Kinesin: Switch I & II and the Motor Mechanism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kinesin: Switch I & II and the Motor Mechanism Commentary 15 Kinesin: switch I & II and the motor mechanism F. Jon Kull1,* and Sharyn A. Endow2,‡ 1Department of Biophysics, Max-Planck Institute for Medical Research, Jahnstrasse 29, D-69120 Heidelberg Germany 2Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 USA *Present address: Department of Chemistry, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA ‡Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Journal of Cell Science 115, 15-23 (2002) © The Company of Biologists Ltd Summary New crystal structures of the kinesin motors differ from transitions that occur in the kinesin motors during the ATP previously described motor-ADP atomic models, showing hydrolysis cycle. The movements of switch I residues striking changes both in the switch I region near the disrupt the water-mediated coordination of the bound nucleotide-binding cleft and in the switch II or ‘relay’ helix Mg2+, which could result in loss of Mg2+ and ADP, raising at the filament-binding face of the motor. The switch I the intriguing possibility that disruption of the switch I region, present as a short helix flanked by two loops in region leads to release of nucleotide by the kinesins. None previous motor-ADP structures, rearranges into a pseudo- of the new structures is a true motor-ATP state, however, β-hairpin or is completely disordered with melted helices probably because conformational changes at the active site to either side of the disordered switch I loop. The relay helix of the kinesins require interactions with microtubules to undergoes a rotational movement coupled to a translation stabilize the movements. that differs from the piston-like movement of the relay helix observed in myosin. The changes observed in the crystal Key words: Molecular motor, Structure/function, Conformational structures are interpreted to represent structural changes, Kinesin, Myosin Introduction more steps of ATP binding or hydrolysis induces small Life inside the cell is an incessant frenzy of rapid back-and- conformational changes in the protein that, under load, create forth movements of myriad cellular components, including strain (Howard, 2001). The strain is relieved by further changes proteins, vesicles and organelles, driven by collisions of water in the motor that produce force and then amplify the force, and other molecules (see Howard, 2001). This Brownian resulting in movement of the motor along its filament. The motion allows molecules such as newly synthesized RNAs to structural elements that undergo strain are likely to have diffuse randomly from their site of entry into the cytoplasm but spring-like or elastic properties that allow them to extend or is far too slow to move molecules the relatively large distances rotate, and then recoil back into their original conformation required in eukaryotic cells and cannot localize them to specific (Howard, 2001). Movements of the motor catalytic core are regions of the cell (Wilkie and Davis, 2001). Localization to a further expected to involve the highly conserved switch regions site within the cell requires facilitated movement, usually aided (Kull et al., 1996; Sablin et al., 1996), switch I and switch II, by one of a battery of cytoskeletal motor proteins - the myosins, so-named because of their structural homology to regions of G kinesins or dyneins. proteins that move upon nucleotide hydrolysis and exchange (Sprang, 1997). Thus, an understanding of the motor mechanism is likely to come only after workers have identified Cytoskeletal motors the spring-like or elastic elements within the motor, together Cytoskeletal motor proteins are specially built to perform their with the force-producing structural changes in the motor and transport function in the cell: one region of the protein binds the steps in the hydrolysis cycle at which they occur. to an actin filament or microtubule, hydrolyzes ATP and moves The two best-studied cytoskeletal motors, myosin and along the filament, while another region attaches to cargo kinesin, are dimeric proteins that have two catalytic domains for transport to a specific site within the cell. Cytoskeletal joined by a coiled-coil rod or stalk. These two motor proteins motors are thus specialized ATPases that transport cargo by and other highly related proteins in their respective families coordinating the hydrolysis of ATP with binding to and contain a central core of structural elements that are remarkably movement along a filament. Remarkably, these molecular similar to one another (Kull et al., 1996) (Fig. 1). Despite this motors convert the chemical energy from ATP hydrolysis structural homology, however, there are indications that the directly into mechanical energy. How do motors capture the kinesin motors differ substantially from the myosins in their energy released by nucleotide hydrolysis and turn it into mechanism of function. A fundamental difference is the work? Motor proteins are apparently capable of sensing and nucleotide-dependent interactions of the motors with their responding to the presence or absence of a γ-phosphate, and filament: myosin bound to ATP is weakly bound to or detached then transmitting this information along a pathway of from actin, whereas kinesin-ATP is strongly bound to increasingly larger conformational changes that culminates in microtubules. Conversely, myosin-ADP is strongly bound to a force-generating event. A prevailing idea is that one or actin, whereas kinesin-ADP is weakly bound to or detached 16 Journal of Cell Science 115 (1) from microtubules. A further basic difference between the motors have been elusive. Almost all of the crystal structures kinesins and myosins is that myosin hydrolyzes ATP while solved so far are complexed to ADP and are interpreted to detached from actin, whereas kinesin hydrolyses ATP while represent weak-binding or detached ADP states (reviewed by attached to the microtubule. But, for both motors, the rate- Sack et al., 1999). The kinesin-ADP models do differ from one limiting step in the hydrolysis cycle is accelerated by binding another, indicating that they may represent structural of the motor to its filament, which results in a characteristic transitions within the ADP state, which could help identify the actin- or microtubule-activated ATPase activity that underlies mechanical elements of the motor that undergo conformational the ability of the motor to move along its filament. changes during the hydrolysis cycle. For example, human kinesin (Kull et al., 1996) and rat kinesin (Kozielski et al., Myosin Work on myosin has identified three distinct conformations of the motor that are thought to correspond to different nucleotide states (Rayment et al., 1993a; Fisher et al., 1995; Dominguez et al., 1998; Houdusse et al., 1999; Houdusse et al., 2000). These have been classified as detached, near rigor, and transition forms (Houdusse et al., 2000) (Fig. 2), all of which bind weakly to actin. The nucleotide bound to the motor is not always an indication of the motor state, since the detached form can be crystallized with either ADP or ATP bound to the active site (Houdusse et al., 1999; Houdusse et al., 2000). The three forms show major differences in the position of the rod-like lever arm, as well as a striking change in the ‘converter’ region at the base of the lever arm. The converter, a rigid α/β subdomain of 67 residues that includes the first three turns of the helical rod (Fig. 1), is thought to convert movements at the nucleotide-binding cleft of the motor, which are transmitted by the adjacent switch II or ‘relay’ helix and the SH1 helix, into the swinging of the lever arm. The SH1 helix, which is also adjacent to the converter, is intact in the near-rigor and transition structures but disordered in the detached form, which has been interpreted to be a motor-ATP state (Houdusse et al., 1999). This mobility of the SH1 helix reflects its role in transmitting and directing movements of the relay helix to the converter domain and lever arm. Structural changes at the nucleotide-binding cleft of myosin are thus coupled to movements of the relay helix, SH1 helix, converter domain and the lever arm (Fig.1). The power stroke is thought to correspond to the swinging of the lever arm (Rayment et al., 1993a; Rayment et al., 1993b); however, the structural elements that undergo strain and the conformational changes in myosin that produce force have not yet been identified. Kinesin motors By comparison with myosin, the structural states of the kinesin Fig. 1. Structural comparison of kinesin and myosin. (A) Front view of kinesin (rat monomeric KHC, PDB 2KIN) (Sack et al., 1997) and myosin II (scallop S1-ADP·VO4, PDB 1DFL) (Houdusse et al., 2000). Core β-strands with adjacent nucleotide-binding (P-loop) or switch regions are colored green (P-loop), purple (switch I) and cyan (switch II). The helix following switch II, the ‘relay’ helix, is red in the two motors. Other β-strands and α-helices common to kinesin and myosin are shown in dark blue-gray and unique areas are in light gray. The myosin converter and kinesin neck helix and neck linker are shown in pink-purple. The myosin lever arm is tan. (B) Back view, rotated 180° from the view in A, showing the filament-binding face of the motors. Switch II at the active site of myosin is connected to the relay helix, which interacts with the converter and lever arm at its other end - the converter can therefore convert changes at the active site into movements of the lever arm. Kinesin: switch I & II and the motor mechanism 17 1997) show little change in the nucleotide-binding site (Fig. myosin) forms a hydrogen bond with an oxygen from the γ- 3A), but helices α4 and α5 are displaced in rat kinesin relative phosphate; (2) a conserved serine (or threonine) residue from to human kinesin (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • UCSD MOLECULE PAGES Doi:10.6072/H0.MP.A002549.01 Volume 1, Issue 2, 2012 Copyright UC Press, All Rights Reserved
    UCSD MOLECULE PAGES doi:10.6072/H0.MP.A002549.01 Volume 1, Issue 2, 2012 Copyright UC Press, All rights reserved. Review Article Open Access WAVE2 Tadaomi Takenawa1, Shiro Suetsugu2, Daisuke Yamazaki3, Shusaku Kurisu1 WASP family verprolin-homologous protein 2 (WAVE2, also called WASF2) was originally identified by its sequence similarity at the carboxy-terminal VCA (verprolin, cofilin/central, acidic) domain with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) and N-WASP (neural WASP). In mammals, WAVE2 is ubiquitously expressed, and its two paralogs, WAVE1 (also called suppressor of cAMP receptor 1, SCAR1) and WAVE3, are predominantly expressed in the brain. The VCA domain of WASP and WAVE family proteins can activate the actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, a major actin nucleator in cells. Proteins that can activate the Arp2/3 complex are now collectively known as nucleation-promoting factors (NPFs), and the WASP and WAVE families are a founding class of NPFs. The WAVE family has an amino-terminal WAVE homology domain (WHD domain, also called the SCAR homology domain, SHD) followed by the proline-rich region that interacts with various Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain proteins. The VCA domain located at the C-terminus. WAVE2, like WAVE1 and WAVE3, constitutively forms a huge heteropentameric protein complex (the WANP complex), binding through its WHD domain with Abi-1 (or its paralogs, Abi-2 and Abi-3), HSPC300 (also called Brick1), Nap1 (also called Hem-2 and NCKAP1), Sra1 (also called p140Sra1 and CYFIP1; its paralog is PIR121 or CYFIP2). The WANP complex is recruited to the plasma membrane by cooperative action of activated Rac GTPases and acidic phosphoinositides.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kinesin Walk: a Dynamic Model with Elastically Coupled Heads
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 6775-6779, June 1996 Biophysics The kinesin walk: A dynamic model with elastically coupled heads IMRE DERENYI AND TAMA'S VICSEK Department of Atomic Physics, Eotvos University, Budapest, Puskin u 5-7, 1088 Hungary Communicated by Leo P. Kadanoff, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, February 26, 1996 (received for review November 28, 1995) ABSTRACT Recently individual two-headed kinesin mol- of the related transport phenomena. These models (12-19), ecules have been studied in in vitro motility assays revealing a except that of Ajdari (20), consider cases in which the internal number of their peculiar transport properties. In this paper degree of freedom of the molecular motors is not taken into we propose a simple and robust model for the kinesin stepping account. The purpose of the present work is to define and process with elastically coupled Brownian heads that show all investigate a dynamic model for the kinesin walk that has an of these properties. The analytic and numerical treatment of internal degree of freedom and results in a full agreement with our model results in a very good fit to the experimental data the experimental data for the range of its parameters allowed and practically has no free parameters. Changing the values by the known estimates for the lower and upper bounds of ofthe parameters in the restricted range allowed by the related these parameters. experimental estimates has almost no effect on the shape of There are two basic classes of possible models for the the curves and results mainly in a variation of the zero load stepping of kinesin (21).
    [Show full text]
  • Kinesin Motility Is Driven by Subdomain Dynamics Wonmuk Hwang1,2,3*, Matthew J Lang4,5*, Martin Karplus6,7*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Kinesin motility is driven by subdomain dynamics Wonmuk Hwang1,2,3*, Matthew J Lang4,5*, Martin Karplus6,7* 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States; 2Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States; 3School of Computational Sciences, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, Korea; 4Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States; 5Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, United States; 6Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States; 7Laboratoire de Chimie Biophysique, ISIS, Universite´ de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France Abstract The microtubule (MT)-associated motor protein kinesin utilizes its conserved ATPase head to achieve diverse motility characteristics. Despite considerable knowledge about how its ATPase activity and MT binding are coupled to the motility cycle, the atomic mechanism of the core events remain to be found. To obtain insights into the mechanism, we performed 38.5 microseconds of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of kinesin-MT complexes in different nucleotide states. Local subdomain dynamics were found to be essential for nucleotide processing. Catalytic water molecules are dynamically organized by the switch domains of the nucleotide binding pocket while ATP is torsionally strained. Hydrolysis products are ’pulled’ by switch-I, and a new ATP is ’captured’ by a concerted motion of the a0/L5/switch-I trio. The dynamic and wet kinesin-MT interface is tuned for rapid interactions while maintaining specificity. The proposed *For correspondence: mechanism provides the flexibility necessary for walking in the crowded cellular environment. [email protected] (WH); DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28948.001 [email protected] (MJL); [email protected] (MK) Competing interests: The authors declare that no Introduction competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinesin Kip2 Enhances Microtubule Growth in Vitro Through Length
    SHORT REPORT Kinesin Kip2 enhances microtubule growth in vitro through length-dependent feedback on polymerization and catastrophe Anneke Hibbel1,6, Aliona Bogdanova1, Mohammed Mahamdeh2, Anita Jannasch1,3, Marko Storch4, Erik Scha¨ ffer3, Dimitris Liakopoulos5, Jonathon Howard2* 1Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany; 2Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, United States; 3Zentrum fu¨ r Molekularbiologie der Pflanzen, Eberhard-Karls- Universita¨ t, Tu¨ bingen, Germany; 4Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; 5CRBM-CRNS, Montpellier, France; 6Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Abstract The size and position of mitotic spindles is determined by the lengths of their constituent microtubules. Regulation of microtubule length requires feedback to set the balance between growth and shrinkage. Whereas negative feedback mechanisms for microtubule length control, based on depolymerizing kinesins and severing proteins, have been studied extensively, positive feedback mechanisms are not known. Here, we report that the budding yeast kinesin Kip2 is a microtubule polymerase and catastrophe inhibitor in vitro that uses its processive motor activity as part of a feedback loop to further promote microtubule growth. Positive feedback arises because longer microtubules bind more motors, which walk to the ends where they reinforce *For correspondence: jonathon. growth and inhibit catastrophe. We propose that positive feedback, common in biochemical [email protected] pathways to switch between signaling states, can also be used in a mechanical signaling pathway to Competing interests: The switch between structural states, in this case between short and long polymers. authors declare that no DOI: 10.7554/eLife.10542.001 competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Bee1, a Yeast Protein with Homology to Wiscott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein, Is Critical for the Assembly of Cortical Actin Cytoskel
    Published February 10, 1997 Bee1, a Yeast Protein with Homology to Wiscott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein, Is Critical for the Assembly of Cortical Actin Cytoskeleton Rong Li Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 Abstract. Yeast protein, Bee1, exhibits sequence ho- associated patches, actin filaments in the buds of Dbee1 mology to Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP), cells form aberrant bundles that do not contain most of a human protein that may link signaling pathways to the cortical cytoskeletal components. It is significant the actin cytoskeleton. Mutations in WASP are the pri- that Dbee1 is the only mutation reported so far that mary cause of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, character- abolishes cortical actin patches in the bud. Bee1 protein ized by immuno-deficiencies and defects in blood cell is localized to actin patches and interacts with Sla1p, a morphogenesis. This report describes the character- Src homology 3 domain–containing protein previously ization of Bee1 protein function in budding yeast. Dis- implicated in actin assembly and function. Thus, Bee1 ruption of BEE1 causes a striking change in the organi- protein may be a crucial component of a cytoskeletal zation of actin filaments, resulting in defects in budding complex that controls the assembly and organization of Downloaded from and cytokinesis. Rather than assemble into cortically actin filaments at the cell cortex. roteins that are conserved between yeast and mam- In addition to the conserved actin-binding proteins, mals are likely to carry out fundamental cellular building blocks of protein interactions common to mam- P functions. The complete yeast genome database malian cytoskeletal and signaling molecules are also found on April 4, 2017 provides a facile route for the identification of these pro- in yeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Sperm Differentiation
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Sperm Differentiation: The Role of Trafficking of Proteins Maria E. Teves 1,* , Eduardo R. S. Roldan 2,*, Diego Krapf 3 , Jerome F. Strauss III 1 , Virali Bhagat 4 and Paulene Sapao 5 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain 3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Chemistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.E.T.); [email protected] (E.R.S.R.) Received: 4 March 2020; Accepted: 20 May 2020; Published: 24 May 2020 Abstract: Sperm differentiation encompasses a complex sequence of morphological changes that takes place in the seminiferous epithelium. In this process, haploid round spermatids undergo substantial structural and functional alterations, resulting in highly polarized sperm. Hallmark changes during the differentiation process include the formation of new organelles, chromatin condensation and nuclear shaping, elimination of residual cytoplasm, and assembly of the sperm flagella. To achieve these transformations, spermatids have unique mechanisms for protein trafficking that operate in a coordinated fashion. Microtubules and filaments of actin are the main tracks used to facilitate the transport mechanisms, assisted by motor and non-motor proteins, for delivery of vesicular and non-vesicular cargos to specific sites.
    [Show full text]
  • A Small-Molecule Activator of Kinesin-1 Drives Remodeling of the Microtubule Network
    A small-molecule activator of kinesin-1 drives remodeling of the microtubule network Thomas S. Randalla, Yan Y. Yipa, Daynea J. Wallock-Richardsa, Karin Pfisterera, Anneri Sangera, Weronika Ficeka, Roberto A. Steinera, Andrew J. Beavila, Maddy Parsonsa, and Mark P. Doddinga,b,1 aRandall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom; and bSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS9 1TD, United Kingdom Edited by Eva Nogales, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved November 21, 2017 (received for review August 25, 2017) The microtubule motor kinesin-1 interacts via its cargo-binding inaccessible in the autoinhibited conformation, available to bind domain with both microtubules and organelles, and hence plays cargo (28). The predominantly basic series of amino acids an important role in controlling organelle transport and microtubule comprising this site can interact with closely related cargo- dynamics. In the absence of cargo, kinesin-1 is found in an auto- adaptor sequences to stabilize the kinesin-1–cargo interaction inhibited conformation. The molecular basis of how cargo engage- and, interestingly, is also known to interact with microtubules in an ment affects the balance between kinesin-1’s active and inactive ATP-independent manner (9, 14, 15, 19). Collectively, these data suggest a stepwise model for kinesin-1 activation, in which en- conformations and roles in microtubule dynamics and organelle TPR transport is not well understood. Here we describe the
    [Show full text]
  • Microtubule Motors
    Microtubule Forces Kevin Slep Microtubules are a Dynamic Scaffold Microtubules in red, XMA215 family MT polymerase protein in green Some Microtubule Functions Cell Structure Polarized Motor Track (kinesins and dynein) Cilia structure (motile and sensory) Mitotic and meiotic spindle structure Cell polarity Coordinate cell motility with the F-actin network Architecture of Tubulin and the Microtubule α/β-Tubulin: The Microtubule Building Block Tubulin is a heterodimer composed of α and β tubulin α and β tubulin are each approximately • 55 kD and are structurally very similar to •each other. •Each tubulin binds GTP: The α GTP is non- exchangeable and the dimer is very stable, Kd = 10-10; the β GTP is exchangeable in the dimer The Microtubule Architecture Tubulin binds head-to-tail along + protofilaments, forming LONGITUDINAL interactions. Longitudinal interactions complete the active site for GTP hydrolysis 13 protofilaments form a hollow tube-the microtubule: 25 nm OD, 14 nm ID (protofilaments interact via LATERAL interactions) The MT is a left-handed helix with a seam, it rises 1.5 heterodimers per turn (α and β form lateral interactions) MTs are polar-they have a plus end and a minus end - The γTubulin Ring Complex (γTuRC) forms a lockwasher to nucleate MTs Axial view Side View γTuRC positions nucleated 13 γTubulins in a ring γTuRC attachment microtubule The Centrosome is a Microtubule Organizing Center (MTOC) rich in γTuRC MTOC’s control where microtubules are formed Centrosomes contain peri-centrosomal material (PCM) surrounding a pair of centrioles γTuRC nucleation complexes are localized to the PCM Centrioles within centrosomes become basal bodies, which are nucleation centers for cilia (motile and primary) and flagella Centrosomes duplicate once per cell cycle Mother centriole nucleates growth of a daughter centriole with an orthogonal orientation Microtubule Polarity and Dynamics Polarized Microtubule Organization in Vivo Centrosome + + + + + + + + + Interphase Mitosis Microtubules are Dynamic Fish melanophore injected with Cy3-tubulin Vorobjev, I.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Classic Kinesin Motors on Microtubules
    Annotated Classic Kinesin Motors on Microtubules Trina A. Schroer1,* 1Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] We are pleased to present a series of Annotated Classics celebrating 40 years of exciting biology in the pages of Cell. This installment revisits “Identification of a Novel Force-Generating Protein, Kinesin, Involved in Microtubule-Based Motility” by Ronald D. Vale, Thomas S. Reese, and Michael P. Sheetz. Here, Trina Schroer comments on the work that led to the purification of a force-generating protein from the giant axons of squid. The motor, named kinesin in this work, depended on nucleotide hydrolysis and was suggested to be involved in subcellular organellar transport. Vale and Sheetz collaborated on this and four other papers that appeared in Cell in 1985 (see below), which, in aggregate, provided a foundation for the microtubule- associated motor field. Each Annotated Classic offers a personal perspective on a groundbreaking Cell paper from a leader in the field with notes on what stood out at the time of first reading and retrospective comments regarding the longer term influence of the work. To see Trina A. Schroer’s thoughts on different parts of the manuscript, just download the PDF and then hover over or double- click the highlighted text and comment boxes. You can also view Schroer’s annotation by opening the Comments navigation panel in Acrobat. Schnapp, B.J., Vale, R.D., Sheetz, M.P., Reese, T.S. (1985). Single Microtubules from Squid Axoplasm Support Bidirectional Movement of Organelles. Cell 40, 455–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(85)90160-6.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytoskeletal Proteins in Neurological Disorders
    cells Review Much More Than a Scaffold: Cytoskeletal Proteins in Neurological Disorders Diana C. Muñoz-Lasso 1 , Carlos Romá-Mateo 2,3,4, Federico V. Pallardó 2,3,4 and Pilar Gonzalez-Cabo 2,3,4,* 1 Department of Oncogenomics, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry. University of Valencia-INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] (C.R.-M.); [email protected] (F.V.P.) 3 CIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 46010 Valencia, Spain 4 Associated Unit for Rare Diseases INCLIVA-CIPF, 46010 Valencia, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-963-395-036 Received: 10 December 2019; Accepted: 29 January 2020; Published: 4 February 2020 Abstract: Recent observations related to the structure of the cytoskeleton in neurons and novel cytoskeletal abnormalities involved in the pathophysiology of some neurological diseases are changing our view on the function of the cytoskeletal proteins in the nervous system. These efforts allow a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying neurological diseases and allow us to see beyond our current knowledge for the development of new treatments. The neuronal cytoskeleton can be described as an organelle formed by the three-dimensional lattice of the three main families of filaments: actin filaments, microtubules, and neurofilaments. This organelle organizes well-defined structures within neurons (cell bodies and axons), which allow their proper development and function through life. Here, we will provide an overview of both the basic and novel concepts related to those cytoskeletal proteins, which are emerging as potential targets in the study of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying neurological disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • How Dynein Moves Along Microtubules
    Special Issue: 40 Years of TIBS Review How Dynein Moves Along Microtubules 1,4 2,3,4 Gira Bhabha, Graham T. Johnson, 1 1, Courtney M. Schroeder, and Ronald D. Vale * Cytoplasmic dynein, a member of the AAA (ATPases Associated with diverse Trends cellular Activities) family of proteins, drives the processive movement of numer- The architecture and nucleotide- ous intracellular cargos towards the minus end of microtubules. Here, we dependent conformational changes of the dynein motor domain were summarize the structural and motile properties of dynein and highlight features recently resolved in several recent that distinguish this motor from kinesin-1 and myosin V, two well-studied structural studies. transport motors. Integrating information from recent crystal and cryoelectron Dynein displays conspicuous differ- microscopy structures, as well as high-resolution single-molecule studies, we ences from kinesin and myosin, includ- also discuss models for how dynein biases its movement in one direction along ing the independent stepping behavior a microtubule track, and present a movie that illustrates these principles. of the two motor domains in the homo- dimer, its much weaker directional bias, and the long separation between Overview of the Dynein Motor Protein the polymer-binding domain and the catalytic body of the enzyme. Eukaryotic cells use motor proteins to transport a variety of cargos, which include membrane- bounded organelles, mRNAs and proteins, along cellular highways of actin filaments and The dynein linker domain plays an microtubules [1,2]. The molecular motor myosin V moves cargos unidirectionally towards the important role in the mechanics of fi barbed end of actin filaments.
    [Show full text]
  • MICROTUBULE GLIDING at the BOUNDARY of KINESIN and DYNEIN PATTERNED SURFACE Junya Ikuta1*, Nagendra K
    MICROTUBULE GLIDING AT THE BOUNDARY OF KINESIN AND DYNEIN PATTERNED SURFACE Junya Ikuta1*, Nagendra K. Kamisetty1, Hirofumi Shintaku1, Hidetoshi Kotera1 and Ryuji Yokokawa1,2 1Kyoto University, JAPAN and 2JST-PRESTO, JAPAN ABSTRACT We constructed a molecular platform to evaluate a tug-of-war between motor proteins, kinesin and dynein. It is the molecular system using the gliding assay, where microtubules (MTs) glide on immobilized motors. In this particular study, we selectively patterned kinesin and dynein on a substrate so as to attach MTs at the boundary between the two motor proteins. We could evaluate the time course of MT position and velocity at the boundary. For the analysis of the number of kinesin and dynein bound to MT, we measured the density of kinesin and dynein on a substrate. We monitored the velocity change of a MT according to the numbers of kinesin and dynein molecules propelling the MT. Force balance between two segments of the MT pulled by kinesin or dynein varies due to the increase or decrease of motors bound. Therefore, we are able to conclude that the velocity change was caused by the force balance between the segments. In conclusion, we could propose a new method to evaluate a tug-of-war between kinesin and dynein. KEYWORDS: Motor protein, Kinesin, Dynein, Microtubule, tug-of-war, Molecular system INTRODUCTION Conventional kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein move along MT in the direction of MT’s plus end or minus end, respectively. They carry intracellular materials along MTs. Thereby, kinesin and dynein have a role of transporting intracellular materials. Many cargos are transported bi-directionally by the cooperative movements of both kinesin and dynein [1].
    [Show full text]