DOCSLIB.ORG

Species Assessment for Grizzly (Brown) Bear (Ursus Arctos) in Wyoming

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species Assessment for Grizzly (Brown) Bear (Ursus Arctos) in Wyoming SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR GRIZZLY (B ROWN ) BEAR (URSUS ARCTOS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 1 2 MELISSA REED -ECKERT , CARRON MEANEY , AND DR. GARY P. BEAUVAIS 1 Meaney & Company, 777 Juniper Avenue, Boulder, Colorado 80304; 303-444-2299; [email protected] 2 Director, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Dept. 3381, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY 82071, 307-766-3023; [email protected] prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming September 2004 1 2 Reed-Eckert, Meaney, and Beauvais – Ursus arctos September 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 3 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 3 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 Taxonomy .......................................................................................................................................5 Distribution .....................................................................................................................................5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General ............................................................................................................................................8 Active seasons...............................................................................................................................11 Denning period..............................................................................................................................12 Landscape Pattern .........................................................................................................................14 Area Requirements........................................................................................................................15 Movement and Activity Patterns ............................................................................................16 Dispersal........................................................................................................................................18 Migration.......................................................................................................................................18 Daily Activity................................................................................................................................18 Reproduction and Survivorship..............................................................................................19 Breeding Behavior.........................................................................................................................19 Breeding Phenology ......................................................................................................................19 Breeding Habitat ...........................................................................................................................20 Fecundity and Survivorship....................................................................................................21 Population Demographics......................................................................................................23 Limiting Factors............................................................................................................................23 Metapopulation Dynamics ............................................................................................................24 Genetic Concerns ..........................................................................................................................24 Food Habits...........................................................................................................................24 Food items.....................................................................................................................................24 Foraging Strategy..........................................................................................................................27 Foraging Variation ........................................................................................................................28 Community Ecology...............................................................................................................29 CONSERVATION .............................................................................................................................. 30 Conservation Status ..............................................................................................................30 USDI Fish and Wildlife Service....................................................................................................30 USDI Bureau of Land Management..............................................................................................30 USDA Forest Service....................................................................................................................31 State Wildlife Agencies.................................................................................................................31 State Natural Heritage Program ....................................................................................................31 Biological Conservation Issues..............................................................................................32 Abundance.....................................................................................................................................32 Trends............................................................................................................................................33 Abundance Trends..................................................................................................................33 Population Extent and Connectivity Trends ...........................................................................34 Habitat Trends ........................................................................................................................35 Range Context...............................................................................................................................37 Extrinsic Threats and Reasons for Decline ...................................................................................37 Anthropogenic Impacts...........................................................................................................37 Page 1 of 54 Reed-Eckert, Meaney, and Beauvais – Ursus arctos September 2004 Invasive Species......................................................................................................................38 Genetic Factors .......................................................................................................................38 Stochastic Factors and Climate Change..................................................................................39 Intrinsic Vulnerability ...................................................................................................................39 Habitat Specificity and Fidelity..............................................................................................39 Territoriality and Area Requirements.....................................................................................40 Susceptibility to Disease and Parasites...................................................................................40 Dispersal Capability................................................................................................................40 Reproductive Capacity............................................................................................................41 Sensitivity to Disturbance.......................................................................................................41 Protected Areas .............................................................................................................................42 CONSERVATION ACTION ................................................................................................................ 43 Existing or Future Conservation Plans...................................................................................43 Conservation Elements..........................................................................................................45 Inventory and Monitoring .............................................................................................................45 Habitat Preservation and Restoration............................................................................................46 Augmentation and Reintroduction ................................................................................................46 INFORMATION NEEDS ..................................................................................................................... 46 Rangewide Needs .................................................................................................................46 Wyoming Needs ....................................................................................................................47
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION of a MEXICAN ONZA SPECIMEN AS a PUMA (PUMA CONCOLOR) in the Americas, There Are Two Documented
    Cryptozoology, 12, 1993-1996, 42-49 © 1996 International Society of Cryptozoology MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION OF A MEXICAN ONZA SPECIMEN AS A PUMA (PUMA CONCOLOR) PE tit A. DRATCH Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Building 560/Room 21-105, Frederick, Maryland 21702, U.S.A. and National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory Ashland, Oregon 96520, U.S.A. WENDY RosLuND National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory Ashland, Oregon 96520, U.S.A. JANICE S. MARTENSON, MELANIE CULVER, AND STEPHEN J. O'BRIEN' Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Building 560/Room 21-105, Frederick, Maryland 21702, U.S.A. ABSTRACT: Tissue samples from an alleged Mexican Onza, shot in the western Sierra Madre in 1986, were subjected to several biochemical assays in an attempt to determine the specimen's relationship to felid species of North America. Protein analyses included isoenzyme electrophoresis and albumin isoelectric focusing. Mi- tochondrial DNA was assayed for restriction fragment lengths with 28 restriction enzymes, and the NÐ5 gene was sequenced. The resulting protein and rnitochondrial DNA characteristics of the Onza were indistinguishable from those of North Amer- ican pumas. INTRODUCTION In the Americas, there are two documented species of large cats: 1) Puma concolor, the puma, also called mountain lion, cougar, and panther in dif- ferent regions of North America, and known as leon in Mexico; and 2) Panthera onca, the jaguar, or tigre as it is known south of the U.S. border. To whom correspondence should be addressed. 42 DRATCH ET AL.: ONZA MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION 43 Flo.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Characteristics of Residential Development Shift Large Carnivore Prey Habits
    The Journal of Wildlife Management; DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21098 Research Article Spatial Characteristics of Residential Development Shift Large Carnivore Prey Habits JUSTINE A. SMITH,1 Department of Environmental Studies, Center for Integrated Spatial Research, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA YIWEI WANG, San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory, 524 Valley Way, Milpitas, CA 95035, USA CHRISTOPHER C. WILMERS, Department of Environmental Studies, Center for Integrated Spatial Research, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA ABSTRACT Understanding how anthropogenic development affects food webs is essential to implementing sustainable growth measures, yet little is known about how the spatial configuration of residential development affects the foraging behavior and prey habits of top predators. We examined the influence of the spatial characteristics of residential development on prey composition in the puma (Puma concolor). We located the prey remains of kills from 32 pumas fitted with global positioning system (GPS) satellite collars to determine the housing characteristics most influencing prey size and species composition. We examined how differences in housing density, proximity, and clustering influenced puma prey size and diversity. We found that at both local (150 m) and regional (1 km) spatial scales surrounding puma kill sites, housing density (but not the clustering of housing) was the greatest contributor to puma consumption of small prey (<20 kg), which primarily comprised human commensals or pets. The species-specific relationships between housing density and prey occupancy and detection rates assessed using camera traps were not always similar to those between housing density and proportions of diet, suggesting that pumas may exercise some diet selectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.MOUNTAIN LION Puma Concolor ATTACKS on a MANED
    Mastozoología Neotropical ISSN: 0327-9383 [email protected] Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Mazzolli, Marcelo MOUNTAIN LION Puma concolor ATTACKS ON A MANED WOLF Chrysocyon brachyurus AND A DOMESTIC DOG IN A FORESTRY SYSTEM Mastozoología Neotropical, vol. 16, núm. 2, diciembre, 2009, pp. 465-470 Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Tucumán, Argentina Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45712497020 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Mastozoología Neotropical, 16(2):465-470, Mendoza, 2009 ISSN 0327-9383 ©SAREM, 2009 Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 http://www.sarem.org.ar MOUNTAIN LION Puma concolor ATTACKS ON A MANED WOLF Chrysocyon brachyurus AND A DOMESTIC DOG IN A FORESTRY SYSTEM Marcelo Mazzolli Projeto Puma, R. Liberato Carioni 247, Lagoa, 88062-205, Florianópolis - SC, Brazil <[email protected]> ABSTRACT: Two independent attacks of mountain lions Puma concolor (Linnaeus, 1771) on different canid species are reported in this note. One of the canids was a sub-adult captive maned wolf Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger, 1815), revealing skull damaged by canine tooth perforation and several bruises along the body. Examination of the wounds and the killing site provided reasonable details on how the attack was conducted. The mountain lion grabbed the maned wolf from behind with both forepaws, and killed it with a bite at the nape of the neck and at the back of the skull.
    [Show full text]
  • Cats of Belize Jaguar Average 4.25 Ft
    WEC314 A Guide to Living with Wild Cats1 Venetia S. Briggs-Gonzalez, Rebecca G. Harvey, Frank J. Mazzotti, and William M. Giuliano2 lands. This research suggests that more wild cats live near farms than people are aware of. Considering the number of wild cats living near villages, attacks on livestock and people are rare in Belize. However, conflicts between people and cats sometimes occur when cats lack food, water and habitat, when livestock is threat- ened, or when people are unaware of the benefits to living with cats. Cats of Belize Jaguar average 4.25 ft. long, 160 lbs. Figure 1. Jaguar (Panthera onca) Credits: © Tony Rath Photography, www.tonyrath.com Sharing the Landscape Belize is home to five species of wild cats. They live mainly in forests and wetlands, and hunt animals such as paca (gibnut), coatimundi, deer, peccary, birds, reptiles, and small rodents. When farms and villages are next to forests, people and wild cats live side-by-side. In the New River area of Orange Walk District, the Lamanai Field Research Center and University of Florida are studying cats using Figure 2. Jaguar (Panthera onca) “camera traps” placed in a variety of locations on private Credits: © Tony Rath Photography, www.tonyrath.com 1. This document is WEC314, one of a series of the Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 2011. Reviewed October 2014. Revised June 2018. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Venetia S. Briggs-Gonzalez, research ecologist; Rebecca G. Harvey, environmental education coordinator; Frank J.
    [Show full text]
  • Puma Field Guide, Available At
    In our on-going efforts to assist wildlife agencies, field researchers, and the general public, The Cougar Network is proud to present the Puma Identification Guide, developed with the help of leading wildlife biologists Harley Shaw, Paul Beier, Melanie Culver, and Melissa Grigione, and edited with the help of Chuck Anderson, Mark Dowling, Dave Hamilton, and Bob Wilson. This document is an abbreviated summary of guidelines used to identify Puma concolor. It discusses how the appearance, tracks, and kill sites of the puma differ from other species, which is not to say that other differentiators do not exist; scat size and segmentation might assist in determining a species in certain circumstances, but these differences are much more subtle and often require laboratory testing to confirm. The intent of this guide is to assist with the more concrete means of identifying the puma in the field. It is not intended to be used as a comprehensive guide to identifying the puma. This guide is not to be construed as a statement of policy; the document is provided only as a tool. This document does not discuss documenting identification. For more information on puma identification – along with information on biological considerations, life history, assessment, and management – see the full-length Puma Field Guide, available at www.cougarnet.org. Appearance Puma concolor has many names, including cougar, mountain lion, puma, catamount, panther and painter. A puma is a large, slender cat with a relatively small head, small, rounded ears that are not tufted, powerful shoulders and hindquarters, and a cylindrical tail that is long and heavy.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone Grizzly Bears: Ecology and Conservation of an Icon of Wildness
    YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEARS ecology and conservation of an ICON OF WILDNESS EDITED BY P.J. White, Kerry A. Gunther, and Frank T. van Manen YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEARS Yellowstone Grizzly Bears: Ecology and Conservation of an Icon of Wildness Editors P. J. White, Kerry A. Gunther, and Frank T. van Manen Contributing Authors Daniel D. Bjornlie, Amanda M. Bramblett, Steven L. Cain, Tyler H. Coleman, Jennifer K. Fortin-Noreus, Kevin L. Frey, Mark A. Haroldson, Pauline L. Kamath, Eric G. Reinertson, Charles T. Robbins, Daniel J. Thompson, Daniel B. Tyers, Katharine R. Wilmot, and Travis C. Wyman Managing Editor Jennifer A. Jerrett YELLOWSTONE FOREVER, YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK AND U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, NORTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCIENCE CENTER Yellowstone Forever, Yellowstone National Park 82190 Published 2017 Contents Printed in the United States of America All chapters are prepared solely by officers or employees of the United States Preface ix government as part of their official duties and are not subject to copyright protection Daniel N. Wenk, Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply. National Park Service (NPS) photographs are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign Introduction xv copyrights may apply. However, because this work may contain other copyrighted images or other incorporated material, permission from the copyright holder may be P. J. White, Kerry A. Gunther, and Frank T. van Manen necessary. Cover and half title images: www.revealedinnature.com by Jake Davis. Chapter 1: The Population 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data P. J. White, Kerry A. Gunther, and Travis C.
    [Show full text]
  • Deer Season Subject to the Species Limitation of Their License in the Hunt Area(S) Where Their License Is Valid As Specified in Section 2 of This Chapter
    CHAPTER 6 DEER HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302, § 23-1-703 and § 23-2-104. Section 2. Regular Hunting Seasons. Hunt areas, season dates and limitations. Special Regular Season Hunt License Archery Dates Dates Area Type Opens Closes Opens Closes Quota Limitations 1 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 1 Gen Nov. 21 Nov. 30 Antlered white-tailed deer off private land; any white-tailed deer on private land 1, 2, 7 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 3500 Doe or fawn valid on 3 private land 2 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 3 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 4 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land except the lands of the State of Wyoming's Ranch A property shall be closed 4 7 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 300 Doe or fawn valid on private land 5 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 5 6 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 200 Doe or fawn 6-1 6 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 7 Gen Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Speciestm
    Species 2014 Annual ReportSpecies the Species of 2014 Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme Species ISSUE 56 2014 Annual Report of the Species Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme • 2014 Spotlight on High-level Interventions IUCN SSC • IUCN Red List at 50 • Specialist Group Reports Ethiopian Wolf (Canis simensis), Endangered. © Martin Harvey Muhammad Yazid Muhammad © Amazing Species: Bleeding Toad The Bleeding Toad, Leptophryne cruentata, is listed as Critically Endangered on The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM. It is endemic to West Java, Indonesia, specifically around Mount Gede, Mount Pangaro and south of Sukabumi. The Bleeding Toad’s scientific name, cruentata, is from the Latin word meaning “bleeding” because of the frog’s overall reddish-purple appearance and blood-red and yellow marbling on its back. Geographical range The population declined drastically after the eruption of Mount Galunggung in 1987. It is Knowledge believed that other declining factors may be habitat alteration, loss, and fragmentation. Experts Although the lethal chytrid fungus, responsible for devastating declines (and possible Get Involved extinctions) in amphibian populations globally, has not been recorded in this area, the sudden decline in a creekside population is reminiscent of declines in similar amphibian species due to the presence of this pathogen. Only one individual Bleeding Toad was sighted from 1990 to 2003. Part of the range of Bleeding Toad is located in Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park. Future conservation actions should include population surveys and possible captive breeding plans. The production of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is made possible through the IUCN Red List Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaguar and Puma Attacks on Livestock in Costa Rica
    Human–Wildlife Interactions 7(1):77–84, Spring 2013 Jaguar and puma attacks on livestock in Costa Rica RONIT AMIT1, Instituto Internacional en Conservación de Vida Silvestre, Universidad Nacional, Here- dia, Costa Rica [email protected] ELIAS JOSÉ GORDILLO-CHÁVEZ, División Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, México RAQUEL BONE, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica Abstract: Human–felid conflicts threaten long-term conservation of jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor). We interviewed ranchers from 50 ranches and inspected farms in northern Costa Rica that reported recent attacks on livestock by these 2 felids. We analyzed ranch characteristics, livestock management practices, details of predation, estimated market- value of economic losses, and ranchers’ perception of damage. Ranchers reported 81 felid attacks on livestock, including 60 head of cattle, 16 horses, 3 sheep, 1 pig, and 1 goat. Mean size of ranches was 233 km2, and mean livestock herd size was 109, including cattle, horses, pigs, sheep, goats, and water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Mean value of an attacked animal was U.S. $177.75 (range = $15 to $854, n = 51), and cumulative loss for all cattle was U.S. $9,065. Eighty-four percent of ranchers reported the presence of jaguars on their property, and 36% perceived the presence of pumas. Economic losses were overestimated by ranchers. Management strategies to address these problems must take into account the small size of ranches and limitations of the cattle and livestock production system in Costa Rica. Damage quantification based on market values can provide a guide to establish an incentive program, but provisions are needed due to ranchers’ potential discontent.
    [Show full text]
  • Kill Rates and Predation Patterns of Jaguars (Panthera Onca) in the Southern Pantanal, Brazil
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service 2010 Kill rates and predation patterns of jaguars (Panthera onca) in the southern Pantanal, Brazil Sandra M. C. Cavalcanti Utah State University, Logan, Department of Wildland Resources, Eric M. Gese USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Cavalcanti, Sandra M. C. and Gese, Eric M., "Kill rates and predation patterns of jaguars (Panthera onca) in the southern Pantanal, Brazil" (2010). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 879. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/879 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal of Mammalogy, 91(3):722–736, 2010 Kill rates and predation patterns of jaguars (Panthera onca) in the southern Pantanal, Brazil SANDRA M. C. CAVALCANTI AND ERIC M. GESE* Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA (SMCC) United States Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA (EMG) * Correspondent: [email protected] Jaguars (Panthera onca) often prey on livestock, resulting in conflicts with humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming 2004-05 Mountain Lion
    TABLE I MOUNTAIN LION SUMMARY OF RECORDED HARVEST MORTALITY STATEWIDE 2004 Male Female Total Average Days per Harvest 100 81 181 3.5 TABLE II MOUNTAIN LION COMPARISON OF RECORDED MORTALITY 2004 Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Harvest 154 145 174 208 186 214 201 199 181 * Lion harvest year actually runs: September 1, 2003 - August 31, 2004. **Data for this report was compiled as of 6/10/04. *** Average Days per Harvest in Table I and Average Days in Table III are calculated from successful legal hunters who reported days hunted only. 277 Table III MOUNTAIN LION LEGAL AND ILLEGAL HARVEST 2004 AREA TOTAL FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL AVERAGE QUOTA SUBQUOTA HARVEST HARVEST HARVEST DAYS 1 Black Hills 12 7 7 14 1.5 2 Teton 7 3 3 3 6 8.0 3 Bridger 8 4 2 4 6 3.2 4 Popo Agie 8 2 2 4 4.0 5 Iron Mountain 12 3 2 5 2.0 6 Laramie Peak 25 3 4 7 3.0 7 Snowy Range 15 10 6 16 2.3 8 Seminoe 10 1 1 2 17.5 9 Sierra Madre 5 4 1 5 4.0 10 Haystacks 6 1 2 3 1.3 11 Red Desert 2 0 1 1 1.0 12 Flaming Gorge 6 3 3 0 3 1.7 13 Wasatch 3 1 1 2 5.5 14 Lincoln 9 3 6 9 7.4 15 Kaycee 25 13 7 20 6.1 16 Gas Hills 6 1 2 3 2.0 17 Piney 5 2 0 1 1.0 18 Wind River 12 4 3 7 1.6 19 Northwest 20 7 4 11 3.7 20 Grass Creek 12 3 3 6 1.4 21 Shell 20 6 1 7 5.2 22 Ten Sleep 15 4 8 12 2.3 23 Sheridan 15 8 8 7 15 6.8 24 Northeast 4 0 0 0 25 Hartville 3 0 0 0 26 Greys River 12 7 6 1 7 1.6 27 Casper 20 3 1 4 1.5 28 Crowheart 3 0 0 0 29 Hoback 9 4 1 4 5 2.6 TOTALS 298 28 100 81 181 3.5 278 WYOMING GAME AND FISH COMMISSION CHAPTER 42 MOUNTAIN LION HUNTING SEASONS Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice Advertising?
    November 15, 2020 Page A-11 Sunday Public Notices Public Notices Court Continued from page A-4 Investigation Law enforcement rooted out CITY OF LANDER PUBLIC NOTICE Smith’s alleged involvement in a ORDINANCE 1236 The Bureau of Reclamation intends to renew existing water service contract with heroin economy through the AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 4 OF THE CITY OF LANDER WYOMING Lucerne Water & Sewer District in accordance with Sec. 9(e) of the Act of August 4, smartphone network, and confi - CODE FOR PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 4-9-13, DEFINITIONS, 1939 (53 Stat. 1187). The contract is to furnish up to 200 acre-feet annually of supple- dential informants. 4-12-2, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-1), mental municipal water supply from Boysen Reservoir. To provide written comments, 4-12-3 SINGLE- AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-2), to request additional information, or to view a copy of the proposed contract, please On May 18 Riverton Circuit 4-12-4 SINGLE AND MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-3), contact Cathy Johnston at (307) 261-5649, or write to: Cathy Johnston, Bureau of Recla- Court Judge Wesley Roberts 4-12-5 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-5) mation, Wyoming Area Office, P.O. Box 1630, Mills, WY 82644. Written comments will signed a search warrant for a AND 4-14-1, DEFINITIONS. be accepted for a period of 60 days from the initial date of this notice. PUB: Lander Journal phone belonging to what court November 15, 2020 PUB: The Ranger documents deem a “known heroin November 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, and
    [Show full text]