Mary and the Trinitarian Order of the Universe A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mary and the Trinitarian Order of the Universe A “THE LORD POSSESSED ME IN THE BEGINNING OF HIS WAYS”: MARY AND THE TRINITARIAN ORDER OF THE UNIVERSE A Commentary on Charles De Koninck’s Ego Sapientia: The Wisdom That Is Mary Katherine M. Gardner Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate of Theology DIRECTOR: Michael Waldstein READERS: Steven Long, Roger Nutt Department of Graduate Theology Ave Maria University July, 2013 AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe a debt of gratitude to Michael and Susie Waldstein that I can only aspire to repay by imitating them to the best of my ability. They constantly place themselves at the disposal of the common good, alike in the extraordinary and in the apparently mundane encounters that fill their days. If I have expressed in what follows any valuable insights into the thought of De Koninck, and through it, into the fumdamental order of God’s creation and Mary’s place therein, this is largely due to the inexhaustible generosity, friendship, and wisdom with which they accompanied me throughout this work. Great thanks are also due to Patrick Gardner, whose insightful suggestions and careful editing not only made it possible for me to complete this work on time, but also greatly improved it. Thanks also to the Jacques Maritain Center at the University of Notre Dame, and in particular to John O’Callaghan and Alice Osberger, for so kindly facilitating my research in the archives of De Koninck’s notes and correspondence housed there. There are many others whose conversation and friendship, prayers, and support were indispensible, especially Matthew DuBroy, Jared Kuebler, Sr. Maria Josefa Bartosch, Sr. Luz-Amen Fischer, and Scott and Simone Heffelfinger. To each of you I offer my profound gratitude. ii Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Commentary on Title and Mottos: .................................................................................................................. 15 Commentary on the Foreword: ....................................................................................................................... 19 Part I: Ego Sapientia .................................................................................................. 27 Chapters 1 and 2: The Nature of Wisdom....................................................................................................... 32 Commentary Chapters 3-7 ................................................................................................................................. 50 Initial Commentary on Chapters 3-5: the Criteria of Wisdom ............................................................ 51 Chapter 3: Mary as Origin of God ....................................................................................................................... 51 Chapter 4: Mary as Origin of God with Knowledge .................................................................................... 58 Chapter 5: Mary as Origin of God as Redeemer ........................................................................................... 60 Chapters 4-7: Wisdom and the Trinitarian Processions ....................................................................... 62 Excursus on the Causality of the Divine Processions ................................................................................. 64 Commentary on Chapters 4-7 in light of Trinitarian Wisdom ............................................................ 89 Chapter 4: The Likeness of the Eternal and Temporal Generations................................................... 90 Chapter 5: Mary as a Principle of the Temporal Procession of the Son ............................................ 94 Chapter 6: The Divine Maternity and the Hypostatic Order .................................................................. 96 Chapter 7 Mary’s Habitual Grace and the Order of Redemption ......................................................... 98 Commentary on Chapters 8-16 ................................................................................ 109 Chapters 8-9: The Shift from God to the World......................................................................................... 112 Chapter 10: Mary as cause of the universal order ................................................................................... 124 Chapters 11-12 Mary as a Common Good ................................................................................................... 131 Chapters 13-14: The Circular Movement in God, Mary, and creation ............................................ 176 Chapter 15: Summary of the First Part ........................................................................................................ 181 Chapter 16: The Height of Beauty in Mary ................................................................................................. 187 Part II: Nigra Sum Sed Formosa ............................................................................... 189 Introduction to Second Part: .......................................................................................................................... 190 Chapters 17-18: Mercy at the Root of God’s Works Ad Extra ............................................................. 200 Commentary on Chapters 19-34 .................................................................................................................. 208 Chapters 19-25: The Nigra Sum as Applied to Human nature .......................................................... 209 Chapters 26-30: The Nigra Sum as Applied to Sin ................................................................................... 245 Chapters 31-34: Unfolding the Most Profound Sense of Nigra Sum sed Formosa .................... 269 Commentary on Chapters 35-42 .................................................................................................................. 297 Chapters 36-39: The Rejection of Mercy ...................................................................................................... 299 Chapters 40-42: The Beauty of Mary in Humility .................................................................................... 333 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 345 Divisio Textus ......................................................................................................... 348 Bibliography ........................................................................................................... 349 i Index of Texts: Ego Sapientia Title and Mottos……………………………………………………………………………………………12 Foreword……………………………………………………………………………………………………...15 Part I Chapters 1-2………………………………………………………………………………………………….26 Chapters 3-7………………………………………………………………………………………………….37 Chapters 8-9………………………………………………………………………………………………..108 Chapter 10…………………………………………………………………………………………………..119 Chapters 11-12……………………………………………………………………………………………124 Chapters 13-14……………………………………………………………………………………………171 Chapter 15…………………………………………………………………………………………………..176 Chapter 16…………………………………………………………………………………………………..183 Part II Chapters 17-18……………………………………………………………………………………………193 Chapter 19…………………………………………………………………………………………………..207 Chapter 20…………………………………………………………………………………………………..219 Chapters 21-23……………………………………………………………………………………………227 Chapters 24-25……………………………………………………………………………………………236 Chapter 26…………………………………………………………………………………………………..243 Chapters 27-28……………………………………………………………………………………………246 Chapters 29-30……………………………………………………………………………………………254 Chapters 31-34……………………………………………………………………………………………261 Chapter 35…………………………………………………………………………………………………..292 Chapter 36……………………..……………………………………………………………………………295 Chapters 37-39……………………………………………………………………………………………316 Chapters 40-41……………………………………………………………………………………………325 Chapter 42…………………………………………………………………………………………………..330 ii Introduction The Nature and Importance of Ego Sapientia: Its Essential Contribution to Mariology In the first question of his Summa Theologiae, St. Thomas delineates the entire science of theology: its very existence, its nature, its principles, and its subject matter. Characteristic of Thomas’s genius is his precise view of the role of philosophy in that science: Sacred doctrine makes use even of human reason, not, indeed, to prove faith (for thereby the merit of faith would come to an end), but to make clear other things that are put forward in this doctrine. Since therefore grace does not destroy nature but perfects it, natural reason should minister to faith as the natural bent of the will ministers to charity. Hence the Apostle says: "Bringing into captivity every understanding unto the obedience of Christ" (2 Cor. 10:5).1 Equally characteristic of Thomas’s contribution to theology is his particular use of Aristotle, especially of his metaphysics and natural philosophy. In the systematic work that begins with Question 2 of the Summa, Thomas takes as foundational the things that God reveals about Himself in Scripture and has entrusted to the Church, never supplanting this foundation with philosophy, but making use of human reason to find the inner order of the things that have been revealed and to penetrate them more deeply, drawing out the treasures hidden within. Theology is therefore the 1 STh Ia, q1 a8 ad2. “Utitur tamen sacra doctrina etiam ratione humana, non quidem ad probandum fidem, quia per hoc tolleretur meritum fidei; sed ad manifestandum aliqua alia quae traduntur
Recommended publications
  • One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards a Symposium
    One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards A Symposium Edited By Victor B. Brezik, C.S.B, CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006 ~ NIHIL OBSTAT: ReverendJamesK. Contents Farge, C.S.B. Censor Deputatus INTRODUCTION . 1 IMPRIMATUR: LOOKING AT THE PAST . 5 Most Reverend John L. Morkovsky, S.T.D. A Remembrance Of Pope Leo XIII: The Encyclical Aeterni Patris, Leonard E. Boyle,O.P. 7 Bishop of Galveston-Houston Commentary, James A. Weisheipl, O.P. ..23 January 6, 1981 The Legacy Of Etienne Gilson, Armand A. Maurer,C.S.B . .28 The Legacy Of Jacques Maritain, Christian Philosopher, First Printing: April 1981 Donald A. Gallagher. .45 LOOKING AT THE PRESENT. .61 Copyright©1981 by The Center For Thomistic Studies Reflections On Christian Philosophy, All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or Ralph McInerny . .63 reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written Thomism And Today's Crisis In Moral Values, Michael permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in Bertram Crowe . .74 critical articles and reviews. For information, write to The Transcendental Thomism, A Critical Assessment, Center For Thomistic Studies, 3812 Montrose Boulevard, Robert J. Henle, S.J. 90 Houston, Texas 77006. LOOKING AT THE FUTURE. .117 Library of Congress catalog card number: 80-70377 Can St. Thomas Speak To The Modem World?, Leo Sweeney, S.J. .119 The Future Of Thomistic Metaphysics, ISBN 0-9605456-0-3 Joseph Owens, C.Ss.R. .142 EPILOGUE. .163 The New Center And The Intellectualism Of St. Thomas, Printed in the United States of America Vernon J.
    [Show full text]
  • Marian Consecration and Giving Us a 33-Day Plan to Prepare Our Souls for That Big Step
    33-Day Preparation for Total Consecration to Jesus Through Mary Following the itinerary of Saint Louis Marie Grignon de Montfort with selections of writings from the Popes and Saints 1 Introduction Saint Louis de Montfort set forth a revolution of spirituality in teaching us about Marian consecration and giving us a 33-day plan to prepare our souls for that big step. What is this consecration? He described this consecration as being a form of “slavery” to Mary. Slavery means that we do nothing without her. We choose not to have a will apart from hers. He even invites us to wear a chain to signify that close bond with her. He elaborated the various consequences of that bond, saying that we share everything with her including our prayers, our intentions, our actions, and our merits. Fundamentally he is saying that we choose to become totally dependent on her: we receive everything through her and share everything with her. At first this sounds radical and may even sound a little scary or seem like a lot of work. As we come to understand the way the spirit of the world has infected our thinking, however, and as we get in touch with our own woundedness, we come to discover that this is a merciful gift from heaven. It is a sweet path of salvation. In fact, it is better than we could have ever hoped for! What it means is that there is a sweet, loving, perfect mother who actually wants to live in this kind of close relationship with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Legion HANDBOOK D10944
    THE OFFICIAL HANDBOOK OF THE LEGION OF MARY PUBLISHED BY CONCILIUM LEGIONIS MARIAE DE MONTFORT HOUSE MORNING STAR AVENUE BRUNSWICK STREET DUBLIN 7, IRELAND Revised Edition, 2005 Nihil Obstat: Bede McGregor, O.P., M.A., D.D. Censor Theologicus Deputatus. Imprimi potest: ✠ Diarmuid Martin Archiep. Dublinen. Hiberniae Primas. Dublin, die 8 September 2005 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Excerpts from the English translation of The Roman Missal © 1973, International Committee on English in the Liturgy, Inc. All rights reserved. Translation of The Magnificat by kind permission of A. P. Watt Ltd. on behalf of The Grail. Extracts from English translations of documents of the Magisterium by kind permission of the Catholic Truth Society (London) and Veritas (Dublin). Quotation on page 305 by kind permission of Sheed and Ward. The official magazine of the Legion of Mary, Maria Legionis, is published quarterly Presentata House, 263 North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Ireland. © Copyright 2005 Printed in the Republic of Ireland by Mahons, Yarnhall Street, Dublin 1 Contents Page ABBREVIATIONS OF BOOKS OF THE BIBLE ....... 3 ABBREVIATIONS OF DOCUMENTS OF THE MAGISTERIUM .... 4 POPE JOHN PAUL II TO THE LEGION OF MARY ...... 5 PRELIMINARY NOTE.............. 7 PROFILE OF FRANK DUFF .......... 8 PHOTOGRAPHS:FRANK DUFF .......facing page 8 LEGION ALTAR ......facing page 108 VEXILLA ........facing page 140 CHAPTER 1. Name and Origin ............ 9 2. Object . ...............11 3. Spirit of the Legion . ...........12 4. Legionary service ............13 5. The Devotional Outlook of the Legion .....17 6. The Duty of Legionaries towards Mary .....25 7. The Legionary and the Holy Trinity ......41 8. The Legionary and the Eucharist .......45 9.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Sunday of Advent
    The Annunciation linktoliturgy.com The Annunciation 4th Sunday of Advent Lessons and Discussions Page 4 – The Annunciation “The angel Gabriel was sent from God...” Page 7 – Name of Jesus “...you shall name him Jesus” Link to Liturgy provides faithful resources which use the latest audiovisu- Page 10 – Mary’s Fiat (and its effects) al means alongside traditional means to evangelize & catechize thus link- “May it be done to me according to your word.” ing life to the Gospel & the Gospel to life. Sign up Free to Link to Liturgy. Page 14 – Double Greeting “Hail, full of grace! The Lord is with you.” Page 16 - Hail Mary: Holy Mary, Ever Virgin Part I “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.” Page 20 – Holy Mary, Ever Virgin Part II “How can this be, since I have no relations with a man?” 28 The Annunciation linktoliturgy.com Communion Antiphon (Isaiah 7:14) – Simple English Propers This should be chanted so that the time of prayer, study and discussion can be made sacred. Another song can be substituted, but should have the same theme. Source: http://www.ccwatershed.org/ Alternate options: Hymns Immaculate Mary Hail Holy Queen Enthroned Above Come, O Long Expected Jesus Savior of the Nations, Come O Come, O Come, Emmanuel Remnant Ave Maris Stella Totus Tuus Collect – Roman Missal In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen Pour forth, we beseech you, O Lord, your grace into our hearts, that we, to whom the Incarnation of Christ your Son was made known by the message of an An-gel, may by his Passion and Cross be brought to the glory of his Resurrection.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Monaghan: a Man of Faith in Action Dr. Ralph Mcinerny: May His
    Vol. XVI, No. II, February 2010 A Tool for Evangelization, Catechesis and Apologetics I did not come to be served, but to serve. Matthew 20:28 The cat and the silo: an image of God’s merciful message By Fr. Michael Miller his heart and, abusing his freedom, disobeyed 2010 God’s command…. He chose himself over and Fund-Raising While I was walking against God, against the requirements of his around the farm with my creaturely status and therefore against his own goal: $50,000 dad, he told me how he had good.” (CCC, nn. 397, 398) This left man been working near the silo helpless and unable to get out of the situation: when he heard a cat meow- “Closed in the darkness, it was necessary to ing desperately. He finally bring us the light; captives, we awaited a tracked it down to the silo. Savior; prisoners, help; slaves a liberator.” (St. Since the silo was no longer Gregory of Nyssa, CCC, n. 457) There was in use, he had put the bot- nothing he could do but cry for help and hope Fr. Miller tom two doors in place to that it would come. keep out animals. The cat, Each Sunday we profess the joyful truth no doubt, saw these as mere obstacles to the that this hope was fulfilled: “For us men and possible delight inside. Despite having the for our salvation He came down from Heaven; whole farm on which to hunt in addition to the by the power of the Holy Spirit He was born food already supplied, the cat climbed the of the Virgin Mary and became man.” Every doors and jumped in the silo.
    [Show full text]
  • Divine Causality and Created Freedom: a Thomistic Personalist View
    Nova et Vetera, English Edition, Vol. 14, No. 3 (2016): 919–963 919 Divine Causality and Created Freedom: A Thomistic Personalist View Mark K. Spencer University of St. Thomas Saint Paul, Minnesota Thomas Aquinas argues that God causes all beings other than himself and moves all of them to all their acts, including causing us and moving us to our free acts.1 This claim is connected to the set of issues surrounding the relation between created freedom and divine providence, predestination, and grace. A strong defender of the free- dom of created persons, such as a Thomistic personalist, might reject this aspect of Aquinas’s account and contend that to be free is to be “lord of one’s acts” (dominus sui actus).2 By this, the personalist would understand that the created free person is the ultimate determinant3 of whether he or she acts (I refer to this, following the Thomistic tradition, as the “exercise” of the act) and of what he or she does in those acts (the “content” or “specification” of the act). Throughout this article, I shall refer to the last sentence as the “personalist thesis” 1 Aquinas, Expositio libri Peryermeneias (hereafter, In Ph) I, lec. 14; Quaestiones disputatae de malo (hereafter, DM), q. 3, aa. 1–2; q. 6, a. un.; Quaestiones disputatae de potentia Dei (hereafter, DP), q. 3, aa. 5 and 7; Summa contra gentiles (hereafter, SCG) III, chs. 65 and 67; Summa Theologiae (hereafter, ST) I, q. 22, a. 2, ad 2; q. 104, a. 1; q. 105, aa. 4–5; I-II, q.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Cross C a T H O L I C C HURCH
    August 16, 2020 • 20th Sunday in Ordinary Time Holy Cross C A T H O L I C C HURCH 4810 Woolworth Avenue • Omaha, NE 68106 Rectory 4803 William Street www.holycrossomaha.org All-powerful and ever-living God, You raised the sinless Virgin Mary, Mother of your Son, body and soul to the glory of Heaven. May we see Heaven as our final goal and come to share her glory. We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with You and the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever. Question: Why does Mary have so many feast days and names? Answer: Christians first began celebrating feast days in honor of Mary, the Mother of Jesus, in the fifth century. That celebration (originally called the Feast of the Dormition and now known by Roman Catholics as the Solemnity of the Assumption) was celebrated on August 15. Very soon, however, other special days dedicated to Mary began to appear in Jerusalem, Rome, and other major cities of the Christian world. These days of feasting became important parts of the life of the community. But, more importantly, each of these unique celebrations became an opportunity to focus on a different facet of the Christian faith, as believers focused their attention on specific events or mysteries of the lives of Mary and her Son. Over the centuries, some of these celebrations became universal (such as the Assumption on Au- gust 15, the Immaculate Conception on December 8, and the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God on January 1).
    [Show full text]
  • May Newsletter 2021.Pdf
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Spring Photos Star Wars Hats On for Day Mental Health Pizza Hot Lunch 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 World Catholic Honker’s Education Day Hot Lunch Wear blue School Council Mtg 6pm Marian Mass 1:15pm C A T H O L I C E D U C A T I O N W E E K 16 17 18 19 Neon Day 20 21 22 Professional Development Day No School for students Office Hours 4pm 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Jump Rope Victoria Day for Heart No School Honker’s Team Color Hot Lunch Day Board Mtg 6pm 30 31 Make me to know your ways O Lord, teach me your paths. Lead me in your truth and teach me, for you are the God of my salvation.” Psalm 25:4-5 Principal: Denise Kobza Associate Principal: Mark Matsalla 235 Mildred Dobbs Boulevard North Lethbridge, Alberta T1H 5R4 Phone: (587) 787‐1490 ‐ Fax: (587) 787‐1491 May 2021 Principals Message May message 2021 I did a google search on Mary to find out if she was called as a peacemaker. I found a Wikipedia page about the Titles of Mary that were more numerous that I realized. The titles differ from early titles to devotional titles to those associated with images or apparitions. Yes, I did eventually find that in the Roman Catholic Church she has the title of Our Lady of Peace, Mother of Peace, Queen of Peace or Our Lady Queen of Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Marian Doctrine As
    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO in affiliation with the PONTIFICAL THEOLOGICAL FACULTY MARIANUM ROME, ITALY By: Elizabeth Marie Farley The Development of Marian Doctrine as Reflected in the Commentaries on the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-5) by the Latin Fathers and Pastoral Theologians of the Church From the Fourth to the Seventeenth Century A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Sacred Theology with specialization in Marian Studies Director: Rev. Bertrand Buby, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, OH 45469-1390 2013 i Copyright © 2013 by Elizabeth M. Farley All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Nihil obstat: François Rossier, S.M., STD Vidimus et approbamus: Bertrand A. Buby S.M., STD – Director François Rossier, S.M., STD – Examinator Johann G. Roten S.M., PhD, STD – Examinator Thomas A. Thompson S.M., PhD – Examinator Elio M. Peretto, O.S.M. – Revisor Aristide M. Serra, O.S.M. – Revisor Daytonesis (USA), ex aedibus International Marian Research Institute, et Romae, ex aedibus Pontificiae Facultatis Theologicae Marianum, die 22 Augusti 2013. ii Dedication This Dissertation is Dedicated to: Father Bertrand Buby, S.M., The Faculty and Staff at The International Marian Research Institute, Father Jerome Young, O.S.B., Father Rory Pitstick, Joseph Sprug, Jerome Farley, my beloved husband, and All my family and friends iii Table of Contents Prėcis.................................................................................. xvii Guidelines........................................................................... xxiii Abbreviations...................................................................... xxv Chapter One: Purpose, Scope, Structure and Method 1.1 Introduction...................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity and Mediation in the French Stream Of
    SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Timothy R. Gabrielli Dayton, Ohio December 2014 SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor _________________________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Anthony J. Godzieba, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Vincent J. Miller, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Timothy R. Gabrielli All rights reserved 2014 iii ABSTRACT SOLIDARITY MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. University of Dayton Advisor: William L. Portier, Ph.D. In its analysis of mystical body of Christ theology in the twentieth century, this dissertation identifies three major streams of mystical body theology operative in the early part of the century: the Roman, the German-Romantic, and the French-Social- Liturgical. Delineating these three streams of mystical body theology sheds light on the diversity of scholarly positions concerning the heritage of mystical body theology, on its mid twentieth-century recession, as well as on Pope Pius XII’s 1943 encyclical, Mystici Corporis Christi, which enshrined “mystical body of Christ” in Catholic magisterial teaching. Further, it links the work of Virgil Michel and Louis-Marie Chauvet, two scholars remote from each other on several fronts, in the long, winding French stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Consecration to Jesus Through Mary
    Saint Louis-Marie de Montfort’s Total Consecration to Jesus Through Mary Choose a day for the Consecration To begin, choose the date of a Marian Feast on which to make the consecration. Whichever Feast you choose will determine the date to begin a 33-day period of spiritual preparation, i.e., you follow spiritual exercises for 33 days, and the next day will be the Marian Feast on which you consecrate yourself. Below is a list of Marian Feasts which are the same on both the traditional and Novus Ordo calendars: Feast / Start of Marian Feast You've Chosen Consecration 33-day Plan Day Apparition of the Immaculate 9 Jan 11 Feb Virgin Mary at Lourdes 20 Feb 1 The Annunciation 25 Mar 13 Jun Our Lady of Mt. Carmel 16 Jul 13 Jul The Assumption 15 Aug 6 Aug Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary 8 Sep 13 Aug Our Lady of Sorrows 15 Sep 19 Oct Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary 21 Nov 5 Nov Immaculate Conception 8 Dec 9 Nov Our Lady of Guadalupe 12 Dec 1 21 Feb when February has 29 days. The Feast of the Annunciation is the Feast that St. Louis de Montfort recommends most of all as it is this Feast that commemorates God Himself taking on flesh and, thereby, subjecting even Himself to trust in and dependency on Our Lady Recommendation: To read St. Louis de Montfort’s True Devotion to Mary either before beginning the Consecration or in conjunction with it. Begin the 33-Day Preparation for Consecration Now begins the 33-day period of exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Blessed Virgin Mary St
    Blessed Virgin Mary St. Thomas Church RCIA Mary and Jesus • Mary was called to become the mother of Jesus. • Special bond between Mary and Jesus. • She was predestined for this honor. • Foreshadowing in the Old Testament: • Disobedience of Eve • Sarah, mother of Isaac • Hannah, mother of Samuel • “The Virgin shall conceive and bear a son, who shall be called Emmanuel” (Is 7:14). Sinless Virgin Mary • She was conceived without sin in order to prepare her for her role. • The Archangel Gabriel addressed her “full of grace.” • Proclamation in 1854. • Jesus was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit. • Mary was betrothed to Joseph, but he had not yet taken her into his home. Common Objections The most common objections you will hear: 1. Catholics worship the Mary. 2. If she was conceived without sin, then she didn’t need to be saved. 3. Mary can’t be ever-virgin if Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary as Virgin and Mother • Mary was the first to believe when she consented to God’s plan. • She is the Mother of Jesus and therefore Mother of God (Ephesus, 431). • She was a faithful disciple, standing at the foot of the cross. • From the cross, she became the Mother of the Beloved Disciple and the Mother of the Church. • As ever-virgin, her entire life was an undivided gift to God. • Being virgin and mother is a fundamental mystery of Mary’s life. Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary • The Rosary is made up of beads on which are said prayers like the Creed, Our Father, Hail Mary, Glory Be, and Hail Holy Queen.
    [Show full text]