 THE PROPOSAL IN DETAIL

1.1 The Proposal

The application seeks approval for a single-storey ancillary dwelling located forward of the existing dwelling. The building would have a minimum setback of 4m from the north-west side boundary and 4.5m from the south-west side boundary of the site.

The building would have a gross floor area of 59.52m2 and would include an attached single vehicle carport. The building would be located within the curtilage of the existing dwelling and would share vehicle access and services such as sewer and stormwater connections.

The finished floor level of the building would be 2.5m Australian Height Datum (AHD).

1.2 The Site

The subject property has an area of 1187m2 and is an internal lot with frontage and vehicle access to Gillies Road. The site contains an existing single dwelling and is generally flat and is clear of vegetation.

The surrounding area is similarly zone Low Density Residential and features properties mainly containing single dwellings.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 25 26 March 2018 2 PLANNING ASSESSMENT

2.1 Statutory Implications

The land is zoned Low Density Residential under the Kingborough Interim Planning Scheme 2015 (the Scheme). An ancillary dwelling is classed as a ‘Residential’ use under the Scheme, which is a use that does not require a permit. The proposal is discretionary as the development requires a variation to the site coverage, window orientation, and inundation requirements of the Scheme.

The relevant parts of the Scheme are:

 Part D – Low Density Residential Zone; and

 Part E – Road and Rail Assets, Parking and Access, Stormwater Management, and Inundation Prone Areas Codes.

Discretionary assessment is required against the following Scheme standards:

(a) Clause 12.4.3 – Site coverage;

(b) Clause 12.4.4 – Sunlight and overshadowing; and

Council's assessment of this proposal should also consider the issues raised in the representations, the outcomes of any relevant State Policies and the objectives of Schedule 1 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.

2.2 Public Consultation

The application was advertised in accordance with the requirements of s.57 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 (from 24/2/2018 to 9/3/2018). One representation was received during the public exhibition period.

The following issues were raised by the representor:

(a) Compliance with requirements for an ancillary dwelling;

(b) Future use of the building; and

2.3 Strategic Planning

The relevant strategies associated with the Scheme are as follows:

Zone Purpose Statements of the Low Density Residential Zone

The relevant zone purpose statements of the Low Density Residential Zone are to:

12.1.1.1 To provide for residential use or development on larger lots in residential areas where there are infrastructure or environmental constraints that limit development.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 26 26 March 2018 12.1.1.4 To provide for existing low density residential areas that usually do not have reticulated services and have limited further subdivision potential.

Clause 12.1.2 and 12.1.3 – Local Area Objectives and Desired Future Character Statements

12.1.2 Local Area Objectives

Local Area Objectives Implementation Strategy SNUG (a) Snug will be maintained as a small (a) The further residential expansion rural town with low density housing. of Snug is to be contained to a few minor subdivisional developments.

12.1.3 Desired Future Character Statements

Desired Future Character Statements Implementation Strategy SNUG (a) The rural and coastal character of (a) Infill development and multi-unit Snug is to be maintained and housing is to be restricted within should primarily contain single Snug and other future developments detached dwellings. should respect the existing streetscapes and larger lot sizes.

2.4 Zone

The site is zoned Low Density Residential under the Scheme. The Zone provides a range of Use and Development Standards and the proposal is assessed against the relevant provisions as follows:

Clause 12.4.2 – Setbacks and building envelope for all dwellings

A1.

Clause A1 of 12.4.2 sets the requirements for the setback of a dwelling to a frontage.

The ancillary dwelling would have a minimum setback of approximately 48m from the frontage boundary in compliance with the requirements of A1.

A2.

Clause A2 of 12.4.2 requires a carport to be setback a minimum of 5.5m from a frontage.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 27 26 March 2018 The carport would have a minimum setback o over 50m from the frontage boundary in compliance with the requirements of A2.

A3.

Clause A3 (a) of 12.4.2 sets the requirements for a dwelling to be contained within a building envelope.

The proposed dwelling would have a setback of 4m from the north-western side boundary and 4.5m from the rear boundary of the adjoining lot (internal boundary) and is within the prescribed building envelope. The proposal complies with A3.

A4.

Clause A4 of 12.4.2 requires that no trees of high conservation value will be impacted, which is satisfied by the proposed development as no trees would be removed.

Clause 12.4.3 – Site coverage and private open space for all dwellings

A1.

Clause A1 of 12.4.3 sets the requirements for the site coverage of all dwellings and the site area free from impervious materials. A maximum site coverage of 25% is allowable and there must be a site area of which at least 25% is free from impervious surfaces.

The proposed site coverage would be 33%, while 41% of the site is free from impervious surfaces. Compliance with A1 is therefore achieved in respect of impervious surfaces; however the proposal requires assessment under P1 in relation to the proposed building site coverage.

P2 - Dwellings must have:

(a) private open space that is of a size and dimensions that are appropriate for the size of the dwelling and is able to accommodate:

(i) outdoor recreational space consistent with the projected requirements of the occupants; and

(ii) operational needs, such as clothes drying and storage; and

(b) have reasonable space for the planting of gardens and landscaping.

(d) not result in an unreasonable loss of natural or landscape values.

There would be a large area of approximately 330m2 surrounding the existing dwelling and the proposed ancillary dwelling. The area is generally flat and would provide adequate opportunity for outdoor recreation, clothes drying, storage and gardens. The buildings on the site would be single-storey and would not be out of character with the pattern of development in the surrounding area. The ancillary dwelling would not result in an unreasonable loss of natural or landscape values and would not be highly visible from surrounding public spaces.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 28 26 March 2018 A2.

Clause A2 of sets the requirements for private open space for a dwelling. The standards relate to area, dimensions, accessibility, orientation, location and gradient.

The ancillary dwelling would be provided with a private open space area on its north-western side that would be directly accessible from the living area. The area satisfies all requirements of the A2. The existing formal private open space area of the existing dwelling would not be compromised by the proposed development.

Clause 12.4.4 – Sunlight and overshadowing for all dwellings

A1.

Clause A1 of 12.4.4 requires that ‘a dwelling must have at least one habitable room (other than a bedroom) window that faces between 30 degrees west of north and 30 degrees east of north’.

The proposed ancillary dwelling would be located 34 degrees west of north and therefore does not comply with A1. The proposal therefore requires assessment under Clause 12.4.4 P1.

P1 - A dwelling must be sited and designed so as to allow sunlight to enter at least one habitable room (other than a bedroom).

The proposed ancillary dwelling would have two living room windows and a kitchen window on the north-western elevation that would have access to approximately 3 hours of direct sunlight on June 21. The proposal is therefore considered to satisfy the above Performance Criteria.

2.5 Code Matters

Code E5.0 – Road and Rail Assets Code

Council’s Development Engineer has advised that proposal complies with the Acceptable Solutions of the Road and Rail Assets Code.

Code E6.0 – Parking and Access Code

Council’s Development Engineer has advised that proposal complies with the Acceptable Solutions of the Parking and Access Code. No engineering conditions are recommended.

Code E7.0 – Stormwater Management Code

Code E15.0 – Inundation Prone Areas Code

The land is located in a Coastal Inundation Medium Hazard Area and therefore requires assessment under Clause E15.7.2 of the Inundation Prone Areas Code.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 29 26 March 2018 Clause 15.7.2 A1 – Coastal Inundation Medium Hazard Areas

For a new habitable building there is no Acceptable Solution. Therefore the proposal must be assessed against the Performance Criteria as follows:

A new habitable building must satisfy all of the following:

(a) floor level of habitable rooms, and rooms associated with habitable buildings (other than a dwelling) that are either publically accessible, used frequently or used for extended periods, must be no lower than the Minimum Level for the Coastal Inundation Low Hazard Area in Table E15.1;

(b) risk to users of the site, adjoining or nearby land is acceptable;

(d) risk to buildings and other works arising from wave run-up is adequately mitigated through siting, structural or design methods;

(e) need for future remediation works is minimised;

(f) access to the site will not be lost or substantially compromised by expected future sea level rise either on or off-site;

(g) provision of any developer contribution required pursuant to policy adopted by Council for coastal protection works;

except if it is development dependent on a coastal location.

Council’s Environmental Planner has assessed the proposal against the above Performance Criteria and is satisfied that the proposal is compliant for the following reasons:

 The finished floor level of the ancillary dwelling would be a minimum 2.5m level as required by Table E15.1;

 Risk to users of the site and adjoining or nearby property or public infrastructure would be acceptable given the proposed floor level satisfies Table E15.1;

 Due to the location of the site, the land would not be affected by wave run- up;

 An Inundation Risk Management Plan submitted with the application has concluded that the need for future remediation works is unlikely to be required within the life of the building;

 There is a low risk that access would be significantly compromised given 1% AEP chance of 300mm of water across the site by 2068 is for a period of no greater than 2 hours; and

 No coastal protection works are required to support the development.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 30 26 March 2018 3 REFERRALS AND REPRESENTATIONS

3.1 Internal Referrals

Health

There are no environmental health issues relevant to the proposed development.

Engineering

Council's Development Engineer has assessed the application and has confirmed that the proposal satisfies the relevant Acceptable Solutions of the Road and Rail Assets, Parking and Access, and Stormwater Management Codes.

Environmental Planning

Council’s Environmental Planner has assessed the application and has confirmed that the proposal satisfies the relevant standards of the Inundation Prone Areas Code.

3.2 External Referrals

There were no external referrals required as part of this application.

3.3 Representations

The following issues were raised by the representor:

(a) Compliance with requirements for an ancillary dwelling.

The representor is concerned that the proposed building does not satisfy the following requirements for an ancillary dwelling:

An ancillary dwelling means an additional dwelling:

(a) with a floor area not greater than 60m2;

(b) that is appurtenant to a single dwelling; and

(c) that shares with that single dwelling access and parking, and water, sewerage, gas, electricity and telecommunications connections and meters.

The representor contends that the proposed carport should be included in the calculation of floor area meaning that the building would exceed 60m2. The representor is also concerned that the ancillary dwelling would not share car parking with the main dwelling.

Response:

The Scheme defines Gross Floor Area as ‘the total floor area of a building measured from the outside of the external walls.’ The proposed carport is an open-sided structure that is not enclosed by external walls. Accordingly, it is excluded from the calculation of floor area, as is the external steps and walkway located on the north-western side of the building.

Although the proposed carport would provide a parking space specifically for the proposed ancillary dwelling, the building and parking space are ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 31 26 March 2018 located within the curtilage of the existing dwelling. The parking space is therefore within the vehicle access and parking area on the site that would be shared between the two buildings. The requirement for shared services is a method for controlling the separation between a dwelling and an ancillary dwelling. This is particularly important on larger rural and semi- rural sites where multiple dwellings are usually prohibited. In this case, the separation between the buildings would be 5m, which satisfies the requirement that the ancillary dwelling is appurtenant to the main dwelling.

(b) Future use of the building.

The representor is concerned that the building would be used for visitor accommodation.

Response: The application seeks approval of an ancillary dwelling providing long term accommodation for residents. A separate planning approval may be required to use the building for visitor accommodation i.e. use of land for providing short or medium term accommodation for persons away from their normal place of residence.

The representor is concerned that the proposal conflicts with the Local Area Objectives and Desired Future Character Statements of the Scheme, which the representor believes discourages multiple dwelling developments.

Response: As discussed, the application seeks approval of an ancillary dwelling, which is listed as ‘no permit required’ under the use table for the Low Density Residential Zone. A planning permit is required as the development requires assessment against a number of performance criteria of the Scheme. The application does not seek approval for multiple dwellings. Local Area Objectives and Desired Future Character Statements are not directly relevant to the assessment of an application and are only consulted when relevant to the particular discretion being exercised. In this case, none of the Local Area Objectives and Desired Future Character Statements relate to the aspects of the application that require discretionary assessment.

4 STATE POLICIES AND ACT OBJECTIVES

The proposal is consistent with the outcomes of the State Policies, including those of the State Coastal Policy.

The proposal is consistent with the objectives of Schedule 1 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.

5 CONCLUSION

The application seeks approval for a single-storey ancillary dwelling at 7a Gillies Street, Snug. The application satisfies the relevant Acceptable Solutions and Performance Criteria of the Scheme.

The proposal is recommended for approval subject to conditions.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 32 26 March 2018 7 RECOMMENDATION

MOVED SECONDED

That the Planning Authority resolves that the report of the Manager Development Services be received and that the development application for ancillary dwelling at 7A Gillies Street, Snug for Mr M C Hardie and Mrs T L Hardie be approved subject to the following conditions:

1. Except as otherwise required by this Permit, use and development of the land must be substantially in accordance with Development Application No. DA-2018- 2 and Council Plan Reference No. P2 submitted on 9 February 2018. This Permit relates to the use of land or buildings irrespective of the applicant or subsequent occupants, and whoever acts on it must comply with all conditions in this Permit. Any amendment, variation or extension of this Permit requires further planning consent of Council.

2. The ancillary dwelling must share service connections and meters with the existing dwelling.

3. To reduce the spread of weeds or pathogens, all machinery must take appropriate hygiene measures prior to entering and leaving the site as per the Tasmanian Washdown Guidelines for Weed and Disease Control produced by the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment.

Any imported fill materials must be sourced from quarries able to provide documentation as to the weeds present on the source site in order to minimise introduction of new weeds and pathogens to the area.

ADVICE

B. The developer should obtain a Plumbing Permit for the development prior to commencing construction.

C. A drainage design plan in accordance with the Director of Building Control Specified List, Schedule 2, at a scale of 1:200, designed by a qualified hydraulic designer, showing the location of the proposed sewer and stormwater house connection drains; including the pipe sizes, pits and driveway drainage, must be submitted with the application for Plumbing Permit.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 33 26 March 2018

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 34 26 March 2018 ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 35 26 March 2018

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 36 26 March 2018

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 37 26 March 2018

PLANNING AUTHORITY SESSION ENDS

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 38 26 March 2018 OPEN SESSION OF COUNCIL RESUMES

Open session of Council resumed at

OFFICERS REPORTS TO COUNCIL

FILE NO TS2652 DATE 14 FEBRUARY 2018 OFFICER BRONTE SMITH - PROJECT MANAGER CAPITAL WORKS ENDORSED BY DAVID REEVE - EXECUTIVE MANAGER ENGINEERING SERVICES

SNUG TO MARGATE SHARED PATH BUDGET REQUIREMENTS

1 PURPOSE

Strategic Plan Reference

Key Priority Area 2 Sustainable land use and infrastructure management Strategic Outcome 2.2 Community infrastructure is enhanced, replaced and maintained Strategy 2.2.3 Provide pathways that improve safety and accessibility for pedestrians, cyclists and other users to make it easier to choose active transport for local trips and recreation.

1.1 This report is to provide an update on progress with the proposed Snug to Margate Cycleway/Shared path and to seek Council endorsement for further funds to complete the project.

2 BACKGROUND

2.1 The concept of a cycleway or shared path between Snug and Margate dates back many years however it was not until November 2011 that Council elected to undertake a high level feasibility study into the community support and the potential route.

2.2 The feasibility study was completed by Pitt and Sherry in 2012 and showed that there was strong local community support for the project and suggested some potential routes and high level costs of construction. The costs at the time varied from over $500K for an unsealed path to over $700K for a sealed path.

2.3 Council was supportive of the project, however, recognised that to fund such a project without accessing other external funding opportunities, would be difficult.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 39 26 March 2018 2.4 Much of this earlier work considered the shared path from Snug to Derwent Avenue.

2.5 In November 2014, Council was successful in gaining a grant from the State Government for the project of $360,000. The grant funding was split into two parts $60,000 to investigate approvals, permits and confirm feasibility of the shared path and $300K allocated for construction works. The grant was predicated on Council matching the funding and was based on a section from Snug to Derwent Avenue, Margate.

2.6 In the detailed design, it was recognised that completing the path at Derwent Avenue, whilst meeting the grant requirements, did not provide the best endpoint and as such it was extended to the Channel Heritage Museum, Margate. In doing so the project was spilt into two stages. Stage 1, from Snug to Derwent Avenue is ~ 3.2km long and Stage 2, from Derwent Avenue to Margate is ~ 1.3km long. Stage 1 representing what was required to meet the grant conditions and Stage 2 a future stage based on available funding.

2.7 The design for Stages 1 & 2 was completed in mid-2017 and the DA for the Snug to Margate Shared Path was approved by Council in November 2017.

2.8 While there was a groundswell of support for the DA there was also an appeal against the DA. The appeal has recently been withdrawn.

2.9 In December 2017, Council was successful in gaining a $174,189 grant from Cycle Tourism within the State Government for Stage 2 of the project. The grant is predicated on Council matching the funding.

2.10 The total forecast project costs have increased since the 2012 inception as the design and understanding and scope of the project has evolved.

2.11 There are a number of factors that have contributed to the total project forecast costs rising;

2.11.1 The additional design and construction costs for Stage 2

2.11.2 Design iterations to improve route safety and amenity leading also to greater construction costs

2.11.3 Responding to appeals against the DA and configuring alternate designs for costing purposes

2.11.4 A greater allowance for land acquisition costs

2.11.5 Extended timelines and resource costs in dealing with;

2.11.5.1 Crown Land Services and their permission to lodge the DA

2.11.5.2 Appeal/s against the DA.

2.11.6 CPI increases

3 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

3.1 There are no statutory requirements in relation to this report.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 40 26 March 2018 4 DISCUSSION

4.1 The design of the shared path has overcome many obstacles, from scope changes, to meeting the requirements of various stakeholders, to improving path safety and amenity, in addition to meeting the needs of the applicable Local Government and State Government regulatory requirements and guidelines.

4.2 The complexities associated with the project have pushed out timings considerably, however we are now progressing closer to the tendering of the project (aiming for this to close in May 2018).

4.3 The estimated costs of the shared path have increased since the original inception, and many factors have contributed to this as outlined above in paragraph 2.11. For construction of both stages 1 and 2 of the project additional funds are required. To complete stage 1 only it is estimated another $150k would be required. Similarly, completion of stage 2 would require an additional $420k of funding with approximately $175K of this funded by a recently acquired grant.

4.4 A more accurate costing will only become apparent when the works are tendered but options to fund the shortfall include:

4.4.1 Commit $150k from the deferral of Algona Road Stormwater project. In the current capital works program, Algona Road stormwater upgrades (Budget $289K) has been highlighted as requiring further investigation and design and it is intended to undertake some necessary minor work this year with a view to a re-scoped project being put forward for consideration in a future year. Based on this approximately $220K has been identified as an option to fund other projects or over expenditure. In particular, it is envisaged this could fund the anticipated over expenditure for this project.

4.4.2 Commit $250k in the 18/19 capital allocations for the Shared Path Project for stage 2 of the project.

5 FINANCE

5.1 Total project cost forecasts at February 2018:

5.1.1 All Stage 1 & 2 project costs;

Costs to Estimate to Estimate at Date Completion Completion

Design (incl. DA) $94,822 $15,785 $110,608

Appeal $13,000 $13,000

Acquisition $109,880 $109,880

Construction $911,292 $911,292

Project $7,137 $72,337 $79,475 Management $1,224,255 (includes 10% contingency)

5.1.2 Stage 1 & 2 annual maintenance cost estimate: $40,000

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 41 26 March 2018 5.2 Previous total project cost forecasts in 2014 and 2015:

5.2.1 Stage 1 only, design and construction;

Estimate at Completion

Design $60,000

Construction $603,000

$663,000

5.2.2 Stage 1 annual maintenance costs: $30,000-$35,000

5.3 Outstanding financial requirements to complete the project;

Costs / Funds Costs

Total Project forecast cost (2018) $1.26M Existing monies committed ($360k grant + 16/17 - $690K Council capital allocation) 17/18 Cycle Tourism Grant - $175K Remaining funds required Approx. $400K

6 ENVIRONMENT

6.1 While the design has no major environmental impacts, 200m of the path just north of Snug has been recently redesigned to accommodate concerns expressed through the DA process. This redesign has resulted in a much safer route with much greater amenity. Additionally fewer trees need to be removed, thereby reducing the environmental impact of the previous design in the DA.

6.2 The design of the path requires a compulsory acquisition of land at 2 Derwent Avenue and 26 Gemalla Road and a number of trees need to be removed to construct the path through these two properties. This was identified in the DA approved by Council and is located within stage 2 of the project.

6.3 An option of acquiring a slightly wider strip of land at 26 Gemalla Road to keep the row of native trees (approximately 175m long) was rejected by the owner.

7 COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTATION

7.1 All residents recently consulted with regard to the updated path alignment described above at paragraph 6.1 were pleased with the new design at this location.

7.2 Council continues to liaise with TasWater and Tas Networks.

7.3 Schools and residents will be notified prior to works start.

7.4 The acquisition of land by notice to treat will be undertaken shortly but open communication with the property owners affected will be continued to minimise their inconvenience.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 42 26 March 2018 8 RISK

8.1 An appeal may be made against the amendment to the approved DA to cater for the design changes as mentioned above (paragraph 6.1). This may further slow the project and delay construction start.

8.2 The time for expending the original grant of $360K has been extended to June 2018, however, with ongoing delays this is likely to push past this date. However, it is expected an extension to this time frame would be granted.

8.3 The risk of completing stage 1 only, is that a there is a less appropriate end point for the shared path with no easy access to the centre of Margate and the grant of $175K for the stage 2 works would need to be refused. Note the timing for acquitting the grant for the stage two works is within the next financial year.

9 CONCLUSION

9.1 Within the project constraints Council has generated a shared path design that fulfils the safety and amenity values required, and provides an important linkage for not only the local community but for others regionally.

9.2 The project is split into stage 1 and stage 2 with both stages attracting grant funding. A far improved outcome is achieved in completing both of these stages together.

9.3 If approved, stage 1 and stage 2 of the project will be run in conjunction with each other with a likely construction start to be towards the end of this financial year. As stage 2 of the project is dependent on funding from the 2018/19 financial year to support the recent Cycle Tasmania grant this will be discussed with Council as part of the overall capital deliberations for 2018/19.

10 RECOMMENDATION

MOVED SECONDED

That Council resolve to:

(a) note the progress with the Margate to Snug Shared path.

(b) utilise $150K from the deferral of part of the Algona Road Stormwater project from the 2017/18 capital works program to cover any shortfall in the funding required for Stage 1 of the project.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 43 26 March 2018 FILE NO 10.21 DATE 14 FEBRUARY 2018 OFFICER JOHN BREEN – CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ENDORSED BY GARY ARNOLD - GENERAL MANAGER

COUNCIL BORROWINGS

1 PURPOSE

Strategic Plan Reference

Key Priority Area 6.0 A well administered organisation Strategic Outcome 6.1 Internal financial and governance arrangements are maintained to a high standard Strategy 6.1.5 Ensure a long term strategic focus drives financial policy and decisions

1.1 The purpose of this report is to consider the undertaking of borrowings for the Kingston Park development.

2 BACKGROUND

2.1 Council has been successful in obtaining $7.2 million in interest free loans under the State Government’s accelerated local government capital program (ALGCP). The loans are for defined projects at Kingston Park as well as the street lighting project.

2.2 The funds available under this grant need to be borrowed from the Tasmanian Public Finance Corporation (TASCORP).

2.3 The Council will be required to pay interest during the financial year and the Government will reimburse Council by providing a grant to the same value.

3 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

3.1 The provisions of Section 78 Borrowings of the Local Government Act 1993 are as follows:

(1) A council, for the purposes of raising a loan or obtaining any form of financial accommodation, may decide by an absolute majority to provide any of the following forms of security:

(a) Debenture;

(b) Bills of sale, mortgage or other charges;

(d) Guarantee;

(e) Any other document evidencing indebtness other than bearer instruments.

(2) A council may not raise a loan in any financial year exceeding any amount the Treasurer determines for the financial year. ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 44 26 March 2018 (3) In this section, loan includes any financial arrangement as determined by the Treasurer.

3.2 The provisions of Section 80 Limit on Borrowings of the Local Government Act 1993 states the following:

(1) Except with the approval of the Minister, a council may not borrow additional money for any purpose if the annual payment required to service the total borrowings would exceed 30% of its revenue of the preceding year.

(2) Grants made to a council for specific purposes are to be excluded in calculating 30% of revenue of the council.

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 The following is the list of projects approved under the ALGCP:

Interest Free

Street Lighting Jun 18 $1.20 million 5 years

Pardalote Footpath/Road Jun 18 $1.20 million 5 years

POS stage 2 & 3 Jun 18 $2.10 million 5 years

Goshawk Road stage 2 Jun 18 $2.70 million 5 years

Total $7.20 million

4.2 It is expected that the first receipt of significant land sale revenue from the site will occur during 2023-2024 which will allow the repayment of the borrowings under the ALGCP.

4.3 TASCORP will require a deed of charge over Council’s revenue to enable borrowings under the ALGCP.

5 FINANCE

5.1 TACORP have provided an indicative rate for these loans of 3.54% based on current interest rates. Given this interest rate, the grant for interest reimbursement will be around $255,000 per annum.

5.2 While there is no interest expense associated with these loans, the budget for 2018/19 for loan interest is $200,000.

5.3 Additional borrowings will be required to fund current projects during 2018.

6 ENVIRONMENT

6.1 No environmental issues have been identified in relation to this matter.

7 COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTATION

7.1 The public will be informed of the borrowings through the regular reporting on the Kingston Park project.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 45 26 March 2018 8 RISK

8.1 There is a financial risk, with a low rating, associated with the borrowings as there is no current certainty around the timing of revenue from land sales for borrowings to be repaid.

8.2 As Councils appetite for financial risk is in the medium to high range, the low financial risk associated with the timing of repayments is considered acceptable.

9 CONCLUSION

9.1 The receipt of the grant under the accelerated local government capital program will provide significant operational savings for Council over the life of the loans.

10 RECOMMENDATION

MOVED SECONDED

That the General Manager be authorised to sign a deed of charge with TASCORP to enable the borrowing of $7.2 million as approved under the accelerated local government capital program.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 46 26 March 2018 FILE NO 15.7 DATE 19 MARCH 2018 OFFICER JULIE ALDERFOX - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ENDORSED BY ANGELA JENNI - MANAGER COMMUNITY SERVICES

NOMINATIONS FOR KINGBOROUGH ACCESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

1 PURPOSE

Strategic Plan Reference

Key Priority Area 1. A safe, healthy and supportive community Strategic Outcome 1.3 A connected, supportive and thriving community Strategy 1.3.3 Enforce regulations that protect the safety, amenity and convenience of the public.

1.1 The purpose of this report is to consider nominations received for representation on the Kingborough Access Advisory Committee.

2 BACKGROUND

2.1 Appointments to the Access Advisory Committee were called for in March 2016. Five appointments were made, four being renewed from the previous two year term.

2.2 Throughout the two year term which concluded in February 2018, there were two resignations from the committee, leaving the number of members at five (5). The low number created uncertainty in regard to always achieving a quorum at meetings.

2.3 Efforts are ongoing by staff and committee members to attract more members to the Access Advisory Committee.

2.4 The Terms of Reference for the Access Advisory Committee allow for up to thirteen (13) members, five (5) from organisations and up to eight (8) individuals.

3 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

3.1 The Committee is appointed in accordance with section 24 of the Local Government Act 1993 and therefore Council is required to approve the appointment of members.

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 Five (5) Nominations have been received for the 2018/2019 term with copies available in the Councillors Room.

4.2 Three nominations were received from existing members Ms Mirjam Holthuis, Mrs Julie Taylor and Mr David Vickery. One nomination was received from previous member Ms Kris Apps and a new membership nomination was received from Mr Kevin Brown.

5 FINANCE

5.1 There are no financial implications associated with this matter. ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 47 26 March 2018 6 ENVIRONMENT

6.1 There are no environmental implications associated with this matter.

7 COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTATION

7.1 In November 2017 letters were sent to local service groups, retirement villages and a supported living establishment encouraging membership on the committee in an effort to grow numbers and broaden the representation of the group.

7.2 Advertising, calling for members was carried out in Council’s social media and the Kingborough Chronicle.

7.3 Advertising and direct approaches will continue to be carried out to ensure an increase in number of Committee members.

8 RISK

8.1 There are no risks associated with this matter.

9 CONCLUSION

9.1 A total of five (5) nominations have been received for membership of the Kingborough Access Advisory Committee. Nominations are attached. It would be appropriate to appoint all nominees.

10 RECOMMENDATION

MOVED SECONDED

That Kris Apps, Kevin Brown, Mirjam Holthuis, Julie Taylor and David Vickery be appointed as members of the Kingborough Access Advisory Committee.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 48 26 March 2018 FILE NO 5.183 DATE 2 MARCH 2018 OFFICER MICHELLE ALLEN - LIAISON OFFICER GOVERNANCE & PROPERTY ENDORSED BY DANIEL SMEE - MANAGER GOVERNANCE & PROPERTY SERVICES

BRUNY ISLAND ADVISORY COMMITTEE

1 PURPOSE

Strategic Plan Reference

Key Priority Area 5 Community leadership Strategic Outcome 5.1 The community is well informed and engaged with Council Strategy 5.1.3 Seek the views of the community and ensure engagement in the decision making process of Council

1.1 The purpose of this report is to consider recommendations from the Bruny Island Advisory Committee (BIAC).

2 BACKGROUND

2.1 A meeting of BIAC was held on Thursday 8 February 2018, with a copy of the minutes attached to this report.

3 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

3.2 There are no statutory requirements associated with this matter.

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 The minutes of the meeting held on 8 February 2018 contain two recommendations for the consideration of Council in relation to speed limits on Bruny Island.

4.2 The first recommendation is “That Council approach the Department of State Growth to prepare a traffic engineering report on the Barnes Bay, Killora, Bulls Bay and Dennes Point roads (CWA Loop) and also Lighthouse Road to look at lowering speed limits, reduced/restricted vehicle sizes excluding service vehicles and erect multi users signs.”

4.3 The second recommendation is “That the Bruny Island Advisory Committee, through Council, support the Department of State Growth with the current speed limit on the Neck.”

4.4 The Department of State Growth sets all speed limits on public roads in Tasmania, with factors to be considered including the following:

 the crash history;

 growth in traffic volumes;

 changes in the environment and roadside development over time,

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 49 26 March 2018  the terrain;

 the number of accesses onto a road;

 the road’s function; and

 the road’s conditions and specifications.

4.5 In relation to Council owned roads, the Department of State Growth would normally seek the views of Council in regard to a specific proposal for changes to existing speed limits.

4.6 The resolution of BIAC asks for a traffic engineering report so as to provide an informed assessment in relation to the need for potential changes to speed limits or restrictions on vehicle sizes.

4.7 Accordingly, it is recommended that this request be referred to the Department of State Growth for consideration.

4.8 In relation to the potential lowering of the speed limit on the Neck, it is recommended that Council simply note BIAC’s position on the matter and take no further action until such time as there is a formal proposal for consideration.

5 FINANCE

5.1 There would be no financial implications for Council relating to these recommendations.

6 ENVIRONMENT

6.1 Whilst BIAC considers environmental issues, there are none that relate to the current recommendations.

7 COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTATION

7.1 BIAC was established to provide communication and consultation with the Bruny Island community.

8 RISK

8.1 No risks to Council are identified in relation to this matter.

9 CONCLUSION

9.1 BIAC met on 8 February 2018 and made two recommendations to Council in relation to speed limits on Bruny Island.

9.2 The first recommendation relates to a request for a traffic engineering report to consider the need for speed limit and vehicle restrictions on Barnes Bay Road, Killora Road, Bull Bay Road, Dennes Point Road and Lighthouse Road. If confirmed, this matter will be referred to the Department of State Growth for comment.

9.3 The second recommendation refers to support for maintaining the current speed limits at the Neck and given that there is no formal proposal for changing speed limits on this section of road, requires no action from Council at this point in time.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 50 26 March 2018 10 RECOMMENDATION

MOVED SECONDED

That:

a) The request from the Bruny Island Advisory Committee for a traffic engineering report to consider the need for speed limit and vehicle restrictions on Barnes Bay Road, Killora Road, Bull Bay Road, Dennes Point Road and Lighthouse Road be referred to the Department of State Growth for consideration.

b) The resolution of the Bruny Island Advisory Committee in relation support for maintaining the existing speed limits on the Neck be noted.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 51 26 March 2018

Minutes of the meeting of the Bruny Island Advisory Committee held at the Bruny Island Community Health Centre on Thursday 8 February 2018 commencing at 10am.

ATTENDANCE

Committee Members: PRESENT APOLOGY Chairperson Cr Mike Percey X Members Mr Trevor Adams X Mr Alex Matysek X Mr John Kobylec X Mr Bill Hughes X Ms Siobhan Gaskell X Mr Gerald McAfee X Ms Jackie Marsh X Dr Rosemary Sandford X Mr Mathew Fagan X

Council Officers: Liaison Officer Governance & Property Services Ms Michelle Allen Deputy General Manager Mr Tony Ferrier

Non-Members:

APOLOGIES

Nil

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Nil

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Mathew Fagan declared an interest in the Bruny Island Livability Study as he is the consultant and if matters pertained to the conduct of the contract he will exclude himself.

CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES

Moved: Trevor Adams Seconded: Alex Matysek

Carried unanimously

APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY CHAIR

At the first meeting of a new committee a Deputy Chairperson is to be elected. The Deputy Chairperson acts in the role in the absence of the Chairperson

Nominated: Trevor Adams

Moved: Bill Hughes Second: Alex Matysek

Carried unanimously

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 52 26 March 2018

PRESENTATIONS & GUEST SPEAKERS:

Nil

CORRESPONDENCE

There was no correspondence at the time of the meeting.

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE FROM THE PUBLIC

At the time of the meeting there were no questions on notice from the public.

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE FROM COMMITTEE MEMBERS

1. At the October meeting Brendan Schmidt asked the following question:

At the October meeting Brendan Schmidt asked why the stormwater project in Victoria Street, Dennes Point has disappeared from Council’s budget

Response from David Reeve:

It is still a valid project and will continue to be considered amongst all other priorities.

2. Dr Rosemary Sandford asked the following question:

TFS safe place locations for bushfire emergencies across Bruny getting information to everyone including residents, shackies, visitors etc. Is it Council’s responsibility to put up signs directing people where to assemble, given the unreliability of phone coverage on the island? How can Council make sure that public safety is ensured at such times?

Response from Tasmanian Fire Service:

All information regarding Community Protection Plans with identified nearby safer places and to download plans go to the TFS website: http://www.fire.tas.gov.au/Show?pageId=colCommunityProtection Page 2 of these documents gives detailed information for people to utilise the community protection plan as part of their bushfire survival plan.

The key message is that Nearby Safer Places (NSP) identified in the plans are places of last resort. They are often outside in open areas such as golf courses, cricket ovals etc and are not emergency assembly areas. NSP’s have been assessed under catastrophic conditions criteria to give people set back from radiant heat as the fire front passes. People are still exposed to smoke and embers so there is a degree of risk related to these places. Leaving early before the fire front is in the area is the safest and best option as a bushfire survival plan.

Emergency Assembly areas are a totally different site with its own criteria and are not related to bushfires. They are often part of a building/structure fire evacuation plan to assemble people safely well away from the burning structure.

The risk and my biggest concern is with signage identifying NSP’s is that people will then rely only on the NSP as their survival option. It is up to Councils if they wish to indicate NSP’s but a great deal of information about NSP’s (especially being places of last resort) would have to accompany the signage to detail what the criteria of a NSP really is. Bushfire survival planning is a complex process as bushfires behave differently with different weather, terrain, conditions etc. so it is not simple black and white as like say a structure fire which is- get out, assemble there, call 000 and wait for the fire truck.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 53 26 March 2018

Residents and tourism operators of Bruny are encouraged to download from the website or ring 1800 000 699 and get a copy of their local protection plan and use the information to integrate it into their bushfire survival planning and emergency evacuation planning. (page 2 of plan)

Council recently formed a Community Resilience Group and is speaking with a Bruny resident in relation to being part of this Committee.

3. Dr Rosemary Sandford asked the following question:

Why does Council not install a mulching machine on the island and train operators to use it (including on-island operators)?

Answer provided by Tony Ferrier:

The Manager of KWS Stuart Baldwin has advised Council that the green waste day held on Bruny Island last year did not attract a lot of participants and over the past year there has been minimal green waste collected on the Island. Tony also stated that the majority of ratepayers of Kingborough have to travel to Barretta to dispose of their green waste.

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE FROM THE PUBLIC

Gerard Castles emailed BIAC in relation to the speed limits on Killora Road and asked the following questions:

1. That it be dealt with as a matter of urgency and /or placed under “Questions without Notice from the Public” at your next meeting.

2. Develop an Engineer’s report on the road safety of the CWA loop road circuit for larger vehicles including buses, large RV’s and towed caravan vehicles to confirm our belief that the road is dangerous

3. Help us lobby for a dramatic lowering of the speed limit

4. A restriction on vehicle size.

The Group all agreed that this is a safety issue and made the following recommendation:

Moved: Siobhan Gaskell Second: Jackie Marsh

THAT Council approach the Department of State Growth to prepare a traffic engineering report on the Barnes Bay, Killora, Bulls Bay and Dennes Point roads (CWA Loop) and also Lighthouse Road to look at lowering speed limits, reduced/restricted vehicle sizes excluding service vehicles and erect multi users signs.

Carried unanimously

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE FROM THE COMMITTEE

Jackie Marsh requested clarification on the following:

Who is responsible for the Alonnah Sheepwash Bay Track (Dray Track) as it is dangerous for users. It is overgrown and you can’t see anyone when going around a corner

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 54 26 March 2018

Tony Ferrier answered:

Council is responsible for this track and Council staff will be informed of these issues.

GENERAL BUSINESS

The table on the following pages shows the General Business items.

NEXT MEETING

The next meeting will be held at the Bruny Island Community Health Centre on Thursday 12 April 2018 at 10am.

CLOSURE

There being no further business the meeting closed at 12.08pm

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 55 26 March 2018

CURRENT ISSUES

1. PLANNING, STRATEGIES AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

No. Item Description Status Responsible Officer

1 New Council is to prepare a Local Provisions Schedule Tony Ferrier informed the Group that there was Tony Ferrier Kingborough (LPS) in accordance with the government’s nothing further to update. Council is continuing to work Planning Scheme requirements, as stipulated within State Planning through the Local Provisions Schedule (zoning maps). Provisions (SPP) and the LPS Guidelines. The SPP Things will change a lot due to the new State Planning and Kingborough LPS will be combined to create the Provisions not including the Environmental Living zone new scheme that will ultimately replace the existing which quite a lot of land is classified on Bruny. It will Kingborough Interim Planning Scheme 2015. either be converted to Landscape Conservation Zone if it has environmental values or to the Rural Living Zone. Tony hopes to have draft maps available for the next meeting to see what is being proposed.

2 Strategic Preparation of a strategic/community plan for Bruny Mathew will be running a workshop on the Bruny Life Tony Ferrier Community Island in which tourism can develop on a long term project for BIAC members after the meeting. Planning for sustainable path. The sustainable path is dependent Bruny Island on maintaining the cultural, environmental and social values embedded in the Bruny Island community.

3 Waste Council is preparing a Waste Management Strategy to Council has adopted the Waste Management David Reeve Management provide direction in relation to the many issues Strategy and is now looking at how it will be Strategy associated with waste disposal in the Municipal Area. implemented. Jackie Marsh advised that tourism rubbish be considered for Bruny as it is a large part of waste on Bruny. Council is about to call for new tenders for the kerbside collection and Bill asked if consideration could be given to kerbside collection on Bruny. Tony advised that this would only happen if there was community support. The Group requested that it be briefed more frequently on this matter, and suggested a briefing paper be provided at the next meeting.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 56 26 March 2018

2. PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE

No. Item Description Comments / Update Responsible Officer

4 Bruny Island The risk management, maintenance and inspection A call for Expressions of Interest for the Airstrip has Tony Ferrier Airstrip requirements associated with the management of the been made and will close on 9 March 2018. Letters Bruny Airstrip have increased significantly in recent have been sent to some potentially interested parties, years. Council has been gathering information and a copy to BICA, on Council’s website and a notice in reviewing available options in relation to the future of the Bruny News and Mercury. the airstrip.

5 Lunawanna Hall An upgrade of the Lunawanna Hall toilet facilities is Michelle advised that she will be meeting with the Michelle Allen Public Toilets and recommended to be undertaken in 2018/19 Architect shortly to discuss the Lunawanna Hall Floor Committees ideas. Victor Mus Request for resealing of the floor. It was noted that Council’s Building Maintenance Coordinator has advised that he has a quote for the resealing if the floor and is checking availability with the contractor.

6 Nebraska Road Coastal erosion and stabilisation works. It was noted that a Development Application has been David Reeve lodged and Council’s Engineering staff are waiting for the approval before work can commence.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 57 26 March 2018

3. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

No. Item Description Comments / Update Responsible Officer

7 Cat Control Council, in conjunction with the Bruny Island The committee was advised that Conrad Daniels from Kaylene Allan community and a range of partner organisations is Bruny Farming has been contracted to undertake on- implementing a cat management program for Bruny ground cat control work. Brett Woodruff who was Island. The program aims to minimise the adverse previously employed as the Field Officer is still impacts of domestic, stray and feral cats. engaged periodically to work with Conrad and pass on skills. A UTAS School of Biological Sciences PhD student has been approved and will commence in Feb 2018. They will undertake research on South Bruny to compliment research we are currently doing at the Neck and North Bruny specifically, feral cat distribution and density across key habitats. In addition they will: quantify prevalence of cat specific parasites (toxoplasmosis in wildlife and livestock, sarcocystosis in livestock) and how it relates to different feral cat densities across the island; further investigate cat, rabbit and quoll interactions; quantify diet of quoll & cats. Enclosed are 2 articles on recent research undertaken as part of the project that BIAC may be interested in. Legal feedback has finally been received on the Draft Cat By-laws for cat ownership on Bruny Island. We are meeting with the lawyers to finalise the draft and then a RIS will be prepared. We are waiting for one more building quote for the Cat Holding Facility

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 58 26 March 2018

4. COMMUNITY SERVICES

No. Item Description Comments / Update Responsible Officer

8 Bruny Island A consultant has been engaged to undertake a survey Dr Rosemary Sandford advised that the launch of the BICAL Community Aged of stakeholders to determine accommodation needs on BICAL report will be held on Sunday 7 March 2018. Living survey Bruny Island. 9 Glensyn Units A proposal has been received from IC4 Developments Michelle Allen advised that to date there has been no Michelle Allen to develop affordable accommodation on the site of the further communication from IC4 Developments. Glensyn Units. 10 Dissemination of Rosemary suggested Kingborough Council needs to Sarah Wilcox provided the following response: Sarah Wilcox information to the be more active in dissemination of info to Bruny Increasing costs to print and deliver the Kingborough Bruny Community community. Council should not rely primarily on News to private addresses across the municipality was internet e.g. FB/Bruny Notices, for dissemination of the catalyst to review the way Council publishes news in Council information to community. Many on Bruny 2016. To ensure information is published in a variety of cannot get internet, and not everyone uses FB. How formats for residents, Council approved a quarterly can Council be more accessible and transparent in publication (called Council News) to appear in the getting its messages across to its ratepayers? Kingborough Chronicle and Kingston Classifieds, which is also available by email subscription and on Council’s

website and social media channels. The Snapshot on Kingborough will continue to be published in the months between the Council News. Anyone wishing to receive the email subscription can contact Council requesting to be added at [email protected]. The publication of these news updates does not coincide with the BI News publication cycle and so Council will make sure the publication is printed and posted at the Service Centre on Bruny Island each month. Along with the monthly updates, Council also publishes regular media releases, which are sent to all media outlets, including the BI News, for their consideration for publication. All media releases are available on Council’s website. Council is unable to provide printed communications for each township within the municipality due to limited resources. It was agreed that an update of the BIAC meeting should be published in the Bruny News after each meeting.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 59 26 March 2018

5. TOURISM & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

No. Item Description Comments / Update Responsible Officer

11 Destination Action Preparation and implementation of a DAP for Bruny Tony Ferrier advised that there has not been a meeting Tony Ferrier Plan (DAP) Island to improve visitor experiences. in a while but projects are still being delivered. John Kobylec asked if anyone was chasing up the proposed funding for the future years and Tony Ferrier advised that this would need to be done by the DAP Committee.

12 Signage at the Concern expressed at the proliferation of signs at the Tony Ferrier advised that the Council is still pursuing Tony Ferrier Adventure Bay Adventure Bay turn-off. the removal of all unauthorised roadside signs. turn-off Council is working with State Growth and will communicate with all the sign owners and this will take place after the election.

13 Recreational Development of strategies to manage the increasing Tony Ferrier advised that Council developed a draft Tony Ferrier Vehicles number of recreational vehicles visiting the area. strategy for recreational vehicles a year or two ago and Council has decided not to adopt the strategy but will respond to any individual recreation vehicle requests or issues.

14 Bruny Island Update of Bruny Tourism Strategy Tony Ferrier advised that he updates the Tourism Tony Ferrier Tourism Strategy Strategy when required (about once a year).

15 Land on the point What is happening with the land at Dennes Point Council has acquired the property and is currently Tony Ferrier at Dennes Point finalising a settlement amount. There will be no tourism venture happening there and it will be public land.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 60 26 March 2018

6. STATE GOVERNMENT AGENCY ITEMS

No. Item Description Comments / Update Responsible Agency

16 The Neck The Parks and Wildlife Service is upgrading the It was noted that Shane Gregory provided the following DOSG Developments walkway to the lookout, as well as undertaking response to the email sent in November: modifications to the carpark and the construction of new public toilets. The speed limit adjacent the Neck carpark has been set at 60km/h. However, following yesterday’s meeting between Minister Hidding and the Bruny Island Community Association (BICA), the Department of State Growth (Department) will review speed limits. In undertaking that review we will be seeking to establish the view of the broader Bruny Island Community and also the level of support from Council as representative of the Community. Trevor made the following motion and the Group debated this topic at length and it was voted upon: MOVED: Trevor Adams SECOND: Bill Hughes THAT the Bruny Island Advisory Committee, through Council, support the Department of State Growth with the current speed limit on the Neck. Carried Against Dr Rosemary Sandford

17 Bruny Island Ferry Renewal of the Bruny Island Ferry contract due to It was noted that Shane Gregory provided the following DOSG Contract expire in June 2018. response to the email sent in November: The tender for a replacement Bruny Island Ferry service is currently live and it is inappropriate to provide specific commentary. For that reason, the Department has been consistent in its advice that tender information will not be provided to any parties other than those directly involved in the tender process.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 61 26 March 2018

The Tasmanian Government has committed to a service at least as good as, or better than, the current service and retaining regulation of resident fare increases to CPI. The number, types and size of vessels will be dependent on the specific tender proposals and it is not possible to provide advice at this time. Mathew Fagan advised that he has spoken to Shane Gregory and from 1 July the new contract operator will capture details of who is going to Bruny etc.

18 Road Sealing Program for sealing of State roads on Bruny Island It was noted that Shane Gregory provided the following DOSG response to the email sent in November: Kingborough Council maintains the Department’s roads on Bruny Island under contract. The contract requires that the road is maintained to a minimum specification, which would require maintenance grading. On that basis Council is best placed to respond to BIAC. I also ask that Council’s staff responsible for delivery of maintenance services for the Department ensure that the contractual obligations are being met.

19 Roadside trees Concern expressed at dead trees alongside the main Shane Gregory provided the following response to the DOSG road to Alonnah and the question asked as to whether email sent in November: DOSG would be undertaking an audit of the same. Kingborough Council maintains the Department’s roads on Bruny Island under contract. Council are required to remove dead or broken branches under the base services component of that contract. The contract also requires that weekly inspections of the road network be undertaken, including the identification, and referral to the Department, of tree works outside of the base services, i.e. dead and dangerous trees to be removed. Notwithstanding Council’s obligations under the maintenance contract, a Tree Framework Risk Assessment is currently underway.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 62 26 March 2018

Trevor Adams requested Council conduct an audit of all the dead trees on the roadsides of Bruny. This matter will be raised with Council’s Works Department.

20 Road Safety Request to Department of State Growth to develop a Michelle Allen advised the Group that the Department DOSG Pamphlet brochure to encourage safe travel on Bruny Island of State Growth has a new Road Safety campaign and Roads. the link is provided https://www.rsac.tas.gov.au/visitingdrivers/ Beck McKinney the Marketing, Communication and Project Manager for the Road Safety Tasmania Taskforce will be attending the next meeting to discuss what is happening in this space.

21 Road Safety Audit The Department of State Growth, in conjunction with Nothing further to report. DOSG Council, has been proceeding with the implementation of the recommendations of a road safety audit.

22 Election The Liberal Party have announced 8 million dollars for Mathew Fagan advised that he had spoken to Nic Commitment from Bruny Island over 4 years Street MP and that the funding to be spent over the 4 the Liberal Party years will be for a range of priorities to be determined by the Bruny Island community and come through Council. The hope is that the Liveability Study will be able to establish priorities for use of the money.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 63 26 March 2018

7. LONG TERM ITEMS

The following issues require resolution in the longer term and are listed for reference. If there is any progress on any item, it will be moved to the current section of the Agenda.

No. Item Description Comments / Update Responsible Officer

23 Pedestrian Bridge Request for the installation of a pedestrian bridge and Shane Gregory has provided the following response to DOSG/ at Alonnah connecting footpath at Main Road, Alonnah or for the email sent in November: signage warning of narrow bridge ahead to slow David Reeve vehicles and improve pedestrian safety. While this bridge does not meet Australian Standards criteria for installation of narrow bridge signage, the Department will review existing pedestrian warning signage at this location. Trevor Adams advised that there no existing pedestrian warning signs on the bridge.

24 Adventure Bay Request for provision of a footpath linking these two The project is not currently listed as a priority in David Reeve Road – Bligh areas. Council’s Capital Works program but its need will Creek to East continue to be monitored in terms of numbers and Cove types of vehicle traffic versus number of pedestrians.

25 Harvey Road Request for sealing of Harvey Road The sealing of Harvey Road has been listed for David Reeve inclusion in Council’s five-year Capital Works program. In the interim, it has been included in the dust suppressant trial.

26 Lockleys Road Request for sealing of Lockleys Road The project is not currently listed as a priority in David Reeve Council’s Capital Works program but its need will continue to be monitored, particularly in light of use by tourist buses endeavouring to show passengers the white wallabies.

27 Coolangatta Road Concern at lack of maintenance on Coolangatta Road Shane Gregory has provided the following response to P&WS by DOSG. the email sent in November: DOSG Council’s Engineering staff are mistaken in their understanding of ownership of Coolangatta Road. The ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 64 26 March 2018

Department of State Growth is responsible for the management of State Highways and subsidiary roads as proclaimed under the provisions of the Roads and Jetties Act 1935. Coolangatta Road is not one of these roads. Ownership of Coolangatta Road is recorded on the LIST, which shows Council as the owner between Adventure Bay and Resolution Road, and of a small section at the western end. The remainder of the road is shown as being under the ownership of DPIPWE/PWS.

28 Road swaps Anomalies in relation to road ownership between Preliminary discussions between the relevant Council DOSG Council and State Government and suggestion that and State Government Departments has occurred but swaps should occur to address these. the matter is ongoing and of lower priority.

29 Road Speeds at Reduction of speed limits and speed bumps at the Friends of North Bruny are working with Council and DOSG North Bruny northern end of the island. State Growth in regards to speed reductions in North Bruny.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 65 26 March 2018

Appendix: Bruny Traffic Counts December 2017 to January 2018

To Bruny From Bruny Total number Week commencing (BA) (AB) 04-Dec-17 496 491 987 11-Dec-17 533 533 1066 18-Dec-17 610 574 1184 25-Dec-17 752 665 1417 1-Jan-18 765 790 1555

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 66 26 March 2018

5 February 2018 TO: Michelle Allen, Liaison Officer, Kingborough Council FROM: Rosemary Sandford, BIAC member Re: BIAC Agenda 8 February 2019: Glensyn Units, Alonnah, Bruny Island. ______Questions:

1. I understand that the Kingborough Council is responsible for the management and infrastructure upkeep of the 4 Glensyn Units at Alonnah, and for overseeing the process for selecting Glensyn residents. These units are intended as appropriate and affordable accommodation for Bruny’s elderly and disabled residents. Can the Council please confirm that this is correct? This is correct. To be eligible an applicant must:  Be resident on Bruny Island for at least the two years immediately prior to this application;  Be requiring accommodation for oneself only (the units are single and cannot accommodate a couple);  Be over 65 years of age/or have a disability;  Be in receipt of a full Centrelink or DVA pension;  Not own a home;  Be able to live independently and be capable of maintaining the residence in a safe and clean condition both internally and externally.

2. Can the Council also confirm that, as manager of this site, it has a duty of care to its residents, present and future? Yes

3. I understand that 1, and soon, 2 units will be vacated by their current residents. Can Council confirm that essential infrastructure upgrades and maintenance works will be undertaken before new residents move into these units? For example, I understand that some aspects of the bathrooms in these units are unsafe for older residents. Given Council’s duty of care to the residents, can Council confirm that the maintenance and infrastructure upgrades required to make these units safe for elderly residents, will be undertaken as a matter of urgency and before new residents move in?

At this point in time, we have only been notified of one departure from the units. Each time a unit becomes vacant, it is assessed by Council’s Building Maintenance Supervisor and any required maintenance is undertaken before any new tenant moves in.

4. Can Council please advise the process for the selection of new Glensyn occupants? Can Council please describe how selectors are chosen? What are the skills sets of those responsible for the selection of new residents, in particular their expertise and experience in aged care and disability care? The selection process involves reference to the waiting list, selection criteria and consultation with a member of BICHSAC. In recent years, this has been Geoff Byrne and is now Fran Davis. Council staff involved in the process do not have expertise or experience in aged or disability care.

5. I understand there is a waiting list for the Glensyn Units. Can Council please advise how many Bruny residents are on the current waiting list? And an estimate of how long their wait might be now that the availability 2 units is pending? There are currently four people on the waiting list. Council can not estimate how long their wait may be as it depends on when a unit become available. As stated above Council has only be notified of one departure at this time.

Rosemary Sandford

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 67 26 March 2018

FILE NO 5.7 DATE 19 MARCH 2018 OFFICER GARY ARNOLD - GENERAL MANAGER

2018 ANZAC DAY SERVICES

1 PURPOSE

Strategic Plan Reference

Key Priority Area 1 A safe, healthy and supportive community Strategic Outcome 1.5 A community that celebrates its arts, culture and place Strategy 1.5.2 Support initiatives and opportunities that grow participation and appreciation of cultural diversity and the arts

1.1 To consider Council’s representative at the various 2018 ANZAC Day services.

2 BACKGROUND

2.1 Each year Council appoints a Councillor to attend an ANZAC Day service and place wreaths on behalf of Council and the community.

3 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

3.1 There are no statutory requirements relating to this report.

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 Council has been advised of the following ANZAC Day services within Kingborough:

 Dawn Service (6.00 a.m.) at Alonnah, Bruny Island

 Dawn Service (6.00 a.m.) at Taroona

 Dawn Service (6.00 a.m.) at Woodbridge

 Dawn Service (6.00 a.m.) at Kingston Beach

 Morning Service (11.00 a.m.) at Snug

4.2 The Mayor has advised that he will be representing Council at the Kingston Beach dawn service and the morning service at Snug. Therefore representatives are required for the dawn services at Alonnah, Woodbridge and Taroona.

5 FINANCE

5.1 Council fund the provision of wreaths from the operational budget.

6 ENVIRONMENT

6.1 There are no environmental implications associated with this matter.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 68 26 March 2018

7 COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTATION

7.1 The various RSL Sub-branches will be advised as to Council’s representatives for the respective services.

8 RISK

8.1 The appointment of Council representatives does not pose any risk to Council.

9 CONCLUSION

9.1 The appointment of Council representatives to the various services is in the line with Council practices for ANZAC Day services.

10 RECOMMENDATION

MOVED SECONDED

That Council appoint the following representatives to attend the 2018 ANZAC Day services within Kingborough:

Dawn Service – Alonnah Councillor ______Dawn Service – Taroona Councillor ______Dawn Service – Woodbridge Councillor ______

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 69 26 March 2018

INFORMATION REPORTS

MOVED SECONDED

That the following information reports be noted:

1. Mayor’s Communications.

2. Financial Report for the Period 1 July 2017 to 28 February 2018.

3. Minutes of the Kingborough Road Safety Committee Meeting dated 24 January 2018.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 70 26 March 2018

MAYOR’S COMMUNICATIONS

Mayor Wass reported the following appointments / activities:

1. 6.30 p.m. Monday 19.2.18 Together with Councillors Bastone, Bury, Fox, Grace, Wriedt, General Manager, Mr Arnold attended LGAT organised Coalition of Tasmanian Key Peak Bodies State Election Candidate Forum to hear a short address from each candidate. Venue: Twin Ovals Function Centre, Kingston.

2. 10.00 a.m. Tuesday 20.2.18 Met with Ms Kathleen Page to discuss private land development. Venue: Civic Centre.

3. 2.00 p.m. Wednesday 21.2.18 In company with General Manager, Mr Arnold, Acting Lord Mayor of Hobart, Mayors of Clarence & Glenorchy, and General Managers of Clarence, Glenorchy and Hobart, met with the Hon Paul Fletcher, MP, Federal Minister for Urban Infrastructure and Cities. Venue: State Growth Offices, L 6, 4 Salamanca Place, Hobart.

4. 4.00 p.m. Wednesday 21.2.18 Met with Mr Mike Oakley and Mr Phillip John to discuss a compliance issue. Venue: Civic Centre.

5. 5.00 p.m. Wednesday 21.2.18 Together with Councillor Fox and General Manager, Mr Arnold, attended Official Opening of ‘Ogilvie Jennings’ new Kingston Offices. Venue: 11 John Street, Kingston.

6. 10.00 a.m. Thursday 22.2.18 At invitation of Huon Valley Council, and in company with General Manager, Mr Arnold, attended Official Opening of the Huon Valley Visitor Information Centre. Venue: Main Road, Huonville.

7. 3.30 p.m. Thursday 22.2.18 Attended Kingston Park Steering Committee meeting. Venue: Civic Centre.

8. 7.00 p.m. Thursday 22.2.18 Met Hon David O’Byrne, Labor candidate for the State seat of Franklin, together with Kettering Cricket Club members to receive details of Labors election promise for the upgrading of their clubrooms. Venue: Kettering Cricket Oval, Kettering.

9. 9.45 a.m. Friday 23.2.18 In company with General Manager, Mr Arnold, attended 2018 Election Leaders’ Forum. Venue: Brighton Civic Centre, Green Point Road, Bridgewater.

10. 6.00 p.m. Friday 23.2.18 At invitation attended 2017 Tasmanian Leaders Program Graduation Celebrations. Venue: Henry Jones Art Hotel, Hobart.

11. 2.00 p.m. Saturday 24.2.18 Together with Councillor Bastone attended AFL, JLT Community Series game between North Melbourne and Melbourne Football Clubs. Venue: Twin Ovals, Kingston. ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 71 26 March 2018

12. 4.00 p.m. Saturday 24.2.18 Attended Taroona Tennis Club’s rededication to the club’s vision following recent upgrades to facilities. Venue: Taroona Tennis Club, Nubeena Crescent, Taroona.

13. 2.00 p.m. Sunday 25.2.18 Met Labor State Leader, Hon Rebecca White MP, Labor candidates for the State seat of Franklin, Hon David O’Byrne, Kathryn Barnsley, Kevin Midson, together with Councillor Chatterton (Chair,Kingston Mens Shed), Channel & Kingston Mens Shed members to receive Labors election promise for Tasmanian Mens Sheds. Venue: Kingston Mens Shed, Gormley Drive, Kingston.

14. 4.00 p.m. Sunday 25.2.18 Met with Ms Elaine Cockshutt and David Archer of Concerned Residents of Snug and Electrona to discuss youth play activities in the area. Venue: Banjo’s Bakery Café, Channel Highway, Margate.

15. 10.00 a.m. Monday 26.2.18 Attended Waste Strategy South general meeting. Venue: Elizabeth Street, Conference Room, Hobart Town Hall, Hobart.

16. 8.30 p.m. Tuesday 27.2.18 Attended GM Performance Review Meeting with Councillors Bastone, Chatterton and General Manager, Mr Arnold. Venue: Civic Centre.

17. 4.45 p.m. Tuesday 27.2.18 In company with General Manager. Mr Arnold attended a celebration to mark 20 years of service to the Tasmania community by Service Tasmania. Venue: Service Tasmania, Shop 27, Channel Court

18. 6.30 p.m. Tuesday 27.2.18 Met with Hon David O’Byrne and Kevin Midson Labor candidates for the State seat of Franklin, together with Kingborough Lions United Football Club members to receive details of Labors election promise for upgrading their changerooms. Venue: Lightwood Park, Kingston.

19. 2.00 p.m. Wednesday 28.2.18 Met with Councillor Grace, General Manager, Mr Arnold and Manager Community Services, Ms Jenni. Venue: Civic Centre.

20. 6.00 p.m. Wednesday 28.2.18 Together with Councillors Fox, Wriedt and staff attended the Launch of ‘Inside with Cats’. Venue: Civic Centre.

21. 12.00 Noon Thursday 1.3.18 Met with Threatened Species Commissioner, Dr Sally Box. Venue: Civic Centre.

22. 3.00 p.m. Thursday 1.3.18 In company with General Manager, Mr Arnold attended Copping refuse Disposal Site Joint Authority general meeting. Venue: Clarence City Council, Rosny Park.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 72 26 March 2018

23. 10.30 a.m. Friday 2.3.18 In company with General Manager, Mr Arnold attended Local Government Association Tasmania general meeting. Venue: Burnie Arts & Function Centre, Wilmot Street, Burnie.

24. 9.45 a.m. Sunday 4.3.18 Attended Bupa KidFit Series Triathlon. Venue: Blackmans Bay Beach, Blackmans Bay.

25. 3.30 p.m. Monday 5.3.18 Met with Mr Alexander Aslanis. Venue: Civic Centre.

26. 11.00 a.m. Tuesday 6.3.18 Met with Ms Libby Robinson, Principal, Kingston High School. Venue: Civic Centre.

27. 2.00 p.m. Wednesday 7.3.18 Attended TasWater Board Selection Committee to undertake candidate interview for TasWater Non Executive Director. Venue: Clarence City Council, Rosny Park.

28. 8.15 a.m. Thursday 8.3.18 Attended TasWater Board Selection Committee to undertake candidate interviews for TasWater Non Executive Director. Venue: Clarence City Council, Rosny Park.

29. 10.20 a.m. Friday 9.3.18 Attended Tasmania Police Graduation Ceremony of Trainee Course 2/2017. Venue: Tasmania Police Academy, Rokeby.

30. 1.30 p.m. Friday 9.3.18 In company with General Manager, Mr Arnold attended State Funeral for Dr Vanessa Goodwin. Venue: St David’s Cathedral, Murray Street, Hobart.

31. 9.30 a.m. Saturday 10.3.18 Together with Councillor Grace attended 55th Scout Guide regatta, opened by Her Excellency Professor the Honourable Kate Warner AM. Venue: Snug Park, Snug.

32. 2.00 p.m. Saturday 10.3.18 Attended Multicultural Women’s Council of Tasmania, International Women’s Day. Venue: Legacy House, Macquarie Street, Hobart.

33. 11.00 a.m. Monday 12.3.18 Joined a number of South Channel residents to acknowledge the FNS L’Astrolabe passage down the D’Entrecasteaux Channel past the memorial for Admiral Bruni D’Entrecasteaux on its voyage to Antarctica. Venue: Gordon Jetty Reserve, Gordon.

34. 7.45 p.m. Thursday 15.3.18 Attended Kingborough Lions United Football Club’s 2018 WSL and NPL Season Launch. Venue: Lightwood Park, Kingston.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 73 26 March 2018

35. 12.00 Noon Friday 16.3.18 Attended Kingborough U3A annual start of the year BBQ. Venue: Tinderbox Beach, Tinderbox.

36. 4.15 p.m. Friday 16.3.18 Officially Opened 2018 Kingston Primary School Twilight Fair. Venue: Kingston Primary School, Kingston.

37. 11.00 a.m. Sunday 18.3.18 Together with Councillors Atkinson and Bury, attended Zero Waste Expo Venue: Kingston Beach Community Hall, Kingston Beach.

Attended by Representative of the Mayor:

1. 1.45 p.m. Saturday 24.2.18 Councillor Percey met with Hon Will Hodgman MP, Premier of Tasmania to receive details of the State Government election promise for the upgrade of the Alonnah Community Hall. Venue: Alonnah Community Hall, Alonnah.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 74 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL

FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD 1 JULY 2017 TO 28 FEBRUARY 2018

SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL 26 MARCH 2018

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 75 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Table of Contents Page No Consolidated Operating Statement Graph (incl Commentary)...... ……………………………… 5-6 Cash Balances………………………………………………………………...... 5 Comments on Financials……………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Budget Reconciliation Notes……………………………………………………………………….………….…… 7 Summary Operating Statement Total for All Programs - Actual vs Budget………….….…… 8 Governance Operating Statement - Actual vs Budget…………………….…….……….……...…… 10 Corporate Governance Operating Statement - Actual vs Budget…………………….…..……… 11 Community Services Operating Statement - Actual vs Budget……………………...……...... 12 Environmental Services Operating Statement - Actual vs Budget………………………….……. 13 Development Services Operating Statement - Actual vs Budget………………………….……… 14 Infrastructure & Services Operating Statement - Actual vs Budget………………………...... 15 Capital Works Summary ……………………………………………..……………………………………………… 9

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 76 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

CASH BALANCES

Balance Type July August September October November December January February March April May June Reserves $ 2,708,000 $ 2,708,000 $ 2,708,000 $ 2,708,000 $ 2,708,000 $ 2,708,000 $ 2,708,000 $ 2,708,000 Held in Trust $ 1,418,000 $ 1,418,000 $ 1,418,000 $ 1,418,000 $ 1,418,000 $ 1,418,000 $ 1,418,000 $ 1,418,000 Unexpended Capital Works $ 6,866,507 $ 8,793,292 $ 8,474,830 $ 8,835,012 $ 5,929,198 $ 5,856,478 $ 6,327,073 $ 5,754,750

Current Year Total Committed Cash $ 10,992,507 $ 12,919,292 $ 12,600,830 $ 12,961,012 $ 10,055,198 $ 9,982,478 $ 10,453,073 $ 9,880,750 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Previous Year Total Committed Cash $ 22,260,012 $ 21,664,134 $ 21,556,844 $ 21,578,461 $ 21,084,100 $ 19,907,885 $ 19,510,920 $ 18,443,458 $ 18,100,176 $ 17,758,479 $ 16,922,418 $ 15,243,035

Uncommitted Funds $ 703,571 $ 3,107,965 $ 823,422 $ 1,155,813 $ 3,094,335 $ 1,501,630 $ 1,446,427 $ 2,787,815 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Current Year Total Cash $ 11,696,078 $ 16,027,257 $ 13,424,252 $ 14,116,825 $ 13,149,533 $ 11,484,108 $ 11,899,500 $ 12,668,566 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Previous Year Total Cash $ 9,043,247 $ 12,312,121 $ 11,378,449 $ 12,456,837 $ 10,173,763 $ 8,476,956 $ 10,964,070 $ 10,783,101 $ 9,926,136 $ 10,176,197 $ 11,037,997 $ 9,492,322

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 77 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018 CASH & INVESTMENTS

CASH ACCOUNTS Interes Maturity Date July August September October November December January February March April May June t Rate CBA - Overdraft Account $ 4,146,838 $ 2,777,745 $ 1,494,562 $ 3,859,955 $ 2,772,279 $ 965,777 $ 2,488,011 $ 3,137,382 CBA – Applications Account $ 3,521 $ 3,521 CBA - AR Account $ 330,043 $ 12,986 $ 187,966 $ 100 $ 95,057 $ 211,543 $ 153,810 $ 251,352 CBA - Bruny Passbook $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2

Total Cash $ 4,476,883 $ 2,790,733 $ 1,682,530 $ 3,860,057 $ 2,867,338 $ 1,177,322 $ 2,645,344 $ 3,392,257 $ - $ - $ - $ -

INVESTMENTS CBA At Call 1.40% At-Call $ 54,115 $ 54,179 $ 54,242 $ 54,306 $ 54,369 $ 54,433 $ 54,498 $ 54,557 Bankwest 2.50% 30-Apr-18 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Bendigo (2) 2.40% 17-Jan-18 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,012,329 $ 2,012,329 $ 2,012,329 NAB (1) Term Deposit 2.40% 30-Jan-18 $ 1,028,029 $ 1,034,493 $ 1,034,493 $ 1,034,493 $ 1,040,615 $ 1,040,615 NAB (2) Term Deposit 2.45% 27-May-18 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,017,753 $ 3,017,753 $ 3,017,753 $ 3,035,984 Mystate 2.45% 18-Mar-18 $ 1,027,516 $ 3,033,977 $ 3,033,977 $ 3,033,977 $ 3,033,977 $ 3,056,989 $ 3,056,989 $ 3,056,989 Tascorp HT 1.50% Managed Trust $ 1,086,263 $ 2,087,729 $ 589,995 $ 590,746 $ 591,529 $ 592,282 $ 592,531 $ 593,513 Tascorp Cash Indexed 1.74% Managed Trust $ 2,023,271 $ 2,026,146 $ 2,029,015 $ 530,916 $ 531,624 $ 532,385 $ 1,532,385 $ 1,535,266

Total Investments $ 7,219,195 $ 13,236,524 $ 11,741,722 $ 10,256,768 $ 10,282,195 $ 10,306,786 $ 9,254,156 $ 9,276,308 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Current Year Total Cash & Investments $ 11,696,078 $ 16,027,257 $ 13,424,252 $ 14,116,825 $ 13,149,533 $ 11,484,108 $ 11,899,500 $ 12,668,566 $ - $ - $ - $ -

Previous Year Cash & Investments $ 9,043,247 $ 12,312,121 $ 11,378,449 $ 12,456,837 $ 10,173,763 $ 8,476,956 $ 10,964,070 $ 10,783,101 $ 9,926,136 $ 10,176,197 $ 11,037,997 $ 9,492,322

$18,000,000 $16,000,000 Total Cash & Investments Current Year Total Cash & Investments Previous Year Cash & Investments $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- July August September October November December January February March April May June

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 78 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

BUDGET NOTES

RECONCILIATION OF ORIGINAL TO FORECAST BUDGET

BUDGET UNDERLYING RESULT (860,240)

Forecast Changes: Rates above budget 250,000 Depreciation - impacts of revaluations (100,000) Loan Interest - delayed borrowings 200,000 Share of Profit in Associate/Subsidiary 200,000 User Fees - above budget 100,000 Interest - Funds above budget 40,000 Profit on Disposal of Assets - Land 60,000 Other Expenses - below budget 100,000 Cost of Assets Retired - resulting from WIP capitalisation (400,000)

Family Day Care User Fees (160,000) Grants (760,000) Employee Benefits 200,000 Child Care Payments 700,000 Other Expenses 20,000

FORECAST UNDERLYING RESULT (410,240)

Budget Net Surplus 139,758 Adjustments Above 450,000 Capital Grant - Kingston Park Federal Grant 50% 1,400,000 Grants for 2017/18 Received in Advance (1,050,000)

FORECAST BUDGET 939,758

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 79 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

COMMENTS ON FINANCIALS

The following items are significantly higher/lower than budget:

OPERATING INCOME

 Rates Rates income is higher than budget by $192k due to general rates (+$137k), garbage rates (+$42k) and Stormwater rate (+$13k) being higher than the budget estimate.

 User Fees User Fees are $131k over budget primarily due to Town Planning being over budget by $115k as a result of engineering fees paid on a few large developments and the volume of planning approvals processed. In addition, the Sports Centre is $39k over budget primarily due to sales revenue from the kiosk and the revenue from fitness programs.

 Grants Recurrent Grants Recurrent is $843k under budget due primarily to the FAGS grants being $798k under budget resulting from the prepayment of funds in June 2017. Grants for Family Day Care are $363k under budget due to the transfer of the business. These losses have been offset by $65k in State Government grants and $150k in Federal Government grants that were not in the budget, as well as $80k for regional cat management.

 Reimbursements Reimbursements are $110k over budget due to an increase in the pensioner rebate, as well as some timing differences in payments. This is offset by an increase in expenditure on pensioner rebates.

OPERATING EXPENSES

 Loan Interest The Loan Interest account is $144k under budget due to the later than expected need to undertake borrowings.

 Materials and Services Materials and Services is $486k under budget primarily due to Community Services being $380k under budget as a result of the transfer of the Family Day Care business. Governance and Property is $82k under budget due to expenditure moving to employee costs and Corporate Services is $41k under budget due to timing differences.

 Depreciation Depreciation is $72k over budget due to the impacts of the 10% revaluation in buildings during 2016/17 and the 3.7% revaluation of infrastructure assets at 30 June 2017.

OTHER NON-OPERATING INCOME/EXPENSES

 Grants Capital The variance of $743k resulted from the early payment of the Roads to Recovery grant for 2017/18 and a $49k grant for cricket nets at the Kingston Beach oval.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 80 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Summary Operating Statement All YTD YTD YTD Annual Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget Variance Budget Budget Variance

Income Rates 25,194,404 25,002,500 191,904 25,062,500 25,312,500 250,000 Income Levies 1,528,105 1,485,000 43,105 1,485,000 1,485,000 (0) Statutory Fees & Fines 1,101,688 1,071,540 30,148 1,629,160 1,629,160 (0) User Fees 1,049,235 918,710 130,525 1,397,790 1,337,790 (60,000) Grants Recurrent 2,028,580 2,871,210 (842,630) 3,917,400 2,107,400 (1,810,000) Contributions - Cash 385,979 295,144 90,835 602,696 602,696 (0) Reimbursements 1,110,024 1,000,000 110,024 1,052,000 1,052,000 (0) Other Income 337,861 426,636 (88,775) 874,604 874,604 (0) Internal Charges Income 361,328 328,000 33,328 491,000 491,000 (0) Total Income 33,097,204 33,398,740 (301,536) 36,512,150 34,892,150 (1,620,000)

Expenses Employee Costs 9,588,186 9,586,414 (1,772) 14,009,759 13,809,759 200,000 Expenses Levies 763,423 742,500 (20,923) 1,485,000 1,485,000 (0) Loan Interest 0 144,000 144,000 240,000 40,000 200,000 Materials and Services 5,634,944 6,120,990 486,046 9,113,549 8,413,549 700,000 Other Expenses 3,027,408 3,079,624 52,216 3,880,424 3,760,424 120,000 Internal Charges Expense 349,839 327,664 (22,175) 491,500 491,500 (0) Total Expenses 19,363,800 20,001,192 637,392 29,220,232 28,000,232 1,220,000

Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: 13,733,405 13,397,548 335,857 7,291,918 6,891,918 (400,000)

Depreciation 6,426,214 6,354,440 (71,774) 9,544,160 9,644,160 (100,000) Loss/(Profit) on Disposal of Assets 6,802 0 (6,802) 600,000 940,000 (340,000) Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: 7,300,388 7,043,108 257,280 (2,852,242) (3,692,242) (840,000)

Interest 163,248 96,000 67,248 144,000 184,000 40,000 Dividends 1,231,981 1,232,000 (19) 1,848,000 1,848,000 (0) Share of Profits/(Losses) of Invest. In Assoc 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) 8,695,617 8,371,108 324,509 (860,242) (1,460,242) (600,000)

Grants Capital 743,475 0 743,475 800,000.00 2,200,000 1,400,000 Contributions - Non Monetory Assets 0 0 (0) 200,000.00 200,000 (0) Transfer of Income 252,070 0 252,070 0 0 (0) NET SUPRPLUS/(DEFICIT) 9,691,162 8,371,108 1,320,054 139,758 939,758 800,000

TOTAL CASH GENERATED 2,269,402 2,016,668 252,734 (10,404,402) (11,104,402) 700,000

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 81 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Summary Operating Statement Governance YTD YTD YTD Annual Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget Variance Budget Budget Variance

Income Rates 22,007,236 21,870,500 136,736 21,922,500 22,172,500 250,000 Income Levies 1,528,105 1,485,000 43,105 1,485,000 1,485,000 (0) Statutory Fees & Fines 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) User Fees 53,333 52,800 533 80,000 80,000 (0) Grants Recurrent 1,036,258 1,620,000 (583,742) 2,160,000 1,110,000 (1,050,000) Contributions - Cash 258,070 248,000 10,070 372,000 372,000 (0) Reimbursements 1,110,024 1,000,000 110,024 1,052,000 1,052,000 (0) Other Income 40,593 52,800 (12,207) 204,200 204,200 (0) Internal Charges Income 48,000 64,000 (16,000) 96,000 96,000 (0) Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Total Income 26,081,620 26,393,100 (311,480) 27,371,700 26,571,700 (800,000)

Expenses Employee Costs 368,705 364,774 (3,931) 555,233 555,233 (0) Expenses Levies 763,423 742,500 (20,923) 1,485,000 1,485,000 (0) Loan Interest 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Materials and Services 309,801 257,000 (52,801) 373,000 373,000 (0) Other Expenses 1,874,333 1,748,764 (125,569) 2,118,900 2,118,900 (0) Internal Charges Expense 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Total Expenses 3,316,262 3,113,038 (203,224) 4,532,133 4,532,133 (0)

Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: 22,765,359 23,280,062 (514,703) 22,839,567 22,039,567 800,000

Depreciation 54,100 48,800 (5,300) 73,200 73,200 (0) Loss/(Profit) on Disposal of Assets 6,802 0 (6,802) 600,000 940,000 (340,000) Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: 22,704,456 23,231,262 (526,806) 22,166,367 21,026,367 (1,140,000)

Interest 1,135 0 1,135 0 0 (0) Dividends 1,231,981 1,232,000 (19) 1,848,000 1,848,000 (0) Share of Profits/(Losses) of Invest. In Assoc 0 0 (0) 0 100,000 100,000 Investment Copping 0 0 (0) 0 100,000 100,000 NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) 23,937,573 24,463,262 (525,689) 24,014,367 23,074,367 (940,000)

Grants Capital 743,475 0 743,475 800,000.00 2,200,000 1,400,000 Contributions - Non Monetory Assets 0 0 (0) 200,000.00 200,000 (0) Transfer of Income 252,070 0 252,070 0 0 (0) NET SUPRPLUS/(DEFICIT) 24,933,118 24,463,262 469,856 25,014,367 25,474,367 460,000

TOTAL CASH GENERATED 23,883,473 24,414,462 (530,989) 23,941,167 23,001,167 (940,000)

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 82 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Summary Operating Statement Corporate Services YTD YTD YTD Annual Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget Variance Budget Budget Variance

Income Rates 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Income Levies 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Statutory Fees & Fines 193,537 209,600 (16,063) 314,400 314,400 (0) User Fees 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Grants Recurrent 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Contributions - Cash (1,423) 0 (1,423) 0 0 (0) Reimbursements 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Other Income 65,192 98,400 (33,208) 165,600 165,600 (0) Internal Charges Income 151,328 152,000 (672) 227,000 227,000 (0) Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Total Income 408,634 460,000 (51,366) 707,000 707,000 (0)

Expenses Employee Costs 1,694,504 1,752,272 57,768 2,661,269 2,661,269 (0) Expenses Levies 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Loan Interest 0 144,000 144,000 240,000 40,000 200,000 Materials and Services 442,980 484,000 41,020 587,000 587,000 (0) Other Expenses 671,061 701,300 30,239 909,700 879,700 30,000 Internal Charges Expense 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Total Expenses 2,808,545 3,081,572 273,027 4,397,969 4,167,969 230,000

Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (2,399,911) (2,621,572) 221,661 (3,690,969) (3,460,969) 230,000

Depreciation 86,407 110,400 (23,993) 165,600 165,600 (0) Loss/(Profit) on Disposal of Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (2,486,319) (2,731,972) 245,653 (3,856,569) (3,626,569) 230,000

Interest 162,113 96,000 66,113 144,000 184,000 40,000 Dividends 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Share of Profits/(Losses) of Invest. In Assoc 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Investment Copping 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (2,324,206) (2,635,972) 311,766 (3,712,569) (3,442,569) 270,000

Grants Capital 0 0 (0) - 0 (0) Contributions - Non Monetory Assets 0 0 (0) - 0 (0) Initial Recognition of Infrastructure Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) NET SUPRPLUS/(DEFICIT) (2,324,206) (2,635,972) 311,766 (3,712,569) (3,442,569) 270,000

TOTAL CASH GENERATED (2,410,613) (2,746,372) 335,759 (3,878,169) (3,608,169) 270,000

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 83 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Summary Operating Statement Governance & Property Services YTD YTD YTD Annual Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget Variance Budget Budget Variance

Income Rates 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Income Levies 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Statutory Fees & Fines 240,318 207,300 33,018 332,800 332,800 (0) User Fees 161,551 113,060 48,491 167,640 167,640 (0) Grants Recurrent 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Contributions - Cash 33,265 0 33,265 0 0 (0) Reimbursements 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Other Income 7,104 4,400 2,704 6,600 6,600 (0) Internal Charges Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Total Income 442,237 324,760 117,477 507,040 507,040 (0)

Expenses Employee Costs 1,134,541 971,432 (163,109) 1,460,556 1,460,556 (0) Expenses Levies 0 0 0 0 0 (0) Loan Interest 0 0 0 0 0 (0) Materials and Services 726,397 808,222 81,825 1,213,258 1,213,258 (0) Other Expenses 70,557 152,400 81,843 193,400 143,400 50,000 Internal Charges Expense 2,960 0 (2,960) 0 0 (0) Transfers Income 0 0 0 0 0 (0) Total Expenses 1,934,455 1,932,054 (2,401) 2,867,214 2,817,214 50,000

Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (1,492,217) (1,607,294) 115,077 (2,360,174) (2,310,174) 50,000

Depreciation 85,486 81,200 (4,286) 125,800 125,800 (0) Loss/(Profit) on Disposal of Assets 0 0 0 0 0 (0) Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (1,577,704) (1,688,494) 110,790 (2,485,974) (2,435,974) 50,000

Interest 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Dividends 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Share of Profits/(Losses) of Invest. In Assoc 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) Investment Copping 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (1,577,704) (1,688,494) 110,790 (2,485,974) (2,435,974) 50,000

Grants Capital 0 0 (0) - 0 (0) Contributions - Non Monetory Assets 0 0 (0) - 0 (0) Initial Recognition of Infrastructure Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) NET SUPRPLUS/(DEFICIT) (1,577,704) (1,688,494) 110,790 (2,485,974) (2,435,974) 50,000

TOTAL CASH GENERATED (1,663,190) (1,769,694) 106,504 (2,611,774) (2,561,774) 50,000

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 84 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Summary Operating Statement Community Services YTD YTD YTD Annual Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget Variance Budget Budget Variance

Income Rates 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Income Levies 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Statutory Fees & Fines 291 0 291 0 0 0 User Fees 687,906 709,650 (21,744) 1,085,350 925,350 160,000 Grants Recurrent 725,049 1,071,210 (346,161) 1,577,400 817,400 760,000 Contributions - Cash 76,565 47,144 29,421 70,696 70,696 0 Reimbursements 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Other Income 14,738 16,900 (2,162) 25,000 25,000 0 Internal Charges Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Total Income 1,504,550 1,844,904 (340,354) 2,758,446 1,838,446 920,000

Expenses Employee Costs 1,236,665 1,363,004 126,339 2,069,874 1,869,874 (200,000) Expenses Levies 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loan Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 Materials and Services 527,877 907,688 379,811 1,381,482 681,482 (700,000) Other Expenses 193,788 227,348 33,560 319,152 299,152 (20,000) Internal Charges Expense 48,000 64,000 16,000 96,000 96,000 0 Transfers Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenses 2,006,330 2,562,040 555,710 3,866,508 2,946,508 (920,000)

Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (501,780) (717,136) 215,356 (1,108,062) (1,108,062) 0

Depreciation 172,434 161,600 (10,834) 246,400 246,400 0 Loss/(Profit) on Disposal of Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (674,214) (878,736) 204,522 (1,354,462) (1,354,462) 0

Interest 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Dividends 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Share of Profits/(Losses) of Invest. In Assoc 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Investment Copping 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (674,214) (878,736) 204,522 (1,354,462) (1,354,462) 0

Grants Capital 0 0 (0) - 0 0 Contributions - Non Monetory Assets 0 0 (0) - 0 0 Initial Recognition of Infrastructure Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 NET SUPRPLUS/(DEFICIT) (674,214) (878,736) 204,522 (1,354,462) (1,354,462) 0

TOTAL CASH GENERATED (846,648) (1,040,336) 193,688 (1,600,862) (1,600,862) 0

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 85 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Summary Operating Statement Development Services YTD YTD YTD Annual Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget Variance Budget Budget Variance

Income Rates 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Income Levies 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Statutory Fees & Fines 623,851 590,664 33,187 885,996 885,996 0 User Fees 120,771 24,000 96,771 36,000 136,000 100,000 Grants Recurrent 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Contributions - Cash 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Reimbursements 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Other Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Internal Charges Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Total Income 744,621 614,664 129,957 921,996 1,021,996 100,000

Expenses Employee Costs 1,272,113 1,229,480 (42,633) 1,866,916 1,866,916 0 Expenses Levies 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loan Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 Materials and Services 85,379 88,480 3,101 132,720 132,720 0 Other Expenses 90,513 102,992 12,479 154,492 154,492 0 Internal Charges Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenses 1,448,005 1,420,952 (27,053) 2,154,128 2,154,128 0

Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (703,383) (806,288) 102,905 (1,232,132) (1,132,132) 100,000

Depreciation 4,395 4,480 85 6,720 6,720 0 Loss/(Profit) on Disposal of Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (707,778) (810,768) 102,990 (1,238,852) (1,138,852) 100,000

Interest 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Dividends 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Share of Profits/(Losses) of Invest. In Assoc 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Investment Copping 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (707,778) (810,768) 102,990 (1,238,852) (1,138,852) 100,000

Grants Capital 0 0 (0) - 0 0 Contributions - Non Monetory Assets 0 0 (0) - 0 0 Initial Recognition of Infrastructure Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 NET SUPRPLUS/(DEFICIT) (707,778) (810,768) 102,990 (1,238,852) (1,138,852) 100,000

TOTAL CASH GENERATED (712,173) (815,248) 103,075 (1,245,572) (1,145,572) 100,000

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 86 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Summary Operating Statement Environmental Services YTD YTD YTD Annual Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget Variance Budget Budget Variance

Income Rates 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Income Levies 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Statutory Fees & Fines 43,692 63,336 (19,644) 95,004 95,004 0 User Fees 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Grants Recurrent 267,273 180,000 87,273 180,000 180,000 0 Contributions - Cash 1,500 0 1,500 150,000 150,000 0 Reimbursements 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Other Income 264 536 (272) 804 804 0 Internal Charges Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Total Income 312,729 243,872 68,857 425,808 425,808 0

Expenses Employee Costs 682,742 678,193 (4,549) 1,029,681 1,029,681 0 Expenses Levies 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Loan Interest 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Materials and Services 391,399 458,384 66,985 777,576 777,576 0 Other Expenses 51,550 26,200 (25,350) 39,300 39,300 0 Internal Charges Expense 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Total Expenses 1,125,691 1,162,777 37,086 1,846,557 1,846,557 0

Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (812,963) (918,905) 105,942 (1,420,749) (1,420,749) 0

Depreciation 1,881 1,760 (121) 2,640 2,640 0 Loss/(Profit) on Disposal of Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (814,844) (920,665) 105,821 (1,423,389) (1,423,389) 0

Interest 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Dividends 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Share of Profits/(Losses) of Invest. In Assoc 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Investment Copping 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (814,844) (920,665) 105,821 (1,423,389) (1,423,389) 0

Grants Capital 0 0 (0) - 0 0 Contributions - Non Monetory Assets 0 0 (0) - 0 0 Initial Recognition of Infrastructure Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 NET SUPRPLUS/(DEFICIT) (814,844) (920,665) 105,821 (1,423,389) (1,423,389) 0

TOTAL CASH GENERATED (816,725) (922,425) 105,700 (1,426,029) (1,426,029) 0

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 87 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL - February 2018

Summary Operating Statement Infrastructure Services YTD YTD YTD Annual Forecast Forecast Actuals Budget Variance Budget Budget Variance

Income Rates 3,187,168 3,132,000 55,168 3,140,000 3,180,000 40,000 Income Levies 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Statutory Fees & Fines 0 640 (640) 960 960 0 User Fees 25,674 19,200 6,474 28,800 28,800 0 Grants Recurrent 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Contributions - Cash 18,000 0 18,000 10,000 10,000 0 Reimbursements 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Other Income 209,970 253,600 (43,630) 472,400 472,400 0 Internal Charges Income 162,000 112,000 50,000 168,000 168,000 0 Transfers Income 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Total Income 3,602,812 3,517,440 85,372 3,820,160 3,860,160 40,000

Expenses Employee Costs 3,190,753 3,227,259 36,506 4,366,230 4,366,230 0 Expenses Levies 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loan Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 Materials and Services 3,155,076 3,117,216 (37,860) 4,648,513 4,648,513 0 Other Expenses 75,607 120,620 45,013 145,480 125,480 20,000 Internal Charges Expense 298,879 263,664 (35,215) 395,500 395,500 0 Transfers Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenses 6,720,316 6,728,759 8,443 9,555,723 9,535,723 20,000

Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (3,117,503) (3,211,319) 93,816 (5,735,563) (5,675,563) 60,000

Depreciation 6,021,511 5,946,200 (75,311) 8,923,800 9,023,800 (100,000) Loss/(Profit) on Disposal of Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Net Operating Surplus/(Deficit) before: (9,139,014) (9,157,519) 18,505 (14,659,363) (14,699,363) (40,000)

Interest 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Dividends 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Share of Profits/(Losses) of Invest. In Assoc 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Investment Copping 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (9,139,014) (9,157,519) 18,505 (14,659,363) (14,699,363) (40,000)

Grants Capital 0 0 (0) - 0 0 Contributions - Non Monetory Assets 0 0 (0) - 0 0 Initial Recognition of Infrastructure Assets 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 NET SUPRPLUS/(DEFICIT) (9,139,014) (9,157,519) 18,505 (14,659,363) (14,699,363) (40,000)

TOTAL CASH GENERATED (15,160,525) (15,103,719) (56,806) (23,583,163) (23,723,163) (140,000)

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 88 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TO 28/02/2017

Budget Actual IMG Carry Grants Commit- 2017/18 Adjustment Total Actual Total Remaining Forward Received ments s

EXPENDITURE BY ASSET TYPE Roads 3,950,108 4,799,000 200,000 (465,538) 8,483,570 5,168,829 643,399 5,812,228 2,671,342 Stormwater 1,091,850 1,741,400 - 931 2,834,181 716,509 483,683 1,200,191 1,633,990 Property 1,309,658 1,014,750 346,786 675,400 3,346,594 907,123 524,050 1,431,173 1,915,421 Other 461,325 626,758 - (205,793) 882,290 84,860 231,719 316,579 565,711 Sub total 6,812,941 8,181,908 546,786 5,000 15,546,635 6,877,320 1,882,851 8,760,171 6,786,464

Kingston Park - 10,000,000 - - 10,000,000 586,000 2,750,131 3,336,131 6,663,869 Grant total 6,812,941 18,181,908 546,786 5,000 25,546,635 7,463,320 4,632,982 12,096,302 13,450,333

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 89 26 March 2018

CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURE BY YTD CATEGORY COMPARED TO BUDGET CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TO 28/02/2017

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 90 26 March 2018

KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TO 28/02/2017

Budget Actual Capital Carry Grants Rec. On costs IMG Commit- Project No. Description Department Forward 2017/18 POS Funding allocated Adjustments Total Actual ments Total Remaining Overall Project budget Kingston Park - 10,000,000 - 10,000,000 - - - 10,000,000 C00688 KP Boulevard Construction Kingston Park - - - - 30,085 - 30,085 (30,085) C00689 KP Promenade Design Kingston Park - - - - 424 - 424 (424) C00690 KP Community Hub Design Kingston Park - - - - 153,606 76,524 230,130 (230,130) C01614 Central Kingston Rd Design Kingston Park - - - - 44,920 - 44,920 (44,920) C01618 Boulevard Construction Kingston Park - - - - 179,158 2,628,607 2,807,765 (2,807,765) C01627 KP Site - Land Release Strategy Kingston Park - - - - 63,774 63,774 (63,774) C01628 KP Site - General Expenditure Kingston Park - - - - 19,779 19,779 (19,779) C03068 Kingston Park Operational Expenditure Kingston Park - - - - 43,838 45,000 88,838 (88,838) C03069 KP Community Hub Construction Kingston Park - - - - 50,413 - 50,413 (50,413) - 10,000,000 - - 10,000,000 586,000 2,750,131 3,336,131 6,663,869

C01375 Kingston Beach Hall Courtyard Upgrade Property 13,274 - 11,000 - 24,274 21,972 21,972 2,302 C01600 Civic Centre Renovations Property - - - - 63 - 63 (63) C01608 25A Osborne Esplanade Toilet Replacement Property - - - - 16,688 34,800 51,488 (51,488) C01611 Cat Facility Bruny Island Property 32,797 - - 32,797 1,749 - 1,749 31,048 C01612 Depot Dog Pound Waste System Property 10,170 - - 10,170 7,055 7,100 14,155 (3,985) C02313 KSC LED Light Upgrade Property 39,141 - 76,891 - 116,032 86,924 86,924 29,108 C02332 Alonnah New Toilet Block Property 126,716 - - 126,716 104,264 (1) 104,263 22,453 C02343 Kingston Beach Hall Upgrade Property 48,500 - - 48,500 41,971 - 41,971 6,529 C03001 Hall Acoustics - Dennes Point Hall Property - 10,000 - 10,000 - - - 10,000 C03002 Margate Hall Floor Replacement Property - 11,000 5,400 16,400 11,162 - 11,162 5,238 C03003 Sports Ground Lighting - Kingston Beach Property - 180,000 45,000 225,000 2,288 210,224 212,512 12,488 C03004 KSC Level 2 Men's Shower Room Upgrade Property - 143,750 - 143,750 68,727 66,064 134,791 8,959 C03005 Coningham Toilet Block Replacement Property - 175,000 - 175,000 1,595 - 1,595 173,405 C03006 Sandfly Hall Toilets - Wastewater Replacement Property - 15,000 - 15,000 20,090 20,090 (5,090) C03007 Kingston Beach Oval Gymnasium Extension Property - 60,000 10,000 10,000 80,000 9,039 52,520 61,559 18,441 C03009 Cricket Net Replacement - Woodbridge Oval Property - 33,000 - 33,000 43,923 43,923 (10,923) C03047 Tracks & Trails Assessment Property - 15,000 - 15,000 622 - 622 14,378 C03067 Depot Security Upgrade Property - - 14,835 14,835 14,835 - 14,835 - C03071 Depot Improvements 17/18 Property - 60,000 (14,835) 45,165 29,744 29,856 59,600 (14,435) C01133 Snug to Margate Cycleway Property 3,549 - - 3,549 4,757 15,837 20,594 (17,045) C01182 Margate to Snug shared path Property 686,286 - - 686,286 34,142 1,363 35,505 650,781 C03082 Kingston Beach Oval Cricket Net replacement Property - - 49,000 - 49,000 - - - 49,000 960,433 702,750 146,891 60,400 1,870,474 521,609 417,763 939,372 931,102

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 91 26 March 2018

Budget Actual Capital Carry Grants Rec. On costs IMG Commit- Project No. Description Department Forward 2017/18 POS Funding allocated Adjustments Total Actual ments Total Remaining C00613 Purchase IT Equipment IT - - - - 12,200 - 12,200 (12,200) C00672 Digital Local Government Program IT 82,715 - - 82,715 15,197 15,197 67,518 C00686 Records Management System Upgrade IT 6,488 - - 6,488 - - - 6,488 C01601 Civic Centre Card Security System IT 12,000 - - 12,000 12,512 - 12,512 (512) C01602 Financial Systems Replacement IT 316,122 - - 316,122 8,293 204,703 212,996 103,126 C01625 Epathway Booking System IT ------C01626 Networkwing Switching Phone System IT 36,000 - - 36,000 33,164 - 33,164 2,836 C03070 Desktop PC Replacement IT - 252,000 - 252,000 1,377 24,463 25,840 226,160 453,325 252,000 - - 705,325 82,742 229,166 311,908 393,417

C01622 Investigation into Water Bores Bruny Isl Other 8,000 - - 8,000 1,218 2,553 3,771 4,229 C03076 Dennes Point Land Acquisition Land - - 900 - 900 (900) C03077 Maddocks Road land acquisition Land - - - - - 8,000 - - - 8,000 2,118 2,553 4,671 3,329

C90003 Design/survey for future works Design - 50,000 - 50,000 - - - 50,000 C01629 Future Capital Works Design - - - - 54,692 - 54,692 (54,692) C03063 Parish Lane - Reconstruction & Sealing Design - - - - 2,018 - 2,018 (2,018) C03065 Beach Rd - Church St to Roslyn Ave Footpath Widen Design - - - - 6,001 - 6,001 (6,001) C03066 Talone Avenue - Reconstruction Design - - - - 10,969 - 10,969 (10,969) - 50,000 - - 50,000 73,679 - 73,679 (23,679)

C02317 Adventure Bay Foreshore Path Reserves 2,920 - - 2,920 2,226 - 2,226 694 C02334 Blackmans Bay Skate Park Upgrade Reserves - - - - 1,340 1,340 (1,340) C02335 Cottage Rd To Kingston Wetlands walking Reserves 10,000 - - 10,000 4,581 - 4,581 5,419 C02342 Kingston Beach Swing Set Reserves 5,553 - - 5,553 7,686 7,686 (2,133) C03008 Lightwood Park - New soccer Training Ground Reserves - 312,000 - 312,000 237,306 20,855 258,161 53,839 C03073 Blackmans Bay Playground Development Reserves 199,895 - 199,895 23,634 57,783 81,417 118,478 C03075 KSC Water Connection Upgrades Reserves 615,000 615,000 81,776 19,149 100,925 514,075 18,473 312,000 199,895 615,000 1,145,368 358,549 97,787 456,336 689,032

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 92 26 March 2018

Budget Actual Capital Carry Grants Rec. On costs IMG Commit- Project No. Description Department Forward 2017/18 POS Funding allocated Adjustments Total Actual ments Total Remaining C00294 North West Bay Bridge Upgrade Bridges 66,640 - - 66,640 77,844 - 77,844 (11,204) C01089 Summerleas Rd/Leslie Rd Junction Squaring Roads - - - - 13,485 - 13,485 (13,485) C01082 Dru Point Seawall & Road Widening Roads 1,161,493 - - 1,161,493 1,104,990 92,192 1,197,183 (35,690) C01142 Beach Rd Margate Rehab Roads - - - - 8,022 - 8,022 (8,022) C01153 Kingston Beach Master Plan - Stage 5 Roads - - - - 79,030 79,030 (79,030) C01158 Powell Rd - Footpath/Drainage Improvement Roads 1,208,278 - - 1,208,278 604,606 5,861 610,467 597,811 C01163 Pelverata Rd/Sandfly Rd Junction reseal Roads - - - - 1,468 1,468 (1,468) C01171 Tingira Road Safety Improvements Roads 23,963 - - 23,963 7,728 7,728 16,235 C01173 Kunama Drive Upgrade vic19-49 Roads 459,303 - - 459,303 381,291 7,069 388,360 70,943 C01174 Old Station Upgrade Ch0-418 Roads 177,000 - - 177,000 169,768 169,768 7,232 C01177 Beach Road Margate Upgrade vic Roads - - - - 618 - 618 (618) C01183 Beach Road Upgrade vic Motel Roads - - - - 523 - 523 (523) C01185 Hutchins Street Reseal vic48-72 Roads ------C01187 Roslyn Avenue RAB Reseal vic 93 Roads - - 826 - 826 (826) C01190 Kiama Place Reseal vic12-18 Roads ------C01191 Kiama Place Reseal vic1-11 Roads ------C01192 Tingira Road Reseal vic2-30 Roads ------C01193 Burwood Road Reseal vic1-21 Roads ------C01196 Summerleas Road Reseal vic208-260 Roads ------C02101 Tinderbox Road-gravel resheeting Roads - - - - 2,631 - 2,631 (2,631) C02106 Kingston Bch Foreshore Esp 30-32 Roads 702,815 - 90,000 792,815 751,124 - 751,124 41,691 C02108 Summerleas Rd - 354 Onwards Roads 100,000 - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 C02109 Whitewater Creek Walkway Bridge Replacem Roads 10,686 - - 10,686 10,221 10,221 465 C02110 Channel Hwy vic Oakleigh Ave Roads 22,000 - - 22,000 23,800 - 23,800 (1,800) C02112 Summerleas Rd Protect Embank Roads 7,897 - - 7,897 3,925 3,925 3,972 C02113 Pavement Protection Roads - - - - 4,757 - 4,757 (4,757) C03010 Kelvedon Avenue Turning Facility Roads - 45,000 55,462 100,462 23,236 78,500 101,736 (1,274) C03011 Redwood Road to Willow Avenue Lane Upgrade Roads - 15,000 (5,000) 10,000 9,449 79 9,528 472 C03012 Tinderbox Beach and Reserve Upgrade Roads - 250,000 - 250,000 3,860 - 3,860 246,140 C03013 Pearl Place to Opal Drive Footpath Upgrade Roads - 20,000 9,000 29,000 28,880 192 29,072 (72) C03014 Oxleys Road Sealing-Channel Hwy to Groombridge Roads - 540,000 - 540,000 47,901 4,882 52,783 487,217 Rd C03015 Morris Avenue Rehabilitation Roads - 350,000 - 350,000 14,389 - 14,389 335,611 C01176 Blanche Avenue Reconstruction Roads 6,969 - - 6,969 8,796 - 8,796 (1,827) C03016 Blanche Avenue Reconstruction Roads - 260,000 - 260,000 74,254 94,084 168,338 91,662 C03017 Palmers Road Junction Safety Improvements Roads - 30,000 - 30,000 3,949 - 3,949 26,051 C03018 Mountain Road Rehabilitation Roads - 350,000 - 350,000 124,586 29,760 154,346 195,654 C03019 Brightwater Road renewal and stormwater Roads - 495,000 (463,000) 32,000 2,358 - 2,358 29,642 C03020 Great Bay Boatramp Upgrade and Improvements Bridges - 40,000 - 40,000 15,246 - 15,246 24,754 C01143 Pelverata Rd Upgrade Roads 3,064 - - 3,064 27,323 6,493 33,815 (30,751) C03021 Pelverata Road Upgrade Roads - 250,000 - 250,000 186,643 39,460 226,103 23,897 C03048 Lighthouse Rd Upgrade - Blackspot Grant Roads - - 200,000 - 200,000 39,901 22,771 62,672 137,328 C03062 Kingston Beach - Beach Rd to Victoria St Foreshore Roads - - - - 552 - 552 (552) C03064 John Street Kingston - Reconstruction Roads - - - - 26,008 - 26,008 (26,008) C03074 Resurfacing Beach Road, Margate Roads - - 98,000 98,000 51,234 51,234 46,766 C90004 Geotechnical investigation for future works Other - 50,000 - 50,000 - - - 50,000 C90005 Works necessitated by development - Roads Other - 50,000 (6,350) 43,650 - - - 43,650 ______

Agenda No. 6 Page 93 26 March 2018

Budget Actual Capital Carry Grants Rec. On costs IMG Commit- Project No. Description Department Forward 2017/18 POS Funding allocated Adjustments Total Actual ments Total Remaining C03079 Tanina News footpath extension Roads - - 6,350 6,350 6,073 - 6,073 277 C90006 Access ramps Roads - 10,000 - 10,000 - - - 10,000 - C90002 2017/18 Resheeting Program Roads - 844,000 (844,000) - - - - - C03043 Killora Rd Resheeting Roads - - 102,000 102,000 82,070 12,397 94,466 7,534 C03044 Cemetery Road Bruny Resheeting Roads - - 109,000 109,000 32,883 61,950 94,833 14,167 C03045 Old Station Road Resheeting Roads - - 210,000 210,000 188,689 - 188,689 21,311 C03059 Risby Road Resheeting - 20 to 2490 Roads 149,000 149,000 98,898 33,189 132,086 16,914 C03060 McKenzies Road Resheeting - 27 to 2011 Roads - - 120,000 120,000 27,679 - 27,679 92,321 C03061 Krauses Road Resheeting - 10 to 2570 Roads - - 154,000 154,000 56,581 10,579 67,160 86,840 C03084 Besters/Clark Road resheeting Roads ------C90001 2017/18 Resealing Program Roads - 1,150,000 (1,150,000) - - - - - C01186 Coolamon Road Reseal Ch0-100 Roads ------C03046 Nierinna Road Resealing Roads - - 244,000 244,000 100,710 136,593 237,303 6,697 C03049 Roslyn Avenue Resealing - 1573 to 1805 Roads 54,000 54,000 59,336 3,354 62,690 (8,690) C03050 Summerleas Rd Resealing - 1071 to 1451 Roads 105,000 105,000 92,836 - 92,836 12,164 C03051 Redwood Road Resealing - 6 to 510 Roads - - 167,000 167,000 174,837 174,837 (7,837) C03052 Maddock Street Resealing - 1 to 10 Roads 4,000 4,000 - - - 4,000 C03053 Hiern Street Resealing - 0 to 567 Roads - - 141,000 141,000 130,568 - 130,568 10,432 C03054 Nansen Court Resealing - 0 to 138 Roads 35,000 35,000 30,748 30,748 4,252 C03055 Maranoa Road Resealing - Heavy Roads 9,000 9,000 949 - 949 8,051 Patching C03056 Denison Street Reasealing - Heavy Roads 20,000 20,000 - - - 20,000 Patching C03057 Browns Road Reasealing - Heavy Patching Roads ------C03058 Opal Drive Resealing - 16 to 22 Roads 20,000 20,000 - - - 20,000 C03080 Frost St, Snug - Heavy Patching Roads 65,000 65,000 64,190 - 64,190 810 C03081 Charlton St, Snug - Heavy Patching Roads 36,000 36,000 12,882 3,996 16,878 19,122

3,950,108 4,749,000 200,000 (465,538) 8,433,570 5,095,150 643,399 5,738,549 2,695,021

C00693 Barretta Site Office Solid Waste - - - - 63 - 63 (63) C01604 BWTS Tip Shop Extension Solid Waste 27,277 - - 27,277 5,789 - 5,789 21,488 C01609 Barretta Landfill Gas Extraction Ext Solid Waste 218,049 - - 218,049 8,818 8,500 17,318 200,731 C01610 BWTS Re-Use Shop Fencing Solid Waste 77,426 - - 77,426 - - - 77,426 C01619 KWS Security Camera Upgrade Solid Waste - - - - 2,185 - 2,185 (2,185) C01620 KWS Green Waste Area Roadworks Solid Waste 8,000 - - 8,000 10,110 10,110 (2,110) 330,752 - - - 330,752 26,965 8,500 35,465 295,287

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 94 26 March 2018

Budget Actual Capital Carry Grants Rec. On costs IMG Commit- Project No. Description Department Forward 2017/18 POS Funding allocated Adjustments Total Actual ments Total Remaining C00509 Coffee Creek WSUD Treatment Stormwater - - - - 132 - 132 (132) C00540 Coningham Stormwater Pgrm-Stage 2 Stormwater - - - - 2,925 - 2,925 (2,925) C00560 Denehey/Hackford Drainage Upgrade Stormwater - - - - 237 - 237 (237) C00561 Kingston Beach Flood Study Stormwater 7,945 - - 7,945 - 9,615 9,615 (1,670) C00570 Dulcia Rd SW Upgrade Stormwater - - - - 472 - 472 (472) C00580 4 Tanina Mews SW Design Stormwater 30,155 - - 30,155 - - - 30,155 C00584 Beach Rd Middleton SW Upgrade Stormwater 55,540 - - 55,540 92,336 - 92,336 (36,796) C00586 Pearsall Ave SW Upgrade Stormwater - - - - 69 - 69 (69) C00587 Taronga Rd SW Upgrade St 2 Stormwater 54,666 - - 54,666 40,532 - 40,532 14,134 C00589 Illawarra Rd SW Upgrade St 2 Stormwater 510,000 - - 510,000 199,873 14,956 214,829 295,171 C00590 Flood Gauge Stormwater 64,360 - - 64,360 7,558 58,100 65,658 (1,298) C00593 Tinderbox Reserve Master Plan S1 Stormwater 39,150 - - 39,150 752 7,660 8,412 30,738 C00595 Blackmans Bay MDS Stormwater - - - - 376 - 376 (376) C00597 Kingston Beach MDS Stormwater - - - - 1,846 - 1,846 (1,846) C00598 Snug Flood Study Stormwater 28,216 - - 28,216 43,600 10,000 53,600 (25,384) C01382 Margate Esplanade Coastal Erosion Stormwater - - - - 493 - 493 (493) C01500 Adventure Bay Flood Study Stormwater 10,000 - - 10,000 24 - 24 9,976 C02102 Margate Espl Rd Stabilisation Stormwater 291,818 - - 291,818 15,842 344,252 360,094 (68,276) C02103 Nebraska Rd Stabilisation Stormwater - - - - 1,202 - 1,202 (1,202) C03022 Coffee Creek Channel Stabilisation - Stage 2 Stormwater - 101,600 - 101,600 8,401 - 8,401 93,199 C03023 Tyndall Beach Erosion Stabilisation Stormwater - 111,000 - 111,000 1,647 - 1,647 109,353 C03024 Blowhole Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 57,000 - 57,000 14,468 - 14,468 42,532 C03025 Aberys Road (Vic 7) Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 28,000 - 28,000 16,538 156 16,694 11,306 C03026 Algona Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 289,000 - 289,000 8,128 - 8,128 280,872 C03027 Andersons Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 36,000 - 36,000 34,179 1,335 35,515 485 C03028 Moodys Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 32,000 - 32,000 33,400 - 33,400 (1,400) C03029 Besters & Clarks Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 50,000 - 50,000 31,652 - 31,652 18,348 C03030 Channel Highway (vic HN 4515) Stormwater Stormwater - 24,000 - 24,000 17,694 1,550 19,244 4,756 Upgrade C03031 Hopfields Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 7,800 (7,568) 232 410 - 410 (178) C03032 23 Combes Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 15,000 - 15,000 10,146 160 10,306 4,694 C03033 Kaoota Road Drainage Upgrade Stormwater - 65,000 - 65,000 47,505 3,345 50,850 14,150 C03034 Pelverata Road (vic HN240) Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 33,000 - 33,000 33,198 1,059 34,257 (1,257) C03035 Kingston Village Dam Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 41,000 - 41,000 5,681 - 5,681 35,319 C03036 Frosts/Van Morey Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 34,000 - 34,000 1,690 - 1,690 32,310 C03037 Whitewater Creek Stabilisation Stormwater - 109,000 - 109,000 5,838 - 5,838 103,162 C03038 School Creek Inlet Works Stormwater - 41,000 - 41,000 1,233 - 1,233 39,767 C03039 Chandlers Road Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - 15,000 (13,501) 1,499 1,568 - 1,568 (69) C03040 Nebraska Road Stabilisation Stormwater - 408,000 - 408,000 3,900 11,100 15,000 393,000 C03041 Drysdale Creek Channel Stabilisation Stormwater - 66,000 - 66,000 2,513 - 2,513 63,487 C03042 Culvert Improvements Adventure Bay Road Stormwater - 48,000 - 48,000 7,029 20,189 27,218 20,782 C90008 Stormwater Master Drainage Scheme Development Stormwater - 80,000 - 80,000 - - - 80,000 C90007 Works necessitated by development - Stormwater Stormwater - 50,000 (28,000) 22,000 - - - 22,000 C03078 Dallas Ave Stormwater Upgrade Stormwater - - 28,000 28,000 21,425 205 21,630 6,370 C03083 Huon Road Culvert Repair (vic 1122) Stormwater - - 22,000 22,000 - - - 22,000 1,091,850 1,741,400 - 931 2,834,181 716,509 483,683 1,200,191 1,633,990

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 95 26 March 2018

TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 6,812,941 18,181,908 546,786 - 5,000 25,546,635 7,463,320 4,632,982 12,096,302 13,450,333

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 96 26 March 2018

MINUTES

Kingborough Road Safety Committee

Meeting No. 2018-1

Wednesday 24 January 2018

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 97 26 March 2018

MINUTES of a Meeting of the Kingborough Road Safety Committee (KRSC) held at the Kingborough Civic Centre, Kingston, on Wednesday 24 January 2018 at 9:00a.m.

PRESENT

PRESENT APOLOGY Chairperson Cr Paul Chatterton  Members: Community Representatives Mr Neil Broomfield  Mr Henry De Cesare  Mr Michael Hughes  (left at 10a.m.) Mr Peter Leschen  Ms Rae Wells  Kingborough Access Committee RACT Mr Will Oakley/ Ms Ali Tope Kingborough Bicycle Advisory Mr Richard Langman  Committee Tasmania Police Sgt Rebecca Davis  Kingborough Community & Police Mr Bill Brundle  Liaison Group Council Officers In Attendance: Executive Assistant Ms Julie Summerfield 

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

No leave of absences were recorded.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

There were no declarations of interest.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

MOVED: Bill Brundle SECONDED: Michael Hughes

That the Minutes of the Committee meeting held on 6 December 2017, as circulated be confirmed. Carried

BUSINESS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES

Media and Communications

The RSAC campaign ‘Drive Safe’ was officially launched 18 December 2017, which Kingborough Council shared across social media.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 98 26 March 2018

Tasmania Police’s ‘Operation Crossroads’, concentrating on the fatal five, was in effect 22 December – 1 January. Kingborough was fatality free over that period.

Campaign Planning

The 2018 KRSC Communications and Engagement Plan was discussed. The Executive Assistant to compile a second draft of the plan as per items agreed upon and distribute to members out of session for comment. The current focus will be children back at school.

Kingborough Community and Police Liaison Group Minutes

The 18 October 2017 minutes were noted.

CORRESPONDENCE

Inwards

Letter from Garry Bailey responding to KRSC correspondence of 24 October 2017 (attached).

Outwards

There was no outwards correspondence.

GENERAL BUSINESS

 Richard Langman raised concerns regarding headlight use in daylight and non- compliant tinted windows on vehicles.

 It was noted there has not been a regular RACT presence at meetings.

 Meeting dates for the year was discussed. The Executive Assistant to contact members out of session about altering the March 2018 meeting.

 Peter Leschen and Henry de Cesare will compile ideas for a piece to be included in the next edition of the Kingborough News. Tasmania Police to provide information including statistics. It was noted that material is to be relevant to the Kingborough area.

MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

There were no matters of general interest.

NEXT MEETING

The next meeting of the Committee will be advised out of session.

CLOSURE: There being no further business, the Chairperson declared the meeting closed at 10:06a.m.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 99 26 March 2018

Kingborough Community and Police Liaison Group Minutes of Meeting 10:30am Wednesday 18th October 2017

Attendance: Brian Dale Chairman Robyn Barratt Community Member Dean Winter Councillor, Kingborough Council Roger McGinniss Community Member Bill Brundle Kingston Beach Neil Broomfield Kingston Road Safety Council Alice Norris Minute Taker, Kingston Police Station

Apologies: David Wiss Divisional Inspector, Kingston Police Station Anne Kingston Kingston High School Rod Street Business Owner (retired) Ron Franks Crime Stoppers Ross Thomas Kingborough Community Enterprise Centre Inc.

Meeting opened at 10:30am by Chairman Dale

Chairman Dale extended a warm welcome to all present.

The Minutes of the previous meeting as circulated were accepted without change.

Moved: Neil Broomfield Seconded: Dean Winter All in favour Carried

BUSINESS ARISING:

- Blackmans Bay Shopping Centre signage has not been changed as previous thought.

IN-GOING CORRESPONDENCE:

- Correspondence received from Ron Franks from Crime Stoppers in response to Brian Dale’s invitation to become regular meeting member. Ron will attend as many meetings as possible. All members in agreeance that Crime Stoppers come on board. - Correspondence received from Kingborough Council in relation to Safety Communities Fund open for grant applications. - Email received from Ross Thomas in regards to the community funding.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 100 26 March 2018

OUT-GOING CORRESPONDENCE:

- Email to Ron Franks inviting him to become a regular member of the Kingston Community and Police Liaison Group.

CRIME REPORT:

The following statistics show the number of offences reported for the entire 2017-18 year compared to the 2016 – 2017 year. (Please note these figures also include Huonville)

2016 - 17 2017 - 18 Change

Total Offences 300 287 -13 -4.3%

Serious Crime 9 12 +3 +33.3%

Offences Against the Person 60 54 -6 -10.0%

Public Place Assault 11 10 -1 -9.1%

Offences Against Property 218 216 -2 -0.9%

Property Damage Offences 42 25 -17 -40.5%

Building Burglary Offences 50 37 -13 -26.0%

- Home Burglary Offences 25 16 -9 -36.0%

- Business Burglary Offences 11 8 -3 -27.3%

- Other Building Burglary Offences 14 13 -1 -7.1%

Conveyance Burglary Offences 15 8 -7 -46.7%

- Car Burglary Offences 15 11 -4 -26.7%

- Other Conveyance Burglary

Offences

Stolen Motor Vehicle Offences 10 6 -4 -40.0%

SMVs Recovered 4 2 -2 -50%

Fraud and Similar Offences 13 10 -3 -23.1%

Other (Misc Offences) 9 7 -2 -22.2%

The figures shown for serious crime have increased due to the fact that these include charges of Arson and as reported in the media recently there has been a number of arson matters within the Kingston Division. All arson matters have been investigated and offenders have been identified and charges laid with the exception of the incident in the last few days which is currently under investigation by Kingston CIB.

Neil raised concern in relation to the 50% decrease in recovered stolen motor vehicles, but when figures were given the decrease is understandable.

Police will continue to monitor crime levels and maintain patrols and police presence in the Kingborough area.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 101 26 March 2018

Brian enquired in relation to the article published in the Kingborough Chronicle about the Northern Roslyn Avenue area parking issue. The Chronicle stated that cars were legally allowed to park on both sides of the road provided there was a 3 metre gap for traffic to flow. The Chronicle had stated that police had confirmed these details as correct. Ross Thomas had sent an email inquiring in relation to some scams that were currently doing the rounds. One scam involves the emailing out of fake Traffic Infringement Notices. Police are aware of this scam and have done several media releases in relation to this. If you have any doubts contact your nearest police station. The second scam involves someone advertising on Facebook that they have wood for sale. Payment is supplied for the wood but wood is never supplied.

Safer Communities Funding. Brian put forward the idea that the group apply in conjunction with the Kingborough Council for grants to be used for installing of CCTV cameras in the Kingston area. Meeting to be organised with Brian, Dean and Daniel Smee with Inspector Wiss to discuss further. Ideas for locations of camera include Channel Court, Blackmans Bay Skate Park. If anyone has any further suggestions for locations, email details to Brian Dale before Wednesday 24th October.

The ongoing issues at the Blackmans Bay skate park were raised. Anti-social behaviour continues in the area. Robyn reported an incident where youths were acting suspiciously on the roof of the hall. Robyn told the youths to get down and was abused. A nearby worker stepped in and told the youths to get off the roof which they then did.

Road Safety

Nothing to report, all issues are currently pending.

Neil raised the issue of Hooning and in the Kingborough area becoming an epidemic. Neil suggested engaging the community more. The idea was raised to use drones to be able to get details of offending vehicles.

Brian will be replacing Bill at the next meeting Road Safety Meeting in December.

Roger requested that he get copies of the minutes from the Road Safety Meeting. Bill to speak with Julie Summerville to organise.

GENERAL BUSINESS:

In relation to the Council engaging to help promote Crime Stoppers. Sarah has just returned from leave, Dean to speak with Sarah and report back at next meeting.

Ross was not at the meeting to report back as to the progression of issues with youths congregating in the area outside the Kingston Library. Carry over to the next meeting to see if issues have been resolved.

Dean Winter reports that a ‘Park in Protest’ has been organises for Sunday 29th October between 2:00pm and 4:00pm on the North Roslyn Avenue to raise the concerns of parking and the safety and traffic management impact that has. Copy of letter to be emailed to Alice Norris for circulation to appropriate police personnel. Dean reports that a traffic management review was conducted in 2008 and again recently. The same volume of traffic is using Roslyn Avenue now as was in 2008. The Kingston Bypass has made an improvement, however with population increases etc. this has levelled out the improved affect the bypass has had.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 102 26 March 2018

Dean raised matter of hooning in Redwood Village area. A letter had been received by the Major from Ms Julie Collins following a complaint to her from a resident in the Redwood Village area. Letter to be taken back to Kingston Police and a response to be prepared by Inspector Wiss.

Crayfish season is coming up and request has been made to police for increased checks on vehicles and boats coming back in from the water at boat ramps in the Kingston area. Ongoing issues with craypots being pulled and the crayfish being stolen before fisherman go out to collect their personal pots. Alice assured members of meeting that Marine Services carried out checks as well as local police, especially those in areas such as Bruny Island, Woodbridge etc.

Brian has sent out an email to all members of the meeting in relation to the new rules regarding cyclists. Brian asked if police would be actively enforcing the new laws.

Meeting closed at 11.10am

The next meeting of the KC&PLG will be held on

Wednesday 12th December commencing at 10:30am at the Civic Centre, Kingborough Council Chambers

Please Note:

Northern Roslyn Avenue – Inspector David Wiss confirms that providing that there is a 3 metres of road that is clear for other vehicles to pass, vehicles are legally allowed to park on both sides of the road.

Firewood Scam – Following conversations with Kingston CIB, no reports have been received in the Kingston area of this scam. Police would like to take the opportunity to reiterate that payment upon delivery should always be followed when making any purchase including on line.

In relation to the new laws regarding cyclists - if a complaint is received by police it will be investigated or if members of the public are observed to be doing dangerous or illegal activities they will be spoken to by police and the appropriate action taken.

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 103 26 March 2018

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 104 26 March 2018

CONFIRMATION OF ITEMS TO BE DEALT WITH IN CLOSED SESSION

MOVED SECONDED

That in accordance with Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 the following items are to be dealt with in Closed Session.

Heading Reference Applications for Leave of Absence 15(2)(h) Tender Assessment - TS2366 Morris Avenue Reconstruction, 15(2)(d) Taroona Tender Assessment - TS2707 Oxleys Road Pave and Seal, 15(2)(d) Kettering

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

CLOSED SESSION

MOVED SECONDED

That in accordance with Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 that Council move into Closed Session.

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

In accordance with the Kingborough Council Meetings Audio Recording Guidelines Policy, recording of the open session of the meeting will now cease.

Open Session of Council adjourned at

OPEN SESSION OF COUNCIL ADJOURNS

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 105 26 March 2018

OPEN SESSION OF COUNCIL RESUMES

Open Session of Council resumed at

MOVED SECONDED

The Closed Session of Council having met and dealt with its business resolves to report that it has determined the following:

Heading Decision Applications for Leave of Absence Tender Assessment - TS2366 Morris Avenue Reconstruction, Taroona Tender Assessment - TS2707 Oxleys Road Pave and Seal, Kettering

Name For Against Name For Against Cr Atkinson Cr Grace Cr Bastone Cr Percey Cr Dr Bury Cr Wass Cr Chatterton Cr Winter Cr Fox Cr Wriedt

CLOSURE

There being no further business, the Chairperson declared the meeting closed at

...... (Confirmed) (Date)

______

Agenda No. 6 Page 106 26 March 2018