Karanja Dam, Karnataka Water Resources Department

Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam, Karnataka Water Resources Department

Doc. No.: CDSO_DSR_PRR_ KA06MH0153_KaWRD_v1.0

May 2019

Central Water Commission Ministry of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation Government of India

THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Quality Control:

Version Date Writers/Contributors Checked by

Dr. Hadush S Hagos (HSH) 1 15/05/2019 Pankaj Kumar Awasthi (PKA Rajiv Kumar Sawarn Anil Kumar Verma (AKV)

Issued/Copied to:

I/C Date Name Organisation Issued 23/05/2019 Shri. Pramod Narayan Central Water Commission

THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Abbreviations

DRIP Dam Rehabilitation & Improvement Project

CWC Central Water Commission

CPMU Central Project Management Unit

CSV Construction Site Visit

SPMU State Project Management Unit

IA Implementation Agency

PIC Project Identification Code

DSRP Dam Safety Review Panel

PST Project Screening Template

DFR Design Flood Review

MSL Mean Sea Level

FRL Full Reservoir Level

MWL Maximum Water Level

TBL Top Bund Level (Top Level of Dam)

MDDL Maximum Draw Down Level

LSL Lowest Sill Level

DSL Dead Storage Level

U/S Upstream

D/S Downstream

El. Elevation

L/B Left Bank

R/B Right Bank

PMF Probable Maximum Flood

SPF Standard Project Flood

CD Works Cross Drainage Works

VRB Village Road Bridge

WBM Water Bound Macadam

NDT Non Destructive Testing

DHARMA Dam Health And Rehabilitation Monitoring Application

O & M Operation and Maintenance

EAP Emergency Action Plan

i | P a g e

ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework

E & S specialists Environmental and Social Specialists

HM Works Hydro-Mechanical Works

EM Works Electro-Mechanical Works

SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System

DG Set Diesel Generator Set

MW Mega Watt

MU Million units

Ha Hectare

MCM Million Cubic Metre

Deg. Degree

Min. Minute

Sec. Second

CM Construction management

QC Quality control m meter m3 Cubic meter m3/sec Cubic meter per second

Km2 Square kilometre

Mcm Million cubic meter

TNWRD Tamil Nadu Water Resource Department

TANGEDCO Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation

KWRD Kerala Water Resource Department

KSEB Kerala State Electricity Board

MPWRD Madhya Pradesh Water Resource Department

UJVNL Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited

DVC Damodar Valley Corporation

ii | P a g e

BACKGROUND

In April 2012, the Central Water Commission (CWC) with assistance from the World Bank, embarked upon a six year Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP) at a preliminarily estimated initial cost of Rs.2100 Crore targeting rehabilitation and improvement of about 250 dams initially of six, later of nine implementing agencies - namely: MPWRD, OWRD, TNWRD, TANGEDCO, KWRD, KSEB, KaWRD, UJVNL and DVC.

In June 2018, the project was extended by DRIP Component Wise Project Cost two years, until June 2020. The current revised cost for DRIP is Rs.3466 Crore out of which Rs. 2920.5 Crore is allocated for Component 1 (RehabilitationTHIS and PAGE Improvement IS LEFT BLANK of Dams INTENTIONALLY and Associated Appurtenances), Rs.232.5 Crore for Component 2 (Dam Safety Institutional Strengthening), and Rs.313 Crore for Component 3 (Project Management). Appropriate assistance is also provided under DRIP to develop O & M Manuals and Emergency Action Plans (EAP) for these dams. The project also promotes new technologies and improves institutional capacities for dam safety evaluation and implementation at the Central and State levels as well as in some identified premier academic and research institutes in the country. The actual total number of dams under DRIP stands at 223.

The Implementing Agencies for DRIP are the Water Resources Departments and State Electricity Boards in the participating States and Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) with Central Water Commission at Central Level. State Implementing Agencies are responsible for implementation of works of dams under their charge. Co-ordination and management of such works within a State rests with the concerned State Project Management Unit (SPMU). Overall project oversight and coordination is carried out by Central Project Management Unit (CPMU) headed by the Project Director with assistance of an Engineering and Management Consultant.

Karnataka Water Resource Department (KaWRD) joined DRIP in August 2014 with initial number of dams totalling 31. Later, KaWRD dropped 9 dams and continuing in DRIP with 22 dams. Preliminarily estimated initial DRIP project cost for KaWRD was Rs.276.1 Crore and the revised actual current project cost is KaWRD Initial/Revised Projects & Cost Rs.581.2 Crore.

iii | P a g e

THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

iv | P a g e

Table of Contents

Abbreviations ...... i

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1

2. PROJECT DETAILS ...... 2 2.1 Project Description ...... 2 2.2 Project Location ...... 2 2.3 Project Benefits ...... 3 2.4 Dam and Reservoir Features (Before rehabilitation under DRIP) ...... 3 2.5 Any Emergency Spillway, Fuse Plug etc...... 4 2.6 Details of previous dam incidents, if any ...... 4 2.7 PST Details ...... 5 2.8 DSRP, CPMU and World Bank Recommendations and Compliance ...... 5 2.9 Scope of Rehabilitation Works as per PST ...... 5 2.10 Drawings ...... 14 3. DAM VISITS (PST Stage) ...... 21 3.1 Dam Inspections ...... 21 3.2 Summary of observations made by CPMU ...... 21 4. DESIGN FLOOD REVIEW (DFR) ...... 21 4.1 DFR Outcome ...... 21 4.2 Brief Summary of Review...... 21 4.3 Recommendations ...... 22 5. REHABILITATION WORKS CARRIED OUT ...... 22 5.1 Summary of Investigations ...... 22 5.2 Main Dam Works ...... 22 5.3 Basic facilities ...... 22 6. INSTRUMENTATION ...... 23 6.1 List of existing instruments installed in dam and their condition ...... 23 6.2 Details of new instruments installed ...... 23 6.3 CPMU Recommendations ...... 23 7. PROCUREMENT OF WORKS ...... 24 7.1 Package wise details ...... 24 7.2 Details of Bidding process...... 25 7.3 Reason for Variation, if any ...... 25 7.4 Litigation / Arbitration, If Any ...... 25 8. THIRD PARTY CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION VISITS BY CPMU ...... 25

v | P a g e

8.1. Summary of Visits undertaken ...... 25

8.2. Summary of Third Party Material Testing ...... 25

8.3. Summary of Major Recommendations ...... 25

8.4. Summary of Compliance by SPMU ...... 27

8.5. Special Visits made by CWC/World Bank/Expert Committee ...... 27

8.6. Summary of Technical Assistance provided by CPMU ...... 27

9. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) 28 9.1 Basic Details ...... 28 9.2 Summary of Observations ...... 28 9.3 Details of ESMF/EIA study (if any) ...... 28 10. OTHER NON-STRUCTURAL INTERVENTIONS ...... 30 10.1 Basic Details ...... 30 10.2 Summary of Observations ...... 30 11. PENDING REHABILITATION WORKS ...... 30 11.1 Details of pending works ...... 30 11.2 Further course of action...... 30 12. REFERENCES ...... 30

Annex A: PST Approval Letter ...... 31

Annex B: Drawings issued for Rehabilitation measures ...... 35

Annex C: Completion Certificate ...... 41

Annex D: Third Party QC Tests ...... 45

Annex E: ESMF OK Card ...... 53

Annex F: Photographs Before and After Rehabilitation Works ...... 57

Annex G: DBA and Inundation Maps ...... 71

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2-1: Index Map of Karanja Dam...... 14 Figure 2-2: Google Map of Karanja Dam...... 15 Figure 2-3: Water Catchment Map of Karanja Dam...... 16 Figure 2-4: Layout Map of Karanja Dam...... 17 Figure 2-5: Longitudinal Section of Karanja Dam...... 18 Figure 2-6: Typical Cross Section of Karanja Earth Dam...... 19 Figure 2-7: Spillway Cross-section of Karanja Dam...... 20

vi | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Project Rehabilitation Report (PRR) is for Karanja Dam, which is one of the 22 dams under DRIP in Karnataka. The Dam Safety Review Panel (DSRP) inspected the dam on 8th July 2015 and recommended both structural & non-structural measures to be taken up by the dam authorities.

DSRP main recommendations included reaming of porous and foundation drains inside the gallery; provision of horizontal collector drain on dam crest and chute drains on dam d/s slope; repair of disturbed riprap in selected sections; restoration of dam crest width in selected sections; removal of anthills on dam d/s slope; installation of V-notch weir; repair of damaged spillway glacis; replacement of leaking spillway gate rubber seals; removal of vegetation on spillway structure and repair of the joints where vegetation had grown; renovation of spillway and sluice gates and hoisting mechanism including painting, oiling and greasing, provision of trash racks at entry of sluice vents. Non-structural measures included review of design flood, preparation of EAP and O&M manual.

In 1989, the dam crest was raised by 2m from 587.15 m to 589.15 m to accommodate a revised design flood at the time from 8,637 m3/s to 13,281 m3/s. The latest revised design flood (PMF) under DRIP is 18,761 m3/s with the original design flood being 13,281 m3/s. Flood routing study carried out by CPMU for the revised design flood resulted in a MWL of 585.66 m. However, based on the data in the PST, the MWL is at 587.1 m. Hence, the available free board is 2.05 m (= 589.15 – 587.1), which fulfils the minimum recommended 1.50 m for embankment dams as per IS 10635.

Following DSRP recommendations, rehabilitation works carried out under DRIP included:

 Reaming of porous holes and foundation drains inside the gallery,  Reconstruction of dry stone rock toe and improvement to V-notch chamber,  Construction of chute and longitudinal drains on dam downstream slope,  Turfing on dam downstream slope,  Providing security barbed wire fencing,  Arresting of leakage on right and left bank sluice gates,  Improvements to Existing Road Adjacent to Bund on Left Side and Right Side of Downstream  Renovation of spillway and sluice gates as well as hoisting systems including painting, oiling and greasing,  Construction of manhole covers for toe drain.

The rehabilitation works were executed under 1 contract at a total completion cost of Rs. 307.21 Lakhs.

The SPMU carried out dam break analysis and prepared inundation maps, which were reviewed and approved by CPMU.

EAP and O&M manual are currently under preparation by the SPMU as per guideline published by CWC under DRIP.

1 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

2. PROJECT DETAILS

The Karanja dam is located across Karanja River in Bidar district, Karnataka state at Latitude of 17º53’00” N and Longitude of 77º19’00” E. It was completed in the year 1988-89. In 1989, the dam crest was raised by 2 m from 587.15 m to 589.15 m to accommodate a revised design flood at that time. Karanja dam is masonry cum earth dam, its total length is 3587.5m, which comprise of an earthen dam 3,480 m long and 4.0 m dam crest width. It has 107.5 m long spillway with 6 nos. radial gates having discharge capacity of 7078.14 m3/s. The TBL, FRL, original MWL and Spillway Crest level are at EL 589.15 m, 584.15 m, 587.15 m and 574.15 m, respectively. The gross storage at FRL is 217.78 MCM (or 7.691 TMC).

2.1 Project Description

Sl. Item Details No. a. Project Identification Code (PIC) KA06MH0181 b. Project Name Karanja Dam c. River Basin Godavari d. Sub River Basin Manjra e. River/Stream Karanja f. Catchment area (km2) 2025.28 g. Year of commencement of project 1969-70 h. Year of completion of project 1988-89

2.2 Project Location

Sl. Item Details No. a. State Karnataka b. District Bidar c. Earthquake Zone II d. Survey of India Map Ref No’s G-5/G-6 e. Nearest City Bidar f. Nearest Airport Hyderabad g. Nearest Railhead Bidar h. Name of Immediate U/S Project Kottur Barrage i. Name of Immediate D/S Project Singure Dam j. Latitude in Deg., Min, Sec. (North) 17º53’00” k. Longitude in Deg., Min, Sec. (East) 77º19’00”

2 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

2.3 Project Benefits

Sl. No. Item Details

a. Type of Project Irrigation b. Gross Command Area (Ha) 29227 c. Culturable Command Area (Ha) 29227 d. Annual Irrigation Potential (Ha) 22793 Hydropower – e. Nil Installed Capacity (MW) Hydropower – f. Nil Firm Power (MW) Hydropower – g. Nil Average Annual Generation (MU) Domestic/Municipal/Industrial Water – h. 29.728 (1.05 TMC) Annual Quantum (MCM) Domestic/Municipal/Industrial Water – Bhalki,Bidar,Humnabad & Chitguppa i. Area and Population Benefitted with enroute villages Flood Protection – j. Nil Flood Protected Area (Ha) Flood Protection – k. Nil Details of Area Benefitted l. Details of Tourism/Recreational Facilities Nil

2.4 Dam and Reservoir Features (Before rehabilitation under DRIP)

Sl. Item Details No. a. Full Reservoir Level (m) 584.15 b. Original Maximum Water Level (m) 587.15 Gross Reservoir Storage Capacity at FRL c. 3 217.78 (Mm ) d. Live Storage Capacity (Mm3 ) 207.03 Revised Live Storage Capacity, if any e. - (Mm3 ) f. Date of bathymetric survey, if any - g. Dam Type Earthfill Cum Masonry Dam Length of Dam at Top (m) i) Total length of the main dam 3587.5 h. ii) Length of embankment dam 3480 iii) Length of masonry/concrete dam 107.5 (central masonry dam/spillway) i. Number and length of dykes (No. & m) Nil j. Top of dam (El. in m.) 589.15 k. Top Level of Upstream Parapet Wall of 590.0 3 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

Sl. Item Details No. main dam (El. in m.) Height of Dam (m) i) Embankment dam – above river bed level (up to dam top without 20.70 l. camber)

ii) Concrete/Masonry dam – above

deepest foundation level (up to dam top) 28.70 4.0 – Embankment dam m Top width of main dam (m) 7.5 – Masonry dam n. Spillway details i) Location Middle (CH 1560 m to CH 1667.5 m) ii) Type of spillway Ogee iii) Length of spillway (m) 107.5 iv) Spillway crest level (m) 574.15 v) Type of Gate Radial vi) Number and size of gates (no. and 6, 15 x 10 m. x m.) vii) Number and thickness of piers (no. 5, 3.4 m thick and m. x m.) Outlet/Sluice details i) In Embankment dam  Number 2 (LBC, RBC)  Size (Width (m). x Height (m).) 1.0 m x 1.0 m, 2.75 m x 2.00  Location CH 1070 m, CH 2790 m  Invert level El. (m) 575.15 m, 575.15 m  Discharging capacity (m3/s) 1.98, 16.93 o. ii) In Concrete/Masonry dam  Number Nil  Size (m. x m.)  Location  Invert level El. (m)  Discharging capacity (m3/s)

Note: All elevations are above MSL

2.5 Any Emergency Spillway, Fuse Plug etc. Nil 2.6 Details of previous dam incidents, if any Nil

4 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

2.7 PST Details

Sl. Item Date/Cost Remarks No. a. PST first received from SPMU 02/09/15 b. Proposed PST Cost (INR in Lakhs) 475.0 c. First review by CPMU - d. Final review by CPMU 29/09/15 e. World Bank Approval 27/10/15 E- mail dated 27/10/2015 f. Approved PST Cost (INR in Lakhs) 450.0

2.8 DSRP, CPMU and World Bank Recommendations and Compliance 2.8.1 DSRP Recommendations and Compliance Compliance to DSRP recommendations as submitted by SPMU/dam authorities is shown on pages 15 to 22 below. 2.8.2 CPMU/World Bank Recommendations and Compliance WB Comments are in line with DSRP comments specially related to repair of damaged part of the spillway glacis. The SPMU compliance to this comment is as given in item 29 of the compliance to DSRP comments (see item 29, page 20). 2.9 Scope of Rehabilitation Works as per PST (a) Remedial Measures (Structural) i. Reaming the body holes and foundation holes in drainage gallery. ii. Re-construction of dry stone rock toe, iii. providing revetment on d/s and u/s iv. Improvement to V-notch chamber. v. Providing and fixing rainwater drain and jungle clearance on downstream vi. Strengthening and arresting of leakages of right bank and left bank sluice gates.

(b) Basic Facilities vii. Improvement to existing road from main entrance gate to stilling basin. viii. Improvement to existing road adjacent to bund. ix. Replacement & augmentation of instrumentation system. x. Providing CC camera at dam site.

(c) Non-structural Measures xi. Design flood studies, flood routing study, preparation of EAP, dam break analysis, preparation of inundation maps, preparation of O&M manual; and stability analysis of dam. 5 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

6 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

7 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

8 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

9 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

10 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

11 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

12 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

13 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

2.10 Drawings

Figure 2-1: Index Map of Karanja Dam.

14 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

Figure 2-2: Google Map of Karanja Dam.

15 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

Figure 2-3: Water Catchment Map of Karanja Dam.

16 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

Figure 2-4: Layout Map of Karanja Dam.

17 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

Figure 2-5: Longitudinal Section of Karanja Dam.

18 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

Figure 2-6: Typical Cross Section of Karanja Earth Dam. (In 1989, the dam crest was raised by 2 m from 587.15 m to 589.15 m)

19 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

Figure 2-7: Spillway Cross-section of Karanja Dam.

20 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

3. DAM VISITS (PST Stage)

3.1 Dam Inspections

Sl. Item Date of visit Remarks No. a. Dam Safety Review Panel (DSRP) 8 July 2015 b. Site Visit made by CPMU experts 8 Oct 2015

3.2 Summary of observations made by CPMU The following main points are recommended to be considered for development of a final design and in preparation of the tender documents:

 A survey with cross-sections is required to detail areas of the embankment needing work and can then be used for developing a final design to bring the embankment to design lines and grades and formation of the proposed rock toe and toe drain.  Proposed embankment repairs require layout maps and detail drawings indicating limits and extents of the works to be tendered.  The gallery works should include repair of the original gravity drain to ensure a dry environment. Porous and foundation drains are to be reamed as proposed. The porous drains require installation of J-traps in accordance with IS codes. These traps will minimize entry of air, which causes formation of calcination and calcareous deposits.  CPMU recommends a full disclosure on all environmental impacts along with the Contractor’s mitigation measures. All mitigation measures are recommended to be included in the tender documents to ensure mitigation measures are implemented.

4. DESIGN FLOOD REVIEW (DFR)

4.1 DFR Outcome

Sl. Original Revised Item Remarks No. Value Value a. Inflow Design Flood (m3/s) 13,281 18,761 PMF Spillway Capacity / Routed Flood routing b. 3 7,078.14 7,571.66 Outflow (m /s) study by CPMU c. Maximum Water Level (m) 587.1 585.66 TBL = 589.15

4.2 Brief Summary of Review

In 1989, the dam crest was raised by 2 m from 587.15 m to 589.15 m to accommodate a revised design flood at the time from 8,637 m3/s to 13,281 m3/s. The latest revised design flood (PMF) under DRIP is 18,761 m3/s with the original design flood being 13,281 m3/s. Flood routing study carried out by CPMU for the revised design flood resulted in a MWL of 585.66 m. However, based on the data in the PST, the MWL is at 587.1 m. Hence, the available free board is 2.05 m (= 589.15 – 587.1), which fulfils the minimum recommended 1.50 m for embankment dams as per IS 10635.

21 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

4.3 Recommendations

 Structural measures - Nil.  Non-structural measures - EAP & O&M.

5. REHABILITATION WORKS CARRIED OUT

5.1 Summary of Investigations

Sl. Item Details Remarks No. a. Geo-Physical Investigations b. Geo-Technical Investigations NA c. Hydraulic Model Studies d. Under-Water Scanning

5.2 Main Dam Works

Sl. Item Details Remarks No. Design flood a. Works from hydrological angle Design flood review Completed. Upstream side revetment Resetting of disturbed upstream b. correction and construction of Completed pitching (rip-rap) template wall Repairs to d/s toe drains, Construction of lead off drain c. provision of V-Notches for at dam top and chute drains Completed seepage measurements on dam d/s slope d. Repairs / provision of d/s rock toe Provision of d/s rock toe Completed e. Provision for d/s turfing Turfing on d/s dam slope Completed Re-drilling / Reaming of drainage Reaming of porous and f. holes in the dam body and in the foundation drains inside Completed foundations gallery Works because of Seepage / Arresting leakage in RBC and g. Completed leakage issues LBC Re-construction of dry h. Hydro-mechanical works Completed stone rock toe Repair of spillway gates, i. Main spillway gates & hoists Completed rubber seal, walkway Repair of RBC and LBC sluice ii. Outlet gates & hoists Completed gates Other miscellaneous works d/s of Casting of concrete manhole i. Completed embankment dam covers;

5.3 Basic facilities

S/N Item Details Status a. b Roads Construction of approach road Completed . b. c Others Improvements to V-notch Completed .

22 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

6. INSTRUMENTATION

6.1 List of existing instruments installed in dam and their condition

V-notch weir. 6.2 Details of new instruments installed

Nil. 6.3 CPMU Recommendations

Nil.

23 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

7. PROCUREMENT OF WORKS

7.1 Package wise details

Estima Contrac Invitation Schedule t / Completio Actual Work ted Procurem Pre-Bid Bid Contract Contract Contractor’s Scheduled for bids / d Award n Cost Date of Packag Name of Works Cost ent Meeting Opening Agreement Agreement Name & Completio NIT Issue Duration Value (INR in Completio e No. Method date date No. date n date (INR in date Address (Months) (INR in Lakhs) n Lakhs) Lakhs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Sri G.D.Lamani, Dam Rehabilitation Class-I and Improvement Contractor Works to Karanja No. 989/ R/o E/33 1 302.8 NCB 05/03/16 06/04/16 19/12/15 14/12/2016 12 13/12/17 323.97 307.21 21/11/18 Dam Under World 2016-17 DT: Ramnagar Bank aided DRIP Tande, E- program Gudisalar, Shorapur, Dist: Yadgir

24 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

7.2 Details of Bidding process

As per details in the above table.

7.3 Reason for Variation, if any

SPMU reported Rs. 70.19 lakhs savings due to change in scope of work during construction.

7.4 Litigation / Arbitration, If Any

No litigation.

8. THIRD PARTY CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION VISITS BY CPMU

8.1. Summary of Visits undertaken

Sl. No. Date of visit Transmittal details of CSV Report a. 11-07-2017 4900 / 16-08-2017 b. 10-10-2017 530 / 29.11.2017 c. 26-03-2018 5612 / 17-05-18 d. 25-07-2018 6210 / 10.08.2018

8.2. Summary of Third Party Material Testing

Third party quality control tests were performed on aggregates as well as on M15 concrete for man-hole cover and dam d/s slope chute and longitudinal drains using non-destructive Schmidt hammer test (NDT). The tests gave satisfactory results. Detailed test report is attached as Annexure D.

8.3. Summary of Major Recommendations

1st Construction Site Visit Report Observations & Recommendations: . Rain cuts have disturbed the downstream slope of the embankment; the slope must be rectified by earth fill and compaction to the designed slope before turfing of the downstream slope. . Rock toe which had disturbed at Right Flank has been rectified by resetting. But observed settlement at part of the area and suggested to remove and reset the same to the proper level.

Noted construction compliance issues:

No Observation / Deficiency Remarks 1 Chute drains constructed are Project authorities have to take action to rectify the not to required line and level, defect and also use good form work for smooth finishing is not good surface. Proper checking of formwork for line and grade is essential. 2 Rain water cuts have disturbed Slope to be rectified to designed slope and section

25 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

No Observation / Deficiency Remarks the slope and some locations before turfing as an additional work. there appears to be bulging due to deposition of eroded earth from rain water at lower elevation. 3 Rock toe rectified has To be rectified and proper supervision is needed depression in part of the area while carrying out the work. 4 Disturbance at many locations To be rectified as additional work. in d/s rock toe 5 Vegetation gown on the pier To be cleared as and when appears to avoid widening of gaps at lift joints or crevices.

2nd Construction Site Visit Report Noted construction compliance issues:

No Observation / Deficiency Remarks Project authorities have to take action to rectify the Chute drains constructed are defect and also use good form work for smooth 1 not to required line and level, surface. Proper checking of formwork for line and finishing is not good grade is essential. Rain water cuts have disturbed the slope and some locations there appears to be bulging due Slope to be rectified to designed slope and section 2 to deposition of eroded earth before turfing as an additional work. from rain water at lower elevation. Rock toe rectified has To be rectified and proper supervision is needed 3 depression in part of the area while carrying out the work. Disturbance at many locations 4 To be rectified as additional work. in d/s rock toe 5 Vegetation gown on the pier Vegetation cleared. Closed. Lot of vegetation has grown at To be uprooted to avoid loosening of the earthen D/s slope of earthen dam and at embankment 6 top of earth dam by the side of asphalted road.

Damages occurred to D/s slope Embankment top and D/s slope must be restored, and top of earthen embankment and kerb stones or drain must be provided at D/s o 7 approximately between crest to divert the surface water to chute drains. Ch.2900.00 m and 3000.00.

Mortar layers of spillway glacis Application of abrasive resistant coat will help in 8 has eroded here and there. avoiding further deterioration of surface

3rd and 4th Construction Site Visit Report Observations: Noted construction compliance issues:

26 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

No Observation / Deficiency Remarks there appears to be bulging due to deposition of eroded earth from rain water at lower elevation. Rock toe rectified has To be rectified and proper supervision is needed 3 depression in part of the area while carrying out the work. Disturbance at many locations 4 To be rectified as additional work. in d/s rock toe 5 Vegetation gown on the pier Vegetation cleared. Closed. Lot of vegetation has grown at To be uprooted to avoid loosening of the earthen D/s slope of earthen dam and at embankment 6 top of earth dam by the side of asphalted road.

Mortar layers of spillway glacis Application of abrasive resistant coat will help in 8 has eroded here and there. avoiding further deterioration of surface

Erosion of dam d/s slope due to Shower nozzles to be mounted to the hose pipes. high pressure from hose pipes Also, reduce hose pipe diameter if necessary. 9 for slope protection grass irrigation

Significant delay by contractor Contractor to take immediate necessary actions to for unknown reasons. Contract speed up and complete works. 10 expired on 15/12/17 but EoT not yet requested.

No lighting in gallery and no Lighting work completed. Closed. 11 proper drainage gallery seepage

8.4. Summary of Compliance by SPMU

Compliance letter received from SPMU against the CPMU experts’ comments during construction site visits is shown below on page 38.

8.5. Special Visits made by CWC/World Bank/Expert Committee

Nil

8.6. Summary of Technical Assistance provided by CPMU  Review of PST.  Review of design flood and flood routing.  Provided technical guidance on maintaining quality of works as per design, contract agreement technical specification and best engineering practices.  Third party quality control tests.  Review of dam break analysis and inundation maps.  Review of O&M manual (currently on-going).  Review of EAP (currently on-going).

27 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

9. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF)

9.1 Basic Details

Sl. Item Yes / No Remarks No. a. ESMF Issue Identified in PST Yes b. Mitigation Measures Proposed Yes c. Any Rehabilitation and Resettlement involved No d. Site Visit Date of CPMU E&S Specialists - e. Site Visit Report of CPMU E&S Specialists -

9.2 Summary of Observations

ESMF management during implementation was generally satisfactory but PPE was hardly used during construction. ESMF OK Card is attached in Annexure E.

9.3 Details of ESMF/EIA study (if any)

Nil.

28 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

SPMU Compliance to CPMU Comments during CSV

29 | P a g e Project Rehabilitation Report of Karanja Dam

10. OTHER NON-STRUCTURAL INTERVENTIONS

10.1 Basic Details

Sl. Item Yes / No Remarks No. Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Draft inundation maps prepared by (i) EAP Available at Site No SPMU was reviewed by CPMU on 24/07/2018, final version submitted a (ii) EAP Prepared under DRIP Yes on 11/04/2019 & approved by (iii) EAP Published No CPMU on 12/04/2019. EAP currently (iv) Stake holder consultations No under preparation. It is to be revised as per guidelines b. O&M Manual availability Yes issued by Central Water Commission (CWC) in January 2018 c. Inflow Forecasting No In progress. So far 67% data d. DHARMA Implementation Yes uploaded. e. Siren No Needs to be installed

10.2 Summary of Observations

Nil

11. PENDING REHABILITATION WORKS

11.1 Details of pending works

i. Preparation of EAP. ii. Preparation of O&M Manual as per guideline published by DRIP. iii. Completion of data entry in DHARMA.

11.2 Further course of action

All pending actions stated above should be completed before December 2019.

12. REFERENCES

i. PST ii. DSRP report iii. Construction site visit report. iv. Information received from SPMU from time to time v. Completion Certificate. vi. World Bank approval vii. Third party testing. viii. Compliance letters from SPMU. ix. ESMF OK Card x. DBA and Inundation Maps