308 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2003 / Proposed Rules

McDonnell Douglas: Docket 2001–NM–99– Inspection and Modification directive (AD) that is applicable to all AD. (c) Within 5 years after the effective date Model 767–300 series airplanes Applicability: Model DC–10–10 and DC– of this AD, do the actions specified in modified by Supplemental Type 10–10F airplanes; Model DC–10–15 paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, per Certificate ST01783AT–D. This proposal airplanes; Model DC–10–30, DC–10–30F, and Boeing ASB DC10–76A048, excluding the would require modifying the in-flight DC–10–30F (KC10A and KDC–10) airplanes; Evaluation Form, both dated August 6, 2001; entertainment (IFE) system and revising Model DC–10–40 and DC–10–40F airplanes; or Revision 01, excluding the Evaluation Model MD–10–10F and MD–10–30F Form, both dated January 29, 2002. the airplane flight manual. This action airplanes; as listed in Boeing Alert Service (1) Do an inspection of the throttle control is necessary to ensure that the flight Bulletin DC10–76A048, Revision 01, dated module on the center pedestal in the flight crew is able to remove electrical power January 29, 2002; certificated in any category. deck compartment to determine its part from the IFE system when necessary Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane number and configuration, which will and is advised of appropriate identified in the preceding applicability identify the group applicability information. procedures for such action. Inability to provision, regardless of whether it has been (2) Modify the throttle control module on remove power from the IFE system the center pedestal in the flight deck modified, altered, or repaired in the area during a non-normal or emergency subject to the requirements of this AD. For compartment per the applicable figure in the airplanes that have been modified, altered, or service bulletin. Accomplishment of the situation could result in inability to repaired so that the performance of the modification constitutes terminating action control smoke or fumes in the airplane requirements of this AD is affected, the for the requirements of paragraph (a) of this flight deck or cabin. This action is owner/operator must request approval for an AD. intended to address the identified alternative method of compliance in Alternative Methods of Compliance unsafe condition. accordance with paragraph (d) of this AD. DATES: Comments must be received by The request should include an assessment of (d) An alternative method of compliance or the effect of the modification, alteration, or adjustment of the compliance time that February 18, 2003. repair on the unsafe condition addressed by provides an acceptable level of safety may be ADDRESSES: Submit comments in this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not used if approved by the Manager, Los triplicate to the Federal Aviation been eliminated, the request should include Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), Administration (FAA), Transport specific proposed actions to address it. FAA. Operators shall submit their requests Airplane Directorate, ANM–114, through an appropriate FAA Principal Compliance: Required as indicated, unless Attention: Rules Docket No. 2002–NM– accomplished previously. Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 54–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., To prevent chafing of wiring inside the Renton, Washington 98055–4056. throttle control module, fuel shutoff lever Los Angeles ACO. lights, and/or aft pedestal lightplates due to Note 3: Information concerning the Comments may be inspected at this degradation of protective sleeving, which existence of approved alternative methods of location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., could result in electrical arcing and failure of compliance with this AD, if any, may be Monday through Friday, except Federal the auto throttle/speed control system and obtained from the Los Angeles ACO. holidays. Comments may be submitted consequent smoke and/or fire in the cockpit; via fax to (425) 227–1232. Comments Special Flight Permit accomplish the following: may also be sent via the Internet using (e) Special flight permits may be issued in the following address: 9-anm- Repetitive Inspections for Chafing accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the (a) Within 18 months after the effective Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 [email protected]. Comments sent date of this AD, perform a general visual and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a via fax or the Internet must contain inspection for chafing or potential chafing of location where the requirements of this AD ‘‘Docket No. 2002–NM–54–AD’’ in the the wiring of the throttle control module can be accomplished. subject line and need not be submitted located on the center pedestal in the flight Issued in Renton, Washington, on in triplicate. Comments sent via the compartment, per Boeing Alert Service December 24, 2002. Internet as attached electronic files must Bulletin (ASB) DC10–76A049, excluding the be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Appendix and Evaluation Form, all dated Vi L. Lipski, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Windows or ASCII text. January 29, 2002. Thereafter, repeat the The service information referenced in inspection at intervals not to exceed 18 Aircraft Certification Service. the proposed rule may be obtained from months, until the actions specified in [FR Doc. 03–21 Filed 1–2–03; 8:45 am] TIMCO Engineered Systems, Inc., 623 paragraph (c) of this AD are accomplished. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a Radar Road, Greensboro, North Carolina general visual inspection is defined as: ‘‘A 27410. This information may be visual examination of an interior or exterior DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION examined at the FAA, Transport area, installation, or assembly to detect Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This Federal Aviation Administration Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at level of inspection is made from within the FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification touching distance unless otherwise specified. 14 CFR Part 39 Office, One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix A mirror may be necessary to enhance visual Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia. access to all exposed surfaces in the [Docket No. 2002–NM–54–AD] inspection area. This level of inspection is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: made under normally available lighting RIN 2120–AA64 Robert Chupka, Aerospace Engineer, conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, Systems and Flight Test Branch, flashlight, or droplight and may require Airworthiness Directives; Boeing ACE–116A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft removal or opening of access panels or doors. Model 767–300 Series Airplanes Certification Office, One Crown Center, Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required Modified by Supplemental Type 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, to gain proximity to the area being checked.’’ Certificate ST01783AT–D Atlanta, Georgia 30349; telephone (770) (b) If any evidence of chafing or potential AGENCY: 703–6070; fax (770) 703–6097. chafing is found during any inspection Federal Aviation required by paragraph (a) of this AD, before Administration, (DOT). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: further flight, repair the chafed wires or ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking Comments Invited reposition wires, as applicable, per Boeing (NPRM). ASB DC10–76A049, excluding the Appendix Interested persons are invited to and Evaluation Form, all dated January 29, SUMMARY: This document proposes the participate in the making of the 2002. adoption of a new airworthiness proposed rule by submitting such

VerDate Dec<13>2002 15:09 Jan 02, 2003 Jkt 200250 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2003 / Proposed Rules 309

written data, views, or arguments as monitors (cathode ray tubes or liquid • Installation of the IFE system has they may desire. Communications shall crystal displays; either hanging above affected crew (flight crew and/or cabin identify the Rules Docket number and the aisle or mounted on individual seat crew) procedures, but the procedures be submitted in triplicate to the address backs or seat trays), or complex circuitry have not been properly revised. (i.e., power supplies, electronic specified above. All communications FAA’s Determination received on or before the closing date distribution boxes, extensive wire for comments, specified above, will be routing, relatively high power As part of its review of IFE systems, considered before taking action on the consumption, multiple layers of circuit the FAA has determined that an unsafe proposed rule. The proposals contained protection, etc.). In addition, in-seat condition exists on all Boeing Model in this action may be changed in light power supply systems that provide 767–300 series airplanes modified by of the comments received. power to more than 20 percent of the STC ST01783AT–D. The IFE system on Submit comments using the following total passenger seats were also these airplanes is connected to an format: considered for the review. The types of electrical bus that cannot be deactivated • Organize comments issue-by-issue. IFE systems not considered for review without also removing power from For example, discuss a request to include systems that provide only audio airplane systems necessary for safe change the compliance time and a signals to each passenger seat, ordinary flight and landing. There is no other request to change the service bulletin in-flight telephone systems (e.g., one means to remove power from the IFE reference as two separate issues. telephone handset per group of seats or system. Additionally, the airplane • For each issue, state what specific bulkhead-mounted telephones), systems manufacturer’s published flight crew change to the proposed AD is being that only have a video monitor on the and cabin crew emergency procedures requested. forward bulkhead(s) (or a projection do not advise the flight crew and cabin • Include justification (e.g., reasons or system) to provide passengers with crew that power cannot be removed data) for each request. basic airplane and flight information, from the IFE system. This condition, if Comments are specifically invited on and in-seat power supply systems that not corrected, could result in inability to the overall regulatory, economic, provide power to less than 20 percent of remove power from the IFE system environmental, and energy aspects of the total passenger seats. during a non-normal or emergency the proposed rule. All comments Items considered during the review situation, and consequent inability to submitted will be available, both before include the following: control smoke or fumes in the airplane and after the closing date for comments, • Can the electrical bus(es) supplying flight deck or cabin. in the Rules Docket for examination by power to the IFE system be deenergized Explanation of Relevant Service interested persons. A report when necessary without removing Information summarizing each FAA-public contact power from systems that may be concerned with the substance of this required for continued safe flight and The FAA has reviewed and approved proposal will be filed in the Rules landing? TIMCO Service Bulletin TSB–767–23– Docket. • Can IFE system power be removed 009, Revision IR, dated August 22, 2001. Commenters wishing the FAA to when required without pulling IFE That service bulletin describes acknowledge receipt of their comments system circuit breakers (i.e., is there a procedures for modifying the IFE system submitted in response to this action switch (dedicated to the IFE system or by installing two new relays to control must submit a self-addressed, stamped a combination of loads) located in the power inputs to the IFE system, and a postcard on which the following flight deck or cabin that can be used to new circuit breaker to protect the wiring statement is made: ‘‘Comments to remove IFE power?)? of the IFE system. Accomplishment of Docket Number 2002–NM–54–AD.’’ The • If the IFE system requires changes the actions specified in the service postcard will be date stamped and to flight crew procedures, has the bulletin is intended to adequately returned to the commenter. airplane flight manual (AFM) been address the identified unsafe condition. properly amended? The FAA also has reviewed and Availability of NPRMs • If the IFE system requires changes approved TIMCO AFM Supplement Any person may obtain a copy of this to cabin crew procedures, have they TIM–AFM–01035, dated March 13, NPRM by submitting a request to the been properly amended? 2002, which revises the procedures FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, • Does the IFE system require under the heading ‘‘Electrical Smoke or ANM–114, Attention: Rules Docket No. periodic or special maintenance? Fire’’ in the ‘‘Emergency Procedures’’ 2002–NM–54–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, In all, approximately 180 IFE systems section of the AFM to provide SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056. approved by STC were reviewed by the instructions for the cabin crew to FAA. The review results indicate that remove power from the various Discussion potential unsafe conditions exist on components of the IFE system in an The Federal Aviation Administration some IFE systems installed on various emergency. (FAA) recently completed a review of transport category airplanes. These Explanation of Requirements of in-flight entertainment (IFE) systems conditions can be summarized as: certified by supplemental type • Electrical bus(es) supplying power Proposed Rule certificate (STC) and installed on to the IFE system cannot be deenergized Since an unsafe condition has been transport category airplanes. The review when necessary without removing identified that is likely to exist or focused on the interface between the IFE power from systems that may be develop on other products of this same system and airplane electrical system, required for continued safe flight and type design, the proposed AD would with the objective of determining if any landing. require accomplishment of the actions unsafe conditions exist with regard to • Power cannot be removed from the specified in the service bulletin the interface. STCs issued between 1992 IFE system when required without described previously. The proposed AD and 2000 were considered for the pulling IFE system circuit breakers (i.e., also would require revising procedures review. there is no switch dedicated to the IFE to be followed in the event of smoke or The type of IFE systems considered system or combination of systems for fire in the airplane by including the for review were those that contain video the purpose of removing power). information in the AFM supplement

VerDate Dec<13>2002 15:09 Jan 02, 2003 Jkt 200250 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1 310 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2003 / Proposed Rules

described previously. Accomplishment consideration of these factors, the FAA apply to Boeing Model 767–300 series of these actions is intended to has determined that 18 months after the airplanes. The model designation in this adequately address the identified unsafe effective date of this AD represents an proposed AD is consistent with the most condition. appropriate interval of time allowable recent type certificate data sheet for the In developing an appropriate wherein an acceptable level of safety affected model. compliance time for this action, the can be maintained. Other Relevant Rulemaking FAA considered not only the degree of Clarification of Airplane Model urgency associated with addressing the The FAA has previously issued Designation subject unsafe condition, but the several ADs that address unsafe amount of time necessary to accomplish While TIMCO Service Bulletin TSB– conditions and require corrective the proposed actions, and the practical 767–23–009, Revision IR, and TIMCO actions similar to those that would be aspect of accomplishing the proposed AFM Supplement TIM–AFM–01035 required by the proposed AD. These actions within an interval of time that specify that they are effective for other ADs, and the airplane models and parallels normal scheduled maintenance ‘‘Boeing Model 767–300ER’’ series STCs to which they apply, are as for the affected operators. In airplanes, this proposed AD would follows:

Model/Series— STC Number— AD Reference—

Airbus A340–211 ...... ST0902AC–D ...... AD 2001–18–01, amendment 39–12427 (66 FR 46939, September 10, 2001). –300 ...... ST00171SE ...... AD 2001–14–10, amendment 39–12321 (66 FR 36455, July 12, 2001). Boeing 737–700 ...... ST09100AC–D ...... AD 2001–14–12, amendment 39–12323 (66 FR 36452, July 12, 2001). ST09104AC–D ...... ST09105AC–D ...... ST09106AC–D ...... –100 and –200 ...... SA8622SW ...... AD 2001–14–11, amendment 39–12322 (66 FR 36453, July 12, 2001). Boeing 747–100 and –200 ...... ST00196SE ...... AD 2001–16–19, amendment 39–12388 and (66 FR 43068, August 17, 2001) Boeing 747–400 ...... SA8843SW ...... AD 2001–14–15, amendment 12326 (66 FR 36447, July 12, 2001). Boeing 747SP ...... ST09097AC–D ...... AD 2001–14–14, amendment 39–12325 (66 FR 36449, July 12, 2001). –200 ...... SA1727GL ...... AD 2001–14–01, amendment 39–12311 (66 FR 36149, July 11, 2001). –200 ...... SA4998NM ...... AD 2001–16–21, amendment 39–12390 (66 FR 43072, August 17, 2001). Boeing 767–200 ...... SA5134NM ...... AD 2001–16–20, amendment 39–12389 (66 FR 43066, August 17, 2001). Boeing 767–200 ...... ST09022AC–D ...... AD 2001–14–13, amendment 39–12324 (66 FR 36450, July 12, 2001). Boeing 767–300 ...... SA5765NM ...... AD 2001–16–17, amendment 39–12386 (66 FR 42937, August 16, 2001). SA5978NM ...... Boeing 767–300 ...... SA7019NM–D ...... AD 2001–18–08, amendment 39–12434 (66 FR 46517, September 6, 2001). Boeing 767–300 ...... ST00118SE ...... AD 2001–14–04, amendment 39–12314 (66 FR 36699, July 13, 2001). Boeing 767–300 ...... ST00157SE ...... AD 2001–16–18, amendment 39–12387 (66 FR 43070, August 17, 2001). McDonnell Douglas DC–9–51 and DC– SA8026NM ...... AD 2001–14–02, amendment 39–12312 (66 FR 36456, July 12, 2001). 9–83. McDonnell Douglas DC–10–30 ...... SA8452SW ...... AD 2001–16–22, amendment 39–12391 (66 FR 43074, August 17, 2001). McDonnell Douglas DC–10–30 ...... ST00054SE ...... AD 2001–13–03, amendment 39–12313 (66 FR 36150, July 11, 2001).

Cost Impact accomplish those actions in the future if a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT There are approximately 37 airplanes this proposed AD were not adopted. The Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 of the affected design in the worldwide cost impact figures discussed in AD FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if fleet. The FAA estimates that 37 rulemaking actions represent only the promulgated, will not have a significant airplanes of U.S. registry would be time necessary to perform the specific economic impact, positive or negative, affected by this proposed AD. actions actually required by the AD. on a substantial number of small entities It would take approximately 66 work These figures typically do not include under the criteria of the Regulatory hours per airplane to accomplish the incidental costs, such as the time Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft proposed modification, at an average required to gain access and close up, regulatory evaluation prepared for this labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based planning time, or time necessitated by action is contained in the Rules Docket. on these figures, the cost impact of the other administrative actions. A copy of it may be obtained by proposed modification on U.S. operators Regulatory Impact contacting the Rules Docket at the is estimated to be $146,520, or $3,960 location provided under the caption per airplane. The regulations proposed herein ADDRESSES. It would take approximately 1 work would not have a substantial direct hour per airplane to accomplish the effect on the States, on the relationship List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 proposed AFM revision, at an average between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based safety, Safety. on these figures, the cost impact of the power and responsibilities among the proposed AFM revision on U.S. various levels of government. Therefore, The Proposed Amendment operators is estimated to be $2,220, or it is determined that this proposal $60 per airplane. would not have federalism implications Accordingly, pursuant to the The cost impact figures discussed under Executive Order 13132. authority delegated to me by the above are based on assumptions that no For the reasons discussed above, I Administrator, the Federal Aviation operator has yet accomplished any of certify that this proposed regulation (1) Administration proposes to amend part the proposed requirements of this AD Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations action, and that no operator would under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

VerDate Dec<13>2002 15:09 Jan 02, 2003 Jkt 200250 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2003 / Proposed Rules 311

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta plumbing, electrical installations, or DIRECTIVES Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. structural members. This action is Operators shall submit their requests through intended to address the identified 1. The authority citation for part 39 an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance unsafe condition. continues to read as follows: Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO. DATES: Comments must be received by Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Note 2: Information concerning the February 7, 2003. § 39.13 [Amended] existence of approved alternative methods of ADDRESSES: Submit comments in compliance with this AD, if any, may be 2. Section 39.13 is amended by obtained from the Atlanta ACO. triplicate to the Federal Aviation adding the following new airworthiness Administration (FAA), Transport directive: Special Flight Permits Airplane Directorate, ANM–114, Boeing: Docket 2002–NM–54–AD. (d) Special flight permits may be issued in Attention: Rules Docket No. 2002–NM– Applicability: Model 767–300 series accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the 19–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., airplanes modified by Supplemental Type Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 Renton, Washington 98055–4056. Certificate (STC) ST01783AT–D, certificated and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a Comments may be inspected at this in any category. location where the requirements of this AD location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., can be accomplished. Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane Monday through Friday, except Federal identified in the preceding applicability Issued in Renton, Washington, on holidays. Comments may be submitted provision, regardless of whether it has been December 26, 2002. via fax to (425) 227–1232. Comments otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in Michael Kaszycki, may also be sent via the Internet using the area subject to the requirements of this the following address: 9-anm- AD. For airplanes that have been modified, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [email protected]. Comments sent altered, or repaired so that the performance via fax or the Internet must contain of the requirements of this AD is affected, the [FR Doc. 03–14 Filed 1–2–03; 8:45 am] ‘‘Docket No. 2002–NM–19–AD’’ in the owner/operator must request approval for an BILLING CODE 4910–13–P alternative method of compliance in Internet as attached electronic files must accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD. be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for The request should include an assessment of DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Windows or ASCII text. the effect of the modification, alteration, or The service information referenced in repair on the unsafe condition addressed by Federal Aviation Administration the proposed rule may be obtained from this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, PO been eliminated, the request should include Box 3707, , Washington 98124– specific proposed actions to address it. 14 CFR Part 39 2207. This information may be [Docket No. 2002–NM–19–AD] Compliance: Required as indicated, unless examined at the FAA, Transport accomplished previously. RIN 2120–AA64 To ensure that the flight crew is able to Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. remove electrical power from the in-flight Airworthiness Directives; Boeing entertainment (IFE) system when necessary FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and is advised of appropriate procedures for Model 727, 737–100, 737–200, and 737– 200C Series Airplanes Barbara Mudrovich, Aerospace such action, accomplish the following: Engineer, Systems and Equipment Modification and Airplane Flight Manual AGENCY: Federal Aviation Branch, ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle Revision Administration, (DOT). Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind (a) Within 18 months after the effective ACTION: Supplemental notice of Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington date of this AD, accomplish paragraphs (a)(1) proposed rulemaking; reopening of 98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2983; and (a)(2) of this AD. comment period. fax (425) 227–1181. (1) Modify the IFE system installed on the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: airplane by installing two new relays and a SUMMARY: This document revises an new circuit breaker, according to TIMCO earlier proposed airworthiness directive Comments Invited Service Bulletin TSB–767–23–009, Revision (AD), applicable to certain Boeing IR, dated August 22, 2001. Model 727, 737–100, 737–200, and 737– Interested persons are invited to (2) Revise the procedures under ‘‘Electrical participate in the making of the Smoke or Fire’’ in the ‘‘Emergency 200C series airplanes. That proposed AD would have required a one-time proposed rule by submitting such Procedures’’ section of the airplane flight written data, views, or arguments as manual (AFM) to include TIMCO AFM inspection to determine the part number Supplement TIM–AFM–01035, dated March of hydraulic accumulators installed in they may desire. Communications shall 13, 2002. When the information in that AFM various areas of the airplane, and identify the Rules Docket number and supplement has been incorporated into the follow-on corrective actions if be submitted in triplicate to the address FAA-approved general revisions of the AFM, necessary. This new action revises the specified above. All communications the general revisions may be incorporated proposed rule by adding an inspection received on or before the closing date into the AFM, and the AFM supplement may for comments, specified above, will be be removed from the AFM. of an additional area of the airplane, and follow-on corrective actions if considered before taking action on the Part Installation necessary. This new action also clarifies proposed rule. The proposals contained (b) As of the effective date of this AD, no what actions are necessary for in this action may be changed in light person may install an IFE system according accumulators with certain part numbers. of the comments received. to STC ST01783AT–D on any airplane, This action is necessary to prevent high- Submit comments using the following unless the IFE system is modified and the velocity separation of a barrel, piston, or format: AFM is revised according to this AD. end cap from a hydraulic accumulator. • Organize comments issue-by-issue. Alternative Methods of Compliance Such separation could result in injury to For example, discuss a request to (c) An alternative method of compliance or personnel in the accumulator area; loss change the compliance time and a adjustment of the compliance time that of cabin pressurization; loss of affected request to change the service bulletin provides an acceptable level of safety may be hydraulic systems; or damage to reference as two separate issues.

VerDate Dec<13>2002 15:09 Jan 02, 2003 Jkt 200250 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1