DOCSLIB.ORG

Masses and the Higgs Mechanism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Masses and the Higgs Mechanism Masses and the Higgs Mechanism Elementary Particle Physics Strong Interaction Fenomenology Diego Bettoni Academic Year 2011-12 The Higgs Mechanism The assumption is made that the universe is filled with a spin-zero field, called a Higgs field, which is a doublet in SU(2) and with a nonzero U(1) hypercharge, but a singlet in color space . The gauge bosons and fermions can interact with this field, and in this interaction they acquire mass. The SU(2) and U(1) quantum numbers of the ground state (i.e. the vacuum are non-zero, so the SU(2) and U(1) symmetries are effectively broken (spontaneously brokedn symmetries). In this context the masses of the W and Z0 bosons can be calculated in terms of measurable parameters. D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 2 Spontaneous Symmetry breaking 1 1 2 2 1 4 L T V 2 2 4 • We can require >0 in order that the potential be bounded below as . • The theory is invariant under -. • To find the spectrum it is necessary: – to find the minimum of the potential (ground state vacuum) – to expand the fields around their value at the minimum and determine the excitations • The 4 term represents an interaction of strength . • Higher powers of would lead to infinities in physical quantities and must therefore be excluded (the theory would not be renormalizable). D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 3 If 2>0 the vacuum corresponds to =0, which minimizes the potential. In that case 2 can be interpreted as (mass)2. If, however, 2<0 we find the minimum of the potential by setting: V 2 2 0 0 Minimum kinetic energy: =constant. The choice =0 is not a minimum of the potential. 2 v v is called the vacuum expectation value of . The field is called a Higgs field. D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 4 To determine the particle spectrum we study the theory in the region of the minimum. x v x We expand around =0. We could also have chosen x v x , but the physics conclusions would be the same, since the theory is symmetric under -. 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 3 2 2 3 4 L v 2v v 4v 6v 4v 2 2 4 2 2 1 v 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 v v v 3v v 2 2 2 2 4 1 2 2 3 1 4 L v v costante 2 4 interactions 2 2 2 m 2v 2 D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 5 • The two descriptions of the theory in terms of or must be equivalent. • It is essential to perturb around the minimum to have a convergent description. • The scalar particle described by the theory with 2<0 is a real scalar, with a mass obtained by its self-interaction with other scalar, because at the minimum of the potential there is a non-zero expectation value v. • There is no trace of the original reflection symmetry. The symmetry was broken when a specific vacuum was chose (+v rather than –v): the vacuum does not have the symmetry of the original Lagrangian, so the solutions do not. • This is called a spontaneous symmetry breaking. D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 6 Complex Scalar Field 1 i2 * 2 * * 2 L 2 ei Global U(1) symmetry 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 L 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 4 2 For >0 the minimum is at the origin 2 2 2 2 2 For <0 the minimum is along a 1 2 v circle of radius v. v x i x We choose =v, =0 x 1 2 2 Mexican Hat Potential D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 7 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 4 4 L v costante 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 m = 2| | •the field corresponds to a massive particle • The terms 2 vanish, thus has zero mass: Goldstone boson ! • Goldstone theorem: whenever a continuous global symmetry is spontaneously broken the spectrum contains a massless, spin-zero boson. • In this case the global U(1) symmetry is broken because we had to choose a particular point on the circle to expand around. • The potential is a minimum along a circle: radial excitations correspond to massive particles (curvature of the potential), whereas along the circle the potential is flat, hence the massless excitation. D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 8 The Abelian Higgs Mechanism Let us require local gauge invariance: i x x x e x D igA 1 A A A x g * 2 * * 2 1 L D D F F 4 •For 2>0 this describes the interaction of a scalar particle of mass with the electromagnetic field A. • There is no mass term for A. • This Lagrangian contains four independent fields: the two real scalars 1 and 2 and the two transverse polarization states of the massless vector boson A . • Also in this case let us look for solutions for 2<0. v hx x xeix x 2 , and h real, using a suitable . D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 9 1 L igA v h igA v h 2 v2 1 v h 2 v h 4 F F 2 4 4 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 h h g v A A v h vh 2 2 1 1 h4 g 2vhA A g 2h2 A A F F 4 2 4 There is now a mass term The Higgs boson h with mass 2v2 for the gauge boson !!! M A gv • La Lagrangian is gauge invariant, but the vacuum is not. • The number of independent fields is still 4: the Higgs boson and the three polarization states of the massive gauge boson. • The Goldstone boson of the previous case (global U(1) symmetry) has become the longitudinal polarization state of the gauge boson. • Higgs Mechanism. • The Higgs boson should exist as a physical particle. • The gauge boson mass is fixed if g2 and v are known, but the mass of the Higgs boson h depends on the unknown parameter . D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 10 The Higgs Mechanism in the Standard Model In the standard model the Higgs field is a doublet in SU(2) 0 i i 1 2 0 3 4 Complex fields 2 2 † 2 † † 2 L † * 0* * 0* 0 0 2 2 2 2 † 1 2 3 4 2 D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 11 2 † † 2 Let us study the potential: V V() is invariant under the local gauge transformation: x x ei x / 2x For 2 < 0 V() has a minimum at: 2 v2 † 2 2 1 0 Let us choose a direction: 0 3 v,1 2 4 0 2 v 1 0 We look for equations satisfied by H(x). x This choice is always possible thanks 2 v H x to the local gauge invariance. The original ( O(4) ) symmetry was: 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 4 invariante By choosing a direction we have three broken global symmetries so three massless Goldstone bosons, which will become the longitudinal parts of W and Z0. D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 12 The electric charge, the weak isospin eigenvalue T3 and the U(1) hypercharge Y of the Higgs field are related by: H Y Q T H 3 2 We have YH=1. The choice of 0 as the component which gets a vacuum expectation value ensures the conservation of electric charge. If the vacuum 0 is invariant under some subgroups of the original SU(2)U(1) any gauge bosons associated with that subgroup will still be massless. privo di massa. Since only one component of the Higgs doublet gets a vacuum expectation value the SU(2) symmetry is broken. Since YH0 then also the U(1) symmetry is broken. However if we operate with the electric charge Q: Y Q0 T3 0 2 i xQ the vacuum is invariant under a transformation 0 0 e 0 0 U(1) transformation corresponding to the electromagnetic interaction: the photon remains massless. D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 13 Y D ig B ig W 1 2 2 2 When gets a vacuum expectation value, proceeding as before the Lagrangian contains extra terms: † † Y Y ig1 B ig2 W ig1 B ig2 W 2 2 2 2 1 0 Using 0 we obtain: 2 v 2 3 1 2 1 g B g W g W iW 0 1 2 2 1 2 3 8 g2 W iW g1B g2W v 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 v g W W v g B g W 8 2 8 1 2 2 1 2 vg2 W W 1 1 2 2 2 v g1 g2 Z Z 2 2 D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 14 For a charged boson the mass term would be of the form m2W+W-. Comparing with: 2 1 vg2 W W 2 We obtain: vg M 2 W 2 For a neutral boson the mass term would be of the form m2ZZ/2. 1 M v g 2 g 2 Z 2 1 2 M 0 MW cosW M Z M W M Z cosW D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 15 Fermion Masses Interaction Lagrangian of the leptons with the Higgs field: † Lint ge LeR eR L Invariant in SU(2). ge arbitrary constant. 1 0 2 v H g v g L e e e e e e e e e e H int 2 L R R L 2 L R R L H-e Vertex g m g v e e Mass term for e m e 2 v e 2 m L m ee e eeH int e v For the neutrino there is no mass term, due to the absence of R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of the Higgs Mechanism in the Standard Model and Beyond Alessandra Edda Baas University of Massachusetts Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2010 Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of the Higgs Mechanism in the Standard Model and Beyond Alessandra Edda Baas University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Part of the Physics Commons Baas, Alessandra Edda, "Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of the Higgs Mechanism in the Standard Model and Beyond" (2010). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 503. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/503 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE HIGGS MECHANISM IN THE STANDARD MODEL AND BEYOND A Thesis Presented by ALESSANDRA EDDA BAAS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE September 2010 Department of Physics © Copyright by Alessandra Edda Baas 2010 All Rights Reserved THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE HIGGS MECHANISM IN THE STANDARD MODEL AND BEYOND A Thesis Presented by ALESSANDRA EDDA BAAS Approved as to style and content by: Eugene Golowich, Chair Benjamin Brau, Member Donald Candela, Department Chair Department of Physics To my loving parents. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a Thesis is never possible without the help of many people. The greatest gratitude goes to my supervisor, Prof. Eugene Golowich who gave my the opportunity of working with him this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Masses and the Vacuum Expectation Value
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE PHYSICAL MASSES AND THE VACUUM EXPECTATION VALUE provided by CERN Document Server OF THE HIGGS FIELD Hung Cheng Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. and S.P.Li Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Nankang, Taip ei, Taiwan, Republic of China Abstract By using the Ward-Takahashi identities in the Landau gauge, we derive exact relations between particle masses and the vacuum exp ectation value of the Higgs eld in the Ab elian gauge eld theory with a Higgs meson. PACS numb ers : 03.70.+k; 11.15-q 1 Despite the pioneering work of 't Ho oft and Veltman on the renormalizability of gauge eld theories with a sp ontaneously broken vacuum symmetry,a numb er of questions remain 2 op en . In particular, the numb er of renormalized parameters in these theories exceeds that of bare parameters. For such theories to b e renormalizable, there must exist relationships among the renormalized parameters involving no in nities. As an example, the bare mass M of the gauge eld in the Ab elian-Higgs theory is related 0 to the bare vacuum exp ectation value v of the Higgs eld by 0 M = g v ; (1) 0 0 0 where g is the bare gauge coupling constant in the theory.We shall show that 0 v u u D (0) T t g (0)v: (2) M = 2 D (M ) T 2 In (2), g (0) is equal to g (k )atk = 0, with the running renormalized gauge coupling constant de ned in (27), and v is the renormalized vacuum exp ectation value of the Higgs eld de ned in (29) b elow.
    [Show full text]
  • B1. the Generating Functional Z[J]
    B1. The generating functional Z[J] The generating functional Z[J] is a key object in quantum field theory - as we shall see it reduces in ordinary quantum mechanics to a limiting form of the 1-particle propagator G(x; x0jJ) when the particle is under thje influence of an external field J(t). However, before beginning, it is useful to look at another closely related object, viz., the generating functional Z¯(J) in ordinary probability theory. Recall that for a simple random variable φ, we can assign a probability distribution P (φ), so that the expectation value of any variable A(φ) that depends on φ is given by Z hAi = dφP (φ)A(φ); (1) where we have assumed the normalization condition Z dφP (φ) = 1: (2) Now let us consider the generating functional Z¯(J) defined by Z Z¯(J) = dφP (φ)eφ: (3) From this definition, it immediately follows that the "n-th moment" of the probability dis- tribution P (φ) is Z @nZ¯(J) g = hφni = dφP (φ)φn = j ; (4) n @J n J=0 and that we can expand Z¯(J) as 1 X J n Z Z¯(J) = dφP (φ)φn n! n=0 1 = g J n; (5) n! n ¯ so that Z(J) acts as a "generator" for the infinite sequence of moments gn of the probability distribution P (φ). For future reference it is also useful to recall how one may also expand the logarithm of Z¯(J); we write, Z¯(J) = exp[W¯ (J)] Z W¯ (J) = ln Z¯(J) = ln dφP (φ)eφ: (6) 1 Now suppose we make a power series expansion of W¯ (J), i.e., 1 X 1 W¯ (J) = C J n; (7) n! n n=0 where the Cn, known as "cumulants", are just @nW¯ (J) C = j : (8) n @J n J=0 The relationship between the cumulants Cn and moments gn is easily found.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGGS BOSONS: THEORY and SEARCHES Updated May 2012 by G
    – 1– HIGGS BOSONS: THEORY AND SEARCHES Updated May 2012 by G. Bernardi (CNRS/IN2P3, LPNHE/U. of Paris VI & VII), M. Carena (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and the University of Chicago), and T. Junk (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory). I. Introduction II. The Standard Model (SM) Higgs Boson II.1. Indirect Constraints on the SM Higgs Boson II.2. Searches for the SM Higgs Boson at LEP II.3. Searches for the SM Higgs Boson at the Tevatron II.4. SM Higgs Boson Searches at the LHC II.5. Models with a Fourth Generation of SM-Like Fermions III. Higgs Bosons in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) III.1. Radiatively-Corrected MSSM Higgs Masses and Couplings III.2. Decay Properties and Production Mechanisms of MSSM Higgs Bosons III.3. Searches for Neutral Higgs Bosons in the CP-Conserving CP C Scenario III.3.1. Searches for Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons at LEP III.3.2. Searches for Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons at Hadron Colliders III.4. Searches for Charged MSSM Higgs Bosons III.5. Effects of CP Violation on the MSSM Higgs Spectrum III.6. Searches for Neutral Higgs Bosons in CP V Scenarios III.7. Indirect Constraints on Supersymmetric Higgs Bosons IV. Other Model Extensions V. Searches for Higgs Bosons Beyond the MSSM VI. Outlook VII. Addendum NOTE: The 4 July 2012 update on the Higgs search from ATLAS and CMS is described in the Addendum at the end of this review. CITATION: J. Beringer et al. (Particle Data Group), PR D86, 010001 (2012) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) July 25, 2012 15:44 – 2– I.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Propagator
    Quantum Mechanics_propagator This article is about Quantum field theory. For plant propagation, see Plant propagation. In Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the diagram. They also can be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are therefore often called Green's functions. Non-relativistic propagators In non-relativistic quantum mechanics the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one spatial point at one time to another spatial point at a later time. It is the Green's function (fundamental solution) for the Schrödinger equation. This means that, if a system has Hamiltonian H, then the appropriate propagator is a function satisfying where Hx denotes the Hamiltonian written in terms of the x coordinates, δ(x)denotes the Dirac delta-function, Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function and K(x,t;x',t')is the kernel of the differential operator in question, often referred to as the propagator instead of G in this context, and henceforth in this article. This propagator can also be written as where Û(t,t' ) is the unitary time-evolution operator for the system taking states at time t to states at time t'. The quantum mechanical propagator may also be found by using a path integral, where the boundary conditions of the path integral include q(t)=x, q(t')=x' .
    [Show full text]
  • Higgs-Like Boson at 750 Gev and Genesis of Baryons
    BNL-112543-2016-JA Higgs-like boson at 750 GeV and genesis of baryons Hooman Davoudiasl, Pier Paolo Giardino, Cen Zhang Submitted to Physical Review D July 2016 Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP) (SC-25) Notice: This manuscript has been co-authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in the Higgs Mechanism
    Spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Higgs mechanism August 2012 Abstract The Higgs mechanism is very powerful: it furnishes a description of the elec- troweak theory in the Standard Model which has a convincing experimental ver- ification. But although the Higgs mechanism had been applied successfully, the conceptual background is not clear. The Higgs mechanism is often presented as spontaneous breaking of a local gauge symmetry. But a local gauge symmetry is rooted in redundancy of description: gauge transformations connect states that cannot be physically distinguished. A gauge symmetry is therefore not a sym- metry of nature, but of our description of nature. The spontaneous breaking of such a symmetry cannot be expected to have physical e↵ects since asymmetries are not reflected in the physics. If spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking cannot have physical e↵ects, this causes conceptual problems for the Higgs mechanism, if taken to be described as spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking. In a gauge invariant theory, gauge fixing is necessary to retrieve the physics from the theory. This means that also in a theory with spontaneous gauge sym- metry breaking, a gauge should be fixed. But gauge fixing itself breaks the gauge symmetry, and thereby obscures the spontaneous breaking of the symmetry. It suggests that spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking is not part of the physics, but an unphysical artifact of the redundancy in description. However, the Higgs mechanism can be formulated in a gauge independent way, without spontaneous symmetry breaking. The same outcome as in the account with spontaneous symmetry breaking is obtained. It is concluded that even though spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking cannot have physical consequences, the Higgs mechanism is not in conceptual danger.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem
    The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem S.E. Rugh∗and H. Zinkernagel† Abstract - The cosmological constant problem arises at the intersection be- tween general relativity and quantum field theory, and is regarded as a fun- damental problem in modern physics. In this paper we describe the historical and conceptual origin of the cosmological constant problem which is intimately connected to the vacuum concept in quantum field theory. We critically dis- cuss how the problem rests on the notion of physical real vacuum energy, and which relations between general relativity and quantum field theory are assumed in order to make the problem well-defined. Introduction Is empty space really empty? In the quantum field theories (QFT’s) which underlie modern particle physics, the notion of empty space has been replaced with that of a vacuum state, defined to be the ground (lowest energy density) state of a collection of quantum fields. A peculiar and truly quantum mechanical feature of the quantum fields is that they exhibit zero-point fluctuations everywhere in space, even in regions which are otherwise ‘empty’ (i.e. devoid of matter and radiation). These zero-point arXiv:hep-th/0012253v1 28 Dec 2000 fluctuations of the quantum fields, as well as other ‘vacuum phenomena’ of quantum field theory, give rise to an enormous vacuum energy density ρvac. As we shall see, this vacuum energy density is believed to act as a contribution to the cosmological constant Λ appearing in Einstein’s field equations from 1917, 1 8πG R g R Λg = T (1) µν − 2 µν − µν c4 µν where Rµν and R refer to the curvature of spacetime, gµν is the metric, Tµν the energy-momentum tensor, G the gravitational constant, and c the speed of light.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minkowski Quantum Vacuum Does Not Gravitate
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KITopen Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Nuclear Physics B 946 (2019) 114694 www.elsevier.com/locate/nuclphysb The Minkowski quantum vacuum does not gravitate Viacheslav A. Emelyanov Institute for Theoretical Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany Received 9 April 2019; received in revised form 24 June 2019; accepted 8 July 2019 Available online 12 July 2019 Editor: Stephan Stieberger Abstract We show that a non-zero renormalised value of the zero-point energy in λφ4-theory over Minkowski spacetime is in tension with the scalar-field equation at two-loop order in perturbation theory. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3. 1. Introduction Quantum fields give rise to an infinite vacuum energy density [1–4], which arises from quantum-field fluctuations taking place even in the absence of matter. Yet, assuming that semi- classical quantum field theory is reliable only up to the Planck-energy scale, the cut-off estimate yields zero-point-energy density which is finite, though, but in a notorious tension with astro- physical observations. In the presence of matter, however, there are quantum effects occurring in nature, which can- not be understood without quantum-field fluctuations. These are the spontaneous emission of a photon by excited atoms, the Lamb shift, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and so forth [5]. This means quantum-field fluctuations do manifest themselves in nature and, hence, the zero-point energy poses a serious problem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Higgs Vacuum Is Unstable
    The Higgs vacuum is unstable Archil Kobakhidze and Alexander Spencer-Smith ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006 E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract So far, the experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) have shown no sign of new physics beyond the Standard Model. Assuming the Standard Model is correct at presently available energies, we can accurately extrapolate the theory to higher energies in order to verify its validity. Here we report the results of new high precision calcula- tions which show that absolute stability of the Higgs vacuum state is now excluded. Combining these new results with the recent observa- tion of primordial gravitational waves by the BICEP Collaboration, we find that the Higgs vacuum state would have quickly decayed dur- ing cosmic inflation, leading to a catastrophic collapse of the universe into a black hole. Thus, we are driven to the conclusion that there must be some new physics beyond the Standard Model at energies below the instability scale Λ 109 GeV, which is responsible for the I ∼ stabilisation of the Higgs vacuum. arXiv:1404.4709v2 [hep-ph] 22 Apr 2014 1 Introduction The Higgs mechanism [1, 2, 3, 4] employed within the Standard Model pro- vides masses for all the elementary particles, except neutrinos. These masses (mi) are universally proportional to the respective constants of interaction between the elementary particles and the Higgs boson: mi = λiv, where −1/2 v √2G 246 GeV is the Higgs vacuum expectation value, which, ≡ F ≈ in turn, is defined through the measurements of the Fermi constant GF in 1 weak processes (e.g., week decays of muon).
    [Show full text]
  • HIGGS BOSONS: THEORY and SEARCHES Updated May 2010 by G
    –1– HIGGS BOSONS: THEORY AND SEARCHES Updated May 2010 by G. Bernardi (LPNHE, CNRS/IN2P3, U. of Paris VI & VII), M. Carena (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and the University of Chicago), and T. Junk (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory). I. Introduction Understanding the mechanism that breaks electroweak sym- metry and generates the masses of all known elementary par- ticles is one of the most fundamental problems in particle physics. The Higgs mechanism [1] provides a general framework to explain the observed masses of the W ± and Z gauge bosons by means of charged and neutral Goldstone bosons that end up as the longitudinal components of the gauge bosons. These Goldstone bosons are generated by the underlying dynamics of electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB). However, the fun- damental dynamics of the electroweak symmetry breaking are unknown. There are two main classes of theories proposed in the literature, those with weakly coupled dynamics - such as in the Standard Model (SM) [2] - and those with strongly coupled dynamics. In the SM, the electroweak interactions are described by a gauge field theory based on the SU(2)L×U(1)Y symmetry group. The Higgs mechanism posits a self-interacting complex doublet of scalar fields, and renormalizable interactions are arranged such that the neutral component of the scalar doublet acquires a vacuum expectation value v ≈ 246 GeV, which sets the scale of EWSB. Three massless Goldstone bosons are generated, which are absorbed to give masses to the W ± and Z gauge bosons. The remaining component of the complex doublet becomes the Higgs boson - a new fundamental scalar particle.
    [Show full text]