DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Health Writing Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Health Writing Guide Public Health Writing Guide Table of Contents Part I: Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Part II: General Writing Strategies and Utilizing Feedback ........................................................................... 3 The Writing Process ................................................................................................................................... 3 Prewriting .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Writing ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Revising and Editing ............................................................................................................................... 6 Structure and Flow..................................................................................................................................... 9 Communicating Data ............................................................................................................................... 11 Incorporating and Describing Data ...................................................................................................... 11 Using Figures and Tables ..................................................................................................................... 11 Phrasing and Word Choice ...................................................................................................................... 14 Conditional Language .......................................................................................................................... 14 Casual vs. Academic/Professional Tone .............................................................................................. 15 General Tips for Writing ...................................................................................................................... 15 Writing as a Team .................................................................................................................................... 18 Tips for Effective Team Writing ........................................................................................................... 18 Resources for Non-Native English Speakers ............................................................................................ 20 Part III: Specific Types of Writing in Public Health....................................................................................... 21 Abstracts .................................................................................................................................................. 22 Critiques (including Book Reviews).......................................................................................................... 24 Executive Summaries ............................................................................................................................... 25 Fact Sheets ............................................................................................................................................... 26 Formal Emails ........................................................................................................................................... 27 Grant Proposals ....................................................................................................................................... 29 1 Letters to the Editor ................................................................................................................................. 31 Literature Reviews ................................................................................................................................... 32 Needs Assessments ................................................................................................................................. 34 Policy Briefs .............................................................................................................................................. 35 Policy Memos ........................................................................................................................................... 37 Professional Communication and Career Documents............................................................................. 39 Resumes ............................................................................................................................................... 39 Cover Letters ........................................................................................................................................ 41 Curricula Vitae ..................................................................................................................................... 44 Project Plans ............................................................................................................................................ 46 Project Reports ........................................................................................................................................ 48 Reflections ............................................................................................................................................... 50 Research Papers ....................................................................................................................................... 52 Part IV: Finding and Using References ......................................................................................................... 54 Finding Sources ........................................................................................................................................ 54 When to Cite ............................................................................................................................................ 54 How to Cite .............................................................................................................................................. 56 Understanding Plagiarism ........................................................................................................................ 57 Part V: Additional Resources ....................................................................................................................... 58 Recommended Writing Books and Websites ...................................................................................... 58 Grammar Resources ............................................................................................................................ 58 Part VI: Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................... 59 Part VII: References ..................................................................................................................................... 60 2 Part I: Introduction Are you feeling unsure about how to get started on a public health writing project? Are you unclear on the difference between a policy brief and a literature review? Do you need to improve your online research skills? Would you like to start using an online citation management program? Whether you are a confident or anxious writer, the Public Health Writing Guide has something for you. A core function of public health is to inform, educate, and empower. As such, writing is an essential tool for public health professionals, and strong written communication skills are critical for addressing the health needs of the communities served by public health professionals. Writing in public health requires evidence-based and clear communication to multiple audiences, including communities, researchers, policy-makers, health care providers, and other public health practitioners. We hope the Public Health Writing Guide will become a key resource for public health studetns, teachers, professionals. Our goal is to provide you with writing guideliens that can be useful to you over the course of your career, any time you are looking for encouragement, structure, or advice about how to get started. Part II: General Writing Strategies and Utilizing Feedback The Writing Process Writing is a process that can generally be divided into three stages: prewriting, writing, and revising/ editing. This section will provide strategies to help you move though each stage. While this information is presented in a linear format, be aware that the writing process is often not so simple. Writers typically move in and out of each stage as their writing and content develop. The most important key to a successful writing process is time; give yourself enough time to write and revise your drafts several times! Prewriting Prewriting is the first stage of writing that focuses on planning and organizing your writing (1). Tasks associated with this stage include (1): • Determining your purpose, • Developing a thesis, and • Organizing your paper. Devoting time to the prewriting stage can clarify your purpose, strengthen your argument, and improve your organization. Determining your Purpose Before you begin to write, be sure you clearly understand your purpose (1,2). If you are writing for a course, review the assignment’s description and rubric. Be sure to clarify any questions you may have about the assignment with your professor or TA. When determining
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Reviews and Literature Reviews
    UMKC Writing Studio 816.235.1146 [email protected] www.umkc.edu/writingstudio Critical Reviews and Literature Reviews What does a critical review include? ◘ The main ideas or arguments in the book or article. Don’t feel you have to mention everything: part of being an effective evaluator is A critical being able to extract the most important ideas from a source. review is not just a ◘ Your own evaluation of the book or article. Don’t just accept the summary. author’s statements without question. Ask yourself such questions as: How effective is the author’s argument? Is it clearly presented and explained? Is it biased in any way? Reading a book or article for a critical review: 1. First, read the assignment carefully. Your instructor may ask, for instance, that you read the book/article in the context of concepts you have covered in class, or that you focus on specific aspects of the book in your critical review. You can use this information to help guide your reading. 2. Before you begin reading, look at the title, as well as the chapter titles or article subheadings, to get an idea of what the author will focus on. You might start forming ideas about what you expect the book/article will say, and then, as you read, decide whether the book/article fulfills your expectations, or whether it leaves important questions unanswered. 3. Read actively. You might want to skim the book/article first, and then go back and take notes (remember to copy down page numbers!). You’ll have two main purposes in your reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Prof
    Curriculum Vitae Prof. Dr. med. Raoul Christian Sutter Personal Particulars _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. med. Raoul Christian Sutter FMH Neurology FMH Intensive Care Medicine FMH cert. Electroencephalography Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Basel Switzerland Spouse: Prof. Dr. med. Sarah Tschudin-Sutter, MD, MSc Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology University Hospital Basel Switzerland Current Position _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Senior physician & Research Director in Neurocritical Care (Departement Klinische Forschung DKF) Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Basel Switzerland University Degrees & Summary of Qualifications _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Medical Doctor 2002 Board certified in Neurology (FMH) 2010 Board certified in Epileptology and Electroencephalographie (SSCN) 2010 (recertified 2020) Venia docendi (Privatdozent) in Neurology and Neurocritical Care 2014 Board certified in Intensive Care Medicine (FMH) 2018 Professorship 2020 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ResearchGate PubFacts Publons LinkedIn Orchid 1 Certified in „Advanced Cardiac Life Support“ (ACLS) 2011 Certified as consultant for the “Swiss Medical Insurances” (SIM) 2011
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools
    applied sciences Article A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools Tatiana Person 1,* , Iván Ruiz-Rube 1 , José Miguel Mota 1 , Manuel Jesús Cobo 1 , Alexey Tselykh 2 and Juan Manuel Dodero 1 1 Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain; [email protected] (I.R.-R.); [email protected] (J.M.M.); [email protected] (M.J.C.); [email protected] (J.M.D.) 2 Department of Information and Analytical Security Systems, Institute of Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, 347922 Taganrog, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Systematic reviews are powerful methods used to determine the state-of-the-art in a given field from existing studies and literature. They are critical but time-consuming in research and decision making for various disciplines. When conducting a review, a large volume of data is usually generated from relevant studies. Computer-based tools are often used to manage such data and to support the systematic review process. This paper describes a comprehensive analysis to gather the required features of a systematic review tool, in order to support the complete evidence synthesis process. We propose a framework, elaborated by consulting experts in different knowledge areas, to evaluate significant features and thus reinforce existing tool capabilities. The framework will be used to enhance the currently available functionality of CloudSERA, a cloud-based systematic review Citation: Person, T.; Ruiz-Rube, I.; Mota, J.M.; Cobo, M.J.; Tselykh, A.; tool focused on Computer Science, to implement evidence-based systematic review processes in Dodero, J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Writing a Thesis Or Dissertation
    GUIDELINES FOR WRITING A THESIS OR DISSERTATION CONTENTS: Guidelines for Writing a Thesis or Dissertation, Linda Childers Hon, Ph.D. Outline for Empirical Master’s Theses, Kurt Kent, Ph.D. How to Actually Complete A Thesis: Segmenting, Scheduling, and Rewarding, Kurt Kent, Ph.D. How to Make a Thesis Less Painful and More Satisfying (by Mickie Edwardson, Distinguished Professor of Telecommunication, Emeritus, ca. 1975), provided by Kurt Kent 2007-2008 Guidelines for Writing a Thesis or Dissertation Linda Childers Hon Getting Started 1. Most research begins with a question. Think about which topics and theories you are interested in and what you would like to know more about. Think about the topics and theories you have studied in your program. Is there some question you feel the body of knowledge in your field does not answer adequately? 2. Once you have a question in mind, begin looking for information relevant to the topic and its theoretical framework. Read everything you can--academic research, trade literature, and information in the popular press and on the Internet. 3. As you become well-informed about your topic and prior research on the topic, your knowledge should suggest a purpose for your thesis/dissertation. When you can articulate this purpose clearly, you are ready to write your prospectus/proposal. This document specifies the purpose of the study, significance of the study, a tentative review of the literature on the topic and its theoretical framework (a working bibliography should be attached), your research questions and/or hypotheses, and how you will collect and analyze your data (your proposed instrumentation should be attached).
    [Show full text]
  • Format Instructions for Pitt Public Health Essays, Thesis, And
    Pitt Public Health Academic Handbook Academic Year 2016-17 Format Instructions for Pitt Public Health Essays, Theses, and Dissertations September 2013 Before you start: In addition to these format instructions, be sure you are aware of the following: • general requirements for the research and document as specified by your department and your advisor, and • rules regarding committee or readers. Before you finish: Early in the semester in which you intend to graduate you should start looking at the detailed information on how to submit the electronic essay, thesis, or dissertation on the graduation Web page of Pitt Public Health. Questions should be directed to Joanne Pegher in the Office of Student Affairs. Generic research document outline: Many students have found the following description of the components of a typical thesis/dissertation helpful as they begin to plan the layout of the document. Some essay writers may also choose to use this format. Other sources of format information: You will also find it useful refer to a style guide such as Strunk and White's Elements of Style or the Chicago Manual of Style. Consult with your department and/or advisor about recommended style guides. Bibliography: You may find it useful to use software such as Endnote for managing your bibliography. ETD (electronic thesis and dissertation) Web site: Your basic source for format instructions is the University’s ETD Web site. This includes instructions, templates, forms, support, and a portal to view all University of Pittsburgh theses and dissertations that have been submitted in the past. However, there are some minor differences in format requirements between the general University guidelines and Pitt Public Health.
    [Show full text]
  • Students Seeking Information for Their Master's Thesis - the Effect of the Internet
    Students seeking information for their Master's thesis - the effect of the Internet Vol. 12 No. 2, January 2007 Contents | Author index | Subject index | Search | Home Students seeking information for their Masters' theses: the effect of the Internet Paulina Junni Hanken - Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, PB 479 (Arkadiankatu 22), 00101 Helsinki, Finland Abstract Introduction. The Internet has radically changed the global availability of scholarly publications. Today, a substantial part of the resources accessible for researchers and university students are offered through electronic site licenses, making the supply of easily obtainable information larger than ever. This brings forth an important question: what are the qualitative and quantitative effects of this development on the use of reference material in research and studies? Method. To address the research question, reference lists of Masters' theses from 1985, 1993 and 2003 were studied in three disciplines: economics, psychology and mathematics, followed by semi-structured interviews of students who had finished their thesis in 2003. Analysis. The quantitative data were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the statistical program SPSS, where the significance of the results was measured with Dunnet's t- test. Results. The findings showed a substantial increase in the use of scholarly articles as references throughout the studied time periods, although the amount of other information sources had remained largely unchanged. There were also significant differences between the three disciplines in the contents of their reference lists, the amount of Internet resources that students used, how they sought and obtained publications, and how they selected their sources. Conclusions. The Internet appears to have had a profound effect on the type and quantity of information that students use as references in Master's theses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Declining Scientific Impact of Theses: Implications for Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repositories and Graduate Studies1
    The declining scientific impact of theses: Implications for electronic thesis and dissertation repositories and graduate studies1 Vincent Larivière,a,d Alesia Zuccala,b and Éric Archambault a,c a Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST), Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec (Canada) b Rathenau Instituut, Den Haag (Nederlands) c Science-Metrix, Montréal, Québec (Canada) d Graduate School of Library and Information Studies, McGill University, Montréal, Québec (Canada) Abstract Although the writing of a thesis is a very important step for scientists undertaking a career in research, little information exists on the impact of theses as a source of scientific information. Knowing the impact of theses is relevant not only for students undertaking graduate studies, but also for the building of repositories of electronic theses and dissertations (ETD) and the substantial investment this involves. This paper shows that the impact of theses as information sources has been generally declining over the last century, apart from during the period of the “golden years” of research, 1945 to 1975. There is no evidence of ETDs having a positive impact; on the contrary, since their introduction the impact of theses has actually declined more rapidly. This raises questions about the justification for ETDs and the appropriateness of writing monograph style theses as opposed to publication of a series of peer-reviewed papers as the requirement for fulfilment of graduate studies. Bibliographic Information This Post-Print is the version of the article accepted for publication. Received February 12, 2007. Published online November 14, 2007, in SpringerLink (http://link.springer.com/ Jointly published by Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, and Springer, Dordrecht Vincent Larivière, Alesia Zuccala and Éric Archambault.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Including Grey Literature and Conducting Multivocal Literature Reviews in Software Engineering
    This is a pre-print of the paper that has been accepted for publication in the Information and Software Technology (IST) journal: www.journals.elsevier.com/information-and-software-technology Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering Vahid Garousi Michael Felderer Mika V. Mäntylä Information Technology Group University of Innsbruck, Austria & M3S, Faculty of Information Technology Wageningen University, Netherlands Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden and Electrical Engineering [email protected] [email protected] University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland [email protected] Abstract: Context: A Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) is a form of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which includes the grey literature (e.g., blog posts, videos and white papers) in addition to the published (formal) literature (e.g., journal and conference papers). MLRs are useful for both researchers and practitioners since they provide summaries both the state-of-the art and –practice in a given area. MLRs are popular in other fields and have recently started to appear in software engineering (SE). As more MLR studies are conducted and reported, it is important to have a set of guidelines to ensure high quality of MLR processes and their results. Objective: There are several guidelines to conduct SLR studies in SE. However, several phases of MLRs differ from those of traditional SLRs, for instance with respect to the search process and source quality assessment. Therefore, SLR guidelines are only partially useful for conducting MLR studies. Our goal in this paper is to present guidelines on how to conduct MLR studies in SE.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations Table of Contents
    Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations Table of Contents (use control+click to navigate directly to a section) Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations .............................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Choosing Monograph Style ........................................................................................................................... 3 Who Decides When a Thesis or Dissertation is Ready to Be Archived? .................................................. 4 Format Requirements That Must be Met ..................................................................................................... 4 Elements of a Thesis or Dissertation—Front Matter, Body and Back Matter .............................................. 4 Other Format Requirements that MUST be met ...................................................................................... 5 Page Size ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Text ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Line Spacing........................................................................................................................................... 5 Margins ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS ATHESIS? a Thesis Is an Important Part of Any Essay, Expository Or Argumentative, Because It Introduces a Pattern Of
    WHAT IS ATHESIS? A thesis is an important part of any essay, expository or argumentative, because it introduces a pattern of de- velopment for the rest of your paper to follow. Think of it as a string of pearls; each pearl represents an idea within your paper, and all of the pearls have a common string running through them. That string is your thesis. • communicates your main idea in a clear, concise manner; • is more than just a general statement, fact, or question; • answers why or how questions related to the chosen topic; • is carefully worded to avoid confusion; • presents your essay’s direction and scope; and • creates a reason for your reader to keep reading. Note: different disciplines have different requirements of what constitutes an appropriate thesis. You should always consult your professor before beginning any writing assignment. While the term “thesis” may imply finality, your thesis may begin as a “working thesis” before you achieve your final focus. In many disciplines, it is helpful to research your topic and become fully immersed in it be- fore deciding upon a direction for your paper. Your thesis can always be reworked as you delve further into writing your paper. Think of your “working the- sis” in the same way you would the rough draft of your paper. As you write your essay, you may find that your thesis is either too general or too specific; at this point, it may be necessary to tweak your thesis to accu- rately reflect what you have discussed in the paper. Through this process, you will be able to identify what your paper still needs to say and what information within your paper is not necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploratory Analysis of Publons Metrics and Their Relationship with Bibliometric and Altmetric Impact
    Exploratory analysis of Publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact José Luis Ortega Institute for Advanced Social Studies (IESA-CSIC), Córdoba, Spain, [email protected] Abstract Purpose: This study aims to analyse the metrics provided by Publons about the scoring of publications and their relationship with impact measurements (bibliometric and altmetric indicators). Design/methodology/approach: In January 2018, 45,819 research articles were extracted from Publons, including all their metrics (scores, number of pre and post reviews, reviewers, etc.). Using the DOI identifier, other metrics from altmetric providers were gathered to compare the scores of those publications in Publons with their bibliometric and altmetric impact in PlumX, Altmetric.com and Crossref Event Data (CED). Findings: The results show that (1) there are important biases in the coverage of Publons according to disciplines and publishers; (2) metrics from Publons present several problems as research evaluation indicators; and (3) correlations between bibliometric and altmetric counts and the Publons metrics are very weak (r<.2) and not significant. Originality/value: This is the first study about the Publons metrics at article level and their relationship with other quantitative measures such as bibliometric and altmetric indicators. Keywords: Publons, Altmetrics, Bibliometrics, Peer-review 1. Introduction Traditionally, peer-review has been the most appropriate way to validate scientific advances. Since the first beginning of the scientific revolution, scientific theories and discoveries were discussed and agreed by the research community, as a way to confirm and accept new knowledge. This validation process has arrived until our days as a suitable tool for accepting the most relevant manuscripts to academic journals, allocating research funds or selecting and promoting scientific staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Complete Thesis
    ARSENIC BIOSAND FILTER: “STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIR SPACE BETWEEN THE RESTING WATER AND THE DIFFUSER BASIN ON ARSENIC REMOVAL AND DETERMINATION OF GENERAL FLOW CURVE” (A case study of Nawalparasi district, Tilakpur V.D.C.) A Thesis Submitted for partial fulfillment for the Bachelor Degree in Environmental Science (Honor’s Degree) to the department of Biological Science and Environmental Science School of Science, Kathmandu University By Shashank Pandey Kathmandu University July 2004 Declaration by student I, Shashank Pandey, hereby declare that the work presented herein is original work done by me and has not been published or submitted elsewhere for the requirement of a degree programme. Any literature date or work done by other and cited within this thesis has given due acknowledgement and listed in the reference section. Shashank Pandey Place: Kathmandu University Date: ARSENIC BIOSAND FILTER: “STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIR SPACE BETWEEN THE RESTING WATER AND THE DIFFUSER BASIN ON ARSENIC REMOVAL AND DETERMINATION OF GENERAL FLOW CURVE” (A case study of Nawalparasi district, Tilakpur V.D.C.) A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment for the Bachelor Degree in Environmental Science (Honor’s Degree) to the department of Biological Science and Environmental Science School of Science Kathmandu University By Shashank Pandey Kathmandu University Date: Dr. Sanjay Nath Khanal (External Examiner) (Supervisor) Associate Professor Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Science Dr. Roshan Raj Shrestha (Supervisor) ENPHO (Executive Chairman) Dr. R.B. ChhetriHead, Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Science Certificate Certified that the thesis entitled “STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIR SPACE BETWEEN THE RESTING WATER AND THE DIFFUSER BASIN ON ARSENIC REMOVAL AND DETERMINATION OF GENERAL FLOW CURVE” (A case study of Nawalparasi district, Tilakpur V.D.C.) submitted by Mr.
    [Show full text]