Another Short History of Composting-1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Another Short History of Composting-1 Another Short History of Composting By Steve Callis, Missouri State Coordinator – International Compost Awareness Week Introducon Compost. Most of us know what it is and how it’s made but, who first obtained this knowledge? Nature obviously has known all along exactly what to do and when to do it. When our distant ancestors moved from being hunter-gatherers to farming, they must have noticed how and why crops flourished or not. They figured out the basics, now let’s see how we got from there to here. Prehistoric Composting has a long and rich history. We know that early man used decomposed organic matter to improve the soil. We also have evidence from around the world that farming populations used some sort of natural fertilizer. Some of these discoveries were accidental and some were the result of the observation of nature. Archaeological evidence shows that the ancient Scots, about 5000 BC, planted crops in heaps of rotting manure. These plantings likely occurred after populations noticed that plants seemed to grow better where the manure had been. Ancient Chinese and Hindu writings indicate that farmers used manures and other organics to enrich their soils. Many of these systems are still in use today and have been the basis for current thinking regarding composting and organic farming. The first indigenous populations throughout the Americas developed farming systems around the same time. These systems utilized fish, fish waste, manure, and plant waste to fertilize their crops. Methods and resources varied based on climate and soil properties, but the basics were, and continue to be, the same. As these civilizations rose and fell, knowledge of composting and amending soils was passed on to future generations. BC to AD As writing became more common, early man started to record his experiences, including composting and farming. Most early civilizations practiced some form of composting by spreading manure and plant waste on fields to improve fertility. Researchers have found clay tablets from the Akkadian Empire, around 2350 BC, which are the first to speak of “making” compost for agricultural use. The Akkadian Empire was in the Mesopotamian Valley, present day Iraq. The Bible and the Talmud both speak of using dung on fields. The Talmud also talks of using the blood from animal sacrifices to improve fertility. Today, blood meal is a common organic farming and gardening supplement. The retired Roman general, Cato the elder, wrote of using animal dung mixed with plant waste in the fields in his book “De Agri Cultura” (Concerning the Culture of the Fields). The early Egyptians also composted with worms. Cleopatra even went so far as to make worms sacred in recognition of their contributions to agriculture. Other areas of the Middle East were also using manure and compost during this time. The early Arabic writer, Ibn al Awan, mentioned the use of animal manures and composting in his book, “Kitab al Falahah” (Book on Agriculture). Much was lost during the Dark Ages. We can thank the monks and monasteries of the time for maintaining and recording good farming practices, including composting. This knowledge was later made available to the public as mankind moved on. 1300 – 1800 As the world found its way out of the Dark Ages, the agricultural information retained by the monks and monasteries, including composting, found its way back to the populations. Renaissance authors, such as William Shakespeare, Sir Francis Bacon, and Sir Walter Raleigh, made several references to composting in their various works. As European settlers came to the Americas, they brought with them knowledge of farming practices, including composting. Imagine their surprise to find that the indigenous populations also practiced their own forms of composting, utilizing locally available materials such as the abundant supply of shad or menhaden fish in nearby creeks and streams. Squanto, of the Patuxent tribe in New England, was one of the first Native Americans to share his knowledge of composting with the Pilgrims. It also turns out that Native Americans were already practicing their own form of sheet composting on their fields. Your garden club may enjoy that factoid. The Pilgrims and other settlers took that knowledge and, since they were in the habit of stabling work animals, added manure and bedding to their own mix. Some colonial entrepreneurs even made compost for sale to their neighbors. In academia, the value of compost was touted by Samuel W. Johnson, a Yale College professor. The Founding Fathers were aware of soil fertility and the value of compost. George Washington, in addition to being a Revolutionary General and President, was also a composter. He wrote about the value of compost and even built a manure shed to store that material on his farm. Thomas Jefferson, another Founding Father and President, was also a composter. He and George Washington frequently corresponded about farming matters. Jefferson noticed that newly cleared land didn’t require fertilization due to its natural fertility. Initially, it was cheaper to obtain and clear new land but, after years of intensive cultivation, fertilizing became a necessity. Jefferson also practiced putting cattle in his fields to take advantage of their manure in restoring the fertility of his fields. I wonder if today’s elected officials would care to discuss the application of manure to fields. 1800 – 1900 As the descendants of the early colonists and other immigrants moved Westward, they came upon land that was naturally fertile due to the natural process of decomposition of plant and animal remains. Most felt there was little need for fertilization and composting. The opposite became true as the soil was depleted of its natural fertility. In 1840, German chemist Justus Von Liebig published his theory that plants only needed nutrients that were water soluble, such as Nitrogen, Phosphorous and Potassium. This theory, along with the declining productivity of soils caused a boom in chemical fertilizers, discarding the value of humus and organic matter in soil. It would take 100 years for that theory to be dispelled by the likes of Sir Albert Howard and others. 1900 - 1930 The early 20th century was a time of great change. The growing population and the migration from the farm to cities created a greater demand upon food producers. Governments and experts of the day encouraged the use of synthetic fertilizers to boost food production. Not enough was known about the ultimate damage that the use of these synthetic fertilizers would do to the soil. World War I took many able-bodied men from the farms to fight the war. This increased the demands on the remaining farmers to produce more food for the armies of the world. Accordingly, those governments encouraged even more food production and supported increased usage of synthetic fertilizers. After the war, arms manufacturers needed a market for the nitrogen they had previously used to produce explosives. This nitrogen was shifted to the fertilizer market and used to help feed the growing urban population. Beginning in 1905, Sir Albert Howard worked as an agronomist in India conducting research on farming practices and composting on the Indian sub- continent. The knowledge he gained regarding composting has been the foundation for current use and understanding of the art and science of composting. Rudolph Steiner, an Austrian philosopher, began developing his theories on Biodynamic Agriculture in 1924. His methods included composting as well as other organic farming methods. Other aspects of Biodynamic Agriculture include treating the farm as a total organism and reliance on astrological planting and harvesting. 1930 – Present During the 1930’s, the United States suffered through the Dust Bowl. There were a number of causes for the Dust Bowl, including poor farming practices as well as a record drought. One of the big problems was the massive loss of topsoil. This experience caused significant research to be conducted into better farming practices and soil management. Meanwhile, on the other side of the globe, Sir Albert Howard was finalizing his research into farming practices in India. One part of his work was to develop the Indore method of composting, named for the Indore region of India. This composting method built upon the ancient practice of returning plant and animal (including human) waste to the soil. At the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, George Washington Carver was conducting his research into soil fertility and farming practices. Carver encouraged farmers to save money and labor by making their own fertilizer (compost). In England, Lady Eve Balfour was researching and developing organic farming and gardening methods including composting. In the 1940’s, J. I. Rodale was researching and promoting the organic method in the United States. World War II sent another generation off to war. It also required an increase in food production to feed the soldiers and war workers at home. When peace finally came, the arms manufacturers again needed an outlet for the nitrogen they had become so adept at producing. Synthetic fertilizers filled that bill and farmers were encouraged to use the new fertilizers. Another part of this transition was that the use of motorized farm equipment meant that fewer horses and oxen were needed. Fewer animals meant less manure to be composted. Agricultural research continues through to the present as has a growing public interest in organic farming and gardening. Soil health has been linked with plant and human health. There have also been mounting concerns regarding solid waste, sewage sludge, bio-solids, and landfill costs. Organic solid waste and sewage sludge in landfills pollute the environment with greenhouse gases, primarily methane, which is more than 20 times as damaging to the atmosphere as CO2. Landfills also present financial challenges. Regulatory compliance and land for landfill expansion is becoming more and more expensive.
Recommended publications
  • Bokashi! 5/12/2014 Bokashi Fermentation Starter for Recycling Food Waste
    bokashi! 5/12/2014 Bokashi fermentation starter for recycling food waste Home Use Instructions The bokashi* is usually a dry organic material that can be made with different ingredients for different uses. The following is one standard ingredients used to make bokashi (U.S. version). Ingredients: Wheat Bran**, Blackstrap Molasses, EM•1 Microbial Inoculant†, Water (ingredients are mixed, fermented and dried). Keep dry. The bokashi can be made at home or garden, or provided by a garden, or it can be purchased ready-to-use. * For more about bokashi and other uses, see page 5. ** Other organic materials can be used instead of wheat bran to house the microorganisms, including rice bran, dried leaves, dry coffee husk/chaff, dried brewery waste, saw dust/wood shavings (walnut, teak, pine —other kinds of wood may be difficult to properly ferment into bokashi), etc. † In the U.S., EM•1 Microbial Inoculant or EM•1 Waste Treatment can be used to make bokashi. The bokashi method of recycling food waste is a two-step process of converting all types of food waste back into the soil. Step 1: "pickle" or ferment the food waste to prepare it for Step 2: adding to soil. The method uses bokashi to sprinkle on food waste in an air-tight container in order so that the food waste will ferment instead of rot. Note. You do not need to use bokashi if you ferment only fruit and vegetable food scraps. However, it may take time to ferment, and it may not be consistent. By adding bokashi, you can more consistently get the food waste to ferment and to ferment more quickly, and also all food waste can then be recycled, including meats, dairy, bones, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • It Starts with the Soil and Organic Agriculture Can Help1
    It Starts with the Soil and Organic Agriculture can Help1 Frederick Kirschenmann We must look at our present civilization as a whole and realize once and for all the great principle that the activities of homo sapiens, which have created the machine age in which we are now living, are based on a very insecure basis---the surplus food made available by the plunder of the stores of soil fertility which are not ours but the property of generations yet to come. ---Sir Albert Howard, The Soil and Health (1947) The foundation of modern science has deep roots in Western culture, reaching back to the 16th and 17th centuries. The central dogma underlying this science is rooted in the mathematics-based science of Rene Descartes. In his Meditations published in 1641, Descartes asserted that one could and must separate the thinking mind (or subject) from the material world (or object). By doing so, he believed one could establish objective certainty, wholly determinable, and free of any subjective bias. It was on this basis that Descartes reduced material reality to mechanical functions. This perspective formed the basis of the “disinterested” sciences and eventually yielded the knowledge, technologies and culture that made industrial science and ultimately industrial agriculture possible. This philosophy of science also shaped our perceptions of soil within modern agriculture. Descartes’ view of the world as a collection of mechanistic fragments was part of an emerging school of thought. Francis Bacon, a contemporary who espoused this same philosophy, promoted the idea that nature must be controlled and manipulated for the exclusive benefit of humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodynamic Agriculture
    Biodynamic Agriculture Economic Botany Dr. Uma Garimella University of Central Arkansas April 19, 2007 Sustainable Agriculture • Movement that emerged in the 1970’s • Serves to address the Environmental and Social concerns brought on by modern, industrial agriculture • Three Main Goals: – Environmental Stewardship – Farm Profitability – Prosperous Farming Communities Sustainable Agriculture Can be divided into three branches: 1. Organic 2. Biodynamic 3. Indore Process Organic • An ecological production management system that promotes and enhances: – Biodiversity – Biological cycles – Soil biological activity • Based on minimal use of off-farm inputs and on management practices that - restore, maintain & enhance ecological harmony. Organic Agriculture production without the use of synthetic chemicals such as fertilizers, pesticides, and antibiotics. Biodynamic • Incorporates the beneficial use of the cosmic energies into the cultivation of plants. • Systematic inputs of mineral, plant and animal nutrient to the field. • Cultivation practices are carried out according to the biodynamic calendar. One of the biodynamic farming practices is to bury cow horns filled with organic cow manure. After being underground for about five months, the compost is removed and made into a tea, which is spread around vineyards and farms. Indore Process • Manufacture of humus from vegetable & animal waste • Developed at the Institute of Plant Industry in Indore, India & brought to “us” by Sir Albert Howard • Determined the maintenance of soil fertility is the real basis of health and of resistance to disease. Various parasites were found to be only secondary matters: their activities resulted from the breakdown of a complex biological system -- the soil in its relation to the plant and to the animal -- due to improper methods of agriculture, an impoverished soil, or to a combination of both.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Revolutionary a Memoir of the Movement for Real Food, Planetary Healing, and Human Liberation
    Organic Revolutionary a memoir of the Movement for Real Food, planetary healING, and human liberation GRACE GERSHUNY 12 Organic Revolutionary markets in 1994, when USDA began to track them, to 8,268 in 2014. There is even a weekly farmers market held in the USDA parking lot in Washington, DC.2 The Roots of the True Organic Vision To see how this vision grew into the modern organic movement it may be helpful to review American and European history with this topic in mind. While I read many of the ‘classics’ of organic thought during my early years in Vermont, I didn’t fit the pieces together until my involve- ment deepened and I began teaching about the subject. The excursion that follows offers my own interpretation and selection of events and actors that has helped me to place my own experience in its historical context. Many people assume that the organic movement had its start with Rachel Carson and the environmental movement of the sixties that inspired farmers to “just say no” to pesticides. The activist uprisings of the 1960s certainly gave rise to the modern organic movement, but the birth of what became known as organic farming really occurred in response to the first widespread use of synthetic fertilizers in the early part of the 20th century. Most of the foundational organic innovators came from Europe, where concerns about the effects of using synthesized chemicals to fertilize crops sprouted a short time after they started being promoted. Around the end of World War I the munitions manufacturers found themselves with large stockpiles of explosives on hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Horticulture Application Manual 2010H
    EM AGRITON SYSTEM Horticulture Manual Working Together For a Sustainable Profitable Farm www.effectivemicro-organisms.co.uk Index Application manual - EM & Horticulture a biological approach 3 Instructions for usage of Effective Micro-organisms (EM-1®) 5 EM products that can be used in horticulture. 6 Grow Best fertiliser 7 Edasil Clay Minerals 9 Ostrea Crushed Sea Shells 10 Vulkamin rock dust Instructions for usage of Effective Micro-organisms (EM-1®) 13 Instructions for using an airlock with cork. 15 Instructions for using the EM fermentation tanks. !!! CULTIVATION 16 The EM System for glasshouse horticulture. 17 The EM System for the container cultivation industry. 18 The importance of pH-testing. 20 Plant Nursery wanting to change to biological cultivation. 21 The EM System for hydro culture with UVC disinfectors. 22 The EM System for tree cultivation and perennials. 23 Uses for EM-A in Chrysanthemum culture. 24 The EM System for nurseries cultivating plant cuttings. 25 The EM System for fruit trees. 26 Strawberry cultivation ( ground crops ) !!! COMPOSTING & GRASS 27 Fermentation of leaf waste. 28 Making organic compost (bokashi) in a trench silo. 29 The EM System for golf courses. Instructions for usage of Effective Micro-organisms (EM-1®) Preparation and application. EM (abbreviation) for Effective Micro-organisms contains many different strains of micro- organisms that have been collected from natural sources and grown using a specific technical method. This method and specific unique mixture have been developed by Professor Higa from the University of Ryukyus in Okinawa, Japan. The main strains of micro-organisms in EM are from five major micro-organism groups; lactic acid bacteria, photosynthesising bacteria, yeasts, fungi and actinomycetes.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Bokashi Bucket” Kitchen Waste Recycling System
    The “Bokashi bucket” kitchen waste recycling system The Bokashi food waste collection system was implemented in 2007 with over 40 units placed around buildings on the Wagga campus and continues to grow in popularity. DFMs idea behind this waste system was to collect and divert compostable food wastes away from the main stream garbage disposal which is sent to land fill. Instead, the compostable waste is recycled via composting with other organic wastes from around the campus. Over 100kg of staff room food waste is collected weekly from around the campus via the Bokashi bucket system and then mixed with other organic wastes from the winery, equine centre, catering and grounds. Around 6 tons of pasteurized products are made weekly at the University. Staff and at this stage some student residents have been given the opportunity to do there bit for the environment and divert their food wastes away from landfill. Collecting and processing food wastes may not sound a glamorous task but as the Uni is a learning institution we should lead by example and work toward zero waste sent to land fill. DFM appreciates the help given in collecting food waste via the Bokashi collection, especially the persons maintaining the units. The Bokashi units do not produce any odours and the liquid available is a high quality liquid fertilizer. If you have any questions regarding the collection and processing of organics at the University or would like to try the system in your building please contact DFM via: • The BEIMS maintenance request portal http://www.csu.edu.au/division/facilitiesm/services/maintenance.htm or • William Pollack [email protected] or • Call the DFM service desk on extension 32279.
    [Show full text]
  • Star-And-Furrow-110.Pdf
    JOURNAL OF THE BIODYNAMIC AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION ■ ISSUE NO: 110 ■ WINTER 2009 ■ ISSN NO: 1472-4634 ■ £4.50 INTERVIEW WITH ALAN BROCKMAN SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ON A BIODYNAMIC FARM A NEW APPROACH TO MILLING AND BAKING GARDEN PLANNING AT PISHWANTON Demeter Certifi cation STAR & FURROW The Association owns and administers the Journal of the Biodynamic Agricultural Association Demeter Certifi cation Mark that is used by Published twice yearly biodynamic producers in the UK to guaran- Issue Number 110 - Winter 2009 THE BIODYNAMIC tee to consumers that internationally recog- ISSN 1472-4634 AGRICULTURAL nised biodynamic production standards are ASSOCIATION (BDAA) being followed. These standards cover both production and processing and apply in more STAR & FURROW is the membership magazine The Association exists in order to sup- than forty countries. They are equivalent to of The Biodynamic Agricultural Association port, promote and develop the biodynamic or higher than basic organic standards. The (BDAA). It is issued free to members. approach to farming, gardening and forestry. Demeter scheme is recognised in the UK as Non members can also purchase Star and This unique form of organic husbandry is Organic Certifi cation UK6. Furrow. For two copies per annum the rates are: inspired by the research of Rudolf Steiner UK £11.00 including postage (1861-1925) and is founded on a holistic and Apprentice Training Europe (airmail) £13.00 spiritual understanding of nature and the A two year practical apprentice training Rest of the World (airmail) £16.00 human being. course is offered in biodynamic agriculture and horticulture. Apprentices work in ex- Editor: Richard Swann, Contact via the BDAA The Association tries to keep abreast of change for board and lodging on established Offi ce or E-mail: [email protected] developments in science, nutrition, education, biodynamic farms and gardens and receive Design & layout: Dave Thorp of ‘The Workshop’ health and social reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditioning Biochar
    Conditioning Biochar Dan Hettinger Living Web Farms Biochars are: Granular and Highly porous. Highly “Recalcitrant”: Resists microbial degradation (potentially non-biodegradable for hundreds of years) Highly Adsorptive Generally alkaline, some more than others Usually crushed and screened from ¼” to dust Nutrients, Microbes, and Substrates ● Charging (adding nutrients) to biochar ● Inoculating (adding microbes) to biochar ● Substrate: Nutrients stick to the walls of biochar, Encouraging microbes to “move in” Source: IBI (Biochar-International.org) Why Bother? ● Adsorptive biochar will likely ‘suck in’ soil’s nutrients when applied raw. ● Conditioning char allows you to hit the ground running on crop production, ‘jump-start’ the ‘soil food web’, and restore damaged soils. ● Biochar can be a vehicle for custom blends of microbes and microbial foods catered towards specific plant needs Important to note: Nature will correct itself. If raw biochar is applied to living soils with adequate organic matter, Eventually it will recover. If biochar is conditioned with expensive ‘designer microbes’, nature will likely outcompete. Inclusion of ‘Indigenous Microbes’ may prove a more effective strategy Remembering the Soil Food Web ● Emphasizes complex relationships of give and take among organisms in soil. ● Diversity of microbes is key to healthy soil that is resilient to changes in moisture, nutrients, pH, etc. ● Biochar aids diversity by moderating stressful conditions and creating a stable habitat for microbes ● Drought, excessive rain ● Nutrient over/under application ● Tillage/physical disruption Guidelines for Conditioning Biochar ● Consider a Nutrient source AND a Microbial inoculant ● Nutrient and Microbe diversity is preferred ● Char should be wetted: encourage adsorption, resist floating ● Consider pH. Some chars may have high ash content and may benefit from rinsing with rain water or soaking in organic acids.
    [Show full text]
  • Fermentation Versus Composting
    Fermentation versus composting Research by: Feed Innovation Services BV, Wageningen, The Netherlands For: EM Agriton BV, Noordwolde (Friesland), The Netherlands 2013 Fermentation versus composting Feed Innovation Services BV Generaal Foulkesweg 72 6703 BW Wageningen T: 0317 465 570 F: 0317 410 773 info@feed‐innovation.com www.feed‐innovation.com BTW: NL 0071.53.582.B.01 KVK: 17086023 ‐ Bankgegevens ‐ ING Bank, Helmond Rek. nr. 66.21.43.310 BIC: INGBNL2A Iban: NL89 INGB 0662 1433 10 Authors: Anke Hitman BSc Klaas Bos PhD Marlou Bosch PhD Arjan van der Kolk MSc Fermentation versus composting Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Materials and methods .................................................................................................................................. 5 3 Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Temperature .......................................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Weight ................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Composition..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodynamic Agriculture.Pdf
    CHAPTER-2 BIODYNAMIC AGRICULTURE Biodynamic agriculture is a form of alternative agriculture very similar to organic farming, but it includes various esoteric concepts drawn from the ideas of Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925). Initially developed in 1924, it was the first of the organic agriculture movements. It treats soil fertility, plant growth, and livestock care as ecologically interrelated tasks, emphasizing spiritual and mystical perspectives. Biodynamic has much in common with other organic approaches – it emphasizes the use of manures and composts and excludes the use of artificial chemicals on soil and plants. Methods unique to the biodynamic approach include its treatment of animals, crops, and soil as a single system, an emphasis from its beginnings on local production and distribution systems, its use of traditional and development of new local breeds and varieties. Some methods use an astrological sowing and planting calendar. Biodynamic agriculture uses various herbal and mineral additives for compost additives and field sprays; these are prepared using methods that are more akin to sympathetic magic than agronomy, such as burying ground quartz stuffed into the horn of a cow, which are said to harvest "cosmic forces in the soil." As of 2016 biodynamic techniques were used on 161,074 hectares in 60 countries. Germany accounts for 45% of the global total; the remainder average 1750 ha per country. Biodynamic methods of cultivating grapevines have been taken up by several notable vineyards. There are certification agencies for biodynamic products, most of which are members of the international biodynamic standards group Demeter International. No difference in beneficial outcomes has been scientifically established between certified biodynamic agricultural techniques and similar organic and integrated farming practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Effect of Various Composting Methods with and Without Biochar on Soil Fertility and Maize Growth
    Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science ISSN: 0365-0340 (Print) 1476-3567 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gags20 Nutrient effect of various composting methods with and without biochar on soil fertility and maize growth Naba Raj Pandit, Hans Peter Schmidt, Jan Mulder, Sarah E Hale, Olivier Husson & Gerard Cornelissen To cite this article: Naba Raj Pandit, Hans Peter Schmidt, Jan Mulder, Sarah E Hale, Olivier Husson & Gerard Cornelissen (2020) Nutrient effect of various composting methods with and without biochar on soil fertility and maize growth, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 66:2, 250-265, DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2019.1610168 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1610168 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa Published online: 05 May 2019. UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1629 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 3 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=gags20 ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE 2020, VOL. 66, NO. 2, 250–265 https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1610168 Nutrient effect of various composting methods with and without biochar on soil fertility and maize growth Naba Raj Pandita,b,c, Hans Peter Schmidtd, Jan Mulderb, Sarah E Halea, Olivier Hussone,f,g and Gerard Cornelissena,b aDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Oslo, Norway; bFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management (MINA), Norwegian University of Life sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway; cAgroforestry, Nepal Agroforestry Foundation (NAF), Koteshwor, Nepal; dCarbon Strategies, Ithaka Institute for Carbon Strategies, Arbaz, Switzerland; eCIRAD, UPR AIDA, Montpellier, France; fAIDA, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Certifying Spirituality Biodynamics in America- Sarah Olsen MAFS Thesis
    chatham F ALK SCHOOL OF SUST AINABILITY & ENVIRONMENT Master of Arts in Food Studies The Undersigned Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis of Sarah Olsen on April 26, 2019 "Certifying Spirituality: Biodynamics in America" Nadine Lehrer, Ph.D., Chair Assistant Professor, Food Studies, Chatham University Frederick Kirschenmann Distinguished Fellow, Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Falk School of Sustainability as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Food Studies Certifying Spirituality: Biodynamics in America A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Food Studies Chatham University Sarah Olsen May 2019 Contents 1. Introduction -1 1.1 Background 2. Literature Review - 5 2.1 Spirituality and Agriculture - 5 2.2 History and Practice of Biodynamics - 12 2.3 Organics in the U.S. - 21 3. Methods - 23 4. Results- 35 4.1 Conference Participant Observation -35 4.1 Survey Results- 40 5. Conclusion - 59 6. Works Cited- 66 7. Appendix A- 68 Certifying Spirituality: Biodynamics in America Introduction: First described by Rudolf Steiner in a series of lectures in 1924, biodynamics is an agri- cultural model that focuses on the farm as an organism that can be affected, both positively and negatively, by the farmers interacting with the spiritual (non-physical) world. In other words, ac- cording to Steiner, the ways in which a farmer tends his/her plants and animals in relation to planetary phases and movements, and his/her treatment of spiritual creatures, all influence physi- cal properties of the earth and therefore the functioning of his/her farm (Steiner, 1993).
    [Show full text]