EASEMENTS and COVENANTS Final Report 22

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EASEMENTS and COVENANTS Final Report 22 EASEMENTS AND COVENANTS Final Report 22 1 1185-VLRC_EasementTitlePage-FinalRep22.indd 1 13/12/10 12:58 PM Contents Terms of Reference 4 Chapter 4: Implied and Prescriptive Easements 43 Preface 5 Implied easements 44 Glossary 6 Common law implied easements 44 Easements implied by statute 47 Executive Summary 10 Prescriptive easements 50 Recommendations 12 Criticisms of prescription 51 Chapter 1: Introduction 19 Conclusions on reform of prescription 54 The law of easements and covenants in Victoria 20 Statutory reciprocal rights 57 Easements 20 Easements and the Torrens system 58 Covenants 21 Should easements be recorded or Public planning and private rights 21 registered? 58 Review of the law of easements and covenants 22 Common law extinguishment by unity Other reviews 22 of estates 59 Structure of this report 23 Narrowing the enforceability of unrecorded easements 60 Chapter 2: Purpose and Characteristics of Easements 25 Chapter 5: Regulatory Easements 63 Essential characteristics of private easements 26 Function of regulatory easements 64 Regulatory easements 26 Creation of regulatory easements 64 Should there be more types of easements? 27 On plan of subdivision 64 Private easements in gross 27 Compulsory acquisition by developer 64 Negative easements 28 Acquisition directly from the servient landowner 66 Chapter 3: Express Creation of Easements 31 Installation and maintenance of assets without an Express grant or reservation 32 easement 66 Express subdivisional easements 32 Availability of information about regulatory Overlapping provisions for express easements 66 subdivisional easements 33 Availability of information about assets when no Standard wording 33 easement has been acquired 68 Compulsory acquisition 36 Submissions 70 Section 36 of the Subdivision Act 36 Chapter 6: Purpose and Nature of Covenants 73 Section 235 of the Water Act 36 Enforcement of restrictive covenants in equity 74 Other jurisdictions 37 Restrictive covenants distinguished from Submissions 38 statutory agreements and restrictions 75 Recommendations for the creation of private Statutory agreements 75 easements by order of VCAT 39 Restrictions 77 Forum 39 Statutory restrictions under the Subdivision Act 77 Criteria and tests 39 Creation of restrictions 77 Complexity and timing 40 Why a ‘restriction’ on a plan of subdivision Involvement of councils and referral is not a restrictive covenant 78 authorities 40 Why a restriction on a plan should not Costs 40 take the place of a restrictive covenant 79 Application to public land 41 2 Victorian Law Reform Commission – Easements and Covenants: Final Report 22 The status of restrictive covenants on Regulation as an alternative to removal 108 registered land 80 Regulation of covenants—the New Should restrictive covenants be recorded or South Wales approach 108 registered? 80 Should planning schemes override Identification of benefited land 82 covenants? 109 Positive covenants 84 A model for the regulation of covenants 110 Management of common property Effect of planning permit on enforcement developments 84 of covenants 112 Other ways of imposing positive Covenants that are inconsistent with a law 112 obligations on successors 85 Chapter 8: Removal and Variation of Submissions 86 Easements and Covenants by Order 115 Conclusion 87 Overview 116 Statutory scheme for covenants 88 What can be removed or varied under section 84? 116 Limiting the duration of restrictive covenants 88 Restrictive covenants and restrictions 116 Renegotiability and information overload 88 Statutory agreements 117 Submissions 89 Easements 117 Discussion 90 Relationship with provisions for Existing restrictive covenants 91 administrative removal 118 Restrictions and section 173 agreements 91 Where should the applications be heard? 119 Chapter 7: Easements and Covenants Submissions on choice of forum 119 under Planning Law 93 Discussion on choice of forum 120 Introduction 94 Power to make a declaration 121 Mechanisms for removal or variation under Costs 122 planning legislation 94 Reformulation of the power 123 Removal or variation by planning scheme 95 Threshold tests or relevant considerations? 123 Removal by a permit to remove or vary 95 Recommended list of relevant Removal and variation of easements 96 considerations 124 Removal or variation by permit 96 Relevant planning scheme 124 Removal under section 36 of the Purpose of the easement or restrictive Subdivision Act 96 covenant and changed circumstances 125 Removal and variation of restrictive covenants 98 Increased burden of easement 126 Development of the current law 98 Material detriment 127 Confusion of laws rather than Extent to which compensation would coordination of processes 102 be adequate 128 Submissions on the removal and variation Acquiescence and delay 128 of restrictive covenants under planning law 102 Abandonment and non-use of easement 129 Covenants as a relevant consideration 103 Other factors 130 Should councils be responsible for Release from contractual obligations 130 enforcement of covenants? 105 The impact of covenants on the Appendix: Submissions 132 implementation of planning policies 106 Bibliography 134 Removal and variation of covenants by planning scheme amendment 107 3 VICTORIAN LAW REFORM COMMISSION Terms of Reference Chairperson Professor Neil Rees* Commissioner 1) The Victorian Law Reform Commission is to review and report on the Associate Professor Pamela O’Connor* desirability of changes to Victoria’s property laws in relation to— Part-time Commissioners a) the Property Law Act 1958; and Magistrate Mandy Chambers b) easements and covenants. Justice Karin Emerton 2) In conducting the review, the Commission should have regard to— Judge Felicity Hampel* Lynne Haultain • the aims of the Attorney-General’s Justice Statement 2, in Hugh de Kretser particular to simplify and modernise the law, and reduce the costs Professor Sam Ricketson*† associated with the justice system; • relevant, contemporaneous reviews or policies in the field in other Expert Consultative Committee jurisdictions, both within Australia and internationally; Jane Allan, Susan Brennan, Justice Clyde Croft, Robyn Crozier, Rebecca Leshinsky, • opportunities for harmonisation with laws of other Australian Associate Professor Sue MacCallum, jurisdictions; Justice Marcia Neave AO, Phil Nolan • developments in technology, including the availability of Reference Team electronic conveyancing; Lindy Smith (Team Leader), Zane Gaylard • the scope for reducing the administrative and/or compliance Hilda Wrixon, Frankie Barbour (intern), burden imposed on business and the not for profit sector, in line Cara Bredebusch (intern) with the Government’s Reducing the Regulatory Burden initiative; Chief Executive Officer and Merrin Mason • social and demographic trends and new approaches to planning and sustainable land use and risk in Victoria. Operations Manager Kathy Karlevski 3) The purpose of the review is to ensure that the laws under review are transparent, accessible and support an efficient and effective system of Communications Manager property rights and transactions in Victoria. Nicola Edwards 4) In particular, the Commission should consider— Team Leaders Emma Cashen, Lindy Smith • Any necessary changes to ensure that the Property Law Act 1958 is certain, effective and up to date. This may include, but is not Community Law Reform Manager limited to, any reforms required to modernise and/or simplify the Myra White language in the Act, clarify meanings that are in doubt, remove Policy and Research Officers obsolete provisions, or improve the overall functioning of the Act. Zane Gaylard , Kirsten McKillop , Ian Parsons • The operation of the law of easements and covenants broadly, Martin Wimpole, Hilda Wrixon and any beneficial changes to streamline planning processes and/ Research Assistant or relevant property laws and practices, as well as options to Tess McCarthy facilitate simpler and cheaper processes. This should incorporate a consideration of the interrelationship, and opportunities for Publications Officer harmonisation and increased clarity across the rules, practices and Carlie Jennings Acts, including the Transfer of Land Act 1958, Property Law Act Research and Executive Assistant 1958, Subdivision Act 1988 and Planning and Environment Act Mia Hollick 1987, amongst others, that govern easements and covenants. Project Officer and Executive Assistant The Commission is also asked to report on any related issues that are identified Jessica Saunders during the course of the review and that may warrant further investigation. Librarian The Commission is to report regarding the Property Law Act 1958 by 30 September 2010, and to report regarding easements and covenants Julie Bransden by 17 December 2010. Assistant Operations Manager Vicki Christou Administrative Officers Sara Yekenkurul * Commissioners involved in this reference. 4† Retired 30 June 2010 Preface In August 2009, the former Attorney-General asked the Commission to review Victoria’s property laws. The first component of the reference was a review of the Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), which the Commission completed in September 2010. This report, which deals with the law of easements and covenants, concludes the reference. Easements and restrictive covenants gained recognition as private property rights well before land use and planning legislation emerged. They now exist alongside a variety of powers and restrictions created under the umbrella of planning legislation and enforced by various public entities. The interaction
Recommended publications
  • 7 - Interests in Land - Easements
    7 - INTERESTS IN LAND - EASEMENTS Definition An easement confers the right to use the land of another in some way, or to prevent it being used in a certain way. Examples are a right of way and a right of light. A legal easement is not merely a right in personam but in rem; it permanently binds the land over which it is exercisable and permanently avails the land which it benefits. Characteristics of an Easement The following 4 essential must be present in order for an easement to exist Re Ellenborough Park [1956] Ch 131: - there must be a dominant and servient tenement; i.e. one plot of land must have the benefit of the right and another plot must have the burden, it cannot exist independently of the ownership of land, an easement must be appurtenant (attached) to a dominant tenement and will pass on a transfer of the land - S.187 LPA 1925. - the right must accommodate the dominant land i.e. it must be of benefit to the land and not for example a personal right granted to its owner Hill v Tupper(1863) 2 H&C 121 - the dominant and servient tenements must not be both owned and occupied by the same person, note quasi-easements under Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 Ch D 31; London v Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd (1993) - the right claimed must be capable of forming the subject matter of a grant i.e. of being granted by deed and therefore (i) There must be both a capable grantor and grantee.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights to Light Consultation
    Law Commission Consultation Paper No 210 RIGHTS TO LIGHT A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission: The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chairman, Professor Elizabeth Cooke, David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod and Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer. Topic of this consultation: This Consultation Paper examines the law as it relates to rights to light. Rights to light are a type of easement which entitle a benefited owner to receive light to his or her windows over a neighbour’s land. We discuss the current law and set out a number of provisional proposals and questions on which we would appreciate consultees’ views. Geographical scope: This Consultation Paper applies to the law of England and Wales. Impact assessment: In Chapter 1 of this Consultation Paper we ask consultees to provide evidence in respect of a number of issues relating to rights to light, such as the costs of engaging in rights to light disputes. Any evidence that we receive will assist us in the production of an impact assessment and will inform our final recommendations for reform. Availability of materials: The consultation paper is available on our website at http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/rights-to-light.htm. Duration of the consultation: We invite responses from 18 February 2013 to 16 May 2013. Comments may be sent: By email to [email protected] OR By post to Nicholas Macklam, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ Tel: 020 3334 0200 / Fax: 020 3334 0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could also send them electronically (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format).
    [Show full text]
  • Easements Across Seven Jurisdictions Within Property
    www.theblackletter.co.uk!1 www.theblackletter.co.ukNeil Egan-Ronayne www.theblackletter.co.ukDecember 2015 Property Law Implied Easements Gerry has been in possession of a registered fee simple estate or ‘freehold’ estate since September 1990. Barton (Construction) Ltd were the registered owners of the unadopted service road that runs along the rear of Gerry’s property up until March 2015 whereupon Barton (Construction) Ltd sold the road to Hyde Ltd as part of a land package. Hyde Ltd has since established a business operation that uses the service road for access. As part of that process they have also erected a lockable gate across the public highway end of the road that is only accessible by using keys held by their employees. Gerry has for a continuous period used the service road in order to park his car and by assumption it is understood that Gerry does not park on the service road itself rather he uses it only as a means of access. When considering Gerry’s position in relation to his denial of access to the service road it would be prudent to refer to the common law position on easements.1 For an easement to be legally considered there are a number of criteria first established in Re Ellenborough Park2 which when met permit such a justification: I. A dominant tenement3 and a servient tenement burdened by the easement must be shown to exist. II. The easement must benefit the dominant tenement. III. The dominant and servient tenements must fall under different ownership.4 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction What Is Land?
    Introduction What is Land? - LPA 1925, s 205: ‘Land’ includes land of any tenure, and mines and minerals…’ land includes not just tangible physical property, but also intangible rights in the land, such as the right to walk across a neighbours driveway. - Land is the physical asset and the rights the owner and others enjoy over it. ‘The idea of property in land’ – Kevin Gray and Susan Francis Gray - The idea of property is fragile, elusive and misused - Property is not a thing but a relationship - Property is the word used to describe particular concentrations of power over things. Statutory Formalities: LPA 1925: - Provided a redefinition of what rights could be legal or equitable - Says a lot about joint ownership, creation of proprietary interests, nature of fee simples and leaseholds LPA 1925, s1: - Legal Estates and Equitable Interests - (1) The only estates in land which are capable of subsisting or of being conveyed or created at law are— . (a) An estate in fee simple absolute in possession; . (b) A term of years absolute. (2) The only interests or charges in or over land which are capable of subsisting or of being conveyed or created at law are— . (a) An easement, right, or privilege in or over land for an interest equivalent to an estate in fee simple absolute in possession or a term of years absolute; . (b) A rentcharge in possession issuing out of or charged on land being either perpetual or for a term of years absolute; . (c) A charge by way of legal mortgage; . (d). (e) Rights of entry exercisable over or in respect of a legal term of years absolute, or annexed, for any purpose, to a legal rentcharge.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Land Work
    73991 Cover_Cover 25/05/2011 11:54 Page 1 Law Commission Reforming the law Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre Law Commission Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre Easements, Covenants and Profits Making Land Work: Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, telephone, fax and email TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/general enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 Email: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, Law Com No 327 London SW1A 2JX Telephone orders/general enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other accredited agents Customers can also order publications from: TSO Ireland 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD Telephone orders/general enquiries: 028 9023 8451 Fax orders: 028 9023 5401 Law Com No 327 12529 HC 1067 Cover / sig1 plateA The Law Commission (LAW COM No 327) MAKING LAND WORK: EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND PROFITS À PRENDRE Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 7 June 2011 HC 1067 London: The Stationery Office £37.00 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Easements Issues Paper A4
    T A S M A N I A LAW REFORM I N S T I T U T E Law of Easements in Tasmania ISSUES PAPER NO 13 FEBRUARY 2009 CONTENTS About this Issues Paper ................................................................................................................i How to respond........................................................................................................................i Information on the Tasmania Law Reform Institute..................................................................i Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................ii Glossary.................................................................................................................................iii List of Questions..................................................................................................................... v Part 1 – Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 1 Part 2 – The Current Law in Tasmania........................................................................................... 3 2.1 What is an easement?..................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Express grant or reservation..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement This Copy of the Thesis Has Been Supplied on Condition That Anyone Who Consults It Is Understood to Recognis
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2015 The Legal Regimes Governing Marine Renewable Energy in England and Wales Hamlyn, Victoria Jane http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3545 Plymouth University All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author's prior consent. The Legal Regimes Governing Marine Renewable Energy Development in England and Wales by Victoria Jane Hamlyn A thesis submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2015 Abstract Name: Victoria Jane Hamlyn Thesis title: The Legal Regimes Governing Marine Renewable Energy in England and Wales This thesis involves an examination of the main international, regional and national legal regimes regulating marine renewable energy in England and Wales. Deriving from a complex patchwork of law and policy, developments have ensued in the absence of a distinct governing ‘legal regime’ and within a number of competing paradigms. This original synthesis attempts to identify lacunae, conflicts and connections within and between the span of legal genres that MRE evokes.
    [Show full text]
  • I Welcome to the Property Law I Course. the Materials Which Will Form the Basis of the Lecture Progr
    1 2017-2018 PROPERTY LAW - I Welcome to the Property Law I course. The materials which will form the basis of the lecture programme are attached. Please bring them along to all sessions. Also included are questions, which we shall go through in class and past papers, which you can browse at leisure. The examination is a 90 minute, closed book exam. It will take the following format: The exam will comprised of two parts, Part I and Part II. There will be two questions in each part. Part I will contain essay questions and part II will contain problem questions. You must answer two questions, one from part I and one from part II. The questions in Part I are problem questions and in Part II essay type questions. If you need to contact me please use the following email address: [email protected] You may wish to purchase a textbook. The one I recommend is: Textbook on Land Law, Judith-Anne Mackenzie, published by Oxford University Press Contents Introduction Estates and interests in land Acquisition of land – contract and conveyance Acquisition of land – adverse possession Leases Easements Restrictive covenants 2 Topic ONE INTRODUCTORY LECTURE A. The Meaning of Property Property is a relationship between people and a thing, rather than the thing itself. Property is a construct of the law. It is the rights we have against other people recognised by our legal system in relation to a thing we claim to own. Land law is concerned with the relationship people have with land and the state of that land.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Land
    ‘The text is clear and easy to understand. It explains the issues very well indeed without over-simplifying fundamental points.’ Introduction to Land Law Introduction Dr Janine Griffi ths-Baker, Senior Lecturer, School of Law, University of Bristol ‘A clear, concise and accurate introductory text written by a leading authority in land law.’ Introduction to Dr Antonia Layard, Lecturer, School of Law, Cardiff University ‘Comprehensive and well-structured.’ Shan Cole, Senior Lecturer, School of Law, University of Glamorgan Land Law Roger Smith’s Introduction to Land Law presents a SECOND EDITION straightforward account of the law and its effects, giving a clear and accessible explanation of concepts students often fi nd diffi cult to grasp. It illuminates the interesting and thought-provoking issues stemming from land law. Roger J. Smith A unique chapter structure allows students to understand the fundamental place and practice of each subject area before delving into some of the deeper matters they will be expected to engage with throughout their course: • Nature and importance sets out, by use of examples, how the law functions and why it is important. Do you want to give yourself a head start come • Main issues and rules clearly explains the key exam time? principles in detail, including case analysis and diagrams where helpful. • Critical and controversial issues introduces areas Visit www.mylawchamber.co.uk/smithintro of topical debate and controversy, outlining the key to access interactive quizzes, sample issues and arguments, then encouraging students to exam questions with answer guidance, and form their own assessment of the law in each area.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Studies in Property Law: Volume 8
    MODERN STUDIES IN PROPERTY LAW: VOLUME 8 This book contains a collection of peer-reviewed papers presented at the Tenth Biennial Modern Studies in Property Law Conference held at the University of Liverpool in April 2014. It is the eighth volume to be published under the name of the Conference. The Conference and its published proceedings have become an established forum for property lawyers from around the world to showcase current research in the discipline. This collection refl ects the diversity and contemporary relevance of modern research in property law. Incorporating a keynote address by Sir John Mummery, retired Lord Justice of Appeal, on ‘ Property in the Information Age ’ , a number of chapters consider the contribution of property law to issues central to the human condition; the home, health and death. Other papers illustrate an enduring need to question and explore fundamental concepts of the subject as well as to consider the challenges of reforming the law. Collectively the chapters demonstrate the vibrancy and importance of property law in dealing with modern concerns across the common law world. Previous volumes in this series: Modern Studies in Property Law: Volume 1 Edited by Elizabeth Cooke Modern Studies in Property Law: Volume 2 Edited by Elizabeth Cooke Modern Studies in Property Law: Volume 3 Edited by Elizabeth Cooke Modern Studies in Property Law: Volume 4 Edited by Elizabeth Cooke Modern Studies in Property Law: Volume 5 Edited by Martin Dixon Modern Studies in Property Law: Volume 5 Edited by Susan Bright Modern
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Prescriptive Easements in Australia and England
    THE FUTURE OF PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENTS IN AUSTRALIA AND ENGLAND FIONA BURNS∗ [The law of prescription — prescriptive easements in particular — has played a vital role in English and Australian land law. Prescriptive easements were easily accommodated into a land law system based on possessory, relative and defeasible titles. However, the advent of title by registration in both countries has raised the issue of whether prescriptive easements have any future value or utility. This article examines and compares the present state of prescriptive easements in Australia and England. It then considers arguments for changes to the law of prescriptive easements, and suggests what action would need to be taken if they were abolished. This article contends that abolition would not be a simple process, as prescription has not only had a role to play in protecting retrospective interests, but also in mediating claims for access and use between landowners.] CONTENTS I Introduction................................................................................................................. 4 II The Law of Prescription Operating Independently of Land Title Registration Systems ....................................................................................................................... 6 A The Common Law and Prescription .............................................................. 6 B England .......................................................................................................... 8 1 General Principles ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Property Law Cases
    TABLE OF CASES UK Cases ...................................................................................................................................... 2 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X-Z US Cases ...................................................................................................................................... 81 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X-Z Australian Cases ....................................................................................................................... 168 Canadian Cases .......................................................................................................................... 171 New Zealand Cases ................................................................................................................... 174 1 back to the top TABLE OF UK CASES A A Ketley Ltd v Scott [1981] ICR 241, 130 NLJ 749 Abbey Homesteads Group Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport (1982) 263 EG 983, 264 EG 151, 154, [1982] 2 EGLR 18 (LT) Abbey National Building Society v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56, [1990] 1 All ER 1085 (HL) Abbey National Building Society v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56, [1990] 1 All ER 1085, 1101 (HL) Abernethie v AM and J Kleiman Ltd (1969) 211 EG 405, [1970] 1 QB 10 Abram Steamship Co v Westvill Shipping Co [1923] AC 773, 781 (HL) Ackland v Lutley (1839) 9 Ed & El 879, 894, 112 Eng Rep 1446 Acton v Blundell (1843) 12 M & W 324, 152 Eng Rep 1223 Adagio Properties Ltd v Ansari [1998] 35 EG 86 (CA) Adams and Wade Ltd v Minister of Housing and Local Government
    [Show full text]