Collaborative Directory

PAGE 1 for the greatest good

DIRECTORY United States Department of Agriculture of States Department United

pacific northwestpacific northwestpacific northwestp

COLLABORATIVE

REGIONREGIONREGIONREGION

Updated: 1/29/2018 Updated:

If you have ques� ons about this publica� on, please contact the Region 6 Oﬃ ce of Communica� ons & Community ce of Communica� 6 Oﬃ the Region on, please contact ons about this publica� ques� have If you 503-808-2153. at Engagement

Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

University of Oregon R6 Forest Collaborative Groups Collaborative R6 Forest Oregon of University Image Credit: 2015, Emily Jane Davis, Oregon State University and Ecosystem Workforce Program, Program, Workforce Ecosystem and University State Davis, Oregon Jane 2015, Emily Credit: Image PAGE 2 PAGE 3

DES FRE-WIN FRE-WIN MAL (Lake Lakeview Initiative) County Group Resources Stewardship ...... 11 ...... 10 Project Forest Collaborative Deschutes ...... 12 MAL on the Fremont-Winema Agreement Master Stewardship MTH MTH ...... 13 Partners Blue Mountain Forest MTH Harney County Collaborative Restoration ...... 14 OCH ...... 15 Clackamas Partners Stewardship RRS Crew Stewardship Hood River Collaborative ...... 16 RRS ...... 17 Collaborative County Forest Wasco RRS ...... 18 Collaborative Restoration Ochoco Forest RRS ...... 19 Partnership Applegate RRS ...... 20 Resiliency MSA Forest Ashland SIU ...... 21 Rogue Basin Partnership SIU ...... 22 Collaborative Restoration Southern Forest Oregon SIU ...... 23 Collaborative Forest Rivers Coast Wild SIU (*) Program Restoration Watershed Collaborative ...... Siuslaw 24 SIU ...... 25 Groups Stewardship Program Restoration Watershed Collaborative Siuslaw SIU (ASG) Group Alsea Stewardship SIU ...... 25 ...... 25 (HSG Group Hebo Stewardship UMA ...... 25 (MPSG) Group Marys Stewardship Peak UMP ...... 25 (SSG) Group Stewardship Siuslaw UMP ...... 25 (SUDSG) Group Smith-Umpqua-Dunes Stewardship WAWT Collaborative Umatilla Forest ...... 26 WIL South Community Umpqua Rural Partnership ...... 27 WIL Coalition Umpqua Forestry ...... 28 CollaborativeWhitman Forest ...... 29 Wallowa WIL WIL ...... 30 Collaborative Forest Willamette Southern COL Group Stewardship ...... 31 Watershed McKenzie GP . . .

Appendix 10 Contacts ...... 59 Part 4: Regional O Contact ce Part O 4: Regional Appendix 9 Link Web ...... 55-57 Part Photos 3: Links to Appendix 6 authorities A list of collaboration related ...... 53-54 Appendix 5 ts of working collaboratively ...... 52 bene Five Appendix 4 ...... 51 Continuum Involvement on he Public Collaboration Appendix 3 approach use a collaborative When to ...... 50 Appendix 2 Service process collaborative in the employees of Forest ...... roles Typical 48-49 Appendix 1 ...... of Collaboration Principles Ten 46-47 OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA and Tools Tips Part 2: Collaborative Part 1: The Collaborative Groups Part 1: The Collaborative CFLR - Map of R6 Forest Collaboratives Collaboratives CFLR - Map of R6 Forest ...... 6-7 What and Why of Collaboration of Collaboration Why What and ...... 5 Collaborative Group Directory Group Collaborative

Community Engagement at 503-808- 2153. Community Engagement directory, please contact the Region 6’s Oﬃ ce of Communicati ons and of Communicati ce Oﬃ 6’s the Region please contact directory, If you have questi ons or comments about informati on contained in this contained on informati about comments ons or If you have questi

a living document that will change over ti me. ti will change over that a living document Region. Since this work is always evolving, this directory should be considered be considered should this directory work is always evolving, this Since Region. use to understand the breadth and depth of this work in the Pacifi c Northwest in the Pacifi of this work the breadth and depth understand use to This directory was established as a resource for employees and leadership to and leadership to employees for as a resource was established This directory plan restorati on eff orts that align with local and community values. and align with local orts that on eff plan restorati the potenti al to engage with Forest Service staff to eff ecti vely prepare for and vely prepare ecti to eff staff Service Forest to engage with al the potenti integrated collaborati ve eff orts are not appropriate for all contexts, but have contexts, for all orts are not appropriate ve eff collaborati integrated with diverse stakeholders to larger-scale, more integrated collaborati on. Such collaborati more integrated larger-scale, to with diverse stakeholders rural and urban stakeholder needs and moving beyond bilateral relati onships onships relati bilateral beyond needs and moving rural and urban stakeholder collaborati ves have played important roles in the Pacifi c Northwest in bridging in c Northwest Pacifi roles in the played important ves have collaborati Region are linked to at least one forest collaborati ve group. Historically, Historically, ve group. collaborati forest one at least to are linked Region forest lands (see map pgs 6-7). All nati onal forests in the Pacifi c Northwest c Northwest Pacifi in the forests onal pgs 6-7). All nati lands (see map forest are 36 collaborati ve groups that work either exclusively or parti ally on nati onal on nati ally or parti exclusively that work either ve groups are 36 collaborati resources, and increase accomplishments and benefi ts across the board. There and benefi and increase accomplishments resources, to address local community prioriti es, build community capacity, leverage leverage capacity, community es, build prioriti community local address to to and has engaged in for decades. It can provide agency staff opportuniti es opportuniti staff agency provide It can decades. in for has engaged and to Collaborati on is something the Pacifi c Northwest Region is deeply committ ed committ is deeply Region c Northwest Pacifi the on is something Collaborati Introduction PAGE 4 PAGE 5 helps create a better understanding among among understanding a better create helps parties all dialogue for opportunity more creative, balanced between social, ecological and needs economic in the outcome invested are people of trust built. is and addressed Five Bene Collaboration ts of Bene Five 1. the process – sharing information More 2. more informed, – more Better decisions 3. well are – when projects Better outcomes 4. when a network projects for – support More 5. are ict – when misunderstandings Less con

Collabora� ve groups that discuss projects and issues as they relate to areas within the boundaries of Federal public lands within the boundaries of Federal areas to relate and issues as they discuss projects that groups ve Collabora� Collabora� ve groups that discuss projects and issues with an approach to land management that looks beyond Na� onal Forest Na� beyond looks that land management to and issues with an approach discuss projects that groups ve Collabora� objec� exist ves objec�

• ng compe� where projects on complex Working • the issue around exist Common values • stake at people with interests are There • present are leaders Service and non-governmental Forest • ve and suppor� is available A decision maker • available are resources Adequate • cipant Non-decision making par� • er expert Subject ma� • interpreter Service process Forest • ons communica� Internal • onship leader rela� and Outreach • mes) (some� proponent Project • Facilitator • on leader Collabora�

(The informati on presented on this page is derived from the eﬀ orts of Ann Moote with Mamut Consulti ng, and Maia Enzer with the U.S. with the Enzer ng, and Maia with Mamut Consulti Moote orts of Ann on this page is derived from the eﬀ on presented (The informati capacity within the Agency.) ve collaborati help advance Service to Forest

on federally owned public lands. owned on federally only. These collabora� ve groups s� ll have members represen� ng a diversity of interests, and organiza� is mainly but their issue focus ons, and organiza� of interests, ng a diversity represen� members ll have s� groups ve These collabora� only. Public Lands: Forest Service makes land management decision on non-Forest Service lands. decision on non-Forest land management Service makes Forest ci� zen group, and other land owner management and connectedness to forest service lands. An all lands approach does not mean that the does not mean that service lands. An all lands approach forest to and connectedness management and other land owner group, zen ci� land boundaries. Using an all lands approach includes planning and management that considers the contribu� ons of state, private, tribal, private, ons of state, the contribu� considers that and management includes planning land boundaries. Using an all lands approach All Lands: What is the diﬀ erence between All Lands and Public Lands Collaborati ve Groups? Lands and Public Lands Collaborati All between erence What is the diﬀ

Collaborati on is Appropriate When: on is Appropriate Collaborati supported. making, and management more eﬀ ec� wildly and more ve ec� eﬀ more making, and management Include: can Service Roles Forest commitment up front, collabora� planning, decision- make on can collabora� up front, commitment be� er ways of moving forward. Although it requires � me and � Although it requires forward. of moving er ways be� and disagreement, and working together to iden� and fy new iden� to together and working and disagreement, of a topic or project, while iden� of agreement fying areas while iden� or project, of a topic sharing informa� on and ideas to expand everyone’s knowledge knowledge everyone’s expand on and ideas to sharing informa� work together to achieve a common purpose. It involves It involves purpose. a common achieve to together work Collabora� views with diverse in which people process on is a Collabora� What is it? What What is Collaboration? What rogram P orkforce cosystem E W Wasco County Forest Collaborative Group Southern Willamette Forest Collaborative Wild Rivers Coast Forest Collaborative Chumstick Wildfire Stewardship Coalition Deschutes Collaborative Forest Project Clackamas Stewardship Partners Applegate Partnership Alsea Stewardship Group Hebo Stewardship Group Marys Peak Stewardship Group Siuslaw Stewardship Group South Umpqua Rural Community Partnership Wallowa County NRAC McKenzie Watershed Stewardship Group South Santiam All Lands Collaborative Tapash Sustainable Forest Collaborative All Lands Collaboratives Hood River Collaborative Stewardship Crew Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition Northeast Washington Pinchot Partners Collaborative Group South Gifford Pinchot Darrington Collaborative Olympic Forest Collaborative Skokomish Watershed Action Team Lakeview Stewardship Group MSA on the Fremont-Winema NF Blue Mountains Forest Partners Harney County Restoration Collaborative Ochoco Forest Restoration Collaborative Ashland Forest Resiliency MSA Southern OR Forest Restoration Collaborative Umatilla Forest Collaborative Group Umpqua Forestry Coalition Collaborative Forest Wallowa-Whitman North Santiam Forest Collaborative N. Central Wa. Forest Health Collaborative Public Lands Collaboratives Public Lands Washington Oregon Colville Gifford Pinchot Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Olympic Deschutes Fremont-Winema Malheur Mt. Hood Ochoco Rogue River-Siskiyou Siuslaw Umatilla Umpqua Wallowa-Whitman Willamette Okanogan-Wenatchee 16) 50 Oregon (20 f Miles o hics 4020Miles 0 nfograp Workforce Program, University of Oregon. Workforce s/i University http://ewp.uoregon.edu/publications/infographics tion R6 forest collaborative groups map available online at: ica 0 publ Spokane University Spokane State orkforce Program, Created: 5/15/2017 Emily Jane Davis, Oregon State University and Ecosystem gon.edu/ n W 90 ore ps stem Orego wp.u 84 s, osy Grou //e 84 ve ttp: Jane Davi at: h aborati ly ne oll 90 10/12/2016 Ec e onli labl ated: Data from Emi R6 Forest C Avai Cre Seattle Public Lands Collaboratives All Lands Collaboratives Seattle Eugene Portland 5 5 Eugene Portland US Forest Service lands BLM and other federal lands

US Forest Service lands BLM and other federal lands

Region 6 Region

Forest Collaborative Groups Collaborative Forest

Region 6 - Forest Collaborative Groups Boundaries Groups Collaborative Forest - 6 Region Region 6 Forest Collaborative Group Boundaries Boundaries Group Collaborative Forest 6 Region PAGE 6 PAGE 7 rogram P orkforce cosystem E W Southern Willamette Forest Collaborative Deschutes Collaborative Forest Project Wasco County Forest Collaborative Group Clackamas Stewardship Partners Applegate Partnership Wild Rivers Coast Forest Collaborative Alsea Stewardship Group Hebo Stewardship Group Marys Peak Stewardship Group Siuslaw Stewardship Group South Umpqua Rural Community Partnership Wallowa County NRAC McKenzie Watershed Stewardship Group South Santiam All Lands Collaborative Tapash Sustainable Forest Collaborative Chumstick Wildfire Stewardship Coalition All Lands Collaboratives Skokomish Watershed Action Team Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition Northeast Washington Collaborative Group South Gifford Pinchot Darrington Collaborative Umatilla Forest Collaborative Group Umpqua Forestry Coalition Collaborative Forest Wallowa-Whitman North Santiam Forest Collaborative Blue Mountains Forest Partners Harney County Restoration Collaborative Hood River Collaborative Stewardship Crew Ochoco Forest Restoration Collaborative Ashland Forest Resiliency MSA Southern OR Forest Restoration Collaborative Olympic Forest Collaborative N. Central Wa. Forest Health Collaborative Lakeview Stewardship Group MSA on the Fremont-Winema NF Pinchot Partners Public Lands Collaboratives Public Lands Washington Umatilla Umpqua Wallowa-Whitman Willamette Siuslaw Ochoco Rogue River-Siskiyou Mt. Hood Malheur Deschutes Fremont-Winema Oregon Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Olympic Gifford Pinchot Colville Okanogan-Wenatchee

16) 50

Oregon (20 f

Miles o hics 4020Miles 0 nfograp Workforce Program, University of Oregon. Workforce s/i University http://ewp.uoregon.edu/publications/infographics tion R6 forest collaborative groups map available online at: ica 0 publ Spokane University Spokane State orkforce Program, Created: 5/15/2017 Emily Jane Davis, Oregon State University and Ecosystem gon.edu/ n W 90 ore ps stem Orego wp.u 84 s, osy Grou //e 84 ve ttp: Jane Davi at: h aborati ly ne oll 90 10/12/2016 Ec e onli labl ated: Data from Emi R6 Forest C Avai Cre Seattle Public Lands Collaboratives All Lands Collaboratives Seattle Eugene Portland 5 5 Eugene Portland US Forest Service lands BLM and other federal lands US Forest Service lands BLM and other federal lands Forest Collaborative Groups Collaborative Forest 6 Region Region 6 Forest Collaborative Group Boundaries Boundaries Group Collaborative 6 Forest Region Region 6 - Forest Collaborative Groups Boundaries Groups Collaborative Forest - 6 Region PAGE 8 PAGE 9

Part 1: Part

basic facts about the group. basic facts from the local community and community from the local such as their mission statement, such as their mission statement, disti nct stakeholder groups. This groups. stakeholder nct disti secti on is aimed at providing the at providing on is aimed secti its own unique story, relati onship onship relati unique story, its own in citi zen-led involvement in public in public zen-led involvement in citi with their local forest, involvement involvement forest, with their local The collaborati ve groups profi led in profi ve groups The collaborati basic informati on about each group basic informati lands management. Each group has group has Each lands management. this directory represent great eff orts great eff represent this directory identi fying the points of contact, and contact, of fying the points identi The Collabora� Groups: ve Collabora� The Facts Box Facts are the focus of DCFP focus the are Central and one between TNC and USFS, Council and USFS Council and USFS Intergovernmental Intergovernmental Oregon Oregon commi� ee members commi� • ons Organiza� Environmental • on Groups Protec� re Community Wildfi • Groups Tribal • Interests and Water Watershed • on and Businesses Organiza� on and Tourism Recrea� • Agencies State • Researchers University State Oregon • Agencies Federal • NF, in Deschutes acres 257,000 of 1.6 million • CFLRP • CCLS • on founda� 501(c)3 through • One between agreements. share cost Two • ve All Lands Collabora� • in 2009 Established • of 19 steering The DCFP comprises State House District #53: Representa� (R) Gene Whisnant ve #53: Representa� House District State Buehler (R) Knute ve # 54: Representa� House District State man (R) John Huff ve #59: Representa� House District State

h� p://deschutescollabora� veforest.org/ p://deschutescollabora� h� onal Forest Na� Deschutes

• Industry Products Forest • Landowners Private

Forest Service: John Allen, Forest Supervisor [email protected] (541) 383-5512 Service: John Allen, Forest Forest [email protected] Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact (541) 548-9546, Administrator, Program Resources Council, Natural Intergovernmental Oregon Central Ediger, Vernita Group: ve Collabora� State Senate District #30: Senator Ted Ferrioli (R) Ferrioli Ted #30: Senator District Senate State State Senate District #27: Senator Tim Knopp (R) Tim Knopp #27: Senator District Senate State U.S. Representa� ve, Oregon District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Oregon ve, Representa� U.S. U.S. Senator for Oregon: Ron Wyden (D) Wyden Ron Oregon: for Senator U.S. U.S. Senator for Oregon: Jeff (D) Merkley Jeff Oregon: for Senator U.S. Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal 2013, Journal of Forestry). cost on both a per-fi al., et basis (Thompson and landscape re on both a per-fi cost on cipa� of Par� Diversity result in a substan� al reduc� on of wildfi re size and suppression and suppression size re on of wildfi al reduc� in a substan� result scale implementa� will planned on of the type of fuel treatments implementa� scale of na� onal forest lands adjacent to the community of Bend. of Bend. the community to lands adjacent onal forest of na� large- that showed on the DCFP study A case landscapes. forest project, is the West Bend Project, which covers over 26,000 acres 26,000 acres over which covers Bend Project, is the West project, on of priority restora� science-based ecosystem ve, collabora� Interface (WUI) areas near Bend, Sisters, and Sunriver. One current One current Sunriver. and Sisters, near Bend, (WUI) areas Interface encourage to established Congress on that in the na� projects techniques. The focus of the eff orts is in the Wildland Urban of the eff The focus techniques. on on demonstra� restora� The DCFP is one of 20 landscape DCFP landscape, including CFLR fund alloca� on and restora� on on and restora� including CFLR fund alloca� DCFP landscape, input to the Forest Service on management decisions within the decisions Service on management the Forest input to The Steering Commi� providing channel for is the formal ee Commi� The Steering community members represen� and values. of views ng a wide set represen� members community (CCLS) funding. The DCFP Steering Commi� 19 are members ee Commi� (CCLS) funding. The DCFP Steering using 10.1 million of Community Capacity and Land Stewardship and Land Stewardship using 10.1 million of Community Capacity resilient condi� on through balanced, science-driven restora� on restora� science-driven balanced, on through condi� resilient economy. economy. a more to of forest acres 257,000 restore The aim of the DCFP is to while mee� ng the needs of communi� es and suppor� ng the local es and suppor� ng the needs of communi� while mee� Deschutes Na� onal Forest on projects to restore healthy forests forests healthy restore to on projects onal Forest Na� Deschutes Since 2009, the DCFP Steering Commi� the ee has advised Commi� Steering Since 2009, the DCFP Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� restora� goals. common reach to on projects restora� together to improve the health of our forest through ac� ve ac� through the health of our forest improve to together of diverse stakeholders bringing Central Oregon communi� es communi� Oregon bringing Central stakeholders of diverse The Deschutes Collabora� ve Forest Project (DCFP) is a group is a group (DCFP) Project Forest ve Collabora� The Deschutes Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Deschutes County County Deschutes Deschutes Collaborative Forest Project Forest Collaborative Deschutes PAGE 10 PAGE 11 OREGON Facts Box Facts small diameter log mill that has sustained has sustained has sustained has sustained log mill that log mill that log mill that small diameter small diameter small diameter jobs. 100 local ve Community Collabora� • in 1998 Established • CFLRP • 501(c)3 • on of a the installa� coordinate Helped to • ve Public Lands Collabora� • Funding Chiefs Joint 2016 Awarded • Outstanding for Award 2014 Chief’s (Lake Initiative) Resources County h� p://lcri.org/forest-collabora� on/ p://lcri.org/forest-collabora� h� onal Forest Na� Fremont-Winema

• Agencies Federal • on Groups Conserva� • ng Groups and Hun� Wildlife • Agencies State • Councils Watershed • ons Organiza� Environmental • ons Community Organiza� • Timber Industry Commercial • Community Business Local • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental • zens Ci� Independent

monitoring/) Team comprised of local students. (h� p://lcri.org/biophysical- (h� students. of local comprised Team LCRI to do was establish the Chewaucan Biophysical Monitoring Monitoring Biophysical the Chewaucan establish do was to LCRI Following review of the Unit, the ﬁ rst thing the collabora� asked ve thing the collabora� rst the Unit, the ﬁ of review Following on cipa� of Par� Diversity Unit (LFSU). they re-designated the Unit as the Lakeview Federal Stewardship Stewardship Federal the Unit as the Lakeview re-designated they approach. The Forest Service responded posi� vely, and in 2001, vely, posi� Service responded Forest The approach. developed and proposed a new, restora� on-based management restora� a new, and proposed developed opera� ons and, a� er studying the results, collabora� vely collabora� the results, er studying ons and, a� opera� par� cipants commissioned a third-party review of the Unit’s Unit’s of the review a third-party commissioned cipants par� Convening as the Lakeview Stewardship Group (LSG), the Group Stewardship as the Lakeview Convening in the Fremont-Winema Na� onal Forest in southern Oregon. Oregon. in southern onal Forest Na� in the Fremont-Winema the 500,000-acre Lakeview Federal Sustained Yield Unit (the Unit) Yield Sustained Federal Lakeview the 500,000-acre 1998 to develop a strategy for sustainable forest management of management forest sustainable for a strategy develop 1998 to The Lakeview Stewardship Group (LSG) collabora� in on began (LSG) collabora� Group Stewardship The Lakeview Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� genera� ons. genera� management that ensures quality of life for present and future and future present for life quality of ensures that management To demonstrate a sustainable approach to natural resources resources natural to approach a sustainable demonstrate To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Lake County County Lake Lakeview Group Stewardship Fremont-Winema Na� onal Forest Na� Fremont-Winema Facts Box Facts Acres: 30,000 ac – 3 Projects (Black Hills, Projects 30,000 ac – 3 Acres: Knight) Red Coyote, • 1.7 Million Acres covers MSA • ve Public Lands Collabora� • in 2011 Established • Agreement Project Supplemental Current

• Agencies Federal • Groups Tribal • t Non-Proﬁ Environmental • on Groups Conserva�

District #60: Representa� ve Cliff (R) Bentz Cliff ve #60: Representa� District District #30: Senate Republican Leader Ted Ferrioli (R) Ferrioli Leader Ted Republican #30: Senate District District #55: Representa� McLane (R) Mike ve #55: Representa� District District #28: Senator Doug Whitse� (R) Doug Whitse� #28: Senator District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Judd Lehman, District Ranger, Chiloquin and Chemult Ranger Districts, (541) 783-4020, [email protected] (eff ec� January 8, 2017) ve ec� (eff (541) 783-4020, [email protected] Districts, Chiloquin and Chemult Ranger Ranger, Judd Lehman, District Forest Service: Mike Lawrence, District Ranger, Chiloquin Ranger District, (541) 783-4020, [email protected] (re� ring January 3, 2017) (re� (541) 783-4020, [email protected] District, Chiloquin Ranger Ranger, District Lawrence, Service: Mike Forest Craig Bienz, Nature Conservancy - Director Sycan Marsh, (541) 273-0789, [email protected] Marsh, Sycan - Director Conservancy Bienz, Nature Craig Marko Bey, Lomakatsi Restora� [email protected] (541) 488-0208, on Project, Restora� Lomakatsi Bey, Marko klamathtribes.com Master Stewardship Agreement: Will Hatcher, Klamath Tribes Natural Resources Director (541) 783-2219 ext: 142, Will.hatcher@ (541) 783-2219 ext: Director Resources Natural Tribes Klamath Will Hatcher, Agreement: Stewardship Master Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact equipment, and supervision, and funding when available. and supervision,equipment, and funding when available. for accomplishments. The Fremont-Winema provides training, training, provides The Fremont-Winema accomplishments. for effi cient implementa� on, and supplemen� capacity ng Forest on, and supplemen� implementa� cient effi treatment outcomes, developing guidelines and technology for for guidelines and technology developing outcomes, treatment are ac� vely engaged with the Forest Service in determining Service in determining with the Forest engaged vely ac� are on cipa� of Par� Diversity restora� on following specifi c planning decisions. The Partners specifi on following restora� Act and develops guidance and direc� on for implemen� ng implemen� for on and direc� guidance Act and develops the planning process under the Na� onal Environmental Policy Policy onal Environmental under the Na� the planning process and implemen� ng restora� on goals. The Forest completes completes The Forest on goals. ng restora� and implemen� Na� onal Forest lands and takes the leadership role in planning role the leadership lands and takes onal Forest Na� Winema Na� onal Forest has the responsibility to manage manage to has the responsibility onal Forest Winema Na� successfully achieve mutual goals and objec� The Fremont- ves. and objec� mutual goals achieve successfully the leveraging of diverse exper� to skills, and resources se, exper� of diverse the leveraging Fremont -Winema Na� onal Forest benefi ts all par� through es ts all par� benefi onal Forest -Winema Na� Fremont Lomakatsi Restora� and the Conservancy The Nature on Project, Restora� Lomakatsi The collabora� ve partnership between the Klamath Tribes, Tribes, the Klamath between partnership ve The collabora� Fremont-Winema Na� onal Forest. Na� Fremont-Winema Service on with Forest Coordina� coopera� ve eff ort for landscape restora� on ac� vi� es within the vi� on ac� restora� landscape ort for eff ve coopera� health. The Master Stewardship Agreement (MSA) authorizes this authorizes (MSA) Agreement Stewardship health. The Master restore diversity, resilience, sustainable and overall landscape landscape and overall sustainable resilience, diversity, restore To treat unhealthy forest condi� ons and habitats in an eff ort to eff in an ons and habitats condi� forest unhealthy treat To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Klamath County County Klamath Master Stewardship Agreement on the Fremont-Winema Fremont-Winema the on Agreement Stewardship Master PAGE 12 PAGE 13 OREGON Facts Box Facts 100,000 (3 projects) Blues on the Southern together working on Project Coali� • • • appx. appx. appx. Acreage: Acreage: Acreage: Projects Projects Projects Planning Planning Planning USFS USFS USFS Recent Recent Recent • CFLRP • 501(c)3 • been have HCRC Since 2008 BMFP and • ve Public Lands Collabora� • in 2006 Established h� p://bluemountainsforestpartners.org/ h� Forest onal Malheur Na�

• Labor Industry • Timber Industry Commercial • zens Ci� Independent • Land Owners Private • ons Organiza� Environmental • on Groups Conserva� • Agencies Federal • Government Local • Agencies State • ons Organiza� Wildlife

District #60: Representa� ve Cliff (R) Bentz Cliff ve #60: Representa� District District #30: Senate Republican Leader Ted Ferrioli (R) Ferrioli Leader Ted Republican #30: Senate District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Steve Beverlin, Malheur Na� onal Forest, Forest Supervisor, [email protected], (541) 575-3073 [email protected], Supervisor, Forest onal Forest, Malheur Na� Beverlin, Service: Steve Forest Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact (541) 620-2546 [email protected] Director, ve Execu� Mark Webb, Group: ve Collabora� depend on natural resources. depend on natural and increased work for the 7,300 residents of Grant County that that County of Grant the 7,300 residents for work and increased the increased resiliency for thousands of acres of na� onal forest of na� thousands of acres for resiliency the increased agreement for forest restora� on on the Malheur, resul� ng in resul� on on the Malheur, restora� forest for agreement on cipa� of Par� Diversity Together, members have developed science-based zones of science-based zones developed have members Together, danger, and improves the ecosystem. and improves danger, alloca� on from USDA, provides logging and mill jobs, reduces fi re fi logging reduces and mill jobs, provides USDA, on from alloca� projects and other work. The work, funded by a $2.5 million funded by The work, and other work. projects 272,000 acres of the Malheur Na� onal Forest through thinning through onal Forest of the Malheur Na� 272,000 acres Service, the BMFP helped forge a 10-year agreement to restore restore to agreement a 10-year Service, the BMFP helped forge lessening the likelihood of li� ga� on. Working with the Forest with the Forest on. Working ga� of li� lessening the likelihood treatments” in the planning and implementa� on process, and implementa� in the planning treatments” staff u� lizes the BMFP collabora� upon “proposed agreed vely the BMFP collabora� lizes u� staff to describe and discuss possible treatment op� Service ons. Forest op� describe and discuss possible treatment to Forest Service resource specialists work with BMFP on fi eld tours with BMFP on fi work specialists Service resource Forest Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� and communi� Blue Mountains. es in the and communi� shared vision to improve the resilience and well-being of forests of forests and well-being the resilience improve to vision shared stakeholders who work together to create and implement a and implement create to together work who stakeholders Blue Mountains Forest Partners (BMFP) is a diverse group of group is a diverse (BMFP) Partners Forest Blue Mountains Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Grant County County Grant Blue Mountains Forest Partners Forest Mountains Blue Master Stewardship Agreement on the Fremont-Winema Fremont-Winema the on Agreement Stewardship Master Facts Box Facts with planning completed) 2008. since on Project Southern Blues Coali� 180,000 (3 completed projects and 2 more and 2 more projects 180,000 (3 completed • CFLRP • 501(c)3 • 2008 ons Project, Solu� Oregon • with BMFP on the together Working • ve Public Lands Collabora� Summit in 2014 held a Science and Economic The HCRC Community of Harney the development spurred that services thermal energy (HCE), a community-scale Energy ons tu� ins� to biomass heat will provide that company and employment ng local crea� while County in Harney orts. on eﬀ restora� enhancing forest • in 2008 Established • appx. Acreage: Projects Planning USFS Recent h� p://highdesertpartnership.org/ h� End) (Southern onal Forest Na� Malheur

• Project Biodiversity Blue Mountains • ons ng Organiza� and Hun� Wildlife • Timber Industry Commercial • Government Local • Labor Industry • ons Organiza� Environmental • ons t Organiza� Non-Proﬁ Environmental • es Universi� Local • on Groups Conserva� • Community Business Local • Land Owners Private Non-Commercial • Agencies Federal • Groups Tribal • and Grazing Range • Business Council Local • on Recrea� Motorized • Councils Watershed • Agencies State • Agencies Federal

District #60: Representa� ve Cliﬀ (R) Bentz Cliﬀ ve #60: Representa� District District #30: Senate Republican Leader Ted Ferrioli (R) Ferrioli Leader Ted Republican #30: Senate District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Steve Beverlin, (541) 575-3073, [email protected] Beverlin, Service: Steve Forest Collabora� ve Group: Brenda Smith, Execu� ve Director, (541) 573-7820, [email protected] Director, ve Smith, Execu� Brenda Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact Diversity of Par� cipa� on cipa� of Par� Diversity planning projects on the Malheur Na� onal Forest. Na� on the Malheur planning projects Works with the Emigrant Creek Ranger District on the current on the current District Ranger Creek with the Emigrant Works interested stakeholders to solve challenging issues. solve to stakeholders interested Service on with Forest Coordina� communi� es by using collabora� with all decision-making ve using collabora� es by communi� sustainability, economic well-being and social vitality of our of our vitality and social well-being economic sustainability, Desert Partnership (HDP) missions of enhancing the ecological of enhancing the ecological (HDP) missions Desert Partnership improving community economic viability under the High viability economic community improving To restore forest land while encouraging stewardship and stewardship land while encouraging forest restore To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Harney County County Harney Harney County Restoration Collaborative Restoration County Harney PAGE 14 PAGE 15 OREGON Mt. Hood Na� Forest onal Na� Mt. Hood Facts Box Facts $6,000,000 of job-crea� ng restora� on ng restora� $6,000,000 of job-crea� Basin River in the Clackamas projects using using using on projects on projects on projects of restora� of restora� of restora� $350,000 worth $350,000 worth $350,000 worth year. every receipts retained • in 2004 Established • • • approximately approximately approximately – 2016: promoted – 2016: promoted – 2016: promoted 2004 2004 2004 From From From • about for funding The CSP recommends • ve All Lands Collabora�

• Government Local • on Groups Conserva� • Timber Industry Commercial • Agencies Federal • Agencies State • Groups ng and Wildlife Hun� • University Local • ons Organiza� Environmental • Councils Watershed

District # 3: District Blumenauer (D) District # 9: District (R) Girod Fred District #18: District Vic Gilliam (Rep/R) District #5: District (D) Schrader Kurt Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Jackie Groce, Clackamas River Ranger District - District Ranger, [email protected] (503) 630-6861 [email protected] Ranger, - District District Ranger River Clackamas Service: Jackie Groce, Forest Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact (503) 657-9112 [email protected], Facilitator, Roth, Robert Group: ve Collabora� resistance to insects and wildfi re. and wildfi insects to resistance on cipa� of Par� Diversity of peregrine falcon nest sites, and thinning projects to increase increase to and thinning projects sites, nest falcon of peregrine by inappropriate off -highway vehicle recrea� on, enhancement recrea� vehicle -highway off inappropriate by decommissioning of unneeded roads, repair of sites damaged damaged of sites repair roads, of unneeded decommissioning salmon and other aqua� and repair road of concern, c species salmon and other aqua� projects that have included improving and expanding habitat for for habitat and expanding included improving have that projects The Mt. Hood Na� onal Forest works closely with CSP on works onal Forest The Mt. Hood Na� to meet restora� on goals. restora� meet to Service on with Forest Coordina� that employs stewardship contrac� ng and other innova� tools ve and other innova� ng contrac� stewardship employs that Stewardship Partners (CSP) is commi� ed to a collabora� process ve a collabora� ed to (CSP) is commi� Partners Stewardship communi� Basin. Clackamas River es within the Clackamas communi� Enhance ecosystem health and economic viability of local of local viability and economic health Enhance ecosystem Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Clackamas County/Clackamas River Basin Basin River County/Clackamas Clackamas p://clackamasstewardshippartners.org/wp/ h� Clackamas Stewardship Partners Stewardship Clackamas Harney County Restoration Collaborative Restoration County Harney Mt. Hood Na� onal Forest Hood Na� Mt. Facts Box Facts (2011), Lava (2013), Polallie Cooper (2014) Cooper (2013), Polallie (2011), Lava planning on the next working and is current District Ranger the Hood River for area • in 2011 Established • Hill ons on Red recommenda� Has provided • ve Public Lands Collabora� www.hrstewcrew.org www.hrstewcrew.org

Public U� li� es li� Public U� Council Watershed on Community Organiza� Governments Tribal Agencies State ons Organiza� Environmental on Groups Recrea� Landowners Private Government Local Industry Forest

District #52: District Mark Johnson ve Representa� District #26: District Chuck Thomsen Senator District #2: District Walden Greg Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Casey Gatz, Natural Resource Planner, Hood River Ranger District, 541-352-1255, [email protected] District, Ranger Hood River Planner, Resource Natural Service: Gatz, Casey Forest by Emily Plummer with DS Consul� ng DS Consul� Emily Plummer with by Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact on is provided and facilita� on District, Conserva� and Water Soil the Hood River by support is provided ve Administra� Group: ve Collabora� objec� ves. objec� future range of variability as reference condi� ons for restora� on restora� ons for condi� as reference of variability range future Where feasible the Stewe Crew considers both the historic and historic both the considers Crew the Stewe feasible Where pa� erns of use and opportuni� es to mi� gate climate change. change. climate gate mi� es to erns of use and opportuni� pa� on cipa� of Par� Diversity wildlife habitat, fi re resiliency, recrea� on opportuni� es, cultural on opportuni� recrea� resiliency, re fi habitat, wildlife goals include addressing forest health, soil and water quality, quality, health, soil and water forest include addressing goals socioeconomic benefi ts in area communi� es. Within this focus communi� ts in area benefi socioeconomic resiliency in and near the na� onal forest while sustaining while sustaining onal forest in and near the na� resiliency The primary focus of the Collabora� ve is on restoring ecological ecological is on restoring ve of the Collabora� The primary focus exper� se. exper� historical data, and sharing technical resource informa� on and informa� resource technical and sharing data, historical engagement at mee� ngs, providing resource informa� on, sharing informa� resource ngs, providing mee� at engagement partners in their collabora� ve process by maintaining ac� ve ac� maintaining by process ve in their collabora� partners landowners on specifi c project goals or ac� vi� es. vi� or ac� goals c project on specifi landowners ed being commi� by Crew Service the Stew supports The Forest landowners and highlight opportuni� es to collaborate with these collaborate es to opportuni� and highlight landowners Service on with Forest Coordina� landscapes. In doing so, they may seek input from neighboring seek input from may they so, In doing landscapes. input on land management ac� vi� es within the context of larger of larger es within the context vi� ac� input on land management of the Mt. Hood Na� onal Forest. The Collabora� provides ve The Collabora� Forest. onal of the Mt. Hood Na� forestland management within the Hood River Ranger District District Ranger the Hood River within management forestland of stakeholders providing consensus-based recommenda� on ons recommenda� consensus-based providing of stakeholders The Hood River Forest Collabora� ve (Stew Crew) is a diverse set set is a diverse Crew) (Stew ve Collabora� Forest River The Hood Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Hood River Ranger District District Ranger River Hood Hood River Forest Collaborative Forest River Hood PAGE 16 PAGE 17 OREGON Facts Box Facts appointment from the Wasco County Board Board Board Board County County County the Wasco the Wasco the Wasco from from from appointment appointment appointment of Commissioners • in 2015 Established • • • lled by lled by lled by fi fi fi ons are ons are ons are ee posi� ee posi� ee posi� Commi� Commi� Commi� Steering Steering Steering • ve All Lands Collabora� h� p://wascoswcd.org/wcswcd_035.htm h� Forest onal Hood Na� Mt.

biophysical se� of variability. range natural ng’s se� biophysical landowners. es and adjacent communi� risk to re wildﬁ products forest local on by liza� u� for by-products businesses. Landscape. County within the Wasco on work on restora�

• Industry Products Forest • ons Organiza� Environmental • Agencies State • Governments Tribal • Councils Watershed • Government Local • on Protec� re Community Wildfi • es li� Public U� • cials Offi Elected Local • on Groups Recrea� and Non-Motorized Motorized • Landowners Private • Government Local • on Plans and reduce Protec� re Support Community Wildfi • on restora� of ow fl a meaningful and predictable Provide • Service the Forest ons to input and recommenda� Provide • ons within a and func� processes natural Restore

District #30: Senate Republican Leader Ted Ferrioli (R) Ferrioli Leader Ted Republican #30: Senate District District #59: Representa� ve John Huﬀ man (R) John Huﬀ ve #59: Representa� District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Kameron Sam, Barlow Ranger District, District Ranger, (541) 467-5101, [email protected] Ranger, District District, Ranger Sam, Barlow Service: Kameron Forest Collabora� ve Group: William Noonan, Facilitator & Coordinator, (541) 296-8185 & Coordinator, William Noonan, Facilitator Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact County area on the Eastside of the Mt. Hood Na� onal Forest. Hood Na� of the Mt. on the Eastside area County on cipa� of Par� Diversity communi� es. The collabora� ve group focuses on the Wasco the Wasco on focuses group ve collabora� es. The communi� of forest resources and related opportuni� es to strengthen local local strengthen es to opportuni� and related resources of forest management of Na� onal Forest lands, and supports the u� liza� on liza� lands, and supports the u� onal Forest of Na� management The group provides the US Forest Service with proposals for for Service with proposals the US Forest provides The group Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� group seeks to: seeks group wildland urban interface with Wasco County. The collabora� ve The collabora� County. with Wasco wildland urban interface ecosystems, economic vitality and quality of life in Wasco in the in Wasco and quality of life vitality economic ecosystems, broad cons� tuency of stakeholders interested in healthy forest forest in healthy interested stakeholders tuency of cons� broad The Wasco County Forest Collabora� ve Group represents a represents Group ve Collabora� Forest County The Wasco Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Wasco County County Wasco Wasco County Forest Collaborative Forest County Wasco Hood River Forest Collaborative Forest River Hood Facts Box Facts $23,980 through the Community Capacity $23,980 through for program grant and Land Stewardship on. facilita� including more of treatment, 20,000 acres of commercial feet than 16 million board of of than 10,000 acres than 10,000 acres more more mber, mber, � � miles of than 15 more and re, ﬁ prescribed on. restora� stream 21 inches diameter over of trees harvest aspen for of agreement and zones on. restora� the U.S. Forest Service awarded the OFRC OFRC the Service awarded Forest the U.S. • than include more and Gap projects Wolf • limited guidelines for provided OFRC • in 2012 Established • on and Founda� onal Forest In 2014, the Na�

• cials Oﬃ Elected Local • Timber Industry Commercial • on Organiza� Environmental • Business Council Local • zens Ci� Independent • Agencies State • Agencies Federal • Landowners Private • es Universi� Local • Groups Tribal

District #60: Representa� ve Cliff (R) Bentz Cliff ve #60: Representa� District District #59: Representa� ve John Huff man (R) John Huff ve #59: Representa� District District #30: Senate Republican Leader Ted Ferrioli (R) Ferrioli Leader Ted Republican #30: Senate District District #55: Representa� McLane (R) Mike ve #55: Representa� District District #28: Senator Doug Whitse� (R) Doug Whitse� #28: Senator District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Paulina District Ranger Gary Asbridge (541) 416-6500 3160 NE Ochoco Hwy, Prineville, OR 97754 Prineville, Hwy, NE Ochoco (541) 416-6500 3160 Gary Asbridge Ranger District Service: Paulina Forest Central Oregon email: [email protected] cell: 503.502.2003 email: [email protected] Oregon Central Collabora� ve Group: Anne E. George, Ochoco Forest Restora� on Collabora� ve Facilitator, Facilita� on, Media� on + Public Involvement on, Media� Facilita� Facilitator, ve on Collabora� Restora� Forest Ochoco Anne E. George, Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact and historic range of variability. of variability. range and historic socioeconomics, plant associa� on groups, dry forest restora� on restora� dry forest on groups, associa� plant socioeconomics, on cipa� of Par� Diversity diffi cult issues, such as aspen restora� change, on, climate aspen restora� cult issues, such as diffi in need of restora� in open discussion about engage on and to in need of restora� Forest planners work with the OFRC to iden� fy priority areas iden� to with the OFRC work planners Forest vegeta� projects. on management vegeta� but has spent the majority of its interac� and Gap on on the Wolf the majority of its interac� but has spent Forest engages with the collabora� ve on several diff issues, erent diff on several ve with the collabora� engages Forest shared technical resources and exper� se. The Ochoco Na� onal Na� se. The Ochoco and exper� resources technical shared Ochoco Forest Restora� on Collabora� and provide (OFRC) ve on Collabora� Restora� Forest Ochoco economically sustainable economically of the ng members non-vo� as serve Service members Forest forest management and � mber produc� and is ecologically on that mber produc� and � management forest Service on with Forest Coordina� wood fi ber produced as a by-product of restora� on, and increase of restora� as a by-product ber produced fi wood economy based on ecosystem restora� to on and adding value restora� based on ecosystem economy natural resource confl icts in the community, build a new forest forest build a new icts in the community, confl resource natural forest ecosystems at the landscape scale, address long-term long-term address scale, landscape the at ecosystems forest To u� lize collabora� ve approaches to help restore fi re-adapted fi help restore to approaches ve collabora� lize u� To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Crook, Wheeler, Grant and Jeﬀ erson Coun� es Coun� erson and Jeﬀ Grant Wheeler, Crook, p://ochocoforest.org/ h� Grasslands onal Na� River Crooked NF & Ochoco Ochoco Forest Restoration Collaborative Restoration Forest Ochoco PAGE 18 PAGE 19 OREGON Facts Box Facts West • (FLN) Learning Network Fire Applegate • 501(c)3 • • • in the in the in the groups groups groups ve ve ve collabora� collabora� collabora� One of the oldest One of the oldest One of the oldest • ve All Lands Collabora� • in 1992 Established

• Councils Watershed • ons Groups Conserva� • University Local • Agencies Federal • Agencies State • ons Organiza� Environmental • Government Local • es li� Public U� • projects habitat In-stream • on projects Riparian Restora� • projects ciency & Measuring Device on eﬃ Irriga� • projects on Fuels reduc� • projects -party monitoring Mul�

District #1: Senator Jeﬀ (R) Kruse Jeﬀ #1: Senator District District #28: Senator Doug Whitse� (R) Doug Whitse� #28: Senator District District #2: Representa� (R) Dallas Heard ve #2: Representa� District District #1: Representa� ve Wayne Krieger (R) Krieger Wayne ve #1: Representa� District District #55: Representa� McLane (R) Mike ve #55: Representa� District District #4: Peter DeFazio (D) DeFazio #4: Peter District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Donna Mickley, District Ranger, [email protected], (541) 899-3800 [email protected], Ranger, District Service: Donna Mickley, Forest Collabora� ve Group: Janelle Dunlevy, Coordinator, [email protected], (541) 899-9982 [email protected], Coordinator, Janelle Dunlevy, Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

Diversity of Par� cipa� on cipa� of Par� Diversity that encompass the en� re Applegate watershed, including: watershed, Applegate re the en� encompass that APWC works on and assists agencies and landowners on projects on projects and landowners agencies on and assists works APWC for Collaborati on: Case Study of the Applegate Partnership. on: Case Study of the Applegate Collaborati for Management Area Guide (1998). See 2002 Measures of Progress Area Management forest resources using goals iden� fi ed in the Applegate Adap� ve Adap� Applegate ed in the fi iden� using goals resources forest being.” onal na� manage to with APWC Service works The US Forest par� es while contribu� well- and community economic local ng to es while contribu� par� Service on with Forest Coordina� partnership with landowners, agencies and other interested and other interested agencies with landowners, partnership through stewardship, educa� on and restora� out in on carried restora� on and educa� stewardship, through promote ecosystem health across the Applegate watershed watershed the Applegate health across ecosystem promote community-based non-profi t organiza� mission is “to on whose t organiza� non-profi community-based The Applegate Partnership & Watershed Council (APWC) is a is Council (APWC) & Watershed Partnership The Applegate Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Josephine, Siskiyou, and Jackson Coun� es Coun� and Jackson Siskiyou, Josephine, p://www.applegatepartnershipwc.org/ h� onal Forest Na� River-Siskiyou Rogue Applegate Partnership Applegate Ochoco Forest Restoration Collaborative Restoration Forest Ochoco Facts Box Facts reduc� on and forest restora� on restora� on and forest reduc� complete. diameter diameter logs (average logs (average by-product by-product 13 inches). with indirect 107 jobs plying to mul� and induced work sustained o fuels of landscape-scale 5,123 acres o on of restora� feet 13.2 million board o annually, me jobs full-� 17 direct o habitat cal cri� Late-successional treated acres in 10-year project, including project, in 10-year acres treated fuel understory density management, underburning. and prescribed treatments, Service and the Forest program Partnerships AFR funding are Fuels program Hazardous 2018. through es on watershed vi� eld ac� in classes and ﬁ stewardship and forest ecology Established in 2010 with a goal of 7,600 a goal in 2010 with Established • on Restora� Landscape Chiefs The Joint • cipated par� have youth 2,000 local Over • hwww.ashlandwatershed.org hwww.ashlandwatershed.org onal Forest Na� River-Siskiyou Rogue

• Agencies Federal • Government Local • on Groups Conserva� • Group Energy Forest • Timber Industry Commercial • Groups Tribal • Community Business Local

State District #5: Representa� ve Peter Buckley (D) Buckley Peter ve #5: Representa� District State State District #3: Senator Kevin Talbert (D) Talbert Kevin #3: Senator District State District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Don Boucher, AFR Project Manager, [email protected], (541) 522-2913 [email protected], Manager, AFR Project Service: Don Boucher, Forest Na� onal Resource Conserva� on Service: Erin Kurtz, [email protected] (541) 664-1070 x408 [email protected] on Service: Erin Kurtz, Conserva� onal Resource Na� Lomakatsi Restora� on Project, Marko Bey, [email protected] (541) 488-0208, [email protected] Bey, Marko on Project, Restora� Lomakatsi The Nature Conservancy, Darren Borgias, [email protected] (541) 770-7933 (541) [email protected] Borgias, Darren Conservancy, The Nature City of Ashland, Chris Chambers, [email protected] (541) 552-2066 [email protected] City of Ashland, Chris Chambers, Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact Fire Management Strategy. Management Fire private lands, crea� ng a model for the Na� Wildland onal Cohesive the Na� for ng a model lands, crea� private on cipa� of Par� Diversity advance the project toward comple� on and expand it to cri� cal cri� it to on and expand comple� toward the project advance landscape. New federal investment and expanding partnerships partnerships and expanding investment federal New landscape. wildfi re and climate resilience in both the ecological and social ecological in both the resilience and climate re wildfi transparency and trust in a cohesive and adap� for approach ve and adap� in a cohesive and trust transparency Conservancy, and Lomakatsi Restora� on Project. Partners build Partners on Project. Restora� and Lomakatsi Conservancy, Resource Conserva� on Service,The Nature the City of Ashland, Conserva� Resource boundary City and private lands. boundary City and private onal Service, Na� Forest the U.S. between is a partnership AFAR Ashland Forest Resiliency Master Stewardship Agreement to cross- to Agreement Stewardship Master Resiliency Ashland Forest Service on with Forest Coordina� economy, and quality of life. AFAR expands the 10-year federal federal the 10-year expands AFAR of life. and quality economy, and protec� ng forests, wildlife, habitat, people, property, local local property, people, habitat, wildlife, ng forests, and protec� wildfi re in a changing climate, securing clean drinking water, water, securing clean drinking climate, in a changing re wildfi lands Restora� on (AFAR) is to reduce the cri� of severe risk cal the cri� reduce to is on (AFAR) lands Restora� The goal of the Ashland Forest Resiliency (AFR) Project and All- (AFR) Project Resiliency of the Ashland Forest The goal Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Jackson County County Jackson Ashland Forest Resiliency Project and All-lands Restoration All-lands and Project Resiliency Forest Ashland PAGE 20 PAGE 21 OREGON Facts Box Facts to ﬁ nalize the organiza� onal framework the organiza� nalize ﬁ to ty for ty for ty for as a backbone en� as a backbone en� as a backbone en� serve serve serve necessarynecessarynecessary to to to Basin in the Rogue on work restora� h� p://www.roguepartners.org h� • • • miles miles miles Basin is 5,156 square Basin is 5,156 square Basin is 5,156 square River River River The Rogue The Rogue The Rogue • ve All Lands Collabora� • in 2013 Established • 501(c)(3) • 2015, RBP has been working of most For

• Councils Watershed • Groups Tribal • on Groups Conserva� • es li� Public U� • Government Local • Agencies State • ons Organiza� Environmental • Groups ve Collabora� Local

District #2: Senator Herman Baertschiger Jr. (R) Jr. Herman Baertschiger #2: Senator District District #1: Senator Jeﬀ (R) Kruse Jeﬀ #1: Senator District District #28: Senator Doug Whitse� (R) Doug Whitse� #28: Senator District District #4: Representa� (R) Duane Stark ve #4: Representa� District District #2: Representa� (R) Dallas Heard ve #2: Representa� District District #1: Representa� ve Wayne Krieger (R) Krieger Wayne ve #1: Representa� District District #55: Representa� McLane (R) Mike ve #55: Representa� District District #4: Peter DeFazio (D) DeFazio #4: Peter District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Chris Park, Forest Hydrologist, (541) 471-6761 [email protected] (541) 471-6761 [email protected] Hydrologist, Forest Service: Chris Park, Forest Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact [email protected] Coordinator, Sam Whitridge, Group: ve Collabora�

appropriate treatments. appropriate on cipa� of Par� Diversity Restora� on Ac� on Plans and implementa� on schedules for Plans and implementa� on on Ac� Restora� among other partners, to collabora� vely develop Watershed Watershed develop vely collabora� to among other partners, Forest Service has worked with the Rogue Basin Partnership, Basin Partnership, with the Rogue Service has worked Forest partner organiza� ons. partner organiza� Service on with Forest Coordina� restora� on ac� vi� and enhance the success of member es and to vi� on ac� restora� emphasizing stewardship, protec� and on, public engagement protec� emphasizing stewardship, wide venue to seek out resources; priori� ze and coordinate ac� on ac� and coordinate ze priori� out resources; seek to wide venue Rogue River Basin of Southern Oregon and to provide a basin- provide and to Basin of Southern Oregon River Rogue To provide leadership to achieve watershed health throughout the throughout health watershed achieve to leadership provide To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Josephine, Jackson, Curry, Douglas and Klamath OR Coun� es & Siskiyou, and Del Norte CA Coun� es CA Coun� Del Norte and Siskiyou, es & Coun� OR and Klamath Douglas Curry, Jackson, Josephine, NF River-Siskiyou Rogue Rogue Basin Partnership Basin Rogue Facts Box Facts in 2010 on in the na� ves collabora� rst of the ﬁ and TNC BLM, UW, with USFS, in partnership Adapted Fire Change; on; Climate Restora� People party Monitoring; es; Mul� Communi� Basin of the Rogue and Ecosystems • – One Plan Group Fire of the Applegate Part • Title III and RACs SRS Funded by • CFLRP • Change series on Climate a webinar Created • • 501(c)3 since 2010 501(c)3 since 2010 • Forest ve Collabora� areas: focal Project • ve Public Lands Collabora� • in 2005 and formally informally Established www.ashlandwatershed.org Community Organiza� on Community Organiza�

• • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental • Agencies Federal • Plan Group Fire Josephine/Jackson • on Organiza� Environmental • Groups Tribal • Agencies State • es Universi� Local • Government Local • Timber Industry Commercial • on Groups Conserva�

District #55: Representa� McLane (R) Mike ve #55: Representa� District District #28: Senator Doug Whitse� (R) Doug Whitse� #28: Senator District District #3: Representa� Carl Wilson (R) ve #3: Representa� District District #2: Senator Herman Baertschiger Jr. (R) Jr. Herman Baertschiger #2: Senator District District #1: Representa� ve Wayne Krieger (R) Krieger Wayne ve #1: Representa� District District #1: Senator Jeff (R) Kruse Jeff #1: Senator District District #5: Representa� ve Peter Buckley (D) Buckley Peter ve #5: Representa� District District #6: Representa� (R) Sal Esquivel ve #6: Representa� District District #3: Senator Kevin Talbert (D) Talbert Kevin #3: Senator District District #4: Peter DeFazio (D) DeFazio #4: Peter District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Allan Hahn, Natural Resources Staff , Rogue River Siskiyou NF, (541) 618-2050 [email protected] (541) 618-2050 [email protected] NF, Siskiyou River , Rogue Staff Resources Service: Allan Hahn, Natural Forest Collabora� ve Group: George McKinley, Execu� ve Director, (541) 482-6220 george@jeff net.org (541) 482-6220 george@jeff Director, ve Execu� McKinley, George Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

assessments of forest restora� on need and opportunity. restora� of forest assessments They have also been instrumental in advancing regional landscape landscape regional in advancing also been instrumental have They to consult in project planning to achieve on the ground success. on the ground achieve planning to in project consult to on cipa� of Par� Diversity social, and economic indicators for agencies and stakeholders and stakeholders agencies for indicators social, and economic to create Produc� of ecological, Guidelines, a set Harmony ve Produc� create to restora� on, the Collabora� ve worked with diverse stakeholders stakeholders with diverse worked ve on, the Collabora� restora� Program and the Rogue River Siskiyou Na� onal Forest. To advance advance To onal Forest. Na� Siskiyou River and the Rogue Program plan emerged from a partnership with the Model Forest Policy Policy with the Model Forest a partnership from plan emerged in a Changing Climate” in 2014. This collabora� developed vely in 2014. This collabora� in a Changing Climate” “The Rogue Basin Ac� on Plan for Resilient Watersheds and Forests and Forests Watersheds Resilient on Plan for “The Basin Ac� Rogue Southern Oregon Forest Restora� on Collabora� completed ve on Collabora� Restora� Forest Southern Oregon manufacturing and workforce capacity. and workforce manufacturing Service on with Forest Coordina� and communi� es, and strengthen regional forest restora� on restora� forest regional strengthen es, and and communi� resilience, reduce the risk of uncharacteris� c wildﬁ re to forests forests to re c wildﬁ the risk of uncharacteris� reduce resilience, Oregon's Rogue River Basin. We work to improve forest health and forest improve to work We Basin. River Rogue Oregon's To increase the restora� on of federal forests in Southwest in Southwest forests on of federal the restora� increase To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Jackson and Josephine Coun� es, Secondary and Ter� ary: Douglas, Coos, Curry, Klamath, and Siskiyou (CA) Coun� es Coun� (CA) and Siskiyou Klamath, ary: Coos, Curry, Douglas, Ter� and es, Secondary Coun� Josephine and Jackson NF River-Siskiyou Rogue Southern Oregon Forest Restoration Collaborative Collaborative Restoration Forest Oregon Southern PAGE 22 PAGE 23 OREGON Rogue River-Siskiyou Na� onal Forest Na� River-Siskiyou Rogue Facts Box Facts and Curry County • ve All Lands Collabora� • in 2012 Established • • • Extension Extension Extension University University University State State State Oregon Oregon Oregon by by by Hosted Hosted Hosted

• Agencies Federal • es Universi� Local • zens Individual Ci� • Landowners Private • Timber Industry Commercial • ons on Organiza� Conserva�

things - including humans - who inhabit the area. things - including humans - who inhabit animals is benefi cial to the health of the forest and the living the health of the forest cial to animals is benefi ecosystem. Restoring the oak and accompanying plants and plants the oak and accompanying Restoring ecosystem. on cipa� of Par� Diversity The land has been transforming over the years to a fi r-based a fi to the years over The land has been transforming Creek is a tributary to the Rogue River near Agness, Oregon. near Agness, Oregon. River the Rogue to is a tributary Creek ecosystems in the Shasta Costa Creek watershed. Shasta Costa Costa Shasta watershed. Creek Costa Shasta in the ecosystems together with the US Forest Service to restore oak savanna oak savanna restore Service to with the US Forest together and monitoring phases. The WRCFC's ini� work is to al project ini� phases. The WRCFC's and monitoring � mely progress of projects through selec� on, planning, execu� on on, planning, execu� selec� through of projects mely progress � and private landowners and industries to support effi and cient support effi to and industries landowners and private lands within the Wild Rivers Coast geographic region. geographic Coast Rivers lands within the Wild es Coun� BLM, States, Tribes, with the USFS, engages The WRCFC Land Management (BLM), and other state, county and private and private county state, (BLM), and other Land Management Service on with Forest Coordina� benefi cial uses of Tribes, public lands managed by the Bureau of Bureau the by public lands managed cial uses of Tribes, benefi US Forest Service, Tribal Lands held in trust for the exclusive and the exclusive for Lands held in trust Service, Tribal US Forest in and around the Na� onal Forest system lands managed by the by lands managed system onal Forest the Na� in and around being of watersheds, the forests they contain, and communi� es and communi� contain, they the forests being of watersheds, a shared vision to protect and improve the resilience and well- the resilience and improve protect to vision a shared group of stakeholders who work together to create and implement implement and create to together work who stakeholders of group The Wild Rivers Coast Forest Collabora� ve (WRCFC) is a diverse is a diverse (WRCFC) ve Collabora� Forest Coast The Wild Rivers Mission/About Statement Mission/About District #3: Representa� Carl Wilson (R) ve #3: Representa� District District #1: Representa� ve Wayne Krieger (R) Krieger Wayne ve #1: Representa� District District #2: Senator Herman Baertschiger Jr. (R) Jr. Herman Baertschiger #2: Senator District District #1: Senator Jeff (R) Kruse Jeff #1: Senator District District #4: Peter DeFazio (D) DeFazio #4: Peter District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Kim Hunter (541) 247-3636, [email protected] (541) 247-3636, [email protected] Service: Kim Hunter Forest Collabora� ve Group: Kendal Martel, Sustainable Northwest (503) 221-6911 x114 [email protected] Northwest Sustainable Martel, Kendal Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

Curry and Josephine Coun� es (addi� onal in California) h� p://wrcfc.org/Home/ h� in California) onal es (addi� Curry Coun� Josephine and Wild Rivers Coast Forest Collaborative Collaborative Forest Coast Rivers Wild Siuslaw Na� Forest onal Na� Siuslaw Facts Box Facts accom¬plish restora� on thinning, resul� ng in on thinning, resul� restora� accom¬plish treated; than 3,700 acres more onal Forest on Na� and 59 projects projects land; on; vegeta� ve with na� into mber sales went � stew-ardship from jobs; wage family ng on, crea� restora� on projects; restora� for of the the Chiefs by Award, Partnership Natural Service and the USDA Forest U.S. on Service, recognizing Conserva� Resources on and forest conserva� promote orts to eﬀ stewardship • on restora� of 65 private-land The approval • planted of riparian areas 1,000 acres Over • • receipts receipts in retained in retained Nearly $3.3 million Nearly $3.3 million • funds on of $1.6 million in matching Genera� • Chiefs’ of the 2010 Two The award • ve All Lands Collabora� • in 2001 Established • mber sales to � of 14 stewardship The award

• Agencies Federal • Councils Watershed • es li� Public U� • on Groups Conserva� • ons Organiza� Environmental • t Non-Proﬁ Environmental • Groups Wildlife

District #9: Representa� (D Caddy McKeown ve #9: Representa� District District #10: Representa� (D) Gomberg David ve #10: Representa� District District #12: Senator Brian Boquist (R) Brian Boquist #12: Senator District District #5: Senator Arnie Roblan (D) Arnie Roblan #5: Senator District District #4: Peter DeFazio (D) DeFazio #4: Peter District District #5: Kurt Schrader (D) Schrader #5: Kurt District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Jeff 541-750-7015 Uebel, [email protected], Service: Jeff Forest Collabora� ve Group: Kirk Shimeall, Stewardship Coordinator, stewardship@cascadepacifi 541-248-3094 c.org, stewardship@cascadepacifi Coordinator, Kirk Shimeall, Stewardship Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact contribu� economies. local ng to contribu� has an impressive history of success restoring the land and of success restoring history has an impressive on cipa� of Par� Diversity Siuslaw Na� onal Forest, in partnership with stewardship groups, groups, with stewardship in partnership onal Forest, Na� Siuslaw employment and contract opportuni� businesses. The area es to opportuni� and contract employment These projects benefi t local communi� provide they es in that communi� t local benefi These projects monitor the ecological and economic impacts of the projects. impacts of the projects. and economic the ecological monitor They meet monthly and a� end fi eld trips to project loca� ons to loca� project to eld trips end fi and a� monthly meet They and priori� ze proposals for future funding with stewardship funds. funding with stewardship future for proposals ze and priori� needs of local communi� es. communi� needs of local also help evaluate lands. The groups on public and private projects promote ecological restora� the meets that on and enhancement restora� ecological promote stewardship and monitor help plan, evaluate, groups Stewardship organiza� ons from the local area that are working with the SNF to the SNF to with working are that area the local ons from organiza� Service on with Forest Coordina� (map). The stewardship groups are a collec� of individuals and on a collec� are groups (map). The stewardship Siuslaw, and Smith-Umpqua-Dunes stewardship group areas areas group stewardship and Smith-Umpqua-Dunes Siuslaw, restora� on projects located in the Alsea, Hebo, Marys Peak, Peak, Marys in the Alsea, Hebo, located on projects restora� Na� onal Forest (SNF), and other partners to fund watershed watershed fund to (SNF), and other partners onal Forest Na� Pacifi c Resource Conserva� the Siuslaw on and Development, Conserva� c Resource Pacifi forest stewardship coopera� ve collabora� Cascade between on collabora� ve coopera� stewardship forest The Siuslaw Collabora� ve Watershed Restora� is a on Program Restora� Watershed ve Collabora� The Siuslaw Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Tillamook, Yamhill, Polk, Lincoln, Benton, Lane h� p://www.cascadepacifi Lane cstewardship.org/ Benton, Lincoln, Polk, Yamhill, Tillamook, p://www.cascadepacifi h� Siuslaw Collaborative Watershed Restoration Program Restoration Watershed Collaborative Siuslaw PAGE 24 PAGE 25 OREGON Siuslaw Na� Forest onal Na� Siuslaw area. species. invasive and control habitat wildlife on District. Conserva� and Water Soil Siuslaw • in 2017 Formed • in 2007 Formed • Watershed River the Mary’s from cipants Includes par� • sh and fi improve that 4 projects As of 2016, completed • in 2003 Formed • area. River the Siuslaw from Includes partners • on with eradica� on Japanese Knotweed Primary focus Smith-Umpqua-Dunes Stewardship Stewardship Smith-Umpqua-Dunes (SUDSG) Group Mary’s Peak Stewardship Group Group Stewardship Peak Mary’s (MPSG) (SSG) Group Stewardship Siuslaw areas. areas. District. and on roads, public safety improve habitat, wildlife species. invasive control their piece of restore to ways looking for are landowners the watershed. area. area. District Ranger Coast on restora� and river removal species and invasive week enhancement. and stream

• in 2011 Formed • River Salmon Tillamook to from cipants Includes par� • the Hebo Ranger by on lands managed is focused Work • sh and enhance ﬁ that 4 projects As of 2016, completed • c when enthusias� property also occur on private Projects • Central the by on the lands managed is focused Work • noxious to related 10 projects As of 2016, completed • 2006 in Formed • River and Yachats the Alsea from cipants Includes par�

Hebo Stewardship Group (HSG) Group Hebo Stewardship Alsea Stewardship Group (ASG) Group Stewardship Alsea

Tillamook, Yamhill, Polk, Lincoln, Benton, Lane h� p://www.cascadepaciﬁ Lane cstewardship.org/ Benton, Lincoln, Polk, Yamhill, Tillamook, p://www.cascadepaciﬁ h� Siuslaw Collaborative Watershed Restoration Program Stewardship Groups Stewardship Program Restoration Watershed Collaborative Siuslaw OREGON Facts Box Facts

acres (3 project areas) (3 project acres Northwest and Sustainable Conservancy,

• 92,000 Over Projects: Planning USFS Recent • Nature The Resources, Wallowa Led by • ve Public Lands Collabora� • in 2011 Established

• Agencies Federal • Councils Watershed • Agencies State • Government Local • ng Groups and Hun� Wildlife • cials Oﬃ Elected State • on Groups Conserva� • ons Organiza� Environmental • Timber Industry Commercial • zens Individual Ci� • Tribes • University Local

WA- District #5 Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R) McMorris Rodgers #5 Cathy District WA- OR - District #58: Representa� ve Greg Barreto (R) Barreto Greg ve #58: Representa� OR - District OR - District #29: Senator Bill Hansell (R) #29: Senator OR - District OR - District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg OR - District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Joani Bosworth (541) 278-3722. Joani Bosworth Forest Service: Forest Nils Christoﬀ (541) 426-8053 erson Nils Christoﬀ Collabora� Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

designated an Oregon Solu� in 2012. ons Project Solu� an Oregon designated on cipa� of Par� Diversity pine planta� ons. The Kahler Dry Forest Restora� was on Project Restora� Dry Forest ons. The Kahler pine planta� Glass Projects that focus on the restora� on of oﬀ ponderosa -site on of oﬀ on the restora� focus that Glass Projects Kahler Dry Forest Restora� and Thomas Creek and the on Project Restora� Dry Forest Kahler Currently working with the Uma� lla Na� on the onal Forest lla Na� with the Uma� working Currently Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� Na� onal Forest. Na� local community socioeconomic health in and near the Uma� lla in and near the Uma� health socioeconomic community local of stakeholders to improve and sustain ecological resiliency and resiliency ecological and sustain improve to of stakeholders To develop and promote balanced solu� ons from a diverse group group a diverse ons from balanced solu� and promote develop To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Aso� n, Garﬁ eld, Columbia, Walla Walla, Baker, Grant, Union, Morrow, Wallowa, Uma� lla, and Wheeler Coun� es Coun� and Wheeler lla, onal Forest Uma� Wallowa, Na� lla Morrow, Union, Grant, Baker, Walla, Walla Columbia, eld, Uma� Garﬁ n, Aso� Umatilla Forest Collaborative Group Collaborative Forest Umatilla PAGE 26 PAGE 27 Umpqua Na� Forest onal Na� Umpqua Facts Box Facts • 501(C)(3) • ve All Lands Collabora� h� p://www.surcp.org/ h�

• Agency Federal • members community spectrum of grassroots Broad • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental Regional • of Indians Band of the Umpqua Tribe Creek Cow • of Land Management Bureau • of Fish and Wildlife Department Oregon • on Service Conserva� onal Resource Na�

District #2: Representa� (R) Dallas Heard ve #2: Representa� District District #7: Representa� (R) Cedric Hayden ve #7: Representa� District District #4: Senator Floyd Prozanski (D) Prozanski Floyd #4: Senator District District #4: Representa� ve Peter DeFazio (D) DeFazio Peter ve #4: Representa� District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: (541) 825-3107 or [email protected] Donna Owens, Forest Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact [email protected] Coordinator, Petrowski, Stan Group: ve Collabora� South Umpqua River watershed communi� es. communi� watershed South Umpqua River on cipa� of Par� Diversity partner-based projects as a 501C3 umbrella organiza� the on for organiza� as a 501C3 umbrella projects partner-based economic interests of our region. We exist to facilitate and actuate and actuate facilitate to exist We of our region. interests economic forestry, aqua� c habitat restora� social and on, and the diverse restora� c habitat aqua� forestry, to support community eﬀ orts of restora� on ecology, restora� on restora� on ecology, orts of restora� eﬀ support community to The South Umpqua Rural Community Partnership was established established was Partnership Community Rural The South Umpqua Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� of a healthy environment through good stewardship prac� ces. prac� stewardship good through environment of a healthy To protect, restore and maintain our communi� es in the context our communi� and maintain restore protect, To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Douglas County County Douglas South Umpqua Rural Community Partnership Community Rural Umpqua South OREGON Umpqua Na� Forest onal Na� Umpqua Facts Box Facts • ve Public Lands Collabora�

h� p://www.umpquafc.org/ h�

• groups environmental Local • owners Small woodlands • Foresters • oners � on prac� ict resolu� Confl • Community volunteer • forester agency Federal • ghters refi fi red Re�

Diversity of Par� cipa� on cipa� of Par� Diversity Copeland watersheds. projects such as designing a restora� in the Calf- on project a restora� such as designing projects Con� nue to work with Forest Service on landscape restora� on Service restora� on landscape with Forest work nue to Con� Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� use and management of fuels on the Umpqua Na� onal Forest. of fuels on the Umpqua Na� use and management lands in Douglas County, Oregon. We are currently focused on ﬁ re on ﬁ focused currently are We Oregon. lands in Douglas County, group that advocates for forest management ac� vi� es on public vi� ac� management forest for advocates that group The Umpqua Forestry Coali� community on is a broad-based, Coali� Forestry The Umpqua Mission/About Statement Mission/About Douglas County County Douglas Umpqua ForestryUmpqua Coalition District #7: District (R) Cedric Hayden ve Representa� District #4: District (D) Prozanski Floyd Senator District #2: District (D) DeFazio Peter ve Representa� Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: (541) 496-4142 or [email protected] Bill Mulholland, Forest Collabora� Don Morrison, (541) 530-2420 or [email protected] Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact PAGE 28 PAGE 29 Facts Box Facts appx. 16,000 – mechanical treatment; 21,00 21,00 21,00 treatment; treatment; treatment; 16,000 – mechanical 16,000 – mechanical 16,000 – mechanical appx. appx. appx. 21 21 21 Joseph Creek); Joseph Creek); Joseph Creek); burn (Lower burn (Lower burn (Lower prescribed prescribed prescribed miles of fencing Agent) 1996) Wallowa Resources Wallowa • Acreage: Projects Planning USFS Recent • • • Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 501(c)3 (External 501(c)3 (External 501(c)3 (External Resources Resources Resources Wallowa Wallowa Wallowa • ve Public Lands Collabora� • • • est. est. est. Resources Resources Resources in 2012 (Wallowa in 2012 (Wallowa in 2012 (Wallowa Established Established Established

• cials Oﬃ Elected Local • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental • ons Organiza� Environmental • Agencies State • Timber Industry Commercial • Agencies Federal • es Universi� Local • Government Local • ng Groups and Hun� Wildlife • Schools Local • Groups and Grazing Rangeland

District #60: Representa� ve Cliff (R) Bentz Cliff ve #60: Representa� District District #30: Senate Republican Leader Ted Ferrioli (R) Ferrioli Leader Ted Republican #30: Senate District District #2: Greg Walden (R) Walden #2: Greg District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal (541) 523-1201, [email protected] Forest Service: Tom Montoya, Forest Supervisor Forest Montoya, Service: Tom Forest Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact (541) 426-8053 x30 Joe Costello, Group: ve Collabora� scale of ac� of the Blue Mountains. management ve of ac� scale support Regional Forester Jim Pena’s focus on increasing pace and on increasing focus Jim Pena’s Forester support Regional in the NEPA process to reach eff ec� ve and effi cient solu� ons that solu� cient and effi ve ec� eff reach to process in the NEPA on cipa� of Par� Diversity The Collabora� ve works with the Forest Service to fi nd innova� ons innova� nd fi Serviceto Forest the with works ve Collabora� The rangeland improvement, noxious weed treatments. treatments. weed noxious improvement, rangeland down woody (live and dead), in stream work, culvert work, work, culvert work, in stream and dead), (live woody down stands to historic range of variability, fuels reduc� on – ladder, on – ladder, fuels reduc� of variability, range historic to stands resource restora� on recommenda� ons such as: restora� on of ons such as: restora� on recommenda� restora� resource by the Wallowa Country Collabora� has numerous This project ve. Collabora� Country the Wallowa by Watershed Assessment issues and recommenda� ons put forth and recommenda� issues Assessment Watershed The Collabora� ve is preparing to review the Lower Joseph Creek Joseph Creek the Lower review to is preparing ve The Collabora� Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� collabora� of stakeholders. group a diverse by on collabora� Wallowa-Whitman Na� onal Forest and local communi� es through communi� and local onal Forest Na� Wallowa-Whitman To improve the social, economic, and ecological resiliency of the of the resiliency and ecological the social, economic, improve To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Wallowa, Union, and Baker Coun� es Coun� Baker and Union, Wallowa, p://www.wallowaresources.org/ h� onal Whitman Na� Wallowa Wallowa Whitman Forest Collaborative - Collaborative Forest Whitman Wallowa OREGON Facts Box Facts • in 2014 Established • ve All Lands Collabora� h� p://southwillame� e.wix.com/swfc p://southwillame� h� Forest onal Na� e Willame�

• Agencies Federal • Timber Industry Commercial • zens Individual Ci� • es Universi� Local

District #18: District Vic Gilliam (R) ve Representa� District #9: District (R) Girod Fred Senator District #7: District (R) Cedric Hayden ve Representa� District #4: District (D) Prozanski Floyd Senator District #5: District (D) Schrader Kurt District #4: District (D) DeFazio Peter Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Darren Cross, Deputy District Ranger, Middle Fork Ranger District, 541-782-5253 [email protected] [email protected] 541-782-5253 District, Ranger Middle Fork Ranger, Deputy District Cross, Service: Darren Forest Collabora� ve Group: Sarah Altemus-Pope, 541-521-5786 swfcollabora� [email protected] 541-521-5786 swfcollabora� Altemus-Pope, Sarah Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact Fork Willame� watershed. e River Willame� Fork project to restore dry mixed conifer habitat in the Upper Middle habitat conifer dry mixed restore to project par� cipa� ng in a collabora� ve planning eff the Rigdon for ort planning eff ve ng in a collabora� cipa� par� receipts, and implementa� is also The SWFC on monitoring. and implementa� receipts, on cipa� of Par� Diversity area” for u� lizing local workforce, priori� zing spending of retained priori� workforce, lizing local u� for area” recommenda� ons for restora� on ac� vi� es, defi ning the “local es, defi vi� on ac� restora� ons for recommenda� rela� on to stewardship contracts, the commi� ee will discuss: the commi� contracts, stewardship on to rela� ecological restora� In of the landscape. on and resilience restora� ecological Outlook Landscape Diversity Project (Outlook) to improve improve (Outlook) to Project Diversity Outlook Landscape stewardship contracts to meet the objec� of the proposed ves the objec� meet to contracts stewardship forestlands. The MFRD would like to implement several several implement to like The MFRD would forestlands. Ranger District of the Willame� e Na� and adjacent onal Forest e Na� of the Willame� District Ranger The SWFC focuses on issues that impact the Middle Fork Middle Fork impact the on issues that focuses The SWFC nearby communi� es. communi� nearby Service on with Forest Coordina� socioeconomic health for the southern Willame� and area e forest Willame� the southern for health socioeconomic forest management solu� ons that sustain ecological resiliency and resiliency ecological sustain ons that solu� management forest (SWFC) is to bring together interested par� local promote es to par� interested together bring is to (SWFC) The purpose of the Southern Willame� e Forest Collabora� ve Collabora� e Forest Willame� of the Southern The purpose Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Lane County County Lane Southern Willamette Forest Collaborative Collaborative Forest Willamette Southern PAGE 30 PAGE 31 OREGON Facts Box Facts • • • and Electric Board and Electric Board and Electric Board Water Water Water Eugene Eugene Eugene by by by Hosted Hosted Hosted • ve All Lands Collabora�

h� p://www.cascadepaciﬁ c.org/smartlist_113/ p://www.cascadepaciﬁ h� Forest onal e Na� Willame�

• Agencies Federal • Agencies State • es li� Public U� • Council Watershed • ons Organiza� Environmental • ves Representa� Industry Forest

how to spend stewardship contrac� ng receipts. contrac� spend stewardship to how poten� al for new stewardship sales and/or recommenda� ons for recommenda� and/or sales stewardship new al for poten� recommenda� ons rela� ng to upcoming stewardship sales, stewardship upcoming ng to ons rela� recommenda� on cipa� of Par� Diversity periodic memos to send to the Forest Service with specifi c Service with specifi the Forest send to periodic memos to The McKenzie Watershed Stewardship Group plans to produce produce plans to Group Stewardship Watershed The McKenzie as support local communi� es. communi� as support local Treasury. This can both promote forest restora� as well on projects restora� forest both promote This can Treasury. placement, road decommissioning) instead of going to the General General the to going of instead decommissioning) road placement, fund other restora� on work (such as culvert removal, large wood wood large removal, (such as culvert on work fund other restora� the funds generated from the sale to remain in the watershed to to in the watershed remain the sale to from the funds generated contracts on � mber sales in the McKenzie watershed would allow allow would watershed mber sales in the McKenzie on � contracts as reducing wildfi re risk and improving forest health. Stewardship Stewardship health. forest risk and improving re wildfi as reducing long-term contracts to meet land-management objec� such ves, objec� land-management meet to contracts long-term Stewardship contrac� ng allows the Forest Service to enter into into enter Service to Forest the ng allows contrac� Stewardship Collabora� ve. Collabora� Service on with Forest Coordina� watershed. This group is a subcommi� ee of the McKenzie subcommi� is a group This watershed. to ini� ate a ‘stewardship contrac� ng’ in the McKenzie group contrac� a ‘stewardship ate ini� to with a number of partners and the Willame� e Na� Forest onal e Na� the Willame� and of partners with a number The Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) has been working has been working (EWEB) Board & Electric Water The Eugene Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Lane & Linn County County & Linn Lane McKenzie Watershed Stewardship Group Stewardship Watershed McKenzie OREGON Facts Box Facts North San� am Watershed Council ini� the ate Council ini� am Watershed North San� process ve collabora� its boundary to expanded ve Collabora� est am Watershed. North San� re include the en� ve Collabora� shed Stakeholder • am For- the North San� In December of 2014 • Water- the Breitenbush called formerly Was • • ve ve All Lands Collabora� All Lands Collabora� • in 2011 Established • the CCLSP in 2012 helped the Funds from

• Councils Watershed • t Non-Proﬁ Environmental • ng Groups and Hun� Wildlife • Agency Federal • Timber Industry • Community Members Local • Other NR Agencies • Industry Private

District #7: District (R) Cedric Hayden ve Representa� District #4: District (D) Prozanski Floyd Senator District #5: District (D) Schrader Kurt Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Grady McMahan, Detroit Ranger District – District Ranger, (503) 854-4200, [email protected] Ranger, – District District Ranger McMahan, Detroit Service: Grady Forest Collabora� ve Group: Rebecca McCoun, Council Coordinator, (503) 930-8202, Council@NorthSan� am.org Council@NorthSan� (503) 930-8202, McCoun, Council Coordinator, Rebecca Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact discuss on the ground issues. discuss on the ground on cipa� of Par� Diversity North San� am Forest Collabora� ve to view proposed projects and projects proposed view to ve Collabora� am Forest North San� around Detroit Lake. The Forest Service leads ﬁ with eld tours Service leads ﬁ The Forest Lake. Detroit around ac� vi� es that are occurring in the Breitenbush Watershed and Watershed in the Breitenbush occurring are es that vi� ac� Service Detroit Ranger District on project planning and restora� on planning and restora� on project District Ranger Service Detroit The North San� am Watershed Council works with the US Forest with the US Forest Council works am Watershed The North San� Canyon. Service on with Forest Coordina� contribu� ng to the economy and job market of the North San� am of the North San� and job market the economy ng to contribu� the headwaters of the North San� am River Watershed while while Watershed am River of the North San� the headwaters ul� mately improve the ecosystem func� of resilience on and func� the ecosystem improve mately ul� to iden� fy and address the issues and opportuni� will that es the issues and opportuni� fy and address iden� to To draw upon the knowledge base of a diverse collabora� ve collabora� a diverse base of the knowledge upon draw To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Marion & Linn County County & Linn Marion ve/ amforestcollabora� am.org/northsan� onal Forest p://northsan� e Na� h� Willame� North Santiam Forest Collaborative Forest Santiam North PAGE 32 PAGE 33 OREGON Facts Box Facts o Thinning o on restora� Habitat o wood and large Culvert o species removal Invasive • ve All Lands Collabora� • • • that that that project project project “Cool Soda” is the overarching “Cool Soda” is the overarching “Cool Soda” is the overarching on: focuses • in 1996 Council Established Watershed • lands 40% public lands 60% private

h� p://www.sswc.org/what-we-do/sweet-home-all-lands-approach/ onal Forest p://www.sswc.org/what-we-do/sweet-home-all-lands-approach/ Na� e h� Willame�

• Agencies Federal • Timber Industry Commercial • Government Local • ons Community Organiza� • Council Watershed • es Universi� Local

Home. on cipa� of Par� Diversity watershed restora� on, and recrea� on opportuni� es near Sweet opportuni� on recrea� on, and restora� watershed to plan and implement projects that will provide employment, employment, will provide that projects plan and implement to Linn County, the City of Sweet Home, and other local organiza� ons organiza� local Home, and other City of Sweet the Linn County, Cascade Timber Consul� ng, South San� am Watershed Council, am Watershed ng, San� South Timber Consul� Cascade The SSALC is working with the Sweet Home Ranger District, District, Home Ranger with the Sweet is working The SSALC Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� and sustainable economic growth. economic and sustainable is to steward water, land and cultural resources to deliver needed deliver to resources and cultural land water, steward is to The mission of the South San� am All Lands Collabora� (SSALC) ve Lands Collabora� am All of the South San� The mission Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Linn County County Linn South Santiam All Lands Santiam South Collaborative Colville Na� onal Forest Na� Colville Facts Box Facts management projects management • 501(c)3 • ve Public Lands Collabora� • in 2002 Established • 25 forest planning of over in cipated Par�

• Agencies Federal • Agencies State • on Groups Conserva� • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental • es li� Public U� • on Northwest Conserva� • Timber Industry Commercial • on Recrea� Non-Motorized • Government Local • es Universi� Local • cials Oﬃ Elected Local

District #7: District (R) Joel Kretz ve Shelly Short (R), Representa� ve Brian Dansel (R), Representa� Senator District #5: District (R) McMorris Rodgers Cathy ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Kathleen Ward, Natural Resources Staff Offi cer, Phone: 509-684-7106, Email: [email protected] cer, Offi Staff Resources Natural Ward, Service: Kathleen Forest Collabora� ve Group: Gloria Flora, Interim Execu� ve Director, Email: gfl ora@s-o-solu� ons.org ora@s-o-solu� Email: gfl Director, ve Execu� Interim Gloria Flora, Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact projects. individuals to communicate concerns to the CNF about individual to concerns communicate individuals to Determining Level of Support for a Project.” This document allows allows This document a Project.” for of Support Level Determining on cipa� of Par� Diversity together. The CNF and the NWFC also created a “Protocol for for a “Protocol also created The CNF and the NWFC together. their interac� on and communica� ons as they con� work nue to con� ons as they on and communica� their interac� the CNF and NWFC was signed that explains the nature of nature the explains that signed was the CNF and NWFC workshop, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between (MOU) between of Understanding a Memorandum workshop, par� cipate in a three-day workshop on collabora� that on. From on collabora� workshop in a three-day cipate par� was approached by Colville Na� onal Forest (CNF) and asked to to (CNF) and asked onal Forest Colville Na� by approached was In 2005 the Northeast Washington Forestry Coali� on (NWFC) Coali� Forestry Washington In 2005 the Northeast Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� vitality. enhance forest health, public safety and community economic economic and community public safety health, enhance forest To demonstrate the full poten� al of restora� to on forestry of restora� al the full poten� demonstrate To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Stevens, Pend Oreille, and Ferry Coun� es Coun� and Ferry Oreille, Pend Stevens, on.org/ p://www.newforestrycoali� h� Northeast Washington ForestryCoalition Washington Northeast PAGE 34 PAGE 35 WASHINGTON Giﬀ ord Pinchot Na� onal Forest Na� Pinchot ord Giﬀ Facts Box Facts restored planta� and and and ons and watersheds, ons and watersheds, ons and watersheds, planta� planta� planta� restored restored restored monitoring ng to contrac� stewardship from receipts on implementa� support project provided project stewardship successful opportunity and restored economic and and and ve ve ve with collabora� with collabora� with collabora� resource resource resource important important important tribal engagement. • • • of 31,253 acres of 31,253 acres of 31,253 acres Inventory Inventory Inventory Stand Stand Stand Completed Completed Completed • retained Title II funding and Has received • ve Public Lands Collabora� • on Huckleberry Restora� Patch Pole • in 2003 Established • roads, decommissioned that 6 Projects

www.pinchotpartners.org www.pinchotpartners.org

• es Universi� Local • ons Community Organiza� • Groups Tribal • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental • ng Groups and Hun� Wildlife • Community Businesses Local • members Individual community

District #20: District (R) Orcu� T. Ed ve DeBolt (R), Representa� Richard ve (R), Representa� John Braun Senator District #3: District Beutler (R) Jamie Herrera ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Community Engagement Staff Offi cer Tracy Calizon, (360) 891-5156, [email protected] Calizon, Tracy cer Offi Staff Community Engagement Forest Service: Forest Gar Abbas, (360) 497-1105, [email protected] Ranger District Collabora� Group: ve Collabora� (360) 334-2555, [email protected] Coordinator, Jamie Tolfree, Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

grant-funded projects to increase collabora� capacity. ve collabora� increase to projects grant-funded on cipa� of Par� Diversity collabora� ve mee� on Pinchot Partners closely with ngs and work mee� ve collabora� Giff ord Pinchot Na� onal Forest staff ac� vely par� monthly in cipate par� vely ac� staff Forest onal Na� Pinchot ord Giff gridlock and toward work being implemented on the ground. on the ground. being implemented work gridlock and toward development of a common ground agenda that leads away from from away leads that agenda ground of a common development The Forest Service has a clear interest in suppor� ng the in suppor� Service interest has a clear The Forest Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� jobs recrea� on opportuni� es and benefi t watershed health. t watershed es and benefi on opportuni� recrea� jobs areas to promote policies and projects that create quality local local quality create that policies and projects promote to areas To work with the Cowlitz Valley Ranger District and surrounding surrounding and District Ranger Valley with the Cowlitz work To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Lewis County County Lewis Pinchot Partners Pinchot Facts Box Facts Adams District and Lewis River Collabora� ves Collabora� River and Lewis Adams District in 2008) formed which were 75,000 acres over Projects, Retained dollars, Title II RAC support from and CCLS funds) (stewardship Receipts • of the Mt. on in 2011 (a combina� Established • Stewardship Resource and Natural 6 Forest • and project group some funding for Receives • ve Public Lands Collabora�

h� p://www.southgpc.org/ h� Forest onal Pinchot Na� ord GIﬀ

• Timber Industry Commercial • ng Groups and Hun� Wildlife • ons Organiza� Environmental • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental • Agencies Federal • Community Business Local • ons Community Organiza� • ons on Organiza� Recrea� • Government Local • Community Businesses Local • Community members Local

District #14: District Gina McCabe (R) ve Norm Johnson (R), Representa� ve s King (R), Representa� Cur� Senator District #3: District Beutler (R) Herrera Jamie ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Community Engagement Staff Offi cer Tracy Calizon, (360) 891-5156, [email protected] Calizon, Tracy cer Offi Staff Community Engagement Forest Service: Forest @fs.fed.us , (509) 395-3401, emilykpla� Emily Pla� Ranger District Collabora� Group: ve Collabora� Lisa Naas Cook, [email protected] Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

exper� se. exper� on cipa� of Par� Diversity about project areas, and to share natural resource and technical and technical resource natural share and to areas, about project and is present for mee� ng and fi eld trips in order to provide data data provide to in order eld trips ng and fi mee� for and is present The Forest Service serves as a non-vo� the group ng member with Servicea non-vo� as serves The Forest communi� es. communi� Service on with Forest Coordina� end of the Giff ord Pinchot Na� in surrounding and onal Forest Pinchot Na� ord end of the Giff forest ecosystem health, recrea� on the south public safety on and recrea� health, ecosystem forest and implementa� on of projects that enhance economic vitality, vitality, enhance economic that on of projects and implementa� partnership that par� cipates in the development, facilita� on, facilita� in the development, cipates par� that partnership The South Giff ord Pinchot Collabora� based is a community ve Collabora� Pinchot ord Giff The South Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Skamania County County Skamania South Gifford Pinchot Collaborative Pinchot Gifford South PAGE 36 PAGE 37 WASHINGTON Facts Box Facts Landslide to improve forest habitat and habitat forest improve Landslide to economy local the strengthen • er the deadly Oso a� year one Created • ve Public Lands Collabora� • school district. local to STEM • in 2015 Established h� p://www.darringtoncollabora� ve.org/ p://www.darringtoncollabora� h� Forest onal Na� Mt-Baker-Snoqualmie

• cials Oﬃ Elected Local • Timber Industry Commercial • ons Organiza� Environmental • es and Schools Universi� Local • on Groups Conserva� • ons t organiza� Based non-proﬁ on Science and Educa� • Agencies Federal

District #39: District (R) Sco� Elizabeth ve ansen (R), Representa� Dan Kris� ve (R), Representa� Kirk Pearson Senator District #1: District DelBene (D) Suzan ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Peter Forbes, Darrington District Ranger, 360-436-2301, [email protected] Ranger, District Darrington Forbes, Service: Peter Forest Collabora� ve Group: info@darringtoncollabora� ve.org info@darringtoncollabora� Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

STEM program. STEM and educa� onal opportuni� es for Darrington’s youth through the through youth Darrington’s es for onal opportuni� and educa� on cipa� of Par� Diversity and provide economic benefi ts to the community of Darrington of Darrington the community ts to benefi economic and provide on the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Na� onal Forest near Darrington, near Darrington, onal Forest Na� on the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie resilient forest, provide for increased, sustainable � mber harvests � sustainable increased, for provide forest, resilient strives to show they can simultaneously create a more ecologically ecologically a more create simultaneously can they show to strives func� and watersheds. oning of our forests func� ve The collabora� goals. of achieving in the way stand issues that Forest in the Darrington vicinity while improving the ecological the ecological vicinity while improving Darrington in the Forest address cials to offi with federal together works ve The collabora� Northwest Forest Plan on the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Na� onal Na� Plan on the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Forest Northwest Service on with Forest Coordina� of increasing ecologically sustainable � under the mber harvest � sustainable ecologically of increasing from federal, state and local government around shared goals goals shared around government and local state federal, from and Math (STEM) youth educa� on programs and representa� ves and representa� on programs educa� youth (STEM) and Math � mber industry, Darrington Science, Technology, Engineering, Science, Technology, Darrington mber industry, � environmental community, members of the local Darrington Darrington of the local members community, environmental from the community of Darrington, WA, the Puget Sound the Puget WA, of Darrington, the community from The Darrington Collabora� ve brings together stakeholders stakeholders together brings ve Collabora� The Darrington Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Snohomish County County Snohomish Darrington Collaborative Facts Box Facts Okanogan-Wenatchee Na� Forest onal Na� Okanogan-Wenatchee Have commi� a single Forest to ed 9 years commi� Have on incep� grassroots – from Service EA on. and Supplementa� monitoring through assistance; landowner private ed to Commi� $254,998 invested have landowners private on fuel reduc� hazardous cost-share into es (thinning, pruning, brush removal, vi� ac� on 416.5 acres. on 416.5 acres. etc.) etc.) as one of the original 8 Fire Recognized on, es in the na� Communi� Adapted partner. FAC a Washington currently Steering a dedicated by is overseen Work ee. Commi� piece #3 is a key District Fire Chelan County to the CWSC on, allowing of the organiza� before, onal role informa� an important play incidents. re er wildﬁ during and a� Established in 2008 – dedicated to landscape landscape to in 2008 – dedicated Established on in the WUI. restora� • • • • • •

Private Landowners Private Agencies State Agencies Federal on Groups Protec� re Community Wildﬁ ons on Organiza� Conserva� Districts Fire Local Industry Business and Tourism Districts Youth/School

• • • • • • • •

District #13: District (R) Manweller Ma� ve (R), Representa� Dent Tom ve (R), Representa� Judy Warnick Senator District #39: District (R) Sco� Elizabeth ve (R), Representa� ansen Dan Kris� ve (R) Representa� Kirk Pearson Senator District #12: District (R) Hawkins Brad ve a (R), Representa� Cary Condo� ve e (R), Representa� Parle� Linda Evans Senator District #1: District DelBene (D) Suzan ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator District #8: District (R) Reichert David ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: USFS WWRD District Ranger Jeff [email protected] (509) 548-2550, Rivera, Jeff Ranger WWRD District Service: USFS Forest Collabora� ve Group: Andrew Holm, CWSC Steering Commi� ee, (509)548-6880 x224, info@chums� ckcoal� on.org ckcoal� ee, (509)548-6880 x224, info@chums� Commi� Steering Holm, CWSC Andrew Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact component of the CWSC mission. of the CWSC component steering commi� an integral remains ee and the partnership commi� steering on cipa� of Par� Diversity Project (UWRP). The USFS holds an ex-offi cio space on the CWSC ex-offi holds an The USFS (UWRP). Project number of projects, including the Upper Wenatchee Restora� on Restora� the Upper Wenatchee including number of projects, The CWSC con� nues to collaborate with the WRRD and USFS on a with the WRRD and USFS collaborate nues to con� The CWSC the face of actual wildfi incidents. re of actual wildfi the face area has been acknowledged for eff ec� in work cross-boundary ve ec� eff for has been acknowledged area acres with a large amount of private lands interface. The project The project lands interface. of private amount with a large acres vision of a resilient community living with wildfi re. with wildfi living community vision of a resilient 23,122 approximately covers area project re The en� the CWSC. we work to accomplish our mission and ul� mately, achieve the achieve mately, our mission and ul� accomplish to work we with extensively has worked 1999), the USFS (EA (CHFR) Project Collabora� on, educa� on and outreach all play a strong role in how in how role a strong all play on and outreach on, educa� Collabora� Service on with Forest Coordina� on Fuels Restora� ck Hazardous on of the Chums� Since the incep� fi re adapted landscapes, governments, businesses, and residents. and residents. businesses, governments, landscapes, adapted re fi and economic contexts in which we view fi re by crea� ng create crea� by re fi view in which we contexts and economic The CWSC highest goal is to change the social, environmental, the social, environmental, change is to goal highest The CWSC Coali� in 2008 formed was on (CWSC) Coali� Capacity Building Program, the Chums� ck Wildfi re Stewardship Stewardship re ck Wildfi Chums� the Capacity Building Program, resources available through the Na� onal Forest Founda� on’s on’s Founda� onal Forest the Na� through available resources crea� on of a Community Wildfi re Protec� on Plan. With the Protec� re Community Wildfi on of a crea� receiving Na� onal Fire Plan grants for fi and the assessments re fi for Plan grants Fire onal Na� receiving wildfi re issues in the Leavenworth area needed to be addressed, be addressed, to needed area issues in the Leavenworth re wildfi This grassroots group started in 2005 with the recogni� on that the recogni� in 2005 with started group This grassroots Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Chelan County h� p://www.ucsrb.org/ncw� c/ p://www.ucsrb.org/ncw� h� County Chelan Chumstick Wildfire Stewardship Coalition Stewardship Wildfire Chumstick PAGE 38 PAGE 39 WASHINGTON Facts Box Facts 27,500 (3 projects) • ve Public Lands Collabora� • in 2013 Established • • • appx. appx. appx. Acreage: Acreage: Acreage: Projects Projects Projects Planning Planning Planning USFS USFS USFS Recent Recent Recent

• Timber Industry Commercial • on Groups Conserva� • Government Local • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental • Groups Tribal • Agencies Federal • ons Organiza� Environmental • Sort Yard Colville Tribal • Agencies Federal

District #13: District (R) Manweller Ma� ve (R), Representa� Dent Tom ve (R), Representa� Judy Warnick Senator District #39: District (R) Sco� Elizabeth ve (R), Representa� ansen Dan Kris� ve (R) Representa� Kirk Pearson Senator District #12: District (R) Hawkins Brad ve a (R), Representa� Cary Condo� ve e (R), Representa� Parle� Linda Evans Senator District #1: District DelBene (D) Suzan ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator District #8: District (R) Reichert David ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Susan Thomas, Partnership Coordinator, (509) 548-2563 [email protected] Coordinator, Service: Partnership Susan Thomas, Forest Director, (509) 888-0321, [email protected] Director, Collabora� ve Group: Melody Kreimes, Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board Forest Health Program Manager & Interim Execu� ve Execu� & Interim Manager Health Program Forest Board Salmon Recovery Upper Columbia Melody Kreimes, Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact condi� ons due to large scale wildﬁ in 2015. res wildﬁ scale large ons due to condi� on cipa� of Par� Diversity and/or adjust the project as needed based on recent changed changed as needed based on recent the project adjust and/or input may increase support for implementa� on, monitoring, implementa� for support increase input may Methow Valley, Wenatchee River, and Tonasket. Collabora� ve Collabora� and Tonasket. River, Wenatchee Valley, Methow iden� fy restora� Districts: Ranger on needs on the following fy restora� iden� Forest Health Collabora� ve on several priority projects that that priority projects on several ve Collabora� Health Forest The Forest Service is working with the North Central Washington Washington North Central with the Service is working The Forest economies in Chelan and Okanogan Coun� es. Coun� and Okanogan in Chelan economies Service on with Forest Coordina� promote u� liza� on of natural resources, and support local and support local resources, on of natural liza� u� promote protect natural resources, provide recrea� onal opportuni� es, onal opportuni� recrea� provide resources, natural protect forest resiliency, preserve terrestrial and aqua� habitat, wildlife c and aqua� terrestrial preserve resiliency, forest To advance forest health through transparent ac� improve ons that ac� transparent through health forest advance To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Okanogan and Chelan Coun� es Coun� Chelan and Okanogan c/ p://www.ucsrb.org/ncw� h� Forest onal Na� Okanogan-Wenatchee North Central Washington Forest Health Collaborative Health Forest Washington Central North Facts Box Facts Tieton Collabora� ve) Collabora� Tieton removed weeds maintained • CFLR • ve All Lands Collabora� • es include: vi� on Ac� Restora� • Control on and Weed Restora� Plant ve Na� • Health on of Forest Restora� • Access onal Use and Forest Recrea� • • Species Species of Threatened of Threatened Recovery Recovery • on Protec� Environmental • on and Outreach Educa� • Technologies Value-added • Accomplishments: 5 Year • funds 99,123 leveraged • and noxious plants of invasive 3,966 acres • restored habitat of wildlife 17,800 acres • and improved 558.5 miles of roads • as the known in 2007 (Previously Established

• Industry Timber Commercial • on Recrea� Non-Motorized • Cabin Owners Chinook Pass • on Northwest Conserva� • on Groups Recrea� Motorized • on Groups Conserva� • Government Local • Agencies State • Agencies Federal • Council Fire Prescribed Washington • Groups Tribal • ng Groups and Hun� Fisheries, Wildlife • on Groups Recrea� Non-Motorized • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental

Washington Department of Natural Resources administered land. administered Resources of Natural Department Washington Clockum State Wildlife Areas, the Ahtanum State Forest, and other Forest, State the Ahtanum Areas, Wildlife State Clockum dry and mesic forest types, the Oak Creek, L.T. Murrary, and Murrary, L.T. types, the Oak Creek, dry and mesic forest Lands incorporated include Naches and Cle Elum Ranger District District Cle Elum Ranger include Naches and Lands incorporated on cipa� of Par� Diversity been completed and the strategy is already being implemented. being implemented. is already and the strategy been completed the southern most por� planning has where area analysis on of the por� the southern most 920,000 acre landscape and priori� zes ini� (FY10) in al treatments ini� zes and priori� landscape 920,000 acre and the Naches Ranger District. This Tapash proposal considers a considers proposal This Tapash District. and the Naches Ranger Forest Sciences Lab, the Okanogan-Wenatchee Supervisors Offi ce, Offi Supervisors Lab, the Okanogan-Wenatchee Sciences Forest was/is being developed through a collabora� ve eff the between ort eff ve collabora� a through developed being was/is Forest Restora� on Strategy (2010, in prep). The Forest strategy strategy The Forest (2010, in prep). on Strategy Restora� Forest as Tapash) proposal fi nds its’ basis in the Okanogan-Wenatchee nds its’ basis in the Okanogan-Wenatchee fi proposal as Tapash) The Tapash Sustainable Forest Collabora� ve (herea� to referred er (herea� ve Collabora� Forest Sustainable The Tapash Coordina� Service on with Forest Coordina� science, community input and adap� management. ve adap� input and science, community landscape through ac� ve restora� on projects backed by best best by backed on projects restora� ve ac� through landscape To improve the ecosystem health and natural func� ons of the func� and natural health the ecosystem improve To Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Chelan, Ki� tas and Yakima Coun� es Coun� and Yakima tas Ki� Chelan, p://www.tapash.org/ h� Forest onal Na� Okanogan-Wenatchee Tapash Sustainable Forest Collaborative Forest Sustainable Tapash

District #5: District (Rep/R) Chad Magendanz (Rep/R), Rodne (D), Jay Mark Mullet District #31: District (Rep/R) Chris Hurst (Rep/R), Stokesbary (R), Drew Roach Pam District #2: District (Rep/R.) Wilcox J.T. Barkis (Rep/R), (R), Andrew Randi Becker District #14: District Gina McCabe (Rep/R) (R), Norm Johnson (Rep/R), s King Cur� District #13: District (Rep/R) Manweller Ma� (Rep/R), Dent (R), Tom Judy Warnick District #12: District (Rep/R) Hawkins Brad a (Rep/R), (R), Cary Condo� te Linda Parle� District # 8: District (Rep/R) Reichert (D), David (D), Maria Cantwell y Murray Pa� Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Forest Service: Amanda Velasquez, CFLR Coordinator Okanogan-Wenatchee NF, [email protected] (509) 664-9212 [email protected] NF, Okanogan-Wenatchee Coordinator CFLR Service: Amanda Velasquez, Forest Collabora� ve Group: Laura Potash, Execu� ve Coordinator, [email protected] (206) 678-7866 [email protected] Coordinator, ve Execu� Potash, Laura Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact PAGE 40 PAGE 41 WASHINGTON Facts Box Facts • ve Public Lands Collabora� • 8, 2015 May Established resource exper� se exper� resource ac� ve engagement at mee� planning, etc. ngs, project mee� at engagement ve ac�

• contractors. with local working Sharing experience • Timber Industry Commercial • on Groups Conserva� • ons Organiza� Environmental • ts Non-Proﬁ Environmental • Groups Wildlife • es Socie� Professional • ons on Organiza� Recrea� • on informa� ering resource Oﬀ • and technical knowledge local data, Sharing historical • ng member Serving as a non-vo� • and maintain process ve collabora� ed to Being commi�

District # 35: Senator Tim Sheldon (D), Representa� ve Dan Griff ey (R), Representa� ve Drew MacEwen (R) MacEwen Drew ve (R), Representa� ey Dan Griff ve Tim Sheldon (D), Representa� # 35: Senator District District #24: Senator Jim Hargrove (D), Representa� ve Kevin Van De Wege (D), Representa� (D) Tharinger Steve ve (D), Representa� De Wege Van Kevin ve (D), Representa� Jim Hargrove #24: Senator District District #6: Senator Pa� y Murray (D), Senator Maria Cantwell (D), Representa� Kilmer (D) Derek ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� #6: Senator District Federal and State Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional and State Federal Tim Davis, Natural Resources Staff Offi cer, (360) 956-2430, [email protected] cer, Offi Staff Resources Natural Tim Davis, Forest Service: Reta Laford, Forest Supervisor, (360) 956-2301, [email protected] (360) 956-2301, Supervisor, Forest Laford, Service: Reta Forest Collabora� TBD Group: ve Collabora� Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact

Diversity of Par� cipa� on cipa� of Par� Diversity communi� es on the Peninsula. communi� of: a minimum consists Service at of the Forest The Role Na� onal Forest, and provide economic benefi ts to � mber � ts to benefi economic and provide onal Forest, Na� Service on with Forest Coordina� provide for increased, sustainable � on the Olympic mber harvests � sustainable increased, for provide simultaneously create a more environmentally sound forest, sound forest, environmentally a more create simultaneously and watersheds. Ul� mately, the purpose is to show we can can we show the purpose is to mately, Ul� and watersheds. Forest while benefi � ng the environmental quality of forests quality of forests ng the environmental � while benefi Forest goals of increasing � mber harvest from the Olympic Na� onal Olympic Na� the from mber harvest � of increasing goals to address issues that stand in the way of achieving the shared shared the of achieving in the way stand issues that address to The Collabora� ve will work together and with federal offi cials offi and with federal together will work ve The Collabora� Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Clallam, Grays Harbor, Jeff erson, & Mason Coun� es h� p://www.olympicforestcollabora� ve.org/ p://www.olympicforestcollabora� h� es Mason Coun� & erson, Jeff Harbor, Grays Clallam, onal Forest Olympic Na� Olympic Forest Collaborative Forest Olympic WASHINGTON Facts Box Facts completed or are nearing comple� on--$12 million comple� nearing or are completed onal Forest. on Olympic Na� ed fi iden� and conversion-to-trail closure, road Olympic on the implemented been in plan have of this program The success onal Forest. Na� and the support of SWAT the to due is largely of $6.6 million in of $6.6 million in and receipt and receipt Tribe Tribe Skokomish Skokomish the for targeted Funds and Trails Roads Legacy watershed. the upper in stabilizing cularly par� decade, the past much work estuary, and Skokomish watershed sheries and fi degraded severely recover to remains ons in the valley. condi� ood prone fl improve The 2007 SWAT Ac� on Plan laid out an ambi� ous on Plan laid out an ambi� Ac� The 2007 SWAT mated ng an es� cos� on projects of 42 restora� set as of 2016, of $48.6 million. Remarkably, total been more-have virtually all of these projects-and • decommissioning, road all high priority As of 2016, • made over has been progress While tremendous •

• Tribe Skokomish • on District Mason Conserva� • Company Diamond Resource Green • on Coali� Olympic Forest • The Wilderness Society • Club Sierra • Power Tacoma • onal Forest Olympic Na� • agencies State governments, Local • residents valley zens, ci� Independent • ves representa� Congressional • Community businesses • on groups Conserva�

District #24: District (D) Tharinger Steve ve (D), Representa� De Wege Van Kevin ve (D), Representa� Jim Hargrove Senator District # 35: District (R) MacEwen Drew ve (R), Representa� ey Dan Griff ve Tim Sheldon (D), Representa� Senator District #6: District Kilmer (D) Derek ve (D), Representa� Maria Cantwell (D), Senator y Murray Pa� Senator Congressional Districts and Representa� ves and Representa� Districts Congressional 360-956-2430, [email protected] cer, Offi Staff Resource Natural Tim Davis, Forest Service: Forest [email protected] 360-765-2201, District, Hood Canal Ranger Ranger, District Dean Yoshina, Contact Informa� on Informa� Contact (206) 890-3529, [email protected] The Wilderness Society, Anderson, Mike Group: ve Collabora� com/FullSWATUpdate2016 Plan Update. Download the full digital copy from h� p://� nyurl. p://� h� from copy the full digital Download Plan Update. Ac� on Plan and recently in the 2016 Skokomish Watershed Ac� on Ac� Watershed Skokomish in the 2016 on Plan and recently Ac� These restora� on projects were iden� fi ed in the 2007 SWAT 3-Year 3-Year SWAT 2007 the in ed fi iden� were projects on restora� These on cipa� of Par� Diversity wood enhancement project that installed 30 log jam structures. installed that project enhancement wood maintenance, replacement of four trail bridges, and a 2010 large and a 2010 large bridges, trail of four replacement maintenance, individual culvert upgrades, fi sh passage improvements, road road improvements, sh passage fi upgrades, individual culvert closures, conversion-to-trail, storm damage risk reduc� on, risk reduc� damage storm conversion-to-trail, closures, Restora� ve ac� decommissioning, road included road ons have ac� ve Restora� $12 million in restora� on work in the Skokomish River Watershed. Watershed. River in the Skokomish on work $12 million in restora� environmental health, fi and quality of life. sheries health, fi environmental over has completed other partners, and several Tribe, Skokomish partnerships that are dedicated to restoring the watershed’s the watershed’s restoring to dedicated are that partnerships the on with the SWAT, Service in collabora� Since 2005, the Forest is a � me of healing for the Skokomish, aided by collabora� ve collabora� aided by the Skokomish, me of healing for is a � Service on with Forest Coordina� residents of the watershed. The fi rst part of the 21st century century part of the 21st rst The fi of the watershed. residents produc� on took a toll on the river, the fi and the sh and wildlife, the fi on the river, a toll on took produc� extraordinary amounts of � mber and hydropower, but that that but mber and hydropower, of � amounts extraordinary During the 20th century, the Skokomish watershed produced produced watershed the Skokomish During the 20th century, Skokomish watershed. watershed. Skokomish managers, and others working collabora� vely to restore a healthy a healthy restore to vely collabora� working and others managers, in 2005 as a diverse, informal partnership of governments, land of governments, partnership informal a diverse, in 2005 as The Skokomish Watershed Ac� on Team (SWAT) was established established was (SWAT) on Team Ac� Watershed The Skokomish Mission/About Statement Mission/About

Mason County h� p://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/olympic/workingtogether/partnerships/?cid=stelprdb5399978 Olympic Na� Forest onal Na� Olympic p://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/olympic/workingtogether/partnerships/?cid=stelprdb5399978 h� County Mason Skokomish Watershed Action Team Action Watershed Skokomish PAGE 42 PAGE 43 PAGE 44 PAGE 45 Part 2 Part Conti nuum Conti collaborati ve process collaborati i. on Principles of Collaborati Ten v. Five benefi ts of working collaborati vely v. ts of working collaborati Five benefi ii. in the Service employees roles of Forest Typical iv. iv. on on the Public Involvement Collaborati vi. A list of collaborati on related authoriti es vi. authoriti on related of collaborati A list iii. ve approach use a collaborati When to collaborati ve eff orts across the Region. Included are: Region. Included orts across the eff ve collaborati

included some ti ps that can help support employees as they engage in as they employees can help support ps that included some ti

To support Forest Service employees in engaging in collaborati on we have in collaborati in engaging Service employees support Forest To

Collabora� on Tips and Tools: Tools: and on Tips Collabora�

(April 13 , 2015) (April 13 capacity within the Agency. within the Agency. capacity These documents were developed by Ann Moote, Mamut Consulti ng, and Maia Enzer, US Forest Service, to help advance collaborati ve collaborati to help advance Service, Forest US Enzer, ng, and Maia Mamut Consulti Ann Moote, by were developed These documents Contact: Maia Enzer at [email protected] Maia Enzer Contact: feedback is welcome. and living document considered on are in this secti The documents to achieve more innova� ve and widely supported decisions. Work to understand diﬀ erent diﬀ understand to decisions. Work supported and widely ve innova� more achieve to

to operate eff ec� vely and effi ciently. Clear protocols about how decisions will about how Clear protocols ciently. and effi vely ec� eff operate to Use clear rules of engagement to maintain trust and avoid unnecessary confl ict. Keep agreements and respond to ques� ons ques� to and respond agreements ict. Keep unnecessary confl and avoid trust maintain to Be accountable to build trust. This includes sharing informa� on about agency protocols, budgets, and budgets, protocols, on about agency This includes sharing informa� build trust. to ce transparency Prac� to create capacity for collabora� ve planning and ac� on. Use the collabora� to process ve on. Use the collabora� planning and ac� ve collabora� for capacity create to onships Build rela� to learn and improve. Collabora� on is an opportunity for crea� vity. Be willing to consider diff erent diff consider Be willing to vity. crea� for on is an opportunity Collabora� improve. learn and to risks Take to maintain the integrity and accountability of the collabora� ve process. Collabora� be on must Collabora� process. ve of the collabora� and accountability the integrity maintain to Be inclusive Embrace diversity diversity Embrace to achieve more eff ec� ve and implementable results. Collabora� ve processes are inherently inherently are processes ve Collabora� results. and implementable ve ec� eff more achieve to together Work

the integrity of the collabora� as use consensus when to should address Decision-making rules process. ve of the collabora� the integrity how informa� on will be communicated to the media and others outside of the group are essen� al to protec� ng protec� al to essen� are outside of the group the media and others to on will be communicated informa� how be made, par� cipants’ roles and responsibili� es, how the group will make recommenda� ons to the agency, and the agency, ons to recommenda� will make the group es, how and responsibili� roles cipants’ be made, par� 8. around the issue. around collabora� ve group decisions. If decisions are not supported, quickly commit to re-engage the collabora� group ve the collabora� re-engage to commit quickly not supported, decisions are decisions. If group ve collabora� and requests for informa� on. Check in with chain of command to ensure line offi and will support understand cers line offi ensure to on. Check in with chain of command informa� for and requests 7. process should be equally transparent. process aff ect other par� cipants without informing the group. The collabora� ve group’s structure and decision-making structure group’s ve The collabora� the group. informing without cipants ect other par� aff taken, and how collabora� ve group input informs decisions and ac� ons. Do not take unilateral ac� may on that ac� unilateral ons. Do not take decisions and ac� input informs group ve collabora� and how taken, of upcoming planning, decisions, and ac� ons. Explain how and why decisions were made or specifi c ac� ons were c ac� made or specifi decisions were ons. Explain how and why planning,of upcoming ac� decisions, and 6. abreast the group Keep work. in agency involvement group ve collabora� es for as opportuni� as well constraints communica� on: maintain communica� on outside of mee� ngs, even during low-ac� vity periods. during low-ac� ngs, even outside of mee� on communica� on: maintain communica� is equally important to follow through on agreed-upon ac� ons. Rela� onships are built through regular, informal informal regular, built through are onships ons. Rela� ac� on agreed-upon through follow to is equally important rela� onships takes � me: it is necessary to work through conten� ous issues and come to agreement on ac� ons. It on ac� agreement to ous issues and come conten� through work me: it is necessary to � takes onships rela� 5. Building projects. solve to together and work on and resources informa� of people who share a network develop ideas and recognize small mistakes and setbacks as learning opportuni� es that can inform future work. work. future inform can es that as learning opportuni� and setbacks mistakes small ideas and recognize approaches, even when they run counter to established best prac� with new Experiment experience. ces or past prac� best established to run counter when they even approaches, 4. interested in the process but are unable or choose not to engage directly. directly. engage unable or choose not to but are in the process interested eff ort. Make clear and iden� fi able eff orts to maintain communica� on with those who may be aff or by ected be aff may on with those who communica� maintain orts to able eff fi clear and iden� ort. Make eff open to anyone who wishes to par� cipate. Work to have all stakeholder interests represented in the collabora� ve in the collabora� represented interests all stakeholder have to Work cipate. par� who wishes to anyone open to 3. at problems from fresh perspec� ves and develop diff solving them. to approaches erent diff and develop ves perspec� fresh from problems at mandates, philosophies, exper� se, areas of experience, and areas of infl uence. That diversity helps the group look the group helps diversity uence. That of infl and areas of experience, se, areas philosophies, exper� mandates,

2. invested in the process and its outcomes. and its outcomes. in the process invested the group’s ability to accomplish shared goals. Share ownership in group decisions to ensure all par� feel cipants all par� ensure to decisions group in ownership Share goals. shared accomplish to ability the group’s important to make the work meaningful to everyone. Leverage the assets of all the par� maximize to cipants all the par� of the assets Leverage everyone. to meaningful the work make to important about sharing vision, credit, and accountability for the success and challenges of the eﬀ on what’s ort. Agree the eﬀ of and challenges the success for and accountability credit, about sharing vision, 1. principles embody both the spirit and best practi ces of the art of collaborati on. collaborati the art of ces of practi both the spirit and best principles embody agreement and disagreement, and working together to identi fy new and bett er ways of moving forward. These moving er ways of and bett fy new identi to together and working and disagreement, agreement involves sharing informati on and ideas to expand everyone’s knowledge of the situati on, identi fying areas of fying on, identi situati of the knowledge everyone’s expand to ideas on and sharing informati involves Collaborati on is a process in which people with diverse views work together to achieve a common purpose. It common a to achieve together work with diverse views in which people a process on is Collaborati Ten Principles of Collaboration of Principles Ten PAGE 46 PAGE 47 TIPS and TOOLS

to ensure projects are propor� onal to the trust and agreements that have been have that and agreements the trust onal to propor� are projects ensure to scale the right at Collaborate your work to capture learning and support adap� ve management. Periodically evaluate evaluate Periodically management. ve learning and support adap� capture to work your and evaluate Monitor

moving towards tougher issues, accelerated project design and/or larger geographic scales. scales. geographic larger design and/or project issues, accelerated tougher towards moving made. This may mean building on ini� al agreements and smaller project areas, taking steps to learn together before before learn together to steps taking areas, and smaller project al agreements building on ini� mean made. This may

10. and using those fi ndings to inform future ac� ons. ac� future inform ndings to fi and using those monitoring requirements); it is about demonstra� ng accountability, understanding the impacts of ac� ons taken, the impacts of ac� understanding ng accountability, it is about demonstra� requirements); monitoring the concerns. Collabora� ve monitoring is not about genera� ng a volume of data (or duplica� ng exis� ng agency ng exis� (or duplica� of data ng a volume about genera� is not monitoring ve Collabora� the concerns. for more complex and larger ac� ons. The level of rigor in monitoring protocols should be suffi address to cient be suffi should protocols in monitoring of rigor ons. The level ac� and larger complex more for provide accountability, build a deeper understanding of the eff ects of decisions and ac� support ons, and build ects of decisions and ac� of the eff build a deeper understanding accountability, provide progress toward goals and iden� fy lessons learned. Monitor eff ects of experimental and controversial ac� ons to ac� and controversial ects of experimental eff fy lessons learned. Monitor and iden� goals toward progress 9. implementa� of the group. and authority clarifying including scope the process, on of the governing implementa� par� cipate in the group’s formal decision-making process, but should support the group in their development and development in their support the group but should process, decision-making formal group’s in the cipate par� opposed to vo� ng and what to do in the event agreement cannot be reached. Forest Service employees should not should Service employees Forest be reached. cannot agreement event do in the to what ng and vo� to opposed Ensure the collabora� ve group knows about and understands agency agency about and understands knows group ve the collabora� Ensure Ensure the collabora� ve group has a plan to maximize involvement of involvement maximize has a plan to group ve the collabora� Ensure Contribu� ng technical and subject ma� er exper� the to se is invaluable exper� er subject ma� and ng technical Contribu� understanding of condi� ons, but avoid overly long and detailed presenta� ons. Only present informa� on informa� ons. Only present presenta� long and detailed overly ons, but avoid of condi� understanding context. economic social, and/or the ecological, to is relevant that deepen, and enrich their discussion. broaden, to help the group discussion. the into elsewhere ons. op� management and people these individuals as colleagues se; view and exper� knowledge social, or economic ecological, you). as them from (as well learn from can you • Provide maps and current Na� onal Forest data and informa� and build discussions help focus on to • and informa� data Forest onal Na� current and maps Provide • will manner that on in a informa� share when sharing knowledge: judgments and value absolutes Avoid • nd out.” fi “I don’t know” and “Let’s say, Be willing to one has all the answers. no that Acknowledge • learned and lessons technology, new science, bring new eld and fi in your of developments abreast Keep • of various consequences and economic ecological and analyzing design with project the group Assist have cipants • par� group ve collabora� Many in the group. of others the knowledge to and listen Recognize

Outreach and rela� leader: onship and rela� Outreach Forest Service process interpreter: interpreter: Service process Forest about the informed ce) are the people from all relevant ensure channels to Find the appropriate and recruiter: communicator Internal Offi Washington ce, and/or Offi ce, Regional Offi Supervisor’s Service (District, Forest ons sugges� Bring any when appropriate. cipate par� to encouraged and are process ve of the collabora� work discussion. for group ve the collabora� back to raised and concerns collabora� ve process and most groups rely heavily on the Forest Service for this input. Some � the SME for ps input. Some � this Service for Forest on the heavily rely groups and most process ve collabora� include: on informa� Provide exibility. of fl as areas as well ons, and constraints deadlines, expecta� policies, procedures, of informed the group Keep ng, and other processes. planning, budge� understand will help the group that and process, award contract process, the NEPA – throughout encountered lenecks bo� – and any progress on. implementa� project ons, organiza� community tribal government, government, local from ves cials and representa� offi relevant interests. and other relevant on, etc.), recrea� industry, forest (e.g., environmental, groups stakeholder Subject ma� (SME): er expert Subject ma� Regular par� cipa� on in mee� ngs, discussions, fi eld tours, and other ac� vi� es of the collabora� ve es of the collabora� vi� and other ac� eld tours, fi ngs, discussions, on in mee� cipa� par� Regular cipant: Par� sharing listening, on includes careful cipa� ort. Par� eff ve the success of a collabora� to is important group is a the agency Ensuring its goals. meet ort to eff the group’s ng to contribu� on, and generally informa� Service Forest However, onships. ng rela� building trus� to is important cipant par� informed consistent, decision-making process. in the formal cipate should not par� employees

5. 3. 4.

2. 1.

of these roles: specifi c roles an agency employee might play in a collabora� ve process. O� one than more will play en one person O� process. ve in a collabora� play might employee an agency c roles specifi staff changes and inconsistent staff par� cipa� on do not support the collabora� of the some are Below process. ve the collabora� on do not support cipa� par� staff and inconsistent changes staff employee’s specifi c roles in the collabora� ve process. Collabora� on is built on individual rela� so rapid onships, rela� on is built on individual Collabora� process. ve in the collabora� c roles specifi employee’s with Forest Service staff responsible for planning, implementa� on, contrac� of those ng, and monitoring, regardless on, contrac� planning, implementa� for responsible Service staff with Forest the agency are everyone’s responsibility. Further, it is important to non-agency par� work can they that cipants par� non-agency to it is important Further, responsibility. everyone’s are the agency suppor� ng the collabora� ve process, building and maintaining rela� onships with par� cipants, and represen� ng and represen� cipants, par� with onships rela� maintaining building and process, ve ng the collabora� suppor� Depending on an employee’s role within the agency, their role in a collabora� ve group will vary. However, However, will vary. group ve in a collabora� their role within the agency, role on an employee’s Depending

Collaborative Processes Collaborative Typical Forest Service Forest Typical in Roles PAGE 48 PAGE 49 TIPS and TOOLS discussed and decided. ensure no viola� on of FACA occurs. Be the gentle FACA custodian. FACA Be the gentle occurs. on of FACA no viola� ensure

• meant. the speaker what and ask if it’s heard you’ve ect back what Reﬂ • to?” agreed asking, we by “Is this what agreements group Test • been already have that things rehashing avoid and use them to agreements working revisit Periodically • doing so. for and being held accountable of the process uphold the integrity to commitment your Express • decision making, to cularly around par� of the process, boundaries clean, legal in maintaining Be diligent • everyone. for is working the process sure make to frequently group Check in with the

While the Forest Service is never the offi cial convener or leader of a collabora� group, ve or leader of a collabora� cial convener offi the Service is never on leader: While the Forest Collabora� ve, seek crea� ideas and new explore to others encouraging by role a leadership en play o� Service staff Forest experiment ng a willingness to demonstra� on by collabora� encourage can ons. You solu� mutually acceptable the to me and resources ng � dedica� by the process to commitment and demonstrate approaches, with new ort. eff ve collabora� All par� cipants, not just the designated facilitator, can use facilita� on skills to help keep the group moving moving the group help keep on skills to use facilita� can facilitator, the designated not just cipants, All par� example: For forward. While for some it may seem unusual for a Forest Service employee to facilitate a collabora� group, ve a collabora� facilitate to Service employee a Forest unusual for seem some it may While for Facilitator: it is an acceptable of the group, – the support importantly tude, and – most a� skills, approach, with the right facilitators: for ps Some � role. O� en the Forest Service brings projects to a collabora� discussion and for group ve a collabora� to Service brings projects Forest en the O� proposer: Project do However, projects. or new in reviving interested are they that shelf-stock these are on, whether considera� same the will remain the project or that project proposed on every take to will want group not assume the open to remain to cipants par� agency for It is equally important process. ve the collabora� through er it goes a� the group. by ideas proposed project ve collabora� Encourage diverse par� cipa� on in the collabora� ve process and fi nd ways to keep non-par� cipa� ng cipa� non-par� keep to nd ways and fi process ve the collabora� on in cipa� par� diverse Encourage work. group’s ve about the collabora� informed public the general es, and communi� local stakeholders,

7. 6. TIPS and TOOLS

Is everyone willing to commit the � me required to work through the issues? through work to me required the � commit willing to  Is everyone be made? a decision must issues before through work me to � enough  Is there if needed? facilitator a neutral hire to available funding  Is there the issues? address adequately on needed to bring in people or informa� to available resources there  Are Are the people with decision-making authority suppor� ve of using a collabora� process? ve of using a collabora� ve with decision-making authority suppor� the people  Are group ve collabora� from emerge ideas that using seriously consider to agree  Do decision-makers discussions? Is there someone willing to advocate for trying approach? a new for advocate someone willing to  Is there ort? eff lead the willing to trusts ty who everyone en� a non-federal  Is there vely? and think crea� together work to others inspire someone who can  Is there Are the people who stand the most to lose and those who stand the most to gain willing to par� cipate? par� to willing gain to the most lose and those who stand to most the who stand the people  Are ves? ng their objec� mee� to approaches erent diff explore willing to stakeholders  Are Do stakeholders share some common values around the issues? around values some common share  Do stakeholders onal missions or agency changing organiza� do not involve that agreement es for opportuni� there  Are mandates? Are there a number of diff erent, possibly compe� ng, objec� ves? ng, objec� compe� possibly erent, a number of diff there  Are involved? issues controversial there  Are ons? ac� desired to on opposi� or likely lack of support for  Is there unclear? proceed to way  Is the best

Adequate resources Adequate

Decision-maker support Decision-maker Leadership

Willing par� cipants Willing par� Room for agreement for Room Complex situa� on situa� Complex soluti on. This checklist can help you decide when to use collaborati on. collaborati to use you decide when can help on. This checklist soluti approaches when the best way to proceed is not clear and people are willing to work together to fi nd a bett er nd a bett fi to work together to not clear and people are willing is proceed to way the best approaches when or appropriate. On the other hand, collaborati on is very appropriate for reviewing past acti ons and designing new ons and designing acti past for reviewing on is very appropriate collaborati On the other hand, or appropriate. situati on is fairly straightf orward or a course of acti on has already been decided collaborati on is usually not needed on is usually collaborati been decided on has already course of acti or a orward straightf fairly on is situati agreement and disagreement, and working together to identi fy new and bett er ways of moving forward. When a moving er ways of and bett fy new identi to together and working and disagreement, agreement involves sharing informati on and ideas to expand everyone’s knowledge of the situati on, identi fying areas of fying on, identi situati of the knowledge everyone’s expand to ideas on and sharing informati involves Collaborati on is a process in which people with diverse views work together to achieve a common purpose. It common a to achieve together work with diverse views in which people a process on is Collaborati When to Use a Collaborative Process Collaborative a Use to When PAGE 50 PAGE 51 TIPS and TOOLS EXAMPLES news sheets, Fact Register Federal releases, email sites, ces, web no� webinars, announcements, etc. Open houses, public ngs, listening mee� online eld trips, sessions, fi etc. webpage, comment ngs with individuals Mee� ng represen� or groups c interests, specifi etc. workshops, ees, Advisory commi� ve collabora� forces, task CFLR and planning teams, etc. CFLRP groups, EXAMPLE agreements Partnership lements se� ated Nego� WHY DO IT WHY DO stakeholders Keep maintain informed; transparency need fy that issues Iden� the test be addressed; to ons to reac� get waters: early on ac� a proposed in the planning process; on or misinforma� address ons mispercep� Discuss issues and ideas; ensure concerns stakeholders’ ons and recommenda� and understood are bring more considered; on into informa� technical the discussion se and the exper� Tap vity of many; crea� of common fy areas iden� fymutually Iden� ground; ons; solu� acceptable support for build broad in forward decisions; move ons situa� controversial ve objec� a shared Achieve ty can neither en� that alone or both can achieve er together do be� accept es can par�

WHEN TO DO IT WHEN TO planned, ons are ac� New on informa� new non- is available, decisions controversial been made have and concerns Stakeholder not known; are interests have may stakeholders on, ons, misinforma� ques� ons about or mispercep� ons planned ac� ons are Planned ac� be or may complex more to way best controversial; is not immediately proceed evident ict issues; conﬂ Complex lack of or controversy; or likely support for planned on to opposi� ons ac� onal* Cross-jurisdic� project *more than one agency, involved etc. landowner, ict conﬂ Intractable all that agreement Reach

provide informa� on informa� provide seek input seek advice seek agreement resources leverage disputes resolve INFORM INFORM CONSULT INVOLVE COLLABORATE CONCEPTSRELATED PARTNER USE IT WHEN TO WHY USE IT MEDIATE PROCESS Consulting, and Maia Enzer, US Forest Service. Consulting, and Maia Enzer, Spectrum, and Sherry Arnstein’s Ladder of Public Participation. It was modifi ed for the Forest Service context by Ann Moote, Mamut ed for the Forest Service context by modifi Ladder of Public Participation. It was Arnstein’s Spectrum, and Sherry the U.S. EPA Confl ict Prevention and Resolution Center’sict Involvement Public Confl This chart is based on the IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum, the U.S. EPA Collaboration on the Public Involvement Continuum Involvement Public on the Collaboration TIPS and TOOLS

  made decisions are icts before conﬂ and resolve misunderstandings fy and address Iden� and accountable as open, transparent, is viewed that in an agency trust Increase  solve to together and work on and resources informa� of people who share Build a network   ons decisions and ac� agency public support for Build individuals on a few reliance – reduce redundancy Build   needs social, and economic and balance ecological, address that projects Design  not otherwise be possible would that projects larger-landscape Achieve projects management public land more implement to resources Leverage   goals and achieve problems address to approaches new ve fy crea� Iden�  issues of understanding on a deeper and draw data available Use the best resistance encounter to likely priority and least highest ons are ac� what Know   ons and posi� interests erent of diﬀ a deeper understanding Develop on  informa� available best and access the on sources informa� of a wider range into Tap a goal help achieve to available are skills, and resources knowledge, what Learn

5. Less conﬂ ict 5. Less conﬂ challenges legal and withstand challenges legal fewer Receive

4. More support 4. More projects and implement problems 3. Be� er outcomes 3. Be�

2. Be� er decisions 2. Be� 1. More informa� on informa� 1. More eff ec� ve and more widely supported. Here are fi ve commonly reported benefi ts of collabora� on. ts of collabora� benefi reported commonly ve fi are Here widely supported. and more ve ec� eff requires � me and commitment up front, collabora� planning, more decision-making, management and make on can collabora� up front, me and commitment � requires agreement and disagreement, and working together to iden� fy new and be� it Although forward. moving of er ways and be� fy new iden� to together and working disagreement, and agreement involves sharing informa� on and ideas to expand everyone’s knowledge of the situa� on, iden� of fying areas on, iden� situa� of the knowledge everyone’s expand to on and ideas sharing informa� involves Collabora� on is a process in which people with diverse views work together to achieve a common purpose. It purpose. It a common achieve to together work views with diverse in which people on is a process Collabora� Five Benefits of Collaboration of Benefits Five PAGE 52 PAGE 53 (P.L. (P.L. (36 CFR 219). “to guide the collaborati ve guide the collaborati “to through a collaborati ve process of ve process through a collaborati (FSH 2409.19 Ch.61.12). (FSH is transparent or nonexclusive” is transparent when implemen� ng laws rela� the ng to rela� ng laws when implemen� “to encourage the collaborati ve, science-based ecosystem restorati on of priority forest forest on of priority restorati ecosystem ve, science-based the collaborati encourage “to (OMB M10-06, Dec. 8, 2009).

Directs the Departments of the Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, and Defense and the EPA to emphasize emphasize to and the EPA and Defense Commerce, Agriculture, of the Interior, the Departments Directs t t and nonprofi for-profi private governments, and tribal local, State, Federal, vity among ve acti “collaborati ti es and individuals” enti ons, other nongovernmental tuti insti by funding restora� on treatments on priority landscapes. To be eligible for CFLRP funding, CFLRP a be eligible for To landscapes. on priority on treatments funding restora� by landscapes…” that… ve process through a collaborati and implemented “be developed must on proposal restora� landscape and … interests ng diverse persons representi ple interested includes multi of cornerstone form the on collaborati on, and cipati parti “three principles of transparency, that Establishes your agency will how in detail “explain to agencies OMB guidance directs Subsequent an open government.” to ve policies and administrati management to internal changes on… [including] proposed collaborati improve on” collaborati improve Provides a framework and guidelines for Federal, state, local, and tribal governments, non-governmental non-governmental and tribal governments, local, state, Federal, and guidelines for a framework Provides and maintain restore to all landscapes and across vely mandated was collabora� work to The Strategy res. and public stakeholders partners, wildfi to respond vely ec� and eff re, wildfi es from communi� protect landscapes, the (FLAME) Act of 2009 and is led by and Enhancement Management, Land Assistance, the Federal by and the Interior. of Agriculture Secretaries and interest, cient is suffi there where party monitoring planning, mul� on during project re collabora� Calls for wildfi reduce purpose of HFRA is “to rst on plans. The fi Protec� re Community Wildfi vely-developed collabora� land Federal supplies, and other at-risk water es, municipal communi� risk to local meet … that goals land management achieve “to contracts use stewardship and BLM to the FS Authorizes an “make to, the Agency Service Handbook directs S.323). The Forest needs” (P.L.108-7 community and rural of on throughout the life in collaborati stakeholders and engage key interests of local a variety involve ort to eff monitoring” on and the project, from project design through implementati using collaborati ve using collaborati the planning process…, the public… early and throughout “engage to the Agency Directs is purpose of the planning rule The stated and appropriate.” feasible where processes plans…” of land management and revision amendment, development, and science-based is The purpose of CFLRP 111-11). resources. and natural environment on projects.” fuel reducti ng hazardous zing, and implementi planning, prioriti

Facilitati on of Cooperati ve Conservati on : ve Conservati on of Cooperati -- Facilitati 13352 Order ve 2004 Execu�

2009 Presiden� al Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government on Transparency al Memorandum 2009 Presiden� 2009 Na� onal Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy Strategy Management Wildland Fire onal Cohesive 2009 Na� on Act (HFRA) Restora� Forests 2003 Healthy ng Projects Contrac� (End Result) 2003 Stewardship 2009 Collabora� ve Forest Landscape Restora� (CFLRP) on Program Restora� Landscape Forest ve 2009 Collabora� 2012 Na� Planning Rule onal Forest 2012 Na� Business Opera� ons, and Na� System. onal Forest ons, and Na� Opera� Business State and Private Forestry, Research and Development, and Development, Research Forestry, and Private State -- Service Deputy Areas ALL Forest to speak es that authori� Many legisla� ve and policy direc� ves either require or encourage a collabora� ve approach. There are collabora� on collabora� are There approach. ve a collabora� or encourage either require ves policy direc� and ve legisla� Many A List of Collaboration Related Authorities Related of Collaboration A List TIPS and TOOLS

diverse and balanced group of stakeholders … as well as appropriate Federal, Tribal, State, County, County, State, Tribal, Federal, … as well as appropriate group of stakeholders diverse and balanced

Provides cost-share grants for collabora� vely developed restora� on projects in New Mexico. Projects must must Projects Mexico. in New on projects restora� developed vely collabora� for grants cost-share Provides “include a and Municipal government representati ves in the design, implementati on, and monitoring of the project” (P.L. of the project” on, and monitoring ves in the design, implementati representati and Municipal government 106-393, Title VI). “provide frequent opportuniti es for citi zens, organizati ons, tribes, ons, tribes, zens, organizati for citi es opportuniti frequent “provide to Advisory (RACs) Councils Resource Requires at beginning meaningfully, openly and cipate parti to es parti interested agencies and other land management development” of project (P.L.106-393). the early stage

2000 Community Forest Restora� Act (CFRA) on Restora� Forest 2000 Community 2000 Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determina� on Act Self-Determina� and Community Schools Rural 2000 Secure PAGE 54 PAGE 55

Part 3 Part your local communiti es. communiti your local

you in producing stories and you in producing stories These links are provided to assist assist to are provided These links materials that explain the impact that explain materials across the Paciﬁ and in c Northwest across the Paciﬁ that collaborati ve groups are having ve groups that collaborati Photo Web Links: Links: Web Photo Links to Collabora� Group ve Collabora� to Links Photo Web Link Web Photo

h� ps://www.fl ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/25104602936/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664507355910/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23528733309/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662485451452/ p://www.ashland.or.us/Page.asp?NavID=12189 h� ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23890455806/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662516880221/ ps://www.facebook.com/ on.org/, h� ckcoali� on/ ps://www.chums� recoali� h� ckwildfi ps://www.instagram.com/chums� on/, h� ckCoali� Chums� ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23428751216/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662801514163/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23548690229/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662089130996/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23635527940/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662485451432/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23289779303/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662516880221/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/25104602936/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664507355910/ p://hoodriverswcd.org/stew-crew/ h� ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/25032547681/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662526492715/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/25104602936/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664507355910/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23902932966/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662526492715/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23896635805/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157661953860969/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23305410824/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662731394615/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23908542406/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157661953860969/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/24498327384/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664701264492/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23933562135/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664386118779/

Collabora� Name Group ve Collabora� Ini� a� ve) a� Ini� Winema MSA Partners on Coali� Stewardship Partners Project Forest ve Collabora� Crew Stewardship Resources County (Lake Group on the Fremont- Agreement Group Stewardship ve Health Collabora� Forest ve Collabora� on Coali� Forestry ve Collabora� Alsea Stewardship Group Alsea Stewardship Partnership Applegate Resiliency Ashland Forest Forest Blue Mountains re ck Wildfi Chums� Stewardship Clackamas ve Collabora� Darrington ve Collabora� Deschutes on Restora� County Harney Group Hebo Stewardship ve Collabora� Hood River Group Stewardship Lakeview Stewardship Peak Mary’s Stewardship Master Watershed McKenzie Washington North Central am Forest North San� Washington Northeast on Restora� Forest Ochoco Collaborative Group Photo Web Links Web Photo Group Collaborative PAGE 56 PAGE 57 Photo Web Link Web Photo h� ps://www.fl ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23227969800/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662036750185/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23227969800/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662036750185/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23823902832/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662485451442/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23907850386/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662485451452/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/25104602936/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664507355910/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/25104602936/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664507355910/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/25159968184/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662036750185/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/24834928800/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662485451442/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23600103340/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157661953860969/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23307250243/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157661991262429/ (on the home page) p://sofrc.org h� ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23908226546/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157661953860969/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23565801879/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662731394615/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23548675059/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157660353639554/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23307250243/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157661991262429/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/26195910504/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664385287259/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23896637265/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157664385287259/ ickr.com/photos/forestservicenw/23087106239/in/ ps://www.fl h� album-72157662801514163/ p://wrcfc.org/Home/ h�

Collabora� Name Group ve Collabora� Program (*) Program Watershed Restora� on Restora� Watershed Team Group ve Collabora� ve Collabora� Community Partnership ve on Collabora� Restora� ve Collabora� ve Collabora� Group ve Collabora� ve Collabora� ve Collabora� Olympic Forest Coali� on Coali� Forest Olympic ve Collabora� Olympic Forest Pinchot Partners Basin Partnership Rogue Group Stewardship Sisuslaw ve Collabora� Siuslaw on Ac� Watershed Skokomish Pinchot ord South Giﬀ am All Lands South San� South Umpqua Rural Forest Southern Oregon e Forest Southern Willame� Forest Sustainable Tapash ve Collabora� lla Forest Uma� on Coali� Umpqua Forestry NRAC County Wallowa Whitman Wallowa Forest County Wasco Forest Coast Wild Rivers PAGE 58 PAGE 59 Part 4 Part

collaborati ve group. collaborati

available to assist you in working with your assist available to This is a list of Regional Offi ce Staff who are Staff ce Offi Regional of This is a list

Regional Oﬃ Contacts: ce Oﬃ Regional

[email protected] c: 503-347-1765 p: 503-808-2220 Regional Legislati ve Aff airs Specialist ve Aff Legislati Regional Nicholas R. Goldstein Nicholas R. Goldstein Legislati ve Aff airs ve Aff Legislati [email protected] [email protected] c: 503-894-4908 p: 503-808-2154 Field Rangers Program Specialist, Collaborati on, Valuing People and Places Valuing on, Collaborati Field Rangers Program Specialist, Rachel LaMedica Rachel LaMedica Valuing People & Places & Places People Valuing

[email protected] [email protected] p: 971-400-3200 Regional Partnership Coordinator Partnership Regional Deirdre Whalen Deirdre Partnerships Partnerships

smpilipfl [email protected] smpilipfl c: 503-758-6119 p: 503-808-2240 Shoni Pilip-Florea, Director Offi ce of Communica� & Community Engagement: ons ce of Communica� Offi for the greatest good

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regula� ons and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, oﬃ ces, and employees, and ins� tu� ons par� cipa� ng in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discrimina� ng based on race, color, na� onal origin, religion, sex, gender iden� ty (including gender expression), sexual orienta� on, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, poli� cal beliefs, or reprisal or retalia� on for prior civil rights ac� vity, in any program or ac� vity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint ﬁ ling deadlines vary by program or incident.

Persons with disabili� es who require alterna� ve means of communica� on for program informa� on (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.

To fi le a program discrimina� on complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimina� on Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at h� p://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_fi l- ing_cust.html and at any USDA offi ce or write a le� er addressed to USDA and provide in the le� er all of the informa� on requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or le� er to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Offi ce of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] .