Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Steeves Matocq ee fsadn eei aito ihnadaogppltos(.. hn,La,Rn u i,2020). the Yin, and & 2020), Hu, Ren, al., Luan, et Zhang, Young (e.g., and (e.g., populations structure among profiling population and community 2021), phy- within natural variation al., understand genetic 2020), et to standing Coimbra al., applied of 2020; level et toolbox al., substantive Coimbra et threatened a Yusefi (e.g., of developed (e.g., demographics management delimitation has conservation species field the and This inform logenetics 2008). to (Avise information worldwide genetic species uses that discipline fully-fledged toolbox genetics conservation The Introduction pedigrees maintaining and building that Peoples, contend Indigenous Keywords further practitioners, researchers, We conservation among return inquiry. analyses relationships communities. in quantitative trusted genomic local and and strengthen and inform uncertainty), strategies to sampling data, better opportunity well-informed missing an including to genomic relatedness, provides conservation design, linkage) founder diversity for research heritability, resource sequencing nuanced (e.g., characterize invaluable that more pitfalls (e.g., throughput an argue to for create pedigree for we high allow data, warranted used address perspective, pedigrees of genomic use is this can robust widely with In One it to data combined been whether management. when Genomic ability and asked species management. has management. the have for tool, relevant species pedigrees - some with a diversity, collating remain inform pedigree and Now, functional pedigrees collecting to genome-wide the continue and to populations. toolbox - inbreeding, biologists substantive threatened conservation genetics relatedness, a estimate in manage to developed potential to (HTS) evolutionary has available maximize genetics tools conservation and long-standing years most 50 the past the Over Abstract 2021 13, September Gooley Rebecca era. genomics Galla conservation Stephanie the in pedigrees of relevance The nvriyo eaaReno Nevada of Milwaukee University - Wisconsin of University Wisconsin-Milwaukee of University University State Dakota North Conservation of School Smithsonian-Mason Canterbury Waipounamu of Te University o Whare Te Ng¯ai R¯unangaTahu, Conservation o Te of Department Zealand New University State Boise h nvriyo Auckland of University The Sydney Trust of Wildlife University and Conservation Isaac The 4 9 osraingnmc,qatttv eeis eire kinship, pedigree, genetics, quantitative genomics, conservation : neRichardson Anne , ic h ae16’,cnevto eeishsgonfo adu ftcnqe noa into techniques of handful a from grown has genetics conservation 1960’s, late the Since 1 5 i Brown Liz , ilHamilton Jill , 10 2 aaWold Jana , vteCouch-Lewis Yvette , 6 ui Heath Julie , 4 aoy .Hogg J. Carolyn , 1 1 aataHauser Samantha , 3 ln Cubrinovska Ilina , xsitu ex 11 , naSanture Anna , nsitu in 7 ml Latch Emily , 4 ay Eason Daryl , 12 n Tammy and , 8 Marjorie , 2 , Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. nesvl aae id( wild managed intensively nibedn hnmcoaeltsd Nelsahe l,21)adpoiesmlretmtso relatedness of estimates similar provide variation and more 2017) explain al., to shown et been (Nietlisbach have do they microsatellites accurate, and than ( complete inbreeding are bustard in pedigrees Houbara When and 2020). Lesobre, (Lacy, 2008), approach Jamieson, this & worldwide, of ( animals efficacy bison ( in American the crane inbreeding 2021), shown Grueber, and have & diversity ( studies Belov, ( manage devil Indeed, Tasmanian salmon and 2014), sockeye 1). measure Kozfkay, to and MacCluer, Fig. used Atlantic (e.g., 2020; being Willougby time including 2009; to al., over pedigrees DeWoody, populations & et alleles with Lacy, et threatened Galla Miller, founder 2009), in (Ivy, Ballou interest 2015; inbreeding of of and 1995; al., loss species kinship Lacy, the track et mean of to potential heterozygosity; minimize evolutionary used and the expected 1989) frequently maintain as Ryder, are inbreeding & known statistics itself), Read, VandeBerg, also including These population, kinship (GD, a 2010). mean diversity in al., others include gene all management population-level to individual population and one small of for kinship ( average coefficients statistics the coefficient or pedigree-based MK, the Common for (i.e., with information diversity kinship-based, parentage 2009). genetic often maintaining managing 2005, is Given of of management ( means conservation cost 2012). achievable kinship Pedigree-based low Pollak, an of and offer 360 & populations. pedigrees ease Ballou, Species these managed, Lacy, relative in 2019, intensively PMx, the al., being (e.g., and et species statistics Faust many tools, aquarium available genetic ZIMS; and readily pedigree-based PopLink, zoo user-friendly SPARKS, calculate these the including (e.g., to management, by information and exemplified pedigree-based 2021) pedigree is of paradigm manage use data-driven Pedigree to a software documented. built reliably have more who community, is ancestry where plants, management kinship, conservation estimate evolutionary in conserve to Pedigrees to used effort were an principles and in same populations biology being threatened these conservation century, in alleles of potential. traits 20th of functional fields the of probability the of heritability the half As and contributions inbreeding, second as 1995). the his As- (Lacy, kinship in through ancestor of 1983). emerged common genetics pedigrees estimate Ballou, a of an 1922; (e.g., from (Wright, provide utility conservation (IBD) estimates identical-by-descent pedigrees the and kinship inheritance, advanced to 2008), and Mendelian famously inbreeding, Feng, generation Hill, Wright suming analysis, & & from Sewall path Cooper, (Kruuk traits pedigree-based Smith, biology 2010). of towards Duvick, evolutionary al., transmission Smith, 2011), et the These (e.g., (Bennett, Ballou understanding agriculture millennia. health for in for human humans applications proxy by 2004), diverse a recorded one maintain been provided remains and have Pedigrees, there long generation, population, HTS, pedigree. have a the in in trees overlooked: advances individuals often family by of is enabled that ancestry toolbox documented methods genetics or new conservation the to within addition tool long-standing In inquiry. genetic conservation (Hoelzel, world changing to a important to 2019). traits respond Mable, functional may of 2019; a species basis Fleischer, how as genomic & understanding diversity the Bruford, to elucidate neutral compu- implications to and putatively has researchers sequencing which managing for HTS adaptation, new possible on 2018), it founded Williams, make & was tools Tiley, Rajora, tational genetics Poelstra, & (Yoder, conservation Funk, potential of evolutionary experienced (Hohenlohe, of for has approaches field proxy hundreds field (HTS) the detecting the sequencing While frame, to throughput time electrophoresis high 2021). short protein relatively through that allozyme variants variants a of in using of variants types thousands reason: the detecting good to from for dedicated growth, and been remarkable inference, has genetic for toolbox used genetic conservation are the regarding discussion Much rsamericana Grus sHScniust dac,teewl odutb oenwadectn ol noprtdinto incorporated tools exciting and new more be doubt no will there advance, to continues HTS As f eire aebe atclrywl utdfrtegntcmngmn fcpie( captive of management genetic the for suited well particularly been have Pedigrees F en erco h offiin frltdes( relatedness of coefficient the of metric a being ) ,fudrgnm-qiaet ie,teeetv ubro niiul onigapopulation), a founding individuals of number effective the (i.e., genome-equivalents founder ), ormn ae eeo,&Iy 07,takah¯e ( 2017), Ivy, & Peregoy, Mace, Boardman, ; nsitu in rsm-id(‘ semi-wild or ) acpiu harrisii Sarcophilus am salar Salmo io bison Bison hayoi nuaaundulata undulata Chlamydotis ot’situ sorta’ 2 cenne l,21;Wih,Hg,McLennan, Hogg, Wright, 2018; al., et McLennan ; ilo v,Jns ac,21,21) whooping 2018), 2016, Latch, & Jones, Ivy, Giglio, ; and id ta. 09 ouain faiasand animals of populations 2019) al., et Wildt ; nohnhsnerka Oncorhynchus ,R=2f = R R, nteasneo nreig Lacy, inbreeding; of absence the in opyi hochstetteri Porphyrio air oet ari,& Lacroix, Robert, Rabier, ; epciey ’ely& O’Reilly respectively; , xsitu ex Grueber ; or ) Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. neae.A aytraee ouain aeeprecdsgicn elnsbfr ouain are populations before declines significant experienced have populations threatened many As unrelated. that pedigrees for solutions efforts. pitfalls and conservation for are pitfalls for resource Pedigree there invaluable utility However, an and animals. provide accuracy and to their plants continued affect have in can diversity pedigrees managing examples, and these From understanding 2020). Hogg, & ( Belov, wolves been ( dogs gray have prairie that Scandanavian black-tailed pedigrees of 2006), programs populations example, wild translocation For for efforts successful rescue potential ludovicianus depression. or designing conservation and outbreeding genetic in estimates inform populations, avoiding to aid refine among used while can help connectivity depression which can genetic inbreeding populations, populations structure, minimize wild amongst group of adaptation social wild ancestry local size, isolated Documented Ralls, population and rescue; effective small genetic 2020). (i.e., for of Frankham, translocations efforts conservation & conservation using flow Lacy, ( to Brandell, gene rattlesnakes Important Sunnucks, re-establish Schrom, to Massasauga 2021). ability DeCandia, Eastern the al., is 2020; in et populations al., (Martin used behaviour efforts et been of translocation (vonHoldt also and heritability have species Pedigrees the iconic this understanding 2021). catenatus in Holdt, in mange von advances & of (Chen to Stahler, basis ( period led time wolves genetic short individuals gray the a those for and in evolve pedigree for might wild recorded populations A declining phenotypes how on 2019). flow al., gene ( et and selection jays of scrub effects Florida the of population natural (i.e., translocations conservation them for varieties or 2018). conditions Chaney, individuals environmental & well-adapted local Richardson select of (e.g., to predictions restoration medium-term use and to then derived (as short- can phenotypes genetic biologists explain the disentangle Conservation to in to interactions, individuals. their aim gene-by-environment in and experiments through interest contributions, These stress of environmental 2020). with and com- al., kinship) cope al., managed et pedigree-based to intensively et George from plants or (Westbrook (e.g., of greenhouses basis ability experiments in genetic functional GxE) used a often the (i.e., are had understand pedigrees to resistance resistance, gardens blight disease mon that to hypothesis addition the In on 2020). based programs, crossing for chestnut manage American blight-susceptible and backcross lisima characterize to to program breeding used ( ambitious been an on also embarked have Foundation pedigrees within but diversity diversity, functional as genome-wide another neutral one putatively from al., much breeding et learn conservation will Hamilton animal tested. communities and and 2020; botanical developed plant and Hamilton, are of aquaria, & approaches approaches zoo, different Santo differing that but anticipate of (Di representative we goals potential diversity overlapping programs, evolutionary preserve the adaptive Given both to preserve collections 2020). are to optimize collections to maintained these made is of diversity being goals managing are The for efforts situ potential 2020). Ongoing their Hamilton, highlighted zoos & banks. et has in Santo seed material Galla animals (2020) plant and of al., SNPs; maintain collections diversity et and (i.e., plant genome-wide Wood manage for polymorphisms by to viability nucleotide review used and recent single extensively a genome-wide been aquaria, have of and pedigrees thousands While of 2020). tens al., to thousands to atnadentata Castanea ouaindffrne cosaseis ag,adt nuethat ensure to and range, species’ a across differences population .I hsisac,acsr aafo eire n hntpcdt nbih eitnewr used were resistance blight on data phenotypic and pedigrees from data ancestry instance, this In ). n omnasmto fpdgesi httefudn niiul hratr ones r equally are founders) (hereafter, individuals founding the that is pedigrees of assumption common One oeuiaedsesladcnetvt ewe ouain,wt mlctosfrrestoration for implications with populations, between connectivity and dispersal elucidate to ) otzo n qai s eire nawl-upre aaimo esrn n managing and measuring of paradigm well-supported a in pedigrees use aquaria and zoos Most nsitu in eiredt a loavne u nesadn fwl ouain n blt omanage to ability and populations wild of understanding our advanced also has data Pedigree he 06,RcyMuti ihr he ( sheep bighorn Mountain Rocky 2006), Shier ; aseiso h rn fetntowt lgtrssatCieecetu ( chestnut Chinese blight-resistant with extinction of brink the on species a ) or ot situ sorta xsitu ex xsitu ex osrain ru il 08 id ta. 09.Frapedigreed a For 2019). al., et Wildt 2008; Hill, & Kruuk conservation; ln n seissses o xml,i 93teAeia Chestnut American the 1983 in example, For systems. fisheries and plant kso ta. 06,adTsaindvl MLna,Gubr Wise, Grueber, (McLennan, devils Tasmanian and 2016), al., et Akesson ˚ o ogtr osrainadptniluei uuersoain(Di restoration future in use potential and conservation long-term for peooacoerulescens Aphelocoma au lupus Canus 3 vscanadensis Ovis nYlosoeNtoa akcmie with combined Park National Yellowstone in ) ,rsacesue eire opredict to pedigrees used researchers ), xsitu ex og obs tee Luikart, & Steele, Forbes, Hogg, ; ouaingntcvariation genetic population Cynomys Sistrurus .mol- C. in Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. a lob sdt aiaeucranadsm-idpdges o xml,mcoaelt akr have markers microsatellite example, For pedigrees. semi-wild and uncertain validate ante- to sable used of populations be Tasmanian non-pedigreed in also in 2018) and can al., use pedigreed et for of McLennan ( pedigrees 2017; management enhance al. lope metapopulation et to reconstructing guiding Huisman and 2015; used 2017; and Taylor, 2019) been Grueber, devils al., have 2010; & et Belov, data Luikart, (Hogg Hogg, Molecular & (Gooley, relationships 2020). pedigrees founder Hohenlohe, al., estimating (Allendorf, popu- et including distant when management, Galla conservation more even 2019; sequencing identity-by-descent, are Jones throughput estimating relationships & for high Flanagan or resolution through inbred better generated are provide SNPs) lations often (i.e., HTS) paren- verify polymorphisms (i.e., to nucleotide approaches markers microsatellite single ( using condor density of a California example, high benefit For endangered the relatives. highlighted critically close (2021) in inferring al., microsatellite-based tage for et populations, especially Moran 2018), wild from al., diverse study et relatively recent (McLennan For informative pedigrees. be complement can and intensivelyapproaches complete of to used management be conservation effective more and to populations. recommendations, lead captive breeding and would wild calculations, values Latch, managed kinship & kinship to Steeves, accurate Galla, respect generating (Hauser, with retention challenges diversity management E.K.Latch, genetic and managed to (R.M.Gooley species pedigrees Plan lead known Survival ungulate completely can have Species of 15% Aquariums 50% only and data fact, over in unpublished Zoos known; species, of pedigree breeding Association their To of group the under- half 2019). of in and Grueber, over- auspices challenges & the both such Hogg, under to of Farquharson, shown severity devil; been Tasmanian the has (e.g., highlight approach contributions MULT shown genetic the individual as individuals, parentage, estimate between unknown success while of diversity reproductive individuals genetic in removing greater parents retain ( to to oryx assumed opposed shown Arabian with been as in assigned has avoidance are pedigree inbreeding a or unknown maintaining into MULTs 2012), still Building with assigned Lacy, MULTs; are 2003) Individuals 2010). uncertainty, (i.e., al., kinship value Altizer, et to track. 2020). (Ballou kinship due & to al., average population Davis, parentage difficult breeding et potential multiple is Overbeek Milligan, the a breeders from (e.g., bands; excluded when parentage polygynous either leg exacerbated extra-pair are amongst is parentage or in parentage challenge captivity, participate tags, This in individuals collars, 2019). Even monogamous radio al., (e.g., socially Ashley, et (e.g., organism when plants; Wildt identifiers the or 2016; open-pollinated their of Ryder, and breeding behaviour lose & monitor mammals, breeding Gurr, individuals to herd-breeding Navarro, and required birds, Putnam, potential cost Ivy, breeding dispersal and 2010; flock the time like with the species coupled to polygamous due wild, challenging the be in time can individuals over parentage pedigrees accurate in example, For compound can 2016). which issues, Johnson, errors, these & to individuals transcription Bailey, addition or Cerda, human In la assumption individuals, to generations. de this supplemented later susceptible (Hammerly, in are 2004), (e.g., also pedigree effects ancestry al., the are these into unknown et pedigrees While incorporated of (Balloux are 2019). information) individuals individuals al., missing when founding with et from perpetuated (Hogg depth unrelated be equally pedigree can as establishment, higher following founders with years treat molecular the ameliorated that using with in founders pedigrees coefficients confirmed amongst inbreeding to relatedness higher been compared significantly of revealed estimates has data inferring which geographic that and shown Conservation, 2014), of further Department has Robertson, Zealand devil Tasmanian & (New SNPs Jamieson, genome-wide of (Bergner, thousands founders than amongst microsatellite-based another of one represented study amongst a instance, kinship k¯ak¯ap¯o For in in populations. variance relatedness non-threatened more from include sampled ( may randomly populations individuals these from founders pedigreed, iptau niger Hippotragus oadespdge hlegs oeua eg,gntco eoi)etmtso eaens rmcan from relatedness of estimates genomic) or genetic (e.g., molecular challenges, pedigree address To isn nomto sotnacnenfrwl eire hr aetg sdffiutt ascertain. to difficult is parentage where pedigrees wild for concern a often is information Missing .Ti sacmo hleg nonee ihgophue atv ouain,which populations, captive group-housed with encountered challenge common a is This ). rxleucoryx Oryx tioshabroptilus Strigops n aagzle( gazelle dama and ) unm&Iy 04.Hwvr o pce hteprec ag differences large experience that species for However, 2014). Ivy, & Putnam ; eosrtdta ulsbigadhl-iln eainhp were relationships half-sibling and full-sibling that demonstrated ) agrdama Nanger yngp californianus Gymnogyps 4 R.M.Gooley ; Preprint .Rsligukonprnaeand parentage unknown Resolving ). .Wiemcoaeltsaeuseful, are microsatellites While ). esnlcomm. Personal nulse data unpublished ® SP aels than less have (SSP) .Mlclrdata Molecular ). .Rsac in Research ). Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. uniaietatlcsmpig(eel hra,&Nae 99 egs osut eras iln,& Ritland, Meirmans, and Bousquet, maps Pelgas, linkage 1999; of Neale, construction in & the captured Sherman, example readily (Sewell, for metadata Further, mapping approaches, genomic locus pedigrees. data with trait in that genomic integrated quantitative carried using data be concluded ascertain plasticity history also to females) phenotypic life impossible can on through 35K be pedigrees would rely date (> scale studies breeding this these species on optimal given Meta-analyses study animal in alone, to fluctuations 2020). Another wild al., annual individuals) 21 et 2021). buffer 30K Villemereuil of to (de Grueber, (> able populations & species were pedigreed Hogg, 15 species (Farquharson, from 39 many survival pedigrees data in impact with pedigree breeding virtue captivity associated harnessed assessing by data in study and demographic generations recent able long-term contrast, how a be the In show example, structured, not For and may fitness. be collected invaluable. and individual is can is records, including However, data data pedigree parameters pedigree analyses. in demographic how evolutionary downstream inherent of key data, sampling for capture in pedigree long-term data accurately variance the genomic of to (e.g., encompass with absence rarely fitness along the datasets and pedigrees in & these demography of forecast Lacy that, understanding independent PVA; to acknowledge collected for (i.e., used We optionally resource disease analysis be critical viability (e.g., can success). a population depression pedigrees reproductive provides through inbreeding alongside and populations of captured 2021) small signs metadata Pollak, for and the practices behaviour, own, management death, its (e.g., best of On morphometrics including cause infertility). extensive, condition), susceptibility, often body is ancestry size, alongside weight, collected data scrub phenotypic Florida information, in shown ( is as sheep pedigree Soay contributions, ( song-sparrows a and genetic 2019), throughout and al. produced fitness number et offspring of cohort, (Chen of jays metrics 1991), number individual Paukstis, regarding understanding & Information (Janzen for molecular valuable survival. determination from and sex inaccessible age, genetic be offspring, without may of species that for data sex coefficients demographic including rich relatedness carry data, identical also to genomic with Pedigrees by required relationships consequences. grandparent-grandoffspring, captured observations different ecological to be discern ecological cannot compared can and that half-siblings pedigrees dataset behavioral (e.g., example, ancillary The For rich a alone. in data 2010). results relationships Sheldon, inter-individual & provide (Clutton-Brock data genomic pedigrees in captured metadata & era information Demographic genomics conservation kinship: genomic the data. Beyond conservation in genomic greatest and the pedigrees that pedigree that of assert both posit value we we in The invest era, experience, we genomics when collective conservation understanding happen the practitioners, our our will In geneticists, advances on conservation advances only below). important between Based not ties (see capture strong pedigrees beyond and develops and underlie 2). also inquiry, that but genomic relationships, data (Fig. inter-individual enhance ecological al., of cannot and et 2015), behavioural alone (Nietlisbach Allendorf, the inbreeding data conservation & gathering and the Luikart, genomic in relatedness Kardos, that tool estimate invaluable also metadata an to see remain approach pedigrees but affordable that (Speed 2017, an argue pedigrees providing we to the comparable perspective, era, and are this genomics that caveats In relatedness their of 2015). considering estimates Balding, produce them, & to maintaining available data and HTS scratch of from abundance pedigrees 2020). building al. towards management conservation et dedicated (Galla impact fertilisation explored differences random be these to which and remains to segregation recommendations extent realized infor- and pairing the in missing recombination However, including variation no of decisions existing 2015). with effects more Balding, capture the ‘perfect’ & may given (Speed are data relatives, pedigrees genomic between when assignments, relatedness Even parentage 2021). accurate and Hale, mation & populations Massaro, wild Cubrinovska, endangered critically Forsdick, and intensively-monitored ( for kak¯ı/black stilt pedigrees of validate to used been recently elwcnevto rciinr n eerhr aeqeidwehrtm n eore hudbe should resources and time whether queried have researchers and practitioners conservation Fellow eire atr elho nomto eodidvda eainhp rdcdprl by purely produced relationships individual beyond information of wealth a capture Pedigrees vsaries Ovis iatpsnovaezelandiae Himantopus utr ebro,Pligo,&Mrisy21) nadto odemographic to addition In 2019). Morrissey & Pilkington, Pemberton, Hunter, ; eopz melodia Melospiza vreke l,22)adbakrbn( robin black and 2020) al., et Overbeek ; 5 ed itibc,Wlk elr acs 2019), Aarcese & Keller, Wolak, Nietlisbach, Reid, ; R .5,wihcnhv ieetsca and social different have can which 0.25), = eriatraversi; Petroica Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. a bet euemre ro ae y5%(hne l,21) td ntepdgedpopulation a pedigreed from the SNPs in false study and study, A sex-linked one identifying in 2013). approach, and al., inheritance. this validation, et Mendelian for marker (Chen using promise for 50% variants great genetics by shows human from rates jays of datasets error scrub field false marker Florida the validated filtering reduce of in equilibrium, for to used Hardy-Weinberg tool able been and was one long depth Portnoy, false et has sequencing as & to Wold approach for Hollenbeck, used lead This 2020; filtering Willis, be can adequate Puritz, Rajora, can processing (O’Leary, to & bioinformatic analyses pedigrees addition Funk, downstream and In (Hohenlohe, bias sequencing, diversity can 2018). preparation, which measure library datasets, and from in identify SNPs, variants Artefacts (e.g., to variants markers 2021). projects, as al., research genomic used conservation are many For SVs) discovery. variant genetic successful Galla (see way the along produce details). error sequencing) for experienced or or 2020 expectations al., preparation, validate biologically-relevant to et library with used consistent be amplification, (Robinson also are WGS can extraction, that using information data homozygosity (e.g., this of pedigrees, approaches runs via known molecular of coefficients are terms whether kinship relationships in familial and compared When inbreeding 2021). were low diversity al., and with downstream et individuals pedigree, for condors, the California using populations in selected managed study were recent many a ( across In antelope diversity of comparisons. sable selection interest founder of the of of family streamline case representative to related phenotypes the across individuals used In diversity characterized closely was (https://sites.uwm.edu/latch/software-2/) genomic 2021). understanding PedSam of representative program al., choice 2020), software maximizing et the when al., (Robinson or inform species et 2019), a can Galla Arakelyan, pedigree & (e.g., Nikoghosyan, a inquiry (Nersisyan, example, genomic For for WGS). groups or resequencing, related accuracy, genome linkage distantly assembly pedigree-based higher identify 2020). Finally, enabling to Bassham by leveraged 2021). assemblies & genome be Amores, al. al. scaffolded (Catchen, et can contiguity for (Tettelin et pedigree and resource interest (Wold valuable order, a of representative a species instance, is been or individuals pangenome this have multiple population maps the In of a ensure assembly in 2019). the to diversity is al., individuals genomic which standing et pangenome, 2019; all (SVs), Brockhurst a Belov, variants capture of 2005; & structural to curation including Hogg, the aim genome, Peel, inform the the Brandies, to with across 2019; et used variants al., Greenhalgh characterise be et (e.g., further may To interest Galla pedigrees High- of (e.g., 2020). genes genotyping al., 2020). for and et mining Bernatchez, discovery Gooley 2014), SNP & al., and Gagnaire, et 2021), (Card Rougemont, al., mapping Duranton, read Leitwein, facilitating by 2018; detailed community Further, al., 2021). et al., Koren quality phased et 2013; generate Rhie to Lee, 2014; trios parent-offspring between Moyle & ambiguity of and likely with selection are associated enable Zhang, error that can (Hahn, repetitive reducing individuals pedigrees to by paralogues identify highly addition assembly also genetic In genome often can and with 2021). and pedigrees assists heterozygosity al., which sex, alternative et sex inbred, on the highly Rhie based homogametic be 2017; capture sampling Makova, to the for to & candidates of Medvedev, sex the Tomaszkiewicz, coverage researchers select heterogametic W; adequate helping some or the Y determination, ensure or (i.e., sex to Z), chromosome genetic sex sex or with homogametic X When species the (i.e., genomes. for chromosome either reference genome selecting high-quality reference and preferred a representative have for inform building to individual for data an biologically-relevant individuals provide selecting of pedigrees selection example, For non-biased a research. genomic implement and design inference and association design for study below). genotypes genomic test see complement to 2017; Pedigrees studies al., GxE (de et and potential (Crossa studies, adaptive variation (GS) assessing environmental selection 2013), with genomic al., 2019a), et al., Morris (GWAS; et studies Villemereuil association genome-wide 2011), Isabel, enovo de eiredt sas nivlal eorefrslcigidvdasfrrsqecn ie,whole (i.e., resequencing for individuals selecting for resource invaluable an also is data Pedigree h eainhpifrainadmtdt atrdb eire r nivlal olt help to tool invaluable an are pedigrees by captured metadata and information relationship The eodifrigteidvdassmldfrmlclrsuis eire a epvtlto pivotal be can pedigrees studies, molecular for sampled individuals the informing Beyond eeec eoe r oeflrsuc o h osrainadeouinr genomics evolutionary and conservation the for resource powerful a are genomes reference 6 iptau niger Hippotragus enovo de eoeasmle (Korbel assemblies genome olye l,22)the 2020) al., et Gooley ; Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. sdt nesadtegnmcbsso hnrdsrpy ehlfr fdafimi hscritically this in dwarfism of form being lethal are condor a & California chondrodystrophy, Santure, in of Johnston, developed basis Feulner, pedigrees genomic to (Stapley, and context the pressures resources useful understand selection mapping provide to to maps example, For used these respond et evolution, (Kawakami to 2017). genome collared species expected of for Smadja, other are understanding created the to an was populations comparison show providing map in how and Beyond architecture linkage genome a landscape also 2014). flycatcher example, recombination al., generations of For over the understanding markers genome. an characterise genome-wide provided the which (Slate of throughout traits maps, genes ( panels controlling linkage of flycatcher dense genes Tracking order genetic of and one of 2011). position is location basis Lange, recombination mapping general & the and Linkage the Laird data, forms understand phenotypic 2009; information. to markers, al., pedigree genetic pedigree et by leverages multi-generational enhanced which a mapping, are across gene or of require method often important mapping’, ‘gene termed 2012). time. Villemereuil, over cost-effective individuals (de a provide more heritability pedigrees across of individuals, IBD (e.g., of lead estimates sampling thousands sizes also precise for for sample consequence, can constructed approach produce large be a turn may to require As in relatedness individuals) models genomic which years. heritability While of captured, Finally, few thousands accurately a response. always to selection or not hundreds predicting one is in across time inaccuracies individuals and the to pedigree genotyped Further, space capture capture to in potential. required variability to evolutionary monitoring environmental likely and longer-term heritability the only to of is compared estimates Santure, studies, relationships, biased genomic Ewen, many to Rutschmann, of lead Villemereuil, pitfalls design pedigrees may de one-off which pedigree that (e.g., effects Balding, effects 2019b) overcome confounding & cohort Brekke, important may Speed and & for 2012; and maternal account Weir including to & pedigrees, fail Hill capture, often 2011; naturally of Weir, approaches GxE 2020). instead & genomic (Hill Hamilton, However, understanding to used genome-sharing & 2015). addition to of be Dochtermann, estimates In Volk, essential can Yoko, realized providing been 2020; 2019a). relatedness while al., also al., of et have et estimates (Bisbing Villemereuil populations species Empirical (de plant distinct in bird or especially threatened valuable groups interactions, this a family in is ( change known potential which hihi global heritability, evolutionary in rapid selection, low study to to recent reveal due general, a response to pressures In example, in selection For 2010). strong quickly al., 2001). experiencing et more (Woodruff, trait populations Wilson evolve threatened model’, of to ‘animal for models proportion populations the characteristic genetic termed enable the complex model Quantitative from heritabilities statistical estimate estimated effects often high pressures 2017). heritability; to mixed (i.e., selective a al., individuals individuals using between the et differences between pedigrees genetic population, Farquharson to relatedness due a is (e.g. pedigree-based that in variation potential individuals in evolutionary between variation and differences leverage phenotypic traits, of these basis on genetic et the depths. Mao low of plants; at and sequence insects, only can fish, that some programs (e.g., Genetics conservation depths species Quantitative for for high and option especially Pedigrees at cost-effective genomics, sequence a conservation caveats of as to its field or costly despite the 2020)  are in of al., imputation more that likelihood anticipate explored genomes 2014). We the be large Schenkel, will 2019). increase 2014) with al., & can et approach al. Chesnais, missing (Ullah et this Sargolzaei, Roshyara alleles of groups, (see rare amounts 2012; family of large Cleveland, even from addressing completing imputation, & information for (e.g., accurate Werf, genotypic option imputation with der one genetics, coupled van is crop When algorithms) and Tier, using human Kinghorn, sequencing alleles of (Hickey, low likely fields by data with the hampered sets In often data are data. missing datasets missing Guhlin, budget-constrained, subsequent (Joseph often and species is depth this concern for conservation of discovery of variant individuals variant Further, species quality all high 2014). for a Clark, set creating & data inheritance, Gottipati, k¯ak¯ap¯o Mendelian Hout, by endangered Van informed critically (Chen, the being set is data representation reduced vni h bec fmlclrifrain eire aeln rvdda understanding an provided long have pedigrees information, molecular of absence the in Even ieuaalbicollis Ficedula ehd htietf h ein ftegnm htcnrbt otathrtblt,broadly heritability, trait to contribute that genome the of regions the identify that Methods sn eppdge aaadtosnso eoewd Ns hc has which SNPs, genome-wide of thousands and data pedigree deep using ) 7 oimsi cincta Notiomystis esnlcomm. Personal sdpdge-ae heritability pedigree-based used ) .Bcuegnmcrsac for research genomic Because ). Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. potnte obidadmiti rse eainhp.W otn htpdgeswl eanrelevant remain will pedigrees provide that and contend implementation, We and design relationships. demogra- research trusted long-term improved maintain provide for and to allow build continue that data to information molecular pedigrees opportunities history conservation Robust with life world. for completed changing and powerhouse and a phic a complemented in diversity create be preserving they can and genomics, that characterizing and better of genetics capable in management advances unprecedented with coupled years for powerhouse communicators genomic science conservation for tool A important an of remain al., will management et pedigrees come. genetic Holderegger that to confident (see conservation uni- are outcomes regarding we conservation groups, and enhances school using politicians 2019), communication with experience and science engaging had Effective makers, for species. has policy threatened tools co-authorship effective retirees, collective highly our classrooms, trees–as Indeed, audiences, versity family relatable. non-scientific as to are presented jargon pedigrees without pedigrees–generally because heritability part and IPLC. large inbreeding, with relatedness, in relationships like encourage beneficial concepts we mutually genetics this, on build Given help diverse them. to share New around pedigrees to environments of Aotearoa parties the use in all as the species for consider well to (treasured) opportunities as researchers provides individuals taonga individuals these Local threatened between regarding and of of Peoples knowledge ties research recovery Indigenous familial with genetics the discussing provide working conservation enhance Zealand, can experience regarding our to pedigrees makers in alignment, (IPLC) Further, this decision 2). Communities Given (Box Indigenous 2020). species with Collier-Robinson, al., significant discussions 2007; culturally et Hudson Lea, for 2019; centerpoint & Steeves Lea a & Ahuriri-Driscoll, Thoms, genomic (Hudson, Rupene, and worldviews Rayne, genetic non-Indigenous of and application Indigenous 1). improved co-development (Box into This species validation. threatened translate for of can management used which conservation data mutual the trust, requires genetic into pedigree builds the research a resources and building genealogy, pedigree strong of history, requires act of life often the help species that Indeed, who task researchers of analyses. and consuming downstream knowledge sets time perform research data a and 2008; conservation demographic is pedigrees al., long-term between data validate et collect pedigree gap Knight who refining gap’; practitioners the and between genomics bridge Collating communication ‘conservation 2015). the help al., or pedigrees et gap’ ‘research-implementation that Shafer the contend (i.e., we practice uses, and these sets Communities Beyond Local data and species. in Peoples especially Indigenous analyses, and GWAS 2017). practitioners, researchers, al., to between et precision bridge Zhou greater study a 2013; are add al., to Pedigrees data and et way pedigree (Chen error unbiased incorporate density that type-I an GWAS marker avoid that provides low shown GWAS to with Benonisottir, also (Young, pedigree-informed able have effects Studies a better selection. these so, are to combines response doing which and In alone effects effects GWAS genetic 2019). genetic the of indirect Kong, and opposed basis & direct as partition genomic Prezeworski, to interest, GWAS the of with understand combined phenotypes be to on can information dense data leverages pedigree phenotypic which example, and For GWAS, that traits. into individuals, loci incorporated unrelated be candidate genomic putatively can identified markers, information many mapping pedigree Similarly, of Meril¨a, ( QTL 2016). stickleback & detection nine-spined Liu, example, freshwater ( the For and spruce marine white quantitative enables between in for 2005). differences phenology which utilised bud (Slate, to be mapping, contributing differences can that loci QTL data traits trait adaptive pedigree Besides continuous or and to 2009). maps mapping, linkage contribute al., linkage effect, et large locus Romanov of 2000; trait genes Frankham, single & by controlled Rideout, are Ballou, (Ralls, species endangered eire r sflto o nesadn eeisadifrigmngmn ffrsfrthreatened for efforts management informing and genetics understanding for tool useful a are Pedigrees hl eire r n ftems ogsadn ol ntecnevto eeistobx when toolbox, genetics conservation the in tools long-standing most the of one are pedigrees While ehv lofudta eire rvd epu iult omnct udmna conservati- fundamental communicate to visual helpful a provide pedigrees that found also have We nilsrtn oncin htln h rsn oteps,pdgesaewl-lge ihboth with well-aligned are pedigrees past, the to present the link that connections illustrating In 8 ie glauca Picea ugtu pungitius Pungitius egse l,21)adphenotypic and 2011) al., et Pelgas ; ag u,Shikano, Guo, Yang, ; Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ege,L . aisn .G,&Rbrsn .C 21) obnn eei aat dniyrelated- identify to data genetic habroptilus). (Strigops Combining Kakapo (2014). the C. parrot, B. depauperate genetically Robertson, a & Genetics in G., founders I. among populati- Jamieson, ness real M., in L. inbreeding Bergner, estimate (2010). heterozygosity (2011). J. L. Does R. T. (2004). Bennett, Foose, T. & Coulson, L., & Lackey, W., ons? Bingaman Amos, C., F., Lynch, Balloux, S., Long, populations. management captive J., zoo of for L. management techniques Faust, genetic C., and Lees, Demographic D., J. populations Ballou, plant and animal pedigrees. wild from coefficients managing inbreeding for Calculating (1983). J. Ballou, genetics. conservation of future and action purview, in the history, The altered (2008). have C. microsatellites J. gene- DNA Avise, conservation how of dispersal: and future pollination, the parentage, and landscape. Plant (2010). Genomics V. (2010). M. G. Ashley, Luikart, & A., P. tics. Hohenlohe, Flagstad, W., & F. S., Bensch, Allendorf, P., Wabakken, population. H., wolf Sand, inbred O., severely award Liberg, SERDP M., a Akesson, ˚ and Matocq) We MA and support. and Forbey References Track Innovation and NSF S. Business, Heath). the feedback Jennifer of JA by Ministry to her to supported the awarded awarded was for by helpful (RC-2702, (OIA-1826801 and funded Forbey provided Program TES) been who S. to has EPSCoR awarded work Rayne, Jennifer 2 (UOCX1602 This Aisling Fund 1. Endeavour Dr. Box (MBIE) Dr. k¯ak¯ariki in Employment kak¯ı thank her to photo, photo her k¯ak¯ap¯o karaka We for grateful for his Hayder LB friendly are for Leonie and a We 2. Hedman provided photo, Petrus Box who manuscript. acknowledge Lacy for this C. gratefully Robert citations of Dr. and draft their to early context species–for thankful are (treasured) an We taonga of manuscript. these review this of for each inspiration for and Groups support Recovery the on come. representatives Ng¯ai to Tahu the generations for management for parentage tool uncertain a as to any used IPLC with and and gene- Acknowledgements assist built practitioners, conservation and researchers, be by between to accuracy used communication continue for be clear pedigrees subse- also pedigree for ensure in can advocate the coupled individuals samples we validate research, Finally, pedigreed Tissue genomic periodically assignments. all pedigree. jumpstart to help the for researchers can birth, in samples tic individuals of embedded tissue pedigreed relati- date metadata and all (e.g., collected inter-individual for death) metadata with inform banks of detailed can Tissue maintaining cause you generations. recommend interest, quent ensure we metadata of to all sampling, and morphometrics (including programs) initial samples possible sex, breeding to tissue as conservation addition collect individuals of In many animals, case onships. as or the for plants provenance) in of geographic founders, pedigree and new information phenotypic a (e.g., establishing when First, success. o ple n udmna eerh n doaefrtermitnnei rgasars the across programs in maintenance their for advocate and research, fundamental and and applied for nsitu in aueRvesGenetics Reviews Nature oeua Ecology Molecular , 5-15. , etakalmmeso h K¯ak¯ap¯o, the of members all K¯ak¯ariki Programmes–including Kak¯ı thank Recovery We and Karaka, 15 rtclRvesi ln Sciences Plant in Reviews Critical aaeetspectrum. management 5,11-00 o:/10.1007/s10592-014-0595-y doi: 1013-1020. (5), o hs einn oasml eiredt,w ffrtefloigavc o maximum for advice following the offer we data, pedigree assemble to beginning those For h rcia ud otegntcfml history family genetic the to guide practical The 31) 01 01 o:/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02318.x doi: 3031. 3021– 13(10), , , 11 219. , oeua Ecology Molecular 1) 697-709. (10), , 29 , 509 3,1811 o:/10.1080/07352689.2010.481167 doi: 148-161. (3), , 25 520. , 9 1)44-76 o:/10.1111/mec.13797 doi: (19),4745-4756. idmmasi atvt:picpe and principles captivity: in mammals Wild eeisadcnevto:areference a conservation: and Genetics onWly&Sons. & Wiley John . osrainbooy evolution biology: Conservation Ø 21) eei ecei a in rescue Genetic (2016). . Conservation xsitu ex Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. eada .L,Sho,E . rnel .E,Salr .R,&vnod,B .(01.Srotcmange Park Sarcoptic National Yellowstone (2021). in M. selection B. vonHoldt, of & evidence R., and variation D. ( genomic Stahler, wolves reduced E., with E. associated Brandell, C., is severity E. Schrom, perspectives. L., and A. models, & DeCandia, methods, . breeding: . . plant in G., Science selection Campos, study. Plant Genomic los indigenous case (2017). de K. Embedding genomics Jarqu´ın, D., R. Montesinos-L´opez, (2019). Varshney, conservation O., J., P´erez-Rodr´ıguez, T. a A. Cuevas, J., Steeves, P., species: Janke, Crossa, significant & & 43 culturally C., Ecology, . of of . Thoms, . Journal research M., P., Zealand genomic Rupene, Dobrynin, in A., M., principles species. Rayne, R. distinct Gooley, L., P., four Collier-Robinson, K. supports Koepfli, giraffe V., of /10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.033. Kumar, analysis S., Whole-genome Winter, (2020). (2021). orthotaenia, P. T., Brycon A. R. Lima, and & Coimbra, franciscanus C., Salminus B. Silva, species, da fish M., aquaculture. Sales, Neotropical 30 conservation A., migratory for M. two implications Lima, M., in and M. flow Luna, gene L., High H. Dantas, individual- R., M. long-term, Coimbra, of role the biology. populations: evolutionary /10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.002 and and ecology doi: Individuals in (2010). animals C. of studies B. based Al- Sheldon, (2019). & G. T., Coop, & Clutton-Brock, . . . improve J., population. S. natural to Schoech, pedigreed W., inheritance 116 a J. Mendelian Fitzpatrick, in R., Using dynamics Bowman, frequency J., (2014). lele E. G. Cosgrove, I., A. Juric, Clark, N., Chen, & S., calling Gottipati, Genotype discovery. V., (2013). SNP R. C. high-throughput G. Hout, Abecasis, Van & N., . . Chen, . F., trios. Busonero, (2021). C., parent-offspring T. Sidore, Pickering, in S., & haplotyping Sanna, . Z., and . Zeng, . B., A., Li, Serban, W., enhancing M., Chen, sustainability. Riechers, and S., for R. co-production repairing Reid, of E., for modes M. Ryan, Six set C., Wyborn, Gene- tool M., Genomes, J. a Genes, Chambers, G3: Chromonomer: synteny. conserved (2020). and 4115-4128. maps S. & 10(11), genetic Bassham, tics, of novo . . integration de & . through versus J., genomes A., reference-guided assembled S. of Amores, Oyler-McCance, comparison J., L., a A. Catchen, and Andrew, genomes K., bird coverage M. Fujita, low assemblies. Two J., genome (2014). ecology Reyes-Velasco, The A. R., (2019). T. D. C. Castoe, Schield, MacLean, C., & D. A., McNally, conservationCard, T., the Richards, in P., pangenomes. genomes J. of reference Hall, evolution of E., and value Harrison, The A., (2019). M. Brockhurst, K. plan, Belov, transfer & J., breeding species. C. threatened & Hogg, of pp. E., analysis 36 Peel, MD, Population P., Spring, Brandies, (2017). Silver Aquariums, A. and J. Zoos Ivy, of Association S., Peregoy, ( crane M., species whooping long-lived Mace, conifer. Can K., widespread 2020. a Boardman, Angert. in A.L. potential persistence Matocq, local M. of Cooper, Evidence Distributions change? D.J. climate Buma, with B.J. pace keep Urza, A.K. S.M., Bisbing, 6,16-03 o:/10.1002/aqc.3336 doi: 1063-1073. (6), 6,25-14 o:/10.1073/pnas.1813852116 doi: 2158-2164. (6), ai lupus Canis , , 27 22 2:2632 o:/10.1111/ddi.13191 doi: 296-312. (2): rsamericana Grus 1) 6-7.di /10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.011 doi: 961-975. (11), LSOne PLoS ). vltoayApplications Evolutionary Genes , 10 , urn Biology Current 3,19 o:/10.20417/nzjecol.43.36 doi: 1-9. (3), 9 1) 4.di /10.3390/genes10110846 doi: 846. (11), Genetics 9,e069 o:/10.1371/journal.pone.0106649 doi: e106649. (9), .AASeisSria Plan Survival Species AZA ). , eoeResearch Genome 198 aueSustainability Nature , 3,8787 o:/10.1534/genetics.114.169052 doi: 847-857. (3), 29 qai osrain aieadFehae Ecosystems Freshwater and Marine Conservation: Aquatic , 14 2) 19-10.di /10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.012 doi: R1094-R1103. (20), 2,4945 o:/10.1111/eva.1312712 doi: 429-445. (2), 10 rceig fteNtoa cdm fSciences of Academy National the of Proceedings 31,1211 o:/10.1101/gr.142455.112 doi: 142-151. 23(1), , rnsi clg Evolution & Ecology in Trends ® rga.Pplto aaeetCenter, Management Population Program. 1-14. , urn Biology Current , 25 , 31 1) 562-573. (10), iest and Diversity -0 doi: 1-10. , rnsin Trends New , , Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ilo .M,Iy .A,Jns .C,&Lth .K 21) vlaino lentv management alternative of Evaluation (2016). K. E. Latch, & C., populations. L. wildlife Jones, in variation https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12254 A., genetic of J. maintenance for Ivy, strategies M., can 10-year-old selection R. a directional in Giglio, that traits suggests functional L.) and robur . growth adaptation. (Quercus . . in oak climatic L., responses drive pedunculate Neuhauser, plastic with N., and experiment adaptive Momirovic, garden Assessing S., common Scheffknecht, (2020). K., P. Rungwattana, Hietz, in G., & decisions Theroux-Rancourt, P., pairing J. informing George, (2020). for E. worldwide. T. relatedness programmes Steeves, of & breeding conservation estimates . T. for . genomic Applications . Steeves, Implications F., birds: and & R. endangered Maloney, nucleotide genetic P., critically . M. single two pedigree, . Hoeppner, . of of S., F., discovery Cleland, comparison L., R. for Brown, A Maloney, R., used Moraga, M., be J., S. Knapp, can Galla, P., species management. M. related conservation Hoeppner, distantly inform L., from to polymorphisms Brown, genomes Reference J., (2019). N. doi:/10.26021/8081 Forsdick, E. Canterbury. J., of University S. Thesis Sciences, birds. Galla, Biological Zealand New in endangered Philosophy critically two of of Doctor passerine. management for genomic monogamous Conservation socially (2019) J. inbred, S. highly extra- Galla, detects a genotyping Robin, Microsatellite Black (2021). Island L. Ornithology Chatham M. Austral and the Hale, SNPs & in to M., paternity microsatellites Massaro, pair From I., analysis: Cubrinovska, parentage J., N. of Forsdick, future The (2019). Zoo. Park G. Lincoln A. 2.5. Jones, beyond. Version & PopLink P., (2019). S. L. of Flanagan, Bier, generations & over D., S. changes https://www.lpzoo.org/science-project/poplink/ Thompson, survival IL. M., Offspring Chicago, Y. (2021). Bergstrom, J., E. L. C. Faust, Grueber, & J., captive breeding. C. in assignment captive Hogg, parentage genetic A., for K. case Farquharson, A (2019). E. C. Grueber, housing. & J., group C. Hogg, in A., management decline K. captive Farquharson, generational a for reveals implications analysis harrisii): Pedigree species. (Sarcophilus (2017). threatened devil E. Tasmanian of C. col- captive situ Grueber, of ex & success J., optimize reproductive C. to Hogg, data A., geographic K. and Farquharson, environmental Using (2020). potential. A. evolutionary preserve J. and Hamilton, (2020). lections & M. N., L. L. mammals. Chevin, Santo, and & Di Sciences birds . in of . Academy date . W. breeding L., National Brouwer, on the P., A. selection Brekke, of variable P., temporally Bize, hihi. Santure, and threatened Zealand D., optimum New Arlt, Can Fluctuating & the A., (2019b). Charmantier, for P. P., date P., Villemereuil, Brekke, lay de in & Brekke, response W., evolutionary A. expected G., No Santure, Applications habitat? G., J. Evolutionary restored J. a Ewen, in Ewen, adapt A., species Rutschmann, bird. D., P., passerine Villemereuil, K. threatened de a Lee, in A., potential /10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.072. adaptive Rutschmann, Little P., (2019a). Villemereuil, How de model: animal https://devillemereuil.legtux.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/tuto_- the package. using heritability R trait en.pdf MCMCglmm biological the a of use Estimation to Tutorial (2012). P. Villemereuil, de oeua Ecology Molecular , 13 osrainGenetics Conservation 5,9110.di /10.1111/eva.12916 doi: 991-1008. (5), aueCommunications Nature 10.1080/01584197.2020.1812406 doi: 121:68-74, , ora fHeredity of Journal , vltoayapplications Evolutionary 83,5457 o:/10.1111/mec.14988 doi: 544-567. 28(3), , 12 3,4247 o:/10.1111/eva.12727. doi: 482-497. (3), 1(0,399398 o:/10.1073/pnas.2009003117 doi: 31969-31978. 117(50), , 05,18-13 o:/10.1007/s10592-019-01198-w doi: 1187-1193. 20(5), , , 21,19 o:/10.1038/s41467-021-22631-0 doi: 1-9. 12(1), , 108 osrainBiology Conservation 5,4845 o:/10.1093/jhered/esx030 doi: 488-495. (5), , 11 Genes 13 9,22-48 o:/10.1111/eva.13034 doi: 2422-2438. (9), , 10 1,9 o:/10.3390/genes10010009 doi: 9. (1), , 35 urn Biology Current 2,7374 o:/10.1111/cobi.13568 doi: 733–744. (2), nmlConservation Animal , 29 5,8984 doi: 889-894. (5), , 19 Evolutionary 4,380-390. (4), Proceedings m - Emu Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. odrge,R,Blehl . olgr . nlr .O,Ggri . ohic,A,...&Zco,F E. F. Zachos, & . . . A., practice. Hochkirch, with F., population science Gugerli, insular O., Linking an J. /10.1111/mec.15202 of genetics: Engler, rescue Conservation J., Genetic Bolliger, (2019). N., (2006). Balkenhol, G. R., Luikart, Holderegger, & M., B. Founder Steele, /10.1098/rspb.2006.3477 (2019). mammals. H., K. S. large programmes Belov, Forbes, & of breeding E., T., on C. J. effect Grueber, unrelated. Hogg, the A., be reveal J. to Ivy, kinships assumed V., are empirical A. founders Lee, when management: M., conservation K. and functional Morris, and B., relationships potential Wright, adaptive J., of C. Conservation Hogg, (2019). C. R. Fleischer, individuals. & inbred W., of diversity. M. descendants Bruford, among R., relationship A. actual Hoelzel, in sampling Variation Mendelian (2012). of S. consequence Research B. a Weir, Genetics as & relationship G., and actual W. phasing in Hill, Variation A (2011). (2012). S. A. evaluation. B. linkage. Weir, M. genomic and & Cleveland, single-stage G., & a W. H., Hill, in J. results Werf, that der van populations of Evolution estimates B., pedigreed Selection genomic-based Tier, for P., Comparing method B. (Preprint). imputation Kinghorn, K. M., E. J. Latch, management. Hickey, conservation E., genomes pedigree-based T. draft in Steeves, correcting use J., and for S. assembling, relatedness Galla, Sequencing, S., (2014). S. C. Hauser, L. increased Moyle, bad: & gone V., populations. pedigree recombinant S. using A Zhang, W., (2016). M. A. population. Hahn, captive J. a Johnson, in & inbreeding minimize H., to Bailey, relatedness A., Conservation DNA-based D. approaches using Evolutionary Cerda, after survival la (2020). offspring de M. a C., Ahlering, in S. & Hammerly, variation R., restorations. Shaw, grassland genetic K., for of Volk, sourcing J., loss seed Lindstrom, to the S., managing Flint, J., and Hamilton, Quantifying pedigrees. of & use (2008). the G. . through . /10.1007/s10592-007-9390-3 I. takahe . of Jamieson, D., population & M. genes. free-ranging E., p450 Matocq, cytochrome C. L., metabolizing Grueber, T. xenobiotic Parchman, of B., evolution woodrats number J. /10.1101/2021.03.08.434435 the copy Henderson, doi: of rapid genomes J., and Trio-binned islands T. gene (2021). Orr, D. L., M. M. Dearing, genetic Holding, zoos, in R., niger) Pedigree-based Greenhalgh, (Hippotragus America. antelope Koepfli, & North sable of in /10.1111/eva.12976 . structure ranches . a . doi: and (2018). private M., in diversity G. and Ferrie, genomic depression centers, P., K. of inbreeding Dobrynin, conservation Comparison R., of K. E. (2020). Murphy, evidence P. S., No Castaneda-Rico, K. G., Latch, Tamazian, (2017). M., R. E. inbreeding. Gooley, & in C. variation Grueber, /10.1038/s41598-017-02000-y C., significant & doi: despite K., 1-11. L. population Belov, insurance J., devil Jones, C. Tasmanian Hogg, R., A., Gooley, J. conservation. Ivy, bison https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21433 improves M., management R. Giglio, osrainGenetics Conservation eeisResearch Genetics , 19 3,2633 o:/10.1111/acv.12247 doi: 296-303. (3), , , 94 44 rceig fteRylSceyB ilgclSciences Biological B: Society Royal the of Proceedings 5,2724 o:/10.1017/S0016672312000468 doi: 267-274. (5), 1,11.di /10.1186/1297-9686-44-9 doi: 1-11. (1), , 3 ee,Gnms Genetics Genomes, Genes, G3: 93 015 o:/10.1007/s10592-019- doi: 20:1-5. 1,4-4 doi:/10.1017/S0016672310000480 47-64. (1), e htlgs,225 Phytologist, New nmlConservation Animal h ora fWllf Management Wildlife of Journal The 12 vltoayApplications Evolutionary etm bryanti Neotoma , 4 oeua clg,28 Ecology, Molecular osrainGenetics Conservation BioRxiv. 6,24-28 o:/10.1111/nph.16427 doi: 2246-2248. (6), , 4,6969 o:/10.1534/g3.114.010264 doi: 669-679. (4), 22 4,3831 o:/10.1111/acv.12463 doi: 348-361. (4), o:10.1101/2021.07.08.451704. doi: , 273 and 19) 4119.doi: 1491-1499. (1593), cetfi Reports Scientific .lepida N. 1)24-86 doi: (17):2848-3856. , , , 9 13 3,6561 doi: 645-651. (3), 82 8,2143-2154. (8), 4,766-774. (4), eelnovel reveal Genetics bioRxiv Animal 7(1), , . Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. mt,R eal,OA ye,adHC oebu.Cnevto eeisi h g fgenomics. of systems. breeding age diverse and the parentage uncertain in for G. Heredity genetics analysis of pedigree Conservation in: Extending nal 58-81 (2012). Pages Rosenbaum. C. R. H.C. Lacy, populations. and York. captive New of Ryder, Press, management O.A. University populations. Genetic Columbia captive DeSalle, of evolution: R. management Stopping the Amato, in (2009). the use R.C. their Lacy, populations: and terms wild genetic of of dynamics Biology Clarification Zoo Evolutionary (1995). C. Introduction. R. Lacy, (2008). M. G. A. data. W. Phillippy, pedigree /10.1098/rspb.2007.1689 & Hill, long-term & . of . B., . use B., E. S. L. binning. Kingan, Kruuk, trio M., with D. genomes Bickhart, /10.1038/nbt.4277 haplotype-resolved T., doi: of A. 1174-1182. assembly Dilthey, novo P., De B. Walenz, (2018). A., Rhie, S., Hi-C. Koren, with haplotyping and assembly /10.1038/nbt.2764. Genome doi: (2013). C. 1099-1101. Lee, & O., Know- gap. J. research–implementation (2008). Korbel, the M. B. and Campbell, areas & conservation Ellegren, T., priority A. selecting Lombard, & Biology A., doing: Balmford, not M., but Rouget, . assembly . ing M., . R. genome Cowling, evolution. F., flycatcher T., chromosomal A. C. collared Knight, and variation second-generation Mugal, rate a A., recombination enables avian Qvarnstrom, of map ogy A., patterns linkage the Husby, high-density reveals N., A and Backstrom, genomics: (2014). L., of H. age Smeds, the in T., inbreeding Kawakami, individual evolution, pedigrees. Measuring ecology, than (2015). better SNP-derived W. reptiles: are F. in Applying measures Allendorf, marker-based determination & G., sex (2016). Luikart, Environmental M., A. Kardos, (1991). O. L. Ryder, G. design. Paukstis, & experimental & and J., J., Gurr, F. Janzen, Y., programs. A. breeding Navarro, captive molecular S., to /10.1093/jhered/esw029 using A. estimates for coancestry prospects Putnam, and molecular A., Methods J. ( (2009). Ivy, wallabies A. parma J. using DeWoody, example empirical & Heredity an C., estimation of programs: R. Pedigree-based breeding Lacy, captive (2019). A., in data B. Miller, M. A., Morrissey, J. & Ivy, G., J. Pilkington, value. M., reproductive and J. of clustering Pemberton, sibship C., assignment, D. parentage Hunter, (2020). data: R. SNP S. from Carroll, reconstruction & Pedigree beyond. data. (2017). genomic . . J. to . for Huisman, access J., foundation Yracheta, unrestricted Whakapapa–a K., on Fox, perspectives R., (2007). Indigenous Genetics N. A. Reviews expectations: Caron, R. and R., interests Lea, Sterling, Rights, & G., Nanibaa’A, G., M., M. Hudson, Lea, and L., conservation wildlife A. research? for Ahuriri-Driscoll, genetic genomics L., Population M. (2021). P. Hudson, O. Rajora, & C., W. management. Funk, A., P. Hohenlohe, , 23 1) 4035-4058. (16), , oeua clg Resources Ecology Molecular 22 0() 4-5.di /10.1093/jhered/esp019 doi: 441-454. 100(4), , 3,6067 o:/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00914.x doi: 610-617. (3), , 14 oeua Ecology Molecular , 6,5557 o:/10.1002/zoo.1430140609 doi: 565-577. (6), 103 16,377-384. 21(6), , ora fBotia Inquiry Bioethical of Journal 2,197-205. (2), ora fHeredity of Journal h urel eiwo Biology of Review Quarterly The , rceig fteRylSceyo odnB London of Society Royal the of Proceedings 30 1,6-2 o:/10.1111/mec.15720 doi: 62-82. (1), , 17 5,1009-1024. (5), , 110 () 43-49. 4(1), , 4,433-444. (4), Heredity 13 , , 66 115 2,1919 o:10.1086/417143. doi: 149-179. (2), ora fHeredity of Journal 1,6-2 o:/10.1038/hdy.2015.17 doi: 63-72. (1), aueBiotechnology Nature aueBiotechnology Nature , arpsparma Macropus 275 , 107 13) 9-9.doi: 593-596. (1635), 5,4342 doi: 403-412. (5), oeua Ecol- Molecular Conservation ). , , Journal 36 31 Nature Jour- (12), (12), Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. essa,L,Nkgoyn . rkla,A 21) G-ae eoeelnt nlssi Dutch gene. in RRM1 analysis for length role telomere a WGS-based and /10.1038/s41598-019-55109-7 inheritance (2019). doi: maternal A. 1-9. stronger Arakelyan, implicates & trios M., family Nikoghosyan, (2017). L., E. Nersisyan, Postma, & M., J. microsatel- /10.1098/rspb.2016.2763 160 Reid, population. at doi: P., bird heterozygosity wild Arcese, than S. a fitness F., in Kresovich, in Guillaume, variation lites & more G., explains sorghum. Camenisch, coefficient . . inbreeding F., in . Pedigree-based L. traits D., Keller, H. agroclimatic P., Upadhyaya, of Sciences Nietlisbach, T., of studies Shah, Academy association Steiner, T., National genome-wide C. & the Hash, and of ceedings P., genomic . S. Population . . Deshpande, mean P., (2013). L., Improving Ramu, P., Sidak-Loftis, Condor: G. H., California Morris, Davis, endangered to A., the bands Navarro, in management. leg M., conservation relationships nithapp/duab017 colored J. parentage for using Judson, estimates Correcting with kinship M., associated (2021). S. Errors C. Thomas, C. (2003). M., M. B. S. Moran, Altizer, & K., birds. A. wild Davis, identify L., J. differentiated Milligan, genetically Mixing carnivore. (2020). J. endangered C. Pedigree an /10.1111/acv.12589 Hogg, of & doi: diversity K., (2018). Belov, boosts P., E. Wise, successfully C. E., populations C. Grueber, Grueber, A., & E. McLennan, J., C. population island Hogg, an in K., loss diversity 017-1017-8 population Belov, gene ( of P., recent devils sign warning Tasmanian Wise, of early of an assessment M., reveals data Pedigree-based R. molecular using Gooley, reconstruction (2021). A., L. E. From H. McLennan, Species Gibbs, 17 & of Size rattlesnake. J., threatened Genome 0998.13383 G. a Jr, (2020). in Insecta. Lipps Y. connectivity in A., Size Huang, computer S. Genome & by Large Martin, X., analysis Very With Li, Pedigree Standards X., Physiology Internal (1986). Zhang, in of Frontiers A. Y., Determination and O. Nie, (Orthoptera) N., Ryder, Caelifera Zhang, & Y., B., Mao, Read, L., new J. and old VandeBerg, simulation. integrating W., hap- diversity: J. Using functional MacCluer, and potential (2020). adaptive of L. Conservation Bernatchez, approaches. (2019). & K. B. A., Mable, P. genomics. Gagnaire, conservation linkage Q., /10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.012 for association, Rougemont, Linkage, information M., mapping: lotype Duranton, gene M., of concepts Leitwein, general The NY. York, (2011). New In C. maps. Lange, 10.5.5. marker Version and & disequilibrium process. M., extinction the N. genetic of Laird, simulation and USA. stochastic Illinois, demographic A Brookfield, for Vortex: Society, package (2021). Zoological J.P. software Chicago Pollak, & PMx: C., R. Lacy, (2012). P. J. Pollak, populations. & pedigreed /10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00148.x of D., management J. and Ballou, analysis C., R. Lacy, o Bology Zoo osrainGenetics Conservation ora fFedOrnithology Field of Journal acpiu harrisii Sarcophilus , 1 31 o:/10.3389/fphys.2020.567125 doi: 1321. 11, , 5 2,147-160. (2), rceig fteRylSceyB ilgclSciences Biological B: Society Royal the of Proceedings , h udmnaso oenSaitclGenetics Statistical Modern of Fundamentals The 20 1,8-0.di /10.1007/s10592-018-1129-9 doi: 89-100. (1), ). oeua clg Resources Ecology Molecular osrainGenetics Conservation , 110 , 74 rihlgclApplications Ornithological rnsi clg Evolution & Ecology in Trends 2,4348 o:/10.1073/pnas.1215985110 doi: 453-458. (2), 2,1118 o:/10.1648/0273-8570-74.2.111 doi: 111-118. (2), 14 ehd nEooyadEvolution and Ecology in Methods , 19 nmlConservation Animal , 2,4940 o:/10.1007/s10592- doi: 439-450. (2), 21 12-82 o:10.1111/1755- doi: :1820-1832. , 123 -3 o:10.1093/or- doi: 1-13. , , cetfi Reports Scientific , 35 p.6-6.Springer, 67-86). (pp. 284 , 3,2528 doi: 245-258. (3), 3 15) 20162763. (1850), 2,4347 doi: 433-437. (2), , 23 6,700-712. (6), , 9 Pro- (1), Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. oao,M . ute .M,Huk .L,Md,W . hmik .G,Krd,M . Ryder, & . wildlife. . . of L., conservation M. the Korody, to G., L. genomics Chemnick, avian S., of W. value Modi, The L., Wall,/10.1186/1471-2164-10-S2-S10 M. & decline. (2009). Houck, and A. M., . abundance . O. E. . prehistoric Tuttle, C., its N., C. tracks M. Steiner, Romanov, condor L., California S. Hendrickson, the L., in E. diversity Biology Aiden, Genome-wide Current O., (2021). Dudchenko, C., D. R. J. Bowie, A., popula- J. Robinson, whakapapa. shrub: seeing: widespread of a Ways Studies of (2013). transfer M. edge. seed Roberts, trailing Climate-based (2021). the D. and E. (2018). strategies, Jarvis, L. /10.1002/eap.1804 restoration & Chaney, shifts, & . tion . A., . S., B. species. Koren, Richardson, vertebrate G., all Formenti, of J., assemblies /10.1038/s41586-021-03451-0 Damas, genome doi: O., error-free Fedrigo, and A., complete genetic song Towards S. expected free-living McCarthy, Individuals’ in A., fitness (2019). Rhie, P. of Arcese, metrics & short-term F., and value, L. evidence ( reproductive Keller, sparrows the generations, E., of future M. critique Wolak, to P., contributions A Nietlisbach, M., rescue: genetic J. Genetic harmful Reid, putatively (2020). of introduction R. the Frankham, minimizing & than variation. rather C., diversity R. genetic chondrodystrophy Lacy, maximizing of supports P., management Sunnucks, Genetic K., (2000). R. Ralls, Frankham, & A., B. condors. Rideout, California D., in J. Ballou, K., pro- Ralls, breeding conservation a of assessment Genetic programs ( (2020). analyses. bustard breeding L. houbara Lesobre, captive the & for of F., gram strategies Lacroix, A., management Robert, Kinship-based R., Rabier, uncertain. (2014). or A. unknown J. are Ivy, pedigrees C. & when Klutsch, S., L., A. Andrew, Putnam, F., Andrew, variation. , biological (2016). W. of P. Bayha, identification Wilson, 08284-210218 M., the Neyelle, & , in K., D. perspectives Rice, Simmons, , , C. M. spruce: F. environments. Manseau, white and in L., years mapping J. pedigrees, QTL Polfus, across (2011). traits N. adaptive Isabel, underlying & 12 Pedigree regions K., Genomics, genomic Ritland, (2020). kaki and G., P. T. maps endangered Meirmans, gene Steeves, critically J., & the Bousquet, R., B., species, Pelgas, Maloney, taonga C., intensively-managed Thyne, an S., in Cleland, ( markers L., genetic Brown, using S., genetic validation the Galla, in A., information Overbeek, pedigree and data /10.1007/s11160-014-9347-9 microsatellite programs. doi: of conservation Use 819-848. salmon long-term loci (2014). two the C. of aren’t C. management Kozfkay, These ecologists. & (2018). T., molecular S. P. for O’Reilly, D. Portnoy, filtering & SNP M., /10.1111/mec.14792 effective C. of doi: Hollenbeck, Principles C., 3193-3206. S. for: Willis, looking B., you’e J. Puritz, J., S. O’Leary, iatpsnovaezelandiae Himantopus , 10 o Biology Zoo eopz melodia Melospiza ilgclConservation Biological 1:9-2.di 10.11157/sites-vol10iss1id236 doi: 93-120. (1): 1,12.di /10.1186/1471-2164-12-145 doi: 1-23. (1), o:/10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.035 doi: . , nmlConservation Animal 39 6,4245 o:10.1002/zoo.21569 doi: 422-435. (6), ). ). hayoi nuaaundulata undulata Chlamydotis Notornis, vlto Letters Evolution , 251 074 o:/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108784 doi: 108784. , L 74,709-716. 67(4), gaoseee(erigtgte) h motneo indigenous of importance the together): (learning eghagots’enete ora fHrdt,105 Heredity, of Journal () 4-5.di /10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00239.x doi: 145-153. 3(2), , , 3 3,271-285. (3), IE:AJunlo oilAtrplg n Cultural and Anthropology Social of Journal A SITES: 15 clg n Society and Ecology clgclApplications Ecological nMrco ae npdge n molecular and pedigree on based Morocco, in ) eiw nFs ilg n Fisheries and Biology Fish in Reviews 3,303-311. (3), M Genomics BMC , Nature 21 oeua Ecology Molecular 2:8 o:10.5751/ES- doi: (2):18. , 28 , 8,26-14 doi: 2165-2174. (8), 592 75) 737-746. (7856), 0 1.doi: S10. 10, , , , 27 24 BMC (16), (3), Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. .S 22) eiaiiyo nepc grsini idpdgedpplto fNrhAeia grey American North of population pedigreed wild a Sinsheimer, & in aggression . . interpack . H., of Zhou, Heritability R., wolves. Shi, I., (2020). Janowitz-Koch, Comparison E., S. Heppenheimer, (2019). J. L., M. A. pedigrees. Saad, DeCandia, & large M., B. in vonHoldt, . . methods . H., imputation Bensmail, genotype Q., A. population-based Nato, Research family-and K., of Kunji, approaches M., assessment M. assemblies: and Abbas, chromosome R., W Mall, E., and M. Ullah, Y C. (2017). Fraser, D. K. discoveries. Makova, . . and & . P., L., Medvedev, M., N. Tomaszkiewicz, Ward, D., of Medini, isolates C., /10.1073/pnas.0506758102 pathogenic Donati, multiple “pan-genome.” J., of microbial M. analysis inbreed- Genome Cieslewicz, and identity. V., relatedness (2005). understanding Masignani, of for framework H., estimates A Tettelin, marker-based Whakapapa: genetic (2007). S. of J. abuse Rito, Te and use study The case A (2015). ing. history: R. oral as H. whakapapa Taylor, of recombi- defence in In Variation (2001). (2017). T. M. Tau, processes. Sciences C. Biological and Smadja, B: patterns & Society W., eukaryotes: Royal A. across the useful?. Santure, distribution E., still and S. it frequency Johnston, is nation G., era: P. Feulner, post-genomic J., the Stapley, in Relatedness (2015). back- J. pedigree D. Genetics in Balding, . zims.Species360.org Changes & (ZIMS). D., System (2004). Speed, Management L. Information Feng, Zoological 1999. & to 2021. M., 1930 Species360. Cooper, from grown S., the widely O. in hybrids Smith, mapping maize Gene N., doi:/10.2135/cropsci2004.1935 brand D. Pioneer (2009). Duvick, of M. C., grounds J. Pemberton, S. future & J. M., and directions. Smith, future Hale, caveats and J., progress, guidelines Stapley, dogs. D., SNPs: with populations: prairie Beraldi, wild J., natural black-tailed Gratten, in translocated J., mapping Slate, of locus success trait the Quantitative on directions. support (2005). J. family Slate, of Effect 20 Biology, (2006). Conservation M. Zieli´nski, P. & D. . Br¨annstr¨om,Shier, . . W., I., M. practice. conservation Bruford, Bergstr¨om, into L., translation C., challenging 30 P. the Alves, and B., Genomics ( J. pine (2015). Wolf, loblolly Ge- B., for pedigrees. A. map three-generation Shafer, consensus outbred two A from (1999). maps 321-330. B. linkage 151(1), individual D. netics, of Neale, imputation integration & genotype and K., efficient Construction B. for I. Sherman, approach M., new M. A SNP- Sewell, (2014). pre-imputation S. of relatives. F. Impact Schenkel, from & information (2014). P., using M. J. 1-11. Scholz, Chesnais, 15(1), & M., genetics, P., Sargolzaei, BMC Ahnert, results. K., imputation Horn, genotype on H., filtering Kirsten, R., N. Roshyara, 2,7-7 o:/10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.009 doi: 78-87. (2), clg n Evolution and Ecology oeua Ecology Molecular , , 16 29 oeua Ecology Molecular 1,3-4 o:/10.1038/nrg3821 doi: 33-44. (1), 1,1514 o:/10.1101/gr.236315.118 doi: 125-134. (1), rnsi Genetics in Trends 6,18-70 o:/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00512.x doi: 1780-1790. (6), , rceig fteNtoa cdm fSine,102 Sciences, of Academy National the of Proceedings , 29 5 , 1) 3140-3150. (15), 1) 7417.di /10.1111/mec.15349 doi: 1764-1775. (10), 14 2,3339 o:/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02378.x doi: 363-379. (2), M Genomics BMC , 33 4,2622 o:/10.1016/j.tig.2017.01.008 doi: 266-282. (4), , 372 13) 0645 o:/10.1098/rstb.2016.0455 doi: 20160455. (1736), , eeia 136 Genetica, 15 16 1,11.di /10.1186/1471-2164-15-478 doi: 1-12. (1), tetccu agalactiae Streptococcus 1,9-0.di 10.1007/s10709-008-9317-z doi: 97-107. (1), eKrk,17 Karaka, Te . rpScience Crop A eiwL,1 LW, Review MAI rnsi clg Evolution & Ecology in Trends hlspia rnatosof Transactions Philosophical 3) 35–35.doi: 13950–13955. (39), mlctosfrthe for Implications : –9. 8– , , 44 iu taeda Pinus aueReviews Nature 6,1935-1946. (6), 3,10. (3), Genome L.). , Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. na sltdpplto fciial nagrdScuntie ( relatedness taimen genetic Sichuan and level endangered inbreeding the critically Estimating of (2020). markers. J. population Yin, isolated & an G., Hu, in G., Ren, P., Luan, Y., Zhang, has and divergence (2020). Iranian–Himalayan A. recent conservation. 00044-8. Beja-Pereira, a and & reveals Bj¨orklund, taxonomy M., bears V., for black Costa, implications Asiatic H., penguin. Fahimi, marginal yellow-eyed J., of endangered M. analysis Jowers, the Phylogenetic in L., of Khalatbari, Species diet H., (2020). G. the C. Yusefi, B. determine Robertson, to & method J., P. a Research Seddon, as Y., Wildlife metabarcoding Heezik, van DNA F., faeces: genotype- Robertson, the of L., sources Dutoit, the J., M. Deconstructing Young, (2019). A. Kong, humans. & in M., associations Przeworski, phenotype S., guidelines. Benonisdottir, transfer I., seed A. trait Young, quantitative inform of of traits importance foundation The functional the (2020). 12 and A. is Plants, heterogeneity J. theory AoB Hamilton, landscape Neutral & restoration: A., (2018). N. in Dochtermann, C. differentiation L., R. K. Volk, Williams, G., & Z. Yoko, P., G. Tiley, W., genetics. J. conservation Poelstra, shape D., body A. of Yoder, analysis locus SNP-panel. trait high-density Quantitative (2016). on Meril¨a, J. based & 10.1038/srep26632 sticklebacks X., nine-spined Liu, in T., divergence Shikano, B., simulations data, Guo, pro- molecular J., evolutionary using Yang, Assessing approach combined (2021). a E. C. analysis. program: Grueber, breeding pedigree & conservation and K., a Belov, in A., time E. over McLennan, cesses J., C. Hogg, relationship. R., and B. Wright, p.811. inbreeding biodiversity, of of Coefficients Encyclopedia (2020). (1922). genetics. K. S. conservation Havens, Wright, and species. & species, plant Populations, . exceptional . (2001). . threatened D.S. T., Woodruff, A. of Kramer, P., conservation M. to Griffith, enhance B., model 34 J. to Fant, zoo variants T., Steeves, the Callicrate, J., structural D., Applying Guhlin, incorporating K-P., J. Koepfli, Ballou, M., J., toolbox: concern. Lec, Wood, conservation genomics Le of Nussey, J., conservation species C. & for the Hogg, studies D., Expanding . genomic Eccles, . . A., Santure, A., (2021). J., C. T. S. Walling, model. Galla, E., animal R., J. Postma, the Wold, M., to M. guide Morrissey, ecologist’s N., An The M. /10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01639.x (2015). Clements, populations. (2010). A. D., breeding H. J. Reale, captive DeWoody, D. & J., in C., diversity A. R. Wilson, genetic Lacy, on A., selection J. Ivy, and C., drift Ecology M. inbreeding, Lamb, of B., N. impacts Fernandez, populations. R., (2019). wildlife K. J. sustainable Snodgrass, Willoughby, & creating for . . genomics . G., and Livingston, 69 ranches, K., Palfrey, private B., Pukazhenthi, centers, P., K. Breeding Koepfli, P., J. Holliday, Miller, & D., Wildt, . A . /10.1111/eva.12886 polygenic. . populations: is W., doi: backcross resistance J. chestnut Jenkins, implies American E., 31-47. ancestry in L. chestnut resistance Barth, American blight V., for with E. selection trade-off Jenkins, genomic K., Optimizing M. (2020). Mandal, A. Q., Zhang, W., J. Westbrook, 6,11-45 o:/10.1111/cobi.13503 doi: 1416-1425. (6), /10.1093/biosci/biz091 doi: 928-943. (11), 41,9–110. 98– 24(1), , clg n Evolution and Ecology 2,11.di /10.1093/aobpla/plaa009 doi: 1-13. (2), , 47 6,5952 doi:/10.1071/WR19246 509-522. (6), oeua ilg n Evolution and Biology Molecular idvriyadConservation and Biodiversity https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13020 , 10 cec,365 Science, 3,19-40 doi:/10.1002/ece3.5994 1390-1400. (3), amla Biology Mammalian 66) 1396-1400. (6460), 17 oeua Ecology, Molecular , 30 , 35 4,11-09 o:/10.1007/s10531-021-02128-4. doi: 1011-1029. (4), 6,12-36 o:/10.1093/molbev/msy076. doi: 1322-1326. (6), ora fAia Ecology Animal of Journal h mrcnNaturalist American The , 100 uh bleekeri Hucho 4,4947 doi:10.1007/s42991-020- 419-427. (4), doi:10.1111/mec. cetfi eot,6 Reports, Scientific vltoayApplications Evolutionary sn eoewd SNP genome-wide using ) osrainBiology Conservation , , 79 56 1,1-6 doi: 13-26. (1), 65,330-338. (645), 1,11.doi: 1-16. (1), BioScience, Molecular , 13 (1), , Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. iue2 iga lutaigtemta eet ewe oeua eg,gntcgnmc n pedigree and genetic/genomic) (e.g., molecular between benefits mutual the illustrating data. Diagram 2: Figure estimate to used tools, molecular and records decisions conservation using genome- inform necessary maximize and to when parameters, programs validated genetic breeding in software, conservation collected available in is pedigrees readily data of Parentage use diversity. one wide detailing Schematic 1: Figure AR, and DE, LB, by TES. led and was YCL, 1 SJG, Box by written authors. was all 2 from Box contributions SJG. with from SJG support by with led were illustrations and genome-wide Fast (2017). M. E. Sobel, & Contributions K., data. Author Lange, population K., and H. pedigree K. on Chan, /10.1002/gepi.21988. D., mapping T. association Dyer, QTL J., Blangero, H., Zhou, h ocpino hspeewsldb J n E,wt upr rmalatos Writing authors. all from support with TES, and SJG by led was piece this of conception The xsitu ex 18 or nsitu in eei pdmooy 41 Epidemiology, Genetic niomns nee nodtbssusing databases into entered environments, 3,1416 doi: 174-186. (3), Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. omnte.Vepit rvddb vteCuhLws(C) tpai .Gla(J)adTammy and (SJG) Galla J. Local and Stephanie Peoples (YCL), Indigenous Couch-Lewis (TES). with Yvette Steeves relationships by grow E. help provided species Viewpoints significant culturally Communities. for Pedigrees 2. Box (AR). management. Richardson species Anne in and use (DE), Eason pedigree Daryl of (LB), benefits Brown the Liz on by practitioners provided conservation Viewpoints from Perspectives 1: Box 19 Posted on Authorea 13 Sep 2021 | The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.162577430.03067651/v2 | This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 20