Dream Chaser Integrated Spacecraft and Pressure Suit Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

45th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2015-117 12-16 July 2015, Bellevue, Washington Dream Chaser® Integrated Spacecraft and Pressure Suit Design Kenneth J. Stroud1 Sierra Nevada Corporation, Louisville, CO, 80027 Shane E. Jacobs2 David Clark Company Incorporated, Worcester, MA, 01604 The new era of commercial human spaceflight offers the opportunity to develop new technologies while applying lessons learned from the past. The Dream Chaser spacecraft and the full pressure suit proposed for use by its crew members tie the past to the present in both spacecraft and pressure suit design, in order to maximize crew safety. Sierra Nevada Corporation’s (SNC) Dream Chaser spacecraft is a state-of-the-art reusable lifting-body vehicle that traces its heritage to NASA’s HL-20 lifting body spacecraft design. Due to its design, SNC’s Dream Chaser operates similar to the space shuttle, including the ability for crewmembers to bailout of the spacecraft if an atmospheric contingency is experienced. To protect against rapid cabin depressurization during ascent and entry, as well as the low atmospheric pressure during bailout, each Dream Chaser crewmember will wear a full pressure suit, along with other integrated crew survival equipment. The suit, designed by David Clark Company Incorporated, is a light-weight pressure suit specifically designed for Dream Chaser operations, with heritage in the Contingency Hypobaric Astronaut Protective Suit (CHAPS) and the S1034 pressure suit design that is currently flown by U-2 pilots. As part of maximizing crew safety, several lessons learned from the Space Shuttle Columbia accident and subsequent Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) report are incorporated into both the Dream Chaser spacecraft and pressure suit designs. These lessons learned include considerations for optimal integration of the suit, seat, survival equipment and cockpit, accommodations for extended visors-down time, and use of a conformal helmet providing significantly improved head protection. In addition, the Dream Chaser spacecraft design requires a vertical climb between the ingress hatch and the cockpit in the launch configuration, which is facilitated by pressure suit design features. Together, the integrated design and development of the Dream Chaser spacecraft and the pressure suit provide next generation human spaceflight capability and safety. Nomenclature AGL = above ground level +Gz = acceleration in the upward direction; “eyeballs down” in-lb = inch pounds MSL = mean sea level ppO2 = partial pressure of oxygen psia = pounds per square inch absolute psid = pounds per square inch differential I. Introduction N July 11, 2011, the Space Shuttle Atlantis landed at Kennedy Space Center, and the United States O relinquished its capability to fly astronauts into space. The U.S. currently has to rely on the Russian Soyuz space capsule to transport NASA astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS), at a cost of over $70 million per seat - more than triple the cost the Russians charged NASA before the end of the Space Shuttle Program in 2006. In order to reduce cost and end U.S. reliance on Russia for transporting American astronauts to space, NASA 1 Crew Systems IPT Lead, Dream Chaser Program, 315 CTC Blvd, Louisville, CO 80027 2 Softgoods Design Manager, Research and Development, 360 Franklin St. Worcester, MA 01604 © 2015 Sierra Nevada Corporation created the Commercial Crew Program (CCP) in 2010 with the goal of transporting crews aboard U.S. spacecraft to the ISS by 2017. At the same time, several corporate and privately-funded space programs have been in development, ranging from air-launched suborbital spacecraft to balloon systems and specialized pressure suits. As part of CCP, Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC) developed the Dream Chaser spacecraft to transport astronauts and cargo to the ISS. Dream Chaser is a reusable, optionally piloted, lifting body spacecraft that launches vertically on an Atlas V rocket and lands horizontally on a conventional runway. The winged design and vehicle operations of Dream Chaser are reminiscent of the space shuttle, from which several lessons have been learned and applied. To protect against a myriad of hazards, including a cabin depressurization during the mission, Dream Chaser crewmembers will wear full pressure suits, developed by David Clark Company Incorporated (DCCI). DCCI, a pioneer in aerospace crew protective equipment and the designer and manufacturer of the Model S1035 Advanced Crew Escape Suit (ACES)[1] (and precursor Model S1032 Launch Entry Suit and Model S1030A Ejection Escape Suit worn by shuttle crewmembers throughout the Figure 1. Model S1034 Pilots program) has been developing pressure suits for a number of commercial Protective Assembly space applications, including Red Bull Stratos[2]. DCCI has also developed the lightweight Contingency Hypobaric Astronaut Protective Suit (CHAPS) to address the specific and unique requirements of the commercial space market. The Dream Chaser Pressure Suit (DCPS) is based largely on lessons learned from the CHAPS, the ACES, the Red Bull Stratos suits, and the S1034 pressure suit design that is currently flown by U-2 pilots (Figure 1). Unique features from each of these suit systems have been identified and optimized for Dream Chaser applications. The DCPS represents the culmination of design lessons learned from high-altitude full pressure suits with bailout capability. Additionally, a strong focus has been placed on the integrated design of the DCPS with the Dream Chaser spacecraft, such that the suit is an integral component of the vehicle’s many subsystems to which the suit interfaces, including the seats, the life support system, displays and controls, and ingress and egress paths. This paper describes the overall process of developing and integrating the designs of the Dream Chaser spacecraft and pressure suit. To this point, this effort has included the definition of a spacecraft-suit architecture that includes lessons learned from other space flight and aircraft programs, and ingress and egress testing to validate the architecture and provide inputs into the detailed design for both spacecraft and suit. Detailed design has not been completed, and is currently on hold. II. Dream Chaser Operations The diverse crew activities onboard Dream Chaser, from pre-launch to post-flight as well as emergency scenarios, drive the need for a robust system to support the astronauts performing those tasks. Dream Chaser crew operations begin during ingress of the vehicle while it sits in the vertical position on the launch pad, where crewmembers must ingress a hatch on the dorsal side of the vehicle, and climb up into their seats while wearing pressure suits. Astronauts must also be able to exit on their own in an emergency. Dream Chaser ascent operations are automated, with astronauts monitoring vehicle trajectory and systems. Atmospheric entry operations are also Figure 2. Dream Chaser launch automated, with the optional ability for the pilot to manually land the vehicle in case of an anomaly. Similar to the space shuttle, Dream Chaser astronauts also have the ability to bail out of the aft hatch while wearing a parachute to land safety on the ground or into the ocean in an emergency. To protect against a loss of cabin pressure during ascent, astronauts wear pressure suits. © 2015 Sierra Nevada Corporation On orbit operations for Dream Chaser vary greatly depending on the mission. For a mission to transport crew to a space station, Dream Chaser operations would primarily be focused on rendezvous and docking, which would likely occur within one or two days of launch. Other missions could include free flight, where Dream Chaser operations are focused on scientific experiments or other mission tasks (robotics, servicing, observation, etc.) and may include different numbers of crewmembers on orbit for different durations. If a depressurization were to occur during a free flight orbital phase where crew are unsuited, astronauts would don their suits while preparing for deorbit and landing. Before return to Earth, astronauts again don pressure suits to protect against a potential loss of cabin pressure. Although the g-forces during entry in Dream Chaser are minimal (about +1.5 Gz), long-duration crewmembers could lose consciousness during the return to Earth without countermeasures because of their weakened cardiovascular system after living in microgravity for several months. To protect against loss of consciousness during entry, long-duration astronauts must be able to sufficiently recline or be recumbent during entry to ensure that the heart can adequately pump blood to the brain. The time from deorbit burn to landing is approximately 70 minutes, during which the Pilot monitors trajectory and subsystems, able to take over manually during an emergency. Upon nominal landing, astronauts “safe” the vehicle so ground personnel can approach and ingress the vehicle to assist the astronauts out of their seats and the vehicle. In the event of an emergency landing where astronauts must exit the vehicle quickly, they must do so unassisted which requires opening the hatch and jumping down approximately four feet to the ground. Alternatively, they may exit the dorsal hatch on top of the vehicle, and jump to the ground near one of the wing’s leading edges about five feet above the ground. III. Spacecraft and Pressure Suit Integrated Design Due to its similarity to the space shuttle in many respects, including the ability to land on a runway, Dream Chaser is the benefactor of several lessons learned from the Space Shuttle Program. However, Dream Chaser also has some important inherent differences. A. Ingress and Egress While the habitable volume where astronauts live and work is comparable between the two vehicles, the space shuttle crew cabin was short and wide with two decks, and Dream Chaser is long and narrow with a single deck (Figure 3). This makes packaging of hardware, including life support equipment, crew seats and cargo, and crew ingress and egress challenging. With no discernible aisle between crew seats and life support equipment and cargo, the only path between the hatch and the cockpit is over folded seats.
Recommended publications
  • Breaking the Pressure Barrier: a History of the Spacesuit Injection Patch

    Breaking the Pressure Barrier: a History of the Spacesuit Injection Patch

    Breaking the Pressure Barrier: A History of the Spacesuit Injection Patch Shane M. McFarland1 Wyle/NASA-Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX Aaron S. Weaver2 NASA-Glenn Research Center, Columbus, OH The spacesuit assembly has a fascinating and complicated history dating back to the early 1930s. Much has been written on this history from an assembly perspective and, to a lesser extent, a component perspective. However, little has been written or preserved specifically on smaller, lesser-known aspects of pressure suit design. One example of this is the injection patch—a small 2–in.-diameter disk on the leg of the Apollo suit that facilitated a medical injection when pressurized, and the only known implementation of such a feature on a flight suit. Whereas many people are aware this feature existed, very little is known of its origin, design, and use, and the fact that the Apollo flight suit was not the only instance in which such a feature was implemented. This paper serves to tell the story of this seeming “afterthought” of a feature, as well as the design considerations heeded during the initial development of subsequent suits. Nomenclature EMU = Extravehicular Mobility Unit ETFE = ethylene tetrafluoroethylene EVA = extravehicular activity FEP = fluorinated ethylene propylene ILC = International Latex Corporation IM = intramuscular (injection) IO = intraosseal (injection) IV = intravascular (injection) LCG = liquid cooling garment NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration PGS = pressure garment subsystem TMG = thermal micromediorite garment UTC = urine transfer connector I. Introduction he earliest efforts in pressure suit design were driven by the need to survive high altitudes during attempts to T break speed or height flight records.
  • Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (Cscs)/Rescue Flight Resource Book

    Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (Cscs)/Rescue Flight Resource Book

    CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS)/RESCUE FLIGHT RESOURCE BOOK OVERVIEW 1 Mission Operations CSCS 2 Directorate RESCUE 3 FLIGHT DA8/Flight Director Office Final July 12, 2005 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas FINAL 07/12/05 2-i Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS)/RESCUE FLIGHT RESOURCE BOOK FINAL JULY 12, 2005 PREFACE This document, dated May 24, 2005, is the Basic version of the Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (CSCS)/Rescue Flight Resource Book. It is requested that any organization having comments, questions, or suggestions concerning this document should contact DA8/Book Manager, Flight Director Office, Building 4 North, Room 3039. This is a limited distribution and controlled document and is not to be reproduced without the written approval of the Chief, Flight Director Office, mail code DA8, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058. FINAL 07/12/05 2-ii Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 1.0 - OVERVIEW Section 1.0 is the overview of the entire Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (CSCS)/Rescue Flight Resource Book. FINAL 07/12/05 2-iii Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 This page intentionally blank. FINAL 07/12/05 2-iv Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 2.0 - CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS) 2.1 Procedures Overview.......................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 ................................................................................
  • The EVA Spacesuit

    The EVA Spacesuit

    POLITECNICO DI TORINO Repository ISTITUZIONALE Glove Exoskeleton for Extra-Vehicular Activities: Analysis of Requirements and Prototype Design Original Glove Exoskeleton for Extra-Vehicular Activities: Analysis of Requirements and Prototype Design / Favetto, Alain. - (2014). Availability: This version is available at: 11583/2546950 since: Publisher: Politecnico di Torino Published DOI:10.6092/polito/porto/2546950 Terms of use: openAccess This article is made available under terms and conditions as specified in the corresponding bibliographic description in the repository Publisher copyright (Article begins on next page) 04 August 2020 POLITECNICO DI TORINO DOCTORATE SCHOOL Ph. D. In Informatics and Systems – XXV cycle Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Glove Exoskeleton for Extra-Vehicular Activities Analysis of Requirements and Prototype Design (Part One) Favetto Alain Advisor: Coordinator: Prof. Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore Prof. Pietro Laface kp This page is intentionally left blank Dedicato a mio Padre... Al tuo modo ruvido di trasmettere le emozioni. Al tuo senso del dovere ed al tuo altruismo. Ai tuoi modi di fare che da piccolo non capivo e oggi sono parte del mio essere. A tutti i pensieri e le parole che vorrei averti detto e che sono rimasti solo nella mia testa. A te che mi hai sempre trattato come un adulto. A te che te ne sei andato prima che adulto lo potessi diventare davvero. opokp This page is intentionally left blank Index INDEX Index .................................................................................................................................................5
  • SPACE SUIT DEVELOPMENT STATUS by Richard S

    SPACE SUIT DEVELOPMENT STATUS by Richard S

    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-3291 -_ -_ c-- *­ a/ A KI R -1- i SPACE SUIT DEVELOPMENT STATUS by Richard S. Johnston, James V. Correale, and Matthew I. Radnofsky Manned Spacecraft Center Hozcston, Texas N AT10 N A 1 AERO N AUT1CS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. FEBRUARY 1966 n TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM , Illllll 11111 Illlll I llllllllll Ill1111 i 00797BL NASA 'I"D-3291 SPACE SUIT DEVELOPMENT STATUS By Richard S. Johnston, James V. Correale, and Matthew I. Radnofsky Manned Spacecraft Center Houston, Texas NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - Price $1.00 ABSTRACT Space suit development, starting with the Mercury program, has progressed to its present sta­ tus as a result of the changing goals of each manned spacecraft mission. The first space suits were de­ signed primarily for protection of flight crews against the possibility of cabin pressure failure. Longer flights and extravehicular activities required design philosophies to change drastically, particularly in the areas of comfort, mobility, reliability, and life- sustaining systems. Future mission goals will re­ quire new design objectives and requirements. ii SPACE SUIT DEVELOPMENT STATUS By Richard S. Johnston, James V. Correale, and Matthew I. Radnofsky Manned Spacecraft Center SUMMARY Space suits for the Mercury missions were designed primarily for pro­ tection of flight crews against the possibility of cabin pressure failure. How­ ever, goals of the Gemini program, particularly extravehicular activities, caused space suit design philosophies to change drastically. The suit had-to sustain life. A basic design was selected to satisfy all mission requirements.
  • Life Support Baseline Values and Assumptions Document

    Life Support Baseline Values and Assumptions Document

    NASA/TP-2015–218570 Life Support Baseline Values and Assumptions Document Editors: Molly S. Anderson Michael K. Ewert John F. Keener Sandra A. Wagner Responsible National Aeronautics and Space Administration Official: Molly S. Anderson CTSD, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mail Code EC2 2101 NASA Road One Houston, Texas 77058 March 2015 THE NASA STI PROGRAM OFFICE . IN PROFILE Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientific and technical conferences, NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) symposia, seminars, or other meetings sponsored Program Office plays a key part in helping NASA or cosponsored by NASA. maintain this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by or historical information from NASA programs, Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASA’s projects, and mission, often concerned with scientific and technical information. The NASA STI subjects having substantial public interest. Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest collection of aeronautical and • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- space science STI in the world. The Program Office language translations of foreign scientific and is also NASA’s institutional mechanism for technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results are published Specialized services that complement the STI by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Program Office’s diverse offerings include creating includes the following report types: custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results .
  • Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences

    Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences

    Asteroid Redirect Crewed Mission Space Suit and EVA System Architecture Trade Study 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jonathan T. Bowie , Raul A. Blanco , Richard D. Watson , Cody Kelly , Jesse Buffington , Stephanie A. Sipila NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 This paper discusses the Asteroid Redirect Crewed Mission (ARCM) space suit and Extravehicular Activity (EVA) architecture trade study and the current state of the work to mature the requirements and products to the mission concept review level. The mission requirements and the resulting concept of operations will be discussed. A historical context will be presented as to present the similarities and differences from previous NASA missions. That will set the stage for the trade study where all options for both pressure garment and life support were considered. The rationale for the architecture decisions will then be presented. Since the trade study did identity risks, the subsequent tests and analyses that mitigated the risks will be discussed. Lastly, the current state of the effort will be provided. Nomenclature ACES = Advanced Crew Escape Suit ACFM = Actual cubic feet per minute AEMU = Advanced Extravehicular Mobility Unit AES = Advanced Exploration Systems ARCM = Asteroid Redirect Crewed Mission ARGOS = Active Response Gravity Offload System BRT = Body Restraint Tether DCCI = David Clark Company Inc. DRM = Design Reference Mission EMU = Extravehicular Mobility Unit EOS = Emergency Oxygen System EVA = Extravehicular Activity FSA = Feedwater Supply Assembly ISS = International Space Station
  • Complex Garment Systems to Survive in Outer Space

    Complex Garment Systems to Survive in Outer Space

    Volume 7, Issue 2, Fall 2011 Complex Garment Systems to Survive in Outer Space Debi Prasad Gon, Assistant Professor, Textile Technology, Panipat Institute of Engineering & Technology, Pattikalyana, Samalkha, Panipat, Haryana, INDIA [email protected] Palash Paul, Assistant Professor, Textile Technology, Panipat Institute of Engineering & Technology, Pattikalyana, Samalkha, Panipat, Haryana, INDIA ABSTRACT The success of astronauts in performing Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) is highly dependent on the performance of the spacesuit they are wearing. Since the beginning of the Space Shuttle Program, one basic suit design has been evolving. The Space Shuttle Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) is a waist entry suit consisting of a hard upper torso (HUT) and soft fabric mobility joints. The EMU was designed specifically for zero gravity operations. With a new emphasis on planetary exploration, a new EVA spacesuit design is required. Now the research scientists are working hard and striving for the new, lightweight and modular designs. Thus they have reached to the Red surface of Mars. And sooner or later the astronauts will reach the other planets too. This paper is a review of various types of spacesuits and the different fabrics required for the manufacturing of the same. The detailed construction of EMU and space suit for Mars is discussed here, along with certain concepts of Biosuit- Mechanical Counter pressure Suit. Keywords: Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA), spacesuits, Biosuit-Mechanical Counter pressure Suit Tissues (skin, heart,
  • Physiology of Decompressive Stress

    Physiology of Decompressive Stress

    CHAPTER 3 Physiology of Decompressive Stress Jan Stepanek and James T. Webb ... upon the withdrawing of air ...the little bubbles generated upon the absence of air in the blood juices, and soft parts of the body, may by their vast numbers, and their conspiring distension, variously streighten in some places and stretch in others, the vessels, especially the smaller ones, that convey the blood and nourishment: and so by choaking up some passages, ... disturb or hinder the circulation of the blouod? Not to mention the pains that such distensions may cause in some nerves and membranous parts.. —Sir Robert Boyle, 1670, Philosophical transactions Since Robert Boyle made his astute observations in the Chapter 2, for details on the operational space environment 17th century, humans have ventured into the highest levels and the potential problems with decompressive stress see of the atmosphere and beyond and have encountered Chapter 10, and for diving related problems the reader problems that have their basis in the physics that govern this is encouraged to consult diving and hyperbaric medicine environment, in particular the gas laws. The main problems monographs. that humans face when going at altitude are changes in the gas volume within body cavities (Boyle’s law) with changes in ambient pressure, as well as clinical phenomena THE ATMOSPHERE secondary to formation of bubbles in body tissues (Henry’s law) secondary to significant decreases in ambient pressure. Introduction In the operational aerospace setting, these circumstances are Variations in Earthbound environmental conditions place of concern in high-altitude flight (nonpressurized aircraft limits and requirements on our activities.
  • AIAA-95-1 062 the Suitport's Progress M. Cohen NASA Ames Research

    AIAA-95-1 062 the Suitport's Progress M. Cohen NASA Ames Research

    NASA-TM-111836 /t/ .' I I AIAA-95-1 062 The Suitport's Progress M. Cohen NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA Life Sciences and Space Medicine Conference April 3-5, 1995 / Houston, TX For permission to copy or republish, contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SOW., Washington, D.C. 20024 AIAA-95-106; THE SUITPORT'S PROGRESS Marc M. Cohen* NASA-Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California Abstract Origins of the Suitport NASA-Ames Research Center developed The Suitport Extravehicular Access Facility the Suitport as an advanced space suit originated during the early phase of the airlock to support a Space Station suit, Space Station Advanced Development based on the AX-5 hard suit. Several third Program. It grew from a recognition that the parties proposed their own variations the construction and operation of Space Station Suitport on the moon and Mars. The Freedom (SSF) would require several Suitport recently found its first practical use thousand hours of EVA time (This finding as a terrestrial application in the NASA- has not changed much for the new design Ames Hazmat vehicle for the clean-up of for "Space Station Alpha." To make the best hazardous and toxic materials. In the Hazmat use of SSF crew time, it will become application, the Suitport offers substantial necessary to make the entire space suit improvements over conventional hazard donning and doffing, and airlock suits, by eliminating the necessicty to egress/ingress as safe, rapid, and efficient decontaminate before doffing the suit. as possible. Definitions The Space Shuttle EMU suit and airlock AX-5 Ames Experimental Suit 5 systems pose several potential CCPS Command/Control Pressure Suit disadvantages for frequent and routine EMU Extra-Vehicular Mobility Unit Space Station operations.
  • Happy Holidays!!!

    Happy Holidays!!!

    December 2000 Cosmonotes Décembre 2000 The Newsletter of the Canadian Alumni of the International Space University Le Bulletin des Anciens Etudiants Canadiens de l’Université Internationale de l’Espace reminiscing on an Aerospace Medicine docked to the Station, three HAPPY Elective at KSC, and an article from the spacewalks will be conducted to busy, busy, busy MSS6. Another deliver, assemble, and activate the opinion piece is included in this issue, U.S. electrical power system on board HOLIDAYS!!! this time on The Dreams our Star Stuff the ISS. The electrical power system, Here is the December 2000 edition of is Made of – thank you to Eric Choi which is built into a 47-foot integrated your CAISU newsletter, Cosmonotes, (SSP 99) for polling the alumni and truss structure known as P6, consists again packed with many fascinating writing a delightful article from all of solar arrays, radiators for cooling, articles from alumni and friends. This responses received. batteries for solar energy storage, and electronics. P6 is the first section of a issue of Cosmonotes was slightly Thank you to all alumni who system that ultimately will deliver 60 delayed to include an article on the volunteered to write articles for times more power to the ISS research November 30th launch of STS-97 with Cosmonotes! It is thanks to the facilities than was possible on Mir. Canadian Astronaut Marc Garneau on constant willingness of alumni to board, a launch that many CAISU contribute that this newsletter keeps Mission Specialist Marc Garneau members were present in Florida to getting better (and thicker!) with each (Ph.D.) will attach P6 to the evolving view thanks to an invitation from the issue.
  • Object Number Classification Object Name A19740727000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle, General Dynamic

    Object Number Classification Object Name A19740727000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle, General Dynamic

    MOVING BEYOND EARTH- Transformation Object List Prepared 04.20.2016 Object Number Classification Object Name A19740727000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle, General Dynamics/Convair FR-4 2-Stage Triamese Concept A19740728000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle, Lockheed Starclipper LS200-8 Stage- and-a-Half Concept,1:96 A19740731000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle,Grumman/Boeing G-3 2-Stage Fully- Reusable Concept, 1:192 A19740732000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle,Grumman/Boeing H-33 2-Stage Partially- Reusable Concept 1:192 A19740733000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle,Grumman/Boeing 2-Stage F-1 Flyback Booster Concept, 1:192 A19740734000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle, Grumman/Boeing F-1 Expendable Booster Concept, 1:192 A19740735000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle, Grumman 2-Stage SRB Parallel Burn Concept, 1:192 A19740736000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle,Grumman 2-Stage LRB Parallel Burn Concept, 1:192 A19740766000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft & Parts Model, Space Shuttle, North American Rockwell Final Concept, 1:100 A19750327000 ART-Paintings Painting, oil on board A19760752000 MODELS-Wind Tunnel Model, Space Shuttle, Delta-Wing High Cross-Range Orbiter Concept A19760753000 MODELS-Wind Tunnel Model, Space Shuttle, Straight-Wing Low Cross-Range Orbiter Concept A19760754000 MODELS-Wind Tunnel Model, Space Shuttle, Final Orbiter Concept A19760778000 MODELS-Manned Spacecraft
  • Eva-Exp-0031 Baseline

    Eva-Exp-0031 Baseline

    EVA-EXP-0031 BASELINE National Aeronautics and EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/18/2018 Space Administration EVA OFFICE EXTRAVEHICULAR ACTIVITY (EVA) AIRLOCKS AND ALTERNATIVE INGRESS/EGRESS METHODS DOCUMENT The electronic version is the official approved document. ECCN Notice: This document does not contain export controlled technical data. Revision: Baseline Document No: EVA-EXP-0031 Release Date: 04/18/2018 Page: 2 of 143 Title: EVA Airlocks and Alternative Ingress Egress Methods Document REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE Revision Change Description Release No. No. Date EVA-EXP-0031 Baseline Baseline per CR# EVA-CR-00031 04/18/2018 Document dated 03/07/2018 submitted and approved through DAA process/DAA # TN54054 approved April 9, 2018 EVA-REF-001 DAA Pre Baseline 03/12/2015 33134 Draft EVA-RD-002 05/14/2015 SAA 12/15/2015 DRAFT The electronic version is the official approved document. ECCN Notice: This document does not contain export controlled technical data. Revision: Baseline Document No: EVA-EXP-0031 Release Date: 04/18/2018 Page: 3 of 143 Title: EVA Airlocks and Alternative Ingress Egress Methods Document Executive Summary This document captures the currently perceived vehicle and EVA trades with high level definition of the capabilities and interfaces associated with performing an Extravehicular Activity (EVA) using an exploration EVA system and ingress/egress methods during future missions. Human spaceflight missions to Cislunar space, Mars transit, the moons of Mars (Phobos and Deimos), the Lunar surface, and the surface of Mars will include both microgravity and partial-gravity EVAs, and potential vehicles with which an exploration EVA system will need to interface.