May 2019

Strategic Environmental

Assessment (SEA) Environmental

Report For Consultation June/July 2019

REGAN ʹ

Port of Waterford Master Plan

MALONE O MALONE

Form ES - 04

Ground Floor – Unit 3 Bracken Business Park Bracken Road, Sandyford Dublin 18, D18V32Y Tel: +353- 1- 567 76 55 Email: [email protected]

Title: Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report, Port of Waterford Master Plan, Port of Waterford Company

Job Number: E1475

Prepared By: Eoghan Fitzsimons Signed:______

Checked By: Klara Kovacic Signed:______

Approved By: Kevin O’Regan Signed:______

Revision Record

Issue Date Description Remark Prepared Checked Approved No.

01 20/05/19 Report FINAL EF KK KOR

Copyright and Third Party Disclaimer MOR has prepared this report for the sole use of our client (as named on the front the report) in accordance with the Client’s instructions using all reasonable skill and competence and generally accepted consultancy principles. The report was prepared in accordance with the budget and terms of reference agreed with the Client and does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. MOR exclude to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person or legal entity (other than the Client in accordance with the terms of reference). MOR has not verified any documents or information supplied by third parties and referred to herein in compiling this document and no warranty is provided as part of this document. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced without express written confirmation from MOR. Any methodology contained in this report is provided to the Client in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of MOR. Disclosure of such information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Third parties who obtains access to this report by any means, including disclosure by the Client, will be subject to the Copyright and Third Party Disclaimer contained herein. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Contents

ABBREVIATIONS ...... VI 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 The Master Plan ...... 1 1.2 Purpose of this Environmental Report ...... 2 1.3 Structure of this Report ...... 3 1.4 Appropriate Assessment (AA) ...... 4 1.5 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) ...... 4 1.6 Responsible Authority ...... 4 1.7 SEA Team ...... 5 2.0 PORT OF WATERFORD OVERVIEW ...... 6 2.1 Port of Waterford (POW) ...... 6 2.2 Master Plan Objectives ...... 8 2.3 Master Plan Development Options ...... 9 2.4 Cheekpoint Lower Bar River Training Wall Evolution ...... 12 2.5 Current and Future Dredging Requirements ...... 14 2.6 Temporal Scope of the Master Plan ...... 17 3.0 SEA METHODOLOGY ...... 18 3.1 The Requirement for SEA ...... 18 3.2 The SEA Process ...... 18 3.3 Baseline Data ...... 19 3.4 Difficulties Encountered and Information Gaps ...... 20 4.0 CONSULTATION ...... 21 4.1 SEA Scoping Phase Consultation ...... 21 4.2 Consultation on the Master Plan and SEA Environmental Report .... 22 5.0 RELATIONSHIP WITH RELEVANT POLICES, PLANS AND PROGRAMMES ...... 23

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental i Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.0 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ...... 25 6.1 Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna ...... 27 6.2 Population & Human Health ...... 38 6.3 Geology, Sediments, Soils & Land-use ...... 42 6.4 Water ...... 46 6.5 Air Quality & Acoustics ...... 54 6.6 Climatic Factors ...... 58 6.7 Material Assets - Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture ...... 61 6.8 Cultural Heritage - Architectural & Archaeological ...... 67 6.9 Landscape & Visual Amenity ...... 72 6.10 Inter-relationships between SEA Environmental Topics ...... 76 6.11 Evolution of the Environment in the Absence of the Master Plan .... 76 7.0 SEA OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND INDICATORS ...... 78 8.0 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES ...... 83 8.1 Alternative 1: Do-Nothing ...... 83 8.2 Alternative 2: Relocation of Port of Waterford ...... 85 8.3 Alternative 3: Development of the POW infrastructure and estuary . 87 8.4 Alternative 4: Concurrent Development of all Options ...... 89 8.5 Alternative 5: Phased Development of all Options ...... 90 9.0 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS IN ABSENCE OF MITIGATION...... 92 9.1 Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna ...... 92 9.2 Population & Human Health ...... 96 9.3 Geology, Sediments, Soils and Land Use ...... 97 9.4 Water ...... 99 9.5 Air Quality and Acoustics ...... 102 9.6 Climatic Factors ...... 104 9.7 Material Assets – Infrastructure, Fisheries, Aquaculture ...... 105 9.8 Cultural Heritage ...... 108 9.9 Landscape and Visual Amenity ...... 109 9.10 Cumulative Effects ...... 110 10.0 MITIGATION AND MONITORING ...... 112 10.1 Mitigation ...... 112 10.2 Monitoring ...... 120

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental ii Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

11.0 NEXT STEPS ...... 125 12.0 REFERENCES ...... 126

FIGURES Figure 1-1: POW Master Plan Area ...... 2 Figure 1-2: Inter-relationships between the POW Master Plan, SEA and AA ...... 4 Figure 1-3: SEA Team ...... 5 Figure 2-1: Master Plan Development Options ...... 10 Figure 2-2: Evolution of the Training Wall ...... 13 Figure 6-1: Master Plan Location Map ...... 26 Figure 6-2: Natura 2000 Designated Sites in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area ...... 29 Figure 6-3: Designated Habitats in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area ...... 31 Figure 6-4: Proposed Natural Heritage Areas (pNHAs) in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area ...... 33 Figure 6-5: Ramsar Sites located within 15km of the Master Plan Area ...... 34 Figure 6-6: Grid Squares Used for Reference for Protected Species Distributions ...... 35 Figure 6-7: I-WeBS Sites in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area ...... 36 Figure 6-8: Electoral Divisions that border Waterford Estuary and Harbour in the vicinity of the Master Plan ...... 39 Figure 6-9: Offshore Geology of the Master Plan Area ...... 42 Figure 6-10: On-shore Geology within the Master Plan Area...... 43 Figure 6-11: Soil Types within the Master Plan Area ...... 45 Figure 6-12: Catchments Map ...... 47 Figure 6-13: Sub-catchments Map ...... 47 Figure 6-14: Transitional and Coastal Waterbodies ...... 48 Figure 6-15: Recurring Flood Zones and Flood Records in the vicinity of the Master Plan .. 52 Figure 6-16: Excerpts of Strategic Noise Mapping for Locality ...... 55 Figure 6-17: Mollusc Production in the Vicinity of the Master Plan Area ...... 65 Figure 6-18: Location of Registered Monuments and Sites (SMR) within 1km from the Master Plan Area ...... 68 Figure 6-19: Location of the NIAH Sites within 1km from the Master Plan Boundary ...... 69 Figure 6-20: Protected Structures (RPS) within the Master Plan Area ...... 70 Figure 6-21: Landscape Character Types within the vicinity of the Master Plan Boundary .. 73 Figure 6-22: Protected and Scenic Views in Kilkenny and Waterford ...... 74 Figure 6-23: Strategic View Analysis ...... 75

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental iii Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

TABLES Table 1-1: Structure of the Environmental Report ...... 3 Table 2-1: Tier 1 and Tier 2 Port Activity in 2017 ...... 7 Table 2-2: Objectives for Master Plan Options ...... 8 Table 2-3: Development Options ...... 11 Table 2-4: Training Wall Design Process ...... 12 Table 2-5: Current and Future Dredging Requirements at the Port ...... 14 Table 2-6: Phasing and Temporal Scope of the Master Plan ...... 17 Table 3-1: The Stages in SEA ...... 18 Table 3-2: SEA Assessment Stages ...... 19 Table 3-3: List of Environmental Indictors in SEA ...... 20 Table 4-1: List of Consultees during the Scoping Stage ...... 21 Table 5-1: Key Polices, Plans, Programmes Relevant to the Master Plan ...... 23 Table 6-1: Natura 2000 Designated Sites within 15km of the Master Plan Area ...... 28 Table 6-2: Proposed Natural Heritage Areas (pNHAs) within 5km of the Master Plan Area 32 Table 6-3: Population of Administrative Counties (CSO, 2016) ...... 38 Table 6-4: Electoral Divisions and their Population Statistics ...... 40 Table 6-5: WFD Catchments, Water bodies and Current Status ...... 49 Table 6-6: Licenced Facilities and Facility Type ...... 51 Table 6-7: Annual Mean Concentrations of Pollutants Measured in Zone D ...... 54 Table 6-8: Noise Compliance of Local Industry ...... 56 Table 6-9: Extract from Schedule B, Permit S0012-02 ...... 57 Table 6-10: Impacts of Climate Change on Port Operations...... 59 Table 6-11: Key Material Issues identified ...... 66 Table 6-12: List of Monuments on the SMR within the Master Plan Area ...... 68 Table 6-13: Record of Protected Structures within Master Plan Area ...... 69 Table 6-14: List of shipwrecks within Waterford Harbour ...... 70 Table 7-1: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators ...... 79 Table 8-1: Description of SEA Environmental Impact Scores ...... 83 Table 8-2: Evaluation of Alternative 1 ...... 83 Table 8-3: Evaluation of Alternative 2 ...... 86 Table 8-4: Evaluation of Alternative 3 ...... 87 Table 8-5: Evaluation of Alternative 4 ...... 89 Table 8-6: Evaluation of Alternative 5 ...... 90 Table 9-1: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Biodiversity ...... 92

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental iv Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 9-2: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts (pre-mitigation) ...... 94 Table 9-3: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Population ...... 96 Table 9-4: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators ...... 98 Table 9-5: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Water ...... 99 Table 9-6: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts ...... 101 Table 9-7: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Air Quality and Acoustics ...... 102 Table 9-8: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Climatic Factors ...... 104 Table 9-9: SEA Objectives, Target and Indicators for Material Assets ...... 105 Table 9-10: SEA Objectives, Target and Indicators for Cultural Heritage ...... 108 Table 9-11: SEA Objectives, Target and Indicators for Landscape and Visual Amenity .... 110 Table 10-1: Mitigation Measures ...... 113 Table 10-2: Environmental Monitoring Programme ...... 121 Table 11-1: Upcoming Events the Master Plan Process ...... 125

APPENDICES Appendix A: Master Plan Map Appendix B: Consultation Submissions Appendix C: Review of the Relevant Plans and Programmes Appendix D: Current Dredging Map Appendix E: Waterford Harbour Aquaculture Map

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental v Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

ABBREVIATIONS A Air Quality and Acoustics AA Appropriate Assessment ACA Architectural Conservation Area AEP Annual Exceedance Probability AQIH Air Quality Index for Health AQS Air Quality Standards B Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna BAT Best Available Technique BCD Below Chart Datum BIM Bord Iascaigh Mhara CAFE Clean Air For Europe Directive CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan CF Climatic Factors CFRAM Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management CH Cultural Heritage (Architectural and Archaeological) CO Carbon Monoxide

CO2 Carbon Dioxide CPLB Cheekpoint Lower Bar CSO Central Statistics Office DAFM Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine DAHRGA Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs DBEI Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation DCCAE Department of Communication, Climate Action and the Environment DCHG Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht DEHLG Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government DHPLG Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government DO Dissolved Oxygen DRCD Department of Rural and Community Development DTTS Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport EC European Commission ED Electoral Division ELV Emission Limit Values EMS Environmental Management System EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESB Electricity Supply Board

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental vi Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

EU European Union EWWSS East Waterford Water Supply Scheme G Geology, Soils and Land-use GES Good Environmental Status GHG Greenhouse Gas GSI Geological Survey Ireland ha Hectares HEFS High-End Future Scenarios HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle HMWB Heavily Modified Water Body HNS Hazardous and Noxious Substances IED Industrial Emissions Directive IFI Inland Fisheries Ireland IGH Irish Geological Heritage IMDO Irish Maritime Development Office IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ITP Industrial Technology Park IWDG Irish Whale and Dolphin group I-WeBS Irish Wetland Bird Survey km Kilometres L Landscape and Visual Amenity LAP Local Area Plan LCA Landscape Character Assessment LNG Liquified Natural Gas Lo-Lo Lift-on Lift-off LSFO Low Sulphur Fuel Oil MA Material Assets – Infrastructure, Fisheries and Aquaculture MOR Malone O’Regan Environmental MPA Marine Protected Area MRFS Mid-Range Future Scenarios MSF Marine Strategic Framework NBDC National Biodiversity Data Centre NEEAP National Energy Efficiency Action Plan NHA Natural Heritage Area NIAH National Inventory of Architectural Heritage NIR Natura Impact Report

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental vii Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

NMS National Monument Service

NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide NPWS National Parks and Wildlife Service NSR Noise Sensitive Receptor pNHA Proposed Natural Heritage Area P Population and Human Health PFI Port Facilities & Industry PLUTS Planning, Land Use and Transportation Study

PM2.5 Particulate Matter

PM10 Particulate Matter POM Programme of Measures POW Port of Waterford OPW Office of Public Works OSPAR (Oslo Paris) Convention of the protection of North-East Atlantic marine environment RBD River Basin District RBMP River Basin Management Plan RPM Record of Protected Monuments RPS Record of Protected Structures RSES Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy SAC Special Area of Conservation SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SEAI Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland SFPA Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SMR Sites and Monuments Record

SOx Sulphur Oxide SPA Special Protection Area SuDS Sustainable Urban Drainage System TEL Trade Effluent Licence TEN-T Trans European Transport Network TII Transport Infrastructure Ireland TSHD Trailing Suction Hopper Dredger TTA Traffic and Transport Assessment UAU Underwater Archaeology Unit UKHO UK Hydrographic Office UNESCO United National Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisations

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental viii Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

W Water WFD Water Framework Directive WIT Waterford Institute of Technology WMS Working Method Statement WWTP Waste Water Treatment Plan

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental ix Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

1.0 INTRODUCTION Malone O’Regan Environmental (MOR) was appointed by the Port of Waterford (POW) to prepare a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the POW 25-year Master Plan (hereafter referred to as the Master Plan). The Master Plan is subject to a SEA and this SEA Environmental Report is the output of Stage three of the four stage SEA process (see Section 1.2 below for further details). This Report has been prepared in compliance with the provisions of Article 12 of European Communities (EC) (Environmental Assessment of Certain Plans and Programmes) Regulations 2004 (S.I No. 435 of 2004) and EC (Environmental Assessment of Certain Plans and Programmes) (Amendment) Regulations 2011 (S.I No. 200 of 2011). The main objective of the SEA process was to evaluate development options proposed in the Master Plan to ensure they could provide a high level of protection for the environment and to provide sustainable development. This SEA Environmental Report should be read in conjunction with the Master Plan, Natura Impact Report (NIR) and the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), which can be found at http://www.portofwaterford.com/corporate-documents. 1.1 The Master Plan The Master Plan is a high-level strategy outlining the main infrastructural works envisaged to facilitate continued growth and trade in the South-East Region for the next 25 years. Development of the Master Plan is considered critical to guide and manage future operations at the Port. It will provide a physical framework to cater for the increased demand for Port services, improve overall Port capacity and performance and illustrate a clear vision of future Port operations. The development of this 25-year Master Plan is considered essential to support Irish economic growth and meet the requirements of both the South-East Region and the Port’s stakeholders. The POW Corporate Plan 2018-2022 predicts that annual throughput at the Port will reach approximately 1.7 million tonnes by 2022 (POW, 2018a) with the Port currently handling over 1.6 million tonnes of freight annually (POW, 2018b). Due to the current economic growth there is a potential for throughput growth significantly beyond what is predicted in the POW Corporate Plan. The Master Plan outlines the approach to achieve the objectives outlined above, namely: 1. To reduce dredging requirements at the Port. 2. To increase navigational safety and access to the Port. 3. To facilitate the development of new shore side berthing provisions and facilities. Currently dredging along Cheekpoint Lower Bar is the POW highest annual operating cost and POW want to minimise or negate this cost to achieve ongoing savings and improve profits. Currently, the approach channel is maintained at 6.5m below chart datum (BCD), which prevents the Port from accommodating larger vessels. POW would also like to ensure the availability of adequate berths and depths as needed by the business in the future. All of the above is necessary for the Port to cater for increases in ship sizes and the changing operational preferences of shipping services industry. A range of both on-shore and off-shore projects will be included in the Master Plan to achieve these objectives. Figure 1-1 below outlines the area covered by the Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental 1 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 1-1: POW Master Plan Area

1.2 Purpose of this Environmental Report In line with the aim of the SEA Directive as set out in Article 1, a SEA is required to: “Provide for a high level of protection to the environment and to contribute to the integration of environmental considerations into the preparation and adoption of plans and programmes with a view to promoting sustainable development…” Under Article 3 of the Directive, an environmental assessment shall be carried out for all plans and programmes: “… which are prepared for agriculture, forestry, fisheries, energy, industry, transport, waste management, water management, telecommunications, tourism, town and country planning or land use and which set the framework for future development consent of projects listed in Annexes I and II to Directive 85/337/EEC.” The Environmental Report is the main output of the SEA process and the purpose of this Report is to: (1) Identify, describe and assess the likely significant effects arising from the Master Plan, including consideration of reasonable alternatives; (2) Ensure that identified adverse effects are communicated, mitigated and that the effectiveness of mitigation is monitored; and (3) Provide an opportunity for statutory and non-statutory bodies as well as members of the public to offer their views on the report through consultation. The objective of the SEA Environmental Report is to ensure that any likely significant environmental effects from the final Master Plan options and their future development are identified, based on the current situation and their likely future situation without the Master Plan. The potential effects are identified for those that arise directly as a consequence of the

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental 2 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Master Plan, but also the effects that arise cumulatively with other plans and / or programmes relevant to the area. Section 3 of this Report outlines the methodology used in this assessment for the Master Plan. 1.3 Structure of this Report This SEA Environmental Report has been divided into 11 sections as outlined in Table 1-1 below. The structure of this Report follows the format recommended in the Guidelines on SEA prepared by the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government1 (DEHLG) (now the DCCAE). Table 1-1: Structure of the Environmental Report

This SEA Environmental Report SEA Guidelines Structure for an Environmental Report Structure

Non-technical summary Separate Document.

Introduction: (brief description of the Masterplan and the area; Section 1: Introduction purpose of report)

Port of Waterford overview and summary of the key objectives of Section 2: Port of Waterford Overview the Masterplan

SEA methodology: (including authors, methods used, technical Section 3: SEA Methodology and difficulties encountered, list of environmental authorities consulted, Consultation etc.)

Consultation with statutory bodies Section 4: Consultation

Relationship of the plan with other relevant plans and Section 5: Relationship with Relevant programmes Plans and Programmes

Section 6: Baseline Environmental Summary of the baseline environment Conditions

Section 7: SEA Objectives, Targets & SEA Objectives and Indicators Indicators

Section 8: Consideration of Assessment of alternatives, and selection of preferred alternative Alternatives

Assessment of the preferred alternative Section 9: Assessment

Incorporation of mitigation measures and assessment results Section 10: Mitigation & Monitoring into the plan, and monitoring proposals

Description of the final steps in the SEA process Section 11: Next Steps

1 Implementation of SEA Directive (2001/42/EC): Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment, Guidelines for Regional and Planning Authorities, page 39, Dept of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, November 2004.

E1475 - Malone O’Regan Environmental 3 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

1.4 Appropriate Assessment (AA) In addition to compliance with the SEA Directive, the preparation and implementation of the Master Plan must meet the provisions of Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) and transposing regulations EC (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 477 of 2011). The Screening Stage (Stage 1) for AA was undertaken for the Master Plan in Q2 of 2018 and is available at http://www.portofwaterford.com/corporate-documents. The AA Screening concluded that the Master Plan has the potential to result in significant adverse impacts on European designated sites i.e. Natura 2000 sites. Therefore, a Natura Impact Report (NIR) was prepared in parallel with preparation of this Report. The findings of the NIR were used to inform the SEA and have been integrated into this Report and the Master Plan, as illustrated in Figure 1-1 below. 1.5 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) A SFRA was also prepared for the Master Plan and is available as a separate document. The SFRA was prepared in accordance with the requirements of The Planning System and Flood Risk Assessment Guidelines for Planning Authorities (Government of Ireland, 2009). 1.6 Responsible Authority This SEA is being undertaken on behalf of POW, who are the responsible authority for the Master Plan. The SEA is being prepared in parallel with the AA. Both processes will inform preparation of the Master Plan. See Figure 1-2 below for details of the integration between the Master Plan development and the SEA and AA processes. Figure 1-2: Inter-relationships between the POW Master Plan, SEA and AA

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 4 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

1.7 SEA Team The SEA team comprises of qualified and experienced engineering, environmental and planning team members from POW, MOR, IE Consulting and SLR Consulting. Collaboration and communication between the team members occurred throughout the SEA process to ensure the preparation of a comprehensive environmental report and to inform the development of the Master Plan, see Figure 1-3 below. Figure 1-3: SEA Team

POW Master Plan Team

Project Director John Norris

Project Manager Kevin O’Regan

SEA Project Coordinator Klara Kovacic

AA Project Coordinator Dyfrig Hubble

AA / Ecology Team SEA Team SFRA Team Kathryn Broderick Eoghan Fitzsimons Aisling Whelan Alisson Flaherty Alisson Flaherty Jer Keohane Kenneth Goodwin Niamh O’Malley Gus Egan Paul McShane

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 5 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

2.0 PORT OF WATERFORD OVERVIEW 2.1 Port of Waterford (POW) Ports play a vital role in facilitating Irish economic growth and it is estimated that ports handle 84% of Ireland’s merchandise trade in volume and 62% in value terms (DHPLG, 2016). Further, the Ports of National Significance are our key international maritime gateways, handling approximately 90% of all tonnage. POW is designated as a Port of National Significance (Tier 2) within the terms of the National Ports Policy (DTTS, 2013) and is a comprehensive port on the Trans European Transport Network2 (TEN-T). Tier 2 ports: a) Are responsible for at least 2.5% of overall tonnage through Irish ports; b) Have the clear demonstrable potential to handle higher volumes of unitised traffic; and, c) Have the existing transport links to serve a wider, national marketplace beyond their immediate region. POW is Ireland’s closest multi-model port to mainland Europe and enjoys excellent transport links with Ireland’s major cities. The DRAFT Southern Assembly Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy (RSES) supports the development of the port as a major international gateway and its achievement of Tier 1 status. POW has been a hub for shipping to and from the south-east of Ireland for over 1,100 years. POW, originally known as Waterford Harbour Commissioners, was established more than 200 years ago in 1816. POW operates with a focus on bulk, general cargoes and container handling through its licenced stevedores. The main centre of operations is Belview Port on the River Suir ca.5km downstream of Waterford City, see Figure 2-1 below. The Port can accommodate large vessels, with ships drafts of up to 9m and lengths of up to 190m. In 2018 the Port handled over 1.6 million tonnes of freight including approximately 1.2 million tonnes of bulk products (predominately agri-related and project cargo) together with another 91,000 tonnes of break bulk (predominately timber, steel and project cargoes). In addition, POW handles 42,000 TEU3 containers / Lift-on / Lift-off (Lo-Lo)4 traffic annually with a view to expanding the Lo-Lo service offering at the Port in the coming years. Between 2008 and 2017, the Port had a Turnover of €75.72 million. The growth in the Irish agri-food industry, which was spurred by the abolition of milk quotas in 2015, is reflected in the increased bulk material at the Port. In addition to bulky cargo, POW is also a member of Cruise Ireland and welcomes many cruise ships to Ireland’s south-east region each year. Table 2-1 below compares POW activity with other Tier 1 and Tier 2 ports in Ireland for 2017.

2 The TEN-T is a European Commission policy directed towards the implementation and development of a Europe-wide network of roads, railway lines, inland waterways, maritime shipping routes, ports, airports and rail-road terminals. 3 Twenty-foot Equivalent Units, describing port throughput capacity. 4 A type of vessel that allows cargo to be loaded or unloaded by either ship or shore cranes.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 6 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 2-1: Tier 1 and Tier 2 Port Activity in 2017 Vessels Cruise Ships Goods Received / Forwarded

Gross Port No. of Tonnage Received Forwarded Tonnes Vessel of Arrivals Passengers Tonnes '000 Arrivals Vessels '000 '000 Dublin 7,713 175,848 127 146,429 15,889 9,107 Tier Cork 1,263 18,362 68 99,263 5,780 3,188 1 Shannon- 515 7,023 0 0 8,552 2,761 Foynes Tier Waterford 427 2,503 6 4,710 1,390 223 2 Rosslare 1,770 34,651 0 0 948 1,218

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 7 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

2.2 Master Plan Objectives The VISION of the Port of Waterford is to be the preferred cargo gateway for the South East Region. The MISSION of the Port is to provide the infrastructure and services to enable and facilitate trade and economic development in the region. The Port Masterplan has been prepared to achieve this vision by providing a clear direction to undertake this mission over the next 25 years. The Master Plan addresses a wide range of issues including: • Financial – capital expenditure, cash flows, debt servicing, etc. • Economic – traffic levels, commodities, shipping patterns, i.e. demand, • Engineering – port marine approaches, dredging, berths, landside infrastructure etc. • Operations – commodities, storage etc. • Environmental – impacts and mitigation measures. This has enabled the port to: • Identify levels of future demand for port infrastructure and services; • Identify areas and potential scope for development; • Prepare alternative development scenarios / schemes; and, • Evaluate these alternatives. The objectives for each group of Master Plan development options (detailed in section 2.3 below) are listed in Table 2-2 below. Table 2-2: Objectives for Master Plan Options No. Master Plan Options Group Objectives 1. Options to minimise dredging and This will minimise future dredging requirements by reducing improve marine access sedimentation in the port operational areas, particularly around Cheekpoint Lower Bar and to: • Improve vessel manoeuvring areas and turning at Belview; • Improve navigational safety in channels to and from the port; and, • Increase channel dimensions to accept larger vessels.

2. Options for The demand to accommodate larger (longer and wider) and development/improvements to deeper (drafted) vessels in the future will require increased berth berths lengths and depths alongside. These options consider improvements to the existing berths (deepening) and potential for additional new berth development at Belview.

3. Shore Side Developments The following land use objectives are aligned with the overall aim of the Masterplan which is to enhance capacity of Belview Port. Objectives include: 1. Identify development land requirement, key projects and Strategic Infrastructure Development required to enhance the capacity and efficiency of the Port; 2. Facilitating the development of zoned land and identify serviced development sites; 3. Improve the storage and handling of materials; 4. Improve traffic management and safety; 5. Ensure port access and security to relevant ISPS Code requirements; 6. Identify supporting infrastructure required to facilitate projects proposals and development of services sites; and,

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 8 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

No. Master Plan Options Group Objectives 7. Develop an infrastructure action plan, focused on financing and delivery.

2.3 Master Plan Development Options The development options presented in the POW Master Plan are not a definitive list of developments that will be undertaken at the Port. Rather, they are a selection of possible proposals for future development that may be undertaken depending on social, economic and environmental variables. Figure 2-1 and Table 2-3 and below outline these development options. Figure 2-1 is presented in Appendix A in a larger format.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 9 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 2-1: Master Plan Development Options

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 10 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 2-3: Development Options No. Option Description

1 Options to minimise dredging and improve marine access

The Cheekpoint Lower Bar area is regularly maintained by dredging, resulting in the need for the disposal of high volumes of dredged material and high ongoing maintenance costs. The key project within the Master Plan Cheekpoint Lower Bar is construction of a river training wall at a strategic location, which would 1.1 River Training Wall significantly reduce the need for ongoing dredging, as shown by the hydrodynamic model completed for the estuary (ABPmer, 2018a). The training wall will be a double line of sheet piles, ca.6m wide – such design minimises environmental impacts, while maximising hydrodynamic benefits.

Carter Patch represents an area of the navigational channel (from Passage East to Sheagh Light) that poses a navigational safety hazard to longer trade vessels. The curve of the navigational channel requires vessels to ‘crab’ Carter Patch Channel when manoeuvring the channel. This results in a limiting length of vessel 1.2 Widening through the area. This project would involve widening this area by 50m to approximately 150m total width to remove this restriction and increase navigational safety and access.

To accommodate larger vessels, it is required to deepen the approach channel, from the mouth of the estuary to the quays, from 6.5mBCD to a Approach Channel 1.3 more appropriate level, potentially to a depth of 8mBCD. Deepening Approach channel deepening would likely be completed in three phases – deepening to 7mBCD, 7.5mBCD and 8mBCD.

Currently, areas where vessels can turn have constraints preventing larger vessels accessing the Port. Therefore, it is proposed to enlarge one of these turning basins to safely accommodate trade vessels which are foreseen to Turning Basin 1.4 possibly visit the Port over the next 25 years. Development This would require widening of the Bingledies channel area, i.e. removal of the rock outcrop to widen and deepen approach channel for maritime safety and manoeuvrability.

2 Options for development/improvements to berths Construction of up to 400m extension of the main Belview Quay to provide two new berths is proposed. This project would require 6 hectares (ha) of land reclamation and capital dredging. 2.1 Belview Quay Extension This would likely be completed in two phases – the first phase would comprise 200m extension, facilitating one new berth, and the second phase would comprise another 200m facilitating the second new berth.

O’Brien’s Quay can currently accommodate 120m long ships. Extension to accommodate 190m long ships is proposed. Extension on either side of the 2.2 O’Brien Quay Extension existing quay is considered. Turning circle will be required in the vicinity of this Quay to allow longer ships to turn, which would require deepening and maintenance dredging.

There is currently a break of 230m in the continuity of the quay wall between Belview Quay and O’Brien’s Quay. This area is prone to 2.3 Quay Wall Continuity sedimentation and impinges on safe navigational depths in the adjacent downstream berth. To minimise this feature and provide additional berthing and storage area, the construction of a quay wall in this area is proposed.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 11 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

No. Option Description

Deepening of berths at Belview or O’Brien’s Quay is proposed to 2.4 Berth Deepening accommodate deeper drafted vessels at the terminals.

3 Shore Side Developments

Improvements to road Alterations to N29 in the vicinity of the Port to allow access to roadside lands 3.1 access to port will be required.

Improvements/developm Development of services including water supply, effluent treatment, and 3.2 ent of services broadband will be required. Potentially, other shore side infrastructural infrastructure developments required to support the above shore side projects.

3.3 Serviced sites Provision of serviced development sites.

3.4 Office Buildings POW is seeking a wider zoning designation on Marine Point.

Development of Development of additional warehousing required for forecasted increased 3.5 additional warehousing Port throughput.

Current Project: Pontoon Relocation The tugs serving Belview Port berth at the pontoon system on the South Quays in Waterford City will be relocated to the Belview Port, downstream from the Belview Quay.

2.4 Cheekpoint Lower Bar River Training Wall Evolution The Cheekpoint Lower Bar river training wall has undergone a lengthy and detailed design process, involving various design iterations to ensure the development will have minimal environmental impacts. Table 2-4 outlines the progression of the training wall design process including a brief description of each training wall design. Figure 2-2 illustrates the difference between the original and the current training wall designs. Table 2-4: Training Wall Design Process Training Wall Description Design Original Design Construction of a training wall 1200m long from Snowhill to Drumdowney Point. The wall would be constructed of rock armour. The area behind the training wall would be reclaimed with dredged material from Cheekpoint and Duncannon Bars and covering an area of 16 ha. The training wall was initially designed to +3.5mOD (Poolbeg), with engineered option to be further raised to +6.0mOD. This option would also require construction of a new road to allow the training wall to be constructed. As a result, 16ha of the River Suir and River Barrow and Nore SACs would be reclaimed, resulting in loss of designated habitats. There would be additional shore- side impacts from the new construction road.

Originally, it was planned that the above training wall is also developed into 1,500m Deep Water Berths long deep water quay. at Snowhill Point This option would result in significant additional shore-side developments.

Revised Design 1 Construction of a training wall 1125m long from Snowhill to Drumdowney Point. The wall would be constructed of rock armour. The wall would be founded on the existing river bed and finished at a top level of 6.0mOD (Poolbeg). The wall design provides for 2m wide on top and side slopes of 1 vertical: 1.5 horizontal. Two breaches would be provided in the wall both 20m wide at low water level, one close to the upstream end of the wall and the other on the eastern side of the wall close to Barrow Bridge. This option would also require construction of a new road to allow training wall to be constructed.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 12 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Training Wall Description Design In this option, the area behind the wall would not be reclaimed, reducing impacts; however, the habitat would be significantly altered. There would be additional shore- side impacts from the new construction road.

Revised Design 2 Construction of an ‘arrow head’ form of training wall scheme at the apex of the confluence of the Rivers Suir and Barrow. The total length of the two walls would be approximately 650m and is implemented as a ‘thin dam’ structure, equivalent to a vertical sheet piled wall. Impacts from this design scheme would be significantly reduced, as no reclamation works would be required, and loss of habitat in the River Suir and River Barrow and Nore SACs would be minimised. In this option, a new construction road would not be required, minimising shore-side impacts.

Current Design The current design proposal envisages two lengths of training wall: • A vee shaped wall ca.495m long; and, • A straight wall ca.130m long. The training wall will be a double line of sheet piles, to ensure the structure can withstand wave impact, currents, silt build-up or an accidental impact. The double sheet will likely be enclosed at either. Waler beams and struts will be required to maintain alignment. The double sheet training wall will be ca.6m wide. This design is aimed around 'splitting' the flow within the River Barrow, as opposed to 'blocking' the flow. The location of the apex has also been moved up estuary, to reduce circulation adjacent to, and at the apex of, the wall. This design achieves minimal habitat impact, and maximises hydrodynamic beneficial effect of removing sedimentation in the key areas.

Figure 2-2: Evolution of the Training Wall

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 13 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

2.5 Current and Future Dredging Requirements Currently POW is carrying out significant amount of maintenance dredging in order to enable safe navigational access. The areas currently being dredged are shown in Appendix D. Dredged materials are disposed of at a licenced site through a Dumping at Sea Permit issued by the EPA in 2014 (S0012-02). The Port have recently applied for a new licence to take into consideration proposed amendments to the current practice. Further details are provided in the Environmental Report of the SEA, Section 6.7 – Material Assets. Any future dredging will require new Foreshore Licence. Although implementation of Phase 1 of the Master Plan will remove the requirement for maintenance dredging, which is currently carried out, implementation of Future Phases of the Master Plan will require both capital and maintenance dredging in other areas. At this stage it is difficult to determine the aggregate amount of dredging required as implementation of Master Plan Options will happen gradually, i.e. initially to 7mBCD, then to 7.5mBCD and 8mBCD in required. This is detailed in Table 2-5 below. This information is based on a series of hydrodynamic modelling projects completed for POW by ABPmer (ABPmer, 2018). Table 2-5: Current and Future Dredging Requirements at the Port Capital Dredge Maintenance Dredge Option Change in Dredging Name No. Commitment Proposed Current Future

This project is designed to negate the current maintenance dredging requirements and be future Cheekpoint Lower proofed to work if the channel is 1.1 Bar River Training No Yes No5 deepened to 8mCD. Wall This equates to a reduction of approximately 185,000m³ annually being relocated to the offshore placement site.

Based on a concept design of 150m channel width, the incremental volumes for capital dredging requirements are estimated to be: • 7mBCD – Carter Patch 156,000 m3; 1.2 Channel Widening Yes No No5 • 7.5mBCD – and Deepening 76,000m3; • 8mBCD - 3 96,000m . Based on modelling undertaken maintenance dredging may not be required.

5 Hydrodynamic modelling studies completed by ABPmer show that maintenance dredging will not be required, however POW will continue to maintain maintenance dredging permissions until the studies are validated and to cover extreme weather events.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 14 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Capital Dredge Maintenance Dredge Option Change in Dredging Name No. Commitment Proposed Current Future

The capital dredging volumes vary for the deepening of the navigational channel depending on the desired depth. The incremental volumes required to be removed are estimated to be: • 7mBCD – 375,000m3; • 7.5mBCD – Approach Channel 1.3 Yes Yes Yes 320,000m3; Deepening • 8mBCD – 3 383,000m . Dredging of Duncannon Channel and Creadan Bank would require an additional 132,000m3 of dredging to occur annually for 8mBCD. Other minor areas, to be identified at project stage may also require dredging.

This project involves the development of a widened and deepened downstream turning circle to facilitate the safe turning of larger vessels. The estimated capital dredging volumes vary depending on the desired depth and incremental dredging requirements are estimated to be: • 7mBCD – 168,000m3; • 7.5mBCD – 45,000m3; • 8mBCD – 3 50,000m . Turning Basin 1.4 Yes Yes Yes Development Maintenance dredging of 99,000m³ per year would be required for 8mBCD. Shallower levels may require less maintenance. Development of an upstream turning circle to 8mCD would require the removal of bedrock, and therefore this option is currently not favoured. Widening of Bingledies channel area up to 40m over a 580m length would require removal of 43,000m3 of silt / sand and 35,000m3 of rock.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 15 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Capital Dredge Maintenance Dredge Option Change in Dredging Name No. Commitment Proposed Current Future

This project is likely to be phased into two 200m segments, totalling 400m. The initial 200m extension would require approximately Belview Quay 10,000m³, with the second 200m, 2.1 Yes No Yes Extension requiring over 33,000m³. Development of this project would increase maintenance dredging by about 50,000m3 annually, in the worst-case scenario.

Capital dredging volume of about 300,000m³ would be required. This would encompass 3 O'Brien Quay approximately 200,000m of rock, 2.2 Yes No Yes Extension so the project needs further evaluation. Maintenance dredging would result in an increase of 15,000m3.

Limited dredging currently takes place in this area but the need for Quay Wall No or this dredging could possibly be 2.3 No Yes Continuity Decrease negated or at least reduced by completing quay wall continuity project.

Minor capital dredging will be required. Only a marginal increase 2.4 Berth Deepening Yes Yes Yes in maintenance volumes would be anticipated.

Shore Side 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A Developments

Pontoon N/A N/A N/A N/A Relocation

While the need for dredging in certain up-estuary areas such as the Cheekpoint Lower Bar and the POW Quay Wall will be reduced or eliminated, downstream areas will require continued and/or increased dredging. As there are multiple combinations of Options that may be implemented over the 25-year Master Plan, the potential total amount of dredged material cannot be calculated at this stage.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 16 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

2.6 Temporal Scope of the Master Plan The Master Plan and associated environmental documentation will be reviewed every 5 years and updated as required. Phasing of the development options in the Master Plan is presented in Table 2-6 below. Table 2-6: Phasing and Temporal Scope of the Master Plan Master Plan Options Option Phases

Current Project Pontoon Relocation

Phase 1 Option No. 1.1 Cheekpoint Lower Bar River Training Wall Option No. 3. Shore Side Future Phases Option No. 1.2 Carter Patch Channel Widening Developments (road access improvements, Option No. 1.3 Approach Channel Deepening services infrastructure, Option No. 1.4 Turning Basin Development serviced development sites, office buildings, Option No. 2.1 Belview Quay Extension additional warehousing) Option No. 2.2 O’Brien’s Quay Extension Option No. 2.3 Quay Wall Continuity Option No. 2.4 Berth Deepening

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 17 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

3.0 SEA METHODOLOGY 3.1 The Requirement for SEA SEA is required under the European Union (EU) Council Directive 2001/42/EC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment (herein referred to as the ‘SEA Directive’). The SEA Directive was transposed into Irish Law through the EC (Environmental Assessment of Certain Plans or Programmes) Regulations (S.I. 435 of 2004) as amended by S.I. No. 200 of 2011 (EC (Environmental Assessment of Certain Plans and Programmes) (Amendment) Regulations 2011) and S.I. No. 436 of 2004 (Planning and Development (Strategic Environmental Assessment) as amended by S.I. No. 201 of 2011 (Planning and Development (Strategic Environmental Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations 2011) respectively. The aim of these Regulations is to enable plan making authorities to incorporate environmental considerations into early decision-making and in an integrated way throughout the plan making process. 3.2 The SEA Process The SEA process is undertaken in four stages, see Table 3-1 below. Table 3-1: The Stages in SEA Stage Description Status

Determines whether SEA is required for a plan / 1. Screening programme in consultation with the designated Completed Q2 2018 statutory consultees.

Determines the spatial and temporal scope of the 2. Scoping SEA in consultation with the designated statutory Competed Q2 2018 consultees.

Formal and transparent assessment of the likely significant impacts on the environment due to implementation of a plan / programme including all 3. Environmental Report Current Stage reasonable alternatives. The output from this stage is an Environmental Report which is required to go on public display along with the draft plan / programme.

Summarises the process undertaken and identifies Scheduled for Q2 4. SEA Statement how environmental considerations and consultations 2019 have been integrated into the final Plan / Programme.

The SEA process is an essential part of achieving sustainable development in public planning and policy making. SEA ensures that negative environmental effects arising from a plan / programme or other strategic action are properly: 1. Identified and assessed; 2. Taken into account by the responsible authority / decision makers; 3. Transparent to the public through public consultation; and, 4. Regularly monitored.

3.2.1 Screening – Stage 1 A Screening Report was completed for the Master Plan and it concluded that a SEA needs to be undertaken as part of the Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 18 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

3.2.2 Scoping – Stage 2 A Scoping Report has been completed and circulated to the relevant environmental authorities, see Table 4-1. The Scoping Report identified the geographical and temporal scope of the Master Plan and the level of detail for the environmental assessment. The Report outlined the proposed methodology for addressing these impacts during the assessment stage. The Scoping Report is available at http://www.portofwaterford.com/corporate- documents.

3.2.3 SEA Environmental Report – Stage 3 (current stage) Stage 3 of the SEA process (the assessment stage) was undertaken in a number of phases, as set out in Table 3-2 below. Table 3-2: SEA Assessment Stages Assessment Stage Description

Information gathered during the SEA scoping exercise was collated and expanded Consultation & upon. This included a review of the findings of the consultation submissions received Baseline during the scoping stage. See Section 4 and Section 6

A review of relevant national and regional plans and policy documents was undertaken Plan & Policy both to identify the key environmental issues, to ensure that the objectives set out in Review the Master Plan meet the requirements of all relevant plans and policies. See Section 4 for more detail.

Key Environmental The key environmental issues were identified based on the baseline data, and the plans Issues and policy review. See Section 6 for more detail.

Environmental The environmental objectives outlined in the Scoping Report were finalised. Objectives

Using the environmental objectives, the assessment of the potential significant effects Assessment associated with the Master Plan (objectives, projects and alternatives to the Plan) was undertaken. See Section 9 for more detail.

Mitigation & Based on this assessment, and the potential environmental impacts, mitigation and Recommendations recommendations have been proposed. See Section 10 for more detail.

The final step is the development of the SEA monitoring framework. See Section 10 for Monitoring more detail.

3.2.4 SEA Study Area The Master Plan area, which comprises the SEA study area, is shown in Figure 1-1. The study area for the SEA is situated along the lower reaches of the River Suir and the River Barrow, which drain into Waterford Harbour. These waterbodies intersect three counties – Co. Waterford, Co. Kilkenny and Co. Wexford. The study area extends ca.3.5km east of Waterford City. Part of the study area is located within the industrial landscape of Belview Port. The study area also extended to cover parts of the River Suir, River Barrow and the Waterford Estuary and Harbour. 3.3 Baseline Data The baseline describes the current environmental conditions in the absence of the Master Plan. This provides a benchmark to which the predicted environmental effects can be assessed.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 19 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Baseline data was collated, using existing data sources, on the environmental indicators in the SEA Directive, namely those listed in Table 3-3 below. Table 3-3: List of Environmental Indictors in SEA Environmental Indicators

Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna Climatic Factors

Population & Human Health Material Assets – Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture

Sediments, Geology, Soils & Land-use Cultural Heritage (Architectural & Archaeological)

Water Landscape & Visual Amenity

Air Quality & Acoustics

3.4 Difficulties Encountered and Information Gaps This SEA has been prepared based on desk-top studies. No surveys were carried out in the Master Plan area. Such surveys will be carried out at individual project planning stages.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 20 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

4.0 CONSULTATION In accordance with Article 6 of the SEA Directive and Article 11 of S.I. No. 435 of 2004, consultation should be undertaken with specific environmental authorities (statutory consultees) on the scope and level of detail to be included in the SEA Environmental Report. In line with S.I. No. 200 of 2011, the five statutory consultees are established as being the: • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); • Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government (DHPLG); • Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM); • Department of Communications, Climate Action and the Environment (DCCAE); and, • Department of Culture, Heritage and Gaeltacht (DCHG). 4.1 SEA Scoping Phase Consultation As part of the SEA Scoping process (in accordance with S.I. No. 435 of 2004), environmental authorities were notified in July 2018 that a submission or observation in relation to the scope and level of detail of the information to be included in the Environmental Report may be made to POW. A total of five statutory consultees and twenty-one non-statutory consultees were consulted, see Table 4-1 below. Notifications were accompanied by a covering letter and a hard / soft copy of the SEA Scoping Report. Table 4-1: List of Consultees during the Scoping Stage Statutory Non-Statutory

EPA An Taisce

Department of Housing, Planning and Local Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM) Government (DHPLG)

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine Chamber of Commerce (Waterford, Wexford & Kilkenny) (DAFM)

Department of Communications, Climate Action Coastwatch Europe and the Environment (DCCAE)

Department of Culture, Heritage and Gaeltacht Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation (DBEI) (DCHG)

Department of Rural and Community Development (DRCD)

Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport (DTTS)

Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI)

Irish Environmental Network (Environmental Pillar)

Irish Maritime Development Office (IMDO)

Irish Ports Associations

Local Amenity Groups including the Cheekpoint and Faithlegg Development Group

Local Authorities (Waterford, Wexford & Kilkenny)

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 21 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Statutory Non-Statutory

Local Heritage Officers (Waterford, Wexford & Kilkenny)

Marine Institute

National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS)

Office of Public Works (OPW)

Passage East Ferry Company Limited

Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority (SFPA)

Southern Regional Assembly

Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII)

A SEA Scoping Workshop was held on 8th August 2018 to allow for statutory and non-statutory consultees to participate in the scoping phase of the Master Plan. A revised Scoping Report was prepared to incorporate comments received from this workshop as well as those revised during the statutory consultation period. Submissions were received from the following stakeholders: • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); • Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht (DCHG); • Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII); and, • Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM). Comments, observations and submissions received are detailed in Appendix B. All submissions have been reviewed and taken into account in preparation of the SEA Environmental Report and the accompanying Natura Impact Report (NIR). 4.2 Consultation on the Master Plan and SEA Environmental Report In line with SEA Regulations, the Master Plan and this SEA draft Environmental Report has been made available to the public and the consultees listed in Table 4-1 above. Consultation on the Master Plan and this SEA Environmental Report will run for 8 weeks, in June and July 2019. A digital copy of the Master Plan and this Report is available on POW website at http://www.portofwaterford.com/corporate-documents.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 22 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

5.0 RELATIONSHIP WITH RELEVANT POLICES, PLANS AND PROGRAMMES As part of the SEA process and in accordance with Annex I of the SEA Directive, SEA requires a review of all other relevant policies, plans and programmes, in order to identify any potential relationship6 between the Master Plan objectives and other policies, plans and programmes. In addition, consideration must be given to the interaction between the Master Plan and the environmental protection objectives and standards included within these policies, plans and programmes. During the scoping stage (Stage 2) an initial review of relevant polices, plans and programmes was conducted, see Table 5-1 below. The purpose of the review at that stage was to assist in providing context to the SEA assessment and to inform our understanding of relevant baseline information. Information regarding the potential interactions between the Master Plan and the policies, plans and programmes listed in Table 5-1 below is detailed in Appendix C. Table 5-1: Key Polices, Plans, Programmes Relevant to the Master Plan Level Plan / Programme / Legislation

• The Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe Directive (2008/50/EC) • Bathing Water Directive [2006/7/EC] • Birds Directive [2009/147/EC] • Environmental Liability Directive [2004/35/EC] • Environmental Noise Directive [2002/49/EC] • Environmental Quality Standards Directive [2008/105/EC] • EU Floods Directive [2007/60/EC] International • EU Shellfish Directive (2006/ 113 / EC) and European • European Maritime & Fisheries Fund Operational Programme 2014 – 2020 • Habitats Directive [92/43/EEC] • Marine Strategy Framework Directive [2008/56/EC] • Maritime Spatial Planning [2014/89/EU] • SEA Directive [2001/42/EC] • Second European Climate Change Programme [ECCP II] 2005 • Waste Framework Directive [2008/98/EC] • Water Framework Directive [2000/60/EC]

• Adaption Planning, Developing Resilience to Climate Change in the Irish Transport Sector (DTTAS, 2017) • Architectural Heritage Protection – Guidelines for Planning Authorities (DAHG, 2011) • National Adaptation Framework (DCCAE 2018) • National Biodiversity Plan 2017-2021 (DAHRRGA, 2017) • National Planning Framework 2040 • River Basin Management Plan 2018-2021 • European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011 to 2015 National • Flora (Protection) Order, 2015, S.I. No. 356 of 2015 • Fisheries Acts 1959 to 2007 (S.I. No. 14 of 1959 and No. 17 of 2007) • Food Wise 2025 • Guidelines for the Treatment of Air Quality During Planning and Construction of National Roads Schemes (NRA, 2006) • Guidelines for the Treatment of Noise and Vibration in National Roads Schemes (NRA, 2004) • Harnessing Our Ocean Wealth: An Integrated Marine Plan for Ireland (InterDepartmental Marine Coordination Group 2012) • Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Programme of Measures (SEAS, 2015) • National Hazardous Waste Management Plan 2014 -2020 (EPA, 2014)

6 SEA Directive – “an outline of the contents, main objectives of the plan or programme and relationship with other relevant plans and programmes;”

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 23 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Level Plan / Programme / Legislation • National Heritage Plan 2002-2007 (DAHG, 2002) • National Landscape Strategy for Ireland 2015 – 2025 (DAHG, 2015) • National Marine Spatial Strategy (in preparation) (DHPLG), • National Mitigation Plan 2017 (DCCAE, 2017) • National Monuments Acts (1930 to 2004) (S.I. No. 2 of 1930 & No. 22 of 2004) • National Policy Framework on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure for Transport in Ireland - 2017 to 2030 • National Ports Policy 2013 • National Strategic Plan for Sustainable Aquaculture Development (DAFM, 2015) • National Spatial Strategy for Ireland 2002-2020 (DEHLG, 2002) • Proposed National Clean Air Strategy (DCCAE, under consultation, 2017) • Spatial Planning and National Roads Guidelines for Planning Authorities (DECLG, 2012) • Traffic and Transport Assessment Guidelines (NRA, 2014) • Wildlife Acts 1976 as amended • Environmental Noise Regulations 2006 • Dumping at Sea Act 1996 as amended

• County Wexford Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2018 • Ferrybank-Belview Local Area Plan 2009-2020 • FLAG South East Local Development Strategy 2016 • Kilkenny Noise Action Plan 2014 -2018 • New Ross Town & Environs Development Plan 2011 -2017 (as extended) • Regional Planning Guidelines for the South-East Region 2010-2022 • Southern Regional Assembly Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy (DRAFT) • Southern Region Waste Management Plan 2015-2021 Regional • Suir Catchment Flood Risk Assessment Management Study (CFRAMS) • Kilkenny County Development Plan 2014-2020 • Waterford City Biodiversity Action Plan • Waterford City Development Plan 2013-2019 • Waterford County Development Plan 2011 – 2017 (as extended) • Waterford Heritage Plan 2017-2022 • Waterford Local Economic & Community Plan 2015-2020 • Waterford Planning, Land Use and Transportation Study (PLUTS) 2004-2020 • Wexford County Development Plan 2013-2019 • Wexford Local Economic and Community Plan 2016-2021

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 24 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.0 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS In accordance with the SEA Directive, the environmental baseline describes the current environmental conditions. Baseline conditions have been compiled for the environmental indicators in the SEA Directives, as listed in Table 3-3. The purpose of this Section is to detail the current baseline environment in the area of the Master Plan and identify key existing pressures and issues related to this baseline environment. Indicators of the environmental quality were determined from the baseline and were used to assess potential impacts of the implementation of the Master Plan. Any future variation to these indicators, as a result of the Master Plan, will be monitored as part of the Master Plan and SEA. For reference purposes a location map illustrating the main towns, villages and other key features in the Master Plan area can be found in Figure 6-1 below.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 25 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-1: Master Plan Location Map

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 26 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.1 Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna Designated Nature Conservation Sites There are over 2000 areas of designated nature conservation in Ireland at international, European and national level including UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) World Heritage and Biosphere sites, Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protected Areas (SPAs), Natural Heritage Areas (NHAs), proposed Natural Heritage Areas (pNHAs) and Ramsar Sites. European Designated Sites The Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Flora and Fauna) is the main legislative instrument for the protection and conservation of biodiversity within the European Union and lists certain habitats and species that must be protected within wildlife conservation areas, considered to be important at European as well as at national level. Natura 2000 is an ecological network of protected areas, set up to ensure the survival of Europe's most valuable species and habitats. SACs A SAC is a designation under the Habitats Directive [92/43/EEC]. The listed habitat types Annex I (Habitats) and species Annex II (species, excluding birds) are those meeting the Directives criteria and considered to be most in need of conservation at European Level. Two SACs are situated within the boundary of the Master Plan area: • Lower River Suir SAC (002137); and, • River Barrow and River Nore SAC (002162). Four SACs Natura Sites are located within 15km of the Master Plan area: • Hook Head SAC (000764); • Bannow Bay SAC (000697); • Tramore Dunes and Back Strand SAC (000671); and, • Ballyteige Burrow SAC (000696). SPAs SPAs are designated under the Birds Directive [2009/147/EC]. This Directive identifies bird species that are rare, in danger of extinction or vulnerable to changes in habitat and which need protection (Annex I species). No SPAs are situated within the boundary of the Master Plan area. However, three SPA Natura Sites are located within 15km of the Master Plan area: • Bannow Bay SPA (000455); • Tramore Back Strand SPA (004027); and, • Keeragh Island SPA (004118). Together SAC and SPA sites form part of the Natura 2000 network and therefore any development that has the potential to impact upon a Natura 2000 site will require an AA under the Habitats Directive. Within ca.15km of the Master Plan area, there are a total of nine Natura 2000 sites. See Table 6-1 and Figure 6-2 below for the exact location of these designated sites.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 27 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 6-1: Natura 2000 Designated Sites within 15km of the Master Plan Area Site Name Site Code Distance (km)* Direction from Master Plan Boundary Special Area of Conservation Lower River Suir SAC 002137 - - River Barrow and River Nore SAC 002162 - - Hook Head SAC 000764 1.0km SE Bannow Bay SAC 000697 5.2km E Tramore Dunes and Backstrand SAC 000671 6.7km W Ballyteige Burrow SAC 000696 14.5km E Special Protection Area Tramore Backstrand SPA 004027 6.7km W Bannow Bay SPA 004033 5.2km E Keeragh Islands SPA 004118 13km E

*The distance to the Natura 2000 sites is measured from the nearest point on the redline boundary to the nearest point on the Natura Site Boundary

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 28 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-2: Natura 2000 Designated Sites in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 29 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

A Stage 1 AA Screening Report has been prepared for the Master Plan. The screening stage established that the Master Plan has the potential to impact on seven Natura 2000 sites and therefore potential impacts on these sites require further investigation at Stage 2 of the AA process – Nature Impact Assessment. Details of these sites can be found in AA Screening Report. The Natura Impact Report (NIR) was prepared in conjunction with this SEA Environmental Report. The findings of the NIR have been incorporated into the assessment section of this Report, see Section 9 (Assessment). Designated Habitats The legal basis on which SACs are selected and designated is the EU Habitats Directive. The Directive lists certain habitats and species that must be protected within SACs. There is a number of natural habitats within and in close proximity to the Master Plan area protected by a range of designations. Figure 6-3 below provides an overview of the Annex 1 habitats for which the SACs detailed within the conservation objectives (NPWS 2017). Marine and terrestrial habitats within the Master Plan area are as follows: • Estuaries [1130]; • Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide [1140]; and, • Salicornia and other annuals colonising mud and sand [1310]. Marine and terrestrial habitats adjacent to the Master Plan area are as follows: • Atlantic salt meadows (Glauco-Puccinellietalia maritimae) [1330]; • Mediterranean salt meadows (Juncetalia maritimi) [1410]; • Reefs [1170]; and, • Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior (Alno-Padion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae) [91E0].

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 30 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-3: Designated Habitats in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 31 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Nationally Designated Sites Natural Heritage Areas (NHAs) are areas designated under the Wildlife Act (1976-2000), as they are considered important habitats which contain plant and animal species whose habitats need protection. Under the Wildlife (Amendment) Act 2000, there are proposed NHAs (pNHAs), which are also legally protected from damage from the date they are formally proposed for designation. No NHAs are situated within the Master Plan area. However, there are seven pNHAs located in 5km of the Master Plan area. These pNHAs are listed in Table 6-2 below and their locations shown in Figure 6-4 below. Table 6-2: Proposed Natural Heritage Areas (pNHAs) within 5km of the Master Plan Area Direction from the Site Name Site Code Distance (km)* Master Plan area Barrow River Estuary pNHA 000698 - - Waterford Harbour pNHA 000787 - - Ballyhack pNHA 000695 <0.1km E Duncannon Sandhills pNHA 001738 0.13km E King’s Channel pNHA 001702 1.4km W / SW Hook Head pNHA 000764 1.4km E Dunmore East Cliffs pNHA 000664 2.0km SW

*The distance to the Natura 2000 sites is measured from the nearest point on the red line boundary to the nearest point on the Natura Site Boundary

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 32 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-4: Proposed Natural Heritage Areas (pNHAs) in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 33 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Wetland and Marine Protected Sites Under the Convention on Wetlands7 (Ramsar, 1971), Ireland has committed to maintaining the ecological character of our wetlands of International importance, known as Ramsar sites. There are two Ramsar Sites located within 15km of the Master Plan area boundary, Tramore Back Strand and Bannow Bay (See Figure 6-5). Figure 6-5: Ramsar Sites located within 15km of the Master Plan Area

Under the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic8 or ‘OSPAR Convention’, Ireland committed to establishing marine protected areas to protect biodiversity (OSPAR Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). However, in Ireland there is no legislation currently in place to legally underpin the established protected areas. Therefore, since OSPAR MPAs would not afford any legal protection to the relevant areas on their own, Ireland has established a number of its SACs as OSPAR MPAs for marine habitats. As a result, Tramore Dunes and Backstrand SAC and Bannow Bay SAC / SPA are both also OSPAR MPAs. In terms of this assessment, both Tramore Backstrand and Bannow Bay Ramsar Sites will be considered in conjunction with Tramore Backstrand and Bannow Bay SPA’s given that they cover the same area. Other Protected Sites Waterford Estuary and Bannow Bay are designated shellfish areas. There are no national parks or nature reserves in 10km of the Master Plan area and no designated Salmonid Rivers located in 25km of the Master Plan area.

7 Source: www.ramsar.org/about-the-ramsar-convention 8 Source: www.ospar.org/convention

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 34 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Undesignated Habitats and Biodiversity Undesignated habitats consist of areas which are not specifically designated but are of importance to sheltering, breeding, and foraging habitat of Annex II species of the Habitats Directive [92/43/EEC] and Annex I Birds of the Birds Directive [2009/147/EC]. Due to the extent of designated habitats (see Figure 6-3 above), the surrounding habitats are of local ecological value, and can be used as ecological corridors by designated species. Furthermore, these areas have the capacity to expand, and therefore, these undesignated natural or semi-natural areas of high biodiversity value should be identified and assessed. Protected Species In Ireland, there is a large number of plant and animal species that are awarded some degree of legal protection under European Communities (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1997 and amendments and / or National legislation. In particular bats, otters and cetaceans are strictly protected by the Regulations as they are listed on Annex IV of the Habitats Directive. In addition, many species of flora and fauna are protected by the Wildlife Act (1976) and the Wildlife (Amendment) Act 2000 in the wider countryside. The National Biodiversity Data Centre (NBDC) website identified protected species distributions within four 10km grid squares covering the Master Plan area – S60. S61, S70, S71, see Figure 6-6 below. Figure 6-6: Grid Squares Used for Reference for Protected Species Distributions

Terrestrial Species The NBDC hold multiple records for otter and badger. Otters are one of the qualifying interests for both the Lower River Suir SAC and the River Barrow and River Nore SAC. The NBDC also holds a small number of records for the three bat species; common pipistrelle, the soprano pipistrelle and the lesser noctule.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 35 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Birds The NBDC hold multiple records for bird species within the Master Plan area. Although, Waterford Harbour is not a designated SPA, Tramore Backstrand SPA is located ca.8.2km west of the Master Plan area. Tramore Backstrand SPA is designated for eight specific bird species in addition to wetland birds and water birds. The BirdWatch Ireland Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS) website was consulted to obtain I- WeBS data (BirdWatch Ireland, 2018). I-WeBS hold records for numerous protected bird species for the Waterford Harbour site (0M403) and Lower Suir River (OM301) including the light-bellied brent goose, the bar-tailed godwit, whooper swan, lapwing, snipe, and golden plover, see Figure 6-7 below. Figure 6-7: I-WeBS Sites in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area

Marine Mammals Waterford Estuary is an important area for marine mammals, with the NBDC holding multiple records for aquatic species within the Master Plan area including Common Seal, Common Porpoise, Humpback Whale, and Long-finned Pilot Whale. The Irish Whale and Dolphin Group (IWDG) hold a small number of records for the common dolphin and the grey seal within the Master Plan area. Aquatic Species Waterford Estuary is important for numerous fish species that migrate along the estuary and the River Suir and / or the River Barrow in search of suitable spawning habitats. These include Atlantic salmon, Lamprey and shad. The presence of Atlantic salmon in the River Suir Catchment is well documented, and this specie forms an integral part of the tourism industry in the locality (NPWS, 2011). Brook, River

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 36 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company and Sea Lamprey all utilise the Lower Suir Estuary, where their presence has been recorded by a NPWS survey (DEHLG, 2007). The Lower Suir Estuary is one of only three known spawning grounds for Twaite Shad in Ireland. This specie was recorded in the Lower River Suir and River Barrow and River Nore estuary in 2013 by Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI). Key Issues Ireland is currently experiencing a decline in floral and faunal populations. Implementation of measures to achieve the requirements of the Habitats Directive and the objectives of the Water Framework Directive are likely to benefit protected sites in the future. The key potential impacts to biodiversity from the implementation of the Master Plan are: Natura 2000 sites There is a potential to impact on the integrity of the Natura 2000 sites located within the Master Plan area, namely the Lower River Suir SAC and the River Barrow and River Nore SAC. Construction works have the potential for direct and indirect impacts on Natura 2000 sites and their qualifying features of interest. Potential impacts include habitat loss or degradation as well as disturbance to habitats, species and ecosystem dynamics. An assessment of potential impacts should take into account species and habitats protected under both European (European Communities (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1997) and national (Wildlife Act 1976 and Wildlife (Amendment) Act 2000) legislation and cover such habitats both inside and outside of designated areas. Water Quality There is a potential to impact on water quality as a result of the activities associated with the implementation of the Master Plan. Impact water quality has a potential to impact habitats and species. Disturbance Impacts on marine and intertidal habitats and species through disturbance from the works associated with the implementation of the Master Plan, including dredging, vibration and noise. These issues must be adequately addressed to ensure there are no negative impacts or loss to protected habitats or species during the lifetime of the Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 37 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.2 Population & Human Health Population The Central Statistics Office (CSO) provides data on population and socio-economic aspects of the population at different levels from the entire State, county level and individual Electoral Divisions (EDs) within each County. The Master Plan area is situated at the confluence of three counties, Waterford, Wexford and Kilkenny. Population changes in these three counties over a ten-year period (2006-2016) is shown in Table 6-3 below. Table 6-3: Population of Administrative Counties (CSO, 2016) Number of Persons Area 2006 2011 % Change 2016 % Change

Waterford 107,961 113,795 5.40% 116,176 2.09%

Wexford 131,749 145,320 10.03% 149,722 3.03%

Kilkenny 87,558 95,419 8.97% 99,232 4.00%

Total 327,268 354,534 8.33% 365,130 2.9%

State 4,239,848 4,588,252 8.22% 4,761,865 3.78%

Economic Activity and Employment Counties Waterford, Wexford and Kilkenny have a combined population of 365,130, ca.71.4% of the South-East Region’s population, and 7.67% of the State population (CSO, 2016). As of Q4 2018, local and national unemployment has fallen considerably (CSO, 2019). The unemployment rate in the South-East Region now stands at 7.7%, which is moderately higher than the national average of 5.4% (CSO, 2019). Small Area Population Statistics There are nine EDs situated adjacent the Master Plan area, see Figure 6-7 below. The total population for these nine EDs is 10,485, over a total area of 145.57km2, spread over counties Waterford, Wexford, and Kilkenny. The average population density in and around the Master Plan area is ca.72 persons/km2, which is noticeably higher than the surrounding counties of Waterford (62.7 persons/km2), Wexford (63.2 persons/km2) and Kilkenny (47.7 persons/km2). Much of this population is concentrated in communities along the coast, namely Cheekpoint, Passage East, Arthurstown-Ballyhack, Duncannon and Dunmore East. Refer to Figure 6-1 above.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 38 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-8: Electoral Divisions that border Waterford Estuary and Harbour in the vicinity of the Master Plan

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 39 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 6-4: Electoral Divisions and their Population Statistics Electoral Divisions Population Population Pop % Change Area (km2) County (EDs) (2011) (2016) Density

Templetown 585 577 -1.4 21.49 26.9 Wexford

Ballyhack 1,302 1,241 -4.7 19.96 62.2 Wexford

Kilmokea 814 853 4.8 13.97 61.1 Wexford

Rathpatrick 1,140 1,095 -3.9 16.88 64.9 Kilkenny

Ballymaclode 1,321 1,247 -5.6 3.58 348.2 Waterford

Faithlegg 2,104 2,152 2.3 22.29 96.6 Waterford

Woodstown 601 600 -0.2 17.80 33.7 Waterford

Killea 1,347 1,571 16.6 13.58 115.7 Waterford

Rathmoylan 1,093 1,149 5.1 15.92 72.2 Waterford

Total 10,307 10,485 1.7 145.47 72.08 N / A

Employment Opportunities in the vicinity of the Master Plan Although much of the local population work outside the area in the professional services industry (CSO, 2018), the area around Waterford Estuary and Harbour is mainly rural which is reflected by the agriculture, fishing and forestry industry. This employment sector employs ca.10% of people in the local EDs, which is above the national average of 4%. The fishing industry provides significant employment for the South-East Region, due to the existing infrastructure of the area. Dunmore East and Kilmore Quay are both in the top five ports in Ireland by value with overall landings to these ports of 10,978 tonnes (BIM, 2016). A key area for inshore fishing in the vicinity of the Master Plan is from Dunmore East to Hook Head. Tourism is also a very important source of employment for the South-East Region. The area has numerous archaeological and cultural heritage sites / features, scenic landscapes, environmental assets and seaside towns and villages that attract tourists to the Region. Commuting / Access The area around POW offices is mainly serviced by regional roads, however the POW is connected to the national primary road network via the N29 road. A regular ferry crossing operates between Passage East (to the west of Waterford Estuary) and Ballyhack (to the east of Waterford Estuary). There is a noticeable disparity in commute times between those living along the east and those living on the west of Waterford Estuary, with a much higher proportion of people spending >45 minutes commuting everyday living in the east, suggesting that Waterford City is a primary commuter destination for those living in the Region. Seveso Sites The SEVESO III Directive (2012/18/EU) deals with the prevention of major accidents that involve dangerous substances and the limitation of their consequences for humans and the environment. The Directive applies to establishments where dangerous substances are produced, used, handled or stored. This is transposed into Irish law through the Chemicals Act (Control of Major Accident Hazards involving Dangerous Substances) Regulations 2015 (S.I. No. 209 of 2015) (the “COMAH Regulations”). There is one SEVESO site <1km from the Master Plan area, SSE Generation Ireland Limited (POW, 2016).

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 40 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Key Issues Unemployment and a lack of investment remain serious issues for the South-East Region. A 2017 study by the Waterford Institute of Technology (WIT) found that one in nine unemployment blackspots9 in Ireland are located in Co. Waterford. Between 2011 and 2016 the IDA created 51,793 jobs throughout the State, of which only 1.19% were in Waterford, Wexford and Kilkenny, despite these counties accounting for 7.67% of the State population (Casey et al, 2018). As POW is Ireland's closest port to continental Europe, the Port is an important local employer and continues to expand, handling 1.37 million tonnes of goods in 2017 - up from 1.27 million in 2016 and 1.09 million in 2015 (POW Annual Reports, 2017, 2016, 2015). The development of the Port over the period of the Master Plan will bring new opportunities to the local community and beyond for employment opportunities as a result of both direct and indirect impacts of the Master Plan. Access to the Port has promoted the growth of other industries in the region, such as Smartply Europe and StoreAll Warehousing Ltd., both of which are located at Belview Port. In addition to meeting the industrial and commercial needs of the Region, POW also promotes tourism by welcoming many cruise ships to Ireland’s South-East Region every year. Increased Port throughput and the expansion of the Port’s footprint, including changes to the dredging regime and the construction of a river training wall, have the potential to impact local fisheries and aquaculture, which may be sensitive to changes in hydrodynamic flow, sedimentation rates, water quality and disturbance. Impacts to human health are considered in Section 6.5 (Air Quality & Acoustics).

9 Blackspots are defined as Electoral Districts with at least 200 people in the labour force and an unemployment rate of 27% or higher. Source: https://www.cso.ie/en/csolatestnews/pressreleases/2017pressreleases/pressstatementcensus2016summaryresults-part2/

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 41 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.3 Geology, Sediments, Soils & Land-use Geology Offshore The offshore area of the Master Plan is located within Waterford Estuary and Harbour, where the seafloor bedrock is characterised by Cambrian quartzite sandstone, Devonian sandstone and areas of Ordovician slate, see Figure 6-9 below. The seafloor substrates mainly comprise of fine to medium sands (GSI, 2018). Within the Master Plan area there is a rock outcrop known as Bingles Rock which is restricting safe access to the Port. This rock outcrop is not of geological interest. Figure 6-9: Offshore Geology of the Master Plan Area

On-shore The on-shore area of the Master Plan area is underlain by the Campile Formation which comprises of rhyolitic volcanics, grey and brown slates and by the In-Campile Formation, which comprises of felsic and intermediate volcanics. To the north of the Master Plan area there is a small area which is underlain by the Dolerite formation which is comprised of basalt and gabbro rock, see Figure 6-10 below. The bedrock is heavily faulted as a result of tectonic events that occurred millions of years ago. Irish Geological Heritage (IGH) sites are sites of unique geological features. A number of these IGH sites were identified in the vicinity of the Master Plan area (GSI, 2018). Fluvial and Lacustrine Geomorphology (IGH 14) is preserved on the eastern bank of the River Suir. Cambrian-Silurian Volcanic Pillow Basalts (IGH4) are preserved at Duncannon, on the

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 42 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company eastern side of the Master Plan area. Precambrian-Devonian Palaeontology (IGH 2) and well- preserved glacial sediments (IGH 7) are found on both sides of Waterford Estuary. South of the Master Plan area three (3 No.) geological heritage sites were identified on the Hook Peninsula. These are IGH 10, IGH 3 and IGH 8, which all record an abundance of Devonian- Carboniferous fossilised fauna in massive limestone outcrops, see Figure 6-10 below. Figure 6-10: On-shore Geology within the Master Plan Area

Estuarine Sediments and Dredging Waterford Estuary bedrock is largely covered with glacial sediments of varying thickness. The freshwater in the River Suir and River Barrow and the sediment within Waterford Estuary tend to be influenced by the terrain through which the river passes, the softer sandstones and limestones having most influence. The major tributaries of Waterford Estuary flow through areas of sand and gravel where the mineral content can be leached. In order to maintain chartered depths in Waterford Estuary and Harbour, POW carry out maintenance dredging at a number of sites throughout the Estuary and Harbour. Detailed map of areas that are currently permitted for dredging is provided in Appendix D. The OSPAR Convention (OSPAR Commission, 2003) recognises that dredging is essential to maintain navigation in ports and harbours as well as for the development of port facilities and that much of the material removed during these necessary activities requires disposal at sea. The dredged material from the harbour and estuary varies from silt, silt / sand to sand. Finer grained material is found in the upper reaches of the harbour and River Suir, and coarser material at the mouth of the estuary. No significant presence of gravel or cobbles has ever been noted. The sandbars at Duncannon and Cheekpoint and the berths at Belview are the primary dredging areas and require dredging at least twice a year. A Trailing Suction Hopper Dredger

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 43 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

(TSHD) is used for dredging along with ploughing / bed levelling at Cheekpoint Lower Bar, to maintain depths at this point. Sediments are regularly tested for contaminants in accordance with the Dumping at Sea Permit and are deemed suitable for disposal in accordance with the relevant EPA guidance (EPA, 2011). Soils The soils beneath the on-shore area of the Master Plan area are derived from mainly non- calcareous materials. These soils may be described as deep well drained and made up of largely acidic materials (AminDW). The soil to the north of the on-shore Master Plan area is described as shallow well drained and made up of largely acidic materials (AminSW), with the soils to the south described as ‘made ground’, see Figure 6-11 below. The soils running along the east and west coast of the Master Plan area are comprised of mosaic deep and shallow soils, which are well drained and largely acidic materials (AminDW & AminSW), alluvium (AlluvMIN), beach sands and gravels (MarSands) and aeolian undifferentiated (AeoUND), see Figure 6-11 below. The Heritage Council has developed a mapping system that details the level of coastal soil susceptibility i.e. the level of soil vulnerability to erosion processes. The on-shore area of the Master Plan area, including adjacent lands, soil susceptibility is classified as ‘low’. This low classification corresponds with the deep well drained and largely acidic materials and ‘made ground’ soil types. There is a small section of the on-shore area classified as ‘medium’ which corresponds with the shallow well drained and largely acidic soil materials. A very minor section of the adjacent land area is classified as having high susceptibility. This area corresponds with beach sands and gravels.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 44 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-11: Soil Types within the Master Plan Area

Land-use According to the Ferrybank-Belview LAP (2017), the majority of the land within the Master Plan area is zoned as Port Facilities and Industrial (PFI) activities. However, Corine 2012 (EPA, 2018) records show that much of this zoned land is currently under agricultural use. Other land uses identified within the on-shore Master Plan area are agriculture and land uses associated with a coastal location, which include estuaries, intertidal flats, beaches, dunes and sand. There are also small areas of passive open space, residential amenity and public utilities. Key Issues The mismanagement of construction activities such as concrete handling, oil refuelling and extractions / excavations has the potential to disturb, contaminate and pollute underlying soils. As an island in the North Atlantic, Ireland is highly susceptible to the negative consequences of coastal erosion, which include loss of valuable land, scenic amenities and damage to infrastructure. Implementation of the Master Plan may also result in potential long-term impacts on erosion and sedimentation within the Estuary and Harbour. However, this is considered highly unlikely given the findings of a recently completed hydrodynamic study of the Harbour (ABPmer, 2018a). Although dredging activities associated with the Master Plan will impact sediments, this activity has been ongoing for the past 20+ years, and extensive studies have proven that there are no significant negative impacts. Mitigation measures will ensure that adverse impacts on soils and geology will be avoided and, where this is not possible, minimised during the life of the Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 45 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.4 Water The EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) establishes a framework for the protection of both surface water and groundwater. Transposing legislation outlines water protection and water management measures required in Ireland to maintain high status of waters where it exists and to prevent any deterioration in existing water status. The first cycle of the River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) ran from 2009-2015, where eight separate plans were devised for all of the River Basin Districts (RBDs) with the objective of achieving at least ‘good’ status for all waters by 2015. The second cycle of the River Basin Management Plan: 2018-2021, is currently underway and all eight RBDs have merged to form one national RBD. Water quality data is also collected by the EPA to provide an overall status of water quality. The monitoring programme, as part of the WFD, assesses water quality but also water trends of rivers in relation to ecological and physico-chemical quality. The WFD status of rivers ranges from ‘high’ to ‘bad’. The EPA also undertakes water quality surveys for transitional and coastal water bodies. Surface Water The on-shore Master Plan area lies within one Catchment (Suir 16) and within the two Sub- catchments (Blackwater [Kilmacow] SC_010 and Williamstown_SC_010), (EPA, 2018). Refer to Figure 6-12 and 6-13 below. The on-shore Master Plan area intersects the Luffany River (Luffany) (IE_SE_16L680750) water body to the east and the Luffany_010 (Gorteens 16) (IE_SE_16L680750) which runs along the western boundary of the Master Plan, both of which are unassigned. The offshore Master Plan area lies within two transitional water bodies (the Lower Suir Estuary10 (IE_SE_100_0500) and the Barrow Suir Nore Estuary (IE_SE_100_0100)) and extends into Waterford Harbour (IE_SE_100_0000) coastal waters towards the south. The New Ross Port Estuary (IE_SE_100_0200) transitional water, lies to the north of the Master Plan area. Refer to Figure 6-14. Table 6-5 below outlines the Catchment, Sub-catchment, WFD water body name, WFD Code, WFD Status and the water bodies at risk within the Master Plan area. The ‘risk’ status of a water body looks at the current water quality and trends and highlights water bodies that are at risk of deteriorating or being at less than ‘good’ status in the future.

10 Estuarine waters are now, under the WFD, known as transitional waters

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 46 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-12: Catchments Map

Figure 6-13: Sub-catchments Map

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 47 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-14: Transitional and Coastal Waterbodies

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 48 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 6-5: WFD Catchments, Water bodies and Current Status Catchment WFD Sub-catchment Name WFD Water body Water (WFD EU WFD Status Risk (WFD Sub-catchment Name body Catchment Code 2010 - Status Code) (EPA Name) Type Code) 2015

Luffany_010 IE_SE_16L Unassign River At Risk Blackwater (Luffany) 680750 ed [Kilmacow]_SC_010 Luffany_010 Strea IE_SE_16L Unassign Suir (16) (16_29) Review (Gorteens 16) m 680750 ed Williamstown_SC_010 N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A (16_19) Lower Suir Estuary (Little Transit IE_SE_100 N / A N / A Moderate At Risk Island - ional _0500 Cheekpoint) Barrow Suir Nore Transit IE_SE_100 Not at N / A N / A Good Estuary ional _0100 Risk IE_SE_100 N / A N / A Waterford Harbour Coastal Good Review _0000

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 49 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

There are three designated bathing areas in close vicinity to the Master Plan Area, namely Duncannon Beach (PA3_012211), Dunmore Councillors’ Strand (PA3_0115) and Dunmore Strand, Dunmore East (PA3_0114). The most recent data published by the EPA on bathing water status was in 2017. Duncannon Beach is designated as ‘good’ while Dunmore Councillors’ Strand and Dunmore Strand both have ‘excellent’ bathing water quality (EPA, 2018). Dredging and Water Quality Monitoring Currently dredging is regularly carried out, with over-dredging12 in places, to provide sedimentation capacity and maintain minimum depths (see section 6.3). As a result, dredging material quantities can vary considerably depending on weather conditions and river flow. Dredging activities have the potential to impact water quality through suspended solids, sediment plumes and sediment deposition. Contaminated sediments also have the potential to impact water quality. One of the main issues with dredging and dredging disposal is the release of contaminants to the water column which is associated with temporary increases in turbidity. This can have a knock-on effect for the increased availability of contaminants to the food chain. POW carry out regular comprehensive testing of the dredged sediment to monitor potential contamination of the sediments and to monitor the potential impacts on the disposal site in accordance with the Dumping at Sea Permit. Chemically, the sediment is ‘clean’ and uncontaminated, and regular testing of sediments has not found evidence of any substance which could negatively impact the environment. Groundwater The EU Groundwater Directive (2006/118/EC) uses a holistic approach to groundwater by addressing the relationships between groundwater, surface water and ecological receptors. The on-shore Master Plan area overlies one groundwater body, the Waterford groundwater body (IE_SE_G_149). This groundwater body is of ‘good’ status. Groundwater vulnerability beneath this section of the Master Plan comprises a mosaic of moderate, high, extreme with a small area of rock at or near the surface. The bedrock aquifer is classified as a Regionally Important Aquifer – Fissured Bedrock (Rf). Marine Waters The Marine Strategy Framework (MSF) Directive requires EU Member States to reach good environmental status (GES) in the marine environment by the year 2020. The Directive is similar to the WFD, but the focus is on the marine environment. GES in the marine environment means that the seas are clean, healthy and productive and that human use of the marine environment is kept at a sustainable level. Since 2016 a programme of measures (POM) and monitoring programme has been in place to facilitate the overarching aim of the Directive which is to protect and preserve the marine environment. Surface Water Emissions in the Master Plan Area Within the Master Plan area there are two Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) sites with discharge to surface water regulated by the EPA, five industrial discharges to surface water regulated under Trade Effluent Licence (TEL) regulated by the Local Authorities, and five IED sites <5km from the Master Plan Area, see Table 6-6 below.

11 Protected Area Code 12 Excessive levels of dredging

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 50 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 6-6: Licenced Facilities and Facility Type

Licensed Distance from the Discharge Facility Name Licence No. Location Activity Master Plan (km) to Water Within the Master Port of Waterford TEL ENV/ W/64 Co. Kilkenny Yes Plan area Smartply Europe Within the Master IED P0001-04 Co. Kilkenny Yes Limited Plan area Within the Master Glanway Limited IED P1015-01 Co. Kilkenny No Plan area Marine Point Partnership Ltd. Within the Master TEL ENV/W /104 Co. Kilkenny Yes (Store-All Plan area Warehousing) Faithlegg Within the Master TEL WPW 02/2001 Co. Waterford Yes Administration Ltd., Plan area ENV / W / 64 A Within the Master Port of Waterford TEL Co. Kilkenny Yes & B Plan area Co. Kilkenny Within the Master Port of Waterford TEL ENV / W / 64 C Yes Plan area Co. Kilkenny Within the Master Port of Waterford TEL ENV / W / 64 D Yes Plan area Co. Kilkenny Within the Master Port of Waterford TEL ENV / W / 64 E Yes Plan area Glanbia Ireland IED P0963-01 Co. Kilkenny < 1km No SSE Generation IED P0606-03 Co. Wexford < 1km Yes Ireland Limited Anglo Beef IED P0040-02 Co. Waterford <4km Yes Processors Ireland Anglo Beef Processors Ireland Unlimited Company IED P0205-02 Co. Waterford <4km Yes trading as ABP Waterford

Flooding A Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) has been undertaken in conjunction with this SEA Environmental Report. The findings of the SFRA have been incorporated into the assessment of this Report, see Section 9 (Assessment). The Office of Public Works (OPW) is the lead State body for flood risk management. In 2018, the OPW launched ‘Flood Maps’ to provide information on the likelihood of flood risk and the extent of flooding across Ireland. Figure 6-15 below shows that the Flood River Extent of the River Barrow Estuary and much of Waterford Harbour is listed by the OPW as a ‘High Probability’ zone, meaning that its Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) is greater than 10% (i.e. a >1 in 10 chance per year that coastal or fluvial flooding will occur along this river). Cheekpoint, Passage East, Woodstown and Arthurstown, all of which border the Master Plan area, experience recurring flood events. Ballyhack and Passage East have also suffered from singular flood events within the past five years.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 51 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-15: Recurring Flood Zones and Flood Records in the vicinity of the Master Plan

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 52 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Key Issues Ireland currently has a good understanding of the causes of water pollution, including foul water, agricultural runoff, industrial discharges and illegal dumping, due to the implementation of the WFD. Any development as part of the Master Plan has the potential to impact water body status, water usage, flood risk and generate wastewater. Key pressures on existing water quality in the area of the Master Plan are from: • Agriculture - diffuse pollution; • Domestic and urban WWTP emissions; • Urban runoff - misconnections from private foul connections to storm sewers, leakage runoff from surfaces; and, • Industrial point source emissions. Potential secondary pressures on existing water quality in the area of the Master Plan include: • Port activities - including vessels accessing the Port and a ferry service operating between Passage East Co. Waterford and Ballyhack Co. Wexford. The Master Plan must fully meet the requirements of the WFD, the Groundwater Directive and the MSF Directive and aim to drive improvement to water quality in both the short and long- term. Some of the development options detailed in the Master Plan may result in physical alterations to water bodies and marines / piers. Any such impacts must be mitigated during the project works. The development options in the Master Plan may result in additional requirements for potable water and wastewater disposal. Emissions, discharges and spills from the sites listed in Table 6-6 above also have the potential to pollute water bodies within and in the vicinity of the Master Plan, impacting on their WFD status. The development of the Port, through the Master Plan will facilitate an increase in throughput at the Port. Flooding of key water supply and water treatment facilities would present a pollution risk with associated impacts on human health, water quality and ecology. However, flood risk and flood risk management is addressed in the SFRA for the Master Plan, available at http://www.portofwaterford.com/corporate-documents.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 53 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.5 Air Quality & Acoustics Ambient Air Quality EU legislation on air quality requires that Member States divide their territory into zones for the assessment and management of air quality. The current trends in air quality in Ireland are reported in the EPA publication ‘2017 Annual Report on Air Quality in Ireland’ which is currently the most up to date analysis of air quality data for Ireland. Four national air quality zones have been designated in Ireland; these are: • Zone A is the Dublin conurbation; • Zone B is the Cork conurbation; • Zone C comprises of 23 large towns in Ireland with a population of >15,000; and, • Zone D is the remaining area of Ireland. The POW is located in Zone D, within the ‘Rural East’ Air Quality Index Region (EPA, 2018). The designated zones have been defined to meet the criteria for air quality monitoring, assessment and management as defined in the aforementioned regulations. Table 6-7 below shows the baseline air quality data used to assess air quality impact criterion in a number of Zone D regions. The data is taken from Air Quality in Ireland 2017. Given the Master Plan is in a rural area, it is considered that average Zone D air quality is good approximation of the background air quality for the site. Table 6-7: Annual Mean Concentrations of Pollutants Measured in Zone D

Total Particulates Baseline Value Zones D NO2 Annual Mean Total Particulates PM10 (PM2.5) Annual Mean EPA Report 2017 (µg/m³) Annual Mean (µg/m³) (µg/m³)

Castlebar 7.4 11.2 -

Kilkitt 2.3 7.8 -

Emo, Laois 3.4 - -

Claremorris - 10.8 5.6

Longford - - 9.2

Average 4.4 9.9 7.4

The closest air monitoring stations to the POW are located in Waterford City, however these are in a Zone C Air Quality region and hence not applicable to the Master Plan area, which is rural in nature and has no large towns. Local Sources of Emissions to Air The main sources of air emissions in the vicinity of the site are the adjacent N29 road and IED licenced facilities (see Table 6-6 above). Traffic-related pollutants tend to settle out quickly near the roadside while the emissions from licenced facilities are subject to strict Emission Limit Values (ELVs) that are regulated by the EPA. Compliance with these ELVs eliminates potential risk to human health and / or the environment. The EPA Air Quality in Ireland Annual Report 2016 has been used to describe the receiving environment in terms of air quality. Following a review of the EPA database (EPA, 2018), there are two Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) sites, five Section 4 Discharges within or adjacent to the Master Plan area and five IED sites <5km from the Master Plan Area. These sites are listed above in Table 6-6 in Section 6.4 (Water). All of these facilities have licenced emissions to air.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 54 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Noise In accordance with Environmental Noise Regulations (S.I. No. 140 of 2006), Kilkenny County Council produced a Noise Action Plan 2014-2018 for all ‘major’ sources of noise emissions in the county (Kilkenny County Council, 2013). Major sources of noise emissions are defined as: • Population agglomerations of over 100,000; • Major airports with over 50,000 movements per year; • Major railways with over 30,000 passengers per year; and • Major roads with over 3 million vehicle passages per year. Port installations are not directly stated within the Regulations, and the Port is not an EPA licenced activity, which is typically taken as ‘industrial activity’ within the remit of the Regulations. However, the Strategic Noise Mapping and the accompanying Local Authority Noise Action Plans are useful tools in understanding the predominant noise emissions within the locality. Figure 6-16 below displays an excerpt from both the 24 hour and 8 hour calculated Strategic Noise Mapping in the locality of the on-shore Master Plan area. Figure 6-16: Excerpts of Strategic Noise Mapping for Locality

According to the Noise Action Plan, the major source of noise present within County Kilkenny are the National Primary and Secondary Routes, which includes the M9, M8, N10, N24, N25, N76 and N77. Under these regulations, Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) produced Strategic Noise Maps which illustrate noise levels (in decibels) along these roads during a typical 24hour period (LDEN, incorporating penalties for evening and night-time values) and night time (8 hours no weighting). The strategic noise maps were supplied to the Local Authority to enable a development of their Noise Action Plan. The findings of the Kilkenny Noise Action Plan are as follows: • Railways do not have a significant impact on noise levels within the county.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 55 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

• Traffic noise is considered to be the only major source of noise in the county.

• 8.7% of people in Kilkenny are exposed to LDEN sound levels above 55 dB from road traffic.

• An estimated 12 people live in areas where LDEN sound levels are >75 dB. Figure 6-16 above shows the excerpt from the 2nd round of Strategic Noise Mapping and indicates that the locality of the Master Plan area is not within or directly impacted from major road noise. Locally to the Port (3.5km radius) there are five EPA licenced sites, which report annually to the EPA on their noise compliance. The noise emission limit values from these sites and the number of exceedances from their most recent annual returns are detailed in Table 6-8 below. Table 6-8: Noise Compliance of Local Industry

EPA licence Reported Facility Name & Address Noise Emission Limits Ref. Compliance

Glanway Limited No monitoring P1015-01 Unit 3 & 6 Belview Port conducted in 2017 LAR,30minute 55dB (7am to 7pm)

LAR,30minute 50dB (7pm to 11pm) Glanbia Ingredients Ireland Ltd. Site reported P0963-01 Gorteena, Belview, Kilkenny LAeq,15minute 45dB (11pm to 7am) no compliance for 2017 clearly audible tonal or impulsive component at NSRs at night. Smartply Europe Ltd. Site reported P0001-04 Slieverue, Belview, Kilkenny compliance for 2017

LAeq, 30minute 55dBA (8am to 10pm) SSE Generation Ireland Ltd. LAeq, 30minute 45dBA (10pm to 8am) Site reported P0606-03 compliance for 2017 Campile New Ross, Wexford No clearly audible tonal or impulsive component at NSLs.

Leq,15minute 55dB(A) 8am o 10pm Anglo Beef Processors Ireland Leq,15minute 45dB(A) 10pm to 8am Site reported P0040-02 compliance for 2017 Ferrybank, Waterford No clearly audible tonal or impulsive component at NSL.

It is noted from the annual returns of these local EPA licenced sites, that noise emissions are compliant with EPA limits. Although the Port is not licensed by the EPA, the capital dredging works do come under the EPAs remit. The Port holds permit number S0012-02, from the EPA to authorise the loading and dumping at sea of dredged material from the Suir Estuary/Waterford Harbour and subject it to 2 conditions relating to noise, namely: 2.1 Noise 2.1.1 The permit holder shall adopt all reasonably practicable measures to minimise the noise impact of the permitted activities at NSLs. 2.1.2 Noise from the permitted activities shall not give rise to sound pressure levels measured at any NS Ls which exceed the limit values specified in Schedule B. I Noise Emissions of this permit. And,

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 56 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

4.8 Noise 4.8.1 The licensee shall carry out a noise survey of the loading activities at Cheekpoint Lower annually, unless otherwise agreed by the Agency, in accordance with Schedule C.I Monitoring at Loading Areas of this permit. Monitoring shall be carried out at NSLs continuously for 30 minutes while loading by TSHD is being carried out. The survey programme shall be undertaken in accordance with the methodology specified in the 'Guidance Note for Noise: Licence Applications, Surveys and Assessments in Relation to Scheduled Activities (NG4)' as published by the Agency. The emission limit values are detailed in Schedule B of the permit, and are shown here in Table 6-9 below. Table 6-9: Extract from Schedule B, Permit S0012-02 Daytime dB Evening time dB Night-time dB

LAr,T (30 minutes) LAr,T (30 minutes) LAeq,T (15 minutes) 55 50 45Note 1 Note 1: There shall be no clearly audible tonal component or impulsive component in the noise emission from the activity al any noise-sensitive location. Schedule C1 of the permit notes annual monitoring (unless otherwise agreed with the EPA) will be taken at the McGrath residence in Cheekpoint (NSL1). The results of this annual survey include dredging and ambient noise data, and indicate that ambient daytime values since 2015 range from a LAeq,30minute of 41dB to 43dB in the Cheekpoint area. Specific noise, arising from dredging works, over the same period, range from LAeq,30minute of 44dB to 47dB. POW have drafted a Noise Reduction Plan, which is now implemented to further control noise arising from dredging works. No dredging takes place at night time. Currently there is no publicly available data present regarding the ambient under-water acoustic environment. It is reasonable to assume, allowing for the merging of two significant river systems and as an estuarine river complex, that the underwater acoustic environment will be relatively high. Additionally, the river system is home to aquaculture, commercial and recreational boat movements. Underwater (aquatic) acoustics is concerned predominately with the potential impact arising from man-made emissions to aquatic species, and there is a considerable overlap between acoustics and aquatic ecology within this study area. The Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht in 2014 released the ‘Guidance to Manage the Risk to Marine Mammals from Man-made Sound Sources in Irish Waters.’ This specifically examines the potential for impact on marine mammals and a risk methodology to asses any plan or proposed development. Off-shore aquatic acoustic monitoring is on-going within Irish Waters with projects such as the Galway Mayo Institute of Technology funded ObSERVE-Acoustic (http://www.observe- acoustic.ie/) tasked with the remit to provide robust scientific knowledge with respect to protected species occurrence and ecology along the Irish Atlantic Margin, along with the EPAs STRIVE 120 report and the LIDO platform (http://www.listentothedeep.com). Key Issues The key issue regarding air quality at the POW is likely to be primarily from traffic. However, current traffic along N29 is currently very low (see section 6.7), and potential impacts of increase in traffic volume will be assessed at project level. Moreover, it is important to note that increased activity at Port means less road traffic at national level, as the cargo is brought closer to its final destination. As the Port develops, it will be imperative that it acknowledges its contribution to the achieving Good Environmental Status (GES) in the marine environment under the Marine Strategy

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 57 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Framework (MSF) Directive 2008/56/EC, and the remit of the Port’s indirect acoustic impact on the marine environment from shipping. The Port must ensure that their dredging works are conducted in a manner that is harmonious to the locality and, as a minimum, compliant with permit conditions. Further the Port shall operate in a manner to prevent noise nuisance at sensitive receptors by understanding their acoustic emission and working to ensure on-site developments work to improve the emissions to the locality. 6.6 Climatic Factors Waterford is classified as having a ‘temperate oceanic climate’13, characterised by a narrow range of annual temperatures and a lack of extreme temperatures in both summer and winter (Met.ie, 2018). The closest Met Éireann temperature monitoring station to Waterford Harbour is at Rosslare Harbour, Co. Wexford, ca.53 km east of Waterford City. Average annual temperatures from 1978-2007 were 10.6°C, with an average of 4.3 hours of sunshine per day. Mean annual rainfall during the same period was 905.5 mm, recorded at Rosslare Harbour. Average annual rainfall is also monitored at Tycor in Waterford, and between 1981-201014 the average annual rainfall was 1,026mm, with an average of 141 ‘wet days’15 per year. According to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) there is “unequivocal” evidence that the climate system is warming and furthermore that: "Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural systems." (IPCC, 2014). Under the 2009 National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP), Ireland has agreed to reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions by 20% compared with 2005 levels by 2020. Latest reports indicate that the country is set to miss not only this target, but longer-term targets as well. According to the EPA, emissions are set to rise by 2% from current [2018] levels by 2020 (EPA, 2018). The expected effects of climate change on Ireland are an increased frequency of extreme weather events within the next century, including a 20%-30% increase in precipitation, greater rainfall intensity coupled with flash floods and an average annual temperature increase of ∼2°C. The potential impacts of climate change could have serious consequences for both people and infrastructure along Ireland’s coastal areas as well as its rivers (OPW, 2015). The OPW published the ‘Flood Risk Management 2015-2019’ report as part of the Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment’s (DCCAE) ‘Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan’, in which they adopted two indicative potential future scenarios, Mid-Range Future Scenarios (MRFS) and High-End Future Scenarios (HEFS), which are based on both average and more extreme climate change projections. Under the MRFS a 20% increase in both extreme rainfall depth and peak flood flows are expected, along with a 0.5m increase in sea level. Under the HEFS, the two former parameters are expected to increase by 30%, along with a 1m rise in sea level by the 2080s16.

13 Under Köppen climate classification 14 Met Eireann’s closest comparable 30-year period, as Rosslare was closed in 2007 15 ‘Wet days’ is when rainfall amounts exceed 1mm 16 Term 2080s used to describe the period covering 2071-2100. Increases are measured with respect to the period 1961-1990.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 58 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Considering the location of the Port at the confluence of the Rivers Barrow and River Suir, along the mouth of Waterford Estuary, either of these two scenarios represent a risk to future operations at the Port. Projected Climate Impacts The Planning Adaptation framework “Developing Resilience to Climate Change in the Irish Transport Sector” was published by the Department of Transport Tourism and Sport (DTTAS, 2017) to outline the projected climatic changes that will affect Ireland in the latter half of this century. As a Tier-2 Port of National Significance, the POW was represented in this report as a member of the report’s Stakeholder Team. Table 6-10 below summarises the observed and projected impacts of climatic events on port operations in Ireland, as outlined by the planning adaptation framework. While ports are generally more climate-resilient than other sectors of the Irish transport network, stronger winds and more intense storms still pose a significant risk to operations and safety at Irish ports. Additionally, increased storm activity will disturb large amounts of sand and silt which will build-up in bays and harbours, resulting in increased amounts of costly dredging operations along port channels. Table 6-10: Impacts of Climate Change on Port Operations

Climate Level of Level of Observed Impact Projected Impact Impact Impact Impact

Radar ability compromised Challenges to storm-water Precipitation Low N/A during heavy precipitation management

Pollution risk where draining services exceed capacity Risk to storage facilities Flooding N/A N/A Impact on dredging requirements – Low positive or negative depending on location Gradual impact on natural scouring capability of estuarial ports Damage to port infrastructure, High Winds Damage to port infrastructure navigational aid and safety equipment and damage to vessels in ports Low to & Storm Damage to vessels in ports Medium Medium Surge Challenging equipment’s ability to discharge at high water Impact on safety of passengers while in transit / embarking / disembarking Extreme heat can reduce life of felt type roofing products and cause degradation of road surfaces Heat Waves N/A N/A Workers may not be able to work in Low glass boxes on cranes Drought may impact on natural scouring leading to increased siltation Potential increased damage to roads, walls, paving, water pipes and storage Low to Cold Spells N/A N/A tanks Medium Operational fuel can freeze Will impact on existing infrastructure, Sea Level N/A N/A including equipment capabilities, i.e. Low Rise Ability to discharge at the top of high water

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 59 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Since 2015 the ‘Nationally Determined’ commitment was implemented by EU Member States to meet the emission targets outlined by the Paris Agreement (COP21)17. This commitment targets a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030. Ireland has committed to a target EU average of 32% renewables in its energy provision by 2030, which aims to limit GHG emissions. According to the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI), Ireland’s two biggest sources of emissions are energy and agriculture, comprising 61% and 32% of total emissions respectively. The 2017 POW Annual Report noted that the total energy consumption at the Port was 1,701MWh, comprising both electricity 1,329MWh (78%) and fossil fuels 372 MWh (22%) for vessels and road vehicles. Key Issues The impacts of climate change, such as an increase in the frequency of extreme weather events, higher rainfall, flooding and sea level increase will affect coastal areas and rivers. Transport is one of the main sectors contributing to Irish GHG emissions. Ports development is an important aspect of managing GHG emissions from the transport sector, as maritime transport is more carbon efficient compared to road traffic. The Master Plan will need to factor in a climate change strategy and mitigation measures to ensure future operations can progress unimpeded. Further, the Master Plan will include measures to reduce GHG emissions from the Port’s activities.

17 The Paris climate conference (COP21) in December 2015, 195 countries adopted the first-ever universal, legally binding global climate deal. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris_en

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 60 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.7 Material Assets - Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture Material assets include transport infrastructure (road, rail, canal, airports and ports), water supply, wastewater treatment infrastructure, waste disposal sites, energy and supply networks. Material assets also includes economic assets such as lands, coastal and water resources which support fisheries and aquaculture.

6.7.1 Transport & Traffic As the Port is an important cargo gateway for the South-East Region, it is vital the Port is well connected to the road network. The POW is directly served by the N29 and N25 national roads. The N25 road connects the Port with Cork in the south-west and Wexford / Rosslare Harbour in the south-east. The N25 road also provides connection to the N24 road to Limerick and the M9 motorway to the north of the Port. From the M9, traffic from the Port can navigate easily to all parts of the country. The Port is connected to Waterford City via the N25 road and the River Suir Bridge which crosses the River Suir to the east of the City and forms part of the N25 Waterford City Bypass. Waterford City train station (Plunkett Station) serves Waterford City and is located ca.4km west of the Master Plan area. The station operates daily passenger trains from Waterford to Dublin and Waterford to Limerick Junction (with connections to Cork, Tralee, Limerick, Ennis, Galway and Dublin). There is also an inactive rail connection into to Port from the national rail network. Up to quite recently, the rail service carried medical equipment, concentrate and other products with train timetables to meet DFDS sailing schedules from Port of Waterford (Belview Terminal) to Rotterdam, which allows for onward delivery into Europe. Although this rail connection is no longer in use, the Port will work with Local Authorities and Iarnród Éireann Freight to encourage the expansion of rail freight services to the Port. The rail link has a potential to open up the Port for the North-West and Mid-West regions. Two proposed Greenway long-distance cycling and walking routes will be located in the environs on the Master Plan Area, namely: • The Kilkenny Greenway, 22km long; and • The Waterford-Rosslare Greenway, 56km long. The proposed cycle / walking routes have the potential to improve commuter connections between the Port and settlements within the wider area, including Waterford City and Ferrybank and New Ross in Co. Wexford. It is an objective of this Plan to provide access points to the Greenway as part of the overall transport strategy for the area, and one of these access points should be at the N29. According to the 2016 Census (CSO, 2016), there are 33,215 people over the age of 15 who commute to school or work each day in Waterford City and environs and the Rathpatrick ED, refer to Section 6.2 (Population and Human Health). In these areas, 65.4% (21,772 persons) commute by car, as either a driver or passenger. Cycling and walking are the next most popular modes of transport with a combined total of 19.8% (6,582 persons). It is expected that the proposed Greenways would increase the percentage of people who commute to work either on foot or by bicycle.

6.7.2 Water Supply Sources Since 2014, Irish Water are the responsible authority for water supply in Ireland, however Waterford City and County Council are contracted to maintain water supply facilities in the County.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 61 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Waterford City and County is served by ca.107 public water supplies. The City’s water supply is served by the East Waterford Water Supply Scheme (EWWSS), serving east Waterford, including Dunmore East, Cheekpoint, Faithlegg and Passage East and Tramore. There are no drinking water protection zones located within or in the vicinity of the Master Plan area. At present, the water supply source for POW is a borehole to the north of the POW site, with capacity of 20m3 per hour. The borehole is connected into the main water network servicing the Port via a pump system and water treatment unit. Water from the borehole feeds water to an 800m3 water storage tank, which connects into the existing Port supply lines. Fire-fighting water is stored in a 1170m3 purpose-built tank.

6.7.3 Wastewater / Foul Water The Waterford City Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) (Reg. Number D0022-01) was commissioned in 2010 and serves Waterford City and the environs of south Co. Kilkenny. It is located approximately 600m west of the Master Plan Area. This WWTP is part of the Waterford Main Drainage Scheme and provides treatment capacity for a population equivalent (PE/day) of 190,000, which has been designed to accommodate the future growth of Waterford City. According to the 2016 Annual Environmental Report, the plant runs at 43% capacity (82,215 PE/day) based on average annual mean usage (Irish Water, 2016). Surface Water Runoff Currently, surface water runoff from the hardstanding areas of the POW is collected in a settlement tank (including an oil interceptor), before discharging to the Lower Suir Estuary. Foul Water Discharge Foul water from the POW offices and facilities is directed to an existing WWTP on-site, which discharges into the River Suir, in accordance with Trade Effluent Licence dated 16th November 2015 – (reference ENV/W/104) and ultimately discharges to the Lower Suir Estuary. The WWTP consists of a balance tank, dissolved air flotation unit and recirculation pumps. Sludge from the WWTP is disposed of in accordance with Kilkenny County Council sludge disposal requirements. Foul water is discharged to the River in accordance with Trade Effluent Licence dated 16th November 2015 – (reference ENV/W/104). POW operates another WWTP serving Marine Point offices which also discharges into the Lower Suir Estuary, under Trade Effluent Licence reference ENV/W/64). Discharge from both plants is regularly monitored in accordance with respective Trade Effluent Licences. As part of the overall development planned at the Port, further investment will be needed for the WWTP to ensure its ability to treat effluent to a sufficient quality. POW does not have facilities for dealing with bilge or ballast water from ships, and this is currently retained on ships.

6.7.4 Waste Management Waterford City and County Council is trying to gradually move away from reliance on landfills through the increasing focus on waste prevention, reuse, maximising recycling and using waste as a fuel in replacement of fossil fuels (EPA, 2016). This is being achieved by government policy which concentrates on waste as a resource. In accordance with EU Directive 2000/59/EC18, Article 4, it states that:

18 Directive - On port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (27 November 2000)

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 62 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

“Member State shall ensure the availability of port reception facilities adequate to meet the needs of the ships normally using the port without causing undue delay to ships.” In line with Article 5 of the Directive, POW have developed a Waste Management Plan19. “An appropriate waste reception and handling plan shall be developed and implemented for each port…” The Waste Management Plan ensures the following: • Compliance with all relevant legislation; • POW activities are transparent; • All Port users are aware of their obligations; • All vessels using the Port are aware of their obligations and the systems in place regarding waste management; and • The Local Authority can make provisions for Port related waste when planning for waste management in their region. Waste at the Port is classified as either ship waste, port waste or cargo waste. Waste from ships is classified under: • General waste - this includes bottles, paper and packaging etc. that is transported on board a ship and offloaded at the Port. • Waste from catering - this includes kitchen refuse such as food waste and any material of animal / poultry origin, such as carcasses. This waste is stored in covered skips, in a bund to avoid contamination. The removal and safe disposal of catering waste is overseen by authorised personnel from the DAFM. • The disposal of Hazardous and Noxious Substances (HNS) – this is defined by the MARPOL Annexes and includes oil, sewage and chemical substances. Waste of this nature must be arranged between the ship agent and a licenced hazardous waste disposal contractor prior to offloading at the Port. The Prevention of Pollution at Sea Acts prohibits ships from discharging waste within ca.4km of Waterford Harbour. Ship waste (including sewage and bilge water) is regulated in Ireland by S.I. No. 117 of 200320 as amended (DHPLG, 2016). Ships wishing to dispose of waste must make an application to the competent authority, disposal is then arranged by the ships agent and conformity checking is carried out by the competent authority. Port Waste refers to all non-ship generated waste but does not include waste generated by companies operating within the Port area, who must provide their own waste disposal. Like ship waste, Port waste is segregated into general and hazardous waste and disposed of accordingly and the POW offices also segregate waste into recyclable and non-recyclable material. As with ship waste, a record of the collection and disposal of waste from the Port facilities is logged for inspection. Cargo waste refers to the waste accumulated from the loading / discharging of cargo and is the responsibility of both the ship and the stevedores / cargo receivers to collect this waste. POW then clean the berth, so it is ready for the next vessel.

19 http://www.portofwaterford.com/corporate-documents 20 Under European Communities (Port Reception Facilities For Ship-Generated Waste And Cargo Residues) Regulations 2003

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 63 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Disposal of Dredged Material Under the OSPAR21 Convention Framework dredged materials is listed under Annex II, Article 3.2, as permitted material to be dumped at sea. POW was granted a Dumping at Sea Permit (S0012-02) by the EPA in 2014, which allows for regular disposal of dredged material from the navigation channels and berths within the harbour and estuary until 2021. In 2017, POW dredged 285,000 tonnes of material from Duncannon Channel, and 120,000 tonnes of material from Cheekpoint Lower Bar; these materials were disposed of at a permitted disposal site, see Figure 2-1. Full implementation of the Master Plan would result in an overall increase in maintenance dredging, with dredging occurring in various locations throughout the harbour and estuary. The Construction Phase of most of the projects would also require capital dredging.

6.7.5 Energy POW requires energy sources to facilitate the operation and management of the Port, including lighting, navigational aids, offices, marine craft, cargo handling assets and road vehicles. In 2017, the POW Annual Report recorded 1,701MWh of energy consumption, with electricity accounting for 78.1% (1,329MWh) of energy usage which powered operational areas, commercial offices and navigational and electrical equipment. Fossils fuels accounted for the remaining energy usage (21.9% - 372MWh) which powered marine craft and road vehicles. In 2017, the POW participated in the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) Better Energy Community grant-aid programme. This programme included the installation of energy efficient lighting refit (to the common areas of office buildings) and a rooftop solar photovoltaic array (PV) to supply common areas of office buildings, which resulted in a modest amount of electricity generation, ca.2,000kWh. Following on from this, the POW plan to develop and implement new energy efficient actions at the Port in the coming years.

6.7.6 Fisheries and Aquaculture Fishing and aquaculture22 are a vital part of Ireland’s coastal economy and largely co-exist with other marine sectors such as ports, marine leisure and tourism. The Irish coastline inshore and offshore waters contain some of the largest and most valuable sea fisheries resources in Europe. In Ireland, the fisheries and aquaculture sector are an important economic activity, particularly in remote coastal areas. Over 14,000 people are employed either directly or indirectly in this sector (DHPLG, 2016). Aquaculture also provides key products for the seafood industry which feeds into the tourism sector. The Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM) 2018 Aquaculture Survey indicates that in 2017 Irish aquaculture production continued to expand in both volume (+7%), value (+24%) and unit value compared to 2016. The fishing and aquaculture industry provide substantial and significant employment for the South-East Region (FLAG, 2016). The main inshore fisheries are crustaceans and shellfish23, but this also includes netting, trawling and line fishing. Aquaculture is a very important industry for the Region which includes bottom culture mussels (Waterford Estuary) and giga oysters (Waterford Estuary and Bannow Bay).

21 OSPAR is the mechanism by which 15 Governments & the EU cooperate to protect the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic 22 This includes the culture or farming of fish, aquatic invertebrates, aquatic plants or any aquatic form of food suitable for the nutrition of fish 23 This includes lobster, crab, whelk, shrimp, scallop and surf clams

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 64 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Waterford Harbour is a Designated Shellfish Area under S.I. No. 55 of 2009 (Quality of Shellfish Waters). Waterford Harbour has also been identified as shellfish growing areas by the Sea Fisheries Protection Authority (SFPA). The SFPA are the authority responsible for classifying shellfish production areas as required under the EU Directive 91/492/EEC24 and by S.I. No. 147 of 199625. Waterford Harbour Designated Shellfish Area spans the entirety of the harbour as well as parts of the estuary, with a total catchment area of 728km2. The Harbour is a classified mollusc production zone with four distinct production sites (SFPA, 2018). Refer to Figure 6-17. Appendix E provides a Waterford Harbour map showing currently permitted aquaculture locations, as well as locations where applications for aquaculture were submitted. Figure 6-17: Mollusc Production in the Vicinity of the Master Plan Area

The active fishery harbours in Waterford are Dunmore East, Passage East, Dungarvan, Heilbhic, and Tramore. Dunmore East is the largest and busiest fishing port in Waterford and is one of six26 Fishery Harbour Centres owned and managed by DAFM. These centres are operated in accordance with the Fishery Harbour Centres Acts 1968 which requires the Minister to bring these Fishery Harbour Centres up to international practice, to reduce congestion at the harbours and to improve safety for the fisheries sector.

24 The Directive sets out hygiene standards for the placing on the market of fishery products, aquaculture products and bivalve molluscs 25 European Communities (Live Bivalve Molluscs) (Health Conditions for Production and Placing on The Market) Regulations, 1996 26 The other Fishery Harbour Centres are: Howth, Co. Dublin, Castletownbere, Co. Cork, Ros an Mhíl, Co. Galway, An Daingean (Dingle), Co. Kerry and Killybegs, Co Donegal

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 65 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Key issues Table 6-11 below lists the key issues identified under each material asset element. Table 6-11: Key Material Issues identified

Element Key Issue

The increase in materials and cargo to and from the Port will require the local infrastructure to be capable of handling these volumes. A Traffic and Transport Assessment (TTA) will be required to assess the additional traffic associated Transport & Traffic with the individual projects of the Master Plan. However, increased throughput at POW will have positive impact by reducing road transport throughout Ireland, by delivering cargo directly to the region rather than transporting it by road from Dublin or Cork.

Increased throughput will result in increased waste being generated at the Waste Port, therefore appropriate planning and waste reduction measures should be Management put in place by the POW to ensure that the current standard of waste disposal and recycling at the Port is maintained.

The Master Plan has a potential to result in an overall increase in dredged Dredging Material material, depending on the implemented options. There are potential impacts Disposal on the disposal location; however, this is managed through Dumping at Sea Permit, and associated long-term studies, assessments and monitoring.

Increased throughput will result in increased energy demand at the POW. Meeting this demand will not present an issue, however, increased energy Energy usage leads to increased greenhouse gas emissions. POW is committed to reduction of GHG, and the current reduction programme will be enhanced.

Channel widening and changes to the scope of dredging within the harbour Fisheries and and estuary have the potential to impact the commercial fisheries and shellfish Aquaculture production sites in the area. Clear mitigation measures will be necessary to limit the impact of the Master Plan on commercial fisheries and aquaculture.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 66 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.8 Cultural Heritage - Architectural & Archaeological Archaeological Features

Archaeological sites are legally protected by the provisions of the National Monuments Acts, the National Cultural Institutions Act 1997 and the Planning and Development Acts. The Record of Monuments and Places27 (RMP) is one of the primary sources of information for known archaeological features, which was established under the National Monuments Acts 1930 to 2004.

The RMP provides an inventory of sites in Ireland (pre 18th Century) for known upstanding archaeological monuments, the original location of destroyed monuments, and the location of possible sites.

The Planning and Development Act 2000 requires Local Authorities to provide a list Record of Protected Structures as part of their CDP. These are structures which are considered to be of architectural value. Most of these structures also appear on the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage (NIAH) list and can be water-related features such as weirs, walls and embankments. The NIAH is an inventory of sites of architectural heritage importance in Ireland (dating from the start of the 18th Century to present day). The NIAH also maintains an inventory of historic gardens and demesnes. Architectural Conservation Areas (ACAs) are designated under Section 81 of the Planning & Development Act 2000-2010 (as amended) for the protection of areas for their special characteristics and distinctive features. ACAs in Ireland are detailed in the various County and Local Area Development Plans (some of which are pending designation).

Waterford City is the oldest city in Ireland, with settlement in Waterford dating back to the Mesolithic period, (over 8,000 years ago). Presumably people settled along the south coast of Ireland due to its deep, sheltered harbour, coastal covers and the navigable rivers – the River Barrow, Nore and the Suir. Through the ages Waterford City and harbour developed into a busy trading port, originally trading mainly with England and Southern Europe and eventually with the rest of Mainland Europe and the World. As a result, today there are hundreds of registered monuments and National Inventory of Architectural Heritage (NIAH) sites within the general area of Waterford Harbour. Archaeological Heritage There are five (5 No.) known registered monuments of archaeological significance within the Master Plan boundary. These are listed in Table 6-12 below. In addition, there are over 50 registered monuments within 1km from the Master Plan area, see to Figure 6-18 below. These include, among others, castles, churches, enclosures, graveyards and fulacht fias. The vast majority of these monuments, including all five within the Master Plan area, are listed in the Site and Monuments Record (SMR).

27 www.archaeology.ie

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 67 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 6-12: List of Monuments on the SMR within the Master Plan Area

Scheduled for Site Reference No. Townland Name Class inclusion in the next revision of RMP

KK047-001 Gorteens Castle Yes

KK043-073001 Kilmurry Enclosure Yes

KK043-073002 Kilmurry Enclosure Yes

KK043-073 Kilmurry Fulacht Fia Yes

KK044-021 Drumdowney Lower Standing Stone Yes

Figure 6-18: Location of Registered Monuments and Sites (SMR) within 1km from the Master Plan Area

Underwater Archaeology POW commissioned an underwater archaeological survey in 1999. No significant archaeological heritage features were noted at this time. In 2002 and 2003 respectively, two shipwrecks were discovered during dredging operations being carried out by the POW near Duncannon. These are the only underwater archaeological features of note within the Harbour area at the present time. Further details regarding shipwrecks in the Harbour are provided below. POW continually engage in consultation with the Underwater Archaeology Unit of the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht to ensure the protection of underwater archaeology during dredging operations undertake at the Port.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 68 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Architectural Heritage There are no NIAH sites located within the Master Plan Area. However, there are over 50 NIAH sites within 1km of the Master Plan area, see Figure 6-19 below. These include gates, bridges and a tunnel. Two sites are of national importance, namely Barrow Bridge which is listed twice due to being registered in both Counties Wexford and Kilkenny. Figure 6-19: Location of the NIAH Sites within 1km from the Master Plan Boundary

Record of Protected Structures Within the Master Plan Area there are three structures listed on the Record of Protected Structures for County Kilkenny, namely the Glass House, Bellevue House and a Mill. Refer to Table 6-13 and Figure 6-20. Table 6-13: Record of Protected Structures within Master Plan Area Reference Included Structure Description No. in NIAH

Country house of early 18th century origin, contemporary No Glass House C483 with the earliest production of glass in Waterford. At present this house is in a ruinous condition.

Bellevue House C480 Country house of early 18th century origin, walled gardens No and outbuildings. At present this structure is in a ruinous condition.

Mill D136 Ruinous shell of 5‐storey flour mill, formerly with two No waterwheels, but now devoid of machinery.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 69 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Figure 6-20: Protected Structures (RPS) within the Master Plan Area

Shipwrecks The National Monument Service maintains an archive of historic shipwrecks around the Irish coast and supplies a searchable database which can be used to locate these shipwrecks. There are sixteen shipwrecks from the Port at Belview to the mouth of the harbour at Hook Head, refer to Table 6-14 below.

Additionally, the George Milburn, a WW1-era minesweeper, lies just offshore at 23m depth approximately 2.5km south of Dunmore harbour. The coordinates for these shipwrecks are provided by the UK Hydrographic Office (UKHO) and the National Monument Service (NMS), although only a fraction of these locations are exact. Table 6-14: List of shipwrecks within Waterford Harbour

Wreck No. Wreck Name Year of Loss Latitude Longitude

W11335 Unknown Unknown 52.27943 -7.00578

W11328 Unknown Unknown 52.27695 -7.00109

W11329 Unknown Unknown 52.25647 -7.03634

W11336 Unknown Unknown 52.25256 -7.04108

W10664 Unknown Unknown 52.22222 -6.93722

W18543 Duncannon Wreck 1 1640s-1660s 52.19292 -6.94033

W11617 Duncannon Wreck 2 1543 52.19380 -6.93976

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 70 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Wreck No. Wreck Name Year of Loss Latitude Longitude

W18578 Unknown Unknown 52.17780 -6.96917

W03675 Hermione (SS) 1917 52.15889 -6.95278

W09941 Patrick (SS) Unknown 52.15000 -6.91667

W05520 UC-44 1917 52.15000 -6.98333

W09580 Dark Island 1987 52.14888 -6.98945

W09762 Jack Buchan 1958 52.13333 -6.93333

W09569 Croghan 1973 52.12972 -6.93658

W05149 Royal Arthur 1871 52.12667 -6.93000

W04334 St. Margaret 1919 52.12194 -6.93194

W04931 George Milburn 1917 52.12400 -6.98070

The shipwrecks which are most relevant to this Master Plan are Duncannon Wreck 1 and Duncannon Wreck 2, both of which are located approximately 1.4km north-east of Creadan Head, north of Dunmore East. Following the discovery of these wrecks as detailed above, a comprehensive exclusion zone was identified around the shipwrecks, agreed by the POW, the NWS and the Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs28 (DAHRGA). This agreement prohibits all activities, including dredging, fishing and diving, within this zone to protect the sites from potential damage. Therefore, the POW has identified approximately a 200m long “no-dredge zone” around the sites. Key Issues Construction activities have the potential for direct negative impacts on heritage features and their setting, especially within the maritime heritage area of Waterford Estuary and Harbour. Since the area is steeped in archaeological sites, there is the potential for development to impact undiscovered archaeological features, therefore mitigation measures will be required. Given the presence of registered monuments (SMR) and protected structures (RPS) within the Master Plan area, sensitive design measures will be employed to ensure that these heritage sites are safeguarded as part of any development works. However, implementation of the Master Plan also provides the opportunity to potentially uncover new heritage features and enhance public awareness of and access to these sites.

28 Now known as the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht (DCHG)

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 71 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.9 Landscape & Visual Amenity Landscape is defined as an area whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and / or human factors. Waterford’s landscape is a valuable resource that sustains industries such as agriculture and fishing, forestry and tourism, rural and urban communities, while providing the vital infrastructure routes and corridors. The POW has been located at Belview Port since its relocation from the Waterford City Quays in 1992. Belview Port is an industrialised area on the River Suir in Waterford Estuary, 6km east of Waterford City. The Port lies on the margins of three counties, Waterford, Wexford and Kilkenny, and is of regional and local importance, serving as both the South-East Region’s largest commercial port, and County Kilkenny’s sole access point to the open sea. As the operations of the Port occur across multiple local authorities, this Landscape Assessment has factored in the CDPs of Waterford (2011-2017), Wexford (2013-2019) and Kilkenny (2014-2020), as well as the Ferrybank-Belview LAP 2017, all of which identify designated landscapes and areas of landscape sensitivity. These are discussed in detail below. The POW is located in an industrial area surrounded by a rural landscape. The majority of the on-shore Master Plan area is currently zoned for Port Facilities and Industry (PFI) activities, with part of the area zoned as a ‘residential amenity Belview’, ‘public utilities’ and ‘passive open space’ 29 (Ferrybank-Belview LAP 2017). The lands to the west of the Master Plan area are zoned for development, as an Industrial Technology Park (ITP). This area is classified as the Belview Strategic Site and is owned by IDA Ireland30. The Master Plan does not lie within any protected or designated landscape areas. Two proposed Greenway long-distance cycling and walking routes will be located in the environs on the Master Plan Area. The disused railway line between Waterford and New Ross intersects a small part of the northern section of the Master Plan area. The railway line is currently zoned as the ‘Waterford to New Ross Greenway’ by the Ferrybank-Belview LAP 2017, which when completed will provide a continuous 22km two way cycling and walking route. This greenway once complete will be termed the Kilkenny Greenway and will link into the wider Greenway network at Waterford City providing alternative commuting opportunities within the area. The Rosslare to Waterford City Greenway, a potential 56km cycle and walking path, is currently in the preliminary / feasibility study stage. The exact route of this greenway is under consideration but it will not run through POW lands as it neither safe nor practical to do so. The Waterford CDP lists the development of the Port as being of ‘strategic importance’ for both the County and the South-East Region, due to its potential to attract further tourism, commerce and industry to the Region. Previous Landscape Character Assessments Landscape Character Assessments (LCAs) are designed to objectively assess the physical attributes, soils / geology, topography, vegetation, land use, settlement patterns and sensitivity to development of landscapes. Areas which are considered to have largely similar landscape characteristics are grouped together under broad headings known as ‘landscape character units’ or ‘landscape character areas.’

29 Lands for possible future development as publicly accessible open space for leisure and recreation. 30 The IDA is a non-commercial, semi-state body promoting Foreign Direct Investment into Ireland through a wide range of services.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 72 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Since the publication of ‘The Landscape and Landscape Assessment: Draft Guidelines for Planning Authorities’ by the DEHLG in 2001, the majority of county councils have produced an LCA Report. The LCA’s relevant to the Master Plan include: • Landscape Character Assessment of Wexford (Wexford County Council, 2013); • Landscape Character Assessment of Kilkenny (Kilkenny County Council, 2014); and, • Landscape Character Assessment of Waterford (MosArt Architects, 2006). Landscape Character Areas Under the Kilkenny CDP 2014-2020 LCA (Kilkenny County Council, 2014), the on-shore Master Plan area lies within an ‘upland area’ and partially a ‘river valley’ Landscape Character Type. The offshore Master Plan boundary is boarded on both sides of Waterford Harbour by a ‘river valley’ and ‘coastal’ Landscape Character Type. The Hook Peninsula on the east side of the Harbour has been designated a Landscape Character Type of ‘greater sensitivity’ by the Wexford CDP (Wexford County Council, 2013), due to the increased pressure in this area from development such as holiday homes. The Waterford City and County LCA (MosArt Architects, 2006) was last revised in 2006, therefore, for the purpose of this assessment, the 2006 LCA has been used to identify the coastal areas along Waterford Harbour. The Landscape Character Types are presented in Figure 6-21 below. Figure 6-21: Landscape Character Types within the vicinity of the Master Plan Boundary

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 73 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Views and Prospects It is important to protect and conserve views and prospects adjoining public roads and river valleys, which are views of high amenity value. To the east of the Master Plan boundary, is a protected view, Snowhill House (Power House) (Reg No. 12404404) as listed on the NIAH website. This protected view is also listed in the Kilkenny CDP as V22. The view is described as: “Views over the confluence of the Rivers Suir and Barrow at Snow Hill on road nos. LS7483 from its junction with road no. LP 3415 and view from road no. LT 74831‐ 15.” The Waterford CDP 2011-201731 lists the entire Waterford coastline as a ‘sensitive’ area, which is defined as an area where: ‘a development could easily cause a change in the character of the landscape and have impact over a wide area’. In addition to this, much of the R683 and R684 regional roads between Passage East, Faithlegg and Waterford City are labelled as ‘scenic routes’ by the Waterford CDP, and Creadan Head in Waterford Harbour, which is located less than 2km from the Master Plan area, is a proposed NHA (No. 27 Waterford CDP). Objective TM14 of the Wexford County Development Plan states: ‘To protect views and vistas from waterways from inappropriate development which would detract from the amenity of the waterways.’ Figure 6-22: Protected and Scenic Views in Kilkenny and Waterford

31 See Appendix 9: Scenic Landscape Evaluation http://www.waterfordcouncil.ie/media/plans-strategies/development-plan/county/Volume%203%20-%20Appendices/A9.pdf

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 74 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

There are also other views from Cheekpoint that, while not specifically listed in the Waterford CDP, warrant consideration as part of the assessment process, see to Figure 6-23 below. Figure 6-23: Strategic View Analysis

Key Issues The visual impact upon the landscape will be taken into consideration during the implementation of the Master Plan in particular during the construction phase of projects which has the potential for negative, short-term impacts on the landscape. In the long-term the majority of the proposed projects are unlikely to have an adverse effect on the landscape and visual amenity of the area, as they largely comprise of in-water works rather than the construction of physical infrastructure. However, the proposed training wall must be assessed in terms of visual amenity impacts in the medium to long term. Preliminary photomontages of the training wall have been prepared and are included in the Master Plan document. Full visual impact assessment will be completed at the project planning stage; however, the preliminary assessment indicates that the training wall will not impact protected views. To mitigate against potential long-term visual effects, the potential Master Plan developments will be designed and located to minimise their impact and to ensure the development options will not seriously hinder or obstruct any protected views in the locality.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 75 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

6.10 Inter-relationships between SEA Environmental Topics In accordance with the SEA Directive, the inter-relationships between the SEA environmental topics must be taken into account as part of the assessment process. While all environmental topics interact with each other to some extent, it is considered that the most significant inter- relationships are between biodiversity, water and material assets. 6.11 Evolution of the Environment in the Absence of the Master Plan The Master Plan sets out the potential options for the future development of POW facilities and operations over the next 25 years, in response to the predicated pressures of increased tonnages being received at Irish ports in addition to the anticipated increase in vessel sizes expected in the coming years. In the absence of the Master Plan, no development would take place at the Port and therefore there would be no additional capacity or infrastructure to receive and process goods at POW. The Port of Waterford is at located in an industrial area with much of the adjoining land zoned for large-scale industrial development. Therefore, even in the absence of the Master Plan, this area is unlikely to remain undeveloped, as it is currently identified to fulfil the future economic demands of the South-East Region. In the absence of the Master Plan, the likely evolution of the environment is as follows: • Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna: The majority of Ireland's habitats that are listed under the Habitats Directive were reported in 2013 to be of inadequate or bad conservation status. Only 9 per cent of listed habitats are considered to be in a favourable state. Species are in majority stable or improving. Next updated report is scheduled for 2019. The absence of the Master Plan is not likely to affect this. • Population and Human Health: No additional employment opportunities or economic growth related to the Port will be generated as POW will be unable cater for larger vessels anticipated to become commonplace in the maritime sector in the coming years. • Geology, Sediments, Soils and Land Use: Land use is zoned for Port facilities and industry and therefore developments are likely to be constructed in the absence of the Master Plan. Continued dredging at Cheekpoint will be required. • Water: As diffuse pollution from agriculture is the key pressure on water quality, meeting the WFD objectives will largely depend on the government policy regarding agriculture and successful control of agri run-off. • Air Quality & Acoustics: As the land adjoining POW is zoned industrial, it is likely to develop. Therefore, traffic in the locality will increase and there will potentially be additional point sources of emissions to air, potentially impacting air quality. However, these impacts will need to be assessed on project level at planning or licensing stages. • Climatic Factors: It is considered that climate change induced extreme weather events including flood risk will continue to increase, regardless of the Master Plan implementation, or other developments in the area. • Material Assets: Road infrastructure is likely to come under increasing pressure due to the development of lands surrounding POW in accordance with zoning. Water, energy usage and wastewater generation are likely to remain unchanged at POW. Aquaculture and fisheries will potentially be impacted by climate change induced extreme weather. • Cultural Heritage: In the absence of the Master Plan, there will be limited opportunity to discover new underwater archaeological features in the vicinity of the Port.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 76 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

• Landscape and Visual Amenity: The Port is located in an industrial area and therefore industrial development is considered likely even in the absence of the Master Plan. The likely evolution of the environment in the absence of the Master Plan is further considered under the Do-Nothing Alternative in Section 8.1 of this report.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 77 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

7.0 SEA OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND INDICATORS SEA objectives are measures developed from policies which usually govern environmental protection objectives established at EU or national level. The SEA objectives are used as standards against which the components of the proposed Master Plan can be evaluated in order to identify the provisions which have the potential to result in likely significant environmental effects. The SEA objectives also take consideration of the baseline conditions (Section 6), consultation and the identification of the key environmental issues. The development of these objectives ensures that the SEA focuses only on those issues that are most relevant and of significance to the Master Plan Area. The SEA objectives are separate to the objectives contained within the Master Plan. The SEA objectives have been divided into environmental topics, with at least one objective for each topic: • Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna (B) • Population & Human Health (P) • Geology, Soils & Land-use (G) • Water (W) • Air Quality & Acoustics (A) • Climatic Factors (CF) • Material Assets – Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture (MA) • Cultural Heritage (Architectural and Archaeological) (CH) • Landscape & Visual Amenity (L). These SEA objectives are then paired with specific targets. Environmental indicators are used to track the process in achieving the targets. Table 7-1 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for the Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 78 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 7-1: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators

Environmental Topic Objectives Targets Indicators

B1: Preserve, protect and where To maintain and or enhance Status, condition, area and number of European possible enhance, the biodiversity, European sites and species in sites and their habitats and species, within flora and fauna at and in the vicinity of accordance with conservation Master Plan area. the Port of Waterford in particular objectives. designated sites and their qualifying Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna (B) features of interest.

B2: Prevent the entry of invasive Prevent the entry and spread of Presence, absence, location, quantity of species to the Master Plan area due invasive species within Master Plan invasive species, within Master Plan area. to the Port operations. area due to Port operations.

P1: To maximise positive impacts and Noise and air quality impacts arising Noise levels and air quality indicators (primarily minimise the negative impacts of the from the proposed projects (on- dust, NOx, CO, SOx). proposed Master Plan projects to the shore and offshore) shall not exceed local communities and mitigate any statutory and/or recommended potential negative effect of guideline values. development on the local Population & Human Health (P) communities. Increasing direct and indirect A long-term employment figures associated with employment created by the delivery the Port. of the projects set-out in the Master Plan.

Implementing corporate social Implementation of specific community projects responsibility programmes at local or sponsorships. communities. G1: To minimise coastal erosion and Protect the coastline from further Erosion rates, and / or presence of new areas of soil / sediment contamination. erosion. erosion within the Master Plan area. Minimise contamination of soils / The number and significance of soil / sediment Geology, Sediments, Soils & Land- sediments at lands within or in the contamination incidents. use (G) vicinity of the Master Plan area.

G2: Beneficial use of dredged Seek to introduce the reuse of Volume of dredge material reused. materials to support circular economy. dredged materials.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 79 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Environmental Topic Objectives Targets Indicators

W1: Prevent the deterioration of the Maintain the status of any water WFD water body status as indicated by the status of water bodies (surface / bodies (surface / ground / coastal) EPA. ground / coastal) in line with the and support the ability of any water objectives of the WFD and River body to maintain or achieve its WFD Basin Management Plan. status. Protect the local designated bathing Maintain status and prevent the Status of local designated bathing areas and areas and shellfish waters. deterioration of water quality the shellfish waters. local designated bathing areas and Water (W) in shell fish waters.

W2: Minimise the impacts on water No increase in flood risk at the Port Flood risk within the Master Plan area. resources and flood risk and to ensure or in the estuary. implementation of the Flood Directive within the Master Plan.

W3: Limit the impacts of the dredging Maintain suspended sediment Suspended sediment concentrations in the regime in the long-term. concentrations at baseline levels. estuary during and after dredging operations.

A1: Air Quality: To minimise the Maintain a ‘Good’ Status on the EPA The EPA’s Air Quality Index for Health. impacts on air quality. Air Quality Index for Health.

Compliance with Air Quality Standards as set out in the CAFE Ambient concentrations of relevant pollutants. Directive.

Air Quality & Acoustics (A) A2: Acoustics: To minimise acoustic Daytime noise emissions, of Lar,T of Noise levels. impacts to local communities and 55dB and night-time emissions of aquatic environments. LAeq,T of 45dB at sensitive receptors. To achieve a ‘Good Environmental Underwater acoustics shall comply with the Status’ (GES) for the acoustic Marine Strategy Framework Directive aquatic environment from direct and (2008/56/EC) to ‘not adversely affect the marine indirect activities as part of the environment’. Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 80 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Environmental Topic Objectives Targets Indicators

CF1: To minimise greenhouse gas To ensure no increase in GHG Carbon emissions from Port activities. (GHG) emissions and the carbon emissions and the carbon footprint, footprint of the Port. expressed per unit of cargo at the Climatic Factors (CF) Port.

CF2: Adaptation to the potential No increased risk from climate Flood risk associated with climate change within climate change effects. change induced flooding events. the Master Plan Area.

MA1: To protect the commercial To support the development of Annual turnover of fisheries and aquaculture in fisheries and aquaculture. sustainable commercial fisheries and the area of the Master Plan. aquaculture within the Port.

MA2: To protect existing and develop To develop new infrastructure which New infrastructure at the Port. new material assets and supports sustainable development infrastructure. within the Port. Material Assets - Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture (MA) MA3: To reduce waste generation To limit any potential increase in the The amount of waste being directed to landfill, from Port related activities. quantity of waste being directed to recycled or reused. landfill from the Port and increase, wherever possible, the quantity of material for reuse and recycling at the Port, supporting a circular economy.

CH1: To prevent damage to / loss to To ensure no significant impacts on The record of known cultural, archaeological, heritage features with particular known SMR or RPS sites. underwater artefact or shipwreck finds, and the regard to the local maritime heritage. quality of these objects.

CH2: To support the research of Cultural Heritage Architectural & underwater archaeology in the Master To prevent potential impact on Archaeological (CH) Plan area. unknown archaeological sites (on- shore and underwater). To improve by record and publication the diverse range of underwater archaeology of the locality.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 81 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Environmental Topic Objectives Targets Indicators

L1: To avoid adverse impacts to the No avoidable significant impacts on The number of receptors affected by significant landscape as far as possible and the landscape character and visual visual impacts from the development of the where possible enhance the amenity as a result of the Master Master Plan. This includes post development Landscape & Visual Amenity (L) landscape character and visual Plan. impacts of the Master Plan. amenity at and in the vicinity of the Port.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 82 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

8.0 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES Alternatives are essential to the SEA process and are required under the SEA Directive. Consideration of alternatives provides the opportunity to identify and examine the different ways to achieve the Master Plan objectives while taking into account environmental issues. In the following sub sections, a “Do-Nothing” scenario and four alternative options are considered. Alternatives have been developed taking cognisance of the best practice guidelines including ‘Developing and Assessing Alternatives in Strategic Environmental Assessment’ (EPA, 2015). Each alternative scenario is assessed against the SEA objectives to identify potential impacts on the environmental topics. The assessment in this section is completed without mitigation measures. Quantitative scoring used during the assessment is outlined in Table 8-1 below. Table 8-1: Description of SEA Environmental Impact Scores

Description Score

Significant positive impacts 3

Moderate positive impacts 2

Slight positive impacts 1

No impacts 0

Slight negative impacts -1

Moderate negative impacts -2

Significant negative impacts -3

8.1 Alternative 1: Do-Nothing The Port continues its present-day operations and facility use. No possible project / options described in the Master Plan are undertaken. Table 8-2: Evaluation of Alternative 1

SEA Objectives Score

Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna

B1: Preserve, protect and where possible enhance, the biodiversity, flora and fauna at and in the vicinity of the Port of Waterford in particular designated sites and their qualifying features 0 of interest.

B2: Prevent the entry of invasive species to the Master Plan area due to the Port operations. 0

Population & Human Health

P1: To maximise positive impacts and minimise the negative impacts of the proposed Master Plan projects to the local communities and mitigate any potential negative effect of -3 development on the local communities.

Geology, Soils & Land-use

G1: To minimise coastal erosion and soil / sediment contamination. 0

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 83 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

SEA Objectives Score

G2: Beneficial use of dredged materials to support circular economy. -2

Water

W1: Prevent the deterioration of the status of water bodies (surface / ground / coastal) in line with the objectives of the WFD and River Basin Management Plan. Protect the local designated 2 bathing areas and shellfish waters.

W2: Minimise the impacts on water resources and flood risk and to ensure implementation of 0 the Flood Directive within the Master Plan.

W3: Limit impacts of the current dredging regime in long term. -3

Air Quality & Acoustics

A1: Air Quality: To minimise the impacts on air quality. -1

A2: Acoustics: To minimise acoustic impacts to local communities and aquatic environments. -2

Climatic Factors

CF1: To minimise greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the carbon footprint of the Port. -1

CF2: Adaptation to the potential climate change effects. -2

Material Assets, Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture

MA1: To protect the commercial fisheries and aquaculture. 0

MA2: To protect existing and develop new material assets and infrastructure. -2

MA3: To reduce waste generation from Port related activities. -1

Cultural Heritage, Architectural & Archaeological

CH1: To prevent damage to / loss to heritage features with particular regard to the local maritime heritage. 1

CH2: Support researching the underwater archaeology in the vicinity of the Port. To improve -3 by record and publication the diverse range of underwater archaeology of the locality.

Landscape & Visual Amenity

L1: To avoid adverse impacts to the landscape as far as possible and where possible enhance 0 the landscape character and visual amenity at and in the vicinity of the Port.

Total Score -17

This alternative does not meet any of the Master Plan objectives and thereby presents a threat to the long-term viability of the POW. Maintenance dredging and Port capacity would remain at current levels, restricting the Port’s ability to adapt to increasing costs or falling revenue. The latter of which would be expected under the “do-nothing” alternative due to the global move towards larger vessels, which will not be able to access the POW. This would in turn

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 84 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company have a significant negative impact on local and regional capacity, and would reduce the industrial and commercial competitiveness of Waterford City and its environs. The most important potential environmental impact of the Master Plan is on biodiversity and Natura 2000 sites. However, do-nothing alternative would likely result in additional development at one of the other Tier 1 or Tier 2 ports in Ireland, and all of those (except Rosslare) are located in Natura 2000 sites. Furthermore, this alternative would likely result in negative impact on road traffic (and related climate change impacts and air quality impacts) in Dublin and Cork, as the extra cargo will likely be shipped to those Ports, resulting in additional pressure on those Ports and road traffic in Dublin and Cork region, which are already under significant pressure. 8.2 Alternative 2: Relocation of Port of Waterford Alternative 2 involves moving the Port of Waterford to the outer estuary, thereby reducing the length of the navigation channel required. This alternative would allow safe access of large vessels with a significantly reduced need for dredging or issues with access to the berths. Also, as this area of Waterford Estuary is not located within SAC or SPA, development would take place outside Natura 2000 sites.

However, this alternative would require complete relocation and reconstruction of the Port, including significant and very costly upgrades to the access roads. All quays would have to be built, together with services and facilities, such as offices, potable water source and WWTP. Substantial protective breakwaters would also be required to be constructed to ensure vessels could be moored safely while discharging. These may cause an interruption to the longshore drift of sediments along the coastline and required dredging.

Relocating the Port would also require significant upgrade to the road network in the area. If this was not undertaken, port traffic would cause heavy traffic on small local roads, within Waterford City and in the rural area south of the Waterford City. Further, there would be significant negative impact on businesses immediately surrounding the Belview Port, as well as significant disturbance to the rural communities surrounding the new location.

Currently residential homes reside in the outer estuary and would be in close proximity to any relocated Port. Visual and acoustic impacts would have to be considered on the local community.

Such large construction projects have significant environmental impacts, including noise and dust emissions, resource use especially in terms of building materials, construction and demolition waste generation, traffic impacts, etc. In addition, there would be significant GHG emissions impacts from such large construction project, and any positive impacts resulting from economies of scale achieved by the larger vessels would likely be negated by the construction related GHG emissions. This location would not provide any protection from the flooding and extreme weather events, which is provided at the current location in Belview.

Economic costs of such project would be prohibitive, and much higher than the potential returns. This Alternative would require significant change in zoning of land and change of use of those lands. It would require greenfield development of currently agricultural land and undeveloped coastline, with significant visual impacts in the area without any industrial development. These negative impacts are not reflected in the scoring below, as the Master Plan objectives do not include ones related to land use, and the economics are discussed in the Master Plan document.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 85 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Practically, an alternative relocation site cannot be identified. The coastline between Dunmore East and Brownstown Head is comprised of rock and is very steep. Therefore, locating a site with adequate access and levels to the water line and also suitable land storage facilitates is very challenging. Altering the topography of the land is not deemed practically feasible due to excessive land works including blasting that would be required.

Table 8-3: Evaluation of Alternative 2 SEA Objectives Score

Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna

B1: Preserve, protect and where possible enhance, the biodiversity, flora and fauna at and in the vicinity of the Port of Waterford in particular designated sites and their qualifying features 2 of interest.

B2: Prevent the entry of invasive species to the Master Plan area due to the Port operations. 0

Population & Human Health

P1: To maximise positive impacts and minimise the negative impacts of the proposed Master Plan projects to the local communities and mitigate any potential negative effect of -3 development on the local communities.

Geology, Soils & Land-use

G1: To minimise coastal erosion and soil / sediment contamination. -1

G2: Beneficial use of dredged materials to support circular economy. 0

Water

W1: Prevent the deterioration of the status of water bodies (surface / ground / coastal) in line with the objectives of the WFD and River Basin Management Plan. Protect the local designated 1 bathing areas and shellfish waters.

W2: Minimise the impacts on water resources and flood risk and to ensure implementation of 0 the Flood Directive within the Master Plan.

W3: Limit impacts of the current dredging regime in long term. 1

Air Quality & Acoustics

A1: Air Quality: To minimise the impacts on air quality. -2

A2: Acoustics: To minimise acoustic impacts to local communities and aquatic environments. -2

Climatic Factors

CF1: To minimise greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the carbon footprint of the Port. -1

CF2: Adaptation to the potential climate change effects. -1

Material Assets, Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture

MA1: To protect the commercial fisheries and aquaculture. 2

MA2: To protect existing and develop new material assets and infrastructure. -3

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 86 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

SEA Objectives Score

MA3: To reduce waste generation from Port related activities. -3

Cultural Heritage, Architectural & Archaeological

CH1: To prevent damage to / loss to heritage features with particular regard to the local -2 maritime heritage.

CH2: Support researching the underwater archaeology in the vicinity of the Port. To improve -1 by record and publication the diverse range of underwater archaeology of the locality.

Landscape & Visual Amenity

L1: To avoid adverse impacts to the landscape as far as possible and where possible enhance -3 the landscape character and visual amenity at and in the vicinity of the Port.

Total Score -16

Although this alternative would meet some of the objectives of the Master Plan, relocating Port is not feasible primarily for practical, economic and environmental (outside of the Natura 2000 sites) reasons. Port of Waterford, is well established at Belview, with valuable infrastructure already built, with this particular location essential to its economic success due to proximity of motorway network. It is deemed that such an alternative would not be deemed sensible and not attain support of planning. 8.3 Alternative 3: Development of the POW infrastructure and estuary Alternative 3 includes all Development Options listed in Table 2-3, except for the Option 1.1 the River Training Wall. Table 8-4: Evaluation of Alternative 3 SEA Objectives Score

Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna

B1: Preserve, protect and where possible enhance, the biodiversity, flora and fauna at and in the vicinity of the Port of Waterford in particular designated sites and their qualifying features -1 of interest.

B2: Prevent the entry of invasive species to the Master Plan area due to the Port operations. -1

Population & Human Health

P1: To maximise positive impacts and minimise the negative impacts of the proposed Master Plan projects to the local communities and mitigate any potential negative effect of 1 development on the local communities.

Geology, Soils & Land-use

G1: To minimise coastal erosion and soil / sediment contamination. 1

G2: Beneficial use of dredged materials to support circular economy. 0

Water

W1: Prevent the deterioration of the status of water bodies (surface / ground / coastal) in line with the objectives of the WFD and River Basin Management Plan. Protect the local designated -2 bathing areas and shellfish waters.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 87 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

SEA Objectives Score

W2: Minimise the impacts on water resources and flood risk and to ensure implementation of 1 the Flood Directive within the Master Plan.

W3: Limit impacts of the current dredging regime in long term. -3

Air Quality & Acoustics

A1: Air Quality: To minimise the impacts on air quality. -1

A2: Acoustics: To minimise acoustic impacts to local communities and aquatic environments. -1

Climatic Factors

CF1: To minimise greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the carbon footprint of the Port. 1

CF2: Adaptation to the potential climate change effects. 1

Material Assets, Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture

MA1: To protect the commercial fisheries and aquaculture. -2

MA2: To protect existing and develop new material assets and infrastructure. 1

MA3: To reduce waste generation from Port related activities. -1

Cultural Heritage, Architectural & Archaeological

CH1: To prevent damage to / loss to heritage features with particular regard to the local -1 maritime heritage.

CH2: Support researching the underwater archaeology in the vicinity of the Port. To improve by record and publication the diverse range of underwater archaeology of the 2 locality.

Landscape & Visual Amenity

L1: To avoid adverse impacts to the landscape as far as possible and where possible enhance the landscape character and visual amenity at and in the vicinity of the Port. 0

Total Score -4

This alternative would allow achievement of economic long-term objectives, by allowing deeper draughted vessels access the Port and increasing the capacity. Also, larger vessels have improved economies of scale, which influences cost and emissions (See Section 9.6 Climatic Factors). Moreover, deepening the channels would improve the conveyance properties of the estuary / river and thereby potentially reduce flooding impact. However, there would be on-going high operating costs associated with this alternative. Under this alternative, the commercial viability of the Port would be placed in jeopardy as significantly expanded dredging works would be required to maintain larger channels. In addition, biodiversity and aquaculture would be potentially impacted as a result of increased dredging in the upper estuary. For these reasons this alternative was not chosen.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 88 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

8.4 Alternative 4: Concurrent Development of all Options Alternative 4 comprises all Development Options within the Master Plan listed in Table 2-3. These developments would occur concurrently over a short timeframe.

Table 8-5: Evaluation of Alternative 4 SEA Objectives Score

Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna

B1: Preserve, protect and where possible enhance, the biodiversity, flora and fauna at and in the vicinity of the Port of Waterford in particular designated sites and their qualifying features -2 of interest.

B2: Prevent the entry of invasive species to the Master Plan area due to the Port operations. -1

Population & Human Health

P1: To maximise positive impacts and minimise the negative impacts of the proposed Master Plan projects to the local communities and mitigate any potential negative effect of 2 development on the local communities.

Geology, Soils & Land-use

G1: To minimise coastal erosion and soil / sediment contamination. -1

G2: Beneficial use of dredged materials to support circular economy. 0

Water

W1: Prevent the deterioration of the status of water bodies (surface / ground / coastal) in line with the objectives of the WFD and River Basin Management Plan. Protect the local designated -3 bathing areas and shellfish waters.

W2: Minimise the impacts on water resources and flood risk and to ensure implementation of -1 the Flood Directive within the Master Plan.

W3: Limit impacts of the current dredging regime in long term. 2

Air Quality & Acoustics

A1: Air Quality: To minimise the impacts on air quality. -1

A2: Acoustics: To minimise acoustic impacts to local communities and aquatic environments. -3

Climatic Factors

CF1: To minimise greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the carbon footprint of the Port. -1

CF2: Adaptation to the potential climate change effects. 2

Material Assets, Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture

MA1: To protect the commercial fisheries and aquaculture. -2

MA2: To protect existing and develop new material assets and infrastructure. 2

MA3: To reduce waste generation from Port related activities. -1

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 89 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

SEA Objectives Score

Cultural Heritage, Architectural & Archaeological

CH1: To prevent damage to / loss to heritage features with particular regard to the local maritime heritage. -1 To support the research of underwater archaeology in the Master Plan area.

CH2: Support researching the underwater archaeology in the vicinity of the Port. To improve 3 by record and publication the diverse range of underwater archaeology of the locality.

Landscape & Visual Amenity

L1: To avoid adverse impacts to the landscape as far as possible and where possible enhance the landscape character and visual amenity at and in the vicinity of the Port. -3

Total Score -9

These developments would occur in tandem with one another over a period of a few years. This alternative would allow achievement of all objectives of the Master Plan and would reduce overall construction time. However, the level of capital investment required, the level of disturbance to the habitats and species, local population, fisheries and aquaculture, and unpredictable economy are all reasons why it was not considered to present a viable approach to the Master Plan. 8.5 Alternative 5: Phased Development of all Options Alternative 5 comprises the full development of the proposed Master Plan as presented in Section 2.3. These developments will occur in phases throughout the 25-year Masterplan period, as shown in Section 2.6. Table 8-6: Evaluation of Alternative 5 SEA Objectives Score

Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna

B1: Preserve, protect and where possible enhance, the biodiversity, flora and fauna at and in the vicinity of the Port of Waterford in particular designated sites and their qualifying features -1 of interest.

B2: Prevent the entry of invasive species to the Master Plan area due to the Port operations. -1

Population & Human Health

P1: To maximise positive impacts and minimise the negative impacts of the proposed Master Plan projects to the local communities and mitigate any potential negative effect of 3 development on the local communities.

Geology, Soils & Land-use

G1: To minimise coastal erosion and soil / sediment contamination. 1

G2: Beneficial use of dredged materials to support circular economy. 1

Water

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 90 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

SEA Objectives Score

W1: Prevent the deterioration of the status of water bodies (surface / ground / coastal) in line with the objectives of the WFD and River Basin Management Plan. Protect the local designated -1 bathing areas and shellfish waters.

W2: Minimise the impacts on water resources and flood risk and to ensure implementation of 0 the Flood Directive within the Master Plan.

W3: Limit impacts of the current dredging regime in long term. 2

Air Quality & Acoustics

A1: Air Quality: To minimise the impacts on air quality. 0

A2: Acoustics: To minimise acoustic impacts to local communities and aquatic environments. -1

Climatic Factors

CF1: To minimise greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the carbon footprint of the Port. -1

CF2: Adaptation to the potential climate change effects. 3

Material Assets, Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture

MA1: To protect the commercial fisheries and aquaculture. -1

MA2: To protect existing and develop new material assets and infrastructure. 3

MA3: To reduce waste generation from Port related activities. -1

Cultural Heritage, Architectural & Archaeological

CH1: To prevent damage to / loss to heritage features with particular regard to the local 0 maritime heritage.

CH2: Support researching the underwater archaeology in the vicinity of the Port. To improve 3 by record and publication the diverse range of underwater archaeology of the locality.

Landscape & Visual Amenity

L1: To avoid adverse impacts to the landscape as far as possible and where possible enhance the landscape character and visual amenity at and in the vicinity of the Port. -2

Total Score 7

This approach allows meeting all medium-term and long-term objectives of the proposed Master Plan. Phased development will also mostly avoid cumulative and in-combination environmental impacts, and is feasible in terms of capital investment and appropriate to the economic conditions.

Therefore, this alternative was selected as the optimal Master Plan approach.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 91 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

9.0 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS IN ABSENCE OF MITIGATION In this Section the potential impacts of the preferred Master Plan alternative on the environment are assessed. The preferred option is outlined in Alternative 5, Section 8.5. The alternatives in section 8 have been initially assessed without mitigation and scored against the SEA objectives detailed in Table 7-1 above. 9.1 Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna This Section assesses the potential impacts of the preferred alternative with regards to all biodiversity receptors within the Master Plan area. Potential environmental impacts on Natura 2000 sites are addressed in detail in the Nature Impact Report for the POW Master Plan, provided separately to this report. Table 9-1 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for biodiversity which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process. Table 9-1: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Biodiversity Environmental Objectives Targets Indicators Topic

B1: Preserve, protect and where possible enhance, the Status, condition, area To maintain and or enhance biodiversity, flora and fauna at and number of European European sites and species and in the vicinity of the Port of sites and their habitats in accordance with Waterford in particular and species, within conservation objectives. Biodiversity, designated sites and their Master Plan area. flora & fauna qualifying features of interest. (B)

Prevent the entry and Presence, absence, B2: Prevent the entry of invasive spread of invasive species location, quantity of species to the Master Plan area within Master Plan area due invasive species, within due to the Port operations. to Port operations. Master Plan area.

In the absence of mitigation measures, there is a potential for all receptors in the study area to be impacted directly or indirectly, in the short, medium and the long-term as a result of the implementing the Master Plan. Potential impacts on the surrounding biodiversity receptors may include: • Effects on European protected Sites including the Lower River Suir SAC and the River Barrow and River Nore SAC and their designated features of interest; • Effects on sensitive marine habitats – habitat quality and habitat loss; • Potential for interaction with Habitats Directive i.e. Article 6; and, • Potential introduction and spread of invasive species and alien species.

The key environmental impacts of the proposed Master Plan relate to the marine and intertidal habitats and species through disturbance during works associated with the Master Plan. The Master Plan is likely to have direct and indirect impacts on marine and intertidal habitats and species through: • Direct habitat loss and / or disturbance to habitats as a result of construction of the Cheekpoint Lower Bar River Training Wall, proposed Quay Wall Continuity and Belview Quay Extension projects; • Potential impacts to the hydrodynamic regime and / or geomorphology of the estuary; • Potential deterioration of water quality; this may happen in case of unplanned events such as discharges of hydrocarbons or accidental discharge of untreated effluents;

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 92 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

• Disturbance of sediment (increased suspended solids and potentially mobilisation of contaminants); • Dredging works may result in localised sediment plumes in the water column; • Impacts associated with increased shipping activities and vessel movements, i.e. increased disturbance, noise, erosion, impacts on water quality (such as mobilisation of sediments, ballast water); • Disturbance / displacement of species including commercial species such as clams and cockles; • Vibration and noise disturbance from construction activities; and, • Potential accidental introduction of invasive species.

Suspended solids are considered one of the key potential contaminants during Port operations. Increased suspended solid concentrations could cause aquatic ecological problems which include reducing light penetration for flora growth, adding bacteria to water, clogging fish gills and smothering spawning grounds. Additionally, increased activity at the Port could lead to increased risk and thus incidence of spills / accidents which cause water pollution, which in turn would affect the health of wildlife populations. Dredging and Disposal of Dredged Materials Dredging operations may disturb the benthic communities. However, as noted within the Natura Impact Statement (NIS) which assessed impacts of dredging currently carried out by the POW and proposed for the future, prepared by AQUAFACT in 2017 (Aquafact, 2017), these benthic communities are adapted to ongoing disturbances by dredging. The recovery begins almost immediately following the completion of these works. Based on the conclusions from the completed NIS prepared by AQUAFACT, it is not considered that the proposed dredging will negatively impact on the integrity or conservation objectives of the Natura 2000 sites, their qualifying interests or impede the movement of migrating fish, marine mammals or otter provided that adequate migration measures are implemented (AQUAFACT 2017). Additionally, the majority of areas within the Master Plan currently undergo some form of dredging, see Appendix D. Therefore, future operations will largely have the same dredging footprint as the current operations. Furthermore, dredging will be phased throughout the life of the Master Plan to minimise potential impacts (Refer to Table 2-5). POW currently dispose of dredged material at sea in accordance with their Dumping at Sea Permit (S0012-02) issued by the EPA. The disposal regime will employ the following best practice measures: • Maintain an acceptable speed to reduce losses during transit during inclement weather; • Division of the disposal site into sectors with each used in turn; and, • Maintain a low speed during disposal to disperse material over the disposal area.

The above measures are standard best practice and serve to minimise any possible impacts on the environment. Potential Impacts on Biodiversity Table 9-2 below summarises the potential impacts on each biodiversity receptor in absence of mitigation measures as a result of the Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 93 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 9-2: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts (pre-mitigation) Receptor Importance Rationale for Importance Potential Impact Summary

Direct Impacts Direct habitat loss and / or disturbance to habitats as a result of construction of the Cheekpoint Lower Bar River Training Wall, Quay Wall Continuity, O’Brien Quay Extension and Belview Quay Extension and the Shore Side Developments. SACs are Increased disturbance, noise, erosion, impacts internationally on water quality (such as mobilisation of Lower River designated under the sediments, ballast water) due to increased Very High Suir SAC* EU Habitats Directive shipping activities and vessel movements. (92/43/EEC) Indirect Impacts Siltation and water pollution. Impacts to the hydrodynamic regime and / or geomorphology of the estuary. Accidental introduction of invasive species. Impacts to movement / migration. Pollution during the construction works. Disturbance / displaced species.

SACs are River Barrow internationally and River Very High designated under the As above. Nore SAC EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)

Direct Impacts SACs are Associated with increased shipping activities and internationally vessel movements, i.e. increased disturbance, Hook Head noise, erosion, impacts on water quality (such as Moderate designated under the SAC mobilisation of sediments, ballast water). EU Habitats Directive Indirect Impacts (92/43/EEC) Potential impacts on habitats as a result of disposal of dredged material.

SACs are internationally Bannow Bay Moderate designated under the No likely impacts. SAC EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) SPAs are internationally Indirect Impacts Bannow Bay Moderate designated under the SPA Disturbance / displacement to species during the EU Birds Directive construction of development options. (79/409/EEC)

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 94 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Receptor Importance Rationale for Importance Potential Impact Summary SACs are Tramore internationally Dunes and Moderate designated under the No likely impacts. Backstrand SAC EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) SPAs are Tramore internationally Indirect Impacts Back Strand Moderate designated under the Disturbance / displacement to species during the SPA EU Birds Directive construction of development options. (79/409/EEC) Designated Fish and Direct Impacts Mammal Species listed Construction-based impacts - dredging, infilling under Annex II activities and in-waterworks (construction of and V of the Habitats quays, training walls etc.) may result in the Aquatic High Directive and is therefore release and resuspension of sediment and Ecology afforded conservation possible contaminants into the surrounding protection. watercourses. Presence of migratory Presence of construction fuel and chemicals species such as lamprey. could be a risk of a pollution incident. Direct Impacts Non-designated Habitat loss or degradation, or creation of habitat. biodiversity from local to Disturbance of wildlife through noise, vibration or Non- regional biodiversity / emissions. designated Medium ecological value. Indirect Impacts Biodiversity Non designated areas may Indirect habitat degradation as a result of such have protected species changes as increased traffic and emissions. present. Disturbance to habitats and species due to vessel usage in area.

Each development option that is part of the Master Plan will require an AA Screening in accordance with Article 6 of the Habitats Directive and Guidelines issued by DEHLG at the planning stage.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 95 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

9.2 Population & Human Health POW are highly attuned to both the local and regional communities and economies as demonstrated in their mission statement: “...to provide infrastructure and services to enable trade and economic development in the Region”. Implementation of the preferred alternative will create medium and long term direct and indirect positive effects on population within the region. Maximum development of the Port will enable POW to operate at increased capacity and contribute to economic development within the region. Table 9-3 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for Population & Human Health which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process. Table 9-3: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Population Environmental Objectives Targets Indicators Topic

Noise and air quality impacts arising from the proposed Noise levels and air quality projects (on-shore and indicators (primarily dust, offshore) shall not exceed NOx, CO, SOx). P1: To maximise positive statutory and/or impacts and minimise the recommended guideline negative impacts of the values. Population & proposed Master Plan Human Health projects to the local Increasing direct and indirect A long-term employment (P) communities and mitigate employment created by the figures associated with the any potential negative effect delivery of the projects set- Port. of development on the local out in the Master Plan. communities. Implementing corporate Implementation of specific social responsibility community projects or programmes at local sponsorships. communities. Economy and Employment Increased employment opportunities created as a result of maximum development of the Port will contribute to tackling the above average unemployment rate in the South-East Region. It is considered that the maximum development of the Port will be particularly beneficial in Waterford City, which has experienced significantly slower economic recovery than the national average over the past decade, exhibiting high unemployment and lower job creation. Between 2017 and 2018, the construction sector experienced a 20% increase in employment nationwide, in the South-East this figure was 1.5% (South-East Monitor, 2018). Construction of the Master Plan developments will increase local employment due to their labour-intensive nature. Local services and material supplies will also be required during the construction phase, providing a moderate economic boost. A vital asset such as a port presents an opportunity to spur growth in the region and attract investment from export-driven sectors, which has the potential to drive up labour demand and wages. Currently, the South-East Region lags behind the national average in terms of IDA and Enterprise Ireland job creation. As a percentage of population, nearly twice as many people are working in minimum wage employment in the South-East than in Dublin (South-East Monitor, 2018). Therefore, the ability to attract investment is vital to regional living standards and long-term sustainability. The Master Plan developments will also contribute to the growth of Waterford City into a regional city of scale in line with the National Planning Framework 2040, and the port has been identified in the DRAFT Southern Assembly Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy (RSES) as a Strategic Employment Location

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 96 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

The Master Plan will provide new direct employment opportunities in the short-term, during the construction phase, and in the long term, during the operational phase, of the Master Plan. It is considered that indirect employment opportunities will rise significantly through spin off industries including those at the Port itself and in nearby urban centres. Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed Master Plan will result in significant positive impacts on population. Amenity Implementation of the Master Plan has the potential to impact on local aquaculture and fishing communities and may potentially reduce the amenity value of the Waterford Harbour through a deterioration of water quality or loss of habitats. However, these potential impacts will be mitigated through best practice measures during the construction phases and through proper project planning. The Master Plan also has the potential for some negative impacts on human health in the short-term as a result of Port developments, which may include increased traffic and construction noise. In the longer term the developments, in conjunction with Local Authority and government planned initiatives, have the potential to greatly enhance the tourism sector of the region. The visual amenity of the area, with its small fishing-villages and rural character, will potentially be diminished through construction of the river training wall, increased vessel presence in the Harbour and noise emissions associated with an expanded Port. Shore-side and Port developments such as roadworks, warehousing and berth and quay expansion will not occur all at the same time under the preferred alternative. Construction activities will likely have a short-term impact on local amenity. The nature of the projects will require large amounts of material, which will need to be transported to and stored at the Port during development works. Construction related traffic in addition to noise and dust emissions will likely be the primary short-term human health impacts arising from the Master Plan. Tourism Despite containing 78 National Monuments, Ireland’s oldest city and some of its most scenic beaches and mountainous areas, the South-East Region attracts just 6.3% of Ireland’s overseas tourists each year (Failte Ireland, 2016). The ability of the Port to accept larger vessels is likely to attract additional cruises to the region which will result in significant positive impacts to the local hospitality industry. While the POW will remain a largely commercial and industrial Port, the presence of a large, active Port in the region will preserve and enhance Waterford’s status as an historic Irish Port city. The POW currently attracts 10% of cruise calls to Ireland, and actively advertises local tourist attractions and tourism initiatives online. An expanded Port would have a greater capacity to not only accept tourists, but promote Waterford’s rich maritime history as well. Furthermore, in the future, Dublin Port may have to turn away cruise vessels due to lack of capacity. These vessels could then go to Port of Waterford instead. 9.3 Geology, Sediments, Soils and Land Use This Section assesses the potential impacts of the preferred alternative with regards to geology, sediments, soils and land use. Table 9-4 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for Geology, Sediments, Soils & Land-use which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 97 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 9-4: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators Environmental Objectives Targets Indicators Topic

Protect the coastline from further erosion. Erosion rates, and / or presence G1: To minimise of new areas of erosion within the coastal erosion and Minimise contamination Master Plan area. soil / sediment of soils / sediments at The number and significance of Geology, contamination. lands within or in the soil / sediment contamination Sediments, Soils & vicinity of the Master Plan incidents. Land-use (G) area.

G2: Beneficial use of Seek to introduce the dredged materials to Volume of dredge material reuse of dredged support circular reused. materials. economy.

Soils Construction of on-shore developments has the potential to result in contamination of underlying soils. Mitigation measures will be employed during construction works regarding soil protection. These will include, among others, measures related to oil storage / refuelling, soil management and cement handling. Once operational these developments will be serviced by appropriate waste water infrastructure which will ensure soils are not polluted in the medium to long term. Geology, Sediments and Dredging As a Tier 2 Port of National Importance, POW carries out dredging to maintain safe navigation and access to the Port. The current dredging regime at the Port has been undertaken without any adverse impacts on underlying geology as shown in numerous studies completed over the past 20 years, and in the most recent “Natura Impact Statement for the Port of Waterford’s proposed Dredging and Disposal Programme” prepared by Aquafact in November 2017 (Aquafact, 2017). Further, there is the potential for contaminated silts to be present. POW have completed extensive sampling and laboratory analysis of the estuarine sediments, most recently in 2017, to ensure no contamination is present. Sediment testing is undertaken every three years under the guidance of the Marine Institute. In addition, the River Suir runs through an alluvial plain, therefore any material lost through dredging will be replaced within the estuary, albeit in a different location. To ensure no impacts would occur for the areas within the Master Plan that were not dredged before a series of studies will be required to be carried out at a planning level and for a Foreshore License required for additional dredging. Erosion, Sedimentation and Disposal at Sea To ascertain the effects of the Master Plan on erosion and sedimentation in Waterford Harbour, the POW commissioned ABPmer to develop detailed estuary wide numerical hydrodynamic and sediment transport model, which was published in June 2018. (ABPmer, 2018b). This study also covers some aspects of disposal at sea. The report concluded that changes in the dredging regime proposed under the preferred alternative of the Master Plan will have little to no impact on the overall sedimentation process, as the natural rate of sediment accumulation in the Harbour far exceeds the level of recirculation of dredged sediment from the existing disposal site. The model predicted that only very intense storms have the potential to displace disposed sediment back into the estuary north of Duncannon. However, the rate of sediment being displaced from the disposal

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 98 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company site and re-deposited in the Harbour will not increase during prolonged periods of intense storms, as initial storm activity will effectively displace all recently-dredged ‘loose’ sediment at once without giving time for re-accumulation. Under the Master Plan, projects north of Duncannon (along the Cheekpoint Lower Bar), i.e. the training wall and capital dredge, will eliminate the need for maintenance dredging in the area. The river will continue to be marginally erosional, but these projects remain highly beneficial in preventing sedimentation in critical navigation sections of the estuary. Geologically, the River Suir from Cheekpoint to Passage East is heavily constrained by fixed “hard points” - areas of relatively erosion-resistant rock. Therefore, the flow path of the river will not be affected by any Master Plan projects. South of Duncannon, the Master Plan is not expected to have a net positive or negative effect on coastal erosion, and the report states that while a capital dredge and channel deepening in this area present economic advantages to the Port, these channels will not be self- maintaining and will require dredging operations to continue. Quay Development Options As part of quay development options, it is proposed to remove Bingles Rock via dredging. This rock is not of geological interest and it is considered that this removal will not negatively impact the underlying geology. It is also proposed to reclaim ca.6 hectares of River Suir along Belview Quay. This is not expected to result in significant adverse impact on soils or geology but it will however need further detailed assessment at project level stage. Overall it is considered that implementation of the Master Plan is unlikely to result in significant adverse impacts on soil and geology provided best practice guidelines and mitigation measures are followed during construction and operational works. 9.4 Water This Section assesses the potential impacts of the preferred alternative with regards to surface water receptors. Flooding impacts are addressed in detail in the Strategic Flood risk Assessment (SFRA) specialist report. Table 9-5 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for water quality which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process. Table 9-5: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Water Environmental Topic Objectives Targets Indicators

Maintain the status of W1: Prevent the any water bodies deterioration of the status (surface / ground / of water bodies (surface / coastal) and support the WFD water body status as indicated by the EPA. ground / coastal) in line ability of any water body with the objectives of the to maintain or achieve its Water (W) WFD and River Basin WFD status. Management Plan. Status of local Maintain status and Protect the local designated bathing areas prevent the deterioration and shellfish waters. designated bathing areas of water quality the local and shellfish waters. designated bathing areas and in shell fish waters.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 99 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Environmental Topic Objectives Targets Indicators

W2: Minimise the impacts on water resources and No increase in flood risk flood risk and to ensure Flood risk within the at the Port or in the implementation of the Master Plan area. estuary. Flood Directive within the Master Plan.

Suspended sediment W3: Limit the impacts of Maintain suspended concentrations in the the dredging regime in the sediment concentrations estuary during and after long-term. at baseline levels. dredging operations.

The Master Plan has, in the absence of suitable mitigation, the potential to impact water receptors through: • Disturbance of sediment (increased suspended solids or mobilisation of contaminants); • Sewage or other discharges to a surface water or groundwater body; • Unplanned events / discharges of hydrocarbons in or adjacent to a surface water or groundwater body; • In-channel works from the construction of the quay wall and quay extensions; • Shore side works from the construction of new port buildings and facilities (site clearance and road extension works); • Increased likelihood of pollution from unplanned events due to increased Port activity; • Traffic accessing and egressing the Site; and, • Dredging (capital and maintenance).

Dredging may result in localised sediment plumes which releases sediments into the surrounding marine water column. Sediment plumes may result in a variety of effects to water such as: • Increased turbidity - this can result in a decrease in the depth that light is able to penetrate water; and, • Chemical changes - as a result of the sediment plume which can alter the physiological conditions by reducing dissolved oxygen (DO) levels in the water. In terms of the physico-chemical parameters relating to water quality, suspended solids are considered one of the main potential contaminants. Increased suspended solid concentrations could cause aquatic ecological problems which include reducing light penetration for flora growth, adding bacteria to water, clogging fish gills and smothering spawning grounds. However, ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd (ABPmer) conducted a modelling study on the impact of plough dredging at Cheek Point in 2017, in accordance with the terms of POW’s current dredging licence (ABPmer, 2017). A monitoring system was set up before and after dredging works to assess water quality, in particular turbidity32. The modelling study also monitored water quality during dredging works to assess if dredging had any adverse impact on water quality. The results show that there was no perceptible change in the water quality due to dredging.

32 Turbidity is a measure of the degree to which the water loses its transparency due to the presence of suspended particulates.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 100 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Turbidity monitoring was also previously conducted during the dredging period February 2012 and February 2013 (IDS Monitoring Ltd., 2013) and between January and March 2017 (IDS Monitoring Ltd., 2017). The results show that there was no significant change in the turbidity levels at the upstream and downstream monitoring stations during any of the dredging campaigns at Cheek Point. It should be noted that turbidity generated by dredging activity must be measured against naturally occurring turbidity (e.g. storm surges) and background turbidity (e.g. navigation) that occurs in the dredging areas before, during and after dredging. The turbidity results indicate that differences observed during dredging were not greater than periods without dredging and any differences can be attributed to natural processes i.e. strong tidal and fluvial flows. Contaminated sediment also has the potential to impact on water quality. The dredged sediment has been tested as part of the Dumping at Sea licence application and the results indicate that the dredge material is not contaminated. Historically, there is no record of any contamination issues within the estuary sediments. Therefore, there was no potential for water to become contaminated. Chemical and radiological testing was also performed on these sediment samples and no issues were identified. These studies have been reviewed and accepted by the EPA. Sediment testing is undertaken every three years under the guidance of the Marine Institute to ensure the material is not contaminated. Table 9-6 below summarises the potential impacts on water quality for each receptor due to the Master Plan. Table 9-6: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts Receptor Importance Rationale for Importance Potential Impact Summary

Indirect Impacts Luffany_010 Small river with a direct Very High discharge into the Lower Accidental spillage / runoff entering the (River) River Suir SAC (002137). watercourse. Indirect Impacts Luffany_010 Small stream with a direct Very High discharge into the Lower Accidental spillage / runoff entering the (Stream) River Suir SAC (002137). watercourse.

Heavily Modified Water Direct Impacts Body (HMWB). The Lower From construction of the Cheekpoint Lower River Suir SAC (002137) is Bar River Training Wall, Quay wall, Belview Lower Suir Estuary a designated area within Quay and O’Brien Quay extension, land (Little Island - Extremely this water body. Cheekpoint) High reclamation, shore side developments and Designated Shellfish area. dredging (increasing suspended solids). (Transitional) Connected to the River Indirect Impacts Barrow and River Nore SAC (002162). Deterioration of water quality.

The River Barrow and River Nore SAC (002162) is a designated area within this water body. Barrow Suir Nore Direct impacts and Indirect impacts on Extremely Designated Shellfish area. Estuary watercourse are deterioration of water High Connected to the Lower (Transitional) quality. River Suir SAC (002137). Duncannon (PA3_0122) designated bathing waters area. Direct impact Waterford Harbour Waterford Harbour is Very High connected to the River Increase in suspended solids from dredging (Coastal) Barrow and River Nore

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 101 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Receptor Importance Rationale for Importance Potential Impact Summary SAC (002162) and Partly Indirect Impact designated Shellfish area. Deterioration of water quality. Dunmore Strand (PA3_0114) and Counsellors' Strand, Dunmore East (PA3_0115) designated bathing waters areas. This groundwater body is of ‘good’ status. Direct Impact Waterford Medium The groundwater body is Contamination of groundwater body from Groundwater body currently characterised as shore-side construction works and Port being 'reviewed' under the activity. WFD 9.5 Air Quality and Acoustics This Section assesses the potential impacts of the preferred alternative with regards to air quality and the acoustic environment. Table 9-7 sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for Air Quality and Acoustics which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process. Table 9-7: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Air Quality and Acoustics Environmental Objectives Targets Indicators Topic

Maintain a ‘Good’ Status on the The EPA’s Air Quality Index A1: Air Quality: To EPA Air Quality Index for Health. for Health. minimise the impacts Compliance with Air Quality on air quality. Standards as set out in the CAFE Ambient concentrations of Directive. relevant pollutants.

Daytime noise emissions, of Noise levels. Air Quality & Lar,T of 55dB and night-time Acoustics emissions of LAeq,T of 45dB at A2: Acoustics: To sensitive receptors. minimise acoustic

impacts to local Underwater acoustics shall communities and To achieve a ‘Good comply with the Marine aquatic environments. Environmental Status’ (GES) for Strategy Framework the acoustic aquatic environment Directive (2008/56/EC) to from direct and indirect activities ‘not adversely affect the as part of the Master Plan. marine environment’

Air Quality While increases in Port activity and the presence of Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) have the potential to negatively affect the air quality of the area, it is not envisaged that air quality will be significantly impacted by the development of the preferred alternative, as large urban areas with a far greater number of road vehicles and other emission sources are capable of maintaining similarly rated “good” air quality standards. Nonetheless, a traffic impact assessment will need to be undertaken at project level to address the issue of air quality. However, it is important to note that in the absence of the Master Plan, the POW will not develop, resulting in increased road traffic due to transport of goods into southeast from Dublin and Cork, i.e. HGVs will travel longer distance on the roads. This would result in higher impacts

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 102 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company on air quality, than potential impacts to air quality resulting from the implementation of the Master Plan. The International Maritime Organization’s Marpol Annex VI, which comes into effect on 1st January 2020, will limit the sulphur content of ship bunker fuel to a maximum of 0.5%. At present the limit is 3.5% (IMO, 2018). Once implemented, ships docking at the POW will be using be using cleaner fuels such as Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (LSFO) and Liquified Natural Gas (LNG), the latter of which produces 25% less CO2, 100% less SOx and Particulate Matter, and 90% less NOx, when compared with Heavy Fuel Oil, which is currently used by about 80% of global intercontinental marine shipping vessels. Therefore, ships from 2020 onwards operating at the Port will have a significantly reduced impact on air quality. Acoustics Sound pressure within the air (above ground) environment, where it is unwanted, is referred to a ‘noise’ and is pertinent to the human population in the locality. Impacts upon places of rest (bedrooms) at night, or recreation (sitting rooms, gardens, playing fields, golf courses, etc.), places of worship during the day, are of particular interest. The night-time limits are set more stringently than the day to reflect the increased annoyance arising from disturbed sleep and to the documented health impact arising from disturbed sleep from noise. Sound pressure within water (aquatic) environment is referred to as aquatic sound and is pertinent to the marine species, most notably marine mammals. Impacts are rated against the response noted within aquatic populations going from no response to death. The response to aquatic sound is species variable and relative to both the sound pressure exerted and the frequency it is in. Due to the significant differences in the density of air and water, and the propagation of sound waves, it is highly unlikely that sound will transmit with any significance, between the two mediums. Above Ground Noise Construction of the development options listed in the Master Plan, will likely increase noise levels within the area. These works will involve the use of construction plant and equipment. Further, it cannot be discounted that impact noise, such as piling, may be required within the water to develop some of these features. These impacts, however, will be short term / temporary in nature and phasing of the Master Plan development options and integration of the options with existing Port operations is considered beneficial in terms of minimising in-combination impacts associated with noise. Noise arising from the Port construction works will be rated against the impacts listed within BS5228-1 ‘Code of practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sites. Part 1 Noise’ and will be utilised to design and manage a construction programme to ensure noise arising from the works is controlled as far as practicable. Increased Port activity, including increased maritime traffic and dredging operations, anticipated as result of the Master Plan also has the potential to result in increased noise levels. This can be partly mitigated through good site management and adherence to best practice guidelines. Nonetheless the increase in activity within the Port will need to be assessed specifically at a project level stage to see if there will be elevations above typical noise nuisance limits within the locality of Noise Sensitive Receptors (NSRs). Aquatic Noise Where in-water works are necessary, a construction methodology must be developed and the risk assessment completed in accordance with relevant guidance to identify, reduce and manage all such activities. Measures to reduce and control the aquatic sound produced will

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 103 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company be used along with dedicated monitoring of both the sound pressure (aquatic) and animal response. Dredging operations are likely to have a direct impact on the estuarine habitat by bringing anthropogenic noise into sea waters and the relevant marine mammals known to visit these areas. Aquatic sound is unlikely to change significantly in terms of peak noise impact from the preferred Master Plan alternative, though planning applications will need to assess the duration of impact arising from increased occurrence or duration of the impact. It is likely that the aquatic sound attributable to individual vessels will not be significantly different to current vessels, though more vessels will be present within the river and thereby the cumulative duration of the aquatic sound, and thereby impact, will increase. It is likely that such assessments will require long term collaboration between acousticians and ecologists and incorporate both raw acoustic data and observed animal behaviours. 9.6 Climatic Factors This Section assesses the potential impacts of the preferred alternative with regards to climatic factors. Table 9-8 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for Climate Factors which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process. Table 9-8: SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators for Climatic Factors Environmental Objectives Targets Indicators Topic

CF1: To minimise To ensure no increase in GHG greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the carbon Carbon emissions from Port emissions and the footprint, expressed per unit of activities. carbon footprint of the cargo at the Port. Port. Climatic Factors (CF) CF2: Adaptation to the Flood risk associated with No increased risk from climate potential climate climate change within the change induced flooding events. change effects. Master Plan Area.

GHG Emissions The POW has already committed to addressing its carbon footprint by embarking on an energy efficiency programme, which includes the introduction of energy-efficient measures at the POW offices. In 2017, the POW installed rooftop solar panels to reduce emissions and actively records energy performance, which targets areas where efficiency can be improved. In 2018, several electric vehicles were purchased. Planned initiatives include the installation of an energy metering system and the widespread introduction of energy efficient office lighting. Emissions from maritime transport represent 3.3% of total global GHG emissions and are expected to double by 2050 (Lindstad et al., 2012). Under the preferred alternative, expanding the Port to allow for more ships and opening up the Port to larger ships will increase throughput while reducing per unit CO2 emissions. Lindstad et al. (2012) states that larger vessels allow for economies of scale - where the expected increase in throughput through the use of larger ships will far exceed the expected increase in port-related emissions, therefore allowing for emissions reductions of up to 30% per unit of cargo at ports. This will enable the POW to meet future regional export/import demands while concurrently reducing per-unit CO2 emissions at the Port.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 104 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

With an increased throughput of goods to the Port, road transport is also expected to increase from the Port, resulting in higher carbon emissions from road traffic. However, per Kilometre, maritime transport is one of the lowest emitting freight transports at 8.4kg CO2/tonne-km, compared with road transport which is 62kg CO2/tonne-km (ECTA, 2011), so with the increase in efficient sea transport, there will be an overall reduction of carbon emissions. Flood Risk and other Climate Change Adaptation The “Developing Resilience to Climate Change in the Irish Transport Sector” (2017) report highlights the impacts of expected climate change effects on Port activities (refer to Section 6.6). The biggest risk to the POW from climate change is the potential for stronger storms and higher winds, which would most likely occur in conjunction with coastal or fluvial flooding. While the POW must take measures to ensure that Port operations can continue safely and efficiently in the face of climate change, the Port benefits from its estuarine (as opposed to coastal) location. According to Met Eireann, wind speeds dramatically reduce just a few kilometres inland (Met Eireann, 2018), which shelters the Port from the rough waves and high winds associated with the open sea. Additionally, the Port is located away from known flood- risk areas, therefore required mitigation measures will likely be minor. 9.7 Material Assets – Infrastructure, Fisheries, Aquaculture This Section will assess the potential impacts of the preferred alternative with regards to material assets (Infrastructure, Fisheries & Aquaculture). Table 9-9 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for material assets which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process. Table 9-9: SEA Objectives, Target and Indicators for Material Assets

Environmental Topic Objectives Targets Indicators

To support the development of Annual turnover of MA1: To protect the sustainable commercial fisheries and commercial fisheries and fisheries and aquaculture in the area aquaculture. aquaculture within the of the Master Plan. Port. To develop new MA2: To protect existing infrastructure which and develop new New infrastructure at supports sustainable material assets and the Port. Material Assets - development within the infrastructure. Infrastructure, Fisheries & Port. Aquaculture (MA To limit any potential increase in the quantity of waste being directed to landfill from the Port MA3: To reduce waste The amount of waste and increase, wherever generation from Port being directed to landfill, possible, the quantity of related activities. recycled or reused. material for reuse and recycling at the Port, supporting a circular economy.

Transport & Traffic The POW is currently served by the purpose-built N29 Belview Port Road which has the capacity to serve a large volume of traffic. As part of the Master Plan, it is proposed that the last kilometre of the N29 road will be downgraded to allow for access to adjoining lands, and the junction that turns off to the Glanbia facility will be replaced by a roundabout. A new

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 105 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company roundabout will minimise congestion for the vehicles accessing either the Port or the Glanbia facility. The 2017 National Roads Network Indicator (TII, 2017) shows that much of the N29 and N25 roads in the Belview / South Kilkenny area are operating significantly below capacity. Freight movements on these roads equate to less than 2,000 Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGV) per day, significantly lower than primary roads in the Greater Dublin Area and Cork. Traffic at morning rush-hour along these roads is considered ‘free flow’ by TII and increase in traffic as a result of the Master Plan is not expected to significantly alter commute times or cause prolonged congestion. Importation of material to the Site will be carried out on a phased basis. However, construction activities associated with the development options will likely lead to a rise in traffic on the local road network, namely increased HGV movements on the local roads in the area when transporting materials to the Port. Such activities may lead to congestion and delays for construction vehicles (delivering materials) accessing the Port. This is anticipated to have slight significance short-term duration impact on the transport network. However, it is important to note that the Port development through the Master Plan implementation will have overall positive impacts on transport in Ireland. Delivering goods closer to destination via sea should ease congestion on roads throughout Ireland. Moreover, there is a rail link a POW which has a potential to open up the Port for the North-West and Mid-West regions, further decreasing burden on road transport. Water Supply Sources Drinking water is an important resource, the use of which must be carefully managed. The existing potable water supply source for POW is a borehole to the north of the site. Fire-fighting water is stored in a purpose-built tank. An increase in trade at the Port, will lead to an increase in demand for water supplies. Potable water will continue to be supplied to the POW from the existing borehole and reserves will need to be assessed on a project by project basis. If additional need arises that cannot be met by the current well, there are two options: drilling an additional well or connecting POW to the mains. Wastewater / Foul water Wastewater poses a significant threat to drinking water, ecosystems, and aquaculture if not properly treated. The primary risks associated with wastewater at the POW are from potential leaks and spills that may occur prior to treatment, and from flooding, which can overwhelm wastewater sewage systems leading to surface and groundwater pollution. As the Master Plan aims to facilitate increased trade at the Port including onshore development, this will in turn lead to increased levels of wastewater being generated. Foul water from the POW offices and facilities is currently directed to two existing WWTPs on-site, which discharge into the River Suir. POW is continuously working on improving performance of these two WWTPs, however, POW is seeking a connection to the Waterford urban Waste Water Treatment Plant. In order to facilitate future expansion at the Port while maintaining good wastewater treatment standards, the POW will construct an effluent treatment plant on-site or connect to the nearby urban WWTP. This would allow the direct removal of process and foul effluent water to a modern treatment plant which would significantly reduce the likelihood of contamination occurring from wastewater discharges.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 106 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Waste Management The POW Waste Management Plan 2017 ensures the Port is compliant with all relevant legislation. With regards to the Master Plan, waste is expected to be generated from the following sources: • Construction of physical infrastructure; • Additional personnel on-site during construction; • Ship waste, this is waste associated with increased throughput which includes general waste and catering waste; • Port waste, this is the increased waste generated from the onshore POW activities (warehousing, and other facilities); and, • Cargo waste, this is the increased waste accumulating from the loading of the cargo.

Construction works will require large amount of on-site construction materials and adequate space for storage. Poor practice of the storage, handling, transportation and / or disposal of waste materials has the potential to cause pollution to the air, soil, groundwater and / or surface waters. The POW will require an effective mitigation strategy to ensure that proper waste disposal standards continue to be met while construction projects are ongoing. Without proper implementation of waste management plans on-site, the impact is assessed as negative, with a moderate significance and a short-term duration. In addition, an updated Waste Management Plan will be required to address the increasing waste through the new port developments and increased activity, to ensure that future waste and recycling targets are met. Dredging and Disposal Implementation of all Development Options has a potential to result in additional dredge material (waste) during the lifetime of the Master Plan. The existing licenced disposal site is offshore, see Figure 2-1. As with past trends, it is likely the dredged material will be deemed suitable for disposal at sea, however appropriate surveys will be undertaken to assess the quantity and frequency of material, to ensure compliance with the current Dumping at Sea Licence. POW will employ the most appropriate method of dredging, to minimise the potential for environmental impact. Energy It is envisaged that during the lifetime of the Master Plan electricity will continue to be supplied by the existing source, the main ESB grid. Increased energy demand for Port offices and facilities is not expected to be an issue, as the existing infrastructure is capable of supplying abundant energy. It is anticipated that there will be no significant additional impacts to the Port, however this will need to be assessed further at project level. Fisheries and Aquaculture As two major commercial operations in the South-East, the ability of the POW and local fisheries to co-exist is of utmost importance to the economic wellbeing of the region. The “Project Ireland 2040 National Planning Framework” emphasises the importance of “enabling all parts of Ireland to achieve their full potential. Specifically, it seeks to strengthen our rural fabric, by reversing town/village and rural population decline”. To this end, the national planning framework seeks to support the “sustainable growth of rural communities”

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 107 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Given that aquaculture was worth €208 million to coastal and rural economies in 2017 (BIM, 2018), its growth and expansion into the future will be a significant contributor to sustainable rural development and will also promote the leisure and tourism sector in coastal areas. Changes in the Port’s dredging regime present the biggest potential risk to fisheries and aquaculture in the harbour, particularly shellfish, as these organisms reside on the soft sands and muds of the harbour bed. The most significant shellfish beds likely to be affected by the various schemes for potential development are located: • Near the entrance to the River Barrow; • In the intertidal/shallow subtidal around the outside of the bend at Carters Patch; • The southern section of Shelburne Bay; and • The lower intertidal of Woodstown Strand. The Marine Masterplan Option Assessment (ABPmer, 2018) concludes that “[for] the Maximum Development Case (and for its components), the overall effect on the water level, flow and sediment regime of the estuary is shown to be minimal.” While the effects of dredging on other users of the harbour were found to be insignificant, the report stresses the need for further assessment, which will likely be undertaken at project level. 9.8 Cultural Heritage This Section will assess the potential impacts of the preferred alternative with regards to cultural heritage. Table 9-10 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for cultural heritage which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process. Table 9-10: SEA Objectives, Target and Indicators for Cultural Heritage

Environmental Topic Objectives Targets Indicators

CH1: To prevent damage to / loss to heritage features with particular regard to the local maritime heritage. To ensure no significant To support the impacts on known SMR The record of known Cultural Heritage research of or RPS sites. cultural, archaeological, Architectural & underwater To prevent potential underwater artefact or Archaeological (CH) shipwreck finds, and the archaeology in the impact on unknown quality of these objects. Master Plan area. archaeological sites (on- To improve by record shore and underwater). and publication the diverse range of underwater archaeology of the locality.

Archaeological Heritage The registered archaeological monuments will not be directly impacted in the short, medium or long term by the Master Plan. There are five (5 No.) registered monuments located within the Master Plan Boundary. All of these sites are located within the on-shore section of the Master Plan boundary. All on-shore development options will be located a sufficient distance from and will not interfere with these monuments.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 108 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

One of the main estuarine/offshore archaeological sites in the vicinity of the Masterplan is a 16th century fishing weir located along the estuary north of Ballyhack (Reg no.WX044-001001), the ruins of which can still be seen at low tide. The reduction in dredging along this section envisaged by the Master Plan will benefit the preservation of this monument by reducing siltation in the estuary. Architectural Heritage The preferred alternative will have an imperceptible effect on the architectural heritage of the area, as much of the proposed developments are estuarine and offshore. There are two (2. No.) NIAH structures located in close vicinity to the Master Plan boundary. These comprise a tunnel associated with Barrow Bridge (Reg. No. 12404403) and Snowhill House gate lodge (Reg no. 12404404/05) which is situated along an isolated rural road on a hill overlooking the Port from the east. No Master Plan works are proposed to take place in close proximity to these or any other NIAH sites therefore no impacts are considered likely. Marine / Underwater Heritage Given Waterford’s rich naval history, numerous recorded shipwrecks are located along the River Suir estuary, Waterford Harbour and out onto the Celtic Sea shelf. As the informal successor to the Port that has existed in Waterford City for over 1,000 years, the POW is committed to preserving and promoting Waterford as one of Ireland’s foremost maritime cities. The primary threat to the preservation of shipwrecks in the area is dredging. Changes to the dredging regime and channel depths along the main navigation path of the Port could have potential negative consequences for shipwrecks in the area. Under the Master Plan, a reduction in dredging in the upper estuary will prevent potential damage to shipwrecks, both known and currently undiscovered; however, it will also reduce a potential to find currently undiscovered shipwrecks. The proposed training wall along the Cheekpoint Lower Bar will reduce downstream sedimentation and prevent further burial of undiscovered wrecks which could potentially assist future discoveries in the harbour. As has been the case since the discovery of Duncannon Wrecks 1 and 2 during dredging operations in 2002 and 2003, the POW commissions underwater archaeology surveys and consults with the Underwater Archaeology Unit (UAU) prior to any intensification of dredging or following the discovery of underwater artefacts. A 200 m “no-dredge zone” is currently in place along the Creadan Head approach channel. In 2016 discussions between the POW and the NMS regarding the possible alteration of this zone to allow for greater operational flexibility commenced and it was agreed that the POW would commission a detailed geophysical survey of the shipwreck site. The survey was undertaken by Hydromaster Ltd. and was published in November 2016. The report expressed the need for greater clarity surrounding the exclusion zone area, as the POW, NMS and UKNO all have their own separate variations of the exclusion zone, but also concluded that the POW’s no-dredge zone had been noticeably successful in protecting the sites from the impacts of dredging. Increases in both throughput and the number of ships docking at the POW as a result of the Masterplan are not envisaged to have any impacts, positive or negative, on the preservation and research of shipwrecks. 9.9 Landscape and Visual Amenity This Section will assess the potential impacts of the preferred alternative with regards to landscape and visual amenity. Table 9-11 below sets out the SEA objectives, targets and indicators for landscape and visual amenity which have been utilised to develop the baseline and guide the assessment process.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 109 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 9-11: SEA Objectives, Target and Indicators for Landscape and Visual Amenity Environmental Objectives Targets Indicators Topic The number of L1: To avoid adverse receptors affected by impacts to the landscape as significant visual No avoidable significant impacts Landscape & far as possible and where impacts from the on the landscape character and Visual Amenity possible enhance the development of the visual amenity as a result of the (L) landscape character and Master Plan. This Master Plan. visual amenity at and in the includes post vicinity of the Port. development impacts of the Master Plan.

The Port of Waterford comprises estuarine and coastal landscapes in addition to onshore industrialised lands. The development options in the Master Plan largely involve in-estuary works to increase navigational access and safety at the Harbour. These works will not involve the construction of physical infrastructure within the Harbour. Therefore, it is unlikely to have any impact on the landscape character and visual amenity of the area. However, in the medium and long term the greater vessel numbers and the larger sized vessels expected at the Port may cause slight temporary adverse impacts on visual amenity within the area. Onshore developments to cater for the anticipated increased activity at the Port will be confined to lands zoned for PFI (Kilkenny County Council, 2017). These developments will be designed in accordance with best practice guidelines and are considered likely to assimilate into the existing industrial landscape. Therefore, no impacts are considered likely. The proposed training wall development has the potential to negatively impact upon visual amenity in the Harbour, in the short-term during construction and in the long term once the structure is complete. At project level, potential mitigation measures will be investigated. Preliminary photomontages have been prepared and are available with the main Master Plan document. It can be concluded that protected views in the area of the Master Plan (see section 6.9 above) will not be impacted. The most significant visual impact will occur from Cheekpoint; however, the wall will be located between the existing industrial and infrastructural features of Belview port and surrounding industrial facilities to the west, and the railway bridge and power plant to the east. It is considered that the development options regarding quay infrastructure will blend into the surrounding Port landscape and as such no significant adverse impacts are expected. Any development option involving the construction of physical structures with the potential to impact on landscape and / or visual amenity will require a detailed assessment at project level stage. 9.10 Cumulative Effects The Master Plan is proposing to phase potential development options (Refer to Table 2-3) which will limit cumulative effects on receptors in the area. Not only will different development options be phased, but within each option there will be sub-phases, e.g. dredging to increasing depths (7m, 7.5m, 8m) and widening Carter’s Patch to 125m first, then 150m. Further, the Master Plan has taken cognisance of other relevant plans and projects in the area, most notably, at this stage of the assessment, is the Waterford North Quays Planning Scheme. The timing of construction and development works should be planned to avoid any potential for negative cumulative effects or inter-relationships with other schemes, plans or projects, while aiming to optimise any potential positive cumulative effects.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 110 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Overall at this strategic level, the cumulative effects on the environment are not considered to be significant, provided there is good site management and appropriate mitigation measures are adhered to in respect of the individual environmental topics.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 111 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

10.0 MITIGATION AND MONITORING 10.1 Mitigation Mitigation measures have been recommended where potential negative impacts have been identified. These mitigation measures aim to prevent and where this is not possible minimise negative environmental impacts envisaged as a result of implementing the Master Plan. The primary mitigation recommendation is that predicted negative impacts should be considered in more detail at project level stage, when the specifics of the development options will be available. Full details of the proposed construction methodologies will be developed at the design stage and subject to detailed assessment to ensure that impacts can be both avoided or minimised. Table 10-1 outlines specific mitigation measures that will be adopted as part of the Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 112 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 10-1: Mitigation Measures

No. Topic Potential Impact Mitigation

An overall Environmental Management Plan, Dredge Management Plan and Habitat Management Plan will be prepared for the Port in accordance with best practice guidelines. These plans will be agreed with 1 General Negative impacts the environment. the relevant statutory bodies. A Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and comprehensive Working Method Statements (WMS) will be created for the individual projects as required.

Pre-construction surveys will be undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced ecologist for each of the relevant projects. These will confirm the extent and quality of the habitat to be impacted by the various elements of the works. Contact with IFI and the National Parks & Wildlife Service will also be established at the design stage. This information will be used at the project level to inform design / approach to the project to ensure the

impacts can be either minimised or avoided. Impact on European sites, habitats Full details of the proposed construction methodologies will be developed at the design stage and subject and species from construction and 2 Biodiversity to detailed assessment to ensure that impacts can be both avoided and minimised. operational phase. In cases where impacts cannot be avoided, the appropriate statutory bodies will be consulted and Disturbance / displacement to derogation licence acquired, where necessary. species. On-going consultation with the NPWS will be required for the full life cycle of the Master Plan to ensure that the NPWS are fully informed and that the mitigation measures employed remain current / relevant in the context of the impacted Natura 2000 sites and their conservation objectives. Ongoing monitoring, including water quality monitoring during projects that take place either in or adjacent to the estuary. This will help monitor impacts on the environment and aquaculture.

A pre-construction survey to identify any potential invasive species. In order to ensure biosecurity in terms of aquatic invasive species, all works requiring access to the marine environment will be required to prepared method statements detailing their biosecurity protocol in Accidental introduction / spread of 3 Biodiversity relation to use of equipment between different Sites. invasive species. The method statements will be based on the relevant guidance for the works being undertaken. In order to mitigate against the unintentional introduction of invasive species to the Site as part of the works, all shore side developments works will be undertaken in line with best practice.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 113 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

No. Topic Potential Impact Mitigation

Good planning and timing of works, with sensitive construction methods and adherence to best practice construction guidelines including NRA guidelines ‘On Crossing Watercourses, On treatment of Otters’ 4 Biodiversity Impacts to movement / migration. etc., and Eastern Fisheries Board ‘Requirements for the Protection of fisheries habitats during Construction and development works at river sites.’

Dredging regime will employ best-practice measures to minimise the release of suspended particulate matter within the water column by: • Preparation of an Environmental Management System (EMS) which meets the recommendations as outlined in the EC Guidance on the implementation of the EU nature legislation in estuaries and coastal zone (EC, 2011a); • Maintaining a low speed during dredging; • Only utilising water jets when necessary to ensure adequate production and efficient loading; • Minimise the use of overflowing whenever possible to achieve an economic load; and, Potential impacts on habitats as a • Dredging will be undertaken as efficiently as possible so that the number of dredger movements 5 Biodiversity result of disposal of dredged is minimised. material. The disposal regime will employ the following best practice measures: • Maintain an acceptable speed to ensure against losses during transit during inclement weather; • Division of the disposal site into sectors with each used in turn; and, • Maintain a low speed during disposal to disperse material over disposal area. The above measures are standard best practice and serve to minimise impacts on the environment. The POW will be bound by the conditions as set out by the EPA in their Dumping at Sea permit. This will ensure a sustainable maintenance / or capital dredging strategy is adopted. The POW will ensure that all dredging works are optimized in line with the ESPO guidance (ESPO, 2007).

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 114 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

No. Topic Potential Impact Mitigation

Disturbances can be kept to a minimum through effective planning and timing of works in addition to adherence of construction best practice guidelines.

Population & Disturbance to the local Noise-producing activities in sensitive locations should be undertaken in line with the EPA’s Guidance Human Health communities during the Note for Noise in Relation to Scheduled Activities (NG4) and monitoring of these activities should be 6 ongoing. Mitigation measures, such as limited operational hours, will be implemented where necessary. Air Quality & construction of development Acoustics options. Development of Dust and Noise Minimisation Plans as applicable. Continued liaison with local communities is recommended with regard to complaints related to air, noise and vibration emissions resulting from POW construction works.

Disturbance to the local Disturbances can be kept to a minimum through effective planning and good site management practices. Population & 7 communities from Port operations / Human Health Continued liaison with local communities should be undertaken to ensure that concerns raised are Port traffic. addressed.

Contamination of soils and Good construction management and planning will ensure soil and groundwater contamination is kept to groundwater during construction a minimum. Sediments, works from concrete, oil and other Geology, Soils hazards. Preparation of Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, Emergency Response Plans and Accident Prevention Procedures. 8 & Land-use Adherence to best practice measures outlined the above plans and the CEMP. These will include, inter Water Contamination of groundwater alia, pollution prevention and control, sediment management, suitable storage of hazardous materials, (Groundwater) body from construction works and minimising surface water runoff and flow from sites, bunded refuelling areas, exposed soil management pollutants being discharged to soils and dust control. and groundwater.

Appropriate surveys will be undertaken to assess the dredged material and to ensure compliance with Sediments, the current Dumping at Sea Permit. 9 Geology, Soils Disposal of dredged material. & Land-use POW will continue to search for a viable beneficial use of dredged material and minimise the amount of dredging being undertaken wherever possible.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 115 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

No. Topic Potential Impact Mitigation

Good construction management and planning will ensure water quality disturbance to be kept to a minimum. Any potential water quality issues from construction activities should be contained and treated to ensure no impact to the receiving water body.

Deterioration of water quality, Works should adhere to best practice guidelines, such as CIRIA C532 - Control of Water Pollution from 10 Water including accidental spillage / Construction Sites. runoff entering the watercourse. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and CEMP will be prepared prior to works commencing. Effluent will continue to be monitored at the Port. Drainage from bunded and waste storage areas will be treated in onsite WWTP. Project designs should aim to ensure WFD objectives are not compromised.

Dredging and construction will have to be planned appropriately, using Best Available Techniques (BAT) at all times, to ensure water quality issues are kept to a minimum, with no significant adverse effects. Impact on the watercourse from Adherence to Dredge Management Plan which will include a dredge mitigation strategy. 11 Water dredging (increasing suspended The Plan will address the potential effects of an increase in ship movements, sediment resuspension, solids). contaminated sediments, and potential for changes to the hydrodynamic regime. Conditions outlined in the Dumping at Sea Permit for dredging activities to be maintained.

All Master Plan developments will be subject to a detailed FRA at planning stage. Future port development will be designed for flood risk and reducing the risk to Port assets. All facilities will include 12 Water Potential for flood risk. Sustainable Urban Drainage (SuDS) design. Ensure that all sewer and foul water drains are adequately equipped to cope with flood events in order to prevent water contamination.

Good site management. Dust and Particulate Matter 13 Air Quality resulting from construction related Dust Management Measures will be included in CEMP on project basis. activities at the Port. Adherence to best practice dust management measures.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 116 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

No. Topic Potential Impact Mitigation

Air Quality Good management of vessel movements within the Harbour to avoid the adverse effects of emissions Climatic Emissions to air resulting from build-up during periods of high Port activity. 14 Factors increased vessel size and number of vessels operating at the Port. Ensure any new Port equipment purchased in the coming years is energy efficient to reduce operational Material emissions. Assets

Air Quality Climatic Negative effects on air quality from Good planning and traffic management to minimise emissions, especially during peak hours. 15 Factors increased road traffic emissions at Improved fuel efficiency and increased electric and low emission cars on Irish roads over the next two the Port. Material decades. Port will provide charging facilities for electric vehicles. Assets

Increase in the frequency of Ensure all Master Plan developments are designed with predicted climatic change factors in mind i.e. Climatic extreme weather everts, higher 16 greater potential for flooding, increase in water level rises and increase and intensity in rainfall events. Factors rainfall and sea level will affect coastal areas and rivers. All Master Plan developments will be subject to a detailed FRA at planning stage.

Increased transport volumes as a A Traffic Impact Assessment (TTA) will be prepared for specific Master Plan projects that will result in Material result of construction activities and 17 increased traffic. Each planning application for future projects at the port will have to consider traffic Assets increase in cargo volumes to the growth at the time of the application. Port.

Review the current Waste Management Plan to assess how best to accommodate additional predicted Increased waste generated at the waste outputs from the new developments. Port as a result of construction and operational activities. Maintain good-standard of recycling and waste disposal at the Port and ensure adequate waste-reception Material 18 facilities are available. Assets Increased wastewater generation at the Port as a result of Upgrade of the current WWTP facilities at the Port will be assessed further at project level. construction and operational activities. Wastewater discharges will be compliant with requirements of the European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface Water) Regulations 2009.

Material Increased energy demand at the Continue with the energy efficiency programme at the Port. Purchase of electric vehicles for the Port, and 19 Assets POW. provision of charging stations.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 117 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

No. Topic Potential Impact Mitigation

Material Impact to the commercial Assets A sediment transport and coastal process modelling should be undertaken for all marine development 20 fisheries and shellfish to ensure there are no significant impacts on species and habitats during the lifetime of the Master Plan. Population & production sites in the area. Human Health

Increased water usage at the Material POW. Monitoring of water usage and wastewater generated will ensure changes are recorded and suitably 21 Assets Increased wastewater generation managed. at the POW.

Consultation with a qualified archaeologist and further sonar and bathymetry research of the estuary prior to construction, channel widening or changes in dredging. Potential for underwater heritage Cultural sites to be negatively impacted Consultation with the DCHG in advance of works taking place in respect of protected heritage features. 22 Heritage during construction and / or Maintenance of appropriate exclusions zones, the extents of which will be agreed with the DCHG. dredging operations. Where agreed necessary from consultation with the DCHG, dredging operations will be supervised by a qualified archaeologist.

Disturbance to registered Maintenance of a strict buffer around the registered monuments (SMRs). No works will be undertaken Cultural 23 monuments (SMRs) located within within this buffer. Heritage the Master Plan Area. Sensitive construction measures will be employed during all works.

Disturbance to the RPS sites Maintenance of a strict buffer around the Glass House, Mill and Bellevue House. No works will be Cultural 24 located within the Master Plan undertaken within this buffer. Heritage Area. Sensitive construction measures will be employed during all works.

Landscape Construction phase impacts on 25 Good site management and planning. Adherence to best practices measures outlined in the CEMP. and Visual landscape and visual amenity.

Landscape Increased Port activity affecting the 26 and Visual visual amenity of Waterford Good planning and management of vessel movements within the Harbour. Harbour

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 118 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

No. Topic Potential Impact Mitigation

Landscape Physical infrastructure may be 27 and Visual visually intrusion / spoil landscape Where possible, sensitive designed aiming assimilation into the surrounding landscape will be ensured. and views.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 119 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

10.2 Monitoring Article 10 of the SEA Directive requires that the significant environmental effects of the implementation of the Master Plan are monitored in order to identify, at an early stage, unforeseen adverse effects and in order to undertake appropriate remedial action. The environmental monitoring programme outlined in Table 10-2 has been developed based on the SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators presented in Section 3.2.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 120 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Table 10-2: Environmental Monitoring Programme Environmental Responsible Authority and Possible Objectives Targets Indicators Topic Data

B1: Preserve, protect and where To maintain and or enhance Status, condition, area and NPWS – Conservation Action Plans possible enhance, the biodiversity, European sites and species in number of European sites and NPWS – Status of EU Protected Habitats flora and fauna at and in the vicinity accordance with conservation their habitats and species. and Species in Ireland Report (Every 6 of the Port of Waterford in objectives. years) particular designated sites and Biodiversity, Flora & IFI – Fisheries research and monitoring Fauna (B) their qualifying features of interest. Prevent the entry and spread of Presence, absence, location, B2: Prevent the entry of invasive invasive species within Master quantity of invasive species, NBDC – National Invasive Special species to the Master Plan area. Plan area. within Master Plan area. Database

Noise and air quality levels arising from the proposed No negative impacts on the P1: To minimise the impact of the projects (on-shore and health of the local community and workers at POW from the proposed Master Plan projects to offshore) shall not exceed CSO statistics and Census data Population & the local communities and mitigate recommended guideline increased port-related activities. POW monitoring, records and reporting Human Health (P) any potential effect of development values. Local Authorities in order to reduce actual and Direct and indirect employment A long-term increase in perceived environmental effects. created by the delivery of the employment opportunities projects set-out in the Master associated within the Port. Plan.

Erosion rates, and / or no new Protect the coastline from areas of erosions within the further erosion. EPA – CORINE landcover mapping G1: To minimise coastal erosion Master Plan area. Local Authorities – County Development and soil / sediment contamination. Minimise contamination of soils The number and significance of Geology, / sediments at lands within or in Plans, Local Area Plans Sediments, Soils & soil / sediment contamination the vicinity of the Master Plan incidents. Land-use (G) area. G2: Beneficial use of dredged Seek to Introduce the reuse of Volume of dredge material materials to support circular POW monitoring and reporting dredged materials. reused. economy.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 121 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Environmental Responsible Authority and Possible Objectives Targets Indicators Topic Data Not to cause deterioration to the status of any water bodies W1: Prevent the deterioration of (surface / ground / coastal) or WFD water body status as the status of water bodies (surface affect the ability of any water EPA – WFD / RBMP status reporting and indicated by the EPA. / ground / coastal) in line with the body to maintain or achieve its updates objectives of the WFD and River Monitoring of local designated WFD status. POW monitoring and reporting Basin Management Plan. Protect bathing areas. the local designated bathing areas. Maintain and prevent the deterioration to the local Water (W) designated bathing areas. W2: Minimise the impacts on water resources and flood risk and to No increase in flood risk at the Flood risk within the Master Plan ensure implementation of the Port or in the estuary. area. Flood Directive within the Master Limit Suspended Sediment Monitor Suspended Sediment OPW – Flood Risk Management Plans Plan. concentrations above baseline, concentrations in the estuary (Reviewed every 6 years) W3: Limit the impacts of the related to dredging in the long- during and after dredging current dredging regime in the term. operations. long-term. Maintain a ‘Good’ Status on the EPA Air Quality Index for The EPA’s Air Quality Index for EPA – Air Quality in Ireland Report Health. Health A1: Air Quality: To minimise the (Annual) impacts on air quality. Compliance with Air Quality Ambient concentrations of Local Authorities Standards as set out in the relevant pollutants. CAFE Directive. Air Quality & Ensure site specific noise Daytime noise emissions, of Acoustics (A) emissions are compliant with Lar,T of 55dB and night-time the specified indicator levels. emissions of LAeq,T of 45dB at A2: Acoustics: To minimise sensitive receptors acoustic impacts to local To achieve a ‘Good POW monitoring and reporting communities and aquatic Environmental Status (GES) Compliance with the indicators of environments. for the acoustic aquatic the Marine Strategy Framework environment from direct and Directive (2008/56/EC) to ‘not indirect activities as part of the adversely affect the marine Master Plan. environment’

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 122 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Environmental Responsible Authority and Possible Objectives Targets Indicators Topic Data To ensure no increase in GHG Carbon emissions and predicted CF1: To minimise greenhouse gas emissions and the carbon GHG emissions from (GHG) emissions and the carbon footprint from the development POW monitoring and reporting development of the Port or Port footprint of the Port. of the Port, as per unit of cargo Climatic Factors activities. at the Port. (CF) No increased risk from climate Flood risk associated with OPW - Flood Risk Management Plans CF2: Adaptation to the potential change induced flooding climate change within the Master (Reviewed every 6 years) climate change effects. events. Plan area. POW - monitoring and records To support the development of MA1: To protect the commercial sustainable commercial Annual turnover of fisheries and BIM monitoring and reporting fisheries and aquaculture. fisheries and aquaculture aquaculture in the Port. Marine Institute monitoring and reporting within the Port.

MA2: To protect existing and To develop new infrastructure The development of new ESB, Irish Water, EPA, Local Authorities develop new material assets and which supports sustainable Material Assets - infrastructure at the Port. and POW reporting infrastructure. development within the Port. Infrastructure, Fisheries & To limit any potential increase Aquaculture (MA) in the quantity of waste being directed to landfill from the Port The amount of waste being MA3: To reduce waste generation and increase, wherever POW monitoring and reporting directed to landfill and tonnages from Port related activities. possible, the quantity of being recycled or reused. material for reuse and recycling at the Port, supporting a circular economy. CH1: To prevent damage to / loss to heritage features with particular Department of Culture, Heritage and the regard to the local maritime The record of known cultural, Gaeltacht – National Monuments Service Cultural Heritage heritage. To ensure no significant (NMS) and NIAH archaeological, underwater Architectural & impacts on known SMR or RPS CH2: To support the research of artefact or shipwreck finds, and Local Authorities Archaeological (CH) underwater archaeology in the sites. the quality of these objects. POW monitoring and reporting vicinity of the Port.

To improve by record and publication the diverse range of

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 123 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Environmental Responsible Authority and Possible Objectives Targets Indicators Topic Data underwater archaeology of the locality. The number of receptors affected L1: To avoid adverse impacts to No avoidable significant by significant visual impacts from the landscape and where possible Local Authorities – Landscape Character Landscape & Visual impacts on the landscape the development of the Master enhance the landscape character Assessments, County Development Amenity (L) character and visual amenity Plan. This includes post and visual amenity at and in the Plans, Local Area Plans as a result of the Master Plan. development impacts of the vicinity of the Port. Master Plan.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 124 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

11.0 NEXT STEPS The next step in the SEA process will be consultations on the Master Plan, SEA Environmental Report, NIR and SFRA. These documents will be made available for viewing at the Port of Waterford offices in Belview and digitally via the POW website. The consultation period will commence in June 2019 and will run for 8 weeks. All comments and submissions received during the consultation period will be collated and the documents will be reviewed as necessary. Where no major objections or comments are received, the final version of the Master Plan will be adopted. Following publication of the Master Plan, a SEA statement will be prepared to summarise the process and outline how environmental considerations and consultation responses were integrated into the final Master Plan. The proposed timeline for the upcoming processes and dates for implementing the Master Plan is outlined in Table 11-1 below. Table 11-1: Upcoming Events the Master Plan Process

Action Timeline

Master Plan, SEA Environmental Report, NIR & SFRA Public June- July 2019 Consultation Publication of Final Master Plan, SEA Environmental Report, August 2019 NIR & SFRA Public Consultation (revised as required)

Publication of SEA Statement August 2019

Please send all comments on this SEA Environmental Report to Ms. Klara Kovacic as follows:

Post: Ms. Klara Kovacic Malone O’Regan Environmental Ground Floor- Unit 3 Bracken Business Park Bracken Road, Sandyford Dublin 18 D18 V4K6

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 01 567 7655

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 125 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

12.0 REFERENCES ABPmer. (2018). Marine Master Plan Option Assessment Report No.2987. Southampton. ABPmer. (2018a). Marine Master Plan - Options Assessment. ABPmer. (2018b). Final Disposal Site Assessment. Acquafact. (2017). Natura Impact Statement. BirdWatch Ireland. (2018). The Irish Wetland Bird Survey. Retrieved from BirdWatch Ireland: http://www.birdwatchireland.ie Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA). (2001). CIRIA C532 Control of Water Pollution from Construction, Guidance for Consultants and Contractors. CIRIA. CSO. (2016). Census. Central Statistics Office. DECLG. (2012). Spatial Planning and National Roads Guidelines for Planning Authorities. Dublin: Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. DHPLG. (2016). National Marine Planning Framework - Baseline Report. Dublin: Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. DHPLG. (2016). Waterford Harbour Pollution Reduction Programme. Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. DoEHLG. (2009). Appropriate Assessment of Plans and Projects in Ireland, Guidance for Planning Authorities. Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government . DoEHLG. (2009). The Planning System and Flood Risk Managmenet. Dublin: Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Goverment. DTTS. (2013). National Ports Policy. ECTA. (2011). Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 Emission from Freight Transport Operations. London: European Chemical Transport Association. EPA. (2011). Dumping at Sea Application Guidance Note. EPA. (2015). Developing and Assessing Alternatives in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Wexford: Environmental Protection Agency. EPA. (2016). Sixth State of the Environment Report. Wexford: Environmental Protection Agency. EPA. (2017). Catchments. Retrieved from Catchments.ie: https://www.catchments.ie/maps/ EPA. (2018). Bathing Water Quality in Ireland 2017. Wexford: Environmental Protection Agency. EPA. (2018). EPA Catchments. Retrieved from EPA Ireland: https://www.catchments.ie/ EPA. (2018). EPA Map Viewer. Retrieved from EPA Maps: http://gis.epa.ie/Envision EPA. (2018). SEA Pack. Dublin: EPA. European Commission. (2002). Assessment of plans and projects significantly affecting Natura 2000 sites. Methodological guidance on the provisions of articles 6(3) and (4) of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC. Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities . FLAG. (2016). Local Development Strategy . South East: Fisheries Local Action Group.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 126 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report May 2019 Port of Waterford Master Plan Port of Waterford Company

Government of Ireland. (2009). The Planning System and Flood Risk Assessment Guidelines for Planning Authorities. Dublin. Government of Ireland. (2018). Project Ireland 2040 National Planning Framework. Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. GSI. (2018). GSI Spatial Resources (Geological Survey of Ireland). Retrieved April 6, 2018, from https://dcenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=a30af518e87a4c0 ab2fbde2aaac3c228 Kilkenny County Council. (2014). Kilkenny Count Development Plan 2014-2020. Kilkenny: Kilkenny County Council. Kilkenny County Council. (2017). Ferrybank-Belview Local Area Plan . MosArt Architects. (2006). Landscape Charcter Assessment for Waterford. MosArt Architects. National Biodiveristy Data Centre. (2018). National Biodiveristy Live Maps. Retrieved from National Biodiveristy Data Centre: http://maps.biodiversityireland.ie/ National Parks and Wildlife Service. (2018). National Parks and Wildlife Service. Retrieved from National Parks and Wildlife Service: https://www.npws.ie NPWS. (2011). River Barrow and River Nore SAC. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht. NRA. (2004). Guidelines for the Treatment of Noise and Vibration in National Road Schemes 1st Rev. Dublin: National Roads Authority. NRA. (2006). Guidelines for the Treatment of Air Quality During the Planning and Construction of National Road Schemes. Dublin: National Roads Authority. NRA. (2014). Traffic and Transport Assessment Guidelines. Dublin: National Roads Authority. OSPAR Commission. (2003). The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environmnet of the North-East Atlantic. POW. (2016). POW Emergency Management Manual 2016. Waterford: Port of Waterford. POW. (2018a). Corporate Plan 2018-2022. Waterford: Port of Waterford. POW. (2018b). Economic Impact Study of the Belview Industrial Zone. Waterford: Port of Waterford. SFPA. (2018). Mollusc Classified Production Areas . Retrieved from http://www.sfpa.ie/Portals/0/Food%20Safety/Maps/Waterford%20Harbour%20Classifi ed%20Production%20Areas.pdf Wexford County Council. (2013). Landscape Character Assessment . Wexford: Wexford County Council.

E1475 - Malone O’ Regan Environmental 127 APPENDICES APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

Headquarters, PO Box 3000 Johnstown Castle Estate County Wexford, Ireland Ceanncheathrú, Bosca Poist 3000 Eastát Chaisleán Chaile Sheáin Malone O’Regan Environmental Contae Loch Garman, Éire T: +353 53 916 0600 Ground Floor – Unit 3 F: +353 53 916 0699 E: [email protected] Bracken Business Park W: www.epa.ie Bracken Road, Sandyford LoCall: 1890 33 55 99 Dublin 18, D18 V4K6

3rd September 2018 Our Ref: SCP180702.1

Re: SEA Scoping for the Port of Waterford Master Plan

Dear Ms. Kovacic,

I refer to your correspondence, dated 16th July 2018, in relation to the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Scoping for the draft Port of Waterford Master Plan (the Master Plan).

EPA is one of the five environmental authorities specified in the SEA Regulations. In our role as an SEA environmental authority, we focus on promoting full integration of the findings of the SEA into the plan and advocating that the key environmental challenges for Ireland are addressed. As a priority, we focus our efforts on reviewing and commenting on key sector plans.

We note the Master Plan will be a 25-year plan to provide guidance and strategic context for future developments at the Port over the period 2020−2045. We acknowledge the consultation and engagement with the public, key stakeholders and environmental authorities (including EPA) undertaken by Port of Waterford Company during the preparation of the Master Plan and associated environmental assessments. Where future reviews and iterations of the Master Plan are proposed, the requirements for SEA and AA should also be considered.

This submission is intended to strengthen the Master Plan and ensure environmental considerations are fully integrated into its preparation and implementation. Our responses to the consultation questions in the SEA scoping report are provided in Appendix I, focussed on the EPA's remit and areas of expertise. We also include additional information on resources and guidance to assist the SEA and Plan preparation processes, as well as key national and regional plans to consider, as appropriate.

Scoping Process Guidance Guidance on the SEA Scoping Process, including an SEA Pack, Integration Guidance, SEA Checklist, SEA Spatial Information Sources and guidance on Integrating Climate Change into SEA, is available on the EPA website and should be considered in the preparation of the SEA. This can be consulted at the following address: http://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/ea/

1

EPA State of the Environment Report 2016 We published our most recent State of the Environment Report in 2016 ‘Ireland’s Environment – An Assessment (EPA, 2016). The recommendations, key issues and challenges described within this report should be considered, as relevant and appropriate to the Master Plan area in preparing the Draft Plan and associated SEA. This report can be consulted at: http://www.epa.ie/irelandsenvironment/stateoftheenvironmentreport/

SEA WebGIS Search and Reporting Tool The EPA SEA WebGIS Search and Reporting Tool is a GIS based web application that allows users to explore, interrogate and produce an indicative report on key aspects of the environment in specific geographic areas. These reports are indicative and will provide an overview of key aspects of the environment within a specific plan area. This may be used to inform the SEA screening and scoping stages for plans and programmes. It may be accessed via www.edenireland.ie

EPA WFD Application Our WFD Application provides a single point of access to water quality and catchment data from the national WFD monitoring programme. The Application is accessible through EDEN https://wfd.edenireland.ie/ and is available to public agencies. Publicly available data can be accessed via the Catchments.ie website.

EPA AA GeoTool Our AA GeoTool application has been developed in partnership with the NPWS. It allows users to a select a location, specify a search area and gather available information for each European Site within the area. It is available at: http://www.epa.ie/terminalfour/AppropAssess/index.jsp

Other Plans & Programmes In terms of the Policy Context for the Master Plan (Section 2 of SEA Scoping Report), other potentially relevant plans and programmes to consider as appropriate in preparing the Master Plan and SEA include:

National National Planning Framework – Ireland 2040 (Note: reference to National Spatial Strategy should be removed) River Basin Management Plan 2018-2021 National Biodiversity Action Plan 2017-2021 Marine Strategy Framework Directive Programme of Measures National Marine Spatial Plan (in prep) National Mitigation Plan National Adaptation Framework Climate Change Adaptation Plan for the Transport Sector National Policy Framework for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure for Transport National Hazardous Waste Management Plan

2

Regional / County / Local Southern Regional Assembly Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy (in prep) SW CFRAM Flood Risk Management Plan(s) and maps (see www.floodinfo.ie ) Regional Transport Strategy / Metropolitan transport strategy for Waterford Any Regional/Local Climate Adaptation Strategies prepared over the lifetime of the Master Plan (to be considered in future reviews/iterations of the Master Plan) Local Authority Noise Action Plans

Environmental Authorities Under the SEA Regulations, notice should also be given to the following:

 The Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government,  Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment, where it appears to the competent authority that the plan or programme, or modification of the plan or programme, might have significant effects on fisheries or the marine environment,  where it appears to the competent authority that the plan or programme, or modification to a plan or programme, might have significant effects in relation to the architectural or archaeological heritage or to nature conservation, the Minister for Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht.

We will provide further comments upon receipt of the Draft Environmental Report and Master Plan and associated documents during the next statutory consultation phase of the SEA Process.

Should you have any queries or require further information in relation to the above please contact me directly.

I would be grateful if you could send an acknowledgement of receipt of this submission to the following email address: [email protected].

Yours Sincerely,

______Dr Tara Higgins Inspector, SEA Section, Office of Evidence and Assessment

3

Appendix I. EPA Responses to Questions in Scoping Report

1. Are you in agreement with the geographic and temporal scope of the assessment?

The map in Fig. 2.1 of the SEA Scoping Report illustrates the Master Plan Boundary. The dredge spoil disposal site, which is situated within a WFD coastal water body, should be included within the scope of the assessment and accordingly we recommend that the map in Fig. 2.1 is amended to include the offshore disposal site.

Additionally, we recommend describing the predicted zone of influence of the Masterplan, with respect to the environmental assessment being carried out. This zone of influence could be also be illustrated on Figure 2.1.

The inclusion of indicative timescales for the various phases of the Master Plan (Phases 1, 2 and 3) would be helpful.

The proposed approach to considering short, medium and long-term impacts as part of the assessment will assist in the identification of likely significant effects at distinct phases of the Master Plan (short term – more potential impact from construction phase activities, through to long term ongoing maintenance activities). This will allow for consideration of appropriate mitigation (and monitoring) to be put place to address any significant adverse effects identified.

Where feasible, any available mapping of undesignated biodiversity in or adjacent to the Master Plan area should be assessed in the context of both the protection, and the possible enhancement, of ecological networks and connectivity. The inclusions of commitment to preparing such habitat mapping within Master Plan area could be considered.

Section 3.1 states that the nine currently proposed infrastructural development projects will be included in the assessment. The assessment of reasonable alternatives will be a key aspects of the assessment and should include consideration of alternatives in the context of these projects, where feasible – see more detailed comments on alternatives below (response to Question 5).

In relation to dredging and management of dredged material, the various capital projects outlined in the Master Plan will give rise to an increased volume of dredged material in future years. The plans to deal with this material over the lifetime of the Master Plan (either reuse or disposal or a combination of both) should be addressed in the assessment. The Master Plan could include a commitment to prepare a separate Dredge Management Plan for the Port to address the environmental management aspects of the initial capital dredging and spoil disposal/re-use activities and the subsequent long-term maintenance dredging and disposal/re-use activities.

2. Are you in agreement with the scoping of the environmental assessment topics?

While we note that all SEA topics have been scoped in and will be addressed in the assessment, we recommend that the assessment is focussed on and tailored to the issues of most relevance to the Master Plan. Key inter relationship between topics should also addressed in the assessment.

Under ‘Water’, physical modifications and impacts on hydromorphology and seafloor integrity should be included and possible impacts on hydrodynamics, salinity regimes and wave heights should be considered. Also under ‘Water’, the assessment should consider pressures and impacts

4

on both the ecological status and chemical status of water bodies in line with WFD requirements, particularly given the likelihood of increased sediment transport. The impacts of chemicals and priority substances should also be considered. Consideration of potential impacts on WFD objectives will be key aspects of the assessment.

Under ‘Climatic Factors’, there would be merit in considering climate change resilience (i.e. how resilient is the Port to the predicted impacts of climate change and how prepared is it for future decarbonisation of the economy). In terms of climate adaptation and climate resilience, the SFRA should consider the impact of the proposed channel deepening / widening on the implications of sea level rise, extreme weather events including storm surges and the likelihood of flooding both within the Master Plan area and elsewhere.

Also under ‘Climatic Factors’, the reference to flooding should be expanded to include other extreme weather – periods of drought, higher intensity rainfall and associated increased runoff, lightning strikes, freeze-thaw scenarios etc.

Under ‘Material Assets, Infrastructure and Fisheries’, we note that increased vehicular traffic levels resulting from implementation of the Master Plan will be considered. It would be useful to consider preparing a Traffic Management Plan for the Belview Port area as part of the Master Plan (or review any existing ones), to assess the on-going need for upgraded transport infrastructure during the lifetime of the Master Plan. Any such assessment should be reflected in the Master Plan monitoring programme.

With regards to the effects of the Master Plan projects on aquaculture and shellfish beds, potential microbiological impacts should be considered as well as impacts associated with suspended solids.

Also under ‘Material Assets, Infrastructure and Fisheries’, the capacity to provide adequate and appropriate water and wastewater infrastructure, in the context of future development associated with implementing the Master Plan, should be addressed.

3. Have we identified the key environmental issues relevant to the POW Master Plan?

The baseline description (and subsequent assessment) should be focussed on aspects relevant to Master Plan.

The “Proposed scope of Baseline Data”, outlined in Table 4.1, is comprehensive. For each of the SEA topics, the description of the baseline should highlight key environmental issues; for example, in describing water quality, the key pressures and reasons for any water bodies within or adjacent to the Master Plan area failing to achieve good status should be described. Similarly, for European Sites, the conservation status of the qualifying interests (and the reasons for any of these being less than favourable) should be described.

This approach will ensure that the baseline and subsequent assessment is relevant, focused and clearly set within the context of the Master Plan.

We welcome the proposal to present the baseline data via maps, graphs and diagrams with supporting text; this supporting text will be important.

5

A commitment should be included in the Master Plan to prepare an overall Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the Port, addressing the key environmental pressures / sensitivities identified in the SEA and providing appropriate mitigation measures to address these. This overarching EMP would in turn would inform the preparation of individual Construction and Environmental Management Plans for the various projects arising from the Master Plan.

4. Are we proposing the most appropriate data to be used during the assessment?

As stated above, the scope of the baseline data should focus on key environmental issues, therefore the consideration of additional aspects such as “conservation status” for ‘Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna’ and “pressures” for ‘Water Quality’, for example, will be important.

Additional data sources that may be useful to consider include:  Data on seafloor / bathymetry - INFOMAR, Admiralty charts  Land use zonings – MyPlan.ie  Flood risk management plans and maps – floodinfo.ie  Climate Change adaptation – climateireland.ie  Water Quality data – catchments.ie, WFD App on EDEN  Biodiversity, Flora & Fauna - EPA AA GeoTool (https://gis.epa.ie/EPAMaps/AAGeoTool)  EPA SEA Search & Reporting Tool (www.edenireland.ie)  EPA List of SEA Spatial Datasets (http://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/ea/)

5. Are you in agreement with the approach to the SEA?

We note the proposed approach to the SEA will consider positive as well as negative effects. We support this approach in the context of maximising the potential co-benefits of the Plan for the environment, society and the economy.

We note in Section 5.1 - SEA Approach that the NIS and SFRA will contribute to and influence the SEA. The key findings, recommendations and mitigation measures identified in the NIS and SFRA should be reflected in the SEA (and in the Master Plan). Coding or numbering of mitigation measures would be useful, to assist ease of cross-refencing between the different reports.

The assessment of cumulative and in-combination effects should include the various proposed projects within the Master Plan (involving widening /deepening / quay side construction / bank management etc.) and also other relevant plans and programmes within and adjacent to the Master Plan / Waterford Estuary area.

Alternatives The proposed approach to alternatives, outlined in section 5.2 of the Scoping Report, merits further consideration. The EPA guidance document Developing and Assessing Alternatives in Strategic Environmental Assessment (EPA, 2015) should be referred to in preparing and assessing alternative development scenarios. This report is available to download at: http://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/ea/developingandassessingalternativesinsea.html

6

There may be merits in adopting a tiered approach to the assessment of alternatives. At a high / strategic level, the assessment could look at the overall options for the development of the Port in its entirety, in a manner that meets the Master Plan objectives (such as increasing trade, reducing dredging requirements etc.). The Master Plan objectives could be described under different headings, e.g. economic, societal, environmental.

At the next tier, the assessment could be broken down into different categories, for example: - Landward development options - Shoreside development options - In-channel development options - Seaward / marine development options etc.

This assessment should examine that options are available within each of these categories over the lifetime of the Master Plan. When considering the options available, aspects such as spatial locations, timing / phasing, technology etc. should be considered.

The use of maps should be considered, where feasible, to illustrate the alternatives considered.

The alternatives which are brought forward for detailed consideration in the SEA should be those that are fully aligned with and meet the aims of the Master Plan, as opposed to those options which have been ruled out. It would be useful, however, to include a summary of what other options / ‘ghost alternatives’ were considered at earlier stages in the Master Plan development process and the reasons they were eliminated). A systematic approach, with assessment criteria clearly defined, should be used to assess alternatives and explain why options either ‘pass’ or ‘fail’.

The Environmental Report should clearly describe:  how reasonable alternatives were identified,  what the potential environmental impacts of the preferred alternative(s) and other reasonable alternatives are, and  why the preferred alternative(s) was/were chosen.

6. Are you in agreement with the draft SEA objectives, indicators and targets?

Table 5.2 is titled ‘Draft Master Plan Objectives, Indicators and Targets’. It should be clarified that this table relates to the SEA objectives, indicators and targets.

For clarity and to assist in cross-referencing, consider assigning numbers or codes to the SEA objectives (e.g. Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna objectives could be referenced BFF1, BFF2 etc.).

All of the objectives/ targets/ indicators should be contextualised in terms of port and port related activities.

Under ‘Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna’, the objective refers to ‘in the vicinity of the Port of Waterford’; there would be merit in extending this to include the offshore dumping site. Consider amending the wording of the second objective ‘prevent the entry of invasive species to the Master Plan area’ to ‘Prevent, manage and control of Invasive Species within the Master Plan area’.

Under ‘Water’, the objective wording ‘Prevent the deterioration of the status of water bodies….’ could be amended as ‘Protect and where possible improve the status of water bodies ….’

7

Under ‘Geology, Soils & Land-use’, the indicator listed for the objective ‘beneficial use of dredged materials to support circular economy’ is ‘volume of water materials’. A better indicator might be ‘fraction of dredged material re-used’ (versus dumped at sea).

Under ‘Geology, Soils & Land-use’, there would be merit in including an objective relating to minimising impacts on seafloor integrity (physical loss and damage).

Under ‘Climatic Factors’, consider amending the indicator to cover wider climate change resilience (not just flooding), such as storms, prolonged drought, cold snaps and freeze-thaw scenarios, erosion, and associated impacts on port infrastructure and operations. There may be merit in considering including a commitment in the Master Plan to preparing a climate adaption plan for the Port.

7. Are you in agreement with the list of proposed consultees for the SEA Process?

We note the comprehensive list of consultees set out in Section 6 of the Scoping Report. There would be merits in including the following in the list of consultees:  Heritage Council  Failte Ireland  Any relevant aquaculture industry representative bodies  Local Authority Waters and Communities Office  Local Authority Waters Support and Advice Team  Regional Climate Change Office.

8

Our Ref: FP2018/077

13 September 2018

Klara Kovacic Malone O’Regan Environmental Ground Floor – Unit 3 Bracken Business Park Bracken Road Sandyford Dublin 18 D18 V4K6

Via email to [email protected]

Re: Port of Waterford Master Plan

A chara

On behalf of the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, I refer to correspondence received in relation to the above.

Outlined below are heritage-related observations/recommendations of the Department under the stated heading(s).

Archaeology The Department notes the documentation submitted as SEA Scoping and the intention to include Cultural Heritage, including Coastal, Intertidal and Underwater Archaeology. The proposed Plan includes a range of both onshore and marine based projects to address the following potential projects:  Cheekpoint Lower Bar training  Quay wall continuity  Belview Quay Extension  Turning Basin Development  Carter Patch Channel Widening  Approach Channel Deepening  Shore Side Development including roads and services  O’Brien Quay Extension  Berth Deepening at the Container Terminal.

Aonad na nIarratas ar Fhorbairt, Bóthar an Bhaile Nua, Loch Garman, Y35 AP90 Development Applications Unit, Newtown Road, Wexford, Y35 AP90 [email protected] www.chg.gov.ie

While the nature of the scoping provides general, minimal detail at this point, these potential projects as well as any scheduled capital and/or ongoing maintenance dredging works within the harbour area has the potential to impact known and previously unknown coastal and underwater cultural heritage. It is noted, however, that one of the goals is to reduce dredging requirements over the period of the Plan. The proposed screening process seeks to address Underwater Cultural Heritage as part of the SEA and subsequent inclusion in the Master Plan. As part of this it is intended to consult with available relevant sources, such as the Wreck Inventory Database of Ireland, etc. This is to be welcomed but the scope of consultation of relevant sources requires expansion.

Underwater Archaeology Recommendations: More detailed archaeological assessment is required to inform fully the SEA and Master Plan. This should take the following format:  Engagement of a suitably qualified and suitably experienced archaeologist to carry out the Underwater Archaeological Impact Assessment (UAIA) section of the report.  The archaeologist should have a track record in the undertaking of such detailed assessment with regard to underwater archaeology and should ideally be experienced in underwater archaeology.  The UAIA shall consult with all available sources, including those listed in the Scoping Document but also local historical and cartographic sources, Topographical Files of the National Museum of Ireland, local Museum collections, previous archaeological work carried out within the Waterford Harbour area and this should include all archaeological results from assessments, excavation and monitoring of works for Port of Waterford. Significant underwater archaeology (both shipwrecks sites and artefactual material) has been discovered over the course of the last 20 years during dredging operations, and these should be considered in any UAIA to inform the SEA and final Master Plan.  Ideally in the coastal areas that may be the subject of works (i.e. from the list above), an archaeological field assessment and intertidal assessment should be carried out to inform on previously unrecorded archaeology in tandem with consulting the Record of Monuments and Places held by the National Monuments Service. However, it is acknowledged that this element of archaeological assessment can also await the planning process should these proposed works come to fruition.

The Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht would request that when further documentation is generated to support the Port of Waterford Masterplan that these should be circulated to the Development Applications Unit once available.

….. 2

Nature Conservation The Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht would note that the conclusions indicated by the screening for Natura Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment are supported by the available information. Further documentation generated to support the Port of Waterford Masterplan should be circulated to the Development Applications Unit once available.

You are requested to send further communications to this Department’s Development Applications Unit (DAU) via email to [email protected]; if emailing is not possible, correspondence may alternatively be sent to:

The Manager Development Applications Unit (DAU) Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht Newtown Road Wexford Y35 AP90

Is mise, le meas

Yvonne Nolan

….. 3

Malone O’Regan Environmental Ground Floor – Unit 3 Bracken Business Park Bracken Road, Sandyford Dublin 18 D18V4K6

14th September 2018

Dear Ms Kovacic

Re: Strategic Environmental Assessment of a 25 year Master Plan for Port of Waterford.

Thank you for your invitation to participate in the scoping consultation for the Port of Waterford 25 year Masterplan. BIM, Ireland’s Seafood development Agency wish to use this opportunity to ensure that the current and future needs and concerns of the seafood sector are appropriately considered within the Assessment.

The Scoping questions are answered on a separate appended document. Additional comments are provided below:

The overall objective of reducing dredging which increasing trade is welcomed. Reductions in dredging are considered beneficial to water quality which in turn is vital for the safety and quality of seafood product from the area.

We suggest that the following Plans, Programmes and Legislation are included in Table 2-1 and again referred to as part of the Baseline data collection:

National

 Foodwise 2025 as a relevant National Plan  European Maritime & Fisheries Fund Operational Programme 2014 – 2020. The Operational Programme (OP) supported by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) in Ireland aims at achieving key national development priorities along with the EU's "Europe 2020" objectives. The OP will support the general reform of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the development of its Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) in Ireland

Regional

 Appropriate Assessment for aquaculture activities in the River Barrow and River Nore SAC is consulted:

https://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/seafood/aquacultureforeshoremanagement/a quaculturelicensing/appropriateassessments/RiverBarrowNoreSAC310317.pdf  Appropriate Assessment of Clam Fishing – Barrow & Nore SAC/Waterford Estuary: http://fishingnet.ie/sea- fisheriesinnaturaareas/concludedassessments/barrownorewaterfordestuary-clamfishery- sac/#d.en.72196  FLAG South East Local Development Strategy as a relevant Regional Plan

Yours Sincerely

Gráinne Devine Environmental Officer

Q1 Are you in agreement with the geographic and temporal scope of the assessment?

Yes we agree with the geographic and temporal scope. However,

Q2 Are you in agreement with the scoping of the Environmental Assessment topics?

We agree with the scoping conclusion for each environment topic. However we suggest that the environmental considerations are expanded in relation to seafood. Suggestions include inclusion of seafood interests across additional environmental aspects not just material assets. Biodiversity Flora and Fauna and Water Quality are also intrinsically important for the sector.

Table 3.3

 Biodiversity Flora and Fauna – effects on stocks of commercial species including clams and cockles.  Population and Human Health – this should not be limited to economic impact on seafood sector but should also include social and environmental impacts.  Water – Impact on Classified Bivalve Mollusc Production areas as a result of works carried out and ongoing maintenance

Q3. Have we identified the key environmental issues relevant to the POW masterplan

We do not consider that the scope of the assessment should be limited to the proposed developments of physical infrastructure. These in turn will be subject to planning permission and as appropriate EIA. The SEA process presents an opportunity for the port of Waterford to assess the wider environmental impacts of how it is managed, operates and the general direction of its management over the period of the plan. Similarly the alternatives considered relate only to proposals for the development of physical structure. It would be good if the scope of the SEA was expanded to examine the role of the POW in the context of Marine Spatial Planning and opportunities for integration and alignment with other sectors beyond tourism, such as the seafood sector.

Q4 Are we proposing the most appropriate data to be used during the assessment?

Additional data sources are suggest below:

Table 4-1 baseline data

 Biodiversity Flora and Fauna – refer to AA completed for aquaculture and for Clam fishery in River Barrow and Nore SAC/ Waterford Estuary – DAFM  Population & Human Health – Classified Bivalve Mollusc Production area status – FSAI

 BIM can provide relevant seafood production data on request.

Q5 Are you in agreement with the approach to the SEA

As per question 3 we believe that the scope should not be limited to the proposed physical developments. We agree with the methodological approach to the SEA.

Q6 Are you in agreement with the draft SEA Objectives, Targets and Indicators?

Yes we agree. Some additional considerations are suggested below:

Table 5.2

 Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna Expand to include status of wild harvestable stocks – Cockles, Razor Clam Invasive species should not be limited to prevention but also include control and eradication.  Population & Human Health Expand to include potential impacts on quality and safety of seafood products  Water - Expand to include the quality of shellfish waters  Material Assets – include production tonnage alongside annual turnover to provide a more reliable metric.

Q7 Are you in agreement with the list of proposed consultees for the SEA process.

Individual Fishing and Aquaculture businesses should be contacted when the environmental report is issued for public consultation. They have valuable knowledge of local environmental conditions and changes that have been experienced to date.

Q8 –Q10 Duplication of earlier questions APPENDIX C Appendix C: Relevant Legislation, Plans and Programmes

Identified Legislation Plans and Programmes Summary of Legislation Plans and Programmes Relevance to the Master Plan

European Policy / Guidance * EU Directive and transposing Irish legislation This EU Directive replaces the Air Framework Directive and the first three daughter directives. The Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe Sets targets for the following air pollutants: (CAFE) Directive (2008/50/EC) • Sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter (PM10 The Master Plan will aim to achieve the air quality standards set out in this

and PM2.5) and lead Directive. * Air Quality Standards Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 180 of • Carbon monoxide and benzene 2011) • Ozone • Arsenic, Cadmium, Nickel and Benzo(a)pyrene

The EU Bathing Water Directive objective is the protection of public health whilst bathing. The revised Directive imposes stricter standards for water quality and the implementation of a new Bathing Water Directive [2006/7/EC] method of assessment. The Master Plan will consider the contribution that measures by the Plan could make towards the attainment of bathing water quality standards. The way in which water quality is measured, focusing on fewer microbiological indicators, and * Bathing Water Quality (Amendment) Coastal outfalls, discharges and flooding events can be linked with bathing setting different standards for inland and coastal bathing sites. Regulations 2008 (S.I. No. 79/2008) (as amended) water pollution. The Directive reduces the health risks linked to bathing by setting scientifically based minimum water quality.

Birds Directive [2009/147/EC] The Master Plan will ensure that all European Sites are suitably protected from loss or damage. * European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) The EU Birds Directive requires all EU Member States to take measures to protect all wild birds Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 477 of 2011) and and their habitats. The Birds Directive aims to protect all of the 500 wild bird species naturally Development options / projects are expected to require a screening for occurring in the European Union. Appropriate Assessment (AA), following which there may be requirement for * European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) a Natura Impact Statement (NIS) to ensure there are no adverse effects (Amendment) Regulations 2015 (S.I. No. 355 of 2015) SPAs and SACs.

The EU Environmental Liability Directive establishes a framework for environmental liability Environmental Liability Directive [2004/35/EC] based on the ‘polluter-pays' principle, to prevent and remedy environmental damage. The Master Plan will comply with all of the Directives requirements, which are * European Communities (Environmental Liability) to prevent and remedy any water damage, land damage and damage to The Directive make the polluter financially liable and allow the competent authority to initiate cost Regulations 2008 [S.I. No. 547/2008] natural habitats and protected species. recovery proceedings where appropriate.

The EU Environmental Noise Directive establishes the assessment and management of Environmental Noise Directive [2002/49/EC] environmental noise. The Directive focuses on (a) the determination of exposure to The Master Plan will consider the Port’s current and future contribution to environmental noise, (b) ensuring that information on environmental noise and its effects is made * Environmental Noise Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 140 of environmental noise to the area. 2006) available to the public and (c) preventing and reducing environmental noise where necessary and preserving environmental noise quality where it is good.

Environmental Quality Standards Directive [2008/105/EC] * European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface The Environmental Quality Standards Directive establishes environmental quality standards The Master Plan will consider the impact of the Port’s potential development Waters) Regulations 2009 (S.I. No. 272 of 2009) and (EQS) for priority substances and certain other pollutants as provided for in Article 16 of the options and its future operations, as they have the potential to be linked to Water Framework Directive (WFD). water pollution. * European Communities (Water Policy) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 722 of 2003)

The Operational Programme (OP) supported by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) in Ireland aims at achieving key national development priorities along with the EU's The Master Plan will have regard for this programme and in particular the European Maritime & Fisheries Fund Operation "Europe 2020" objectives. The OP strategy is designed around the Irish national priorities in the potential impact of the Master Plan on the competitiveness of local fishing Programme 2014-2020 for Ireland agri-food sector and funding aims at increasing the competitiveness of the fisheries and and aquaculture. aquaculture sectors. Identified Legislation Plans and Programmes Summary of Legislation Plans and Programmes Relevance to the Master Plan

Floods Directive [2007/60/EC] * European Communities (Assessment and Management of The EU Floods Directive requires all EU Member States to assess if all watercourses and The Master Plan will consider the implications of flood risk arising from the Flood Risks) Regulations 2010. (S.I. No. 122 of 2010) and coastlines are at risk from flooding, to map the flood extent and assets and humans at risk in potential development options, as the Port is the vicinity of a number of major these areas and to take adequate and coordinated measures to reduce this flood risk. rivers (River Suir and the River Barrow). * European Union (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Flood Risk) Regulations 2012 (S.I. No. 470/2012)

Shellfish Directive (2006/ 113 / EC) * European Communities (Quality of Shellfish Waters) The EU Shellfish Directive details the quality required of shellfish waters in order to protect The Master Plan will have regard for this Directive in order to minimise Regulations 2006 (SI 268/2006) (as amended) and shellfish. The Directive sets physical, chemical and microbiological requirements that designated adverse impacts on water quality and shellfish life. shellfish waters must either comply with or endeavour to improve. * requirement of Shellfish Waters Directive 2009 (SI 55/2009) and (SI 464/2009) for designated shellfish waters

Habitats Directive [92/43/EEC] The Master Plan will ensure that all European Sites are suitably protected from loss or damage. * European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) The EU Habitats Directive requires all EU Member States to ensure the conservation of a wide Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 477 of 2011) and range of rare, threatened or endemic animal and plant species. Within this Directive, some 200 Any potential development options will require a screening for Appropriate rare and characteristic habitats types are also targeted for conservation in their own right. Assessment (AA), following which there may be the requirement for a Natura * European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Impact Statement (NIS) to ensure that any options proposed do not adversely (Amendment) Regulations 2015 (S.I. No. 355 of 2015) affect SPAs and SACs.

Marine Strategy Framework Directive [2008/56/EC] The EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive aims to prevent and reduce impacts to the marine The Master Plan will have implications on the environmental status of marine environment. The Directive establishes a framework where the necessary measures are taken * European Communities (Marine Strategy Framework) waters. Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 249 of 2011) to achieve or maintain a good environmental status in the marine environment by the year 2020.

Maritime Spatial Planning [2014/89/EU] The EU Maritime Spatial Planning Directive requires all EU Member States to draw up a Marine The Master Plan will regard to its implications for the Marine Spatial Planning Spatial Plan that should map existing human activities in their marine waters and identify their * European Union (Framework for Maritime Spatial Planning) in Ireland. Regulations 2016 (S.I. No. 352 of 2016) most

SEA Directive [2001/42/EC] * European Communities (Environmental Assessment of Certain Plans and Programmes) Regulations 2004 (S.I. No. The EU Directive on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the The Master Plan will have regard to the SEA Regulations. SEA means that 435 of 2004) as amended and Environment (the SEA Directive) established the requirement for SEA as part of high level plans and programmes must be assessed for their environmental effect decision-making process and the development of plans and programmes. before they are adopted. * European Communities (Environmental Assessment of Certain Plans and Programmes) (Amendment) Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 200 of 2011) as amended

This climate and energy programme is a set of binding legislation which aims to ensure that EU Member States meet the ambitious climate and energy targets for 2020. These targets, known Second European Climate Change Programme The Master Plan will aim to contribute towards climate change mitigation. as the "20-20-20" targets. POW has an obligation to limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through [ECCP II] 2005 The objective of this programme seeks to develop the necessary elements of a strategy to management and mitigation measures. implement the Kyoto Protocol.

The EU Waste Framework Directive sets out concepts and definitions related to waste Waste Framework Directive [2008/98/EC] management, including the definition of waste, recycling, recovery. The Master Plan will consider the implications of this Directive with any * Environmental Protection Agency (Industrial Emissions) The Directive requires that waste is managed without endangering human health, without potential development options which are likely to result in waste being (Licensing) Regulations 2013 S.I. 137 of 2013 Waste harming the environment and managed without harming water, air, soil, plants or animals. generated. Management Act 1996 and 2001 Waste should not cause a nuisance through noise or odours or places of special interest.

The EU Water Framework Directive requires all EU Member States to protect and improve water The Master Plan will consider the requirements of the WFD to ensure it does Water Framework Directive [2000/60/EC] quality in all waters so that we achieve good ecological status by 2015 or, at the latest, by 2027. not compromise its objectives, and that it contributes to achieving its aims. It applies to rivers, lakes, groundwater, and transitional coastal waters. The Directive requires Identified Legislation Plans and Programmes Summary of Legislation Plans and Programmes Relevance to the Master Plan

* European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface that management plans be prepared on a river basin basis and specifies a structured method for The Master Plan will promote the sustainable management of the water Waters) Regulations 2009 (S.I. No. 272 of 2009) and developing these plans. environment by carefully considering current land uses and future climate scenarios, to facilitate long-term improvements to water quality, including * European Communities (Water Policy) Regulations 2003 protecting groundwater. (S.I. No. 722 of 2003) * European Communities (Groundwater) Regulations 2010 (S.I. No. 9 of 2010)

The EU EIA Directive (2014/52/EU) amends the previous EIA Directive (2011/92/EU) on the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (EIA) assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. The Master Plan and accompanying Strategic Environmental Assessment (2014/52/EU) It introduces changes in EIA requirements across the EU such as the introduction of mandatory (SEA) will take cognisance of this directive. ‘Competent Experts’, changes to screening procedures, and mandatory post-EIA monitoring.

The EU Strategy aims to halt the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the EU and help The Master Plan aims to preserve, protect and where possible enhance, the EU Biodiversity Strategy stop global biodiversity loss by 2020. It reflects the commitments taken by the EU in 2010, within biodiversity, flora and fauna at and in the vicinity of the Port of Waterford in the international Convention on Biological Diversity. particular designated sites and their qualifying features of interest.

National Level

Adaption Planning, Developing Resilience to Climate The objective of this strategy is to identify options for transport infrastructure and services that The Master Plan will refer to this strategy, particularly the adaption measures Change in the Irish Transport Sector will help to build resilience against the impacts of climate change. and impacts.

The Master Plan will consider architectural heritage sites to ensure they are Architectural Heritage Protection – Guidelines for The guidelines set out measures for planning authorities to abide by in order to protect the protected from loss or damage resulting from the potential development Planning Authorities architectural heritage within Ireland. options of the Port.

The NAF sets a national strategy to reduce the negative effects of climate change and to avail The POW Master Plan will consider the objectives of the NAF, as POW has National Adaptation Framework (NAF) of positive impacts. The NAF was developed under the Climate Action and Low Carbon an obligation to limit GHG emissions through management and mitigation Development Act 2015. measures.

The NBP sets out a national strategy for the maintenance and enhancement of biological The Master Plan will look for opportunities to conserve, and where possible National Biodiversity Plan (NBP) 2017-2021 diversity and to raise awareness about the link between plans / programmes and biodiversity restore, biodiversity in line with local biodiversity plans. impacts.

The NPF provides a framework for future development and investment in Ireland. The NPF The Master Plan will consider land-use and changes to land-use arising from National Planning Framework (NPF): Ireland 2040 Our provides a long-term view to public policy and investment, and aims to coordinate sectoral areas potential development options in its plan and should aim to limit over Plan such as housing, jobs, transport, education, health, environment, energy and communications, development and sprawl. into an overall coherent strategy.

The Master Plan will consider the implication of this plan during the National Hazardous Waste Management Plan 2014-2020 This plan sets priorities to be pursued to improve the management of hazardous waste. construction of developmental infrastructure options which are likely to generate waste along operational waste.

The RBMP sets out a framework for the protection of water bodies within the River Basin Districts The Master Plan will promote the sustainable management of water through (RBDs). The RBMP aims to improve water quality within inland surface waters (rivers and lakes), the carefully consideration of current land-use, future climate scenarios and River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) 2018-2021 transitional waters coastal waters and groundwater and meet the environmental objectives minimise the effects of flooding and drought events to facilitate long-term outlined in Article 4 of the WFD. The plan aims to achieve these objectives by 2021. improvements in water quality, including the protection of groundwater.

European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) This regulation transposes the EU Habitats Directive and EU Birds Directive into Irish law. All The Master Plan will ensure the protection of European Sites. Regulation 2011 to 2015 Natura 2000 sites in Ireland are given legal protection.

The Environmental Noise Regulations 2006 give effect to EU Directive 2002/49/EC on the The Master Plan will consider the Ports current and future contribution to Environmental Noise Regulation (S.I. No. 140 of 2006) assessment and management of environmental noise. environmental noise to the area. Identified Legislation Plans and Programmes Summary of Legislation Plans and Programmes Relevance to the Master Plan

This order enforces the protection of rare and endangered plants which is derived from Section The Master Plan will ensure the protection of the species listed in this order. 21 of the Wildlife Act. The objectives include it being illegal to alter, damage or interfere in any Flora (Protection) Order, 2015, S.I. No. 356 of 2015 It is an offence to alter or damage the habitats or plants listed here and this way with the named flora species or their habitats. This protection also applies wherever the is not confined to designated sites. plants are found and is not confined to sites designated for nature conservation.

Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI) replaced the Fisheries Boards following the Inland Fisheries Act (2010). The Act ensures the suitability of fish habitats, including taking consideration of the The Master Plan will consider any potential impacts on fisheries resources Fisheries Acts 1959 to 2007 (S.I. No. 14 of 1959 and No. conservation of biodiversity in water ecosystems. from the development or operation of the Port. The Master Plan should 17 of 2007) The Act provides efficient and effective management, conservation, protection, development and identify measures to minimise any significant adverse impacts. improvement of fisheries, hatcheries and fish farms. The Act also requires those involved in aquaculture to obtain a licence.

Food Wise 2025 sets out a ten year plan for the agri-food sector. It underlines the sector’s unique The Master Plan will have regard to this plan in relation to the aquaculture Food Wise 2025 and special position within the Irish economy, and it illustrates the potential which exists for this sector. sector to grow even further.

The Plan aims to build on Ireland’s maritime heritage and increase engagement with the sea. Harnessing Our Ocean Wealth: An Integrated Marine The Master Plan will consider this plan as it will contribute towards its The three high level goals of this plan are: (a) a thriving maritime economy, (b) healthy Plan for Ireland objectives. ecosystems and (c) engagement with the sea.

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive requires all EU Member States to take cost-effective measures to achieve or maintain Good Environmental Status (GES) by 2020. The Master Plan will consider the implications on the environmental status of Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Programme of marine waters and should therefore consider the PoMs to ensure that it does Measures (PoMs) The aim of the PoMs is to put in place actions and measures which will support the meeting of the environmental targets set out under Article 10 of the MSF Directive, leading to the not have a negative effect on the environmental status of the marine waters. achievement (or maintenance) of GES.

The Plan outlines stipulations for proper planning, conservation and management of national heritage for all plans / programmes. The Master Plan will consider sites of archaeological, architectural, cultural National Heritage Plan 2002-2007 and natural heritage and ensure they are protected from loss or damage The Plan aims to set out a clear and coherent strategy and framework for the protection and resulting from the potential development options. enhancement of Ireland’s heritage.

The National Landscape Strategy provides a framework for the protection of the cultural, social, The Master Plan will protect all cultural, social, economic and environmental National Landscape Strategy for Ireland 2015-2025 economic and environmental values embedded in the landscape. values embedded in the landscape.

The National Mitigation Plan identifies steps to transition Ireland to a low carbon, climate resilient The Master Plan will consider this plan and should remain conscientious of National Mitigation Plan (for Climate Change) 2017 and environmentally sustainable economy by 2050. the need to limit CO2 emission through its potential development options.

National Monuments Act (1930 to 2004) The National Monuments Act ensures the identification, protection, conservation, presentation The Master Plan will consider sites of archaeological, architectural, cultural and transmission to future generations of cultural and natural heritage. The Act ensures that and natural heritage and ensure they are protected from loss or damage (S.I. No. 2 of 1930 & No. 22 of 2004) effective and active measures are taken to meet these objectives. resulting from potential development options.

National Policy Framework on Alternative Fuels The aim of this policy is to establish a long-term framework to guide technological development The Master Plan will consider this policy and should remain conscientious of Infrastructure for Transport in Ireland – 2017 to 2030 and investment in the deployment of alternative fuels. the need to limit CO2 emission through the deployment of alternative fuels.

The objective of the National Ports Policy is to facilitate a competitive and effective market for The Master Plan will review and consider the aims of this policy to ensure the National Ports Policy 2013 maritime transport services. continued sustainable development of the ports sector in Ireland.

National Strategic Plan for Sustainable Aquaculture The National Strategic Plan for Sustainable Aquaculture Development aims to develop a The Master Plan will consider this plan to help sustain and grow the Development sustainable and competitive aquaculture sector. production of aquaculture.

The Master Plan will have regard to this strategy and contribute towards the The NSS aims to achieve a balance between the social, economic, physical development and achievement of its objectives. This is a 20-year framework for Ireland that National Spatial Strategy (NSS) for Ireland 2002-2020 population growth between regions. aims to achieve a balance between the social, economic and physical development, through more effective and integrated planning. Identified Legislation Plans and Programmes Summary of Legislation Plans and Programmes Relevance to the Master Plan

The Master Plan will have regard to this strategy and understand that air Proposed National Clean Air Strategy The Proposed National Clean Air Strategy aims to promote clean air policies to enhance and quality will be a major part of the decision making and planning process protect the quality of the air we breathe. (under consultation) throughout the development of the Master Plan.

The Dumping at Sea Act restriction the dumping at sea of vessels, aircraft, substances and The Master Plan will consider this act to ensure that all potential development Dumping at Sea Act 1996 (as amended) material. options comply with this act.

These acts provide the principal national legislation for the protection of wildlife and the control Wildlife Acts 1976 (as amended) The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. of some activities that may result in adverse impacts on wildlife.

The NDP will drive Ireland’s long term economic, environmental and social progress across all National Development Plan (NDP) 2018-2027 parts of the country over the next 10 years. The plan is fully integrated with the new approach The Master Plan will have regard for local and regional economic plans. to spatial planning in Ireland in the National Planning Framework.

Regional / Local Policy

The Master Plan will have regard to this plan and will contribute towards the County Wexford Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) 2013-2018 Wexford BAP aims to conserve biodiversity within the County. achievement of its objectives. The overall aim of this plan is the conservation of biodiversity within the County.

The Ferrybank-Belview LAP outlines a strategy for the proper planning and sustainable Ferrybank-Belview Local Area Plan (LAP) 2009-2020 development of an area of land stretching from Grannagh to Belview and from the River Suir to The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. the line of the Waterford bypass.

This strategy outlines the development needs, objectives and action plan for the south east FLAG South East Local Development Strategy 2016 The Master Plan will have regard for this strategy. area with regard to fisheries and aquaculture.

The Master Plan will consider the contribution that potential development The Kilkenny Noise Action Plan aims to avoid, prevent and reduce, where necessary, on a options make towards the management of environmental noise including Kilkenny Noise Action Plan 2014-2018 prioritised basis the harmful effects, including annoyance, from long-term exposure to traffic and ship cargo noise reduction, prevention measures and protecting environmental noise from road traffic and rail etc. quite areas.

This plan sets out policies and objectives for planning and sustainable development of the New New Ross Town & Environs Development Plan 2011-2017 Ross Town and Environs area. The Plan aims to develop and improve in a sustainable manner The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. (as extended) the social, economic, environmental and cultural aspect of the area.

The South-East Region includes Waterford City and counties Carlow, Kilkenny, South Tipperary, Waterford and Wexford. Regional Planning Guidelines for the South-East Region These Guidelines take account of the key issues affecting the development of this region, The Master Plan will have regard to these guidelines. 2010-2022 including population; economy and employment; industrial and commercial development; transportation; water supply and wastewater facilities; energy and communications; education, healthcare, retail and community facilities; environmental protection.

The Southern Regional Assembly is responsible for preparing the RSES for the Southern Southern Regional Assembly Regional Spatial and Region. The RSES will provide a long-term regional level strategic planning and economic The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. Economic Strategy (RSES) (to commence) framework in support of the implementation of the National Planning Framework. The draft Southern Regional Assembly RSES was issued for public consultation in December 2018.

The Master Plan will have regard to this plan and will contribute towards the The Southern Region Waste Management Plan establishes a framework for the sustainable Southern Region Waste Management Plan 2015-2021 achievement of its objectives. The main aims being to prevent waste and / or management of wastes generated in the region. increase recycling.

Suir Catchment Flood Risk Assessment Management The Suir CFRAM Study is in line with the EU Floods Directive [2007/60/EC] and S.I. No. 122 of

Study (CFRAMS) 2010 to deliver on the core components of the National Flood Policy. Identified Legislation Plans and Programmes Summary of Legislation Plans and Programmes Relevance to the Master Plan

Kilkenny CDP provides detailed county-level strategies to allow for strategic planning and Kilkenny County Development Plan (CDP) 2014-2020 The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. sustainable development of an area.

Waterford BAP aims to conserve biodiversity within the County and outlines stipulations for The Master Plan will have regard to this plan and will contribute towards the Waterford City Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) proper planning, conservation and management of biodiversity and heritage for all plans / achievement of its objectives. The overall aim of this plan is the conservation programmes at county level. of biodiversity within the County.

The Waterford City Development Plan provides a detailed city strategy to allow for the proper The Master Plan will have regard for this plan and will contribute towards the Waterford City Development Plan 2013-2019 planning and sustainable development of Waterford City. achievement of its objectives.

Waterford CDP provides detailed county-level strategies to allow for strategic planning and The Master Plan will have regard for this plan and will contribute towards the Waterford CDP 2011-2017 (as extended) sustainable development of an area. achievement of its objectives.

The Master Plan will have regard to this plan and will contribute towards the Waterford Heritage Plan 2017-2022 The Waterford Heritage Plan aims to highlight the importance of heritage at a strategic level. achievement of its objectives by aiming to conserve and protect heritage.

This Plan identifies positive steps to deliver changes that will improve the economy and drive The Master Plan will have regard to this plan and will contribute towards the Waterford Local Economic & Community Plan 2015-2020 social transformation to Waterford in terms of the economic development, community achievement of its objectives. engagement and a better quality of life.

The Waterford PLUTS provides a vision and strategy for the development of Waterford City and The Waterford Planning Land Use and Transportation The Master Plan will have regard to this plan and will contribute towards the Environs to 2020 and that a key city development challenge is to fully harness its river front Strategy (PLUTS) 2004-2020 achievement of its objectives. potential as a central focus for the development of a new Irish urban experience.

Wexford CDP provides detailed county-level strategies to allow for strategic planning and Wexford CDP 2013-2019 The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. sustainable development of an area.

The Wexford Local Economic and Community Plan sets high level goals to improve the socio- Wexford Local Economic and Community Plan 2016-2021 The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. economic and community outcomes in County Wexford up to 2021.

Flood Risk Management Plan (FRMP) for the Suir River The FRMP aims to set out a range of proposed measures and actions to manage and reduce The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. Basin (UoM 16) 2018 flood risk within the area.

The proposed Rosslare to Waterford City Greenway would utilise the disused Waterford to Rosslare to Waterford City Greenway Rosslare railway line, which runs through the POW. The plan is in its early stages and the The Master Plan will have regard for this plan. feasibility of the greenway is currently being assessed.

APPENDIX D

APPENDIX E