IMPACT September 2019 PDF 11 Mb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IMPACT September 2019 PDF 11 Mb IMPACTTHE MAGAZINE OF THE AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING ATSE.ORG.AU NUMBER 209 | SEPTEMBER 2019 A picture of health How health technology is transforming our lives Contents Annual Academy Oration 16 Cover photo of Dr Erica Smyth & New Fellows Welcome AO FTSE by Frances Andrijich IMPACT is the biannual magazine of the Australian Friday 29 November 2019 Academy of Technology and Engineering. PUBLISHER Australian Academy of Technology and Engineering ADDRESS Level 6, 436 St Kilda Road 24 Melbourne VIC 3004 20 POSTAL ADDRESS JOIN US GPO Box 4055 FEATURES Melbourne VIC 3001 as we welcome more than two dozen 16 Making high quality health-care leaders from across industry, government TELEPHONE accessible to all and academia as Fellows of the Academy. +61 3 9864 0900 By Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw EMAIL The event includes the annual Oration, [email protected] 19 3D vision of cancer research delivered by a Fellow of global standing. CEO Dr Margaret Hartley FTSE 20 Diabetes progress – it’s finger-pricking good EDITOR By Erica Smyth Benjamin Hickey 28 DESIGN 23 Body clock linked to a healthy ticker Elizabeth Geddes By Benjamin Hickey REGULARS ISSN 1326-8708 (print) 24 Skin in the game 4 From the President’s Desk 2207-8223 (electronic) Interview with Tony Weiss 6 Policy PRINT POST Publication number 28 Improving the lives of 12 Academy News 100007367 Australians with dementia COPYRIGHT By Greg Tegart and Anne Livingstone 36 STEM Education © Australian Academy of Technology and Engineering 31 Why I mentor 38 Women in STEM By Academy Fellows DOWNLOAD AS A PDF 46 Technology atse.org.au 34 Precision medicine 51 Engineering By Alan Trounson Pullman on the Park 56 Fellows 40 The Accidental Engineer 192 Wellington Parade Interview with Maria Skyllas-Kazacos 63 Obituaries Melbourne VIC 3002 70 What we’re reading The Academy acknowledges 46 Apollo 11 carried my scientific [email protected] the Traditional Owners of the land experiments to the moon, on which we meet and work. 73 Spotlight We pay our respects to Elders, but so what? past, present and emerging. By Brian O’Brien 52 Safety by design By Mark Hoffman IMPACT SEP—19 3 FROM THE PRESIDENT’S DESK The cost of monitoring devices (eg, single Moving on, assume that we have EHRs that are lead ECGs) has come down dramatically populated with a complete and accurate set By Hugh Bradlow while at the same time their accuracy has of endogenous, genomic and exogenous data. been enhanced. Our ability to collect and Goodness knows how long it will take us to analyse data using new machine learning get there but what could we achieve? The short answer is a transformation of healthcare. algorithms has improved out of sight. Consider the use of machine learning to predict However, “the fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our adverse health events before they occur. In Technology & data stars” but in our data. Machine learning has the hype around machine learning it is usually two preconditions, namely that you collect all forgotten that it is just pattern recognition. If relevant data and that the data is accurate. In you train a neural network with enough patterns, terms of collecting relevant data, work by IBM eventually it will recognise variants of those has indicated that endogenous data (the data patterns with a high probability. So if you are in healthcare arising inside the medical system – pathology able to feed data about an individual (their reports, doctors’ notes, imaging, etc) will influence ECG, their food consumption, exercise, travel, only 10 per cent of the outcomes. Even if we add etc) continuously into a big data environment In theory the use of technology, genomics data to the endogenous data, the it is conceivable that patterns will emerge impact on outcomes rises only by 30 per cent. that enable the pre-conditions for events to specifically the Internet of be recognised before the actual event (eg, a The remaining 60 per cent of outcomes are heart attack) occurs. Things (IoT), should transform influenced by exogenous data – the information healthcare: it should enable about our lifestyles which is not collected by the My favourite scenario is that you are happily medical system. Examples of such exogenous going about your business when an ambulance continuous (instead of data are many but include diet, exercise, appears and carts you off to hospital even though episodic) monitoring of chronic location and travel, human interactions and you are protesting that you feel fine. Seems pretty other considerations. invasive doesn’t it? – but it beats actually having conditions, prediction of adverse a heart attack because if not treated within events, and improved diagnosis. Even if we could determine which data we must 12 hours the heart damage is irreversible. collect, our ability to assemble that data into a In practice however, these format accessible to physicians and researchers There is another consideration in having access to benefits are yet to materialise is constrained by many factors. While the country complete and accurate data, namely healthcare is moving glacially towards a consolidated provider performance. It is well known that the (with some notable exceptions Electronic Health Record (EHR), as individuals medical system regards healthcare as a free in the imaging space). we collect very little of the exogenous data. For market and doctors are not constrained from example, how many people keep track of their charging anything the market will bear, with the daily food intake? result that charges vary by an order of magnitude Why is that? depending on the provider. In a normal free Furthermore, even for the few that do collect such market the consumer can also make a judgement data, the plethora of systems and formats used on the value of the product being provided but to do so do not encourage sharing. Finally, privacy in medicine no such data is available to the considerations quite rightly create significant patient. Even if data is available (eg, success rate (but not insuperable) barriers to data collection of procedures performed) the providers have and sharing. As an example, consider the plausible ways of rationalising their differences discussion about the change in approach to in outcomes – the patient was more difficult, the Australia’s My Health Record from “opt in” to “opt hospital nursing staff was not up to scratch, key out”. Before “opt out” the EHR was barely used. personnel were not available that day, etc. Returning to the 10 per cent of outcomes that Now consider what we could do if we had could be influenced by comprehensive EHRs, accurate data on all the relevant variables: assuming the collection of endogenous data patient data (medical history, activity history, is complete, accuracy is still an issue. Clinical genome, etc); practitioner data (procedure Decision Support (CDS) systems, often based on outcomes, qualifications, professional history, Artificial Intelligence, should be able to assist activity history, food history, etc); data about doctors in avoiding medical errors, determining other staff involved in the treatment (nurses, the optimum treatment for a specific patient’s anaesthetists, etc); hospital data (history, staffing condition, and identifying the critical pathology levels, etc); environmental data (weather, traffic, tests that should be conducted. However, they etc) and so on. are dependent on the data supplied to them Conceivably it would be possible to pick a pattern via the electronic health record system. in an individual healthcare provider’s performance Professor Hugh Bradlow – effectively define a “figure of merit” for the Research has shown that this data has a FTSE ability of that doctor – which would then enable “half-life” of a mere four months due to rapidly Hugh Bradlow is the President patients to determine whether it was worth changing treatment regimes and is often wildly of the Australian Academy of paying extra for that person. I have no idea what Technology and Engineering. inaccurate due to poor record-keeping by a complete data set would like (I have suggested You can hear more of his thoughts physicians. As a result, doctors either ignore or some of the parameters above) nor whether there on Big Data and healthcare override the CDS systems, making them of little in a podcast available on the is an actual pattern that could be picked out for value. This is not a technology issue – it is a human Academy’s website. a given practitioner but I do know that this is an behaviour issue making it much harder, but not active area of research and we should find out impossible, to fix. However, until the health system in the next decade. atse.org.au recognises that the EHR is just the beginning and that they need to tackle the quality, as well as In summary, technology and data have a huge completeness of the data that is used to populate role to play in healthcare. However, we are just at the EHR, progress will be slow. The USA is starting the very beginning of a long and complex journey to tackle these types of problem with their shift which will be more governed by human behaviour to outcomes-based health payments. issues than technology. 4 IMPACT SEP—19 IMPACT SEP—19 5 TRANSPORT REPORT TRANSPORT POLICY POLICY By Kathryn Fagg and Drew Clarke Car Shifting 82% gears Preparing for a transport revolution The first petrol engine car New technologies are emerging in the areas For example, inadequate planning, population the uptake of low and zero emissions vehicles Shifting Gears — Preparing for a of digital and data, communications, sensing growth and the spread of urban centres could and their increased use in government and Transport Revolution was published in Australia hit the streets and spatial, and energy.
Recommended publications
  • Major Incidents Report 2018–19 the Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience (AIDR) Is a Attribution Disaster Resilience Knowledge Centre
    Department of Home Affairs Major Incidents Report 2018–19 The Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience (AIDR) is a Attribution disaster resilience knowledge centre. We develop, maintain and share knowledge and learning to support a disaster Where material from this publication is used for any purpose, resilient Australia. We work with government, communities, it is to be attributed to the developer as follows: Source: Major non-government organisations, not-for-profits, research Incidents Report 2018-19 (AIDR 2019). organisations, education partners and the private sector to enhance disaster resilience through innovative thinking, Contact professional development and knowledge sharing. Enquiries regarding the content, licence and any use of this AIDR is funded by the Australian Government Department of document are welcome at: Home Affairs through Emergency Management Australia. AIDR is supported by its partners: the Australian Government, the Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council 370 Albert St, East Melbourne VIC 3002 (AFAC), the Bushfire & Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Telephone: +61 (0)3 9419 2388 Centre and Australian Red Cross. Email: [email protected] Published by the Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience on behalf of Emergency Management Australia, Australian Disclaimer Government Department of Home Affairs. The Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience, in consultation © Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience 2019 with subject matter
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Regulation Overhaul After Opal Tower Strife
    Construction regulation overhaul after Opal Tower strife Opal Tower apartment owner Andrew Neverly yesterday. Picture: Hollie Adams EXCLUSIVE SAM BUCKINGHAM-JONES JOURNALIST 12:00AM JANUARY 16, 2019 NSW’s $25 billion construction industry faces a regulatory overhaul following a damning report that found “a number of construction and design issues” with Sydney’s troubled Opal Tower. The Australian can reveal that the NSW minister in charge of regulation, Matt Kean, has told the peak body representing the nation’s building surveyors he is planning to introduce a “broader suite of reforms” in coming weeks. Mr Kean has also spoken to several other groups and key industry experts, and it is understood he plans to take the proposed reforms — which would regulate engineers, builders, architects and other building practitioners — to cabinet as early as this week. The move by the Better Regulation Minister to introduce sweeping reforms came as three independent experts released an interim report that found failures in the way the Opal Tower was designed and built. There were “significant rectification works” needed, Mark Hoffman from the University of NSW, said yesterday in a media conference alongside Planning Minister Anthony Roberts. “A number of design and construction issues have been identified,” said the report by Professor Hoffman, UNSW professor Stephen Foster and University of Newcastle professor John Carter. GRAPHIC: Problems that fell through the cracks More than 300 apartment owners and residents face further months of uncertainty despite suffering a “nightmare” experience for the past 22 days. On Christmas Eve, hundreds of people were evacuated from the 36-storey, 392-apartment tower at Sydney’s Olympic Park after they heard loud bangs and saw large cracks appear.
    [Show full text]
  • Mascot Towers - Evacuation Opal Tower - Background
    MASCOT TOWERS - EVACUATION OPAL TOWER - BACKGROUND On 14 June 2019, residents were evacuated from another The Opal Tower is a high-rise residential building located in building in Sydney, known as Mascot Towers due to Sydney Olympic Park, NSW. It consists of 36 storeys above structural defects. ground and 3 basement levels below ground. Construction of the building was completed in 2018 and occupation of the 392 On that day a letter was issued by the Building Manager residential apartments commenced in the second half of 2018. stating that “(t)he Building’s engineer has carried out a site inspection this afternoon regarding cracking in the transfer On Christmas Eve 2018, residents of the Opal Tower reported slab beams supporting the primary building corner” and loud noises, including a loud “bang”, associated with the raised concerns for the safety of residents. structure of the building. Early investigations of the source of these loud noises identified cracks in a load-bearing panel on Investigations are being undertaken as to the cause of the Level 10 of the building. Further investigations revealed further cracking in Mascot Towers, however concerns have been cracking of the hob beam supporting the cracked load-bearing expressed that this is another indication similar to Opal panel and other cracked concrete structural members at Level Tower that reform is needed in the regulatory system. The 4 of the building. Mascot Towers were built in 2008, so there are also concerns that they do not fall within the statutory warranty Due to safety concerns, residents of the building were scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • EA Matters April 2019 Edition
    EA Matters April 2019 Edition EA Matters Serving our members and the wider community April 2019 Edition Welcome to EA Matters – a newsletter aimed at keeping our volunteers in touch with EA and your chance to share best practice, lessons learned and ideas on how we can better serve our members and the wider community. Trish White Peter McIntyre National President CEO Welcome to the first edition of EA Matters Our ‘case study’ focus falls on volunteers’ work in this, our centenary year. in Queensland in the wake of recent floods. As we look back with pride to the achievements of our As always, we also share some of EA’s successes profession over the past 100 years, we acknowledge in the media and our public advocacy as the our volunteers for all they have done in the past – voice of the profession with government. and all you continue to do today. Thank you! In this issue, we explore some of the plans for this very special year. Trish White Peter McIntyre [email protected] [email protected] THIS ISSUE Student and World Engineers graduate Highlights of Update from the Convention engagement our advocacy EA Board EA Matters April 2019 Edition Ask EA In each edition of EA Matters engineering workforce planning the Public Affairs team we answer one or two questions in the face of cyclical demand. and Chair of the Transport from Office Bearers. Australia Society, testified We want to collaborate more with before the Australian House Please submit your questions via: local government to understand the of Representatives Standing surveymonkey.com/r/askEA sector’s needs for engineers and Committee on Infrastructure, help to plan ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaky Foundations: the National Crisis in Construction
    The National crisis in construction EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Australia’s construction industry has reached crisis point. From cracking apartment buildings to massive cost overruns in public infrastructure, there is not one part of the sector that isn’t failing in some way. THE economic costs of failure are piling up. In the The causes of these failures, though similarly short-term, we are seeing professional insurance multitudinal, have one common underlying thread: the fees skyrocket, threatening a downturn in one of the systematic weakening of government as the protector economy’s leading sectors, as well as general cost of public interest in an industry that is riddled with blow-out and delays that impeded the level of activity asymmetries, informational and financial. The major and decelerate the productivity gains that flow from forms of this are: infrastructure investment. In the medium term there will § Failure to adequately enforce existing building be the costs of remediation, estimated to be $6.2 billion standards or ensure they keep pace with evolving and ultimately a loss of confidence and therefore value in building practices. the nation’s biggest asset class. § Loss of public sector skills and capability leading to poor project scoping and design as well as the This is a crisis with a very human face, with dire financial challenges for the private sector in dealing with an consequences, given that for most people, property is uninformed purchaser. the biggest investment they make in their lives. § Outsourcing of building approvals resulting in increased conflicts of interest and lack of oversight. The scale of failures in the construction industry are staggering.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Proptech Startups to Watch in 2020
    Six proptech startups to watch in 2020 Larry SchlesingerReporter Jan 14, 2020 — 10.56am The demise of two global players marked a reality check for the fast-growing property disruption game in 2019. In May, UK hybrid estate agency Purplebricks quit Australia after a disastrous two-and-a-half years where it racked up massive losses, numerous scandals and where its market value on the London Stock Exchange plummeted. Investor appetite for proptech has increased in Australia. The fallout claimed founder Michael Bruce and was followed soon after by the closure of Purplebricks' American business as the company licked its wounds and retreated to its UK base. A few months later came the astounding fall from grace of co-working giant WeWork, with its September 30 IPO canned, its $US47 billion ($68.2 billion) valuation slashed to a fraction of that value and a bailout from Japanese backer Softbank required to save it from total collapse. In Australia, WeWork halted its expansion plans, as exclusively revealed by The Australian Financial Review. Despite these failures, local success achieved by the likes of hotel booking tech company Siteminder and Airbnb property management platform MadeComfy has lifted investor appetite for proptech, with money pouring into funding rounds for the next wave of start-ups hoping to steal a bigger share of the property pie. Here are some to keep an eye on in 2020: Bricklet Both Mirvac and Stockland have bought minority stakes in the fractional ownership platform targeted at more sophisticated investors than the more established BrickX platform. Not only have the ASX heavyweights acquired equity stakes in Bricklet, but they intend to list properties for sale on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society Of
    Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 2018 Volume 151 Part 2 Numbers 469 & 470 for the encoucagementof studies and investigations in Science Art I itcratuie and Philosophy...” The Royal Society of New South Wales Office Bearers for 2018 Patron His Excellency General The Honourable David Hurley AC DSC (Ret’d) Governor of New South Wales President Prof. Ian Sloan AO FRSN PhD FAA Vice Presidents Em. Prof. David Brynn Hibbert AM FRSN PhD CChem FRSC FRACI Mr John Hardie FRSN BSc (Syd) FGS MACE Ms Judith Wheeldon AM FRSN BS (Wis) MEd (Syd) FACE Hon. Secretary (Ed.) Em. Prof. Robert Marks FRSN MEngSci ResCert PhD (Stan) Hon. Secretary (Gen.) Dr Herma Biittner FRSN Dr.rer.nat Hon. Treasurer Mr Richard Wilmott MRSN Hon. Librarian Dr Ragbir Bhathal FRSN PhD FRAS FSAAS Hon. Web Master A/Prof. Chris Bertram FRSN PhD Councillors Dr Erik W. Aslaksen FRSN MSc (ETH) PhD Dr Mohammad Choucair PhD MRSN Em. Prof. Robert Clancy FRSN PhD FRACP Dr Laurel Dyson BSc(Hons) BA(Hons) PhD MRSN Ms Margaret Gibson MRSN Dr Donald Hector AM FRSN BE(Chem) PhD FIChemE FIEAust FAICD Prof. Nalini Joshi AO FRSN PhD (Prin) FAAS The Hon. Virginia Judge FRSN Prof. E James Kehoe FRSN PhD Hon. Prof. Ian Wilkinson FRSN PhD Southern Highlands Ms Anne Wood FRSN Branch Representative Executive Office The Association Specialists Editorial Board Em. Prof. Robert Marks FRSN MEngSci ResCert MS PhD (Stan) — Hon. Editor Prof. Richard Banati FRSN MD PhD Prof. Michael Burton FRSN MA MMaths (Cantab) PhD (Edinb) FASA FAIP Dr Donald Hector AM FRSN BE(Chem) PhD (Syd) FIChemE FIEAust FAICD Em.
    [Show full text]
  • Opal Tower Investigation Final Report
    OPAL TOWER INVESTIGATION FINAL REPORT Independent Advice to NSW Minister for Planning and Housing 19 February 2019 Opal Tower Investigation – Final Report Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 1 TOR 1 – Causes of damage ....................................................................................................................... 1 TOR 2 – Making the Opal Tower safe for occupancy .................................................................... 1 TOR 3 – How to avoid this type of incident in the future ........................................................... 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Terms of Reference .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Building Structure ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Investigation Activities ................................................................................................................................... 4 Observed Damage ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Consequences of Damage .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Building Standards, Building Quality and Building Disputes First Report
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE Regulation of building standards, building quality and building disputes First report Report 4 November 2019 www.parliament.nsw.gov.au LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Public Accountability Committee Regulation of building standards, building quality and building disputes First report Ordered to be printed 13 November 2019 Report 4 - November 2019 i LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Regulation of building standards, building quality and building disputes New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Public Accountability Committee. Regulation of building standards, building quality and building disputes : first report / Public Accountability Committee [Sydney, N.S.W.] : the Committee, 2019. [xiv, 178] pages ; 30 cm. (Report no. 4 / Public Accountability Committee) “November 2019” Chair: David Shoebridge, MLC. ISBN 9781920788414 1. Construction industry—Law and legislation—New South Wales. 2. Building laws—New South Wales. 3. Building failures—Law and legislation—New South Wales. 4. Standards, Engineering—Quality control. 5. Building—Quality control. 6. Architects and builders—Quality control. I. Shoebridge, David. II. Title. III. Series: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Public Accountability Committee. Report ; no. 4 690.83709944 (DDC22) ii Report 4 - November 2019 PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE Table of contents Terms of reference vii Committee details viii Chair's foreword ix Recommendations xi Conduct of inquiry xiv
    [Show full text]
  • At the Frontier of Tomorrow's Medicine
    At the frontier of tomorrow’s medicine 1 | Stem Cells Australia Milestones in Australian stem cell research 1990s • Approval of drug to fight 1980s infection and support blood stem cell transplant based on Metcalf discovery (Amgen) • Australia pioneers IVF technology, 1960s first donor egg and frozen embryo pregnancies (Carl Wood & Alan Trounson) • Factors that control blood • Stem cells discovered in mouse brain cell development identified (Perry Bartlett) (Don Metcalf) • New methods to mobilise blood stem cells transforms bone marrow transplants (Chris Juttner & Luen Bik To; Don Metcalf & Uli Dührsen) • Factor that controls mouse embryonic stem cell growth identified(Nic Gough) What are stem cells? There are more than 200 different types of cells in the human body. Each of these has a specific job. For example, red blood cells carry oxygen. By contrast, stem cells are unspecialised and are capable of 1) making a copy of themselves, and 2) creating the more specialised cells needed to replace those lost to injury, disease and daily wear and tear. There are two main types of stem cells. Tissue stem cells are found in many of our organs but can usually only create cells of that organ. Pluripotent stem cells can be coaxed to form any cell type in the body. 2 | Stem Cells Australia 2010s • Stem cells grown on therapeutic contact lens restores sight in blinding corneal disease (Stephanie Watson & Nick Di Girolamo) • Stem Cells Australia – ARC Special Research 2000s Initiative – commences • New type of stem cell identified in the adult heart
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Housing Supply Myth
    The Australian housing supply myth Cameron K. Murray∗ February 14, 2020 Abstract Australia's expensive housing market is claimed to be primarily the result of a shortage of supply due to town planning constraints, leading to political pressure on councils and state governments to remove planning regulations, regardless of their planning merit. We argue that this supply story is a myth and provide evidence against three key elements of the myth. First, there has been a surplus of dwellings constructed compared to population demand, rather than a shortage. Second, planning approvals typically far exceed dwelling construction, implying that more approvals or changes to planning controls on the density and location of development cannot accelerate the rate of new housing supply. Third, large increases in the rate of housing supply would have small price effects relative to other fac- tors, like interest rates, and come with the opportunity cost of forgone alternative economic activities. Indeed, if the story were true, then property developers would be foolishly lob- bying for policy changes that reduce the price of their product and the value of the balance sheets, which mostly comprise undeveloped land. Keywords: Housing supply, Home prices, Planning, Housing policy. 1 Introduction In many capital cities in Australia there is a housing affordability crisis which needs to be addressed through increasing housing supply, planning reform and stamp duty taxation reform. Falling house prices are not correcting the pent-up demand and years of lack of supply. (UDIA, 2019) Economists and policymakers in Australia have argued that too few new homes are being built because of restrictive town planning regulations, leading to lower housing supply and higher home prices (Kendall & Tulip, 2018; Daley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th NSW Stem Cell Network Workshop
    19th NSW Stem Cell Network Workshop Innovating the Marketplace with Stem Cells Convention Centre Darling Harbour, Sydney 29th November 2013 19th NSW Stem Cell Network Workshop : Innovating the Marketplace with Stem Cells 19th NSW Stem Cell Network Workshop : Innovating the Marketplace with Stem Cells 3 WELCOME Welcome to the 19th Workshop of the NSW Stem Cell Network. This workshop is about recognising the strengths and weaknesses of stem cell research in Australia and coming up with solutions on how to build on these strengths and overcome the weaknesses to- wards a strong and innovative national stem cell industry. The holy grail of stem cell research is that cells can be produced for any tissue in the laboratory and then used for disease modelling, pharmaceutical discovery and testing or as a transplantation ther- apy for diseases. Blood stem cells are the gold standard for this and have proven a clinical success for decades. More recently the clinical relevance of other types of stem cells, such as those produced from skin or isolated from the limbus of the eye, are demonstrating therapeutic efficacy. The last 15 years also has seen an explosion of stem cell technologies, with human embryonic stem cells, fol- lowed by induced pluripotent stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells with their anti-inflammatory properties. This workshop aims to bring together industry leaders to discuss what the market wants from stem cells, how to strengthen the Australian stem cell industry through building commercial potential and how to keep Australia at the forefront of stem cell innovations. You will hear from industry leaders in stem cell research who have seen the inception and decay of the Australian Stem Cell Centre and how to use this knowledge towards future successes.
    [Show full text]