MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]AA14501A.;5 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 17DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ Seq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 22255
IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the base prospectus (the Base Prospectus) following this page, and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Base Prospectus. In accessing the Base Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. THE FOLLOWING BASE PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED OTHER THAN AS PROVIDED BELOW AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER. THIS BASE PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY BE DISTRIBUTED TO PERSONS THAT ARE NOT US PERSONS AS DEFINED IN REGULATION S UNDER THE US SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE SECURITIES ACT) OR WITHIN THE UNITED STATES TO QIBs (AS DEFINED BELOW) WHO ARE ALSO QUALIFIED PURCHASERS (AS DEFINED BELOW). ANY FORWARDING, DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS BASE PROSPECTUS IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS UNAUTHORISED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE MAY RESULT IN A VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS. NOTHING IN THIS BASE PROSPECTUS CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE SECURITIES DESCRIBED IN THIS BASE PROSPECTUS (THE NOTES) HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR WITH ANY SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (1) IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 144 A UNDER THE US SECURITIES ACT (RULE 144A) TO A PERSON THAT THE HOLDER AND ANY PERSON ACTING ON ITS BEHALF REASONABLY BELIEVE IS A QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 144A (A QIB) THAT IS ALSO A QUALIFIED PURCHASER AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2(A)(51) OF THE US INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 (A QUALIFIED PURCHASER) THAT (A) IS NOT A BROKER-DEALER WHICH OWNS AND INVESTS ON A DISCRETIONARY BASIS LESS THAN US$25 MILLION IN SECURITIES OF UNAFFILIATED ISSUERS, (B) IS NOT A PARTICIPANT DIRECTED EMPLOYEE PLAN, SUCH AS A 401(K) PLAN, (C) WAS NOT FORMED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTING IN STEEL CAPITAL S.A. (THE ISSUER), (D) IS ACQUIRING THE NOTES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF A QIB THAT IS ALSO A QUALIFIED PURCHASER, IN A PRINCIPAL AMOUNT THAT IS NOT LESS THAN US$100,000, (E) UNDERSTANDS THAT THE ISSUER MAY RECEIVE A LIST OF PARTICIPANTS HOLDING POSITIONS IN ITS SECURITIES FROM ONE OR MORE BOOK-ENTRY DEPOSITORIES AND (F) WILL PROVIDE NOTICE OF THE TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS TO ANY SUBSEQUENT TRANSFEREE, OR (2) IN AN OFFSHORE TRANSACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 903 OR RULE 904 OF REGULATION S UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, IN EACH CASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES. Confirmation of your Representation: In order to be eligible to view this Base Prospectus or make an investment decision with respect to the Notes, you must be (i) a person other than a US person (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act) or (ii) a QIB who is a Qualified Purchaser. By accessing this Base Prospectus, you shall be deemed to have represented to us that you are not a US person or that you are a QIB that is a Qualified Purchaser that can represent as set out in (A)-(F) above. You are reminded that you may not, nor are you authorised to, deliver, forward or distribute this Base Prospectus (or any reproduction of this Base Prospectus) to any other person. The materials relating to the offering do not constitute, and may not be used in connection with, an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction or place where offers or solicitations are not permitted by law. If a jurisdiction requires that the offering be made by a licensed broker or dealer and the Permanent Dealers (as defined herein) or any affiliate of the Permanent Dealers is a licensed broker or dealer in that jurisdiction, any offering of Notes shall be deemed to be made by the Permanent Dealers or such affiliate on behalf of the Issuer in such jurisdiction. Under no circumstances shall this Base Prospectus constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of any securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. Recipients of this Base Prospectus who intend to subscribe for or purchase any securities are reminded that any subscription or purchase may only be made on the basis of the information contained in this Base Prospectus in combination with the relevant series prospectus or final terms. This Base Prospectus may only be communicated to persons in the United Kingdom in circumstances where section 21(1) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 does not apply to the Issuer.
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: AA14501A.;5 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BC14501A.;14 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 52DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ J1:1Seq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 28985
29SEP201015501907 OAO SEVERSTAL (incorporated as an open joint stock company under the laws of the Russian Federation) US$3,000,000,000 Programme for the Issuance of Loan Participation Notes to be issued by, but with limited recourse to, Steel Capital S.A. for the purpose of financing loans to OAO SEVERSTAL Under the programme for the issuance of Loan Participation Notes (the Programme) described in this base prospectus (the Base Prospectus), Steel Capital S.A. (the Issuer), subject to compliance with all relevant laws, regulations and directives, may from time to time issue loan participation notes (the Notes) on the terms set out herein, as completed by a set of final terms (each such set of final terms ‘‘Final Terms’’) setting out the specific terms of each issue. The aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding will not at any time exceed US$3,000,000,000 (or the equivalent in other currencies). Notes will be issued in Series (as defined in ‘‘Overview of the Programme’’) and the sole purpose of issuing each Series will be to finance a loan (each a Loan) to JSC Severstal (the Company or the Borrower) as borrower, on the terms of a facility agreement between the Issuer and the Company dated 19 October 2010 (the Facility Agreement), as amended and supplemented by a loan supplement to be entered into between the Issuer and the Company in respect of each Series on each date on which the Notes of that Series are issued (each a Loan Supplement and, together with the Facility Agreement, a Loan Agreement). Subject as provided in the Trust Deed (as defined in ‘‘Overview of the Programme’’) the Issuer will (a) charge, in favour of Citibank, N.A., London Branch as trustee (the Trustee), by way of a first fixed charge, as security for its payment obligations in respect of each Series of Notes and under the Trust Deed, certain of its rights and interests under the relevant Loan Agreement and the relevant Account (as defined in the relevant Loan Supplement), but excluding any Reserved Rights (as defined in the ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’) and (b) assign, in favour of the Trustee, certain of its other rights under the Loan Agreement but excluding any Reserved Rights, in each case for the benefit of the holders of the corresponding Series of Notes (the Noteholders), all as more fully described in ‘‘Overview of the Programme’’. In each case where amounts of principal, interest and additional amounts (if any) are stated to be payable in respect of a Series of Notes, the obligation of the Issuer to make any such payment constitutes an obligation only to account to the Noteholders, on each date upon which such amounts of principal, interest and additional amounts (if any) are due in respect of such Series of Notes, for an amount equivalent to all principal, interest and additional amounts (if any) actually received by, or for the account of, the Issuer pursuant to the corresponding Loan Agreement. The Issuer will have no other financial obligations under the Notes. Noteholders will be deemed to have accepted and agreed that they will be relying solely and exclusively on the Company’s covenant to pay under the relevant Loan Agreement and the credit and financial standing of the Company in respect of the financial servicing of each Series of Notes. AN INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD HAVE REGARD TO THE FACTORS DESCRIBED UNDER THE SECTION ENTITLED ‘‘RISK FACTORS’’ IN THIS BASE PROSPECTUS. The Notes and the corresponding Loans (together, the Securities) have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) or with any securities regulatory authority of any State or other jurisdiction of the United States. The Notes may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, US persons, except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The Notes are being offered and sold outside the United States to non-US persons in reliance on Regulation S (Regulation S) under the Securities Act (the Regulation S Notes) and within the United States to qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), as defined in Rule 144A (Rule 144A) under the Securities Act, that are also qualified purchasers (QPs), as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the US Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Investment Company Act), in reliance on the exemption from registration under the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A (the Rule 144A Notes). Prospective purchasers are hereby notified that sellers of the Notes may be relying on the exemption from the provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A. For a description of these and certain further restrictions on Offers, sales and transfers of the Notes and distribution of this Base Prospectus, see ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’ and ‘‘Selling and Transfer Restrictions’’. Application has been made to the UK Financial Services Authority in its capacity as competent authority under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) for Notes issued under the Programme for the period of 12 months from the date of this Base Prospectus to be admitted to the official list of the UK Listing Authority (the UKLA) (the Official List) and to the London Stock Exchange plc (the London Stock Exchange) for such Notes to be admitted to trading on the regulated market of the London Stock Exchange (the Market). The Market is a regulated market for purposes of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2004/39/EC. References in this Base Prospectus to Notes being ‘‘listed’’ (and all related references) shall mean that such Notes have been admitted to listing on the Official List and to trading on the Market. Unlisted Notes may also be issued pursuant to the Programme. The relevant Final Terms in respect of the issue of any Notes will specify whether or not such Notes will be listed on the London Stock Exchange (or any other stock exchange) and admitted to trading on the Market (or any other market). Regulation S Notes of each Series which are sold in an ‘‘offshore transaction’’ within the meaning of Regulation S, will initially be represented by interests in a global unrestricted Note in registered form (each a Regulation S Global Certificate), without interest coupons, which will be deposited with a common depositary for, and registered in the name of a nominee of, Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (Euroclear) and Clearstream Banking, societ´ e´ anonyme (Clearstream, Luxembourg) on its Issue Date. Beneficial interests in a Regulation S Global Certificate will be shown on, and transfers thereof will be effected only through, records maintained by Euroclear or Clearstream, Luxembourg. Rule 144A Notes of each Series sold to QIBs that are also QPs, as referred to in, and subject to the transfer restrictions described in, ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’ and ‘‘Selling and Transfer Restrictions’’, will initially be represented by interests in a global restricted Note in registered form (each a Rule 144A Global Certificate and together with any Regulation S Global Certificates, the Global Certificates), without interest coupons, which will be deposited with a custodian for, and registered in the name of a nominee of, The Depository Trust Company (DTC) on its Issue Date. Beneficial interests in a Rule 144A Global Certificate will be shown on, and transfers thereof will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC and its participants. See ‘‘Summary of the Provisions relating to the Notes in Global Form’’. Individual definitive Notes in registered form will only be available in certain limited circumstances as described herein. The price and amount of Notes to be issued under the Programme will be determined by the Issuer, the Company and the relevant Dealer (as named in ‘‘Overview of the Programme’’) at the time of issue in accordance with prevailing market conditions. The minimum specified denomination of any Notes issued under the Programme shall be A100,000 (or its equivalent in any other currency as at the date of issue of the Notes). The rating of certain Series of Notes to be issued under the Programme may be specified in the applicable Final Terms. Whether or not each credit rating applied for in relation to relevant Series of Notes will be issued by a credit rating agency established in the European Union and registered under Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 (the CRA Regulation) will be disclosed in the Final Terms. Please also refer to ‘‘Risk Factors—Ratings of the Notes’’. Arrangers and Permanent Dealers BARCLAYS CAPITAL GOLDMAN SACHS INTERNATIONAL THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND
The date of this Base Prospectus is 7 July 2011.
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 40. X 64. File: BC14501A.;14 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BE14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 80D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 44255
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS BASE PROSPECTUS This Base Prospectus comprises a base prospectus for the purposes of Article 5.4 of Directive 2003/71/EC (the Prospectus Directive) and for the purpose of giving information with regard to the Issuer, the Company, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries taken as a whole (the Group), the Notes and the Loans which, according to the particular nature of the Issuer, the Company, the Group, the Notes and the Loans, is necessary to enable investors to make an informed assessment of the assets and liabilities, financial position, profit and losses and prospects of the Issuer, the Company and the Group, and of the rights attaching to the Notes and the Loans. Each of the Issuer and the Company accepts responsibility for the information contained in this Base Prospectus. To the best of the knowledge and belief of each of the Issuer and the Company, each of which has taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case, the information contained in this Base Prospectus is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information. This Base Prospectus does not constitute an offer of, or an invitation by or on behalf of, the Issuer, the Company, the Group, the Arrangers or the Dealers (each as defined in ‘‘Overview of the Programme’’) to subscribe for any of the Notes. This Base Prospectus is only being distributed to and is only directed at (i) persons who are outside the United Kingdom or (ii) to investment professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order) or (iii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated, falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as relevant persons). The Notes are only available to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to subscribe, purchase or otherwise acquire such Notes will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this document or any of its contents. None of the Arrangers, the Dealers, their respective affiliates or the Trustee makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in this Base Prospectus. Each person receiving this Base Prospectus acknowledges that such person has not relied on any of the Arrangers, the Dealers, their respective affiliates or the Trustee in connection with its investigation of the accuracy of such information or its investment decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of the Arrangers or the Dealers accepts any responsibility whatsoever for the contents of this Base Prospectus, or for any other statement, made or purported to be made by an Arranger or a Dealer or on its behalf in connection with the Issuer, the Company, the Group, the Loans or the Notes. Each Arranger and each Dealer accordingly disclaims all and any liability whether arising in tort or contract or otherwise which it might otherwise have in respect of this Base Prospectus or any such statement. Each person contemplating making an investment in the Notes issued under the Programme from time to time must make its own investigation and analysis of the creditworthiness of the Company and its own determination of the suitability of any such investment, with particular reference to its own investment objectives and experience, and any other factors that may be relevant to it in connection with such investment. Each purchaser of the Notes should be aware that it may be required to bear the financial risks of this investment for an indefinite period of time. No person has been authorised to give any information or to make any representation other than those contained in this Base Prospectus in connection with the issue or sale of the Notes and, if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorised by the Issuer, the Company, the Group or any of the Arrangers or the Dealers. Neither the delivery of this Base Prospectus nor any sale made in connection herewith shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Issuer, the Company or the Group since the date hereof or the date upon which this Base Prospectus has been most recently amended or supplemented or that there has been no adverse change in the financial position of the Issuer, the Company or the Group since the date hereof or the date upon which this Base Prospectus has been most recently amended or supplemented or that any other information supplied in connection with the Programme is correct as of any time subsequent to the date on which it is supplied or, if different, the date indicated in the document containing the same. The distribution of this Base Prospectus and the offering or sale of the Notes in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons into whose possession this Base Prospectus comes are required by the Issuer, the Company, the Group, the Arrangers and the Dealers to inform themselves about and to observe any such restriction. The Notes have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction of the United States. Subject to certain
i
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BE14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BE14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 20D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 53960
exceptions, Notes may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account of benefit of, US persons (as defined in Regulation S). For a description of certain restrictions on offers and sales of Notes and on distribution of this Base Prospectus, see ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’. This Base Prospectus is not intended to provide the basis of any credit or other evaluation and should not be considered as a recommendation by any of the Issuer, the Company, the Group, the Trustee, the Arrangers or the Dealers that any recipient of this Base Prospectus or any financial statements should purchase the Notes. None of the Issuer, the Company, the Group, the Arrangers, the Dealers or the Trustee or any of their respective affiliates or agents makes any representation about the legality of the purchase of the Notes by an investor under applicable investment or similar laws. Each prospective investor is advised to consult its own counsel and business adviser as to legal, tax, business, financial and related matters concerning the purchase of the Notes. The contents of this Base Prospectus are not to be construed as legal, business or tax advice. Each prospective investor in the Notes must comply with all applicable laws and regulations in force in any jurisdiction in which it purchases, offers or sells the Notes and must obtain any consent, approval or permission required of it for the purchase, offer or sale by it of the Notes under the laws and regulations in force in any jurisdiction to which it is subject or in which it makes such purchases, offers or sales, and none of the Company, the Issuer, the Arrangers, the Dealers or the Trustee or any of their respective affiliates or agents shall have any responsibility therefor. Each of the Arrangers and Dealers is acting solely for the Company and the Issuer and no one else in connection with the Notes and the Programme and is not, and will not be, responsible to any other person for providing advice in respect of the Notes and the Programme or for providing the protections afforded to their respective clients. This Base Prospectus contains summaries with respect to certain terms of the Trust Deed and the Facility Agreement, but reference should be made to the actual documents for complete information with respect thereto. These documents will be made available free of charge to prospective investors upon request to the Company or at the office of the paying and transfer agent in London and New York City. The Issuer is a soci´et´e anonyme incorporated for an unlimited duration under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Luxembourg). The Issuer is not a subsidiary of the Company. The registered office of the Issuer is located at 2, Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, L-1115 Luxembourg and its telephone number is +35 242 122 449. The Issuer is registered with the Registre de Commerce et des Societ´ es´ a` Luxembourg (the Register of Commerce and Companies in Luxembourg) under number B116975. For further information on the Issuer, see ‘‘The Issuer’’. The Notes have not been approved or disapproved by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) or any other federal or state securities commission or regulatory authority in the United States, nor has such any commission or regulatory authority passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this Base Prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offence in the United States. THE STATEMENTS HEREIN ABOUT US FEDERAL TAX ISSUES ARE MADE TO SUPPORT MARKETING OF THE NOTES. NO TAXPAYER CAN RELY ON THEM TO AVOID TAX PENALTIES. EACH PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER SHOULD SEEK ADVICE FROM AN INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR ABOUT THE TAX CONSEQUENCES UNDER ITS OWN PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF INVESTING IN NOTES UNDER THE LAWS OF LUXEMBOURG, THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, THE UNITED STATES AND ITS CONSTITUENT JURISDICTIONS AND ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE THE PURCHASER MAY BE SUBJECT TO TAXATION. The Securities have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act. The Notes may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, US persons except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The Regulation S Notes issued under the Programme from time to time are being offered and sold outside the United States to non-US persons in reliance on Regulation S and the Rule 144A Notes issued under the Programme from time to time are being offered and sold within the United States to QIBs that are also QPs in reliance on the exemption from registration under the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A. Prospective purchasers are hereby notified that sellers of the Notes may be relying on the exemption from the provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A. For a description of these and certain further restrictions on offers, sales and transfers of the Notes and distribution of this Base Prospectus, see ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’ and ‘‘Selling and Transfer Restrictions’’.
ii
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BE14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BE14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 80D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 28272
IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUE OF ANY SERIES OF NOTES, THE DEALER OR DEALERS (IF ANY) NAMED AS THE STABILISING MANAGER(S) (THE STABILISING MANAGER(S)) (OR PERSONS ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY STABILISING MANAGER(S)) IN THE APPLICABLE FINAL TERMS MAY OVER-ALLOT NOTES OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS WITH A VIEW TO SUPPORTING THE MARKET PRICE OF THE NOTES AT A LEVEL HIGHER THAN THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL. HOWEVER, THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT THE STABILISING MANAGER(S) (OR ANY PERSONS ACTING ON BEHALF OF A STABILISING MANAGER) WILL UNDERTAKE STABILISATION ACTION. ANY STABILISATION ACTION MAY BEGIN ON OR AFTER THE DATE ON WHICH ADEQUATE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THE TERMS OF THE OFFER OF THE RELEVANT SERIES OF NOTES IS MADE AND, IF BEGUN, MAY BE ENDED AT ANY TIME, BUT MUST END NO LATER THAN THE EARLIER OF 30 DAYS AFTER THE ISSUE DATE OF THE RELEVANT SERIES OF NOTES AND 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE ALLOTMENT OF THE RELEVANT SERIES OF NOTES. ANY STABILISATION ACTION OR OVER-ALLOTMENT MUST BE CONDUCTED BY THE RELEVANT STABILISING MANAGER(S) (OR PERSONS ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY STABILISING MANAGER(S)) IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.
NOTICE TO NEW HAMPSHIRE RESIDENTS NEITHER THE FACT THAT A REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR AN APPLICATION FOR A LICENCE HAS BEEN FILED UNDER CHAPTER 421-B OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE REVISED STATUTES (RSA 421-B) WITH THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NOR THE FACT THAT A SECURITY IS EFFECTIVELY REGISTERED OR A PERSON IS LICENCED IN THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CONSTITUTES A FINDING BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THAT ANY DOCUMENT FILED UNDER RSA 421-B IS TRUE, COMPLETE AND NOT MISLEADING. NEITHER ANY SUCH FACT NOR THE FACT THAT AN EXEMPTION OR EXCEPTION IS AVAILABLE FOR A SECURITY OR A TRANSACTION MEANS THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HAS PASSED IN ANY WAY UPON THE MERITS OR QUALIFICATIONS OF, OR RECOMMENDED OR GIVEN APPROVAL TO, ANY PERSON, SECURITY OR TRANSACTION. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE, OR CAUSE TO BE MADE, TO ANY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER, CUSTOMER OR CLIENT ANY REPRESENTATION INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION The Company has agreed that, for so long as any Notes are ‘‘restricted securities’’ within the meaning of Rule 144(a)(3) under the Securities Act, it will, during any period in which it is neither subject to Section 13 or 15(d) of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) nor exempt from reporting pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) thereunder, provide to any holder or beneficial owner of such restricted securities or to any prospective purchaser of such restricted securities designated by such holder or beneficial owner or to the Principal Paying Agent (as defined herein) for delivery to such holder, beneficial owner or prospective purchaser, in each case upon the request of such holder, beneficial owner, prospective purchaser or Principal Paying Agent, the information required to be provided by Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Base Prospectus contains ‘‘forward looking statements’’ within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act which relate to, without limitation, any of the Company’s plans, financial position, objectives, goals, strategies and future operations and performance and the assumptions underlying these forward looking statements. Words such as ‘‘estimates’’, ‘‘expects’’, ‘‘believes’’, ‘‘intends’’, ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘will’’, ‘‘should’’ and any similar expressions are used to identify forward looking statements. These forward looking statements are contained in ‘‘Risk Factors’’, ‘‘Operating and Financial Review’’, ‘‘Business’’ and elsewhere in this Base Prospectus. The Company has based these forward looking statements on the current view of its management with respect to future events and financial performance. These views reflect the best judgment of its management but involve uncertainties and are subject to certain known and unknown risks and other important factors beyond the Company’s control, the occurrence of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in the Company’s forward looking statements and from past results, performance or achievements. Although the
iii
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BE14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BE14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 20D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 47253
Company believes that the estimates and the projections reflected in such forward looking statements are reasonable, if one or more of the risks or uncertainties materialise or occur, including those identified in this Base Prospectus, or if any of the underlying assumptions prove to be incomplete or incorrect, the Company’s actual results of operations may vary from those expected, estimated or projected. Accordingly, prospective purchasers of the Notes should not place undue reliance on these forward looking statements. The important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in these forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, those discussed in ‘‘Risk Factors’’, ‘‘Operating and Financial Review’’ and ‘‘Business’’. These forward looking statements speak only as at the date of this Base Prospectus. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to disseminate after the date of this Base Prospectus any updates or revisions to any forward looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in its expectation with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such forward looking statements are based, unless required to do so by applicable law.
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS The Company is an open joint stock company established under the laws of the Russian Federation. A substantial number of the Company’s directors and executive officers named in this Base Prospectus reside outside the United Kingdom and/or the United States. Moreover, a substantial portion of the assets of the Company and of such persons are located outside the United Kingdom and the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for the Trustee, acting on behalf of the Noteholders, to effect service of process within the United Kingdom or the United States upon the Company (although, under the Loan Agreements the Company will appoint an agent for service of process in the United Kingdom) and/or to enforce against the Company or any such person court judgments obtained in the United Kingdom and the United States courts. Judgments rendered by a court in any jurisdiction outside the Russian Federation may not be enforced by courts in the Russian Federation unless there is (i) an international treaty in effect providing for the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil cases between the Russian Federation and the jurisdiction where such judgment is rendered, and/or (ii) a federal law of the Russian Federation providing for the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments. The Company is not aware of any treaty or convention directly providing for the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation or between the United States and the Russian Federation. However, the Company is aware of one instance in which Russian courts have recognised and enforced an English court judgment. The basis for this was a combination of the principle of reciprocity and the existence of a number of bilateral and multilateral treaties to which both the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation are parties. In the absence of established court practice, however, it is difficult to predict whether a Russian court will be inclined in any particular instance to recognise and enforce an English court judgment on these grounds. In addition, Russian courts have limited experience in the enforcement of foreign court judgments. The limitations described above may significantly delay the enforcement of such judgment, or completely deprive the Noteholders or the Trustee of effective legal recourse for claims under the Notes relating to the Loans. Each Loan Agreement, and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with it, will be governed by English law and will provide that if any dispute or difference arises from or in connection with such Loan Agreement, such dispute shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration in accordance with the LCI Arbitration Rules. Before any arbitration or arbitral tribunal has been appointed to determine a dispute, however, the Issuer may elect, by notice in writing to the Company, to require that all disputes or a specific dispute be heard by a court of law. The seat of any arbitration will be London, England. The United Kingdom, the United States and the Russian Federation are parties to the United Nations (New York) Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention). Consequently, Russian courts should generally recognise and enforce in the Russian Federation an arbitral award from an arbitral tribunal in the United Kingdom, on the basis of the rules of the New York Convention (subject to qualifications provided for in the New York Convention and compliance with Russian procedural regulations and other procedures and requirements established by Russian legislation). However, it may be difficult to enforce arbitral awards in the Russian Federation due to: • the inexperience of the Russian courts in international commercial transactions;
iv
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BE14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BE14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 260D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 28033
• official and unofficial political resistance to the enforcement of awards against Russian companies in favour of foreign investors; and • the inability of Russian courts to enforce such awards. In September 2002, the new arbitrazh procedural code of the Russian Federation (the Arbitrazh Procedural Code) entered into force. The Arbitrazh Procedural Code established the procedure for Russian courts to refuse to recognise and enforce a foreign arbitral award. The Arbitrazh Procedural Code and other Russian procedural legislation could change; therefore, among other things, other grounds for Russian courts to refuse the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments and foreign arbitral awards could arise in the future. In practice, reliance upon international treaties may meet with resistance or a lack of understanding on the part of a Russian court or other officials, thereby introducing delay and unpredictability into the process of enforcing any foreign court judgment or arbitral award in the Russian Federation.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION Market and Other Statistical Data Market data used in this Base Prospectus, as well as certain statistics, including statistics in respect of product sales by volume of third parties and market share, under the captions ‘‘Overview’’, ‘‘Risk Factors’’, ‘‘Operating and Financial Review’’, ‘‘Industry’’ and ‘‘Business’’, have been extracted from official and industry sources and other third-party sources that the Company believes to be reliable, such as the following: • AME Group. The AME Group (AME) is a global firm of independent economists in the metal and mineral industries with research offices in Australia and affiliations in North America, South America, Africa and China. • CDU TEK. CDU TEK is the central dispatch unit of the Russian Federation Ministry of Industry and Trade. • Chermet Corporation. The Chermet Corporation (Chermet) is a Russian company that provides and publishes information, statistics and analytic surveys relating to producers of ferrous metals. • Commodities Research Unit. Commodities Research Unit (CRU) is an independent business analysis and consultancy group focused on the mining, metals, power cables, fertiliser and chemical sectors. • IMC Group Consulting Ltd. IMC Group Consulting Ltd (IMC) is an international consultancy and offers a broad spectrum of services in the environmental, mining, minerals, engineering and energy industries worldwide. IMC’s headquarters are in Icon Business Centers, New Lake Drive, Sherwood Park, Nottingham, NG15 0DT, UK. The staff of IMC consists of engineers, accountants, economists and geologists with extensive experience in the metals and mining industries. • The John T. Boyd Company. The John T. Boyd Company is a mining consulting firm of independent mining consultants exclusively serving the domestic and international coal and mineral industries. The company’s business address is 4000 Town Center Blvd., Suite 300, Canonburg, Pennsylvania, 15317, United States of America. The John T. Boyd Company employs engineers, geologists and technicians with decades of experience. • Metal Bulletin. Metal Bulletin plc is an independent company quoted on the London Stock Exchange. It provides news, prices, analysis and research to financial, metals, minerals, energy and other commodity markets through online services and print media. • RudProm. RudProm is an agency that collates statistics about iron ore producers in the former Soviet Union. • SRK Consulting. SRK Consulting provides a range of consulting services to the resource industry. SRK Consulting’s business address is 5th Floor, Churchill House, 17 Churchill Way, Cardiff CF10 2HH, United Kingdom. SRK Consulting employs over 70 full-time technical specialists providing experienced support for all aspects of the natural resource industry. • Steel Business Briefing. Steel Business Briefing is an independent publisher dedicated to providing news, information and prices to the global steel industry.
v
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BE14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BE14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 200D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 49717
• Visiongain Ltd. Visiongain Ltd. (Visiongain) is an independent business information provider for the Telecoms, Pharmaceutical, Defence, Energy and Metals industries. • Wardell Armstrong International. Wardell Armstrong International (WAI) is an internationally recognised, independent minerals industry consultancy. The company’s business address is Wheal Jane, Baldhu, Truro, Cornwall, TR3 6EH, United Kingdom. WAI employs engineers, geologists and technicians with decades of experience, including prior field experience of the geology and mineralisation of gold deposits in Russia, Kazakastan, Burkina Faso and Guinea. • worldsteel. The World Steel Association (worldsteel) is one of the largest industry associations in the world, representing approximately 180 steel producers, national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes. worldsteel produces annual reports on the global steel industry. Where information in this Base Prospectus has been sourced from third-parties including in respect of information concerning the Company’s competitors, this information has been accurately reproduced, and as far as the Company and the Issuer are aware and are able to ascertain from the information published by the aforementioned sources, no facts have been omitted which would render the reproduced information, data and statistics inaccurate or misleading. Such information, data and statistics may be approximations or estimates or use rounded numbers. The Company and the Issuer have accurately reproduced such information and, as far as the Company and the Issuer are aware and are able to ascertain from information published by such third-party, no facts have been omitted that would render the reproduced information inaccurate or misleading. Nevertheless, prospective investors are advised to consider this data with caution. Market studies are often based on information or assumptions that may not be accurate or appropriate, and their methodology is inherently predictive and speculative. Prospective investors should note that the Company’s estimates are based on such third-party information. Neither the Company, the Arrangers nor the Dealers have independently verified the figures, market data or other information on which third-parties have based their studies. In addition, some of the information contained in this Base Prospectus has been derived from official data of Russian government agencies and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (CBR). The official data published by Russian federal, regional and local government agencies are substantially less complete or researched than those of more developed countries. Official statistics, including those produced by the CBR, may also be produced on different bases than those used in more developed countries. Any discussion of matters relating to Russia in this Base Prospectus must, therefore, be subject to uncertainty due to concerns about the completeness or reliability of available official and public information. The contents of the Group’s website do not form any part of this Base Prospectus.
Financial Information The Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 included in this Base Prospectus beginning on page F-17 and ending on page F-96, together with the notes thereto (the Annual Financial Statements) and the Company’s consolidated condensed interim financial statements as at and for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and 2010 included in this Base Prospectus beginning on page F-1 and ending on page F-16, together with the notes thereto (the Interim Financial Statements and together with the Annual Financial Statements, the Financial Statements) were prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, (IASB), in effect at the time of preparing these consolidated financial statements. In this Base Prospectus, • Russian Rouble, Russian Roubles, Rouble, Roubles or RUR refers to the lawful currency of the Russian Federation; • US dollar, US dollars, U.S.$ or US$ refers to the lawful currency of the United States of America; • British pound sterling, British pounds sterling, GBP or £ refers to the lawful currency of the United Kingdom; and • EUR, euro, or F refers to the single currency of the participating member states in the Third Stage of the European Economic and Monetary Union of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, as amended from time to time.
vi
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BE14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BE14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 80D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 3245
Mining Reserves Certain information relating to the Group’s reserves and resources relating to iron ore and coal cited in ‘‘Business’’ and ‘‘Industry’’ are produced by reference to the following sources. Estimation for the Karelsky Okatysh, Olkon and Vorkutaugol assets is based on the report issued by IMC Consulting Ltd dated June 2006, which was prepared in accordance with Australasian Joint Ore Reserves Committee Code (JORC) reporting standards, reduced by actual production since 1 January 2006, and also accounting for the disposal of the Kuzbassugol mining complex (Kuzbassugol) in April 2008. The report of IMC Consulting Ltd was not prepared for the purposes of this Base Prospectus. Reserves and resource estimations for Severstal Resources’ PBS Coals Limited (PBS Coals) and the Putu Range iron ore project have been developed under the guidelines of National Instrument 43-101, which is the standard of public disclosure of information relating to mineral properties in Canada and essentially similar to the Australasian JORC standard. Reports for PBS Coals and the Putu Range project have been prepared by the John T. Boyd Company and SRK Consulting, respectively. See also ‘‘Industry—Mining Industry— International Reporting Methodologies’’. These reports have not been prepared for the purposes of this Prospectus.
Operating Data All data relating to the Group’s production and operations, such as volumes of production, production capacity and certain sales information presented by sector, geography and product, cited in ‘‘Business’’, and as cited specifically elsewhere in this Base Prospectus, were derived from management accounts and information, which were not reviewed or audited by ZAO KPMG, the independent auditors of the Group.
Certain Defined Terms In this Base Prospectus: • the CBR means the CBR; • the Company or the Borrower means JSC Severstal; • the Group means the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries; • the Issuer means Steel Capital S.A.; • the FAS means the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation; • the Russian Government means the federal government of the Russian Federation; • tonnes means metric tonnes, and one metric tonne is equal to one thousand kilograms; • the US means the United States; • the UK means the United Kingdom; • the EU means the European Union and its member states as at the date of this Base Prospectus; • Russia means the Russian Federation; and • the CIS means the countries that formerly comprised the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and that are now members or associate members of the Commonwealth of Independent States: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.
Rounding Certain figures included in this Base Prospectus have been subject to rounding adjustments; accordingly, figures shown for the same category presented in different tables may vary slightly, and figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures which precede them.
SUPPLEMENTARY BASE PROSPECTUS The Company will, in connection with the admission of the Notes to listing on the Official List and to trading on the Market, so long as any Note remains outstanding and listed on the Official List and traded on the Market, in the event of any significant new factor, material mistake or inaccuracy relating to the information contained in this Base Prospectus, prepare a supplement to this Base Prospectus or publish a
vii
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BE14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BE14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 5660DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 17157
new Base Prospectus for use in connection with any subsequent issue of the Notes to be admitted to listing on the Official List and to trading on the Market. If at any time the Issuer shall be required to prepare a supplementary prospectus pursuant to section 87G of the FSMA, the Issuer will prepare and make available an appropriate amendment or supplement to this Base Prospectus or a further Base Prospectus which, in respect of any subsequent issue of Notes to be listed on the Official List and admitted to trading on the Market, shall constitute a supplementary prospectus as required by the UKLA and section 87G of the FSMA. The Issuer and the Company may agree with any Dealer that a Series of Notes may be issued in a form not contemplated by the Terms and Conditions herein, in which event a supplementary Base Prospectus, if appropriate, will be published which will describe the effect of the agreement reached in relation to such Notes.
viii
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BE14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BG14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1520DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63840
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW OF THE GROUP ...... 1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROGRAMME ...... 8 OVERVIEW FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE GROUP ...... 17 RISK FACTORS ...... 21 USE OF PROCEEDS ...... 47 EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION ...... 48 CAPITALISATION ...... 49 SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION ...... 50 OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW ...... 53 INDUSTRY ...... 113 BUSINESS ...... 124 MANAGEMENT...... 178 PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS ...... 191 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS ...... 192 REGULATORY MATTERS ...... 194 DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY ...... 208 THE ISSUER ...... 209 FACILITY AGREEMENT ...... 211 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NOTES ...... 258 FORM OF FINAL TERMS ...... 272 SUMMARY OF THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE NOTES IN GLOBAL FORM ..... 281 TAXATION ...... 287 CERTAIN ERISA CONSIDERATIONS ...... 298 SELLING AND TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS ...... 300 SUBSCRIPTION AND SALE ...... 304 LEGAL MATTERS ...... 306 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ...... 307 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ...... 308 GLOSSARY...... 310 INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ...... 315
ix
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BG14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BI14501A.;22 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 30D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 45085
OVERVIEW OF THE GROUP This overview may not contain all the information that may be important to prospective purchasers of the Notes and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with this entire Base Prospectus, including the more detailed information regarding the Group’s business and the Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Base Prospectus. Certain statements in this overview include forward-looking statements that also involve risks and uncertainties as described in ‘‘Forward-Looking Statements’’. The Group is an international, vertically integrated steel and mining company that sells high quality metal and mining products to customers across the world. According to Metal Bulletin, the Group was the world’s twenty-first largest producer of crude steel in 2010 by volume of production (as adjusted for the disposal of the group’s Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren and Severstal Wheeling assets). The Group is a full production cycle operation, which includes iron ore, coal, scrap collection, steel mills and rolled product plants, downstream production and distribution businesses, as well as gold mining enterprises. The Group’s primary production facilities are geographically diversified with locations in Russia, the United States and a number of other countries, including Kazakhstan, Burkina Faso and Guinea. With a focus on high value added products in attractive niche markets, the Group’s corporate strategy is to become one of the global industry leaders in terms of EBITDA and to sustain a leading position in terms of both margins and return on investment as a vertically-integrated steel and steel-related mining company. The Group comprises three business divisions: Russian Steel Division, Severstal International (North America operations) and Severstal Resources (including Nord Gold N.V. (Nordgold)). Russian Steel Division. In 2010, the Russian Steel Division produced approximately 16.6 percent of total Russian crude steel production, based on data from worldsteel, which accounted for 63.9 percent of the Group’s total revenues. According to calculations by the Group’s management based on publicly released data, the Russian Steel Division was the third largest producer of crude steel products in Russia by volume of production in 2010. The Russian Steel Division is comprised of the following: steel products production, pipes production, metalware production, scrap collection and processing and trading and service companies. • The production of steel products occurs primarily at the Cherepovets Steel Mill, including a number of its workshops, among which there are high-grade automotive galvanising facilities at Severgal and Rolling Mill 5000, as well as a number of other facilities located primary in northwestern region of Russia. These facilities jointly constitute the full production cycle, from the creation of crude steel to production of high value added products, such as electric welded pipes for construction or coated flat products for the automotive industry. The Russian Steel Division produced 11.1 million tonnes of crude steel in 2010 and achieved total steelmaking capacity of approximately 100 percent. • Pipes production is carried out at the ZAO Izhorsky Pipe Mill (Izhora Pipe Mill), a large diameter pipe mill. With an achieved total pipemaking capacity of 480 thousand tonnes as at 31 December 2010, the Izhora Pipe Mill produced 460 thousand tonnes in 2010. • Metalware production consists of ZAO Severstal-Metiz’s (Severstal-Metiz) wire drawing and metalware manufacturing businesses in Russia, Ukraine and Italy, with total sales of 786 thousand tonnes in 2010. According to calculations by the Group’s management based on publicly available data, the Group’s metalware market share represented approximately 23 percent of domestic Russian total sales volume and approximately 16 percent of Ukrainian metalware total sales volume, respectively, in 2010. • Scrap collection and processing is a ferrous scrap metal recycling business, which supplies scrap metal to Cherepovets Steel Mill and other companies. It consists of companies located in several Russian regions. • Trading and service companies comprise trading companies both in the Russian Federation and abroad. The main purpose of the service companies is to service and maintain the production processes of the Cherepovets Steel Mill by providing equipment repairing services. Severstal International. Severstal International is currently comprised of Severstal North America, see ‘‘—Severstal International—Discontinued Operations—Lucchini and North America disposal groups’’. • Severstal North America is comprised of Severstal Dearborn, LLC (Severstal Dearborn), Severstal Columbus, LLC (Severstal Columbus) and holding companies—Severstal US Holdings LLC, Severstal US Holdings II, LLC (formerly known as Severstal Wheeling Holding Company) and Severstal Columbus Holdings LLC. According to the Group’s estimates, these companies comprised the sixth
1
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BI14501A.;22 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BI14501A.;22 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 70D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 49157
Overview of the Group
largest steelmaking company in the United States in 2010. Severstal North America produces high quality, flat-rolled products and has 3.6 million tonnes of annual crude steel making capacity (5.2 million tonnes following the increased slab capacity at Severstal Columbus in June 2011). Severstal Resources. Severstal Resources comprises the following: iron ore production, coal production and gold production, as well as a smaller ferroniobium production complex. • The Group’s iron ore business is comprised of two iron ore extracting complexes: OAO Karelsky Okatysh (Karelsky Okatysh), which produces iron ore pellets, and OAO Olkon (Olkon), which produces iron ore concentrate. The Group’s iron ore business is also focused on three iron ore projects: the Group’s investment in the Putu Range project in south-eastern Liberia, for which the Group has signed a Mineral Development Agreement with the Government of Liberia; the Group’s investment in Core Mining Limited (Core Mining), which controls exploration licenses for the Avima iron ore deposit in the Republic of Congo and the Kango iron ore deposit in the Republic of Gabon; and the Group’s investment in a project in the Brazilian city of Macapa, SPG Mineracao S.A. (SPG), which owns a number of high potential iron ore licenses in the area of Tartarugalzinho, Amapa state, jointly named as the ‘‘Tartarugal project’’. • The Group’s coal business comprises Vorkutaugol, PBS Coals and Tsentralny field. Vorkutaugol comprises five longwall mines, an open pit mine and three washing plants. It extracts both coking and steam coal, and is located in northern Russia. PBS Coals operates open mines and deep room and pillar mines in the United States. It extracts coking and steam coal, and produces coking coal concentrate. Tsentralny field is a greenfield project located in the Tyva Republic. • The Group’s gold business comprises the Group’s gold mining assets recently consolidated under Nordgold, Severstal’s gold mining subsidiary. Nordgold includes eight operating mines, two development projects, five advanced exploration projects and a broad portfolio of early exploration projects and licensees located across West Africa in Guinea and Burkina Faso, Kazakhstan and Russia. The Company continues to consider its plans with respect to Nordgold, including a possible initial public offering or demerger. Severstal Resources was the largest producer of hard coking coal and the second largest producer of iron ore pellets in Russia in 2010, according to Rasmin and Rudprom. With the capacity to supply almost all of the current iron ore and a substantial majority of the hard coking coal needs of the Russian Steel Division, Severstal Resources forms the basis of the Group’s balanced and vertically-integrated business model. With a focus on high value-added products, such as export quality iron ore pellets and hard coking coal concentrate, Severstal Resources had a total iron ore output of 43.2 million tonnes of iron ore and ROM output of 16.6 million tonnes of coal in 2010. Severstal Resources estimates that, as at 31 December 2010, it had iron ore reserves and resources of approximately 589 million tonnes and 3,924 million tonnes, respectively, and coal reserves and resources of approximately 322 million tonnes and 219 million tonnes, respectively.
COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS The Group has developed a variety of competitive strengths, which it believes provide it with a greater resilience to the cyclical nature of the steel industry than some of its competitors and a basis on which to build its position as a global metals and mining company.
Vertically-Integrated Business with Access to Iron Ore, Coal and Scrap The Group is a vertically-integrated steel producer operating on a global scale. Its facilities span the full production cycle from iron ore and coal mining operations to steel mills and rolled-product plants as well as downstream production and distribution businesses. Its mining operations, conducted by Severstal Resources, provide supplies of iron ore and coal to its production facilities in Russia and to a lesser extent in the United States and also have the capacity to supply iron ore and coal to third-parties, which they do. The Group has its own scrap collection and processing facilities. Severstal Resources was the largest producer of hard coking coal and the second largest producer of iron ore pellets in Russia in 2010, according to Rasmin and Rudprom. The Russian Steel Division’s operations with respect to iron ore and coal are economically fully self-sufficient, as Severstal Resources’ overall production volumes are able to cover in full the overall consumption volumes of the Russian Steel
2
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BI14501A.;22 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BI14501A.;22 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 30D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55757
Overview of the Group
Division, without taking into account the chemical features of the particular coal and iron ore mix required. However, the Russian Steel Division does source a portion of its iron ore and coal requirements from third party suppliers primarily due to its requirements for materials with different chemical features and to take advantage of beneficial prevailing prices. Severstal Resources’ deposits have technical characteristics enabling it to produce a relatively wide range of products for customers in the metallurgical industries, in addition to the Group’s steel operations. Its reserves of iron ore and coal are significant, with estimated mine lives exceeding several decades. The Group considers mining to be one of its core businesses. Currently, the Group’s North American business units are economically fully self-sufficient in coking coal, and it sources iron ore and other raw materials from domestic suppliers under a variety of arrangements aimed at ensuring a reliable long-term supply of raw materials at competitive prices. This includes a long-term contract with Cliffs Natural Resources for the supply of iron ore to Severstal Dearborn until 2022. Severstal North America also indirectly sources approximately 25.0 percent of its coal needs from its sister company PBS Coals, located in Somerset, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Severstal Dearborn has long-term contracts in place for approximately half of its coking coal and it owns 50.0 percent of MSC, one of the largest coking plants in North America to support blast furnace operations. The balance of Severstal North America’s requirements is purchased on the spot markets. The vertically-integrated nature of the Group enables it to secure raw material supplies for its operations while reducing the Group’s exposure to raw material price fluctuations, resulting in increased efficiencies.
Global Cost Competitiveness Globally, Russia is one of the lowest cost regions for steel production in the world. With its largest production facilities located in northwest Russia, the Group benefits from relatively low-cost supplies of electricity and natural gas, as well as low transportation fees, given the proximity of its production facilities to producers of raw materials in that region, major steel-consuming markets in the central European part of Russia and the ports of the St. Petersburg region. In addition to these cost advantages, as one of the largest producers of steel in Russia, the Group benefits from economies of scale in production and negotiating power with its suppliers, including third-party suppliers of raw materials. This cost competitiveness is particularly valuable in granting the Group flexibility to shift its sales focus between the Russian domestic market and the export market depending on relative demand for steel and mining products domestically and globally. In order to maintain its cost competitiveness, the Group has made and continues to make investments to upgrade its facilities in the pursuit of increased productivity and energy efficiency. For example, in 2010, the Group’s largest steel production facility, located in Cherepovets, was estimated to be approximately 51.4 percent self-sufficient in terms of its own generation and consumption of electricity. See ‘‘—Strategy— Pursue Lower-Cost Steel Production’’.
Geographically Diversified Business with a Broad Range of Products The Group’s production facilities are geographically diversified, with locations in Russia, the United States and a number of other countries, including Kazakhstan, Burkina Faso and Guinea. The majority of the Group’s key steel and mining assets are located within Russia. The Group also continues to develop its mining businesses in low-cost regions such as Kazakhstan and regions in Africa. The Group’s largest steel production facility, located in Cherepovets in northwest Russia, provides it with the ability to access the Russian, CIS and Eastern European steel markets. Furthermore, the Group believes that, as a result of its presence in the United States, it benefits from greater access to the technologically advanced North American markets, which assists the Group in understanding the needs of its customer base and in tailoring its products accordingly. The global diversified nature of the Group has also enabled it to benefit from the sharing of industry know-how and best practices across business divisions. Extensive experience in mining operations in various regions aids the Group’s strategy to pursue further expansion of its mining operations internationally through a combination of M&A and greenfield investments.
Investment in Modernisation and Advanced Technological Processes The Group has made significant investments into modernisation programmes at its main steel production facilities and mining facilities in Russia, as well as its facilities in the United States and Africa, aimed at
3
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BI14501A.;22 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BI14501A.;22 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 220D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 36834
Overview of the Group
expanding production and achieving operational efficiencies. In 2009 and 2010, the Group’s capital expenditure at its three business divisions amounted to approximately US$806.8 million and US$1,310.3 million, respectively, excluding the Group’s discontinued operations of Lucchini SpA and its subsidiaries (Lucchini), Severstal Sparrows Point LLC (Sparrows Point), Severstal Warren LLC (Severstal Warren), Several Wheeling Inc. (Severstal Wheeling) and Mountain State Carbon LLC (MSC). As a result, the majority of the Group’s capital assets are currently in good condition and do not require significant investments in the near-term. Depending on prevailing market conditions, the Group intends to invest approximately an additional US$9,728.8 million excluding maintenance capital expenditures, during the period from 2011 to 2015 as part of its continuing capital expenditure programme, with current investment priorities focused on facilitating the expansion of the Group’s mining businesses in Russia, Africa and the United States, and expanding the Group’s share of the Russian domestic steel products market, aided by the Balakovo project and new galvanising and colour coating lines. The capital expenditure programme includes investments in the Severstal Dearborn facility, where the completion of a new pickle line and tandem cold mill (PLTCM) is expected to result in a reduction in costs and improvements in energy efficiency, while also upgrading product quality and yields. The completion of Severstal Dearborn’s hot dip galvanising (HDG) line is expected to allow Severstal Dearborn to provide additional automotive quality products at competitive costs. Investments in the Phase II expansion at Severstal Columbus are expected to double its production capacity in 2011, reduce costs and increase the facility’s ability to produce value added products. Ongoing investments in upgrading facilities, customer care projects and research and development efforts are expected to help the Group maintain a leading position in the Russian high-quality value-added steel sector. The Group specialises in producing advanced steel grades for the oil and gas, shipbuilding and automotive industries in Russia. The Group has also sought to adopt new technological processes when operationally convenient to do so, such as the introduction of PCI technology into blast furnace ‘‘C’’ at the Severstal Dearborn facility in connection with the rebuilding of that blast furnace in 2007. In addition, aggregate annual capital expenditure on maintenance for the Group is expected to be approximately US$777.0 million in 2011 and expected to gradually increase to approximately US$890.0 million in 2015 (provided that the Group undertakes the expansion projects contemplated by the current business plan and subject to then-prevailing market conditions). As a result, the Group believes that its modern production facilities and consistent investment programmes position it well within the high value-added and niche steel product markets, in addition to its other steel and metalware products.
Experienced Management Team The Group’s senior management team combines extensive steel and resources industry knowledge with international management and financial expertise, including valuable insight gained from the five independent non-executive directors on the board of directors. At an operational level, the Group has developed, and continues to refine, a management structure that is focused on improving accountability, clarifying responsibilities and streamlining information reporting and decision-making. Backed by international experience and advanced technical and business qualifications, the management team’s ability to successfully manage the performance of the Group’s assets is evidenced by the increased operating efficiency of the Cherepovets Steel Mill in recent years and cost reduction achievements across the divisions.
Strong Corporate Governance The Group seeks to adhere to international corporate governance standards. The Group benefits from a culture of independence on its board of directors as a result of both a diverse, multinational membership and the independence of half of its board and chairman (according to UK standards of independence). In addition, the Group has established committees of its board of directors in accordance with the UK Combined Code on Corporate Governance and has implemented other measures aimed at promoting transparency and good corporate governance. These measures include implementing internal control procedures and internal audit functions, publishing quarterly financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, publishing regular production updates and requiring the approval by majority vote of the Board of Directors of transactions with a value exceeding 10.0 percent of the book value of the Company’s assets and requiring the approval by a two-thirds majority of the total number of directors, excluding any retired
4
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BI14501A.;22 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BI14501A.;22 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 160D*/290D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 27968
Overview of the Group
directors, for transactions for the purchase of assets with a total value exceeding US$500 million and for reviews of the consolidated budget.
STRATEGY The Group’s corporate strategy is to become one of the global industry leaders in terms of EBITDA and to sustain a leading position in terms of margins and return on investment as a vertically-integrated steel and steel-related mining company. The Group has grounded its corporate strategy in the crucial industrial growth drivers of cost competitiveness, vertical integration and presence in consolidated and growing markets in order to build upon and improve its ranking as one of the leading steel companies worldwide. To successfully implement this strategy, the Group intends to pursue the following initiatives:
Capitalise on Presence in Growing Regional Markets and Assets Optimisation in Developed Markets The Group’s main regional markets exhibited strong growth rates in 2010 following the global economic crisis: steel demand in Russia grew by approximately 43.2 percent, and in the US, by approximately 35.3 percent year-on-year, according to worldsteel. The Group has a positive mid-to-long term growth outlook for steel demand in all the regions in which it has a presence. The Group’s strategy in each of its key regions is as follows: Russia. The Group views the Russian market for steel products as providing significant growth potential due to rising personal incomes, growing demand for modern housing, cars and the poor state of the country’s infrastructure which requires significant investments. The Group plans to continue to invest in its production facilities in Russia, as it expects a steady growth of steel demand in Russia. In line with its strategy, starting from June 2010, the Group has commenced operations at its TPZ-Sheksna facility. TPZ-Sheksna is located close to the Group’s main Russian steelmaking facilities in Cherepovets and has a capacity of 250 thousand tonnes per year of electric welded pipes and other profiles. The Group is also constructing the Balakovo mini-mill in central Russia, with an expected capacity of one million tonnes per year upon completion, which is currently planned for 2013. The Balakovo mini-mill is expected to produce long term products for the construction and infrastructure industries. The Group is planning to construct two new galvanising and two new colour-coating lines. USA. After the US economy fully recovers from the recessionary effects of the recent financial crisis and returns to steady growth, US steel demand is expected to rise in line with the long-term global trend. Future US growth is expected to be particularly driven by population growth and the need to build up previously underinvested infrastructure. The Group plans to focus on developing competitive and efficient steelmaking assets in the United States. For additional information on the Group’s US strategy, see ‘‘—Modernise and Bring to Sustainable Profitability Operations in the United States’’. India. The Group assumes India will be one of the highest growth areas in the next decade with an estimated growth rate in steel demand of 8.5 percent per year from 2010 to 2020, according to World Steel Dynamics. The Group and National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. (NMDC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to establish a joint venture company to build an integrated steel plant. The plant, which will be constructed in Karnataka and is expected to have a capacity of between 2 and 5 million tonnes per year.
Expand Mining Business Globally The Group believes that its mining activities will provide a strong source of growth and intends to expand its iron ore and coal production, as well as its other mining operations. The Group plans to significantly expand its mining operations in Russia, the CIS and other emerging markets with the aim of increasing its cost competitiveness and its global level of vertical integration. Vertical integration is a key part of the Group’s business model. The Group is one of the few international steel companies with a strong position in both iron ore and coking coal. Following the planned expansion of its brownfield projects in Russia (such as Karelsky Okatysh and Vorkutaugol) and its coking coal production in the United States, the Group is targeting at least 80.0 percent global economic self-sufficiency in raw materials to secure cost-competitiveness, improve total profitability and smooth influence of business cycles.
5
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BI14501A.;22 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BI14501A.;22 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 249D*/290D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 21710
Overview of the Group
The Group is also pursuing several major projects, including exploration and development license opportunities for the Tsentralny field in the Republic of Tyva (Russia); a project with Affero Mining, Inc. (formerly Africa Aura) for the development of an iron ore deposit in Putu Range (Liberia); and a project with SPG for the development of an iron ore deposit in Amapa (Brazil). The Group intends to continue its focus on stringent cost control at its mining facilities in order to counter the global trend of increasing mining costs.
Modernise and Bring to Sustainable Profitability Operations in the United States Following the sale of the Group’s Northern Steel Group, Inc. assets in May 2010 and its 100.0 percent stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC in March 2011, the Group plans to focus on developing competitive and efficient steelmaking assets in the United States. With the Group’s investments to complete Phase II of the Severstal Columbus expansion, resulting in an expected doubling of that facility’s production capacity in 2011, the Group intends to strengthen Severstal Columbus’ position as one of the most cost competitive US flat mills. In an environment of rising raw material prices, Severstal Dearborn is expected to benefit from its long-term contract with Cliffs Natural Resources. In addition, investments in the PLTCM and HDG line at Severstal Dearborn are expected to further improve its cost position and enable it to produce advanced automotive steels. The Group’s management believes that this will make Severstal Dearborn one of the principal suppliers of high-quality flat products in North America. The Group is also considering participating in a greenfield project for the building of a DRI plant that would also secure DRI supply to Severstal Columbus.
Pursue Low-Cost Steel Production The Group believes that cost competitiveness in every region where it produces steel is a vital element of its success. Accordingly, the Group plans to continue to pursue a strategy of lower-cost steel production in relation to its Russian operations (in comparison to global cost levels in steel production), as well as in relation to its US operations (in comparison to regional cost levels in steel production). Vertical integration is an integral part of the Group’s business model. The Group is one of the few international steel companies with a strong position in both iron ore and coking coal. The Group is economically fully self-sufficient in primary steel-related raw materials in Russia, and, in the US, only local coking coal capacities are sufficient to provide full economic integration for steel plants in North America. The Group is targeting to have at least 80.0 percent global economic self-sufficiency in raw materials. The Group believes that a low cost operating structure can be achieved by a combination of capital expenditure on production facilities, energy efficiency improvements, integration of its raw materials business with steel production and labour productivity gains. The Group’s capital expenditure programme includes various projects to improve operational efficiencies and to reduce raw material consumption.
RISK FACTORS An investment in the Notes involves a high degree of risk, including but not limited to the following: • The Group’s business is dependent on the global economic environment. • The steel and mining industries are cyclical, which may result in adverse fluctuations in the demand for the Group’s products. • Any significant change in prices or supply of raw materials may cause the Group’s financial results to vary, which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. • The Group will require a significant amount of cash to fund its capital expenditure programme. If the Group is unable to generate this cash through operations or external sources, this programme may not be completed on schedule or at all. • The Group has grown rapidly and intends to pursue opportunities to grow its operations through further acquisitions, but there can be no assurance that the Group will be able to successfully integrate such acquired companies or identify suitable acquisition targets. • The steel industry is highly competitive, and the Group may not be able to compete successfully.
6
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BI14501A.;22 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BI14501A.;22 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 460DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 2393
Overview of the Group
• Payments under each Loan Agreement are structurally subordinated to existing indebtedness of the Group’s subsidiaries, and these subsidiaries may incur further such indebtedness in the future. • Political and governmental instability could adversely affect the value of investments in Russia, including the Notes. • Arbitrary or selective state action could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business. • Weaknesses relating to the Russian legal system and Russian legislation create an uncertain environment for investment and for business activity. For further information on the risks affecting the Group, see ‘‘Risk Factors’’ beginning on page 21.
USE OF PROCEEDS The gross proceeds from each offering of a Series of Notes will be used by the Issuer for the sole purpose of financing the corresponding Loan to the Company. The gross proceeds of such Loan will be used by the Company for general corporate purposes unless otherwise specified in the relevant Loan Agreement. In connection with the receipt of such Loan, the Company will pay an arrangement fee, as reflected in the relevant Final Terms.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Crew Gold From February 2010 to January 2011, through a series of transactions, the Group acquired a 100.0 percent stake in Crew Gold, a gold mining company previously headquartered in London and previously listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Oslo Stock Exchange. Crew Gold owns and operates LEFA mine, a high potential gold mining project in Guinea, West Africa.
Iron Mineral Beneficiation Services (Proprietary) Limited During 2010, the Group acquired a 25.6 percent stake in Iron Mineral Beneficiation Services (Proprietary) Limited (IMBS), a research and development company based in Johannesburg, South Africa. The Group acquired an additional 7.4 percent stake in March 2011 increasing its ownership interest to 33.0 percent IMBS has developed a coal-based Finesmelt technology capable of processing unusable iron ore fines and thermal coal into valuable metallic products similar to DRI/HBI. Currently, IMBS is developing its first commercial project in Phalaborwa, South Africa. As a part of the transaction, International Iron Beneficiation Group (IIBG) was formed, a new company that has an exclusive license to commercialise the technology worldwide (outside of South Africa and neighbouring countries), of which the Group owns a 51.0 percent stake.
National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. In December 2010, Severstal and NMDC, the leading iron ore producer in India, signed an MOU to establish a 50:50 joint venture company with the objective of building an integrated steel plant in India.
Severstal North America Assets In March 2011, the Group sold its 100.0 percent stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC. The remaining 50.0 percent share in MSC is accounted for using the equity method.
SPG Mineracao S.A. In May 2011, the Group acquired a 25.0 percent stake in SPG. SPG is a private iron ore mining and exploration company with its headquarters in Macapa city, Amapa state, Brazil. SPG’s main asset is a number of high potential iron ore licenses in the area of Tartarugalzinho, Amapa state, jointly named as the ‘‘Tartarugal project’’, with the total approximate resource potential of 600 million tonnes of iron ore, based on the Group’s estimation.
7
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BI14501A.;22 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 15:17 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;13 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 26021
OVERVIEW OF THE PROGRAMME The following overview contains basic information about the Notes and Loans and should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the information set forth under ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’ and ‘‘Facility Agreement’’ appearing elsewhere in this Base Prospectus. The following overview does not purport to be complete and is taken from, and is qualified in its entirety by, the remainder of this document and, in relation to the terms and conditions of any particular Series of Notes, the applicable Final Terms. Words and expressions defined in ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’ below shall have the same meanings in this overview. The Issuer and the Company may agree with any Dealer that Notes may be issued in a form other than that contemplated in ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’, in which event a supplement to this Base Prospectus, if appropriate, will be made available that will describe the effect of the agreement reached in relation to such Notes. Each Series of Notes will be structured as a Loan by the Issuer to the Company of a sum equivalent to the gross proceeds of an issue of such Series. The Issuer will issue Notes to Noteholders, for the sole purpose of funding such Loan. The Loan will have capacity to produce funds to service the payments due and payable on the Notes. Each Series of Notes will be constituted by a principal trust deed (the Principal Trust Deed) as supplemented and amended in respect of such Series of Notes by a supplemental trust deed (each a Supplemental Trust Deed, and together with the Principal Trust Deed, a Trust Deed), each entered into between the Issuer and the Trustee. Pursuant to each Trust Deed the Issuer will (i) charge to the Trustee by way of a first fixed charge as security for the benefit of the holders of a Series of Notes (a) all principal, interest and other amounts payable by the Company to the Issuer as lender under the relevant Loan Agreement, (b) the right to receive all sums which may be or become payable by the Company under any claim, award or judgment relating to the relevant Loan Agreement and (c) all rights, title and interest in and to all sums of money now or in the future deposited in an account established for the relevant Series of Notes with the Principal Paying and Transfer Agent in the name of the Issuer (the Account) including interest from time to time earned thereon and (ii) assign certain of its rights under the relevant Loan Agreement (but excluding any Reserved Rights), to the Trustee for the benefit of the holders of the corresponding Series of Notes. As a consequence of the assignment of the rights under the Loan Agreement the Trustee shall assume the rights of the Issuer (other than certain Reserved Rights) as set out in the relevant provisions of the Trust Deed. If and when the first fixed charge of certain of the Issuer’s rights and interests under any Loan is enforced, the Trustee will assume the rights of the Issuer under such Loan as set out in the relevant provisions of the Trust Deed and the Trustee will assume certain rights and obligations towards the Noteholders, as more fully set out in the Trust Deed. The Company will be obliged to make payments in respect of principal, interest and additional amounts (if any) to the Issuer under each Loan into the Account in accordance with the terms of the relevant Loan Agreement. The Issuer will agree in the Trust Deed not to make or consent to any amendment to or any modification or waiver of, or authorise any breach or proposed breach of, the terms of any Loan Agreement, unless the Trustee has given its prior written consent. The Issuer will further agree to act at all times in accordance with any instructions of the Trustee from time to time with respect to each Loan Agreement. Any material amendments, modifications, waivers or authorisations made with the Trustee’s consent shall be notified to the Noteholders in accordance with, and as more fully described in, ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes—14. Notices’’, and shall be binding on the Noteholders. Formal notice of the security interests created by any Trust Deed will be given to the Company and the Principal Paying and Transfer Agent who will each be required to acknowledge the same. Each Series of Notes will be limited recourse obligations and the Issuer will not have any obligation to the Noteholders other than the obligation to account to Noteholders for payments of principal, interest and other amounts, if any, received by it or for its account pursuant to the relevant Loan. Set out below is a diagrammatic representation of the structure:
Principal and Interest Principal and Interest on the Notes on the Loan
Noteholders The Issuer The Company
Proceeds of the Proceeds of the Loan Notes 6JUL201114414679
8
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;13 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 28111
Overview of the Programme
Notes to Be Issued Under the Programme
Issuer ...... Steel Capital S.A. Company (as Borrower) ...... JSC Severstal with its registered office and business headquarters at Ul. Mira 30, 162600 Cherepovets, Russia. Description ...... Programme for the Issuance of Loan Participation Notes pursuant to which the Issuer may issue Notes. Offering ...... The Notes and the corresponding Loans have not been, and will not be, registered under the Securities Act and, subject to certain exceptions, may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, US persons (as defined in Regulation S). The Notes may be offered and sold (i) within the United States to QIBs, as defined in Rule 144A, that are also QPs, as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A and (ii) to persons who are not US persons (as defined in Regulation S) in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S. The Issuer has not been and will not be registered under the Investment Company Act. Prospective purchasers are hereby notified that sellers of the Rule 144A Notes may be relying on the exemption from the provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A and the Issuer is relying on an exemption from the Investment Company Act provided by Section 3(c)(7) thereof. Each purchaser of Notes will be deemed, by its acceptance of such Notes, to have made certain representations and agreements intended to restrict transfers of the Notes as described under ‘‘Selling and Transfer Restrictions’’. No holder or beneficial owner of the Notes may transfer the Notes except to a transferee who can make the same deemed representations and agreements as set forth in ‘‘Selling and Transfer Restrictions’’ on behalf of itself and each account for which it is purchasing. Any transfer in breach of the transfer restrictions set forth in ‘‘Selling and Transfer Restrictions’’ will be void ab initio and will not operate to transfer any rights to the transferee. For a description of these and certain further restrictions, see ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’ and ‘‘Selling and Transfer Restrictions’’. Programme Size ...... Up to US$3,000,000,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies at the date of issue) aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding at any one time. The Issuer, with the consent of the Company, may increase the amount of the Programme in accordance with the Dealer Agreement (as defined in ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’). In this respect, for the purpose of calculating the aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding, the premium of Notes issued at a premium shall be added to their principal amount. Arrangers ...... Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs International and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Permanent Dealers ...... Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs International and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Dealers ...... Pursuant to the terms of the Dealer Agreement, the Issuer, on the Company’s instructions, may from time to time terminate the appointment of any Dealer under the Programme. The
9
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 90D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 10902
Overview of the Programme
Issuer, on the Company’s instructions, may also from time to time appoint additional Dealers either in respect of one or more Series of Notes or in respect of the whole Programme. References in this Base Prospectus to ‘‘Permanent Dealers’’ are to the persons listed above as Dealers and to such additional persons that are appointed as dealers in respect of the whole Programme (and whose appointment has not been terminated) and to ‘‘Dealers’’ are to all Permanent Dealers and all persons appointed as dealers in respect of one or more Series of Notes. Trustee ...... Citibank, N.A. Principal Paying and Transfer Agent . Citibank, N.A., London Branch, unless it is specified in the relevant Final Terms relating to a Series of Notes that another principal paying and transfer agent is appointed in respect of that Series. References in this Base Prospectus to ‘‘Principal Paying and Transfer Agent’’ are to Citibank, N.A., London Branch or such alternative principal paying agent or agents, as the case may be. Registrar ...... Citigroup Global Markets Deutschland AG, unless it is specified in the relevant Final Terms relating to a Series of Notes that an alternative registrar is appointed in respect of that Series. References in this Base Prospectus to ‘‘Registrar’’ are to Citigroup Global Markets Deutschland AG or such alternative Registrar, as the case may be. Paying Agent ...... Citibank, N.A., unless it is specified in the relevant Final Terms relating to a Series of Notes that another paying agent is appointed in respect of that Series. References in this Base Prospectus to ‘‘Paying Agent’’ are to Citibank, N.A., or such alternative paying agent, as the case may be. Transfer Agent ...... Citibank, N.A., unless it is specified in the relevant Final Terms relating to a Series of Notes that another transfer agent is appointed in respect of that Series. References in this Base Prospectus to ‘‘Transfer Agent’’ are to Citibank, N.A., or such alternative transfer agent, as the case may be. Calculation Agent ...... Citibank, N.A., London Branch, unless it is specified in the relevant Final Terms relating to a Series of Notes that another calculation agent is appointed in respect of that Series. References in this Base Prospectus to ‘‘Calculation Agent’’ are to Citibank, N.A., London Branch or such alternative calculation agent, as the case may be. Method of Issue ...... The Notes will be issued on a syndicated or non-syndicated basis. The Notes will be issued in series (each a Series) having one or more issue dates and on terms otherwise identical to each other (or identical other than in respect of the amount and the date of first payment of interest), the Notes of each Series being intended to be interchangeable with all other Notes of that Series. The specific terms of each Series will be completed in the Final Terms which shall complete the ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’. Status ...... Each Series of Notes will constitute the obligation of the Issuer to apply the proceeds from the issue of the Notes solely for financing the corresponding Loan and to account to the Noteholders for amounts equivalent to sums of principal,
10
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 30D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 30460
Overview of the Programme
interest and additional amounts (if any) actually received by or for the account of the Issuer pursuant to such Loan, all as more fully described in ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes—1. Status’’. Security ...... The Issuer’s payment obligations in respect of each Series of Notes will be secured by a first fixed charge on: • principal, interest and other amounts paid and payable under the relevant Loan Agreement and the Issuer’s right to receive all sums paid and payable under any claim, award or judgment relating to such Loan Agreement (save for any Reserved Rights); and • all the rights, title and interest in and to all sums of money held from time to time in an account for the particular Series specified in the relevant Final Terms, together with the debt represented thereby (including interest from time to time earned thereon) pursuant to the Trust Deed. Assignment of Rights ...... The Issuer will assign its rights under the relevant Loan Agreement (save for any Reserved Rights and those rights charged above) to the Trustee on the Issue Date of the corresponding Series of Notes. Form ...... Each Series of Notes will be issued in registered form. The Regulation S Notes and the Rule 144A Notes will be represented by the Regulation S Global Certificate and the Rule 144A Global Certificate, respectively, in each case without interest coupons. The Global Certificates will be exchangeable for Definitive Certificates (as defined in ‘‘Summary of the Provisions relating to the Notes in Global Form’’) in the limited circumstances specified in the Global Certificates. Clearing Systems ...... DTC (in the case of the Rule 144A Notes), Euroclear and Clearstream, Luxembourg (in the case of the Regulation S Notes) and such other clearing system as may be agreed between the Issuer, the Company, the Paying Agents, the Trustee and the relevant Dealer(s). Initial Delivery of Notes ...... On or before the issue date for each Series, the Rule 144A Global Certificate will be deposited with a custodian for DTC and the Regulation S Global Certificate will be deposited with Citibank Europe plc as common depositary for Euroclear and Clearstream, Luxembourg. The Rule 144A Notes will be registered in the name of a nominee of DTC and the Regulation S Notes will be registered in the name of a nominee of Euroclear and Clearstream, Luxembourg. Global Certificates may also be deposited with any other clearing system or may be delivered outside any clearing system provided that the method of such delivery has been agreed in advance by the Issuer, the Company, the Paying Agents, the Trustee and the relevant Dealer(s). Notes that are to be credited to one or more clearing systems on issue will be registered in the name of a nominee or nominees for such clearing systems. Currencies ...... Subject to compliance with all relevant laws, regulations and directives, Notes may be issued in any currency agreed between the Issuer, the Company and the relevant Dealer(s). Maturities ...... Subject to compliance with all relevant laws, regulations and directives, Notes may be issued with any maturity as may be
11
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 210D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 12129
Overview of the Programme
agreed between the Issuer, the Company and the relevant Dealer(s). Denomination ...... Notes will be in such denominations as may be specified in the relevant Final Terms, save that unless otherwise permitted by then current laws and regulations: (i) Notes which have a maturity of less than one year and in respect of which the issue proceeds are to be accepted by the Issuer in the United Kingdom or whose issue otherwise constitutes a contravention of section 19 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 will have a minimum specified denomination of £100,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies), (ii) Notes resold pursuant to Rule 144A will be issued in specified denominations of US$200,000 or its equivalent in other currencies rounded upwards as agreed between the Issuer, the Company and the relevant Dealer(s) or integral multiples of US$1,000 thereafter and (iii) the minimum specified denomination of any Notes shall be A100,000 (or its equivalent in any other currency as at the issue date of the relevant Notes). Rate of Interest ...... The Notes may be issued on a fixed rate or a floating rate basis. Fixed Rate Notes ...... Fixed interest will be payable in arrear on the date or dates in each year specified in the relevant Final Terms. Floating Rate Notes ...... Floating Rate Notes will bear interest determined separately for each Series of Notes issued on a floating rate basis and the corresponding Loan Supplement as follows (and as specified in the relevant Final Terms and Loan Supplement): (i) on the same basis as the floating rate under a notional interest rate swap transaction in the relevant Specified Currency governed by an agreement incorporating the 2006 ISDA Definitions, as published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.; or (ii) by reference to the London inter-bank offered rate (LIBOR) or the Euro inter-bank offered rate (EURIBOR) (or such other benchmark as may be specified in the relevant Final Terms and Loan Supplement) as adjusted for any applicable margin. Interest Periods and Interest Rates . . The length of the interest periods for the Notes and the applicable interest rate may differ from time to time or be constant for any Series. Notes may have a maximum interest rate, a minimum interest rate, or both. The use of interest accrual periods permits the Notes to bear interest at different rates in the same interest period. All such information will be set out in the relevant Final Terms. Redemption ...... The relevant Final Terms will specify the basis for calculating the redemption amounts payable and whether there will be any put or call options. Unless permitted by then current laws and regulations, Notes that have a maturity of less than one year and in respect of which the issue proceeds are to be accepted by the Issuer in the United Kingdom or whose issue otherwise constitutes a contravention of section 19 of the FSMA must have a minimum redemption amount of £100,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies).
12
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 34922
Overview of the Programme
Issuer’s Restrictions and Covenants . . So long as any Note remains outstanding, the Issuer will not, without the prior written consent of the Trustee, inter alia, engage in any business whatsoever (other than entering into limited recourse debt securities programmes and other limited recourse debt securities issues for the benefit of the Company, issuing notes thereunder for the purpose of financing any loans to the Company and certain other activities). See ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes—4. Restrictive Covenants’’. Furthermore, the Issuer will agree in the Trust Deed not to make or consent to any amendment or modification or waiver of, or authorise any breach or proposed breach of the terms of any Loan Agreement unless the Trustee has given its prior written consent. Use of Proceeds of the Notes ...... The Issuer will apply the gross proceeds of the issue of each Series of Notes to fund the corresponding Loan to the Company. Redemption by the Issuer at the Option of the Company ...... The Issuer will redeem the Notes in whole, but not in part, at 100.0 percent of their aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest and all additional amounts, if any, if the Group elects to repay any Loan on the happening of certain events that result in the Group (or the Issuer) being required to pay additional amounts on account of Russian or Luxembourg taxes in respect of payments under the corresponding Loan or corresponding Notes or results in the Group being required to pay additional amounts on account of increased costs incurred by the Issuer, reduced amounts receivable by the issuer or the Issuer makes any payment of foregoes any return in connection with the relevant Loan. Mandatory Redemption ...... In limited circumstances as more fully described in the relevant Loan Agreement, the Notes may be redeemed by the Issuer in whole, but not in part, on any Interest Payment Date in the case of Floating Rate Notes or at any time, in the case of Fixed Rate Notes, upon giving notice to the Trustee and the Company, at the principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest and all additional amounts, if any, up to the date of redemption in the event that it becomes unlawful for (i) the Issuer to allow the relevant Loan to remain outstanding under the relevant Loan Agreement or (ii) the Issuer to allow the relevant Notes to remain outstanding. In either case, the Loan would be repaid in full on the date notified by the Issuer. Relevant Events ...... In the case of a Relevant Event (as defined in the ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes—9. Enforcement’’) the Trustee may, subject to the provisions of the Trust Deed, enforce the security created in the Trust Deed in favour of the Noteholders. Withholding Tax ...... All payments of principal and interest in respect of each Series of Notes will be made in full without set-off or counterclaim and free and clear of and without deduction for or on account of all taxes, which are or will be imposed, assessed, charged, levied, collected, demanded, withheld or claimed by Luxembourg, or any taxing authority thereof or therein, other than as required by law. If any such taxes, duties and other charges are payable, the sum payable by the Company to the Issuer under the relevant Loan Agreement will (subject to certain exceptions and limitations) be required to be increased to the extent necessary
13
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 150D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 52657
Overview of the Programme
to ensure that the Noteholders receive the net sum which they would have received free from any liability in respect of any such deduction or withholding had no such deduction or withholding been made or required to be made. The sole obligation of the Issuer in this respect will be to pay to the Noteholders sums equivalent to the sums received from the Company. Further Issues ...... The Issuer may from time to time issue further Notes of any Series on the same terms as existing Notes of the same Series and such further Notes shall be consolidated and form a single Series with such existing Notes of the same Series. In the event of such further issuance, the principal amount of the relevant Loan will be correspondingly increased. Listing and Trading ...... Application will be made, where specified in the relevant Final Terms, for a Series of Notes to be admitted to listing on the Official List and to trading on the Market or to be listed on such other stock exchange or official list and traded on such other market as shall be specified in the relevant Final Terms or the Series of Notes will remain unlisted. Rating ...... Series of Notes issued under this Programme may be rated or unrated. Where a Series of Notes is rated, such rating will not necessarily be the same as the rating assigned to the Programme and will be specified in the relevant Final Terms. The rating of certain Series of Notes to be issued under the Programme may be specified in the applicable Final Terms. Whether or not each credit rating applied for in relation to relevant Series of Notes will be issued by a credit rating agency established in the European Union and registered under Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 (the ‘‘CRA Regulation’’) will be disclosed in the Final Terms. See ‘‘Risk Factors—Ratings of the Notes’’. Credit ratings assigned to the Notes do not necessarily mean that they are a suitable investment. A rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organisation. Similar ratings on different types of notes do not necessarily mean the same thing. The ratings do not address the likelihood that the principal on the Notes will be prepaid, paid on an expected final payment date or paid on any particular date before the legal final maturity date of the Notes. The ratings do not address the marketability of the Notes or any market price. Any change in the credit ratings of the Notes or the Company could adversely affect the price that a subsequent purchaser will be willing to pay for the Notes. The significance of each rating should be analysed independently from any other rating. Governing Law ...... The Notes and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with them, will be governed by English law. The provisions of articles 86 to 94-8 of the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915, as amended on commercial companies are excluded. Selling Restrictions ...... United States, United Kingdom and Russia and any other jurisdiction relevant to any Series. See ‘‘Subscription and Sale’’.
14
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 290D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 19984
Overview of the Programme
ERISA Considerations ...... A Series of Notes issued under the Programme may be regarded for purposes of the United States Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) as equity interests in a separate entity whose sole asset is the Loan. Accordingly, the Notes should not be acquired by any ‘‘benefit plan investor’’ within the meaning of Section 3(42) of ERISA. Each purchaser and/or holder of Notes and each transferee therefore will be deemed to have made certain representations as to its status under ERISA and the US Tax Code. Potential purchasers should read the sections entitled ‘‘Certain ERISA Considerations’’ and ‘‘Selling and Transfer Restrictions’’. Risk Factors ...... An investment in the Notes involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should have regard to the factors described in the section entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in this Base Prospectus. The Loan Corresponding to Each Series of Notes Lender ...... Steel Capital S.A. Borrower ...... JSC Severstal. Security and Ranking ...... None of the Loans will be secured by any collateral. Obligations under the Loan will rank at least pari passu with all other unsecured and unsubordinated financial indebtedness of the Company. Interest Basis Dates ...... Interest will be payable on a fixed or floating rate basis as specified in the relevant Loan Supplement. Redemption at the Option of the Company ...... Each Loan may be prepaid at the Company’s option in whole, but not in part, on any Interest Payment Date in the case of Floating Rate Loans or at any time, in the case of Fixed Rate Loans, in either case at the principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest and additional amounts, if any, up to the date of repayment, for certain tax reasons or by reason of certain increased costs as provided in the Facility Agreement. Mandatory Repayments ...... In the event that it becomes unlawful for the Issuer to fund any Loan or allow such Loan to remain outstanding under the relevant Loan Agreement or allow the corresponding Series of Notes to remain outstanding, the Company may be required to repay such Loan in full. Certain Restrictions and Covenants . . The Issuer will have the benefit of certain covenants made by the Company all as fully described in the relevant Loan Agreement. Events of Default ...... In the case of an Event of Default (as defined in the Facility Agreement), the Trustee may, subject as provided in the Trust Deed, require the Issuer to declare all amounts payable under the relevant Loan Agreement by the Company to be due and payable. Use of Proceeds of the Loans ...... The Company will use the gross proceeds of each Loan for general corporate purposes unless otherwise specified in the relevant Loan Agreement. In connection with the receipt of any Loan, the Company will pay an arrangement fee as reflected in the relevant Final Terms.
15
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BK14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 4970DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 25958
Overview of the Programme
Withholding Tax ...... All payments of principal and interest under each Loan will be made in full without set off or counterclaim and free and clear of and without deduction for or on account of all taxes which are or will be imposed, assessed, charged, levied, collected, demanded, withheld or claimed by the Russian Federation, other than as required by law. If any such taxes, duties or other charges are payable in respect of the Loan, the sum payable by the Company under the Loan will (subject to certain conditions) be required to be increased to the extent necessary to ensure that the Issuer receives the net sum which it would have received free from any liability in respect of any such deduction or withholding had no such deduction or withholding been made or required to be made. Governing Law ...... The Loans, and any non contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with them, will be governed by English law.
16
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BK14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BM14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 495D*/3770D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 37198
OVERVIEW FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE GROUP The following tables set forth, in summary form, consolidated statements of financial position, income statements and other information relating to the Group. Such information has been derived from the Financial Statements of the Group prepared in accordance with IFRS. The reports of ZAO KPMG appear elsewhere in this Prospectus. The financial information presented below should be read in conjunction with such Financial Statements, reports and ‘‘Operating and Financial Review’’.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS Three months ended Year ended 31 December 31 March 2010 2009(1) 2008(1) 2011 2010(1) (Amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars, except as otherwise stated) Revenue Revenue—third parties ...... 13,510,930 9,540,775 15,888,278 3,701,803 2,723,394 Revenue—related parties ...... 62,335 53,118 177,481 25,399 18,437 13,573,265 9,593,893 16,065,759 3,727,202 2,741,831 Cost of sales ...... (9,110,216) (7,209,763) (10,542,560) (2,510,038) (1,945,871) Gross profit ...... 4,463,049 2,384,130 5,523,199 1,217,164 795,960 General and administrative expenses ...... (638,403) (516,863) (801,528) (168,034) (147,504) Distribution expenses ...... (990,727) (791,505) (995,732) (235,299) (195,884) Other taxes and contributions ...... (182,351) (150,001) (153,071) (55,632) (37,098) Share of associates’ profit/(loss) ...... 19,401 13,298 (2,687) (1,580) 1,824 Net loss from securities operations ...... (104,694) (12,160) (99,876) (9,786) (3,514) (Loss)/profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... (46,748) (30,058) (43,511) (4,032) 1,189 Net other operating (expenses)/income ...... (15,288) (37,675) 555,665 (1,637) (7,168) Profit from operations ...... 2,504,239 859,166 3,982,459 741,164 407,805 Impairment of non-current assets ...... (81,123) (88,056) (531,975) (827) (63,720) Negative goodwill ...... — — 79,862 — — Net other non-operating (expenses)/income ...... (44,444) (31,790) 238,945 (4,863) (10,242) Profit before financing and taxation ...... 2,378,672 739,320 3,769,291 735,474 333,843 Interest income ...... 103,396 91,452 128,840 13,357 34,134 Interest expense ...... (630,775) (478,453) (397,915) (122,643) (185,274) Foreign exchange difference ...... 62,687 (204,371) (262,769) 174,395 119,901 Profit before income tax ...... 1,913,980 147,948 3,237,447 800,583 302,604 Income tax expense ...... (487,249) (133,960) (490,448) (162,635) (105,923) Profit from continuing operations ...... 1,426,731 13,988 2,746,999 637,948 196,681 Loss from discontinued operations ...... (1,941,745) (1,133,083) (685,073) (67,579) (974,535) (Loss)/profit for the year/period ...... (515,014) (1,119,095) 2,061,926 570,369 (777,854) Attributable to: shareholders of OAO Severstal ...... (576,994) (1,037,240) 2,028,972 531,006 (785,352) non-controlling interests ...... 61,980 (81,855) 32,954 39,363 7,498 Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period (millions of shares) ...... 1,005.2 1,005.2 1,007.2 1,005.2 1,005.2 Basic and diluted (loss)/profit per share (US dollars) . (0.57) (1.03) 2.01 0.53 (0.78) Basic and diluted profit per share—continuing operations (US dollars) ...... 1.36 0.01 2.72 0.60 0.19 Basic and diluted loss per share—discontinued operations (US dollars) ...... (1.93) (1.04) (0.71) (0.07) (0.97)
(1) These amounts reflect adjustments made in connection with the presentation of discontinued operations. See ‘‘Operating and Financial Review—Key factors affecting the Group’s financial results—Discontinued operations and the disposition of assets held for sale’’.
17
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BM14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BM14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 220D*/3025D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63924
Overview Financial Information of the Group
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION As at As at 31 December 31 March 2010 2009 2008 2011 (Amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars) Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents ...... 2,012,662 2,853,376 2,652,888 1,778,220 Short-term bank deposits ...... 12,690 95,533 818,545 13,275 Short-term financial investments ...... 27,463 73,129 112,782 35,482 Trade accounts receivable ...... 967,837 1,457,651 1,941,876 1,400,338 Amounts receivable from related parties ...... 12,359 26,716 63,831 62,768 Restricted cash ...... 41,313 — — 27,860 Inventories ...... 2,366,924 2,974,227 4,271,886 2,734,058 VAT recoverable ...... 278,594 288,032 361,542 293,365 Income tax recoverable ...... 39,578 106,019 172,947 30,478 Other current assets ...... 298,070 285,453 279,707 416,251 Assets held for sale ...... 3,509,882 24,415 8,872 2,045 Total current assets ...... 9,567,372 8,184,551 10,684,876 6,794,140 Non-current assets: Long-term financial investments ...... 205,232 128,616 70,342 287,678 Investment in associates and joint ventures ...... 158,564 143,857 110,907 282,694 Property, plant and equipment ...... 7,351,835 9,485,480 9,827,392 7,806,947 Intangible assets ...... 1,799,776 1,369,204 1,510,658 1,845,964 Restricted cash ...... 61,714 17,541 21,703 62,894 Deferred tax assets ...... 101,406 239,835 246,541 113,248 Other non-current assets ...... 82,620 74,802 41,507 127,559 Total non-current assets ...... 9,761,147 11,459,335 11,829,050 10,526,984 Total assets ...... 19,328,519 19,643,886 22,513,926 17,321,124 Liabilities and shareholders’ equity Current liabilities: Trade accounts payable ...... 897,389 1,378,300 1,528,453 1,123,228 Amounts payable to related parties ...... 16,717 16,656 71,960 36,610 Short-term debt finance ...... 1,422,262 1,478,301 2,038,693 1,626,507 Income taxes payable ...... 41,230 34,150 46,131 70,473 Other taxes and social security payable ...... 156,078 209,084 213,315 222,304 Dividends payable ...... 17,131 5,704 128,715 6,963 Other current liabilities ...... 531,736 743,230 868,409 514,551 Liabilities related to assets held for sale ...... 3,272,354 11,979 4 14,627 Total current liabilities ...... 6,354,897 3,877,404 4,895,680 3,615,263 Non-current liabilities: Long-term debt finance ...... 4,719,772 5,748,559 6,227,225 4,463,608 Deferred tax liabilities ...... 493,280 394,990 496,379 528,137 Retirement benefit liabilities ...... 164,555 738,328 722,065 172,592 Other non-current liabilities ...... 276,244 508,266 619,961 287,747 Total non-current liabilities ...... 5,653,851 7,390,143 8,065,630 5,452,084 Equity: Share capital ...... 3,311,288 3,311,288 3,311,288 3,311,288 Treasury shares ...... (26,303) (26,303) (26,303) (26,303) Additional capital ...... 1,165,530 1,165,530 1,165,530 1,165,530 Foreign exchange differences ...... (297,219) (52,478) 84,987 73,298 Retained earnings ...... 2,780,190 3,436,270 4,488,396 3,341,672 Other reserves ...... 76,411 43,600 27,601 59,970 Total equity attributable to shareholders of OAO Severstal .. 7,009,897 7,877,907 9,051,499 7,925,455 Non-controlling interests ...... 309,874 498,432 501,117 328,322 Total equity ...... 7,319,771 8,376,339 9,552,616 8,253,777 Total equity and liabilities ...... 19,328,519 19,643,886 22,513,926 17,321,124
18
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BM14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BM14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1805D*/1855D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 27086
Overview Financial Information of the Group
SUMMARY CASH FLOW DATA Three months ended Year ended 31 December 31 March 2010 2009(1) 2008(1) 2011 2010(1) (Amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars) Net cash from/(used in) operating activities— continuing operations ...... 1,805,810 1,403,465 3,217,321 161,827 (42,695) Net cash (used in)/from operating activities— discontinued operations ...... (546,636) 207,726 216,540 58,205 (240,232) Net cash from/(used in) operating activities ...... 1,259,174 1,611,191 3,433,861 220,032 (282,927) Cash used in investing activities—continuing operations ...... (1,349,104) (37,128) (4,292,244) (259,125) (365,580) Cash used in investing activities—discontinued operations ...... (150,162) (193,509) (340,281) (26,152) (28,829) Cash used in investing activities ...... (1,499,266) (230,637) (4,632,525) (285,277) (394,409) Cash (used in)/from financing activities—continuing operations ...... (386,227) (761,331) 1,640,320 (210,675) 345,302 Cash from/(used in) financing activities—discontinued operations ...... 98,346 (420,509) 605,882 (28,227) 65,178 Cash (used in)/from financing activities ...... (287,881) (1,181,840) 2,246,202 (238,902) 410,480
(1) These amounts reflect adjustments made in connection with the presentation of discontinued operations. See ‘‘Operating and Financial Review—Key factors affecting the Group’s financial results—Discontinued operations and the disposition of assets held for sale’’.
OTHER MEASURES Three months ended Year ended 31 December 31 March 2010 2009(1) 2008(1) 2011 2010(1) (US$ millions) EBITDA(2) ...... 3,262.6 1,589.0 4,877.5 933.8 583.1 Interest expense ...... 630.8 478.5 397.9 122.6 185.3 Net interest expense(3) ...... 527.4 387.0 269.1 109.3 151.1 Total debt(4) ...... 6,142.0 5,830.7 6,485.7 6,090.1 6,290.4 Cash and cash equivalents ...... 2,012.7 2,264.9 1,820.6 1,778.2 2,228.5 Short-term deposits ...... 12.7 89.7 812.7 13.3 84.0 Net debt(5) ...... 4,116.6 3,476.1 3,852.4 4,298.6 3,977.9 Certain ratios EBITDA/Interest expense ...... 5.2 3.3 12.3 7.6 3.1 EBITDA/Net interest expense ...... 6.2 4.1 18.1 8.5 3.9 Net debt/EBITDA ...... 1.3 2.2 0.8 1.2(6) 1.7(6) Total debt/EBITDA ...... 1.9 3.7 1.3 1.6(7) 2.7(7)
19
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BM14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BM14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1115DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 13416
Overview Financial Information of the Group
CONSOLIDATED EBITDA RECONCILIATION Three months ended Year ended 31 December 31 March 2010 2009(1) 2008(1) 2011 2010(1) (US$ millions) Profit from Operations ...... 2,504.2 859.2 3,982.5 741.2 407.8 Add: Depreciation and amortisation of productive assets ...... 711.7 699.7 851.5 188.6 176.5 Loss/(profit) on disposal of plant, property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... 46.7 30.1 43.5 4.0 (1.2) Consolidated EBITDA ...... 3,262.6 1,589.0 4,877.5 933.8 583.1
(1) These amounts reflect adjustments made in connection with the presentation of discontinued operations. See ‘‘Operating and Financial Review—Key factors affecting the Group’s financial results—Discontinued operations and the disposition of assets held for sale’’. Total debt, cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits were adjusted as at 31 December 2009, 2008 and 31 March 2010 by amounts related to the Group’s entities presented as discontinued operations. (2) The Group defines EBITDA as profit from operations plus depreciation and amortisation of productive assets and loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. • EBITDA is presented as a supplemental measure of the Group’s operating performance, which the Group believes is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in the steel industry. • EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and investors should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of the Group’s operating results as reported under IFRS. Some of these limitations are as follows: • EBITDA does not reflect the impact of financing costs, which can be significant and could further increase if the Group incurs more debt, on the Group’s operating performance. • EBITDA does not reflect the impact of income taxes on the Group’s operating performance. • EBITDA does not reflect the impact of depreciation and amortisation on the Group’s operating performance. The assets of the Group’s businesses which are being depreciated, depleted and/or amortised will have to be replaced in the future and such depreciation and amortisation expense may approximate the cost to replace these assets in the future. By excluding this expense from EBITDA, EBITDA does not reflect the Group’s future cash requirements for these replacements. EBITDA also does not reflect the impact of loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. • Other companies in the steel and mining industries may calculate EBITDA differently or may use it for different purposes than the Group, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. • The Group relies primarily on its IFRS operating results and uses EBITDA only supplementally. See the Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus. EBITDA is not defined by, or presented in accordance with, IFRS. EBITDA is not a measurement of the Group’s operating performance under IFRS and should not be considered as an alternative to profit, operating profit, net cash provided by operating activities or any other measure of performance under IFRS or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of the Group’s liquidity. In particular, EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to the Group to invest in the growth of its business. (3) Net interest expense consists of the interest expense and interest income. (4) Total debt consists of short-term and long-term debt finance. (5) Net debt consists of total debt less cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits. (6) Based on EBITDA for the three months ended 31 March, multiplied by four, and net debt as at 31 March. (7) Based on EBITDA for the three months ended 31 March, multiplied by four, and total debt as at 31 March.
20
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BM14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 200D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 38737
RISK FACTORS An investment in any Notes issued under the Programme involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should consider carefully the risks set forth below in this Base Prospectus prior to making any investment decision with respect to any such Notes. The risks described below could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes. Investors should note that the risks described below are not the only risks the Group faces. The Group has described only the risks that they consider to be material. However, there may be additional risks that the Group currently considers not to be material or of which the Group is not currently aware, and any of these risks could have the effects set forth above.
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE GROUP AND THE STEEL AND MINING INDUSTRIES The Group’s business is dependent on the global economic environment In 2010, the world economy demonstrated an overall upward tendency. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), in 2010 global GDP increased by 5.1 percent, which was 1.2 percent higher than expected and in 2011, the IMF forecasts global GDP growth to be 4.3 percent. The second half of 2009 through 2011 year to date were characterised by a number of positive developments in the global markets, as key emerging and developing economies demonstrated strong demand for raw materials products supported by government stimulus initiatives. This was coupled with general restocking in the steel market and growth of steel consumption in the US market. According to the Russian Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat), Russia’s GDP in 2010 increased by 4.0 percent year-on-year; total fixed assets investments was 7.5 percent of GDP; and recorded industrial production growth was 7.5 percent year-on-year. In the first quarter of 2011, Russia’s GDP increased by 4.1 percent period-on-period, industrial production rose to 5.3 percent period-on-period and total fixed asset investments remained at the same level of 5.9 percent of GDP. This robust recovery had a significant positive impact on both pricing and demand for steel products, iron ore and coking coal. As worldsteel reported, in 2010, Russian domestic steel demand increased by 43.2 percent year-on-year. This in turn had a significant positive impact on the Group’s 2010 financial results. Nevertheless, the global economic environment is subject to a number of uncertainties, including mounting government deficits, discontinuation of certain stimulus programmes, deflation and continuing high levels of unemployment. A restructuring of sovereign debt issued by one or more Eurozone member states or any impact on global or Russian financial markets resulting from the ongoing sovereign debt crisis affecting certain Eurozone member states could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Uncertainty created by the possibility of a deterioration of the financial markets could make it more difficult for the Group to fund its capital and liquidity requirements. There is a risk of a possible cyclical downturn in the Chinese economy, which would result in a global economic downturn and impact on all industries. If global economic conditions do deteriorate, the resulting contraction in demand for many of the Group’s products and the tightening of the credit markets could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The steel and mining industries are cyclical, which may result in adverse fluctuations in the demand for and the prices of the Group’s products The industries in which a large proportion of the Group’s customers operate, such as the automotive, construction and oil and gas industries, are cyclical in nature, which can result in adverse fluctuations in the demand for and price of steel products. Demand for the raw materials necessary for the production of steel products, such as iron ore and coal, is generally correlated with the demand for steel products. Particular economic and market factors may also have a significant effect on certain parts of the Group’s operations, such as an economic downturn in the United States leading to a decrease in production by automotive manufacturers, resulting in a decrease in demand for the Group’s automotive flat steel products. Furthermore, the recent global economic downturn resulted in a decline in demand for and prices of steel and iron ore products. Although prices have risen significantly in 2010 in response to the start of the global recovery, there is no guarantee that this recovery will continue. Adverse fluctuations in the demand for the Group’s products or the supply of competing products may result in overproduction or underproduction, increased costs or general uncertainty in the industry, any of which could have a material
21
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 41916
Risk Factors
adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Any significant change in prices or supply of raw materials may cause the Group’s financial results to vary, which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations The Group requires substantial amounts of raw materials in the steel production process, in particular coal and iron ore. Although the Russian Steel Division has a secure supply of iron ore and coal from Severstal Resources and certain Severstal North America operations have secure iron ore supply through long-term contracts, the availability of coal, iron ore and/or slabs for Severstal North America, and the availability of other necessary raw materials such as scrap may be negatively affected by a number of factors largely beyond the control of the Group, including interruptions in production by suppliers, supplier allocation to other purchasers, price fluctuations and transport costs. In addition, the Group’s operations require substantial amounts of other raw materials, including various types of limestone, alloys, refractories, oxygen, fuel and gas, the price and availability of which are also subject to market conditions. The Group may not be able to adjust its prices to recover the costs of significant increases in the prices of such raw materials. Any significant change in the prices or supply of raw materials could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group will require a significant amount of cash to fund its capital expenditure programme. If the Group is unable to generate this cash through operations or external sources, this programme may not be completed on schedule or at all Steel production and mining are capital intensive businesses. In particular, the Group has undertaken a capital expenditure programme focused on the modernisation and development of its existing steel production and mining facilities. The Group’s capital expenditure programme was reviewed in 2011 and is scheduled to run through 2015, involving the expenditure of approximately US$9,728.8 million (excluding maintenance) over that period. The Group had total capital expenditures of US$806.8 million in 2009 and US$1,310.3 million in 2010, excluding the Group’s discontinued operations of Lucchini, Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC. See ‘‘Business—Investment in Modernisation and Advanced Technological Processes’’. The Group plans to rely on cash generated from its operations, and, to a lesser extent, external financing, to provide the capital needed for the capital expenditure programme. However, there can be no assurance that the Group will be able to generate adequate cash from operations or that external financing, if necessary, will be available on reasonable terms. In addition, capital expenditure programmes are subject to a variety of potential problems and uncertainties, including changes in economic conditions, delays in completion or delivery, cost overruns and defects in design or construction, which may require additional cash investment. For example, the construction of the production facilities at Severstal Columbus in the United States in 2007 experienced significant cost overruns as a result of higher than expected construction costs. Further, the Group’s capital expenditure programme includes plans to acquire significant amounts of new equipment, including more advanced technologies. While such new production equipment and technologies are aimed at increasing the operational performance of the Group’s facilities, there can be no assurance that the equipment will meet its intended production targets on a timely basis, or at all, the result of which could be reduced production, delays or additional costs. Further, to finance the programme, the Group may incur a substantial amount of additional indebtedness, the interest and principal repayments on which may be a significant drain on the cash flows of the Group. A failure or delay of the Group’s capital expenditure programme or the significant increases in the financing costs that may be incurred to fund the programme could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group has grown rapidly and intends to pursue opportunities to grow its operations, including through further acquisitions, but there can be no assurance that the Group will be able to successfully integrate such acquired companies or identify suitable acquisition targets In recent years, the Group has increased its ownership interests in a number of companies and acquired other companies, businesses and production assets, in particular the acquisition of a number of mining
22
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55360
Risk Factors
operations, both gold and iron ore, by Severstal Resources. The Group may consider future acquisitions of assets or companies that the Group believes are aligned with its corporate strategy and financial targets and offer significant potential synergies. In particular, the Group considers growth opportunities in India, Africa (specifically in Liberia, Congo, Burkina Faso, Guinea, Gabon), Brazil and other emerging markets. The success of past, current and future acquisitions will depend on the Group’s ability to manage the assimilation of the acquired assets or companies into its operations despite the inherent difficulties, such as existing operational inefficiencies, cultural differences, redundancies of personnel, incompatibility of equipment and information technology, production failures or delays, loss of significant customers, problems with minority shareholders in acquired companies and their material subsidiaries, the potential disruption of the Group’s own business, the assumption of liabilities relating to the acquired assets or businesses, the possibility that indemnification agreements with the sellers of such assets may be unenforceable or insufficient to cover potential liabilities, the impairment of relationships with employees and counterparties as a result of difficulties arising out of integration, poor records or internal controls and difficulty in establishing immediate control over cash flows. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Group will be able to achieve the targets synergies in its operations with recent or planned acquisitions. Additionally, the value of any business the Group acquires or invests in may be lower than the amount that the Group pays for it if, which, for example, could be related to a decline in the position of that business in the market or markets where it operates or to a decline in the market generally. Developed markets, such as Western Europe and the United States, may offer lower margins, as a general matter, compared to Russia and the CIS. The Group may not be able to identify suitable acquisition targets, and future acquisitions may not be available to the Group on terms as favourable as in the past. The Group may in the future face significant competition for potential acquisitions. When making acquisitions it may not be possible for the Group to conduct a detailed investigation of the nature of the assets being acquired due to, for example, time constraints in making the acquisition decision and other factors. The Group may also become responsible for additional liabilities or obligations not foreseen by the Group at the time of an acquisition, including in particular any financial liabilities entered into by previous management prior to completion. Any or all of these difficulties, if they materialise, could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
A substantial portion of the Group’s gold assets were obtained through the acquisitions of interests in public companies and limited due diligence was conducted in connection with such acquisitions The Group holds the Irokinda, Zun-Holba, Berezitovy and Taparko mines through its interest in High River Gold Mines Ltd. (High River Gold), a company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, which was acquired primarily in market transactions after performing limited due diligence. Some of the Group’s gold assets in Kazakhstan were originally obtained through market purchases of shares in a formerly listed entity, Celtic Resources Holdings Ltd. (Celtic). The Group’s controlling interest in Crew Gold Corporation (Crew Gold), a formerly listed entity, was obtained through a series of market transactions in which the Group was not able to perform the same level of due diligence as it would otherwise have been able to undertake in the acquisition of a private company. As a consequence, there can be no assurances that liabilities will not materialise of which the Group was unaware or that the target’s operations and asset base are not worse than expected, all of which could have been exposed as part of a more thorough due diligence exercise. Such liabilities could include claims by third parties to challenge the validity of transactions entered into by the previous owner of the acquired assets, for which the Group had no direct responsibility. Any such liabilities could have an adverse effect on the Group’s operations and the value of the Notes.
The Group may experience equipment failure or other unanticipated events, which may result in significant interruption in manufacturing processes, production curtailment and shutdowns The Group’s manufacturing processes depend on critical pieces of steel making and mining equipment, such as furnaces, continuous casters and rolling equipment, and electrical equipment, such as transformers, underground equipment, excavators, trucks and beneficiation equipment. This equipment may, on occasion, be out of service as a result of malfunction or defect. In addition, the Group’s facilities are subject to the risk of damage due to unanticipated events, such as fires, explosions or adverse weather
23
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 410D*/660D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 18329
Risk Factors
conditions. In the event of equipment failure or damage to its facilities, the Group may experience loss of revenues or customers due to material plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production and may require large capital expenditures to repair or replace faulty machinery or to repair damaged facilities, and if the equipment failure or damage to facilities extends to injuries to employees or has an environmental impact, other costs or liabilities arising out of those circumstances. For example, in 2008, there was an explosion at one of Severstal North America’s blast furnaces (blast furnace ‘‘B’’), which severely damaged the furnace. The Group maintains property and business interruption insurance customary for businesses in the steel industry, nonetheless, any loss of revenues or customers or large unexpected capital expenditures resulting from equipment failure or other unanticipated events could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group’s mining operations are subject to hazards and risks that could lead to unexpected production delays, increased costs, damage to property or injury or death to persons The Group’s mining operations include open-pit and underground mining, both of which involve significant hazards and risks. Hazards associated with the Group’s open-pit mining operations include flooding of the open pit, collapses of the open-pit wall, accidents related to the operation of large open-pit mining and rock transportation equipment, accidents related to the preparation and ignition of large scale open-pit blasting operations, production disruptions due to weather and hazards related to the disposal of mineralised wastewater, such as groundwater and waterway contamination. Hazards associated with the Group’s underground mining operations include underground fires and explosions, including those caused by flammable gas, cave-ins or ground falls, discharges of gases and toxic chemicals, flooding, sinkhole formation and ground subsidence and other accidents and conditions resulting from drilling and removing and processing material from an underground mine. If any of these hazards or accidents results in significant injury to employees and damage to equipment or other property, the Group may experience unexpected production delays, increased production costs, and increased capital expenditures to repair or replace equipment or property, as well as claims from affected employees and environmental and other authorities for any alleged breaches of applicable laws or regulations. For example, in 2007, there was an explosion and fire at the Vorktaugol mining complex that resulted in ten casualties and the suspension of mining (see ‘‘Business—Severstal Resources—Health, Safety and Environment’’). Any such disruptions to mining, delays and costs could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group’s stated mineral reserves and resources are only estimate based on a range of assumptions and there can be no assurance that the anticipated tonnage or grades can be achieved The Group’s estimates of its iron ore and coal reserves and resources contained in this Prospectus are calculated by reference to estimates provided by IMC Consulting Ltd in its report dated June 2006, and for PBS Coals by John T. Boyd Company in its report dated 30 May 2008 and for Putu by SRK Consulting report dated February 2011 prepared in accordance with JORC reporting standards. Nordgold estimates are based on the report issued by Wardell Armstrong International Ltd dated January 2011 which was prepared in accordance with internationally accepted standards set forth in the JORC code. See ‘‘Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Mining Reserves’’. Such estimates were based on interpretations of geological data obtained from sampling techniques and projected rates of production. Sampling techniques and projections are inherently uncertain and variances in reserve and resource estimates under different methodologies may be difficult to determine and evaluate. In addition, reserve and resource estimates do not account for the possibility that the initial phase of drilling and exploration may take several years before production is possible or for the effect of market prices of iron ore or coal on the economic feasibility of mining any particular deposit. If the Group’s actual production of iron ore and coal in the future is significantly less than the Group’s planned production based on these estimates of its reserves, the Group may not be able to supply iron ore and coal to its steel operations at an economically feasible price or at all, which would have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
24
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 2497
Risk Factors
An increase in existing trade barriers or the imposition of new trade barriers in the Group’s principal export markets could cause a significant decrease in the demand for its products in those markets Some of the products of the Group’s Russian operations are subject to various trade barriers, such as anti-dumping duties, tariffs and quotas, in its principal export markets, including the European Union and the United States. See ‘‘Regulatory Matters—Trade Barriers and Anti-Dumping Regulations’’. These trade barriers affect the demand for the Group’s products by effectively increasing the prices for those products compared to domestically available products. An increase in existing trade barriers, or the imposition of new trade barriers, could cause a significant decrease in the demand for the Group’s products in its principal export markets, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Russian Government may impose export tariffs on Russian steel and mining producers, which could adversely affect the demand for its products Historically, the Russian Government has considered adopting export tariffs on certain steel and mining products, potentially including products produced by the Group. Certain of the Group’s major customers, as well as other major consumers of steel products, have presented, and may in the future present, to the Russian Government initiatives to introduce such import duties in order to affect the pricing of steel and mining products in the domestic market. However, no decision has been made to this effect and, therefore, the impact of any such export tariffs as may be adopted on the Group’s business, results of operations and prospects is uncertain.
The Group’s business entails significant health, safety and environmental liability risks The Group operates industrial facilities in which heavy metals or hazardous substances that are liable to present significant risks to the health or safety of neighbouring populations and to the environment are present. In this respect, the Group has in the past and may in the future incur liability for having caused injury or damages to persons or property or for the pollution of the environment. Although the Group has made provisions for such future potential liability, there can be no assurance that the amounts covered by such provisions will prove to be sufficient in the future due to the intrinsic uncertainties involved in projecting expenditures and liabilities relating to health, safety and the environment. It is possible that the assumptions used to determine these provisions will need to be adjusted in the future due to future changes in regulations, changes in the interpretation or application of regulations by the relevant authorities, or, with respect to issues related to restoration of the environment, changes in technical, hydrological or geological restrictions, or the discovery of pollution that is not yet known. It is possible that the Group’s current insurance policies will be insufficient to cover the costs of any such future material liability. See ‘‘—The Group’s existing and future insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover costs arising from hazards and other operational risks arising from its steel and mining operations’’. Any such liability shortfalls could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Achieving environmental compliance at sites that are currently in operation or that have been decommissioned entails a risk that could generate substantial financial costs for the Group The competent authorities have made, are making or may in the future make specific requests that the Group carries out environmental improvement works, such as cleaning up and rehabilitating sites, and controlling emissions at sites in Europe where it is currently operating, or where it has operated in the past (including at sites it has disposed of), at neighbouring sites or at sites where the Group stored or disposed of waste. The Group may be required to incur significant costs to fulfill these obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Additional or stricter environmental rules and regulations may significantly increase the Group’s cost of compliance The Group’s steel making plants and mining operations involve potential environmental problems including the generation of pollutants and the storage and disposal of wastes and other hazardous
25
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 230D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 22070
Risk Factors
materials. As a result, the Group must comply with stringent regulatory requirements necessitating the commitment of significant financial resources and expects that the global trend towards stricter environmental laws and regulations will continue. Any significant increase in the cost of complying with such environmental rules and regulations in the future could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group’s existing and future insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover costs arising from hazards and other operational risks arising from its steel and mining operations Although the Group believes that, with respect to each of its production facilities, it maintains insurance at levels generally in line with the relevant local market standards, some of its business divisions do not have comprehensive business interruption insurance and most of the Group’s business divisions do not maintain environmental liability insurance. In particular, the Russian Steel Division maintains only limited levels of insurance against business interruption, but does not have insurance against third-party liabilities for property or environmental damage. The Group would therefore suffer significant losses in the event of damage to or destruction of any of its principal operating assets in Russia or in the event that any claim is brought against the Group relating to personal injury, death or property damage caused by the Group’s operations in Russia. In addition, no assurance can be given that the Group will be able to maintain existing insurance or obtain additional insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates, which could lead to future shortfalls between the Group’s liability and its insurance coverage. Any such liability shortfalls could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group maintains a significant part of the social and physical infrastructure in the Cherepovets area, which requires a substantial commitment of resources The Group has been responsible for maintaining a portion of the social and physical infrastructure in and around the city of Cherepovets and currently owns various social assets. The Group is by far the largest employer in Cherepovets, and it estimates that its tax and other similar payments to the city of Cherepovets accounted for a significant proportion of the city’s total budget for the years ended 31 December 2010 and 2009. The Group expects that the city of Cherepovets will continue to rely on it for a substantial portion of its budget and that it will continue to maintain some of it’s commitments in respect of social, employment and welfare infrastructure in the Cherepovets area. The Group’s limited flexibility and significant level of additional fixed resource commitments could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The steel industry is highly competitive, and the Group may not be able to compete successfully The markets for steel and steel products are highly competitive. Steel producers are also in competition with producers of substitute materials, particularly in the automotive, construction and packaging industries. The Group’s competitors include major international steel producers, some of which are larger or have greater capital resources than the Group or, in some cases, have lower costs than the Group. Competitors may have competitive advantages in terms of location and access to key suppliers and transport routes. The Group’s competitive position may also be affected by the recent trend towards consolidation in the steel industry. The highly competitive nature of the industry combined with excess production capacity for some steel products has exerted, and may in the future continue to exert, downward pressure on prices of certain of the Group’s products. There can be no assurance that the Group will be able to compete effectively in the future. See ‘‘Industry—Competition’’. In addition, as a major Russian steel producer, the Company appears on the register of the FAS maintained for companies with a 35.0 percent share in a particular goods market. The measures applicable to the Company as a result of this inclusion could restrict its ability to set prices for such goods. Failure by the Group to compete effectively for any of these reasons could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
26
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 61017
Risk Factors
Inflation in Russia could increase the Group’s costs Although inflation in Russia decreased from 13.4 percent year-on-year in 2008 to 8.8 percent in 2009 and remained at the same level of 8.8 percent in 2010 according to Rosstat, inflation may increase in the future. As Rosstat reported, the recorded level of inflation for the first five months of 2011 was 4.8 percent. A number of the Group’s costs relating to its Russian operations, such as wage costs, maintenance costs, construction costs and utilities costs, are sensitive to rises in general price levels in Russia. However, due to competitive pressures, the Group may not be able to raise prices sufficiently to preserve operating margins. Accordingly, high rates of inflation could increase the Group’s costs and there can be no assurance that the Group will be able to maintain or increase its operating margins to cover such costs and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Wage increases in Russia may reduce the Group’s profit margins Wage costs in Russia have historically been significantly lower than wage costs in the more economically developed countries of North America and Europe for similarly skilled employees. However, if wage costs were to increase in Russia, this could result in a reduction in the Group’s profit margins. Unless the Group is able to continue to increase the efficiency and productivity of its employees, wage increases could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group’s Russian operations obtain significant amounts of their electricity from the wholesale market which is currently subject to an ongoing liberalisation programme and purchase a substantial portion of their natural gas needs from a government controlled entity that declared a programme of price increases, either of which could result in costs increases In 2010, the Group’s Russian operations purchased significant volumes of natural gas from subsidiaries of OAO Gazprom (Gazprom), a government controlled entity and the dominant producer and monopoly transporter of natural gas within Russia. Domestic natural gas prices are regulated by the government and have been rising over the last few years. In 2010, gas prices soared by approximately 24.0 percent, according to the Federal Tariff Service of Russia. The current Gazprom strategic program is aimed at gas price increases for customers in Russia and designed to move prices toward European levels. According to the programme, in 2011, gas prices are expected to increase by approximately 15.0 percent. The Group’s electricity purchases come from the wholesale market. In 2010, wholesale electricity prices increased by approximately 9.0 percent, according to the Federal Tariff Service of Russia. Starting from 1 January 2011, price controls on electricity were removed under the implementation of the liberalisation program aimed at introducing competition, liberalising the wholesale electricity market and moving from regulated pricing to a market-based system. It is uncertain what effect this liberalisation plan will have on the electricity market in the long-term, but it is anticipated that in 2011 wholesale electricity prices will increase further mostly as a result of increases in fuel prices that are correlated with electricity prices. In 2010, the share of own electricity used by the Russian Steel Division was 51.4 percent. Any substantial increases in costs could adversely affect the Group’s future profitability to the extent it is unable to pass on higher costs to its customers. This could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Company is beneficially controlled by a single person, whose interests could conflict with those of the Noteholders The Company is beneficially controlled by Mr. Alexey Mordashov (the Majority Shareholder), who as at 10 June 2011, controlled indirectly 77.97 percent of the Company’s shares and has an option to purchase another 4.96 percent, see ‘‘Principal Shareholders’’. As a result, the Majority Shareholder has the ability to exert significant influence over certain actions requiring shareholder approval, including, but not limited to, increasing or decreasing the authorised share capital of the Company (and disapplying pre-emptive rights), the election of directors, declaration of dividends, the appointment of management and other policy decisions. While transactions with the Majority Shareholder and his affiliates can benefit the Company, the interests of the Majority Shareholder could at times conflict with the interests of
27
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 34372
Risk Factors
Noteholders. Although the Group has in the past sought and continues to conclude related party transactions on an arm’s length basis, conflicts of interest may arise between the Group, its affiliates and the Majority Shareholder or his affiliates, resulting in the conclusion of transactions on terms not determined by market forces. See ‘‘Management’’ and ‘‘Related Party Transactions’’. Any such conflict of interest could adversely affect the Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group’s competitive position and future prospects are heavily dependent on the experience and expertise of its Majority Shareholders, senior management and technical personnel The Majority Shareholder, who is also the Group’s chief executive officer, and senior management team have been and, the Group believes, will continue to be important in the implementation of the Group’s strategy and the operation of the Group’s day-to-day activities. The experience, personal connections and relationships of members of senior management are important to the conduct of its business. There can be no assurance that these individuals will continue to make their services available to the Group in the future. The Group partially maintains key man insurance covering its senior managers. Moreover, competition for management and technical personnel, such as steel and mining engineers, with relevant expertise is intense due to the small number of qualified individuals, and this situation could seriously affect the Group’s ability to retain its existing senior management and technical personnel and attract additional suitably qualified senior management and technical personnel. The loss or diminution in the services of members of the Group’s senior management team or technical personnel or an inability to attract and retain additional senior management and technical personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Severe weather conditions could significantly affect the Group’s business and financial results Severe weather conditions in Russia can affect the Group’s ability to produce and transport its products. For example, in February 2010 due to unusually cold weather conditions, Olkon’s tailing dump facilities froze. The incident resulted in a minor production decrease from February to March. A substantial part of the Group’s sales by volume from its Russian steel operations sold internationally are routed through the port of St. Petersburg, which experiences occasional shutdowns due to bad weather and can only be fully utilised during the summer navigation period, when the Gulf of Finland is not frozen over. Severe weather in March 2011 led to a queue of approximately 150 vessels in the Gulf of Finland waiting for the icebreaker from Murmansk, which resulted in cargo delivery delays. Normally, the queue does not exceed fifty vessels. Severe weather conditions could negatively affect distribution and therefore revenues from international sales. Any of these climatic limits could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Disruption in rail transport and increased rail costs could significantly hinder the Group’s operations and product distribution in Russia The Group’s Russian operations depend on the Russian railway system and rely predominantly on the rail freight network operated by JSC Russian Railways (Russian Railways) for transport of raw materials and deliveries of its steel products to its facilities, consignment agents and customers. Russian Railways is the predominant company in the Russian railway sector which, together with its subsidiaries, owns the country’s largest fleet of freight rolling stock. It also plays a monopolistic role as the sole railway infrastructure operator, and it enjoys a near monopoly in the provision of locomotive services. The physical infrastructure and other assets owned and operated by Russian Railways, particularly its rail network, largely date back to Soviet times and have in many cases, not been adequately maintained. The Russian railway system is subject to risks of disruption as a result of the declining physical condition of the facilities, a shortage of railcars, the limited capacity of border stations and load shedding, including those due to poorly maintained railcars and train collisions. In particular, the rolling stock of Russian Railways is generally in a poor state of repair. While the Group owns and leases railcars, and rents additional railcars, such assets are sufficient for only a portion of the Group’s total transportation requirements. The failure of Russian Railways to upgrade its rolling stock within the next few years could result in a shortage of available working rolling stock, a disruption in transportation of the Group’s raw
28
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D /120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 37380
Risk Factors
materials and products and increased costs of rail transport. There can be no assurance that the age and insufficient funding and maintenance of a substantial part of the Russian railway network and other infrastructure operated by Russian Railways will not in the future lead to material disruptions of the Group’s business or increase the Group’s costs of doing business. In addition, the Russian Government sets rail tariffs and may further increase these tariffs, as it has done in the past. Such increases in railway tariffs have resulted in significant increases in the Group’s transportation costs. Both the privatisation of Russian Railways and its cost of upgrading its rolling stock and other facilities could further contribute to increased tariffs. The Group considers alternative delivery methods (such as river and motor transport) where practicable. Any disruption in transportation or increase in tariffs could significantly increase the Group’s costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group may be subject to administrative sanctions, required divestitures or limitations on operations if it fails, or is found to have failed, to comply with the prior approval or subsequent notification requirements of the FAS with respect to its acquisitions of companies that are incorporated and operating in Russia or assets located in Russia The Group has expanded its operations through the acquisition of companies that are incorporated and operating in Russia or assets that are located in Russia, such as the mining companies that currently comprise Severstal Resources. Some of these acquisitions are, or were, subject to the prior approval or subsequent notification requirements of the FAS, or its predecessor agencies. Certain portions of these requirements are vaguely worded and there can be no assurance that the Group will be able to comply fully or that the FAS will not challenge the Group’s past compliance, which could result in administrative sanctions, required divestitures or limitations on operations. Any such sanctions, divestitures or limitations would materially adversely affect the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group’s business could be adversely affected if it fails to obtain or renew necessary licences or fails to comply with the terms of its licences The Group’s business depends on the continuing validity of its licences, the issuance to it of new licences and its compliance with the terms of its licences, including subsoil licences for the Group’s mining operations in Russia. Regulatory authorities exercise considerable discretion in the timing of licence issuance and renewal and in monitoring of licensees’ compliance with licence terms. Requirements imposed by these authorities may be costly and time-consuming and may result in delays in the commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations. Moreover, legislation on subsoil rights remains internally inconsistent and vague, and the acts and instructions of licensing authorities and procedures by which licences are issued are often arguably inconsistent with legislation. In certain circumstances, state authorities in Russia may seek to interfere with the issuance of licences, for example, by initiating legal proceedings alleging that the issuance of a licence violates the civil rights or legal interests of a person or legal entity. The licensing process may also be influenced by outside commentary, political pressure and other extra legal factors. In the case of subsoil licences, unsuccessful applicants may bring direct claims against the issuing authorities that the licence was issued in violation of applicable law or regulation. If successful, such proceedings and claims may result in the revocation or invalidation of the licence. Accordingly, licences that the Group requires may be invalidated or may not be issued or renewed. Licences that are issued or renewed may not be issued or renewed in a timely fashion or may involve conditions that restrict the Group’s ability to conduct its operations or to do so profitably. As part of their obligations under licensing regulations and the terms of their licences, the Group’s Russian subsidiaries are also required to comply with numerous industrial standards, maintain production levels, recruit qualified personnel, maintain necessary equipment and a system of quality control, monitor the Group’s operations, maintain appropriate filings and, upon request, submit appropriate information to licensing authorities, which are entitled to control and inspect their activities. In most cases, a licence may be suspended or terminated if the licensee does not comply with the ‘‘significant’’ or ‘‘material’’ terms of the licence. However, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of Russia has not issued any new interpretive guidance on the meaning of ‘‘significant’’ or ‘‘material’’ terms of licences. Court decisions on the meaning of these terms have been inconsistent and, under the Russian legal system, do not have
29
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BO14501A.;18 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 10 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 30632
Risk Factors
significant value as precedents for future judicial proceedings. These deficiencies result in the regulatory authorities, prosecutors and courts having significant discretion over enforcement and interpretation of the law, which may be used arbitrarily to challenge the rights of subsoil licensees. As a result, while the Group seeks to comply with the terms of its subsoil licences and believes that it is currently in material compliance with the terms of such licences, there can be no assurance that its licences will not be suspended or terminated. In the event that the licensing authorities in Russia discover a material violation by a member of the Group, that member of the Group may be required to suspend its operations or to incur substantial costs in eliminating or remedying the violation, which could have an adverse effect on the Group’s business or results of operations. In addition, the Group may be unable to conduct its activities or operations or to enforce its rights with respect to some of its properties. The Group’s properties in the Murmansk region and the Republic of Sakha-Yakutiya in Russia, which include the Olenegorsky and the Neryungi mine and the Gross deposit, respectively, are governed by perpetual land use rights without any formalised lease agreements, which could be challenged. While the Group is not aware of any challenges of its land rights in respect of those properties, a successful challenge to the Group’s rights to such properties may result in the Group not being able to proceed with the development or continued operation of a mine or project, which in turn, may have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations and financial condition and the value of the Notes. In addition, the Group’s business outside of Russia also depends on the continuing validity of licences, the issuance to them of new licences and compliance with the terms of such licences, which may involve uncertainties and costs to the Group. Any or all of these factors may affect the Group’s ability to obtain, maintain or renew necessary licences. If the Group is unable to obtain, maintain or renew necessary licences or is only able to obtain or renew them with newly introduced material restrictions, it may be unable to benefit fully from its reserves, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group has engaged and may continue to engage in related party transactions and major transactions The Group has engaged in transactions with certain of its shareholders, including the Majority Shareholder, directors and executive officers and companies controlled by them or in which they or the Group own an interest (see ‘‘Related Party Transactions’’). The Group believes that these related party transactions have been and will continue to be concluded at arm’s length. However, there can be no assurance that the terms on which these related party transactions are conducted have not and will not differ significantly from the terms on which third-party transactions have been and are conducted. The practice of related party transactions may result in transactions conducted on terms less favourable to the Group than would otherwise have been negotiated with third parties and could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes. Besides that, the Company and other entities of the Group have engaged in large value transactions which under applicable Russian law are categorised as ‘‘major transactions’’ and which require approval by the board of directors or, depending on the size of the relevant transaction, by the shareholders of the company that is entering into such transaction. The Group believes that those ‘‘major transactions’’ which the Group entities enter into are properly authorised. However, there can be no assurance that all procedural requirements have been complied with in connection with the approval of such transactions. A ‘‘major transaction’’ which has not been properly authorised may be challenged by a company or any of its shareholders.
The Group’s business depends on good relations with its employees. A breakdown in these relations and/or restrictive labour and employment laws could have a material adverse impact on the Group Although the Group believes its labour relations with its employees are good, there can be no assurance that a work slowdown or a work stoppage will not occur at any of the Group’s operating units or exploration prospects. At most of the Group’s business units, there are collective bargaining agreements in place with labour unions. Any future work stoppages, disputes with employee unions or other labour- related developments or disputes, including renegotiation of collective bargaining agreements, could result in a decrease in the Group’s production levels and adverse publicity and/or an increase in costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations and financial condition and the value of the Notes.
30
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BO14501A.;18 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63881
Risk Factors
Employees and former employees of the Group and service providers or customers of the Group (as well as neighbouring populations) may have been exposed, and, to a certain extent, may still be exposed, to toxic or hazardous substances The Group’s steel and mining operations use, and have in the past used, large quantities of heavy metals, chemical, toxic or hazardous substances. In spite of safety and monitoring procedures implemented by the Group at each production site, employees, and in some cases the employees of other companies and service providers, have been or may have been exposed to such substances and some employees may have developed specific pathologies from such exposure, which could induce them to file claims against the Group in future years. The Group is involved in legal actions and occupational illness claims due to past exposure to asbestos. Owing to the latency periods for various asbestos related pathologies, the possibility that an increasing number of legal actions or occupational illness claims will be filed in the years ahead cannot be excluded. In addition, employees of the Group or its service providers or customers or persons living near the Group’s manufacturing facilities are exposed or have in the past been exposed to certain substances that are currently considered not to be hazardous. However, chronic toxicity, even in very low concentrations or exposure doses, could be discovered in the future. This could also lead to claims against the Group. If any of the events described above lead to a material liability for the Group in the future, this could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group bears the risk of interest rate fluctuations Interest rates on the Group’s debt finance are either fixed or variable, at a fixed spread over LIBOR or EURIBOR for the duration of each contract. Accordingly, the Group is exposed to the effect of fluctuations in interest rates with an immediate effect on the interest costs of the Group, in the case of borrowings at a variable rate interest, and an effect on the rate at which borrowings at fixed rates of interest are refinanced or renewed from time to time. There can be no assurance that the costs associated with an increase in the rates of interest at which the Group borrows funds will be able to be passed on in the form of higher prices to its customers. Accordingly, increases in interest rates may have an adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
The Group may incur losses as a result of fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rates of the rouble, the US dollar or the euro The Group is exposed to translational and transactional foreign currency exchange rate risks. Translational foreign currency exchange rate risks are the result of translating assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than into US dollar amounts for financial reporting purposes. Transactional foreign currency exchange rate risks arise as a result of payments the Group makes or receives that involve foreign currency exchange. Currently, the Group’s International operations are balanced with most of their revenues, borrowings and expenses denominated in the same currency. The Group’s Russian operations have revenues denominated in roubles, US dollars and euros, with meaningful fluctuations year on year. Expenses are mostly in roubles and borrowings are in US dollars and euros. As the Group reports its financial results in US dollars and must frequently exchange or translate foreign currency into roubles or roubles into foreign currency, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Russia’s property law is subject to uncertainty and contradiction The legal framework relating to the ownership and use of land and other real property in Russia is not yet sufficiently developed to support private ownership of land and other real estate to the same extent as is common in some of the more developed market economies of North America and Europe. Land use and title systems rely on complex traditional ownership systems. As a result, the title of land that the Group might invest in may be unclear or in doubt. Moreover, the validity of the Group’s right to title or use of its properties may be successfully challenged or invalidated due to technical violations or defects in title. Such instability creates uncertainties in the operating environment in the emerging market nations, which could
31
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 650D*/660D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 12172
Risk Factors
hinder the Group’s long term planning efforts and may prevent the Group from carrying out its business strategy effectively and efficiently. If the real property owned or leased by the Group is found not to be in compliance with all applicable approvals, consents, registrations or other regulations, the Group may lose the use of such real property, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Shareholder liability under Russian legislation could cause the Company to become liable for the obligations of its Russian subsidiaries and its Russian joint venture entities Under Russian law, the Company may be jointly and severally liable for the obligations of its Russian subsidiaries or joint venture entities together with such entities if (i) the Company has the ability to make decisions for such Russian subsidiaries or joint venture entities as a result of its ownership interest, the terms of a binding contract or in any other way, (ii) the Company has the ability to issue mandatory instructions to such Russian subsidiaries or joint venture entities and that ability is provided for by the charter of the relevant Russian subsidiary or joint venture entity or in a binding contract and (iii) the relevant Russian subsidiary or joint venture entity concluded the transaction giving rise to the obligations pursuant to the Company’s mandatory instructions. In addition, the Company may have secondary liability for the obligations of its Russian subsidiaries or joint venture entities if (a) it has the ability to make decisions for the relevant Russian subsidiary or joint venture entity as a result of its ownership interest, the terms of a binding contract, or in any other way and (b) the relevant Russian subsidiary or joint venture entity becomes insolvent or bankrupt due to the Company’s fault (i.e., the Company has used its ability referred to in (a) above knowing that this would result in insolvency or bankruptcy of the relevant Russian subsidiary or joint venture entity). This type of liability could result in significant losses, and could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Incomplete, unreliable or inaccurate official data and statistics could create uncertainty The Group relies on and refers to information and statistics from various third-party sources and its own internal estimates. For example, substantially all the information contained in this Prospectus concerning the Group’s competitors has been derived from publicly available information. The Group believes that these sources and estimates are reliable, but has not independently verified them. There can be no assurance that statistics derived from third-party sources are true and accurate in all material respects.
Weaknesses in the tax systems and legislation of some countries in which the Group operates create an uncertain environment for its business activity and could subject the Group to additional material tax liabilities The Group operates in various jurisdictions. Tax legislation that is currently in effect in some of these jurisdictions is in its infancy and not well developed and is subject to varied interpretations by the local authorities. Despite the Group’s efforts to comply with the applicable tax legislation, the selective application of the relevant tax laws at the discretion of the local authorities complicates tax planning and business decisions within the Group. Furthermore, it puts the arrangements and structures in place at risk of being challenged by the local tax authorities based on the adverse selective interpretation by them of the applicable tax legislation (with the possibility of the application of new interpretations of tax laws and regulations retroactively), which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial position, results of operations, prospects and the value of the Notes. As at 31 December 2010, the tax authorities from Russia, Kazakhstan, Burkina Faso and Guinea had made contingent claims for taxes, fines and penalties in the amount of approximately US$137.4 million (31 December 2009: US$6.3 million; 31 December 2008: US$4 million) to certain of the Group’s entities. The management of the Group does not agree with the tax authorities’ claims and believes that the Group has complied with the existing legislation in all material respects. The management of the Group is unable to assess the ultimate outcome of the claims and the outflow of financial sources to settle such claims, if any. The Group’s management believes that it has made adequate provisions for other probable tax claims.
32
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D /120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 26968
Risk Factors
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO RUSSIA A substantial portion of the Group’s fixed assets are located in Russia and a significant portion of the Group’s revenues are derived from Russia. There are certain risks associated with investments in Russia.
Emerging markets such as Russia are subject to greater risks than more developed markets, including significant economic, political and social, and legal and legislative risks; in addition, financial turmoil in Russia could disrupt the Group’s business, as well as negatively affect the value of the Notes Generally, investment in emerging markets is suitable only for sophisticated investors who are familiar with and who fully appreciate the significance of the risks involved in investing in emerging markets and prospective investors are urged to consult with their own legal and financial advisers before making an investment in the Notes. Investors should note that emerging markets such as Russia are subject to rapid change and that the information set out in this Prospectus may become outdated relatively quickly. Moreover, financial turmoil in any emerging market country tends to adversely affect prices in equity markets of all emerging market countries as investors move their money to more stable developed markets. As has happened in the past, financial problems or an increase in the perceived risks associated with investing in emerging economies could dampen foreign investment in Russia and adversely affect the Russian economy. In addition, during such times, companies that operate in emerging markets can face severe liquidity constraints as foreign funding sources are withdrawn. Thus, even if the Russian economy remains relatively stable, financial turmoil in other emerging market country could adversely affect the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Political Risks Changes in the political situation inside Russia or Russia’s involvement in conflicts with other countries could create an uncertain operating environment, hinder the Group’s long-term plans and adversely affect the value of the Group’s investments in Russia In the past, ethnic, religious, historical and other divisions inside Russia have led to tensions and, in certain cases, military conflict and terrorist attacks. If such an event were to occur in the future, it could result in significant political consequences, including the imposition of a state of emergency in some or all of Russia or heightened security measures, which may disrupt normal economic activity. In the past such conflicts occurred between Russia and its neighbours. For example, a military conflict in August 2008 between Russian and Georgia involving South Ossetia and Abkhazia may have added additional downward pressure on the Russian stock market, which had already been affected by the global economic downturn. As a result of this conflict, Russia’s relations worsened with certain other countries for a considerable period of time. Russia’s relationships with Ukraine and Belarus has been also recently been strained for a variety of reasons. Though none of these conflicts has directly affected the Group’s business, such conflicts or tensions could have an adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Political and governmental instability could adversely affect the value of investments in Russia, including the Notes Since 1991, Russia has moved from a one-party state with a centrally planned economy to a federal republic with democratic institutions and a market-oriented economy. The Russian political system, though more stable than in the 1990s, remains vulnerable to popular dissatisfaction, including dissatisfaction with the results of privatisations in the 1990s, as well as to demands for autonomy from particular regional and ethnic groups. The course of political, economic and other reforms has in some respects been uneven, and the composition of the Russian Government has, at times, been unstable. However, over the period from 2000 to 2008, President Vladimir Putin achieved and generally maintained political and governmental stability in the country which accelerated the reform process and made the political and economic situation in Russia more conducive to investment. In March 2008, Mr. Dmitry Medvedev was elected as the president of Russia. A significant degree of continuity has been maintained between the two administrations due, in large part, to the appointment by President Medvedev of Vladimir Putin as the Russian Prime Minister. It is possible, however, that future presidents may take a different approach to
33
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/180D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 18316
Risk Factors
reforms and to the state’s foreign and domestic policies in the future. Moreover, while the Russian political system and the relationship between President Medvedev, the Russian Government and the Russian Parliament appear to be stable, future political instability could result from the decline of the overall economic situation, include any deterioration in the standard of living. Shifts in governmental policy and regulation in Russia may be less predictable than in many Western democracies and could disrupt or reverse political, economic and regulatory reforms. Current and future changes in the federal government of Russia, major policy shifts or a lack of consensus between the President of Russia, the federal government, Russia’s parliament and powerful economic groups, could lead to political instability, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of investments relating to Russia and as such on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Arbitrary or selective state action could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business State authorities have a high degree of discretion in Russia and at times exercise their discretion arbitrarily, without hearing or prior notice, and sometimes in a manner that is contrary to law. For example, some analysts cite the Russian Government’s effective re-nationalisation of Yukos in the 2000s as an example of the Russian Government’s selective actions. Possible state actions include withdrawal of licences, interference with or nullification of contracts and transactions entered into in connection with privatisations, invalidation of share issuances and registrations, sudden and unexpected tax audits, criminal prosecutions and civil actions. There can be no assurance that business activities of the Group will not be affected by the tax audits undertaken by the Federal Tax Service. In addition, the Cherepovets Steel Mill is the largest taxpayer in the Vologodskaya region where it is located, any substantial decrease in its tax liabilities may be subject to investigation by the tax authorities in more aggressive fashion than would usually be the case. See ‘‘—The Group maintains a significant part of the social and physical infrastructure in the Cherepovets area, which requires a substantial commitment of resources’’. Arbitrary or selective state action, if directed at the Group, could lead to the loss of key licences, termination of contracts, invalidation of share issuances, civil litigation, criminal proceedings and imprisonment of key personnel, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Economic Risks Economic instability in Russia could adversely affect the Group’s business Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Russian economy has experienced at various times: • significant declines in gross domestic product; • hyperinflation; • increases in, or high, interest rates; • an unstable currency; • high state debt relative to gross domestic product; • a weak banking system providing limited liquidity to Russian enterprises; • a large number of loss-making enterprises that continued to operate due to the lack of effective bankruptcy proceedings; • the use of fraudulent bankruptcy actions in order to take unlawful possession of property; • significant use of barter transactions and illiquid promissory notes to settle commercial transactions; • tax evasion; • the ‘‘black’’ and ‘‘grey’’ market economies; • high levels of capital flight; • corruption and the penetration of organised crime into the economy;
34
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 34380
Risk Factors
• significant increases in unemployment and underemployment; and • the impoverishment of a large portion of the Russian population. From 2000 to the first half of 2008, Russia experienced a growth in its GDP, higher tax collections and increased stability of the rouble, all of which provided a certain degree of economic stability. In 2004, however, several Russian banks experienced a sharp reduction in liquidity and the licences for certain of these banks were withdrawn. Furthermore, the Russian economy was adversely affected by the recent global economic downturn that started in the second half of 2008. For example, according to Rosstat, Russian GDP decreased by 7.9 percent in 2009 and increased by 4.0 percent in 2010. In the first quarter of 2011, GDP grew by 4.1 percent period-on-period, according to Rosstat. A deterioration of the economic situation in the global markets may lead to a worsening of the economic situation in Russia. In addition Russia produces and exports large quantities of oil, natural gas and other mineral resources, the Russian economy is particularly vulnerable to market downturns or economic slowdowns elsewhere in the world, which may cause fluctuations in the prices of oil, natural gas and minerals on the world market, which reached record high levels in 2008. A significant or sustained decline in the price of oil, natural gas or minerals could significantly slow or disrupt the Russian economy. The occurrence of any of these events could adversely affect Russia’s economy and the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Introduction of currency restrictions may limit the Group’s ability to execute its strategy or operate its business or could otherwise adversely affect the Russian capital markets During the 1990s, Russia’s currency regulation and control regime severely limited, and at times prohibited, certain hard currency payments and operations. Despite recent liberalisation, there can be no assurance that Russia’s currency regulation and control regime will not impose new restrictions or prohibitions. Restrictions or prohibitions on hard currency payments and operations could limit the Group’s ability to invest in its capital improvement programmes, pursue attractive acquisition opportunities or purchase raw materials or sell its products internationally. In addition, such restrictions or prohibitions may limit an investor’s ability to repatriate earnings from securities of Russian issuers, including the Group, or otherwise have a negative impact on the Russian capital markets. The consequences of any new restrictions or prohibitions could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Russian banking system remains underdeveloped with a limited number of creditworthy Russian banks, and another banking crisis could place severe liquidity constraints on the Group’s business Russia’s banking and other financial systems are not well developed or regulated, and Russian legislation relating to banks and bank accounts is subject to varying interpretations and inconsistent application. The 1998 financial crisis resulted in the bankruptcy and liquidation of many Russian banks and almost entirely eliminated the developing market for commercial bank loans at that time. From April to July 2004, the Russian banking sector experienced its first serious turmoil since the financial crisis of August 1998 when several privately owned Russian banks experienced liquidity problems and were unable to attract funds on the interbank market or from their client base. Simultaneously, they faced large withdrawals of deposits by both retail and corporate customers. Several of these privately owned Russian banks collapsed or ceased or severely limited their operations. Russian banks owned or controlled by the Government or the CBR and foreign owned banks generally were not adversely affected by the turmoil. The global economic downturn in 2008 led to the financial troubles of certain Russian banks and to significant liquidity restraint for others. Profitability levels of most Russian banks have been adversely affected. Recently, there has been a rapid increase in lending by Russian banks, which many believe has been accompanied by deterioration in the credit quality of the borrowers. In addition, a robust domestic corporate debt market is leading to Russian banks increasing their exposure to the corporate sector. The serious deficiencies in the Russian banking sector, combined with the deterioration in the credit portfolios of Russian banks, may result in the banking sector being more susceptible to market downturns or economic slowdowns, including due to Russian corporate defaults that may occur during any such market downturn or economic slowdown. There are currently also only a limited number of creditworthy Russian
35
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 17465
Risk Factors
banks, most of which are located in Moscow. The bankruptcy or insolvency of any banks with which the Group does business could adversely affect the Group’s business. Another banking crisis, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of the banks which hold the Group’s funds, could result in the loss of its income for several days or affect its ability to complete banking transactions in Russia, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes. Furthermore, any shortages of funds or other disruptions to banking experienced by the Group’s banks from time to time could also have a material adverse effect on the Group’s ability to complete its planned developments or obtain finance required for its planned growth and thus could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Russia’s physical infrastructure is in poor condition The physical infrastructure in Russia, including rail and road networks, power generation and transmission, communication systems, and building stock, largely dates back to Soviet times and has not been adequately funded and maintained. Electricity and heating shortages in some regions of Russia have seriously disrupted the local economies. For example, in August 2009, an accident at the Sayano-Shushenskaya hydroelectric power plant resulted in a significant portion of the supply to the local power grid being lost, which led to widespread power failure in the region and forced all major users such as aluminum smelters to switch to generators. Additionally, in January 2006, electricity supplies to certain industrial customers in Moscow were reduced as a result of extreme cold weather in Moscow. Other parts of the country face similar problems. Road conditions throughout Russia are also poor, with many roads not meeting modern quality requirements. The Russian Government is actively pursuing the reorganisation of the nation’s rail, electricity and telephone systems. Any such reorganisation may result in increased charges and tariffs while failing to generate the anticipated capital investment needed to repair, maintain and improve these systems. The poor condition or further deterioration of Russia’s physical infrastructure may harm the national economy, disrupt access to communications, increase the cost of doing business in Russia or disrupt business operations, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Social Risks Social instability could lead to labour and social unrest, increased support for renewed centralised authority, nationalism or violence In the view of some analysts, the failure to pay full salaries on a regular basis and the failure of salaries and benefits generally to keep pace with the rapidly increasing cost of living have led in the past, and could lead in the future, to labour and social unrest. Labour and social unrest could have political, social and economic consequences, such as increased support for a renewal of centralised authority; increased nationalism, with support for re-nationalisation of property, or expropriation of or restrictions on foreign involvement in the economy of Russia; and increased violence. Any of these outcomes could have an adverse effect on confidence in Russia’s social environment and the value of investments in Russia, could restrict the Group’s operations and lead to a loss of revenue, and could otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Crime and corruption could disrupt the Group’s ability to conduct its business and could materially adversely affect the Group’s financial condition and results of operations Organised criminal activity has reportedly increased significantly since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, particularly in large metropolitan centres. In addition, the Russian and international press have reported high levels of official corruption in Russia and other CIS countries, including the bribery of officials for the purpose of initiating investigations by state agencies, obtaining licences or other permissions or in order to obtain the right to supply goods or services to state agencies. Press reports have also described instances in which state officials have engaged in selective investigations and prosecutions to
36
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 37204
Risk Factors
further interests of the state and individual officials. Additionally, published reports indicate that a significant number of Russian media regularly publish slanted articles in return for payment. The proliferation of organised or other crime, corruption and other illegal activities that disrupt the Group’s ability to conduct its business effectively, or any claims that it has been involved in corruption, or illegal activities (even if false) that generate negative publicity, could have an adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
RISKS RELATING TO THE RUSSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM AND RUSSIAN LEGISLATION Weaknesses relating to the Russian legal system and Russian legislation create an uncertain environment for investment and for business activity Russia continues to develop its legal framework in accordance with international standards and the requirements of a market economy. Since 1991, new Russian domestic legislation has been put into place. Currently, this system includes the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 1993, the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and other federal laws, decrees, orders and regulations issued by the president, government and federal ministries, which can be complemented by regional and local rules and regulations, adopted in certain spheres of regulation. These legal norms on the one hand can overlap or contradict one another and on the other hand can leave gaps in the regulatory infrastructure. Several fundamental Russian laws have only recently become effective. Consequently, certain areas of judicial practice are not yet formed, and are often difficult to predict. Among the risks of the current Russian legal system are: • inconsistencies among (i) federal laws, (ii) decrees, orders and regulations issued by the president, the Russian Government, federal ministries and regulatory authorities and (iii) regional and local laws, rules and regulations; • limited judicial and administrative guidance on interpreting Russian legislation; • the relative inexperience of judges and courts in interpreting new principles of Russian legislation, particularly business and corporate law; • substantial gaps in the regulatory structure due to delay or absence of implementing legislation; • a high degree of unchecked discretion on the part of governmental authorities; and • bankruptcy procedures that are not well developed and are subject to abuse. All of these weaknesses could affect the Group’s ability to enforce its rights under contracts, or to defend itself against claims by others, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The lack of independence of certain members of the judiciary, the difficulty of enforcing court decisions and governmental discretion in instigating, joining and enforcing claims could prevent the Group or the Noteholders from obtaining effective redress in a court proceeding and could materially adversely affect the value of the Notes The independence of the judicial system and its immunity from economic, political and nationalistic influences in Russia are also less than complete. The Russian court system in the past has been and may still be understaffed and underfunded. Russia, along with many western European states, such as Germany and France, is a civil law jurisdiction and, as such, judicial precedents generally have no binding effect on subsequent decisions. Enforcement of court judgments by law enforcement agencies can sometimes be time consuming because of the large number of outstanding court judgments. Additionally, court claims are often used in furtherance of political aims. The Group may be or may become subject to such claims and may not be able to receive a fair trial. There are also legal uncertainties relating to property rights. During Russia’s transformation from a centrally planned economy to a market economy, legislation has been enacted to protect private property against expropriation and nationalisation. However, it is possible that, due to the lack of experience in enforcing these provisions and due to political changes, these protections would not be enforced in the event of an attempted expropriation or nationalisation, or in the event that the Group’s business is
37
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 60182
Risk Factors
reorganised. Expropriation or nationalisation of any of the Group’s entities, their assets or portions thereof, or their break-up into separate companies, potentially without adequate compensation, could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Group is subject to anti-monopoly laws enforced by the FAS, which may result in certain limitations being imposed on the Group’s activities, the violation of which may result in civil, administrative and even criminal liability The Federal Law No. 135-FZ ‘‘On Protection of Competition’’ dated 26 July 2006, which came into force on 26 October 2006, (the Competition Law) generally prohibits any concerted action, agreement or coordination of business activity that results or may result in, among other things, (a) price fixing, discounts, extra charges or margins; (b) coordination of auction bids; (c) partition of a commodity market by territory, volume of sales or purchases, types of goods, customers or suppliers; (d) refusal to enter into contracts with buyers (customers) for reasons other than economic or technological reasons; (e) imposing unfavourable contractual terms; (f) fixing disparate prices for the same goods, for reasons other than economic or technological reasons; (g) creation of barriers to entering or exiting a market; and (h) restriction of competition in any other way. There is no established court practice on what concerted actions or coordination of business activity is and courts interpret these concepts inconsistently. As a result, there is significant uncertainty as to what actions may be viewed as violation of the Competition Law. In a number of precedents, Russian courts found concerted actions where market participants acted in a similar way within the same period of time, although, arguably, there have been legitimate economic reasons for such behaviour and the behaviour was not aimed at restriction of competition. Therefore, there is a risk that the Group can be found in violation of the Competition Law if its market behavior, vis-a-vis` its customers or suppliers is viewed as being similar to behaviour of the Group’s competitors and perceived by the FAS as a purported restriction of competition. Such broad interpretations of the Competition Law may result in the FAS imposing substantial limitations on the Group’s activities, may limit operational flexibility and may result in civil, administrative and even criminal liability. The FAS has ample powers to investigate perceived violations of the Competition Law, has been very active over the last several years in policing marketing, sales and supply strategies of major participants of the Russian steel industry and has brought charges against certain market participants alleging concerted actions in violation of the Competition Law. In July 2010, the FAS commenced proceedings in respect of several steel companies, including the Group, for alleged actions in violation of the Competition Law. Specifically, the FAS is investigating claims about high steel prices and the different prices charged to Russian and non-Russian customers, with the issue being discrimination against Russian customers in favour on non-Russian customers. In March 2011, the FAS has admitted that there has been no violation of the Competition Law and the case has been closed. If the Group’s activities are found to be in violation of the Competition Law in any of the cases described above or in any other cases, the Group could be subject to penalties or ordered to change its business operations in a manner that increases costs or reduces profit margin and revenue, which can adversely affect the Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the event that the title to any Russian company acquired by the Group through privatisation, bankruptcy sale or by other means is successfully challenged, the Group may lose its ownership interest in that company or its assets Almost all of the Group’s steel making and mining assets in Russia consist of companies that have been privatised or that the Group acquired through bankruptcy proceedings or directly or indirectly from others who acquired them through privatisation or bankruptcy proceedings, and the Group may seek to acquire additional companies that have been privatised or that have undergone bankruptcy proceedings. In view of some analysts, privatisation legislation in Russia is vague, internally inconsistent and in conflict with other elements of Russian legislation. Although the statute of limitations for challenging transactions entered into in the course of privatisations is currently three years, privatisations may still be vulnerable to challenge, including through selective action by governmental authorities motivated by political or other extra legal considerations. If any of the Group’s acquisitions is challenged as having been improperly conducted and the Group is unable to defend itself successfully, the Group may lose its ownership interests, which could have a
38
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 50682
Risk Factors
material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
Russian tax law and practice are not fully developed and are subject to frequent changes that could adversely affect the Group’s business The Company and the Russian subsidiaries of the Group are subject to a broad range of Russian taxes and other compulsory payments and levies imposed at the federal, regional and local levels, including, but not limited to profits tax, value added tax (‘‘VAT’’), payroll taxes, excise taxes, property tax, and other taxes and levies. Russia’s laws and regulations relating to these taxes, such as the Russian Tax Code, have been in force for a short period of time as compared to tax laws and regulations of more developed market economies. Historically, the system of tax collection in Russia has been relatively ineffective, resulting in frequent changes in the tax legislation and the interpretation and application of the existing laws and regulations by various authorities. Although Russia’s tax climate, tax system and the quality of Russian tax legislation have generally improved with the introduction of the Russian Tax Code, there can be no assurance that the Russian Tax Code will not be changed in the future in a manner that would significantly contribute to the instability and unpredictability of the tax system. It is also possible that the Russian Government will impose arbitrary or onerous taxes, fines and penalties in the future, which could adversely affect the business of the Company and the Russian subsidiaries of the Group. Since Russian federal, regional and local tax laws and regulations have been subject to frequent changes and some of the sections of the Russian Tax Code relating to the above mentioned taxes are comparatively new, the interpretation and application of these laws and regulations is often unclear, unstable or non-existent. Different interpretations of tax laws and regulations may exist both among and within government bodies at the federal, regional and local levels increasing the number of existing uncertainties and tax risks and leading to inconsistent enforcement of these laws and regulations in practice. The Russian tax system is therefore impeded by the fact that at times it still relies heavily on the inconsistent judgments of local tax officials and fails to address many of the existing problems. Furthermore, taxpayers, the Russian Ministry of Finance and the Russian tax authorities often interpret tax laws and regulations differently. Private clarifications to specific taxpayers’ queries with respect to particular situations issued by the Russian Ministry of Finance are not binding on the Russian tax authorities. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the representatives of the local Russian tax inspectorates will not take positions contrary to those set out in the private responses issued by the Russian Ministry of Finance. During the past several years the tax authorities have shown a tendency of taking more assertive positions in their interpretation of tax legislation, which has led to an increased number of material tax charges made by them as a result of tax audits of companies operating in various industries, including the mining industry. In some instances, the Russian tax authorities have applied new interpretations of tax laws and regulations retroactively. It is therefore possible that transactions and activities of the Company and the Russian subsidiaries of the Group that have not been challenged in the past may be challenged in the future. In practice, taxpayers often have to resort to court proceedings to defend their positions against the tax authorities. In the absence of binding precedent, court rulings on tax or other related matters taken by different courts relating to the same or similar circumstances may also be inconsistent or contradictory. In its decision of 25 July 2001, the Constitutional Court of Russian Federation introduced the concept of ‘‘a taxpayer acting in a bad faith’’ without clearly stipulating the criteria for its interpretation and application. This concept is not defined in the Russian tax legislation or other branches of Russian legislation. Nonetheless, to date in practice this concept has been used by the tax authorities in order to deny, for instance, the taxpayer’s right to rely on the letter of the law. Based on the available practice, it could be concluded that the tax authorities and courts often exercise significant discretion in interpreting this concept in a manner that is at times unfavourable to taxpayers. On 12 October 2006, the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation (the ‘‘Supreme Arbitration Court’’) issued Ruling No. 53 (‘‘Ruling No. 53’’), which introduced a concept of the ‘‘unjustified tax benefit’’, defined mainly by reference to specific examples of such tax benefits (i.e., tax benefits received by taxpayers in connection with transactions that have no reasonable business rationale)
39
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 10 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 47
Risk Factors
which may lead to the disallowance of their application. Based on the current practice, it is apparent that the tax authorities actively seek to apply this concept to challenge tax positions taken by taxpayers. Although the intention of Ruling No. 53 was to combat the abuse of tax law, based on the court practice relating to its application in cases which were brought to courts to date, it can be concluded that the tax authorities have started applying the ‘‘unjustified tax benefit’’ concept in a broader sense than may have been initially intended by the Supreme Arbitration Court. Importantly, the Group is aware of cases where this concept has been applied by the Russian tax authorities to disallow benefits granted by double tax treaties. Although to date the courts have often relied on this concept in ruling in favour of taxpayers, there is no assurance that the courts will follow such precedents in the future. Tax declarations together with related documentation are subject to review and investigation by a number of authorities empowered by Russian law to impose fines and penalties on taxpayers. Generally, tax declarations and the related documentation remain open and subject to inspection by the tax authorities for a period of three calendar years immediately preceding the year in which the decision to conduct a tax audit is taken. The fact that a particular year has been reviewed by the tax authorities does not prevent that year, or any tax declarations and other documentation relating to that year, from further reviews by the tax authorities during the three-year limitation period. In particular, a tax authority superior to the inspectorate which carried out the initial tax audit may re-audit the same period. Therefore, previous audits do not preclude subsequent claims relating to the audited period. Furthermore, the Russian Tax Code provides for the possible extension of the three-year limitation period for liabilities for tax offences if the taxpayer is deemed to obstruct the performance of the tax audit and this has become an insurmountable obstacle for the tax audit. As the terms ‘‘obstructed’’ and ‘‘insurmountable obstacles’’ are not specifically defined in Russian tax law or any other branches of Russian legislation, the Russian tax authorities may attempt to interpret these terms broadly, effectively linking any difficulty experienced by them in the course of their tax audits with obstruction committed by the taxpayer and use that as a basis to seek tax adjustments and penalties beyond the three-year limitation period. Therefore, the statute of limitations is not entirely effective with respect to liabilities for the payment of taxes in Russia. If it is concluded that the Company and/or the Russian subsidiaries of the Group have significant tax underpayments for the respective prior tax periods, it may have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Russian transfer pricing legislation as currently in effect allows the tax authorities to make transfer pricing adjustments and impose additional tax liabilities in respect of all ‘‘controlled’’ transactions (except for those conducted at state regulated prices and tariffs) if the transaction price differs upwards or downwards, as applicable, from the market price determined in accordance with procedure established by the tax legislation by more than 20 percent. Under the current transfer pricing legislation, ‘‘controlled’’ transactions include transactions with related parties, barter transactions, foreign trade transactions and transactions with unrelated parties characterised by significant price fluctuations (i.e., if the price applied under these transactions differs from prices applied under similar transactions by more than 20 percent within a short period of time). Special transfer pricing rules apply to transactions with securities and derivatives. Transfer pricing rules as currently in effect are vaguely drafted, generally leaving wide scope for discretion by tax authorities and courts in practice. Moreover, in the event that the tax authorities make transfer pricing adjustment, current transfer pricing rules do not provide for an offsetting adjustment for the related counterparty in the transaction. There is a plan to introduce substantial amendments to the Russian transfer pricing legislation. A new draft law introducing wholesale reform to the transfer pricing legislation, making it more stringent, was approved by the Russian Parliament in the first reading on 19 February 2010, with the second and third readings most likely to take place during the second part of 2011. At this point, it cannot be predicted with absolute certainty when these amendments will be enacted, if at all, what their exact content will be and what effect they may have on taxpayers, including the Group. If the tax authorities were to impose significant additional tax liabilities as a result of the application of transfer pricing rules and transfer pricing adjustments made, this could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In May 2009, the Russian President included in his budget message regarding the Government’s budget policy for 2010 to 2012 a proposal for legislative changes to the anti-avoidance mechanism with respect to the application of double tax treaty benefits in cases where the ultimate beneficiaries of income do not reside in the relevant tax treaty jurisdictions. It is currently uncertain if and when the these amendments
40
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 470D*/660D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 11 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 28446
Risk Factors
may be introduced, what their exact content will be, how they will be interpreted and applied by the tax authorities and/or courts in practice and what effect they may have on taxpayers, including the Group. It is possible that following the introduction of these changes in the Russian tax legislation, the benefits of double tax treaties claimed by the taxpayers in the past under certain circumstances may become unavailable. The facts described above create tax risks in Russia that may be substantially more significant than those typically found in countries with more developed tax systems. Historically, the Company and the main Russian subsidiaries of the Group have paid significant amounts of taxes to the Russian budget due to the scale of their operations. Consequently, the introduction of new taxes, an increase in the current tax rates or the introduction of amendments to currently effective taxation rules may have a substantial impact on the overall tax liabilities of the respective entities of the Group and may, in particular, result in the Group being required to make substantially larger tax payments in the future. In addition to creating a substantial tax burden, the tax risks and uncertainties described above complicate the Group’s tax planning and related business decisions, potentially exposing the Company and the Russian subsidiaries of the Group to significant additional taxes, fines and penalties and enforcement measures that could adversely affect the Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Group’s effective tax rate and financial condition could be affected by the Russian tax status of the non-Russian subsidiaries of the Group The Group operates in various jurisdictions and includes companies incorporated outside Russia. Russian tax laws, as currently in effect, do not contain detailed rules on taxation of foreign companies in Russia. It is possible that with the evolution of these rules or further to the introduction of the relevant changes to the Russian tax legislation or further to changes in the approach of the Russian tax authorities and/or the courts to their interpretation and application, the non-taxable status of some or all foreign companies of the Group in Russia may be challenged and the Group may become subject to additional taxation in Russia.
RISK FACTORS RELATED TO THE NOTES Risk Factors Relating to the Notes and the Trading Market Before making their investment decision, potential investors in the Notes should read the terms of the Facility Agreement, and in particular the covenants and events of default, and certain exclusions therefrom, which in substance will define the limits of a Noteholder’s rights and remedies. See ‘‘Facility Agreement’’.
The Notes may not be a suitable investment for all investors Each potential investor in the Notes must determine the suitability of that investment in light of its own circumstances. In particular, each potential investor should: • have sufficient knowledge and experience to make a meaningful evaluation of the Notes, the merits and risks of investing in the Notes and the information contained in this Base Prospectus; • have access to, and knowledge of, appropriate analytical tools to evaluate, in the context of its particular financial situation, an investment in the Notes and the impact such investment will have on its overall investment portfolio; • have sufficient financial resources and liquidity to bear all of the risks of an investment in the Notes; • understand thoroughly the terms of the Notes and be familiar with the behaviour of the relevant financial markets; and • be able to evaluate (either alone or with the help of a financial adviser) possible scenarios for economic, interest rate and other factors that may affect its investment and its ability to bear the applicable risks.
41
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/180D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 12 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 54554
Risk Factors
Payments under each Loan Agreement are structurally subordinated to existing indebtedness of the Group’s subsidiaries, and these subsidiaries may incur further such indebtedness in the future The obligations of the Company under each Loan Agreement are structurally subordinated to the existing obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries. In addition, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Loan Agreements, the Company and its subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional debt in the future, including debt that may be secured or structurally senior to the debt under each Loan. Any such additional debt incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries would be structurally senior to the obligations of the Company under each Loan Agreement. As at 31 March 2011, the Group had approximately US$6,090.1 million of total debt. Secured indebtedness of the Company or any of its subsidiaries may also rank effectively senior to the obligations of the Company under each Loan Agreement. The incurrence of such additional indebtedness by the Company or its subsidiaries could have an adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations, future prospects and the value of the Notes.
The Company may be unable to repay its obligations under a Loan Agreement At maturity, the Company may not have the funds to fulfill its obligations under a Loan Agreement and may not be able to arrange for additional financing. If the maturity date of a Loan occurs at a time when other arrangements prohibit the Company from repaying that Loan, the Company would try to obtain waivers of such prohibitions from the lenders under those arrangements, or the Company could attempt to refinance the borrowings that contain the restrictions. If the Company could not obtain the waivers or refinance these borrowings, the Company would be unable to repay that Loan.
Noteholders’ recourse against the Issuer is limited The Issuer is only obliged to make payments under a Series of Notes to the Noteholders in an amount equivalent to sums of principal, interest and/or additional amounts (if any) actually received by or for the account of the Issuer under the relevant Loan Agreement, less any amount in respect of Reserved Rights. Consequently, if the Company fails to fully satisfy its obligations under a Loan Agreement, the Noteholders of the corresponding Series of Notes will receive less than the scheduled amount of principal, interest and/or additional amounts (if any) on the relevant due date.
Noteholders have no direct recourse against the Company Except as otherwise disclosed in ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’ and in the Trust Deed, no proprietary or other direct interest in the Issuer’s rights under or in respect of the Loan Agreements or the Loans exists for the benefit of the Noteholders. Subject to the terms of the Trust Deed, no Noteholder will have any entitlement to enforce any of the provisions of the Loan Agreements or have direct recourse against the Group, except through action by the Trustee under the Security Interests (as defined in ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’). Neither the Issuer nor the Trustee under the Assigned Rights (as defined in ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’) shall be required to monitor the financial performance or status of the Group or to enter into proceedings to enforce payment under a Loan Agreement unless it has been indemnified and/or secured by the Noteholders to its satisfaction against all liabilities, proceedings, claims and demands to which it may thereby become liable and all costs, charges and expenses which may be incurred by it in connection therewith. Payments of principal and/or interest by the Company under each Loan Agreement to, or to the order of, the Trustee or the Principal Paying Agent will satisfy the Issuer’s obligations in respect of the Notes. Consequently, Noteholders will have no further recourse against the Issuer or the Group after such payment is made.
The debt agreements that the Group has entered into include covenants that may restrict the Group from making certain business decisions and/or carrying out its business strategy The agreements that govern the Group’s debt instruments, including the Loan Agreements, contain certain restrictions limiting its flexibility in operating its business. Such restrictions limit its ability to: • create liens; • borrow money;
42
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 13 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 32997
Risk Factors
• sell or otherwise dispose of assets; • engage in mergers or consolidation; • increase share capital; • pay dividends or make any distribution on its share capital; • provide guarantees or other security; and • enter into derivative transactions. These restrictions could hinder the Group’s ability to carry out its business strategy and the Group’s ability to make payments on the Loans. In addition, a breach of a Loan Agreement or the terms of other debt instruments could cause a default under the terms of the Group’s other financing arrangements, causing all debt under those financing arrangements to become due. No assurance can be given that if the indebtedness under the relevant Loan Agreement were to be accelerated, the assets of the Group would be sufficient to generate the funds necessary to repay the relevant Loan, and thus the corresponding Series of Notes, in full in satisfaction of its obligations under the relevant Loan Agreement.
The Group may prepay the loans under the Loan Agreements Under the terms of each Loan Agreement, the Company may, subject to certain conditions, prepay the relevant Loan if it is required to increase its payments for tax reasons regardless of whether the increased payment obligation results from any change in the applicable tax laws or treaties or from the change in application of existing tax laws or treaties or from enforcement of the security provided for in connection with the corresponding Series of Notes. The Company may also prepay a Loan if it is required to indemnify the Issuer in respect of certain increased costs to the Issuer (as may be set forth in the relevant Loan Agreement). In the event that it becomes unlawful for the Issuer to allow a Loan to remain outstanding under the relevant Loan Agreement, to allow the corresponding Series of Notes to remain outstanding, to maintain or give effect to any of its obligations under the relevant Loan Agreement and/or to charge or receive or be paid interest at the rate then applicable to the relevant Loan, the Company may be required by the Issuer to prepay the relevant Loan in full. In case of any such prepayment, all outstanding Notes of such Series of Notes would be redeemable at par together with accrued interest.
There is no active trading market for the Notes There may not be an existing market for the Notes at the time they are issued. Although each Series of Notes is expected to be listed on the Official List and traded on the Market, an active trading market in the Notes may not develop or be maintained after listing. If an active trading market does not develop or cannot be maintained, this could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and the trading price of the Notes. In addition, Securities markets, in recent periods, have experienced significant price fluctuations. These fluctuations were often unrelated to the operating performance of the companies whose securities are traded on such stock markets. Market fluctuations as well as adverse economic conditions have negatively affected the market price of many securities and may affect the market price of the Notes.
Interest and some other payments under any Loan may be subject to Russian withholding tax In general, interest payments on borrowed funds made by a Russian legal entity to a non-Russian legal entity or organisation having no registered presence and/or no permanent establishment in Russia are subject to Russian profits tax withholding (‘‘withholding tax’’) at the rate of 20 percent which could be reduced or eliminated under the terms of an applicable double tax treaty subject to compliance with the respective treaty clearance formalities by the recipient of interest. The Company believes that interest payments made by it to the Issuer on any Loan should not be subject to Russian withholding tax under the terms of the Convention between the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Russian Federation for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital signed on 28 June 1993 (the ‘‘Convention’’). There can be no assurance, however, that such double tax treaty relief will be available in practice or will continue to be available throughout the term of any Loan, particularly, if the legislative changes to the anti-avoidance mechanism with respect to double tax
43
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 14 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 4878
Risk Factors
treaty benefits in cases where the ultimate beneficiaries of income do not reside in the relevant tax treaty jurisdictions are introduced to the Russian Tax Code or the approach of the Russian tax authorities and/or courts to the interpretation and application of double tax treaties will change. Furthermore, the Company is aware of at least two instances where the Russian tax authorities tried to challenge the application of double tax treaty benefits in similar structures. In one instance, the court upheld the position of the taxpayer. In the second case, to the best of our knowledge, the tax authority has withdrawn its claim. At this stage, it is difficult to predict whether the above-mentioned disputes would remain isolated cases or mark the start of a general trend. If payments under any Loan become payable to the Trustee pursuant to the security arrangements described herein, any benefits of the Convention will cease and payments of interest and some other amounts under the relevant Loan Agreement to the Trustee will become subject to Russian withholding tax at the rate of 20 percent or such other tax rate as may be in force at the time of payment. It is not expected that the Trustee will, or will be able to, claim the exemption from or the reduction in withholding tax rate under any double tax treaty under such circumstances. In addition, while some of the Noteholders might be eligible for an exemption from or a reduction in Russian withholding tax rate or Russian personal income tax rate, as applicable, under the applicable double tax treaties entered into between their countries of residence and the Russian Federation, where such treaties exist and to the extent that they are applicable and could be relied upon by these Noteholders, there is no assurance that such exemption or reduction will be available to them in practice, under such circumstances. If interest or some other payments due under any Loan become subject to Russian withholding tax or interest payments on any Notes become subject to any withholding or deduction for the account of any Luxembourg taxes (as a result of which the Issuer will reduce interest or the respective other payments made under the corresponding Series of the Notes by the amount of such withholding taxes), the Company will be obliged (subject to certain conditions) under the terms of the relevant Loan Agreement to increase the amounts payable by it under the relevant Loan (‘‘gross up’’) or to pay such additional amounts on the relevant Loan, respectively, as may be necessary to ensure that the net payments received by the Issuer and/or the Noteholders will not be less than the amounts they would have received in the absence of such withholding or deduction. It is currently unclear, however, whether provisions of the relevant Loan Agreement obliging the Company to gross up payments on the Loans will be enforceable under Russian law as currently in effect. If the Company fails to increase the relevant payments or to pay additional amounts on the relevant Loan, as may be applicable, such failure will constitute an Event of Default pursuant to the relevant Loan Agreement. If the Company is obliged to increase payments or to pay additional amounts under any Loan Agreement (as described above), it may (without premium or penalty), subject to certain conditions, prepay the relevant Loan in full. In such case, all outstanding Notes of the corresponding Series will each be redeemable at par together with accrued and unpaid interest and additional amounts, if any, to the date of the redemption. See ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Notes’’.
Sale or disposal of the Notes in Russia may become subject to Russian withholding tax or Russian personal income tax, as applicable, reducing the value of the Notes If a non-resident Noteholder that is a non-Russian legal entity or organisation sells and/or otherwise disposes of any Notes other than through its permanent establishment in Russia and receives sales or disposal proceeds from a source within Russia, there is a risk that the portion of the sales or disposal proceeds, if any, representing accrued interest may be subject to the 20 percent Russian withholding tax (or such other tax rate as may be in force at the time of payment), even if the sale or disposal results in a loss. This tax rate could be reduced or eliminated under provisions of an applicable double tax treaty entered into between the countries of residence of such Noteholders and the Russian Federation, where such treaties exist and to the extent that they are applicable and could be relied upon by these Noteholders, subject to compliance with respective treaty clearance formalities by these Noteholders. While some of the Noteholders might be eligible for an exemption from or a reduction in Russian withholding tax rate under applicable double tax treaties, there is no assurance that such exemption or reduction will be available to them in practice under such circumstances. Where proceeds from the sale or other disposal of the Notes are deemed to be received from a source within Russia by a Noteholder who is an individual not residing for tax purposes in Russia, Russian
44
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 15 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 30923
Risk Factors
personal income tax at the rate of 30 percent (or such other tax rate as may be in force at the time of payment) will apply to the gross amount of sales or disposal proceeds realised upon the sale or disposal of the Notes decreased by any available duly documented cost deductions (including the acquisition cost of the Notes), provided that the documentation supporting cost deductions is provided to the person obliging to withhold the tax on time. Although the Russian personal income tax rate may technically be reduced or eliminated under provisions of an applicable double tax treaty, subject to compliance with the respective treaty clearance formalities by a non-resident Noteholder who is an individual, in practice, non-resident individuals would not be able to obtain the advance treaty relief in relation to sales or disposal proceeds received from a source within Russia, whilst obtaining a refund of Russian personal income tax that was excessively withheld in relation to these proceeds could be extremely difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore, even though the Russian Tax Code is typically interpreted such as only a Russian professional asset manager or broker, or another person (including a foreign company with a permanent establishment or any registered presence in Russia or an individual entrepreneur located in Russia) acting under an agency agreement, a commission agreement or a commercial mandate agreement for the benefit of a non-Russian individual to withhold Russian personal income tax from payments associated with the sale or other disposal of securities made to a non-Russian individual, there is no guarantee that other Russian companies or foreign companies with a permanent establishment or registered presence in Russia or individual entrepreneurs located in Russia would not seek to withhold Russian personal income tax under these circumstances. It should be noted, in particular, that pursuant to recent changes introduced to the Russian Tax Code, the list of persons qualifying as tax agents for Russian personal income purposes was extended so to include from 1 January 2012, the custodians remitting interest (coupon) income to individuals on bonds with a mandatory centralised depositary, where the bond issue is registered or in relation to which the identification number is assigned starting from 1 January 2012. Although these new rules should not affect the taxation of income payable on the Notes, there can be no assurance that in certain circumstances a Russian custodian would not seek to withhold Russian personal income tax from income paid to a Non-Resident Noteholder—Individual. The imposition or possibility of imposition of Russian withholding tax or Russian personal income tax as applicable could adversely affect the value of the Notes. See ‘‘Taxation’’.
Ratings of the Notes In general, European regulated investors are restricted under Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 (the ‘‘CRA Regulation’’) from using credit ratings for regulatory purposes, unless such ratings are issued by a credit rating agency established in the EU and registered under the CRA Regulation (and such registration has not been withdrawn or suspended), subject to transitional provisions that apply in certain circumstances whilst the registration application is pending. Such general restriction will also apply in the case of credit ratings issued by non-EU credit rating agencies, unless the relevant credit ratings are endorsed by an EU-registered credit rating agency or the relevant non-EU rating agency is certified in accordance with the CRA Regulation (and such endorsement action or certification, as the case may be, has not been withdrawn or suspended). Where a Series of Notes is rated, the rating assigned to the Notes and details of the relevant rating agency will be specified in the applicable Final Terms. Whether or not each credit rating applied for in relation to the relevant Series of Notes will be issued by a credit rating agency established in the European Union and registered under the CRA Regulation will be disclosed in the Final Terms.
Changes to the credit ratings of Russia, the Company or the Programme may adversely affect the value of the Notes Outstanding Eurobonds of Russia are rated ‘‘Baa1’’ by Moody’s, ‘‘BBB’’ by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and ‘‘BBB’’ by Fitch. The Company’s credit ratings and the Programme ratings will be set out in the final terms relating to the relevant issue of the Notes. The foregoing credit ratings do not mean that the Notes are a suitable investment. A rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organisation. The ratings do not address the likelihood that the principal on the Notes will be prepaid, paid on an expected final payment date or paid on any particular date before the legal final maturity date of the Notes. The ratings do not address the marketability of the Notes or any
45
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BQ14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ Seq: 16 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 60502
Risk Factors
market price. The significance of each rating should be analysed independently from any other rating. Any changes in the credit ratings of the Company or the Notes could adversely affect the value of the Notes and the price that a subsequent purchaser will be willing to pay for the Notes.
Legal investment considerations may restrict certain investments The investment activities of certain investors are subject to investment laws and regulations, or to the review by, or regulation of, certain authorities. Each potential investor should consult its legal advisers to determine whether and to what extent (i) the Notes are legal investments to it; (ii) the Notes can be used as collateral for various types of borrowing; and (iii) other restrictions apply to its purchase or pledge of any Notes. Financial institutions should consult their legal advisers or the appropriate regulators to determine the appropriate treatment of the Notes under any applicable risk based capital or similar rules.
The Notes may only be transferred in accordance with the procedures of the depositaries in which the Notes are deposited Except in limited circumstances, the Notes will be issued only in global form with interests therein held through the facilities of Euroclear, Clearstream, Luxembourg and/or DTC. Ownership of beneficial interests in the Notes is shown on, and the transfer of that ownership is effected only through, records maintained by Euroclear, Clearstream, Luxembourg and/or DTC or their nominees and the records of their participants. The laws of some jurisdictions may require that certain purchasers of securities take physical delivery of such securities in definitive form. These laws may impair the ability to transfer beneficial interests in the Notes. Because Euroclear, Clearstream, Luxembourg and/or DTC can only act on behalf of their participants, which, in turn, act on behalf of owners of beneficial interests held through such participants and certain banks, the ability of a person having a beneficial interest in a note to pledge or transfer such interest to persons or entities that do not participate in the Euroclear, Clearstream, Luxembourg and/or DTC systems may be impaired.
The United States federal income tax characterisation of the Notes is uncertain No authority directly addresses the US federal income tax characterisation of securities like the Notes and the Issuer has not and will not seek a ruling from the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as to their characterisation for such purposes. To the extent relevant for US federal income tax purposes, the Issuer intends to treat the Notes as indebtedness for such purposes. No assurance can be given that the IRS will not assert, or a court would not sustain, a position regarding the characterisation of the Notes that is contrary to this treatment. Alternative characterisations include treatment of the Notes as beneficial ownership of the relevant Loan or as equity in the Issuer, which is a passive foreign investment company. Prospective investors should seek advice from their own tax advisors as to the consequences to them of investing in the Notes, including their treatment for US federal income tax purposes.
Further notes of a Series of Notes issued in additional offerings by the Issuer may not be fungible for US federal income tax purposes with the Notes issued in the original offering of that Series of Notes If the further notes of a Series of Notes are not fungible with the Notes issued in the original offering of that Series of Notes, US holders of those notes may be required to accrue original issue discount on the further notes into income whether or not they receive cash payments. Because the further notes may not be distinguishable from the previously outstanding Notes, the market value of all of the Notes may be adversely affected. See ‘‘Taxation—Certain US Federal Income Tax Considerations—Fungible Issue’’.
Risk Factors Relating to Luxembourg law Insolvency laws in Luxembourg could negatively affect the ability of Noteholders to enforce their rights Any insolvency proceedings with regard to the Issuer would most likely be based on and governed by the insolvency laws of Luxembourg, the jurisdiction under which the Issuer is organised. As a result, in the event of the Issuer’s insolvency, a Noteholder’s claim against the Issuer will most likely be subject to insolvency laws of Luxembourg. The insolvency laws of Luxembourg may not be as favourable to the interest of Noteholders as the laws in other jurisdictions. In the event that the Issuer experiences financial difficulty, it is not possible to predict with certainty in which jurisdiction or jurisdictions insolvency or similar proceedings would be commenced or how these proceedings would be resolved. In addition, there can be no assurance as to how the insolvency laws of Luxembourg will be applied in insolvency proceedings relating to several jurisdictions.
46
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BQ14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BU14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 6320DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 17485
USE OF PROCEEDS The gross proceeds from each offering of a Series of Notes will be used by the Issuer for the sole purpose of financing the corresponding Loan to the Company. The gross proceeds of such Loan will be used by the Company for general corporate purposes unless otherwise specified in the relevant Loan Agreement. In connection with the receipt of such Loan, the Company will pay an arrangement fee, as reflected in the relevant Final Terms.
47
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BU14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BU14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 2680DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 54453
EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION The official currency of Russia, where a substantial amount of the Group’s assets are located, is the Rouble. However, the Financial Statements are reported in US dollars. As a result, fluctuations in the value of the Rouble against the US dollar may affect these results when translated into US dollars. See ‘‘Risk Factors—Risk Factors Relating to the Group and the Steel and Mining Industries—The Group may incur losses as a result of fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rates of the rouble, the US dollar or the euro’’. and ‘‘Operating and Financial Review—Key Factors Affecting the Group’s Financial Results—Exchange rate movements’’. The table below sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information regarding the exchange rate between the Rouble and the US dollar, based on the official exchange rate quoted by CBR. Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the Rouble and the US dollar in the past are not necessarily indicative of fluctuations that may occur in the future. These rates may also differ from the actual rates used in the preparation of the Financial Statements and other information presented in this Base Prospectus.
RUR per US$1.00 Year ended 31 December High Low Period average(1) Period end 2005 ...... 29.00 27.46 28.22 28.78 2006 ...... 28.78 26.18 27.26 26.33 2007 ...... 26.58 24.26 25.57 24.55 2008 ...... 29.38 23.13 24.85 29.38 2009 ...... 36.43 28.67 31.71 30.24 2010 ...... 31.78 28.93 30.37 30.48 2011 Three months ended 31 March ...... 30.52 29.19 29.27 28.43 April ...... 28.16 27.50 28.10 27.50 May...... 28.48 27.26 27.87 28.07 June ...... 28.35 27.68 27.98 28.08
(1) The average is calculated as a geometric average in respect of each day during relevant period.
No representation is made that the rouble amounts referred to in this Base Prospectus could have been or could be converted into US dollars at the above exchange rates or at any other rate.
48
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BU14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BU14501A.;11 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 3530DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 8872
CAPITALISATION The following table sets forth on a consolidated basis the Group’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term debt finance and capitalisation as of 31 March 2011. Prospective investors should read this table in conjunction with ‘‘Selected Consolidated Financial Information’’, ‘‘Operating and Financial Review’’ and the Financial Statements which are included in this Prospectus beginning on page F-1.
As at 31 March 2011 Actual Cash and cash equivalents ...... 1,778,220 Short-term debt finance ...... 1,626,507 Long-term debt finance ...... 4,463,608
Equity Share capital ...... 3,311,288 Treasury shares ...... (26,303) Additional capital ...... 1,165,530 Foreign exchange differences ...... 73,298 Retained earnings ...... 3,341,672 Other reserves ...... 59,970 Equity attributable to shareholders of OAO Severstal ...... 7,925,455 Non-controlling interests ...... 328,322 Total equity ...... 8,253,777 Total capitalisation(1) ...... 12,717,385
There has been no material change in the Group’s total capitalisation since 31 March 2011.
(1) Total capitalisation is the sum of long-term debt finance and total equity.
49
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BU14501A.;11 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BW14501A.;10 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 495D*/3770D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 1208
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION The following tables set forth, in summary form, consolidated statements of financial position, income statements and other information relating to the Group. Such information has been derived from the Financial Statements of the Group prepared in accordance with IFRS. The reports of ZAO KPMG appear elsewhere in this Prospectus. The financial information presented below should be read in conjunction with such Financial Statements, reports and ‘‘Operating and Financial Review’’.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS Three months ended Year ended 31 December 31 March 2010 2009(1) 2008(1) 2011 2010(1) (Amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars, except as otherwise stated) Revenue Revenue—third parties ...... 13,510,930 9,540,775 15,888,278 3,701,803 2,723,394 Revenue—related parties ...... 62,335 53,118 177,481 25,399 18,437 13,573,265 9,593,893 16,065,759 3,727,202 2,741,831 Cost of sales ...... (9,110,216) (7,209,763) (10,542,560) (2,510,038) (1,945,871) Gross profit ...... 4,463,049 2,384,130 5,523,199 1,217,164 795,960 General and administrative expenses ...... (638,403) (516,863) (801,528) (168,034) (147,504) Distribution expenses ...... (990,727) (791,505) (995,732) (235,299) (195,884) Other taxes and contributions ...... (182,351) (150,001) (153,071) (55,632) (37,098) Share of associates’ profit/(loss) ...... 19,401 13,298 (2,687) (1,580) 1,824 Net loss from securities operations ...... (104,694) (12,160) (99,876) (9,786) (3,514) (Loss)/profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... (46,748) (30,058) (43,511) (4,032) 1,189 Net other operating (expenses)/income ...... (15,288) (37,675) 555,665 (1,637) (7,168) Profit from operations ...... 2,504,239 859,166 3,982,459 741,164 407,805 Impairment of non-current assets ...... (81,123) (88,056) (531,975) (827) (63,720) Negative goodwill ...... — — 79,862 — — Net other non-operating (expenses)/income ...... (44,444) (31,790) 238,945 (4,863) (10,242) Profit before financing and taxation ...... 2,378,672 739,320 3,769,291 735,474 333,843 Interest income ...... 103,396 91,452 128,840 13,357 34,134 Interest expense ...... (630,775) (478,453) (397,915) (122,643) (185,274) Foreign exchange difference ...... 62,687 (204,371) (262,769) 174,395 119,901 Profit before income tax ...... 1,913,980 147,948 3,237,447 800,583 302,604 Income tax expense ...... (487,249) (133,960) (490,448) (162,635) (105,923) Profit from continuing operations ...... 1,426,731 13,988 2,746,999 637,948 196,681 Loss from discontinued operations ...... (1,941,745) (1,133,083) (685,073) (67,579) (974,535) (Loss)/profit for the year/period ...... (515,014) (1,119,095) 2,061,926 570,369 (777,854) Attributable to: shareholders of OAO Severstal ...... (576,994) (1,037,240) 2,028,972 531,006 (785,352) non-controlling interests ...... 61,980 (81,855) 32,954 39,363 7,498 Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period (millions of shares) ...... 1,005.2 1,005.2 1,007.2 1,005.2 1,005.2 Basic and diluted (loss)/profit per share (US dollars) . (0.57) (1.03) 2.01 0.53 (0.78) Basic and diluted profit per share—continuing operations (US dollars) ...... 1.36 0.01 2.72 0.60 0.19 Basic and diluted loss per share—discontinued operations (US dollars) ...... (1.93) (1.04) (0.71) (0.07) (0.97)
(1) These amounts reflect adjustments made in connection with the presentation of discontinued operations. See ‘‘Operating and Financial Review—Key factors affecting the Group’s financial results—Discontinued operations and the disposition of assets held for sale’’.
50
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BW14501A.;10 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BW14501A.;10 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 220D*/3025D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 16573
Selected Consolidated Financial Information
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION As at As at 31 December 31 March 2010 2009 2008 2011 (Amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars) Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents ...... 2,012,662 2,853,376 2,652,888 1,778,220 Short-term bank deposits ...... 12,690 95,533 818,545 13,275 Short-term financial investments ...... 27,463 73,129 112,782 35,482 Trade accounts receivable ...... 967,837 1,457,651 1,941,876 1,400,338 Amounts receivable from related parties ...... 12,359 26,716 63,831 62,768 Restricted cash ...... 41,313 — — 27,860 Inventories ...... 2,366,924 2,974,227 4,271,886 2,734,058 VAT recoverable ...... 278,594 288,032 361,542 293,365 Income tax recoverable ...... 39,578 106,019 172,947 30,478 Other current assets ...... 298,070 285,453 279,707 416,251 Assets held for sale ...... 3,509,882 24,415 8,872 2,045 Total current assets ...... 9,567,372 8,184,551 10,684,876 6,794,140 Non-current assets: Long-term financial investments ...... 205,232 128,616 70,342 287,678 Investment in associates and joint ventures ...... 158,564 143,857 110,907 282,694 Property, plant and equipment ...... 7,351,835 9,485,480 9,827,392 7,806,947 Intangible assets ...... 1,799,776 1,369,204 1,510,658 1,845,964 Restricted cash ...... 61,714 17,541 21,703 62,894 Deferred tax assets ...... 101,406 239,835 246,541 113,248 Other non-current assets ...... 82,620 74,802 41,507 127,559 Total non-current assets ...... 9,761,147 11,459,335 11,829,050 10,526,984 Total assets ...... 19,328,519 19,643,886 22,513,926 17,321,124 Liabilities and shareholders’ equity Current liabilities: Trade accounts payable ...... 897,389 1,378,300 1,528,453 1,123,228 Amounts payable to related parties ...... 16,717 16,656 71,960 36,610 Short-term debt finance ...... 1,422,262 1,478,301 2,038,693 1,626,507 Income taxes payable ...... 41,230 34,150 46,131 70,473 Other taxes and social security payable ...... 156,078 209,084 213,315 222,304 Dividends payable ...... 17,131 5,704 128,715 6,963 Other current liabilities ...... 531,736 743,230 868,409 514,551 Liabilities related to assets held for sale ...... 3,272,354 11,979 4 14,627 Total current liabilities ...... 6,354,897 3,877,404 4,895,680 3,615,263 Non-current liabilities: Long-term debt finance ...... 4,719,772 5,748,559 6,227,225 4,463,608 Deferred tax liabilities ...... 493,280 394,990 496,379 528,137 Retirement benefit liabilities ...... 164,555 738,328 722,065 172,592 Other non-current liabilities ...... 276,244 508,266 619,961 287,747 Total non-current liabilities ...... 5,653,851 7,390,143 8,065,630 5,452,084 Equity: Share capital ...... 3,311,288 3,311,288 3,311,288 3,311,288 Treasury shares ...... (26,303) (26,303) (26,303) (26,303) Additional capital ...... 1,165,530 1,165,530 1,165,530 1,165,530 Foreign exchange differences ...... (297,219) (52,478) 84,987 73,298 Retained earnings ...... 2,780,190 3,436,270 4,488,396 3,341,672 Other reserves ...... 76,411 43,600 27,601 59,970 Total equity attributable to shareholders of OAO Severstal .. 7,009,897 7,877,907 9,051,499 7,925,455 Non-controlling interests ...... 309,874 498,432 501,117 328,322 Total equity ...... 7,319,771 8,376,339 9,552,616 8,253,777 Total equity and liabilities ...... 19,328,519 19,643,886 22,513,926 17,321,124
51
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BW14501A.;10 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]BW14501A.;10 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 3925DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 52303
Selected Consolidated Financial Information
SUMMARY CASH FLOW DATA Three months ended Year ended 31 December 31 March 2010 2009(1) 2008(1) 2011 2010(1) (Amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars) Net cash from/(used in) operating activities— continuing operations ...... 1,805,810 1,403,465 3,217,321 161,827 (42,695) Net cash (used in)/from operating activities— discontinued operations ...... (546,636) 207,726 216,540 58,205 (240,232) Net cash from/(used in) operating activities ...... 1,259,174 1,611,191 3,433,861 220,032 (282,927) Cash used in investing activities—continuing operations ...... (1,349,104) (37,128) (4,292,244) (259,125) (365,580) Cash used in investing activities—discontinued operations ...... (150,162) (193,509) (340,281) (26,152) (28,829) Cash used in investing activities ...... (1,499,266) (230,637) (4,632,525) (285,277) (394,409) Cash (used in)/from financing activities—continuing operations ...... (386,227) (761,331) 1,640,320 (210,675) 345,302 Cash from/(used in) financing activities—discontinued operations ...... 98,346 (420,509) 605,882 (28,227) 65,178 Cash (used in)/from financing activities ...... (287,881) (1,181,840) 2,246,202 (238,902) 410,480
(1) These amounts reflect adjustments made in connection with the presentation of discontinued operations. See ‘‘Operating and Financial Review—Key factors affecting the Group’s financial results—Discontinued operations and the disposition of assets held for sale’’.
52
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: BW14501A.;10 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CA14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 260D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 62992
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW The following is a discussion of the Group’s financial condition and results of operations as at and for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 and as at and for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and 2010, and of the material factors that the Group believes are likely to affect its financial condition and results of operations. You should read this section in conjunction with the Financial Statements included in this Prospectus beginning on page F-1. The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. In addition, the following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements that reflect the Group’s plans, estimates and beliefs. The Group’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in these forward- looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Prospectus, including ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and ‘‘Forward Looking Statements’’.
OVERVIEW OF THE GROUP The Group is an international, vertically integrated steel and mining company that sells high quality metal and mining products to customers across the world. According to Metal Bulletin, the Group was the world’s twenty-first largest producer of crude steel in 2010 by volume of production (as adjusted for the disposal of the group’s Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren and Severstal Wheeling assets). The Group is a full production cycle operation which includes iron ore, coal, scrap collection, steel mills and rolled product plants, downstream production and distribution businesses, as well as gold mining enterprises. The Group’s primary production facilities are geographically diversified with locations in Russia, the United States and a number of other countries, including Kazakhstan, Burkina Faso and Guinea. With a focus on high value added products in attractive niche markets, the Group’s corporate strategy is to become one of the global industry leaders in terms of EBITDA and to sustain a leading position in terms of both margins and return on investment as a vertically-integrated steel and steel-related mining company. The Group comprises three business divisions: Russian Steel Division, Severstal International (North America operations) and Severstal Resources (including Nordgold).
THE GROUP’S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB, in effect at the time of the preparation of the Financial Statements. The Financial Statements include the accounts of the Group’s subsidiaries from the date that control effectively commenced until the date that control effectively ceased. Acquisitions of controlling interests in companies that were previously under the control of the Majority Shareholder of the Group are accounted for as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented or, if later, at the date on which control was obtained by the Majority Shareholder. Acquisitions by the Majority Shareholder of additional interests in the acquired companies, after control over those companies has been obtained by the Majority Shareholder, are treated as if those additional interests were acquired by the Group. Intra Group balances, transactions, unrealised gains and losses arising from such transactions have been eliminated in these Financial Statements. The list of the Group’s significant subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures with effective ownership interests as at 31 December 2008, 2009 and 2010 is included in the Annual Financial Statements.
Segmental Reporting for the years ended 31 December, 2008, 2009 and 2010 In 2010, the Group was divided into four reporting segments, in accordance with IFRS 8 ‘‘Operating Segments’’ for the purposes of the Annual Financial Statements: the Russian Steel segment, the Severstal Resource segment, the Severstal North America segment and the Lucchini segment (discontinued). The discussion relating to the years ended 31 December, 2008, 2009 and 2010 follows the reporting segment structure consistent with the Annual Financial Statements.
Severstal Resource Segment The Severstal Resource segment included the following operations: iron ore production, coal production, gold production and ferroniobium production.
53
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CA14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CA14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 290D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 24877
Operating and Financial Review
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment produces a wide range of products, including hot-rolled sheets, profiles, large- diameter pipes, and cold-rolled coated sheets encompassing special-grade sheets for the automotive industry, hot-rolled plates, metalware and long products from steel production facilities located in the Russian Federation. It sells steel products on the domestic Russian market, serving the needs of the Russian automotive, construction, shipbuilding, oil and gas, engineering and other industries, as well as on the international market.
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America comprised the Group’s North American assets and was organised under the Severstal International division for business purposes. The Severstal North America product line includes hot-rolled, cold-rolled, galvanized steel and high-quality flat-rolled steel.
Lucchini segment (discontinued) Lucchini was also organised under the Severstal International division, but in the years ended 31 December 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Lucchini segment was classified as discontinued operations and assets held for sale as of 31 December 2010 in the Annual Financial Statements. In October 2006, the Group acquired from the Majority Shareholder a controlling interest in Lucchini, which produces special and high-quality steel and quality and specialty long products for the European market. Due to the significant decline in Lucchini’s profitability and the uncertain future prospects for a recovery in the European market for Lucchini’s products, the Group decided to dispose of Lucchini, reflecting it as an asset held for sale and a discontinued operation in the Annual Financial Statements. In March 2010, the Group acquired a 20.2 percent stake in Lucchini from a Lucchini family company, bringing the Group’s share in the capital of Lucchini to 100.0 percent In June 2010, the Group sold a 50.8 percent stake in Lucchini to the Majority Shareholder, following an extensive M&A process that did not result in acceptable bids. However, in accordance with IFRS requirements, the Group continued to consolidate the Lucchini segment in the Annual Financial Statements primarily due to a call option exercisable within the following five years and a contractual entitlement, for the benefit of the Group, to any gain on a subsequent sale of this stake to a third party. In February 2011, the Group signed an amendment to the Lucchini sale and purchase agreement with the Majority Shareholder, which cancelled the call option and the contractual entitlement, for the benefit of the Group, to any gain on a subsequent sale of this stake to a third party. As a result, effective from the date of that amendment, the Group has accounted for the investment in Lucchini using the equity method.
Segmental Reporting for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011 In 2011, as a result of the Group’s gold production operations reaching a certain share of assets and profit within the Group, the presentation and disclosure of segment information was changed by separating the Group’s gold production operations into the Gold segment. As of 31 March 2011, the Group had four reportable segments: Steel Resources and Gold (the two reportable segments representing together the Group’s Severstal Resource division), Russian Steel and Severstal North America. The comparative information for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011, has been disclosed as if the separation had occurred at the beginning of the three months ended 31 March 2010. The discussion relating to the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011 follows the reporting segment structure consistent with the Interim Financial Statements. The Lucchini segment, presented in the Group’s financial statements for the three months ended 31 March 2010, is not currently a segment of the Group, being accounted for under the equity method from February 2011. The comparative information for the three months ended 31 March 2010 reflect adjustments made in connection with the presentation of discontinued operations. At present, Severstal Resources comprises the Group’s Steel Resources and Gold segments for financial reporting purposes.
54
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CA14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CA14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 36854
Operating and Financial Review
Steel Resources segment The Steel Resources segment includes following operations: iron ore production, coal production and ferroniobium production.
Gold segment The Gold segment comprises extraction and refining facilities located in the Russian Federation, Burkina Faso, Guinea and Kazakhstan.
KEY FACTORS AFFECTING THE GROUP’S FINANCIAL RESULTS The Group’s results are affected by a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:
Discontinued operations and the disposition of assets held for sale Discontinued operations are disclosed when a component of the Group has either been disposed of during the reporting period or is classified as held for sale at the reporting date and represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations. A discontinued operation is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale. This condition is regarded as met only when the disposal is highly probable within one year from the date of classification. For periods covered in the Group’s Financial Statements, the Group’s discontinued operations represent the Lucchini segment and Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC, which are operating segments within the Severstal North America reporting segment. These assets were all classified as held for sale as at 31 December 2010 following management’s decision to sell these entities within 12 months after the reporting date. The financial results for the years ended 2009 and 2008 have been restated to reflect the classification as discontinued operations. In March 2011, the Group sold 100.0 percent of its stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren and Severstal Wheeling, and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC. Preliminarily, the total consideration is assessed by management in the amount of US$156.4 million. In accordance with the sales-purchase agreement, the ultimate consideration is to be finalized within 120 days after the close of the transaction. The Group’s remaining 50.0 percent interest in MSC is accounted for using the equity method. In February 2011, the Group signed an amendment to the Lucchini sale and purchase agreement with the Majority Shareholder, which cancelled the call option and the contractual entitlement, for the benefit of the Group, to any gain on a subsequent sale of this stake to a third party. As a result, effective from the date of that amendment, the Group has accounted for the investment in Lucchini using the equity method.
Macroeconomic trends The majority of the Group’s operations are, or were in the periods under review, based in Russia, the United States and Africa. As a result, macroeconomic trends in these regions and region specific factors significantly influence the Group’s performance. The global economic downturn had a significant impact on the Company’s financial results during 2008 and 2009. Following a number of years of strong growth, global economic conditions started to rapidly deteriorate during the third quarter of 2008 as the major financial markets became increasingly unstable. Most major developed economies moved into recession by the end of 2008, with GDP growth significantly decelerating as the global economic downturn began to take effect. In 2009, economic activity remained subdued and despite efforts by national banks and governmental policies, overall GDP growth for 2009 was negative in the Group’s key economies, including Russia. However, over the course of 2010 there was evidence that the global economy emerged from the global economic downturn. After a slow year in 2009, many countries showed substantial GDP growth in 2010. In Russia, GDP increased by 4.0 percent in 2010, a significant improvement over 2009 when GDP decreased by 7.9 percent, China demonstrated the highest growth in GDP, with an increase of 10.3 percent in 2010. While largely positive, a number of economic events during 2010 did negatively influence the world economy and as a result the markets for the Company’s products. For example, Greece and Ireland each
55
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CA14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CA14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 40D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 3903
Operating and Financial Review
struggled with severe sovereign debt crises and tightening measures in the Chinese housing market resulted in some fears that the Chinese economy was decelerating. The major drivers of growth in 2010 were government stimulus expenditures, significant restocking of inventories and renewed growth of international trade. The Group believes that the GDP growth in Russia for the first quarter of 2011 generally increased demand for its core products, positively affecting the Group’s pricing, sales and profit from operations. The following table sets forth certain information for Russia and the United States as at and for the dates indicated:
For the year ended 31 December 2008 2009 2010 Russia GDP growth(1) ...... 5.2% (7.9)% 4.0% Percent change in consumer price index(1) ...... 13.4% 8.8% 8.8% United States GDP growth(2) ...... 0.0% (2.6)% 2.9% Percent change in consumer price index(3) ...... 3.8% (0.4)% 1.6% Average nominal exchange rates Roubles per US dollar(4) ...... 24.85 31.71 30.37
Source: (1) Russian Federal State Statistics. (2) Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Department of Commerce. (3) Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (4) CBR.
Exchange rate movements The majority of the Group’s operations are based in Russia, the United States and Africa. The functional currency is determined separately for each of the Group’s entities. For all of the Group’s Russian entities, the majority of costs and significant portion of revenues are denominated in roubles, and accordingly, their functional currency is the rouble. The functional currency of the Group’s entities located in North America is the US dollar. The functional currency for Burkina Faso entities is the Communaute Financiere Africaine franc, while the functional currency for Guinea is the US Dollar. Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency of each entity at the foreign exchange rate ruling on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are translated into the functional currency of each entity at the foreign exchange rate ruling at that date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency of the entity at the foreign exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising on translation are recognised in the income statement. Within Russia, official exchange rates are determined daily by the CBR. Market rates may differ from the official rates although these differences are generally within narrow ranges. However, any conversion of rouble amounts into US dollars should not be construed as a representation that rouble amounts have been, could be or will in the future be, convertible into US dollars at the exchange rates used, or at any other exchange rate. See also ‘‘Exchange Rate Information’’ and ‘‘—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure on Market risk—Foreign currency exchange risk’’.
Commodity price risk The Group’s revenue is exposed to the market risk of price fluctuations related to the sale of steel products. Prices for the steel products that the Group sells both inside and outside of Russia are generally determined by market forces. These prices may be influenced by factors such as supply and demand, production costs (including the costs of raw material inputs) and global and Russian economic growth.
56
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CA14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CA14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 230D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 9985
Operating and Financial Review
Over the periods covered by this operating and financial review, fluctuations in market demand for, and market prices of, steel products significantly affected the revenues received by the Group from the sale of steel products. These fluctuations are likely to continue to affect the revenue that the Group receives from the sale of its products. For example, during the global economic downturn, there was a steep decline in the prices of the products that the Group produces. The Group, however, was able to implement cost-cutting initiatives that partially offset the decline in the prices of its products.
Costs The Group requires substantial amounts of raw materials in the steel production process, in particular iron ore, coal and scrap. Prices for these raw materials experienced dramatic decreases during the global economic crisis in late 2008 and during 2009. However, by the first quarter of 2011, coking coal and iron ore prices have already exceeded the previous record high prices recorded in 2008, and scrap prices have also increased substantially. In furtherance of the Group’s vertical-integration strategy, it has consolidated Severstal Resources primarily to secure a supply of iron ore and coking coal concentrate at competitive market rates and, to a significant extent, largely to insulate it, on a consolidated basis, from the impact of increases in prices of iron ore and coal. Management believes that cost competitiveness in every region where the Group produce steel is a vital element to strengthen the Group’s position over the cycle and industry-leading margins. The Group, however, continues to rely on external suppliers for a number of its raw materials. The Group also consumes large volumes of electricity and natural gas, which are largely supplied to the Russian Steel Division and Severstal Resources by monopoly providers in Russia, while North America businesses are supplied by certain local utilities. From 2008 to the date of this Prospectus, natural gas and electricity tariffs in Russia have been steadily increasing, and the Group does not expect this trend to change. The rates of increase may be higher than the rates at which the Group is able to increase its steel prices. In addition, competition in the railway transport industry in Russia is limited and the Group is, in part, dependent on the monopoly railway service provider for delivery of both raw materials and products. The Russian monopoly railway service providers regularly increase tariffs for their services at a rate that may be higher than the rate at which the Group is able to increase the price of its steel products. In addition to increases in electricity, raw materials, transportation and natural gas prices, increasing wage costs in Russia have added to the costs of the Group’s Russian operations over the periods, other than the year ended 31 December 2010, covered in this operating and financial review.
M&A activities The Group pursues M&A opportunities which are in line with its corporate strategy. The Group aims to capitalise on its high level of vertical integration, cost competitiveness and a high level of producer concentration in its main regional markets. Assets and companies that provide significant upside in line with these key industrial objectives and which are expected to deliver considerable synergies with the Group’s core production facilities are considered as possible M&A targets. In 2008, the Group increased its presence in North America via acquisitions of North American steel and mining companies. In 2009, the Group slowed its M&A activity, instead focusing on the optimisation of the Group’s production processes. This optimization process culminated in March 2011 with the sale of three of the Group’s facilities in North America: 100 percent stakes in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC. In 2009, the Group also adopted a new corporate strategy, including a new set of financial and industrial targets. The Group’s key financial objective is to become one of the global industry leaders by EBITDA, while further improving margins and returns on investment. The Group continues to target at least 80.0 percent self sufficiency in iron ore and coking coal globally. The Group’s top investment priority is to expand its steel and raw materials business in Russia and other CIS countries and explore business opportunities in other high-growth emerging markets. In particular, the Group continues to consider growth opportunities in Africa, specifically in Liberia, Congo, Burkina Faso, Guinea and Gabon.
57
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CA14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CA14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 350D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 58552
Operating and Financial Review
Nord Gold—The Severstal Gold Business Since 2008, the Group has completed several acquisitions, which resulted in the creation of a leading gold mining company focused on emerging markets. The Group’s approach to acquisitions has been to identify and acquire assets at attractive valuations; particularly in situations where the assets are being operated below their potential and/or the target is in financial distress. The Group acquired Celtic and Crew Gold and a controlling stake in High River Gold, as well as a number of other mines and licenses. Following these successful acquisitions, the Group is planning to continue leveraging the value of its gold mining assets though its three-pillar strategy: 1) operational optimisation and integration of the acquired operations; 2) increasing profitability and improving the cash cost position; and 3) organic expansion and developing additional accretive M&A opportunities.
Mining Business Following the successful acquisitions of mining assets, OAO StalMag, Semgeo LLP, PBS Coals Ltd., High River Gold Mines Ltd. and Severstal Liberia Iron Ore Ltd., in 2008 and 2010, the Group intends to expand its iron ore and coal production, as well as its other mining operations, including a significant expansion of its mining operations in Russia, the CIS and other emerging markets with the aim of increasing its cost competitiveness and its global level of vertical integration.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Crew Gold From February 2010 to January 2011, through a series of transactions, the Group acquired a 100.0 percent stake in Crew Gold, a gold mining company previously headquartered in London and previously listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Oslo Stock Exchange. Crew Gold owns and operates LEFA mine, a high potential gold mining project in Guinea, West Africa.
Iron Mineral Beneficiation Services (Proprietary) Limited During 2010, the Group acquired a 25.6 percent stake in IMBS, a research and development company based in Johannesburg, South Africa. The Group acquired an additional 7.4 percent stake in March 2011 increasing its ownership interest to 33.0 percent. IMBS has developed a coal-based Finesmelt technology capable of processing unusable iron ore fines and thermal coal into valuable metallic products similar to DRI/HBI. Currently, IMBS is developing its first commercial project in Phalaborwa, South Africa. As a part of the transaction, IIBG was formed, a new company that has an exclusive license to commercialise the technology worldwide (outside of South Africa and neighbouring countries), of which the Group owns a 51.0 percent stake.
National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. In December 2010, Severstal and NMDC, the leading iron ore producer in India, signed an MOU to establish a 50:50 joint venture company with the objective of building an integrated steel plant in India.
Severstal North America Assets In March 2011, the Group sold its 100.0 percent stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC. The remaining 50.0 percent share in MSC is accounted for using the equity method.
SPG Mineracao S.A. In May 2011, the Group acquired a 25.0 percent stake in SPG. SPG is a private iron ore mining and exploration company with its headquarters in Macapa city, Amapa state, Brazil. SPG’s main asset is a number of high potential iron ore licenses in the area of Tartarugalzinho, Amapa state, jointly named as the ‘‘Tartarugal project’’, with the total approximate resource potential of 600 million tonnes of iron ore, based on the Group’s estimation.
58
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CA14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CA14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 530D*/660D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 44049
Operating and Financial Review
OPERATIONAL OUTLOOK Since 31 March 2011, the Group has continued to perform generally in line with management’s expectations. During the global economic downturn, the Group acted to reduce costs and created other initiatives to manage the business. Consequently, the Group was able to withstand the impact of the decrease in global demand for steel in 2009. The Group also generated cash throughout 2009 and further strengthened its financing structure. As a result, management believes that the Group has emerged from this challenging period in a strong and stable position and is well positioned to exploit the global economic recovery as it gathers pace. The steel industry showed signs of stabilisation in 2010, according to Steel Business Briefing and CRU, and the Group saw a tentative recovery in pricing and demand in some of its key markets, particularly in Russia and the United States. The outlook for 2011 continues to improve as economic growth in emerging markets and a gradual recovery of demand in mature markets accelerates. The Group believes that strong demand for raw materials, expected for the remainder of 2011, will enable the Group to exploit its competitive advantage through its Severstal Resources division. In Russia, the Group expects further recovery in the oil and gas and construction sectors. The Group believes that export markets will also continue to be an important source of sales for the Russian Steel Division. The Group’s capital expenditures continue to be generally in accordance with the Group’s investment programme.
DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP’S INCOME STATEMENT LINE ITEMS The following discussion provides a description of the composition of the principal line items on the Group’s income statement for the periods presented.
Revenue The Group generates revenue primarily through the manufacture and sale of a wide range of iron and steel products: cold-rolled sheet, colour-coated sheet, metalware products, large diameters pipes, long products, hot-rolled strip and plate, pellets and iron ore, large group of coke products and by-products and sale of gold and other raw materials.
Cost of sales Cost of sales includes raw materials, consumables, energy costs, repair and maintenance expenses, labour costs, geological services and the majority of depreciation and amortisation charges.
Gross profit Gross profit represents the Group’s total revenue less cost of sales. Gross margin is gross profit divided by revenue.
General and administrative expenses General and administrative expenses consist of a wide range of administrative costs and the cost of general management and related depreciation and amortisation. General and administrative expenses primarily include labour costs, repair services, insurance expenses and material and fuel expenses related to administrative and managerial activities of the Group.
Distribution expenses Distribution expenses consist primarily of expenses related to selling activities of the Group. Distribution expenses include depreciation and amortisation of assets related to selling activities, advertising expenses, freight insurance expenses, commercial credit insurance, transportation expenses and other distribution expenses.
59
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CA14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CA14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 470DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 1625
Operating and Financial Review
Other taxes and contributions Other taxes and contributions consist of taxes other than income tax. Primarily other taxes and contributions include extraction taxes on the extracted coal and iron ore concentrate and property tax payable on property, plant and equipment used in operations.
Share of associate’s profits/losses Associates are those enterprises in which the Group has significant influence, but does not have control over the financial and operating policies. The Financial Statements include the Group’s share of the total recognised gains and losses of associates accounted for on an equity accounting basis, from the date that significant influence effectively commences until the date that significant influence effectively ceases. When the Group’s share of losses exceeds the carrying amount of the associate, the carrying amount is reduced to nil and recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the Group has incurred obligations in respect of the associate. Where a Group entity transacts with an associate of the Group, profits and losses are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the relevant associate.
Net gain/loss from securities operations Net gain/loss from securities operations consists primarily of gain/loss on held-for-trading securities, gain/ loss on held-to-maturity securities and originated loans and gain/loss on available-for-sale securities.
Loss/gain on disposals of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets Loss/gain on disposals of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets arises when the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets occurs and the loss/gain is calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the item.
Net other operating expenses/income Net other operating expenses/income consists primarily of profit/loss from the sale of inventory, fines and penalties for breach of contracts and changes in provision for contingencies.
Profit/loss from operations Profit/loss from operations is calculated by subtracting net operating expenses from gross profit.
Impairment of non-current assets The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-current assets are reviewed annually to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. An impairment loss is recognised whenever the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount.
Negative goodwill Where an investment in a subsidiary, an associate or a jointly controlled entity is made, any excess of the Group’s share in the fair value acquired of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities over the cost of acquisition is recognised on the income statement immediately as negative goodwill.
Profit/loss before financing and taxation Profit/loss before financing and taxation is calculated by subtracting net non-operating expenses from profit from operations.
Interest income Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on bank deposits and originated loans.
60
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CA14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 710D*/4335D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 5668
Operating and Financial Review
Interest expense Interest expense consists primarily of interest accrued on the Group’s borrowings (including public debt presented by bonds and private debt consisting of bank borrowings, finance leases and loans), interest expense on pension liability, expense on tax restructuring and expense on dismantlement provisions.
Net financing expense Net financing expense comprises interest income, interest expense, including amortisation of transaction costs, and foreign exchange gains or losses.
Profit/loss before income tax Profit/loss before income tax is profit before financing and taxation adjusted by interest income, interest expense and foreign exchange difference.
Income tax expense Taxes on income include current income taxes, deferred income taxes and corrections to prior years’ current tax charges. Current income taxes include all domestic and foreign income taxes which are calculated in accordance with the rules established by the taxation authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Group operates. Deferred income taxes reflect the temporary differences between the carrying values of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as unused tax loss and tax credit carry- forwards, on which deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which those assets can be utilised. The Group’s overall income tax rate varies due to different tax rates in jurisdictions where the Group conducts business, the proportion of income earned in each such jurisdiction and the varying tax treatment of costs and expenses.
Profit from continuing operations Profit from continuing operations is profit before income tax less income tax expense.
Loss from discontinued operations Loss from discontinued operations results from the disposal of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations for which the related assets, liabilities and operating results can be distinguished operationally and for financial reporting purposes. The results of discontinued operations, net of taxes and the gain or loss on their disposal are presented separate from continuing operations in the income statements.
Profit/loss for the period Profit/loss for the period is calculated by subtracting loss from discontinued operations from profit from continuing operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011 The following discussion is based on, and should be read in conjunction with, the Interim Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Prospectus. The financial results of the three months ended 31 March 2010 were restated to reflect adjustments made in connection with the presentation of Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC, which are operating segments within the North America reporting segment (together, the North America disposal group) as discontinued operations.
61
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 755D*/3335D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 8113
Operating and Financial Review
The following table sets forth the Group’s consolidated interim condensed income statements for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011:
Period on Three months ended Period on period 31 March period percent 2010 2011 change change (US$ millions) Revenue Revenue—third parties ...... 2,723.4 3,701.8 978.4 35.9% Revenue—related parties ...... 18.4 25.4 7.0 38.0% 2,741.8 3,727.2 985.4 35.9% Cost of sales ...... (1,945.8) (2,510.0) (564.2) 29.0% Gross profit ...... 796.0 1,217.2 421.2 52.9% General and administrative expenses ...... (147.5) (168.0) (20.5) 13.9% Distribution expenses ...... (195.9) (235.3) (39.4) 20.1% Other taxes and contributions ...... (37.1) (55.6) (18.5) 49.9% Share of associates’ profit/(loss) ...... 1.8 (1.6) (3.4) (188.9)% Loss from securities operations ...... (3.5) (9.8) (6.3) 180.0% Profit/(loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... 1.2 (4.0) (5.2) (433.3)% Net other operating expenses ...... (7.2) (1.7) 5.5 (76.4)% Profit from operations ...... 407.8 741.2 333.4 81.8% Impairment of non-current assets ...... (63.7) (0.8) 62.9 (98.7)% Net other non-operating expenses ...... (10.3) (4.9) 5.4 (52.4)% Profit before financing and taxation ...... 333.8 735.5 401.7 120.3% Interest income ...... 34.1 13.4 (20.7) (60.7)% Interest expense ...... (185.3) (122.6) 62.7 (33.8)% Foreign exchange difference ...... 120.0 174.3 54.3 45.3% Profit before income tax ...... 302.6 800.6 498.0 164.6% Income tax expense ...... (105.9) (162.7) (56.8) 53.6% Profit from continuing operations ...... 196.7 637.9 441.2 224.3% Loss from discontinued operations ...... (974.6) (67.5) 907.1 (93.1)% (Loss)/profit for the period ...... (777.9) 570.4 1,348.3 (173.3)%
Revenue The Group’s consolidated revenue increased by US$985.4 million, or 35.9 percent, from US$2,741.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$3,727.2 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to a US$744.8 million increase in revenue of the Russian Steel segment, a US$108.7 million increase in revenue of the Gold segment, a US$305.4 million increase in revenue of the Steel Resources segment, partially offset by a US$12.3 million decrease in revenue of the Severstal North America segment. The increase in revenue was also partially offset by a US$161.2 million increase in intersegment transactions. Changes in the prices of the Group’s various products were generally consistent with the prevailing market trends for each such product. Compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010, the Group’s revenue from related parties increased by US$7.0 million, or 38.0 percent, from US$18.4 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$25.4 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. See ‘‘Related Party Transactions’’. The increase in revenue from related parties was in line with the overall increase of the Group’s revenue.
62
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1320D*/1935D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 29675
Operating and Financial Review
Revenue by product The following table sets forth the Group’s revenue by product for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011:
Period on Three months Period on period ended 31 March period percent 2010 2011 change change (US$ millions) Hot-rolled strip and plate ...... 936.6 1,110.8 174.2 18.6% Galvanised and other metallic coated sheet(1) ...... 376.4 454.6 78.2 20.8% Cold-rolled sheet ...... 347.9 408.5 60.6 17.4% Large diameter pipes ...... 202.9 283.7 80.8 39.8% Gold...... 134.4 242.0 107.6 80.1% Metalware products ...... 166.6 231.6 65.0 39.0% Coal and coking coal concentrate ...... 121.0 222.2 101.2 83.6% Shipping and handling costs billed to customers ...... 129.6 149.1 19.5 15.0% Semi-finished products ...... 22.8 138.0 115.2 505.3% Long products ...... 62.6 119.9 57.3 91.5% Other tubes and pipes, formed shapes ...... 65.9 117.7 51.8 78.6% Pellets and iron ore ...... 46.3 92.3 46.0 99.4% Colour-coated sheet ...... 32.9 53.3 20.4 62.0% Scrap ...... 12.8 21.9 9.1 71.1% Other ...... 83.1 81.6 (1.5) (1.8)% Revenue ...... 2,741.8 3,727.2 985.4 35.9%
(1) Hereinafter referred to as ‘‘Galvanised sheet’’.
Revenue by delivery destination The following table sets forth the Group’s revenue by delivery destination for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011:
Period on Three months Period on period ended 31 March period percent 2010 2011 change change (US$ millions) Russian Federation ...... 1,211.1 1,869.3 658.2 54.3% North America ...... 810.4 845.9 35.5 4.4% Europe ...... 454.0 734.2 280.2 61.7% China and Central Asia ...... 82.6 106.9 24.3 29.4% The Middle East ...... 68.7 102.8 34.1 49.6% Central and South America ...... 80.6 26.7 (53.9) (66.9)% Africa ...... 28.0 22.2 (5.8) (20.7)% South-East Asia ...... 6.4 19.2 12.8 200.0% Revenue ...... 2,741.8 3,727.2 985.4 35.9%
63
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 95D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 8019
Operating and Financial Review
Revenue by segment The following table sets forth the Group’s revenue by segment for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011:
Period on Three months Period on period ended 31 March period percent 2010 2011 change change (US$ millions) Steel Resources segment ...... 459.0 764.4 305.4 66.5% Gold segment ...... 135.3 244.0 108.7 80.3% Russian Steel segment ...... 1,664.0 2,408.8 744.8 44.8% Severstal North America segment ...... 769.8 757.5 (12.3) (1.6)% Intersegment transactions ...... (286.3) (447.5) (161.2) 56.3% Revenue ...... 2,741.8 3,727.2 985.4 35.9%
Steel Resources segment The Steel Resources segment’s revenue increased by US$305.4 million, or 66.5 percent, from US$459.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$764.4 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. Included in these amounts are intersegment revenue, primarily to the Russian Steel segment, of US$263.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 and US$425.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. Excluding intersegment revenue, revenue of the Steel Resources segment increased by US$142.5 million, or 72.7 percent, from US$196.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$338.5 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne, and an increase in sales by volume as described below. Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment revenue, of the Steel Resources segment by product: Pellets and iron ore. Revenue from pellets and iron ore sales increased by US$46.0 million, or 99.4 percent, from US$46.3 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$92.3 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in sales by volume. The increase in sales by volume was primarily due to an increase in sales by volume to Asia as well as to Europe as a result of sales to the related party Lucchini. The increase in the average price per tonne was due to a rise in demand. Coal and coking coal concentrate. Revenue from coal and coking coal concentrate sales increased by US$101.2 million, or 83.6 percent, from US$121.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$222.2 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This increase was primarily due to an increase in sales by volume and an increase in the average price per tonne. The increase in sales was primarily due to a general market recovery and improved product mix, such as an increase in revenue from hard coking coal sales, which had a higher price than other coal products.
Gold segment The Gold segment’s revenue increased by US$108.7 million, or 80.3 percent, from US$135.3 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$244.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase in sales reflected the significantly increased demand and stronger average realised gold price of US$1,403 per ounce, 27 percent higher than the price of gold in the three months ended 31 March 2010. Gold. Revenue from gold sales increased by US$107.6 million, or 80.1 percent, from US$134.4 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$242.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s revenue increased by US$744.8 million, or 44.8 percent, from US$1,664.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$2,408.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. Included in the above amounts are intersegment revenue of US$23.3 million in the
64
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 90D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 35617
Operating and Financial Review
three months ended 31 March 2010 and US$21.6 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase in revenue for this segment was primarily due to the market-driven increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in sales by volumes as described below. Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment revenue, of the Russian Steel segment by product: Hot-rolled strip and plate. Revenue from hot-rolled strip and plate sales increased by US$150.1 million, or 23.4 percent, from US$640.6 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$790.7 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne. Cold-rolled sheet. Revenue from cold-rolled sheet sales increased by US$99.0 million, or 52.9 percent, from US$187.1 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$286.1 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This increase was primarily due to an increase in sales by volume and an increase in the average price per tonne. The increase in sales by volume was primarily due to the market-driven increase in demand. Galvanised sheet. Revenue from galvanised sheet sales increased by US$72.9 million, or 92.2 percent, from US$79.1 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$152.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in sales by volume. The increase in sales by volume was primarily due to the market-driven increase in demand, mostly in the domestic Russian construction industry. Semi-finished products. Revenue from semi-finished products sales increased by US$115.3 million, or 510.2 percent, from US$22.6 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$137.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in sales by volume. The increase in sales by volume was primarily due to the market- driven increase in demand for steel and semi-finished products. Large diameter pipes. Revenue from large diameter pipes sales increased by US$80.8 million, or 39.8 percent, from US$202.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$283.7 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This increase was primarily due to an increase in sales by volume and an increase in the average price per tonne. The increase in sales by volume was primarily due to the market-driven increase in demand, specifically due to the increase in demand from Gazprom, the Group’s main customer of pipes. Metalware products. Revenue from metalware products sales increased by US$65.0 million, or 39.0 percent, from US$166.6 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$231.6 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and due to increase in sales by volume. The increase in sales by volume was primarily due to the market-driven recovery of demand, specifically in the domestic Russian construction and automotive markets.
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America’s revenue decreased by US$12.3 million, or 1.6 percent, from US$769.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$757.5 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the sale in May 2010 of the Northern Steel Group (NSG) operating facilities, a group of steel service companies operated under different trade names, which was significantly offset by the general economic recovery in the North American market, which led to increased consumption of steel by the US automotive industry, converters and service centres and an increase in the average price per tonne. Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment revenue, of Severstal North America by product: Hot-rolled strip and plate. Revenue from hot-rolled strip and plate sales increased by US$24.1 million, or 8.1 percent, from US$296.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$320.1 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per
65
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 155D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 34703
Operating and Financial Review
tonne, which was partially offset by a slight decrease in revenue by volume. The decrease in revenue by volume was primarily due to the NSG divestiture, which was partially offset by the market-driven recovery of demand. The increase in the average price per tonne was due to the market-driven recovery of demand. Cold-rolled sheet. Revenue from cold-rolled sheet sales decreased by US$38.4 million, or 23.9 percent, from US$160.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$122.4 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in revenue by volume due to the NSG divestiture, which was partially offset by average price per tonne increases resulting from the general economic recovery and increased consumption of steel by the US automotive industry.
Revenue by delivery destination Changes in the regional revenue structure resulted in the increase of sales to Russia, North America, Europe, China and Central Asia, South-East Asia and the Middle East and the decrease in sales to Central and South America and Africa in the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010, primarily due to the change in market-driven demand and respective reallocation of sales from one region to another.
Cost of sales The Group’s cost of sales increased by US$564.2 million, or 29.0 percent, from US$1,945.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$2,510.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This increase was primarily due to a US$672.2 million increase in cost of sales of the Russian Steel segment, a US$54.3 million increase in the Gold segment and a US$53.1 million increase in the Steel Resources segment’s cost of sales, partially offset by a US$49.5 million decrease in the Severstal North America segment’s cost of sales and a US$165.9 million increase in intersegment transactions.
Cost of sales by segment The following table sets forth the Group’s cost of sales by segment for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011:
Period on Three months ended Period on period 31 March period percent 2010 2011 change change (US$ millions) Steel Resources segment ...... (322.1) (375.2) (53.1) 16.5% Gold segment ...... (73.4) (127.7) (54.3) 74.0% Russian Steel segment ...... (1,057.0) (1,729.2) (672.2) 63.6% Severstal North America segment ...... (772.0) (722.5) 49.5 (6.4)% Intersegment transactions ...... 278.7 444.6 165.9 59.5% Cost of sales ...... (1,945.8) (2,510.0) (564.2) 29.0%
Steel Resources segment The Steel Resources segment’s cost of sales increased by US$53.1 million, or 16.5 percent, from US$322.1 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$375.2 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This increase was primarily due to a US$20.9 million increase in fuel and energy expenses and a US$26.7 million increase in labour costs generally consistent with wage inflation during the period. Fuel and energy expense. The increase in fuel and energy expenses was primarily due to an increase in the volume of production and its related increase in energy consumption and market and regulation-driven increases in energy tariffs and fuel prices. Labour and related tax expense. The increase in labour and related tax expense was primarily due to the increase in the average benefits of employees compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010, which is generally consistent with wage inflation during the period.
66
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 410D*/2055D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 49502
Operating and Financial Review
Gold segment The Gold segment’s cost of sales increased by US$54.3 million, or 74.0 percent, from US$73.4 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$127.7 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This increase was primarily due to the consolidation of Crew Gold and due to an increase in production levels. In particular, there was a US$13.6 million increase in raw materials expenses, a US$15.3 million increase in fuel and energy expenses and US$15.4 million increase in depreciation and amortisation charges. Raw materials expense. The increase in raw materials expense was in line with an increase in sales by volume in the three months ended 31 March 2010 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2011 and an increase in purchase prices. Fuel and energy expense. The increase in fuel and energy expenses was primarily due to the increase in sales by volume and the increase in energy tariffs and fuel prices. Depreciation and amortisation. The increase in depreciation and amortisation expense was mainly due to the effect of Crew Gold acquisition.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s cost of sales increased by US$672.2 million, or 63.6 percent, from US$1,057.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$1,729.2 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to a US$482.0 million increase in raw materials expense, a US$30.4 million increase in fuel and energy costs and a US$41.8 million increase in labour costs. Additionally, changes in works-in-progress and finished goods balances increased the cost of sales by US$117.0 million. This increase was primarily due to a rise in production and sales volumes by most of the companies of the Russian Steel segment in the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010. Raw materials expense. The increase in raw materials expense was in line with an increase in sales by volume in the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010. An increase in prices for pellets, coking coal, iron ore, ferro-alloys, coke and scrap metal also contributed to the increase in the cost of sales. Fuel and energy expense. The increase in fuel and energy expenses was primarily due to the increase in sales by volume and the increase in energy tariffs and fuel prices. Labour and related tax expense. The increase in labour costs was primarily due to the increase in the average salaries of employees which increased in line with inflation, partially offset by a decrease in the average number of employees.
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America’s cost of sales decreased by US$49.5 million, or 6.4 percent, from US$772.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$722.5 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This decrease was primarily due to the NSG divestiture.
Profit from operations For the reasons described above, compared to the prior period, the Group’s profit from operations increased by US$333.4 million from US$407.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$741.2 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was due to a US$421.2 million increase in gross profit, partially offset by a US$87.8 million increase in net operating expenses. The increase in net operating expenses was primarily due to a US$39.4 million increase in distribution expenses, a US$20.5 million increase in general and administrative expenses and a US$18.5 million increase in other taxes and contributions.
67
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 35D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 31351
Operating and Financial Review
The following table sets forth the Group’s net operating expenses for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011:
Period on Three months Period on period ended 31 March period percent 2010 2011 change change (US$ millions) General and administrative expenses ...... (147.5) (168.0) (20.5) 13.9% Distribution expenses ...... (195.9) (235.3) (39.4) 20.1% Other taxes and contributions ...... (37.1) (55.6) (18.5) 49.9% Share of associates’ profit/(loss) ...... 1.8 (1.6) (3.4) (188.9)% Loss from securities operations ...... (3.5) (9.8) (6.3) 180.0% Profit/(loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... 1.2 (4.0) (5.2) (433.3)% Net other operating expenses ...... (7.2) (1.7) 5.5 (76.4)% Net operating expenses ...... (388.2) (476.0) (87.8) 22.6%
Steel Resources segment The Steel Resources segment’s profit from operations increased by US$205.0 million, from US$67.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010, to US$272.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase in profit from operations was due to a US$252.3 million increase in gross profit, as a result of the factors described above, which was partially offset by a US$15.9 million increase in distribution expenses as a result of increased railway tariff and transportation volume expenses and a US$25.3 million increase in general and administrative expenses. This last expense was primarily the result of an increase in the average salaries of employees, which increased in line with inflation, as well as an increase in doubtful debt provision charges accrued within the normal course of business.
Gold segment The Gold segment’s profit from operations increased by US$53.4 million, from a US$46.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to a US$100.3 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase in profit from operations was due to a US$54.4 million increase in gross profit, as a result of the factors described above, which was partially offset by a US$1.0 million increase in net operating expenses.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s profit from operations increased by US$22.7 million from US$330.1 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$352.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase in profit from operations was due to a US$72.6 million increase in gross profit, as a result of the factors described above, which was partially offset by a US$49.9 million increase in net operating expenses. The increase in the Russian Steel segment’s net operating expenses was primarily due to a US$18.0 million increase in general and administrative expenses and a US$23.3 million increase in distribution expenses primarily driven by the increase in railway tariffs and transported volumes. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to the increase in the average salaries in line with inflation and performance bonuses. Performance bonuses include bonuses paid to management and administrative employees. In addition, the increase was due to changes in doubtful debt provision charges accrued within the normal course of business.
Severstal North America segment Compared to the prior period, the Severstal North America segment’s loss from operations changed from US$26.4 million loss in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$18.1 million profit in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This change was due to a US$37.2 million decrease in gross loss and a US$7.3 million decrease in net operating expenses. The decrease in gross loss was a result of the factors described above.
68
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 115D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 6585
Operating and Financial Review
The decrease in net operating expenses was primarily due to a US$6.4 million decrease in general and administrative expenses largely resulting from the NSG divestiture.
Profit before financing and taxation Compared to the prior period, the Group’s profit before financing and taxation increased by US$401.7 million from US$333.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$735.5 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. This increase was due to a US$333.4 million increase in profit from operations, as described above, and a US$68.3 million decrease in net non-operating expenses. The decrease in net non-operating expenses of US$68.3 million was primarily due to a US$62.9 million decrease in impairment of non-current assets and a US$5.4 million decrease in net other non-operating expenses. The following table sets forth the Group’s net non-operating expenses for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011:
Three months Period on ended Period on period 31 March period percent 2010 2011 change change (US$ millions) Impairment of non-current assets ...... (63.7) (0.8) 62.9 (98.7)% Net other non-operating expenses ...... (10.3) (4.9) 5.4 (52.4)% Net non-operating expenses ...... (74.0) (5.7) 68.3 (92.3)%
Impairment of non-current assets Impairment of non-current assets for the three months ended 31 March 2010 mainly consists of a US$59.6 million impairment loss accrued by Severstal North America in respect of the sale of the NSG.
Loss/profit for the period Compared to the prior period, the Group’s loss for the period decreased by US$1,348.3 million, or 173.3 percent, from a loss of US$777.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to a profit of US$570.4 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a US$401.7 million increase in profit before financing and taxation, a US$96.3 million decrease in net financing expense and a US$907.1 million decrease in loss from discontinued operations represented by the Lucchini and North America disposal groups, which includes US$802.3 million decrease of impairment loss recognised in the three months ended 31 March 2010 as well as a decrease in net loss by US$23.1 million and increase in gain from disposal by US$81.7 million, the effects of which were partially offset by a US$56.8 million increase in income tax expense.
Net financing expense Net financing expense changed by US$96.3 million from a net expense of US$31.2 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to a net income of US$65.1 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The change was primarily due to a US$62.7 million decrease in interest expense and a US$54.3 million increase in foreign exchange gain, the effects of which were partially offset by a US$20.7 million decrease in interest income from US$34.1 million to US$13.4 million. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to the decrease in amounts placed on short-term deposit accounts during the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the decrease in the average interest rates as the result of the partial replacement of higher interest bearing public debt (9.75 percent US dollar- denominated loan participation notes maturing in 2013) with lower interest bearing public debt (6.7 percent US dollar-denominated loan participation notes maturing in 2017) and early repayment of the most expensive bilateral facilities.
69
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 395D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 10 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 12936
Operating and Financial Review
Foreign exchange gains increased by US$54.3 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010, primarily due to the fact that the appreciation of the rouble against the US dollar during the three months ended 31 March 2011 was higher than the appreciation of the rouble against the US dollar during the three months ended 31 March 2010.
Income tax expense Income tax expense increased by US$56.8 million, from US$105.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$162.7 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase was primarily due to the US$498.0 million increase in profit before income tax.
For the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010 The following discussion is based on, and should be read in conjunction with, the Group’s Annual Financial Statements, included in this Prospectus beginning on page F-17. Compared to the Group’s 2009 Annual Financial Statements, the 2009 financial results in the Group’s 2010 Annual Financial Statements were restated to reflect the adjustments made in connection with the presentation of discontinued operations. The following table sets forth the Group’s consolidated income statement for the years ended 2009 and 2010:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year year percent 2009 2010 change change (US$ millions) Revenue Revenue—third parties ...... 9,540.8 13,510.9 3,970.1 41.6% Revenue—related parties ...... 53.1 62.3 9.2 17.3% 9,593.9 13,573.2 3,979.3 41.5% Cost of sales ...... (7,209.8) (9,110.2) (1,900.4) 26.4% Gross profit ...... 2,384.1 4,463.0 2,078.9 87.2% General and administrative expenses ...... (516.9) (638.4) (121.5) 23.5% Distribution expenses ...... (791.5) (990.7) (199.2) 25.2% Other taxes and contributions ...... (150.0) (182.4) (32.4) 21.6% Share of associates’ profit ...... 13.3 19.4 6.1 45.9% Net loss from securities operations ...... (12.2) (104.7) (92.5) 758.2% Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... (30.1) (46.7) (16.6) 55.1% Net other operating expenses ...... (37.5) (15.3) 22.2 (59.2)% Profit from operations ...... 859.2 2,504.2 1,645.0 191.5% Impairment of non-current assets ...... (88.1) (81.1) 7.0 (7.9)% Net other non-operating expenses ...... (31.8) (44.4) (12.6) 39.6% Profit before financing and taxation ...... 739.3 2,378.7 1,639.4 221.8% Interest income ...... 91.5 103.4 11.9 13.0% Interest expense ...... (478.5) (630.8) (152.3) 31.8% Foreign exchange difference ...... (204.4) 62.7 267.1 (130.7)% Profit before income tax ...... 147.9 1,914.0 1,766.1 — Income tax expense ...... (133.9) (487.3) (353.4) 263.9% Profit from continuing operations ...... 14.0 1,426.7 1,412.7 — Loss from discontinued operations ...... (1,133.1) (1,941.7) (808.6) 71.4% Loss for the year ...... (1,119.1) (515.0) 604.1 (54.0)%
70
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1555D*/2255D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 11 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 64347
Operating and Financial Review
Revenue The Group’s consolidated revenue increased by US$3,979.3 million, or 41.5 percent, from US$9,593.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$13,573.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. This increase was primarily due to a US$2,635.7 million increase in revenue of the Russian Steel segment, a US$1,613.5 million increase in revenue of the Severstal Resources segment and a US$599.0 million increase in revenue of the Severstal North America segment. The increase in revenue was partially offset by a US$868.9 million increase in intersegment revenue. Changes in the prices of the Group’s various products were generally consistent with the prevailing market trends. The Group’s revenue from related parties increased by US$9.2 million, or 17.3 percent, from US$53.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$62.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The Group’s revenue from related parties comprised 0.6 percent and 0.5 percent of the Group’s total revenue in the year ended 31 December 2009 and in the year ended 31 December 2010, respectively. The increase in revenue from related parties was in line with the overall increase of the Group’s revenue.
Revenue by product The following table sets forth the Group’s revenue by product for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year year percent 2009 2010 change change (US$ millions) Hot-rolled strip and plate ...... 2,741.3 3,964.5 1,223.2 44.6% Cold-rolled sheet ...... 1,156.1 1,587.1 431.0 37.3% Galvanised and other metallic coated sheet ...... 1,289.5 1,532.8 243.3 18.9% Large diameter pipes ...... 777.3(1) 961.3 184.0 23.7% Metalware products ...... 624.2(1) 832.4 208.2 33.4% Gold...... 512.3 748.8 236.5 46.2% Coal and coking coal concentrate ...... 272.2(1) 686.2 414.0 152.1% Shipping and handling costs billed to customers ...... 527.6(1) 678.0 150.4 28.5% Semi-finished products ...... 280.0 635.1 355.1 126.8% Long products ...... 350.6 470.0 119.4 34.1% Pellets and iron ore ...... 217.2 383.7 166.5 76.7% Other tubes and pipes, formed shapes ...... 255.1 347.8 92.7 36.3% Colour-coated sheet ...... 246.4 288.1 41.7 16.9% Scrap ...... 58.3 98.2 39.9 68.4% Others ...... 285.8 359.2 73.4 25.7% Revenue ...... 9,593.9 13,573.2 3,979.3 41.5%
(1) The classification of these items is different from that in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 due to the correction of immaterial errors, unknown when the financials were authorised for issue, in the way the corresponding figures for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2008 were presented; such items were correctly presented in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2009, 2008 and 2007.
71
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 0D*/320D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 12 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 33766
Operating and Financial Review
Revenue by delivery destination The following table sets forth the Group’s consolidated revenue by delivery destination for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year year percent 2009 2010 change change (US$ millions) Russian Federation ...... 3,955.9 6,203.2 2,247.3 56.8% North America ...... 2,448.5 3,131.8 683.3 27.9% Europe ...... 1,510.8 2,342.2 831.4 55.0% China and Central Asia ...... 673.2 469.2 (204.0) (30.3)% South-East Asia ...... 295.0 454.8 159.8 54.2% The Middle East ...... 418.5 437.8 19.3 4.6% Central and South America ...... 152.7 422.5 269.8 176.7% Africa ...... 139.3 111.7 (27.6) (19.8%) Revenue ...... 9,593.9 13,573.2 3,979.3 41.5%
Revenue by segment The following table sets forth the Group’s revenue by segment for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year year percent 2009 2010 change change (US$ millions) Severstal Resource segment ...... 1,870.8 3,484.3 1,613.5 86.2% Russian Steel segment ...... 6,179.1 8,814.8 2,635.7 42.7% Severstal North America segment ...... 2,312.5 2,911.5 599.0 25.9% Intersegment transactions ...... (768.5) (1,637.4) (868.9) 113.1% Revenue ...... 9,593.9 13,573.2 3,979.3 41.5%
Severstal Resource segment The Severstal Resource segment’s revenue increased by US$1,613.5 million, or 86.2 percent, from US$1,870.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$3,484.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. Included in these amounts are intersegment revenue, primarily to the Russian Steel segment, of US$723.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 and US$1,494.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. Excluding intersegment revenue, revenue of the Severstal Resource segment increased by US$842.9 million, or 73.5 percent, from US$1,146.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,989.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in sales volume as described below. Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment revenue, of the Severstal Resource segment by product: Gold. Revenue from gold sales increased by US$236.5 million, or 46.2 percent, from US$512.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$748.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase was primarily due to a market-driven increase in revenue by volume and an increase in the average price per ounce of gold. Pellets and iron ore. Revenue from pellets and iron ore sales increased by US$166.5 million, or 76.7 percent, from US$217.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$383.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne, partially offset by a decrease in revenue by volume due to changes in the sales structure of pellets and iron ore from third parties to consolidated entities within Russian Steel as the result of their increased production.
72
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 270D*/320D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 13 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 2591
Operating and Financial Review
Coal and coking coal concentrate. Revenue from coal and coking coal concentrate sales increased by US$414.0 million, or 152.1 percent, from US$272.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$686.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. This increase was primarily due to a market-driven increase in revenue by volume and an increase in the average price per tonne.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s revenue increased by US$2,635.7 million, or 42.7 percent, from US$6,179.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$8,814.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. Included in the above amounts are intersegment revenue of US$142.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2010 and US$44.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. This increase was primarily due to the market-driven increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in revenue by volume as described below. Domestic sales in particular have grown as a result of the Russian market recovery. Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment revenue, of the Russian Steel segment by product: Hot-rolled strip and plate. Revenue from hot-rolled strip and plate sales increased by US$864.9 million, or 46.2 percent, from US$1,871.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$2,736.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue by volume and the average price per tonne was primarily due to the market-driven recovery of demand and due to changes in product mix resulting in higher revenue from hot-rolled strip and plate sales. Cold-rolled sheet. Revenue from cold-rolled sheet sales increased by US$351.8 million, or 51.7 percent, from US$680.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,032.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue by volume and the average price per tonne was primarily due to the market-driven recovery of demand, mostly in the domestic Russian automotive industry, which recovered partially as a result of policies implemented by the Russian Government. Galvanised sheet. Revenue from galvanised sheet sales increased by US$72.7 million, or 18.9 percent, from US$384.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$457.0 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue by volume and the average price per tonne was primarily due to the market-driven recovery of demand, mostly in the domestic Russian construction industry. Semi-finished products. Revenue from semi-finished products sales increased by US$355.3 million, or 127.2 percent, from US$279.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$634.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue by volume and the average price per tonne was primarily due to the market-driven recovery of demand for steel and semi-finished products. Colour-coated sheet. Revenue from colour-coated sheet sales increased by US$41.7 million, or 17.0 percent, from US$246.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$288.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue by volume and the average price per tonne was primarily due to the market-driven recovery of demand, mostly in the domestic Russian construction industry. Long products. Revenue from long products sales increased by US$119.4 million, or 34.1 percent, from US$350.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$470.0 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue by volume and the average price per tonne was primarily due to the market- driven recovery of demand, mostly in the domestic Russian construction industry. The construction industry and steel service centers, the main customers of long products, experienced considerable improvements in financing which resulted in increased consumption by these customers during 2010. Metalware products. Revenue from metalware products sales increased by US$208.2 million, or 33.4 percent, from US$624.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$832.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue by volume and the average price per tonne was primarily due to the market-driven recovery of demand, specifically in the domestic Russian construction and automotive markets.
73
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 5D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 14 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63176
Operating and Financial Review
Large diameter pipes. Revenue from large diameter pipes sales increased by US$184.0 million, or 23.7 percent, from US$777.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$961.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue by volume and the average price per tonne was primarily due to the market-driven recovery of demand, specifically due to the increase in demand from Gazprom and OAO AK Transneft, the Group’s main customers of pipes.
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America’s revenue increased by US$599.0 million, or 25.9 percent, from US$2,312.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$2,911.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in revenue was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and increase in revenue by volume, primarily due to a market-driven recovery of demand resulting from the increase in the consumption of steel by major US customers. Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment sales, of Severstal North America by product: Hot-rolled strip and plate. Revenue from hot-rolled strip and plate sales increased by US$358.3 million, or 41.2 percent, from US$869.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,227.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in revenue by volume due to the market-driven recovery of demand by major US Customers. Cold-rolled sheet. Revenue from cold-rolled sheet sales increased by US$79.2 million, or 16.7 percent, from US$475.3 million in the year ended 31 December in 2009 to US$554.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in revenue by volume resulting from the economic recovery in the North American market. Galvanized and other metallic coated sheet. Revenue from galvanized and other metallic coated sheet sales increased by US$170.6 million, or 18.8 percent, from US$905.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,075.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the average price per tonne and an increase in revenue by volume resulting from the economic recovery in the North American market.
Revenue by delivery destination Changes in the regional sales structure resulted in an increase in sales to Russia, North America, Europe, the Middle East, South-East Asia and Central and South America and a decrease in sales to China and Central Asia and Africa in the year ended 31 December 2010, compared to the year ended 31 December 2009, mainly due to the market-driven changes of demand and respective reallocation of sales from one region to another.
Cost of sales The Group’s cost of sales increased by US$1,900.4 million, or 26.4 percent, from US$7,209.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$9,110.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2010.
Cost of sales by segment The following table sets forth the Group’s cost of sales by segment for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year year percent 2009 2010 change change (US$ millions) Severstal Resource segment ...... (1,405.6) (1,781.5) (375.9) 26.7% Russian Steel segment ...... (4,081.4) (6,003.2) (1,921.8) 47.1% Severstal North America segment ...... (2,491.9) (2,911.6) (419.7) 16.8% Intersegment transactions ...... 769.1 1,586.1 817.0 106.2% Cost of Sales ...... (7,209.8) (9,110.2) (1,900.4) 26.4%
74
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1070D*/2015D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 15 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 42722
Operating and Financial Review
Severstal Resource segment The Severstal Resource segment’s cost of sales increased by US$375.9 million, or 26.7 percent, from US$1,405.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,781.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase was primarily due to a US$124.0 million increase in raw materials expense, a US$86.5 million increase in fuel and energy, a US$64.0 million increase in services cost, a US$68.5 million increase in labour cost, a US$52.7 million increase in the use of integral implements and spare parts. Raw materials expense and use of integral implements and spare parts. The increase in raw materials expense and use of integral implements and spare parts was primarily due to the increase in production and sales volumes in the year ended 31 December 2010 compared to the year ended 31 December 2009. Fuel and energy expenses. The increase in fuel and energy expenses was primarily due to the increased production and sales volumes and the increase in energy tariffs and fuel prices. Service cost. The increase in service cost was primarily due to the increased production and sales volumes and repair services in the year ended 31 December 2010 compared to the year ended 31 December 2009. Labour cost. The increase in labour cost was primarily due to the increase in the average salaries of employees, which was in line with inflation in Russia.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s cost of sales increased by US$1,921.8 million, or 47.1 percent, from US$4,081.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$6,003.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase was primarily due to a US$1,918.9 million increase in raw materials expense and a US$126.9 million increase in fuel and energy, which was partially offset by the changes in work-in-progress and finished goods balances. Raw materials expense. The increase in raw materials expense by US$1,918.9 million was due to the increase in revenue by volume and a corresponding increase in production volumes and changes in the structure of raw materials used due to changes in production process. Fuel and energy expense. The increase in fuel and energy expense by US$126.9 million was due to the increase in energy tariffs and fuel prices as well as increase in production and sales volumes.
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America’s cost of sales increased by US$419.7 million, or 16.8 percent, from US$2,491.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$2,911.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in cost of sales was primarily due to the increased volumes and the higher cost per unit of raw materials.
Profit from operations The Group’s profit from operations increased by US$1,645.0 million, or 191.5 percent, from US$859.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$2,504.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase was due to a US$2,078.9 million increase in gross profit, due to the factors discussed above, and offset by a US$433.9 million increase in net operating expenses, primarily driven by a US$121.5 million increase in general and administrative expenses and a US$199.2 million increase in distribution expenses.
75
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 15D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 16 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 37549
Operating and Financial Review
The following table sets forth the Group’s net operating expenses for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year year percent 2009 2010 change change (US$ millions) General and administrative expenses ...... (516.9) (638.4) (121.5) 23.5% Distribution expenses ...... (791.5) (990.7) (199.2) 25.2% Other taxes and contributions ...... (150.0) (182.4) (32.4) 21.6% Share of associates’ profit ...... 13.3 19.4 6.1 45.9% Loss from securities operations ...... (12.2) (104.7) (92.5) 758.2% Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... (30.1) (46.7) (16.6) 55.1% Net other operating expenses ...... (37.5) (15.3) 22.2 (59.2)% Net operating expenses ...... (1,524.9) (1,958.8) (433.9) 28.5%
Severstal Resource segment The Severstal Resource segment’s profit from operations increased by US$1,156.1 million from US$91.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,247.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in profit from operations was due to a US$1,237.6 million increase in gross profit, as a result of the factors discussed above, which was offset by an increase of US$81.5 million in net operating expenses. The increase in the Severstal Resource segment’s operating expenses was primarily due to a US$68.7 million increase in distribution expenses, a US$30.5 million increase in general and administrative expenses and a US$20.2 million increase in other taxes and contributions, partially offset by a US$37.5 million decrease in loss from securities operations. The increase in distribution expenses was primarily due to increased export shipments and tariff charges in line with inflation. General and administrative expenses primarily increased due to the changes in doubtful debt provision charges and the slight increase in average salaries which were in line with inflation. The increase in other taxes and contributions was primarily due to increased production volumes and related taxes. Changes in loss from securities operations were primarily due to gains from fair value revaluation of Crew Gold shares during its step-up acquisition in the year ended 31 December 2010.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s profit from operations increased by US$334.9 million, or 32.3 percent, from US$1,035.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,370.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in profit from operations was due to a US$713.9 million increase in gross profit, as a result of the factors described above, partially offset by a US$379.0 million increase in net operating expenses. The increase in the Russian Steel segment’s operating expenses was primarily due to a US$143.7 million increase in loss from securities operations, a US$142.1 million increase in distribution expenses and a US$83.0 million increase in general and administrative expenses. The increase in loss from securities operations was primarily due to a US$134.0 million provision accrued in respect of doubtful deposit account. The increase in distribution expenses was primarily due to the increase in railway tariffs and transported volumes. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due to an increase in consulting expenses related to the development of the Group’s business system and the increase in the average salaries, which was in line with inflation and performance bonuses. Performance bonuses include bonuses paid to management and administrative employees.
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America’s loss from operations decreased by US$196.4 million, from a US$257.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to a US$61.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The decrease
76
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 495D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 17 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 35911
Operating and Financial Review
was primarily due to a US$179.3 million decrease in gross loss, which was, in turn, due to the factors described above, and a US$17.1 million decrease in net operating expenses. The decrease in net operating expenses was primarily due to a US$6.7 million decrease in general and administrative and distribution expenses, a US$2.6 million increase in gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment, a US$3.6 million decrease in net other operating expenses and a US$4.5 million increase in share of associates’ profit in the year ended 31 December 2010. The decrease in general and administrative and distribution expenses was in line with the continuing effect of cost-cutting initiatives implemented by management during the year ended 31 December 2009, while the increase in share of associate’s profit was mainly due to improvements in associate’s financial results.
Profit before financing and taxation Compared to the prior period, the Group’s profit before financing and taxation increased by US$1,639.4 million, or 221.8 percent, in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase was due to a US$1,645.0 million increase in profit from operations, partially offset by a US$5.6 million increase in net non-operating expenses. The increase in profit from operations was due to the factors discussed above. The increase in net non-operating expenses was primarily due to a US$12.6 million increase in net other non-operating expense, partially offset by a US$7.0 million decrease in impairment of non-current assets in respect of specific items of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. The following table sets forth the Group’s net non-operating expenses for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year year percent 2009 2010 change change (US$ millions) Impairment of non-current assets ...... (88.1) (81.1) 7.0 (7.9)% Net other non-operating expenses ...... (31.8) (44.4) (12.6) 39.6% Net non-operating expenses ...... (119.9) (125.5) (5.6) 4.7%
Impairment of non-current assets Compared to the prior period, the Group’s impairment of non-current assets decreased by US$7.0 million, or 7.9 percent, in the year ended 31 December 2010. This decrease was due to changes in impairment charges accrued in respect of specific items of property, plant and equipment in the Severstal Resources, Russian Steel and North America segments.
Net other non-operating expenses Compared to the prior period, the Group’s net other non-operating expenses increased by US$12.6 million, or 39.6 percent, in the year ended 31 December 2010. This increase was primarily due to the increase in Group’s social expenditure and charitable donations of US$13.4 million.
Loss for the year The Group’s loss for the year decreased by US$604.1 million from US$1,119.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$515.0 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The decrease was due to a US$1,639.4 million increase in profit before financing and taxation, a decrease in net financing expenses of US$126.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2010 compared to the year ended 31 December 2009 which was partially offset by a US$353.4 million increase in income tax expense and by a US$808.6 million increase in loss from discontinued operations. The increase in profit before financing and taxation is primarily due to the factors described above.
77
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CC14501A.;25 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1190DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 18 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 2300
Operating and Financial Review
Net financing expense Net financing expense decreased by US$126.7 million, or 21.4 percent, from US$591.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$464.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. This decrease was due to a US$152.3 million increase in interest expense from US$478.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$630.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2010, a US$11.9 million increase in interest income, from US$91.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$103.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2010 and a US$267.1 million change in foreign exchange losses from a loss of US$204.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to a gain of US$62.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to significant amounts of financing raised during the year ended 31 December 2010, including the Severstal Columbus US dollar-denominated bonds in the amount of US$525.0 million, ruble-denominated bonds in the amount of US$498.0 million and US dollar- denominated bonds in the amount of US$1,000 million. Another reason for this increase was the one-off cash-out related to the redemption premium paid to holders of the US dollar-denominated loan participation notes maturing in 2013. The increase in interest income by US$11.9 million was primarily due to an increase in the amounts of deposits with increased maturity during the year ended 31 December 2010 compared to the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease in foreign exchange losses by US$267.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2010 compared to the year ended 31 December 2009 was primarily due to the lower depreciation of the rouble against the US dollar in the year ended 31 December 2010 compared to the depreciation of the rouble against the US dollar in 2009.
Income tax expense Income tax expense increased by US$353.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2010, primarily due to the increase in profit before income tax of US$1,766.1 million compared to the year ended 31 December 2009 primarily as a result of the factors described above.
Discontinued operations The Group’s discontinued operations represent the Lucchini and North America disposal groups that are classified as held for sale as of 31 December 2010. The loss from discontinued operations increased by US$808.6 million, or 71.4 percent, from US$1,133.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,941.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in loss was due to the additional impairment loss accrued on remeasurement of the Lucchini and North America disposal groups to fair value less costs to sell recognised in 2010 in the amounts of US$1,010.3 million and US$289.8 million respectively, which was partially offset by the increase in disposal groups’ operating results.
For the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009 The following discussion is based on, and should be read in conjunction with, the Group’s Annual Financial Statements, included in this Prospectus beginning on page F-17. Compared to the Group’s 2008 and 2009 Annual Financial Statements, the 2008 and 2009 financial results in the Group’s Annual Financial Statements were restated to reflect the adjustments made in connection with the presentation of discontinued operations.
78
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CC14501A.;25 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CE14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 515D*/3395D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 6830
Operating and Financial Review
The following table sets forth the Group’s consolidated income statement for the years ended 2008 and 2009:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year percent 2008 2009 year change change (US$ millions) Revenue Revenue—third parties ...... 15,888.3 9,540.8 (6,347.5) (40.0)% Revenue—related parties ...... 177.5 53.1 (124.4) (70.1)% 16,065.8 9,593.9 (6,471.9) (40.3)% Cost of sales ...... (10,542.6) (7,209.8) 3,332.8 (31.6)% Gross profit ...... 5,523.2 2,384.1 (3,139.1) (56.8)% General and administrative expenses ...... (801.5) (516.9) 284.6 (35.5)% Distribution expenses ...... (995.7) (791.5) 204.2 (20.5)% Other taxes and contributions ...... (153.1) (150.0) 3.1 (2.0)% Share of associates’ (loss)/profit ...... (2.7) 13.3 16.0 (592.6)% Net loss from securities operations ...... (99.9) (12.2) 87.7 (87.8)% Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... (43.5) (30.1) 13.4 (30.8)% Net other operating income/(expenses) ...... 555.7 (37.5) (593.2) (106.7)% Profit from operations ...... 3,982.5 859.2 (3,123.3) (78.4)% Impairment of non-current assets ...... (532.0) (88.1) 443.9 (83.4)% Negative goodwill ...... 79.9 — (79.9) (100.0)% Net other non-operating income/(expenses) ...... 238.9 (31.8) (270.7) (113.3)% Profit before financing and taxation ...... 3,769.3 739.3 (3,030.0) (80.4)% Interest income ...... 128.8 91.5 (37.3) (29.0)% Interest expense ...... (397.9) (478.5) (80.6) 20.3% Foreign exchange difference ...... (262.8) (204.4) 58.4 (22.2)% Profit before income tax ...... 3,237.4 147.9 (3,089.5) (95.4)% Income tax expense ...... (490.4) (133.9) 356.5 (72.7)% Profit from continuing operations ...... 2,747.0 14.0 (2,733.0) (99.5)% Loss from discontinued operations ...... (685.1) (1,133.1) 448.0 65.4% Profit/(loss)for the year ...... 2,061.9 (1,119.1) (3,181.0) (154.3)%
Revenue The Group’s consolidated revenue decreased by US$6,471.9 million, or 40.3 percent, from US$16,065.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$9,593.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a US$5,884.7 million decrease in revenue of the Russian Steel segment, a US$655.9 million decrease in revenue of the Severstal North America segment and a US$581.9 million decrease in revenue of the Severstal Resource segment. The decrease in revenue was partially offset by a US$650.6 million decrease in intersegment revenue. Changes in the prices of the Group’s various products were generally consistent with the prevailing market trends and the effect of the global economic downturn for each product. The Group’s revenue to related parties decreased by US$124.4 million, or 70.1 percent, from US$177.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$53.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The Group’s revenue to related parties comprised 1.1 percent and 0.6 percent of the Group’s total revenue in the year ended 31 December 2008 and in the year ended 31 December 2009, respectively. The decrease in revenue from related parties was in line with the overall decrease of the Group’s revenue.
79
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CE14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CE14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1100D*/1775D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 45723
Operating and Financial Review
Revenue by product The following table sets forth the Group’s revenue by product for the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year percent 2008 2009 year change change (US$ millions) Hot-rolled strip and plate ...... 5,165.8 2,741.3 (2,424.5) (46.9)% Cold-rolled sheet ...... 1,822.7 1,156.1 (666.6) (36.6)% Galvanised and other metallic coated sheet ...... 1,839.6 1,289.5 (550.1) (29.9)% Large diameter pipes ...... 819.7(1) 777.3(1) (42.4) (5.2)% Metalware products ...... 1,204.7(1) 624.2(1) (580.5) (48.2)% Gold...... 190.4 512.3 321.9 169.1% Coal and coking coal concentrate ...... 257.5(1) 272.2(1) 14.7 5.7% Shipping and handling costs billed to customers ...... 664.4(1) 527.6(1) (136.8) (20.6)% Semi-finished products ...... 631.9 280.0 (351.9) (55.7)% Long products ...... 1,267.9 350.6 (917.3) (72.3)% Pellets and iron ore ...... 453.1 217.2 (235.9) (52.1)% Other tubes and pipes, formed shapes ...... 485.5 255.1 (230.4) (47.5)% Colour-coated sheet ...... 359.1 246.4 (112.7) (31.4)% Scrap ...... 321.3 58.3 (263.0) (81.9)% Others ...... 582.2 285.8 (296.4) (50.9)% Revenue ...... 16,065.8 9,593.9 (6,471.9) (40.3)%
(1) The classification of these items is different from that in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 due to the correction of immaterial errors, unknown when the financials were authorised for issue, in the way the corresponding figures for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2008 were presented; such items were correctly presented in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Revenue by delivery destination The following table sets forth the Group’s consolidated revenue by delivery destination for the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year percent 2008 2009 year change change (US$ millions) Russian Federation ...... 8,878.9 3,955.9 (4,923.0) (55.4)% North America ...... 3,047.3 2,448.5 (598.8) (19.7)% Europe ...... 2,726.6 1,510.8 (1,215.8) (44.6)% China and Central Asia ...... 252.9 673.2 420.3 166.2% South-East Asia ...... 248.7 295.0 46.3 18.6% The Middle East ...... 532.7 418.5 (114.2) (21.4)% Central and South America ...... 275.9 152.7 (123.2) (44.7)% Africa ...... 102.8 139.3 36.5 35.5% Revenue ...... 16,065.8 9,593.9 (6,471.9) (40.3)%
80
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CE14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CE14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 435D*/620D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 6516
Operating and Financial Review
Revenue by segment The following table sets forth the Group’s revenue by segment for the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year percent 2008 2009 year change change (US$ millions) Severstal Resource segment ...... 2,452.7 1,870.8 (581.9) (23.7)% Russian Steel segment ...... 12,063.8 6,179.1 (5,884.7) (48.8)% Severstal North America segment ...... 2,968.4 2,312.5 (655.9) (22.1)% Intersegment transactions ...... (1,419.1) (768.5) 650.6 (45.8)% Revenue ...... 16,065.8 9,593.9 (6,471.9) (40.3)%
Severstal Resource segment The Severstal Resource segment’s revenue decreased by US$581.9 million, or 23.7 percent, from US$2,452.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$1,870.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. Included in these amounts are intersegment revenue, primarily to the Russian Steel segment, of US$1,379.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 and US$723.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. Excluding intersegment revenue, revenue of the Severstal Resource segment increased by US$73.7 million, or 6.9 percent from US$1,073.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$1,146.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The increase was primarily due to increases in the average price per tonne and an increase in revenue by volume as described below. Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment revenue, of the Severstal Resource segment by product: Gold. Revenue from sales of gold increased by US$321.9 million, or 169.1 percent, from US$190.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$512.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in revenue by volume, which was in turn, primarily due to the acquisition of High River Gold in December 2008 and an increase in the average price per ounce of gold. Pellets and iron ore. Revenue from sales of pellets and iron ore decreased by US$235.9 million, or 52.1 percent, from US$453.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$217.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne, partially offset by an increase in revenue by volume due to changes in revenue by regions primarily to Russia and Western Europe as well as in some new markets such as Asia, Ukraine and the Middle East. These trends were due to prevailing market conditions. Coal and coking coal concentrate. Revenue from sales of coal and coking coal concentrate increased by US$14.7 million, or 5.7 percent, from US$257.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$272.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. This increase was primarily due to an increase in revenue by volume primarily resulting from the acquisition of PBS Coals and was partially offset by a decrease in the average price per tonne.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s revenue decreased by US$5,884.7 million, or 48.8 percent, from US$12,063.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$6,179.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. Included in the above amounts are intersegment revenue of US$44.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 and US$39.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in both average price per tonne and revenue by volume as a result of the global economic downturn and a corresponding decline in steel consumption in all industries.
81
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CE14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CE14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 510D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 56534
Operating and Financial Review
Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment revenue, of the Russian Steel segment by product: Hot-rolled strip and plate. Revenue from sales of hot-rolled strip and plate decreased by US$2,077.2 million, or 52.6 percent, from US$3,949.0 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$1,871.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne and a decrease in revenue by volume due to the above mentioned market- driven decline in demand. Due to the fact that the domestic Russian market declined more than the export market in the year ended 31 December 2009 compared to the year ended 31 December 2008, the decrease in domestic Russian revenue by volume was partially offset by the increase in international volume. The positive impact, of the effect on revenue by volume, however, was reduced due to prices in the export market being generally lower than prices in the domestic market. Cold-rolled sheet. Revenue from sales of cold-rolled sheet decreased by US$568.3 million, or 45.5 percent, from US$1,249.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$680.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne and a decrease in revenue by volume due to the above mentioned market-driven decline of demand. Galvanised sheet. Revenue from sales of galvanised sheet decreased by US$417.0 million, or 52.0 percent, from US$801.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$384.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne and a decrease in revenue by volume. The decrease in revenue by volume was primarily due to the above mentioned market-driven decline of demand for galvanised sheet in the construction industry in the Russian market. From the end of 2008 through the first half of 2009, the majority of construction projects were stopped, which led to the decrease in demand and resulted in the stoppage by the Group of one of its galvanised lines for reconstruction works in the end of 2008 until the middle of 2009, which also affected the volume of production and revenue by volume. Semi-finished products. Revenue from sales of semi-finished products decreased by US$352.6 million, or 55.8 percent, from US$631.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$279.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne and a decrease in revenue by volume due to the above mentioned market-driven decline in demand for steel in the Group’s main export markets. Colour-coated sheet. Revenue from sales of colour-coated sheet decreased by US$112.7 million, or 31.4 percent, from US$359.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$246.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne and the slight decrease in revenue by volume due to the above mentioned market-driven decline in demand. Color-coated sheet is one of the high-value added products for which demand remained relatively constant during the global economic downturn. Long products. Revenue from sales of long products decreased by US$917.3 million, or 72.3 percent, from US$1,267.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$350.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne and a decrease in revenue by volume due to the above mentioned market-driven decline of demand. The construction industry and steel service centres, the main customers of long products, experienced a considerable shortage in financing and thus decreased their consumption during the first half of 2009. The closing by the Group of the open-hearth production facility in November 2008, also negatively affected revenue by volume. Metalware products. Revenue from sales of metalware products decreased by US$580.1 million, or 48.2 percent, from US$1,204.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$624.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne and a decrease in revenue by volume due to the above mentioned market-driven decline of demand for metalware products in the construction industry.
82
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CE14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CE14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 75D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 50222
Operating and Financial Review
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America’s revenue decreased by US$655.9 million, or 22.1 percent, from US$2,968.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$2,312.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease in revenue was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne, primarily due to a decrease in the consumption of steel by major US customers resulting from the downturn in the North American market. Set forth below is a discussion of the revenue, excluding intersegment revenue, of Severstal North America by product: Hot-rolled strip and plate. Revenue from hot-rolled strip and plate sales decreased by US$347.4 million, or 28.6 percent, from US$1,216.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$869.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne caused by the above mentioned market-driven decline of demand. Cold-rolled sheet. Revenue from cold-rolled sheet sales decreased by US$98.3 million, or 17.1 percent, from US$573.6 million in the year ended 31 December in 2008 to US$475.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne which was partially offset by an increase in revenue by volume. The increase in revenue by volumes was primarily due to management’s decision to shift plant production from hot-rolled sheet to higher value-added cold-rolled sheet products, which partially mitigated the effect of deteriorating market conditions in North America. Galvanized and other metallic coated sheet. Revenue from galvanized and other metallic coated sheet sales decreased by US$133.1 million, or 12.8 percent from US$1,038.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$905.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average price per tonne caused by the above mentioned market-driven decline in demand.
Revenue by delivery destination Changes in the regional revenue structure resulted in a decrease in revenue to Russia, North America, Europe, the Middle East, Central and South America and an increase in revenue from sales to China and Central Asia, South-East Asia and Africa in the year ended 31 December 2009 compared to the year ended 31 December 2008 mainly due to the market-driven changes of demand and respective reallocation of revenue from one region to another.
Cost of sales The Group’s cost of sales decreased by US$3,332.8 million, or 31.6 percent, from US$10,542.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$7,209.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009.
Cost of sales by segment The following table sets forth the Group’s cost of sales by segment for the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year percent 2008 2009 year change change (US$ millions) Severstal Resource segment ...... (1,376.4) (1,405.6) (29.2) 2.1% Russian Steel segment ...... (7,388.0) (4,081.4) 3,306.6 (44.8)% Severstal North America segment ...... (3,243.1) (2,491.9) 751.2 (23.2)% Intersegment transactions ...... 1,464.9 769.1 (695.8) (47.5)% Cost of Sales ...... (10,542.6) (7,209.8) 3,332.8 (31.6)%
Severstal Resource segment The Severstal Resource segment’s cost of sales increased by US$29.2 million, or 2.1 percent, from US$1,376.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$1,405.6 million in the year ended
83
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CE14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CE14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 95D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 44361
Operating and Financial Review
31 December 2009. The increase was primarily due to a US$43.0 million increase in depreciation and amortisation charges and was partially offset by a decrease in fuel and energy expenses of US$25.7 million. Depreciation and amortisation. The increase in depreciation and amortisation expense was mainly due to the effect of acquisition of PBS Coals and High River Gold. Fuel and energy expenses. The decrease in fuel material and energy was primarily due to a decrease in volume production and market-driven decreases in mazut and gasoline prices.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s cost of sales decreased by US$3,306.6 million, or 44.8 percent, from US$7,388.0 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$4,081.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in sales by volume. Raw materials expense. The decrease in raw materials expense by US$2,675.4 million was due to the decrease in sales by volume and prices for primary raw materials. Fuel and energy expense. The decrease in fuel and energy expense by US$163.7 million was due to the decrease in sales by volume, but was partially offset by the increase in energy tariffs and fuel prices. Labour and related tax expenses. The decrease in labour costs of US$252.0 million was primarily due to a decrease in the average number of employees for the period.
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America’s cost of sales decreased by US$751.2 million or 23.2 percent, from US$3,243.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$2,491.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in sales and a corresponding decrease in production, as well as general cost-cutting initiatives.
Profit/(loss) from operations The Group’s profit from operations decreased by US$3,123.3 million from a US$3,982.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to a US$859.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was due to a US$3,139.1 million decrease in gross profit, primarily due to the factors discussed above and partially offset by a US$15.8 million decrease in net operating expenses. The following table sets forth the Group’s net operating expenses for the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year percent 2008 2009 year change change (US$ millions) General and administrative expenses ...... (801.5) (516.9) 284.6 (35.5)% Distribution expenses ...... (995.7) (791.5) 204.2 (20.5)% Other taxes and contributions ...... (153.1) (150.0) 3.1 (2.0)% Share of associates’ (loss)/profit ...... (2.7) 13.3 16.0 (592.6)% Net loss from securities operations ...... (99.9) (12.2) 87.7 (87.8)% Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets ...... (43.5) (30.1) 13.4 (30.8)% Net other operating income/(expenses) ...... 555.7 (37.5) (593.2) (106.7)% Net operating expenses ...... (1,540.7) (1,524.9) 15.8 (1.0)%
Severstal Resource segment The Severstal Resource segment’s profit from operations decreased by US$514.6 million, or 85.0 percent, from US$605.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$91.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease in profit from operations was due to a US$611.1 million decrease in gross
84
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CE14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CE14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 410D*/1415D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 21191
Operating and Financial Review
profit, primarily as a result of the factors described above, partially offset by a US$96.5 million decrease in net operating expenses. The decrease in the Severstal Resource segment’s operating expenses was primarily due to a US$39.0 million decrease in distribution expenses and a US$66.3 million decrease in general and administrative expenses. The decrease in distribution expenses was primarily due to reduction of railway tariff expenses, which in turn were due to a decrease in volumes transported for sale for the reasons described above. General and administrative expenses decreased, primarily due to the decrease of a bad debt provision expense by US$44.9 million due to management’s negotiations with customers aimed at decreasing doubtful debts.
Russian Steel segment The Russian Steel segment’s profit from operations decreased by US$2,142.4 million, or 67.4 percent, from US$3,178.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$1,035.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease in profit from operations was due to a US$2,578.1 million decrease in gross profit, primarily as a result of the factors described above, partially offset by a US$435.7 million decrease in net operating expenses. The decrease in the Russian Steel segment’s operating expenses was primarily due to a US$165.3 million decrease in general and administrative expenses, a US$159.9 million decrease in distribution expenses and a US$85.8 million decrease in loss from securities operations. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to a decrease in labour and related tax expenses of US$51.7 million, a decrease in services of US$36.7 million and a reduction in provision for doubtful accounts of US$8.2 million. The decrease in distribution expenses was primarily due to the decrease in railway tariffs. The decrease in loss from securities operations was due to significant decrease in market quotations for trading securities in the year ended 31 December 2008 compared to the year ended 31 December 2009.
Severstal North America segment Severstal North America’s profit from operations decreased by US$437.4 million, from a profit of US$179.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to a loss of US$257.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a US$95.3 million decrease in gross loss, due to the factors discussed above, and a US$532.7 million increase in net operating expenses. The increase in net operating expenses was primarily due to a US$610.3 million increase in net other operating expenses in the year ended 31 December 2009. This increase was primarily due to the fact that there were non-recurring income items which occurred in the year ended 31 December 2008 and which did not occur in the year ended 31 December 2009. The following non-recurring items, all of which increased other operating income and offset net other operating expenses, occurred in the year ended 31 December 2008: US$177.0 million lump sum payment from Dearborn Industrial Generation to Dearborn for early termination of a long-term electricity supply contract and US$430.0 million of insurance proceeds recognised in the year ended 31 December 2008 due to the blast furnace ‘‘B’’ explosion. The Group had no non-recurring income items in the year ended 31 December 2009 which offset net other expenses for the same period.
Profit before financing and taxation Compared to the prior period, the Group’s profit before financing and taxation decreased by US$3,030.0 million, or 80.4 percent, in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was due to a US$3,123.3 million decrease in profit from operations, partially offset by a US$93.3 million decrease in net non-operating expenses. The decrease in profit from operations was due to the factors discussed above. The decrease in net non-operating expenses was primarily due to a US$443.9 million decrease in impairment of non-current assets, partially offset by a US$79.9 million decrease in negative goodwill and a US$270.7 million decrease in net other non-operating income.
85
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CE14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CE14501A.;17 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 195DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 45374
Operating and Financial Review
The following table sets forth the Group’s net non-operating expenses for the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009:
Year ended Year on 31 December Year on year percent 2008 2009 year change change (US$ millions) Impairment of non-current assets ...... (532.0) (88.1) 443.9 (83.4)% Negative goodwill ...... 79.9 — (79.9) (100.0)% Net other non-operating income/(expenses) ...... 238.9 (31.8) (270.7) (113.3)% Net non-operating expenses ...... (213.2) (119.9) 93.3 (43.8)%
Impairment of non-current assets Compared to the prior period, the Group’s impairment of non-current assets decreased by US$443.9 million, or 83.4 percent, in the year ended 31 December 2009. This decrease was due to the effect of significant impairments recorded in the year ended 31 December 2008 as a result of the impairment tests performed in respect of the Group’s cash generating units due to the global economic downturn and the existence of impairment indicators.
Negative goodwill The negative goodwill in the year ended 31 December 2008 was primarily attributable to the acquisition of High River Gold.
Profit/(loss) for the year The Group’s profit for the year decreased by US$3,181.0 million from a profit of US$2,061.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to a loss of US$1,119.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease was due to a US$3,030.0 million decrease in profit before financing and taxation and a US$59.5 million increase in net financing expense, a US$448.0 million increase in loss from discontinued operations, which was partially offset by a US$356.4 million decrease in income tax expense. The decrease in profit before financing and taxation is primarily due to the factors described above.
Net financing expense Net financing expense increased by US$59.5 million, or 11.2 percent, from US$531.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$591.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. This increase was due to a US$80.6 million increase in interest expense from US$397.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to US$478.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2009, a US$37.3 million decrease in interest income and a US$58.4 million decrease in foreign exchange loss. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to new long-term borrowings, such as the rouble- denominated bonds issued in the amount of US$494.0 million in September 2009. The decrease in interest income by US$37.3 million was primarily due to the lower average cash and deposit balances in the year ended 31 December 2009 compared to the year ended 31 December 2008. The decrease in foreign exchange loss by US$58.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 compared to the year ended 31 December 2008 was primarily due to the lower depreciation of the rouble against the US dollar in the year ended 31 December 2009 compared to the depreciation of the rouble against the US dollar in 2008.
Income tax expense Income tax expense decreased by US$356.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2009, primarily due to the decrease in profit before tax of US$3,089.5 million and due to the decrease in Russian statutory tax rate from 24.0 percent to 20.0 percent in the year ended 31 December 2009 compared to the year ended 31 December 2008.
86
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CE14501A.;17 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 4850D*/6450D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 27008
Operating and Financial Review
Discontinued operations Losses from discontinued operations increased by US$448.0 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 mainly due to the operating losses generated by Lucchini and North America disposal groups.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES As at 31 March 2011, the Group had total cash and cash equivalents of US$1,778.2 million and short-term bank deposits of US$13.3 million. As at 31 December 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Group had total cash and cash equivalents of US$2,652.9 million, US$2,853.4 million and US$2,012.7 million, respectively. The Group has financed and expects to continue to finance its operations and capital expenditures primarily through the Group’s operating cash flows and, to the extent required, through borrowings or capital raising activities, including going forward, the offering of notes from time to time pursuant to the Programme. Historically, a significant portion of the Group’s capital expenditures has been related to the modernisation of the Group’s producing assets. For a discussion of the Group’s historical and expected capital expenditures, see ‘‘Business—Russian Steel Division—Capital Expenditures; Business—Severstal International—Capital Expenditures; Business—Severstal Resources—Capital Expenditures’’.
87
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 80D /300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 54545
Operating and Financial Review
Cash flows For the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011 The following table sets forth the Group’s consolidated cash flow for the three months ended 31 March 2010 and 2011: Period on Three months period ended 31 March Period on percentage 2010 2011 period change change (US$ millions) Net cash from operating activities Profit before financing and taxation ...... 333.8 735.5 401.7 120.3% Adjustments to reconcile profit to cash generated from operations ...... 235.8 197.1 (38.7) (16.4)% Changes in operating assets and liabilities ...... (399.8) (506.4) (106.6) 26.7% Interest paid ...... (145.4) (142.1) 3.3 (2.3)% Income tax paid ...... (67.1) (122.3) (55.2) 82.3% Net cash (used in)/from operating activities—continuing operations ...... (42.7) 161.8 204.5 — Net cash (used in)/from operating activities—discontinued operations ...... (240.2) 58.2 298.4 — Net cash (used in)/from operating activities ...... (282.9) 220.0 502.9 — Cash from investing activities Capital expenditures(1) ...... (200.1) (360.8) (160.7) 80.3% Net (increase)/decrease in short-term bank deposits ..... (2.7) 0.7 3.4 — Additions to financial investments and associates, net of proceeds on disposal ...... (201.5) (7.4) 194.1 (96.3)% Net cash inflow from disposal of subsidiaries ...... — 97.0 97.0 — Other ...... 38.7 11.4 (27.3) (70.5)% Cash used in investing activities—continuing operations . (365.6) (259.1) 106.5 (29.1)% Cash used in investing activities—discontinued operations (28.8) (26.2) 2.6 (9.0)% Cash used in investing activities ...... (394.4) (285.3) 109.1 (27.7)% Cash from financing activities Proceeds from debt finance ...... 1,366.1 249.1 (1,117.0) (81.8)% Repayment of debt finance ...... (906.7) (411.7) 495.0 (54.6)% Repayment under lease obligations ...... (0.8) (1.2) (0.4) 50.0% Dividends paid ...... — (11.0) (11.0) — Acquisitions of non-controlling interests ...... (113.3) (35.9) 77.4 (68.3)% Cash from/(used in) financing activities—continuing operations ...... 345.3 (210.7) (556.0) — Cash from/(used in) financing activities—discontinued operations ...... 65.2 (28.2) (93.4) — Cash from/(used in) financing activities ...... 410.5 (238.9) (649.4) — Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents . . . (1.0) 69.8 70.8 — Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents ...... (267.8) (234.4) 33.4 (12.5)% Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations and assets held for sale at the end of the period ..... (357.0) — 357.0 —
(1) Consisting of cash outlays for purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Net cash from operating activities increased by US$502.9 million, or 177.8 percent, from a cash outflow of US$282.9 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to a cash inflow of US$220.0 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011.
88
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 32410
Operating and Financial Review
The increase was due to an increase in cash inflow from continuing operations of US$204.5 million, from a cash outflow of US$42.7 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to a cash inflow of US$161.8 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011, and a change in cash inflow from discontinued operations of US$298.4 million, from a cash outflow of US$240.2 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to a cash inflow of US$58.2 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase in cash inflow from continuing operations mainly relates to a US$401.7 million increase in profit before financing and taxation, partially offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities of US$106.6 million and a decrease in impairment of non-current assets of US$62.9 million, which was added back to profit before financing and taxation for cash flow purposes and an increase in income tax paid by US$55.2 million. The increase in profit before financing and taxation was due to the factors discussed above. Changes in operating assets and liabilities was mainly a result of an increase in trade accounts receivable and amounts receivable from related parties due to increased revenue of steel and other products in the three months ended 31 March 2011 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in impairment of non-current assets of US$62.9 million primarily relates to the impairment loss accrued in respect of the NSG during the three months ended 31 March 2010. Net cash from operating activities—continuing operations was also affected by a US$55.2 million increase in income tax paid due to an increase in taxable profit for the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010. The increase in cash from operating activities—discontinued operations of US$298.4 million relates to Lucchini and North America disposal groups and is mainly explained by the decrease in net loss of US$907.1 million from a loss of US$974.6 million in the three months ended 31 March 2010 to a loss of US$67.5 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011. The increase in cash further relates to changes in operating assets and liabilities of Lucchini and North America disposal groups, partially offset by loss on remeasurement of the Lucchini to fair value less costs to sell of US$802.3 million, which was added back to net loss for cash flow purposes. Net cash used in investing activities decreased by US$109.1 million from US$394.4 million for the three months ended 31 March 2010 to US$285.3 million for the three months ended 31 March 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in net cash used in investing activities—continuing operations by US$106.5 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in financial investments, investments to associates, an increase in cash inflow from disposal of subsidiaries, which was partially offset by an increase in capital expenditures and an increase in cash inflow from disposal of subsidiaries. The decrease in additions to financial investments and investments in associates, net of proceeds on disposals, of US$194.1 million was primarily attributable to the acquisition of interests in Crew Gold in the amount of US$90.3 million and loans given by the Group to third parties: Titan Services Limited in the amount of US$82.5 million and Lydford Trading Limited in the amount of US$18.5 million during the three months ended 31 March 2010. The increase in capital expenditures of US$160.7 million was in line with the Group’s budgeted capital expenditures of $1,969.0 million for 2011 compared to US$1,400 million for 2010. The cash inflow from disposal of subsidiaries of US$97.0 million represents the sale of the North America disposal group and SSM RP Holding B.V. and its wholly owned subsidiary OOO Severstal-metiz: welding consumables during the three months ended 31 March 2011. Net cash received from financing activities changed by US$649.4 million or 158.2 percent, from a cash inflow of US$410.5 million for the three months ended 31 March 2010 to a cash outflow of US$238.9 million for the three months ended 31 March 2011. This change relates to the decrease in cash inflow from financing activities—continuing operations of US$556.0 million and decrease in cash inflow from financing activities—discontinued operations of US$93.4 million. Decrease in cash inflow from financing activities—continuing operations of US$556.0 million was primarily attributable to the decrease in proceeds from debt financing, net of debt repayments of US$622.0 million,
89
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 4130D*/6910D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 24073
Operating and Financial Review
increase in dividends paid of US$11.0 million and was partially offset by a decrease in cash spent on acquisitions of non-controlling interests of US$77.4 million. The decrease in proceeds from debt financing in the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010 was primarily due to long-term borrowings made in the first quarter of 2010, including the rouble-denominated bonds issued by the Company in the amount of US$498.0 million in February 2010 and bonds issued by Severstal Columbus in the amount of US$525.0 million in February 2010. The increase in dividends paid by US$11.0 million reflect payment of dividends accrued for the nine month 2010 financial results. The decrease in cash spent on acquisitions of non-controlling interest relates to the acquisitions of non-controlling interests in Crew Gold and Severstal-Ukraine LLC in the amounts of US$32.9 million and US$3.0 million, respectively, during the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to US$113.3 million of cash spent on acquisition of non-controlling interest in Lucchini during the three months ended 31 March 2010. The decrease in cash inflow from financing activities—discontinued operations of US$93.4 million mainly relates to the net decrease in proceeds from debt financing during the three months ended 31 March 2011 compared to the three months ended 31 March 2010. The effect of exchange rates resulted in an increase in cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended 31 March 2011 due to the appreciation of the rouble against the US dollar during this period as compared to the same period in the prior year.
90
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 40D /300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 47297
Operating and Financial Review
For the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010 The following table sets forth the Group’s consolidated cash flow for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Year ended Year on December 31 Year on year percent 2009 2010 year change change (US$ millions) Net cash from operating activities Profit before financing and taxation ...... 739.3 2,378.7 1,639.4 221.8% Adjustments to reconcile profit to cash generated from operations ...... 711.9 951.8 239.9 33.7% Changes in operating assets and liabilities ...... 479.6 (629.1) (1,108.7) — Interest paid ...... (490.0) (569.6) (79.6) 16.2% Income tax paid ...... (37.3) (326.0) (288.7) 774.0% Net cash from operating activities—continuing operations ...... 1,403.5 1,805.8 402.3 28.7% Net cash from/(used in) operating activities— discontinued operations ...... 207.7 (546.6) (754.3) — Net cash from operating activities ...... 1,611.2 1,259.2 (352.0) (21.8)% Net cash used in investing activities Capital expenditures(1) ...... (808.7) (1,251.1) (442.4) 54.7% Net decrease/(increase) in short-term bank deposits . . . 668.1 (46.7) (714.8) — Additions to financial investments and associates, net of proceeds on disposal ...... (39.8) (226.3) (186.5) 468.6% Net cash outflow on acquisitions of subsidiaries ...... — (48.5) (48.5) — Net cash inflow on disposal of subsidiaries ...... 5.0 118.6 113.6 — Other ...... 138.3 104.9 (33.4) (24.2)% Cash used in investing activities—continuing operations ...... (37.1) (1,349.1) (1,312.0) — Cash used in investing activities-discontinued operations (193.5) (150.2) 43.3 (22.4)% Cash used in investing activities ...... (230.6) (1,499.3) (1,268.7) — Net cash used in financing activities Proceeds from debt finance ...... 2,754.4 3,481.6 727.2 26.4% Acquisitions of non-controlling interests ...... (23.4) (455.1) (431.7) — Disposal of non-controlling interest ...... — 5.7 5.7 — Repayment of debt finance ...... (3,422.8) (3,283.3) 139.5 (4.1)% Repayment under lease obligations ...... (7.7) (5.0) 2.7 (35.1)% Dividends paid ...... (116.1) (130.1) (14.0) 12.1% Contributions of non-controlling interests ...... 54.3 — (54.3) — Cash used in financing activities—continuing operations ...... (761.3) (386.2) 375.1 (49.3)% Cash (used in)/from financing activities—discontinued operations ...... (420.5) 98.3 518.8 — Cash used in financing activities ...... (1,181.8) (287.9) 893.9 (75.6)% Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents . 1.7 (104.7) (106.4) — Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents .... 200.5 (632.7) (833.2) (415.6)% Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations and assets held for sale at the end of the period ...... — (208.0) (208.0) —
(1) Consists of cash outlays for purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.
91
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 6384
Operating and Financial Review
Net cash from operating activities decreased by US$352.0 million, or 21.8 percent, from US$1,611.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,259.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The decrease was due to a change in cash from operating activities—discontinued operations from a cash inflow of US$207.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to a cash outflow of US$546.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2010 partially offset by the increase in cash inflow from continuing operations of US$402.3 million from a cash inflow of US$1,403.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to a cash inflow of US$1,805.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase in net cash from operating activities—continuing operations of US$402.3 million was primarily attributable to the increase in profit before financing and taxation of US$1,639.4 million and an increase in loss on remeasurement and disposal of financial investments of US$92.5 million, an increase in the provision for inventories, receivables and other provisions of US$116.7 million, which were added back to profit for cash flow purposes and was partially offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities of US$1,108.7 million and an increase in income tax paid of US$288.7 million. The increase in loss on remeasurement and disposal of financial investments mainly relates to the provision accrued in respect of doubtful deposit account in the amount of US$134.0 million, which was partially offset by a US$41.6 million gain from fair value revaluation of Crew Gold shares during its step-up acquisition in the year ended 31 December 2010. Changes in provisions for inventories, receivables and other provisions was primarily attributable to a significant decrease in provisions as the result of a release of inventories during the year ended 31 December 2009 in respect of which a provision was previously accrued at the end of the year ended 31 December 2008. The accrual of the provision in the year ended 31 December 2010 was made within the normal course of business. Net cash from operating activities decreased due to the increase in cash outflow from changes in operating assets and liabilities of US$1,108.7 million, which were mainly attributable to the significant increase in inventories, a corresponding increase in VAT recoverable, an increase in trade receivables offset by an increase in trade accounts payable, including accounts payable to related parties balances, increase in other taxes and social securities payable and other non-current liabilities. The increase in inventory was driven by an increase in inventory purchases in the year ended 31 December 2010 as a result of the global economic recovery during 2010. The increase in VAT recoverable as well as the increase in trade payables and receivables were in line with the increase in inventory purchases and Group’s revenue and are also explained by the global economic recovery. The net cash from operating activities was also affected by a US$288.7 million increase in income tax paid and US$79.6 million increase in interest paid. The increase in income tax paid was in line with the increase in taxable profit for the year ended 31 December 2010 as compared to the year ended 31 December 2009 and the increase in interest paid was in line with the increased financing in the year ended 31 December 2010 compared to the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease in cash from operating activities—discontinued operations by US$754.3 million from a cash inflow of US$207.7 million to a cash outflow of US$546.6 million primarily relates to Lucchini and North America disposal groups and is mainly explained by the decrease in their profits. Net cash used in investing activities increased by US$1,268.7 million from US$230.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to US$1,499.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The increase was attributable to an increase in cash used in investing activities—continuing operations of US$1,312.0 million partially offset by a decrease in cash used in investing activities—discontinued operations of US$43.3 million. The increase in net cash used in investing activities—continuing operations was attributable to the increase in capital expenditures of US$442.4 million which was in line with the US$1,400 million capital expenditure 2010 programme approved by the Group and an increase in additions to financial investments and associates net of disposal of US$186.5 million mainly due to the equity investments to Crew Gold corporation of US$174.8 million, Core Mining Limited of US$15.0 million, Intex resources ASA of US$13.0 million, SCM of US$6.2 million and Iron Mineral Benification Services (Proprietary) Limited of
92
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1490D*/5385D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 62385
Operating and Financial Review
US$7.5 million which was offset by a decrease in financial investment balances attributable to a repayment of loans and notes. The increase in cash outflow from investing activities was also driven by changes in short-term bank deposits of US$714.8 million, from a decrease of US$668.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009, to an increase of US$46.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The decrease in short-term bank deposits in 2009 was mainly due to cash received from payments of deposits upon maturity and due to a decrease in the Group’s available cash as a result of the decrease in revenue caused by the global economic downturn. The slight increase in short-term bank deposits in 2010 is explained by the placements of available cash to interest-bearing deposit accounts. The net cash outflow from investing activities was partially offset by the increase in net cash inflow of US$113.6 million due to the disposal of the NSG during the year ended 31 December 2010. The decrease in cash used in investing activities—discontinued operations of US$43.3 million mainly relates to the decrease in capital expenditures of the Lucchini and North America disposal groups. Net cash used in financing activities decreased by US$893.9 million, from a net cash outflow of US$1,181.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to a net cash outflow of US$287.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2010. The decrease relates to the decrease in net cash used in financing activities—continuing operations of US$375.1 million and to the decrease in net cash used in financing activities—discontinued operations of US$518.8 million. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities—continuing operations from a net cash used in financing activities of US$761.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2009 to a net cash used in financing activities of US$386.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2010 was primarily attributable to the increase in proceeds from debt finance, net of repayments of US$866.7 million primarily as the result of issuance of US$525.0 million of Severstal Columbus bonds in February 2010, US$498.0 million of ruble- denominated bonds in February 2010 and US$1,000 million of US dollar-denominated bonds in October 2010 as well as a decrease in repayments of debt. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities—continuing operations was partially offset by an increase in cash outflow on acquisition of non-controlling interests by US$431.7 million. The increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of non-controlling interest of Lucchini in the amount of US$113.3 million, High River Gold in the amount of US$127.0 million and Crew Gold in the amount of US$214.8 million. The decrease in cash inflow from financing activities—continuing operations was also affected by other equity changes that were mainly connected with increase in dividends paid in the year ended 31 December 2010 and changes in contribution of a non-controlling interest from the dilution of the Group’s ownership in High River Gold in the year ended 31 December 2009. Net cash used in financing activities—discontinued operations decreased by US$518.8 million from a net cash outflow of US$420.5 million to a net cash inflow of US$98.3 million mainly due to an increase in proceeds from debt finance, net of repayments. The effect of exchange rates resulted in an additional decrease in cash and cash equivalents in the year ended 31 December 2010 due to the depreciation of the rouble against the US dollar in the year ended 31 December 2010 as compared to the year ended 31 December 2009.
93
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 285D*/420D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55688
Operating and Financial Review
For the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009 The following table sets forth the Group’s consolidated cash flow for the years ended 31 December 2008 and 2009.
Year ended Year on December 31 Year on year percent 2008 2009 year change change (US$ millions) Net cash from operating activities Profit before financing and taxation ...... 3,769.3 739.3 (3,030.0) (80.4)% Adjustments to reconcile profit to cash generated from operations ...... 1,344.1 711.9 (632.2) (47.0)% Changes in operating assets and liabilities ...... (587.0) 479.6 1,066.6 — Interest paid ...... (273.8) (490.0) (216.2) 79.0% Income tax paid ...... (1,035.3) (37.3) 998.0 (96.4)% Net cash from operating activities—continuing operations .... 3,217.3 1,403.5 (1,813.8) (56.4)% Net cash from operating activities—discontinued operations . . . 216.6 207.7 (8.9) (4.1)% Net cash from operating activities ...... 3,433.9 1,611.2 (1,822.7) (53.1)% Net cash used in investing activities Capital expenditures(1) ...... (1,720.3) (808.7) 911.6 (53.0)% Net (increase)/decrease in short-term bank deposits ...... (259.9) 668.1 928.0 — Additions to financial investments and associates, net of proceeds on disposal ...... (45.7) (39.8) 5.9 (12.9)% Acquisition of entities under common control ...... (41.4) — 41.4 — Net cash outflow on acquisitions of subsidiaries ...... (3,068.7) — 3,068.7 — Net cash inflow on disposal of subsidiaries ...... 671.7 5.0 (666.7) (99.3)% Other ...... 172.1 138.3 (33.8) (19.6)% Cash used in investing activities—continuing operations ..... (4,292.2) (37.1) 4,255.1 (99.1)% Cash used in investing activities-discontinued operations ..... (340.3) (193.5) 146.8 (43.1)% Cash used in investing activities ...... (4,632.5) (230.6) 4,401.9 (95.0)% Net cash used in financing activities Proceeds from debt finance ...... 6,175.9(2) 2,754.4 (3,421.5) (55.4)% Acquisitions of non-controlling interests ...... (178.2) (23.4) 154.8 (86.9)% Repurchase of issued shares ...... (26.3)(2) — 26.3 — Repayment of debt finance ...... (2,930.7) (3,422.8) (492.1) 16.8% Repayment under lease obligations ...... (19.9) (7.7) 12.2 (61.3)% Dividends paid ...... (1,346.5) (116.1) 1,230.4 (91.4)% Contributions of non-controlling interests ...... — 54.3 54.3 — Dividends to the Majority Shareholder paid by acquired entity under common control ...... (34.0) — 34.0 — Cash from/(used in) financing activities—continuing operations 1,640.3 (761.3) (2,401.6) — Cash from/(used in) financing activities—discontinued operations ...... 605.9 (420.5) (1,026.4) — Cash from/(used in) financing activities ...... 2,246.2 (1,181.8) (3,428.0) — Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents ...... (17.3) 1.7 19.0 — Net increase in cash and cash equivalents ...... 1,030.3 200.5 (829.8) (80.5)%
(1) Consists of cash outlays for purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. (2) The classification of these items is different from that in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 due to the correction of immaterial errors, unknown when the financials were authorised for issue, in the way the corresponding figures for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2008 were presented; such items were correctly presented in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2009, 2008 and 2007. Net cash from operating activities decreased by US$1,822.7 million, or 53.1 percent, from US$3,433.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to a US$1,611.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2009.
94
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 50409
Operating and Financial Review
The decrease in net cash from operating activities was due to the decrease in net cash from operating activities—continuing operations of US$1,813.8 million and a decrease in net cash from operating activities—discontinued operations of US$8.9 million. The decrease in cash from operating activities—continuing operations was primarily caused by the decrease in profit before financing and taxation of US$3,030.0 million, which stemmed from the overall decrease in revenue as a result of the decrease in demand for steel products and global economic downturn; the decrease in impairment charges of US$443.9 million; the decrease in the provision for inventories, receivables and other provisions of US$325.4 million; the decrease in depreciation and amortisation of US$140.0 million which were added back to profit for cash flow purposes. These changes were partially offset by decrease in gain from disposal of subsidiaries of US$314.4 million which mainly related to disposal of OAO Mine Berezovskaya, OAO Mine Pervomaiskaya and ZAO Zhernovskaya-3. The decrease in impairment charges of US$443.9 million was due to the effect of significant impairments recorded in the year ended 31 December 2008 as a result of the impairment tests performed in respect of the Group’s cash generating units due to the global economic downturn and the existence of impairment indicators. The decrease in provisions for inventories, receivables and other provisions was primarily attributable to the significant release of inventories during the year ended 31 December 2009 in respect of which a provision was previously accrued at the end of the year ended 31 December 2008. These factors were partially offset by the increase in cash inflow related to changes in operating assets and liabilities of US$1,066.6 million due to a significant decrease in inventories, trade accounts receivable and amounts receivable from related parties and in VAT recoverable. These changes were primarily driven by a Group initiative to mitigate the impact of deteriorating global economic conditions by optimising the Group’s working capital by renegotiating existing contracts with consumers and suppliers, decreasing inventory stock levels and an overall increase of working capital efficiency. Net cash from operating activities was also affected by a US$998.0 million decrease in income tax paid due to the decrease in taxable profit for the year ended 31 December 2009 compared to the year ended 31 December 2008. The decrease in cash inflow from operating activities was also affected by the increase in interest paid of US$216.2 million, which was attributable to significant debt financing raised during the second half of 2008, primarily for the acquisition of the North American assets. Net cash used in investing activities decreased by US$4,401.9 million, or 95.0 percent, from a net cash outflow of US$4,632.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to a net cash outflow of US$230.6 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease mainly relates to the decrease in net cash used in investing activities—continuing operations of US$4,255.1 million and the decrease in net cash used in investing activities—discontinued operations of US$146.8 million. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities—continuing operations was primarily attributable to a decrease in capital expenditures of US$911.6 million (as part of the Group’s policy to reduce capital expenditures to US$1,000 million in 2009), and a decrease in net cash outflow on the acquisition of subsidiaries by US$3,068.7 million, from a US$3,068.7 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to nil in the year ended 31 December 2009. This was driven by the suspension of the Group’s M&A programme as a result of the global economic downturn. The decrease in cash outflow on investing activities was also attributable to changes in short-term bank deposits of US$928.0 million, from an increase of US$259.9 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to a decrease of US$668.1 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease in short-term bank deposits was mainly due to cash received from payments of deposits upon maturity and due to a decrease in the Group’s available cash as a result of the decrease in revenue caused by the global economic downturn. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities was partially offset by the decrease in net cash inflow on disposals of subsidiaries of US$666.7 million. The decrease was also due to a US$5.9 million decrease in cash outflow related to additions to financial investments and associates net proceeds from disposal. The decrease in net cash inflow on disposal of subsidiaries relates to the disposal of the following subsidiaries in
95
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 315D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 10 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 2063
Operating and Financial Review
the year ended 31 December 2008: OOO Georesurs, OAO Mine Berezovskaya, OAO Mine Pervomaiskaya, ZAO Zhernovskaya-3, Relco Spzoo, Coimpex Spzoo and OAO Metallurgremont. The Group made no significant disposals of subsidiaries in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease in cash used in investing activities—discontinued operations from cash used in investing activities was US$340.3 million in the year ended 31 December 2008; the corresponding figure was US$193.5 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. The decreases mainly related to the decline in capital expenditures of the disposal groups. Net cash from financing activities decreased by US$3,428.0 million, or 152.6 percent, from a net cash inflow of US$2,246.2 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 to a net cash outflow of US$1,181.8 million in the year ended 31 December 2009. Such decrease relates to the decrease in net cash from financing activities—continuing operations of US$2,401.6 million and due to the decrease in net cash from financing activities—discontinued operations of US$1,026.4 million in the year ended 31 December 2008 compared to the year ended 31 December 2009. The decrease in net cash from financing activities—continuing operations was driven by a decrease in proceeds from debt finance, net of repayments of US$3,913.6 million. The decrease in proceeds from debt finance and increase in repayment of debt finance was primarily due to the continuing optimisation of the Group’s credit portfolio and liquidity position, which is in line with the Group’s de-leveraging and debt re-balancing strategy. Net cash outflow from financing activities was also affected by the decrease in cash used for acquisitions of non-controlling interests. The decrease in cash used for acquisitions of non-controlling interests was due to the fact that in the year ended 31 December 2008 the Group acquired an additional stake in Celtic, OAO Dneprometiz (Dneprometiz), Severstal Columbus, Karelsky Okatysh and Severstal-Metiz. In the year ended 31 December 2009, the Group’s operations with non-controlling interests were limited to the acquisitions of additional stakes in Severstal Columbus and High River Gold. Net cash outflow from financing activities was also affected by the decrease in dividends paid to the Majority Shareholder in connection with the acquisition of ZAO Trade House Severstal Invest (Severstal Invest) and repurchase of issued shares in the year ended 31 December 2009, the increase in contribution of a non-controlling interest from the dilution of the Group’s ownership in High River Gold in the year ended 31 December 2009 and significant decrease in dividends paid for the year ended 31 December 2009.
INDEBTEDNESS The following table sets out the Group’s indebtedness as at 31 March 2011 and 31 December 2010:
31 March 31 December 2011 2010 (US$ millions) Eurobonds 2013(1) ...... 543.6 543.6 Eurobonds 2014(1) ...... 375.0 375.0 Eurobonds 2017(1) ...... 1,000.0 1,000.0 Rouble bonds 2011(1) ...... 527.6 492.2 Rouble bonds 2013(1) ...... 527.6 492.2 Severstal Columbus bonds(1) ...... 525.0 525.0 Other issued notes and bonds(1) ...... 174.1 146.0 Bank financing(1) ...... 2,374.5 2,474.2 Other financing(1) ...... 40.5 68.8 Accrued interest ...... 81.7 106.6 Unamortised balance of transaction costs ...... (79.5) (81.6) Total debt financing ...... 6,090.1 6,142.0(2)
(1) Excludes accrued interest. (2) As reflected in the statement of financial position of the Interim Financial Statements.
96
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1190D*/1375D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 11 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 43610
Operating and Financial Review
Major Indebtedness In October 2010, the Group issued US$1,000 million US dollar-denominated loan participation notes maturing in 2017. These bonds, issued under the Programme, bear an interest rate of 6.7 percent per annum, which is payable semi-annually in April and October each year, beginning in April 2011. The proceeds from the bond issuance were used to fund the purchase of US$706.4 million nominal of the Group’s US$1,250.0 million dollar-denominated loan participation notes due 2013 and for refinancing of certain other debts of the Group. In February 2010, the Group issued an aggregate principal amount of US$498.0 million rouble- denominated bonds maturing in 2013. These bonds bear an interest rate of 9.75 percent per annum, which is payable semi-annually in February and August each year, beginning in August 2010. The proceeds from the bonds issuance were used for the optimisation of the Group’s credit portfolio and the refinancing of short-term loan facilities. As at 31 March 2011, the amount outstanding under this facility was US$527.6 million. In February 2010, the Group’s subsidiary Severstal Columbus issued in aggregate principal amount of US$525.0 million US dollar-denominated bonds maturing in 2018. These bonds bear an interest rate of 10.25 percent per annum, which is payable semi-annually in February and August each year, beginning in August 2010. The proceeds from the bond issuance were used to refinance outstanding debt obligations originally incurred to finance construction at Severstal Columbus. In September 2009, the Group issued in aggregate principal amount of US$494.0 million rouble- denominated bonds with a two-year put option maturing in September 2012. These bonds bear an interest rate of 14.0 percent per annum, which is payable semi-annually in arrear in March and September of each year, beginning in March 2010. The proceeds from the bond issuance were used for the optimisation of the Group’s credit portfolio and the refinancing of short-term loan facilities. As at 31 March 2011, the amount outstanding under this facility was US$527.6 million. In September 2008, the Group entered into a PXF syndicated facility with mandated lead arrangers for a maximum principal amount of US$2,500.0 million maturing in 2013, with the outstanding amount being amortised from 2010 until the expiration date and bearing interest at LIBOR three months plus 2.35 percent. In July 2008, the Issuer issued US dollar-denominated loan participation notes in an aggregate principal amount of US$1,250.0 million for the sole purpose of financing a loan facility between the Company and the Issuer. The loan is due in July 2013 and bears interest at an annual rate of 9.75 percent payable semi-annually in arrear in January and in July of each year. As at 31 March 2011, the amount outstanding under this facility was US$543.6 million. The Group entered into a syndicated facility with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in December 2007 (subsequently amended in March 2008), for a maximum principal amount of A 600.0 million. The facility expires in 2017 with the outstanding principal amount being amortised from 2009 until the expiration date and bears interest at EURIBOR six month plus 2.0-2.2 percent. In April 2004, Citigroup Germany issued US dollar-denominated loan participation notes in an aggregate principal amount of US$375.0 million for the sole purpose of financing a loan facility between the Company and Citigroup Germany. The loan is due in April 2014 and bears interest at an annual rate of 9.25 percent payable semi-annually in arrear in April and in October of each year. As at 31 March 2011, the amount outstanding under this facility was US$375.0 million.
97
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 80D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 12 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 16836
Operating and Financial Review
Total debt was contractually repayable as at the following dates:
31 March 31 December 2011 2010 (US$ millions) Less than one year ...... 1,626.5 1,422.3 Between one and five years ...... 2,916.1 3,093.7 After more than five years ...... 1,547.5 1,626.0 Total debt financing ...... 6,090.1 6,142.0(1)
(1) As reflected in statements of financial position of the Interim Financial Statements.
Commitments and contingencies As at 31 March 2011, the Group had capital commitments of US$1,341.0 million. In the normal course of business, the Group enters into long-term contracts for supply of raw materials and sales of its products. These contracts allow for periodic adjustments in prices depending on prevailing market conditions.
Guarantees As at 31 March 2011, the Group had US$35.9 million of guarantees issued compared to US$38.2 million as at 31 December 2010.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ON MARKET RISK The Group’s risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group’s activities. The Group’s Board of Directors oversees how management monitors compliance with the Group’s risk management policies and procedures and reviews the adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group. Exposure to credit, liquidity, currency and interest rate risk arises in the normal course of the Group’s business. Management believes that the use in the Russian Steel and Severstal North America segments of derivatives to hedge their interest rates, commodity inputs and foreign exchange rate exposures were not material to the Group’s financial position or results of operations. The Group believes that the fair value of its financial assets and liabilities as at 31 March 2011 approximates the respective carrying amounts, except for the following borrowings:
As at 31 March 2011 Market value Book value Difference (US$ millions) Eurobonds 2013(1) ...... 614.3 543.6 70.7 Eurobonds 2014(1) ...... 426.0 375.0 51.0 Eurobonds 2017(1) ...... 1,011.3 1,000.0 11.3 Rouble bonds 2011(1) ...... 548.7 527.6 21.1 Rouble bonds 2013(1) ...... 554.5 527.6 26.9 Severstal Columbus bonds(1) ...... 580.1 525.0 55.1 3,734.9 3,498.8 236.1
(1) Excludes accrued interest. The market value of the Group’s Eurobonds was determined based on London Stock Exchange quotations. The market value of the Group’s Rouble bonds was determined based on Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange quotations.
98
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 380D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 13 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 53378
Operating and Financial Review
Credit risk The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset in the statement of financial position and guarantees. The Group has developed policies and procedures for the management of credit exposures, including the establishment of credit committees that actively monitor credit risk.
Liquidity risk The Group manages liquidity risk with the objective of ensuring that funds will be available at all times to honour all cash flow obligations as they become due by preparing annual budgets, by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities.
Foreign currency exchange risk The Group incurs foreign currency exchange risk when the Group’s entities enter into transactions and balances not denominated in their functional currency. The Group has assets and liabilities denominated in several foreign currencies. Foreign currency exchange risk arises when the actual or forecasted assets in a foreign currency are either greater or less than the liabilities in that currency. The Group’s management performs foreign currency exchange rate sensitivity analysis on a yearly basis. For an analysis of such results for 31 December 2008, 2009 and 2010, see note 31 to the Annual Financial Statements beginning on page F-87 of this Prospectus.
Interest rate risk Interest rates on the Group’s debt financing are either fixed or variable, at a fixed spread over LIBOR or EURIBOR for the duration of each contract. Changes in interest rates impact primary loans and borrowings by changing either their fair value, as with fixed rate debt, or their future cash flows, as with variable rate debt. The Group’s management does not have a formal policy of determining how much of the Group’s exposure should be to fixed or variable rates. However, at the time of raising additional debt financing, the Group uses its judgment to decide whether a fixed or variable rate would be more favourable over the expected term. The following table sets forth the amount of variable rate instruments as at 31 March 2011:
(US$ millions) Variable rate instruments Financial assets ...... 26.1 Financial liabilities ...... (1,833.6) (1,807.5)
All of the Group’s other interest-bearing financial assets and liabilities are at fixed rate. A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at 31 March 2011 would have increased/(decreased) equity and annualised profit by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.
Net profit 100 bp 100 bp increase decrease (US$ millions) Variable rate instruments Financial assets ...... 0.3 (0.3) Financial liabilities ...... (18.3) 18.3 Cash flow sensitivity (net) ...... (18.1) 18.1
99
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/660D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 14 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 13161
Operating and Financial Review
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES The Group believes that its most significant accounting policies and it critical accounting judgments and estimates are those described below.
Significant accounting policies The Group believes that its most significant accounting policies to be those described below.
Basis of consolidation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries are those enterprises controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Parent Company. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in these consolidated financial statements from the date that control effectively commences until the date that control effectively ceases. The non-controlling interests represent the non-controlling shareholders’ proportion of the net identifiable assets of the subsidiaries, including the non-controlling shareholders’ share of fair value adjustments on acquisitions. The non-controlling interests are presented in the statement of financial position within equity, separately from the parent’s shareholders’ equity. Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised gains arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated in preparing these consolidated financial statements; unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides an evidence of impairment of the asset transferred.
Acquisition of Subsidiaries The purchase method of accounting was used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group. The initial accounting for a business combination involves identifying and determining the fair values to be assigned to the acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities and the cost of acquisition. If the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the period in which the combination is effected, the Group accounts for the combination using the provisional values for the items for which the accounting is incomplete. The Group recognises any adjustments to those provisional values as a result of completing the initial accounting within twelve months from the acquisition date. As a result, goodwill or negative goodwill is adjusted accordingly. Comparative information for the periods before the completion of the initial accounting for the acquisition is presented as if the initial accounting had been completed at the acquisition date.
Accounting for business combinations of entities under common control IFRS provides no guidance on accounting for business combinations of entities under common control. Management adopted the accounting policy for such transactions based on the relevant guidance of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP). Management believes that this approach and the accounting policy disclosed below are in compliance with IFRS. Acquisitions of controlling interests in companies that were previously under the control of the Majority Shareholder are accounted for as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented or, if later, at the date on which control was obtained by the Majority Shareholder. The assets and liabilities acquired are recognised at their book values. The components of equity of the acquired companies are added to the same components within the Group’s equity, except that any share capital of the acquired companies is recorded as a part of additional capital. The cash consideration for such acquisitions is recognised as a liability to or a reduction of receivables from related parties, with a corresponding reduction in equity, from the date the acquired company is included in these consolidated financial statements until the cash consideration is paid. Parent Company shares issued in consideration for the acquired companies are recognised from the moment the acquired companies are included in these financial statements. No goodwill is recognised where the Group acquires additional interests in the acquired companies from the Majority shareholder. The difference between the share of net assets acquired and the cost of investment is recognised directly in equity.
100
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CG14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 19DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ Seq: 15 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 35653
Operating and Financial Review
Business combination achieved in stages In a business combination achieved in stages, the Group remeasures its previously held equity interest in the associates or joint ventures at its acquisition date fair value and recognises the resulting gain or loss, if any, in profit or loss.
Investments in associates Associates are those enterprises in which the Group has significant influence, but does not have control over the financial and operating policies. Investments in associates are accounted for under the equity method and are initially recognised at cost, from the date that significant influence commences until the date that significant influence ceases. Subsequent changes in the carrying value reflect the post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net assets of the associate and goodwill impairment charges, if any, after adjustments to align the accounting policies with those of the Group. When the Group’s share of losses exceeds the carrying amount of the associate, the carrying amount is reduced to nil and recognition of further losses is discontinued, except to the extent that the Group has incurred obligations in respect of the associate. Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its associates are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the associates; unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred.
Interests in joint ventures A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby the Group and other parties undertake an economic activity when the strategic financial and operating policy decisions relating to the activities of the joint venture require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. Where a Group entity undertakes its activities under joint venture arrangements directly, the Group’s share of jointly controlled assets and any liabilities incurred jointly with other venturers are recognised in its financial statements and classified according to their nature. Liabilities and expenses incurred directly in respect of interests in jointly controlled assets are accounted for on the accrual basis. Income from the sale or use of the Group’s share of the output of jointly controlled assets, and its share of joint venture expenses, are recognised when it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transactions will flow to the Group and their amount can be measured reliably. Joint venture arrangements that involve the establishment of a separate entity in which each venturer has an interest are referred to as jointly controlled entities. The Group reports its interests in jointly controlled entities using the equity method of accounting whereby an interest in jointly controlled entities is initially recorded at cost and adjusted thereafter for post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net assets of the joint venture. The income statement reflects the Group’s share of the results of operations of the joint venture. Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its jointly controlled entities are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the joint venture; unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred.
Goodwill Goodwill arising on the acquisition of a subsidiary, associate or a jointly controlled entity represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group’s interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the subsidiary, associate or jointly controlled entity recognised at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is initially recognised as an asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill in respect of subsidiaries is disclosed as an intangible asset and goodwill relating to associates and jointly controlled entities is included within the carrying value of the investments in these entities. No goodwill is recognised where the Group acquires additional interests in the acquired companies (acquisitions of non-controlling interests). The difference between the share of net assets acquired and the cost of investment is recognised directly in equity. Where goodwill forms a part of a cash generating unit and the part of the operations within that unit is disposed of, the goodwill associated with that operation is included in the carrying amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal of the operation.
101
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CG14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 36170
Operating and Financial Review
Negative goodwill represents the excess of the Group’s share in the fair value of acquired identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities over the cost of an acquisition. It is recognised in the income statement at the date of the acquisition.
Foreign currency transactions Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency of each entity at the foreign exchange rate ruling on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are translated to the functional currency of each entity at the foreign exchange rate ruling at that date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency of the entity at the foreign exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising on the translation are recognised in the income statement.
Exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources Expenditures associated with search for specific mineral resources are recognised as exploration and evaluation assets. The following expenditure comprises cost of exploration and evaluation assets: • obtaining of the rights to explore and evaluate mineral reserves and resources including costs directly related to this acquisition; • researching and analyzing existing exploration data; • conducting geological studies, exploratory drilling and sampling; • examining and testing extraction and treatment methods; • compiling prefeasibility and feasibility studies; • activities in relation to evaluating the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral recourse. Administration and other overhead costs are charged to the cost of exploration and evaluation assets only if directly related to an exploration and evaluation project. If a project does not prove viable, all irrecoverable exploration and evaluation expenditure associated with the project net of any related impairment allowances is written off to the income statement. The Group measures its exploration and evaluation assets at cost and classifies as tangible or intangible according to the nature of the assets acquired and applies the classification consistently. Exploration and evaluation assets considered to be tangible are recorded as a component of property, plant and equipment at cost less impairment charges. Otherwise, they are recorded as intangible assets, such as licenses. To the extent that tangible asset is consumed in developing an intangible asset, the amount reflecting that consumption is capitalized as a part of the cost of the intangible asset. As the asset is not available for use, it is not depreciated. All exploration and evaluation assets are monitored for indications of impairment. An exploration and evaluation asset is no longer classified as such when the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable and the development of the deposit is sanctioned by management. The carrying amount of such exploration and evaluation asset is reclassified into development asset.
Development expenditure Development expenditure includes costs directly attributable to the construction of a mine and the related infrastructure and is accumulated separately for each area of interest. Development expenditure is capitalised and is recorded as a component of property, plant and equipment or intangible assets, as appropriate. No depreciation is charged on the development expenditure before the start of commercial production. To the extent that revenue arises from test production during the development stage, an amount is charged from development expenditure to the cost of sales so as to reflect a zero net gross margin.
102
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170D*/420D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 16884
Operating and Financial Review
Property, plant and equipment Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset and, for qualifying assets, borrowing costs capitalised. In the case of assets constructed by the Group, related works and direct project overheads are included in cost. The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the part will flow to the Group and its cost can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognised. Repair and maintenance expenses are charged to the income statement as incurred. Gains or losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment are recognised in the income statement. Depreciation is provided so as to write off property, plant and equipment over its expected useful life. Depreciation is calculated using the straight line basis, except for depreciation on vehicles and certain metal-rolling equipment, which is calculated on the basis of mileage and units of production, respectively. The estimated useful lives of assets are reviewed regularly and revised when necessary. The principal periods over which assets are depreciated are as follows:
Buildings and constructions ...... 20-50 years Plant and machinery ...... 10-20 years Other productive assets ...... 5-20 years Infrastructure assets ...... 5-50 years
Leases Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the Group. All other leases are classified as operating leases. Assets held under finance leases are initially recognised as assets of the Group at their fair value at the inception of the lease or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the statement of financial position as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly to the income statement as a part of interest expense. The depreciation policy for depreciable leased assets is consistent with that for depreciable assets, which are owned. If there is no reasonable certainty that the Group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the asset is fully depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or its useful life. Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are consumed.
Intangible assets (excluding goodwill) Intangible assets acquired by the Group are measured on initial recognition at cost. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Intangible assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line basis and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The estimated useful life and amortisation method are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period, with the effect of any changes in estimate being accounted for on a prospective basis. The table below presents the useful lives of intangible assets:
Mineral rights ...... 12-25 years Software ...... 3-10 years Other intangible assets ...... 3-50 years
103
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 230D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 19803
Operating and Financial Review
The major components of the other intangible assets include capitalised favourable contracts and land lease rights. Amortisation of intangible assets is included in the caption ‘‘Cost of sales’’ in the consolidated income statement.
Impairment of assets The carrying amount of goodwill is tested for impairment annually. At each reporting date, the Group assesses whether there is any indication of impairment of the Group’s other assets. If any such indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. An impairment loss is recognised whenever the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount.
Calculation of recoverable amount For financial assets carried at amortised cost, the amount of the impairment is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and its recoverable amount that is the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. For other assets, the recoverable amount is the greater of the fair value less cost to sale and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate cash inflows largely independent of those from other assets, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
Reversals of impairment An impairment loss in respect of a held-to-maturity investment, loan or receivable is reversed if the subsequent increase in recoverable amount can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised. An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets, an impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses. The cost of inventories is based on the weighted average principle and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. In the case of manufactured inventories and work in progress, cost includes an appropriate share of production overheads. Allowances are recorded against slow-moving and obsolete inventories.
Financial assets Financial assets include cash and cash equivalents, investments, and loans and receivables. Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances, cash deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. Financial assets are classified into the following specified categories: financial assets ‘at fair value through profit or loss’ (FVTPL), ‘held-to-maturity’ investments, ‘available-for-sale’ (AFS) financial assets and ‘loans and receivables’. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition.
Effective interest method The effective interest method is a method of calculating the carrying value of a financial asset held at amortised cost and of allocating interest income over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts (including all fees on points paid or received that
104
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 410D*/660D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55386
Operating and Financial Review
form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the financial asset, or, where appropriate, a shorter period. Income is recognised on an effective interest basis for debt instruments other than those financial assets designated as at FVTPL.
Financial assets at FVTPL Financial assets are classified as at FVTPL where the financial asset is either held for trading or it is designated as at FVTPL. A financial asset is classified as held for trading if: • it has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near future; or • it is a part of an identified portfolio of financial instruments that the Group manages together and has a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. A financial asset other than a financial asset held for trading may be designated as at FVTPL upon initial recognition if: • such designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise; or • the financial asset forms part of a group of financial instruments, which are managed and performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with the Group’s documented risk management or investment strategy, and information about the grouping is provided internally on that basis. Financial assets at FVTPL are stated at fair value, with any resultant gain or loss recognised in profit or loss. The net gain or loss recognised in the income statement incorporates any dividend or interest earned on the financial asset.
Held-to-maturity investments Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity dates that the Group has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity investments. Held-to-maturity investments are recorded at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any impairment.
Loans and receivables Trade receivables, loans, and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial.
AFS financial assets AFS financial assets are those non-derivative financial assets that are not classified as financial assets at FVTPL, held-to-maturity or loans and receivables and are stated at fair value. Listed shares that are traded in an active market are stated at their market value. Investments in unlisted shares that do not have a quoted market price in an active market are measured at management’s estimate of fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognised in other comprehensive income with the exception of impairment losses, which are recognised directly in the income statement. Where the investment is disposed of or is determined to be impaired, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in the equity is included in the income statement for the period. Dividends on AFS equity instruments are recognised in the income statement when the Group’s right to receive the dividends is established.
105
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D /120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 3601
Operating and Financial Review
Derecognition of financial assets The Group derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire; or it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another entity.
Financial liabilities Financial liabilities are classified as either financial liabilities ‘at FVTPL’ or ‘other financial liabilities’.
Financial liabilities at FVTPL Financial liabilities are classified as at FVTPL where the financial liability is either held for trading or it is designated as at FVTPL. A financial liability is classified as held for trading if: • it has been incurred principally for the purpose of repurchasing in the near future; or • it is a part of an identified portfolio of financial instruments that the Group manages together and has a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. A financial liability other than a financial liability held for trading may be designated as at FVTPL upon initial recognition if: • such designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise; or • the financial liability forms a part of a group of financial instruments, which are managed and where performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with the Group’s documented risk management or investment strategy, and information about the grouping is provided internally on that basis. Financial liabilities at FVTPL are stated at fair value, with any resultant gain or loss recognised in profit or loss. The net gain or loss recognised in profit or loss incorporates any interest paid on the financial liability.
Other financial liabilities Other financial liabilities, including borrowings, are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs. Borrowing costs on loans specifically for the purchase or construction of a qualifying asset are capitalised as a part of the cost of the asset they are financing. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognised in the income statement.
Derecognition of financial liabilities The Group derecognises financial liabilities when, and only when, the Group’s obligations are discharged, cancelled or they expire.
Hedging instruments The Group holds cash flow hedging instruments in order to hedge the exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction and which could affect profit or loss. Changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument designated as a cash flow hedge are recognised in other comprehensive income to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the extent that the hedge is ineffective, changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss. If the hedging instrument no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. The cumulative gain or loss that has been previously recognised in other comprehensive income remains in equity until the forecast transaction occurs. When the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the amount that has been recognised in other
106
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 27466
Operating and Financial Review
comprehensive income is transferred to the carrying amount of the asset when it is recognised. In other cases, the amount recognised in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss in the same period that the hedged item affects profit or loss.
Dividends payable Dividends are recognised as a liability in the period in which they are authorised by the shareholders.
Other taxes and contributions Other taxes and contributions are taxes and mandatory contributions paid to the government, or government controlled agencies, that are calculated on a variety of bases, but exclude taxes calculated on profits, value added taxes calculated on revenues and purchases and social security costs calculated on wages and salaries. Social security costs are included in cost of sales, distribution expenses and general and administrative expenses in accordance with the nature of related wages and salaries expenses.
Income tax Income tax on the profit for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the income statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income, in which case it is recognised in other comprehensive income. Current tax expense is calculated by each entity on the pre-tax income determined in accordance with the tax law of the country, in which the entity is incorporated, using tax rates enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is calculated using the balance sheet method, providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and taxation purposes. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realised simultaneously. Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which these assets can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised. Deferred tax is not recognised in respect of the following: • investments in subsidiaries where the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future; • if it arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and • initial recognition of goodwill.
Provisions Employee benefits The Group pays retirement, healthcare and other long-term benefits to its employees. The Group has two types of retirement benefits: defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans. Defined contribution plans are post-employment benefit plans under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts in respect of those benefits. The Group’s only obligation is to pay contributions as they fall due, including contributions to the Russian Federation State pension fund. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in future payments is available.
107
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 230D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 702
Operating and Financial Review
Defined benefit plans are post-employment benefits plans other than defined contribution plans. The calculation of the Group’s net obligation in respect of defined retirement benefit plans is performed annually by management using the projected unit credit method. In accordance with this method, the Group’s net obligation is calculated separately for each defined benefit plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods; that benefit is discounted to its present value and the fair value of any plan assets is deducted. The discount rate used is the yield at the reporting date on high-quality corporate bonds for a respective country that have maturity dates approximating the terms of the Group’s obligations. Any actuarial gain or loss arising from the calculation of the retirement benefit obligation is fully recognised in the current year’s income statement. Other long-term employee benefits include various compensations, non-monetary benefits and long-term incentive programme.
Decommissioning liability The Group has environmental liabilities related to restoration of soil and other related works, which are due upon the closures of certain of its production sites. Decommissioning liabilities are estimated case-by-case based on available information, taking into account applicable local legal requirements. The estimation is made using existing technology, at current prices, and discounted using a real discount rate. Future decommissioning costs, discounted to net present value, are capitalised and the corresponding decommissioning liability raised as soon as the constructive obligation to incur such costs arises. Future decommissioning costs are capitalised in property, plant and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the related asset. The unwinding of the decommissioning liability is included in the consolidated income statement as interest expense. Ongoing rehabilitation costs are expensed when incurred.
Onerous contracts A provision for onerous contracts is recognised when the expected benefits to be derived by the Group from a contract are lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations under the contract. The provision is measured at the present value of the lower of the expected cost of terminating the contract and the expected net cost of continuing with the contract. Before a provision is established, the Group recognises any impairment loss on the assets associated with that contract.
Other provisions Other provisions are recognised in the statement of financial position when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Share capital Ordinary shares Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.
Repurchase of issued shares When share capital recognised as equity is repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid which includes directly attributable costs is net of any tax effects, and is recognised as a deduction from equity. Repurchased shares are classified as treasury shares and are presented as a deduction from total equity. When treasury shares are sold or reissued subsequently, the amount received is recognised as an increase in equity, and the resulting surplus or deficit on the transaction is transferred to/from retained earnings.
Operating income and expenses The Group presents profit or loss from operations, which includes various types of income and expenses arising in the course of production and sale of the Group’s products, disposal of property, plant and
108
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 530D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 14951
Operating and Financial Review
equipment, participation in joint ventures and associates, securities operations and the other Group’s regular activities. Certain items are presented separately from profit or loss from operations by virtue of their size, incidence or nature to enable a full understanding of the Group’s financial performance. Such items, which are included in profit or loss before financing and taxation, primarily include impairment of non-current assets, negative goodwill and other non-operating income and expenses, as, for example, gain or loss from disposal of subsidiaries and associates and charitable donations.
Revenue recognition Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenue is reduced for estimated customer returns, rebates and other similar allowances. When goods are sold or services are rendered in exchange for dissimilar goods or services, the revenue is measured at the fair value of the goods or services received, adjusted by the amount of cash or cash equivalents transferred. When the fair value of the goods or services received cannot be measured reliably, the revenue is measured at the fair value of the goods or services given up, adjusted by the amount of any cash or cash equivalents transferred.
Sale of goods Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised in the income statement when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer; the Group retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold; the amount of revenue can be measured reliably; it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity; and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.
Rendering of services Revenue from a contract to provide services is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the contract.
Interest income Interest income is recognised in the income statement on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that asset’s net carrying amount.
Interest expense Interest expense is recognised in the income statement as it accrues, taking into account the effective yield on the liability.
Net income from securities operations Net income from securities operations comprises dividend income (except for dividends from equity associates), realised and unrealised gains on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, realised gains and impairment losses on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investments.
Earnings per share Earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net profit by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, assuming that shares issued in consideration for the companies acquired from the Majority Shareholder were issued from the moment these companies are included in these consolidated financial statements.
109
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 410D /540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 57923
Operating and Financial Review
Discontinued operations Discontinued operations are disclosed when a component of the Group’s business that represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations either has been disposed of during the reporting period or is classified as held for sale at the reporting date. This condition is regarded as met only when the disposal is highly probable within one year from the date of classification. The comparative income statement is represented as if the operation had been discontinued from the beginning of the comparative period. Assets and liabilities of a disposal group are presented in the statement of financial position separately from other assets and liabilities. Comparative information related to discontinued operations is not amended in the balance sheet.
Segment reporting An operating segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any of the Group’s other components. An operating segment’s operating results are reviewed regularly by the CEO to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available. The reportable segments’ amounts in the disclosure are stated before the intersegment elimination and are measured on the same basis as those in the consolidated financial statements, except for non-monetary investments in subsidiaries reported within long-term financial investments, which are translated into the presentation currency at the historic exchange rate. Inter-segment pricing is determined on an arm’s length basis. Segment capital expenditure is the total cost incurred during the period to acquire property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets other than goodwill.
Government grants Government grants are recognised when there is a reasonable assurance that they will be received and the Group will comply with the conditions associated with the grant. Government grants related to assets are presented as a deduction from the cost of the asset.
Critical accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Group’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The determination of estimates requires judgments which are based on historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, and other available information. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to: • useful lives of property, plant and equipment; • impairment of assets; • allowances for doubtful debts, obsolete and slow-moving inventories; • decommissioning liability; • retirement benefit liabilities; • litigations; and • deferred income tax assets.
110
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 10 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 38098
Operating and Financial Review
Useful lives of property, plant and equipment The Group assesses the remaining useful lives of items of property, plant and equipment at least at each financial year-end and, if expectations differ from previous estimates, the changes are accounted for as a change in an accounting estimate in accordance with IAS 8 ‘‘Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors’’. These estimates may have a material impact on the amount of the carrying values of property, plant and equipment and on depreciation expense for the period.
Impairment of assets The Group reviews the carrying amount of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets are impaired. In making the assessments for impairment, assets that do not generate independent cash flows are allocated to an appropriate cash-generating unit. Subsequent changes to the cash generating unit allocation or to the timing of cash flows could impact the carrying value of the respective assets.
Allowance for doubtful debts The Group makes allowance for doubtful receivables to account for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. When evaluating the adequacy of an allowance for doubtful debts, management bases its estimates on the current overall economic conditions, the ageing of accounts receivable balances, historical write-off experience, customer creditworthiness and changes in payment terms. Changes in the economy, industry or specific customer conditions may require adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
Allowance for obsolete and slow-moving inventories The Group makes allowance for obsolete and slow-moving raw materials and spare parts. In addition, certain finished goods of the Group are carried at net realisable value. Estimates of net realisable value of finished goods are based on the most reliable evidence available at the time the estimates are made. These estimates take into consideration fluctuations of price or cost directly relating to events occurring subsequent to the end of the reporting period to the extent that such events confirm conditions existing at the end of the period.
Decommissioning liability The Group reviews its decommissioning liability, representing site restoration provisions, at each reporting date and adjusts it to reflect the current best estimate in accordance with IFRIC 1 ‘‘Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities’’. The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the expenditures required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date based on the requirements of the current legislation of the country where the respective operating assets are located. The risks and uncertainties that inevitably surround many events and circumstances are taken into account in reaching the best estimate of a provision. Considerable judgment is required in forecasting future site restoration costs. Future events that may affect the amount required to settle an obligation are reflected in the amount of a provision when there is sufficient objective evidence that they will occur.
Retirement benefit liabilities The Group uses an actuarial valuation method for measurement of the present value of post-employment benefit obligations and related current service cost. This involves the use of demographic assumptions about the future characteristics of the current and former employees who are eligible for benefits (mortality, both during and after employment, rates of employee turnover, disability and early retirement, etc.) as well as financial assumptions (discount rate, future salary and benefit levels, expected rate of return on plan assets, etc.).
Litigation The Group exercises judgment in measuring and recognising provisions and the exposure to contingent liabilities related to pending litigation or other outstanding claims subject to negotiated settlement, mediation, arbitration or government regulation, as well as other contingent liabilities. Judgment is
111
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:52 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CI14501A.;15 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 4850DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 11 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 5573
Operating and Financial Review
necessary in assessing the likelihood that a pending claim will succeed, or liability will arise, and to quantify the possible range of the final settlement. Because of the inherent uncertainties in this evaluation process, actual losses may be different from the originally estimated provision. These estimates are subject to change as new information becomes available, primarily with the support of internal specialists or with the support of outside consultants. Revisions to the estimates may significantly affect future operating results.
Deferred income tax assets Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. The estimation of that probability includes judgments based on the expected performance. Various factors are considered to assess the probability of the future utilisation of deferred tax assets, including past operating results, operational plans, expiration of tax losses carried forward, and tax planning strategies. If actual results differ from such estimates or if these estimates must be adjusted in future periods, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected. In the event that the assessment of future utilisation of deferred tax assets must be reduced, this reduction will be recognised in the income statement.
112
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CI14501A.;15 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CS14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 800D*/2675D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 35199
INDUSTRY The following information includes extracts from publicly available information, data and statistics and has been extracted from official sources and other sources the Company believes to be reliable. The Company accepts responsibility for accurately reproducing such information, data, and statistics and, as far as the Company is aware, no facts have been omitted that would render such information misleading. The Company accepts no further responsibility in respect of such information, data and statistics. Such information, data and statistics may be approximations or use rounded numbers.
STEEL INDUSTRY Global Overview The global steel industry is affected by a combination of factors, including periods of economic growth or recession, worldwide production capacity and the existence of, and fluctuations in, steel imports and protective trade measures. Steel prices respond to supply and demand and fluctuate in response to general and industry specific economic conditions. The steel industry is cyclical and highly competitive and historically has been characterised by excess world supply. From 1997 to 2001, the business environment in the steel industry was challenging, resulting in financial difficulties for a number of steel companies. At the same time, difficult market conditions encouraged several companies to implement operational efficiency programmes in order to improve their respective financial profiles. By 2004, worldwide supply and demand were more in balance and supply was constrained by the availability of raw materials largely due to growing demand in China. This led to substantial price increases that continued into early 2005. In the second half of 2005, there was downward pressure on prices due in part to increased steel production in China. Prices have strengthened again recently as worldwide supply and demand have returned to a more balanced position. At the same time, the steel sector faced increasing raw materials and energy costs, particularly for iron ore and coal towards the end of 2007 and into 2008. In the first half of 2008, the steel market had experienced a significant increase in steel prices, reflecting both rising demand and raw material costs. The second half of 2008 brought the global economic downturn and a significant decline in the steel market. The downturn continued through the end of 2008 and early 2009. Steel prices started to recover in the second half of 2009, due to the beginning of the economic recovery, an inventory restocking cycle and the unprofitability of many steel producers resulting in a renegotiation of pricing contracts. A further restocking cycle in 2010, together with rising raw material costs and a slow bringing on-line of idle capacity, with global crude steel capacity utilisation ultimately reaching pre-crisis levels of approximately 80 percent (according to worldsteel), resulted in robust growth in steel prices in 2010. The steel industry operates predominantly on a regional basis as a result of the high cost of transporting steel. However, despite the limitations associated with transportation costs, as well as the restrictive effects of protective tariffs, duties and quotas, levels of global imports and exports have generally increased in the last decade as production has shifted towards low-cost production regions such as Brazil, India and CIS, which includes Russia, Ukraine and other former Soviet states. While steel production has historically been concentrated in the EU, North America, Japan and the former Soviet Union, steel production in China and elsewhere in Asia has grown in importance over the past decade. In 2010, China was the largest single producer of steel in the world, producing 626.7 million tonnes of crude steel, as well as the largest consumer of steel, consuming approximately 557 million tonnes of finished steel. According to worldsteel, China’s steel production in 2010 increased by 9.3 percent from 2009, accounting for 44.3 percent of global steel production. This represents an decrease in the rate of growth from the 14.7 percent achieved in 2009, but represents a increase in growth from the 1.1 percent in 2008, 17.1 percent in 2007 and 18.9 percent in 2006. The value of the global steel market was estimated to be US$937.6 billion at the end of 2010, according to data from Visiongain. According to worldsteel, world crude steel output was 1,413.6 million tonnes in 2010, representing a increase of 15.3 percent compared to output in 2009. The four largest steel producers in the world in 2010 were China (producing 626.7 million tonnes), Japan (producing 109.6 million tonnes), the USA (producing 80.6 million tonnes) and Russia
113
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CS14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 37DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 47078
Industry
(producing 67.0 million tonnes). The following table sets forth estimated crude steel production data by country or region from 2007 to 2010:
World Crude Steel Production 2007 2008 2009 2010 (million tonnes) European Union (consisting of 27 countries) ...... 209.7 198.0 139.1 172.9 Other Europe ...... 30.6 31.8 28.8 33.1 CIS...... 124.2 114.3 97.4 108.4 US...... 98.1 91.4 58.2 80.6 North America (excluding the US) ...... 34.5 33.1 24.2 31.2 South America ...... 48.2 47.4 37.8 43.8 Middle East/Africa ...... 35.3 33.7 31.4 36.1 China ...... 494.9 500.3 573.6 626.7 Japan ...... 120.2 118.7 87.5 109.6 Asia (excluding China and Japan) ...... 147.4 152.0 121.0 144.9 India ...... 53.1 57.8 62.8 66.8 Brazil ...... 33.8 33.7 26.5 32.8 Oceania ...... 8.8 8.4 6.0 8.1 World total ...... 1,351.3 1,329.0 1,226.5 1,413.6 Annual change (percent) ...... 8.0 (1.7) (7.7) 15.3
Source: worldsteel While production in Europe, Japan and the United States remains significant, steel producers in those regions have increasingly focused on rolling and finishing of semi-finished products. The industry is currently seeing a shift in demand from ‘‘commodity steel’’ to ‘‘high value-added steel’’ or ‘‘specialised steel’’ in developed markets. The term ‘‘commodity steel’’ refers to low-grade steel used primarily for construction and in other basic structural components. Asian steel producers have emerged as the largest producers of commodity steel, as the majority of consumption of commodity steel is in Asian and other emerging markets. The terms ‘‘high value-added steel’’ or ‘‘specialised steel’’ refer to high-grade steel, typically produced with varying alloys to improve strength and/or durability. High value-added steel is used primarily by the automotive, aerospace and railway industries. Prices and margins for high value-added steel tend to be higher than for commodity steel due to the unique structural/chemical characteristics of high value-added steel which end users of high value added steel typically require. The following table sets forth estimated finished steel consumption data by country or region from 2007 to 2010.
World Finished Steel Consumption 2007 2008 2009 2010 (million tonnes) European Union (consisting of 27 countries) ...... 198.2 182.6 119.5 144.8 Other Europe ...... 23.0 20.8 23.9 29.6 CIS...... 56.6 50.0 36.1 48.5 US...... 108.0 97.5 59.2 80.1 NAFTA (excluding the US) ...... 32.5 31.6 23.7 30.2 South America ...... 41.6 44.3 33.6 45.8 Middle East/Africa ...... 66.2 68.3 69.1 71.2 China ...... 422.5 434.7 548.0 576.0 Japan ...... 81.2 78.0 52.9 63.8 Asia (excluding China and Japan) ...... 138.1 140.8 107.3 125.6 India ...... 49.5 52.6 55.3 60.6 Oceania ...... 8.4 8.5 5.5 7.4 World total ...... 1,220.8 1,201,9 1,134.1 1,283.6 Annual change (percent) ...... 6.8 (1.5) (6.2) 13.2
Source: worldsteel
114
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CS14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 830D*/2300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 23877
Industry
According to worldsteel, world finished steel consumption was 1,283.6 million tonnes in 2010, representing a increase of 13.2 percent compared to consumption in 2009. All major steel consuming countries demonstrated growth in steel consumption, including China, which achieved a 5.1 percent steel consumption growth rates in 2010 compared to 2009. Major traded steel products worldwide include semi-finished products, hot and cold-rolled sheets and coils, steel tubes and fittings, galvanised sheet, wire rod and angles and sections. The strategy and product mix of steel producers generally varies between producers in industrial countries and producers in emerging markets. Historically, commodity steel producers in industrialised countries had limited export markets due to the high cost of transporting steel relative to the low value of commodity steel grades. In the second half of the twentieth century, producers in emerging markets began to compete with steel producers in industrialised countries by taking advantage of the lower manufacturing costs in their countries to offset high transportation costs. In response, producers in Western Europe and Japan invested heavily in new technology and capacity to produce high value-added steel grades in order to differentiate their product portfolio and protect their margins by reducing their exposure to commodity steel prices. However, these similar and simultaneous investments resulted in production overcapacity and put pricing pressures on value-added segments. Recently, the growth and consolidation of both steel consumers and raw material suppliers has weakened the bargaining power of steel producers and put further pressure on their margins. Steel producers have responded with a phase of industry consolidation. In 2002, Usinor, Arbed and Aceralia in Europe merged to form Arcelor, and Kawasaki Steel and NKK in Japan merged to form JFE. In 2002, Nucor acquired the assets of Birmingham Steel and International Steel Group (ISG), acquired the assets of Acme, LTV and Bethlehem Steel in the United States. In 2004, Ispat International NV and LNM Holdings NV, which comprised the LNM Group, merged to form Mittal Steel, and in early 2005 Mittal Steel merged with ISG. The ArcelorMittal merger in 2006 reflects the desire of many steel companies to integrate and consolidate in order to maintain pricing power and margin stability through the business cycle. The steel industry remains one of the most fragmented industrial sectors and is widely affected by economic cycles. The Group’s management expects that further merger and acquisition activity will occur in the future, as industry players look to acquire greater influence over market pricing, thereby reducing their vulnerability to future declines in demand. Industries including automotive and aerospace are similarly affected by economic cycles and have sought to consolidate in order to minimise fluctuations in prices and margins throughout the cycle. The wave of consolidation has continued between 2006 and early 2011. In 2007, Indian steelmaker Tata Steel purchased a 100.0 percent stake in the Corus group. During the period from 2007 to the first half 2011 Russian steelmakers also closed a number of deals. OJSC Novolipetsk Steel (NLMK) acquired control over both Maxi-Group and VIZ Stal in Russia, Evraz Group SA (Evraz) acquired control over Claymont Steel and Oregon Steel in the United States, Mechel acquired Laminorul Braila metallurgical plant located in Romania and NLMK took over control of Steel Invest and Finance (SIF), its joint venture with Duferco Group. There is also an ongoing consolidation of the Chinese steel industry, led by Baosteel, Hebei Steel, Wuhan Steel and Shandong Steel Groups. In early 2011 Japanese companies Nippon Steel and Sumitomo announced their planned merger expected to be completed in late 2012, which will make them a global top-tier steel manufacturer. Consolidation has enabled steel companies to lower their production costs, has allowed for more stringent supply-side discipline, including through selective capacity closures, and has enabled some steel companies to maintain pricing power. Despite the recent consolidation, the global steel market remains highly fragmented. According to Metal Bulletin, in 2010, the five largest producers of crude steel—ArcelorMittal; Hebei I&S; Baosteel; Wuhan Steel; Nippon Steel—together accounted for approximately 18.4 percent of total worldwide steel production, with ArcelorMittal, the largest, accounting for 6.4 percent. The 20 largest steel producers accounted for approximately 41.6 percent of total global steel production in 2010.
115
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CS14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 40D*/290D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 9796
Industry
Competition The Group faces competition from a number of steel makers in the global steel industry. The following table sets forth some of the competitors of the Group in the global steel industry.
Competitors of the Group—Global Steel Industry Year ended 31 December Company 2010 (thousand tonnes) Estimated worldwide crude steel production ...... 1,413.6 Including: —ArcelorMittal (Luxemburg) ...... 90.5 —Hebei I&S (China) ...... 52.9 —Baosteel (China) ...... 44.5 —Wuhan (China) ...... 36.5 —Nippon Steel (Japan) ...... 36.1
Source: Metal Bulletin
Russian Steel Industry The Soviet Union produced approximately 160 million tonnes of crude steel a year at the end of the 1980s. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the steel industry suffered a substantial decline in production, to about 75 million tonnes of crude steel for all the newly independent states combined in 1997. At that point, Russia was producing approximately 38 million tonnes of rolled products annually. However, steel production started to recover following the devaluation of the Ruble in 1998, due in part to the significant cost benefits that steel exporters experienced in 1999 and 2000. While the major mills were export-oriented and their sales receipts were mostly US dollar-based, their operating costs fell substantially in US dollar terms following the devaluation. In addition, the strength of steel prices in 2000 led to increased capacity utilisation rates, even at technologically inferior mills. Though steel prices decreased in the second half of 2001 and the first half of 2002, beginning in the third quarter of 2002, the steel market demonstrated robust recovery in terms of both prices and volumes. According to worldsteel, in 2005, 2006 and 2007 production of crude steel grew approximately 0.8 percent, 7.1 percent, and 2.3 percent, respectively, compared to the previous year. Production of crude steel in 2008 decreased approximately 5.4 percent, the production of steel in 2009 decreased by approximately 12.4 percent, in response to the global economic downturn, the steel production in 2010 started to recover and climb by 11.7 percent. Privatisation of the Russian steel industry. Privatisation of the Russian steel industry began in 1993 and was primarily ‘‘insider’’ focused, meaning that factories were sold to their employees and management. The privatisation programme provided for Roskommetallurgiya (successor to the USSR Ministry of Metals) to supervise the privatisation process, but no special regime was implemented for the privatisation of the steel industry and, accordingly, the number of state-owned steel companies declined rapidly so that, by mid-1994, the state’s shareholding in iron and steel production companies amounted only to 15.0 to 25.0 percent By the end of 1995, control over most of the largest Russian steel producers such as the Group, OJSC Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Works (MMK), OAO Mechel (Mechel) and NLMK, was transferred to private management and ownership. However, because no plan for the privatisation of the steel industry was ever put in place, the state failed to attract the required investment, technology and know-how into this sector. Therefore, starting in 1995, the Russian Government changed the method of privatisation to attract strategic investors into the sector. Pursuant to an edict of President Yeltsin, a holding company, OAO Rossiyskaya Metallurgiya, was established, to which 10.0 percent stakes in steel producing companies remaining in state ownership and 100.0 percent stakes in five leading steel production scientific research institutes were transferred. The Russian Government intended to sell 49.0 percent of shares in OAO Rossiyskaya Metallurgiya, thus retaining control over the companies and attracting investments at the same time. However, investors did not show any interest in the project and OAO Rossiyskaya Metallurgiya was liquidated in 1997. Stakes in several companies were sold in cash auctions. Stakes in the remaining companies were retransferred into the ownership of the Ministry of Property Relations.
116
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CS14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 410D*/430D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 20343
Industry
The Russian steel industry is now consolidated among six large producers including the Group, Evraz, NLMK, MMK, Metalloinvest and Mechel. These producers largely control the domestic Russian market. Russian steel production. In 2010, Russia ranked as the world’s fourth largest producer of crude steel, producing 67.0 million tonnes of steel, or approximately 4.7 percent of global production, according to worldsteel. The metals and mining sector is one of the most important sectors of the Russian economy. Russian enterprises produce a wide range of metal products for the domestic economy, in particular for the oil and gas, defence and construction industries. Russian market. Russian steel production decreased from 1991 to 1998 as a result of the general economic decline in Russia during this period and the consequent reduced demand from the primary steel product consumers: the construction, infrastructure and engineering industries and the military sector. Consumption of rolled steel products in Russia has followed a U-shaped trend since 1990. Consumption was 65 million tonnes in 1990 and then declined steadily, due to reduced consumption by heavy industry, to only 18 million tonnes in 1998. However, the devaluation of the Ruble in 1998 resulted in economic growth and a sharp increase in domestic demand for steel products, and by 2007, Russia’s total steel consumption had increased to 40.4 million tonnes, decreasing in 2009 to 24.7 million tonnes, according to worldsteel. In 2010 steel consumption in Russia has soared by 37.6 percent to 34.0 million tonnes, according Russian steel statistics. Export market. Asia, the Middle East and the EU are the primary export destinations for Russian steel producers. In 2010, Russian producers exported 28.0 million tonnes of semi-finished and finished steel products, according to the Federal Customs Service.
Steel Production Process The key stages of the steel production process are coke making, iron making, steelmaking and steel rolling. Steel companies actively seek captive iron ore and coking coal resources to ensure a secure supply of raw materials for their steel production. The following is a brief summary of these processes: Coke making. Coke is a solid product of coal coking. Coke usually contains 84.0 to 91.0 percent carbon and is used as the main fuel in blast furnaces. Coke is produced by heating the prepared coal charge in the absence of oxygen at temperatures of 900 to 1,200 C (pyrolysis) for 14 to 18 hours in the coke ovens. After discharge from the ovens, coke is delivered to the blast furnaces for further use in iron making. Other products of the traditional by-product coking process include coke-oven gas and various by-products separated from the coke-oven gas. Coke-oven gas may be used as gaseous fuel in coking and other shops of the steel plant, as well as in adjacent power generation. The other by-products are further processed by the designated on-site shops and eventually sold to the third-party customers. Iron making. Prepared iron ore raw materials (sinter and pellets) and coke are used for hot metal production. Coke and natural gas serve as fuel for the blast furnaces. Coke-oven gas, together with top gas from the blast furnaces, is used as fuel for the heating of the stoves. Sinter, pellets and coke are layered and fed into a blast furnace from the top. Fuel combustion, reduction of iron from oxides, carbonisation of iron with partial reduction of silicon and manganese, melting of all components of burden and slag-making all occur inside a blast furnace. Once formed, hot metal sinks to the bottom of the blast furnace where it is tapped off into the torpedo cars and delivered to the steel making shop to be converted into steel. Hot metal can also be delivered to a pig iron casting machine that produces pig iron for sale as a semi-finished product. Slag from the blast furnaces is recycled and further used in a variety of industries. At many steel plants, top gas generated in the blast furnaces during the iron making process is also used as a fuel for stoves, coke ovens, boilers, rolling mills and other purposes. Steel making. Steel is produced from hot metal and/or steel scrap and scrap substitutes using one of the following three technologies.
117
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CS14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 10D*/520D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 45823
Industry
Basic oxygen furnace (BOF). The oxygen converter process is based on the interaction of process oxygen (practically pure oxygen) with the molten charge bath. By blowing oxygen through the bath, the carbon content is reduced and the charge is transformed into low-carbon steel. Scrap and hot metal are charged into the vessel and oxygen is then blown via a lance into the vessel, oxidising carbon and other impurities (silicon, manganese, etc.), thus lowering the carbon content of the molten charge and partially removing undesired chemical elements. Fluxes, such as burnt lime and dolomite, are fed into the vessel to form slag, which absorbs undesired impurities during the steel making process. The steel is then poured into a steel ladle where alloying materials can be added. The oxygen converter process is generally considered to be the most efficient steelmaking route for producing large volumes of high-quality steel. Electric arc furnace process (EAF). In electric arc furnaces the scrap and other charge elements are being melt by the heat generated by electricity arcing between graphite electrodes and the metallic charge. The key equipment components of the EAF are: a furnace shell, a retractable roof, a graphite electrode arm, a tilting device and a furnace transformer. The EAF production process consists of charging, melting, oxidation and tapping. The EAF charge consists of scrap and scrap substitutes, such as DRI/HBI or pig iron, and sometimes hot metal, as well as fluxes. In some furnace designs, charge materials can be added in batches or continuously fed during the melting process. Once the melting stage is completed, the steel is tapped out into a preheated ladle. Some liquid steel is often left in the furnace to facilitate the melting of the next charge. Open hearth process. In the open hearth process the steel is produced by melting scrap, hot metal and other charge components by the radiation heat of the burners positioned above the charge materials surface. Scrap and other components are charged into the furnace prior to heating. Fuel (such as natural gas, fuel oil, etc.) is burned to heat the scrap, hot metal is charged and slag is formed and flushed. During melting, the oxidation of carbon and other impurities (such as silicon and manganese) takes place. Fluxes, such as metallurgical lime and other, are used to form slag, which absorbs impurities during the steel making process. Generally speaking, open hearth furnaces are disadvantaged by relatively high operating costs due to high levels of energy consumption, relatively low productivity, as well as prevailing combination with the ingot cast route. At the same time, open hearth allows higher flexibility in the raw materials use and under certain circumstances may be economically compatible with both EAF and BOF. The tendency of the world steel making industry has been gradual substitution of the open hearth production with either BOF or EAF routes. Steel rolling. Cast steel is a relatively weak mass of coarse uneven metal crystals or ‘‘grains’’. Rolling the steel makes this coarse grain structure re-crystallise into a much finer grain structure, giving greater toughness, shock resistance and tensile (stress) strength. Rolling is also the main method used to shape steel into different products. Flat rolling process consists of passing the steel between two rolls revolving at the same speed but in opposite directions. The gap between the rolls is less than the thickness of the steel being rolled, resulting in the steel being reduced in thickness, at the same time, lengthened. In addition to hot rolling, where steel is reheated prior to rolling, it may also be further reduced without preheating in the process called cold rolling, resulting in a different set of properties.
MINING INDUSTRY Iron Ore The global iron ore industry is characterised by a high degree of consolidation, with BHP Billiton, Vale, and Rio Tinto accounting for approximately 60.0 percent of the global seaborne iron ore trade. The major iron ore producing countries are Australia, Brazil and China. India is another large producer which has rapidly increased its role in the global iron ore market, with an 80.0 percent increase in iron ore output from 2005 to 2010.
118
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CS14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 225D*/290D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 53321
Industry
Industry The dominance of the major producers in the market has led to significant changes recently. 2008 was a particularly strong year in terms of pricing, with iron ore spot prices rising well above the established annual contract prices. This led to losses in potential profits of the major iron ore producers, as they sold iron ore based on annual contracts. In response to this, in the second quarter of 2010, major producers introduced a new quarterly pricing mechanism based on the spot price over the previous three months. The following table sets forth iron ore production by country or region from 2007 to 2010:
Iron ore production 2007 2008 2009 2010 (million tonnes) China ...... 682.5 824.0 880.2 979.0 Brazil ...... 336.5 346.0 299.8 355.0 Australia ...... 299.1 349.8 393.9 437.5 CIS...... 202.1 190.4 176.4 189.9 India ...... 206.9 223.0 257.4 263.8 US...... 52.4 53.6 26.5 39.6 South Africa ...... 41.6 49.0 55.4 55.0 European Union (consisting of 27 countries) ...... 27.6 26.5 19.8 23.9 Other Europe ...... 6.7 7.5 7.5 7.4 South America (excluding Brazil) ...... 37.3 38.3 31.4 37.6 North America (excluding US) ...... 42.4 45.2 44.2 41.1 World Total ...... 1,992.8 2,223.5 2,267.6 2492.0 Annual Change (percent) ...... 9.8 11.6 2.0 9.9
Source: AME Historically, Europe, Japan and China have been the major iron ore consumption centers. Following an economic slowdown in 2001 and corresponding reduction in iron ore demand, markets rebounded in 2002, with China and certain countries in the CIS showing significant increases in demand in connection with increases in steel production in these countries. Since that time, global consumption of steel, and thus of iron ore, has significantly increased. China has experienced the highest growth in steel consumption, with an increase in demand of more than 66.0 percent from 347.5 million tonnes in 2005 to 577.0 million tonnes in 2010. The major exporting countries of iron ore globally include Australia, Brazil and India, and the major importers are major steel producing countries: China, Japan, South Korea and Germany. Russian market. According to worldsteel, total iron ore production in Russia in 2010 was approximately 99.5 million tonnes. Total iron ore exports were approximately 27.6 million tonnes, and total imports were approximately 9.7 million tonnes. Imports to Russia are generally limited by high transportation costs and the lack of port facilities in the Far East and on the Black Sea that are capable of handling large sizes of ore carrying vessels. Russian steel producers have increasingly sought to acquire control of iron ore production assets, and attained control over nearly all of the major Russian producers of iron ore by the end of 2004. For example, in 2003 Mechel acquired control over Korshunovksy GOK (KGOK), during 2004, Evraz acquired control over KGOK, NLMK acquired control over Stoilensky GOK, and Ural Steel acquired control over Mikhailovsky GOK. Production of iron ore in Russia is concentrated in the Kursk region, representing the majority of Russian production, as well as in the northwest, Urals and Siberian districts. Iron ore produced in Russia is mainly magnetite, not hematite, which is common in Australia and Brazil. Production process. Approximately 90.0 percent of iron ore mined in Russia is extracted by open-pit methods, with the balance extracted from underground mines. After extraction, the ore is processed further in order to increase its iron concentration. The iron ore is then crushed to a powder-like consistency, and iron-rich particles are separated from the waste rock by magnetic separation to produce iron ore concentrate. This concentrate is then formed into pellets or sinter that are suitable for use as blast furnace feed.
119
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CS14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 36DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 25824
Industry
To produce sinter, iron ore pellets and concentrates and iron-bearing materials (blast furnace dust, screenings of sinter and pellets, scale, waste and slime), flux (limestone) and coke breeze are weighed and mixed to form sinter burden. This sinter burden is then granulated and laid in two layers in sinter machines. The sinter burden becomes sinter at temperatures of 1,070–1,200 C through the combustion of carbon from the coke breeze, while air is simultaneously drawn through the sinter burden by means of exhausters. After crushing, screening and cooling the sinter is ready for delivery to blast furnaces. In producing iron ore pellets, iron ore concentrate is mixed with water and other additives, such as hentonite and limestone. The resulting slurry is baked at approximately 1,300 C. After the pellets have been screened and undersized material removed, they are prepared for use in blast furnaces.
Coal Coal may be divided into steam (thermal) coal and coking (metallurgical) coal. Steam coal is used in electricity generation and industrial applications, while coking coal is used to manufacture coke for use in blast furnaces and other metallurgical applications. Coking coal swells when heated in coke ovens to produce hard coke, which characteristic is essential in steel making operations. Approximately 400–500 kilograms of coke is used per tonne of hot metal. Coke is supplemented by the direct injection of PCI at rates of 100 to 200 kilograms per tonne of hot metal. PCI uses less expensive semi-soft coking coal to reduce costs. In recent years, the global coal industry has consolidated, partly as a result of oil companies and other non-mining companies exiting the sector. As a result of consolidation, coal suppliers have gained more pricing power. Historically, Australia, China, Indonesia and South Africa have been the largest coal-producing countries, with Russia increasing its share of world supply in recent years. Russian market. Russia has the world’s second largest coal reserves after the United States, according to AME. Its proven coal reserves total approximately 157 billion tonnes, accounting for 19.0 percent of the world’s proven coal reserves. In 2010, Russia exported 16.0 million tonnes of coal, according to AME. Approximately 68.0 percent of Russia’s coking coal production capacity was owned by or affiliated with Russian steel producers in 2010, according to Metal Expert. Coal production in Russia is concentrated in the Kuznetsk Basin and the Kansko-Achinskii Basin, which are east of the Ural Mountains, and Pechorskii Basin, which is northeast of European Russia, and collectively account for the majority of Russia’s total coal production. There was a consolidation boom in Russian coal industry in 2005–2007, as Evraz acquired a 50.0 percent stake in Yuzhkuzbassugol (owner and operator of coal mines in Novokuznetsk, Russia), Mechel acquired a 100.0 percent stake in Yakutugol (owner and operator of coal deposits in Sakha Republic of Russia) and the Group consolidated Severstal Resources, which included the significant coal mining operations of Vorkutaugol and, at that time, Kuzbassugol. Producers. The following table presents the largest Russian coking coal producers in 2010:
Share in total Company Production production (million (percent) tonnes) Mechel ...... 9.3 17.1 Evraz ...... 8.0 14.7 Sibuglemet ...... 6.2 11.4 Raspadskaya ...... 5.3 9.6 Severstal ...... 5.2 9.6 Kuzbassrazrezugol ...... 2.6 4.8 SUEK...... 2.3 4.2 Belon ...... 3.8 6.9 SDS-Holdinh ...... 2.0 3.7 PMH...... 1.9 3.6 Others ...... 7.9 14.4 Totals ...... 54.5 100.0
Source: RASMIN
120
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CU14501A.;9 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 13488
Industry
Production process. Approximately two-thirds of the coal mined in Russia is extracted by open pit methods, with the balance extracted from underground mining. At surface mines, a combination of shovels and draglines is used for moving coal and overburden after drilling and blasting. Production at underground mines in Russia is predominantly from long-wall mining. After mining, depending upon the amount of impurities in the coal, the coal is processed in a wash plant, where it is crushed and beneficiated. Coking coal is then transported to steel plants for conversion to coke for use in steel making. Steam coal is shipped to utilities that use it in boilers to generate steam used in producing electricity.
Russian Methodologies for Reserve and Resource Reporting Severstal Resources has traditionally used Russia’s long-established system of reserve and resource reporting, set forth by the Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources. In 2005, Severstal Resources began voluntarily using the internationally recognised JORC code of reserves and resource reporting, see ‘‘—International Reporting Methodologies’’. All data relating to Severstal Resources’ iron ore and coal reserves and resources summarised in this Prospectus is calculated by reference to estimates contained in a report issued by IMC Consulting Limited dated June 2006 (adjusted for actual production since January 2006, and as further adjusted for the disposal of Kuzbassugol in April 2008), which was prepared in accordance with JORC reporting standards except Severstal Resources’ expected reserves extension based on adjacent reserves acquisition. Reserves and resource estimations for the Severstal Resources’ PBS Coals operations and the Putu Range iron ore project have been developed under the guidelines of National Instrument 43-101, which is standard of public disclosure of information relating to mineral properties in Canada and essentially similar to Australasian JORC standard. Reports for the PBS Coals and Putu Range project have been prepared by John T. Boyd Company and SRK Consulting, respectively. The primary difference between Russian and international methodologies is that Russian methodologies rely on ‘‘geometrical’’ methods to determine reserves, as compared to international methodologies, which utilize sampling and extrapolation techniques. According to the Russian system, deposits are classified into one of four classes, based on the complexity of their geological structure. This classification may take into account quantitative results measuring the inconsistencies in the basic features of mineralization. This initial classification is intended to identify those resources warranting further study. Depending on the extent of further exploration, mineral resources are subsequently divided into ‘‘explored’’ and ‘‘evaluated’’ deposits. Explored deposits have been sufficiently explored to proceed with a feasibility study relating to commercial development, and evaluated deposits have been explored to the extent necessary to determine whether continued exploration is warranted. Resources that do not meet the standards for explored or evaluated deposits are classified as projected resources. Explored and evaluated deposits are further classified based on the type, quantity and quality of the measurements taken to evaluate the reserves. Category A reserves include only explored deposits, and must meet the following criteria: • the sizes, forms and bedding conditions of the mineral body have been determined; the nature and regularities in their morphology and internal fabric have been studied; the barren and off-grade segments within the mineral bodies have been detected and mapped; and the locations and fault amplitudes of dislocations with a break have been identified; • the natural varieties of the minerals within the body have been determined; its categories and grades have been identified and mapped; its compositions and properties have been verified; and the quality of all categories and grades of the identified minerals have been characterized in terms of all parameters stipulated by industrial regulations; • the distribution and forms of those valuable and noxious components found in the mineral body and products of its processing have been investigated; and • the mineral reserves have been mapped based on test wells, mine workings and detailed trial runs. Category B reserves include only explored deposits. Category B reserves have been subject to a high level of investigation, though their boundaries have been determined with less accuracy than Category A reserves. Category B reserves meet the criteria established for Category A reserves, except that Category B reserves may contain a limited extrapolation zone that is substantiated on the basis of geological criteria and geophysical and geochemical research.
121
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CU14501A.;9 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CU14501A.;9 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 36276
Industry
Category C1 reserves are characterised by a lower level of accuracy than the determination of Category B reserves. Most explored deposits are Category C1 reserves. Category C1 reserves meet the criteria established for Category B, except that additional extrapolation is permitted in mapping the mineral deposit. Category C2 reserves consist of evaluated deposits. Category C2 reserves must meet the criteria established for Category C1, except that: • the sizes, forms, internal fabric and bedding conditions of the mineral body are confirmed by means of only a limited number of test wells and core samples; and • the boundaries of the deposit (including core samples and outcroppings) are mapped based on data gathered from only a limited number of test wells, and a geologically substantiated extrapolation of deposit parameters is permitted. Resources that do not meet the standards for classification as A, B, C1 or C2 reserves may be classified as probable resources, in Category P1, P2 or P3. Such deposits have undergone some exploration, but require further geological work in order to be upgraded to A, B, C1 or C2 reserves. While a direct comparison between international and Russian reporting methodologies is difficult because each is founded on different principles, it is often the case that categories A and B Russian reserves correlate to proved reserves, and C1 Russian reserves to probable reserves. However, these relationships may vary among deposits, and at different times for the same deposits.
International Reporting Methodologies Several codes exist for reporting reserves in the international mining industry. The technical differences between these codes are minor, and results are generally comparable regardless of which methodology is employed in assessing a particular deposit. The principal reporting codes in current use are: • United States Geologic Survey Circular 831 (United States); • Ontario Securities Commission Instrument 43-101 (Canada); • Australasian Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Code (Australia); • Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining Reporting Code (United Kingdom and Ireland); and • South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Reporting Code (South Africa). Each of these codes recognises the difference between mineral resources and reserves. Conversion from a mineral resource to an ore reserve requires the application of ‘‘modifying factors’’, including mining, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors. A ‘‘resource’’ is geologically defined; it becomes a ‘‘reserve’’ when the modifying factors, especially technical and economic factors, are taken into account. Each of these codes also includes strict guidelines for data quality and reporting in mining commodities. The Council of Mining and Metallurgical Institutions (CMMI), which includes representatives of the major international standard-setting organisations, is currently working to establish a common international reporting code standard. CMMI has promulgated common definitions that have been adopted by each of its member organisations in their respective reporting codes, including the principal reporting codes noted above, and these definitions are also incorporated into reporting standards that have been adopted by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. A mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of material of intrinsic economic interest in or on the earth’s crust, or deposit, in such a form, quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. Mineral resources are subdivided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into inferred, indicated and measured categories. Portions of a deposit that do not have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction are not included as mineral resources. An inferred mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which tonnage, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a low level of confidence. It is inferred from geological evidence and
122
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CU14501A.;9 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]CU14501A.;9 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 3950DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55665
Industry
assumed but not verified geological and/or grade continuity, and based on information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes which is limited or of uncertain quality and/or reliability. An indicated mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a reasonable level of confidence. It is based on exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings, and drill holes. The locations are too widely or inappropriately spaced to confirm geological continuity and/or grade continuity, but are spaced closely enough for continuity to be assumed. A measured mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a high level of confidence. It is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings, and drill holes. The locations are spaced closely enough to confirm geological and/or grade continuity. Ore reserves are the economically mineable parts of an indicated or measured mineral resource. Ore reserves take account of diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined. Appropriate assessments, which may include feasibility studies, have been carried out on the deposit and include consideration of and modification by realistically assumed mining, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors. These assessments establish that at the time of reporting extraction is reasonably justified. A probable ore reserve is the economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some circumstances, a measured mineral resource.
123
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CU14501A.;9 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DA14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 160D*/320D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 61132
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW OF THE GROUP The Group is an international, vertically integrated steel and mining company that sells high quality metal and mining products to customers across the world. According to Metal Bulletin, the Group was the world’s twenty-first largest producer of crude steel in 2010 by volume of production (as adjusted for the disposal of the group’s Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren and Severstal Wheeling assets). The Group is a full production cycle operation which includes iron ore, coal, scrap collection, steel mills and rolled product plants, downstream production and distribution businesses, as well as gold mining enterprises. The Group’s primary production facilities are geographically diversified with locations in Russia, the United States and a number of other countries, including Kazakhstan, Burkina Faso and Guinea. With a focus on high value added products in attractive niche markets, the Group’s corporate strategy is to become one of the global industry leaders in terms of EBITDA and to sustain a leading position in terms of both margins and return on investment as a vertically-integrated steel and steel-related mining company. The Group comprises three business divisions: Russian Steel Division, Severstal International (North America operations) and Severstal Resources (including Nordgold). Russian Steel Division. In 2010, the Russian Steel Division produced approximately 16.6 percent of total Russian crude steel production, based on data from worldsteel, which accounted for 63.9 percent of the Group’s total revenues. According to calculations by the Group’s management based on publicly released data, the Russian Steel Division was the third largest producer of crude steel products in Russia by volume of production in 2010. The Russian Steel Division is comprised of the following: steel products production, pipes production, metalware production, scrap collection and processing and trading and service companies. • The production of steel products occurs primarily at the Cherepovets Steel Mill, including a number of its workshops, among which there are high-grade automotive galvanising facilities at Severgal and Rolling Mill 5000, as well as a number of other facilities located primary in northwestern region of Russia. These facilities jointly constitute the full production cycle, from the creation of crude steel to production of high value added products, such as electric welded pipes for construction or coated flat products for the automotive industry. The Russian Steel Division produced 11.1 million tonnes of crude steel in 2010 and achieved total steelmaking capacity of approximately 100 percent. • Pipes production is carried out at the Izhora Pipe Mill, a large diameter pipe mill. With an achieved total pipemaking capacity of 480 thousand tonnes as at 31 December 2010, the Izhora Pipe Mill produced 460 thousand tonnes in 2010. • Metalware production consists of Severstal-Metiz’s wire drawing and metalware manufacturing businesses in Russia, Ukraine and Italy, with total sales of 786 thousand tonnes in 2010. According to calculations by the Group’s management based on publicly available data, the Group’s metalware market share represented approximately 23 percent of domestic Russian total sales volume and approximately 16 percent of Ukrainian metalware total sales volume, respectively, in 2010. • Scrap collection and processing is a ferrous scrap metal recycling business, which supplies scrap metal to Cherepovets Steel Mill and other companies. It consists of companies located in several Russian regions. • Trading and service companies comprise trading companies both in the Russian Federation and abroad. The main purpose of the service companies is to service and maintain the production processes of the Cherepovets Steel Mill by providing equipment repairing services. Severstal International. Severstal International is currently comprised of Severstal North America, see ‘‘—Severstal International—Discontinued Operations—Lucchini and North America disposal groups’’. • Severstal North America is comprised of Severstal Dearborn, Severstal Columbus and holding companies—Severstal US Holdings LLC, Severstal US Holdings II, LLC (formerly known as Severstal Wheeling Holding Company) and Severstal Columbus Holdings LLC. According to the Group’s estimates, these companies comprised the sixth largest steelmaking company in the United States in 2010. Severstal North America produces high quality, flat-rolled products and has 3.6 million tonnes of annual crude steel making capacity (5.2 million tonnes following the increased slab capacity at Severstal Columbus in June 2011).
124
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DA14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DA14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 2750D /3990D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 2861
Business
Severstal Resources. Severstal Resources comprises the following: iron ore production, coal production and gold production, as well as a smaller ferroniobium production complex. • The Group’s iron ore business is comprised of two iron ore extracting complexes: Karelsky Okatysh, which produces iron ore pellets, and Olkon, which produces iron ore concentrate. The Group’s iron ore business is also focused on three iron ore projects: the Group’s investment in the Putu Range project in south-eastern Liberia, for which the Group has signed a Mineral Development Agreement with the Government of Liberia; the Group’s investment in Core Mining, which controls exploration licenses for the Avima iron ore deposit in the Republic of Congo and the Kango iron ore deposit in the Republic of Gabon; and the Group’s investment in a project in the Brazilian city of Macapa, SPG, which owns a number of high potential iron ore licenses in the area of Tartarugalzinho, Amapa state, jointly named as the ‘‘Tartarugal project’’. • The Group’s coal business comprises Vorkutaugol, PBS Coals and Tsentralny field. Vorkutaugol comprises five longwall mines, an open pit mine and three washing plants. It extracts both coking and steam coal, and is located in northern Russia. PBS Coals operates open mines and deep room and pillar mines in the United States. It extracts coking and steam coal, and produces coking coal concentrate. Tsentralny field is a greenfield project located in the Tyva Republic. • The Group’s gold business comprises the Group’s gold mining assets recently consolidated under Nordgold, Severstal’s gold mining subsidiary. Nordgold includes eight operating mines, two development projects, five advanced exploration projects and a broad portfolio of early exploration projects and licensees located across West Africa in Guinea and Burkina Faso, Kazakhstan and Russia. The Company continues to consider its plans with respect to Nordgold, including a possible initial public offering or demerger. Severstal Resources was the largest producer of hard coking coal and the second largest producer of iron ore pellets in Russia in 2010, according to Rasmin and Rudprom. With the capacity to supply almost all of the current iron ore and a substantial majority of the hard coking coal needs of the Russian Steel Division, Severstal Resources forms the basis of the Group’s balanced and vertically-integrated business model. With a focus on high value-added products, such as export quality iron ore pellets and hard coking coal concentrate, Severstal Resources had a total iron ore output of 43.2 million tonnes of iron ore and ROM output of 16.6 million tonnes of coal in 2010. Severstal Resources estimates that, as at 31 December 2010, it had iron ore reserves and resources of approximately 589 million tonnes and 3,924 million tonnes, respectively, and coal reserves and resources of approximately 322 million tonnes and 219 million tonnes, respectively.
125
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DA14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DA14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 15686
Business
Severstal
Severstal Russian Steel Severstal Resources Severstal International
Severstal North America: Steel products production Iron ore production Steel products production
Pipes production Coal production
Metalware production Gold production
Scrap collection and processing
Trading and service 30JUN201101443217 The Group originally consisted of its core Russian steelmaking business, which was state-owned until its privatisation in 1993. Since that time, the Group has expanded by identifying attractive acquisition opportunities and by consolidating all of the steel and mining assets of the Group’s Majority Shareholder into its business. In addition to acquiring numerous production facilities in Russia in 2004, the Group acquired substantially all of the principal steelmaking and finishing assets of US steel producer Rouge Steel Company (Rouge Steel), subsequently renamed Severstal Dearborn. In June 2006, the Group acquired controlling interests in Karelsky Okatysh, Olkon, Vorkutaugol, OAO Mine Pervomaiskaya and OAO Mine Berezovskaya, the last two of which were disposed of in the second quarter of 2008. In October 2006, the Group acquired a controlling interest in European steel producer Lucchini, increasing its interest to 100.0 percent in March of 2010 before selling 50.8 percent of its interest in June 2010 to the Group’s Majority Shareholder. See ‘‘—Severstal International—Discontinued Operations—Lucchini and North America disposal groups’’. In 2007, the Group purchased Neryungri—Metallic, ZAO Rudnik Aprelkovo (Aprelkovo) and Celtic gold mining operations in Russia, as well as gold mining licences in Russia. In January 2008, the Group completed the acquisition of Celtic. In August 2008, the Group acquired Semgeo. In November 2008, the Group acquired a 53.8 percent stake in High River Gold and increased its stake to 72.6 percent through a series of transactions in 2010. In January 2008, the Group acquired a controlling interest in Severstal Columbus, a steel mill in Columbus, Mississippi. In May 2008, the Group acquired ArcelorMittal’s Sparrows Point facility, subsequently renamed Severstal Sparrows Point LLC. In July 2008, the Group acquired WCI Steel Inc. (WCI) (renamed Severstal Warren). In August 2008, the Group acquired all of the steel production assets
126
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DA14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DA14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 410D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 44446
Business
of Esmark Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of flat-rolled and other steel products in the United States. These assets included Severstal Wheeling, as well as a number of steel servicing companies that have since been divested. In March 2011, the Group sold its 100.0 percent stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC. See ‘‘—Severstal International—Discontinued Operations—Lucchini and North America disposal groups’’. In 2009, the Group consolidated all of its gold mining assets under Nordgold. In 2010, the Group acquired a 93.4 percent stake in Crew Gold and brought its stake to 100.0 percent in 2011. In 2010 the Group obtained a licence for further exploration and coal extraction at the Tsentralny field, and signed an MOU to establish a 50:50 joint venture with NMDC, the leading iron ore producer in India, with the objective of building an integrated steel plant in India. Additionally, in 2011 the Group acquired a 25.0 percent stake in SPG, a private iron ore mining and exploration company headquartered in Macapa City. For more information, see ‘‘—History and Development of the Group’’ and ‘‘—Recent Developments’’.
COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS The Group has developed a variety of competitive strengths, which it believes provide it with a greater resilience to the cyclical nature of the steel industry than some of its competitors and a basis on which to build its position as a global metals and mining company.
Vertically-Integrated Business with Access to Iron Ore, Coal and Scrap The Group is a vertically-integrated steel producer operating on a global scale. Its facilities span the full production cycle from iron ore and coal mining operations to steel mills and rolled-product plants as well as downstream production and distribution businesses. Its mining operations, conducted by Severstal Resources, provide supplies of iron ore and coal to its production facilities in Russia and to a lesser extent in the United States and also have the capacity to supply iron ore and coal to third-parties, which they do. The Group has its own scrap collection and processing facilities. Severstal Resources was the largest producer of hard coking coal and the second largest producer of iron ore pellets in Russia in 2010, according to Rasmin and Rudprom. The Russian Steel Division’s operations with respect to iron ore and coal are economically fully self-sufficient, as Severstal Resources’ overall production volumes are able to cover in full the overall consumption volumes of the Russian Steel Division, without taking into account the chemical features of the particular coal and iron ore mix required. However, the Russian Steel Division does source a portion of its iron ore and coal requirements from third party suppliers primarily due to its requirements for materials with different chemical features and to take advantage of beneficial prevailing prices. Severstal Resources’ deposits have technical characteristics enabling it to produce a relatively wide range of products for customers in the metallurgical industries, in addition to the Group’s steel operations. Its reserves of iron ore and coal are significant, with estimated mine lives exceeding several decades. The Group considers mining to be one of its core businesses. Currently, the Group’s North American business units are economically fully self-sufficient in coking coal, and it sources iron ore and other raw materials from domestic suppliers under a variety of arrangements aimed at ensuring a reliable long-term supply of raw materials at competitive prices. This includes a long-term contract with Cliffs Natural Resources for the supply of iron ore to Severstal Dearborn until 2022. Severstal North America also indirectly sources approximately 25.0 percent of its coal needs from its sister company PBS Coals, located in Somerset, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Severstal Dearborn has long-term contracts in place for approximately half of its coking coal and it owns 50.0 percent of MSC, one of the largest coking plants in North America to support blast furnace operations. The balance of Severstal North America’s requirements is purchased on the spot markets. The vertically-integrated nature of the Group enables it to secure raw material supplies for its operations while reducing the Group’s exposure to raw material price fluctuations, resulting in increased efficiencies.
127
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DA14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DA14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 49D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 42316
Business
Global Cost Competitiveness Globally, Russia is one of the lowest cost regions for steel production in the world. With its largest production facilities located in northwest Russia, the Group benefits from relatively low-cost supplies of electricity and natural gas, as well as low transportation fees, given the proximity of its production facilities to producers of raw materials in that region, major steel-consuming markets in the central European part of Russia and the ports of the St. Petersburg region. In addition to these cost advantages, as one of the largest producers of steel in Russia, the Group benefits from economies of scale in production and negotiating power with its suppliers, including third-party suppliers of raw materials. This cost competitiveness is particularly valuable in granting the Group flexibility to shift its sales focus between the Russian domestic market and the export market depending on relative demand for steel and mining products domestically and globally. In order to maintain its cost competitiveness, the Group has made and continues investments to upgrade its facilities in the pursuit of increased productivity and energy efficiency. For example, in 2010, the Group’s largest steel production facility, located in Cherepovets, was estimated to be approximately 51.4 percent self-sufficient in terms of its own generation and consumption of electricity. See ‘‘—Strategy— Pursue Lower-Cost Steel Production’’.
Geographically Diversified Business with a Broad Range of Products The Group’s production facilities are geographically diversified, with locations in Russia, the United States and a number of other countries, including Kazakhstan, Burkina Faso and Guinea. The majority of the Group’s key steel and mining assets are located within Russia. The Group also continues to develop its mining businesses in low-cost regions such as Kazakhstan and regions in Africa. The Group’s largest steel production facility, located in Cherepovets in northwest Russia, provides it with the ability to access the Russian, CIS and Eastern European steel markets. Furthermore, the Group believes that, as a result of its presence in the United States, it benefits from greater access to the technologically advanced North American markets, which assists the Group in understanding the needs of its customer base and in tailoring its products accordingly. The global diversified nature of the Group has also enabled it to benefit from the sharing of industry know-how and best practices across business divisions. Extensive experience in mining operations in various regions aids the Group’s strategy to pursue further expansion of its mining operations internationally through a combination of M&A and greenfield investments.
Investment in Modernisation and Advanced Technological Processes The Group has made significant investments into modernisation programmes at its main steel production facilities and mining facilities in Russia, as well as its facilities in the United States and Africa, aimed at expanding production and achieving operational efficiencies. In 2009 and 2010, the Group’s capital expenditure at its three business divisions amounted to approximately US$806.8 million and US$1,310.3 million, respectively, excluding the Group’s discontinued operations of Lucchini, Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC. As a result, the majority of the Group’s capital assets are currently in good condition and do not require significant investments in the near-term. Depending on prevailing market conditions, the Group intends to invest approximately an additional US$9,728.8 million excluding maintenance capital expenditures, during the period from 2011 to 2015 as part of its continuing capital expenditure programme, with current investment priorities focused on facilitating the expansion of the Group’s mining businesses in Russia, Africa and the United States, and expanding the Group’s share of the Russian domestic steel products market, aided by the Balakovo project and new galvanising and colour coating lines. The capital expenditure programme includes investments in the Severstal Dearborn facility, where the completion of a new PLTCM is expected to result in a reduction in costs and improvements in energy efficiency, while also upgrading product quality and yields. The completion of Severstal Dearborn’s HDG line is expected to allow Severstal Dearborn to provide additional automotive quality products at competitive costs. Investments in the Phase II expansion at Severstal Columbus are expected to double its production capacity in 2011, reduce costs and increase the facility’s ability to produce value added products. Ongoing investments in upgrading facilities, customer care projects and research and development efforts are expected to help the Group maintain a leading position in the Russian high-quality value-added steel sector. The Group specialises in producing advanced steel grades for the oil and gas, shipbuilding and
128
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DA14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DA14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 90D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 21949
Business
automotive industries in Russia. The Group has also sought to adopt new technological processes when operationally convenient to do so, such as the introduction of PCI technology into blast furnace ‘‘C’’ at the Severstal Dearborn facility in connection with the rebuilding of that blast furnace in 2007. In addition, aggregate annual capital expenditure on maintenance for the Group is expected to be approximately US$777.0 million in 2011 and expected to gradually increase to approximately US$890.0 million in 2015 (provided that the Group undertakes the expansion projects contemplated by the current business plan and subject to then-prevailing market conditions). As a result, the Group believes that its modern production facilities and consistent investment programmes position it well within the high value-added and niche steel product markets, in addition to its other steel and metalware products.
Experienced Management Team The Group’s senior management team combines extensive steel and resources industry knowledge with international management and financial expertise, including valuable insight gained from the five independent non-executive directors on the board of directors. At an operational level, the Group has developed, and continues to refine, a management structure that is focused on improving accountability, clarifying responsibilities and streamlining information reporting and decision-making. Backed by international experience and advanced technical and business qualifications, the management team’s ability to successfully manage the performance of the Group’s assets is evidenced by the increased operating efficiency of the Cherepovets Steel Mill in recent years and cost reduction achievements across the divisions.
Strong Corporate Governance The Group seeks to adhere to international corporate governance standards. The Group benefits from a culture of independence on its board of directors as a result of both a diverse, multinational membership and the independence of half of its board and chairman (according to UK standards of independence). In addition, the Group has established committees of its board of directors in accordance with the UK Combined Code on Corporate Governance and has implemented other measures aimed at promoting transparency and good corporate governance. These measures include implementing internal control procedures and internal audit functions, publishing quarterly financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, publishing regular production updates and requiring the approval by majority vote of the Board of Directors of transactions with a value exceeding 10.0 percent of the book value of the Company’s assets and requiring the approval by a two-thirds majority of the total number of directors, excluding any retired directors, for transactions for the purchase of assets with a total value exceeding US$500 million and for reviews of the consolidated budget.
STRATEGY The Group’s corporate strategy is to become one of the global industry leaders in terms of EBITDA and to sustain a leading position in terms of margins and return on investment as a vertically-integrated steel and steel-related mining company. The Group has grounded its corporate strategy in the crucial industrial growth drivers of cost competitiveness, vertical integration and presence in consolidated and growing markets in order to build upon and improve its ranking as one of the leading steel companies worldwide. To successfully implement this strategy, the Group intends to pursue the following initiatives:
Capitalise on Presence in Growing Regional Markets and Assets Optimisation in Developed Markets The Group’s main regional markets exhibited strong growth rates in 2010 following the global economic crisis: steel demand in Russia grew by approximately 43.2 percent, and in the US, by approximately 35.3 percent year-on-year, according to worldsteel. The Group has a positive mid-to-long term growth outlook for steel demand in all the regions in which it has a presence. The Group’s strategy in each of its key regions is as follows: Russia. The Group views the Russian market for steel products as providing significant growth potential due to rising personal incomes, growing demand for modern housing, cars and the poor state of the country’s infrastructure which requires significant investments. The Group plans to continue to invest in its production facilities in Russia, as it expects a steady growth of steel demand in Russia. In line with its
129
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DA14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DA14501A.;23 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 368DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 58430
Business
strategy, starting from June 2010, the Group has commenced operations at its TPZ-Sheksna facility. TPZ-Sheksna is located close to the Group’s main Russian steelmaking facilities in Cherepovets and has a capacity of 250 thousand tonnes per year of electric welded pipes and other profiles. The Group is also constructing the Balakovo mini-mill in central Russia, with an expected capacity of one million tonnes per year upon completion, which is currently planned for 2013. The Balakovo mini-mill is expected to produce long term products for the construction and infrastructure industries. The Group is planning to construct two new galvanising and two new colour coating lines. USA. After the US economy fully recovers from the recessionary effects of the recent financial crisis and returns to steady growth, US steel demand is expected to rise in line with the long-term global trend. Future US growth is expected to be particularly driven by population growth and the need to build up previously underinvested infrastructure. The Group plans to focus on developing competitive and efficient steelmaking assets in the United States. For additional information on the Group’s US strategy, see ‘‘—Modernise and Bring to Sustainable Profitability Operations in the United States’’. India. The Group assumes India will be one of the highest growth areas in the next decade with an estimated growth rate in steel demand of 8.5 percent per year from 2010 to 2020, according to World Steel Dynamics. The Group and NMDC signed an MOU to establish a joint venture company to build an integrated steel plant. The plant which will be constructed in Karnataka and is expected to have a capacity of between 2 and 5 million tonnes per year.
Expand Mining Business Globally The Group believes that its mining activities will provide a strong source of growth and intends to expand its iron ore and coal production, as well as its other mining operations. The Group plans to significantly expand its mining operations in Russia, the CIS and other emerging markets with the aim of increasing its cost competitiveness and its global level of vertical integration. Vertical integration is a key part of the Group’s business model. The Group is one of the few international steel companies with a strong position in both iron ore and coking coal. Following the planned expansion of its brownfield projects in Russia (such as Karelsky Okatysh and Vorkutaugol) and its coking coal production in the United States, the Group is targeting at least 80.0 percent global economic self-sufficiency in raw materials to secure cost-competitiveness, improve total profitability and smooth influence of business cycles. The Group is also pursuing several major projects, including exploration and development license opportunities for the Tsentralny field in the Republic of Tyva (Russia); a project with Affero Mining, Inc. (formerly Africa Aura) for the development of an iron ore deposit in Putu Range (Liberia); and a project with SPG for the development of an iron ore deposit in Amapa (Brazil). The Group intends to continue its focus on stringent cost control at its mining facilities in order to counter the global trend of increasing mining costs.
Modernise and Bring to Sustainable Profitability Operations in the United States Following the sale of the Group’s Northern Steel Group, Inc. assets in May 2010 and its 100.0 percent stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC in March 2011, the Group plans to focus on developing competitive and efficient steelmaking assets in the United States. With the Group’s investments to complete Phase II of the Severstal Columbus expansion, resulting in an expected doubling of that facility’s production capacity in 2011, the Group intends to strengthen Severstal Columbus’ position as one of the most cost competitive US flat mills. In an environment of rising raw material prices, Severstal Dearborn is expected to benefit from its long-term contract with Cliffs Natural Resources. In addition, investments in the PLTCM and HDG line at Severstal Dearborn are expected to further improve its cost position and enable it to produce advanced automotive steels. The Group’s management believes that this will make Severstal Dearborn one of the principal suppliers of high-quality flat products in North America. The Group is also considering participating in a greenfield project for the building of a DRI plant that would also secure DRI supply to Severstal Columbus.
130
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DA14501A.;23 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DC14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 16332
Business
Pursue Low-Cost Steel Production The Group believes that cost competitiveness in every region where it produces steel is a vital element of its success. Accordingly, the Group plans to continue to pursue a strategy of lower-cost steel production in relation to its Russian operations (in comparison to global cost levels in steel production), as well as in relation to its US operations (in comparison to regional cost levels in steel production). Vertical integration is an integral part of the Group’s business model. The Group is one of the few international steel companies with a strong position in both iron ore and coking coal. The Group is economically fully self-sufficient in primary steel-related raw materials in Russia, and, in the US, only local coking coal capacities are sufficient to provide full economic integration for steel plants in North America. The Group is targeting to have at least 80.0 percent global economic self-sufficiency in raw materials. The Group believes that a low cost operating structure can be achieved by a combination of capital expenditure on production facilities, energy efficiency improvements, integration of its raw materials business with steel production and labour productivity gains. The Group’s capital expenditure programme includes various projects to improve operational efficiencies and to reduce raw material consumption.
HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE GROUP The Group’s predecessor, Cherepovets Metallurgical Works, produced its first cast iron in 1955. Cherepovets Metallurgical Works was 100.0 percent state-owned until it was privatised in 1993 in accordance with the State Programme for the Privatisation of State and Municipal Enterprises in the Russian Federation. The newly privatised entity, the Company, was registered as an open joint stock company in the city of Cherepovets on 24 September 1993. Since 1993, the Group has expanded geographically to include steel operations in North America and Europe and has expanded its corporate vision by entering a number of different businesses, including companies engaged in the mining of iron ore, coal, gold and other minerals, the procurement of scrap, pipe manufacturing, metalware production, the manufacturing of steel furniture and kitchenware, construction and repair. A brief timeline illustrating the historical development of the Group’s current business divisions, the Russian Steel Division, Severstal International and Severstal Resources is set forth below.
1994-1999 The Group and the Majority Shareholder acquire a combined interest in Karelsky Okatysh, an iron ore pellet producer. 1995 The Company’s shares list on the RTS. 1995-2001 The Group and the Majority Shareholder acquire a controlling stake in Olkon, an iron ore producer in the Murmansk region in Russia. 2000 The Group purchases Rolling Mill 5000 from OAO United Heavy Machinery. 2001 The Group and Arcelor formed the Severgal joint venture, which produces high-quality galvanised auto body sheet products. 2001-2003 The Group and the Majority Shareholder acquire Vorkutaugol, which consists of several mines, coking coal production and beneficiation plants in the Republic of Komi in Russia. 2001-2002 The Majority Shareholder acquires a controlling stake in Kuzbassugol, a coal-mining company that includes the Pervomayskaya Mine and the Berezovskaya Mine. 2004 The Group acquires substantially all the assets of Rouge Steel, forming the business formerly called Severstal North America and now called Severstal Dearborn, an integrated steel- making facility based in Michigan. 2005 The Group’s shares list on MICEX. The Group acquires a 100.0 percent stake in ZAO Severstal-Metiz, now Severstal-Metiz, from the Majority Shareholder. SeverCorr, LLC (later renamed Severstal Columbus) is formed in order to develop a ‘‘next generation’’ steel plant in Mississippi.
131
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DC14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DC14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170D*/180D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 1242
Business
Severstal North America (later renamed Severstal Dearborn) and Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation form MSC through a 50:50 joint venture. The Group and the Majority Shareholder acquire Lucchini, an integrated steel-making company. 2006 The Group conducts its initial public offering on the LSE. The Group acquires the majority stake of a number of mining and steel companies (including Lucchini) from the Majority Shareholder. The Group completes the construction of the Izhora Pipe Mill, which produces large diameter pipes. The Company approves a new corporate governance system, incorporating independent directors into its Board of Directors. Severstal-Metiz acquires Dneprometiz. 2007 Severstal Columbus (formerly SeverCorr, LLC) mini-mill commences operations. The Group acquires several scrap processing businesses. The Group establishes SMZ-Kolpino, a processing service centre. The Group acquires 86.3 percent of Celtic, a company with subsidiaries holding gold mining assets in Kazakhstan. The Group establishes LLC Severstal-Ukraine to be a distributor in Ukraine and begins expanding its distribution operations in Belarus through ZAO SeverstalBel. The Group acquires ArcelorMittal’s 25.0 percent stake in the Severgal joint venture, taking the Group’s stake in Severgal to 100.0 percent. The Group acquires stevedore company ZAO Neva-Metall. The Group sells Lucchini Sidermeccanica to members of the founding Lucchini family. The Group commences development of the mini-mill in Balakovo. The Group acquires all of the shares in Neryungri-Metallic and Rudnik Aprelkovo, each a Russian gold mining company. 2008 The Group acquires 61.5 percent of African Iron Ore Group Ltd. (later renamed Severstal Liberia Iron Ore Ltd.), which owns the exploration rights for an iron ore deposit in the Putu Range area in Liberia. The Group acquires WCI (later renamed Severstal Warren) based in Ohio. The Group acquires 100.0 percent of PBS Coals, a coking coal producer located in Pennsylvania. The Group acquires Esmark Incorporated (later renamed Severstal Wheeling) located in West Virginia, including the remaining 50.0 percent stake in MSC. The Group acquires Sparrows Point based in Maryland. The Group completes the acquisition of both Olkon and Karelsky Okatysh. The Group completes the acquisition of Celtic. The Group sells Kuzbassugol to ArcelorMittal. The Group acquires a 100.0 percent stake in Redaelli. The Group acquires 100.0 percent of Semgeo, which includes a gold mine in Kazakhstan. The Group acquires a 53.8 percent stake in High River Gold, which comprises the Irokinda, Zun-Holba and Berezitovy mines in Russia and the Taparko mine in Burkina Faso.
132
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DC14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DC14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1070D*/1481D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55121
Business
2009 Following a restructuring, Nordgold acquires all of the Group’s gold mining assets. 2010 The Group acquires 20.2 percent of Lucchini bringing its shareholdings in Lucchini to 100.0 percent The Group later sells 50.8 percent of its stake in Lucchini to the Majority Shareholder. See ‘‘—Severstal International—Discontinued Operations—Lucchini and North America disposal groups’’. The Group acquires a 16.5 percent stake in Core Mining which controls exploration licences for the vima iron ore deposit in the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) and the Kango iron ore deposit in the Republic of Gabon. The Group commences operations at its TPZ-Sheksna facility with production capacities of electric welded pipes and other profiles. The Group sells Northern Steel Group, a group of companies within the Severstal North America segment. Through a series of transactions, the Group increases its interest in High River Gold to 72.6 percent. Through a series of transactions, the Group brings its total interest in Crew Gold to 93.4 percent. The Group acquires, through Nordgold, an 11.0 percent stake in SCM, increasing its ownership to 18.1 percent. The Group obtains a license for further exploration and coal extraction at the Tsentralny field in the western part of the Ulug-Khemskiy basin in the Tyva Republic, Russia. The Group acquires a 21.7 percent stake in Intex Resources, a public mining and exploration company listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange with its headquarters in Oslo Norway. The Group acquires a 25.6 percent stake in IMBS, a research and development company based in Johannesburg, South Africa. Severstal and NMDC, the leading iron ore producer in India, sign an MOU to establish a 50:50 joint venture company with the objective of building an integrated steel plant in India. The Group sells a 5.9 percent stake in OAO Vorkutaugol. 2011 The Group sells its 100.0 percent stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren and Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC. The Group acquires a 7.4 percent stake in IMBS, increasing its ownership interest to 33.0 percent. The Group acquires an additional 6.6 percent stake in Crew Gold to increase its ownership interest to 100.0 percent. The Group acquires an additional 49.0 percent stake in Severstal-Ukraine, LLC, increasing its ownership interest to 100.0 percent. The Group sells its 100.0 percent stake in SSM RP Holding B.V. and its wholly-owned subsidiary OOO Severstal-metiz: welding consumables. The Group acquires a 25.0 percent stake in SPG, a private iron ore mining and exploration company headquartered in Macapa City.
133
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DC14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DC14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 60D /120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 41451
Business
Employees The following table sets forth the average number of the Group’s employees (full-time equivalents) by business division in 2009 and 2010:
Business division 2009 2010 Russian Steel Division ...... 50,848 50,541 North America(1) ...... 2,828 2,201 Severstal Resources ...... 27,735 26,568 Total ...... 81,411 79,310
Note: (1) Excludes data for the Group’s discontinued operations: Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC.
Health, Safety and Environment Each of the Group’s business divisions operate health and safety management systems which apply a systematic approach to establishing work processes that preserve and enhance their employees’ ability to work effectively and safely and are in compliance with applicable legal requirements. Each of the Group’s business divisions monitors its compliance with applicable environmental regulations and standards. In 2010, the Group launched a labor safety project with the ultimate goal to be among the industry leaders in safety by 2014. Under the project, a number of initiatives have been launched to develop and implement an effective safety management system penetrating into every business process and resting on the personal attitude of every worker to his or her own safety.
Insurance The Group’s operations are subject to numerous operating risks, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, labour force disruptions, unavailability of materials and equipment, weather conditions, pit wall failures, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding, seismic activity, interruptions to power supplies and industrial and other accidents at mills, mines, processing plants or related facilities. While management has set up internal controls to try to prevent and mitigate these events, these risks and hazards could result in damage to, or destruction of mineral properties or processing facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays in mining and monetary losses and possible legal liability. The Group’s business divisions maintain a level of insurance commensurate with the standards of other leading steel companies in the markets in which it operates.
Legal Each of the Group’s business divisions has been and continues to be the subject of legal proceedings and adjudications from time to time, which are incidental to the Group’s business. However, the Group is not aware of any governmental, legal or arbitration proceedings (including any such proceedings which are pending or threatened of which the Group is aware) during the last 12 months, which may have, or have in the recent past, significant effects on the Group’s financial position or profitability.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Crew Gold From February 2010 to January 2011, through a series of transactions, the Group acquired a 100.0 percent stake in Crew Gold, a gold mining company previously headquartered in London and previously listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Oslo Stock Exchange. Crew Gold owns and operates LEFA mine, a high potential gold mining project in Guinea, West Africa.
Iron Mineral Beneficiation Services (Proprietary) Limited During 2010, the Group acquired a 25.6 percent stake in IMBS, a research and development company based in Johannesburg, South Africa. The Group acquired an additional 7.4 percent stake in March 2011
134
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DC14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DC14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 350D*/4340D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 19519
Business
increasing its ownership interest to 33.0 percent. IMBS has developed a coal-based Finesmelt technology capable of processing unusable iron ore fines and thermal coal into valuable metallic products similar to DRI/HBI. Currently, IMBS is developing its first commercial project in Phalaborwa, South Africa. As a part of the transaction, IIBG was formed, a new company that has an exclusive license to commercialise the technology worldwide (outside of South Africa and neighbouring countries), of which the Group owns a 51.0 percent stake.
National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. In December 2010, Severstal and NMDC, the leading iron ore producer in India, signed an MOU to establish a 50:50 joint venture company with the objective of building an integrated steel plant in India.
Severstal North America Assets In March 2011, the Group sold its 100.0 percent stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC. The remaining 50.0 percent share in MSC is accounted for using the equity method.
SPG Mineracao S.A. In May 2011, the Group acquired a 25.0 percent stake in SPG. SPG is a private iron ore mining and exploration company with its headquarters in Macapa city, Amapa state, Brazil. SPG’s main asset is a number of high potential iron ore licenses in the area of Tartarugalzinho, Amapa state, jointly named as the ‘‘Tartarugal project’’, with the total approximate resource potential of 600 million tonnes of iron ore, based on the Group’s estimation.
RUSSIAN STEEL DIVISION In 2010, the Russian Steel Division produced approximately 16.6 percent of total Russian crude steel production, based on data from worldsteel, accounting for 63.9 percent of the Group’s total revenues. According to calculations by the Group’s management based on publicly released data, the Russian Steel Division was the third largest producer of crude steel in Russia by volume of production in 2010. The Russian Steel Division comprises: (i) steel product production which consists primarily of steel production facilities at the Cherepovets Steel Mill with an achieved total steelmaking capacity of 11.1 million tonnes of crude steel per year as at 31 December 2010, including a number of its workshops, among which there are high-grade automotive galvanising facilities at Severgal and Rolling Mill 5000, as well as a number of other facilities located primarily in the northwestern region of Russia; (ii) metalware production with its wire drawing and metalware manufacturing business at several production facilities in Russia and abroad, with a total estimated metalware production capacity of about 1.5 million tonnes per year as at 31 December 2010 and with over 55 thousand different product types; (iii) pipes production at the Izhora Pipe Mill, a large diameter pipe mill with achieved total pipemaking capacity of 480 thousand tonnes as at 31 December 2010; (iv) scrap collection and processing consisting of Russian Steel Division’s scrap collection and processing companies; and (v) trading and services companies with various supporting functions for trading, maintenance and transportation. The Russian Steel Division’s primary steel production facility is the Cherepovets Steel Mill, located in Cherepovets, in northwest Russia, approximately 600 kilometres from Moscow and approximately 450 kilometres from St. Petersburg. The Russian Steel Division also includes a heavy plate mill in Kolpino, which is approximately 26 kilometres from St. Petersburg. The Izhora Pipe Mill is adjacent to Kolpino. Metalware operates out of multiple sites across Russia, Ukraine and Italy. These locations give the Russian Steel Division strategic proximity to river ports and railways, providing logistically favourable access to raw material sources and customers.
Facilities The following table sets forth the Russian Steel Division’s major current production capacity and equipment by unit as at 31 December 2010.
135
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DC14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DC14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 43477
Business
Major Steel Production Facilities, Russian Steel Division—Achieved Capacity
As at 31 December 2010 Equipment Capacity (million tonnes per year) Russian Steel Division Cherepovets Steel Mill Coking plant ...... 8 batteries 3.9 Sintering plant ...... 8 machines 8.9 Blast furnace facilities ...... 5 furnaces 8.8 Basic oxygen furnaces ...... 3 furnaces 9.3 EAFs ...... 2 furnaces 1.7 Continuous casters ...... 7 casters 12.1 Hot-rolling mills ...... 4 mills 8.8 Of which finished products ...... 5.8 Cold-rolling mills ...... 2 mills 2.8 Of which finished products ...... 1.5 Continuous pickling lines ...... 3 lines 3.3 Hot-dip galvanising lines ...... 2 lines 0.7 Section rolling mills ...... 3 mills 2.3 Cold roll-forming lines ...... 1 line 0.2 Pipe rolling mills ...... 7 mills 0.3 Automotive grade galvanising line (Severgal) ...... 1 line 0.4 SMZ-Kolpino Welded I-beam production site ...... 1 line 0.01 Rolled products plasma cutting ...... 4 machines 0.02 Flat-rolled products processing area (shot blasting and prime coating facilities) ...... 1 line 0.04 TPZ-Sheksna Slitting line ...... 1 line 0.25 Izhora Pipe Mill Pipe mill ...... 1 line 0.48 Metalware Metalware ...... N/A 1.50 Cherepovets Steel Mill. The Cherepovets Steel Mill produces almost all of the Russian Steel Division’s crude steel. The facilities’ achieved total production capacity is 11.1 million tonnes of crude steel per year in 2010. The Russian Steel Division’s steel production facilities at the Cherepovets Steel Mill are fully integrated, occupying approximately 30 square kilometres, with coking, sintering, blast furnaces, steel making, casting and hot and cold rolling facilities. The hot phase at the Cherepovets Steel Mill consists of a coking facility; a sintering facility; five blast furnaces; three oxygen converters; two vacuum degassers; two EAFs; seven continuous casting lines; three hot strip mills, two hot-rolling mills and a heavy plate mill (Rolling Mill 5000). The cold phase at the Cherepovets Steel Mill consists of three continuous picking lines, two cold rolling mills and annealing facilities, two tempering mills, two lines for dynamo steel, two galvanising lines, one cold profile tending line, one colour coating line, seven pipe rolling mills and an automotive grade galvanising line in the Severgal workshop. Coking facility. The coal charge coking process involves heating a charge up to approximately 1,000 C to 1,100 C without air, removing volatile coking products and collecting the resulting solid porous residue (coke). The coking process is conducted in coke chambers, which are combined into coke batteries. The coking facility comprises two coking workshops. Coking workshop No.1 consists of four coking batteries: No. 3 and No. 4 each with 61 ovens; No.5 and No.6 each with 77 ovens. Coking workshop No. 2 also
136
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DC14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DC14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 390DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 57637
Business
consists of four coking batteries: No. 8, No.9 and No.10 each with 65 ovens and equipped with paired flues systems; and coking battery No.7, which is currently under reconstruction. Sintering facility. The sintering facility comprises Sintering Plants 2 and 3 and Charge Preparation Shops 1 and 2. Charge Preparation Shop 1 is a closed warehouse designed for discharging, storing and providing raw materials for Sintering Plant 2 and Sintering Plant 3. Charge Preparation Shop 2 is designed for discharging, storing and providing raw materials for the Blast furnaces and limestone for Sintering Plant 3. Sintering Plant 2 and Sintering Plant 3 produce flux sinter for the Blast furnaces. A mixture of concentrates, additives and solid fuel is required for the sintering process. Blast furnace coke fines (0-25 mm) are used as fuel for the sintering process, while limestone is used as a fluxing agent. The basisity (CaO/SiO2) of flux sinter is set according to the needs of the blast furnace process. Blast furnace facilities. Blast furnace production consists of cast iron being melted in blast furnaces. There are five blast furnaces at the Cherepovets Steel Mill, with an estimated current combined capacity of 8.8 million tonnes per year. Blast Furnace 5 was fully refurbished in October 2006. Blast Furnace 4, which recommenced operation in December 2005 after refurbishment and recommissioning. Blast Furnaces 1 and 2 are the oldest furnaces. Blast Furnace 3 is currently undergoing reconstruction to increase its capacity and efficiency, and is not expected to be completed before 2015. Pig iron that has been converted into liquid form is delivered to the electric steel-making and casting machines by way of 100-tonne ladle cars, while in the converter process it is delivered in torpedo ladles with a capacity of 600 tonnes. BOFs and EAFs. Crude steel is produced at the Cherepovets Steel Mill in three BOFs with a combined capacity of 9.3 million tonnes per year, and two EAFs with a combined capacity of 1.7 million tonnes per year. Continuous casters. The BOF shop has four 2-strand curve-type casters, capable of casting slabs with cross-sections of 200 to 250 mm by 1020 to 1850 mm; and one 2-strand curve-type casters can produce slab sections with a vertical section of 250 to 315 mm by 1020 to 2000 mm. The EAF shop has one 2-strand vertical slab caster, capable of casting slabs with sections of 150 to 200 mm by 100 to 1580 mm and one 6-strand radial billet caster, casting billets into square sections from 100 mm2 to 150 mm2. Hot-rolling mills. The Cherepovets Steel Mill’s hot-rolling mills consist of three hot-rolling shops with a combined capacity of 8.8 million tonnes per year. Hot-rolling Shop 1 is equipped with two combined semi-continuous mills. Mill 2800 produces thick plates with a thickness of 6.35 to 50 mm, which serve as feedstock for Mill 1700. Mill 1700 produces sheet with a thickness of 0.8 to 8 mm and is equipped with four coilers. Hot-rolling Shop 2 is equipped with Mill 2000, a continuous wide-sheet mill includes four reheating furnaces and length and width-cutting machines. Mill 2000 is operated on a fully-automated basis and produces sheet with a thickness of 1.2 to 16 mm. Hot-rolling Shop 3 is equipped with Rolling Mill 5000, a heavy plate mill located in Kolpino. Rolling Mill 5000 produces wide quarto plate for shipbuilding, and strips for pipe manufacturing, including feedstock for the Izhora Pipe Mill. Cold-rolling mills. The Cherepovets Steel Mill has two cold-rolling mills, with a combined capacity of 2.8 million tonnes per year, including a four-stand continuous rolling Mill 1700 and a five-stand continuous rolling Mill 1700. The cold-rolling mills produce cold-rolled sheet with a thickness of 0.25 to 3.2 mm. The cold-rolling mills operate together with two tempering mills, a set of bell-type annealing furnaces and slitting and cutting lines. Continuous pickling lines and hot-dip galvanising lines. The Cherepovets Steel Mill has three pickling lines with a combined capacity of 3.3 million tonnes per year, as well as two hot-dip galvanising lines with zinc and alumozinc coating with a combined capacity after reconstruction in 2010 of 720 thousand tonnes per year.
137
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DC14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 90D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 26591
Business
Section rolling mills. The Cherepovets Steel Mill has three section rolling mills with a combined capacity of 2.3 million tonnes per year: a medium-section Mill 350, a small-section Mill 250, thermo-strengthening equipment and a wire rod Mill 150. Cold roll-forming line. The Cherepovets Steel Mill’s cold roll-forming line produces a range of different shaped profiles: closed profile, S-shape profile, E-shape profile, trough-shape profile, angle profile and others and has a combined capacity of 200 thousand tonnes per year. Pipe rolling mills. The Cherepovets Steel Mill also has seven pipe rolling mills that can produce pipes with circular, oblong and semi-oblong, square and rectangular cross sections in a wide range of sizes. The seven pipe rolling mills have a combined capacity of 300 thousand tonnes per year. Automotive grade galvanising line (Severgal). Incorporated as a shop within the Cherepovets Steel Mill, Severgal produces high-quality galvanised auto body sheet products. In commercial operation since December 2005, the galvanising line has a capacity of 400 thousand tonnes per year. Severgal can produce galvanised-steel sheet with a thickness of 0.4 to 2.0 mm and a width of 900 to 1,850 mm. The plant produces steel sheet products coated with zinc-iron alloy. Severgal is strategically located close to several major domestic automotive ‘‘greenfield’’ production facilities, including Nissan and Toyota in St. Petersburg, Hyundai in Sestroretsk (near St. Petersburg), Alfa Automotive Technologies LLC (a supplier of Renault) in Moscow, Ford and Volkswagen in Kaluga. SMZ-Kolpino. SMZ-Kolpino applies the priming coat of paint on sheets for shipbuilding, provides half-finished products for machinery and manufactures large fabricated sections for the construction industry. The company was certified for compliance with international standards ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHAS 18001. SMZ-Kolpino has the following facilities and metal processing services: an automated rolled metal products preservation line (produced by the PME-Group, Finland), distinguished by its shotblasting and protective prime coating, which are sheet metal processing methods designed to prevent corrosion; an automated beam welding line (also produced by the PME-Group, Finland), which produces welded structures such as T-bars and I-bars; and the automated plasma-beam cutting lines (produced by KOIKE, Japan), which conduct sheet metal plasma cutting, including for manufacturing welded structures. TPZ-Sheksna. TPZ-Sheksna produces electric-welded pipes for construction of various diameters, thickness and length, as well as square and rectangular sections with different cross-sections. The plant has a slitting line 2000 to produce strips and an electric pipe-welded line for the production of round pipes with diameters ranging from 127 to 146 mm with wall thicknesses ranging from 3 to 16 mm. The plant is able to produce circular pipes, square profiles ranging from 100 100 mm to 300 300 mm and rectangular profiles ranging from 120 80 mm to 400 200 mm. Izhora Pipe Mill. The Izhora Pipe Mill in Kolpino produces electric longitudinal welded pipes with a designed diameter of 610 mm, which can be produced with diameters ranging from 1020 to 1420 mm, and 12,000-18,300 mm in length, with outer three layered anti-corrosion coating and inner smooth coating. Construction of the Izhora Pipe Mill was completed in July 2006. Rolling Mill 5000 was modified to produce strips manufactured by its steel business to feed the Izhora Pipe Mill. The Izhora Pipe Mill has an achieved production capacity of 480 thousand tonnes of pipes per year. Metalware. The Group’s Metalware production business comprises Severstal-Metiz and its subsidiaries: Dneprometiz (Ukraine) and Redaelli (Italy). The Group’s Metalware production business currently produces more than 55,000 types of products, including rod, calibrated steel, steel rope, nails, fibre, fastenings, netting, welding materials and metal cord and currently have a total maximum production capacity of more than 1.5 million tonnes per year. In 2010, total metalware sales reached 786 thousand tonnes. Severstal-Metiz operates wire and wire goods production facilities in Cherepovets, Orel and Volgograd. In 2006, the Group acquired the Dneprometiz plant in Ukraine. Each of these locations in Russia and Ukraine benefits from developing markets with a high concentration of industrial and retail customers. In addition to enjoying significant geographic coverage, Severstal-Metiz operates in each of the primary parts of the Russian metalware products market, benefitting from the range of products manufactured at the respective plants. Dneprometiz produces wire and certain other processed products at its production facilities located in Ukraine.
138
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 151D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 29473
Business
Since 31 July 2008, Redaelli (Italy) has been a part of Severstal-Metiz. Redaelli is an Italian company, one of leading manufacturers of special ropes on the global market. The company produces products for a number of industries, including oil and mining, bridge-building, electric and power. It is focused on advanced ropes for floating drilling platforms, lifters, stadiums, cable bridges and ropeways. Redaelli has a service and distribution unit and an engineering unit. A new site was opened in Trieste, Italy, on 30 November 2009.
Steel Production Process The following diagram illustrates the principal steps in the Russian Steel Division’s main steel production processes:
Raw Materials
Coking Plant Sintering Plant
Blast Furnaces
Raw Materials (including scrap)
Electric Arc Furnaces Basic Oxygen Furnaces
Continuous Casting
Hot Rolling Mills Mill 500
Section Mills
Cold Forming and Cold Rolling Mills Pipe Mills
Colour Coating Galvanising Lines Lines
Hot-dip Galvanising Line (Severgal)
Finish Products and Further Processed Metalware Izhora Pipe TPZ- Products Mill Sheksna 5JUL201116014203
The Russian Steel Division continuously seeks to improve the efficiency of the steel production process through the implementation of its asset modernisation programme.
139
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 210D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 48091
Business
The steelmaking process at the Cherepovets Steel Mill begins with coal being fed into the coking plant and iron ore concentrate and other materials being fed into the sintering plant to produce coke and sinter, respectively. The mix of sinter, pellets and coke is then fed into the blast furnaces, which operate continuously. During the blast furnace process, the charge is converted into pig iron. Liquid slag, which remains after smelting, is also removed from the blast furnaces. When cooled, the slag is crushed at the slag-processing facilities and is then sold domestically by the Russian Steel Division as road-construction material. Gas produced by the blast furnaces is captured and recycled to produce heat. The molten pig iron is transported to the BOF shop and EAFs in railway ladle cars. The basic oxygen steelmaking process is autogenous, or self-sufficient in terms of energy. The two EAFs at the Cherepovets Steel Mill, each with a capacity of 150 tonnes per heat, do not need to be charged with molten pig iron, and can be charged with ‘‘cold’’ material, normally steel scrap, recycled goods made from steel which have reached the end of their useful life and solid pig iron. The current proportion of scrap metal used in the EAFs is approximately 75.0 percent Other forms of raw materials may be used, including pig iron from the blast furnaces that has been cast and allowed to go cold. Molten steel produced by the EAFs can either undergo secondary steelmaking or be transported to the continuous caster. 100.0 percent of the liquid steel is fed from the furnaces into the continuous casting machines to produce slabs and billets. Continuous casting is the most efficient casting process with the lowest metal consumption per tonne of rolled products, saving approximately 70 kilograms of steel per tonne compared to ingot casting. The slabs are further rolled at the hot-rolling mills into sheet and coils. Additional processing methods related to cold-rolling further improve the surface characteristics of the steel. These additional processing methods include pickling, hydrogen annealing and tempering. Some cold-rolled sheet is galvanised, which involves applying a coat of zinc and aluminium, and some is further colour coated. Quality control. The Russian Steel Division has established comprehensive quality control systems at each stage of its production cycle. The Russian Steel Division employs techniques of benchmarking performance to best practice and statistical process control, which the Russian Steel Division began in 2001. Since 2005, the Cherepovets Steel Mill has been developing and implementing a system of statistical production management and from 2009 has begun implementation of the ‘‘Continuing Improvement’’ programme under which a unified model of operational management and continuous quality improvement is being developed and implemented. The main objective of these quality control systems is to improve the quality of steel by improving technological process parameters. The current quality control systems are carried out by an internal quality control department with further support provided by SGS Vostok Limited, a French-based quality surveyor, during transportation and loading. In February 2011, the Company successfully passed the re-certification audit of its quality management system in terms of its compliance with international specification requirements: ISO 9001:2008 and ISO/TS 16949:2009 by LR EMEA (Lloyd’s Register). As a result, the quality management system certificates were extended for a further period of three years, until 23 March 2014. The quality control measures employed by the Russian Steel Division have enabled it to maintain a range of products that meet the high standards required in the United States, Germany, Japan and other markets, in addition to the modernised Russian oil and pipeline industries. A range of products produced by the Russian Steel Division have been certified by the Marine Register of the Russian Federation, Lloyd’s Register, the American Bureau of Shipping, Norske Veritas, Germanischer Lloyd, Bureau Veritas and the Russian River Register. In 2001, the Russian Steel Division received several certificates attesting to the quality of the production output at Mill 5000. The Russian Steel Division’s steel products are also supplied to various offshore oil and gas development projects. Currently, the Company holds more than 70 certificates attesting to the quality of its products. The quality management system compliant with GOST R ISO 9000:2008 (a Russian quality standard) was introduced at TPZ-Sheksna and is currently awaiting assessment by independent certification authorities. The laboratory of mechanical tests was successfully accredited on the pipe profiling plant TPZ-Sheksna, and was certified by VNIINMASH in December 2010. In March 2011, TPZ-Sheksna was certified by
140
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 27553
Business
Lloyd’s Register to conform to EN 10219, demonstrating its production completely corresponds to the basic requirements of the European Union Directives, and can, as a result, be exported to the EU market. The quality management system at the Izhora Pipe Mill has been certified since December 2006 corresponding to requirements of standards ANSI/API Specification Q1, ISO/TS 29001, ISO 9001 as developed, introduced and certified by the American Petroleum Institute (API). The Izhora Pipe Mill has licences to use the API monogram on its pipes produced for main long-distance oil and gas pipelines. Severstal-Metiz’s three plants in Russia have management quality systems corresponding to the requirements of International Standard ISO 9001:2008. Severstal-Metiz has received a certificate of conformity stating that its quality control system is in compliance with the requirements of International Standard ISO/TS 16949:2009 concerning calibrated rolled metal and shaped sections issued by Der Norske Veritas (DNV). In addition, Severstal-Metiz has a series of certificates attesting to the quality of its products, including welding wire, steel ropes, reinforcing steel cables (PS Strand), railway fasteners, engineering and high-strength fasteners, low-carbon wire for concrete reinforcement, wire fibre and periodic profile wire (Bp-1).
Supply Chain The principal raw materials used by the Russian Steel Division to produce steel include iron ore concentrate and pellets, coking coal, limestone and dolomite, non-ferrous metal and ferro-alloys and metal scrap. The Russian Steel Division maintains a minimum two-week reserve of all the main raw materials used in the production process. This reserve is normally increased to approximately three weeks during the winter to compensate for any potential break in supply due to bad weather and for increased consumption rates experienced during the colder weather. In addition, during the winter, the stocks of ferro-alloys and scrap are increased to one and three months, respectively. The Russian Steel Division’s steel production energy requirements include water, gas, electricity and steam. Raw materials. Currently Severstal Resources’ overall coking coal and iron ore production volumes are able to cover in full the overall consumption volumes of the Russian Steel Division, without taking into account the chemical features of the particular coal and iron ore mix required. As a result, the Russian Steel Division’s operations with respect to iron ore and coal are economically fully self-sufficient. However, the Russian Steel Division does source a portion of its iron ore and coal requirements from third party suppliers primarily due to its requirements for materials with different chemical features and to take advantage of beneficial prevailing prices. In 2010, the Russian Steel Division’s steel operations procured approximately 68 percent of its iron ore, concentrate and pellets, and 65 percent of its coal requirements from Severstal Resources, purchasing its remaining requirements from third party sources. In 2010 and 2009 the Cherepovets Steel Mill’s raw materials requirements account for approximately 100.0 percent of the Russian Steel Division’s total raw material requirements. The following table sets forth a breakdown of the raw materials procured by the Cherepovets Steel Mill in 2009 and 2010.
Procurement of Raw Materials—Cherepovets Steel Mill Year ended 31 December Raw materials 2009 2010 (thousand tonnes) Iron ore (concentrate and pellets) ...... 10,774 12,798 Coal ...... 5,344 5,393 Metal scrap ...... 2,163 4,200 Ferro-alloys and non-ferrous metals ...... 140 199 Iron ore and pellets. The smelting process at the Russian Steel Division’s blast furnace facilities requires up to 40.0 percent of the feedstock to be in the form of iron ore pellets, the majority of which are sourced from Severstal Resources. Almost all iron ore concentrate and pellets are supplied to the Russian Steel Division’s steel operations on the basis of contracts that are reviewed and renegotiated on a quarterly basis
141
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 10D*/320D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 41005
Business
with third parties and on a montly basis with Severstal Resources. All of the Russian Steel Division’s contracts with its iron ore suppliers, including those with Severstal Resources, are concluded on an arm’s length basis. The Russian Steel Division’s quality control of iron ore supplies involves verifying suppliers’ quality certificates and monitoring the moisture content, iron content and weight of the ore concentrate at laboratories located at each of the Russian Steel Division’s production facilities. Some contract arrangements provide for price adjustments depending on the quality of the concentrate. In 2010 and 2009, the Cherepovets Steel Mill’s iron ore requirements account for approximately 100.0 percent of the Russian Steel Division’s total iron ore requirements. The following table sets forth a breakdown of the iron ore procured by the Cherepovets Steel Mill by supplier in 2009 and 2010.
Major Suppliers of Iron Ore Concentrate and Iron Ore Pellets—Cherepovets Steel Mill Year ended 31 December Supplier 2009 2010 (thousand tonnes) Iron ore concentrate Olkon(1) ...... 4,926 3,997 Kovdorsky GOK ...... 1,970 3,215 Yakovlevskaya Ruda ...... — 30 Others ...... 311 828 Iron ore pellets Karelsky Okatysh(1) ...... 3,567 4,728
Note: (1) Owned by the Group.
Coal. The Russian Steel Division meets most of its annual coke supply requirements from its own coke batteries, using coal purchased from Severstal Resources, with the remainder sourced from third parties. It receives some additional supplies of coke concentrate from third-party suppliers. The Russian Steel Division has long-standing relationships with its key coal suppliers, which consist primarily of companies in Severstal Resources, and, in particular, Vorkutaugol. Vorkutaugol has been supplying coal to the Russian Steel Division and its predecessors for more than 40 years. Geographically, the Cherepovets Steel Mill is closer to Vorkutaugol than Vorkutaugol’s other customers. All contracts with the Russian Steel Division’s coal suppliers, including those with Severstal Resources, are concluded on an arm’s length basis and may be suspended if suitable coal can be purchased from alternative suppliers at lower prices. Contracts are generally concluded for a term of one year, with the intention of ensuring continuity, security and reliability of supplies. Payments under these contracts are made with a 2-4 weeks delay. In 2010 and 2009, the Cherepovets Steel Mill’s coal requirements account for approximately 100.0 percent of the Russian Steel Division’s total coal requirements. The following table sets forth a breakdown of the coal procured by the Cherepovets Steel Mill by supplier in 2009 and 2010.
Major Suppliers of Coal—Cherepovets Steel Mill Year ended 31 December Supplier 2009 2010 (million tonnes) Vorkutaugol(1) ...... 3,707 3,528 Sibuglemet ...... 131 247 Mechel ...... 997 925 Others ...... 509 693
Note: (1) Owned by the Group.
142
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1450DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 3878
Business
Scrap. The Russian Steel Division is a significant consumer of scrap in Russia and sources its scrap on a spot basis from smaller suppliers and on a contract basis for larger volumes, in part sourced from the Group’s own scrap collectors. In 2010, the Russian Steel Division consumed approximately 4.0 million tonnes of scrap, of which 2.8 million tonnes were purchased, including purchases from the Group’s own scrap collectors, and 1.2 million tonnes were internally sourced from the Cherepovets Steel Mill. The Russian Steel Division has its own scrap-processing facilities that allow it to utilise a wide range of sizes of steel scrap. These facilities include special cutting and packaging lines for processing the scrap so that it is ready for use in the smelting process. Scrap is sourced both externally, from companies that collect scrap metal, and internally, by using amortisation scrap, which consists of fixed assets that were cut up and melted down at the end of their useful lives, and production waste. Scrap is used in all steel-melting processes; the average proportion of scrap metal in the metal charge used in the smelting process ranges from approximately 25.0 percent in the oxygen converter and 75.0 percent in the electric arc shop. In August 2008, management responsibility for the scrap operations was transferred to the Russian Steel Division from Severstal Resources. The Group believes that the transfer of these operations into the Russian Steel Division is more appropriate, particularly given the planned addition of a mini-mill, which is currently expected to be completed in 2013, resulting in a significant increase in the consumption of scrap metal. See ‘‘—Capital Expenditure Programme’’. Other raw materials. The Russian Steel Division sources limestone from its open-pit limestone mines located in the northern part of the Vologda region in Russia, approximately 250 kilometres from Cherepovets. A wide range of ferro alloys is also used in the steelmaking process. Non-ferrous metals, such as zinc, manganese and aluminium, are employed primarily in the production of higher value added steel products, such as galvanised sheet. The Russian Steel Division sources most of its ferro alloy requirements from third party suppliers under annual contracts. A new 3-year contract with adjustable price for the supply of zinc was signed recently with Chelyabinsk Zinc Plant. The Russian Steel Division also imports certain raw materials, such as ferro-alloys and refractory materials, from Norway, Austria, China, Ukraine, Germany and Brazil. Contracts are typically for a term of one year, with prices being fixed on a quarterly basis or adjusted monthly by reference to market rates. Prices for non-ferrous metals are generally linked to the London Metal Exchange prices for such metals. Energy. Cherepovets Steel Mill uses the vast majority of the Russian Steel Division’s electricity requirements. Its electricity requirements total approximately 5.89 billion kilowatt hours per year. In 2010, 51.4 percent of these electricity requirements were provided by two on-site power stations owned by the Russian Steel Division. The two power stations have a total installed capacity of approximately 421 megawatts. The power stations generate electricity by burning natural gas and waste by-products from the steel mill’s production process, such as coke breeze, blast-furnace gas and coke-oven gas. Recycling waste by-products creates significant cost savings. As a result, the Russian Steel Division uses a relatively low amount of energy coal to generate electricity at its facilities. The Russian Steel Division covers its remaining electricity requirements through direct contracts to buy electricity in the Russian wholesale electricity market, typically with a term of one year. In 2010 and 2009, the Cherepovets Steel Mill’s energy requirements account for a substantial portion of the Russian Steel Division’s total energy requirements.
143
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 240D*/440D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 15324
Business
The following table sets forth a breakdown of the energy consumption of the Cherepovets Steel Mill in 2009 and 2010.
Consumption of Energy—Cherepovets Steel Mill Year ended 31 December Energy consumption 2009 2010 Electricity (millions of kilowatt hours)(1) ...... 5,403.5 5,894.0 Natural gas (million cubic metres) ...... 2,053.8 2,210.7 Diesel and fuel oil (thousands of tonnes) ...... 25.5 26.2
Note: (1) Cherepovets Steel Mill’s electricity generation facilities generated 3,187.8 million kilowatt hours and 3,029.5 million kilowatt hours in 2009 and 2010, respectively, the majority of which was used by the plant, and some of which was used by other production facilities or lost in transmission. The plant purchased 2,215.7 million kilowatt hours and 2,864.6 million kilowatt hours in 2009 and 2010, respectively.
The Cherepovets Steel Mill purchases a significant amount of electricity on the wholesale market in addition to the amount it produces internally. Prices for electricity in the Russian wholesale market have continued to increase and further increases are expected in line with the liberalisation of the Russian electricity industry. If prices remain high and if it is economically feasible to do so, the Russian Steel Division would consider constructing additional generating units. To generate heat, the steelmaking facilities within the Russian Steel Division use blast-furnace gas. The gas used is sufficient to meet all of the heat requirements of the Russian Steel Division, with surplus heat being sold to local utilities. Natural gas and fuel oil also form part of the Russian Steel Division’s energy requirements. Natural gas is used as a heat source in the blast furnaces, reheating lines and power plants. The power plants within the Russian Steel Division operate a combined cycle. These plants burn gases, including natural gas, to generate steam for electricity and burn by-product coal breeze from the coking plants to supplement hot water and industrial steam output. The Russian Steel Division’s power plants use fuel oil only in emergencies. The Russian Steel Division purchases its natural gas from a subsidiary of Gazprom, the natural gas supplier, under a five-year contract expiring in 2012 primarily at prices established by the Russian Federal Tariff Service. Affiliates of Gazprom, LukOil and TNK-BP supply fuel oil, typically under contracts with a term of one year, with a price determined monthly.
Products Steel products Crude steel products. The Russian Steel Division had a total crude steel output was 11.1 million tonnes in 2010. The following table sets forth the Russian Steel Division’s production of crude steel in 2009 and 2010, as well as the estimated aggregate production of crude steel in Russia and the Russian Steel Division’s estimated share of production.
Crude Steel Production—Russian Steel Division
Year 2009 2010 Russian Steel Division, million tonnes ...... 9.5 11.1 Estimated aggregate production of crude steel in Russia, million tonnes ...... 60.0 67.0 Russian Steel Division’s estimated share of production in Russia, percent ...... 15.8 16.6
Source: worldsteel.
144
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 90D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 43542
Business
Semi-finished products. Semi-finished products are intermediary products from the production process and represent generic steel products that have not yet been rolled for a specific application. The Division classifies the following products as ‘‘semi-finished’’. Finished steel products. Most of the Russian Steel Division’s crude steel production is further processed into finished steel products, which include flat and long products. Flat products include hot-rolled and cold-rolled sheet, plates and coils. Long products include hot-rolled sections, rebar and wire rod. The following table sets forth the Russian Steel Division’s total output and sales volumes by product category in 2009 and 2010.
Crude steel output and sales volumes by product—Russian Steel Division(1)
Year ended 31 December 2009 2010 (thousand tonnes) Output volumes Crude steel ...... 9,548 11,085 Sales volumes by product Hot-rolled strip and plate ...... 3,948 4,569 Large diameter pipes ...... 390 471 Cold-rolled sheet ...... 1,265 1,541 Metalware products ...... 683 786 Galvanised and other metallic coated sheet ...... 508 537 Long products ...... 788 773 Semi-finished products ...... 839 1,403 Other tubes and pipes formed shapes ...... 436 490 Colour-coated sheet ...... 234 244 Scrap ...... 289 339 Total steel products ...... 9,380 11,153 Other and shipping ...... — 82 Total sales by products ...... 9,380 11,235
Note: (1) Includes intersegmental sales.
Hot-rolled strip and plate. Hot-rolled flat products include heavy-gauge plate and light-gauge hot-rolled sheet produced from ordinary and high-quality carbon steel, low-alloy strengthened steel and clad steel. Clad steel includes two- and three-ply steel combined with a corrosion-resistant or wear-resistant ply. The Russian Steel Division produces hot-rolled plate with a maximum thickness of 450 mm, up to 4,800 mm in width and 20 thousand mm in length, as well as coils for rerolling of up to 36 tonnes. Heavy- gauge plate is used to manufacture pipes, oil and gas tanks, ships, bridge structures and railway cars. Light- gauge hot-rolled sheet has a minimum thickness of 0.8 mm and is used for welded pipe and tubing, automotive parts, small-size shapes, channels and profiles. Large diameter pipes. The Izhora Pipe Mill produces large diameter pipes with three layered anti-corrosion coating, diameters ranging from 610 mm to 1,420 mm and 18.3 metres in length, aimed at domestic customers in the gas industry, as well as domestic oil customers and some export customers. The Russian Steel Division is able to produce sophisticated steel grades for pipe manufacturing as well as high-quality steel with a very low level of impurities (sulphur content of less than 0.025 percent and a phosphorus content of less than 0.05 percent). Cold-rolled sheet. A cold-rolled flat product consists of cold-rolled sheet and coils with a thickness of 0.25 to 3.2 mm and is up to 1,620 mm in width. Cold-rolled sheet, which has a greater plasticity and a better
145
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DE14501A.;26 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 210DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 58166
Business
surface quality than hot-rolled sheet, has various uses, including the manufacture of automotive body panels and home appliances. In addition, cold-rolled products serve as feedstock for the Russian Steel Division’s galvanised and roll-formed products. Metalware products. Severstal-Metiz’s factories focus on the manufacture of metalware, such as low-carbon and high-carbon wire rods, nails, cold-drawn steel, steel rope, netting and fastenings. Severstal- Metiz comprises three sites in Russia: the Cherepovets site, the Orel site and the Volgograd site, located in northwest Russia, central Russia and the Povolzhie region of Russia, respectively. The Metalware business has an additional site in each of Ukraine and Italy. Galvanised and other metallic-coated sheet. The Russian Steel Division produces galvanised coated products, including those produced for the automotive industry by Severgal. The Russian Steel Division believes that demand for galvanised products from international automotive manufacturers will increase. Due to strict requirements of automotive plants outside Russia, the Russian Steel Division has focused on improving the quality of its products significantly and has developed new grades of products (for example, products with an alumino-silicon coating and high-strength steels) to meet the demands of automotive customers. The Russian Steel Division has benefited from Severstal North America’s experience in manufacturing high-quality galvanised products for the automotive industry. Long products. Hot-rolled steel sections are produced from ordinary carbon steel, high-carbon steel, low-alloy steel, structural alloy steel and include equal and unequal angles, hexagonal shapes, round bars, steel strips, wire rods and reinforcement bars. Other tubes and pipes, formed shapes. The Russian Steel Division produces more than 250 types of carbon and low-carbon steel roll-formed shapes, including perforated, close welded square and rectangular sections. Profiles with rectangular and square cross sections are widely used in the agricultural machine building, civil construction and automotive industries. Cold-formed sections also include a wide range of pipes and construction and furniture materials. To satisfy the growing demand of the Russian construction market, the Russian Steel division launched Severstal-TPZ Sheksna in 2010, resulting in increased production capacity of up to 250 thousand tonnes of steel tube, formed shapes and hollow sections per year. Colour-coated sheet. The Russian Steel Division produces colour-coated material of more than 20 colours with thickness of up to 1.2 mm and width from 1000 to 1400 mm. The main application of the colour- coated products is in the construction industry for roofing, hedging and similar uses. In some cases this product can substitute for galvanised material. Scrap. The Russian Steel Division conducts gathering, processing and delivery of breakage of ferrous metals for further use in steel-smelting units, including for export. Other and shipping. Other goods manufactured by the Russian Steel Division include civil construction goods and associated products. The Russian Steel division also renders services in transportation and support of cargoes both domestically and abroad.
Research and Development The Russian Steel Division is pursuing research and development initiatives with Russian universities and research institutes. Such initiatives include research and development centres for cast iron, steel and metal- rolling production applications. The Russian Steel Division is also conducting research initiatives, including the development of new kinds of cold-rolled and hot-rolled sheet which is not currently produced in Russia, the development of a strip with special properties, such as cold-resistance and plasticity, bimetallic rolled-stock combining high-wearing quality of the cladding layer and high plasticity, weldability and cold-resistance of the primary layer, and a cold-rolled galvanised automobile-body sheet of high durability. In addition, research is directed towards the optimisation of chemical composition and process-dependent parameters for the improvement of surface finish, and the reduction of expenses in the production of hot-rolled, cold-rolled and galvanised sheets.
146
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DE14501A.;26 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 100D*/320D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 59167
Business
Sales, Marketing and Competition The Russian Steel Division sells its products in both export and Russian domestic markets. The Russian Steel Division views the Russian domestic market as strategically important and has implemented a long-term programme designed to broaden its customer base and develop its relationship with various key customers. In the export markets, the Russian Steel Division aims to sell products predominantly on a spot-market basis. The following table sets forth the revenues by market for both domestic and export sales for the Russian Steel Division in 2009 and 2010.
Revenues by Market—Russian Steel Division(1)
Year ended 31 December Market 2009 2010 (percent of (percent of revenues) revenues) Domestic sales Russian Federation ...... 55.6 61.0 Export sales Europe ...... 13.5 11.8 CIS...... 9.6 7.9 The Middle East ...... 6.4 4.7 China and Central Asia ...... 5.7 2.4 South-East Asia ...... 4.7 4.8 Africa ...... 2.3 1.2 Central and South America ...... 1.9 4.1 North America ...... 0.3 2.1 Total ...... 100.0 100.0
Note: (1) Includes intersegmental sales. The following table sets forth the revenues by industry sector for both domestic and export sales for the Russian Steel Division in 2009 and 2010.
Revenues by Industry Sector—Russian Steel Division(1)
Year ended 31 December Industry sector 2009 2010 (percent of (percent of revenues) revenues) Construction and processing ...... 50.4 54.8 Oil and gas ...... 11.8 10.8 Machinery building ...... 13.8 7.2 Tube and pipemaking ...... 10.1 9.4 Automotive ...... 5.1 5.8 Other ...... 8.8 12.0 Total ...... 100.0 100.0
Note: (1) Includes intersegmental sales. Sales to the construction and processing market make up the majority of the Russian Steel Division’s sales. Construction and processing sales increased from 50.4 percent in 2009 to 54.8 percent in 2010. The share attributable to the automotive industry grew from 5.1 percent in 2009 to 5.8 percent in 2010. Sales to the oil and gas industry and to the tube and pipemaking industries increased in absolute terms in 2010 but fell as a percentage of sales relative to the other markets.
147
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 830DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 21917
Business
Russian domestic sales. The Russian Steel Division continues to regard Russia as its most important market. This market has certain advantages, including the ability to realise higher profit margins, high demand from domestic industries that rely on a stable supply of steel products, lower transportation costs for delivery of products and the ability to develop long-term strategic alliances with customers. Due to the impact of the global economic downturn on Russian industries, the Russian Steel Division’s domestic sales accounted for only 55.6 percent of total sales revenue in 2009. Domestic sales have increased in 2010, up to 61.0 percent. Customers. Since 2007, the Russian Steel Division has attached increasing importance to the construction and construction materials sectors, which include a number of important customers located in the European part of Russia, as well as to the large customers emerging in the developing economies of several CIS countries. Sales to the construction segment accounted for 41.9 percent of domestic sales in 2010. At the same time the Russian Steel Division’s largest customers are in the oil and gas, pipe-manufacturing and automotive sectors. A major part of the Russian Steel Division’s domestic sales are made by the Cherepovets Steel Mill, either directly to end users or to trading and distribution companies (see also ‘‘—Distribution’’). The following paragraphs briefly describe the main customers to which the Cherepovets Steel Mill sells directly. Tube and pipe-making industries accounted for approximately 11.8 percent of the Russian Steel Division’s total domestic sales by value in 2010. The Cherepovets Steel Mill’s principal customers in the pipe manufacturing sector are the Vyksa pipe plant and Chelyabinsk tube rolling plant (ChTPZ). The Cherepovets Steel Mill sold more than 900 thousand tonnes of different products to domestic customers in this sector in 2010. The Cherepovets Steel Mill is able to produce sophisticated steel grades for pipe manufacturing as well as high-quality steel with a very low level of impurities, namely, a sulphur content of less than 0.025 percent and a phosphorus content of less than 0.05 percent The Russian automotive sector accounted for approximately 7.6 percent of the Russian Steel Division’s total domestic sales in 2010. The Russian Steel Division’s key customers in the domestic automotive sector are OAO AutoVAZ and OAO UAZ. The Russian Steel Division aims to increase sales to foreign car producers, such as Renault and Ford. Due to the strict requirements of automotive plants, especially those outside Russia, the Russian Steel Division has focused on improving the quality of its products significantly and has developed new grades of products (for example, products with an alumino-silicon coating and high-strength steels) to meet the demands of customers and has benefited from Severstal North America’s experience in manufacturing high-quality galvanised products for the automotive industry. Key customer management. The Russian Steel Division has identified a number of key customers as part of a project to work in close co-ordination with customers in strategically important sectors, including such large accounts as OAO OMK-STAL, OAO Gazprom, OAO Transneft, OAO Volzhsky Pipe Plant, OAO ChTPZ, OAO AutoVAZ and OAO GAZ. The Russian Steel Division works with these customers as part of its ‘‘key account management’’ process, managed by a dedicated team which includes the development of new products and leads to further innovations both for the customer and the Russian Steel Division. Services for such customers include the construction of consignment warehouses in different regions and quarterly product-quality co-ordination, overseen by representatives of both the Russian Steel Division and the relevant customer. Sales by the Russian Steel Division to such customers’ accounts for more than 20.0 percent of the Russian Steel Division’s total sales. Distribution. The Russian Steel Division’s domestic sales are made to regional and other distributors, directly to end-users, or through Severstal Invest. The regional distribution of the Russian Steel Division’s products primarily involves the delivery of steel to the construction and processing industry. The Russian Steel Division received 33.0 percent and 36.7 percent of its revenues from sales to this group of Russian customers in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
148
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 5D*/320D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 60644
Business
Products The following table sets forth the domestic sales by product for the Russian Steel Division in 2009 and 2010.
Domestic Sales by Product—Russian Steel Division(1)
Year ended 31 December Product 2009 2010 (thousand (US$ (thousand (US$ tonnes) million) tonnes) million) Hot-rolled strip and plate ...... 1,420 781.1 2,187 1,425.4 Large-diameter pipes ...... 297 626.8 469 960.1 Cold-rolled sheet ...... 609 345.1 956 630.6 Metalware products ...... 425 351.4 529 523.9 Galvanised and other metallic-coated sheet ...... 336 273.6 402 342.1 Long products ...... 649 298.4 704 432.4 Semi-finished products ...... 4 2.5 26 13.2 Other tubes and pipes, formed shapes ...... 350 201.8 384 267.9 Colour-coated sheet ...... 214 225.2 220 258.6 Scrap ...... 95 19.4 112 34.5 Total steel products ...... 4,399 3,125.3 5,989 4,888.7 Other and shipping ...... — 312.2 — 489.7 Total sales by products ...... 4,399 3,437.5 5,989 5,378.4
Note: (1) Includes intersegmental sales. The Russian Steel Division’s domestic sales are dominated by hot-rolled strip and plate, which accounted for approximately 36.5 percent of total domestic sales by volume in 2010. Higher value-added products such as cold-rolled flat products and colour-coated sheet are also significant, making up approximately 16.0 percent and 3.7 percent, respectively, of total domestic sales by volume in 2010. Contracts. The Russian Steel Division has developed a flexible approach to contractual relations with its Russian domestic customers. Contracts are concluded on a quarterly, semi-annual or annual basis, depending on the customer. Factors determining the length of the contract include, for example, relationship history, industry and significance of the customer in its industry. Contracts also include a flexible system of discounts and rebates that provides for price adjustments on the basis of product tonnage, timing of payment and other contractual terms. The current economic environment is also a significant factor in choosing the length of the contractual period and certain other contractual terms (e.g.: price and volume). As market prices become more volatile, contracts will provide for more frequent renegotiation of the terms. In the domestic market, this is illustrated by shorter contract periods with customers in the metal trading and metal processing industries, whose markets are characterized by volatility, whereas customers in the automobile industry generally have longer contractual periods, reflecting the relative stability of the automotive market generally. In the export market, shipments usually are made on a monthly basis, but with a couple of exceptions for more stable customers, such as purchasers of cold-rolled non-grain oriented steel. Contracts for key customers usually have a duration of approximately three months, after which the price may be renegotiated, and may include other customised terms. The Russian Steel Division seeks prepayments from certain customers, including new customers and those companies who are considered to be at risk financially. In 2010, prepayments (full and partial) accounted for approximately 26.0 percent of the Russian Steel Division’s sales by value. The remainder of contracts requires settlement within a range of two to three weeks from delivery and combined settlements. This flexibility of contract and credit terms has generated a significant competitive advantage for the Russian Steel Division, allowing it to forge closer ties with customers and to react more effectively to changes in market conditions. In recent years, the Russian Steel Division has experienced very low levels of bad debts.
149
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 30D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63038
Business
Izhora Pipe Mill. In 2010, almost 100 percent of Izhora Pipe Mill’s sales were made into the Russian domestic market. Izhora Pipe Mill sells most of its products to the oil and gas industry and, in particular, to Gazprom, which purchased approximately 61.5 percent of all products sold by the mill in 2010. Sales are usually made to customers directly, generally under one-year contracts. Metalware domestic sales. Severstal-Metiz continues to regard Russia as its most important market. This market has certain advantages, such as significant demand from the domestic construction industry and greater profit margins, compared with export markets, and is characterised by lower transportation costs for delivery to customers from its Russian production facilities. Severstal-Metiz’s most important Russian customers are in the construction industry and the mass market, which consists primarily of small and medium-sized businesses, housing and communal services providers as well as individuals. Due to the absence of significant consolidation in the construction industry, Severstal-Metiz’s customer base is large. The largest part of Severstal-Metiz’s domestic sales consist of high-carbon products, such as ropes and steel wire, and low-carbon wire, which together accounted for approximately 64.5 percent of total domestic sales by volume in 2010. Severstal-Metiz’s Russian customers purchase its products on a range of contractual terms, varying from point-of-sale transactions to long-term contracts of typically three-, six- or twelve-month durations and depending also on factors such as the customer’s history and the industry. Severstal-Metiz typically seeks prepayments from certain customers, including new customers and those who are considered to be at risk financially. A flexible system of discounts and rebates may also be given according to product tonnage, timing of payment and other matters. Export sales. In line with its strategy of focusing on the Russian domestic market, the Russian Steel Division’s export sales strategy is oriented towards spot markets of steel products. In 2010, export sales of the Russian Steel Division increased by almost 300 thousand tonnes, reaching 5,246 thousand tonnes. The primary increase was in export sales of semi-finished products. The primary market for slabs was Europe, where many European steelmakers idled their blast furnaces in 2009 and 2010 due to lack of demand. The Russian Steel Division used this opportunity and increased sales of semi-finished products by more than 500 thousand tonnes in 2010 compared to 2009. The American market also presented some opportunities in hot-rolled coils and slabs, with the Russian Steel Division shifting sales from the traditionally low-margin markets of China and Middle East decreasing its overall share in total sales down to 7.1 percent from 12.1 percent to the American market increasing its share in total sales of the division from 2.2 percent to 6.2 percent Customers. The Russian Steel Division also focuses on a number of strategic export customers, focusing specifically on those customers who have recently established, or are likely to establish, operations in Russia or in other markets that the Russian Steel Division considers to be strategically important (for example, Greif, Inc., Ford Motors). The Russian Steel Division’s largest export customers are rerollers and tubemakers. In 2010, the major buyers were Dongkuk, Stahl Werke Bremen GmbH, Mir Steel Ltd., Borusan Mannesmann and Maghreb Steel. Distribution. The Russian Steel Division conducts its export sales through export-trading subsidiaries, Severstal Export GmbH, AS Severstallat, LLC Severstal-Ukraine and ZAO SeverstalBel. This system has enabled the Russian Steel Division to increase the efficiency of its export operations by minimising its reliance on intermediaries in the sales process, thereby reducing its distribution costs. Severstal Export GmbH is the marketing centre for the Russian Steel Division’s sales operations in the export markets, excluding the Baltic States, which are covered by AS Severstallat. Handling export operations through one centre has allowed the Russian Steel Division to achieve cost savings through lower administrative expenses, to benefit from large volumes and to eliminate intermediaries from the distribution chain. AS Severstallat has been the Russian Steel Division’s export agent in the Baltic region since its formation in 1992. Although the Russian Steel Division has direct contracts with certain customers in the Baltic market, the majority of sales contracts, primarily with shipbuilding companies, are concluded through AS
150
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 5D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 58510
Business
Severstallat. AS Severstallat now operates as the export agent and the customer-oriented regional service centre for the Baltic countries and Northern and Eastern Europe. It conducts a variety of businesses, including direct sales and a cutting service for coils. The Russian Steel Division’s export trading companies are responsible for the day-to-day management of export operations, with monitoring provided by the Russian Steel Division’s sales department in collaboration with the trading companies described above. This system provides a higher degree of control over export operations and ensures that these operations are aligned with the Russian Steel Division’s long-term strategy. Products. The Russian Steel Division’s export sales consist predominantly of flat products, with hot-rolled products and cold-rolled products accounting for approximately 45.4 percent and 11.2 percent, respectively, of sales by volume in 2010. Semi-finished products are also a significant part of total export sales by volume, with a 26.2 percent share in 2010, due to strong cost advantages in the merchandise slab market. The following table sets forth the export sales by product for the Russian Steel Division in 2009 and 2010.
Export Sales by Product—Russian Steel Division(1)
Year ended 31 December Product 2009 2010 (thousand (US$ (thousand (US$ tonnes) million) tonnes) million) Hot-rolled strip and plate ...... 2,528 1,091.1 2,382 1,312.0 Large-diameter pipes ...... 93 151.2 2 1.2 Cold-rolled sheet ...... 656 335.7 585 402.0 Metalware products ...... 258 275.3 257 311.8 Galvanised and other metallic-coated sheet ...... 172 110.7 135 115.0 Long products ...... 139 60.6 69 44.9 Semi-finished products ...... 835 284.7 1,377 663.1 Other tubes and pipes, formed shapes ...... 86 53.6 106 80.3 Colour-coated sheet ...... 20 21.2 24 29.6 Scrap ...... 194 38.9 227 63.7 Total steel products ...... 4,981 2,423.0 5,164 3,023.6 Other and shipping ...... — 318.6 82 412.8 Total sales by products ...... 4,981 2,741.6 5,246 3,436.4
Note: (1) Includes intersegmental sales.
Metalware. The main international markets for metalware products are those in the CIS, as well as in Europe. Its customers are generally in similar industries to those in the Russian market. Severstal-Metiz conducts its export sales mainly through Dneprometiz, which sells primarily to customers in Ukraine, and Redaelli Tecna in Italy. Pipes. The main international market for Cherepovets pipes is the CIS market. The European customers are shipped with pipes made in Riga and Silesia (Poland) on AS Severstallat’s facilities. Scrap. Scrap is mostly sold on the domestic market. In 2010, however, the Russian Steel Division exported some of its scrap due to lack of demand on the Russian market.
Competition Both the Russian and the international steel markets are highly competitive due to the large number of key players. Primary competitive factors include product sophistication, quality, price, payment terms and customer service. In addition, the development of new technologies has reduced the capital costs associated with steel production and led to increased competition from new entrants to the industry with lower capital requirements. The steel industry also competes with producers of materials that offer an
151
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 250D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 15096
Business
alternative to traditional steel products, such as aluminium or plastic. In response to this competition, the Russian Steel Division has consistently invested in new facilities, allowing it to produce lower cost, higher quality and more sophisticated products, as well as in management systems and personnel. The Group has also steadily moved the Russian Steel Division further down the value-chain, producing higher-value- added, differentiated products and establishing closer relations with end-users. The share of domestic market in Russian Steel Division total sales has increased from approximately 55.6 percent in 2009 to 61.0 percent in 2010. The Russian Steel Division’s key competitors in the Russian domestic markets for flat-rolled steel products are MMK and NLMK. The major competitors for long products include Evraz and Mechel. Vyksa and ChTPZ compete with the Russian Steel Division in pipes. The following table sets forth the principal competitors of the Russian Steel Division in the Russian crude steel market by volume of production.
Principal Competitors of the Russian Steel Division—Russian Crude Steel Production
Year ended 31 December Company 2009 2010 (thousands of tonnes) Evraz ...... 11,278 11,955 MMK...... 9,729 11,419 Russian Steel Division ...... 9,548 11,085 NLMK...... 10,104 10,989 Mechel ...... 5,748 6,073
Source: Official company data, Metal-Expert. The Russian market is characterised by intensifying competition for customers, raw materials, capital and experienced personnel. In terms of volume, the Group believes that the Cherepovets Steel Mill is one of the two largest steel complexes in the CIS based on production data published by Chermet and is one of the most sophisticated by range of products. The plant has a captive supply of high-quality raw materials, allowing it to ensure a favourable cost baseline even as compared to the largest domestic competitors. These factors have enabled the Russian Steel Division to increase its sales in the domestic construction market. Finally, the Russian Steel Division’s relative market strength is underpinned by its proactive marketing strategy and ongoing efforts to increase quality and technical sophistication, which has allowed it to forge long-term relationships with key domestic customers in the pipe production and automotive sector.
Capital Expenditure Programme The Russian Steel Division’s capital expenditure in 2009 and 2010 was approximately US$368.6 million and US$575.6 million, respectively, most of which was spent on new projects as well as on the repair and modernisation of its existing steel operations. The Russian Steel Division’s capital expenditure programme is designed to increase productivity and efficiency, effect environmental upgrades, replace and refurbish major equipment, and develop its product mix further to produce higher-quality, value-added products, including coated steel and cold-rolled products. New products under development include tube-making strips, such as the pilot batch of X-80 and X-100 API-class strength steel for large-diameter pipelines; heavy plates for a shipbuilding project to be rolled by the 2800 and 5000 rolling mills; hot-dip galvanised sheets for automotive exposed parts and IF-steels; duplex steels and micro-alloyed steels; a skelp steel with increased corrosion-resistant and low-temperature-resistant properties; and long products of A 500C class for construction applications. As a result of the capital expenditure programme, modern processing technology and equipment from leading suppliers to the steel industry, including Fuchs, LOI, SMS Siemag and Siemens, have been installed at the Russian Steel Division’s facilities.
152
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 65415
Business
The Russian Steel Division’s total capital expenditure excluding maintenance from 2011 to 2015 is expected to be approximately US$3,865.9 million. Aggregate capital expenditure on maintenance for the Russian Steel Division is expected to be approximately US$427 million in 2011, and is expected to gradually increase to approximately US$550 million in 2015 (provided that the Group undertakes the expansion projects contemplated by the current business plan and subject to market conditions). Cherepovets Steel Mill. Capital expenditure planned at the Cherepovets Steel Mill is primarily as follows: Blast furnace facilities. Blast Furnace 3 was decommissioned at the end of 2006 for refurbishment and is expected to remain out of operation until 2015. Blast Furnaces 3, 4 and 5 are scheduled to have PCI technology installed with Blast Furnaces 3 and 4, to be completed by 2015 and, in respect of Blast Furnace 5, during its capital refurbishment in 2016. Reconstruction of the hot blast stoves in Blast Furnace 5 was begun in 2008, and is still underway. Blast Furnace 5 consists of four hot blast stoves, the last of which will become operational in 2019. Blast Furnace 2 is scheduled to be shut down in 2015, prior to the launch of Blast Furnace 3. Blast Furnace 1 is scheduled to be shut down by the beginning of 2017. Coke batteries 7, 4, 8 and 9 will gradually be refurbished, and the construction thereof will be completed in 2012, 2014, 2018 and 2023, respectively. Converter shop. Capital expenditures will focus on production expansion and quality improvement of output, enabling the production of new products, such as X-80 and X-100 API-class strength steel. Dust-treatment equipment is also to be installed. The converter, the continuous-casting plant, the water handling facilities, the steel ladle facility and the steel secondary refining facility will be modernized. This is expected to increase the combined capacity of the continuous casters. Flat rolling facilities. Automated systems and sheet-straightening machines are to be installed and heating facilities refurbished. Mill 5000 is also to be modernised by improving the quality and decreasing the costs, and expanded to produce high-quality strips for large-diameter pipes and other applications which, when completed, are expected to increase the capacity of Mill 5000 to 784 thousand tonnes per year. The cold-rolling equipment is to be refurbished to increase product quality and production capacity to 3.0 million tonnes per year by 2013. One galvanizing line with an annual capacity of 400 thousand tonnes and a colour coating line with an annual capacity of 200 thousand tonnes are planned for completion by 2015. Another galvanizing line with an annual capacity of 450 thousand tonnes and a colour coating line with an annual capacity of 200 thousand tonnes are planned for completion by 2019. Energy-generating facilities. The capital expenditure programme aims to increase the reliability of gas, water and energy supplies to the major production shops. This is expected to include the commissioning of one air-separating unit, as well as the refurbishment of one air-separating unit in the oxygen shop. To decrease the share of purchased energy the Group is planning to refurbish existing generating facilities. Transportation facilities. Capital expenditure on transportation facilities in the Russian Steel Division is also planned, including the development of its internal railway infrastructure and the purchase of coil delivery ramps and locomotives. Other facilities. Capital expenditure in downstream facilities within the Russian Steel Division is also planned, including the construction of a number of service centres in Russia, aimed at increasing the production and distribution of high-value added products. Izhora Pipe Mill and Metalware facilities. The installation of a single-position expander enabling the expansion of production by 40 thousand tonnes per year to reach 520 thousand tonnes per year is planned to begin in 2014 at the Izhora Pipe Mill. The Group’s Russian metalware facilities have implemented capital expenditure programmes to enhance the efficiency of their assets and have formed a long-term development strategy. The further capital expenditure programmes include project for special ropes on the Chinese market, development of cord business and development of rope service centres. Mini-mill. The Russian Steel Division plans to add a mini-mill in Russia with a planned capacity of approximately 1 million tonnes of finished long products per year. In July 2007, construction of the Balakovo mini-mill was started in the Saratov region of Russia. It is currently expected that the mini-mill will be completed in the second quarter of 2013 at an estimated cost of approximately US$693 million (excluding VAT). This production facility is to be located close to growing markets for steel products,
153
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 210D*/420D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 10637
Business
primarily as a result of the construction industry, as well as markets for scrap metal and raw materials for their EAFs. Scrap metal assets. The estimated capital expenditure requirements in the ferrous scrap metal business between 2011 and 2015 are approximately US$200 million. The capital expenditure is expected to consist of expenditure on existing processing facilities.
Employees Employee numbers for the Russian Steel Division were reduced from 61,189 in 2008 to 50,848 in 2009, and to 50,541 in 2010, in part, due to increased labour efficiency and ongoing efficiency improvements. The significant decrease in the number of employees mostly during 2009 has resulted in a significant improvement in the Company’s overall labor productivity in 2010, with utilisation levels of production facilities returning to the levels seen prior to the global economic downturn. A two-year collective bargaining agreement was concluded between the Group and the Mining and Metallurgical Trade Union in 2009 in respect of employees at the Cherepovets Steel Mill, which provides, among other matters, that wages may be renegotiated when the price of a basket of goods increases by at least 5.0 percent, was extended until 2011. Since 1996, the Russian Steel Division has experienced no material labour disputes, strikes or employee legal actions. The Russian Steel Division considers its employee relations to be good. The majority of employees of the Russian Steel Division are entitled to a lump-sum payment on retirement, which is based on their average salary and number of years of service, as well as monthly fixed payments.
Health, Safety and Environment Management systems of Cherepovets Steel Mill are certified to be in conformance with the requirements of OHSAS 18001 and ISO 14001 international standards. In 2009, there were 78 industrial accidents in the Russian Steel Division, declining to 61 in 2010. In 2010, there were 10 accidents in metalware production, compared to 23 in 2009. There was one accident at the Izhora Pipe Mill in 2010 and two accidents in 2009. The Russian Steel Division is participating in the Group’s overall labor safety project and the Group’s management believes that it has been effective in reducing the number of incidents with an ultimate goal to be among the industry leaders in safety by 2014. The total expenditures on occupational health and safety measures at the Cherepovets Steel Mill in 2010 amounted to approximately US$7.5 million, compared to approximately US$4.4 million in 2009. These expenditures were made on items such as safety clothing, boots and other personal safety equipment and improving working conditions. Expenditures on implementation of environmental protection measures amounted to US$8.6 million in 2009 and US$20.5 million in 2010.
Insurance The Russian Steel Division maintains a level of insurance covering property, plant and equipment. The Russian Steel Division believes that this insurance is commensurate with the standards of other international and domestic steel companies and has business interruption insurance coverage ranging from fixed costs to full gross profits, depending on the plant, for interruption periods of up to 12 months. The Russian Steel Division does not purchase full insurance for third-party liability in respect of property or environmental damage. Third-party insurance services are provided to the Russian Steel Division by Russian insurers, including Sheksna Insurance Company (in 2009), which was previously owned by the Group and divested in 2004. In 2009, Sheksna Insurance Company was acquired by SOGAZ and subsequently the third-party insurance services for Russian Steel Division was redirected to insurance company SOGAZ. All risks covered by policies issued by SOGAZ are reinsured, with approximately 70.0 percent to 95.0 percent reinsured in the international market and the remainder with domestic insurers.
154
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DG14501A.;24 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 7DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ Seq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 19531
Business
SEVERSTAL INTERNATIONAL Severstal International is currently comprised of Severstal North America.
Severstal North America Severstal North America is comprised of Severstal Dearborn, Severstal Columbus and holding companies—Severstal US Holdings, LLC, Severstal US Holdings II, LLC and Severstal Columbus Holdings, LLC. Severstal North America holds interests in four joint ventures and one associate, established together with other US companies in order to expand product line and provide services: Double Eagle Steel Coating Company (Double Eagle), Spartan Steel Coating, LLC (Spartan Steel), MSC and Mississippi Steel Processing, LLC (MSP) and Delaco Processing, LLC (Delaco Processing). The joint ventures produce metallurgical coke and galvanised steel, and provide steel processing services. The Group’s management continues to consider the optimal asset structure for the Group in the United States through making strategic acquisitions and disposals from time to time, as well as through ongoing organic growth.
Severstal Dearborn Severstal Dearborn is located in Dearborn, Michigan. This location gives Severstal Dearborn strategic proximity to major automotive customers, to the Great Lakes waterways and to three large railroads in North America, providing logistically favourable access to raw materials and to customers. Current crude steel capacity at Severstal Dearborn is 2.1 million tonnes annually. Severstal Dearborn’s product line includes hot-rolled, cold-rolled and galvanised steel. These products and, in particular, the value-added products such as high strength, high-carbon and low-alloy steel, are largely targeted at the automotive industry. Severstal Dearborn has three joint ventures and an associate, each established with US companies: • Double Eagle is a 50.0 percent joint venture with United States Steel Corporation (US Steel), with a capacity of 0.6 million tonnes of electrogalvanised steel per year, approximately one-half of which is dedicated to supplying Severstal Dearborn. Double Eagle produces electrogalvanised sheet steel for automotive customers; • Spartan Steel is a 48.0 percent joint venture with Worthington Steel of Michigan, with a capacity of 0.6 million tonnes of hot-dip galvanised steel per year, approximately 80.0 percent of which is dedicated to Severstal Dearborn. Spartan Steel produces hot-dip galvanised sheet steel for automotive and service customers. Severstal Dearborn supplies nearly 100 percent of the sheet steel used as substrate to Spartan Steel; • MSC is a 50.0 percent joint venture, which has the capacity of 1.0 million tonnes of coke per year, approximately half of which is dedicated to supplying Severstal Dearborn. MSC produces metallurgical coke; and • Delaco Processing is an associate, 49.0 percent of which is owned by Severstal Dearborn and 51.0 percent of which is owned by Delaco Supreme Tool and Gear Company. Delaco Processing specialises in longitudinal slitting of steel coils and is capable of slitting steel coils with a width of up to 1,829 mm.
Severstal Columbus Severstal Columbus is one of the most technologically advanced steelmaking facilities in North America. Commissioned in August 2007, it is the newest mini-mill in North America and the only EAF compact strip process (CSP) plant in the world designed to make exposed automotive steels. Severstal Columbus focuses on the production of high-quality, flat-rolled steel. The Phase II expansion, which commenced in 2008 and is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2011, will increase crude steel capacity to 3.1 million tonnes, matching the hot strip mill capacity and allowing Severstal Columbus to achieve greater economies of scale. In addition, Phase II will increase the capacity of downstream operations approximately 30.0 percent to 120.0 percent depending on the unit, including a continuous pickle line, batch annealing, temper mill and continuous galvanising line. The hot end of the Phase II expansion, which includes an EAF, ladle metallurgy furnace, tunnel furnace and continuous caster, began production in June 2011.
155
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DG14501A.;24 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 60D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 42529
Business
Severstal Columbus produces a broad range of high quality hot-rolled, hot-rolled picked and oiled, cold-rolled and galvanised sheet products for customers primarily in the distributor, construction, automotive, appliance, machinery and pipe and tube markets. It also has the capability to produce motor lamination grades and renitrogenised steels as well as value-added applications for culverts, shipbuilding and line-pipe. Severstal Columbus is strategically located in Columbus, Mississippi giving it access to high growth markets in the southern United States and Mexico, including the growing vehicle manufacturing operations in those regions. Severstal Columbus’s approximately 5.3 square kilometre site has been designed to allow for additional on-site downstream operations, which is intended to be developed independently or through joint development opportunities. Severstal Columbus owns 20.0 percent of MSP, a steel service centre under construction at Severstal Columbus’ industrial site. MSP is a joint venture with Merlo Holding, Inc. (40.0 percent) and Layhill Ventures, LLC (40.0 percent). Production began in the second quarter of 2011 with anticipated annual production of 156 thousand tonnes of processed steel products per year.
Facilities Severstal North America’s main production facilities for Severstal Dearborn and Severstal Columbus are set forth below:
Steel Production Facilities, Severstal North America Division—Capacity
As at 31 December 2010 Equipment Capacity (million tonnes per year) Severstal Dearborn Blast furnace facilities ...... 1 1.9 Basic oxygen furnaces ...... 2 3.0 Ladle refining facilities ...... 2 3.3 Vacuum degassing facilities ...... 1 0.7 Continuous casters ...... 2 3.3 Hot rolling mills ...... 1 3.3 Pickle lines ...... 2 1.1 Tandem mills ...... 1 1.3 Temper mills ...... 1 0.8 Annealing processes ...... 2 0.9 Hot dip galvanising lines* ...... 1 0.5 Electrogalvanising lines* ...... 1 0.3 Severstal Columbus EAFs ...... 1 1.5 Continuous casters ...... 1 1.5 Hot rolling mills ...... 1 1.5 Continuous pickle lines ...... 1 1.2 Tandem mills ...... 1 1.2 Temper mills ...... 1 0.5 Annealing processes ...... 1 0.4 Hot dip galvanising lines ...... 1 0.5
Note: * Joint venture equipment. Severstal North America’s share of the JV production is presented.
Severstal Dearborn. Severstal Dearborn is focused primarily on high quality flat-rolled carbon steel products and currently has a production capacity of 2.1 million tonnes of crude steel per year. Severstal Dearborn’s facility is a fully integrated plant located on an industrial site adjacent to Ford’s stamping, engine, frame, paint and assembly plants. Severstal Dearborn’s operations consist of one operating blast furnace, one BOF with two vessels, two ladle refining facilities, one vacuum degassing facility, two
156
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 70D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 6143
Business
continuous casters, one hot strip mill, two operating pickle lines, one tandem mill, one temper mill, two annealing facilities, a share of hot-dip galvanising line at Spartan Steel and an electrogalvanising line at Double Eagle. It also has a share of the steel-slitting facility at Delaco Processing and a coke facility at MSC. These facilities enable Severstal Dearborn to produce high quality, flat-rolled carbon steel products consisting of hot-rolled, cold-rolled and galvanised steel. Blast furnaces. Severstal Dearborn’s blast furnace ‘‘C’’ has a working volume of approximately 1,800 cubic metres and a capacity to produce approximately 1.9 million tonnes of hot metal per year. In 2007, blast furnace ‘‘C’’ was completely rebuilt and modernised. Severstal Dearborn’s ‘‘B’’ blast furnace was damaged in an accident in 2008. Once rebuilt, it will have a working volume of approximately 800 cubic meters and will add 1.1 million tonnes of hot metal capacity per year. Steelmaking facilities. Severstal Dearborn has a BOF with two 236-tonne converter BOF vessels and two slab continuous casting machines. One is a twin strand, straight mould machine with a metallurgical length of 26.5 metres, and the other is a single strand, straight mould machine with a metallurgical length of 23.5 metres. Rolling facilities. Severstal Dearborn’s hot rolling mill has three walking beam furnaces, four roughing stands and seven finishing stands. This mill has a capacity of 3.3 million tonnes per year. Severstal Dearborn has two operating pickle lines, one of which has a maximum line speed of 110 metres per minute and the other has a maximum line speed of 381 metres per minute. The pickle lines have a total capacity of 1.1 million tonnes per year. Severstal Dearborn expects to launch its PLTCM in September 2011 and shut down the existing pickle lines approximately three months later. Severstal Dearborn’s tandem mill is a four-stand by four-high mill. The maximum line speed is 975 metres per minute and the maximum coil weight is 27.2 tonnes. The tandem mill has a capacity of 1.3 million tonnes per year. The existing tandem mill is expected to be shut down approximately three months after the PLTCM launches. Severstal Dearborn’s temper mill is a one-stand, four-high design. The maximum rolling speed is 858 metres per minute and the maximum coil weight is 27.2 tonnes. The temper mill has a capacity of 0.8 million tonnes per year. Severstal Dearborn has two annealing processes: hydrogen batch annealing and hydrogen-nitrogen (HN) batch annealing. The hydrogen batch annealing facility consists of 26 bases with 17 furnaces and a stacking height of 5.28 metres. The HN batch annealing facility has 86 bases with 34 furnaces and a stacking height of 3.95 metres. The primary fuel used for both annealing processes is natural gas. Spartan Steel hot-dip galvanising line. Spartan Steel produces hot-dip galvanised sheet steel sold to automotive and service centre customers. Spartan Steel has improved its capacity through good management practices and a 2006 upgrade of the furnace and cooling capability. Spartan Steel currently reports its capacity as 0.6 million tonnes annually. Severstal Dearborn sells approximately 80.0 percent of this output. Double Eagle electrogalvanising line. Double Eagle has a capacity of 0.6 million tonnes per year, approximately one-half of which is dedicated to Severstal Dearborn. This facility has 42 plating cells and can coat on one or two sides at a thickness of 0 to 100 grams per square metre. The facility can coat the substrate with either pure zinc or a zinc-iron alloy. MSC coke plant. MSC has a capacity of 1.0 million tonnes per year, approximately half of which is dedicated to supplying Severstal Dearborn. MSC produces metallurgical coke. Delaco Processing slitter. Delaco Processing operates a steel slitting facility capable of processing coils up to 1,829 millimetres wide and up to 27 tonnes in weight and creating slit widths as low as 35 mm. Severstal Columbus. Severstal Columbus is the newest mini-mill in North America. Severstal Columbus is the only EAF CSP plant in the world designed to make exposed automotive steels. The facility serves a growing manufacturing industry in the southern United States. The facility has access to both rail and interstate truck routes for fast delivery to more than twelve targeted states and northern Mexico. The annual production capacity at Severstal Columbus was 1.5 million tonnes of crude steel when it was built,
157
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 2070D*/2300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 34826
Business
but the Group plans to increase the production capacity at Severstal Columbus to approximately 3.1 million tonnes of crude steel per year after completing Phase II. The initial segment of Phase II, which includes an EAF, ladle metallurgy furnace, tunnel furnace and continuous caster, launched in June 2011. The second segment of Phase II, which includes a push-pull pickle line and a hot dip galvanizing line, is expected to launch in the fourth quarter of 2011. Severstal Columbus includes EAF casting and hot-rolling, cold-rolling and galvanising facilities. Melt shop. Severstal Columbus’ state-of-the-art EAF has a diameter of 7.5 metres and a volume of 200 cubic metres. The tap weight of the furnace is 150 tonnes, with a tap-to-tap time of 45 minutes. The second EAF became operational in June 2011. The facility’s melt shop also includes two 154 tonne ladle metallurgy furnaces and two 154 tonne vacuum degassers. Continuous caster. Severstal Columbus’ continuous caster has two single strands, each with a vertical mould. The caster has an annual rated capacity of 1.5 million tonnes. The second continuous caster became operational in June 2011. Hot rolling mill. Severstal Columbus’ continuous caster is linked to the six stand hot rolling mill by a 261 meter tunnel furnace. Fired by natural gas, the furnace is designed to heat slabs to approximately 1,175 degrees Celsius for rolling on the direct coupled hot rolling mill. The facility’s hot rolling mill has six stands (four high). Phase II adds a second tunnel furnace and two hot shuttles to connect both casters to the exiting hot rolling mill. Phase II also adds a second downcoiler to enable the hot rolling mill capacity to double and provide high reliability. Continuous pickling line. Severstal Columbus’ continuous pickle line can produce pickled and oiled coils or it can be directly linked to the five stand tandem mill for continuous pickling and cold-rolling. The pickle line has extensive storage capacity for completed coils awaiting shipment. Cold mill. Severstal Columbus’ five stand, four high tandem mill has an annual production capacity of approximately 1.2 million tonnes. The cold rolling mill includes a batch anneal facility with an annual capacity of 0.4 million tonnes. The anneal system includes a total of 21 works bases, 11 heating bells and 11 cooling bells. Temper mill. Severstal Columbus’ single-stand, four high temper mill has an annual rated capacity of 0.5 million tonnes. Hot dip galvanising line. Severstal Columbus’ hot dip galvanising line has an annual capacity of 0.5 million tonnes. The line is designed to coat cold-rolled strip for exposed automotive and appliance applications.
Supply Chain: Raw Materials and Energy The following table sets out consumption of various raw materials by Severstal North America in 2009 and 2010.
158
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 40D /240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63389
Business
Consumption of Raw Materials and Energy—Severstal North America
Year ended 31 December Raw materials(1) 2009 2010 (thousand tonnes, except as otherwise noted) Iron ore ...... 2,453.8 2,927.5 Coal ...... 200.3 199.2 Hot briquetted iron and pig iron ...... 299.0 296.2 Coke ...... 833.6 920.4 Metal Scrap ...... 1,663.3 1,987.2 Ferro Alloys ...... 27.4 33.2 Fluxes ...... 222.0 279.7 Other Materials ...... 119.9 126.6 Energy Electricity (millions of kilowatt-hours) ...... 1,644.4 1,811.8 Natural Gas (1,000 cubic meters) ...... 266,850.1 381,457.8
Note: (1) Excluding data for the Group’s discontinued operations: Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC.
Severstal Dearborn. The principal raw materials used by Severstal Dearborn to produce steel include iron ore pellets, coke and metal scrap. Severstal Dearborn does not maintain a minimum reserve of raw materials with the exception of iron ore pellets, which are delivered by ship. The Great Lakes shipping channels are typically closed during the period from January to March, and accordingly, Severstal Dearborn accumulates a three-month supply of iron ore pellets by the end of each year to sustain production during the winter months. Other raw materials are generally delivered by rail and by road. The principal energy sources for Severstal Dearborn include electricity and natural gas. Iron ore and pellets. Iron ore is purchased exclusively from Cliffs Natural Resources pursuant to a long-term contract, at a competitive price set annually by reference to then current market price, expiring at the end of 2022. Severstal Dearborn has committed to purchase all of its iron ore requirements from Cliffs Natural Resources through this period, including a minimum volume of 2.5 million tonnes per year from 2011 to 2022. Severstal Dearborn consumed approximately 2.7 million tonnes of iron ore per year in 2009 and 2010. Coke. In 2010, Severstal Dearborn received approximately 80.2 percent of its total coke consumed from MSC. Severstal Dearborn has entered into long-term agreements with an affiliate of DTE Energy Company (DTE Energy) to acquire most of the balance of the coke required to operate its blast furnaces. If additional volume is required, it will be purchased on a spot market basis. Scrap. Scrap is purchased from companies that collect scrap metal and is also generated internally from Severstal Dearborn production processes. Approximately 25.0 percent of the BOF vessels charge is scrap and the remaining 75.0 percent is liquid iron. Severstal Dearborn also uses scrap-processing services, which allows Severstal Dearborn to process a wide range of sizes and quality of steel scrap. Such services include special cutting and packaging lines for processing the scrap so that it is ready for use in the smelting process. Although there have been sharp increases in market prices of steel scrap in both the United States and international markets in recent years, Severstal Dearborn believes that its strategic location in a region with significant sources of prime automotive scrap brings it an advantage in transport costs. Severstal Dearborn launched a scrap blending programme in the fourth quarter of 2007. This programme allows for the replacement of prime scrap bundles with non-prime grades to reduce costs. Non-prime grades of scrap currently account for approximately 40.0 percent of the total scrap, which is approximately the same percentage as 2009 and 2010. Purchased slabs. Severstal Dearborn purchases slabs (semi-finished products) in order to produce incremental hot sheet products. In 2010, Severstal Dearborn purchased a total of 258 thousand tonnes from other companies, including Severstal Warren and Severstal Sparrows Point. In connection with the sale of Severstal Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren and Severstal Wheeling, Severstal Dearborn entered into a supply agreement under which Severstal Dearborn agreed to purchase 390 thousand tonnes of slabs
159
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 90D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 48902
Business
from the disposed companies in 2011 and 154 thousand tonnes of slabs from the disposed companies in 2012 at a price which is set at a percentage below spot market prices, pursuant to an index. Electricity. Severstal Dearborn’s electricity requirements total approximately 0.6 million megawatt-hours per year. Electricity is purchased from DTE Energy, a local public utility, under two contracts which expire in 2013 and 2016. The contracts provide for firm power at a competitive price and interruptible power at a lower rate. In 2008, Severstal Dearborn received approximately US$177 million from CMS Energy Corporation, an affiliate of DIG for the termination of an electricity supply arrangement that was otherwise to extend until 2030. The termination was at the request of DIG and the lump sum payment broadly compensates Severstal Dearborn for the differential in price it is likely to have to pay another supplier for the duration of the original arrangement. Natural gas. Severstal Dearborn purchases gas on the open market from Southwest Energy LP. The gas is transported to Severstal Dearborn by the natural gas provider Michcon Pipeline, a subsidiary of DTE Energy, pursuant to a contract that expires in 2013. Severstal Columbus. The principal raw materials and energy sources used in Severstal Columbus’ production process are steel scrap, pig iron, HBI, DRI, electricity and natural gas. These commodities are purchased pursuant to long-term or annual agreements. Some of these agreements do not have fixed prices and, therefore, the price paid is subject to the volatility of the market. Steel scrap. Scrap represents Severstal Columbus’ largest raw material expenditure. In 2008, a significant amount of scrap was provided by Jefferson Iron and Metal Brokerage, Inc. (Jefferson) pursuant to a long-term contract that initially expires in 2012, but, absent notice of termination, will be automatically renewed for subsequent one year terms. Jefferson procures and manages Severstal Columbus’ inbound scrap supply, although Severstal Columbus holds title to inbound supply after procurement. Jefferson’s minimum commitment is to provide 30.5 thousand tonnes per month. The purchasing department of Severstal North America works with Jefferson to solicit bids for scrap in the market. The availability and price of scrap under the Jefferson contract are subject to market conditions. In addition to scrap purchased through Jefferson, Severstal Columbus has scrap buyback programmes with some of its customers. Under these programmes, Severstal Columbus buys scrap from these customers at a price higher than these customers would be able to obtain on the open market, but lower than what Severstal Columbus would be required to pay on the open market. Using specially designed trucks, scrap can be transported back to Severstal Columbus in the same vehicle that delivers steel products to these customers, offering a substantial freight savings. Any remaining scrap needed by Severstal Columbus is purchased directly on the open market from one or several of the more than 50 vendors from which Severstal Columbus has purchased scrap in the past. Pig iron, HBI and DRI. Stena Metal, Inc. (Stena) procures and manages Severstal Columbus’ international inbound pig iron, HBI and DRI supply. The supply procured by Stena is stored on consignment at Severstal Columbus’ facility and title passes to Severstal Columbus upon its notice to Stena to release such supply. Severstal Columbus also purchases pig iron from Consolidated Mill Supply, Inc., StemCor USA, Inc., Alpicom, S.A. and from RG Steel, LLC at market prices. Electricity. Severstal Columbus purchases electricity pursuant to a long-term partially interruptible power supply agreement with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) that expires in 2018 and certain related ancillary agreements with the TVA. Under the contracts, the rates charged for electricity vary according to the current rates charged by the TVA, the amount of usage and certain other factors related to individual agreements. For rate reduction credits, a portion of the power provided can be interrupted by the TVA on five minutes notice and a portion of the power to which Severstal Columbus is entitled can be voluntarily sold back. Certain of these credits expire in 2011 and 2012. To facilitate electricity consumption needs and delivery by the TVA, Severstal Columbus owns and maintains a power substation near the facility. The TVA has constructed certain additional power delivery feeds and equipment in order to meet its facilities production needs. Natural Gas. Severstal Columbus purchases natural gas from Atmos Energy Marketing, LLC pursuant to a contract that, absent default, is terminable on 30 days written notice. Natural gas is purchased at market prices under a firm commitment to provide specified quantities daily. The gas is transported to Severstal
160
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 47DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 11500
Business
Columbus in accordance with a separate fixed price contract with Atmos Energy Corporation that initially terminates in 2011, but, absent notice of termination, will be automatically renewed for a subsequent one year terms.
Products The following table shows Severstal North America’s sales by product for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Sales volumes by products—Severstal North America Division(1)(2)
Year ended 31 December Product 2009 2010 (thousand tonnes) Hot-rolled strip and plate ...... 1,523 1,834 Cold-rolled sheet ...... 688 711 Galvanised and other metallic coated sheet ...... 1,054 1,196 Total rolled products ...... 3,265 3,741 Total semi-finished products ...... 1 1 Total ...... 3,266 3,742
Notes: (1) Excluding data for the Group’s discontinued operations: Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC. (2) Includes intersegment sales. The percentages in the following discussion are all for the year ended 31 December 2010.
Severstal Dearborn Most of Severstal Dearborn’s crude steel production is further processed into finished steel products, including: hot-rolled sheet, cold-rolled sheet, hot-dip galvanised and electrogalvanised sheets and high-carbon, high-strength low-alloy, alloy and specialty steel sheets. Severstal Dearborn’s products are consumed in a variety of end markets, including automotive, distributors, converters and other.
Severstal Columbus Severstal Columbus’s crude steel production is further processed into finished steel products, including hot-rolled sheet, cold-rolled sheet and hot-dip galvanised sheet steel. Severstal Columbus produces the following steel grades: commercial steel, drawing steel, deep drawing steel, extra deep drawing steel or interstitial free, structural steel, high-strength low allow, and low-, medium- and high-carbon steels.
Sales, Marketing and Competition The following tables show shipments to Severstal North America’s top customers for the years ended 31 December 2010 and 2009:
Sale by customer—Severstal North America Division(1)
Year ended 31 December Customer 2010 (thousands of tonnes) Ford...... 496.5 GM...... 237.8 Worthington Steel ...... 179.4 Kenwal ...... 165.9 Chrysler ...... 164.3 Hanna Steel ...... 101.6 Lakeside Steel ...... 67.4
Note: (1) Excluding data for the Group’s discontinued operations: Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC.
161
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 330DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 9675
Business
Year ended 31 December Customer 2009 (thousands of tonnes) Ford...... 389.4 Worthington Steel ...... 203.4 GM...... 165.2 John Maneely Company ...... 101.9 Chrysler ...... 78.0 New Process Steel ...... 73.1 Hanna Steel ...... 72.5
Note: (1) Excluding data for the Group’s discontinued operations: Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC. The following table shows Severstal North America’s sales by product for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Sales by products—Severstal North America Division(1)
Year ended 31 December Product 2009 2010 (thousand (US$ (thousand (US$ tonnes) million) tonnes) million) Hot-rolled strip and plate ...... 1,523 869.5 1,834 1,227.8 Cold-rolled sheet ...... 688 475.3 711 554.5 Galvanised and other metallic coated sheet ...... 1,054 905.2 1,196 1,075.8 Total rolled products ...... 3,265 2,250.0 3,741 2,858.1 Total semi-finished products ...... 1 0.6 1 0.5 Total steel products ...... 3,266 2,250.6 3,742 2,858.6 Other and shipping ...... — 61.9 — 52.9 Total ...... 3,266 2,312.5 3,742 2,911.5
Note: (1) Excluding data for the Group’s discontinued operations: Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC. The following table shows sales by volume for Severstal North America for domestic US sales and export sales for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010.
Revenues by Market—Severstal North America Division(1)
Year ended 31 December Market 2009 2010 (percent (percent of sales of sales by by volume) volume) US sales ...... 94.8 97.8 Export sales ...... 5.2 2.2 Total ...... 100.0 100.0
Note: (1) Excluding data for the Group’s discontinued operations: Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC.
162
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 25D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55713
Business
The following table shows the revenues of Severstal North America by industry sector for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010.
Revenues by Industry Sector—Severstal North America Division(1)
Year ended 31 December Industry sector 2009 2010 (percent (percent of of revenues) revenues) Automotive ...... 37.0 34.7 Service centers ...... 28.8 34.0 Converters ...... 20.6 18.9 Other ...... 13.6 12.4 Total ...... 100.0 100.0
Note: (1) Excluding data for the Group’s discontinued operations: Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC. Severstal North America has a national sales organisation which is structured into two geographic regions: Northern and Southern, and a separate automotive team that covers all geographic areas. There are 27 individuals across all regions who are involved in direct selling, including account managers and sales managers. Each member of Severstal North America’s sales team sells all products produced from any facility. Order entry and customer service teams are located in both Severstal Dearborn and Severstal Columbus. There are 36 individuals in customer service with between 12 and 13 at each location in addition to an automotive customer service team. Marketing and sales administration activities for Severstal North America, including analysis, forecasting, planning, market research and systems, are conducted for all of Severstal North America by a corporate marketing department located in Dearborn, Michigan.
Competition Severstal North America competes directly with domestic and foreign flat-rolled carbon steel producers and producers of plastics, aluminium and other materials that can be used in place of flat-rolled carbon steel in manufactured products. Severstal North America competes principally on the basis of price, service, quality and the ability to meet the customers’ product specification and delivery schedules. The following table shows crude steel produced by Severstal North America’s principal competitors for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2010:
Principal Competitors of Severstal North America
Year ended 31 December Company 2009 2010 (millions of tonnes) AK Steel ...... 3.6 5.1 ArcelorMittal (Flat Carbon Americas) ...... 16.1 21.0 Nucor ...... 12.7 19.0 Steel Dynamics ...... 3.4 4.5 US Steel (Flat Roll Segment (US)) ...... 8.9 13.9
Source: Released company data, US Steel Investor Packet, 10-K Filings The United States steel industry is a cyclical business that is highly competitive. In the United States, Severstal North America competes with many domestic integrated steel companies as well as with electric- furnace-based mini-mills, which generally have resulted in a more flexible maintenance cost structure than integrated steel producers and derive certain competitive advantages by utilising a less capital-intensive
163
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 250D*/320D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 14302
Business
steel-making process. The major domestic suppliers are ArcelorMittal, US Steel and Nucor, each with a significant market share, with the remainder of the supply coming from a number of smaller producers and imported steel. Shipments of steel products are heavily influenced by transportation and logistics expenses and most shipments are made within 500 kilometers of the production facility.
Capital Expenditure Programme Severstal North America Division’s capital expenditures in 2009 and 2010 were approximately US$200.8 million and US$300.9 million, respectively, excluding the Group’s discontinued operations of Sparrows, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC. In 2010, US$125.0 million was spent on an ongoing PLTCM project and tandem cold rolling mill, while US$44.0 million was expended on an ongoing HDG line in Dearborn. Both of these projects will help produce value-added products. The Group also spent US$68.0 million on Phase II in Columbus. Severstal North America Division’s total capital expenditure, excluding maintenance, from 2011 to 2015 is expected to be approximately US$1,338.1 million. Aggregate capital expenditure on maintenance for the Severstal North America Division is expected to be approximately US$32 million in 2011, and is expected to gradually increase to approximately US$51 million in 2015. Severstal Dearborn. Severstal Dearborn’s capital expenditure programme is designed to replace or refurbish major equipment, increase productivity and efficiency, make environmental improvements, refine product quality and develop Severstal Dearborn’s product mix. Severstal Dearborn’s modernisation programme has seen the implementation of several projects completed to date, including (i) the modernisation and expansion of Severstal Dearborn’s larger blast furnace ‘‘C’’ in 2007, (ii) the installation of a secondary emission control system at the BOF, which allowed it to use lower-priced scrap and meet increasingly stringent environmental standards, (iii) the installation of a straight-mould conversion at the continuous caster, which provides the ability to produce high quality slabs for the automotive market and (iv) upgrades to the hot strip mill reheat furnace, which have allowed Severstal Dearborn to significantly reduce natural gas consumption. In addition to the recently completed projects, two major projects are underway: • The construction of a new continuous PLTCM, which is expected to decrease operating costs and allow Severstal Dearborn to produce steel products that will be required by its automotive customers in the future. • The construction of a new exposed HDG line. Severstal Dearborn is working to obtain a US$730.9 million term loan from the United States Department of Energy (the DOE Loan) under its Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive Programme. The DOE Loan will finance the PLTCM, the HDG line, a new continuous annealing line and associated infrastructure. This loan is expected to have an 18 year amortisation period and an interest rate that approximates the United States Treasury’s cost of funds. Severstal Columbus. The Severstal Columbus capital expenditure programme is primarily aimed at the completion of Phase II of its expansion plan, scheduled to be completed in 2011. The Phase II expansion plan is expected to increase total annual crude steel capacity of Severstal Columbus to 3.1 million tonnes. Construction of all required buildings has been completed and certain equipment for the Phase II expansion has been purchased. The remaining projected expenditures to complete the Phase II expansion will be used for the construction of certain supporting systems (power distribution, water, piping and electrical), the purchase of remaining equipment and installation.
Employees Employee numbers for Severstal North America decreased from 2,828 in 2009 to 2,201 in 2010 as part of labour cost reduction initiatives. These figures exclude employees of the Group’s discontinued operations of Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC. See ‘‘—Severstal International— Discontinued Operations—Lucchini and North America disposal groups’’.
164
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 250D*/540D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 10 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 44817
Business
Severstal Dearborn. Hourly employees of Severstal Dearborn are represented by the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (the UAW). Severstal Dearborn and the UAW have a labour agreement with a five-year term which expires on 31 March 2012. The labour agreement provides for 401(k) plans, health insurance, life insurance and a defined contribution retirement plan. Severstal Columbus. The employees of Severstal Columbus are not represented by a labour union. Severstal Columbus believes it has created a competitive compensation system to supplement base compensation.
Health, Safety and Environment Health and Safety. Severstal North America has striven to improve its safety performance through programmes that involve employee safety awareness training, safety compliance audits, daily safety briefings, cardinal safety rules, supervisor safety leadership training and electronic safety concern tracking systems to ensure timely closure of identified issues. Environment. Severstal North America’s management believes it is in substantial compliance with environmental laws, rules and regulations.
Insurance Severstal North America maintains insurance covering its plant, property and equipment in order to provide adequate capital availability in the event of a significant property loss. Severstal North America’s insurance programme is commensurate with the practice of other leading steel companies in the United States and covers direct physical damage and business interruption in the form of lost profits and continuing expenses up to specified limits and subject to specified deductibles. Severstal North America also maintains insurance addressing other business risks such as third-party personal injury and property damage exposure, fiduciary and executive liability exposure, workers’ compensation liability and marine cargo protection.
Discontinued Operations—Lucchini and North America disposal groups The Group’s discontinued operations represent the Lucchini segment and Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and MSC, which are an operating segment within the North America reporting segment. In October 2006, the Group acquired from the Majority Shareholder a controlling interest in Lucchini, which produces special and high-quality steel and specialty long products for the European market. In order to achieve the greatest flexibility during this disposal, it was decided to consolidate ownership and in March 2010, the Group acquired a 20.2 percent stake in Lucchini from a Lucchini family company, bringing the Group’s share in the capital of Lucchini to 100.0 percent. In June 2010, the Group sold a 50.8 percent stake in Lucchini to the Majority Shareholder, following an extensive M&A process that did not result in acceptable bids. The Group continued to consolidate the Lucchini segment primarily due to a buy-back call option exercisable within the following five years and a contractual entitlement, for the benefit of the Group, to any gain on a subsequent sale of this stake to a third party. In February 2011, the Group signed an amendment to the Lucchini’s share purchase agreement with the Majority Shareholder, which cancelled the buy-back call option and the entitlement, for the benefit of the Group, to any gain on a subsequent sale of this stake to a third party. Effective from the date of this transaction, the Group accounts for the investment in Lucchini using the equity method. Among the available options for Lucchini are its restructuring or, should a restructuring fail, initiation of bankruptcy proceedings. In parallel with this process, the Group’s management is still attempting the sale of the Group’s stake in Lucchini. In March 2011, the Group sold its 100.0 percent stake in Sparrows Point, Severstal Warren, Severstal Wheeling and a 50.0 percent stake in MSC. The remaining 50 percent share in MSC is accounted for using the equity method.
165
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/720D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 11 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 1722
Business
SEVERSTAL RESOURCES Severstal Resources is comprised of iron ore production, coal production and gold production, as well as a smaller ferroniobium production complex. • The Group’s iron ore business is comprised of two iron ore extracting complexes: Karelsky Okatysh, which produces iron ore pellets, and Olkon, which produces iron ore concentrate. The Group’s iron ore business is also focused on three iron ore projects: the Group’s investment in the Putu Range project in south eastern Liberia, for which the Group has signed a Mineral Development Agreement with the Government of Liberia; the Group’s investment in Core Mining, which controls exploration licenses for the Avima iron ore deposit in the Republic of Congo and the Kango iron ore deposit in the Republic of Gabon; and the Group’s investment in a project in the Brazilian city of Macapa, SPG, which owns a number of high potential iron ore licenses in the area of Tartarugalzinho, Amapa state. Karelsky Okatysh, located in the Karelia Republic, produces iron ore pellets and had an annual iron ore output of 30 million tonnes in 2010 and plans to increase it up to 34.6 million tonnes by 2015 and estimated JORC iron ore reserves and resources of approximately 480 million tonnes and 1,203 million tonnes, respectively. Olkon, located in the Murmansk region of Russia, produces iron ore concentrate and had an annual iron ore output of 13 million tonnes in 2010 and plans to increase it to 14.5 million tonnes by 2015 and estimated JORC iron ore reserves and resources of approximately 108 million tonnes and 351 million tonnes, respectively. Liberia’s Putu Range iron ore project has estimated resources of 2,370 million tonnes based on report issued by SRK Consulting Ltd in February 2011 prepared under the Guidelines of National Instrument 43-101. Core Mining projects in Congo and Gabon are at an early exploration stage and have no estimated ore resources. SPG has a total approximate resource potential of 600 million tonnes of iron ore, based on the Group’s estimation. • The Group’s Coal business comprises Vorktaugol, PBS Coals and Tsentralny field. Vorkutaugol comprises five longwall mines, an open pit mine, and three washing plants. It extracts both coking and steam coal. Vorkutaugol, located in the Komi Republic, produces coking and steam coal and had ROM output of 12.6 million tonnes in 2010 and plans to increase it to 14.1 million tonnes by 2015 and estimated JORC coal reserves of approximately 261 million tonnes. PBS Coals, located in the southwest of Pennsylvania in the United States, operates open mines and deep room and pillar mines. It extracts coking and steam coal, and produces coking coal concentrate. PBS Coals, produced 4.1 million tonnes of ROM in 2010 and plans to increase it to 8.2 million tonnes by 2015. PBS Coals has estimated NI 43-101 coal reserves and resources of approximately 61 million tonnes and 219 million tonnes. Tsentralny field is a greenfield project located in the Tyva Republic and according to its acquired state license, has total resources approximating 639 million tonnes of C1 and C2 categories, according to the Russian classification system. See ‘‘Industry—Mining Industry—Russian Methodologies for Reserve and Resource Reporting’’ for further details on the Russian classification system. • The Group’s gold business comprises eight producing mines, two development projects, five advanced exploration projects and a broad portfolio of early exploration projects and licensees. In 2010, it produced gold and gold equivalent of 589.1 Koz and had estimated JORC reserves of approximately 8.9 Moz, as well as resources of 23.0 Moz. Severstal Resources was the largest producer of hard coking coal and the second largest producer of iron ore pellets in Russia in 2010, respectively, according to Rudprom and Rasmin. With the capacity to supply all of the current iron ore and hard coking coal needs of the Russian Steel Division, Severstal Resources forms the basis of the Group’s balanced and vertically-integrated business model. With a focus on high value-added products, such as export quality iron ore pellets and hard coking coal concentrate, Severstal Resources had 43.2 million tonnes of iron ore output and ROM output of 16.6 million tonnes of coal in 2010. Severstal Resources estimates that, as at 31 December 2010, it had iron ore reserves and resources of approximately 588 million tonnes and 3,924 million tonnes, respectively, and coal reserves and resources of approximately 322 million tonnes and 219 million tonnes, respectively, based on reports issued by IMC Consulting Ltd dated June 2006, prepared in accordance with JORC reporting standards (assets in Russia), by SRK Consulting Ltd dated February 2011 prepared under the Guidelines of National Instrument 43-101 (Putu deposit, Liberia) and by the John T. Boyd Company dated 30 May 2008 under the Guidelines of National Instrument 43-101 (PBS Coals).
166
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 12 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 47233
Business
Mining at a glance Open pit mining The Group’s iron ore production and a portion of its coal and gold production come from open pit mining. The open pit mining process consists of four processes: drilling by heavy duty rotary blast hole drills, blasting, loading of materials by hydraulic face shovels and transport by large off-highway rear-dump mining trucks. The size and the quantity of mining equipment and the attendant mine design features vary from mine to mine and are dictated by the rate of production. Ore mining is subject to the benefication process. The beneficiation flow process is dependent on the nature of the ore and includes ore crushing, milling, gravity and wet magnetic separation for iron ore and heap or agitation leaching for gold.
Underground mining The majority of coal and a portion of gold ore are mined by means of underground mining techniques, using a system of shafts, declines, stopes or faces. The Group uses the following underground mining methods: ore blasting for hard gold ore, shearing for softer coal and the transportation of mined material out of the mine to the processing plant via a conveyor system and skips. The beneficiation process includes crushing, milling, washing and flotation for coal.
Facilities Iron Facilities Karelsky Okatysh. Karelsky Okatysh is located in Kostomuksha in the Karelia Republic in the northwest of Russia. It mines magnetite quartzite ores and produces high-quality iron ore pellets with an iron content of 63.0 to 65.0 percent Karelsky Okatysh operates two major deposits that have an estimated life of 33 years based on the Group’s estimates of JORC reserves plus expected reserves extension. The average total iron content of the reserves at Karelsky Okatysh is approximately 29.0 percent The opening of new mines at the Korpanga deposit as well as the implementation of a planned efficiency improvement programme will increase the production capacity of Karelsky Okatysh to 35 million tonnes of iron ore output per year. Kostomuksha. The arch shaped Kostomuksha deposit consists of three sections, with a total strike extent of approximately 13,000 metres and an open pit depth reaching 280 metres. The average stripping ratio was 0.9 in 2010. The iron content in the ore is medium (28.2 percent total iron, 23.5 percent iron magnetite), though it is well suited for wet magnetic beneficiation. The deposit produces high-quality concentrate (68.3 percent iron) and pellets (63.0 to 65.0 percent iron). The Kostomuksha deposit has an iron ore output of 18.8 million tonnes at 29.0 percent iron per year. Korpanga. In 2007, a mine opened at the Korpanga deposit, which consists of east and west sections that have strike lengths of 3,800 metres and 3,000 metres, respectively. The ore qualities at Korpanga are similar to the Kostomuksha deposit. The Korpanga deposit has iron ore output of 11.4 million tonnes at 27.0 percent total iron per year. Extracted ore is delivered to the beneficiation plant by railway. The beneficiation plant is located seven kilometres from the central section of the Kostomuksha deposit and 25 kilometres from Korpanga. The beneficiation plant output was 10.2 million tonnes of concentrate (representing 29 million tonnes of input ore, excluding residual ore at transfer stocks and hoppers at the plant) in 2010. The Group believes that this capacity could be increased to 11.8 million tonnes of concentrate per year with a small investment. The planned investment would include the installation of dry magnetic separation equipment at the open pits to reduce the waste feed into the crushers. The plant beneficiation process currently consists of two crushing lines and 12 beneficiation circuits equipped with primary magnetic separation equipment. Olkon. Olkon is located in the Murmansk region in northwest Russia. It mines magnetite-haematite quartzite ores and produces high-quality iron ore concentrate. Currently, ore mining is carried out in five open pits: Olenegorsky, Kirovogorsky, Baumansky, 15-Letiya Oktyabrya and Komsomolsky in conjunction with the new site at the Olenegorsky underground mine, which was built in 2005. Olkon has recently acquired two additional mining licenses for the Kurkenpahk and Vostochny deposits totalling around 43 million tonnes of non-JORC reserves, estimated according to the Russian methodology in A,B,C1 and
167
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 13 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 7537
Business
C2 categories, suitable for open pit mining. Olkon’s deposits have an estimated life of 18 years based on the Group’s estimates of JORC reserves plus reserves extension. There are 87 million tonnes of ore within the existing boundary of the open pits. Additionally, The Group plans to begin mining operations at satellite deposits such as Kurkenpahk and Vostochny. The average iron content in the Olkon reserves is 27.0 percent total iron and 21.0 percent iron magnetite. Olkon produces iron ore concentrate with an average iron content of 65.7 percent The average stripping ratio was 0.95 in 2010. The annual iron ore output has been increased from 12.0 to 14.1 million tonnes over the past few years. A further increase to approximately 15.6 million tonnes is planned once the satellite deposit mines are fully operational. The ore from the Kirovogorsky, Baumansky, 15-Letiya Oktyabrya and Komsomolsky pits is delivered by railway to a beneficiation plant located approximately 11 kilometres away. The beneficiation plant, consisting of two crushing lines and 10 beneficiation circuits equipped with primary magnetic separation equipment, had a production of 4.3 million tonnes of concentrate in 2010. Putu Range. The Putu Range iron ore project is located in Liberia, 120 kilometres inland from the coast. According to a report by SRK Consulting Ltd., resources at Putu Range amount to 2,370 million tonnes at an average grade 34 percent of total iron. Extensive drilling is currently underway as part of the Bankable Feasibility Study, scheduled for completion in 2014. Production commencement is expected in 2017 with potential output of at least 20 million tonnes of concentrate. Implementation of this project will allow Severstal Resources to become a significant player in the iron ore seaborne market.
Coal Facilities Vorkutaugol. The Vorkutaugol mine is located near the town of Vorkuta in the Komi Republic in the northeast of European Russia. The Vorkutaugol mine operates the Vorkutskoye and Vorgashorskoye coal deposits with an estimated life of 46 and 20 years, respectively, based on the Group’s estimates of JORC reserves plus expected reserves extension. The mining area of Vorkutaugol consists of five underground mines and one open pit. Premium grades of coking coal account for a high proportion of the Vorkutaugol reserves. There are four principal seams currently under operation at the Vorkutskoye deposit, which comprises four mines: ‘‘Severnaya’’, ‘‘Komsomolskaya’’, ‘‘Zapolyrnaya’’ and ‘‘Vorkutinskaya’’. Three of the seams, Moshniy, Troinoy and Chetvertiy seam, are between 1.4 and 3.9 metres and are suitable to be extracted by conventional longwall shears. The Pyatiy seam is 0.9 metres thick and is currently extracted using plough technology. Total ROM output in 2010 was 8.4 million tonnes. There is only one seam of workable thickness at the Vorgashorskaya mine. The total seam thickness is between 3.0 metres and 3.6 metres. The mine has two high-productivity faces, with an annual ROM output of 3.7 million tonnes in 2010. Some ROM coals are processed at the central Pechorskaya plant. There is one open pit in operation, the Un’aginskoe mine with an annual ROM output (without overburden) of 0.5 million tonnes of hard coking coal. There are currently three washing facilities in Vorkuta (Severnaya—located at the Severnaya mine, Vorkutinskaya—located at the Vorkutinskaya mine and central Pechorskaya). The washing process reduces ash content to approximately 8.5 percent, enabling the production of concentrate with a high market value. Coking coal concentrate from Vorkutaugol can be used directly in coke batteries. The most valuable coal is washed on the site at Vorkuta. PBS Coals. PBS Coals is a coking and steam coal producer located in the United States. It operates several surface and underground mining complexes near Somerset, Pennsylvania. PBS Coals had a total ROM output of 4.1 million tonnes in 2010. Planned production increases are expected to result in ROM output up to 8.2 million tonnes of production by 2015. According to a report by the John T. Boyd Company dated 30 May 2008, under the Guidelines of National Instrument 43-101, estimated coal reserves and resources of approximately 61 million tonnes and 219 million tonnes, respectively. PBS Coals is favourably located in relation to Severstal Dearborn’s steel producing facilities in North America as well as to export seaborne markets. Tsentralny field. Tsentralny field is a coal greenfield project in the Tyva Republic of Russia. According to its acquired state license, it has total resources of approximately 639 million tonnes of coking coal of C1
168
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DI14501A.;36 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 530DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 14 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 61802
Business
and C2 categories, according to the Russian classification system. There are 10 coal seams at the deposit. Production commencement is expected in 2017 with potential ROM output of 10 million tonnes.
Gold Facilities Nordgold currently operates eight mines in Guinea, Burkina Faso, Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation. The LEFA mine in Guinea is owned through Crew Gold, which has been fully consolidated by the Group in January 2011. The Taparko mine in Burkina Faso, as well as the Irokinda, Zun-Holba and Berezitovy mines in the Russian Federation, are owned through High River Gold, in which the Group holds a 72.6 percent controlling interest. Nordgold maintains a 100.00 percent interest in companies, which own each of the Neryungri, Aprelkovo and Suzdal mines, located in the Russian Federation. Ore is mined either from underground mines or from open pits. Nordgold has 5 open pit mines and 3 underground mines. The ore is then stored until it is able to be crushed and ground into a finer consistency, to be processed to obtain gold through various methods. Each method used by Nordgold and the industry as a whole involves the use of cyanide to draw out the gold and other chemical processes that separate the gold from other elements in the ore. Gold is then extracted from the solution onto metal cathode bars, which are melted down and poured into dore´ bars, which primarily contain gold but which can also contain a small amount of silver or copper. Once the gold is poured into dore´ bars, the dore´ is collected and stored securely at the mines until an appropriate amount of dore´ has accumulated, when it is boxed and transported, via secure truck, helicopter or aircraft to the refinery, where the dore´ is refined into gold bullion bars. The gold bullion is transferred to safe storage at a bank, which holds the gold until the Severstal gold business makes the decision to sell on the spot market. Nordgold has 23.0 million ounces of measured, indicated and inferred resources according to JORC as of 1 November 2010, most of which are equally distributed between West Africa (45.6 percent) and Russia (44.8 percent). The remaining 9.6 percent are located in Kazakhstan. Nordgold organises its business across three core regions:
West Africa: • Crew Gold: Comprises the LEFA mine in Guinea, an open pit gold mine consisting of two material open pit deposits. In 2010, the mine produced 194 Koz of gold. (Consolidation of results started at 31 July 2010). • Somita: Comprises the Taparko mine in Burkina Faso, an open pit gold mine consisting of three open pit deposits. In 2010, it produced 127.2 Koz of gold. • Developments in West Africa: Comprises a number of properties in the development and exploration stage located in West Africa. The key development project in West Africa is at Bissa, which is expected to begin production in 2013, and was recently granted an approval by the Council of Ministers of Burkina Faso. The Group also has over 30 exploration permits in Burkina Faso, where exploration works are being carried out, and the assessment of exploration potential by Crew Gold in Guinea is currently underway.
Kazakhstan: • Celtic and Semgeo: Comprises the Suzdal underground gold mine in Kazakhstan and gold deposits in the auxiliary open pit gold mines of Zherek and Balazhal in the vicinity of Suzdal, which are currently under technological review and exploration. In 2010, this operation produced 87.3 Koz of gold.
Russia: • Berezitovy: Comprises an open pit gold mine located in the Amur region of the Russian Federation. In 2010, this operation produced 71.4 Koz of gold.
169
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DI14501A.;36 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DK14501A.;19 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 3170DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 43645
Business
• Buryatzoloto: Comprises the operations of Zun-Holba and Irokinda, two underground gold mines, located in the Buryatia Republic of the Russian Federation. In 2010, this segment produced 136.1 Koz of gold. • Neryungri-Metallik and Aprelkovo: Comprises open pit gold mines in the Republic of Yakutia and Transbaikal region of the Russian Federation. In 2010, this segment produced 93.9 Koz of gold. • Development Russia: Comprises properties in the exploration and evaluation stages located in the Russian Federation.
Reserves and Resources At expected rates of operation, the Group estimates that Severstal Resources’ audited reserves and resources of iron ore and coal are sufficient for at least thirty years of iron ore and coking coal production. The table below shows the Group’s reserves and resources estimation. Estimation for the Karelskiy Okatysh, Olkon and Vorkutaugol assets is based on the report issued by IMC Consulting Ltd dated June 2006, which was prepared in accordance with internationally accepted standards set forth in the JORC code. Reserves and resource estimations for Severstal Resources’ PBS Coals operations and the Putu Range iron ore project have been developed under the guidelines of National Instrument 43-101, which is the standard of public disclosure of information relating to mineral properties in Canada and essentially similar to Australasian JORC standard. Reports for PBS Coals and the Putu Range project have been prepared by the John T. Boyd Company and SRK Consulting, respectively. See also ‘‘Industry—Mining Industry—International Reporting Methodologies’’. Estimates for Nordgold are based on the report issued by Wardell Armstrong International Ltd dated January 2011, which was prepared in accordance with internationally accepted standards set forth in the JORC code. Nordgold’s proven and probable reserves totalled 8.9 Moz as at 1 November 2010. Of this total, reserves in West Africa accounted for 68.2 percent while reserves in the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan accounted for 24.1 and 7.7 percent, respectively. The measured and indicated resources totalled 12.4 Moz as at 1 November 2010, while inferred resources totalled 10.7 Moz, for a total of measured, indicated and inferred resources of 23.0 Moz. Nordgold also has 103 Moz of inferred silver resources through its 50.0 percent interest in the OOO ‘‘Prognoz-Serebro’’ (Prognoz) project. Of this total, resources in West Africa accounted for 45.6 percent while reserves in the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan accounted for 44.8 and 9.6 percent, respectively.
170
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DK14501A.;19 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DK14501A.;19 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 125D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 13003
Business
Estimated Reserves and Resources—Severstal Resources(1)
Resources Reserves Resources extension(6) Iron Ore Karelsky Okatysh(2)(3)(4) ...... 480.1 1,203.4 56.0 Olkon(2)(3)(4) ...... 108.4 350.6 43.3 Putu(5) ...... — 2,370.0 Total ...... 588.5 3,924.0 99.3 Coal Vorkutaugol(2)(3)(4) ...... 260.5 — 52.5 PBS Coals(7)(4) ...... 61.3 218.7 Tsentralny (Tyva) ...... — 639.0 Total ...... 321.8 218.7 691.5 Gold(8) West Africa ...... 6.07 10.50 — Kazakhstan ...... 0.68 2.19 — Russia ...... 2.15 10.32 — Total ...... 8.90 23.01 —
Source: (see Notes). Notes: (1) All numbers for iron ore and coal are presented in millions of tonnes, numbers for gold presented in Moz. (2) Proved and Probable reserves based on report issued by IMC Consulting Ltd dated June 2006, prepared in accordance with JORC reporting standards. (3) Measured and Indicated resources, based on report issued by IMC Consulting Ltd dated June 2006, prepared in accordance with JORC reporting standards. (4) Audited reserves, adjusted on actual production since the date of reporting, as of 31 December 2010. (5) Inferred Resources based on SRK Consulting Report issued in February 2011. (6) Resources based on Russian methodology and legislation: C1 and C2 categories within current state licenses. (7) Reserves and Resources a report by the John T. Boyd Company dated 30 May 2008 under the Guidelines of National Instrument 43-101 adjusted on actual production since the date of reporting as of 31 December 2010. (8) Proven and Probable Gold Reserves; Measured, Indicated and Inferred Gold Resources (on a 100 percent basis) as of 1 November 2010 based on report by Wardell Armstrong International Ltd. issued in January 2011.
Supply Chain Severstal Resources has a centralised procurement department based in Moscow for bulk purchases of mining and other equipment and in certain circumstances aggregates its purchases with members of the Group in order to obtain volume discounts. Raw materials. Raw materials used by Severstal Resources include petroleum products, liquid explosives and metallic raw materials and supplies. Petroleum products are the largest raw material type consumed by Severstal Resources. In order to take advantage of economies of scale, Severstal Resources has centralised the purchasing of items that are used in all of its operations. Purchases of petroleum products are centralised and made under annual contracts, some of which include credit terms, with several large suppliers and their subsidiaries, such as OAO ‘‘Gazprom neft’’, OAO ‘‘NK Rosneft’’, ‘‘TNK-BP Holding’’, OAO ‘‘LukOil’’ and OAO ANK ‘‘Bashneft’’. Suppliers are selected based on competitiveness of their commercial terms. Actual prices are determined on a monthly basis with a subset of the suppliers chosen from the wider group based on their offer for that month. In 2010, a total of 9 contracts were entered into with petroleum suppliers; however, usually only three to five suppliers actually supply petroleum products in any given month. The purchasing of metal- based raw materials and explosives is also centralised.
171
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DK14501A.;19 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DK14501A.;19 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 0D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 17297
Business
Following a competitive tender process, Karelsky Okatysh signed a six-year contract for the supply of liquid explosives with one of the market leaders, OOO ‘‘Eastern Mining Services’’. In order to supply the liquid explosives under the contract, a new manufacturing plant for liquid explosives was constructed in Kostomuksha. A similar contract was entered into by Olkon with ZAO ‘‘Dyno Nobel Russia’’ (ZAO ‘‘Orica CIS’’) and a new liquid explosives manufacturing plant was constructed in Olenegorsk in December 2010. Contracts for the supply of metallic raw materials are signed annually, while prices are fixed on a monthly or quarterly basis. The two principal suppliers are OOO ‘‘TK Evraz Holding’’ and OOO ‘‘Metallurg Trust’’. Severstal Resources expects that during the next ten years it will have a raw materials surplus. Severstal Resources believes that such a surplus would provide it with enhanced stability in terms of raw material supplies and enable it to meet potential future production growth. Energy. Severstal Resources’ energy requirements include electricity purchased from local energy producers, typically under annual contracts, with prices fixed for the duration of the term.
Products Severstal Resources produces a high proportion of premium products, such as iron pellets from iron ore and coking coal concentrate from coal, for domestic and international customers. In 2010, iron pellets constituted 71 percent of Severstal Resources’ production of iron ore, and coking coal concentrate constituted 62 percent of its coal production. The following table sets forth Severstal Resources’ sales volumes in 2009 and 2010.
Sales Volumes—Severstal Resources(1)
Year ended 31 December Product 2009 2010 (thousands of tonnes, unless otherwise indicated) Coking coal ...... 180 575 Coking coal concentrate ...... 5,083 7,262 Steam coal ...... 3,885 3,896 Iron ore pellets ...... 8,763 9,797 Iron ore concentrate ...... 5,107 4,027 Gold (ounces) ...... 516,245 598,414 Ferroniobium (tonnes) ...... 296 129
Note: (1) Includes intersegmental sales.
Coking coal and coking coal concentrate. Vorkutaugol’s and PBS Coals’ two main products are premium hard coking coal in concentrate form and semi-soft coking coal in concentrate form with an ash content of 8.5 percent Steam coal. Vorkutaugol and PBS Coals also produce steam coal. It is sold to local heating and power plants in the Komi region, and it is also sold to industrial customers. Iron ore pellets and concentrate. Karelsky Okatysh produces iron ore pellets. These have an iron content of 65.0 percent for non-fluxed and 63.2 percent for fluxed pellets. Pellets are a high value-added iron ore product, as they can be used directly in the blast furnace without intermediate sintering. They also ensure optimal coke consumption in the furnace and significantly reduce the carbon dioxide emissions in the furnace operation. Olkon produces iron ore fines with an iron content of 65.7 percent Currently these fines are shipped only to the Russian Steel Division where they are used as sinter feed, before being blended with coke and loaded into the blast furnace. Gold. Nordgold is a gold producer operating eight production sites across Burkina Faso, Guinea, Russia and Kazakhstan. In 2010, the business produced 589.1 Koz of gold. In 2010, production from the gold
172
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DK14501A.;19 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DK14501A.;19 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 105D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 30124
Business
mines in the Russian Federation accounted for 51.2 percent of Nordgold’s total production, while the gold mines in Kazakhstan and West Africa accounted for 14.8 percent and 34.0 percent, respectively. Over time, the proportion of production from the Russian Federation is expected to decrease relative to production from West Africa, including from the LEFA mine in Guinea. Ferroniobium. Ferroalloys are being produced at a smelter located in Vishnevogorsk in the Ural Mountains in Russia. Current production is 129 tonnes of ferroniobium with a grading of 65 to 67 percent Nb. The smelter’s total capacity is approximately 1,500 tonnes. Niobium concentrate for ferroniobium production is shipped from the Severstal’s niobium mine operating in the Krasnoyarsk region of Russia.
Sales, Marketing and Competition Severstal Resources sells its products internally within the Group as well as to the international and Russian domestic markets. Severstal Resources aims to maintain its domestic market share and expand its international market share with high-quality pellets and coking coal concentrate. Severstal Resources’ sales are dominated by coking coal concentrate and coking coal, which accounted for approximately 30.9 percent of sales by revenue in 2010. Iron ore pellets accounted for approximately 29.1 percent of sales by revenue. Gold accounted for approximately 21.5 percent of sales by revenue, while all other products represented 18.7 percent of Severstal Resources’ sales by revenue. The following table sets forth sales by product for Severstal Resources in 2009 and 2010.
Sales by Product—Severstal Resources(1)
Year ended 31 December Product 2009 2010 (thousand (US$ (thousand (US$ tonnes) million) tonnes) million) Coking coal ...... 180 3.5 575 37.7 Coking coal concentrate ...... 5,083 449.3 7,262 1,037.6 Steam coal ...... 3,885 154.7 3,896 165.8 Iron ore pellets ...... 8,763 404.7 9,797 1,011.4 Iron ore concentrate ...... 5,107 180.5 4,027 275.1 Gold (ounces) ...... 516,245 512.3 598,414 748.8 Ferroniobium (tonnes) ...... 296 7.4 129 3.3 Total sales by products ...... — 1,712.4 — 3,279.7 Other and shipping ...... — 158.4 — 204.6 Total revenue ...... — 1,870.8 — 3,484.3
Note: (1) Includes intersegmental sales.
Customers. Within the Group, Severstal Resources sells iron ore pellets and coking coal to the Russian Steel Division and Severstal International. In 2010, Severstal Resources’ total iron ore and coking coal sales were 21.6 million tonnes, of which 13.2 million tonnes were sold to the Russian Steel Division and Severstal North America, 3.9 million tonnes were sold domestically and 4.5 million tonnes were exported. In 2010, Severstal Resources’ total sales were 9.8 million tonnes of iron ore pellets and 7.3 million tonnes of coal concentrate. In 2010, Severstal Resources provided 100.0 percent of the pellets required by the Russian Steel Division. Since there has historically been a large number of available gold purchasers worldwide, Nordgold is not dependent on sales of gold to any particular customer. Due to the size of the international bullion market and stockpiles of gold reserves, individual gold producers and other market participants generally do not significantly influence pricing or total quantities offered and sold. Severstal Resources’ main external customers are domestic Russian and European steel producers. Severstal Resources’ largest domestic customers, other than the Russian Steel Division, are Evraz and
173
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DK14501A.;19 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DK14501A.;19 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 10D*/2480D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 39631
Business
Mechel. Major European customers include Corus and ISD. Additionally, smaller amounts of coal are also sold to steel producers, stand-alone coking companies and power plants. Severstal Resources’ main export destinations were Europe, the United States and the CIS (predominantly Ukraine). Contracts. Severstal Resources operates through direct contracts with customers. Usually contracts with domestic customers have a three-month term, after which both the volume and price may be reviewed. The majority of export sales are made through one to three-year contracts, with price terms reviewed annually. Severstal Resources contracts on an annual basis with Corus, its largest export buyer, and intends to increase the amount of sales organised under annual fixed price contracts in the future. It also intends to offer combined pellet and coking coal concentrate contracts for its main international customers. At present, Severstal Resources enters into most contracts on a FOB, DAP and FCA delivery basis; however, in the future, it intends to gradually move to CPT/CIF contracts. Because Severstal Resources ships large volumes, it is often able to negotiate discounts on freight and rail fees, resulting in better margins on its sales. Nordgold sells its gold in the form of bullion, which is kept for sale in gold accounts at Nomos Bank for the Group’s Russian operations, at Metalor for the Kazakh operations, at Standard Bank for Burkina Faso operations and at MKS Finance S.A. for its Guinean operation. Most sales are currently made at the spot price. The decision whether to sell is made depending on the current market environment and sales are typically made at least each quarter. The exception is gold from Guinea which is refined at Produits Artistiques Metaux´ Precieux.´ Benchmark prices for gold are generally based on the London gold market quotations. An advance of approximately 90.0 percent of the estimated value of each shipment is obtained from MKS Finance S.A. at the London PM price on the day the shipment arrives at the Zurich airport.
Competition The Group believes that Severstal Resources is favourably positioned on the global cost curve for both iron ore and coking coal, with strong competitive positions in domestic markets and in its core export markets of northern and eastern Europe. This is evident in respect of the pellets produced at Karelsky Okatysh and coking coal concentrate produced at Vorkutaugol, the two assets with stronger orientation towards the export market and higher-value added products. Severstal Resources has a strong market position in the Russian iron ore and coking coal markets. The following tables set forth the principal competitors of Severstal Resources in the Russian markets for coking coal and iron ore. The following table shows Severstal Resources’ principal competitors in the Russian coking coal market for the year ended 31 December 2010:
Principal Competitors of Severstal Resources—Russian Coking Coal Market
Year ended Year ended 31 December 31 December Producer of coking coal 2009 2010 (estimated (estimated percentage percentage of Russian of Russian production, production, 44.7 million 54.5 million tonnes) tonnes) Sibuglemet (independent producer)...... 14.4 11.4 Yuzhny Kuzbass (owned by Mechel) ...... 9.4 9.8 Raspadskaya (affiliated with Evraz) ...... 17.5 9.6 Severstal Resources ...... 9.2 9.6 Yuzhkuzbassugol (affiliated with Evraz) ...... 9.5 8.5 Yakutugol (owned by Mechel) ...... 4.2 7.3 KRU (independent producer) ...... 2.7 4.0 Other ...... 33.1 39.8
Source: Rasmin.
174
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DK14501A.;19 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DK14501A.;19 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 190D*/420D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 22800
Business
The following table shows Severstal Resources’ principal competitors in the Russian iron ore market for the year ended 31 December 2010.
Principal Competitors of Severstal Resources—Russian Iron Ore Market
Year ended Year ended 31 December 31 December Producer of iron ore (concentrate, pellets or lump) 2009 2010 (estimated (estimated percentage of percentage of Russian Russian production, production, 85.4 million 91.9 million tonnes) tonnes) Metalloinvest ...... 31.1 33.2 Evraz ...... 20.4 19.1 Severstal Resources ...... 16.0 15.2 NLMK...... 16.2 15.0 Mechel ...... 5.0 7.1 Kovdor ...... 6.6 6.8 Other ...... 4.7 3.6
Source: RudProm. The Russian coking coal market is less consolidated than the Russian iron ore market, with high competition in low quality coking coals. Severstal Resources’ key competitors in this market include Raspadskaya and Sibuglemet. Severstal Resources believes that its location provides it with an advantage over its competitors, many of whom are located in the Kuzbass region, which is located over two thousand kilometres away from the major purchasers of coking coal in the European part of Russia and Ukraine. Based on RudProm and Rasmin industry data, Severstal Resources believes it faces less competition in the iron ore pellets market, compared to the coking coal market. Severstal Resources’ main competitor in the Russian iron ore pellets market is Metalloinvest, which delivered approximately 7.4 million tonnes of pellets and 9.2 million tonnes of iron ore concentrate into the Russian domestic market in 2010. Other large producers are Evraz, NLMK and Mechel who predominantly supply iron ore to their own steelmaking operations. The only significant company importing iron ore into the Russian market is the Kazakh producer OAO SSGPO. In 2010, OAO SSGPO exported approximately 4.3 million tonnes of pellets and 6.2 million tonnes of iron ore concentrate into the Russian iron ore market, mostly to MMK.
Capital Expenditure Programme In recent years, Severstal Resources has replaced all of its major equipment for both its underground operations and open pit mines. In 2009 and 2010, its capital expenditure was approximately US$242.3 million and approximately US$433.8 million, respectively. Further capital improvements are currently underway at each of Severstal Resources’ mining assets, with a planned total capital expenditure, excluding maintenance, of approximately US$3,454.7 million from 2011 to 2015. These projects are designed to further modernise equipment, increase the production of premium products, stabilise the mix of products, optimise degasification systems, utilise coal mine methane, develop new iron ore and coal reserves, improve cost efficiency and expand extraction and beneficiation capacities. The expected average maintenance capital expenditure from 2011 to 2015 are approximately US$350 million per year. In carrying out its capital expenditure programme, Severstal Resources plans to improve its internal processes for sourcing supplies, including by consolidating purchasing and seeking to enter long-term contracts with key suppliers, such as with suppliers of heavy machinery. Karelsky Okatysh. The capital expenditure requirements at Karelsky Okatysh between 2011 and 2015 include the following: expansion of ore extraction, beneficiation and pelletising capacities; upgrade of concentration facilities; selective debottlenecking projects; and the addition of dry magnetic separation and flotation systems at the beneficiation plant.
175
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DK14501A.;19 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DK14501A.;19 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 210D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 46680
Business
Overall, the planned improvements are expected to result in full utilisation of the pelletiser and to increase long-term production of pellets by approximately 8.5 percent against 2011 production levels up to an estimated 10.5 million tonnes by 2015. Olkon. The capital expenditure requirements at Olkon between 2011 and 2015 include the following projects: construction of two additional underground mines; improvements at the existing open pit at Komsomolsky; and improvements in the capacity of the mine’s railroads. Overall, the planned improvements are expected to increase the production output to 4.9 million tonnes of iron ore concentrate per year by 2015. Vorkutaugol. The estimated capital expenditure requirements at Vorkutaugol between 2011 and 2015 include: replacement of obsolete mining equipment with equipment of improved efficiency; surface and underground mine infrastructure development; and various investments in mine safety measures. Overall, the planned improvements are expected to maintain the average production output at 9.2 million tonnes of product per year to 2015. PBS Coals. The main capital expenditure requirements for PBS Coals between 2011 and 2015 are: the development of new surface and deep mines; the construction of a new plant; and the construction of a port facility. These improvements, once completed, are expected to increase the production output of PBS Coals up to 4.8 million tonnes in 2015 in comparison with 3.4 million tonnes in 2010. Gold mining assets. The estimated capital expenditure requirements in connection with gold mining assets between 2011 and 2015 are approximately US$1,183.4 million. The capital expenditure is expected to consist of expenditures at the existing mines in Russia, Kazakhstan and West Africa to improve and sustain productivity, the development of promising deposits under the mining licences acquired earlier and the possible acquisition of additional licences and other gold mining assets.
Employees Employee numbers for Severstal Resources decreased from 27,735 in 2009 to 26,568 in 2010. Severstal Resources expects to continue its restructuring and headcount optimisation programme, according to which the headcount reductions are expected to be achieved through higher productivity through increased use of capital equipment, employee training and optimisation of organisational structures, which will be partially offset by headcount increases driven by anticipated production increases, particularly in gold mining and coal. Severstal Resources has entered into collective bargaining agreements in respect of employees at Karelsky Okatysh, expiring in December 2013, and Olkon, expiring in May 2013. In respect of Vorkutaugol, Severstal Resources is a party to a regional collective agreement, expiring at the end of 2013. Under Russian legislation, Severstal Resources is obliged to make monthly pension contributions to the state pension fund on behalf of all of its employees. Contributions are calculated according to a regressive scale related to employees’ actual compensation. Currently, Severstal Resources does not have any material accrued liabilities in respect of their contributions to the state pension fund. In addition to the contributions made to the state pension fund, Severstal Resources has obligations in respect of social programmes under collective workplace agreements, which include providing life and workplace insurance, medical insurance and voluntary pension contributions.
Health, Safety and Environment The business of mining, particularly underground mining, can be dangerous. Severstal Resources is required to comply with a range of health and safety laws and regulations, for which the Group has established a significant health, safety and environmental protection system for its mining operations. Each mine has an environmental specialist and a health and safety specialist to focus on compliance with law and the Group’s own objectives. The Group’s management views the health and safety of the Group’s workforce as a critical component to the Group’s operations. Management believes that any injuries,
176
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DK14501A.;19 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DK14501A.;19 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 4130DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 775
Business
occupational diseases and other operational incidents can be prevented and that all employees of the Group are responsible for preventing such occurrences. The number of industrial accidents recorded at Severstal Resources were 169 in 2010 and 181 in 2009. The goal for 2011 is to reduce industrial accidents by 15 percent (compared with 2010). Severstal Resources made health and safety investments of approximately US$ 32.5 million in 2010 and US$27.4 million in 2009. Karelsky Okatysh, Vorkutaugol and Olkon are accredited under the international occupational health and safety standard, OHSAS 18001. Severstal Resources is participating in the Group’s overall labor safety project and the Group’s management believes that is has been effective in reducing the number of incidents with an ultimate goal to be among the industry leaders in safety by 2014.
Insurance Severstal Resources maintains a level of insurance commensurate with the standards of other large mining companies in Russia. In particular, it fully insures the property, plant and equipment of Karelsky Okatysh and Olkon at actual value. These assets also have limited business interruption insurance covering the direct costs of an interruption, including lost profit and incurred fixed costs of operation. Insurance services are provided to Severstal Resources by SOGAZ. Insurance coverage in respect of property, plant and equipment at the coal mines is provided on a limited basis and does not include business interruption insurance. Procedures are being put in place to ensure insurance coverage for all newly built major facilities. All employees are insured against accidents that occur within the workplace. Severstal Resources does not have comprehensive insurance for third-party liability in respect of property or environmental damage.
177
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DK14501A.;19 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 80D*/420D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 44298
MANAGEMENT
ANNUAL GENERAL SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING The annual general shareholders’ meeting is the Company’s highest governing body and has exclusive powers to take certain decisions by a vote of the ordinary shares represented at the meeting. The powers of the Company’s shareholders, acting through the general shareholders’ meeting, are derived from, and their scope is limited to, the powers set forth in the Federal Law dated 26 December 1995 No. 208-FZ ‘‘On Joint Stock Companies’’, as amended (Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies), and the Company’s charter. Voting at a general shareholders’ meeting is generally based on the principle of one vote per ordinary share, with the exception of the election of the Board of Directors, which must be done through cumulative voting. Ordinarily, a majority vote of the voting shares present at a general shareholders’ meeting is required for a decision of the general shareholders’ meeting to be valid. However, a three-quarters majority vote of the voting shares present at a general shareholders’ meeting is required to approve certain decisions. Issues for which a majority vote is required include: • the number of members of the Board of Directors, and the election and dismissal of its members; • the election and dismissal of the Internal Audit Commission; • the approval of the Company’s independent auditor; • the increase of the Company’s share capital by way of an increase in the nominal value of the Company’s shares; • the reduction of the Company’s share capital by way of the repurchase of part of the Company’s shares for the purpose of decreasing the total number of outstanding shares and the cancellation of the acquired or repurchased shares; • the approval of the Company’s annual reports and financial statements; • the declaration and payment of dividends; • the splitting and consolidation of the Company’s shares; • the approval of interested party transactions in cases provided for by the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies; • the approval of the Company’s participation financial and industrial groups, associations and other unions of commercial organisations; • the approval of internal regulations in relation to management bodies of the Company; and • other issues as provided by the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies and the Company’s charter. Issues for which a three-quarters majority vote is required include: • amendments to the Company’s charter; • the reorganisation of the Company; • the liquidation of the Company, appointment of the liquidation commission and approval of the interim and final liquidation balances; • the number, nominal value and type of authorised shares, and the rights attached to those shares; • the approval of major transactions in cases provided for by the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies; • the acquisition by the Company of issued shares in cases provided for by the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies; • any issue of additional shares, or securities convertible into shares, by a closed subscription; • the reduction of the Company’s share capital by way of a reduction of the nominal value of the Company’s shares; • the increase of the Company’s share capital by issuing additional ordinary shares by means of an open subscription if the ordinary shares to be additionally issued would constitute over 25.0 percent of the total number of ordinary shares issued prior to such additional issue; and
178
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 230D /240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 45166
Management
• the issue of securities convertible into ordinary shares by means of an open subscription if the shares into which the securities would be converted would constitute over 25.0 percent of the total number of ordinary shares issued prior to such issue. A quorum for a general shareholders’ meeting of the Company is achieved if the holders of more than 50.0 percent of the issued outstanding voting shares are attending in person or by proxy. If a 50.0 percent quorum is not achieved, the quorum shall be at least the holders of 30.0 percent of the issued outstanding voting shares to attend (in person or by proxy) a meeting duly reconvened to consider the same agenda. The annual general shareholders’ meeting must be convened by the Board of Directors between 1 March and 30 June of each year, and the agenda must include the following items: • election of the members of the Board of Directors; • approval of the annual report, balance sheet and profit and loss statement; • approval of the distribution of profits and losses; • approval of the appointment of an independent auditor; and • election of the Internal Audit Commission. A shareholder owning, individually or collectively with other shareholders, at least 2.0 percent of the issued voting shares may propose items for the agenda of the annual general shareholders’ meeting and may nominate candidates to the Board of Directors and the Internal Audit Commission pursuant to the Charter of the Company. Any agenda items or nominations must be submitted to the Company no later than 60 calendar days after the end of the financial year. Extraordinary general shareholders’ meetings may be convened by the Board of Directors on its own motion or at the request of the Internal Audit Commission, the independent auditor or any shareholder owning, individually or collectively with other shareholders, at least 10.0 percent of the issued voting shares at the date of the request. A general shareholders’ meeting may be held in person or by absentee ballot. A general shareholders’ meeting held in person involves the adoption of resolutions by the general shareholders’ meeting through the personal attendance of the shareholders or their authorised representatives for the purpose of discussing and voting on issues on the agenda, provided that if the ballot is mailed to shareholders for participation at a meeting convened in such form, the shareholders may complete and mail the ballot back to the company without personally attending the meeting. A general shareholders’ meeting held by absentee ballot involves the determination of shareholders’ opinions on the issues on the agenda by means of a written poll. The following issues cannot be decided by absentee ballot: • the election of the members of the Board of Directors; • the election of the Internal Audit Commission; • the approval of the appointment of an independent auditor; and • the approval of the annual report, balance sheet and profit and loss statement, and the distribution of profits and losses.
Notice and Participation All shareholders entitled to participate in a general shareholders’ meeting must be notified of the meeting, whether the meeting is to be held in person or by absentee ballot, no fewer than 30 days prior to the date of the meeting, and such notification shall specify the agenda for the meeting. However, if election of the members of the Board of Directors or reorganisation in the form of merger, spin-off or split-up of the Company is on the agenda of an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting, shareholders must be notified at least 70 days prior to the date of the meeting. Only those items that are set forth in the statutory notice to shareholders may be considered at a general shareholders’ meeting. According to the Company’s charter, the notice to the shareholders can be sent to the shareholders by registered post or delivered by
179
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/420D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 1798
Management
hand. The Company must also publish the notice in the Russian newspapers ‘‘SEVERSTAL Rossiyskaya Stal’’ (formerly known as ‘‘Cherepovetsky Metallurg’’) and ‘‘Rossiyskaya Gazeta’’. The list of persons entitled to participate in a general shareholders’ meeting is to be compiled on the basis of the data in the Company’s register of shareholders on the date specified by the Board of Directors. The list of persons entitled to participate in a general shareholders’ meeting may not be compiled earlier than the date of adoption of the resolution to hold such meeting and may not be more than 50 days before the date of the meeting or, in the case of an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting to elect the Board of Directors, 85 days before the date of the meeting. Generally, the right to participate in a general shareholders’ meeting may be exercised by a shareholder as follows: • by personal attendance; • by proxy; • by absentee ballot; or • by delegating the right to vote using the absentee ballot to a duly authorised representative.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Pursuant to the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies and the Company’s charter, the Board of Directors is responsible for the general management of the Company and its operations, except with respect to matters reserved to the exclusive competence of the general shareholders’ meeting. The members of the Board of Directors are elected at the annual general shareholders’ meeting through a system of cumulative voting for the period until the next annual general shareholders’ meeting (except if re-election of the Board of Directors is required by an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting). Only natural persons (as opposed to legal entities) are entitled to sit on the Board of Directors. Members of the Board of Directors are not required to be shareholders of the Company. As provided by law, the Company’s charter requires that the entire Board of Directors retire and stand for re-election at each annual general shareholders’ meeting, and that a new Board of Directors be elected through cumulative voting. Under cumulative voting, each shareholder may cast an aggregate number of votes equal to the number of shares it holds multiplied by the number of persons to be elected to the Board of Directors, and the shareholder may give all such votes to one candidate or spread them between two or more candidates. All directors may be removed as a group without cause at any time before their term expires by a majority vote of shareholders participating in a general shareholders’ meeting. Persons elected to the Board of Directors may be re-elected an unlimited number of times. The Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies generally prohibits the Board of Directors from acting on issues that fall within the exclusive competence of the general shareholders’ meeting of the Company. According to the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies and the Company’s charter, the Board of Directors has the power to perform the general management and, among other things, it has the power to: • determine the Company’s business priorities; • convene annual and extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting of the Company, other than in certain cases provided by law; • approve the agendas of general shareholders’ meetings of the Company; • determine the record date for compilation of the list of persons having the right to participate in the general shareholders’ meetings and pass resolutions on certain other issues in connection with the preparation for, and holding of, general shareholders’ meetings; • resolve to issue bonds and other securities in accordance with applicable law; • determine the value of property and of the placement and repurchase price of the Company’s securities in accordance with applicable law; • acquire shares, bonds and other securities issued by the Company other than in situations reserved to the exclusive competence of the general shareholders’ meeting;
180
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 10D*/5160D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 40355
Management
• decide on the policy of appointment and remuneration of the Company’s senior management, including the general director and make recommendations with respect to such policy and the early termination of its powers; • make recommendations on the amount of remuneration and compensation to be paid to the members of the Internal Audit Commission and on the independent auditor’s fee; • make recommendations on the amount of dividends to be paid and the procedure for the payment thereof; • decide on the utilisation of the Company’s reserve and other funds; • approve internal documents of the Company regulating activity of the Board of Directors committees, as well as the Company’s Code of Corporate Conduct; • establish and close down the Company’s branches and representative offices; • approve major and interested party transactions in accordance with applicable law; • approve the appointment of the Company’s registrar and the terms of, as well as the termination of, the registrar’s appointment; • approve transactions with a value exceeding 10.0 percent of the book value of the Company’s assets; • approve the acquisition of (i) shares or participatory interests or the rights to dispose of them or (ii) fixed assets or intangible assets, if the total value of any such transaction is more than the equivalent of US$500 million; and • review of the consolidated budget of the Group and submission of recommendations related to such budget. Under the Company’s charter, the total number of the Board of Directors shall be 10. A meeting of the Board of Directors has a quorum if at least half of its members are present. Some decisions (such as approvals of major transactions) require the unanimous agreement of all members of the Board of Directors. Decisions on approval of transactions with a value exceeding 10.0 percent of the book value of the Company’s assets shall be approved by the majority vote of the Board of Directors and transactions for the purchase of assets with a total value over US$500 million and reviews of the consolidated budget are to be adopted by a two-thirds majority of the total number of directors, excluding any retired directors. As at 27 June, 2011, the active membership of the Board of Directors (the business address of each of which is Ulitsa Mira 30, Cherepovets, Vologda Region, 162608 Russia, and the telephone of which is +7 8202 530 900) is as follows:
Year of Name Birth Current position/biography and outside memberships Since Christopher Clark ...... 1942 Chairman of the Board of Directors, Member of the 2006 Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Mr. Clark is a leading industrialist and brings extensive business knowledge to the Board. His career spans 40 years at Johnson Matthey plc, the specialty chemicals and precious metals group, where he became Chief Executive Officer in 1998. He led the group into the FTSE 100 in 2002. Since his retirement in 2004, Mr. Clark has taken a number of non-executive positions. He is a graduate in metallurgy; he studied at Trinity College, Cambridge and Brunel University, London. Mr. Clark’s outside activities include the following: • Urenco Limited (Chairman of the Board of Directors); and • Citicorp Venture Capital (Board Adviser).
181
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 550D*/5700D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 50793
Management
Year of Name Birth Current position/biography and outside memberships Since Alexey A. Mordashov ...... 1965 Member of the Board of Directors; Chief Executive 1996 Officer of the Group, Member of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Mr. Mordashov has worked for Severstal since 1988. He started his career as a senior shop economist, becoming Chief Financial Officer in 1992 before being appointed in December 1996 as Severstal’s Chief Executive Officer. In June 2002, he was elected Chairman of Severstal’s Board of Directors and served as Chief Executive Officer of Severstal Group. Since December 2006, he has been Chief Executive Officer of Severstal. Mr. Mordashov serves on the Entrepreneurs Council of the Government of the Russian Federation. In addition, he is a member of the Russian-German workgroup responsible for strategic economic and finance issues, and head of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs’ (RSPP) Committee of Trade Policy and WTO. Since March 2006 he has been a member of the EU-Russia Business Cooperation Council. He is also a member of the Atlantic Council President’s International Advisory Board. Mr. Mordashov earned his undergraduate degree from the Leningrad Institute of Engineering and Economics. He also holds an MBA degree from Newcastle Business School of Northumbria University (Newcastle UK). Mr. Mordashov was granted honorary doctorates from the Saint-Petersburg State University of Engineering and Economics in 2001 and from the University of Northumbria in 2003. Mr. Mordashov’s outside activities include the following: • OAO Rossiya Bank (Member of the Board of Directors); • OOO Capital (General Director); • OOO Algoritm (General Director); • ZAO Laguna-Delta (General Director); • ZAO Sveza (Chairman of the Board of Directors); • OOO Terraprof (General Director); • OAO Power machines (Chairman of the Board of Directors); • OAO Novy Impulse Center (Member of the Board of Directors); and • ZAO Severgroup (General Director).
182
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 970D*/5640D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 35613
Management
Year of Name Birth Current position/biography and outside memberships Since Martin Angle ...... 1950 Independent Director, Chairman of the Audit 2006 Committee. Martin Angle holds a number of non-executive directorships in addition to OAO Severstal, including in the UK Pennon Group plc, Savills plc and the Chairmanship of the National Exhibition Centre Group Ltd. He also sits on the Board of Shuaa Capital psc in Dubai. During his career, Martin has held senior executive positions in investment banking, industry and more recently private equity, where he was an Operational Managing Director of Terra Firma Capital Partners and held various senior positions in its portfolio companies including the Waste Recycling Group Ltd, where he was Executive Chairman, and Le Meridien Hotel Group, where he was Deputy Chairman. Prior to that, Martin was for a number of years the Group Finance Director of TI Group plc, a specialised engineering company in the UK FTSE 100 with activities in over 50 countries. Before that, he spent 20 years in investment banking, where he held a number of senior positions with SG Warburg & Co Ltd, Morgan Stanley and Dresdner Kleinwort Benson. Martin is a graduate in physics, a Chartered Accountant, a Member of the Chartered Securities Institute and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. He also sits on the Advisory Board of the Warwick Business School. Mr. Angle’s outside activities include the following: • Savills Plc (Non-Executive Director, Chairman of the Audit Committee); • Pennon Group Plc (Non-Executive Director, Chairman of the Remuneration Committee): • The National Exhibition Center Group Ltd. (Non-Executive Chairman); • Warwick Business School (Member of the Advisory Board of Directors); • Shuaa Capital psc (Non-Executive Director); and • FIA Foundation for the Automobile & Society (Trustee and Director).
183
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 1030D /2040D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63953
Management
Year of Name Birth Current position/biography and outside memberships Since Ronald Freeman ...... 1939 Independent Director, Member of the Audit 2006 Committee. Ronald Freeman is a member of the Board of Directors, an Advisory Partner and stockholder of the Moscow-based Troika Dialog investment bank. He is also a non-executive member of the board of directors of Volga Gas and of Polish Telecom; and, a member of the Executive Committee of the Atlantic Council. He is a member of the International Advisory Committee of Columbia Law School, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Pilgrims Society (UK) and Chairman of the International Advisory Board, Kozminski University (Warsaw). Between 1991 and 1997, Ronald was Head of the Banking Department of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). He was responsible for debt and equity financing in the private sector in 23 countries of the former Soviet Union, with a total annual funds commitment of Euro 2 billion. Prior to that, Ronald was vice-chairman of Citigroup European investment banking and a general partner of Salomon Brothers. Ronald holds a BA degree from Lehigh University, and an LLB from the Law School of Columbia University. He was admitted to the New York Bar. Mr. Freeman’s outside activities include the following: • Troika Dialog Investment Bank (Advisory Partner); • Polish Telecom (Non-Executive Member of the Board of Directors); • Columbia Law School (Member of the International Advisory Committee); • Volga Gas (member of the Board of Directors); • Atlantic Council (Vice Chairman and Member of the Executive Committee); • The Pilgrims (Chairman, Executive Committee); • UK/US Fulbright Commission (Commissioner, Co-Chairman Finance Committee); and • Kozminski University (Chairman, International Advisory Board).
184
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 10D*/5940D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 50550
Management
Year of Name Birth Current position/biography and outside memberships Since Peter Kraljic ...... 1939 Independent Director; Member of the Audit 2006 Committee. Peter Kraljic is a Director Emeritus at McKinsey, where he spent 32 years and held a number of senior positions until his retirement in 2002. Focused mainly on industrial clients in the chemicals, pharmaceuticals, automotive assembly, and steel and aluminium sectors, he was also a member of McKinsey’s Shareholders and Personnel Development Committee and has managed the company’s activities in France as a General Director. Peter has also written a number of scientific and business articles for publications such as the Harvard Business Review and Le Figaro Economic. He has also recently led special projects aimed at economic growth and job creation in Germany and Brazil. Peter graduated from the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia (Faculty of Metallurgy), and holds a PhD degree from Polytechnic University in Hannover, Germany. He also holds a Masters degree in business management from the INSEAD business school, France. Mr. Kraljic’s outside activities include the following: • Business School Bled (member of Advisory Board); • LEK d.d., Slovenia (member of Advisory Board); • Gorenje (member of Advisory Board); and • SID (member of Advisory Board). Sergei A. Kuznetsov ...... 1971 Member of the Board of Directors, CEO Severstal 2009 International, CEO Severstal North America. Sergei Kuznetsov started his career in 1994 as an expert in trade operations for steel and steel products at the State Owned Foreign Trade Association Promsyrioimport (Industrial Materials Import/ Export). In 1995-2001 he worked as a commercial representative at Steel Trading Section of Moscow Representative Office of Cargill Enterprises, Inc. He joined Severstal in 2002 to head Business Planning Group responsible for acquisitions of foreign assets and development of international projects. In 2004 he was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of Severstal North America. In 2008 he became Chief Financial Officer of OAO Severstal. In July 2009 Sergei became CEO of Severstal International and CEO of Severstal North America. Sergei graduated from Bauman Moscow State Technical University in 1994, where he majored in Engineering. In 1998 he received his Finance MBA from California State University, Hayward.
185
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 270D*/5520D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 9 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 9403
Management
Year of Name Birth Current position/biography and outside memberships Since Mr. Kuznetsov’s outside activities include the following: • Severstal Investments, LLC (Member of the Board of Directors, President, CEO); • Severstal Dearborn, LLC (Member of the Board of Directors, President, CEO); • Severstal US Holdings, LLC (Member of the Board of Directors); • Lucchini S.p.A. (Member of the Board of Directors); • Severstal Columbus Holding, LLC (Member of the Board of Directors); • Severstal US Holdings II Inc. (Member of the Board of Directors); and • Charnwood I, LLC (Treasurer). Alexey G. Kulichenko ...... 1974 Member of the Board of Directors, CFO Severstal. 2009 Alexey Kulichenko graduated from the Omsk Institute of World Economy with a degree in economics. In 1996-2003 he worked in ‘‘Sun Interbrew’’, starting his career as cash flow economist of Omsk plant ‘‘Pocap’’ and ending as Efficiency Planning and Managing Director of ‘‘Sun Interbrew’’. From 2003 till 2005 Alexey worked as CFO at ‘‘Unimilk’’—the second largest milk producer in Russia, which joins 20 plants in Russia and Ukraine. From December 19, 2005 to July 2009 he served as CFO of CJSC ‘‘Severstal Resource’’. Since May 2006 Alexey is the member of the Board of directors of JSC ‘‘Vorkutaugol’’. In July 2009 Alexey Kulichenko was appointed CFO of OAO Severstal. Mr. Kulichenko does not have outside activities. Mikhail V. Noskov ...... 1963 Member of the Board of Directors of the Group, 1998 Non-executive Director. Mikhail Noskov worked at the International Moscow Bank between 1989 and 1993. From 1994, he was Trade Finance Director of Credit Suisse (Moscow). He has worked for Severstal since February 1997 as Head of Corporate Finance and from 1998 as Finance and Economics Director. In June 2002, he was made Deputy CEO for Finance and Economics of the Severstal Group, from 2007 till 2008 he was Deputy CEO for Finance and Economics of Severstal. Mikhail graduated from the Moscow Institute of Finance. Mr. Noskov’s outside activities include the following: • OAO Sveza (Member of the Board of Directors);
186
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 70D*/3660D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 10 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 48851
Management
Year of Name Birth Current position/biography and outside memberships Since • ZAO ‘‘National Media Group’’ (Member of the Board of Directors); • Non governmental pension fund ‘‘Stalfond’’ (Chairman of Advisory Board); • Non governmental pension fund ‘‘Gazfond’’ (Member of the Board of Directors); • TUI Aktiengesellschaft (Member of the Board of Directors); • OAO Novy Impulse Center (Chairman of the Board of Directors); • OAO Mostotrest (Independent Director, Member of the Board of Directors); and • ZAO Severgroup (CFO) Rolf Stomberg ...... 1940 Senior Independent Director, Chairman of the 2006 Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Rolf Stomberg is Chairman of the Supervisory Board of LANXESS AG, Leverkusen, a global chemical company, which was formed after reorganisation of Bayer AG. He is Senior Independent Director of medical device producer Smith & Nephew plc, London, and advises a number of German family owned companies. After his executive career of nearly 30 years with BP (British Petroleum Co plc), where he last held the position of CEO of BP’s downstream business and Managing Director on the main board of the company, he held a number of directorships in internationally operating companies in Europe such as Reed Elsevier Group, TNT NV, Scania AB, John Mowlem plc and Management Consulting Group plc, as well as on the boards of PE owned companies. Rolf is an economics graduate holding a Doctorate of Hamburg University, where he also served as a Lecturer. He was Honorary professor at the business school of Imperial College, London, and the Institut Francais de Petrol, Paris. Mr. Stomberg’s outside activities include the following: • Lanxess AG (Chairman of the Supervisory Board); • Smith & Nephew plc (Senior Independent Director), Chairman of the Remuneration Committee, Member of the Audit Committee, Member of the Nominations Committee); • Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc. (Non-Executive Director, member of the Audit Committee, Member of Nominations Committee, Chairman of Remuneration Committee);
187
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 130D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 11 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 10427
Management
Year of Name Birth Current position/biography and outside memberships Since • HOYER GmbH (Vice-chairman of the Advisory Board); • Biesterfeld AG (Member of the Supervisory Board); and • KEMNA Bau Andreae GmbH+Co.KG (Member of the Supervisory Board). Alexander D. Grubman ...... 1962 CEO, Severstal Russian Steel Division (newly nominated candidate for Alexander Grubman joined Severstal in September the Board of Directors) 2006 as Operations Director of Severstal Resources, becoming Chief Operating Officer later that year. In June 2009 Alexander became Chief Executive Officer of Severstal Resources. In September 2010 he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Severstal Russian Steel Division. Prior to joining Severstal, Alexander held leading management positions at Coca-Cola Company, SunInterbrew and Unimilk. Alexander graduated from Moscow Technological Institute of Food Industries as a mechanic engineer. Mr. Grubman’s outside activities include the following: • ZAO Izhora Pipe Mill (Chairman of the Board of Directors); • ZAO Severstal Long Product Mill Balakovo (Chairman of the Board of Directors); and • OAO Severstal-metiz (Chairman of the Board of Directors). There are no current or potential conflicts between the private interests and duties of the members of the Board of Directors or the General Director and the duties of those officers to the Company. In the previous five years, no member of the Board of Directors has been convicted of any fraudulent offence; served as a director, partner, founder or senior manager of any organisation that has been the subject of any bankruptcies, receiverships or liquidations; was subject to any official public incrimination or sanctions by statutory or regulatory authorities, including designated professional bodies, or has been disqualified by a court from acting as a director of an issuer or from acting in the management or conduct of the affairs of any issuer.
GENERAL DIRECTOR The General Director of the Company is the Company’s executive body that carries out the day-to-day management of the Company. The General Director, elected by the general shareholders’ meeting for a three-year term, is entitled to act on behalf of the Company without a power of attorney. The following matters are within the competence of the General Director: • the implementation of current and future programmes of the Company; • the performance of the routine management of the Company’s operations; • the representation of the Company’s interests both in Russia and abroad; • performance of the resolutions adopted by the general shareholders’ meeting and the Board of Directors;
188
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 210D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 12 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55332
Management
• the adoption of regulations on sub-divisions of the Company and on various subjects of the Company’s business activities; • employment of the Company’s staff; • the issuance of powers of attorney on behalf of the Company; • the entry into transactions on behalf of the Company; • the general management of the Company’s assets (the value of which does not exceed 10 percent of the assets of the Company); and • the issuance of orders and instructions binding upon all subordinated officers and employees of the Company. Mr. Alexey A. Mordashov, the controlling shareholder of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, was elected by shareholders as the General Director on 11 June 2010 for a three-year term.
EXTERNAL AUDITORS AND INTERNAL AUDIT COMMISSION As required by Russian law, the Company’s financial and economic activities are monitored by the Company’s Internal Audit Commission (a body established by the general shareholders’ meeting of the Company) and the Company’s Chief Accountant. ZAO KPMG conducts the statutory audit of the Company’s stand-alone accounts produced under Russian Accounting Standards. The appointment of ZAO KPMG as the statutory auditors of the Company is approved by the annual general shareholders’ meeting. Audits of the Company’s financial and economic performance are conducted by the Internal Audit Commission on the basis of the Company’s annual results, but may also be carried out at any time on the initiative of the Internal Audit Commission or at the request of the general shareholders’ meeting, the Board of Directors or any shareholder owning a total of at least 10 percent of the Company’s voting shares. The Internal Audit Commission prepares a report on the basis of the results of the audit. The report should contain confirmation of the authenticity of data included in financial reports, accounts and other financial documents of the Company, and set forth breaches of procedures for conducting accounting operations and financial reporting established by applicable Russian laws. The Internal Audit Commission’s report must be submitted to the Board of Directors no later than 45 days prior to the annual general shareholders’ meeting in accordance with Regulations on Internal Audit Commission. In accordance with the Company’s charter, the Internal Audit Commission consists of three members. They are elected at the annual general shareholders’ meeting and their incumbency lasts until the date of the next annual general shareholders’ meeting. The present members of the Internal Audit Commission are:
Name Position Mr. Roman Antonov ...... Deputy Chief Audit Executive Mr. Artem Voronchikhin ...... Chief Audit Executive Mrs. Svetlana Guseva ...... Manager of Internal Audit and Risk Management
AUDIT COMMITTEE The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for evaluating candidates for the position of the Group’s auditor, evaluating auditors’ reports, evaluating the Group’s internal control and risk management procedure, analysing the system for the approval of unusual transactions and making suggestions for improvement to the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee consists of three Independent Directors. At least one member of the Audit Committee shall have recent, relevant and sufficient experience in the financial area, as well as skills reasonably required for financial statements and business risks analysis and financial management skills. No senior executive of the Company may be a member of the Audit Committee.
189
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DQ14501A.;21 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 3530DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 13 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 10561
Management
The Audit Committee consists of three members of the Board of Directors: Mr. Freeman, Mr. Kraljic and Mr. Angle. The Audit Committee is chaired by Mr. Angle.
REMUNERATION AND NOMINATION COMMITTEE The Remuneration and Nomination Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in engaging qualified experts in managing the Company and creating the incentives necessary to ensure their successful work in the Company. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee consists of three members. At least two members of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee, including the Chairman of the Committee, shall be Independent Directors who are not senior executives of the Company. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee consists of three members of the Board of Directors: Mr. Stomberg, Mr. Clark and Mr. Mordashov. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee is chaired by Mr. Stomberg.
COMPENSATION OF SENIOR MANAGERS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Remuneration of the key managers of the Company totalled US$52.8 million in 2010. This includes salaries, bonuses for 2010, as well as the change in accrued provisions under the long-term incentive programmes. These changes are subject to further adjustments, depending on a range of financial indicators of the Company and its industry peer group. As at 31 December 2010, those accrued provisions amounted to approximately US$20 million. Remuneration of the Company’s key managers in 2009 was US$19.6 million, while bonuses were minimal and no reserves were made under the long-term incentive programmes. Members of the Board of Directors do not receive compensation for service as directors nor is any director a party to any service contract with the Company or any of its subsidiaries where such contract provides for benefits upon termination of employment.
190
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DQ14501A.;21 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DT14501A.;8 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 3975DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 3555
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS The table below sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of the Company as at 10 June 2011 according to the Company’s share register:
Percentage Shareholder of shares OOO Deutsche Bank(1) ...... 24.48 ASTROSHINE LIMITED ...... 19.99 LORANEL LIMITED ...... 19.99 ZAO BANK CREDIT SUISSE ...... 15.23 RAYGLOW LIMITED ...... 9.41 OOO Capital ...... 2.27 NP National Depository Centre ...... 2.14 Other minority shareholders ...... 6.49 Total ...... 100.0
Note: (1) OOO Deutsche Bank is the custodian for Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the Depositary for the Company’s Global Depositary Receipts programme. The Company placed global depositary receipts (‘‘GDRs’’), which were admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange on 14 November 2006. Each GDR represents one ordinary share. As at 10 June 2011, approximately 77.97 percent of the Company’s share capital was indirectly controlled by Mr. Alexey Mordashov, the Company’s chief executive officer and a member of the Board of Directors. Mr. Mordashov has an option to purchase another 4.96 percent of the Company’s share capital and intends to exercise it in the near future. As at 10 June 2011, 0.015 percent of the Company’s shares were controlled by members of the Board of Directors through GDRs representing such shares.
191
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DT14501A.;8 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DU14501A.;10 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 140D*/240D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 37246
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The following is a summary of the Group’s most significant transactions with related parties for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008. For further details of these transactions, see Note 11 to the Annual Financial Statements for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 and Note 4 of the Interim Financial Statements for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and 2010. In the ordinary course of its business, the Group has engaged, and continues to engage, in transactions with parties that are under common control with the Group or that are otherwise related parties to the Group. Transactions with entities under common control with the Group constitute transactions with parties that have the same beneficial owners as the Company, or who are also members of the Board of Directors. See ‘‘Principal Shareholders’’. Other than the transactions with entities under common control described herein, the Group did not engage in any transactions with members of its Board of Directors during the period under review. The Group has transactions with related parties in respect of revenue, purchases, financing and other types of transactions. Because of the varying ownership percentages of its Majority Shareholder in such related parties, as well as other factors, there may be incentives for transactions between the Group and its related parties to be effected on other than arm’s-length terms, which could result in subsidies or other transfers of value and could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations and financial condition. The following related parties and their transactions are considered to be significant to the Group. The scope of related party transactions entered into by the Group as reflected in the Annual Financial Statements were similar to those entered into by the Group in the three months ended 31 March 2011.
REVENUE As disclosed in the Interim Financial Statements, the Group’s revenue from related parties totalled US$25.4 million for the three months ended 31 March 2011. As disclosed in the Annual Financial Statements, the Group’s revenue from related parties totalled US$62.3 million, US$53.1 million and US$177.5 million for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The main part of Group’s revenue from related parties is represented by revenue from associates and other related parties. Revenue from associates and other related parties amounted to US$25.4 million in the three months ended 31 March 2011 and mainly comprised revenue of Steel Resources segment from Lucchini S.p.A. and revenue of the Russian Steel segment from Air Liquide Severstal; the remaining revenues came from other counterparties which individually did not represent any significant revenue transactions. Revenue from associates and other related parties amounted to US$61.5 million, US$52.7 million and US$176.8 million for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and mainly comprised revenue of the Russian Steel segment from Air Liquide Severstal and other counterparties which individually did not represent any significant revenue transactions. Lucchini S.p.A. is one of the largest European producers of special quality steel with 4.0 million tonnes of annual crude steelmaking capacity, which serves more than 1,000 customers in niche markets, such as automotive, rails, bearings, springs and wire rod. Severstal has a 49.2 percent ownership in Lucchini S.p.A. as of March 31, 2011. Air Liquide Severstal is an industrial gas producer with a production capacity of 5,750 kg/h of liquid oxygen. Severstal has a 25.0 percent ownership plus one share in Air Liquide Severstal, which was established jointly with Air Liquide. Air Liquide Severstal has been set up within the Cherepovets steel complex in the Vologda region, Russia. Such transactions were undertaken as part of divisions’ normal business operations and are expected to continue in the foreseeable future.
PURCHASES As disclosed in the Interim Financial Statements for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and 2010, the Group’s purchases from related parties amounted US$54.0 million for the three months ended 31 March 2011. As disclosed in the Annual Financial Statements, the Group’s purchases from related parties totalled
192
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DU14501A.;10 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DU14501A.;10 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 290DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63873
Related Party Transactions
US$180.5 million, US$193.3 million and US$371.5 million for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The main part of the Group’s purchases is represented by purchases from associates and joint ventures totalling US$41.9 million for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and US$153.3 million, US$112.1 million and US$220.4 million for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and mainly comprised purchases by Severstal North America from Double Eagle, Spartan Steel and purchases by the Russian Steel Division from Air Liquide Severstal. Double Eagle is the world’s largest electrogalvanising line, which produces premium quality galvanised sheet steel. The plant, located in Dearborn, Michigan, has a production capacity of 789 thousand tonnes per year, approximately one half of which is dedicated to one of the Severstal North America entities— Severstal Dearborn. Spartan Steel produces hot dip galvanised sheet steel. The plant is located in Monroe, Michigan, and has a production capacity of 544 thousand tonnes per year, about 80.0 percent of which is dedicated to Severstal Dearborn. Such transactions were undertaken as part of divisions’ normal business operations and are expected to continue in the foreseeable future.
FINANCING The Group’s cash flows have been used, from time to time, to finance the development of various companies. As disclosed in the Interim Financial Statements, the Group’s interest income from related parties amounted US$4.3 million for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and mainly represented by interest income received on deposits placed to a related party bank OAO ‘‘Metcombank’’. As disclosed in the Annual Financial Statements, the Group’s interest income from related parties totaled US$18.5 million, US$17.9 million and US$18.1 million for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and mainly represented by interest income received on deposits placed to a related party bank OAO ‘‘Metcombank’’.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For additional information and certain financial statement amounts with respect to various related party transactions for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the balances as at such date, refer to the following parts of the Annual Financial Statements for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Consolidated income statements Consolidated statements of financial position Notes to the consolidated financial statements: Note 11—Related party transactions Note 12—Related party balances Note 20—Investments in associates and joint ventures Note 29—Subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures Note 30—Segment information For relevant disclosures for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and 2010 and the balances as of those dates, refer to the corresponding parts of the Interim Financial Statements for the three months ended 31 March 2011 and 2010, and in particular the following: Consolidated interim condensed income statements Consolidated interim condensed statements of financial position Notes to the consolidated interim condensed financial statements: Note 4—Related party transactions Note 5—Related party balances
193
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DU14501A.;10 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DV14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 680D*/840D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 21885
REGULATORY MATTERS
REGULATION OF THE STEEL AND MINING INDUSTRIES IN RUSSIA Russia has not enacted any specific legislation governing the operation of the steel industry and the business of steel-manufacturing companies. The production, sale and distribution of steel in the Russian Federation is regulated by general civil legislation and administrative and special legislation relating to quality standards, industrial safety, environmental, employment and other rules. The Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation on 18 March 2009 approved the ‘‘Strategy for Development of Metal Manufacture Industry of the Russian Federation for the Period till 2020’’ (the Strategy). The Strategy supersedes the ‘‘Strategy for Development of Metal Manufacture Industry of the Russian Federation for the Period till 2015’’ dated 29 May 2007. The Strategy, inter alia, outlined the key trends and factors relevant for the development of national ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy, set out three stages of development of the Russian metallurgy (2009-2011, 2012-2015 and 2016-2020) and determined that innovative growth would be the priority for improving competitive strength of national manufacturers. The Federal Law ‘‘On Technical Regulation’’ No. 184-FZ dated 27 December 2002, as amended (the Technical Regulation Law), introduced new rules relating to the development, enactment, application and enforcement of obligatory technical requirements and the development of voluntary standards relating to manufacturing processes, operations, storage, transportation, selling and utilisation. The Technical Regulation Law supersedes the Laws of the Russian Federation ‘‘On Certification of Goods and Services’’ No. 5151-1 dated 10 June 1993 and ‘‘On Standardisation’’ No. 5154-1 dated 10 June 1993 and will be followed by the revision of existing legislation and technical rules falling within the scope of its regulation. Under the Technical Regulation Law, technical rules and regulations relating to industrial safety and environmental protection can be enacted only by federal laws, decrees of the president, resolutions of the government and by-laws adopted by state authorities responsible for technical regulation. In those cases where the Technical Regulation Law provides for mandatory confirmation of product conformity to the established technical regulations (standards), certain Group companies are obliged to obtain certificates of compliance evidencing that their products meet the requirements of technical regulations, standards, codes of practice or terms and conditions of contracts. In those cases where Russian laws and regulations relating to industrial safety provide for mandatory issuance of permits to use technical equipment at hazardous production facilities, certain Group companies are obliged to obtain the required permits which prove that their products meet the relevant industrial safety requirements.
Federal, Regional and Local Regulatory Authorities Governing the Steel Industry At the federal level, regulatory authority over the steel industry is divided primarily between the Ministry of Industry and Trade and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology. The Ministry of Industry and Trade is responsible for the development of governmental policy in, and regulation of, the industry. In addition, it regulates certain aspects of Russian exports and imports of steel products. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology is responsible for the development of governmental policy and regulation in the sphere of natural resources, including subsoil. Particularly, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology passes regulations, inter alia, setting safety requirements to the process of exploration, development of natural resources, the order of re-issuance and transfer of subsoil licenses, the rules of access to the geological information, which belongs to the state, and establishes rules of accounting for natural resources on the state balances and of classification and evaluation of natural resources. On 14 February 2009 the Government founded the Government’s Commission on Development of Metals Production Sector (the Commission). The main functions of the Commission is to coordinate the above- mentioned regulatory authorities’ actions concerning development and implementation of state policy in the sphere of steel industry.
194
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DV14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DV14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 170D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 23727
Regulatory Matters
The federal ministries in Russia are not responsible for compliance control or management of state property and provision of services, which are directed by the federal services and the federal agencies, respectively. The federal services and agencies that are relevant to the Group’s activities include: • The Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision, which sets procedures for, and oversees compliance with, industrial safety and environmental rules and issues licences for certain industrial activities and activities relating to safety and environmental protection; • The Federal Agency for Subsoil Use, which organises auctions and issues licences for subsoil use and approves design documentation for subsoil production activities; • The Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology, which determines and oversees levels of compliance with obligatory state standards and technical regulations; and • the Federal Service for the Supervision of the Use of Natural Resources (‘‘Rosprirodnadzor’’), which exercises supervision over the observance of environmental legislation (including legislation relating to handling of hazardous wastes), controls geological exploration, the rational use and protection of subsoil (including compliance with the relevant terms and conditions of subsoil licenses) and exercises the land control. Aside from the above federal executive bodies, which are directly involved in regulating and supervising the steel sector in Russia, there are a number of other federal regulators that, together with their structural subdivisions, have authority over general issues relevant to the Russian steel industry, such as defence, internal affairs, security, border services, justice, tax enforcement, rail transport and other matters. Generally, regional and municipal authorities with jurisdiction over the specific territory in which a steel- producing enterprise is located have authority in certain matters, in particular with regard to land-use allocations.
Licensing of Operations The Group is required to obtain numerous licences, authorisations and permits from Russian governmental authorities for its operations. The Federal Law No. 128-FZ ‘‘On Licensing of Certain Types of Activities’’ of 8 August 2001 as amended (the Licensing Law), as well as effective provisions of the new Federal Law No. 99-FZ ‘‘On Licensing of Certain Types of Activities’’ of 4 May 2011 (the New Licensing Law) which shall supersede the Licensing Law of 2001 on 3 November 2011, as well as other laws and regulations, set forth the activities subject to licensing and establish procedures for issuing licences. In particular, some of the Group’s Russian companies need to obtain licences, permits and approvals of executive authorities to carry out certain activities, including, inter alia: • the use of subsoil, which is described in more detail below in ‘‘—Subsoil Licensing’’; • the exploitation of chemically hazardous, explosive and flammable industrial objects; • the collection, utilisation, deactivation, transportation and disposing of hazardous waste of hazard classes from I to IV; • the storage, utilisation and distribution of explosives for industrial use (three different licences); • surveying works; and • transportation activities. These licences are usually issued for a period of five years and in most cases may be extended upon application by the licensee. It should be noted that under the New Licensing Law these licences will be issued for an indefinite term. Licences for carrying out of certain types of geological survey may be issued for a period of 10 years. Licences for the use of natural resources may be issued for shorter or longer periods. Certain types of licences may also have unlimited terms. The requirements imposed by regulatory authorities may be costly and time-consuming, which may result in delays in the commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations. Accordingly, the licences that the Group needs may not be issued in a timely fashion, or may impose requirements that restrict its ability to conduct its operations or to do so profitably.
195
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DV14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DV14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 90D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 10716
Regulatory Matters
As part of the Group’s obligations under licensing regulations and the terms of its licences and permits, the Group must comply with numerous industrial standards, employ qualified personnel, maintain certain equipment and a system of quality controls, monitor operations, maintain and make appropriate filings and, upon request, submit specified information to the licensing authorities that control and inspect their activities. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension and subsequent revocation of our licenses by the court order. Special rules apply to suspension and revocation of subsoil licenses.
Subsoil Licensing In Russia, mining minerals requires a subsoil licence with respect to an identified mineral deposit, as well as the right (through ownership, lease or other right) to use the land where such licensed mineral deposit is located. In addition, as discussed above, operating permits are required with respect to specific mining activities. The licensing regime for use of subsoil for geological research, exploration and production of mineral resources is established primarily by the Federal Law of the Russian Federation ‘‘On Subsoil’’ No. 2395-1 dated 21 February 1992, as amended, (the Subsoil Law). The procedure for subsoil use licensing, as well as certain rules of exploration and production of mineral resources was established by Resolution of the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation on 15 July 1992, as amended, (the Licensing Regulation). There are two major types of licences: (1) an exploration licence, which is a non-exclusive licence granting the right of geological exploration and assessment within the licence area, and (2) a production licence, which grants the licensee an exclusive right to produce minerals from the licence area. In practice, some of the licences are issued as combined licences, which grant the right to explore, assess and produce minerals from the licence area. There are two major types of payments with respect to the use of subsoil: (1) periodic payments for geological exploration under the Subsoil Law and (2) the minerals extraction tax under the Tax Code. Failure to make these payments could result in the suspension or termination of the subsoil licence. Issuance of subsoil licences. Subsoil licences are issued by the Federal Agency for Subsoil Use. Most of the currently existing production licences owned by companies derive from (1) pre-existing rights granted during the Soviet era and up to the enactment of the Subsoil Law to state-owned enterprises that were subsequently reorganised in the course of post-Soviet privatisations; or (2) tender or auction procedures held in the post-Soviet period. The Subsoil Law and the Licensing Regulation set out the major requirements relating to such tenders and auctions. Amendments to the Subsoil Law, passed in August 2004, significantly changed the procedure for awarding exploration and production licences, in particular abolishing the joint grant of licences by federal and regional authorities. Under the 2004 amendments, production licences and combined exploration and production licences are awarded by tender or auction conducted by the Federal Agency for Subsoil Use. While the auction or tender commission may include a representative of the relevant region, the separate approval of regional authorities is no longer required in order to issue subsoil licences. The winning bidder in the tender is selected on the basis of the submission of the most technically competent, financially attractive and environmentally sound proposal that meets published tender terms and conditions. At the auction, the success of the bid is determined by the attractiveness of the financial proposal. Exploration licenses are generally awarded without a tender or auction by the special commission formed by the Subsoil Agency, which includes the representatives of the relevant regional executive authority. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology maintains an official list of deposits in respect of which exploration licenses can be issued. The company may obtain a license for geological exploration (which will be conducted at the company’s own expense) of the deposit included into the above-mentioned list by filing an application with the Subsoil Agency (or its regional department). Unless there is more than one application with respect to the same deposit (in which case the Subsoil Agency sets up an auction for combined exploration and production license for the deposit) the special commission makes the decision to grant the license upon examination of the application. The Subsoil Law allows for production licences to be issued without a tender or auction procedure only in limited circumstances, such as instances when a mineral deposit is discovered by the holder of an exploration licence at its own expense during the exploration phase. In those circumstances, as a matter of
196
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DV14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DV14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 70D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55263
Regulatory Matters
practice, the production licence will be issued to the holder of the exploration licence, but, legally, the right of the holder of the exploration licence to receive the production licence in the event of discovery is not guaranteed. Regional authorities may issue production licences for ‘‘common’’ mineral resources, such as clay, sand or limestone. A recipient of a licence from a regional authority is also usually granted rights to use the land surrounding the licence area. Extension of subsoil licences. The term of any subsoil licence is set forth in the licence and runs from the date the licence is registered. Prior to January 2000, exploration licences could have a maximum term of five years, production licences a maximum term of 20 years, and combined exploration, assessment and production licences a maximum term of 25 years. After amendment of the Subsoil Law in January 2000, exploration licences may still have a maximum term of five years (except for exploration licences in relation to inland sea waters, territorial sea and continental shelf which may be issued for a period of up to 10 years); production licences may have a one-year term in a limited number of special cases, but are generally granted for a term of the expected operational life of the field based on a feasibility study; and combined exploration, assessment and production licences can be issued for the term of the expected operational life of the field based on a feasibility study. These amendments did not affect the terms of licences issued prior to January 2000, but permit licensees to apply for extensions of such licences for the term of the expected operational life of the field in accordance with the amended Subsoil Law. The Subsoil Law permits a subsoil licensee to request an extension of a production licence in order to complete the production from the subsoil plot covered by the licence or the procedures necessary to vacate the land once the use of the subsoil is complete, provided the user complies with the terms and conditions of the licence and the relevant regulations. In practice, the factors that may affect a company’s ability to obtain the approval of licence amendments include its compliance with the licence terms and conditions and its management’s experience and expertise relating to subsoil issues, including experience in amending licences. Maintenance and termination of subsoil licences. A licence granted under the Subsoil Law is generally accompanied by a licensing agreement. The licensing agreement sets out the terms and conditions for the use of the subsoil licence. Prior to the August 2004 amendments, the relevant regional authority, the Ministry of Natural Resources and the licensee were each party to a licence agreement. Under the August 2004 amendments, only the Federal Agency for Subsoil Use and the licensee are parties to licence agreements. Under a licensing agreement, the licensee makes certain environmental, safety and production commitments, including extracting annually an agreed target amount of reserves; conducting agreed mining and other exploratory and development activities; protecting the environment in the licence areas from damage; providing geological information and data to the local authorities; submitting on a regular basis formal progress reports to regional authorities; making all obligatory payments when due and commitments with respect to social and economic development of the region. When the licence expires, the licensee must return the land to a condition, which is adequate for future use. Most of the conditions set out in a licence are based on mandatory rules contained in Russian law, and licence agreements are generally not negotiable. The Group expects that it will be able to meet the commitments set forth in its licensing agreements. The fulfilment of a licence’s conditions is a major factor in the good standing of the licence. If the subsoil licensee fails to fulfil the licence’s conditions, upon notice, the licence may be terminated by the licensing authorities. However, if a subsoil licensee cannot meet certain deadlines or achieve certain volumes of exploration work or production output as set forth in a licence, it may apply to amend the relevant licence conditions, though such amendments may be denied. The Subsoil Law and other Russian legislation contain extensive provisions for licence termination. A licensee can be fined or the licence can be limited, suspended or terminated for the reasons noted above, for repeated breaches of the law, upon the occurrence of a direct threat to the lives or health of people working or residing in the local area, or upon the occurrence of certain emergency situations. A licence may also be limited, suspended or terminated for violations of ‘‘material’’ licence terms. Although the Subsoil Law does not specify which terms are material, failure to pay subsoil taxes and failure to
197
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DV14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DV14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 30D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 38508
Regulatory Matters
commence operations in a timely manner have been common grounds for suspension or termination of licences. Consistent underproduction and failure to meet obligations to finance a project or to submit data reports (as required by law) would also likely constitute violations of material licence terms. In addition, certain licences provide that the violation by a subsoil licensee of any of its obligations may constitute grounds for limiting, suspending or terminating the licence. If the licensee does not agree with a decision of the licensing authorities, including a decision relating to a licence limitation, suspension or termination or the refusal to reissue an existing licence, the licensee may appeal the decision through administrative or judicial proceedings. In certain cases of termination, the licensee has the right to attempt to cure the violation within three months of its receipt of notice of the violation. If the issue has been resolved within such a three-month period, no termination or other action may be taken. Licences may be transferred only under certain limited circumstances that are identified in the Subsoil Law, including the reorganisation of the licence holder or in the event that an initial licence holder transfers its licence to a legal entity in which it has at least a 50 percent ownership interest, provided that the transferee possesses the equipment and authorisations necessary to conduct the exploration or production activity that is covered by the transferred licence.
Land Use Rights Land use rights are needed and granted for the portions of the licence area actually being used, including the plot being mined, access areas and areas where other mining-related activity is occurring. Under the Land Code of the Russian Federation No. 136-FZ of 25 October 2001, as amended, (the Land Code), legal entities may generally have the rights of ownership or lease with regard to land plots in the Russian Federation. A majority of land plots in the Russian Federation are owned by federal, regional or municipal bodies, which can sell or lease land to private users. Legal entities may also have a so-called ‘‘right of perpetual use’’ of land plots, provided such type of title was obtained by them prior to the enactment of the Land Code; however, the Federal Law on Introduction of the Land Code of 25 October 2001, with certain exceptions, requires legal entities using land plots on the right of perpetual use to purchase or to lease the respective land plot from the relevant federal, regional or municipal authority by 1 January 2012. The Group’s mining subsidiaries (composing Severstal Resources) generally have a property right to their plots or a long-term lease. There are also certain land plots in perpetual use, however, those plots are currently being transferred to long-term lease agreements. A land plot lessee has a priority right to enter into a new land lease agreement with a lessor upon the expiration of a land lease. In order to renew a land lease agreement, the lessee must apply to the lessor (usually state or municipal authorities) for a renewal prior to the expiration of the agreement. Any lease agreement for a period of one year or more must be registered with the relevant state authorities.
Environmental Considerations The Group is subject to laws, regulations and other legal requirements relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the discharge of substances into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and waste, the clean-up of contaminated sites, flora and fauna protection and wildlife protection. Issues of environmental protection in Russia are regulated primarily by the Federal Law ‘‘On Environmental Protection’’ No. 7-FZ of 10 January 2002, as amended, (the Environmental Protection Law), as well as by a number of other federal and local legal acts. Pay-to-pollute. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology, The Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision, the Federal Agency on Water Resources and other government agencies establish guidelines for setting limits for different types of permissible impact on the environment, including the emission, disposal of substances and waste disposal, and extraction of natural resources. A company may obtain approval for exceeding these statutory limits from the federal or regional authorities, depending on the type and scale of environmental impact. As a condition to such approval, a plan for the reduction of the emissions or disposals must be developed by the company and cleared with the
198
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DV14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DV14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 230DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 4439
Regulatory Matters
appropriate governmental authority. Fees are assessed on a sliding scale for both the statutory or individually approved limits on emissions and effluents and for pollution in excess of these limits: the lowest fees are imposed for pollution within the statutory limits, intermediate fees are imposed for pollution within the individually approved limits, and the highest fees are imposed for pollution exceeding such limits. Payments of such fees do not relieve a company of its responsibility to take environmental protection measures and undertake restoration and clean-up activities. Environmental approval. Certain activities that may affect the environment are subject to state ecological approval by federal authorities in accordance with the Federal Law ‘‘On Ecological Expert Examination’’ No. 174-FZ of 23 November 1995, as amended. Conducting operations that may cause damage to the environment without state ecological approval may result in the negative consequences described in ‘‘—Environmental liability’’. Enforcement authorities. The Federal Service for the Supervision of the Use of Natural Resources, the Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision, the Federal Service for Hydrometrology and Environmental Monitoring, the Federal Agency on Subsoil Use, the Federal Agency on Forestry and the Federal Agency on Water Resources and certain other federal authorities (along with their regional branches) are involved in environmental control, implementation and enforcement of relevant laws and regulations. The federal government and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology are responsible for co-ordinating the activities of the regulatory authorities in this area. Such regulatory authorities, along with other state authorities, individuals and public and non-governmental organisations, also have the right to initiate lawsuits for the compensation of damage caused to the environment. The statute of limitations for such lawsuits is 20 years. Environmental liability. If the operations of a company violate environmental requirements or cause harm to the environment or any individual or legal entity, a court action may be brought to limit or ban these operations and require the company to remedy the effects of the violation. Any company or its employees that fail to comply with the requirements of applicable environmental laws and regulations may be subject to administrative and/or civil liability, while individuals may also be subject to criminal liability. Courts may also impose clean-up obligations on violators in lieu of or in addition to imposing fines. The Group has, in the past, been subject to enforcement actions, fines and, in some cases, court actions in relation to breaches of environmental regulations by the entities currently comprising the Russian Steel Division and Severstal Resources. Although none of these court actions and fines has had, individually or in aggregate, a material adverse effect on the Group, its business and results of operations, there can be no assurance that any such court actions or fines will not have a material effect on the Group in the future. Subsoil licences generally require certain environmental commitments. Although these commitments can be substantial, the penalties for failing to comply and the clean-up requirements are generally low.
Health and Safety Due to the nature of the Group’s business, much of its activity is conducted at industrial sites by large numbers of workers, and workplace safety issues are of significant importance to the operation of these sites. The principal law regulating industrial safety is the Federal Law ‘‘On Industrial Safety of Dangerous Industrial Facilities’’ No. 116-FZ of 21 July 1997, as amended, (the Safety Law). The Safety Law applies, in particular, to industrial facilities and sites where certain activities are conducted, including sites where lifting machines and high pressure devices are used, where alloys of ferrous and non-ferrous metals flammable, toxic and explosive substances are produced, used, stored, processed and transported and where certain types of mining are done. The Safety Law also contains a comprehensive list of dangerous substances and their permitted concentration, and extends to facilities and sites where these substances are used. There are also regulations that address safety rules for coal mines, the production and processing of ore, the blast-furnace industry, steel smelting, alloy production and nickel production. Additional safety rules also apply to certain industries, including metallurgical and coke chemical enterprises, and the foundry industry.
199
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DV14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DW14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 15770
Regulatory Matters
Any construction, reconstruction, liquidation or other activities in relation to regulated industrial sites is subject to a state industrial safety review. Any deviation from project documentation in the process of construction, reconstruction and liquidation of industrial sites is prohibited unless reviewed by a licensed expert and approved by the Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision. Companies that operate such industrial facilities and sites have a wide range of obligations under the Safety Law and the Labour Code of Russia effective 1 February 2002, as amended, (the Labour Code). In particular, they must limit access to such sites to qualified specialists, maintain industrial safety controls and carry insurance for third-party liability for injuries caused in the course of operating industrial sites. The Safety Law also requires these companies to enter into contracts with professional wrecking companies or create their own wrecking services in certain cases, conduct personnel training programmes, create systems to cope with and inform the Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision of accidents and maintain these systems in good working order. In certain cases, companies operating industrial sites must also prepare declarations of industrial safety which summarise the risks associated with operating a particular industrial site and measures the company has taken and will take to mitigate such risks and use the site in accordance with applicable industrial safety requirements. Such declaration must be adopted by the chief executive officer of the company, who is personally responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the data contained therein. The industrial safety declaration, as well as a state industrial safety review, are required for the issuance of a licence permitting the operation of a dangerous industrial facility. The Safety Law also provides that the use of technical equipment at dangerous industrial facilities is subject to Rostekhnadzor permission. The Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision has broad authority in the field of industrial safety. In case of an accident, a special commission led by a representative of the Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision conducts a technical investigation of the cause. The company operating the hazardous industrial facility where the accident took place bears all costs of an investigation. The officials of the Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision have the right to access industrial sites and may inspect documents to ensure a company’s compliance with safety rules. The Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision may suspend or terminate operations or impose administrative liability. Any company or individual violating industrial safety rules may incur administrative and/or civil liability, and individuals may also incur criminal liability. A company that violates safety rules in a way that negatively impacts the health of an individual may also be obligated to compensate the individual for lost earnings, as well as health-related damages.
Investments in Russian Companies of Strategic Importance The Federal Law ‘‘On the Procedure for Making Foreign Investments in the Companies of Strategic Importance for the Defence and Security of the State’’ No. 57-FZ, as amended (the Strategic Investments Law) came into force in May 2008. The Strategic Investments Law establishes certain restrictions for foreign investments into Russian companies which are deemed strategically important for the defence and security of the Russian Federation (the Strategic Companies). The Strategic Investments Law provides for the list of activities that have strategic importance for the national defence and security. This list inter alia includes (a) exploration and production of subsoil of federal land plots and, generally, (b) activities of those companies that have a market share in a particular segment in excess of 35 percent Under the Strategic Investments Law, an acquisition by a foreign investor of a direct or indirect control over a Strategic Company requires a permit of the competent state authority. Under the Strategic Investments Law, an establishment by foreign entity (or any other person that is a member of the group with the participation of a foreign entity) of direct or indirect control over a Strategic Company requires a permit of the competent state authority. Therefore, inter alia, an acquisition by a foreign entity (or its group member) of a stake in a Strategic Company which vests an acquirer with right to exercise certain percentage of voting rights (ranging from 5 to 50 percent depending on type of the foreign investor and type of the Strategic Company) in the charter capital of the Strategic Company, requires obtaining a prior permit of the competent state authority. If an acquisition of a stake over the relevant percentage happens without obtaining such prior permit, the acquisition transaction could by found void
200
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DW14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DW14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 64907
Regulatory Matters
upon the claim of any interested party (including the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation) or the acquirer may be deprived from voting rights which correspond to the stake acquired in the Strategic Company.
Competition and Mergers Control Federal Law No. 135-FZ ‘‘On the Protection of Competition’’ dated 26 July 2006, as amended (the Competition Law), establishes a merger control regime and requires that the FAS be notified of certain transactions. Under the Competition Law, an investor or several entities constituting ‘‘a group of entities and/or individuals’’ should apply for the prior consent of the FAS or submit to it a post-completion notification in relation to: • an initial acquisition of more than 25.0 percent of the voting shares in a joint stock company, or 33.3 percent of the participation interest in a limited liability company, provided that the acquirer did not have any shares (participation interest) in such company or had less than the above threshold before the acquisition; • a subsequent acquisition of the voting shares in a joint stock company or participation interests in a limited liability company such that the level of their holding of the company’s shares (participation interest) passes the threshold of 50.0 percent or 75.0 percent of the voting shares in a joint stock company or 50.0 percent or 66.6 percent of the participation interests in a limited liability company; • acquisition or lease of production or intangible assets if the book value of such assets exceeds 20.0 percent of the production or intangible assets of the seller (transferor); or • an acquisition of (direct or indirect) rights to determine the terms of the business of another entity (e.g. rights to give binding instructions to another entity or control the decision making process in another entity) or to exercise the powers of its executive body. A prior FAS clearance for an acquisition is required if (i) either the aggregate balance value of assets of the acquirer and the target and the companies of their respective groups exceeds RUR7 billion or the aggregate value of revenues of the same entities in the last calendar year exceeds RUR10 billion and, simultaneously, (ii) the aggregate value of assets of the target and the companies of its group exceeds RUR250 million or, alternatively, one of the entities mentioned above is entered in the Register of Entities Holding a Dominant Position or Entities with a Market Share Exceeding 35.0 percent A post-completion notification on acquisition is required if (i) either the aggregate balance value of assets of the acquirer and the target and the companies of their respective groups exceeds RUR400 million or the aggregate value of revenues of the same entities in the last calendar year exceeds the same amount and, simultaneously, (ii) the aggregate value of assets of the target and the companies of its group exceeds RUR60 million. Under the Competition Law, a transaction without prior FAS approval or post-notification may be invalidated by a court resolution held upon the FAS claim, provided that such transaction has led or may lead to the restriction of competition, for example, by strengthening a dominant position in the relevant market. More generally, Russian law provides for civil, administrative and criminal liability for the breach of anti-monopoly law. Intra-group transfers are subject to merger control. They may be exempt from the prior approval requirement and may be subject to post-completion notification if: (i) an intra-group transfer is made to a transferee (a) in which the transferor holds more than 50.0 percent of voting shares or (b) which holds more than 50.0 percent of voting shares in the transferor; or (ii) not later than 1 month prior to completion a list of group members is disclosed to the FAS in accordance with Article 31 of the Competition Law. The list should specify the grounds for including each of the group members in the group. The list submitted to the FAS will be published on the FAS website.
201
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DW14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DW14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 270D*/320D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 62904
Regulatory Matters
The Competition Law expressly provides for its extraterritorial application to transactions and actions which are made outside of Russia between Russian and(or) foreign entities if such transactions or actions relate to production and(or) intangible assets located in the territory of Russia or to the shares (participation interests) in, or rights in relation to, companies operating in the territory of Russia, or otherwise impact the competition environment in Russia. As part of its competition-monitoring activities, the FAS keeps a Register of Entities Holding a Dominant Position or Entities with a Market Share Exceeding 35.0 percent As a major Russian steel producer, the Company appears on the register in relation to certain types of steel products. The FAS may rule that even certain companies do not appear on the register have a dominant position in the market. Such companies are subject to more rigorous governmental regulation including the imposition of price controls.
Employment and Labour Labour matters in Russia are primarily governed by the Labour Code. Employment contracts. As a general rule, employment contracts for an indefinite term are concluded with all employees. Russian labour legislation expressly limits the possibility of entering into term employment contracts. However, an employment contract may be entered into for a fixed term of up to five years in certain cases where labour relations may not be established for an indefinite term due to the nature of the duties or the conditions of the performance of such duties as well as in other cases expressly identified by federal law. An employer may terminate an employment contract only on the basis of the specific grounds enumerated in the Labour Code, including: • liquidation of the company or downsizing of staff; • failure of the employee to comply with the position’s requirements due to incompetence, confirmed by appraisal; • systematic failure of the employee to fulfil his or her duties without a fair excuse if this employee was subject to prior disciplinary action and if a warning or reprimand imposed on the employee has not been withdrawn by the employer; • any single gross violation by the employee of his or her duties as it is defined in the Labour Code; and • provision by the employee of false documents or misleading information prior to entry into the employment contract. An employee dismissed from a company due to downsizing or liquidation is entitled to receive compensation including a severance payment and, depending on the circumstances, average salary payments for a certain period of time. The Labour Code also provides protections for specified categories of employees. For example, except in cases of liquidation of a company, an employer cannot dismiss the employees, being on a sick-leave, business trip or on a holiday and pregnant women. Mothers with a child under the age of three, single mothers with a child under the age of 14 or disabled child under the age of 18 or other persons caring for a child under the age of 14 or disabled child under the age of 18 without a mother may not be dismissed by the employer unless for guilty actions. Dismissal of minors, except for dismissal due to liquidation of a company, requires prior approval by the State Labour Inspectorate or by the respective Minor Inspectorate. Any termination by an employer that is inconsistent with the Labour Code requirements may be invalidated by a court, and the employee may be reinstated. Lawsuits resulting in the reinstatement of illegally dismissed employees and the payment of damages for wrongful dismissal are increasingly frequent, and Russian courts tend to support employees’ rights in most cases. Where an employee is reinstated by a court, the employer must compensate the employee for unpaid average salary for the period between the wrongful termination and reinstatement, as well as for mental distress.
202
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DW14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DW14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 230D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 38796
Regulatory Matters
Work time. The Labour Code generally sets the regular working hours at 40 per week. Any time worked beyond 40 hours per week, as well as work on public holidays and weekends, must be compensated at a higher rate. Annual paid vacation leave under the law is generally 28 calendar days. Employees who perform underground and open-pit mining works or other work in harmful conditions may be entitled to additional paid vacation ranging from 7 to 36 working days. The retirement age in the Russian Federation is 60 years for males and 55 years for females. However, the retirement age for male miners who have worked in underground mines for at least 10 years, and females who have worked in underground mines for at least seven years and six months, is 50 years and 45 years, respectively. Persons who have worked as miners in open-pit mines and/or underground mines for at least 25 years or who have worked for some leading mining professions for at least 20 years may also retire, regardless of age. Salary. The minimum salary in Russia, as established by federal law, is calculated on a monthly basis and is RUR4,611 from 1 June 2011. Strikes. The Labour Code defines a strike as the temporary and voluntary refusal of workers to fulfil their work duties with the intention of settling a collective labour dispute. Russian legislation contains several requirements for legal strikes. Participation in a legal strike may not be considered by an employer as grounds for terminating an employment contract, although employers are generally not required to pay wages to striking employees for the duration of the strike. Participation in an illegal strike after it has been determined as illegal may be adequate grounds for termination. Trade Unions. Although recent Russian labour regulations have curtailed the authority of trade unions, they still retain significant influence over employees and, as such, may affect the operations of large industrial companies in Russia. In this regard, the Group’s management routinely interacts with trade unions, in particular the Mining and Metallurgical Trade Union, in order to ensure the appropriate treatment of employees and the stability of its business. See ‘‘Business—Russian Steel Division— Employees’’. The activities of trade unions are generally governed by the Federal Law on Trade Unions, Their Rights and Guaranties of Their Activity of 12 January 1996, as amended, (the Trade Union Law). Other applicable legal acts include the Labour Code of Russia, which provide for more detailed regulations relating to activities of trade unions. As part of their activities, trade unions may: • negotiate collective contracts and agreements such as those between the trade unions and employers, federal, regional and local governmental authorities and other entities; • monitor compliance with labour laws, collective contracts and other agreements; • access work sites and offices, and request information relating to labour issues from the management of companies and state and municipal authorities; • represent their members and other employees in individual and collective labour disputes with management; • participate in strikes; and • monitor redundancy of employees and seek action by municipal authorities to delay or suspend mass layoffs. Russian laws require that companies co-operate with trade unions and do not interfere with their activities. Trade unions and their officers enjoy certain guarantees as well, such as: • legal restrictions as to rendering redundant employees elected or appointed to the management of trade unions; • protection from disciplinary punishment or dismissal on the initiative of the employer without prior consideration of reasoned opinion of the management of the trade union and, in certain circumstances, the consideration of reasoned opinion of the relevant trade union association;
203
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DW14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DW14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 270D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 34554
Regulatory Matters
• retention of job positions for those employees who stop working due to their election to the management of trade unions; • protection from dismissal at the employer’s initiative due to some dismissal grounds for employees who previously served in the management of a trade union for two years after the termination of the office term; and • provision of the necessary equipment, premises and transportation vehicles by the employer for use by the trade union free of charge, if provided for by a collective bargaining contract or other agreement. If a trade union discovers any violation of work condition requirements, notification is sent to the employer with a request to cure the violation and to suspend work if there is an immediate threat to the lives or health of employees. The trade union may also apply to state authorities and labour inspectors and prosecutors to ensure that an employer does not violate Russian labour laws. Trade unions may also initiate collective labour disputes, which may lead to strikes. To initiate a collective labour dispute, trade unions present their demands to the employer. The employer is then obliged to consider the demands and notify the trade union of its decision. If the dispute remains unresolved, a reconciliation commission attempts to end the dispute. If this proves unsuccessful, collective labour disputes are generally referred to mediation or labour arbitration. The Trade Union Law provides that those who violate the rights and guaranties provided to trade unions and their officers may be subject to disciplinary, administrative and criminal liability. Although neither the Code of Administrative Delinquencies of Russia of 30 December 2001, nor the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of 13 June 1996, currently has provisions specifically relating to these violations, general provisions and sanctions may be applicable.
Collective Bargaining Agreements The Labour Code provides that a collective bargaining agreement applies to all employees of a company whether members or non-members of the trade union. A collective bargaining agreement may be concluded either for the company on the whole, or for its branches, representative offices and other structural subdivisions. A collective bargaining agreement may be concluded for a term not exceeding three years and may be extended for another three years. It is not possible to include in the collective bargaining agreement a provision worsening the employees’ standing under the general rule of law, as such provisions would be null and void.
Trade Barriers and Anti-Dumping Regulations Steel-producing countries generally view their steel industries as strategically important and therefore requiring protection from foreign competition. In addition, the governments of some emerging economies employ non-market methods to try to protect and develop their steel industries, and, while those governments seek to achieve the desired balance in their economies between production levels and product mix and consumption, they may resort to protectionist measures against imports from third countries. Exports of steel from Russia are primarily regulated by the Federal Law ‘‘On Fundamentals of State Regulation of Foreign Trade Activities’’ No. 164-FZ dated 8 December 2003 and bilateral agreements between Russia and its trading partners, including the United States, the EU and China, which establish minimum prices and/or quotas for the export from Russia to those markets of certain types of steel products. Russian exporters of steel products to the United States and the EU are required, in accordance with the bilateral agreements between Russia and the United States and the EU, respectively, to obtain a licence for those exports for certain steel products from the Russian Ministry of Economic Development. General. In general, the recent trend worldwide has been for the relaxation of import restrictions. The largest importers of the Company’s products are countries in the EU and North America. Restrictive measures on imported steel introduced by certain Latin American countries have not affected the Company’s business adversely, as the Company’s exports have, for geographical reasons, been principally directed at markets in the EU, Middle East and North America.
204
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DW14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DW14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 275D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 6 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 40719
Regulatory Matters
The Group believes that, due to Russia being granted ‘‘market economy’’ status by the EU and various countries, including the United States, South Africa and Brazil, it has become relatively easier for Russian steel producers to defend their interests in the course of anti-dumping and other trade proceedings, and the Group expects this trend to continue if Russia accedes to the WTO in the near future. United States. Russian steel producers, including the Russian Steel Division are currently able to operate in the US market in accordance with the following two agreements, which limit Russian exports of metal products: • A suspension agreement on hot-rolled cut-to-length steel plate, which establishes minimum prices without quotas based on information about the costs and expenses of Russian exporters. Russian exporters concluded this market economy cost-based agreement with the US Department of Commerce on 20 December 2002, replacing the non-market economy agreement that had been in force since 1997. Russian Steel Division is the only exporter from Russia who has applied with the US Department of Commerce to sell hot-rolled cut-to-length steel plate into the US market; • A suspension agreement on hot-rolled flat carbon-steel products, which established minimum prices and quotas. The quota for 2010 was approximately 0.9 million tonnes (of which the Company was allocated approximately 0.45 million tonnes). The quota for 2009 was approximately 0.9 million tonnes (of which the Company was allocated approximately 0.45 million tonnes). While these quotas have generally been enough to satisfy Russian producers’ needs, the Company is restricted on sales of hot-rolled coils and thin sheets in the US market. Despite the existence of quota volumes for the Company’s shipments of hot-rolled coils and thin sheets to the US market, the Company did not supply these products in 2009 and 2010 to the US market, because it was not attractive in comparison with other export markets. • In relation to steel products such as cold-rolled, galvanised and semi-finished steel and long products, Russian exporters have been operating in the US market without any restrictions on the import of these products since the expiry of the Comprehensive Steel Agreement on 11 July 2004; and • Russia was granted ‘‘market economy’’ status by the United States with effect from 1 April 2002. EU. On 26 October 2007, the Russian Federation and the EU entered into an agreement regulating trade in certain steel products. This agreement established a quota for the export of Russian metals into the EU and superseded the previous quota system for the export of Russian metals, which had been in place since 1 December 1997 in the form of a bilateral agreement. This agreement and these quotas are referred to in a regulation issued by the European Council on 22 October 2007 on import of certain steel products from the Russian Federation as amended by the European Commission Regulation No. 1093/2009 dated 13 November 2009.
Quotas for Export of Russian Steel into the EU, 2008, 2009 and 2010
Year ended Year ended Year ended 2008 2009 2010 Products (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) SA. Flat products SA1. Coils ...... 1,035,000 1,067,575 1,087,397 SA2. Heavy plate ...... 275,000 303,498 288,922 SA3. Other flat products ...... 595,000 651,248 625,122 SA4. Alloyed products ...... 105,000 114,925 110,316 SA 5. Alloyed quarto plates ...... 25,000 27,580 26,266 SA 6. Alloyed cold-rolled and coated sheets ...... 110,000 120,425 115,569 SB. Long products SB1. Beams ...... 55,000 60,480 57,784 SB2. Wire rod ...... 324,000 355,131 340,402 SB3. Other long products ...... 507,000 593,795 532,667 Total ...... 3,031,000 3,294,657 3,184,445
205
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DW14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DW14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 7 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 55684
Regulatory Matters
On 31 October 2003, the EU terminated its anti-dumping investigation against imports of hollow sections originating from Russia and Turkey, without the imposition of any trade restrictions. Russia was granted ‘‘market economy’’ status by the EU in November 2002.
Anti-Dumping Proceedings The most significant anti-dumping proceedings against Russian steel exporters were initiated between 1996 and 2001 by the United States in respect of a wide range of hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel products. The Company actively participated, along with other Russian steel producers, in all those proceedings. In general, the granting of ‘‘market economy’’ status to Russia by the United States in April 2002 has led to a reduction in the anti-dumping measures imposed in the US market, benefiting, in particular, the ferrous metal industries. For example, the United States terminated the anti-dumping proceedings against imports of cold-rolled steel products, which it initiated on 21 June 1999 and 18 October 2001, and, since April 2002, the Company has incurred lower rates of duty in anti-dumping proceedings compared to rates from previous periods, for example, the 184 percent anti-dumping duty for Russian hot-rolled steel that the United States imposed in 1999. In 2004 and 2005, the following key decisions were made regarding Russian steel exporters by foreign government authorities: • Expiration of the US-Russia Comprehensive Steel Agreement, which established quotas on various types of steel products such as cold-rolled, galvanised and semi-finished steel and long products, on 14 July 2004. Since that time, the Russian Steel Division and other Russian exporters have operated in the US market without any restrictions on these products. • Termination of anti-dumping measures against hot-rolled and cold-rolled products in Canada. • Termination of anti-dumping measures against electrical steel products in China. • Suspension of anti-dumping measures against cold-rolled steel products in China. • Termination of anti-dumping measures against cold-rolled steel products in South Africa, hot-rolled products in Indonesia and cold-rolled and long steel products in Colombia. • Opening of US cut-to-length market through the establishment of minimum prices under a market economy suspension agreement with the US Department of Commerce, as the result of co-operation between the Department and the Company. • Possibility of the export of new grades of hot-rolled products within the framework of the US-Russia Suspension Agreement on hot-rolled flat carbon-steel products. Currently, there are relatively few trade restrictions in force against exports from the Russian Federation in countries such as Mexico, Argentina, Peru and Thailand. These restrictions did not have and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s business. Meanwhile, a number of anti-dumping duty measures against Russian steel products expired after being in force for five years, including measures relating to grain-oriented electrical steel in China and cold-rolled steel in Colombia. The Company, along with other Russian steel producers, continues to participate in those proceedings and reviews that it regards as important to its business. The Company intends to continue to participate actively in all inter- governmental consultations relating to Russian steel exports to the United States, the EU and other international markets.
REGULATION OF THE STEEL AND MINING INDUSTRIES IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE Overview Steel and mining operations and activities in the United States and Europe are extensively regulated at both the federal and state level in the United States and at the national and local level in Europe. Federal, national, regional, state and local authorities in the United States and the EU regulate a variety of matters, including employee health and safety; royalties; permitting and licensing requirements; environmental impact assessment, planning and development; and environmental compliance (including, for example,
206
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DW14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DW14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 530DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 8 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 29107
Regulatory Matters
compliance with the regulatory regimes governing waste and waste water treatment and disposal; waste transportation; emissions and discharges; protection of species and habitats; decommissioning, reclamation and restoration of properties used for mining or other activities; surface subsidence from underground mining and the effects that mining and other activities have on surface and/or groundwater quality and availability). Activities and operations involved in the mining and steel production industries generate hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, effluent and emissions, require waste transportation and treatment, and have other environmental impacts which require various environment-related permits and approvals to be held or received. Licences may also be required for the abstraction of the relevant natural resources. Such permits and licences are subject, in certain situations or on the occurrence of certain events, to modification or addition of conditions (including monitoring, upgrading, improvement, decommissioning and aftercare requirements), or revocation by issuing authorities. The carrying out of such activities and operations is also subject to various restrictions and other requirements under environmental, health and safety laws. Violations of health and safety laws relating to a mine or a steel factory, or a failure to comply with the instructions of relevant health and safety authorities, may result in the temporary or permanent shutdown of steel or mining operations in the United States or Europe, as well as the imposition of fines, or penalties corrective procedures. Steel and mining businesses in the United States and Europe are also required in many cases to prepare and present to national, federal, regional, state and/or local authorities information pertaining to the anticipated effect or impact that proposed exploration, mining or production activities may have upon the environment. The preparation and presentation of this information in many cases requires a substantial commitment of personnel and financial resources. In response to such presentations, the national, federal, regional, state and/or local authorities are empowered to determine that mining operations must suspended or decommissioned.
Climate Change In December 1997, in Kyoto, Japan, the signatories to the United Nations Convention on Climate Change established individual, legally binding targets to limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions by developed nations in the period 2008-2012. This international treaty, known as the Kyoto Protocol, came into force in the Russian Federation on 16 February 2005. The Kyoto Protocol enables the emissions reductions to be achieved by a variety of means including emissions trading and investment in overseas emissions reduction projects. Russia is anticipated to offer opportunities in relation to such projects. The 181 states and the EU have ratified, accepted, accessed or approved the Protocol. Discussions are ongoing as to a possible successor to the Kyoto Protocol, with the aim of signing a new agreement in December 2009. It is currently unclear what emission reduction targets will be adopted, but in light of recent scientific and economic reports on the impact of climate change, these may be more stringent than those adopted in the Kyoto Protocol. In a separate development, in July 2005 Australia, China, India, Japan, South Korea and the United States formed the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. Members of the partnership intend to cooperate on the development and transfer of technology with a view to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Steel and mining operations in Europe and the United States are subject to laws, regulations and policies aimed at limiting or reducing greenhouse gas emissions. For example, in the EU, an increasingly stringent regulatory framework is being developed to achieve the EU’s Kyoto Protocol commitments and to meet its own emissions reductions targets which affect, among other activities, coke ovens and steel plants. In the United States, California’s recent legislative initiatives may indicate a trend towards a similarly stringent regulatory system. In addition, government entities and other organisations in Europe and the United States are actively investing in research projects aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In the past, such legislative and research initiatives have involved additional market regulatory measures such as emissions trading, switching to cleaner forms of energy and/or introducing emissions-curbing technologies.
207
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DW14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DX14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 6140DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 14780
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY The Company’s charter states in clause 4.1 that the main aim of the company is earning profits and using profits in the interest of the company. The Company is an open joint stock company incorporated under the laws of the Russian Federation and domiciled in Cherepovets, Russia. The Company’s registration number is 1023501236901 and its registered address is 30 Mira Street, Cherepovets, Vologodskaya oblast, 162600, Russian Federation. The telephone number of the Company’s Moscow office is +7 495 926 7766.
208
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DX14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DY14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 0D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 34172
THE ISSUER GENERAL The Issuer is a public limited liability company (soci´et´e anonyme) of unlimited duration that is incorporated, exists and operates under the laws of Luxembourg, in compliance with the Companies’ Act 1915, other applicable regulations and its Articles of Incorporation. The Issuer was incorporated on 11 May 2006 and is registered with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies’ Register (Registre de Commerce et des Soci´et´es) under registration number B 116.975. The registered office of the Issuer is 2, Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, L-1115 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. The telephone number of the registered office of the Issuer is +35 242 122 462 and its fax number is +35 242 122 718. The Articles of Incorporation of the Issuer have been published in the M´emorial, Journal Officiel du Grand Duch´e de Luxembourg, Recueil des Soci´et´es et Associations C-No 1522 on 9 August 2006. The Issuer is a special purpose vehicle and is operated for the purpose of issuing asset backed securities. The Issuer has entered into an administrative services and domiciliation agreement on 12 May 2006 with Deutsche Bank Luxembourg SA, whereby Deutsche Bank Luxembourg SA provides in Luxembourg certain domiciliary, management, administrative, accounting and related services in relation to the Issuer’s business. The Issuer’s share capital, as of the date of this Prospectus, is A31,000 divided into 310 registered shares with a par value A100, each of which is fully paid.
SHAREHOLDERS Stichting Steel Capital Luxembourg, a Dutch company owns 309 shares in the Issuer and Stichting Participatie DITC Amsterdam, a Dutch company, owns 1 share. Stichting Steel Capital Luxembourg is an organisation incorporated in the Netherlands having its registered office at Herengracht 450, 1017 CA Amsterdam. It is registered with the handelsregister van de Kamers van Koophandel of Amsterdam under number 34247473. The objectives of Stichting Steel Capital Luxembourg are, among others, to incorporate, manage and control shares in the share capital of the Issuer and to exercise all rights attached to such shares. Stichting Participatie DITC Amsterdam is an organisation incorporated in the Netherlands, having its registered office at Herengracht 450, 1017 CA Amsterdam. It is registered with the handelsregister van de Kamers van Koophandel of Amsterdam under number 34148998. The objectives of Stichting Participatie DITC Amsterdam are, among others, to acquire and hold shares and to exercise all rights attached to such shares.
STATUTES Article 4 of the Articles of Incorporation provides that the principal objects of the Issuer are the issue of loan participation notes for the purpose of financing loans to JSC Severstal and to its affiliates, the granting of security interests over its assets in relation to the issuance of the loan participation notes and the making of deposits at banks or with other depositaries. The Issuer may further carry out any transaction, whether commercial or financial, which are directly or indirectly connected with its corporate object at the exclusion of any banking activity. In general, the Issuer may carry out any operation which it may deem useful or necessary to the accomplishment and the development of its corporate purpose.
MANAGEMENT The Issuer is managed by its board of directors (the Issuer’s Board of Directors), who are appointed by the shareholders. The current directors of the Issuer are as follows:
Name Business Address Mme. Anja Lakoudi ...... 2, Boulevard Konrad Adenauer L-1115 Luxembourg Mme. Heike Kubica ...... 2, Boulevard Konrad Adenauer L-1115 Luxembourg Mme. Stephanie Becker ...... 2, Boulevard Konrad Adenauer L-1115 Luxembourg The Issuer’s directors do not perform any principal activities outside of the Issuer that are significant with respect to the Issuer.
209
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DY14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DY14501A.;7 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 5810DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63050
The Issuer
There are no current or potential conflicts between the private interests and duties of the members of the Issuer’s Board of Directors and the duties of those officers to the Issuer.
OTHER The Issuer is not aware of any governmental, legal, or arbitration proceedings (including any such proceedings which are pending or threatened of which the Issuer is aware), during the last 12 months, which may have, or have in the recent past, significant effects on the Issuer’s financial position or profitability.
210
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DY14501A.;7 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DZ14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 260D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 2432
FACILITY AGREEMENT The following is the text of the Facility Agreement entered into between the Company and the Issuer. In the context of each Loan, the Facility Agreement should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the relevant Loan Supplement for such Loan.
This Facility Agreement is made on 19 October 2010 between: (1) JSC ‘‘SEVERSTAL’’, an open joint stock company established under the laws of the Russian Federation whose registered office is Ul. Mira 30, 162608 Cherepovets, Vologda Region, Russian Federation (‘‘Severstal’’); and (2) STEEL CAPITAL S.A., a soci´et´e anonyme incorporated in Luxembourg with limited liability whose registered office is at 2, Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, L-1115 Luxembourg, registered with the Register of Commerce and Companies of Luxembourg under number B116975 (the ‘‘Lender’’, which expression, where the context so admits, includes any successor Lender pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and the Lender acting in its capacity as issuer of the agreed funding).
Whereas: (A) The Lender has at the request of Severstal agreed to make available to Severstal a loan facility in the maximum amount of the Programme Limit (as defined below) on the terms and subject to the conditions of this Facility Agreement, as amended and supplemented in relation to each Loan (as defined below) by a loan supplement dated the relevant Closing Date (as defined below) substantially in the form set out in Schedule 1 hereto (each, a ‘‘Loan Supplement’’). (B) It is intended that, concurrently with the extension of any Loan under this loan facility, the Lender will enter into agreed funding in the same nominal amount and bearing the same rate of interest as such Loan. Now it is hereby agreed as follows:
1 Definitions and Interpretation 1.1 Definitions In this Facility Agreement (including the recitals), the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: ‘‘Account’’ means an account in the name of the Lender with the Principal Paying and Transfer Agent as specified in the relevant Loan Supplement. ‘‘Accounting Standards’’ means IFRS, US GAAP or any other internationally recognised set of accounting standards deemed equivalent to IFRS by the relevant regulators for the time being. ‘‘Affiliate’’ of any specified person means (i) any other person, directly or indirectly, controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with such specified person or (ii) any other person who is a director or officer (a) of such specified person, (b) of any Subsidiary of such specified person or (c) of any person described in (i) above. For the purpose of this definition, ‘‘control’’ when used with respect to any person means the power to direct the management and policies of such person, directly or indirectly, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise; and the terms ‘‘controlling’’ and ‘‘controlled’’ have meanings correlative to the foregoing. ‘‘Agency’’ means any agency, authority, central bank, department, government, legislature, minister, official or public statutory person (whether autonomous or not) of, or of the government of, any state or supra- national body. ‘‘agreed funding’’ shall mean the Indebtedness (including in the form of securities) that may be incurred to the agreed funding source from time to time by the Lender under the Programme, each such series of agreed funding corresponding to a Loan and, in relation to a Loan, as defined in the relevant Loan Supplement; ‘‘agreed funding agreements’’ shall mean any debt instrument or facility or guarantee thereof, trust deed, agency agreement or subscription agreement entered into in connection with any agreed funding and any side or fee letters ancillary thereto;
211
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DZ14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DZ14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 110D*/480D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 2 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 46895
Facility Agreement
‘‘agreed funding source’’ shall mean any person to whom the Lender owes any Indebtedness (including securities), which Indebtedness was incurred to fund a Loan (including a designated representative or trustee of such Person or any assignee or transferee appointed in connection with the agreed funding source); ‘‘Asset Disposition’’ means any sale, lease, transfer or other disposition (or series of related sales, leases, transfers or dispositions) by Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal, including any disposition by means of a merger, consolidation or similar transaction (each referred to for the purposes of this definition as a ‘‘disposition’’), of: (a) any shares of Capital Stock of a Subsidiary of Severstal (other than directors’ qualifying shares or shares required by applicable law to be held by a person other than Severstal or a Subsidiary of Severstal); (b) all or substantially all the assets of any division or line of business of Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal; or (c) any other assets of Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal outside of the ordinary course of business of Severstal or such Subsidiary, other than, in the case of Clauses (a), (b) and (c) above, (i) a disposition by a Subsidiary of Severstal to Severstal or by Severstal or a Subsidiary of Severstal to a Subsidiary of Severstal; (ii) a disposition of assets in a single transaction or a series of related transactions with a Fair Market Value of less than US$20,000,000; (iii) a disposition of cash or Temporary Cash Investments; (iv) the creation of a Lien (but not the sale or other disposition of the property subject to such Lien); (v) the licensing or sublicensing of rights to intellectual property or other intangibles in the ordinary course of business; (vi) any disposition constituting or resulting from the enforcement of a Lien incurred in compliance with Clause 10.1; (vii) the sale, lease or other disposition of (A) obsolete, worn out, negligible, surplus or outdated equipment or machinery or (B) raw materials or inventory in the ordinary course of business; (viii) the lease, assignment or sublease of any real or personal property in the ordinary course of business; (ix) sales or other dispositions of assets or property received by Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal upon the foreclosure on a Lien granted in favour of Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal or any other transfer of title with respect to any ordinary course secured investment in default; or (x) the surrender or waiver of contract rights or the settlement, release, or surrender of contract, tort or other claims, in the ordinary course of the business. ‘‘Auditors’’ means the auditors of Severstal’s consolidated financial statements (prepared in accordance with applicable Accounting Standards) for the time being or, if they are unable or unwilling promptly to carry out any action requested of them under this Agreement, such other internationally recognised firm of accountants as may be approved in writing by the Lender for this purpose. ‘‘Average Life’’ means, as of the date of determination, with respect to any Indebtedness, the quotient obtained by dividing (1) the sum of the products of the numbers of years from the date of determination to the dates of each successive scheduled principal payment of such Indebtedness multiplied by the amount of such payment by (2) the sum of all such payments. ‘‘Base Prospectus’’ means, unless defined in the relevant Loan Supplement in relation to a Loan, the base prospectus relating to the agreed funding dated 7 July 2011. ‘‘Broken Amount’’ has the meaning set out in the Loan Supplement. ‘‘Business Centre’’ has the meaning set out in the Loan Supplement.
212
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DZ14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DZ14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 50D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 3 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 16436
Facility Agreement
‘‘Business Day’’ means: (i) save in relation to Clause 4, a day (other than a Saturday or Sunday) on which (a) banks and foreign exchange markets are open for business generally in the relevant place of payment, and (b) if on that day a payment is to be made in a Specified Currency other than euro hereunder, where payment is to be made by transfer to an account maintained with a bank in the Specified Currency, foreign exchange transactions may be carried on in the Specified Currency in the principal financial centre of the country of such Specified Currency, and (c) if on that day a payment is to be made in euro hereunder, a day on which the TARGET System is operating (a ‘‘TARGET Business Day’’), and (d) in relation to a Loan corresponding to any agreed funding to be sold pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, banks and foreign exchange markets are open for business generally in New York City; and (ii) in relation to Clause 4, (a) in the case of a Specified Currency other than euro, a day (other than a Saturday or Sunday) on which commercial banks and foreign exchange markets settle payments in the principal financial centre for such Specified Currency; and/or (b) in the case of euro, a TARGET Business Day; and/or (c) in the case of any Specified Currency where one or more Business Centres is specified in the relevant Loan Supplement a day (other than a Saturday or a Sunday) on which commercial banks and foreign exchange markets settle payments in such currency in the Business Centre(s) or, if no currency is indicated, generally, in each of the Business Centres. ‘‘Calculation Agent’’ has the meaning specified in the relevant Loan Supplement. ‘‘Calculation Amount’’ has the meaning specified in the relevant Loan Supplement. ‘‘Capital Lease Obligation’’ means an obligation that is required to be classified and accounted for as a finance or capital lease for financial reporting purposes in accordance with Accounting Standards, and the amount of Indebtedness represented by such obligation shall be the capitalised amount of such obligation determined in accordance with Accounting Standards; and the Stated Maturity thereof shall be the date of the last payment of rent or any other amount due under such lease prior to the first date upon which such lease may be terminated by the lessee without payment of a penalty. ‘‘Capital Stock’’ means, with respect to any person, any and all shares, interests, participations, rights to purchase, warrants, options, or other equivalents (however designated) of capital stock of a corporation and any and all equivalent ownership interests in a person other than a corporation; in each case whether now outstanding or hereafter issued. ‘‘Closing Date’’ means the date specified as such in the relevant Loan Supplement. ‘‘Consolidated Indebtedness’’ means, for any date of determination (and without duplication), all Indebtedness of the Group outstanding as at the balance sheet date of the latest published consolidated financial statements of the Group published immediately preceding the date of determination, as is shown on a consolidated balance sheet of the Group as at such balance sheet date prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards to which the then most recent published audited consolidated financial statements of Severstal comply, as consistently applied. ‘‘Consolidated Leverage Ratio’’ as of any date of determination (the ‘‘Determination Date’’), means the ratio of (x) the aggregate amount of Consolidated Indebtedness to (y) the aggregate amount of EBITDA for the period (the ‘‘EBITDA Calculation Period’’) of the two most recent consecutive semi-annual periods ending prior to the date of such determination for which financial statements have been delivered under Clause 10.9, as determined in good faith by a responsible financial or accounting officer of Severstal; provided, however, that: (a) if (i) Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal has incurred any Indebtedness since the balance sheet date of the latest published consolidated financial statements of the Group published immediately preceding the date of determination (the ‘‘Relevant Date’’) which remains outstanding on the Determination Date; or (ii) the transaction giving rise to the need to calculate the Consolidated Leverage Ratio is an incurrence of Indebtedness, or both, Consolidated Indebtedness shall be calculated after giving effect on a pro forma basis to such Indebtedness as if such Indebtedness had been incurred on the Relevant Date; (b) if (i) Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal has repaid, repurchased, defeased or otherwise discharged any Indebtedness since the Relevant Date or (ii) any Indebtedness is to be repaid,
213
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DZ14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DZ14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 530D*/950D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 4 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 63485
Facility Agreement
repurchased, defeased or otherwise discharged (in each case other than Indebtedness incurred under any revolving credit facility unless such Indebtedness has been permanently repaid and has not been replaced) on the date of the transaction giving rise to the need to calculate the Consolidated Leverage Ratio, the Consolidated Leverage Ratio shall be calculated on a pro forma basis as if such repayment, repurchase, defeasement or discharge had occurred on the Relevant Date; (c) if since the Relevant Date Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal have made an Asset Disposition as a result of which a Person ceased to be a Subsidiary of Severstal, Consolidated Indebtedness shall be reduced on a pro forma basis by an amount of Indebtedness (to the extent originally included) equal to the Indebtedness of such Person as if such Asset Disposition had occurred on the Relevant Date; (d) if since beginning of the EBITDA Calculation Period, Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal made any Asset Disposition, EBITDA shall be reduced by an amount equal to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation calculated in line with the definition of EBITDA (if positive) or increased on a pro forma basis by an amount equal to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation calculated in line with the definition of EBITDA (if negative) directly attributable to the assets which are the subject of such Asset Disposition as if such Asset Disposition had occurred on the first day of such EBITDA Calculation Period; (e) if since the beginning of the EBITDA Calculation Period, Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal (by merger or otherwise) made an Investment or an acquisition of assets which constitutes all or substantially all of a business or an operating unit of a business, including any acquisition of assets occurring in connection with a transaction requiring a calculation to be made hereunder, EBITDA shall be calculated after giving pro forma effect to such Investment or acquisition as if such Investment or acquisition had occurred on the first day of such EBITDA Calculation Period; and (f) if since the beginning of the EBITDA Calculation Period any person that subsequently became a Subsidiary of Severstal or was merged with or into Severstal or any Subsidiary of Severstal since the beginning of such period) shall have made any Asset Disposition, any Investment or acquisition of assets that would have required an adjustment pursuant to Clause (c) or (d) above if made by Severstal or a Subsidiary of Severstal during such period, the Consolidated Leverage Ratio shall be calculated after giving pro forma effect thereto as if such Asset Disposition, Investment or acquisition had occurred on the first day of such EBITDA Calculation Period. For purposes of this definition, whenever pro forma effect is to be given to an acquisition of assets and the amount of income or earnings relating thereto, the pro forma calculations shall be determined in good faith by a responsible financial or accounting officer of Severstal. ‘‘Core Business’’ has the meaning given to it in Clause 10.3.2. ‘‘Currency Agreement’’ means any foreign exchange contract, currency swap agreement or other similar agreement with respect to currency values. ‘‘Day Count Fraction’’ means, in respect of the calculation of an amount of interest on any Loan for any period of time (from and including the first day of such period to but excluding the last) (whether or not constituting an Interest Period or Interest Accrual Period, the ‘‘Calculation Period’’): (i) if ‘‘Actual/Actual’’ or ‘‘Actual/Actual-ISDA’’ is specified in the relevant Loan Supplement, the actual number of days in the Calculation Period divided by 365 (or, if any portion of that Calculation Period falls in a leap year, the sum of (A) the actual number of days in that portion of the Calculation Period falling in a leap year divided by 366 and (B) the actual number of days in that portion of the Calculation Period falling in a non-leap year divided by 365); (ii) if ‘‘Actual/365 (Fixed)’’ is specified in the relevant Loan Supplement, the actual number of days in the Calculation Period divided by 365; (iii) if ‘‘Actual/360’’ is specified in the relevant Loan Supplement, the actual number of days in the Calculation Period divided by 360;
214
Kama II Prospectus Proj: P16045LON11 Job: 11ZBY14501 (11-16045-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750 Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: DZ14501A.;16 MERRILL CORPORATION LFORD// 6-JUL-11 10:53 DISK129:[11ZBY1.11ZBY14501]DZ14501A.;16 mrll_0909.fmt Free: 80D*/300D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 5 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;91 4 C Cs: 46661
Facility Agreement
Facility Agreement (iv) if ‘‘30/360’’, ‘‘360/360’’ or ‘‘Bond Basis’’ is specified hereon, the number of days in the Calculation Period divided by 360, calculated on a formula basis as follows: