Eastbourne Downland Management Plan 2015-2022
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix L: SSSI Assessment (Site of Special Scientific Interest Source Pathway Receptor Analysis for Drought Permit Options)
Our Dry Weather Plan South East Water’s 2021 draft drought plan Appendix L: SSSI Assessment (site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis for drought permit options) March 2021 South East Water Rocfort Road Snodland Kent ME6 5AH Drought Plan | March 2021 Contents 1.1 Groundwater drought permits - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 3 1.1.1 Halling No. 8 - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 3 1.1.2 Balcombe- site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 5 1.1.3 Tangier / Chasewood - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 6 1.1.4 Southlands / Oaklands - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 8 1.1.5 Hackenden - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 10 1.2 Surface water - Site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 11 1.2.1 RIVER OUSE Drought Plan - SSSI Source Pathway Receptor Analysis 2020 11 1.2.2 RIVER CUCKMERE - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 14 Annex – Assessment of the hydrological links between the River Cuckmere and the West Dean Brooks. 19 2 Drought Plan | March 2021 1.1 Groundwater drought permits - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis In support of the assessment of potential effects associated with the drought permit it has been assumed that: • All appropriate infrastructure is in place at the source • Pump testing will have been undertaken and used to confirm the extent of any surface water drawdown and inform the need to re- scope this assessment with respect to potential groundwater effects • Abstracted water meets all quality criteria associated with both Environment Agency consenting requirements and requirements for potable supply • All abstracted water is transferred to supply via existing pipe works 1.1.1 Halling No. -
Eastbourne Downland Estate Whole Estate Plan 2020-2045
EASTBOURNE DOWNLAND ESTATE WHOLE ESTATE PLAN 2020-2045 The Vision for the Eastbourne Downland Estate over the next 25 years Conserve the iconic downland landscape and cultural heritage of the Estate, so that these special qualities can be enjoyed, understood and valued by the public, with access for all, contributing to Eastbourne’s sense of community, wellbeing and belonging and instil a strong sense of public stewardship that encourages visitors and people from all backgrounds to actively care for the Estate and invest in it. Maintain and enhance the ‘natural capital’ of the Estate, so that high-quality, well-managed habitats are resilient and adaptable to climate change, pests or disease; support wildlife networks throughout the landscape; and continue to deliver the widest range of ecosystem services into the future. Ensure that these ecosystem services are enjoyed, valued and understood by the public, with all Eastbourne residents feeling they are beneficiaries of the Estate – not just those who are able to visit regularly. Ensure that our farmers are supported and valued as stewards of our land, its soils and its wildlife, with sustainable and profitable businesses that can continue to flourish and innovate. Protect the Estate for future generations, ensuring that it is self-sustaining and financially resilient, built on diversified income streams, promoting innovation, craftsmanship, rural creative industries, and high-quality visitor experiences, supporting tourism and local communities. 1 prepared an endorsed WEP (Strategic Policy -
Download the South-East IAP Report Here
Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) in the Environment Agency Southern Region Helen Keeble, Penny Williams, Jeremy Biggs and Mike Athanson Report prepared by: Report produced for: Pond Conservation Environment Agency c/o Oxford Brookes University Southern Regional Office Gipsy Lane, Headington Guildbourne House Oxford, OX3 0BP Chatsworth Road, Worthing Sussex, BN11 1LD Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who took time to send pond data and pictures or other information for this assessment. In particular: Adam Fulton, Alex Lockton, Alice Hiley, Alison Cross, Alistair Kirk, Amanda Bassett, Andrew Lawson, Anne Marston, Becky Collybeer, Beth Newman, Bradley Jamieson, Catherine Fuller, Chris Catling, Daniel Piec, David Holyoak, David Rumble, Debbie Miller, Debbie Tann, Dominic Price, Dorothy Wright, Ed Jarzembowski, Garf Williams, Garth Foster, Georgina Terry, Guy Hagg, Hannah Cook, Henri Brocklebank, Ian Boyd, Jackie Kelly, Jane Frostick, Jay Doyle, Jo Thornton, Joe Stevens, John Durnell, Jonty Denton, Katharine Parkes, Kevin Walker, Kirsten Wright, Laurie Jackson, Lee Brady, Lizzy Peat, Martin Rand, Mary Campling, Matt Shardlow, Mike Phillips, Naomi Ewald, Natalie Rogers, Nic Ferriday, Nick Stewart, Nicky Court, Nicola Barnfather, Oli Grafton, Pauline Morrow, Penny Green, Pete Thompson, Phil Buckley, Philip Sansum, Rachael Hunter, Richard Grogan, Richard Moyse, Richard Osmond, Rufus Sage, Russell Wright, Sarah Jane Chimbwandira, Sheila Brooke, Simon Weymouth, Steph Ames, Terry Langford, Tom Butterworth, Tom Reid, Vicky Kindemba. Cover photograph: Low Weald Pond, Lee Brady Report production: February 2009 Consultation: March 2009 SUMMARY Ponds are an important freshwater habitat and play a key role in maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level. However, they are vulnerable to environmental degradation and there is evidence that, at a national level, pond quality is declining. -
SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL (INCLUDING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT) Submission Version
SEAFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2017-2030 Seaford Town Council SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL (INCLUDING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT) Submission Version May 2019 Seaford Neighbourhood Plan Sustainability Appraisal February 2019 Contents NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 1.INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 11 WHAT IS A SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL (INCLUDING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT)? ................................................................................................................................................ 13 WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT? .................................................................................... 14 HOW TO COMMENT ON THE SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL ............................................................. 15 STRUCTURE OF THE SA ............................................................................................................. 15 COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PLANS AND PROGRAMMES REGULATIONS . 16 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT...................................................................................... 16 2. SEAFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN .................................................................................... 18 NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING AREA ........................................................................................... 18 NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN VISION -
Seaford Head Nature Reserve Management Plan 2018 - 2028
Seaford Head Nature Reserve Management Plan 2018 - 2028 Sarah Quantrill and Steve Tillman 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 4 1.1: Executive Summary & Vision Statement .................................................... 4 2: POLICY STATEMENT ...................................................................................... 5 3: GENERAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................ 6 3.1: General Information .................................................................................... 6 3.1.2: Tenure ................................................................................................. 7 3.1.3: Management/organisational infrastructure ........................................... 7 3.1.4: Site infrastructure ................................................................................. 8 3.1.5: Map coverage ...................................................................................... 9 3.1.6: Photographic coverage ........................................................................ 9 3.2: Zones ....................................................................................................... 10 3.3: Environmental information ........................................................................ 10 3.3.1: Physical ............................................................................................. 10 3.3.1.1: vulnerability and climate change .................................................... -
Polegate and Willingdon
Appendix 1.4 – Polegate and Willingdon 547 Sites 120_1510 Hindsland Fields (East) 193_1510 Land Bounded in Part by A27 & Levett Road 204_1510 Cophall Farm 236_3370 Mornings Mill Farm 241_1510 Land at Shepham Lane 255_1510 Land at and Adjoining Honey Farm 257_1510 Land Adjacent to Cophall Farm 271_1510 Land South of Aberdale Road 457_1510 Little Shepham, Shepham Lane 540_3370 Land at Broderickland & Hamlands Farm 772_1510 Land at Rear of Dittons Farm 835_1510 Land at Polly Arch, Lynholm Road 548 120/1510 Hindsland Fields (East), Eastbourne Road Ecological Assessment Site overview The site is identified as a playing field in a semi-urban setting on the boundary of residential development between Polegate and Lower Willingdon; it is bordered on the east by agricultural land (Morning’s Mill Farm). Aside from farmland, the surrounding area is developed for housing, recreation and transport. The site itself comprises open grassed land bordered by scrub, hedgerow and trees. No significant built structures are present. The local soils are slightly permeable seasonally wet slightly acid but base-rich loams and clays with impeded drainage. Ecological baseline: search radii from site boundary Sites of European and national importance: 500m Sites of local importance and protected and/or notable species: 500m Ponds and waterbodies: 500m Ecological baseline: designated sites A number of designated sites have been recorded from within the search radius; refer to Figure 6.4 designated sites mapping for more details of locations. Sites of European importance None Sites of national importance None Sites of local importance Distance Site from site Direction Key habitat/ features of interest (approx.) Deciduous woodland A small area of deciduous woodland lies to the 350m NE Priority Habitat north east of site beyond the site boundary. -
Biodiversity Strategy 2021 - 2025
Lewes District Council Biodiversity Strategy 2021 - 2025 Document name: Biodiversity Strategy Document type: Strategy Authority(ies) covered: LDC Responsible (Executive Lead): Andy Frost, Customer First Resolution Team Senior Specialist Advisor (Green Consultancy) Jane Goodall, Strategy Lead QE Accountable (Operational Lead): Andy Frost, Customer First Resolution Team Senior Specialist Advisor (Green Consultancy) Version (e.g. first draft, final Final report): Approved by: Cllrs Julie Carr and Matthew Bird Date of publication: 10 June 2021 Revision due: Date 2023 Final Equality and Fairness Seanne Sweeney Analysis (EaFA) report approved by: Date final EaFA report approved: 6 May 2021 Contents Page Contents 4 Executive Summary 5 Purpose of the strategy 5 What is biodiversity? 5 Natural assets 6 Why do we need a Biodiversity Strategy? 7 Policy and legislative context 7 The Focal Areas 8 Collaboration through partnership working 9 Preserve and enhance existing valuable habitats 10 Creating more and joining up existing biodiversity habitats 12 The importance of trees and tree planting 12 Implement biodiversity net gains within development 13 Promoting biodiversity and understanding throughout our councils 14 Nature based solutions and ecosystem services 15 Pesticide Policy and Pollinator Strategy 16 What our councils will do 18 Appendix 1 – Our Partners 3 Biodiversity strategy Executive Summary With the natural world facing threats to an unprecedented degree, Lewes District Council is scaling up efforts to defend local biodiversity, reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality. For more detail on the council’s approach to these issues, visit our climate change webpage. Healthy and resilient societies depend on giving nature the space it needs. -
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1: Final
Eastbourne Borough Council and Wealden District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1: Final September 2008 Prepared for: ERRATA The Eastbourne Borough Council and Wealden District Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) contains references to the circumstances when a Flood Risk Assessment is required, which exceed the guidance contained in Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk. In response to the letter from the Environment Agency dated 23rd June 2008, Eastbourne Borough Council and Wealden District Council amend the text of the SFRA as follows: Paragraph 3.2.2 (page 8) 3. Flood Risk Assessments are required for all development proposals of 1 ha or greater in Flood Zone 1. Paragraph 11.1 (page 70) 11.1 When are Flood Risk Assessments Required? When informing developers of the requirements of a flood risk assessment for a development site, consideration should be given to the position of the development relative to flood sources, the vulnerability of the proposed development and its scale. In the following situations a Flood Risk Assessment should always be provided with a planning application: • The development site is located in Flood Zone 2 or 3; • The proposed development is greater than 1 hectare; • The development site is located in an area known to have experienced flooding problems from any flood source; and • The development is located within 20m of any watercourse regardless of Flood Zone classification. Table 11-1 (page 74) 1st column 7th row Sites greater than 1 hectare Table 11-1 (page 74) 1st column 8th Row The Environment Agency are statutory consultees for all major developments in Flood Zones 1. -
Appraisal of Possible Environmental Impacts of Proposals for England
www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal Appraisal of possible environmental impacts of proposals for England Coast Path between Shoreham by Sea and Eastbourne Pier Natural England’s Report to the Secretary of State Contents and arrangement of this report This report records the conclusions of Natural England’s appraisal of any potential for environmental impacts from our proposals to establish the England Coast Path in the light of the requirements of the legislation affecting Natura 2000 sites, SSSIs, NNRs, protected species and Marine Conservation Zones. The report is arranged in the following sections: 1. Summary A summary of our conclusions, including key mitigation measures built into our proposals. 2. Scope In this part of the document we define the geographic extent for the appraisal and the features that are included. 3. Baseline conditions and In this part of the document we identify which features might be sensitive ecological sensitivities to changes in access, and rule out from further consideration those that are not. 4. Potential for interaction In this part of the document we identify places where sensitive features are present and whether there could, or will not, be an interaction with proposed changes in access. 5. Assessment of impact- In this part of the document we look in more detail at sections of coast risk and incorporated where there could be an interaction between the access proposal and mitigation measures sensitive features. We discuss possible risks to sensitive features and explain how these have shaped the design of our proposals and/or led to the inclusion of specific mitigation measures. -
Site D Descri Iption/ /Surro Oundin Ng Area
SITE DESCRIPTION/SURROUNDING AREA 2 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2-1 Site Description ...................................................................................................... 2-1 Topography ............................................................................................................ 2-2 Surrounding Area ................................................................................................... 2-2 Natural Characteristics ........................................................................................... 2-3 SITE DESCRIPTION/SURROUNDING AREA 2 INTRODUCTION Site Description 2.1 This section of the ES introduces the application site and the surrounding area. 2.2 The site is located in the small hamlet of Filching, East Sussex, approximately 3.5km northwest of Eastbourne. The approximate centre of the site lies at National Grid Reference 556400, 102900. The site occupies a broadly rectangular piece of land of approximately 1.9 hectares. 2.3 The application site currently comprises a disused derelict chalk quarry with exposed worked chalk faces and base. 2.4 A mature vegetation belt runs along the eastern boundary of the quarry, adjoining the ‘Ashleigh’ property. Intermittent shrubs and small trees occur around the remaining crest of the quarry. 2.5 The site is located within a wider landscape of predominantly rolling hills and pastoral farmland, with a substantial local hedgerow network within -
East Sussex, South Downs and Brighton & Hove Waste And
East Sussex, South Downs and Brighton & Hove Waste and Minerals Sites Plan - Schedule of Suitable Industrial Estates 1 Introduction 3 2 Site Profiles 9 Gossary 116 I/A Alder Close Hawthorn Rd Industrial Estate, Lottbridge Drove, Eastbourne 11 I/B Avis Way / New Road Industrial Estates, Newhaven 13 I/C Beeching Road Industrial Estate, Bexhill 15 I/D Bellbrook Industrial Estate, Uckfield 17 I/E Brampton Road Industrial Estate, Willingdon Drove, Eastbourne 19 I/F Brett Drive Industrial Estate, Bexhill 21 I/G Bulverhythe Depot, Bulverhythe, St-Leonards-on-Sea 23 I/H Castleham Industrial Estate, St Leonards-on-Sea 25 I/I Centenary Industrial Estate, Brighton 27 I/J Chaucer Industrial Estate, Polegate 29 I/K Churchfields Industrial Estate, St Leonards-on-Sea 31 I/L Cradle Hill Industrial Estate, Cradle Hill Rd, Seaford 34 I/M Diplocks Way, Hailsham 36 I/N Dittons Business Park, Dittons Road, Polegate 38 I/O English Close Industrial Area, Brighton 40 I/P Farningham Road, Crowborough 42 I/Q Finmere Road Industrial Estate, nr. Lottbridge Drove, Eastbourne 45 I/R Hammonds Drive Industrial Estate, Lottbridge Drove, Eastbourne 47 I/S Heathfield Industrial Estate (Ghyll Road Site), Heathfield 49 I/T Highfields Industrial Estate, Willingdon Drove, Eastbourne 51 I/U Hollingbury Industrial Estate, Brighton 53 I/V Home Farm Industrial Estate, Brighton 55 I/W Hove Technology Park, St Joseph's Close, Hove 57 I/X Hyde Business Park, Bevendean, Brighton 59 I/Y Ivyhouse Lane Industrial Estates, Hastings 61 I/Z Mile Oak Depot (Polegate Depot), Polegate 63 I/AA Millbrook Business Park, Crowborough 65 I/AB More House Farm, Wivelsfield 67 I/AC Moulsecoomb Fairways Industrial Estate, Brighton 69 I/AD Newhaven Industrial Estate Plots 4 to 9, Beach Road / Beach Close / Railway Road, Newhaven 72 I/AE Newtown Road Industrial Estate, Brighton 74 I/AF Oakwood Business Park, Golden Cross, Nr. -
Appendix a Landscape Character Type A: Open Downland
Appendix A Landscape Character Type A: Open Downland The Open Downland type comprises the distinctive upland landscape on the south facing dip slope of the South Downs. The chalk downs extend east from the Arun Valley to the sea at the Seven Sisters, and rise above the Itchen Valley east of Winchester. This is Kipling’s classic ‘blunt, bow-headed, whale-backed Downs' (Sussex, 1902). This type contains some of the highest and most remote parts of the South Downs National Park. Description Key Characteristics ◼ Large scale open elevated landscape of rolling chalk downland, with distinctive dry valleys and ‘mini-scarps’ that relate to faults in the chalk. ◼ Underlain by solid chalk geology with very occasional surface clay capping and windblown sand creating local pockets of variation in the landscape. ◼ Large scale geometric arable fields, resulting from 20th century field amalgamation or 19th century enclosure in Sussex with a greater variety of historic field pattern of 17th to 19th century origin in Hampshire. ◼ Visually permeable post and wire field boundaries. Few hedgerow boundaries and woodland cover limited to small deciduous woodland blocks and distinctive hilltop beech clumps. ◼ Strong seasonal variation in the landscape with ploughed arable fields scattered with flints contrasting with swathes of arable crops at other times of year. ◼ General absence of surface water due to the porosity and permeability of the chalk bedrock, although the ephemeral winterbournes and dew ponds are distinctive features. ◼ Fragments of chalk downland grassland and rare chalk heath, together with associated scrub and woodland habitats are confined to steep slopes where arable cultivation has proved difficult.