DOCSLIB.ORG

Benchmarking Magnetizabilities with Recent Density Functionals Arxiv

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benchmarking Magnetizabilities with Recent Density Functionals Arxiv Benchmarking magnetizabilities with recent density functionals Susi Lehtola,∗,y,z Maria Dimitrova,∗,y Heike Fliegl,∗,{ and Dage Sundholm∗,y yUniversity of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, P.O. Box 55 (A.I. Virtanens plats 1), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland zMolecular Sciences Software Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States {KIT, Institute of Nanotechnology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany E-mail: [email protected].fi; maria.dimitrova@helsinki.fi; heike.fl[email protected]; dage.sundholm@helsinki.fi Abstract mented this approach as a new feature in the gauge-including magnetically induced current We have assessed the accuracy for magnetic method (Gimic). Magnetizabilities can be cal- properties of a set of 51 density functional culated from magnetically induced current den- approximations, including both recently pub- sity susceptibilities within this approach even lished as well as already established function- when analytical approaches for magnetizabili- als. The accuracy assessment considers a se- ties as the second derivative of the energy have ries of 27 small molecules and is based on com- not been implemented. The magnetizability paring the predicted magnetizabilities to liter- density can also be visualized, providing addi- ature reference values calculated using coupled tional information that is not otherwise easily cluster theory with full singles and doubles and accessible on the spatial origin of the magneti- perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] employing large zabilities. basis sets. The most accurate magnetizabili- ties, defined as the smallest mean absolute er- ror, were obtained with the BHandHLYP func- 1 Introduction tional. Three of the six studied Berkeley func- tionals and the three range-separated Florida Computational methods based on density- functionals also yield accurate magnetizabili- functional theory (DFT) are commonly used ties. Also some older functionals like CAM- in quantum chemistry, because DFT calcu- B3LYP, KT1, BHLYP (BHandH), B3LYP and lations are rather accurate despite their rel- PBE0 perform rather well. In contrast, unsat- atively modest computational costs. Older arXiv:2011.06560v3 [physics.chem-ph] 19 Jan 2021 1,2 isfactory performance was generally obtained functionals such as the Becke'88{Perdew'86 1,3 with Minnesota functionals, which are therefore (BP86), Becke'88{Lee{Yang{Parr (BLYP) 4,5 not recommended for calculations of magnet- and Perdew{Burke{Ernzerhof (PBE) func- ically induced current density susceptibilities, tionals at the generalized gradient approxima- 6 7,8 and related magnetic properties such as mag- tion (GGA) as well as the B3LYP and PBE0 netizabilities and nuclear magnetic shieldings. hybrid functionals are still often employed, even We also demonstrate that magnetizabilities though newer functionals with improved accu- can be calculated by numerical integration of racy for energies and electronic properties have the magnetizability density; we have imple- been developed. The accuracy and reliability of various den- 1 sity functional approximations (DFAs) has been tion about the origin of the corresponding com- assessed in a huge number of applications and ponents of the magnetizability tensor. Similar benchmark studies.9{17 It is important to note approaches have been used in the literature for that functionals that are accurate for energet- studying spatial contributions to nuclear mag- ics may be less suited for calculations of other netic shielding constants.46{53 molecular properties.16 In specific, the accu- We will describe our methods for numerical racy of magnetic properties calculated within integration of magnetizabilities using the cur- DFAs has been benchmarked by comparing rent density susceptibility in sections2 and3. magnetizabilities and nuclear magnetic shield- Then, in section4, we will list the studied set ings to those obtained from coupled-cluster cal- of density functionals, and present the results culations using large basis sets,18,19 although in section5: the functional benchmark is dis- modern DFAs have been less systematically in- cussed in section 5.1, and magnetizability densi- vestigated.16,20{23 The same also holds for nu- ties and spatial contributions to magnetizabil- clear independent chemical shifts24{28 and mag- ities are analyzed in section 5.2. The conclu- netically induced current density susceptibili- sions of the study are summarized in section6. ties,29{36 which have been studied for a large Atomic units are used throughout the text, un- number of molecules, but whose accuracy has less stated otherwise, and summation over re- never been benchmarked properly. peated indices is assumed. Magnetizabilities are usually calculated as the second derivative of the electronic energy with respect to the external magnetic pertur- 2 Theory bation,37{41 The current density JB(r) in equation (2) is for- @2E mally defined as the real part (R) of the me- ξαβ = − : (1) chanical momentum density, @Bα@Bβ B=0 JB(r) = −R Ψ∗(r) p − AB(r) Ψ(r) ; (3) Such analytic implementations for magnetiz- abilities exist in several quantum chemistry pro- where p = −ir is the momentum opera- grams. However, since the magnetic interaction tor. Substituting equation (2) into equation (1) energy in equation (2) can also be written as an straightforwardly leads to integral over the magnetic interaction energy density ρB(r) that is given by the scalar prod- 2 Z @ 1 B B 3 uct of the magnetically induced current density ξαβ = A (r)·J (r) d r : (4) @Bα@Bβ 2 JB(r) with the vector potential AB(r) of the B=0 30,31,42{45 external magnetic field B The current density susceptibility tensor29{31 Z Z (CDT) is defined as the first derivative of the B 3 1 B B 3 E = ρ (r) d r = − A (r) · J (r) d r; magnetically induced current density with re- 2 (2) spect to the components of the external mag- an approach based on quadrature is also pos- netic field in the limit of a vanishing magnetic field,32{35 sible. As will be seen in section2, the nu- B merical integration approach for the magneti- Bβ @Jγ Jγ = : (5) zability provides additional information about @Bβ B=0 its spatial origin that is not available with the B analytic approach based on second derivatives: The vector potential A (r) of an external static the tensor components of the magnetizability homogeneous magnetic field is expressed as density defined in section2 are scalar functions 1 AB(r) = B × (r − R ); (6) that can be visualized, and the integration ap- 2 O proach can be used to provide detailed informa- 2 (0) where RO is the chosen gauge origin. The αβ where i is the imaginary unit and χµ (r) is a component of the magnetizability tensor can standard atomic-orbital basis function centered then be obtained from equations (4), (5) and (6) at Rµ. GIAOs eliminate the gauge origin from as Z the expression used for calculating the CDT; ξ 3 the expression we use is given in the supporting ξαβ = ραβ(r)d r; (7) information (SI). Since the expression for the where the magnetizability density is defined as magnetizability density in equations (7) and (8) can be computed by quadrature, magnetizabil- ξ 1 X Bβ ρ (r) = r Jγ (r) (8) ities can be obtained from the CDT even if the αβ 2 αδγ δ δγ corresponding analytical calculation of magne- tizabilities as the second derivative of the en- where αδγ is the Levi{Civita symbol, α, β, ergy has not been implemented. γ, and δ are one of the Cartesian directions (x; y; z), and rδ also denotes one of (x; y; z). The components of the magnetizability density 3 Implementation ξ tensor ραβ(r) are scalar functions that can be visualized to obtain information about the spa- The present implementation is based on the 56 57 tial contributions to the corresponding element Gimic program and the Numgrid library, of the magnetizability tensor ξαβ. which are both freely available open-source soft- As the isotropic magnetizability (ξ) is ob- ware. Gauge-independent CDTs can be cal- 32{35 tained as the average of the diagonal elements culated with Gimic using the density ma- of the magnetizability tensor trix, the magnetically perturbed density matri- ces and information about the basis set. 1 Z ξ = Tr ξ = ρξ(r)d3r; (9) In order to evaluate equation (7), a molecular 3 integration grid is first generated from atom- centered grids with the Numgrid library, as we introduce the isotropic magnetizability den- described by Becke 58. In Numgrid, the grid sity ρξ(r) defined as weights are scaled according to the Becke par- 58 1 titioning scheme using a Becke hardness of 3; ρξ(r) = Tr ρξ(r); (10) 3 the atom-centered grids are determined by a radial grid generated as suggested by Lindh which yields information about the spatial ori- et al. 59, and angular grids due to Lebedev 60 gin of the isotropic magnetizability, as we will are used. demonstrate in section 5.2. Given the quadrature grid, the diagonal ele- Although there is freedom with regard to the ments of the magnetizability tensor are calcu- B choice of the gauge origin of A (r), the mag- lated in Gimic from the Cartesian coordinates netic flux density B is uniquely defined via of the n grid points multiplied with the CDT equation (6), because B = r × (A(r) + rf(r)) calculated in the grid points. For example, the holds for any differentiable scalar function f(r). ξxx element of the magnetizability tensor is ob- The exact solution of the Schr¨odingerequation tained from equation (7) as should also be gauge invariant. However, the n use of finite one-particle basis sets introduces X ξ gauge dependence in quantum chemical calcula- ξxx = ρi;xx (12) tions of magnetic properties. The CDT can be i=1 made gauge-origin independent by using gauge- where the xx component of the magnetizability including atomic orbitals (GIAOs), also known density tensor at grid point i is as London atomic orbitals (LAOs),32,54,55 1 h i ξ J Bx − J Bx −i(B×[Rµ−RO]·r)=2 (0) ρi;xx = y z i z y i (13) χµ(r) = e χµ (r) ; (11) 2 3 J Bx J Bx where y z i and z y i are the product of (with aug-cc-pVQZ on the hydrogen atoms) the z and y components of the CDT calculated and benchmark quality integration grids were in grid point i with the Cartesian coordinates y employed in all calculations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benchmark Study of the Performance of Density
    DOI: 10.1002/open.201300012 Benchmark Study of the Performance of Density Functional Theory for Bond Activations with (Ni,Pd)-Based Transition-Metal Catalysts Marc Steinmetz and Stefan Grimme*[a] The performance of 23 density functionals, including one LDA, due to partial breakdown of the perturbative treatment for the four GGAs, three meta-GGAs, three hybrid GGAs, eight hybrid correlation energy in cases with difficult electronic structures meta-GGAs, and ten double-hybrid functionals, was investigat- (partial multi-reference character). Only double hybrids either ed for the computation of activation energies of various cova- with very low amounts of perturbative correlation (e.g., PBE0- lent main-group single bonds by four catalysts: Pd, PdClÀ , DH) or that use the opposite-spin correlation component only PdCl2, and Ni (all in the singlet state). A reactant complex, the (e.g., PWPB95) seem to be more robust. We also investigated barrier, and reaction energy were considered, leading to 164 the effect of the D3 dispersion correction. While the barriers energy data points for statistical analysis. Extended Gaussian are not affected by this correction, significant and mostly posi- AO basis sets were used in all calculations. The best functional tive results were observed for reaction energies. Furthermore, for the complete benchmark set relative to estimated CCSD(T)/ six very recently proposed double-hybrid functionals were ana- CBS reference data is PBE0-D3, with an MAD value of 1.1 kcal lyzed regarding the influence of the amount of Fock exchange molÀ1 followed by PW6B95-D3, the double hybrid PWPB95-D3, as well as the type of perturbative correlation treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Limit of Accuracy of the Global Hybrid Meta Density Functional for Main-Group Thermochemistry, Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions
    J. Chem. Theory Comput. XXXX, xxx, 000 A Exploring the Limit of Accuracy of the Global Hybrid Meta Density Functional for Main-Group Thermochemistry, Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions Yan Zhao and Donald G. Truhlar* Department of Chemistry and Supercomputing Institute, UniVersity of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street S.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431 Received June 25, 2008 Abstract: The hybrid meta density functionals M05-2X and M06-2X have been shown to provide broad accuracy for main group chemistry. In the present article we make the functional form more flexible and improve the self-interaction term in the correlation functional to improve its self-consistent-field convergence. We also explore the constraint of enforcing the exact forms of the exchange and correlation functionals through second order (SO) in the reduced density gradient. This yields two new functionals called M08-HX and M08-SO, with different exact constraints. The new functionals are optimized against 267 diverse main-group energetic data consisting of atomization energies, ionization potentials, electron affinities, proton affinities, dissociation energies, isomerization energies, barrier heights, noncovalent complexation energies, and atomic energies. Then the M08-HX, M08-SO, M05-2X, and M06-2X functionals and the popular B3LYP functional are tested against 250 data that were not part of the original training data for any of the functionals, in particular 164 main-group energetic data in 7 databases, 39 bond lengths, 38 vibrational frequencies, and 9 multiplicity-changing electronic transition energies. These tests include a variety of new challenges for complex systems, including large-molecule atomization energies, organic isomerization energies, interaction energies in uracil trimers, and bond distances in crowded molecules (in particular, cyclophanes).
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of DFT Procedures for the Calculation of Proton-Exchange
    Article pubs.acs.org/JCTC Performance of Density Functional Theory Procedures for the Calculation of Proton-Exchange Barriers: Unusual Behavior of M06- Type Functionals Bun Chan,*,†,‡ Andrew T. B. Gilbert,¶ Peter M. W. Gill,*,¶ and Leo Radom*,†,‡ † School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia ‡ ¶ ARC Centre of Excellence for Free Radical Chemistry and Biotechnology and Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: We have examined the performance of a variety of density functional theory procedures for the calculation of complexation energies and proton-exchange barriers, with a focus on the Minnesota-class of functionals that are generally highly robust and generally show good accuracy. A curious observation is that M05-type and M06-type methods show an atypical decrease in calculated barriers with increasing proportion of Hartree−Fock exchange. To obtain a clearer picture of the performance of the underlying components of M05-type and M06-type functionals, we have investigated the combination of MPW-type and PBE-type exchange and B95-type and PBE-type correlation procedures. We find that, for the extensive E3 test set, the general performance of the various hybrid-DFT procedures improves in the following order: PBE1-B95 → PBE1-PBE → MPW1-PBE → PW6-B95. As M05-type and M06-type procedures are related to PBE1-B95, it would be of interest to formulate and examine the general performance of an alternative Minnesota DFT method related to PW6-B95. 1. INTRODUCTION protocol.13,14 In a recent study,15 however, it was shown that, Density functional theory (DFT) procedures1 are undeniably for complexation energies of water, ammonia and hydrogen the workhorse for many computational chemists.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ion Mobility-Aided, Quantum Chemical Benchmark Analysis of H+GPGG Conformers Daniel Beckett, Tarick J
    Article Cite This: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 5406−5418 pubs.acs.org/JCTC Electronic Energies Are Not Enough: An Ion Mobility-Aided, Quantum Chemical Benchmark Analysis of H+GPGG Conformers Daniel Beckett, Tarick J. El-Baba, David E. Clemmer, and Krishnan Raghavachari* Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Peptides and proteins exist not as single, lowest energy structures but as ensembles of states separated by small barriers. In order to study these species we must be able to correctly identify their gas phase conformational distributions, and ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) has arisen as an experimental method for assessing the gas phase energetics of flexible peptides. Here, we present a thorough exploration and benchmarking of the low energy conformers of the small, hairpin peptide H+GPGG with the aid of ion mobility ). spectrometry against a wide swath of density functionals (35 dispersion-corrected and uncorrected functionals represented by 21 unique exchange−correlation functionals) and wave function theory methods (15 total levels of theory). The three experimentally resolved IMS peaks were found to correspond to three distinct pairs of conformers, each pair composed of species differing only by the chair or boat configuration of the proline. Two of the H+GPGG conformer pairs possess a cis configuration about the Pro−Gly1 peptide bond while the other adopts a trans configuration. While the experimental spectrum reports a higher intensity for the o legitimately share published articles. cis-1 conformer than the trans conformer, 13 WFT levels of theory, including a complete basis set CCSD(T) extrapolation, obtain trans to be favored in terms of the electronic energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics
    CPMD Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics An ab initio Electronic Structure and Molecular Dynamics Program The CPMD consortium WWW: http://www.cpmd.org/ Mailing list: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] January 29, 2019 Send comments and bug reports to [email protected] This manual is for CPMD version 4.3.0 CPMD 4.3.0 January 29, 2019 Contents I Overview3 1 About this manual3 2 Citation 3 3 Important constants and conversion factors3 4 Recommendations for further reading4 5 History 5 5.1 CPMD Version 1.....................................5 5.2 CPMD Version 2.....................................5 5.2.1 Version 2.0....................................5 5.2.2 Version 2.5....................................5 5.3 CPMD Version 3.....................................5 5.3.1 Version 3.0....................................5 5.3.2 Version 3.1....................................5 5.3.3 Version 3.2....................................5 5.3.4 Version 3.3....................................6 5.3.5 Version 3.4....................................6 5.3.6 Version 3.5....................................6 5.3.7 Version 3.6....................................6 5.3.8 Version 3.7....................................6 5.3.9 Version 3.8....................................6 5.3.10 Version 3.9....................................6 5.3.11 Version 3.10....................................7 5.3.12 Version 3.11....................................7 5.3.13 Version 3.12....................................7 5.3.14 Version 3.13....................................7 5.3.15 Version 3.14....................................7 5.3.16 Version 3.15....................................8 5.3.17 Version 3.17....................................8 5.4 CPMD Version 4.....................................8 5.4.1 Version 4.0....................................8 5.4.2 Version 4.1....................................8 5.4.3 Version 4.3....................................9 6 Installation 10 7 Running CPMD 11 8 Files 12 II Reference Manual 15 9 Input File Reference 15 9.1 Basic rules........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treating London-Dispersion Effects with the Latest Minnesota Density Functionals: Problems and Possible Solutions
    Treating London-Dispersion Effects with the Latest Minnesota Density Functionals: Problems and Possible Solutions Lars Goerigk∗ School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia E-mail: [email protected] 1 Abstract It is shown that the latest Minnesota density functionals (SOGGA11, M11-L, N12, MN12-L, SOGGA11-X, M11, N12-SX, and MN12-SX) do not properly describe London-dispersion interactions. Grimme's DFT-D3 correction can solve this problem partially, however, double-counting of medium-range electron correlation can occur. For the related M06-L functional, the alternative VV10 van-der-Waals kernel is tested, but it experiences similar double-counting. Most functionals give unphysical disso- ciation curves for the argon dimer, an indication for method-inherent problems, and further investigation is recommended. These results are further evidence that the London-dispersion problem in density functional theory approximations is unlikely to be solved by mere empirical optimization of functional parameters, unless the function- als contain components that ensure the correct asymptotic long-range behavior. Lon- don dispersion is ubiquitous, which is why the reported findings are not only important for theoreticians, but also a reminder to the general chemist to carefully consider their choice of method before undertaking computational studies. TOC Graphic MN12-SX N12-SX MN-12L M11 SOGGA-11X London Dispersion? M11-L SOGGA11 N12 reference +DFT-D3? +VV10? Keywords: density functional theory, Minnesota density functionals, London dis- persion, noncovalent interactions, DFT-D3, DFT-NL, vdw-DFT 2 Herein, we investigate if the latest Minnesota-type1{7 density-functional-theory ap- proximations (DFTAs) can describe the ubiquitous London-dispersion8 phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Density Functional Theory for Transition Metals and Transition Metal Chemistry
    REVIEW ARTICLE www.rsc.org/pccp | Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry Christopher J. Cramer* and Donald G. Truhlar* Received 8th April 2009, Accepted 20th August 2009 First published as an Advance Article on the web 21st October 2009 DOI: 10.1039/b907148b We introduce density functional theory and review recent progress in its application to transition metal chemistry. Topics covered include local, meta, hybrid, hybrid meta, and range-separated functionals, band theory, software, validation tests, and applications to spin states, magnetic exchange coupling, spectra, structure, reactivity, and catalysis, including molecules, clusters, nanoparticles, surfaces, and solids. 1. Introduction chemical systems, in part because its cost scales more favorably with system size than does the cost of correlated WFT, and yet Density functional theory (DFT) describes the electronic states it competes well in accuracy except for very small systems. This of atoms, molecules, and materials in terms of the three- is true even in organic chemistry, but the advantages of DFT dimensional electronic density of the system, which is a great are still greater for metals, especially transition metals. The simplification over wave function theory (WFT), which involves reason for this added advantage is static electron correlation. a3N-dimensional antisymmetric wave function for a system It is now well appreciated that quantitatively accurate 1 with N electrons. Although DFT is sometimes considered the electronic structure calculations must include electron correlation. B ‘‘new kid on the block’’, it is now 45 years old in its modern It is convenient to recognize two types of electron correlation, 2 formulation (more than half as old as quantum mechanics the first called dynamical electron correlation and the second 3,4 itself), and it has roots that are almost as ancient as the called static correlation, near-degeneracy correlation, or non- Schro¨ dinger equation.
    [Show full text]
  • How Accurate Are the Minnesota Density Functionals for Non-Covalent
    How accurate are the Minnesota density functionals for non-covalent interactions, isomerization energies, thermochemistry, and barrier heights involving molecules composed of main-group elements? Narbe Mardirossiany and Martin Head-Gordon∗,y yKenneth S. Pitzer Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA zChemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract ten hybrid Minnesota functionals). Similarly, the main strength of the local Minnesota den- The 14 Minnesota density functionals pub- sity functionals is that the best ones provide lished between the years 2005 and early 2016 very good performance for thermochemistry are benchmarked on a comprehensive database (e.g. MN15-L), barrier heights (e.g. MN12- of 4986 data points (84 datasets) involving L), and systems heavily characterized by self- molecules composed of main-group elements. interaction error (e.g. MN12-L and MN15-L), The database includes non-covalent interac- while the main weakness is that none of them tions, isomerization energies, thermochemistry, are state-of-the-art for the full spectrum of non- and barrier heights, as well as equilibrium bond covalent interactions and isomerization energies lengths and equilibrium binding energies of (although M06-L is clearly the best from the non-covalent dimers. Additionally, the sensi- four local Minnesota functionals). As an over- tivity of the Minnesota density functionals to all guide, M06-2X and MN15 are perhaps the the choice of basis set and integration grid is most broadly useful hybrid Minnesota function- explored for both non-covalent interactions and als, while M06-L and MN15-L are perhaps the thermochemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Ψk Scientific Highlight of the Month
    Ψk Scientific Highlight Of The Month No. 144 January 2019 Simplified DFT methods for consistent structures and energies of large systems Eike Caldeweyher1 and Jan Gerit Brandenburg2;3;∗ 1Mulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstr. 4, 53115 Bonn, Germany 2Thomas Young Center, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom 3Institute for Physical Chemistry, University of G¨ottingen,Tammannstr. 6, 37077 G¨ottingen,Germany This Psi-k Scientific Highlight is a reformatted preprint version of E. Caldeweyher and J. G. Brandenburg 2018 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30 213001 and is reproduced with permission by the Institute of Physics. Abstract Kohn-Sham density functional theory (DFT) is routinely used for the fast electronic struc- ture computation of large systems and will most likely continue to be the method of choice for the generation of reliable geometries in the foreseeable future. Here, we present a hierarchy of simplified DFT methods designed for consistent structures and non-covalent interactions of large systems with particular focus on molecular crystals. The covered methods are a minimal basis set Hartree-Fock (HF-3c), a small basis set screened exchange hybrid functional (HSE- 3c), and a generalized gradient approximated functional evaluated in a medium-sized basis set (B97-3c), all augmented with semi-classical correction potentials. We give an overview on the methods design, a comprehensive evaluation on established benchmark sets for ge- ometries and lattice energies of molecular crystals, and highlight some realistic applications on large organic crystals with several hundreds of atoms in the primitive unit cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Performance of Density Functionals for Predicting Potential Energy Curves in Hydrogen Storage Applications
    Assessment of the Performance of Density Functionals for Predicting Potential Energy Curves in Hydrogen Storage Applications Srimukh Prasad Veccham and Martin Head-Gordon∗ Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The availability of accurate computational tools for modeling and simulation is vital to accelerate the discovery of materials capable of storing hydrogen (H2) under given parameters of pressure swing and temperature. Previously, we compiled the H2Bind275 dataset consisting of equilibrium geometries and assessed the performance of 55 density functionals over this dataset (Veccham, S. P.; Head-Gordon, M. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2020, 16, 4963{4982). As it is crucial for computational tools to accurately model the entire potential energy curve (PEC), in addition to the equilibrium geometry, arXiv:2102.02836v1 [physics.chem-ph] 4 Feb 2021 we have extended this dataset with 389 new data points to include two compressed and three elongated geometries along 78 PECs for H2 binding, forming the H2Bind78×7 dataset. Assessing the performance of 55 density functionals on this significantly larger and more comprehensive H2Bind78×7 dataset, we have identified the best performing density functionals for H2 binding applications: PBE0-DH, !B97X-V, !B97M-V, and DSD-PBEPBE-D3(BJ). Addition of Hartree Fock exchange improves the performance 1 of density functionals, albeit not uniformly throughout the PEC. We recommend the usage of !B97X-V and !B97M-V density functionals as they give good performance for both geometries and energies In addition, we have also identified B97M-V and B97M-rV as the best semi-local density functionals for predicting H2 binding energy at its equilibrium geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORING CRITICAL CONFORMATIONS: STATE SEARCHING and SAMPLING in BOTH GERMANIUM CHAINS and ICE by GENTRY H. SMITH Bachelor of S
    EXPLORING CRITICAL CONFORMATIONS: STATE SEARCHING AND SAMPLING IN BOTH GERMANIUM CHAINS AND ICE By GENTRY H. SMITH Bachelor of Science in Chemistry Southern Nazarene University Bethany, OK, USA 2016 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science December 2018 EXPLORING CRITICAL CONFORMATIONS: STATE SEARCHING AND SAMPLING IN BOTH GERMANIUM CHAINS AND ICE Thesis Approved: Dr. Christopher J. Fennell Thesis Advisor Dr. Jindal K. Shah Dr. Jimmie D. Weaver ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To Oklahoma State University, for providing the environment in which I have been able to study, teach, and research. To the HPCC and the individuals who manage it for providing a powerful cluster for computations and continuous support for technical issues. To my advisor, who instructed and assisted me in research. To my parents, by blood and marriage, who have always encouraged me toward higher goals. To my wife, Miranda, who has supported me for over five years. Acknowledgments reflect the views of the author and are not endorsed by committee members or Oklahoma State University. iii Name: GENTRY H SMITH Date of Degree: December 2018 Title of Study: EXPLORING CRITICAL CONFORMATIONS Major Field: CHEMISTRY Abstract: Molecular conformation plays a critical role in the properties of sys- tems in both the condensed or vapor states. The ensemble of conformations dictates structural properties, average energy, heat capacities, and other thermodynamic and dynamic quantities. Here, we explore the role of conformation in proton ordering and orientational defect formation in ice as well as strategies for exhaustive conformer searching for molecules using Group IV element backbones.
    [Show full text]
  • A Generally Applicable Atomic-Charge Dependent London Dispersion
    A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction Eike Caldeweyher,1 Sebastian Ehlert,1 Andreas Hansen,1 Hagen Neugebauer,1 Sebastian Spicher,1 Christoph Bannwarth,1, 2 and Stefan Grimme1, a) 1)Mulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Institut f¨urPhysikalische und Theoretische Chemie der Universit¨atBonn Beringstr. 4, D-53115 Bonn, Germany 2)Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America (Dated: 25 January 2019) The D4 model is presented for the accurate computation of London dispersion interactions in density func- tional theory approximations (DFT-D4) and generally for atomistic modeling methods. In this successor to the DFT-D3 model, the atomic coordination-dependent dipole polarizabilities are scaled based on atomic partial charges which can be taken from various sources. For this purpose, a new charge-dependent parameter- economic scaling function is designed. Classical charges are obtained from an atomic electronegativity equi- libration procedure for which efficient analytical derivatives are developed. A numerical Casimir-Polder integration of the atom-in-molecule dynamic polarizabilities yields charge- and geometry-dependent dipole- dipole dispersion coefficients. Similar to the D3 model, the dynamic polarizabilities are pre-computed by time-dependent DFT and elements up to radon are covered. For a benchmark set of 1225 dispersion coeffi- cients, the D4 model achieves an unprecedented accuracy with a mean relative deviation of 3.8% compared to 4.7% for D3. In addition to the two-body part, three-body effects are described by an Axilrod-Teller-Muto term. A common many-body dispersion expansion was extensively tested and an energy correction based on D4 polarizabilities is found to be advantageous for some larger systems.
    [Show full text]