Yearbook 1983 Supreme Court Historical Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yearbook 1983 Supreme Court Historical Society YEARBOOK 1983 SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY WILLIAM HOWARD TAFf TENTH CHIEF JUSTICE, \92\-\930 YEARBOOK 1983 SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, Honorary Chairman Fred Vinson, Chairman Linwood Holton, President EDITOR William F. Swindler ASSOCIATE EDITOR Jeffrey B. Morris ASSISTANT EDITORS David T. Pride Kathleen Shurtleff CONTRIBUTORS Loren P. Beth is a professor of political science at the University of Georgia and a member of the Society. James M. Buchanan is the associate editor for the Documentary History of the Su­ preme Court of the United States, /789-/800. George A. Christensen, a retired U.S. naval officer, and a student at the University of Maryland School of Law, is an amateur historian, and a member of the Society. Josiah M. Daniel, III is an attorney with the law firm of Underwood, Wilson , Berry, Stein & Johnson in Amarillo, Texas, a student of American legal history, and a member of the Society. John D. Gordan, III is a partner in the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York City and a member of the Society. Rex Lee is the Solicitor General of the United States, and a former dean of Brigham Young University School of Law. Jeffrey Morris is the associate editor of the Yearbook and an assistant professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania. James R. Perry is an editor of the DocumentGlY HistOlY of the Supreme Court of the United Slales, /789-/800. Merlo J. Pusey, a former editorial writer for the Washington Post, is the author of the Pulitzer Prize winning biography of Charles Evans Hughes. William F Swindler is the editor of the Yearbook and a professor emeritus at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law at the College of William and Mary. Melvin I. Urofsky is a professor of history at Virginia Commonwealth University. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Officers and Trustees of the Supreme Court Historical Society would like to thank the Charles Evans Hughes Memorial Foundation for its generous support of the publication of thi s Yearbook. YEARBOOK 1983 Supreme Court Historical Society In Memoriam: Abe Fortas 7 Rex Lee Admission to the Supreme Court Bar, 1790-1800: A Case Study of Institutional Change 10 James R. Perry and James M. Buchanan Here Lies the Supreme Court: Gravesites of the Justices 17 George A. Christensen The Trial of the Officers and Crew of the Schooner "Savannah" 31 John D. Gordan, III Roscoe Conkling and the Fourteenth Amendment 46 William F. Swindler Myth and Reality: The Supreme Court and Protective Legislation in the Progressive Era 53 Melvin I. Urofsky Justice Harlan and the Chief Justiceship, 1910 73 Loren P. Beth What Heaven Must Be Like: William Howard Taft as Chief Justice, 1921·30 80 Jeffrey B. Morris Justice Roberts' 1937 Turnaround 102 MerloJ. Pusey De Minimis, or, Judicial Potpourri "Chief Justice of the United States:" History and Historiography of the Title 109 Josiah M. Daniel, III Toward 1987: A "Pre-Constitutional" Law Case 113 William F. Swindler Copyright © 1983, by the Supreme Court Historical Society, III Second Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20002. The Supreme Court Historical Society BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Honorary Chairman Fred M. Vinson, Jr. Linwood Holton Chairman President Vice Presidents Frank Gilbert Kenneth Rush David Lloyd Kreeger Melvin M. Payne Alice L. O' Donnell Virginia Warren Daly, Secretary Peter A. Knowles, Treasurer Trustees Ralph E. Becker Francis R. Kirkham Griffin B. Bell Sol M. Linowitz Mrs. Hugo L. Black Wade H. McCree, Jr. Vincent C. Burke, Jr. William Barnabas McHenry Gwendolyn D. Cafritz Richard A. Moore William T. Coleman, Jr. David A. Morse Charles T. Duncan Dwight D. Opperman Patricia Collins Dwinnell E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr. William T. Gossett Merlo J. Pusey Erwin N. Griswold William P. Rogers Lita Annenberg Hazen Fred Schwengel J. Roderick Heller, III Bernard G. Segal Jospeh H. Hennage Whitney North Seymour Stanley N. Katz William F. Swindler Bruce E. Kiernat Obert C. Tanner Earl W. Kintner J. Albert Woll Gary J. Aichele Executive Director In Memoriam ABE FORTAS 1910·1982 7 In Memoriam: Abe Fortas Rex Lee* Abe Fortas, Associate Justice of the Supreme academic record , he won a scholarship to the Court of the United States from 1965 to 1969 , Yale Law School , which he entered in 1930 at the died at his home in Washington, D. C. on AprilS, age of 20. 1982. He was 71 years old, but even for a man Propitious circumstances and the relentless whose career had been so rich. so varied and so application of his remarkable ability made Yale fruitful , his death cannot be said to have come in the turning point of Fortas' life. He led his class the fullness of time. Only a few days before, he academically, was Editor-in-Chief of the Law had argued before the Supreme Court and neither Journal, and authored a brilliant student note at his appetite for work nor his powers showed any the direction of William O. Douglas, then a signs of diminishing. young Sterling Professor of Law, who would To recall the details of his life is to exhibit, as later call Fortas "my prize student" and who the historian Burckhardt said, only the " under­ would become an intimate friend for life. side of the tapestry": the knots and stitches, not Fortas was appointed assistant professor of the whole work. Abe Fortas was animated by a law upon his graduation in 1933 , but for the next warmth, a compassion, a profound gravity that four years his world had two centers, New Haven could be felt, that cannot be captured in words. and Washington. During summers and semesters but that made him who he was and whom we when he was not teaching. he worked at the Ag­ remember. ricultural Adjustment Administration at the be­ Abe Fortas was born in Memphis, Tennessee hest of two other Yale faculty members who had on June 19, 1910 . His Orthodox Jewish parents been drawn by the New Deal , Thurman Arnold had emigrated from England. His father was a and Wesley Sturges. In 1934, Fortas joined cabinetmaker who was also a sometime shop­ Douglas at the new Securities and Exchange keeper and jeweler. Abe was the youngest of five Commission as a consultant. He became an im­ children, and his family's modest circumstances portant collaborator with Douglas in the prepara­ dictated that any achievement he enjoyed would tion of a study of protective committees that led be self-made. He worked his way through high to major legislative revisions in reorganization school by playing the violin in a small dance proceedings under the Bankruptcy Act. Three band. The violin began as a source of pleasure. years after joining the Commission, Fortas left became a means of self-support along with part­ the Yale faculty. In the meantime, he had married time work in a shoe store, and remained a passion Carolyn Agger. She, too, became a brilliant stu­ throughout his life. His academic record led to a dent at the Yale Law School and after her gradua­ scholarship at Southwestern College, a Presby­ tion in 1933, began an outstanding career as a tax terian institution in Memphis. There he was pres­ lawyer that has continued to the present day. ident of the drama and debating clubs and leader In 1939, at the age of 29. Fortas became Gen­ of the school orchestra. With a near-perfect eral Counsel to the Bituminous Coal Division of the Department of the Interior. Two years later, he became Director of the Division of Power in the Department. In that capacity, he met a young * Reprinted from the Solicit or General 's remarks congressman named Lyndon B. Johnson, who before the Supreme Court of the United States during was interested in a proposed power project in his the Special Session in memory of Justice Fortas on December 13 , 1982. home state of Texas. The introduction led to a 8 YEARBOOK 1983 life-long friendship which included Fortas' rep­ was a landmark in the modern attempt to bring resentation of Johnson in the contested Texas into closer proximity legal rules and scientific Senatorial election of 1948. knowledge concerning insanity. Less than a dec­ Talented young men. of whom Fortas was one ade later. again by appointment of the court. he of the best. were able to rise quickly in the New convinced the Supreme Court that Clarence Earl Deal. In 1942 at the age of 32. Fortas became Gideon was entitled under the Constitution to a Under Secretary of the Interior. His legal abili­ lawyer to defend him in state court for a petty ties had been firmly established. ln the new post. offense. Both cases were constitutional water­ he demonstrated the judgment and force required sheds. to become a successful second in command to Abe Fortas was an advocate not only of the Secretary Harold Ickes. the self-styled cur­ powerful and the penniless. but also of the arts . If mudgeon of the Roosevelt administration. Fortas his professional passion was craftsmanship. his won Ickes' trust so quickly and to such a degree private passion was music and art. The two that he frequently substituted for the secretary at merged symbolically in the form of his desk at Cabinet meetings. the firm which was made from a Victorian grand With the declaration of war after Pearl Harbor. piano. He was an effective supporter of the Na­ the business of the Interior Department acquired tional Endowments for the Arts and for the new gravity. The Department was charged with Humanities. He arranged for Pablo Casals to administering the removal of Japanese Ameri­ play at the White House.
Recommended publications
  • The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments
    A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments Lauren Paige Joyce Judson Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts In Political Science Jason P. Kelly, Chair Wayne D. Moore Karen M. Hult August 7, 2014 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Judicial Politics, Electoral Realignment, Alteration to the Supreme Court Copyright 2014, Lauren J. Judson A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments Lauren J. Judson ABSTRACT During periods of turmoil when ideological preferences between the federal branches of government fail to align, the relationship between the three quickly turns tumultuous. Electoral realignments especially have the potential to increase tension between the branches. When a new party replaces the “old order” in both the legislature and the executive branches, the possibility for conflict emerges with the Court. Justices who make decisions based on old regime preferences of the party that had appointed them to the bench will likely clash with the new ideological preferences of the incoming party. In these circumstances, the president or Congress may seek to weaken the influence of the Court through court-curbing methods. One example Congress may utilize is changing the actual size of the Supreme The size of the Supreme Court has increased four times in United States history, and three out of the four alterations happened after an electoral realignment. Through analysis of Supreme Court cases, this thesis seeks to determine if, after an electoral realignment, holdings of the Court on issues of policy were more congruent with the new party in power after the change in composition as well to examine any change in individual vote tallies of the justices driven by the voting behavior of the newly appointed justice(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Burial Information for These Recipients Is Here
    Civil War Name Connection Death Burial Allen, James Enlisted 31Aug1913 Oakland Cemetery Pottsdam, NY St Paul, MNH Anderson, Bruce Enlisted 22Aug1922 Green Hill Cemetery Albany, NY Amsterdam, NY Anderson, Charles W Served 25Feb1916 Thornrose Cemetery (Phorr, George) 1st NY Cav Staunton, VA Archer, Lester Born 27Oct1864 KIA - Fair Oaks, VA Fort Ann, NY IMO at Pineview Cemetery Queensbury, NY Arnold, Abraham Kerns Died 23Nov1901 St Philiips in the Highlands Church Cold Springs, NY Garrison, NY Avery, James Born 11Oct1898 US Naval Hospital New York City, NY Norfolk, VA Avery, William Bailey Served 29Jul1894 North Burial Grounds 1st NY Marine Arty Bayside, RI Baker, Henry Charles Enlisted 3Aug1891 Mount Moriah Cemetery New York City, NY Philadelphia, PA Barnum, Henry Alanson Born 29Jan1892 Oakwood Cemetery Jamesville, NY Syracuse, NY Barrell, Charles Luther Born 17Apr1913 Hooker Cemetery Conquest, NY Wayland, MI Barry, Augustus Enlisted 3Aug1871 Cold Harbor National Cemetery New York City, NY Mechanicsville, VA Barter, Gurdon H Born 22Apr1900 City Cemetery Williamsburg, NY Moscow or Viola, ID** Barton, Thomas C Enlisted Unknown - Lost to History New York City, NY Bass, David L Enlisted 15Oct1886 Wilcox Cemetery New York City, NY Little Falls, NY Bates, Delavan Born 19Dec1918 City Cemetery Seward, NY Aurora, NE Bazaar, Phillip Died 28Dec1923 Calvary Cemetery (Bazin, Felipe) New York City, NY Brooklyn, NY Beddows, Richard Enlisted 15Feb1922 Holy Sepulchre Cemetery Flushing, NY New Rochelle, NY Beebe, William Sully Born 12Oct1898 US Military
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Heritage
    Civil War Heritage Day Albany Rural Cemetery, Menands, New York Saturday, September 13, 2008 Tours, Music, Events: 10 am - 5 pm Reception and Parade for President Lincoln! 3:00 pm On February 18, 1861 , Jefferson Davis was sworn in as President of the Confederacy and a celebration was held to mark the establishment of the Confederate States of America. On February 18, 1861 , Abraham Lincoln had been elected President of the United States but had not yet reached Washington. On February 18, 1861 , Abraham Lincoln was in Albany , New York. Albany’s Mayor George Thacher met Lincoln at the train station, and they rode in a carriage to the Capitol. As the carriage proceeded down Broadway and turned right to go up State Street, it passed Stanwix Hall, the current residence of John Wilkes Booth. Undoubtedly, Booth watched with almost all of Albany as the new President went by. Another spectator was Clara Harris, daughter of Senator Ira Harris. Clara and her fiancé Major Henry Rathbone would be reunited with President and Mrs. Lincoln at a later encounter with Booth. On June 7, 1862, in the midst of the war, the Trustees of Albany Rural donated a section named the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Plot. One hundred and forty-nine Civil War Veterans were buried in this plot and at least 600 more were buried in family plots throughout the cemetery. The Grand Army of the Republic Civil War Monument at Albany Rural contains the names of 648 Albany City residents who “ Died in Action.” The bronze plates on the monument were cast from a melted down Civil War cannon.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Division Presidential Electors Faqs and Roster of Electors, 1816
    Election Division Presidential Electors FAQ Q1: How many presidential electors does Indiana have? What determines this number? Indiana currently has 11 presidential electors. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that each state shall appoint a number of electors equal to the number of Senators or Representatives to which the state is entitled in Congress. Since Indiana has currently has 9 U.S. Representatives and 2 U.S. Senators, the state is entitled to 11 electors. Q2: What are the requirements to serve as a presidential elector in Indiana? The requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the United States. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 provides that "no Senator or Representative, or person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector." Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment also states that "No person shall be... elector of President or Vice-President... who, having previously taken an oath... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Congress may be a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." These requirements are included in state law at Indiana Code 3-8-1-6(b). Q3: How does a person become a candidate to be chosen as a presidential elector in Indiana? Three political parties (Democratic, Libertarian, and Republican) have their presidential and vice- presidential candidates placed on Indiana ballots after their party's national convention.
    [Show full text]
  • A House Divided: When State and Lower Federal Courts Disagree on Federal Constitutional Rights
    Florida State University College of Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Publications 11-2014 A House Divided: When State and Lower Federal Courts Disagree on Federal Constitutional Rights Wayne A. Logan Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Wayne A. Logan, A House Divided: When State and Lower Federal Courts Disagree on Federal Constitutional Rights, 90 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 235 (2014), Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/161 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\90-1\NDL106.txt unknown Seq: 1 8-DEC-14 14:43 A HOUSE DIVIDED: WHEN STATE AND LOWER FEDERAL COURTS DISAGREE ON FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Wayne A. Logan* “The operation of a double system of conflicting laws in the same state is plainly hostile to the reign of law. Janus was not a god of justice.”1 Despite our many differences, “We the People”2 take as a given that rights contained in our Federal Constitution will apply with equal force throughout the land. As John Jay put it in The Federalist No. 22, “we have uniformly been one people; each individual citizen everywhere enjoying the same national rights, privileges, and protection.”3 To better ensure federal rights uniformity, the Framers included the Supremacy Clause in the Consti- tution4 and ordained that there be “one supreme Court”5 to harmonize what Justice Joseph Story termed “jarring and discordant judgments”6 of lower courts, giving rise to “public mischiefs.”7 © 2014 Wayne A.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defence of the Court's Integrity
    In Defence of the Court’s Integrity 17 In Defence of the Court’s Integrity: The Role of Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes in the Defeat of the Court-Packing Plan of 1937 Ryan Coates Honours, Durham University ‘No greater mistake can be made than to think that our institutions are fixed or may not be changed for the worse. We are a young nation and nothing can be taken for granted. If our institutions are maintained in their integrity, and if change shall mean improvement, it will be because the intelligent and the worthy constantly generate the motive power which, distributed over a thousand lines of communication, develops that appreciation of the standards of decency and justice which we have delighted to call the common sense of the American people.’ Hughes in 1909 ‘Our institutions were not designed to bring about uniformity of opinion; if they had been, we might well abandon hope.’ Hughes in 1925 ‘While what I am about to say would ordinarily be held in confidence, I feel that I am justified in revealing it in defence of the Court’s integrity.’ Hughes in the 1940s In early 1927, ten years before his intervention against the court-packing plan, Charles Evans Hughes, former Governor of New York, former Republican presidential candidate, former Secretary of State, and most significantly, former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, delivered a series 18 history in the making vol. 3 no. 2 of lectures at his alma mater, Columbia University, on the subject of the Supreme Court.1 These lectures were published the following year as The Supreme Court: Its Foundation, Methods and Achievements (New York: Columbia University Press, 1928).
    [Show full text]
  • “THE MOVEMENT of COERCION” Justice David J. Brewer
    “THE MOVEMENT OF COERCION” BY Justice David J. Brewer _______ FOREWORD BY DOUGLAS A. HEDIN Editor, MLHP David Josiah Brewer served on the Supreme Court from December 18, 1889 to March 27, 1910. Off the court, he continued to express his views on a wide range of subjects, legal and otherwise, through articles in journals, books and numerous public addresses, including the following to the New York State Bar Association in January 1893. 1 His topic was “The Movement of Coercion” which, he explained, referred to the demands of the “multitudes” to share the wealth earned and accumulated by a few: I wish rather to notice that movement which may be denominated the movement of "coercion," and which by the mere force of numbers seeks to diminish protection to private property. It is a movement which in spirit, if not in letter, violates both the Eighth and Tenth Command- ments; a moment, which, seeing that which a man has, attempts to wrest it from him and transfer it to those who have not. It is the unvarying law, that the wealth of a community will not be in the hands of a few, and the greater the general wealth, the greater the individual accumulations. 1 In his biography of the justice, Michael J. Brodhead devotes an entire chapter to his “off-the- bench activities.” David J. Brewer: The Life of a Supreme Court Justice, 1837-1919 116-138 (Southern Illinois Univ. Press, 1994)(“In fact, he was the most visible and widely known member of the Fuller Court.”). 1 He argued that the “coercion movement” against private property expressed itself through, first, unions and, second, excessive regulation, though neither was evil per se : First, in the improper use of labor organizations to destroy the freedom of the laborer, and control the uses of capital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Warren Court and the Pursuit of Justice, 50 Wash
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 50 | Issue 1 Article 4 Winter 1-1-1993 The aW rren Court And The Pursuit Of Justice Morton J. Horwitz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Morton J. Horwitz, The Warren Court And The Pursuit Of Justice, 50 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 5 (1993), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol50/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE WARREN COURT AND THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE MORTON J. HoRwiTz* From 1953, when Earl Warren became Chief Justice, to 1969, when Earl Warren stepped down as Chief Justice, a constitutional revolution occurred. Constitutional revolutions are rare in American history. Indeed, the only constitutional revolution prior to the Warren Court was the New Deal Revolution of 1937, which fundamentally altered the relationship between the federal government and the states and between the government and the economy. Prior to 1937, there had been great continuity in American constitutional history. The first sharp break occurred in 1937 with the New Deal Court. The second sharp break took place between 1953 and 1969 with the Warren Court. Whether we will experience a comparable turn after 1969 remains to be seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicts of Interest in Bush V. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? Richard K
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship Spring 2003 Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? Richard K. Neumann Jr. Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Richard K. Neumann Jr., Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally?, 16 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 375 (2003) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? RICHARD K. NEUMANN, JR.* On December 9, 2000, the United States Supreme Court stayed the presidential election litigation in the Florida courts and set oral argument for December 11.1 On the morning of December 12-one day after oral argument and half a day before the Supreme Court announced its decision in Bush v. Gore2-the Wall Street Journalpublished a front-page story that included the following: Chief Justice William Rehnquist, 76 years old, and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, 70, both lifelong Republicans, have at times privately talked about retiring and would prefer that a Republican appoint their successors.... Justice O'Connor, a cancer survivor, has privately let it be known that, after 20 years on the high court,'she wants to retire to her home state of Arizona ...
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment As Judicial Selection?
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 18 (2009-2010) Issue 3 Article 3 March 2010 Impeachment as Judicial Selection? Tuan Samahon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons Repository Citation Tuan Samahon, Impeachment as Judicial Selection?, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 595 (2010), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol18/iss3/3 Copyright c 2010 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj IMPEACHMENT AS JUDICIAL SELECTION? Tuan Samahon* Ideological judicial selection encompasses more than the affirmative nominating, confirming, and appointing of judges who pre-commit to particular legal interpretations and constructions of constitutional text. It may also include deselection by way of im- peachment and removal (or at least its threat) of judges subscribing to interpretations and constructions of the Constitution that one disapproves. This negative tactic may be particularly effective when deployed against judges on closely divided collegial courts, such as the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. courts of appeals, where per- sonnel determine voting majorities and, in turn, majorities determine case outcomes. The Pickering-Chase, Fortas-Douglas, and Christian Coalition impeachments and threats of impeachment illustrate that the use or threat of this tactic is more common than might be supposed. Indeed, recent calls for the removal of Circuit Judge Jay Bybee demonstrate the continuing allure of impeachment as judicial selection. This Article examines the phenomenon of impeachment as judicial selection through Professors Tushnet’s and Balkin’s framework of “constitutional hardball.” In the case of impeachment as judicial selection, Congress plays constitutional hardball by claiming that it is an appropriate tool for political control and a fraternal twin to the modern appointments process.
    [Show full text]
  • David Josiah Brewer and the Christian Constitution, 81 Marq
    Marquette Law Review Volume 81 Issue 2 Winter 1998: Symposium: Religion and the Article 13 Judicial Process: Legal, Ethical, and Empirical Dimensions David Josiah Brewer And The hrC istian Constitution J. Gordon Hylton Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation J. Gordon Hylton, David Josiah Brewer And The Christian Constitution, 81 Marq. L. Rev. 417 (1998). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol81/iss2/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DAVID JOSIAH BREWER AND THE CHRISTIAN CONSTITUTION J. GORDON HYLTON* Professor Berg does a great service by reminding us that religion has been an important factor in the lives of many of the men and women who have served on the United States Supreme Court. Unfortunately, historians, legal scholars, and judicial biographers have paid scant atten- tion to this aspect of our constitutional experience. I hope to illustrate the advantage of exploring the connections between religious belief and constitutional theory through a brief examination of the life and career of Justice David Josiah Brewer, who figures prominently in Professor Berg's paper. Brewer was born in Smyrna, Asia Minor, to missionary parents in 1837. He was raised in New England, but in the late 1850s, he migrated to Kansas where he later served on the state supreme court and the fed- eral circuit court.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    1st DRAFT SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 74-1055 AND 74-1222 W. T. Stone, Warden,! . Petitioner On Wnt of Certwran to the 74-1055 ' United States Court of Appeals Lloyd Ch;ies Powell. for the Ninth Circuit. Charles L. Wolff, Jr.,) . Warden, Petitioner, On Wnt of Cert1oran to the ?'4-1222 v United States Court of Appeale 'd L. R' for the Eighth Circuit. D av1 . 1ce. [May -, 1976] Mn. JusTICE PowELL delivered the opinion of the Court. Respondents in these cases were convicted of criminal offenses in state courts, and their convictions were af­ firmed on appeal. The prosecution in each case relied upon evidence obtained by searches and seizures alleged by respondents to have been unlawful. Each respondent subsequently sought relief in a federal district court by filing a petition for a writ of federal habeas corpus under- 28 U. S. C. § 2254. The question presented is whether a federal court should consider, in ruling on a petition for· habeas corpus relief filed by a state prisoner, a claim that evidence obtained by an unconstitutional search or sei­ zure was introduced at his trial, when he has previously been afforded an opportunity for full and fair litigation of his claim in the state courts. The issue is of consid­ erable importance to the administration of criminal justice. 74-1055 & 74-1222-0PINION 2 STONE v. POWELL I We summarize first the relevant facts and procedural history of these cases. Respondent Lloyd Powell was convicted of murder in June 1968 after trial in a California state court.
    [Show full text]