DOCSLIB.ORG

1/10/2017 Interview Transcript of Governor Fidai: Q. 2: I Was Governor of Maidan Wardak Province from 2008 Till 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1/10/2017 Interview Transcript of Governor Fidai: Q. 2: I Was Governor of Maidan Wardak Province from 2008 Till 2014 1/10/2017 Interview transcript of Governor Fidai: Q. 2: I was governor of Maidan Wardak province from 2008 till 2014. It was the time that we piloted the Afghan Public Protection Force (APPF), I think it was one year after I went to Maidan Wardak as the governor. Which unfortunately didn’t show the desired results, most probably didn’t fulfill the expectations of our international partners and therefore it didn’t get further funding. I was also one of the pioneers to start the local councils at the district level in the province, the model was jointly adopted by the USAID and IDLG, later on, as the Social Outreach Councils. Which they modified and therefore, unfortunately, didn’t prove to elect true community leaders. They made it a kind of political bribery to the community elders that the government like. The initial concept was that we bring true leaders to cooperate on security issues, but government decided to add national security department’s vetting to the process and bring only those people that we like. Q. 3: Most of the stability programs were short term, their projects were short term. They were actually experimental with no actual linkage to a long term stability strategy. I can also say they were more like relief programs, just to treat the existing problems for short time. I will go again to the example of social outreach councils. We wanted them to be people who will go back and forth between the government and the people. But what ASOP elected were people who even couldn’t go to their village. They were just there to receive their salaries of 200, I think. The program would have stopped at any time as soon as the money was discontinued. I didn’t see a link between the method of ASOP councils’ elections, vetting process and any long term stability or development. I say that for successful stability programs we needed a vision, followed by some emergency relief type program to decrease the effects of military and other security operations, followed by development and finally stability interventions. Implementing stability programs in isolation was not useful. Because stability programs were implemented mostly in those areas where American military serge had happened and it was accompanied by problems that needed to be addressed. Unfortunately stability programs were seen as means of sustain military achievement, which could have had long term impact. There was not logical sequencing in the programs. Can you tell me what the policy that guided the stability interventions was? Most of them were listening to the complaints and demands of the people and designing projects for to address those. One thing happened with stability programs was that individual capacities were built, but capacity of the government as an institution was mainly left intact. Q. 4: I think only Afghan Local Police (ALP) was an area where we agreed with the Americans. It was a success too compared to other programs for stability. Americans lacked a strong political commitment to stability in Afghanistan. It looked like they were experimenting their strategy and policy here. Government (Afghan) wanted to support ALP and make a force of districts at the provincial level. In the start we defined ALP as a force of the people of the province fighting for the province. Americans saw it as village force fighting for village, not the district or the province. We were defining the term Local at the province level, while Americans were defining it at the village level. Finally we agreed to have it at the district level. Definition was important, because logistic arrangements were proposed differently. Government’s vision was to change the local police to a common police force in the province that will participate in the battles against the insurgents. But Americans opposed the idea of getting them involved in the anti-insurgency operations, while we saw that role inevitable. We proposed that ALP should be linked to the provincial councils and must be vetted by them. Americans didn’t agree to our proposals, they were stressing to make this force a village force and proposed that the vetting should also take place at the village level. Problem was that we were not able to hold accountable those people from the village that who vetted the local police, because they had no obligation to respond to us. If we had involved the provincial councils we could have easily held them accountable for their selection and recommendation of a person to the local police. I was against the involvement of the national security department in the screening process of the local police. Because that department was dealing this issue politically and personal choices were involved. I also proposed a quick reaction force of the Afghan national army, of about 50 persons, to be present in the province to support the ALP in case they need support. Americans said no, and stressed that ANP and ANA should provide support. I knew complexity of the command and control and resources allocation in the ANA and ANP and knew they are not able provide on time support. So we had problems right from the design stage of the program. Q. 5: I think stability programs could have been more effective if the implementers had listened to the right people. Unfortunately, they didn’t, if there was a disagreement at the local level about something the implementers will come to the provincial office and ask for help. If we didn’t impose their decision on the local level they would go to the center and get agreement of the officials at the central level and then impose the decision on us in the province and districts. This approach of just looking for an agreement of the government officials had affected all the follow up activities. It led to identification of wrong local approaches, local authorities used to just symbolically appear in the meetings without active participation. And obviously it was not leading to build capacity of the district authorities, because there used to be a distance between the implementing staff and the district officials. Q. 6: Back then I proposed something, my proposal to look for the historic background of a district then come up with some projects that has some history in that place. For example, I proposed that let us establish ALP first in those districts that have a history of Arbakai (local militias) and districts that don’t have a history of Arbakai, let us strengthen their national police units. A part of the arrangement that I proposed was that let us take all the resources of national police out of Paktika and give it to the police in Baghlan and take all the resources of local police out of Baghlan and give it to Paktika. Problem was in the misunderstanding of stability and security terms. If this approach was implemented both the south and north would have had longer stability. Problem with arming local police in the north was that local commanders, who were involved in the internal wars of 80s and 90s, took advantage of the local police program. And when they saw the international forces out, they started to revert back to their rivalries of 90s. The reason that south stayed relatively stable for longer time wat that in many southern provinces people didn’t go through sever group fights in 80s and 90s. Old group rivalries are a reason for instability. Second, I think general crime rate was higher in the north so there were already groups ready to make the system instable. I am not trying to rule out the possibility that stability programs helped. I think these were valuable programs, these programs had a good effect and people benefited from them. In some case even Taliban took advantage of the stability programs too. I mean indirectly benefited. In the south Taliban fought more battles so more military operation took place against them. I think a large number of targeted military operations in the south helped to remove some important Taliban and enabled the districts to stay calm for a longer time. Q. 7: My conservative idea is that for stability you have to implement laws with seriousness and laws must have a relation with the belief system of the people. In Afghanistan understanding of the people from law is that it is a part of the religion, so anything imposed on them in the name of Islam they accept it, because they consider it a part of the framework of their understanding. Taliban are using this belief framework for their legitimacy, if we can make people understand the reality that actions of Taliban are not part of the religion in reality, they will lose legitimacy. We somehow must take away this legitimacy from Taliban. If we establish special terrorism court on the local level, which will try cases against Taliban according to the rules of Shariah, and sentence them according to the Hadoods (capital punishments) of Shariah they will lose their legitimacy. We must also try them in the cases of narcotics. Currently we are bringing them to the normal courts, which slow and people already don’t trust the existing court system. I think piloting counter terrorism and Hadood courts is worth investment. Q. 8: Yes, I agree that presence of government is important, right now we have village, district and provinces. I propose that we should create another level too, which used to exist, Alaqadari (alaqadari used to be a sub-district unit, remote areas of a district used to have an Alaqadar, who used to do most of the jobs that a district governor can do).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (2 – 8 November 2020)
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (2 – 8 November 2020) KEY FIGURES IDPs IN 2020 (AS OF 8 NOVEMBER) 278,420 People displaced by conflict 157,630 Received assistance NATURAL DISASTERS IN 2020 (AS OF 8 NOVEMBER) 110,560 Number of people affected by natural disasters UNDOCUMENTED RETURNEES Conflict incident IN 2020 (AS OF 7 NOVEMBER) Internal displacement 720,000 Returnees from Iran Disruption of services 6,630 Returnees from Pakistan 3,200 Returnees from other countries South: Humanitarian activities affected by fighting HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Armed clashes between Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a non-state PLAN (HRP) REQUIREMENTS & armed group (NSAG) continued with airstrikes and Improvised Explosive Device FUNDING (IED) detonations mainly in Kandahar, Hilmand, Zabul and Uruzgan provinces. The ongoing conflict has resulted in displacement and civilian casualties and is 1.13B hindering the delivery of humanitarian assistance and services, particularly in Requirements (US$) – HRP hard-to-reach districts. 2020 In Hilmand, movement in affected areas is restricted due the presence of IEDs. 474.6M On 2 November, a roadside IED in Bolan, Lashkargah reportedly killed seven 42% funded (US$) in 2020 people and wounded two others. The main roads connecting Kandahar city to AFGHANISTAN HUMANITARIAN Panjwayi and Zheray are only partially open due to damaged culverts and the FUND (AHF) 2020 threat of IEDs. The presence of IEDs has also been reported on farms in Arghandab district. Three health facilities in Hilmand remain closed while nine 57.01M others are partially open. Five Mobile Health Teams suspended their services in Contributions (US$) Maywand and Zheray districts affecting 20,000 people in hard-to-reach areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 October 2020 "Generated on Refers to the Date on Which the User Accessed the List and Not the Last Date of Substantive Update to the List
    Res. 1988 (2011) List The List established and maintained pursuant to Security Council res. 1988 (2011) Generated on: 19 October 2020 "Generated on refers to the date on which the user accessed the list and not the last date of substantive update to the list. Information on the substantive list updates are provided on the Council / Committee’s website." Composition of the List The list consists of the two sections specified below: A. Individuals B. Entities and other groups Information about de-listing may be found at: https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ombudsperson (for res. 1267) https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/delisting (for other Committees) https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/2231/list (for res. 2231) A. Individuals TAi.155 Name: 1: ABDUL AZIZ 2: ABBASIN 3: na 4: na ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺒﺎﺳﯿﻦ :(Name (original script Title: na Designation: na DOB: 1969 POB: Sheykhan Village, Pirkowti Area, Orgun District, Paktika Province, Afghanistan Good quality a.k.a.: Abdul Aziz Mahsud Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: na Passport no: na National identification no: na Address: na Listed on: 4 Oct. 2011 (amended on 22 Apr. 2013) Other information: Key commander in the Haqqani Network (TAe.012) under Sirajuddin Jallaloudine Haqqani (TAi.144). Taliban Shadow Governor for Orgun District, Paktika Province as of early 2010. Operated a training camp for non- Afghan fighters in Paktika Province. Has been involved in the transport of weapons to Afghanistan. INTERPOL- UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/View-UN-Notices- Individuals click here TAi.121 Name: 1: AZIZIRAHMAN 2: ABDUL AHAD 3: na 4: na ﻋﺰﯾﺰ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﺎن ﻋﺒﺪ اﻻﺣﺪ :(Name (original script Title: Mr Designation: Third Secretary, Taliban Embassy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates DOB: 1972 POB: Shega District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan Good quality a.k.a.: na Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: Afghanistan Passport no: na National identification no: Afghan national identification card (tazkira) number 44323 na Address: na Listed on: 25 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • “They've Shot Many Like This”
    HUMAN RIGHTS “They’ve Shot Many Like This” Abusive Night Raids by CIA-Backed Afghan Strike Forces WATCH “They’ve Shot Many Like This” Abusive Night Raids by CIA-Backed Afghan Strike Forces Copyright © 2019 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-37779 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org OCTOBER 2019 ISBN: 978-1-6231-37779 “They’ve Shot Many Like This” Abusive Night Raids by CIA-Backed Afghan Strike Forces Map of Afghanistan ............................................................................................................... i Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: the Conflict Between Hazaras and Kuchis in the Beshud Districts of Wardak Province
    Response Afghanistan: The conflict between Hazaras and Kuchis in the Beshud Districts of Wardak Province Topics/questions: What are the main causes of the conflict between Hazaras and Kuchis in Behsud in Wardak province? How are the attacks between the groups organised? Brief information about the background of the conflict The conflict between Hazaras and Kuchis1 in Wardak province dates back to Abdur Rahman Khan’s regime at the end of the 19th century and the policy pursued by the regime to secure control of the Hazara-dominated central areas of Afghanistan (Hazarajat). In addition to waging war, endeavours were made to establish influence and control by moving religiously educated Sunni Pashtuns into these areas. Taxes were also levied on the Hazaras, arrangements were made to facilitate the buying and selling of Hazara slaves (prohibited in 1923), and Pashtuns from the south, primarily from the Kandahar area, were encouraged to migrate into these areas (Milich 2009). According to Rassul (2010), the Hazara communities in the central parts of Afghanistan were relatively independent before Abdur Rahman gained control. During the reign of Rahman, many Hazaras were killed or forced to leave the area, and Kuchis allied with Rahman were given rights to grazing land in the areas (Ferdinand 2006, pp. 186 – 188)2. Since Abdur Rahman’s time, the Hazara people have been exploited and oppressed by many regimes in Kabul, most recently by the Taliban, among other things through taxation, the redistribution of land, forced marriages and the promotion of Pashto at the expense of Hazaragi (the Hazaras’ spoken language, a dialect variant of Dari).
    [Show full text]
  • Over a Century of Persecution: Massive Human Rights Violation Against Hazaras in Afghanistan
    OVER A CENTURY OF PERSECUTION: MASSIVE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION AGAINST HAZARAS IN AFGHANISTAN CONCENTRATED ON ATTACKS OCCURRED DURING THE NATIONAL UNITY GOVERNMENT PREPARED BY: MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN HASRAT DATE: FEBRUARY,2019 ABBREVIATIONS AIHRC Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission ALP Afghan Local Police ANA Afghanistan National Army ANBP Afghanistan National Border Police ANP Afghanistan National Police ANSF Afghanistan National Security Forces ANDS Afghanistan National Directorate of Security BBC British Broadcasting Corporation DFAT Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade EU European Union HRW Human Rights Watch IDE Improvised Explosive Devices IDP Internal Displaced Person ISAF International Security Assistance Force IS-PK Islamic state- Khorasan Province MP Member of Parliament NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organizations NUG National Unity Government PC Provincial Council UNAMA United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan UNDP United Nations Development Programmes I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….…1 2. SECURITY CONTEXT OF AFGHANISTAN …………………………………………………………………………….….…3 3. METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 4. THE EXTENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION AGAINST HAZARAS IN AFGHANISTAN....6 5. TARGET KILLING AND ORCHESTRATED ATTACK...………………………....…….………….………………….11 a. THE TALIBAN ATTACKS ON JAGHORI, UROZGAN AND MALISTAN…...…................………….….…11 b. SUICIDE ATTACKS ON MAIWAND WRESTLING CLUB..................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
    Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel April 1, 2021
    OFS REPORT TO CONGRESS FRONT MATTER OPERATION FREEDOM’S SENTINEL LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS APRIL 1, 2021–JUNE 30, 2021 FRONT MATTER ABOUT THIS REPORT A 2013 amendment to the Inspector General Act established the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) framework for oversight of overseas contingency operations and requires that the Lead IG submit quarterly reports to Congress on each active operation. The Chair of the Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency designated the DoD Inspector General (IG) as the Lead IG for Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS). The DoS IG is the Associate IG for the operation. The USAID IG participates in oversight of the operation. The Offices of Inspector General (OIG) of the DoD, the DoS, and USAID are referred to in this report as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to oversight of OFS. The Lead IG agencies collectively carry out the Lead IG statutory responsibilities to: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight of the operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of programs and operations of the U.S. Government in support of the operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, investigations, and evaluations. • Report quarterly to Congress and the public on the operation and activities of the Lead IG agencies. METHODOLOGY To produce this quarterly report, the Lead IG agencies submit requests for information to the DoD, the DoS, USAID, and other Federal agencies about OFS and related programs. The Lead IG agencies also gather data and information from other sources, including official documents, congressional testimony, policy research organizations, press conferences, think tanks, and media reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for Their Own: a Stronger Afghan Response to Civilian Harm
    Part of the Countries in Conflict Series Caring for Their Own: A Stronger Afghan Response to Civilian Harm CARING FOR THEIR OWN: A STRONGER AFGHAN RESPONSE TO CIVILIAN HARM Acknowledgements Center for Civilians in Conflict would like to thank Open Society Foundations (OSF), which provided funding to support this research and offered insightful comments during the drafting of this report. We also appreciate the Afghan translators and interpreters that worked diligently to deliver quality research for this report, as well as those that offered us travel assistance. Finally, Center for Civilians in Conflict is deeply grateful to all those interviewed for this report, especially civilians suffering from the con- flict in Afghanistan, for their willingness to share their stories, experi- ences and views with us. Copyright © 2013 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org NOTE: Many names in this report have been changed to protect the identity of those interviewed. Cover photo courtesy of James Longley. All photos in text by Trevor Keck/Center for Civilians in Conflict. Map of Afghanistan C A m H 64 u 66 68 70 72 Mur 74 H ° D ° ° ° a-ye ° gho ° ar y b INA ya UZBEKISTAN r INA a AFGHANISTAN D Qurghonteppa TAJIKISTAN Kerki (Kurgan-Tyube) Mary Kiroya iz M rm Dusti Khorugh u e BADAKHSHAN r T g a Keleft Rostaq FayzFayzabad Abad b ir Qala-I-Panjeh Andkhvoy Jeyretan am JAWZJAN P Mazar-e-Sharif KUNDUZ
    [Show full text]
  • Service Delivery in Taliban Influenced Areas…
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 465 | APRIL 2020 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Service Delivery in Taliban- Influenced Areas of Afghanistan By Scott S. Smith Contents “One Land, Two Rules” ................3 Emergence and Consolidation of the Insurgency ......................... 5 Education .......................................8 Health ............................................ 11 Electricity, Media, and Telecommunications .................. 15 Other Services ............................ 17 Conclusion ................................... 18 Students take an exam outdoors because their school had suffered extensive damage in fighting between Taliban and government forces. (Photo by Jim Huylebroek/New York Times) Summary • As the Taliban gained and con- • A study of several diverse districts • The Taliban initially opposed gov- solidated their hold over territo- across Afghanistan reveals that the ernment schools, but they later ry, they were forced to become Taliban leadership has attempted developed policies that allowed responsible for the well-being of to establish a certain uniformity in schools to function, as well as per- local communities. its governance of territory largely mitting girls to attend school to • Even as the Taliban leadership re- or partly under its control. age twelve. mained focused on military objec- • For example, while the Taliban have • Should there be a peace process, tives, in recent years they began to always allowed health officials to the Taliban and government will develop policies to deliver educa- work in their areas, in part because need to reconcile their differenc- tion and health services in particu- they too need these services, they es on service delivery in the areas lar, in some cases reversing earlier have taken increasing ownership of falling under their control. policies that denied these services.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Advice Afghanistan Afghanistan – AFG36160 – Haji Abdul – Nasr Party – Hazaras – Shia Muslims – Land Disputes 16 February 2010
    Country Advice Afghanistan Afghanistan – AFG36160 – Haji Abdul – Nasr Party – Hazaras – Shia Muslims – Land disputes 16 February 2010 1 Is there any information on Haji Abdul or Haj Abdul, and who he is and what his background is? Is he a powerful warlord in Afghanistan? A search of the sources consulted did not locate specific information on a powerful warlord in Afghanistan named Haji Abdul or Haj Abdul. Reference was found to a warlord in Jalalabad named Haj Abdul Qadir.1 However, sources referred to in an RRT research response dated 16 September 2005 indicate that Haji Abdul Qadir, who had become the Minister of Public Works, was assassinated in 2002.2 A UNHCR district profile dated 24 February 2003 refers to a Commander Abdul Hakim Nassiri from the Nasr faction, affiliated to Hezb-e-Wahdat (Khalili), being in the Malistan district of Ghazni province at that time.3 Ghazni province adjoins Wardak province.4 2 [Deleted.] 3 Please provide general information about what the Nasr Party is, what they stand for, and who they are affiliated with. Do they have anything to do with the Taliban? The following RRT research responses provide background information on the Sazman-e Nasr in Afghanistan: RRT Country Research 2003, Research Response AFG15791, 3 March.5 RRT Country Research 2003, Research Response AFG23184, 22 December.6 RRT Country Research 2004, Research Response AFG17045, 25 October.7 RRT Country Research 2005, Research Response AFG17439, 5 August.8 1 Suyono, S.J. & Qudsy, Z. 2001, ‗After the Taliban, Old Dangers Resurface – The Rise of Warlords, Tempo, 2 December, Worldpress.org website http://www.worldpress.org/Asia/392.cfm – Accessed 1 September 2005 – Attachment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan INDIVIDUALS
    CONSOLIDATED LIST OF FINANCIAL SANCTIONS TARGETS IN THE UK Last Updated:01/02/2021 Status: Asset Freeze Targets REGIME: Afghanistan INDIVIDUALS 1. Name 6: ABBASIN 1: ABDUL AZIZ 2: n/a 3: n/a 4: n/a 5: n/a. DOB: --/--/1969. POB: Sheykhan village, Pirkowti Area, Orgun District, Paktika Province, Afghanistan a.k.a: MAHSUD, Abdul Aziz Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref):AFG0121 (UN Ref): TAi.155 (Further Identifiying Information):Key commander in the Haqqani Network (TAe.012) under Sirajuddin Jallaloudine Haqqani (TAi.144). Taliban Shadow Governor for Orgun District, Paktika Province as of early 2010. Operated a training camp for non Afghan fighters in Paktika Province. Has been involved in the transport of weapons to Afghanistan. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we- work/Notices/View-UN-Notices-Individuals click here. Listed on: 21/10/2011 Last Updated: 01/02/2021 Group ID: 12156. 2. Name 6: ABDUL AHAD 1: AZIZIRAHMAN 2: n/a 3: n/a 4: n/a 5: n/a. Title: Mr DOB: --/--/1972. POB: Shega District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan Nationality: Afghan National Identification no: 44323 (Afghan) (tazkira) Position: Third Secretary, Taliban Embassy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref):AFG0094 (UN Ref): TAi.121 (Further Identifiying Information): Belongs to Hotak tribe. Review pursuant to Security Council resolution 1822 (2008) was concluded on 29 Jul. 2010. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/ Notices/View-UN-Notices-Individuals click here. Listed on: 23/02/2001 Last Updated: 01/02/2021 Group ID: 7055.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN Northeast
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (9 – 15 September 2019) KEY FIGURES IDPS IN 2019 (AS OF 15 SEP) 262,000 People displaced by conflict 211,000 Received assistance NATURAL DISASTER IN 2019 (AS OF 8 SEP) 294,500 Number of people affected by natural disasters Conflict incident RETURNEES IN 2019 (AS OF 14 SEP) 292,300 Internal displacement Returnees from Iran Disruption of services 18,000 Returnees from Pakistan 12,000 Returnees from other countries Northeast: Fighting in Baghlan, Kunduz and HRP REQUIREMENTS & FUNDING Badakhshan 612M Requested (US$) The security situation remained tense in the northeast as armed clashes continued between the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) and the 250.7M Taliban in Baghlan and Kunduz. In Kunduz, the Taliban reportedly took control 41% funded (US$) of the district administration centre in Archi district causing displacement to surrounding villages. Access of humanitarian actors to the area has been AFGHANISTAN HUMANITARIAN negotiated and two assessment teams have been deployed to analyse the FUND (AHF) needs of internally displaced persons (IDPs). 28.2M During the past week, conflict continued in Jorm district, Badakhshan province Contributions (US$) which according to the Government resulted in the displacement of more than 4,200 people to the centre of Jorm district. Also, around 2,800 people were 5M displaced to Rostaq district during recent fighting in Darqad and Yangi Qala Pledges (US$) districts in Takhar province. Humanitarian organisations will conduct a needs 26.5M assessment to inform the response. Expenditure (US$) Last week, around 10,745 IDPs affected by conflict were verified by inter- agency assessment teams in Baghlan, Kunduz, Takhar and Badakhshan 4.1M provinces as being in need of humanitarian assistance.
    [Show full text]