arXiv:1204.2374v1 [astro-ph.SR] 11 Apr 2012 oee,tesals utgan r losbetdt vari to subjected also are grains dust ex smallest in emission the observed However, the reproduce to required therefore a msin mle utgan htrdaemr e more radiate t that the grains to dust Si wave contribute smaller systems. emission, all not such mal as- do explain at bodies to or km-sized thin order belt and in planetesimals optically Kuiper made often System’s are is Solar they belt characte with teroid that key comparison is One A radiation. disks lengths. circumste stellar debris in the of located by tic dust, cause heated wavelengths, from belts, longer arising lar at emission excess thermal in by seen b wavelengt then characterized (IR) is are mid-infrared Emission disks to down debris detaile emission (2008), photospheric As Wyatt (IRAS). by The review Satellite us- disks. 1984), the Astronomical al. debris Infrared et (Aumann the harbor Vega ing around to discovered known was one are first stars hundred Several Introduction 1. edo Send etme 4 2018 24, September srnm Astrophysics & Astronomy eevdSpebr2,21;accepted 2018; 24, September Received 5 e words. Key com also and grains. crystal results, dust transient our explain the to that routes suggest crystallization disks debris to compared Conclusions. replenish Dust timescales. short relatively on grains dust Results. Methods. Spitzer Aims. Context. 4 3 1 2 D lntr ytm:Zdaa ut–cruselrmte I – matter circumstellar – dust Zodiacal systems: planetary h Eso ee amdbi ik,i obnto ihrece with combination in disks, debris warm seven of SEDs the eea ersdss hsfidn otat ihsuisof studies with contrasts finding This disks. debris several lvn ris h anrsl forsuyi htw n evi find we that is study our of result p main crystalline that The find grains. we olivine view, of point mineralogical a From ris ihtmeaue bv udesK ie h gso ages time. the in survival Given mid- and K. in origin their hundreds detected questions above are temperatures features with s emission excess grains, where in those emission where are years, disks last the in discovered been sal o observed. not usually ff ebra rn eussto requests print okl bevtr,Rsac etefrAtooyadEar and Hungary Astronomy Budapest, for Centre Research Observatory, Konkoly nvriyHiebr,Kirchho Heidelberg, University srpyiaice ntttudUniversit¨ats-Sternwa und Institut Astrophysikalisches e-mail: 69117 K¨onigstuhl 17, f¨ur Astronomie, Institut Planck Max ednOsraoy ednUiest,P o 53 NL-230 9513, Box PO University, Leiden Observatory, Leiden hssuyfcsso eemnn h ieaoyo h dust the of mineralogy the determining on focuses study This / oei eindsc si a eemn utcmoiinan composition dust determine can it as such designed is code .Olofsson J. I rs efidta ot fntal ersdssi u apeaeexp are sample our in disks debris all, not if most, that find We ersdsstaermatrsror flfoe planetes leftover of reservoirs remnant trace disks Debris [email protected] edvlpadpeetanwrdaietase oe(D code transfer radiative new a present and develop We pcrsoi aa nodrt rvd e nihsit th into insights new provide to order in data, spectroscopic tr:idvda:H 176A D680 BD 69830, HD A, 113766 HD individual: Stars: h rsneo erc lvn ris n h vrl di overall the and grains, olivine Fe-rich of presence The [email protected] : 1 .Juh´asz A. , aucitn.Transient˙dust no. manuscript rnin uti amdbi disks debris warm in dust Transient ff Isiu ¨rPyi,610Hiebr,Germany Heidelberg, 69120 f¨ur Physik, -Institut 2 eeto fF-ihoiiegrains olivine Fe-rich of Detection h Henning Th. , ffi inl are ciently 1 .Mutschke H. , t AU,Shlegahn23 74 ea Germany Jena, 07745 Schillerg¨achen 2-3, (AIU), rte eto h ehnssta a ersosbefrteproduc the for responsible be may that mechanisms the on ment etsol ee be should ment ieds nwr ersds so e eeain ediscus We generation. new a of is disk debris warm in dust line fae:sas–Tcnqe:spectroscopic Techniques: – stars nfrared: cess. ABSTRACT in d her- rxn ris(nttt)hv ml bnacscompared abundances small have (enstatite) grains yroxene at ntemdifae.A neetn ustwti the within subset interesting An mid-infrared. the in tarts nce ous ris- a-ihpoolntr ik,weeF-ern crystall Fe-bearing where disks, protoplanetary gas-rich edleg Germany Heidelberg, hs. ecsfrF-ihcytlieoiiegan (Fe grains olivine crystalline Fe-rich for dences nrrdseta hc onstwrstepeec of presence the towards points which spectra, infrared + l- tlbrtr xeiet nds pia properties. optical dust on experiments laboratory nt d y - h otsas h rsneo hs ml risi puzzli is grains small these of presence the stars, host the f 037 D147A D196,H 80 ,[B20]I – 8 ID [GBR2007] B, 98800 HD 169666, HD A, 15407 HD 307, 20 ALie,TeNetherlands The Leiden, RA 0 hSine,HnainAaeyo cecs ..Bx6,H-1 67, Box P.O. Sciences, of Academy Hungarian Sciences, th ml npaeaysses adu f“am ersdisks debris “warm” of handful A systems. planetary in imals faldbi ik,Bye ta.20,Ce ta.20)aeF are 2006) al. et Chen 2006, al. et Bryden disks, debris all of tr u td ilfcso usto hsgop amde- warm group: ( objects this rare of very centra These subset features. the a emission on to with disks focus closer bris will ( much study mid-IR material Our the a star. in presence starts the excess s suggesting these in For emission disks. debris the warm tems, years: last the 2012 during ob emerged unusual several al. L¨ohne regi observations, et inner mid-IR their to 2010, in thanks However, grains dust al. warm et for Liseau evidences no showing 2009, al. et (Carpenter th of evolution exce steady-state observed a the to disk. produce debris converge will may that and cascade emission, collisional eventuall a will and in bodies km-sized of via collisions happen continu structive example is for can grains replenishment dust Such small replenished. of T timescales. population short the on that system suggests the from them evacuate can that e ff ebra ikpoete iutnosy emk s fti oeon code this of use make We simultaneously. properties disk d rgno h utgrains. dust the of origin e rud7dbi ik iheiec o amds,bsdon based dust, warm for evidence with disks debris 7 around cs uha onigRbrsnda n aito pressu radiation and drag Poynting-Robertson as such ects, 3 recn rnin hs,sgetn rdcino sma of production a suggesting phase, transient a eriencing oto h nw ersdssaeKie ettp disks belt-type Kuiper are disks debris known the of Most ff .Tamanai A. , eiae oSDmdln fotclyti ik.The disks. thin optically of modeling SED to dedicated ) ffi rne ewe h ieaoyo uti ls Idisks II Class in dust of mineralogy the between erences in ntmsae fmnh o tlattresources. three least at for months of timescales on cient 4 .Mo´or A. , 5 n P. and , / [Mg Abrah´am ´ + ewr debris warm se µ n risare grains ine Fe] -ie dust m-sized ocrystalline to ino small of tion possible s ∼
c 5 g and ng, .)for 0.2) ∼ S 2018 ESO 5–10 have 525 result y ll ously ∼ µ jects ons. m), 2% de- ys- his re, ss -, ), 1 e l Olofsson et al.: Transient dust in warm debris disks
G-, K-stars, whose mid-IR spectra (5-35 µm) show strong emis- witnessing the production of a second generation of dust, where sion features. Such emission features are usually seen in primor- crystalline grains are produced by different mechanisms. dial disks around young Class II objects, and are associated with In the following, we present in Section2 the sample of warm µm-sized silicate dust grains. In addition to the relatively small debris disks and briefly summarize the Spitzer/Irs data reduc- sizes of such dust grains, the presence of a strong excess at short tion. The new radiative transfer code we use is described in de- wavelengths (∼ 5 µm) is indicative of a high temperature for the tails in Sect. 3. We also justify which dust species we choose to dust grains, suggesting the dust is located close to the star. The model the mid-IR spectra. Section4 presents several “early” re- presence of these small dust grains close to the star is intriguing sults that we find relevant to SED modeling of debris disks, and since the solution of a steady-state evolution may not be suitable we present our best fit models for individual sources in Sect. 5. anymore. At the ages of the systems, the smallest grains should The discussion of our results is then separated in three parts. In have been depleted, either by radiation pressure or Poynting- Section 6 we investigate the survival and transient nature of the Robertson drag. This means the disks could be experiencing a dust grains as well as the time variability for some of the sources transient phase (e.g., Wyatt et al. 2007). In that case, two sce- in our sample, while in Sect.7 we emphasize on the origin of narios are possible, either (i) a recent collision between two or the crystalline grains that we detect in the dust belts. Finally, more bodies (planetesimals, comets, asteroids), or (ii) an outer we briefly compare our results to what is known for objects in belt feeds the inner regions, in a very similar scenario to the Late our Solar System in Sect.8, and we summarize our findings and Heavy Bombardment (LHB), that happened in the Solar System. possible further improvements in Sect. 9. To have a better understanding of the origin of this dust, and as- sess whetherit is transientornot,oneway is to studytheSpectral rs Energy Distribution (SED) of these rare debris disks, and deter- 2. Spitzer/I data and stellar parameters mine the temperature of the dust responsible for the emission, The stellar sample (Table1) was gathered from the literature and and thus its distance from the star. investigating the Spitzer archive, looking for warm debris disks A powerful diagnostic to complement such study is to make around solar analogs (F-, G-, K-type stars). The Spitzer/Irs spec- use of the emission features that arise from (sub-) µm-sized tra were retrieved from the Spitzer archive and reduced using the grains. The width, shape and peak positions of the emission fea- FEPS pipeline (see Bouwman et al. 2008). tures provide information on the composition of the dust grains All stellar parameters, namely T⋆, L⋆ and d⋆ (effective (see Henning 2010 for a recent review). The most common temperature, luminosity and distance, respectively), were taken dust species are from the silicate class, which have been de- from literature. To reproduce the photospheric emission we use tected in various environments, e.g., in the interstellar medium, Kurucz model that best matches the photometric near-IR data winds of AGB stars, and objects from the Solar System. The and will minimize the excess emission in the 5–8 µm range of main building blocks of the silicates are Si, O, Mg and Fe (then the Irs data. The spectral decomposition procedure is extremely followed by Ca and Al). When modeling the dust mineralogy sensitive to the photospheric emission model used, especially for via spectral decomposition, one should therefore focus primar- objects that display small mid-IR excess (e.g., HD69830, see ily on dust species that contained these four main ingredients. Fig. 15). 4− Silicates are an association of [SiO4] tetrahedra, with inclu- As several Spitzer/Irs AOR (Astronomical Observation sions of Mg or Fe (following cosmic abundances). Not only Request) contained both high and low spectral resolution ob- the chemical composition of the grains has an influence on the servations at different wavelengths (e.g. Short-Low and Long- emission features; the internal periodic arrangement of the SiO4 High), we rebin the spectra to the minimal spectral resolution tetrahedra will have a significant impact on the emission fea- in order to obtain an uniform spectral resolution over the entire tures. Grains with long-range order are in their crystalline form, wavelength range. Doing so, the fitting process does not favor as opposed to the amorphous form. As explained in detail in spectral regions with higher spectral resolution. Henning (2010), optical properties of crystalline and amorphous Four objects in our sample are known multiple systems: grains are significantly different, with multiple sharp emission HD113766, HD98800, BD+20307 and HD15407. For the first features for the former one, while emission features are much two objects, given the small separation of the different compo- broader for amorphous grains. It is therefore possible to distin- nents and the slit size of the Irs instrument, the photospheric guish between amorphous and crystalline grains, as well as dif- emission of the dust-free component has to be removed in order ferent dust species. Modeling the dust mineralogy can therefore to consistently determine the dust location around the star. For provide useful insights into dust composition and crystallization HD113766 we use the luminosities as reported in Lisse et al. processes at stake in the debris disks, which in turn provide in- (2008) for HD113766A (around which the dust is located). formation on the origin of the dust. To assess if the grains trace For HD98800 we use the Keck diffraction-limited observations a second generation or are the remnants of the primordial, gas- of the quadruple system by Prato et al. (2001) to model photo- rich disks one has to search for possible differences between the spheric emission of the two components. Prato et al. (2001) in- mineralogy of dust in ClassII disks compared to the dust we deed provide the individual fluxes for the two spectroscopic bi- observe in debris disks. For several stars, Juh´asz et al. (2010) naries A & B (the dust being located around the spectroscopic found pyroxene crystalline grains with a Fe fraction of about binary HD98800B). For these two objects we will now refer to ∼ 10%, however, a result that appears to be quite general for the HD113766A and HD98800B. BD+20307 is a spectroscopic petrology of crystalline olivine grains in protoplanetary disks is binary (3.5 days period, Weinberger 2008) of two, almost iden- that they are Mg-rich (and hence Fe-poor, see Bouwman et al. tical, late F-type stars and the disk is circumbinary, meaning 2008, Olofsson et al. 2010). The overall lack of Fe-bearing crys- no correction has to be applied to the Irs spectrum. HD 15407 talline grains has been studied by several authors and can be ex- is a binary system with a 21.21” separation. The dust is lo- plained by crystallization processes that take place in massive cated around the primary HD15407A (F5) and the secondary disks (gas-phase condensation, Gail 2010 or thermal annealing, HD15407B (K2, Melis et al. 2010) does not appear in the Irs Nuth & Johnson 2006). One may wonder if we observe a sim- slit, therefore no correction to the spectrum has to be performed ilar result for the dust in warm debris disks. If not, we may be for this object.
2 Olofsson et al.: Transient dust in warm debris disks
Table 1. Stellar sample
Starname Alias SpT T⋆ L⋆ d⋆ Age AOR Epoch Ref [K] [L⊙] [pc] [Myr] [d-m-y] HD 113766 A F4V 6800 4.4 123 10-16 3579904 01-03-2004 1, 2, 3 HD 69830 K0V 5650 0.67 12.6 4000 28830720 14-01-2009 4, 5, 6 BD+20 307 HIP 8920 G0 5750 1.8 92±11 ∼1000 14416384 15-01-2006 7, 8, 9 HD 15407 A F5V 6500 4.5 54.7 80 26122496 09-10-2008 10 HD 169666 F5 6750 5.16 53.2 2100 15016960 02-07-2005 11 HD 98800 B TWA4 K5 4600 0.62 44.9 8-10 3571968 25-06-2004 12, 13, 14, 15 +3.5 [GBR2007] ID 8 2MASS J08090250-4858172 G 5750 0.8 361 38−6.5 21755136 16-06-2007 16, 17
References: (1) Chen et al. (2005), (2) Chen et al. (2006), (3) Lisse et al. (2008), (4) Beichman et al. (2005), (5) Lisse et al. (2007), (6) Beichman et al. (2011), (7) Weinberger (2008), (8) Zuckerman et al. (2008), (9) Weinberger et al. (2011), (10) Melis et al. (2010), (11) Mo´or et al. (2009), (12) Koerner et al. (2000), (13) Prato et al. (2001), (14) Furlan et al. (2007), (15) Verrier & Evans (2008), (16) Gorlova et al. (2007), (17) Naylor & Jeffries (2006)
the sources presented in this study, we choose λmin = 0.3 µm
0 and λmax = 100mm. The broad wavelength range is required to 10 sample the heating (stellar) and cooling (dust) radiation field to
10-2 calculate the dust temperature correctly. We can question whether scattered light emission should be 10-4 considered when trying to model mid-IR (5–35 µm) spectra. If the albedo A of a single particle of size s is defined as follows: -6
× 10
sca Qsca(λ, s) -8 = 10 A , (1) Qabs(λ, s) + Qsca(λ, s) -10 10 MgFeSiO4 where Qabs(λ, s) and Qsca(λ, s) are the absorption and scatter- MgFeSi2 O6 10-12 ing efficiencies (see Sect.3.2 for more details), then the scat- Mg2 SiO4 tered light emission of this single dust grain is proportional to -14 10 Qsca(λ, s) × A (Wolf & Hillenbrand 2005). Figure1 shows how 100 101 λ [ m] this quantity decreases dramatically with increasing wavelengths (∼ 4 orders of magnitude smaller at 5 µm than at1 µm), for three different amorphous dust species, for a grain size s = 0.1 µm. Fig. 1. Qsca × A for 0.1 µm-sized grains as a function of wave- Consequently, we choose not include the contribution of scat- length for three dust species. Qsca being the scattering efficiency tered light in the modeling process. and A the albedo of the grain (see Eqn1). The last free parameter of our model is the grain size distri- bution, which we assume to be a differential power-law of in- p dex p (dn(s) ∝ s ds, p ≤ 0) between smin and smax. One given model is therefore the sum of the stellar flux and thermal emis- 3. Modeling the optically thin emission sion from grains of different sizes, for several dust species, and is defined by four parameters rin, rout, α and p. The mass of dust rs To model the SEDs including the I spectra, we use the Mdust within the disk is determined when fitting the dust com- “DEBris disk RAdiative transfer” code (Debra hereafter), a ra- position over the Irs spectral range. The fitting is performed via diative transfer code dedicated to optically thin disks. Originally the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm on a linear combination of adapted from the “Debris disk radiative transfer simulation tool” all the thermal emission contributions from the considered dust (Wolf & Hillenbrand2005), the code has been improvedin order species. For a single dust grain of size s, the thermal emission rs to determine the dust mineralogy as probed by the I spectra. flux Femis, received by an observer at distance d⋆, is computed as follows:
3.1. The disk setup 2 s Femis(r, λ, s) = × Qabs(λ, s) × π × Bλ(λ, Td), (2) The Debra code is designed to compute the SED of a “star + d⋆ ! disk” system in the optically thin regime. The star is defined by its Kurucz model and distance d⋆, and the radiative trans- where Bλ(λ, Td) is the Planck function at temperature Td, which fer code can then compute the reprocessed (thermal and scat- dependson grain sizes, compositions and distance from the star r tered) emission arising from the circumstellar dust. The disk is (see Sect. 3.2.2). Finally, to determine the best fit over the entire defined by the following parameters: inner and outer radii rin SED (i.e., the disk geometry as well as the dust composition) we and rout, mass of dust Mdust and a volume density power expo- use a genetic algorithm (pikaia, Charbonneau 1995) over the nent α (≤ 0). The density profile is assumed to be a power-law four free parameters mentioned above. The code iterates over α ( (r) = (r/r0) ) between rin and rout (sampled on nr = 80 ra- 100 generations, with 50 individuals per generation, and fits the dial points). For a given set of parameters, one can then compute dust composition at every iteration. Each time, the goodness of P P 2 the total emission arising from the disk over a large wavelength the fit is estimated with a reduced χr and the best fit is the one 2 range (for more details, see Wolf & Hillenbrand 2005). For all with the lowest χr .
3 Olofsson et al.: Transient dust in warm debris disks
Table 2. Dust species used. State refers to the amorphous (“A”) or crystalline (“C”) form.
Species State Chemical Density Mg / [Mg + Fe] Shape Ref formula [g.cm−3] [%] Amorphous silicate A MgFeSiO4 3.71 50 DHS 1 (olivine stoichiometry) Amorphous silicate A Mg2SiO4 3.88 100 DHS 2 (olivine stoichiometry) Amorphous silicate A MgFeSi2O6 3.20 50 DHS 1 (pyroxene stoichiometry) Amorphous silicate A MgSiO3 2.71 100 DHS 2 (pyroxene stoichiometry) Mg-rich olivine C Mg1.85Fe0.15SiO4 3.33 92.5 Aerosol 3 (San Carlos sample) Fe-rich olivine C Mg1.6Fe0.4SiO4 3.33 80 Aerosol 3 (Sri Lanka sample) Ortho-enstatite C MgSiO3 2.78 100 DHS 4 Silica (β-cristobalite) C SiO2 2.27 - Aerosol 5 Carbon A C 1.67 - DHS 6
References: (1) Dorschner et al. (1995), (2) J¨ager et al. (2003), (3) Tamanai & Mutschke (2010), (4) J¨ager et al. (1998a), (5) Tamanai (2010), (6) J¨ager et al. (1998b, “cel600”, “cel800”, “cel1000”: cellulose pyrolized at 600, 800 and 1000 ◦C, respectively)
3.2. The dust setup 2010). When possible (and relevant, see Sect.3.2.3) we opt for optical constant as it enables us to separate the contributions rs The I spectra of the objects in our sample show prominent from different grain sizes, while aerosol measurements do not emission features that are associated with warm (sub-) µm sil- disentangle such contributions as the sample is a mixture of icate dust grains. In order to reproduce the data we use sev- grains with different sizes. For the amorphous silicate grains we eral dust species, from amorphous (with olivine and pyrox- use the Distribution of Hollow Spheres (DHS) scattering theory, ene stoichiometries) and crystalline silicates (forsterite and en- with a filling factor fmax of 0.7. Min et al. (2007) have shown statite) to crystalline β-cristobalite silica and amorphous car- these absorption efficiencies best match the extinction profile bon. These amorphous or crystalline dust grains, or their asso- toward the galactic center at 10 and 20 µm. For the crystalline ciated emission features, have been observed numerous times in species we also use the DHS scattering theory, but with a filling disks around young ClassII objects (e.g., Bouwman et al. 2001, factor fmax of 1.0, for which the absorption efficiencies usually 2008, Juh´asz et al. 2010, Oliveira et al. 2011, Olofsson et al. best match the observed band positions and compare well with 2009, 2010, Sargent et al. 2009b), and disks around evolved other laboratory measurements (see Juh´asz et al. 2010). For the ClassIII objects (e.g., Beichman et al. 2011, Lisse et al. 2007, amorphous carbon grains we use the DHS theory with a filling 2008, 2009, Weinberger et al. 2011). Amorphous grains of factor fmax of 1. olivine (Mg2xFe2(1−x)SiO4) and pyroxene (Mg2xFe2(1−x)Si2O6) stoichiometries are also the dominant species in the interstellar We compute absorption efficiencies for ten discrete grain medium (∼98%, Kemper et al. 2005, Min et al. 2007). They are sizes, logarithmically spaced between smin = 0.1 µm and smax. the major building blocks for the dust content in circumstellar For the crystalline silicate and silica grains, we limit smax to environments. And yet, many uncertainties remain on the opti- 1 µm. According to crystallization models, one does not expect cal properties of these grains. For instance Tamanai et al. (2006) to produce pure crystals of several µm via thermal annealing. show the differences in band positions and band widths of the Grains are more likely to grow via collisional aggregation of emissivity profiles for several species (crystalline forsterite and both small crystalline and amorphous material (e.g. Min et al. 2008). Additionally, optical properties of large crystalline grains enstatite or amorphous Mg2SiO4) when using two different lab- oratory techniques (KBr pellets versus aerosol measurements). can become degenerate with optical properties of other dust These measured emissivity profiles are also different from ab- species, since the recognizable emission features of small crys- sorption efficiencies calculated using optical constant measure- tals fade away when increasing s. Limiting smax to 1 µm is in ments. One must be aware of these unfortunate limitations, and line with previous studies of dust in protoplanetary disks (e.g., interpret carefully the results from spectral decomposition when Bouwman et al. 2008, Juh´asz et al. 2010, Olofsson et al. 2010) using several dust constituents. This is the main reason why we where crystalline grains are foundto be much smaller than amor- focus our study on silicate dust grains and choose not to include phous grains. Concerning the maximum grain size for amor- additional, more complex dust species, to limit degeneracies in phous grains, we tested several values for smax and the outcomes the fitting process. Other dust components would have been in- of this exercise are discussed in Sect. 4.3. cluded only if significant signatures were detected in the resid- uals. All the dust components used in this study are listed in 3.2.2. Temperature determination Table 2. Young massive Class II circumstellar disks contain large amount rs 3.2.1. Absorption efficiencies of dust, but also contains gas. When modeling I spectra for these objects, one can therefore assume all the dust grains, lo- There are several ways to obtain absorption efficiencies Qabs, cated in the optically thin regions of the disks, are in thermal such as optical constant combined with a scattering theory or us- contact and have the same temperature at a given distance r. ing laboratory extinction measurements (Henning & Mutschke However debris disks are devoid of gas and the previous assump-
4 Olofsson et al.: Transient dust in warm debris disks
0.9
0.8
0.7 0.5
0.6 0.4