DOCSLIB.ORG

International Perspectives on Aid Effectiveness [PDF,2MB]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Perspectives on Aid Effectiveness [PDF,2MB] The Network The Development Studies Network provides information and discussion on social and economic development issues. It publishes a quarterly journal, Development Bulletin, runs regular seminars on development policy and annual conferences on international development. Members of the Network are encouraged to contribute information and papers to the Development Bulletin. Subscription to the Development Bulletin includes membership of the Network. This allows you to publicise in the Development Bulletin information about new development-related books, papers, journals, courses or conferences. Being a member of the Network allows you special discounts to Network seminars and conferences. Network Office Bearers National Patron Advisory Board The Right Honourable Mr Ian Sinclair Dr John Browett, Dean, School of Social Sciences and Director Development Studies Centre, Flinders University Board of Directors Professor John Overton, Director, Development Studies Dr Pamela Thomas Centre, Massey University Associate Professor Joe Remenyi, Deakin University Dr Terry Hull, Director, Demography Program, Australian Professor Gavin Jones, Australian National University National University Dr Sharon Bessell, Australian National University Mr Bob McMullan, MP, Canberra Janet Hunt, Consultant Professor Mark McGillivray, World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University, Helsinki Editorial Board Dr Pamela Thomas, Managing Editor Professor Dick Bedford, University of Waikato Editor Professor Dean Forbes, Flinders University Dr Pamela Thomas Professor R. Gerard Ward, Australian National University Associate Editors Professor Cherry Gertzel, Curtin University Annabel Pengilley Professor Joe Remenyi, Deakin University (Book Review Editor) Correspondence Development Bulletin Development Studies Network Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Tel: 61 2 6125 2466, 61 2 6125 8257 Fax: 61 2 6125 9785 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://devnet.anu .edu .au ISSN 1035-1132 The Development Studies Network Editor's notes 3 Opening address Effective aid: A whole-of-government approach 5 The Hon. Chris Gallus MP Discussion Introduction: Summing up and the way forward - a retrospective 7 and prospective on aid effectiveness Geoffrey Fox en Features I , Reforming the structure of aid Aid effectiveness: Threats to the new 'consensus'? 11 Janet Hunt and Bill Morton Australian aid in the new millennium 16 c Satish Chand Poverty-efficient official development assistance 22 (]) Mark McGillivray and Simon Feeny A contrarian view on aid effectiveness 27 I , Tim Curtin Developing effective aid delivery frameworks within policy parameters 31 Annmaree O'Keejfe Donor harmonisation for improved aid effectiveness 35 c Michael Ulard Derek Sikua and Tony Banks Aid and partnerships: The effectiveness of relationships 41 john Overton and Donovan Storey 0 Negotiating alternative economic strategies for regional development 46 Kathryn Robinson, Katherine Gibson, Deirdre McKay and Andrew McWilliam Reviewing and reforming aid planning and practice A new framework for NGO effectiveness 51 Linda Kelly Investing in aid effectiveness: The contexts and challenges 57 for Australian NGOs Rhonda Chapman Evaluating aid: A process for reflection, learning and change 63 Meg Keen and Sango Mahanty Ten points for better monitoring and evaluation 68 Peter Ellis Faith in international development: Evaluating the effectiveness of 72 faith-based NGOs Linda Kurti, Anna Whelan and Anthony Zwi Case studies: Perspectives on practice Aid effectiveness and Australia's new interventionism in the Southwest Pacific 76 Sinclair Dinnen Aid to the Pacific: Challenge for change 81 Rodney Cole Judging success in a post-conflict environment- whose criteria? 85 Solomon Islands CPRF as a case study Marjorie Sullivan and judi Pattison Aid effectiveness in rural Papua New Guinea: A long-term perspective 90 R Michael Bourke A serious case of conditionality: The World Bank gets stuck in the 95 forests ofPNG Colin Filer Reaching the peak: Contrasting experiences for NGOs in Solomon Islands 100 en and Papua New Guinea I , Felicity Pascoe Women in East Timor: Health crisis and aid priorities 105 Lee Anne Henfry Measuring the effectiveness of aid for Nepali health 109 c Terence Murphy (]) Publications I , New books 113 Journals 116 Reports 117 c Resources Organisations and programs 119 0 Web resources 122 2 Does aid work and for whom? And how do you judge this? Small questions, but of enormous import, both to Australia's own interests, and, more importantly, to the people who are the recipients of aid. The Development Studies Network symposium, International Perspectives on Aid en Effectiveness, 24-25 June 2004, set out to find some answers. This was a landmark event in Australian development practice and theory. With our co-conveners, and assistance from the National Institute of Social Sciences and Law and AusAID, we (]) brought together leading academics, practitioners and policy makers to debate, discuss and dissect the issues. I , It soon became clear that the trend against conditionality and the big project has taken root across much of the sector. When people spoke about really effective aid, it was most often to small, flexibly designed, community-based and owned enterprises that they referred. 0 From a policy making perspective, the focus again was on in-line and in-country managers, and of the value of not only bringing their perspectives to the forefront, but the importance for policy makers of both receiving and acting on information from the bottom up, and on investing in the knowledge and skills of donor staff. Nevertheless, the differing perspectives at the symposium revealed that there is still vigorous debate z to be had on what constitutes the real catalyst for success in development, and that the hoary old free-trade infected, aid/growth dichotomy has life in it still. In this volume you will find a range of papers which reflect- and reflect upon­ these diverse views. Some provide theoretical and statistical analyses of how and why aid does and doesn't work. Others look closely at how donor policy is made, its strengths en and weaknesses. Then there are on-the-ground case studies, where aid in action is placed under the microscope and we are able to see in detail how projects really work in the field. We hope you will find these papers, the critiques and ideas therein, as useful and stimulating as we found the discussion and debate during the symposium. If you have a response, please contact us. We welcome comments and criticisms for inclusion in 0 the Viewpoint section of a future issue of Development Bulletin. Collaboration and support I ' This issue of Development Bulletin would not have been possible without support from • AusAID. Again, the ANU's National Institute of Social Sciences and Law has provided invaluable support. At the heart of the success of the symposium, however, were the contributions of our speakers and authors, whose tremendous expertise made the event, and, we trust, this edition of Development Bulletin, of such value and interest. Finally, mention must be made of a strong supporter, not just of the Aid Effectiveness symposium, but much of the work of the Development Studies Network over the last couple of years, that of the Hon. Chris Gallus MP, in her role as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Foreign Affairs. Ms Gallus's commitment, knowledge and abiding interest in promoting the efforts ofAustralian donors and the interests of the recipients of aid will be sorely missed. August 2004 3 Next Development Bulletin development, plus an international dialogue and issue of the In early September, the Network convenes a major international Development Bulletin which brings together ways to assist symposium that looks at the impacts of people trafficking development in 1imor-Leste. If you would like to contribute a through a development lens. A special issue of Development paper on any of these topics, please contact us. Bulletin will follow in late 2004, focusing on these issues. Also in the pipeline are issues on post-conflict reconstruction, Pamela Thomas innovations in community resources and indigenous Managing Editor ) ' 4 Development Bulletin 65 Effective aid: en A whole-of-government approach The Hon. Chris Gallus, MP en Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Foreign Affairs Q) Introduction ', This international symposium has attracted strong participation from regional governments, NGO partners and academia and is a credit to the Development Studies Network and its collaborators, the National Institute for Social Sciences arid Law, Massey University, New Zealand, and theN ational Museum ofAustralia. As we all know, successful collaboration is also the key to successfully delivering development assistance. Here, I wish to address the question ofcollaboration at the government level by explaining Australia's whole-of-government approach to delivery of development assistance and discussing some of the elements necessary for such an approach to be effective. The need for new approaches Globally, we have witnessed an evolution in thinking about aid and development, spurred by concern over continuing poverty levels in many parts of the world. Donors and developing countries are increasingly aware that development is a complex process dependent upon multiple factors. Good governance, security, and access to international markets and capital, are key among these. One
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oecd High Level Forum on Policy Coherence: Availability of Medicines for Neglected and Emerging Infectious Diseases Issues for D
    OECD HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON POLICY COHERENCE: AVAILABILITY OF MEDICINES FOR NEGLECTED AND EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION INTRODUCTION This paper provides background information and raises issues for consideration by participants in the OECD High Level Forum (HLF) on Policy Coherence: Availability of Medicines for Neglected and Emerging Infectious Diseases.1 What is the problem? Infectious diseases are one of the primary causes of mortality in the world and in developing countries they are a major barrier to economic development, social progress and human health. An estimated 10.8 million people died from infectious diseases in 2001 and 10.6 million of those occurred in the developing world, while only 1.4 percent (150,000) occurred in high-income countries. The top four killers in Sub-Saharan Africa are infectious diseases, and the fifth is prenatal deaths. Those most vulnerable are children, pregnant women, young mothers and people in what should be their most productive years. However, the health innovation system is failing to deliver new medicines, vaccines and diagnostics for neglected infectious diseases. These diseases include tuberculosis and malaria, but also tropical diseases such as Human African trypanosomiasis, leishmaniasis, schistosomiasis, Chagas disease, lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis. To date, most medicines used to deal with such diseases in developing countries were first developed for other markets or purposes. Problems arise related to cost, safety, stability, formulation and resistance. Mechanisms for addressing the lack of viable markets, expanding the global capacity for drug discovery, and increasing the productivity of R&D have to be found. What can we do? The Forum will focus on how to create co-operation, collaboration and coherent policies required to improve the incentives and efficiency of the innovation system to scale-up research and discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Aid Effectiveness in Kenya Volatility and Fragmentation of Foreign Aid, with a Focus on Health
    WOLFENSOHN CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT WORKING PAPER 8 | JANUARY 2009 A CASE STUDY OF AID EFFECTIVENESS IN KENYA VOLATILITY AND FRAGMENTATION OF FOREIGN AID, WITH A FOCUS ON HEALTH Francis M. Mwega The Brookings Global Economy and Development working paper series also includes the following titles: • Wolfensohn Center for Development Working Papers • Middle East Youth Initiative Working Papers • Global Health Initiative Working Papers Learn more at www.brookings.edu/global Francis M. Mwega is Associate Professor at the School of Economics at the University of Nairobi. Editor’s Note: This paper was commissioned by the Wolfensohn Center for Development at the Brookings Institution. This paper is one in a series of country case studies that examines issues of aid effectiveness and coordination at the country level. It does not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views of the Brookings Institution, its board or the advisory council members. For more information, please contact the Wolfensohn Center at [email protected]. CONTENTS Introduction . .1 Pattern and evolution of foreign aid to Kenya . 4 Total aid and its decompositions . 4 Country Programmable Aid (CPA) . 6 Emerging players in aid . 7 Chinese development assistance to Kenya . 7 Private sector aid . 10 Volatlitiy of Aid . 12 Extent of volatility of total aid and its components in Kenya . 12 The effects of aid cyclicality . 12 Government responses to aid volatility and decline over time . 14 Costs of volatility . .17 Fragmentation of Aid . 20 Aid fragmentation in Kenya . 21 Aid Coordination in Kenya . 24 Foreign Aid to Kenya’s Health Sector . 29 Pattern and evolution of aid to the health sector; its volatility and fragmentation .
    [Show full text]
  • The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
    CHAPTER 17 The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness Roberto Bissio* I. Introduction: the Paris which politicians and the press translate to the public Declaration is not a global as “aid”. partnership for development The United Nations Millennium Declaration adopted by Heads of State and Government in 2000 The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness was reaffirmed that “[they are] committed to making the adopted in 2005 and reaffirmed in Accra1 in 2008 right to development a reality for everyone and to at ministerial-level forums convened by the Organi- freeing the entire human race from want”.3 The com- sation for Economic Co-operation and Development mitments made at the Millennium Summit were later (OECD). The principles and indicators included in the summarized in the eight Millennium Development Paris Declaration frame what OECD calls a “land- Goals,4 all of them extracted or literally quoted from mark reform” in development cooperation2 endorsed the Millennium Declaration. Goal 8, Develop a global by leading development practitioners. The Paris Dec- partnership for development, spells out what devel- laration did not emerge from the United Nations or oped countries should do to enable developing coun- any of its bodies, but given the high level of support tries to achieve the other seven in a set of six targets: that the Declaration has received from the major bilat- eral donors and the active engagement of key multilat- • Target 8.A: develop further an open trading eral organizations such as the World Bank and OECD and financial system that is rule based, predict- itself in its implementation, it is important to analyse able and non-discriminatory, and that includes it from the point of view of the right to development.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Evidence of Aid Effectiveness in Global Health: the Case of the Global Fund
    Generating evidence of aid effectiveness in global health: the case of the Global Fund Katharine Heus MSc Global Health and Public Policy Abstract Global health has been identified as a ‘tracer-sector’ for advancement in regards to aid- effectiveness. This paper interrogates how evidence of aid effectiveness has been generated within one of the central, most resource-rich global health actors: The Global Fund to fight Tuberculosis, Aids and Malaria. Key terms are defined, processes for generating evidence of aid-effectiveness within both the public and global health arenas examined, and conclusions around the predominance of vertical interventions in the global health arena proposed. Ultimately, it is argued that the need for strategic and financial legitimacy has driven the Global Fund to generate very specific kinds of evidence of AE and that the Global Fund only generates the kind of evidence it can take. Generating Evidence of Aid Effectiveness in Global Health: The case of the Global Fund Katharine Heus Introduction In his seminal work on aid and development in Lesotho, Ferguson suggested that for the most part, the actors engaged in this highly diversified, multi-billion dollar ‘development’ undertaking “only sought the kind of advice they could take” (1994, p. 284). This comment reveals a quandary at the center of many contemporary debates around aid and development, largely – how can evidence of “aid effectiveness” (hereafter AE) be generated? In order to answer this question, it is necessary to interrogate not only how, but also why and for what purposes evidence is generated. The pivotal word in this phrase is ‘generated,’ for it reveals that evidence is, in and of itself, fundamentally constructed (Mosse, 2004; Justice, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Strengthened Framework for Aid Effectiveness
    BACKGROUND STUDY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FORUM Towards a strengthened framework for aid effectiveness April 2008 Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 2. Strengths and weaknesses of the Paris Declaration aid effectiveness model ....................... 2 3. Issues in a strengthened international framework for aid effectiveness............................... 4 4. Improving clarity and monitorability of indicators in the Paris Declaration ........................ 13 5. Transparency and inclusiveness of monitoring and mutual accountability ......................... 16 6. Recognising the implications of a more diverse set of actors .............................................. 17 7. From a technical to a political agenda.................................................................................. 21 8. Possible priorities for the DCF ‐ short and medium‐term .................................................... 22 9. Recommendations................................................................................................................ 24 1. Introduction 1. As part of the substantive preparations for the first biennial high‐level Development Cooperation Forum (DCF) in July 2008, the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations (UNDESA) is undertaking a review of recent trends and progress in international development cooperation. This review will inform the analytical report of the Secretary‐General,
    [Show full text]
  • From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: a Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants ISSN 1328-7478
    Department of the Parliamentary Library INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES •~J..>t~)~.J&~l<~t~& Research Paper No. 25 1998-99 From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: A Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants ISSN 1328-7478 © Copyright Commonwealth ofAustralia 1999 Except to the exteot of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department ofthe Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament in the course oftheir official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribntion to Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced,the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian govermnent document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staffbut not with members ofthe public. , ,. Published by the Department ofthe Parliamentary Library, 1999 INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES , Research Paper No. 25 1998-99 From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: A Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants Professor John Warhurst Consultant, Politics and Public Administration Group , 29 June 1999 Acknowledgments This is to acknowledge the considerable help that I was given in producing this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Development Aid More Effective the 2010 Brookings Blum Roundtable Policy Briefs Ccontentsontents
    SEPTEMBER 2010 Global Economy and Development at BROOKINGS MAKING DEVELOPMENT AID MORE EFFECTIVE THE 2010 BROOKINGS BLUM ROUNDTABLE POLICY BRIEFS CCONTENTSONTENTS Can Aid Catalyze Development? ...................................................................................................................3 Homi Kharas Brookings U.S. Government Support for Development Outcomes: Toward Systemic Reform ........................................10 Noam Unger Brookings The Private Sector and Aid Effectiveness: Toward New Models of Engagement .............................................20 Jane Nelson Harvard University and Brookings International NGOs and Foundations: Essential Partners in Creating an Effective Architecture for Aid ..........28 Samuel A. Worthington, InterAction and Tony Pipa, Independent consultant Responding to a Changing Climate: Challenges in Financing Climate-Resilient Development Assistance ....37 Kemal Derviş and Sarah Puritz Milsom Brookings Civilian-Military Cooperation in Achieving Aid Effectiveness: Lessons from Recent Stabilization Contexts ...48 Margaret L. Taylor Council on Foreign Relations Rethinking the Roles of Multilaterals in the Global Aid Architecture ............................................................55 Homi Kharas Brookings INTRODUCTION The upcoming United Nations High-Level Plenary From high-profile stabilization contexts like Meeting on the Millennium Development Goals will Afghanistan to global public health campaigns, and spotlight global efforts to reduce poverty, celebrat- from a renewed
    [Show full text]
  • Donors Vastly Underestimate Differences in Charities' Effectiveness
    Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 15, No. 4, July 2020, pp. 509–516 Donors vastly underestimate differences in charities’ effectiveness Lucius Caviola∗† Stefan Schubert‡† Elliot Teperman David Moss§ Spencer Greenberg Nadira S. Faber¶ ‡ Abstract Some charities are much more cost-effective than other charities, which means that they can save many more lives with the same amount of money. Yet most donations do not go to the most effective charities. Why is that? We hypothesized that part of the reason is that people underestimate how much more effective the most effective charities are compared with the average charity. Thus, they do not know how much more good they could do if they donated to the most effective charities. We studied this hypothesis using samples of the general population, students, experts, and effective altruists in five studies. We found that lay people estimated that among charities helping the global poor, the most effective charities are 1.5 times more effective than the average charity (Studies 1 and 2). Effective altruists, in contrast, estimated the difference to be factor 50 (Study 3) and experts estimated the factor to be 100 (Study 4). We found that participants donated more to the most effective charity, and less to an average charity, when informed about the large difference in cost-effectiveness (Study 5). In conclusion, misconceptions about the difference in effectiveness between charities is thus likely one reason, among many, why people donate ineffectively. Keywords: cost-effectiveness, charitable giving, effective altruism, prosocial behavior, helping 1 Introduction interested behavior: e.g., people more frequently choose the most effective option when investing (for their own benefit) People donate large sums to charity every year.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Animal Funders Briefings
    BRIEFING SERIES February, 2019 v1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Smart Giving: Some Fundamentals 2 Supporting Alternative Foods To Farmed Animal Products 4 Veg Advocacy 7 Corporate Campaigns For Welfare Reforms 9 Fishes 12 Legal and Legislative Methods 13 A Global Perspective on Farmed Animal Advocacy 15 Shallow Review: Increasing Donations Through Your Donation 19 2 Smart Giving: Some Fundamentals How Much To Give? There are a number of approaches to how much to give, Why Give? including: For the world: There are over 100 hundred billion farmed animals alive at any moment in conditions that Giving what you don’t need cause severe suffering, that number has been increasing over time and is projected to continue to do so. Consuming animal products is associated with many x % Pledging a set percentage negative health outcomes and animal agriculture is a chief cause of environmental degradation—causing approximately 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions. % Giving to reach a personal best For you: Giving activates the brain’s reward centers, Some people give everything above what is necessary to resulting in increased life satisfaction and happiness. satisfy their needs, in part because of evidence that high levels of income have diminishing returns on wellbeing. How Can We Help Identify Cost-effective Funding Thousands of people (including some of the wealthiest) How To Give? Opportunities? publicly pledge some set percentage for giving. Pledging could increase your commitment to giving, further Effective giving is important because top Farmed Animal Funders release briefings and research connect you with a giving community, and inspire others. giving options are plausibly many times more different promising areas.
    [Show full text]
  • G7/8 Commitments
    G7/8 COMMITMENTS The Group of 7/8 (G7/8) has made a number of public commitments to tackle neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Below is a list of the specific commitments made by the G7/8 between 1998 and 2016. Japan “We note that the efforts and achievements toward UHC, health system strengthening (HSS) and Ise-Shima Summit preparing and responding to public health emergencies are further jeopardized by the significant May 2016 threat posed by AMR. We also acknowledge the importance and contribution of R&D and innovation to preserve and deploy existing remedies, and to discover new remedies for these and other health areas, such as neglected tropical diseases and poverty related infectious diseases as well as conditions related to ageing. “With these in mind, we particularly commit to take concrete actions in the following areas as elaborated in the G7 Ise-Shima Vision for Global Health, as set out in the Annex. We also instruct our Health Ministers to further elaborate necessary actions on these areas at their Meeting in Kobe in September.” - G7 Ise-Shima Leaders’ Declaration “At the G7 Ise-Shima Summit, we, the G7 leaders, commit to take the following concrete actions for advancing global health… “Shedding light on diseases that require further R&D improvements, particularly for conditions not adequately addressed by the market, including Poverty-Related Infectious Diseases (PRDs) and Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs): 1. Implement policies to encourage the development of and access to medical products for those diseases. 2. Encourage G7 countries to support “push (e.g. support to cover R&D cost)” and “pull (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching Our Development Goals: Why Does Aid Effectiveness Matter?
    Better aid… Reaching Our Development Goals: because it matters. Why Does Aid Effectiveness Matter? This booklet aims to stimulate dialogue around the aid reform effort embodied by the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. It reminds us of why this agreement is important, outlines what objectives have been set, and points to what still needs to be accomplished. This effort is driving many actors in developing countries—56 of whom participated in the 2008 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration— aid agencies, global funds and civil society groups to reflect and act together within the widest consultative process ever convened on development assistance. This booklet reflects that process, bringing together a range of voices on aid and its quality. “... the true test The Millennium of aid effectiveness is Development Goals improvement in people’s lives.” Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger – 2006 Survey on Monitoring the Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education Paris Declaration, OECD (2007) Goal 3: Promote gender equality and empower women Goal 4: Reduce child mortality Goal 5: Improve maternal health Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development Reaching Our Development Goals: Why Does Aid Effectiveness Matter? In September 2000, world leaders made a series of historic commitments at the United Nations Millennium Summit. They pledged to work together to free their fellow human beings from the “abject and dehumanizing conditions of extreme poverty” and to “make the right to development a reality for everyone.” Their wide-ranging commitments—now known as the MDGs—include efforts to address environmental degradation, gender inequality and HIV/AIDs as well as improve access to education, health care and clean water for the world’s poorest.
    [Show full text]
  • HARMONY DAY 21 March, 2001 ______
    1 A Media Analysis conducted on behalf of The Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs by Media Monitors Australia HARMONY DAY 21 March, 2001 _________________________________________ Executive Summary 2 Press Coverage 6 Overview 6 The Lead-up 7 On the Day 8 After the Event 9 Broadcast Coverage 11 Overview 11 The Lead-up 13 On the Day 14 After the Event 16 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Favourable Balanced Unfavourable 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 r re y e o a ft f D e e A B h t n O Figure 1: Overall Volume & Tone of Coverage Overview During the period 15 February to 28 March 2001, there were 83 press, 193 radio and 24 television items pertaining to, and surrounding, 'Harmony Day'. The day was very favourably received by the press, radio and television media with 83 per cent of total coverage promoting the positive aspects of the event. The majority of favourable coverage conveyed the key Harmony Day themes of "tolerance and equality for all" through announcements and reportage of events and celebrations. Positive coverage was widely spread around the states - with particular focus on the towns of Dubbo (NSW), Rockhampton (Qld) and the city of Adelaide. In terms of total volume, South Australia was the source of most coverage, followed by Queensland, New South Wales and Western Australia. Seventeen per cent of coverage focussed on negative issues. South Australian radio station 5AA was the source of the majority of unfavourable coverage: the result of adverse reactions by talk-back callers, some ethnic groups and the Opposition to comments made by South Australian MP, Christine Gallus.
    [Show full text]