DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Repport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Repport final re portp Project code: B.BSC.0321 Prepared by: Professor Els Meeusen Monash University Date published: April 2013 PUBLISHED BY Meat & Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 New ap proaches to innate immunity in livestock and the potential for manipulation - review Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. PROJECT NO. B.BSC.0321 NEW APPROACHES TO INNATE IMMUNITY IN LIVESTOCK AND THE POTENTIAL FOR MANIPULATION – REVIEW RESEARCH ORGANISATION: Monash University PROJECT LEADER: Professor Els Meeusen PROJECT TEAM: 1. Els N Meeusen , ( [email protected] ), Monash University, School of Biomedical Sciences, Wellington Road, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia. 2. Michael de Veer , ( [email protected] ), Monash University, School of Biomedical Sciences, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia. 3. Paul J Hertzog , ( [email protected] ), Centre for Innate Immunity and Infectious Diseases, Monash Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright st., Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia. 4. Michael J Stear , ([email protected] ) University of Glasgow, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, 464 Bearsden Rd, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK. 5. Bonnie A Mallard , ( [email protected] ) University of Guelph, Department of Pathobiology, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1 6. Nicholas N Jonsson , ( [email protected] , University of Glasgow, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, 464 Bearsden Rd, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK. CONTENT Chapter 1. Review of innate immunity literature in mice, man and livestock species. Chapter 2. The relationship between the innate immune system versus the acquired immune system and their proportional contribution to an animal’s response to disease Chapter 3. Prophylactic and therapeutic modulators to enhance innate immunity (including vaccines, stress) Chapter 4. Impact of nutrition on innate immune responses (including diet and food supplement, intestinal microflora). Chapter 5. Genetic contribution of immunity to resistance; breeding for disease resistance Chapter 6. Summary of recommendations for future research Appendix 1: Glossary of terms Appendix 2: Experts consulted Appendix 3: Relevant conferences attended Chapter 1 The Innate Immune System –sculpting the animal immune response Table of Contents OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 2 CYTOKINES MEDIATING INNATE IMMUNE RESPONSES.......................................................................... 5 PRIMARY CELL TYPES ASSOCIATED WITH THE INNATE IMMUNE SYSTEM: ............................................ 7 INNATE SCULPTING OF ADAPTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSES. ...................................................................... 9 PATTERN RECOGNITION RECEPTORS –INNATE RECOGNITION AND SIGNALLING ................................ 10 TOLL LIKE RECEPTORS (TLRs)............................................................................................................. 10 RIG-I LIKE HELICASES (RLHs). ............................................................................................................. 12 CYTOPLASMIC RNA SENSORS ............................................................................................................ 12 CYTOPLASMIC DNA SENSORS ........................................................................................................... 12 NOD –LIKE RECEPTORS (NLRs). ......................................................................................................... 13 C-TYPE LECTINS (CTLs) ....................................................................................................................... 16 PENTRAXINS –HUMORAL PRRs ......................................................................................................... 17 PREEXISTING CELLULAR IMMUNE ACTIVATORS OR “ALARMINS” ........................................................ 17 EFFECTOR TRIGGERED IMMUNITY ........................................................................................................ 18 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AND QUESTIONS ABOUT PRR SIGNALING............................................... 19 SUBCELLULAR LOCALISATION ........................................................................................................... 19 TISSUE /CELL SPECIFICITY – ORGAN SPECIFIC IMMUNITY ................................................................ 19 REGULATORS OF PRR SIGNALING ..................................................................................................... 20 PRACTICAL OUTCOMES ..................................................................................................................... 21 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 1 - 1 The Innate Immune System –sculpting the animal immune response Paul Hertzog and Michael de Veer Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia [email protected] [email protected] OVERVIEW The innate immune response refers to the primitive, evolutionarily conserved, immune system that responds rapidly to a foreign stimulus. It has been long known to involve resident immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells (DC) and acts in consort with other “innate” protective mechanisms such as physical barriers (e.g. mucous), chemicals (e..g. free radicals), temperature controls, to form the body’s front-line defence systems. Not only does the innate immune response provide rapid defence, but also produces cytokines that amplify more innate responses, and importantly sculpts the ensuing adaptive immune response. These responses are mediated by cytokines and chemokines that are responsible for the development, recruitment and activation of infiltrating cells. Thus, the innate immune response is the basis of the inflammatory response. The cardinal signs of rubor (redness), tumor (swelling), calor (heat), dolor (pain) and functio laesa (loss of function), are the result of increased blood flow, vascular permeability and cell infiltration caused by the cytokines and chemical products released from stimulated innate immune cells. These signs have been known for centuries and the cellular and cytokine details elaborated in recent decades. However, is only in the last 14 years that our appreciation of the innate immune system has been shaken from the now apparently naïve notion of an essentially non- specific response, to one with a degree of specificity and structure, albeit not as elaborate as the adaptive immune response. The discoverers of this response won the 2011 Nobel Prize for this seminal contribution (http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2011 ). This revolution in our understanding of the innate immune system began with the discovery of the Drosophila Toll mutant as a developmental anomaly and subsequent demonstration of the role of the Toll receptor in protection from infection [1]. This was quickly followed by noting homology of the Toll gene with the interleukin-1 (IL1) cytokine family implicating a role in immune response [2], identification of mammalian homologues, designated Toll-like Chapter 1 - 2 Receptors (TLRs) and demonstration of TLR4 as mediating the sensing and response to the prototypical inflammatory stimulus, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [3]. Since these discoveries were occurring at a time of enormous technological advances such as high throughput DNA and RNA sequencing, high density microarrays and generation of gene targeted mice for in vivo validation of function, there was an explosion of discovery in the ensuing years [4]. These led to the identification of a family of up to 13 TLRs in mammals and the rapid identification of the signal transduction components such as the adaptor molecules, kinases, transcription factors and sets of genes involved in the innate response (Fig.1). The families of receptors that initiate innate immune responses to pathogens grew as it was realised that the TLRs could not explain responses to all pathogens. These included RIG-I-Like Helicases (RLHs), DNA sensors [4], Nod-Like Receptors (NLRs) [5] and C –type Lectins [6]. The expanded family of receptors which co-evolved with pathogenic microorganisms are commonly known as Pathogen Recognition Receptors (PRRs). Accordingly, the molecules that trigger these receptors are known as Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs) [7, 8]. PAMPs are present in almost all invasive organisms, from bacteria to viruses and fungi, and are derived from the major families of molecules found in these organisms, including cell surface glycolipids,, nucleic acids, lipids, proteins and chemicals (Fig.1). The innate receptors or PRRs also recognise endogenous non-pathogen ligands such as extracellular matrix components, nucleic acids from dying
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inflammasome Activation-Induced Hypercoagulopathy
    cells Review Inflammasome Activation-Induced Hypercoagulopathy: Impact on Cardiovascular Dysfunction Triggered in COVID-19 Patients Lealem Gedefaw, Sami Ullah, Polly H. M. Leung , Yin Cai, Shea-Ping Yip * and Chien-Ling Huang * Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] (L.G.); [email protected] (S.U.); [email protected] (P.H.M.L.); [email protected] (Y.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.-P.Y.); [email protected] (C.-L.H.) Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the most devastating infectious disease in the 21st century with more than 2 million lives lost in less than a year. The activation of inflammasome in the host infected by SARS-CoV-2 is highly related to cytokine storm and hypercoagulopathy, which significantly contribute to the poor prognosis of COVID-19 patients. Even though many studies have shown the host defense mechanism induced by inflammasome against various viral infections, mechanistic interactions leading to downstream cellular responses and pathogenesis in COVID-19 remain unclear. The SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with numerous cardiovascular disor- ders including acute myocardial injury, myocarditis, arrhythmias, and venous thromboembolism. The inflammatory response triggered by the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome under certain car- diovascular conditions resulted in hyperinflammation or the modulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 signaling pathways. Perturbations of several target cells and tissues have been described in inflammasome activation, including pneumocytes, macrophages, endothelial cells, and dendritic cells. Citation: Gedefaw, L.; Ullah, S.; Leung, P.H.M.; Cai, Y.; Yip, S.-P.; The interplay between inflammasome activation and hypercoagulopathy in COVID-19 patients is an Huang, C.-L.
    [Show full text]
  • NLRP6 Induces Pyroptosis by Activation of Caspase-1 in Gingival
    JDRXXX10.1177/0022034518775036Journal of Dental ResearchNLRP6 Induces Pyroptosis 775036research-article2018 Research Reports: Biological Journal of Dental Research 2018, Vol. 97(12) 1391 –1398 © International & American Associations NLRP6 Induces Pyroptosis by Activation for Dental Research 2018 Article reuse guidelines: of Caspase-1 in Gingival Fibroblasts sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518775036 10.1177/0022034518775036 journals.sagepub.com/home/jdr W. Liu1* , J. Liu1*, W. Wang1, Y. Wang2,3, and X. Ouyang1 Abstract NLRP6, a member of the nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat-containing (NLR) innate immune receptor family, has been reported to participate in inflammasome formation. Activation of inflammasome triggers a caspase-1–dependent programming cell death called pyroptosis. However, whether NLRP6 induces pyroptosis has not been investigated. In this study, we showed that NLRP6 overexpression activated caspase-1 and gasdermin-D and then induced pyroptosis of human gingival fibroblasts, resulting in release of proinflammatory mediators interleukin (IL)–1β and IL-18. Moreover, NLRP6 was highly expressed in gingival tissue of periodontitis compared with healthy controls. Porphyromonas gingivalis, which is a commensal bacterium and has periodontopathic potential, induced pyroptosis of gingival fibroblasts by activation of NLRP6. Together, we, for the first time, identified that NLRP6 could induce pyroptosis of gingival fibroblasts by activation of caspase-1 and may play a role in periodontitis. Keywords: periodontitis, pattern recognition receptors, cell death, Porphyromonas gingivalis, inflammasomes, flow cytometry Introduction have been demonstrated to participate in periodontitis (Huang et al. 2015; Chaves de Souza et al. 2016; Marchesan et al. Pyroptosis is a newly identified type of programmed cell death 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • The Intestinal Parasite Cryptosporidium Is Controlled by an Enterocyte Intrinsic Inflammasome That Depends on NLRP6
    The intestinal parasite Cryptosporidium is controlled by an enterocyte intrinsic inflammasome that depends on NLRP6 Adam Saterialea,1, Jodi A. Gullicksruda, Julie B. Engilesa, Briana I. McLeoda, Emily M. Kuglera, Jorge Henao-Mejiab,c, Ting Zhoud, Aaron M. Ringd, Igor E. Brodskya, Christopher A. Huntera, and Boris Striepena,2 aDepartment of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; bDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute for Immunology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; cDivision of Protective Immunity, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and dDepartment of Immunology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519 Edited by Stephen M. Beverley, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, and approved December 1, 2020 (received for review April 24, 2020) The apicomplexan parasite Cryptosporidium infects the intestinal Murine infection with C. tyzzeri resembles human cryptospo- epithelium. While infection is widespread around the world, chil- ridiosis in location, pathology, and resolution and provides an dren in resource-poor settings suffer a disproportionate disease important tool to define the host and parasite factors that burden. Cryptosporidiosis is a leading cause of diarrheal disease, determine the outcome of infection and to identify the im- responsible for mortality and stunted growth in children. CD4 mune
    [Show full text]
  • NOD-Like Receptors in the Eye: Uncovering Its Role in Diabetic Retinopathy
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review NOD-like Receptors in the Eye: Uncovering Its Role in Diabetic Retinopathy Rayne R. Lim 1,2,3, Margaret E. Wieser 1, Rama R. Ganga 4, Veluchamy A. Barathi 5, Rajamani Lakshminarayanan 5 , Rajiv R. Mohan 1,2,3,6, Dean P. Hainsworth 6 and Shyam S. Chaurasia 1,2,3,* 1 Ocular Immunology and Angiogenesis Lab, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 652011, USA; [email protected] (R.R.L.); [email protected] (M.E.W.); [email protected] (R.R.M.) 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 652011, USA 3 Ophthalmology, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans’ Hospital, Columbia, MO 652011, USA 4 Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 652011, USA; [email protected] 5 Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore 169856, Singapore; [email protected] (V.A.B.); [email protected] (R.L.) 6 Mason Eye Institute, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 652011, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-573-882-3207 Received: 9 December 2019; Accepted: 27 January 2020; Published: 30 January 2020 Abstract: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an ocular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). International Diabetic Federations (IDF) estimates up to 629 million people with DM by the year 2045 worldwide. Nearly 50% of DM patients will show evidence of diabetic-related eye problems. Therapeutic interventions for DR are limited and mostly involve surgical intervention at the late-stages of the disease. The lack of early-stage diagnostic tools and therapies, especially in DR, demands a better understanding of the biological processes involved in the etiology of disease progression.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Role of Non-Canonical NOD-Like Receptors and Inflammasomes in Inflammation and Disease
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2018-03-21 Examining the Role of Non-Canonical NOD-like Receptors and Inflammasomes in Inflammation and Disease Platnich, Jaye Matthew Platnich, J. M. (2018). Examining the Role of Non-Canonical NOD-like Receptors and Inflammasomes in Inflammation and Disease (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/31757 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/106465 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Examining the Role of Non-Canonical NOD-like Receptors and Inflammasomes in Inflammation and Disease by Jaye Matthew Platnich A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN IMMUNOLOGY CALGARY, ALBERTA MARCH, 2018 © Jaye Matthew Platnich 2018 Abstract The NOD-like Receptors (NLRs) are a family of pattern recognition receptors known to regulate a variety of immune signaling pathways. A substantial portion of NLR research focuses on the pyrin domain-containing NLRP subfamily. The canonical NLRPs are inflammasome-forming proteins responsible for the activation of caspase-1 and the maturation and secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18.
    [Show full text]
  • ATP-Binding and Hydrolysis in Inflammasome Activation
    molecules Review ATP-Binding and Hydrolysis in Inflammasome Activation Christina F. Sandall, Bjoern K. Ziehr and Justin A. MacDonald * Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; [email protected] (C.F.S.); [email protected] (B.K.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-403-210-8433 Academic Editor: Massimo Bertinaria Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 3 October 2020; Published: 7 October 2020 Abstract: The prototypical model for NOD-like receptor (NLR) inflammasome assembly includes nucleotide-dependent activation of the NLR downstream of pathogen- or danger-associated molecular pattern (PAMP or DAMP) recognition, followed by nucleation of hetero-oligomeric platforms that lie upstream of inflammatory responses associated with innate immunity. As members of the STAND ATPases, the NLRs are generally thought to share a similar model of ATP-dependent activation and effect. However, recent observations have challenged this paradigm to reveal novel and complex biochemical processes to discern NLRs from other STAND proteins. In this review, we highlight past findings that identify the regulatory importance of conserved ATP-binding and hydrolysis motifs within the nucleotide-binding NACHT domain of NLRs and explore recent breakthroughs that generate connections between NLR protein structure and function. Indeed, newly deposited NLR structures for NLRC4 and NLRP3 have provided unique perspectives on the ATP-dependency of inflammasome activation. Novel molecular dynamic simulations of NLRP3 examined the active site of ADP- and ATP-bound models. The findings support distinctions in nucleotide-binding domain topology with occupancy of ATP or ADP that are in turn disseminated on to the global protein structure.
    [Show full text]
  • NLRP6: a Multifaceted Innate Immune Sensor
    Review NLRP6: A Multifaceted Innate Immune Sensor Maayan Levy,1,2 Hagit Shapiro,1,2 Christoph A. Thaiss,1,2 and Eran Elinav1,* NLRP6, a member of the nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat-con- Trends taining (NLR) innate immune receptor family, regulates inflammation and host NLRP6 is highly expressed in the small defense against microorganisms. Similar to other NLRs, NLRP6 not only partic- and large intestine, and has both ipates in inflammasome formation, but is also involved in nuclear factor-kB (NF- inflammasome-dependent and -inde- kB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling regulation and facili- pendent roles in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. tation of gastrointestinal antiviral effector functions. Additionally, NLRP6 contrib- utes to the regulation of mucus secretion and antimicrobial peptide production, NLRP6 inflammasome-induced inter- leukin (IL)-18 is modulated by microbial thereby impacting intestinal microbial colonization and associated microbiome- metabolites, and downstream IL-18 related infectious, autoinflammatory, metabolic, and neoplastic diseases. How- secretion induces an antimicrobial ever, several of the mechanisms attributed to the functions of NLRP6 remain peptide program in intestinal epithelial cells that is critical to prevent debatable, leaving open questions as to the relevant molecular mechanisms and dysbiosis. interacting partners, and putative human relevance. We herein discuss recent findings related to NLRP6 activity, while highlighting outstanding questions and NLRP6 in sentinel goblet cells is required for mucus production, future perspectives in elucidating its roles in health and disease. thereby preventing the invasion of enteric bacteria into the mucosal layer NLRs in the Innate Immune System in an inflammasome-dependent, but IL-18-independent manner.
    [Show full text]
  • NLR Members in Inflammation-Associated
    Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2017) 14, 403–405 & 2017 CSI and USTC All rights reserved 2042-0226/17 $32.00 www.nature.com/cmi RESEARCH HIGHTLIGHT NLR members in inflammation-associated carcinogenesis Ha Zhu1,2 and Xuetao Cao1,2,3 Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2017) 14, 403–405; doi:10.1038/cmi.2017.14; published online 3 April 2017 hronic inflammation is regarded as an impor- nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain IL-2,8 and NAIP was found to regulate the STAT3 Ctant factor in cancer progression. In addition (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs). TLRs and CLRs are pathway independent of inflammasome formation.9 to the immune surveillance function in the early located in the plasma membranes, whereas RLRs, The AOM/DSS model is the most popular model stage of tumorigenesis, inflammation is also known ALRs and NLRs are intracellular PRRs.3 Unlike used to study the function of NLRs in fl fl as one of the hallmarks of cancer and can supply other families that have been shown to bind their in ammation-associated carcinogenesis. In amma- the tumor microenvironment with bioactive mole- specific cognate ligands, the distinct ligands for somes initiated by NLRs or AIM2 have been widely cules and favor the development of other hallmarks NLRs are still unknown. In fact, mounting evidence reported to participate in the maintenance of 10,11 Nlrp3 Nlrp6 of cancer, such as genetic instability and angiogen- suggests that NLRs function as cytoplasmic sensors intestinal homeostasis. -/-, -/-, Nlrc4 Nlrp1 Nlrx1 Nlrp12 esis. Moreover, inflammation contributes to the and participate in modulating TLR, RLR and CLR -/-, -/-, -/- and -/- mice are 4 more susceptible to AOM/DSS-induced colorectal changing tumor microenvironment by altering signaling pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflammasome Regulation: Therapeutic Potential For
    molecules Review Inflammasome Regulation: Therapeutic Potential for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Qiuyun Xu 1, Xiaorong Zhou 1 , Warren Strober 2,* and Liming Mao 1,3,* 1 Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Nantong University, 19 Qixiu Road, Nantong 226019, China; [email protected] (Q.X.); [email protected] (X.Z.) 2 Mucosal Immunity Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA 3 Basic Medical Research Center, School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (W.S.); [email protected] (L.M.) Abstract: Inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes formed to regulate the maturation of pro- inflammatory caspases, in response to intracellular or extracellular stimulants. Accumulating studies showed that the inflammasomes are implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), although their activation is not a decisive factor for the development of IBD. Inflammasomes and related cytokines play an important role in the maintenance of gut immune homeostasis, while its overactivation might induce excess immune responses and consequently cause tissue damage in the gut. Emerging studies provide evidence that some genetic abnormalities might induce enhanced NLRP3 inflammasome activation and cause colitis. In these cases, the colonic inflammation can be ameliorated by blocking NLRP3 activation or its downstream cytokine IL-1β. A number of natural products were shown to play a role in preventing colon inflammation in various experimental colitis models. On the other hand, lack of inflammasome function also causes intestinal abnormalities. Thus, an appropriate regulation of inflammasomes might be a promising therapeutic strategy for IBD Citation: Xu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Strober, intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasite-Microbiota Interactions with the Vertebrate Gut: Synthesis Through an Ecological Lens
    REVIEW published: 14 May 2018 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00843 Parasite-Microbiota Interactions With the Vertebrate Gut: Synthesis Through an Ecological Lens Jacqueline M. Leung 1*, Andrea L. Graham 1 and Sarah C. L. Knowles 2* 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States, 2 Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom The vertebrate gut teems with a large, diverse, and dynamic bacterial community that has pervasive effects on gut physiology, metabolism, and immunity. Under natural conditions, these microbes share their habitat with a similarly dynamic community of eukaryotes (helminths, protozoa, and fungi), many of which are well-known parasites. Both parasites and the prokaryotic microbiota can dramatically alter the physical and immune landscape of the gut, creating ample opportunities for them to interact. Such interactions may critically alter infection outcomes and affect overall host health and Edited by: disease. For instance, parasite infection can change how a host interacts with its bacterial Michael Thomas-Poulsen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark flora, either driving or protecting against dysbiosis and inflammatory disease. Conversely, Reviewed by: the microbiota can alter a parasite’s colonization success, replication, and virulence, Courtney Stairs, shifting it along the parasitism-mutualism spectrum. The mechanisms and consequences Uppsala University, Sweden of these interactions are just starting to be elucidated in an emergent transdisciplinary Robin James Flynn, University of Liverpool, area at the boundary of microbiology and parasitology. However, heterogeneity in United Kingdom experimental designs, host and parasite species, and a largely phenomenological and Abdul Jabbar, University of Melbourne, Australia taxonomic approach to synthesizing the literature have meant that common themes *Correspondence: across studies remain elusive.
    [Show full text]
  • The NLRP6 Inflammasome in Health and Disease
    www.nature.com/mi REVIEW ARTICLE The NLRP6 inflammasome in health and disease Laxman Ghimire1, Sagar Paudel1, Liliang Jin1 and Samithamby Jeyaseelan1,2 NACHT, LRR (leucine-rich repeat), and PYD (pyrin domain) domain-containing 6 (Nlrp6) is a member of the NLR (nucleotide- oligomerization domain-like receptor) family that patrols the cytosolic compartment of cells to detect pathogen- and damage- associated molecular patterns. Because Nlrp6 is a recently discovered inflammasome, details of its signaling mechanism, structural assembly, and roles in host defense have yet to be determined. To date, Nlrp6 has been proposed to perform a multitude of functions ranging from control of microbiota, maintenance of epithelial integrity, and regulation of metabolic diseases to modulation of host defense during microbial infections, cancer protection, and regulation of neuroinflammation. While recent studies have questioned some of the proposed functions of Nlrp6, Nlrp6 has been shown to form an inflammasome complex and cleaves interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-18 during microbial infection, indicating that it is a bonafide inflammasome. In this review, we summarize the recent advancements in knowledge of the signaling mechanisms and structure of the Nlrp6 inflammasome and discuss the relevance of NLRP6 to human disease. Mucosal Immunology (2020) 13:388–398; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41385-020-0256-z 1234567890();,: NOD-LIKE RECEPTORS IN IMMUNITY functional degradation of N-terminal region is involved in The mammalian immune system is endowed with the germline- pathogen recognition. encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRR) that sense both Because NLRP6 is a relatively new member of the NLR family, its pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage- detailed signaling mechanism is yet to be established.
    [Show full text]
  • NOD-Like Receptors (Nlrs) and Inflammasomes
    International Edition www.adipogen.com NOD-like Receptors (NLRs) and Inflammasomes In mammals, germ-line encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) detect the presence of pathogens through recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or endogenous danger signals through the sensing of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The innate immune system comprises several classes of PRRs that allow the early detection of pathogens at the site of infection. The membrane-bound toll-like receptors (TLRs) and C-type lectin receptors (CTRs) detect PAMPs in extracellular milieu and endo- somal compartments. TRLs and CTRs cooperate with PRRs sensing the presence of cytosolic nucleic acids, like RNA-sensing RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene I)-like receptors (RLRs; RLHs) or DNA-sensing AIM2, among others. Another set of intracellular sensing PRRs are the NOD-like receptors (NLRs; nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat containing receptors), which not only recognize PAMPs but also DAMPs. PAMPs FUNGI/PROTOZOA BACTERIA VIRUSES MOLECULES C. albicans A. hydrophila Adenovirus Bacillus anthracis lethal Plasmodium B. brevis Encephalomyo- toxin (LeTx) S. cerevisiae E. coli carditis virus Bacterial pore-forming L. monocytogenes Herpes simplex virus toxins L. pneumophila Influenza virus Cytosolic dsDNA N. gonorrhoeae Sendai virus P. aeruginosa Cytosolic flagellin S. aureus MDP S. flexneri meso-DAP S. hygroscopicus S. typhimurium DAMPs MOLECULES PARTICLES OTHERS DNA Uric acid UVB Extracellular ATP CPPD Mutations R837 Asbestos Cytosolic dsDNA Irritants Silica Glucose Alum Hyaluronan Amyloid-b Hemozoin Nanoparticles FIGURE 1: Overview on PAMPs and DAMPs recognized by NLRs. NOD-like Receptors [NLRs] The intracellular NLRs organize signaling complexes such as inflammasomes and NOD signalosomes.
    [Show full text]