DOCSLIB.ORG

HALSBURY's Laws of England

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HALSBURY's Laws of England Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 HALSBURY’S Laws of England FIFTH EDITION 2013 Additional Materials: Sentencing and Disposition of Offenders (Release and Recall of Prisoners) This additional materials booklet supplements the Fifth Edition title SENTENCING AND DISPOSITION OF OFFENDERS, contained in volume 92 (2010). For a full list of volumes comprised in a current set of Halsbury’s Laws of England please see overleaf. Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_01_HalftitlePage • Sequential 1 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 Fifth Edition volumes: 1 (2008), 2 (2008), 3 (2011), 4 (2011), 6 (2011), 7 (2008), 8 (2010), 9 (2012), 10 (2012), 11 (2009), 12 (2009), 13 (2009), 14 (2009), 15 (2009), 16 (2011), 17 (2011), 18 (2009), 19 (2011), 21 (2011), 22 (2012), 23 (2013), 24 (2010), 25 (2010), 26 (2010), 27 (2010), 28 (2010), 30 (2012), 31 (2012), 32 (2012), 34 (2011), 35 (2011), 36 (2011), 39 (2009), 40 (2009), 41 (2009), 42 (2011), 43 (2011), 44 (2011), 45 (2010), 46 (2010), 48 (2008), 49 (2008), 50 (2008), 52 (2009), 53 (2009), 54 (2008), 55 (2012), 56 (2011), 57 (2012), 60 (2011), 61 (2010), 62 (2012), 63 (2012), 64 (2012), 65 (2008), 66 (2009), 67 (2008), 68 (2008), 69 (2009), 70 (2012), 71 (2013), 72 (2009), 73 (2009), 74 (2011), 75 (2013), 76 (2013), 77 (2010), 78 (2010), 79 (2008), 80 (2013), 81 (2010), 82 (2010), 83 (2010), 84 (2013), 84A (2013), 85 (2012), 87 (2012), 88 (2012), 88A (2013), 89 (2011), 90 (2011), 91 (2012), 92 (2010), 93 (2008), 94 (2008), 96 (2012), 97 (2010), 99 (2012), 100 (2009), 101 (2009), 102 (2010), 103 (2010) Fourth Edition volumes (bold figures represent reissues): 1(1) (2001 Reissue), 1(2) (2007 Reissue), 3(2) (2002 Reissue), 8(1) (2003 Reissue), 8(2), 12(1), 13 (2007 Reissue), 15(3) (2007 Reissue), 15(4) (2007 Reissue), 16(2), 17(2), 18(2), 23(1), 23(2), 24, 26 (2004 Reissue), 36(2), 39(1A), 39(1B), 44(2), 48 (2007 Reissue), 51, 52 Additional Materials: Housing (Housing Benefit) containing vol 22 (2006 Reissue) paras 140–186; Road Traffic (Tramways) containing vol 40(3) (2007 Reissue) paras 1532–1634; Sentencing and Disposition of Offenders (Release and Recall of Prisoners) containing vol 92 (2010) paras 761–820; Specific Performance containing vol 44(1) (Reissue) paras 801–1000; Tort (Conversion and Wrongful Interference with Goods) containing vol 45(2) (Reissue) paras 542–686 Fourth and Fifth Edition volumes: 2013 Consolidated Index (A–E), 2013 Consolidated Index (F–O), 2012 Consolidated Index (P–Z), 2013 Consolidated Table of Statutes, 2013 Consolidated Table of Statutory Instruments, etc, 2013 Consolidated Table of Cases (A–L), 2013 Consolidated Table of Cases (M–Z, ECJ Cases) Updating and ancillary materials: 2013 Annual Cumulative Supplement; Monthly Current Service; Annual Abridgments 1974–2012 June 2013 Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_01_HalftitlePage • Sequential 2 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 HALSBURY’S Laws of England FIFTH EDITION LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain 1987–97 Additional Materials: Sentencing and Disposition of Offenders (Release and Recall of Prisoners) 2013 Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_02_TitlePage • Sequential 1 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 Members of the LexisNexis Group worldwide United Kingdom LexisNexis, a Division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd, Halsbury House, 35 Chancery Lane, LONDON, WC2A 1EL, and London House, 20–22 East London Street, EDINBURGH, EH7 4BQ Australia LexisNexis Butterworths, Chatswood, New South Wales Austria LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac GmbH & Co KG, Vienna Benelux LexisNexis Benelux, Amsterdam Canada LexisNexis Canada, Markham, Ontario China LexisNexis China, Beijing and Shanghai France LexisNexis SA, Paris Germany LexisNexis GmbH, Dusseldorf Hong Kong LexisNexis Hong Kong, Hong Kong India LexisNexis India, New Delhi Italy Giuffrè Editore, Milan Japan LexisNexis Japan, Tokyo Malaysia Malayan Law Journal Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur New Zealand LexisNexis NZ Ltd, Wellington Poland Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis Sp, Warsaw Singapore LexisNexis Singapore, Singapore South Africa LexisNexis Butterworths, Durban USA LexisNexis, Dayton, Ohio FIRST EDITION Published in 31 volumes between 1907 and 1917 SECOND EDITION Published in 37 volumes between 1931 and 1942 THIRD EDITION Published in 43 volumes between 1952 and 1964 FOURTH EDITION Published in 56 volumes between 1973 and 1987, with reissues between 1988 and 2008 FIFTH EDITION Commenced in 2008 © Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright owner except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Applications for the copyright owner’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publisher. Warning: The doing of an unauthorised act in relation to a copyright work may result in both a civil claim for damages and criminal prosecution. Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland. Parliamentary copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office on behalf of Parliament. Any European material in this work which has been reproduced from EUR-lex, the official European Union legislation website, is European Union copyright. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. A CIP Catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 13 (complete set, standard binding): 9781405734394 ISBN 13: 9781405780520 ISBN 978-1-4057-8052-0 9 781405 780520 Typeset by Letterpart Limited, Caterham on the Hill, Surrey CR3 5XL Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Visit LexisNexis at www.lexisnexis.co.uk Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_03_ImprintPage • Sequential 1 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 Editor in Chief THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN LORD HIGH CHANCELLOR OF GREAT BRITAIN 1987–97 Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_04_EditorialBoard01 • Sequential 1 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 Editors of this Volume MARTIN COOK, BA and GAVIN DILLOW, MA Commissioning Editor CLAIRE TURPIN, LLB, MSc Indexer JAMES A. WARD, BA, LLB, a Solicitor of the Senior Courts of England and Wales Managing Editor HELEN HALVEY, LLB Publisher SIMON HETHERINGTON, LLB Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_05_EditorialBoard02 • Sequential 1 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 SENTENCING AND DISPOSITION OF OFFENDERS (RELEASE AND RECALL OF PRISONERS) Consultant Editors PHILLIPPA KAUFMANN, LLB, MA, of Gray’s Inn, Barrister; one of Her Majesty’s Counsel RUTH BRANDER, MA, of Middle Temple, Barrister The law stated in this volume is in general that in force on 1 May 2013, although subsequent changes have been included wherever possible. Any future updating material will be found in the Current Service and annual Cumulative Supplement to Halsbury’s Laws of England. Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_06_EditorialBoard03 • Sequential 1 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_06_EditorialBoard03 • Sequential 2 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE How to use Halsbury’s Laws of England ......................................... 11 References and Abbreviations........................................................... 13 Table of Statutes............................................................................... 19 Table of Statutory Instruments ......................................................... 23 Table of Cases .................................................................................. 25 Volume 92 SENTENCING AND DISPOSITION OF OFFENDERS Table of Contents ............................................................................. 1 12. Release and Recall of Prisoners.................................................. 3 Index ................................................................................................ 135 Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_07_PublicationContents • Sequential 1 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 Letterpart Ltd • Typeset in XML • Division: HLVolBK_92_plm_07_PublicationContents • Sequential 2 Letterpart Ltd • Size: 240mm x 149mm • Date: May 29, 2013 • Time: 16:45 HOW TO USE HALSBURY’S LAWS OF ENGLAND Volumes Each text volume of Halsbury’s Laws of England contains the law on the titles contained in it as at a date stated at the front of the volume (the operative date). Information contained
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FAQ: Brexit and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
    FAQ: Brexit and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Part One: What is the Charter? June 2018 Contents Q: What is the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights? A: At the Cologne European Council in June 1999, the European Council adopted a decision on the drawing up of a Charter of The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. That decision stated: Fundamental Rights brings together in a single “There appears to be a need, at the present stage of the Union’s document the fundamental development, to establish a Charter of fundamental rights in rights protected in the order to make their overriding importance and relevance more EU. It was proclaimed in visible to the Union’s citizens”. 2000 and became legally binding in 2009. Although The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (the Charter) brings together in a there is overlap between single document the fundamental rights protected in the EU. The Charter the EU Charter and the sets out rights and freedoms under six titles: Dignity, Freedoms, Equality, European Convention on Solidarity, Citizens’ Rights, and Justice. The accompanying Explanatory Human Rights / the UK Notes are “a valuable tool of interpretation intended to clarify the Human Rights Act, there are important procedural provisions of the Charter” and they set out the sources of the provisions and substantive differences. in the Charter. However, legal experts have commented that, “The Charter is often described as a strand-tying document … However, the This FAQ discusses: characterisation of the Charter thus, as a tidying or strand-tying exercise only, tends to underplay its importance” (C Gallagher, A Patrick and K • The background to O’Byrne 2018 at para 2.12).
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Forces Bill 2021 Summary
    Headline can be Armedon three Forces lines Bill 2021 Title Summary Sub-title or short context to document Armed Forces Bill 2021 – Summary Background Since the Bill of Rights 1688, the legislation making the provision necessary for the Armed Forces to exist as a disciplined force has been subject to regular renewal by an Act of Parliament. The next renewal is needed by the end of 2021. The primary purpose of these Acts is to provide for the continuation for a further period of up to five years of the legislation enabling the Armed Forces to be recruited and maintained as disciplined bodies; that legislation is the Armed Forces Act 2006.The 2006 Act introduced a single system of law and the Service Justice System that applies to all Service personnel wherever in the world they are operating. The 2006 Act was implemented in 2009, replacing three separate Service Discipline Acts that dated back to the 1950s. The 2006 Act continues to serve our Armed Forces well and subsequent Armed Forces Acts have brought the 2006 Act up to date for the contemporary needs of the Services. In 2017, in preparation for this Bill, MOD commissioned an independent review of the Service Justice System (SJS) to ensure that it continues to be transparent, fair and efficient. The review made 79 recommendations for improvement and the Bill includes provision to implement a few of these which require primary legislation. In common with other five-yearly Bills, this one contains a small number of proposals which fall outside the ambit of Service discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration, (2021)
    Right to respect for private and family life: immigration, (2021) Right to respect for private and family life: immigration Last date of review: 02 March 2021 Last update: General updating. Authored by Austen Morgan 33 Bedford Row Chambers Convention rights - from the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and given further effect by scheduling to the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) have applied incontrovertibly in domestic UK law since 2 October 2000. There was considerable discussion from 1997 about which rights would be litigated in future years, on the basis of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) at Strasbourg, in the three jurisdictions of the United Kingdom (UK): England and Wales; Scotland; and Northern Ireland. Some commentators anticipated that art.8 (the right to respect for private and family life) would be important, as the basis of a new domestic right to privacy. Few, if any, predicted that the family life aspect of art.8 would play a significant role in UK immigration law and practice; this regulates the entry (and possibly exit) of non-nationals, whether as visitors, students, workers, investors or residents. Overview of Topic 1. This article looks at legislative, executive and judicial attempts to limit such art.8 cases since 2000, a project led by successive Secretaries of State (SoS) for the Home Department, of whom there have been six Labour, one coalition Conservative and three Conservatives in the past 20 years. 2. It considers the following topics: the structure of art.8 in immigration cases; how the SoS might theoretically limit its effect in tribunals and courts; the failed attempt to do so through the Immigration Rules; the slightly more successful attempt to do so through statute; the mixed response of the senior judiciary; and future prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy Police
    Royal Navy Police An inspection of the leadership of the Royal Navy Police in relation to its investigations July 2016 © HMIC 2016 ISBN: 978-1-78655-157-3 www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic Contents Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 2. How effective is the overall strategic leadership and direction of the RNP, including the structures and mechanisms in support of these areas? .............. 10 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 10 Findings ................................................................................................................ 10 3. How effective are the oversight, governance, monitoring and assessment arrangements within the RNP to ensure investigations are effective and kept free from improper interference? ........................................................................... 24 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 24 Findings ................................................................................................................ 25 4. How well does the RNP use the National Intelligence Model in identifying strategic policing priorities that influence strategic planning and resourcing? 31 What we were looking for ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Law Affecting Commonwealth Citizens Who Entered the United Kingdom Before 1973
    © 2018 Bruce Mennell (04/05/18) Immigration Law Affecting Commonwealth Citizens who entered the United Kingdom before 1973 Summary This article outlines the immigration law and practices of the United Kingdom applying to Commonwealth citizens who came to the UK before 1973, primarily those who had no ancestral links with the British Isles. It attempts to identify which Commonwealth citizens automatically acquired indefinite leave to enter or remain under the Immigration Act 1971, and what evidence may be available today. This article was inspired by the problems faced by many Commonwealth citizens who arrived in the UK in the 1950s and 1960s, who have not acquired British citizenship and who are now experiencing difficulty demonstrating that they have a right to remain in the United Kingdom under the current law of the “Hostile Environment”. In the ongoing media coverage, they are often described as the “Windrush Generation”, loosely suggesting those who came from the West Indies in about 1949. However, their position is fairly similar to that of other immigrants of the same era from other British territories and newly independent Commonwealth countries, which this article also tries to cover. Various conclusions arise. Home Office record keeping was always limited. The pre 1973 law and practice is more complex than generally realised. The status of pre-1973 migrants in the current law is sometimes ambiguous or unprovable. The transitional provisions of the Immigration Act 1971 did not intersect cleanly with the earlier law leaving uncertainty and gaps. An attempt had been made to identify categories of Commonwealth citizens who entered the UK before 1973 and acquired an automatic right to reside in the UK on 1 January 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Safety Act 2003
    Marine Safety Act 2003 CHAPTER 16 CONTENTS 1 Safety directions 2 Fire authorities: power to charge 3 Amendments and repeals 4 Commencement 5Extent 6Short Title Schedule 1 — New Schedule 3A to the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 - Safety Directions Schedule 2 — Minor and Consequential Amendments Schedule 3 — Repeals ELIZABETH II c. 16 Marine Safety Act 2003 2003 CHAPTER 16 An Act to make provision about the giving of directions in respect of ships for purposes relating to safety or pollution and about the taking of action to enforce, in connection with, or in lieu of, directions; to make provision about fire-fighting in connection with marine incidents; and for connected purposes. [10th July 2003] E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Safety directions (1) The following shall be inserted in Part IV of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 (c. 21) (safety) after section 108 (births and deaths)— “108ASafety directions (1) Schedule 3A (safety directions) shall have effect. (2) A provision made by or by virtue of this Act (including one which creates an offence) shall have no effect in so far as it— (a) is inconsistent with the exercise by or on behalf of the Secretary of State of a power under Schedule 3A (safety directions), (b) would interfere with a person’s compliance with a direction under that Schedule, or (c) would interfere with action taken by virtue of that Schedule.” (2) Before Schedule 4 to that Act there shall be inserted new Schedule 3A set out in Schedule 1 to this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armed Forces Bill 7 DECEMBER 2005 Bill 94 of Session 2005-2006
    RESEARCH PAPER 05/86 The Armed Forces Bill 7 DECEMBER 2005 Bill 94 of Session 2005-2006 The Armed Forces Bill (Bill 94 of Session 2005-06) was presented on 30 November 2005. Second Reading is scheduled for 12 December 2005. The intention of the Bill is to consolidate and modernise the provisions of the three Service Discipline Acts: the Army Act 1955, the Air Force Act 1955 and the Naval Discipline Act 1957. These Acts will be repealed on the passage of this Bill into law. This paper should be read in conjunction with Library Research Paper RP05/75, Background to the Armed Forces Bill, 11 November 2005, which provides an outline of the current disciplinary system, some pre- legislative comments and sets out a number of issues that may be the subject of discussion as this Bill progresses. Claire Taylor INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AND DEFENCE SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: List of 15 most recent RPs 05/71 The EU Accession Bill [Bill 51 of 2005-06] 26.10.05 05/72 Afghanistan – The Culmination of the Bonn Process 26.10.05 05/73 The Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill 01.11.05 [Bill 57 of 2005-06] 05/74 Economic Indicators, November 2005 01.11.05 05/75 Background to the Forthcoming Armed Forces Bill 11.11.05 05/76 Unemployment by Constituency, October 2005 16.11.05 05/77 Equality Bill [Bill 85 of 2005-06] 17.11.05 05/78 Northern Ireland (Offences) Bill [Bill 81 of 2005-06] 17.11.05 05/79 The Health Bill: Part I Smokefree premises, places and 22.11.05 vehicles [Bill 69 of 2005-06] 05/80 The
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of the Human Rights Act: Extracts from the Evidence Contents
    Rt Hon Harriet Harman MP Twenty years of the Human Rights Act: Extracts from the evidence Contents 1 ECtHR Judgments against the UK: the effects of the HRA 2 2 Relationship of UK Courts and ECtHR 4 3 Using the ECHR in the UK courts 5 4 Judgments on rights 7 5 Wider policy changes brought about through individual legal cases 8 6 The Human Rights Act and Parliament 9 7 The Human Rights Act and Legislation 11 Parliamentary scrutiny of legislation 12 The process when UK courts consider legislation is not compliant with the Convention 12 8 Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 14 Change secured without using court proceedings 15 Training in Human Rights 16 9 Further issues raised in evidence 18 Incorporation of other human rights treaties? 18 The definition of public authority 18 Access to justice 19 Freedom of Religion and Belief 20 Wider Understanding of Rights 21 2 Twenty years of the Human Rights Act: Extracts from the evidence 1 ECtHR Judgments against the UK: the effects of the HRA Box 1: Lord Irvine of Lairg, House of Lords Second Reading Debate, 3 Nov 1997 “Our legal system has been unable to protect people in the 50 cases in which the European Court has found a violation of the convention by the United Kingdom. That is more than any other country except Italy. The trend has been upwards. Over half the violations have been found since 1990.”1 Source: HL Deb, 3 Nov 1997, col 1228 Box 2: Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law […] In 2017 only 0.2%, 2 out of all 1,068 judgments given by the Strasbourg Court found a violation by the UK, and in 2016 this figure was 0.7%, 7 out of all 993 judgments.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Gaps” and the Possible Abolition of Consensual Stop and Search
    “Legislative gaps” and the possible abolition of consensual stop and search James Chalmers, University of Glasgow 24 June 2015 1. I have been asked to provide a note for the Independent Advisory Group on Stop and Search on the legislative gaps which might be left if consensual stop and search were abolished in Scotland. That note follows. I should note that it has been prepared in a very short timescale and is not intended to represent an authoritative or exhaustive review of the relevant law or principles, but I hope that it is of some assistance to the Group. Background 2. At common law, the police may search the person of anyone they have lawfully arrested. Beyond this, however, there is (except in cases of urgency) no common law power of search. The principle remains that set out by the Lord Justice-General (Inglis) in Jackson v Stevenson (1897) 2 Adam 255 at 260: ...a constable is entitled to arrest, without a warrant, any person seen by him committing a [crime], and he may arrest on the direct information of eye witnesses. Having arrested him, I have no doubt that the constable could search him. But it is a totally different matter to search a man in order to find evidence to determine whether you will apprehend him or not. If the search succeeds... you will apprehend him; but if the search does not succeed, you will not apprehend him. Now, I have only to say that I know of no authority for ascribing to constables the right to make such tentative searches, and they seem contrary to constitutional principle.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union Withdrawal (Consequential Modifications) (Eu Exit) Regulations 2020
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE EUROPEAN UNION WITHDRAWAL (CONSEQUENTIAL MODIFICATIONS) (EU EXIT) REGULATIONS 2020 2020 No. [XXXX] 1. Introduction 1.1 This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Cabinet Office and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 1.2 This memorandum contains information for the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments. 2. Purpose of the instrument 2.1 The purpose of this instrument is to ensure that the UK statute book works coherently and effectively following the end of the transition period. 2.2 It clarifies how certain terms, including EU-related definitions, should be interpreted in domestic legislation on or after IP completion day. As part of this, the instrument clarifies how cross references to EU legislation should be read. 2.3 The instrument makes technical repeals to redundant provisions within primary legislation arising from the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (“EUWA”). These are primarily repeals of amending provisions, in particular relating to the European Communities Act 1972 (“the ECA”), where EUWA has already provided for the repeal of the amended provisions. The purpose of the repeals in these Regulations is to tidy up the statute book and they have no substantive effect. 2.4 The instrument amends the Interpretation Act 1978 (and the devolved equivalents) in relation to the interpretation of references to “relevant separation agreement law” . The instrument also amends EUWA to provide for how existing references to EU instruments that form part of relevant separation agreement law and how existing non- ambulatory references to direct EU legislation should be read. It also makes consequential amendments to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Consequential Modifications and Repeals and Revocations) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 1(S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine), Wales Marine Pollution, Wales
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). Wales Statutory Instruments are not carried in their revised form on this site. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2011 No. 559 (W.81) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, WALES LICENSING (MARINE), WALES MARINE POLLUTION, WALES The Marine Licensing (Exempted Activities) (Wales) Order 2011 Made - - - - 25 February 2011 Laid before the National Assembly for Wales - - 1 March 2011 Coming into force - - 6 April 2011 The Welsh Ministers, as the appropriate licensing authority under section 113(4)(b) of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009(1), make the following Order in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 74(1), (2) and (3) and 316(1) of that Act, and by section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972(2). The Welsh Ministers are designated for the purposes of section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 in relation to the prevention, reduction and management of waste(3). In deciding to make this Order, the Welsh Ministers have had regard to the matters mentioned in section 74(4) of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009. The Welsh Ministers have carried out a consultation in accordance with section 74(5) of that Act. PART 1 Introductory provisions Title and commencement 1.—(1) The title of this Order is the Marine Licensing (Exempted Activities) (Wales) Order 2011. (2) This Order comes into force on 6 April 2011. (1) 2009 c. 23. (2) 1972 c. 68. (3) Article 3 of the European Communities (Designation) (No.2) Order 2010 [S.I. 2010/1552]. Document Generated: 2011-03-24 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made).
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Memorandum to the European Union
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 (CONSEQUENTIAL MODIFICATIONS AND REPEALS AND REVOCATIONS) (EU EXIT) REGULATIONS 2018 2018 No. [XXXX] 1. Introduction 1.1 This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Department for Exiting the European Union and is laid before Parliament by Act. 1.2 This memorandum contains information for the Sifting Committees. 2. Purpose of the instrument 2.1 The purpose of this instrument is to ensure that the UK statute book accommodates “retained EU law”, a new body of domestic law introduced by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (“the EUWA 2018”), coherently and effectively after the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. 2.2 This instrument amends the Interpretation Act 1978, the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 (“the ILRA 2010”) and the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954, which set out general rules of interpretation for legislation. 2.3 This instrument makes provision for how non-ambulatory cross-references to European Union legislation up to the point immediately before exit should be read. Non-ambulatory references are references which are not automatically updated.1 It also makes provision for how cross-references to EU legislation post-exit should be read. 2.4 It also adds a number of words and expressions to the ILRA 2010 and the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954 and provides general rules of interpretation in light of the introduction of “retained EU law”. 2.5 These Regulations repeal and revoke primary and secondary legislations in consequence of the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972 (“the ECA 1972”) and arising from the withdrawal of the UK from the EU.
    [Show full text]