DOCSLIB.ORG

The Farmington Valley Biodiversity Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Farmington Valley Biodiversity Project A Model for Intermunicipal Biodiversity Planning in Connecticut Metropolitan Conservation Alliance a program of MCA Technical Paper Series: No. 11 The Farmington Valley Biodiversity Project: A Model for Intermunicipal Biodiversity Planning in Connecticut by Hank J. Gruner, BS Michael W. Klemens, PhD Alexander Persons, MS Metropolitan Conservation Alliance Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx, NY Cover photograph: Farmington Valley from Talcott Mountain State Park, Simsbury, CT ©Alex Persons, FRWA Suggested Citation: Gruner, H. J., M. W. Klemens, and A. Persons. 2006. The Farmington Valley Biodiversity Project: A Model for Intermunicipal Biodiversity Planning in Connecticut. MCA Technical Paper No. 11, Metropolitan Conservation Alliance, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York. This document is available online at: www.wcs.org/mca Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the vision and enthusiastic support of many officials, landowners and volunteers from the seven partnering municipalities: Avon, Canton, East Granby, Farmington, Granby, Simsbury and Suffield. We thank the Project Working Group and Special Town Volunteers: Fran Armentano, Howard Beach, Phil Chester, Elizabeth Dolphin, Carolyn Flint, Charlie Francis, Betsy Furtney, Joyce Kennedy Raymes, Steve Kushner, Eric Luckingbeal, Robert S. Melvin, Steve Paine, Sally Rieger, and Laurie Whitten. Several scientists played a key role in collecting biological and habitat-related data for use in the project; they include Greg Hanisek, Jay Kaplan, Bill Moorhead, Damon Oscarson, Ed Pawlak, Dennis Quinn, and Mark Santyr. We would like to extend special thanks to Aram Calhoun and the University of Maine for their support for vernal pool mapping and assessment, and Ken Metzler at the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection for his assistance with the ecoregion mapping. We would like to thank the volunteer vernal pool survey teams in Farmington, Simsbury, and Suffield: Amy Bauchiero, Howard Beach, Chris Beebe, Bob Borg, Barbara Chain, Barbara David, Tina and Mike Delaney, Elizabeth Dolphin, Sarah Faulkner, Betsy Furtney, Tom Heffernan, Shelly Jamison, Tina Laviana, Sue Mack, Regina Mahony, Carol Martin, Ken Mather, Jennifer Mattrick, Bob Melvin, Hunter Neal, Jeff Ollendorf, Larry Peters, Judy Radke, Sally Rieger, Barbara and George Rodgers, Carol Rollet, Richard Sawitzke, Mike Stanley, Cindy Stempf, Debra Sweeney, Guy and Peter VanBeckum, Laurie Whitten, Margery Winters, and Pamela Wolf. For generously sharing their advice and expertise, we would also like to thank Robert Askins of Connecticut College, and Michael Beauchene, Jenny Dickson, Dawn McKay, Nancy Murray, Paul Rego, and Karen Zyko of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. This project would not have been possible without the dedication of numerous staff members at the Farmington River Watershed Association (FRWA) and the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Metropolitan Conservation Alliance (WCS/MCA). We extend special thanks to Danielle LaBruna and Kevin Ryan of WCS/MCA for editing, formatting, and assembling the manuscript. We also extend special thanks to Regina Mahony and Eric Hammerling of the FRWA and Jennifer Schmitz and Nick Miller of WCS/MCA. Finally, we extend our gratitude to Kevin Case for his vision in bringing this partnership together. Funding for this project was generously provided by the WCS/MCA, the Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, Sweetwater Trust, Northeast Utilities Foundation/Connecticut Light & Power, the Beatrice Fox Auerbach Foundation, the Aldo Leopold Stewardship Fund of the Sand County Foundation, Robinson & Cole, LLP, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection/Special Environmental Project, and the towns of Avon, Canton, East Granby, Farmington, Granby, Simsbury and Suffield. ii Table of Contents Introduction 1 ? The importance of conserving biodiversity 2 ? Land use change and biodiversity 3 ? Planning at the landscape level 4 ? The Farmington River Valley 5 Building Awareness and Community Involvement 9 Methods 10 ? Phase I: Identifying biological data sets 10 ? Phase II: Mapping core habitats and fragmentation levels 15 ? Phase III: Integrating available natural resource layers to refine and prioritize areas for surveys 16 ? Phase IV: Conducting field surveys, vernal pool mapping and invasive species assessments 18 ? Phase V: Integrating survey data with habitat area maps and creating conservation overlays 21 Town Conservation Profiles 25 Utilizing the Maps and Data 48 ? Incorporation in the Plan of Conservation and Development 48 ? Moving from planning to action 48 Summary 51 Literature Cited 52 Tables ? Table 1: Biological diversity at multiple scales within the Farmington River Valley 2 ? Table 2: State-listed vertebrate, invertebrate and plant species used in FVBP Data Analysis 13 ? Table 3: Category I Conservation Focal Species (non-state-listed) used in FVBP Data Analysis 14 ? Table 4: List of Significant Natural Communities of Conservation Concern used in FVBP Data Analysis 14 ? Table 5: Summary of biological datasets used in FVBP data analysis 21 Figures ? Figure 1: Ecoregions of the Farmington River Valley 8 ? Figure 2: Land cover within the project area 15 ? Figure 3: Fragmentation of the landscape 16 ? Figure 4: Integrating biological data 17 ? Figure 5: Integrating wetland mapping 17 ? Figure 6: Prioritization of study sites 18 ? Figure 7: The biodiversity conservation area overlay 23 ? Figure 8: Protected parcels within the biodiversity conservation area overlay 24 ? Figure 9: Avon biodiversity map 27 ? Figure 10: Canton biodiversity map 30 ? Figure 11: East Granby biodiversity map 33 ? Figure 12: Farmington biodiversity map 36 ? Figure 13: Granby biodiversity map 39 ? Figure 14: Simsbury biodiversity map 43 ? Figure 15: Suffield biodiversity map 47 iii Introduction The Farmington Valley Biodiversity Project (FVBP) is an intermunicipal collaboration involving seven contiguous towns located within the Farmington River Valley of Connecticut: Avon, Canton, East Granby, Farmington, Granby, Simsbury and Suffield. The primary objectives of the project are to: 1) Collect and map comprehensive data on the biological resources within the seven-town area. 2) Identify and map priority conservation areas for incorporation within each town’s Plan of Conservation and Development to help guide municipal planning and decision making regarding land use. 3) Promote awareness of the region’s unique ecological communities, the importance of biodiversity, threats to biodiversity, and the role that various municipal commissions can take towards the conservation of biodiversity. The project is coordinated by the Metropolitan Conservation Alliance, a program of the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS/MCA), and the Farmington River Watershed Association (FRWA). The FVBP is an extension of several other conservation initiatives undertaken by the WCS/MCA in the tri-state region of Connecticut, New York and New Jersey including the Eastern Westchester Biotic Corridor (Miller & Klemens 2002), the Croton-to-Highlands Biodiversity Plan (Miller & Klemens 2004), and the Southern Wallkill Biodiversity Plan (Miller et al. 2005). Planning models such as these strategically link contiguous towns and provide the mechanism for individual municipalities to address their local conservation needs in a manner that also fosters regional conservation planning. The model also provides a significant scale of economic efficiency. By spreading costs among a group of towns, the cost for any single town to accomplish the same work is much reduced. Intermunicipal partnerships are also attractive to potential donors because they are both local and regional in scope. A formal FVBP working group was created to assist in administering and communicating locally about the project. The working group consists of representatives from each of the participating towns including town planning staff and commission members, land trust officials, environmental attorneys, professional ecologists, and WCS/MCA and FRWA staff. The project was officially launched in November 2001 with a workshop that brought together a broad array of experts including town planners and commission members from the seven participating towns, biologists from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, WCS/MCA, The Nature Conservancy, and the Connecticut Museum of Natural History, an environmental attorney, land use managers from the McLean Game Refuge, the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC), and the FRWA. This working session focused on obtaining input on the following areas to guide project staff in development and implementation of the project: ? Knowledge of existing and available sources of biological data for the Farmington Valley that could be incorporated into the project. 1 ? Strategies for managing the biological data set, including guidelines for sharing and distributing the data, as well as developing GIS data layers. ? Approaches and methods to undertaking the field research component of the project. The Importance of Conserving Biodiversity Although small in land area, the Connecticut landscape is diverse for its size, featuring an impressive range of distinct ecological regions and within them, a rich diversity of animals and plants. Even within the seven-town area of the Farmington River valley covered by the FVBP this is evident. Biodiversity encompasses the richness of life at all levels, from the genetic level to the species
Recommended publications
  • Consolidated School District of New Britain

    Consolidated School District of New Britain

    CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Helen Yung District Communications Specialist (860) 832-4382, cell (860) 877-4552 [email protected] URBAN AND SUBURBAN TEENAGERS TAKE TEAM WORK AND DIVERSITYTO NEW HEIGHTS ATOP HUBLEIN TOWER (SIMSBURY, CT)—Climbing Hublein Tower at the Talcott Mountain State Park was the least of the challenges for a group of 35 middle and high school students conducting geological field studies along the Metacomet Ridge on July 15. The students, from six school districts dispersed from New Britain to the greater Hartford area are enrolled in the Metacomet Ridge Interdistrict Academy (MRIA). The MRIA program is funded through the State Department of Education Interdistrict Cooperative Grant and managed by CREC (Capital Region Education Council), have the task of studying the environment of the Metacomet Ridge, a rocky ridge that rises above the Connecticut Valley and stretches from Long Island Sound to far above the Massachusetts/Connecticut border. According to Dr. Nalini Munshi, lead teacher at Roosevelt Middle School’s S.T.E.M Academy, the students conducted a land cover testing that includes a site of 30 by 30 meters square squares at the bottom of Talcott Mountain State Park. The students with assistance from NBHS Teachers Joe Bosco, III and Robert Ramsey feed their data into an international website for scientists known as the Globe network, where in Scientists can access it and use it for their own research. The work that the students do is considered real time science. Referring to the land cover testing, Dr. Munshi said, “we calculate the canopy cover and ground cover and measure the height of the dominant and co dominant tree species.
  • Bioscienceenterprisezone 700.Pdf

    Bioscienceenterprisezone 700.Pdf

    J U B E N LITTLE LEAGUE FIELDS SS IP R E E I X C Farmington River State Access Area R Second Natural Pond Last Natural Pond C V K T D A T R Y C D A Y N R R R S E WBER C A D D L R O I D D R R O U A O I R W D N T R N G S D R T T O V R A E D G D Y E R R N R C H ROM D I O L A D T R F D U D B E R W X E D N L E I R O Y O D I R R W N R V D O A R D M D L R R D N N R I E A E A I L Z T R G M A R Y N B R G A W Great Brook E N W A FARM BUILDING E E F R I G E N D F N E D O E I T R GR T N DR W R R L TO U G U O N B A N R I T D W H N T KE B X Poplar Swamp Brook NT R I L O AI S A W LE V Y D I G R C LL L T AG E G TUNXIS MEAD PARK E N N E I A R G P S L E M N 460301 S O I U A D N T R T A N ARKIN IN U L S W O AY L T A M D D O F R EN R WICK K E A D W R L O E L WHIT I T A V L R C N E O O T T T L A D N W O M T O R C O D H C U O E R R D N F P TUNXIS MEAD PARK S D T P E O A R RK R Great Brook M A I I L P N NE R T W D E S RE R M O D F Great Brook E D R S D TUNXIS MEAD PARK A T E M TOWN OF FARMINGTON R Pope Brook E S H D I O X Great Brook A N K U A H T IL L R HARTFORD COUNTY, R D TF L B RD P UN HILL E GALOW V A D TUNXIS MEAD PARK RD N HILL T O L VINE T CONNECTICUT E A G O I CT N BYRNE L I F M C R E OAK ESC FA O LA R N ND A R EN T V C T E T A 0 B P V G E 1 L D ¬« E RD EN PHEASANT HILL C H R S D M T APLE A South Reservoir V-FARM Oakland Gardens DG South Reservoir Dam R I E R D OAKLAND GARDENS FIRE STATION BIOSCIENCE A IL RD R L A GE D O U T E E ID IMBE LI N N Q R V E R L South Reservoir A T T R N O ES I C ER A R L ENTERPRISE ZONE V T A A O A T I U I D L D T O R N N R D R R B N D H L A I G T I L R C W L L D N I D R L I N E L H N D I R O N I H P T N N S S A L U I N U I A D T M A N S D I T R R T D N S U E SEWER TREATMENT PLANT S S R O O T D F .
  • Municipal Plan and Regulation Review, the Committee Provided Municipal Land Use Regulations and Pcds for Most of the Participating Towns

    Municipal Plan and Regulation Review, the Committee Provided Municipal Land Use Regulations and Pcds for Most of the Participating Towns

    MUNICIPAL PLAN & REGULATION REVIEW LOWER FARMINGTON RIVER & SALMON BROOK WILD AND SCENIC STUDY COMMITTEE March 2009 Avon Bloomfield Burlington Canton East Granby Farmington Granby Hartland Simsbury Windsor Courtesy of FRWA MUNICIPAL PLAN & REGULATION REVIEW LOWER FARMINGTON RIVER & SALMON BROOK WILD AND SCENIC STUDY COMMITTEE MARCH 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • INTRODUCTION • PROJECT OVERVIEW AND METHODOLOGY • STATUTORY FRAMEWORK • DEFINITIONS & ACRONYMS • STUDY CORRIDOR SUMMARY • TOWN SUMMARIES o Avon o Bloomfield o Burlington o Canton o East Granby o Farmington o Granby o Hartland o Simsbury o Windsor • REVIEW CHART o Geology o Water Quality o Biodiversity o Recreation o Cultural Landscape o Land Use EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed designation of the lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook as a Wild and Scenic River, pursuant to 16 U.S.C. §§ 1271 to 1287 (2008), is a regional effort to recognize and protect the River itself and its role as critical habitat for flora and fauna, as a natural flood control mechanism, and as an increasingly significant open space and recreational resource. A review of the municipal land use regulations and Plans of Conservation and Development (“PCD”) for the ten towns bordering the River within the Lower Farmington and Salmon Brook Watersheds (the “Corridor Towns”) was conducted (the “Review”). The results of the Review identify and characterize the level of protection established in local regulations for each of the six different Outstanding Resource Values (“ORVs”), or natural, cultural, or recreational values of regional or national significance associated with the Lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook. Designation of the Lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook as Wild and Scenic will not impact existing land use plans and regulations in the ten Corridor Towns.
  • URBANIZED AREA OUTLINE MAP (CENSUS 2000) Springfield, MA--CT

    URBANIZED AREA OUTLINE MAP (CENSUS 2000) Springfield, MA--CT

    URBANIZED AREA OUTLINE MAP (CENSUS 2000) Springfield, MA--CT H al F Copper Hill Rd la a d i d a r y A R ve v H k A e e n North St Cr e W i ll Ln Silver o LEGEND t e l p a M SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL NAME STYLE ) S y t International H w w y H Congamond 1 e d CANADA 8 g n R iffi 9 e Lake r l G l (G Fourmile Brk Halladay o AIR (Federal) ¹ r ) a C t n ( v S Ave E i 2 L’ANSE RES (1880) l h t l 0 e r R 2 o Enfield Town 25990 y Trust Land / Home Land d N StHwy 159 (East St) Southwick Town 65825 ( ) North Granby 54660 w 5 H 7 T1880 S y U w H OTSA / TDSA / ANVSA t S k r KAW OTSA (5340) B y a l Tribal Subdivision C SHONTO (620) MASSACHUSETTS 25 AIR (State) ¹ HAMPDEN 013 CONNECTICUT 09 Thompsonville 75940 Tama Res (4125) HARTFORD 003 ) ve StHw ) A y 190 (Thompsonville SDAISA t eton Rd) S apl d StHwy 190 (M n Lumbee (9815) a r ) G StHwy 539 (Mountain Rd ( ANRC 7 8 StHwy 159 (East Street) 1 NANA ANRC 52120 y w StHwy 168 (Moun tH Urbanized Area tai S n R d) Baltimore, MD 04843 Urban Cluster Tooele, VT 88057 StHwy 190 k r State or Statistically Equivalent Entity B (Franklin St) y Suffield Town 74540 d NEW YORK 36 d ) t u S County or Statistically Equivalent Entity M n i a ERIE 029 M ( 5 7 Minor Civil Division (MCD) ¹ Manitook Mountain Rd y Suffield Depot 74655 Harmon Dr w Pike Twp 59742 H Lake t S Census County Division (CCD) StHw y 513 (B Kula CCD 91890 ridge S t) Consolidated City MILFORD 47500 StHwy 526 (Sheldon St) Incorporated Place ¹ StHwy 1 8 RemingtonSt 7 (Shel don St) Rome 63418 Thompsonville 75940 Census Designated Place (CDP) StHwy 187 (Stone Rd) S tH w Zena 84187 y 1 8 9 (G Where international, state, county, and/or MCD / CCD boundaries coincide, or where American Indian reservations and r a Stony Brk tribal subdivision boundaries coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for only the highest-ranking of these n b y boundaries.
  • AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SP Lainville

    AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SP Lainville

    d n H L Bradley Brook Beaverdam Pond Williams Pond r r R u D H r D s D t d Taine and y ell S 4 d Mountain c 7 Upl nd xw rn e Rd a a e 6 n i m M F n SV k 1 t L l or t n R s r s n o l N a Morley Elementary School R H l y Fisher Meadows gg s E N ! e L w Pi u e r H b a o b r S m d r n ld D W R e l b k D O'Larrys Ice Pond No 1 t o el c T e e r r A r o e a w a R a Ratlum Mountain Fish & Game Club Pond i t x y a Edward W Morley School u r f S r d r M t h r A 162 a d v D r l h a i i n h l r d R o v s y Charles W House u n R L C l u A o n l P l a o r Av ry l ll n e t i e d a n M M D w r n R n i e m k H L c D S e d Farmington Woods 2 H e B 4 v t o n d R R o o l a r i S i d Fisher Meadows e n a C e n l B 167 p V o M S r i l e lton St D r A A 133 F l V l r r o D u i S e C V i M n v s l l R o S e r D u v B e H b u o D y T H y A 156 A A e o q l ob n l m S e o d S i e t i e t A 162 r S n S r i o s n r n o v r d H R e l i u t s ar Av Punch Brook n r l b a h t e n r v c rm l s e e r Trout Brook R h o o D S c b n i O e a d l e R e l r v m o k l e L t A r t s d W s r i n s d r r West Hartford Reservoir No 5 a o l a R f o C d o r R tm d r e r S f i d o h i W o o i y Taine Mountain W v D e a t s n l a u t d R n i l W L e k r f v l r y A V O N Dyke Pond D D L a b r t e d W B e L l n o a r R o y t A R a n y i S g r d a r Punch Brook Ponds J n g y e i o d M a d B S d r B n a d e t a a y A s i i n b o H E r P d t G L e c r r d L r t R w il n y v d n o e f l a il H A P x r e t u e i n m nc M t l i w h B P e t e l R e r e a i S R o Norw s ! o ood Rd t d Bayberry
  • Geographic Names

    Geographic Names

    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
  • Mass Receiving Report

    Mass Receiving Report

    Mass Receiving Report Prepared for the Western Region Homeland Security Advisory Council October 24, 2013 Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Franklin Regional Planning Commission Pioneer Valley Regional Planning Commission Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Planning Assumptions ............................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 7 Western Massachusetts Region .................................................................................................................... 7 Geography ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Demographics ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Methodology - Research ......................................................................................................................... 10 Determining the Mass Receiving Catchment Area Data ........................................................................
  • Rattlesnake Mountain Farmington CT

    Rattlesnake Mountain Farmington CT

    This Mountain Hike In Connecticut Leads To Something Awesome Looking for a mountain hike in Connecticut that’s truly unique? Then look no further! At the top of this mountain is a hidden site, unknown by many Connecticut residents. But a little piece of folk history is waiting to be rediscovered by you. So let’s get going! Rattlesnake Mountain in Farmington is a 2.3-mile hike off of Route 6. Part of the Metacomet Ridge, this short trail can be a little taxing for beginners, but it's totally worth it! Be prepared to catch some fantastic sights atop this scenic vista as you explore the rare plants and traprock ridges. An increasing number of locals have begun using the ridges here for rock climbing. They may look for intimidating, but they make for great exercise. Not to mention you'd be climbing volcanic rock. At 750 feet high and 500 feet above the Farmington River Valley, there's no shortage of views. But the coolest thing atop this mountain isn't the sight. It's Will Warren's Den! This boulder rock cave is a local historic site that will leave you breathless. Who knew Connecticut had caves quite like this! 1 The plaque affixed to the cave reads "Said Warren, according to legend, after being flogged for not going to church, tried to burn the village of Farmington. He was pursued into the mountains, where some Indian squaws hid him in this cave." It may not look like much from the outside, but the inside is a cool oasis.
  • GEOLOGIC RADON POTENTIAL of EPA REGION 1 Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire Rhode Island Vermont

    GEOLOGIC RADON POTENTIAL of EPA REGION 1 Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire Rhode Island Vermont

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC RADON POTENTIAL OF EPA REGION 1 Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire Rhode Island Vermont OPEN-FILE REPORT 93-292-A Prepared in Cooperation with the | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 9'% 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC RADON POTENTIAL OF EPA REGION 1 Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont R. Randall Schumann EDITOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 93-292-A Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1993 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. CONTENTS SECTION____________________________________PAGE 1. The USGS/EPA State Radon Potential Assessments: An Introduction 1 Linda C.S. Gundersen, R. Randall Schumann, and Sharon W. White Appendix A: Geologic Time Scale 19 Appendix B: Glossary of Terms 20 Appendix C: EPA Regional Offices, State Radon Contacts, 26 and State Geological Surveys 2. EPA Region 1 Geologic Radon Potential Summary 36 Linda C.S. Gundersen, R. Randall Schumann, and Sandra L. Szarzi 3. Preliminary Geologic Radon Potential Assessment of Connecticut 47 Linda C.S. Gundersen andR. Randall Schumann 4. Preliminary Geologic Radon Potential Assessment of Maine 83 Linda C.S. Gundersen andR. Randall Schumann 5. Preliminary Geologic Radon Potential Assessment of Massachusetts 123 R. Randall Schumann and Linda C.S. Gundersen 6. Preliminary Geologic Radon Potential Assessment of New Hampshire 157 Linda C.S. Gundersen andR. Randall Schumann 7. Preliminary Geologic Radon Potential Assessment of Rhode Island 191 Linda C.S.
  • Johnsons Announce Gift of 71-Acre Conservation Easement At

    Johnsons Announce Gift of 71-Acre Conservation Easement At

    G RANBY EWSLETTER Land Trust N Preserving Granby’s Natural Heritage www.granbylandtrust.org C PO Box 23 C Granby, Connecticut 06035 C Volume 5 Johnsons Announce Gift of 71-Acre Conservation Easement at Annual Meeting he unusually warm and sunny late October Tday suggested that this would be a special Land Trust Annual Meeting. It was in many ways. With fall’s full colors on parade, almost 100 land trust members gathered on October 21st and were treated to a walk through one of Granby’s most beautiful properties – Paula and Whitey Johnson’s 90-acre parcel on Simsbury Road in West Granby – followed by an old-fashioned outdoor picnic at the Johnson’s house. It was a family affair all day. On the walk The Land Trust led by Whitey Johnson, kids ran Whitey Johnson talks about his property and its history thanks Paula ahead of the adults during the Annual Meeting Hike in October. and Whitey through the rolling fields, by the solid old stonewalls and into the Johnson for their Johnson’s woods which are bounded by the Land Trust Receives Three commitment and McLean Game Refuge. After the walk, every- Conservation Easements in 2007 one gathered together and the annual meeting • The Johnson Family - 71 acres dedication to was called to order. During the meeting, the • The Werner Family - 40 acres (see pg. 14) Granby and the Johnsons announced that they intended to • The Brown Family - 10+ acres (see pg. 7) give the Land Trust a conservation easement legacy they have over 71-acres of this spectacular land, forever built for future preserving it as open space.
  • Appendix 1. Specimens Examined

    Appendix 1. Specimens Examined

    Knapp et al. – Appendix 1 – Morelloid Clade in North and Central America and the Caribbean -1 Appendix 1. Specimens examined We list here in traditional format all specimens examined for this treatment from North and Central America and the Caribbean. Countries, major divisions within them (when known), and collectors (by surname) are listed in alphabetic order. 1. Solanum americanum Mill. ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA. Antigua: SW, Blubber Valley, Blubber Valley, 26 Sep 1937, Box, H.E. 1107 (BM, MO); sin. loc. [ex Herb. Hooker], Nicholson, D. s.n. (K); Barbuda: S.E. side of The Lagoon, 16 May 1937, Box, H.E. 649 (BM). BAHAMAS. Man O'War Cay, Abaco region, 8 Dec 1904, Brace, L.J.K. 1580 (F); Great Ragged Island, 24 Dec 1907, Wilson, P. 7832 (K). Andros Island: Conch Sound, 8 May 1890, Northrop, J.I. & Northrop, A.R. 557 (K). Eleuthera: North Eleuthera Airport, Low coppice and disturbed area around terminal and landing strip, 15 Dec 1979, Wunderlin, R.P. et al. 8418 (MO). Inagua: Great Inagua, 12 Mar 1890, Hitchcock, A.S. s.n. (MO); sin. loc, 3 Dec 1890, Hitchcock, A.S. s.n. (F). New Providence: sin. loc, 18 Mar 1878, Brace, L.J.K. 518 (K); Nassau, Union St, 20 Feb 1905, Wight, A.E. 111 (K); Grantstown, 28 May 1909, Wilson, P. 8213 (K). BARBADOS. Moucrieffe (?), St John, Near boiling house, Apr 1940, Goodwing, H.B. 197 (BM). BELIZE. carretera a Belmopan, 1 May 1982, Ramamoorthy, T.P. et al. 3593 (MEXU). Belize: Belize Municipal Airstrip near St. Johns College, Belize City, 21 Feb 1970, Dieckman, L.
  • Environmental Journalists Talk About Their Beat Rotting Holes—Home Sweet Home

    Environmental Journalists Talk About Their Beat Rotting Holes—Home Sweet Home

    CONNECTICUT Woodlands ENVIRONMENTAL JOURNALISTS TALK ABOUT THEIR BEAT ROTTING HOLES—HOME SWEET HOME. BLUE TRAILS MAP INSIDE. The Magazine of the Connecticut Forest & Park Association FALL 2015 Volume 80 No 3 The ConnectiCuT ForesT & Park assoCiaTion, inC. OFFICERS PRESIDENT, ERIC LUKINGBEAL, Granby VICE-PRESIDENT, WILLIAM D. BRECK, Killingworth VICE-PRESIDENT, DAVID G. LAURETTI, Bloomfield VICE-PRESIDENT, STARR SAYRES, East Haddam TREASURER, JAMES W. DOMBRAUSKAS, New Hartford SECRETARY, ERIC HAMMERLING, West Hartford FORESTER, THOMAS J. DEGNAN, East Haddam DIRECTORS BRETT BOSKIEWICZ, Simsbury STARLING W. CHILDS, Norfolk JESSI CHRISTIANSEN, Killingworth R. RICHARD CROCE, Killingworth RUTH CUTLER, Ashford CAROLINE DRISCOLL, New London PETER KNIGHT, Bloomfield MICHAEL LECOURS, Farmington SCOTT LIVINGSTON, Bolton JEFF LOUREIRO, Canton RUSS CHAREST ERIN McGRATH, Wesleyan University LAUREN L. McGREGOR, ESQ., Hamden Building a bridge on the new trail in the Whitney Forest. See page 22 JEFFREY O’DONNELL, Bristol DAVID PLATT, Chester RAYMOND RADIKAS, Glastonbury ALEX J. SIEBERT, Wesleyan University Annual Membership RICHARD WHITEHOUSE, Glastonbury Connecting People to the Land Individual $ 35 HONORARY DIRECTORS Our mission: The Connecticut Forest & Park Family $ 50 Association protects forests, parks, walking GORDON L. ANDERSON, St. Johns, FL Supporting $ 100 HARROL W. BAKER, JR., Bolton trails and open spaces for future generations by RICHARD A. BAUERFELD, Redding connecting people to the land. CFPA directly Benefactor $ 250 RUSSELL BRENNEMAN, Westport involves individuals and families, educators, GEORGE M. CAMP, Middletown community leaders and volunteers to enhance ANN CUDDY, Ashland, OR Life Membership $ 2500 PRUDENCE CUTLER, Farmington and defend Connecticut’s rich natural heritage. SAMUEL G. DODD, North Andover, MA CFPA is a private, non-profit organization that ASTRID T.